Skip to main content
Download PDF

The DNA methylation status of the serotonin metabolic pathway associated with reproductive inactivation induced by long-light exposure in Magang geese

BMC Genomics volume 24, Article number: 355 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Domestic geese are seasonal breeders and have the lowest reproductive capacity among all poultry species. Magang geese is a topical short-day breeder, short photoperiod exposure stimulates its reproductive activity while long photoperiod inhibits. To explore epigenetic change that could influence reproductive activity, we performed whole genome bisulfite sequencing and transcriptome sequencing in the hypothalamus at three reproductive stages during long-light exposure in male Magang geese.

Results

A total number of 10,602 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified among three comparison groups. We observed that the vast majority of DMRs were enriched in intron regions. By integrating the BS-sequencing and RNA-seq data, the correlation between methylation changes of CG DMRs and expression changes of their associated genes was significant only for genes containing CG DMRs in their intron. A total of 278 DMR-associated DEGs were obtained among the three stages. KEGG analysis revealed that the DMR-associated DEGs were mainly involved in 11 pathways. Among them, the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway was significantly enriched in both two comparisons (RA vs.RD and RD vs.RI); the Wnt signaling pathway, apelin signaling pathway, melanogenesis, calcium signaling pathway, focal adhesion, and adherens junction were significantly enriched in the RA vs. RI comparison. In addition, the expression level of two serotonin-metabolic genes was significantly altered during reproductive axis inactivation by the methylation status of their promoter region (TPH2) and intron region (SLC18A2), respectively. These results were confirmed by Bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP), pyrosequencing, and real-time qPCR, indicating that serotonin metabolic signaling may play a key role in decreasing the reproductive activity of Magang geese induced by long-light exposure. Furthermore, we performed a metabolomics approach to investigate the concentration of neurotransmitters among the three stages, and found that 5-HIAA, the last product of the serotonin metabolic pathway, was significantly decreased in the hypothalamus during RI.

Conclusions

Our study reveals that the methylation status of the serotonin metabolic pathway in the hypothalamus is associated with reproductive inactivation, and provided new insight into the effect of DNA methylation on the reproductive regulation of the hypothalamus in Magang geese.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Seasonal reproduction is an evolutionary strategy adopted by birds to maximize the survival of their offspring. Domestic geese are seasonal breeders and have the lowest reproductive capacity among all poultry species, causing significant economic losses in the poultry industry. Geese reproduction is day length-dependent and can be simply classified into short-day and long-day breeding [1]. Magang geese are typical short-day breeders, exposure to long days will lead to gonadal inactivity [2, 3]. Seasonal reproductive behavior in birds can be induced by day length, artificial photoperiod programs have been developed to induce out-of-season breeding in geese [2, 4, 5].

Birds perceive light by relying on the deep-brain photoreceptors (DBP) [6, 7]. Hypothalamus DBPs perceive and transmit light information and induce secretion of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) from the pars tuberalis (PT), which reverses action on ependymal cells at the base of the third ventricle of the hypothalamus [7, 8]. Thyroid-stimulating hormone activates the type 2 deiodinase (dio2)/type 3 deiodinase (dio3) switching system and induces local Triiodothyronine (T3) release in the mediobasal hypothalamus [9]. Previous reports on long-day breeder quail and short-day breeder sheep showed that thyroid hormone synthesized from the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH) is the dominant signal controlling the activation of the reproductive axis [10, 11]. In chickens, the genetic mutation of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor gene (TSHR) contributes to the weakening of seasonal reproductive behavior [12, 13].

A major mechanism of seasonal reproduction is related to endocrine and molecular regulatory mechanisms on the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis [4, 5]. Hypothalamic thyroid hormone T3 stimulates the seasonal secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) which activates the reproductive system [13, 14]. A high level of T3 can induce functional recovery in dormant testis [9, 10].GnRH enters the pituitary gland through the portal vein and is transported to the pituitary, resulting in the release of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) from the anterior pituitary gland, leading to gonadal maturation [14]. How photoperiod impacts on GnRH secretion remain controversial [15,16,17]. However, the different neuro-mediator systems such as neurotransmitters, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) or thyroid hormone in hypothalamus have been shown to play a role in influencing complex endocrine processes related to photoperiodic regulation of seasonally reproductive activity [6, 18, 19].

Numerous studies have shown that photoperiodic adaptation produces phenotypes (such as seasonal reproduction) that are associated with changes in epigenetic markers [20,21,22,23,24].DNA Methylation is one of the important epigenetic mechanisms controlling behavior and physiology. Epigenetic modification participates in gene expression regulation that controls reproductive activities in seasonal reproductive breeds [24,25,26]. Epigenetic variation within brain tissues is an important factor to explain behavioral variation in avian [27]. Although transcriptome responses triggered by photoperiods have been extensively studied in seasonal reproductive breeds [28,29,30], little is known about photoperiod-induced transcriptome responses and epigenetic effects in short-day breeds. Whether epigenetic modifications mediate seasonal changes in gene expression in the geese hypothalamus are currently unknown but it is widely accepted that DNA methylation is inversely correlated with gene expression activation. An integrative analysis of both DNA methylation and gene expression is necessary for a full understanding of the involvement of epigenetics in seasonal reproduction in geese. In this study, we investigated epigenetic and transcriptional responses of Magang geese to long-light exposure using methylome and transcriptome profiling of the hypothalamus.

Materials and methods

Artificial photoperiodism and sample collection

Magang Geese is considered short-day breeder, and photoperiodism seriously affects its fertility. Magang Geese were obtained from the geese farm (Qingyuan, Guangdong). The artificial photoperiodism to induce the seasonal inactivation of Magang geese was shown (Supplementary Figures, Figure S1), reproductive activity stage (RA) indicated geese at their breeding seasons were maintained under a photoperiod of natural day length [(12 light (L):12 dark (D)], and then transferred to artificial long day condition (18 L: 6 D) for 17 days, long day promotes a decline of reproductive activity (RD) of the geese population, the laying rate in female geese at this stage is reduced to 17% compared to the laying period; two weeks later, the geese population were induced to reproductive inactivity stage (RI). Male geese used in the present study, three independent biological replicates were performed under each group (RA, RD and RI). Geese were euthanized by inhalation of carbon dioxide and cervical dislocation, which performed by laboratory technician who has extensive experience in application of techniques. Hypothalamus samples were collected and dissected.

Bisulfite sequencing and bioinformatics analyses

Hypothalamus samples were collected and performed transcriptome sequencing and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq). Total RNA and Genomic DNA were immediatedly extracted from tissues. Bisulfite treatment were performed by using the Zymo EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (ZYMO RESEARCH, CA, USA) with 500 ng genomic DNA, Bisulfite-treatmented DNA were purified to prepare whole-genome bisulfite sequencing libraries with the EpiGnome Kit (Epicenter, Madison, WI, USA). All libraries were sequenced at 100 bp paired-end reads on BGI MGISEQ-2000 platform (BGI, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China). Raw data were trimmed and filtered to remove adapters or low-quality base by using Trimmomatic v.0.36 [31]. Clean reads were mapped to the chromosome-level genome of the Lion-head goose (Anser cygnoides) (assembled by Zhongkai university of Agriculture and Engineering, data unpublished) using HISAT2 v2.1.0 software [32] with default parameters, and then unique mapping reads used for methylation analyses.

Bisulfite conversion efficiency were investigated to determine cytosines that were either methylated (false discovery rate, FDR % 0.05). Only cytosines covered by at least five sequencing reads were considered in the following test. DNA methylation level was defined by calculated the proportion of methylated cytosines among total cytosines relative to the total reads covering the sites was defined DNA methylation level. Sliding window analysis was performed to inspect the reproducibility between biological replicates (window size = 100 kb and step size = 50 kb) of methylation levels was conducted for each sample in all three sequence contexts. DMR detection was performed following the method of MethylKit [33]using a window size of 100 bp and a step size of 50 bp following the Benjamini–Hochberg multiple test correction [34]. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between methylation levels in pairs of biological replicates was estimated within three groups.

RNA-seq and Differential gene expression analysis

Total RNA extracted as mentioned above was used for RNA-seq on Illumina HiSeq 4000 to generate 150 bp paired-end reads. Clean reads filtered by Fastp [35] were mapped to the geese genome using HISAT2 v2.1.0 software [32]with default parameter, DEseq2(v.1.26.0) [36] was performed to identification of DEGs, the threshold level was set with a standard. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were determined by DESeq2 (v.1.26.0) [36] requiring FDR < = 0.05, fold change > = 2. Each pairwise combination of the two reproductive stage was investigated. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted for each species using a regularized log2 transform of the normalized counts of all genes as generated by DESeq2 (v.1.26.0) [36]. Pearson correlation of gene expression (log2 of the normalized counts) between biological replicates was calculated using R v.3.6.2 (https://www.R-project.org). The DMR-related genes were performed Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis by using Metascape (https://metascape.org/). KEGG pathway annotation was identified according to the KEGG database(https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) [37,38,39]. KEGG enrichment analysis was performed using KOBAS [40], and p < 0.05 was set as the threshold for significant enrichment. Primers of the differentially expressed genes used for qPCR validation are listed in Table S1.

Target metabolomics for neurotransmitters in hypothalamus of geese

AB SCIEX QTRAP LC-MS/MS detection platform was used to detect the metabolites in the sample and quantify the content of the neurotransmitter in hypothalamic tissues among the three stages of geese during long light exposure, according to the proposal used in quail [18]. After whole hypothalamus homogenization, samples were processed for liquid Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer (LS-MS) detection within 24 h. Twenty-three neurotransmitter metabolites (shown in Table S2) were measured via Waters ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, USA). Chromatography was performed on an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, Waters, USA). Load 5 µL of each sample by the auto-sampler, the column temperature was 40 °C. Under mass spectrometry conditions, in a positive ion model using the following parameters: ion source temperature = 500◦C; ion spray voltage = 5,000 V; curtain gas (nitrogen) = 30 psi; both atomizing gas and auxiliary gas = 60 psi. Mass spectrometry was performed using the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) scan method.

Bisulfite sequencing PCR, pyrosequencing, and real-time PCR validation

We performed Bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) and pyrosequencing to validate the methylation change of two serotonin metabolism-related genes (TPH2 and SLC18A2). Genomic DNA was extracted from hypothalamic tissues with MagPure Tissue DNA LQ Kit (D6321, Guangzhou Magen Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). The purified DNA was treated with bisulfite with Zymo EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (ZYMO RESEARCH, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Then the methylated DNA was amplified by BSP primer, PCR products was cloned into PGEM-T easy vector system (Promega, Madison, USA), and performed sanger sequencing, the methylation rate for each stage was calculated by the total number of 430 clones (117 clones in RA, 129 clones in RD, and 184 clones in RI). We performed pyrosequencing to validate the methylation level of the three genes (TPH2, SLC18A2, and GPR26). Primers were designed by PyroMark Assay Design 2.0 (https://www.qiagen.com/us/resources), and the 5’ end of the primer was biotinylated. Primers designed for bisulfite sequencing PCR, pyrosequencing and real-time PCR are listed in Table S1.

Results

DNA methylome profiles of the goose hypothalamus during HPG axis inactivation induced by long-light exposure

We determined methylation changes in the Magang goose genome underlying photoperiodism. Hypothalamus were collected for whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq). Each stage had three biological replicates, with sequencing depths of ~ 30× (Table S3). BS-seq covered more than 85% of all cytosines. Methylation in the goose genome was found to exist in three types, including CG, CHG, and CHH (where H corresponds to A, T, or C). DNA methylation predominantly occurs in CG sites in the geese’s genome. CG-methylated cytosine sites accounted for the highest proportion in hypothalamus samples of geese, about 83% of all methylcytosines occurred in the CG context, while the proportion of methylated cytosine in the CHG and CHH context was ranging from 0.72 to 0.89% and 0.98 to 1.20%, respectively (Table 1). After long light exposure, the hypothalamus exhibited reduced levels of cytosine methylation in the CG context. The proportion of methylated cytosine in CG context varied greatly between replicates in RA (Table 1, F test, p < 0.05). No significant change in methylation levels in all three contexts was found among the three comparison groups (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Global methylation profile of goose hypothalamus data. (A) The genome-wide methylation level of goose hypothalamus data. (B) Distribution of methylation levels across genes. The red curve, green curve and blue curve indicated the methylation level across genes in RA stage, RD stage, and RI stage respectively. Two tailed t-test: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01

Full size image
Table 1 Methylation levels in the goose genome in three sequence contexts (CG, CHG, and CHH, where H = A, T, or C)
Full size table

Using a beta-binomial model [41], we identified 10,602 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between any two-time points (RA vs. RD, RA vs. RI, and RD vs. RI) (Table S4) ; Among them, the total number of 3,033 DMRs (1017 hypermethylated and 2,016 hypomethylated) between RA and RD, 3,677 DMRs (1,863 hypermethylated and 1,814 hypomethylated) between RD and RI, and 3,892 (1,399 hypermethylated and 2,493 hypomethylated) between RA and RI (Fig. 2A) were identified. We then mapped the DMRs to genomic and genic features distribution of DMRs–the numbers of hypermethylated and hypomethylated CG, CHG, and CHH DMRs associated with genes were counted. We observed that the vast majority of DMRs were enriched within intron regions (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Genomic distribution of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) induced by long light exposure in the hypothalamus. (A) The number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs).(B) Distribution of DMRs in the goose genome. The numbers of hyper- (red) and hypomethylated CG, CHG, and CHH DMRs (blue) associated with genes (including exon, intron, upstream, downstream sequences, and intergenic)

Full size image

Transcriptome change during HPG axis inactivation induced by long-light exposure

To assess the potential impact of methylation changes on gene expression, RNA-seq was conducted to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Table S5 and Table S6). Principal component analysis (PCA) of the normalized count data separated the three stages (Fig. 3A). We identified 290 DEGs between RA and RD, 1,563 DEGs between RD and RI, and 916 DEGs between RA and RI (Fig. 3B, C). Cluster analysis of DEGs identified four statistically significant clusters (Fig. 3D);

Fig. 3
figure 3

Transcriptome profile of goose hypothalamus. (A) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the goose hypothalamus data. (B) Volcano plot for the long photoperiod-induced changes of gene expression. Red points represent DEGs with at least a 2-fold change and an adjusted p-value (FDR) between pairs. (C) Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in goose hypothalamus data. (D). Heat map of goose hypothalamus data

Full size image

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that the DEGs in cluster1 significantly enriched in G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway; In cluster 2, DEGs were associated with transmembrane transport and regulation of cell activation; GO categories represented in cluster 3 were associated with the cell surface receptor linked signaling pathway, G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway, and neuron system development (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The GO terms (A) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichments (B) of the DEGs. (A) GO terms enriched in the differentially expressed genes among the cluster 1, 2 and 3. (B) KEGG enriched in the differentially expressed genes among cluster 1, 2 and 3

Full size image

To further understand the role of DEGs in the functional regulation of the hypothalamus during seasonal inactivation, signaling pathways were analyzed by the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). The results showed that the highlighted pathways significantly overrepresented in cluster 1 were neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction (VIPR1, TRHR, P2RX3, PTGDR, CCKAR) and synaptic vesicle cycle (TPH2, SLC6A4, SLC18A2, DDC). The highlighted pathways significantly overrepresented in cluster 2 were thyroid hormone signaling pathway (DIO2, SRC, PFKFB2, FOXO1, HIF1A, ITGAV, NCOA3, PRKCB, SLC9A1), and glutamatergic synapse. The highlighted pathways significantly overrepresented in cluster 3 were neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, calcium signaling pathway, and ECM-receptor interaction (Fig. 4B). The synaptic transmission pathway was significantly changed in cluster 3, enriched in several synaptic types, including GABAergic synapse, serotonergic synapse, dopaminergic synapse, and cholinergic synapse. For validation, six genes related to hypothalamic neurotransmitters metabolic were selected to be analyzed by qRT-PCR (Supplementary Figures, Figure S2).

DMR-associated DEGs during HPG axis inactivation induced by long-light exposure

To evaluate the potential impact of methylation changes on gene expression during the HPG axis inactivation, we examined the distribution of the DMR-associated DEGs (Fig. 5). A total number of 278 DMRs-associated DEGs were identified among three stages in the hypothalamus, Fisher’s exact test showed that DMRs-associated genes were more likely to be differentially expressed (P < 0.001), indicating the regulatory effect of DNA methylation on gene expression. Among them, thirty-three DMR-associated DEGs were identified in the RA vs. RD comparison (82.6% of DMRs located in the intron, 6.5% of DMRs located in the upstream of the gene, 4.3% located in the downstream of gene, and 6.5% located in the exon); One hundred and thirty-seven DMR-related DEGs were identified in the RD vs. RI comparison (75.3% of DMRs located in the intron, 8.4% located in the upstream of the gene, 4.0% located in the downstream of gene, and 12.3% located in exon); In the RA vs. RI comparison, 108 DMR-associated DEGs were identified (77.3% of DMRs located in the intron, 2.8% located in the upstream of the gene 1.7% located in the downstream of gene, and 18.2% located in the exon) (Table S7).

Fig. 5
figure 5

DMR-related genes for DEGs in the goose hypothalamus. Venn diagrams showed the DMRs-related DEGs identified in the hypothalamus. Fisher’s exact test showed that DMRs-related genes were more likely to be differentially expressed (P < 0.001)

Full size image

To evaluate the potential impact of methylation changes on gene expression in the hypothalamus during HPG axis inactivation in geese, we examined the expression of genes that are associated with DMRs in the hypothalamus. The quadrant plot showed the correlation between the methylation changes of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and expression changes of the DMR- associated differentially expressed genes during HPG axis inactivation (Fig. 6). The results showed that the genes containing DMRs in their introns have a weak negative correlation between the methylation changes and the expression changes (Pearson’s correlation, r = -0.05, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 6). No significant negative correlation was detected between the gene containing DMRs in their exon and expression changes of their associated genes (Pearson’s correlation, r = -0.07, P = 0.058). Therefore, methylation changes during HPG axis inactivation have a weak negligible impact on genome-wide gene expression in the hypothalamus of geese.

To further investigate the biological function in which DMR-associated DEGs might be involved, we performed a KEGG pathway analysis (Table 2). KEGG analysis revealed that the DMR-associated DEGs were mainly involved in 11 pathways. Among them, the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway was significantly enriched in both two comparisons (RA vs.RD and RD vs.RI); the Wnt signaling pathway, apelin signaling pathway, melanogenesis, calcium signaling pathway, focal adhesion, and adherens junction were significantly enriched in the RA vs. RI comparison (Table 2).

Table 2 The KEGG pathway enrichment of DMR-related genes
Full size table

DMR-associated DEGs are involved in neurotransmitter metabolism during HPG axis inactivation induced by long-light exposure

We investigated the biological function of the top 10 DMR-associated DEGs in the comparison of RA and RI, and found that two genes (TPH2 and SLC18A2) were involved in neurotransmitter metabolism. Compared with RA, DNA methylation levels of the TPH2 gene and SLC18A2 gene in RI increased by 31.85% and 31.99%, respectively. Significantly elevated DNA methylation levels reduced the gene expression level of TPH2 and SLC18A2 in the RI. BSP and Pyrosequencing was performed to validate the high methylation level of the TPH2 and SLC18A2 gene in the RI stage, and measure the methylation level change of the GPR26 gene between RA and RD stage (Table 3, Table S8, and Supplementary Figures, Figure S3). In addition, we performed targeted quantification of neurotransmitters in the goose hypothalamus among three stages, and found the concentration of 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA), which was the last product of 5-HT metabolism significantly declined in the RI stage compared to the RA stage (Table 4). Moreover, Chronic exposure to different photoperiods could alter the number of neurotransmitters in the hypothalamus, we observed that the concentration of histidine was significantly increased in RD, but showed no significant difference between RA and RI.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Influences of DMRs on the expression of genes. Quadrant plot of methylation changes of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and expression changes of the DMR-associated differentially expressed genes during HPG inactivation. The x-axis represents the methylation difference of DMRs among comparison groups. The y-axis indicates the expression difference (log2-fold change) of the DMR-associated genes among the three comparison groups. The red points indicate genes with significant (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 0.05) differential expression. Cor indicates Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Only significant (p < 0.05) correlation coefficients are shown

Full size image
Table 3 Methylation level of TPH2, SLC18A2, and GPR26 validated by pyrosequencing
Full size table
Table 4 Concentration of neurotransmitters during HPG axis inactivation in the goose hypothalamus (n = 3)
Full size table

Discussion

The hypothalamus is an integral part of the central nervous system that integrates environmental stimuli and endogenous signals [21]. Recent findings indicate that epigenetic modifications are essential in regulating and timing seasonal rhythms [42, 43]. DNA methylation was important in regulating the seasonal timing of reproduction in Great Tits [44]. Short photoperiods inhibit reproductive activity in hamsters because hypermethylation altered the mRNA expression level of a critical gene involved in the thyroid hormone synthesis pathway in the hypothalamus [24]. In songbirds, the hypothalamus showed epigenetic differences between the non-migrant and migrant periods, which were associated with photoperiodic changes [45]. Long light exposure induces reproductive inactivation in Magang geese; however, the epigenetic changes concerned with seasonal reproduction in the hypothalamus are still unknown.

At the epigenetic level, DNA methylation predominantly occurs in CG sites in the geese genome. Prolonged light exposure did not change methylation levels in all three contexts in Magang geese. In contrast, long light induced the expression level of DNA methyltransferase 3α (DNMT3A) in the hypothalamus was significantly increased in the hamster, a long-day breeder [46]. The most interesting finding was that gene containing DMRs in their introns was observed to have a weak negative correlation between the methylation changes and the expression changes in the hypothalamus. These results indicate that intron methylation may have important regulatory functions in the hypothalamus that are associated with reproductive inactivation during long light exposure. Recently, the regulatory role of non-coding variants at the intron region of TSHR contributes to the regulation of seasonal reproduction in Atlantic herring [47].

At the expression level, Photoperiodism impacted gene expression levels in the hypothalamus [4, 5, 48]. Gene expression in the hypothalamus was associated with increased TSHβ and dio2 mRNA levels and decreased dio3 mRNA levels under long light conditions [48]. As expected, the expression level of dio2 observed a significant increase in RD after long light exposure in the hypothalamus of Magang geese. By comparing the transcriptome differences between RA and RI, we found that the effects of prolonged light stimulation were mainly related to the serotonin (5-HT) /dopamine (DA)- Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) system. In avian, the reproductive behavior was strictly controlled by the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, and the hypothalamic neurotransmitters 5-HT, DA, and VIP have important effects on the secretion of pituitary prolactin [49,50,51,52,53].

Compared to RA, two serotonin metabolism genes (SLC18A2 and TPH2) had the largest change in expression level in RI. As the rate-limiting enzyme of 5-HT synthesis, TPH2 was widely expressed in the brain and controlled serotonin synthesis. The mRNA expression pattern in TPH2 is affected by the photoperiod [54, 55]. SLC18A2 is a key regulator of the monoamine neurotransmitter systems, which can package serotonin and dopamine neurotransmitters in the cytoplasm into vesicles for release [56]. Zebrafish individuals with homozygous mutants showed abnormal responses to light changes and affected brain development [57]. We also observed that the mRNA expression level of GnRH-1 significantly increased in the RI stage, suggesting that long light exposure inhibited the GnRH signaling is inhibited in short-day breeders [58]. Long days stimulated the mRNA expression level of GnRH-1 [24], in long-day breeder starlings, GNRH-1 mRNA-expressing cells were significantly greater in breeding birds than in nonbreeding birds [59].

Long light exposure associated with reproductive inactivation in Magang geese is accompanied by alterations in the epigenome. DMR-associated DEGs in the hypothalamus, and the methylation level change in the intron had a significant negative correlation with gene expression. Compared to the RA stage, VIPR1 showed the most decreased expression levels and hypomethylated DMRs responded to long light exposure in the RD stage. The VIPR1 gene is reported to be significantly associated with chicken reproduction [60,61,62]. VIP is known to play a vital role in internal SCN timekeeping, and VIP was the first activated following a long light stimulation [63, 64]. GPR26 showed significantly decreased expression levels, and the most hypermethylated DMRs responded to long light exposure. GPR26 is a central brain-specific orphan GPCR whose endogenous ligand remains unclear. Genetic deletion of GPR26 leads to anxiety and depression-like behaviors [65]. Compared to RA, TPH2, and SLC18A2 showed significantly decreased expression levels and the most hypermethylated DMRs responded to long light exposure in the RI stage. Both genes were involved in serotonin metabolism, we validated the CpG site in both two genes and showed the hypermethylation level occurred upstream of the TPH2 gene and in the intron of SLC18A2. To directly assess whether these alterations have any functional consequence on serotonin metabolism, neurotransmitter data showed the concentration of 5-HIAA decreased in the RI stage in the hypothalamus. In male rhesus macaques, the concentration of CSF 5-HIAA significantly increases in the breeding season [66, 67]. In humans, 5-HT turnover shows circannual variation by season [68].

Taken together, our results reveal a functional association between serotonin metabolism in hypothalamus and reproductive inactivation in Magang geese during long light exposure.

Data availability

The data sets supporting the results of this article were included within the article and additional files. The raw sequence data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2021) at National Genomics Data Center (Nucleic Acids Res 2022), China National Center for Bioinformation / Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Bio-Project of Bisulfite sequencing data and RNA-seq data: PRJCA013343; GSA accession of Bisulfite sequencing data and RNA-seq data: CRA008993) that are publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa.

References

  1. Shi ZD, Tian YB, Wu W, Wang ZY. Controlling reproductive seasonality in the geese: a review. World’s Poult Sci J. 2019;64(3):343–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang YM, Shi ZD, Liu Z, Liu Y, Li XW. Endocrine regulations of reproductive seasonality, follicular development and incubation in Magang geese. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;104(2–4):344–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pan JQ, Liufu S, Sun JF, Chen WJ, Ouyang HJ, Shen X, Jiang DL, Xu DN, Tian YB, He JH, et al. Long-day photoperiods affect expression of OPN5 and the TSH-DIO2/DIO3 pathway in Magang goose ganders. Poult Sci. 2022;101(10):102024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu H, Chen Z, Shao X, Yu J, Wei C, Dai Z, Shi Z. Reproductiveaxis gene regulation during photostimulation and photorefractoriness in Yangzhou goose ganders. Front Zool. 2017;14:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu H, Shao X, Chen Z, Wei C, Lei M, Ying S, Yu J, Shi Z. Induction of out-of-season egg laying by artificial photoperiod in Yangzhou geese and the associated endocrine and molecular regulation mechanisms. Anim Reprod Sci. 2017;180:127–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshimura T. Thyroid hormone and seasonal regulation of reproduction. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2013;34(3):157–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuenzel WJ, Kang SW, Zhou ZJ. Exploring avian deep-brain photoreceptors and their role in activating the neuroendocrine regulation of gonadal development. Poult Sci. 2015;94(4):786–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanon EA, Lincoln GA, Fustin JM, Dardente H, Masson-Pévet M, Morgan PJ, Hazlerigg DG. Ancestral TSH mechanism signals summer in a photoperiodic mammal. Curr Biol. 2008;18(15):1147–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yasuo S, Watanabe M, Nakao N, Takagi T, Follett BK, Ebihara S, Yoshimura T. The reciprocal switching of two thyroid hormone-activating and -inactivating enzyme genes is involved in the photoperiodic gonadal response of japanese quail. Endocrinology. 2005;146(6):2551–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshimura T, Yasuo S, Watanabe M, Iigo M, Yamamura T, Hirunagi K, Ebihara S. Light-induced hormone conversion of T4 to T3 regulates photoperiodic response of gonads in birds. Nature. 2003;426(6963):178–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wood S, Loudon A. Clocks for all seasons: unwinding the roles and mechanisms of circadian and interval timers in the hypothalamus and pituitary. J Endocrinol. 2014;222(2):R39–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, Meadows JR, Sherwood E, Webster MT, Jiang L, Ingman M, Sharpe T, Ka S, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature. 2010;464(7288):587–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karlsson AC, Fallahshahroudi A, Johnsen H, Hagenblad J, Wright D, Andersson L, Jensen P. A domestication related mutation in the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor gene (TSHR) modulates photoperiodic response and reproduction in chickens. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2016;228:69–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaiser UB, Chin PMCWW. Studies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) action using GnRH receptor-expressing pituitary cell lines. Endocr Rev. 1997;18(1):46–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stoney PN, Helfer G, Rodrigues D, Morgan PJ, McCaffery P. Thyroid hormone activation of retinoic acid synthesis in hypothalamic tanycytes. Glia. 2016;64(3):425–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho S, Chung J, Han J, Ju Lee B, Han Kim D, Rhee K, Kim K. 9-cis-retinoic acid represses transcription of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) gene via proximal promoter region that is distinct from all-trans-retinoic acid response element. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001;87(2):214–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thiéry JC, Chemineau P, Hernandez X, Migaud M, Malpaux B. Neuroendocrine interactions and seasonality. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2002;23(1–2):87–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu Y, Jiang D, Liu J, Fu Y, Song Y, Fan D, Huang X, Liufu S, Pan J, Ouyang H, et al. Photoperiodic changes in both hypothalamus neurotransmitters and circulating gonadal steroids metabolomic profiles in relation to Seasonal Reproduction in Male Quail. Front Physiol. 2022;13:824228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharp PJ. Photoperiodic regulation of seasonal breeding in birds. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1040:189–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dawson A, King VM, Bentley GE, Ball GF. Photoperiodic control of seasonality in birds. J Biol Rhythms. 2001;16(4):365–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stevenson TJ. Environmental and hormonal regulation of epigenetic enzymes in the hypothalamus. J Neuroendocrinol 2017, 29(5).

  22. Stevenson TJ. Circannual and circadian rhythms of hypothalamic DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase expression in male siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2017;243:130–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stevenson TJ. Epigenetic regulation of Biological Rhythms: an Evolutionary Ancient Molecular Timer. Trends Genet. 2018;34(2):90–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stevenson TJ, Prendergast BJ. Reversible DNA methylation regulates seasonal photoperiodic time measurement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(41):16651–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. He Y, Zuo Q, Edwards J, Zhao K, Lei J, Cai W, Nie Q, Li B, Song J. DNA methylation and Regulatory Elements during Chicken germline stem cell differentiation. Stem Cell Reports. 2018;10(6):1793–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wood SH, Hindle MM, Mizoro Y, Cheng Y, Saer BRC, Miedzinska K, Christian HC, Begley N, McNeilly J, McNeilly AS et al. Circadian clock mechanism driving mammalian photoperiodism. Nat Commun 2020, 11(1).

  27. Guerrero-Bosagna C, Pertille F, Gomez Y, Rezaei S, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Vogeli S, Stratmann A, Voelkl B, Toscano MJ. DNA methylation variation in the brain of laying hens in relation to differential behavioral patterns. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2020;35:100700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morris KM, Hindle MM, Boitard S, Burt DW, Danner AF, Eory L, Forrest HL, Gourichon D, Gros J, Hillier LW, et al. The quail genome: insights into social behaviour, seasonal biology and infectious disease response. BMC Biol. 2020;18(1):14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao W, Yuan T, Fu Y, Niu D, Chen W, Chen L, Lu L. Seasonal differences in the transcriptome profile of the Zhedong white goose (Anser cygnoides) pituitary gland. Poult Sci. 2021;100(2):1154–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhong Y, Di R, Yang Y, Liu Q, Chu M. Transcriptome Analysis of Neuroendocrine Regulation of Ovine Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Ovary Axis during Ovine Anestrus and the Breeding Season. Genes (Basel) 2021, 12(12).

  31. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):907–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Akalin A, Kormaksson M, Li S, Garrett-Bakelman FE, Figueroa ME, Melnick A, Mason CE. methylKit: a comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. Genome Biol. 2012;13(10):R87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false Discovery Rate - a practical and powerful Approach to multiple testing. J Royal Statist Soc Series B. 1995;57:289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28(11):1947–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Ishiguro-Watanabe M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D587–d592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bu D, Luo H, Huo P, Wang Z, Zhang S, He Z, Wu Y, Zhao L, Liu J, Guo J, et al. KOBAS-i: intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W317–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Feng H, Conneely KN, Wu H. A bayesian hierarchical model to detect differentially methylated loci from single nucleotide resolution sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(8):e69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Tolla E, Stevenson TJ. Sex differences and the neuroendocrine regulation of Seasonal Reproduction by supplementary environmental cues. Integr Comp Biol. 2020;60(6):1506–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stoney PN, Rodrigues D, Helfer G, Khatib T, Ashton A, Hay EA, Starr R, Kociszewska D, Morgan P, McCaffery P. A seasonal switch in histone deacetylase gene expression in the hypothalamus and their capacity to modulate nuclear signaling pathways. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;61:340–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Viitaniemi HM, Verhagen I, Visser ME, Honkela A, van Oers K, Husby A. Seasonal variation in genome-wide DNA methylation patterns and the onset of Seasonal timing of Reproduction in Great Tits. Genome Biol Evol. 2019;11(3):970–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sharma A, Singh D, Malik S, Gupta NJ, Rani S, Kumar V. Difference in control between spring and autumn migration in birds: insight from seasonal changes in hypothalamic gene expression in captive buntings. Proc Biol Sci 2018, 285(1885).

  46. Stevenson TJ, Prendergast BJ, Nelson RJ. Mammalian seasonal rhythms: Behavior and Neuroendocrine Substrates. Horm brain Behav. 2002;14:93–156.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chen J, Bi H, Pettersson ME, Sato DX, Fuentes-Pardo AP, Mo C, Younis S, Wallerman O, Jern P, Molés G, et al. Functional differences between TSHR alleles associate with variation in spawning season in Atlantic herring. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):795.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharma A, Das S, Sur S, Tiwari J, Chaturvedi K, Agarwal N, Malik S, Rani S, Kumar V. Photoperiodically driven transcriptome-wide changes in the hypothalamus reveal transcriptional differences between physiologically contrasting seasonal life-history states in migratory songbirds. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Clemens JA, Sawyer BD, Cerimele B. Further evidence that serotonin is a neurotransmitter involved in the control of prolactin secretion. Endocrinology. 1977;100(3):692–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Clemens JA, Roush ME, Fuller RW. Evidence that serotonin neurons stimulate secretion of prolaction releasing factor. Life Sci. 1978;22(24):2209–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Al Kahtane A, Kannan M, Kang SW, El Halawani ME. Regulation of prolactin gene expression by vasoactive intestinal peptide and dopamine in the turkey: role of ca signalling. J Neuroendocrinol. 2005;17(10):649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Youngren O, Chaiseha Y, Al-Zailaie K, Whiting S, Kang SW, El Halawani M. Regulation of prolactin secretion by dopamine at the level of the hypothalamus in the turkey. Neuroendocrinology. 2002;75(3):185–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Namken S, Sinpru P, Kamkrathok B, Sartsoongnoen N, Chaiseha Y. Role of vasoactive intestinal peptide during the transition from incubation behavior to rearing behavior in the female native thai chicken. Poult Sci. 2017;96(10):3768–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Malek ZS, Labban LM. Photoperiod regulates the daily profiles of tryptophan hydroxylase-2 gene expression the raphe nuclei of rats. Int J Neurosci. 2021;131(12):1155–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Siemann JK, Williams P, Malik TN, Jackson CR, Green NH, Emeson RB, Levitt P, McMahon DG. Photoperiodic effects on monoamine signaling and gene expression throughout development in the serotonin and dopamine systems. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15437.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Johnson RG Jr. Accumulation of biological amines into chromaffin granules: a model for hormone and neurotransmitter transport. Physiol Rev. 1988;68(1):232–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Baronio D, Chen YC, Decker AR, Enckell L, Fernández-López B, Semenova S, Puttonen HAJ, Cornell RA, Panula P. Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (SLC18A2) regulates monoamine turnover and brain development in zebrafish. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2022;234(1):e13725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. La Y, He X, Zhang L, Di R, Wang X, Gan S, Zhang X, Zhang J, Hu W, Chu M. Comprehensive Analysis of Differentially Expressed Profiles of mRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA in the Uterus of Seasonal Reproduction Sheep. Genes (Basel) 2020, 11(3).

  59. Stevenson TJ, Bernard DJ, Ball GF. Photoperiodic condition is associated with region-specific expression of GNRH1 mRNA in the preoptic area of the male starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Biol Reprod. 2009;81(4):674–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Sun X, Chen X, Zhao J, Ma C, Yan C, Liswaniso S, Xu R, Qin N. Transcriptome comparative analysis of ovarian follicles reveals the key genes and signaling pathways implicated in hen egg production. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Xu H, Zeng H, Luo C, Zhang D, Wang Q, Sun L, Yang L, Zhou M, Nie Q, Zhang X. Genetic effects of polymorphisms in candidate genes and the QTL region on chicken age at first egg. BMC Genet. 2011;12:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhou M, Lei M, Rao Y, Nie Q, Zeng H, Xia M, Liang F, Zhang D, Zhang X. Polymorphisms of vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor-1 gene and their genetic effects on broodiness in chickens. Poult Sci. 2008;87(5):893–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Paul S, Hanna L, Harding C, Hayter EA, Walmsley L, Bechtold DA, Brown TM. Output from VIP cells of the mammalian central clock regulates daily physiological rhythms. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Todd WD, Venner A, Anaclet C, Broadhurst RY, De Luca R, Bandaru SS, Issokson L, Hablitz LM, Cravetchi O, Arrigoni E, et al. Suprachiasmatic VIP neurons are required for normal circadian rhythmicity and comprised of molecularly distinct subpopulations. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Khan MZ, He L. Neuro-psychopharmacological perspective of Orphan receptors of rhodopsin (class A) family of G protein-coupled receptors. Psychopharmacology. 2017;234(8):1181–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Patrick TMehlman JD, Beth JFernald F, RSallee. Stephen JSuomi, MarkkuLinnoila: CSF 5-HIAA, testosterone, and sociosexual behaviors in free-ranging male rhesus macaques in the mating season. Psychiatry Res. 1997;72(2):89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kristin B, Zajicek BS CSPS, Susan E, Shoaf Ph D, Patrick T, Mehlman Ph D, Stephen JS, Markku Linnoila Ph PhD. & J Dee Higley Ph.D Seasonal Variation in CSF 5-HIAA concentrations in male Rhesus Macaques. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000;22:240–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Luykx JJ, Bakker SC, Lentjes E, Boks MP, van Geloven N, Eijkemans MJ, Janson E, Strengman E, de Lepper AM, Westenberg H, et al. Season of sampling and season of birth influence serotonin metabolite levels in human cerebrospinal fluid. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e30497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Aimei Dai, Zhongqi Liufu, and Jin Xu for valuable discussion and helpful comments on this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515010781), the key discipline research capacity improvement project of Guangdong Province (2021ZDJS006), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072730), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou (202102080162), and Key Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2020B020222003).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jiaxin Liu and Yanglong Xu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, 510225, China

    Jiaxin Liu, Yanglong Xu, Yuting Fu, Sui Liufu, Danli Jiang, Jianqiu Pan, Hongjia Ouyang, Yunmao Huang, Yunbo Tian & Xu Shen

  2. State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510275, China

    Yushuai Wang & Jinning Zhang

Authors
  1. Jiaxin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanglong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yushuai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinning Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuting Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sui Liufu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Danli Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jianqiu Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hongjia Ouyang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yunmao Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yunbo Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Xu Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.S, YB.T, and YM.H conceived the idea and designed the experiments, X.S, JX.L, and YM.H wrote the manuscript, JX.L, YL.X, YS.W, X.S, JN. Z, and YT,F performed experiments and data analysis, S.LF, JQ.P, DL.J and HJ.OY help to collection the samples. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunmao Huang, Yunbo Tian or Xu Shen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All experiments were performed following relevant guidelines and adhering to the ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org/) for reporting animal experiments. All experimental animal procedures complied with the laboratory animal management and welfare regulations approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (EAEC-ZHKU, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China), under permit NO.2019120310. All efforts have been made to minimize animal suffering following the Institutional Animal Ethics Guidelines (AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Xu, Y., Wang, Y. et al. The DNA methylation status of the serotonin metabolic pathway associated with reproductive inactivation induced by long-light exposure in Magang geese. BMC Genomics 24, 355 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09342-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09342-0

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us