Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluation of circulating microRNA profiles in blood as potential candidate biomarkers in a subacute ruminal acidosis cow model - a pilot study

BMC Genomics volume 24, Article number: 333 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) is a metabolic disorder often observed in high-yielding dairy cows, that are fed diets high in concentrates. We hypothesized that circulating miRNAs in blood of cows could serve as potential candidate biomarkers to detect animals with metabolic dysbalances such as SARA. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs, serving as regulators of a plethora of molecular processes. To test our hypothesis, we performed a pilot study with non-lactating Holstein–Friesian cows fed a forage diet (FD; 0% concentrate, n = 4) or a high-grain diet (HG; 65% concentrate, n = 4) to induce SARA. Comprehensive profiling of miRNA expression in plasma and leucocytes were performed by next generation sequencing (NGS). The success of our model to induce SARA was evaluated based on ruminal pH and was evidenced by increased time spent with a pH threshold of 5.8 for an average period of 320 min/d.

Results

A total of 520 and 730 miRNAs were found in plasma and leucocytes, respectively. From these, 498 miRNAs were shared by both plasma and leucocytes, with 22 miRNAs expressed exclusively in plasma and 232 miRNAs expressed exclusively in leucocytes. Differential expression analysis revealed 10 miRNAs that were up-regulated and 2 that were down-regulated in plasma of cows when fed the HG diet. A total of 63 circulating miRNAs were detected exclusively in the plasma of cows with SARA, indicating that these animals exhibited a higher number and diversity of circulating miRNAs. Considering the total read counts of miRNAs expressed when fed the HG diet, differentially expressed miRNAs ( log2 fold change) and known function, we have identified bta-miR-11982, bta-miR-1388-5p, bta-miR-12034, bta-miR-2285u, and bta-miR-30b-3p as potential candidates for SARA-biomarker in cows by NGS. These were further subjected to validation using small RNA RT-qPCR, confirming the promising role of bta-miR-30b-3p and bta-miR-2285.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate that dietary change impacts the release and expression of miRNAs in systemic circulation, which may modulate post-transcriptional gene expression in cows undergoing SARA. Particularly, bta-miR-30b-3p and bta-miR-2285 might serve as promising candidate biomarker predictive for SARA and should be further validated in larger cohorts.

Background

MicroRNAs are a class of small non-coding RNAs which regulate a wide range of biological processes such as mammary gland development [12, 16, 17, 20] and ovary development [46, 49], differentiation, apoptosis, and viral infection through post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression [4]. Since the first miRNA was identified in lin-4 (Caenorhabditis elegans) in 1993, an increasing number of miRNAs have been found in animals as sequencing and bioinformatics technologies advanced and ushered in a new era and the capability to quickly detect many classes of short RNA molecules, including miRNAs, in a variety of biological samples like plasma, blood cells, milk, urine, etc. [31]. With a view to comprehend the regulatory network of miRNAs and gene expression, it is crucial to understand the identification and characterization of miRNAs and their targets in animals in recent years [18]. The finding of circulating miRNAs in bodily fluids like milk, urine, and saliva [8] opened the door to the field of biomarker discovery, which uses a mix of omics technologies to achieve the least invasive detection of molecules feasible, for example in cancer biology. A miRNA biomarker is a miRNA that is generated or enriched in a specific tissue, and whose circulating levels may reflect pathological or physiological changes in that tissue associated to diseases or progression of diseases. MiRNAs have recently become highly useful biomarkers of human infectious, genetic, and metabolic diseases but there are only a few studies in farm animals. In the past few years, profiles of circulating miRNAs have been connected to pregnancy and the oestrous cycle [21, 22], infection [11, 15], and various physiological processes, metabolic changes, and adaptive response pathways driving skeletal muscle growth in cattle [44].

Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) is a frequent metabolic disorder of high-producing cows, commonly associated with a high-grain (HG) diet and is identified by a drop of ruminal pH due to rapid accumulation of volatile fatty acids, as well as lactic acid [42, 59]. Cows experiencing SARA undergo both ruminal and systemic inflammation, which are induced by a cascade of events starting with dysbiosis in the rumen and resulting in the activation of the innate immune response and several metabolic disorders [7, 60].

In this study, we hypothesized that blood miRNAs could serve as potential candidate biomarkers for rumen health in cows using a diet-induced SARA bovine model. To test our hypothesis, comprehensive identification of miRNA profiles were conducted and miRNAs in plasma and leucocytes were evaluated towards its potential to serve as candidate biomarkers in cows that were exposed to SARA risk by a HG feeding period consisting of a 65% concentrate diet. The presence of specific miRNAs in the plasma and leucocytes could contribute to understand the systemic pathophysiology of SARA in cattle. In addition, miRNAs could serve as valid biomarkers to identify cows suffering from SARA in a herd. Furthermore, biomarkers could be used to identify those cows which are able to better cope with SARA, also considering further breeding strategies. The findings of our study contribute to a better understanding of how dietary changes affect the systemic circulation of miRNAs and provide data for miRNAs and their potential use as biomarkers of SARA in cows.

Results

MiRNA expression pattern in plasma and blood leucocytes

We evaluated whether our cow model would successfully induce SARA in cows. We discovered that 100% of the cows in our cow model experienced at least episodes of SARA, which were indicated by increased time spent with a pH threshold of 5.8 for an average length of 320 min/d. In total, 520 miRNAs were found in plasma (Fig. 1a, b, c), with 360 of those shared by all forage diet (FD) and HG diets (Fig. 1a). We examined all the miRNAs found in the plasma from the four cows fed on FD and later a HG diet, which resulted in the identification of 398, 430, 416, and 430 miRNAs in each cow (Fig. 1b and c). Hence, for FD, there were 423 individual cow miRNAs on HG and 360 shared miRNAs between all cows. For additional analysis, the shared miRNAs for FD and HG were examined (Fig. 1a), and none was found to be distinct to cows on FD diet, whereas 360 miRNAs were shared between the FD AND HG diet (Fig. 1a). We further discovered that several miRNAs in the cows' plasma were exclusively expressed when they were fed an HG diet, which suggests that the HG diet causes a higher level of circulating miRNAs. As a result, we recorded 63 miRNAs from the cows exclusively when they were fed the HG diet (Fig. 1a), then further sorted, and filtered them according to total read counts, read counts across animals, and known function.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Venn diagram of microRNAs expressed in plasma. A Zero record of miRNAs expressed in forage-based diet leucocytes and 63 miRNAs exclusively expressed in high-grain diet in plasma. B 360 miRNAs shared within all cows (1, 2, 3 and 4) on forage-based diet (C) 423 miRNAs shared within all cows (1, 2, 3 and 4) on high-grain diet

Full size image

In total, 730 miRNAs were found and recorded in leucocytes, with 650 miRNAs shared by all analysed samples (Fig. 2), which could be considered as a core microRNAome within our dataset. When comparing FD and HG diets, 17 miRNAs were found to be expressed solely on the FD, while 34 miRNAs on the HG diet.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Venn diagram miRNAs expressed in leucocytes. 17 miRNAs were exclusively expressed in forage-based diet and 34 miRNAs were exclusively expressed in high-grain diet

Full size image

By analyzing the unique miRNAs present in every cow and diet, we were able to determine the animal-specific miRNAs. As a result, miRNAs identified as unique and expressed in cows fed on both diets were chosen. Three cows were also found to have three animal-specific miRNAs: bta-miR-2285bb, bta-miR-664a, and bta-miR-2285am-5p (leucocytes).

An inspection of the whole dataset identified 498 miRNAs shared between plasma and leucocytes (Fig. 3). In addition, 22 miRNAs were expressed solely in plasma and 232 other miRNAs in leucocytes (Fig. 3). Hence, we observed a higher number of miRNAs in leucocytes than in plasma. The ten most abundant miRNAs (Table 1) reported to be shared between plasma and leucocytes have been ranked by decreasing read counts from the 498 shared miRNAs identified between plasma and leucocytes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Venn diagram of microRNAs shared between plasma and leucocytes. 22 miRNAs were exclusively expressed in plasma while 232 miRNAs were exclusively expressed in leucocytes and a total of 498 miRNAs were shared between plasma and leucocytes

Full size image
Table 1 The 10 most expressed miRNAs in plasma and leucocytes
Full size table

Feeding a SARA inducing high grain diet affects the expression of miRNAs in plasma and blood leucocytes

Differential expression analysis revealed that 12 miRNAs were differentially expressed in plasma samples (FD vs. HG diet) with a false discovery rate (FDR) lower than 0.05 (Table 2), from which 10 miRNAs (bta-miR-12034, has-miR-23a-5p, bta-miR-2454-3p, bta-miR-1388-5p, bta-miR-338, bta-miR-664b, bta-miR-2285aa, bta-miR-6524, bta-miR-331-5p, bta-miR-769) were found to be up-regulated when the cows were fed a HG diet and 2 miRNAs were down-regulated (bta-miR-1306, bta- miR-7857-5p) (Fig. 4a). With an FDR < 0.05, 25 miRNAs were differentially expressed in leucocytes (forage vs. HG diet), of which 5 miRNAs (bta-miR-10225a, bta-miR-484, bta-let-7b, (hsa-let-7b-5p), bta-miR-423-5p) were up-regulated when the cows were fed the HG diet and 20 miRNAs were found to be down-regulated (Fig. 4b). In plasma as well as in leucocytes samples, hierarchical clustering detected a separation based on similarity of miRNA expression in the two different diets (Fig. 4c and d, respectively). The clustering of the samples was also investigated using principal component analysis (PCA) of miRNA read counts adjusted to the unique mappings in the bovine genome. Within plasma samples the first PC (PC1) was responsible for 29% of the variance between samples, whereas the second PC (PC2) was responsible for 20% (Fig. 5a). PC1 shows a cluster for the HG diet, whereas for forage only three out of the four animals clustered together. For plasma samples, PC1 seems to explain differences regarding the diet within the same four animals.

Table 2 12 Differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs in plasma (FDR < 0.05)
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

MicroRNA expression levels represented by a volcano plot (A) in plasma, (B) in leucocytes, and miRNA expression levels represented by a heat map (C) in plasma and (D) in leucocytes. In (A) and (B) each dot represents a single miRNA with red points indicating 10 upregulated and 2 downregulated miRNAs. The green points denote the log2 foldchange while the grey points indicated the non-significant. Plots were created with R software. In (C) and (D) green and orange represent forage and high-grain feeding, respectively, while red and blue indicate upregulated and downregulated miRNAs

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Principal component analysis of miRNA composition in (A) plasma, showing variation between diets and cows, and in (B) leucocytes, showing variation between diets and cows: blue; forage diet, orange; high-grain diet (65% grain)

Full size image

Within blood leucocytes, PC1 explains 65% of variation and clearly distinguishes the animals, and PC2 separates the diets with a 15% variance (Fig. 5b). Three of the most up-regulated differentially expressed miRNAs between the diets were chosen for target prediction (Table 3).

Table 3 Target prediction [54] of differentially expressed circulating miRNAs
Full size table

Identification of potential candidate biomarkers

Due to the strong effect of diet on the miRNA expression profile in plasma and since plasma is a relatively easily available sample matrix, we further focused on miRNAs expressed in plasma to identify potential candidate biomarkers of SARA in our cow model. To validate the NGS data, small RNA RT-qPCR assays were established and performed for the most promising biomarker candidates. We carefully selected 6 miRNAs (bta-miR-2285u, bta-miR-30b-3p, bta-miR-12034, bta-miR-11982, bta-miR-1306, and bta-miR-1388-5p) (Table 4) for further in-depth analyses, based on the total read counts of the filtered miRNAs present in all the cows fed a HG diet (and not expressed in the FD) (n = 63), as well as the differentially expressed miRNAs (n = 12) in plasma samples. References to previous literature, as well as the functions annotation on miRBase 22 (www.mirbase.org [26]) were also considered for the selection of potential candidate biomarkers (Table 4). To further understand the biological functions of the selected miRNAs for further validation, we carried out the target predictions of the upregulated miRNAs in plasma. To monitor the expression of the potential candidate biomarkers for a longer period we included a third time point from the same cows, when cows were fed the HG diets for three weeks (HG3). To complete the picture, we measured those selected miRNAs based on its expression pattern in plasma samples, also in leucocyte samples by small RNA RT-qPCR.

Table 4 Selected potential candidate biomarkers
Full size table

MicroRNA bta-miR-2285u had a higher relative expression when cows were fed FD (P = 0.04), while the relative expression was reduced as the cows transitioned to HG feeding throughout the weeks (Fig. 6a). On the contrary, in leucocytes the relative expression of bta-miR-2285u increased in HG3, and differential expression was visible (Fig. 7a). When compared to forage feeding, microRNA bta-miR-30b-3p had a higher expression in the first week of high-grain feeding (HG1) (P = 0.10) in plasma, which is in line with our NGS data results (Fig. 6b). In leucocytes, miR-30b-3p recorded a relatively higher expression in forage-based feeding in comparison to plasma (Fig. 7b). Bta-miR-12034 (Figs. 6c and 7c) only showed a tendency for differential expression between HG1 and HG3 (P = 0.10). For miR-11982 (Fig. 6d), we identified a tendency for higher expression in HG3 with (P = 0.09) (Fig. 7d). Bta-miR-1306 (Fig. 6e) had a relative high expression in forage-based feeding, with a greater expression in HG1 (P = 0.03). The expression of miR-1306 was higher in forage-based feeding than in HG feeding (Fig. 7e). Bta-miR-1388-5p (Fig. 6f) had no significant differential expression, but a tendency towards lower expression with HG feeding and in leucocytes (P = 0.10) (Fig. 7f). Bta-miR-1388-5p had a higher expression after HG3 (3 weeks of high grain feeding).

Fig. 6
figure 6

RT-qPCR validation of selected miRNAs as potential biomarker candidates in plasma. The miRNAs were selected based on NGS results (A) miR-2285u for high read counts, (B) miR-30b-3p for high expression with HG, (C) miR-12034 for up-regulation with HG, (D) miR-11982 for for high read counts, (E) miR-1306 for down-regulation with HG, (F) miR-1388-5p for up-regulation with HG. MiR-103 and miR-107 were used as internal standard for normalization. HG1 = First week of high-grain feeding, HG3 = Third week of high-grain feeding

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

RT-qPCR validation of selected miRNAs as potential candidate biomarkers in leucocytes. Targets were selected based on their expression in plasma and are the same as in Fig. 6. MiR-103 and miR-107 were used as internal standard for normalization of all expression levels. HG1 = First week of high-grain feeding, HG3 = Third week of high-grain feeding

Full size image

To further understand the significance of our results in plasma, we compared the expression profile of miRNAs in plasma to the expression profile of miRNAs in rumen papillae from the same cows, which were sampled for a companion paper [40]. In total, we identified 673 miRNAs in papillae and 520 miRNAs in plasma. There were 487 miRNAs shared between rumen papillae and blood plasma, accounting for 69% of all miRNAs. 186 miRNAs were found to be expressed only in papillae, while 33 miRNAs were found to be expressed exclusively in plasma (Fig. 8). The top 25 miRNAs were shared in blood plasma and rumen papillae. MiR-21-5p, miR-27b, let-7f, and let-7a-5p were among the top ten most expressed miRNAs in our list (Table1).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Venn diagram of miRNAs in papillae and plasma. 86 miRNAs were exclusively expressed in papillae while 33 miRNAs were exclusively expressed in plasma and a total of 487 miRNAs were shared between papillae and plasma

Full size image

The miRNAs miR-2285u, miR-30b-3p, miR-12034, miR-11982, and miR-1306 that were chosen for in-depth analysis in plasma were also found to be expressed in papillae.

Discussion

SARA has been investigated extensively in cattle, but viable systemic biomarkers have yet to be discovered. In our study, SARA was experimentally induced by feeding a HG diet. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic identification of miRNA profiles within blood (plasma and leucocytes), with the goal of evaluating them as possible candidate biomarkers in cows exposed to SARA.

The SARA is typically considered a metabolic disorder occurring within the rumen. This condition induces changes in the rumen microbiota and epithelium, increasing the leakage of microbial-derived toxins into the systemic circulation which in turn induce systemic inflammation, mainly via TLR-4/CD14-pathway [60]. The rumen epithelium is recognized to have a significant role in both metabolism and uptake of digested nutrients that are transported to peripheral tissues through the blood. Some evidence suggests that the process involves in impairment of the rumen epithelium's barrier function as a result of high luminal osmolality, which can result in swelling and rupture of ruminal papillae after feeding HG based diets, despite the lack of a complete understanding of the mechanisms behind endotoxin translocation through stratified squamous epithelium [25]. Pathogens and dietary constraints both have the ability to impact the amount of intestinal endotoxins, hence endotoxin translocation via the gut is likely present. These challenges could lead to a considerable rise in intestinal endotoxin burden, which is already known to occur in ruminants during sub-acute ruminal acidosis [41]. Subacute ruminal acidosis has been linked to local inflammation events, and it is possible that local inflammation might open the way for larger dietary or microbe-derived molecules to freely diffuse through disrupted epithelial junctions of the rumen epithelium [37]. As a result, it's possible that the activation of an inflammatory cascade in the rumen epithelium during SARA leads to functional and structural changes like endocytosis of cell junctional proteins, epithelial apoptosis, and activation of myosin light chain kinase phosphorylation, which can lead to cytoskeletal contractions and increased permeability, as seen in inflamed intestinal tissues [60].

In our pilot study, when cows were fed a HG diet, there were more circulating miRNAs, with 63 miRNAs exclusively expressed with the HG diet. The HG diet had a considerable influence (P = 0.04) on miR-2285u expression (Fig. 6a). MiRNA bta-miR-2285 variants could be employed as a candidate biomarker for rumen health in cattle. Sun and colleagues discovered six rumen-specific miRNAs in their research: bta-miR-2285 s, bta-miR-6527, bta-miR-1434-3p, bta-miR-2387, bta-miR-2344, and bta-miR-615 [51]. They also labelled the bta-miR-2285 mutation as rumen-related, suggesting that the miRNAs discovered in this study could be potentially used as biomarker. With 6100 targeted transcripts, bta-miR-2285u was also recognized as an excellent candidate to serve as biomarker for SARA from our list of prospective candidate biomarkers. In our cow model, we observed 23 mutations of bta-miR-2285 in blood plasma, 60 mutations of bta-miR-2285 in leucocytes and 47 mutations of bta-miR-2285 in rumen papillae samples. We discovered that the miRNAs selected for further investigation were also found in papillae, implying that they could be secreted into the bloodstream from the ruminal epithelium. Circulating miRNAs could be released from cells into the blood or any other body fluid in either an active (secretion) or passive (membrane leaking) way [9, 28, 30]. A great deal of interest generated by circulating miRNAs relates to their involvement in the regulation of molecular pathways of recipient cells and their exceptional potential as easily accessible biomarkers of diseases and disorders [48]. MiR-2285 was found to be highly expressed in HG3, suggesting an association with SARA and therefore with stressful conditions for the rumen. This result is consistent with our companion paper, which showed that our model was effective in inducing SARA where the cows experienced severe SARA, as indicated by increased in time spent with a pH below 5.8 [45].

Muroya and colleagues showed that grazing on pasture affected the plasma miRNAs compared to grain-feeding in Japanese black cattle. In particular, they found bta-miR-30b-5p to be highly expressed in plasma of cattle given a high-grain diet as compared to grazing cattle [39]. We identified bta-miR-30b-3p (Fig. 6b) with a higher relative expression in high grain diet than in the forage-based diet, both via NGS and small RNA RT-qPCR. Therefore, we believe that bta-miR-30b-3p could be linked to high grain feeding and subsequently to SARA. Hence, bta-miR-30b-3p is an incredibly viable candidate to serve as a candidate biomarker for rumen health in cows at risk of developing SARA. It targets 4313 transcripts which implies that miR-30b-3p plays a crucial role in post-transcriptional regulation. There are several immune related genes targeted, such as CD28, which has 4 different suggested seed regions. CD28 is a T-cell co-receptor which leads to IL-6 production. Another target of miR-30b-3p is CD160, which is targeted by 3 sites. CD160 is a glycoprotein which is expressed on peripheral blood NK cells and CD8 T -lymphocytes with cytolytic effector activity (Table 3) [54]. Immunoglobulin superfamily member 6 (IGSF6), molecule like family member G (CD300LG), and sialomucin core protein 24 (CD164) were all linked to genes involved in immune response and had seed regions of 1, 2, 2, respectively. CD164 encodes transmembrane sialomucin and cell adhesion molecule that regulates the proliferation, adhesion, and migration of hematopoietic progenitor cells. The encoded protein affects muscle organ development by interacting with the C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 [5]. Summarizing our findings, we believe that the expression of bta-miR-30b-3p in plasma could be linked to the metabolic state of the cows.

In our study, also miR-1388-5p was identified among the list of the 12 differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs in plasma for forage against HG diets with a read count of 595 and therefore was further analysed. In a previous study by Wang and colleagues, miR-1388-5p was identified as one of the 25 core differentially expressed miRNAs in relation to the formation of the mammary gland development and the differentiation of epithelial cell terminals during lactation compared to non-lactation [57]. With two separate seed areas, bta-miR-1388-5p targets 2715 transcript with diverse immune related genes targeted, such as CD84, which contributes to the adaptive immune response. With seed regions of 1 each, CD86 and CD300LB are also involved in adaptive immune response (Table 3) [54]. Therefore, miR-1388-5p was also considered as a potential candidate biomarker of SARA but could not be confirmed by small RNA RT-qPCR. Bta-miR-11982 (Fig. 6d) shows a lower expression during the forage feeding with a lower expression after HG3. Bta-miR-11982 (Fig. 7d) indicates a higher expression in HG3 diets with a p-value of 0.088. We were unable to confirm a regulation of bta-miR-12034 using RT-qPCR after feeding high-grain diets (Figs. 6c and 7c).

In a previous study of our group, we examined the effects of a high-grain diet on miRNA and mRNA expression of ruminal epithelial tissue [40]. We discovered miR-21-5p, miR-27b, let-7a-5p, let-7f, and miR-205 in the rumen papillae of cows, which were also found in the blood of cows in a previous study [23]. This is in line with the findings of the current study, in which we found that bta-miR-21-5p, bta-let-7f, and bta-let-7a-5p, as well as bta-miR-143 and bta-miR-26a, were among the 25 most expressed miRNAs in both plasma and papillae. Although they showed high read counts in plasma, they were not DE between forage and high-grain, therefore we did not analyse them further to determine their suitability as candidate biomarkers. These highly abundant miRNAs found in rumen papillae, plasma, and leucocytes in both feeding regimes in our study have previously been linked to immunity and environmental stress sensing in cows, bovine skeletal muscle development, connective tissue cell differentiation, and glucose and lipid metabolism regulation in mice, demonstrating their biological relevance in tissue development and immunity [19, 32, 38, 62].

In cattle, Ioannidis and Donadeu looked for possible biomarkers of tissue-function in plasma and blood cells and discovered 5 miRNAs (miR-486, miR-142-5p, miR-191, miR-92a, and miR-30e-5p) that are shared between plasma and blood cells [23]. Bovine miR-486, miR-92a, and miR-143 were also identified in our study from the list of the most expressed and shared miRNAs in plasma and leucocytes. Although, we found in our study that the top three most represented miRNAs, miR-451, miR-21-5p, and hsa-miR-451a, were the same in both plasma and leucocytes. During forage-based feeding, read counts were often low, however, some cows in our study on the FD had a higher read count than the rest. This could be related to the cows' specific genetic variations. Limitations of our pilot study are the relatively small sample size of four animals per analysed group. Therefore, there is the need for more research in affected cow herds to demonstrate that the expression of these miRNAs is constantly associated to cows that are suffering from SARA.

Conclusion

The results of our pilot study demonstrate that dietary modifications affect the release and expression of miRNAs in systemic circulation, potentially influencing post-transcriptional gene expression in SARA-affected cows. MicroRNA bta-miR-30-3p was identified and selected to be a top candidate to serve as a biomarker for SARA.. Additionally, the mutation of bta-miR-2285 were also differentially expressed between the forage based diet and the SARA inducing high-grain diet, suggesting that they could be candidate biomarker for rumen health. Therefore, microRNAs bta-miR-30b-3p and bta-miR-2285u appear to be promising candidates and should be investigated further.

Methods

Cows and diet-induced SARA model

The cows used in this research are a subset from a larger experiment conducted at the research and training farm of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria and published by Rivera-Chacon et al. [45]. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics and Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna and the Austrian national authority according to the law for animal experiments (protocol number: BMNWF-68.205/0003-V/3b/2019) and conducted in compliance with ARRIVE guidelines. In brief, we used four ruminal-cannulated non-lactating Holstein cows (average age of 11.30 ± 2.29 years, body weight of 909.75 ± 98.17 kg). Cows were fed first a diet of 100% forage and were transitioned after one week of adaptation to a 65% high-grain (HG) diet to induce SARA. Details of the diet composition and feeding protocol are given in [45]. The presence of SARA was confirmed using a ruminal pH threshold of 5.8 for an average duration of 320 min/d [59], whereby the ruminal pH was monitored every 15 min via Lethbridge Research Centre Ruminal pH Measurement System (LRCpH,Dascor Inc., CA, USA) [45]. After the study, cows were released on pasture at the research and training farm of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna.

Blood sampling

Blood samples were collected in EDTA-coated tubes (Becton Dickinson, USA) from the jugular vein before the morning meal. To examine miRNA expression profiles, blood samples were obtained and analysed during forage feeding and at week one of the HG feeding (HG1). For validation of NGS results and further analysis additional blood samples from the same cows were obtained at week three of HG feeding (HG3).

Blood samples were centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C to obtain 3 layers: pellet, buffy coat, and plasma. The buffy coat was utilized to evaluate cellular miRNA expression in leucocytes. To obtain cell-free plasma, the supernatant (plasma) was centrifuged a second time at 800 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The cell-free plasma was employed to analyse free circulating miRNAs. All samples were stored at -80 °C until further processing.

Total RNA Isolation

Total RNA from 400 µl plasma sample was extracted using NucleoSpin Plasma miRNA Kit (Macherey–Nagel, Germany) following the manufacturer´s protocol for isolation of small and large RNAs. Total RNA from leucocyte pellets was conducted using NucleoSpin miRNA kit from Macherey–Nagel taking 200 µl of each pellet sample as starting material. The RNA was eluted using 50 µl of RNase-free water. All samples were frozen and stored at -80 °C. Quality control was performed using a chip for small RNAs (Agilent, California, USA) in a Bioanalyzer instrument (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, California, USA). The RNA concentration and wavelength peak were determined using a DeNovix spectrometer.

Small RNA sequencing

The NEXTflex Small RNA-Seq Kit (Bioo Scientific) was used to prepare small RNA libraries from each matrix, which were then sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 utilizing a 50-base single-end sequencing method by CeGaT GmbH (Tübingen). Illumina bcl2fastq (2.20) was used to demultiplex the sequencing reads, and Skewer was used to trim the adapters (version 0.2.2). Demultiplexed reads were analysed using sRNAbench [1] and reads with an average PHRED score below 20 were discarded. To identify bovine (bta) miRNAs and human (hsa) miRNA homologues, the analysis was run in genome mode with the cow genome (UMD3 1 mp) and miRBase 22 as a reference. Reads below 15 nucleotides were discarded before mapping and were not included in further analyses. Bowtie was used to map sequence reads against the miRNA library allowing two nucleotide mismatches. Data on raw sequencing can be found in the GEO database (GSE198854).

Differential expression analysis of miRNAs and predictions of DEmiRNAs Target

Differential expression of miRNAs were calculated with DESeq2 [36] (version 1.30.1), using the model: Y = cow + diet. The DE miRNAs and genes were identified using the Wald test and by computing the appropriate contrasts. Differences in expression were considered significant at a Benjamini and Hochberg [2] corrected P ˂ 0.05. Differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs were defined as microRNAs with an adjusted p ≤ 0.05 and a |log2 (fold change) |≥ 1. TargetScan [53] and miRBase [13] were used to predict DE miRNA target genes based on miRNA sequences.

The heatmaps with hierarchical clustering were created using ggplot [58] in R [43], based on normalized counts of miRNAs from DESeq2 [36] (version 1.30.1), and the principal component analysis (PCA) plot was likewise visualized and adjusted using DESEq2 [36] (version 1.30.1) and ggplot [58] packages.

Quantification of selected miRNAs by RT-qPCR

Quantification of selected DE miRNA was done by a poly-A-technique according to the manufacturer’s protocol (miRNA 1st-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, Agilent Technologies). Therefore, 112 ng of total RNA was polyadenylated for 30 min at 37 °C using the 5 × Poly A Polymerase buffer, 10 mM of rATP and E.coli Polymerase A (2U/µL) and then terminated by 95 °C for 5 min in a total volume of 10 µL. In a second step, 10 µL of the elongated miRNA was reverse transcribed using the 10 × AffinityScript RT buffer, 10 µM of RT Adapter primer, 100 mM of dNTP mix and the AffinityScript RT/RNAse block enzyme mixture in a 20 µL volume. After incubation for 5 min at 55 °C and 15 min at 25 °C, reverse transcription (RT) was carried out at 42 °C for 30 min. Heating step at 95 °C for 5 min led to the inactivation of RT. Following reverse transcription, RT-qPCR was performed on a ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) with three technical replicates per sample using 6.25 µL of 2 × miRNA QPCR Master Mix (Agilent Technologies), 0.5 µL of Universal Reverse Primer (3.125 µM, Agilent Technologies), 0.5 µL of specific small RNA primers (3.125 µM) and 3.5 ng of template in a total volume of 12.5 µL. Small RNA primers for the RT-qPCR were designed based on the sequence information from miRBase (Table 5). The amplification program consisted of the initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, primer annealing at the optimal temperature for each specific primer (Table 5), and elongation at 72 °C for 30 s. Melting curve analysis was carried out for the specificity of the PCR amplification. Each qPCR assay was performed using negative template control and RT minus controls. MiR-103 (5’-AGCAGCATTGTACAGGGCTATGA-3’) and miR-107 (5’-CAAAGTGCTTACAGTGCAGGTAG-3’) served as reference miRNAs [55]. Their stable expression in bovine plasma and blood leukocytes were checked. Relative expression was calculated by the ΔΔCT-method [35] and has been described in detail, previously [27]. In short, different RNA content of the individual samples was corrected by the geometric mean of the CT values from the reference miRNAs (ΔCT). The miRNA expression was calculated relative to the individual values per each cow on the forage-based diet as baseline feeding (ΔΔCT). The results are shown as mean of the relative expression 2−ddCT. Overall effects were checked by ANOVA in R. Group differences were calculated by a Kruskal–Wallis test and were considered significant with P < 0.05.

Table 5 Selected miRNA primers for qPCR
Full size table

Availability of data and materials

This published manuscript, its additional information files, and publicly accessible repositories contain all data created or analysed during this investigation. The raw fastq files of the sequence data were submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository under the accession number GSE198854.

Abbreviations

3’-UTR:

3’ Untranslated region

bp:

Base pairs

Ca:

Calcium

Cl:

Chloride

Ct:

Cycle threshold

DMI:

Dry matter intake

FD:

Forage based diet

HG:

High grain diet

K:

Potassium

LBP:

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

miRNAs:

MicroRNAs

Na:

Sodium

PCA:

Principal component analysis

rpm:

Reads per million

SARA:

Subacute rumen acidosis

SCFA :

Short chain fatty acids

References

  1. Aparicio-Puerta E, Lebrón R, Rueda A, Gómez-Martín C, Giannoukakos S, Jaspez D, Medina JM, Zubkovic A, Jurak I, Fromm B, Marchal JA, Oliver J, Hackenberg M. sRNAbench and sRNAtoolbox 2019: Intuitive fast small RNA profiling and differential expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W530–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57(1):289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Capra E, Turri F, Lazzari B, Cremonesi P, Gliozzi TM, Fojadelli I, Pizzi F. Small RNA sequencing of cryopreserved semen from single bull revealed altered miRNAs and piRNAs expression between High- and Low-motile sperm populations. BMC Genom. 2017;18(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3394-7.

  4. Catalanotto C, Cogoni C, Zardo G. MicroRNA in control of gene expression: an overview of nuclear functions. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(10):1712. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17101712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. CD164 CD164 molecule—NIH Genetic Testing Registry (GTR)—NCBI. (n.d.). Retrieved 27 June 2022, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/genes/8763/.

  6. Chen T, Xi QY, Ye RS, Cheng X, Qi QE, Wang SB, et al. Exploration of microRNAs in porcine milk exosomes. BMC Genom. 2014;15:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-100.

  7. Danscher AM, Li S, Andersen PH, Khafipour E, Kristensen NB, Plaizier JC. Indicators of induced subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) in Danish Holstein cows. Acta Vet Scand. 2015;57(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0128-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dong H, Gao Q, Peng X, Sun Y, Han T, Zhao B, et al. Circulating MicroRNAs As Potential Biomarkers for Veterinary Infectious Diseases. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00186.

  9. Erdos Z, Barnum JE, Wang E, DeMaula C, Dey PM, Forest T, Bailey WJ, Glaab WE. Evaluation of the Relative Performance of Pancreas-Specific MicroRNAs in Rat Plasma as Biomarkers of Pancreas Injury. Toxicol Sci. 2020;173(1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfz184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang L, Sørensen P, Sahana G, Panitz F, Su G, Zhang S, Thomsen B. MicroRNA-guided prioritization of genome-wide association signals reveals the importance of microRNA-target gene networks for complex traits in cattle. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27729-y.

  11. Farrell D, Shaughnessy RG, Britton L, MacHugh DE, Markey B, Gordon SV. The Identification of Circulating MiRNA in Bovine Serum and Their Potential as Novel Biomarkers of Early Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis Infection. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0134310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferreira AM, Bislev SL, Bendixen E, Almeida AM. The mammary gland in domestic ruminants: a systems biology perspective. J Proteomics. 2013;94:110–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2013.09.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: MicroRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(90001):D140–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guan J, Long K, Ma J, Zhang J, He D, Jin L, Luo X. Comparative analysis of the microRNA transcriptome between yak and cattle provides insight into high-altitude adaptation. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3959. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3959.

  15. Hansen EP, Kringel H, Thamsborg SM, Jex A, Nejsum P. Corrigendum to ‘Profiling circulating miRNAs in serum from pigs infected with the porcine whipworm, Trichuris suis’ [Vet. Parasitol. 223 (2016) 30-33]. Vet Parasitol. 2018;249:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hare KS, Leal LN, Romao JM, Hooiveld GJ, Soberon F, Berends H, Van Amburgh ME, Martín-Tereso J, Steele MA. Preweaning nutrient supply alters mammary gland transcriptome expression relating to morphology, lipid accumulation, DNA synthesis, and RNA expression in Holstein heifer calves. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(3):2618–30. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hou J, An X, Song Y, Cao B, Yang H, Zhang Z, Shen W, Li Y. Detection and comparison of microRNAs in the caprine mammary gland tissues of colostrum and common milk stages. BMC Genet. 2017;18(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-017-0498-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang Y, Cheng JH, Luo FN, Pan H, Sun XJ, Diao LY, Qin XJ. Genome-wide identification and characterization of microRNA genes and their targets in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Gene. 2016;576(1 Pt 2):261–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2015.10.044.

  19. Hu X, Xing Y, Ren L, Wang Y, Li Q, Fu X, Yang Q, Xu L, Willems L, Li J, Zhang L. Bta-miR-24-3p Controls the Myogenic Differentiation and Proliferation of Fetal Bovine Skeletal Muscle-Derived Progenitor Cells by Targeting ACVR1B. Animals. 2019;9(11):859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Li R, Dudemaine P-L, Do DN, Bissonnette N. Transcriptome Analysis of Long Non-Coding RNA in the Bovine Mammary Gland Following Dietary Supplementation with Linseed Oil and Safflower Oil. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ioannidis J, Donadeu FX. Circulating miRNA signatures of early pregnancy in cattle. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2529-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ioannidis J, Donadeu FX. Circulating microRNA Profiles during the Bovine Oestrous Cycle. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0158160. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ioannidis J, Donadeu FX. Comprehensive analysis of blood cells and plasma identifies tissue-specific miRNAs as potential novel circulating biomarkers in cattle. BMC Genomics. 2018;19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4646-5

  24. Jin W, Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Liang G, Beaudoin F, Zhao X, Guan LL. Transcriptome microRNA profiling of bovine mammary epithelial cells challenged with Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus bacteria reveals pathogen directed microRNA expression profiles. BMC Genom. 2014;15:181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-181.

  25. Kleen JL, Hooijer GA, Rehage J, Noordhuizen JPTM. Subacute Ruminal Acidosis (SARA): a review. J Vet Med Ser A. 2003;50(8):406–14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0442.2003.00569.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: Annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(D1):D68–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kreuzer S, Rieger J, Strucken EM, Thaben N, Hünigen H, Nöckler K, Janczyk P, Plendl J, Brockmann GA. Characterization of CD4+ subpopulations and CD25+ cells in ileal lymphatic tissue of weaned piglets infected with Salmonella Typhimurium with or without Enterococus faecium feeding. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2014;158(3–4):143–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.01.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laterza OF, Lim L, Garrett-Engele PW, Vlasakova K, Muniappa N, Tanaka WK, Johnson JM, Sina JF, Fare TL, Sistare FD, Glaab WE. Plasma MicroRNAs as sensitive and specific biomarkers of tissue injury. Clin Chem. 2009;55(11):1977–83. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2009.131797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lawless N, Foroushani ABK, McCabe MS, O’Farrelly C, Lynn DJ. Next generation sequencing reveals the expression of a unique miRNA profile in response to a gram-positive bacterial infection. PloS One. 2013;8(3):e57543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057543.

  30. Lecchi C, Zamarian V, Gini C, Avanzini C, Polloni A, Rota Nodari S, Ceciliani F. Salivary microRNAs are potential biomarkers for the accurate and precise identification of inflammatory response after tail docking and castration in piglets. J Anim Sci. 2020;98(5):skaa153. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75(5):843–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-Y.

  32. Liang G, Malmuthuge N, McFadden TB, Bao H, Griebel PJ, Stothard P, Guan LL. Potential Regulatory Role of MicroRNAs in the Development of Bovine Gastrointestinal Tract during Early Life. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e92592. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Li R, Beaudoin F, Ammah AA, Bissonnette N, Benchaar C, Zhao X, Ibeagha-Awemu EM. Deep sequencing shows microRNA involvement in bovine mammary gland adaptation to diets supplemented with linseed oil or safflower oil. BMC Genom. 2015;16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1965-7.

  34. Li R, Dudemaine PL, Zhao X, Lei C, Ibeagha-Awemu EM. Comparative Analysis of the miRNome of Bovine Milk Fat, Whey and Cells. PloS One. 2016;11(4):e0154129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154129.

  35. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods (San Diego, Calif). 2001;25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ménard S, Cerf-Bensussan N, Heyman M. Multiple facets of intestinal permeability and epithelial handling of dietary antigens. Mucosal Immunol. 2010;3(3):247–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2010.5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Miretti S, Lecchi C, Ceciliani F, Baratta M. MicroRNAs as Biomarkers for Animal Health and Welfare in Livestock. Front Vet Sci 2020;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.578193.

  39. Muroya S, Shibata M, Hayashi M, Oe M, Ojima K. Differences in Circulating microRNAs between Grazing and Grain-Fed Wagyu Cattle Are Associated with Altered Expression of Intramuscular microRNA, the Potential Target PTEN, and Lipogenic Genes. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162496. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pacífico C, Ricci S, Sajovitz F, Castillo-Lopez E, Rivera-Chacon R, Petri RM, Zebeli Q, Reisinger N, Kreuzer-Redmer S. Bovine rumen epithelial miRNA-mRNA dynamics reveals post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression upon transition to high-grain feeding and phytogenic supplementation. Genomics. 2022;114(3):110333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Plaizier JC, Khafipour E, Li S, Gozho GN, Krause DO. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA), endotoxins and health consequences. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012;172(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Gozho GN, McBride BW. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: The physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Vet J (London, England: 1997). 2008;176(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. R Core Team (2020). —European Environment Agency. (n.d.). [Methodology Reference]. Retrieved 21 December 2021, from https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers/r-development-core-team-2006.

  44. Raza SHA, Kaster N, Khan R, Abdelnour SA, El-Hack MEA, Khafaga AF, Taha A, Ohran H, Swelum AA, Schreurs NM, Zan L. The Role of MicroRNAs in Muscle Tissue Development in Beef Cattle. Genes. 2020;11(3):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rivera-Chacon R, Castillo-Lopez E, Ricci S, Petri RM, Reisinger N, Zebeli Q. Supplementing a phytogenic feed additive modulates the risk of subacute rumen acidosis, rumen fermentation and systemic inflammation in cattle fed acidogenic diets. Animals. 2022;12(9):1201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Romao JM, Jin W, He M, McAllister T, Guan LL. MicroRNAs in bovine adipogenesis: genomic context, expression and function. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:137. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Salilew-Wondim D, Ahmad I, Gebremedhn S, Sahadevan S, Hossain MDM, Rings F, Tesfaye D. The expression pattern of microRNAs in granulosa cells of subordinate and dominant follicles during the early luteal phase of the bovine estrous cycle. PloS One. 2014;9(9):e106795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106795.

  48. Samir M, Pessler F. Small non-coding RNAs associated with viral infectious diseases of veterinary importance: potential clinical applications. Front Vet Sci. 2016;3:22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Singh P, Golla N, Singh P, Baddela VS, Chand S, Baithalu RK, Singh D, Onteru SK. Salivary miR-16, miR-191 and miR-223: Intuitive indicators of dominant ovarian follicles in buffaloes. Mol Genet Genomics. 2017;292(5):935–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-017-1323-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Strozzi F, Mazza R, Malinverni R, Williams JL. Annotation of 390 bovine miRNA genes by sequence similarity with other species. Anim Genet. 2009;40(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01780.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sun HZ, Chen Y, Guan LL. MicroRNA expression profiles across blood and different tissues in cattle. Scientific Data. 2019;6(1):190013. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2019.13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Sun J, Aswath K, Schroeder SG, Lippolis JD, Reinhardt TA, Sonstegard TS. MicroRNA expression profiles of bovine milk exosomes in response to Staphylococcus aureus infection. BMC Genom. 2015;16:806. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2044-9.

  53. TargetScanHuman 7.2. (n.d.). Retrieved 17 May 2021, from http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/.

  54. TargetScanHuman 8.0. (n.d.). Retrieved 13 December 2021, from http://www.targetscan.org/vert_80/.

  55. Timoneda O, Balcells I, Córdoba S, Castelló A, Sánchez A. Determination of reference microRNAs for relative quantification in porcine tissues. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang D, Liang G, Wang B, Sun H, Liu J, Guan LL. Systematic microRNAome profiling reveals the roles of microRNAs in milk protein metabolism and quality: Insights on low-quality forage utilization. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21194. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21194.

  57. Wang X, Zhang L, Jin J, Xia A, Wang C, Cui Y, Qu B, Li Q, Sheng C. Comparative transcriptome analysis to investigate the potential role of miRNAs in milk protein/fat quality. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24727-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Munich: Springer; 2016. 

  59. Zebeli Q, Dijkstra J, Tafaj M, Steingass H, Ametaj BN, Drochner W. Modeling the adequacy of dietary fiber in dairy cows based on the responses of ruminal pH and milk fat production to composition of the diet. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91(5):2046–66. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zebeli Q, Metzler-Zebeli BU. Interplay between rumen digestive disorders and diet-induced inflammation in dairy cattle. Res Vet Sci. 2012;93(3):1099–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.02.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang BW, Cai HF, Wei XF, Sun JJ, Lan XY, Lei CZ, Chen H. MiR-30-5p Regulates Muscle Differentiation and Alternative Splicing of Muscle-Related Genes by Targeting MBNL. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17020182.

  62. Zhang WR, Zhang HN, Wang YM, Dai Y, Liu XF, Li X, Ding XB, Guo H. MiR-143 regulates proliferation and differentiation of bovine skeletal muscle satellite cells by targeting IGFBP5. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2017;53(3):265–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-016-0109-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the team at the VetFarm (Vetmeduni Vienna) for their help during the experiment. We would like to express our gratitude to, R. M. Petri, T. Enzinger and V. Strasser (Vetmeduni Vienna) for their invaluable assistance.

Funding

This research received funding by Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs and the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development. BIOMIN Holding GmbH, which is part of DSM, supports financially the Christian Doppler Laboratory for Innovative Gut Health Concepts of Livestock. Funding for parts of the project was also received by Österreichische Buiatrischen Gesellschaft (ÖBG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Innovative Gut Health Concepts of Livestock, Institute of Animal Nutrition and Functional Plant Compounds, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    O. E. Ojo, C. Pacífico, A. Sener-Aydemir, S. Ricci, R. Rivera-Chacon, E. Castillo-Lopez, Q. Zebeli & S. Kreuzer-Redmer

  2. Nutrigenomics Unit, Institute of Animal Nutrition and Functional Plant Compounds, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    O. E. Ojo, L. Hajek, S. Johanns & S. Kreuzer-Redmer

  3. Biome Diagnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria

    C. Pacífico

  4. DSM, BIOMIN Research Center, Tulln an Der Donau, Austria

    N. Reisinger

Authors
  1. O. E. Ojo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Hajek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Johanns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Pacífico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Sener-Aydemir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Ricci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Rivera-Chacon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Castillo-Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. N. Reisinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Q. Zebeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. S. Kreuzer-Redmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Funding acquisition: NR, QZ. Project administration: QZ. Conceptualization and study design: SKR, NR, QZ. Animal feeding, care, and sampling: SR, RR-C and ECL. Sample preparation: AS-A, SJ, and SK-R. Lab analysis: LH, SJ and AS-A. Data analysis and interpretation: OEO, LH, SJ, CP, SR, and SK-R. Original drafting of the manuscript: OEO and SK-R. Revising the manuscript critically for intellectual content: all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kreuzer-Redmer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to 26 of the Law for Animal Experiments, Tierversuchsgesetz 2012-TVG (protocol number: BMBWF-68.205/0033-V/3b/2019), all treatments and handlings of animals in this experiment were approved by national authorities as well as the Ethics Committee of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The research was funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Digital and Economic Affairs, the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development, and BIOMIN Holding GmbH, which is part of DSM, with the help of the Christian Doppler Laboratory for Innovative Livestock Gut Health Concepts. BIOMIN GmbH, which is part of DSM, manufactures and trades feed additives, employs NR. This had no bearing on how the results were presented or interpreted.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1

. 25 Differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs in leucocytes (FDR < 0.05).

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 2

. 63 miRNAs expressed in every cow fed a high grain diet but not in each cow on a forage-based diet are listed below, along with their read counts (rpm) in plasma.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 3

. 34 miRNAs expressed in every cow fed a high grain diet but not in each cow on a forage-based diet are listed below, along with their read counts (rpm) in leucocytes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ojo, O.E., Hajek, L., Johanns, S. et al. Evaluation of circulating microRNA profiles in blood as potential candidate biomarkers in a subacute ruminal acidosis cow model - a pilot study. BMC Genomics 24, 333 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09433-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09433-y

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us