Skip to main content
Download PDF

Regulation of cashmere fineness traits by noncoding RNA in Jiangnan cashmere goats

BMC Genomics volume 24, Article number: 604 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cashmere has long been used as the raw material for wool textiles. The diameter of the cashmere fibre determines its quality and economic value. However, the regulatory role of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) in cashmere fineness remains unclear, especially regarding the interaction between ncRNAs and coding RNAs.

Results

Transcriptome sequencing was used to identify the expression profiles of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) in the skin tissues of Jiangnan cashmere goats with different cashmere fineness levels. Integration analysis of ncRNA and coding RNA was performed in combination with previous research results. The results showed that 16,437 lncRNAs, 2234 circRNAs, and 1322 miRNAs were identified in 8 skin samples of cashmere goats. A total of 403 differentially expressed (DE) lncRNAs, 62 DE circRNAs and 30 DE miRNAs were identified in the skin tissues of the fine groups (Fe) and coarse groups (Ce). We predicted the target gene of DE lncRNA, the target gene of DE miRNA and the host gene of DE circRNA. Based on functional annotation and enrichment analysis of target genes, we found that DE lncRNAs could be involved in regulating the fineness traits of cashmere. The most potential lncRNAs were MSTRG.42054.1, MSTRG.18602.3, and MSTRG.2199.13.

Conclusions

The data from this study enriched the cashmere goat noncoding RNA database and helped to supplement the annotation of the goat genome. The results provided a new direction for the breeding of cashmere characters.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cashmere goats have two types of hair follicles in their skin. One is the primary hair follicle, which grows wool. The other is the secondary hair follicles, which produces cashmere that are high-quality natural textile materials. According to the textile processing method and the preferences of consumers, finer cashmere of the same colour has a higher price. In addition to the ecological environment and breeding management, the regulation of cashmere traits is mainly influenced by genetic factors. Therefore, it is important to find the key genes that influence the diameter of cashmere. Based on our previous work, the RNA expression levels of skin samples of cashmere with different fineness levels from Jiangnan cashmere goats [1] and Tibetan cashmere goats [2] were analysed by transcriptome sequencing technology. A number of candidate genes related to cashmere traits were screened, including FA2H, SOX18, SOX4, WNT5A, NOTCH2, NOTCH3, KRT26, KRT28, and KRT39. Similar studies have also been carried out on Liaoning cashmere goats and Inner Mongolian cashmere goats [3,4,5]. All these studies provided valuable genetic resources for cashmere goat genetic breeding and reproduction. It is generally believed that proteins are the final product of genetic information and are responsible gene functions. In fact, less than 2% of genes encode proteins, and the remaining noncoding transcripts are collectively referred to as ncRNA [6, 7]. With the development of science and technology, more studies have suggested that ncRNA is involved in physiological and developmental processes and the expression regulation of related genes in different ways [8, 9].

LncRNAs are noncoding RNA molecules with a length of more than 200 bp and a conserved secondary structure [10, 11]. LncRNAs regulate gene expression through various interaction mechanisms, such as cell cycle regulation, splicing regulation, gene imprinting, mRNA degradation and translation regulation [12]. MiRNA is a kind of noncoding single-stranded small molecule RNA with a length of 19–25 nt. MiRNA is produced by Dicer enzyme processing of a 70 nt single-stranded RNA precursor with a hairpin structure [13]. Similar to small interfering RNAs, miRNAs play an important regulatory role by specifically binding to target gene binding sites, inhibiting target gene translation or degrading target mRNA [14]. At present, in addition to lncRNAs and miRNAs, circRNAs have also attracted the attention of many scholars. CircRNA is a noncoding RNA with a covalent bond forming a ring structure [13]. More studies are needed on the biogenesis and characteristics of circRNAs to reveal the potential role of circRNAs in key processes in the organisms.

Currently, many studies have indicated that ncRNAs can participate in the regulation of hair growth in mammals. An earlier study showed that miR-125b was expressed in large quantities in skin stem cells, and the epidermis of transgenic mice overexpressing miR-125b became thicker, the sebaceous glands became larger, and the mice could not form a coat [15]. Other studies have shown that miR-200b and miR-196a are involved in controlling the development of mouse hair follicles through potential target genes in the WNT signalling pathway [16]. In several critical periods of sheep and goat fetuses, some lncRNAs, miRNAs and circRNAs showed significantly different expression trends, suggesting that they were involved in the regulation of hair growth and follicle development [17,18,19]. At present, ncRNA has also been studied in the regulation of hair follicle development and cashmere growth in several cashmere goat breeds, including Liaoning cashmere goat, Inner Mongolian cashmere goat and Shanbei white cashmere goat [5, 20,21,22]. However, the regulatory mechanism of ncRNA is complex. Analysis of ncRNAs combined with coding RNA and verification in different species will help clarify the regulatory mechanism of ncRNAs. In this study, we detected the expression of ncRNA in the skin samples of cashmere with different fineness levels form Jiangnan cashmere goats, and combined the results with those of previous work to explore the regulatory effect of ncRNA on cashmere growth [1]. This study aims to provide valuable genetic resources for the genetic improvement of cashmere goats.

Results

Quality control of high-throughput sequencing date

We sequenced eight chain specific libraries and obtained clean data of 92.68 Gb. The Q30 of each sample was no less than 95.03%. The ratio of clean reads from a single library to the reference genome ranged from 94.19 to 94.86% (Table S1). A total of 122.81 M clean reads were obtained by sequencing 8 small RNA libraries. The clean reads from each library were 12.56 M, and the Q30 was no less than 96.22%. The ratio of clean reads from a single library to the reference genome ranged from 78.68 to 83.76% (Table S2). The above data indicated that the noncoding RNA sequencing data were of high quality and could be used for subsequent analysis.

Analysis of ncRNA expression level

In lncRNA analysis, the intersection of CNCI, CPAT, CPC and Pfam prediction results was used to identify 34,979 noncoding RNAs in 8 samples, including 16,437 lincRNAs, 2146 Antisense-lncRNAs, 15,513 Intronic-lncRNAs, 883 sense_lncRNAs (Fig. S1A-B). A total of 2234 circRNAs were identified in 8 skin tissues. The distribution of circRNA reads on different chromosomes was significantly different (Fig. S1C). CircRNA lengths were mainly concentrated in the range of 400–1200 nt. In addition, most circRNAs were derived from the exon region of the source gene, and only a few were derived from the intergenic region and intron region (Fig. S1D). The above characteristics are consistent with mammalian circRNA characteristics. A total of 1,322 miRNAs were identified from 8 small RNA libraries, including 422 known miRNAs and 900 novel miRNAs.

The boxplot of ncRNA expression distribution is shown in Fig. 1. The FPKM distribution for lncRNAs is shown in Fig. 1A, and the TPM distribution for circRNAs and miRNAs is shown in Fig. 1B, C. The overall expression levels of lncRNAs, circRNAs and miRNAs were low in the skin tissues of 8 Jiangnan cashmere goats. lncRNA expression levels in different samples were concentrated, and the degree of fluctuation was small. The expression levels of circRNA and miRNA fluctuated greatly.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Boxplot of noncoding RNA expression levels. (A) LncRNA. (B) CircRNA. (C) MiRNA. The ordinate represents the log value of the sample expression quantity (FPKM/TPM).

Full size image

Differential expression analysis of ncRNA

When the fold change was ≥ 2 and the P value was ≤ 0.05, 403 DE lncRNAs were identified in skin samples of the Ce groups and Fe groups, among which 219 lncRNAs were upregulated and 184 were downregulated in the Fe group (Fig. 2A, B). Sixty-two DE circRNAs were identified in the samples of the Ce and Fe groups, with 30 circRNAs upregulated and 32 circRNAs downregulated in the Fe group (Fig. 2C, D). Similarly, 30 DE miRNAs were identified in the different groups. The expression of 12 and 8 DE miRNAs was upregulated and downregulated in the Fe group, respectively (Fig. 2E, F).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Volcano plots and heatmaps of DE ncRNAs. (A, B) DE LncRNA analysis. (C, D) DE circRNA analysis. (E, F) DE miRNA analysis

Full size image

Functional annotation of DE lncRNAs

The 12,049 target genes were predicted for 403 DE lncRNAs, with 10,861 target genes predicted in trans, and 1,907 target genes predicted in cis. It is worth noting that 28 genes were predicted in both trans and cis. We performed functional annotation and enrichment analysis of DE lncRNA target genes. The top 10 GO terms and pathways with the highest enrichment were plotted as bubble maps (P < 0.05). Based on GO analysis, in the biological processes (BP) category, target genes were mainly enriched in the positive regulation of collagen biosynthetic process (GO:0032967), branch elongation of an epithelium (GO:1,900,118), and negative regulation of execution phase of apoptosis (GO:0015909) (Fig. 3A). In the classification of cellular component (CC) category, the target genes were mainly enriched in hemoglobin by autolysosome (GO:0044754), hemoglobin by hemoglobin complex (GO:0005833), hemoglobin by hemoglobin by autolysosome (GO:0044754), hemoglobin complex (GO:0005833), and MHC protein complex (GO:0042611) (Fig. 3B). In the molecular function (MF) category, target genes were mainly enriched in efflux transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0015562), pheromone receptor activity (GO:0016503), and thiolester hydrolase activity (GO:0016790) (Fig. 3C). Similarly, KEGG annotation analysis showed that DE lncRNA target genes were mainly enriched in bacterial invasion of epithelial cells (ko05100), pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis (ko00770), and vascular smooth muscle contraction(ko04270) (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Functional annotation of DE lncRNA target genes. (A) Biological process. (B) Cellular component. (C) Molecular function. (D) KEGG pathways

Full size image

Functional annotation of DE circRNA host genes

The 62 DE circRNAs were derived from 61 genes. Based on GO analysis, in the BP category, DE circRNA host genes were mainly enriched in cerebral cortex development (GO:0021987), positive regulation of RNA splicing (GO:0033120), and pigmentation (GO:0043473) (Fig. 4A). In the CC category, host genes were mainly enriched in terminal bouton (GO:0043195), dendrite (GO:0030425), and caveola (GO:0005901) (Fig. 4B). In the MF category, the host genes were mainly enriched in serine-type endopeptidase activity (GO:0004252), RNA binding (GO:0003723), and RNA cap binding (GO:0000339) (Fig. 4C). Similarly, KEGG annotation analysis showed that host genes were mainly enriched in nucleotide excision repair (ko03420), proteoglycans in cancer (ko05205), and alcoholism (ko05034) (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Functional annotation of DE circRNA target genes. (A) Biological process. (B) Cellular component. (C) Molecular function. (D). KEGG pathways

Full size image

Functional annotation of DE miRNAs

The 30 DE miRNAs predicted 3,970 target genes. Based on GO analysis, in the BP category, the target genes were mainly enriched in the protein deubiquitination (GO:0016579), ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process (GO:0006511), and positive regulation of the canonical Wnt signalling pathway (GO:0090263) (Fig. 5A). In the CC category, the target genes were mainly enriched in apical plasma membrane (GO:0016324), receptor complex (GO:0043235), and sarcoplasmic reticulum (GO:0016529) (Fig. 5B). In the MF category, target genes were mainly enriched in thiol-dependent ubiquitinyl hydrolase activity (GO:0036459), calcium ion binding (GO:0005509), and ligand-gated sodium channel activity (GO:0015280) (Fig. 5C). Similarly, KEGG annotation analysis showed that DE miRNA target genes were mainly enriched in inflammatory mediator regulation of TRP channels (ko04750), peroxisome (ko04146), and ECM-receptor interaction (ko04512) (Fig. 5D).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Functional annotation of DE miRNA target genes. (A) Biological process. (B) Cellular component. (C) Molecular function. (D). KEGG pathways

Full size image

Combined analysis of ncRNAs and coding genes

To further understand the role of lncRNA, circRNA and miRNA in hair follicle development and cashmere growth, we conducted a joint analysis of ncRNA and coding RNA. In a previous study, 479 DE mRNAs were identified in the skin samples of the Fe and Ce groups of Jiangnan cashmere goats [1]. These DE mRNAs intersected with the target genes of DE lncRNAs and DE miRNAs, and the host genes of DE circRNAs in this study. A total of 396 DE lncRNAs had 447 predicted DE target genes, 2 DE circRNAs had 2 predicted DE host genes, and 17 DE miRNAs had 91 predicted DE target genes (Fig. 6A). The information of DE ncRNA and DE target genes is summarized in Table S3.

Combined with GO functional annotation analysis, we identified some DE target genes of DE lncRNAs annotated to epidermal and epithelial cell-related GO terms (Table S4). The number of CXADR, MMP12 and BCL9L targeted lncRNAs ranked in the top three, with 19, 17 and 10, respectively. The number of GO terms with KLF4, TGFB1I1 and WNT5A annotations ranked in the top three, which were 7, 3 and 3, respectively. In addition, the target genes of DE miRNA were annotated to the GO terms associated with skin, hair follicles, and angiogenesis and development. Six DE miRNAs (novel_miR_420, novel_miR_87, novel_miR_410, novel_miR_726, novel_miR_879, and novel_miR_662) had 7 predicted target genes (CD40, MAP3K3, FZD8, SOX4, GLI1, MCC, and FZD2) related to skin, hair follicle and angiogenesis and development (Fig. 6B).

Based on KEGG analysis, we summarized the information of DE lncRNA and DE miRNA target genes annotated to hair follicle development and hair growth-related pathways (Table S5). Among them, the number of target genes annotated to the MAPK signalling pathway (ko04016) was the largest.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Combined analysis of coding RNA and noncoding RNA. (A) Venn diagrams of coding genes and ncRNAs. (B) Sankey diagram of DE miRNA target gene GO annotation. (C) The ceRNA network diagram. The diamond represents mRNA, triangle represents lncRNA, circle represents circRNA, and concave quadrilateral represents miRNA. (D) Validation of lncRNA by qRT-PCR.

Full size image

Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network analysis

In this study, candidate ceRNA relationship pairs were obtained by targeting miRNA relationships. CeRNAs can regulate the expression of each other by competitively binding to miRNAs. Therefore, based on miRNA target prediction, we constructed a ceRNA network with 9 DE mRNAs, 5 DE miRNAs, 10 DE lncRNAs and 1 circRNA. It is worth noting that novel_miR_724 has the most most targeted (Fig. 6C).

Validation of RNA-seq results by qRT-PCR

We randomly selected 8 DE lncRNAs (MSTRG.2199.13, MSTRG.35284.4, MSTRG.46161.2, MSTRG.4208.4, MSTRG.58766.1, MSTRG. MSTRG.24220.5, MSTRG.8900.1, and MSTRG.40421.14) for qRT-PCR analysis to verify the transcriptome sequencing results. According to Fig. 6D, the qRT-PCR detection results showed a consistent trend with the RNA-seq data, indicating that transcriptome sequencing data were reliable and could be used for subsequent tests.

Discussion

The skin of mammals is the tissue that comes into direct contact with the environment. Skin has the functions of protection, sensation, secretion, excretion and respiration [23, 24]. Cashmere goat hair follicles are an important accessory organ of the skin and are divided into primary hair follicles and secondary hair follicles [25]. Changes in the microenvironment and gene expression profile of skin tissues affect the growth and development of hair follicles, thereby affecting mammalian hair growth [26]. At present, the study of the noncoding RNA involved in cashmere fineness traits is not comprehensive. Therefore, the study of ncRNA expression profiles can help to elucidate the molecular mechanism by which ncRNAs regulate the fineness of cashmere goats. In this study, transcriptome sequencing revealed that a large number of lncRNAs, miRNAs and circRNAs were enriched in the skin tissues of cashmere goats, and their expression patterns showed different levels of abundance (Fig. 1). We found that fewer circRNAs and miRNAs were identified in the skin tissue of cashmere goats, and the overall expression level of circRNAs in the skin tissue was low. Moreover, the number of DE miRNAs was lower in the Ce and Fe groups. Therefore, our analysis of circRNA and miRNA is limited.

The skin is divided into epidermis, dermis and subcutaneous tissue. The epidermis is composed of tightly arranged epithelial cells [27,28,29]. To further understand the function of ncRNAs, we functionally annotated the target genes of ncRNAs. We found a large number of DE lncRNA target genes are annotated to GO terms related to differentiation, development, and migration of epidermal or epithelial cells, including GO:0009913, GO:0008544, GO:0045606, GO:0035313, GO:0030855, GO:0050673, GO:0010669, GO:0060429, GO:0045198, GO:0060638, GO:0002009, GO:0016331, GO:0030857, GO:0010633, GO:0050680, GO:0060054, GO:0010718, and GO:0010632) (Table S3). Among them, MSTRG.42054.1 have three target genes, namely, CD40, BCL9L and MMP12. MSTRG.18602.3 have target genes such as MAP3K3, NCSTN, and TGFB1I1. It is worth noting that these target genes are differentially expressed in the skin tissues of coarse and fine groups of cashmere goats [1]. Among them, CD40 protein is widely expressed in hematopoietic cells as well as endothelial cells and is involved in immune defense function in vivo [30, 31]. The TGFB1I1 gene regulates the activity of androgen receptors and is involved in the regulation of Wnt and TGFB signaling pathways [32]. Dermal papilla cells (DPC) located in the hairball part of the hair follicle express androgen receptors and key enzymes in androgen metabolism. Studies have shown that DPC in different body parts have different responses to androgens, thus leading to different hair growth conditions [33, 34].

The epidermis in the skin tissue has no blood supply, and the dermal papilla, located in the hairball part of the hair follicle, is connected to blood vessels. Therefore, the main source of nutrients for hair follicles is the dermal papilla. The size of the hairball part of the hair follicle is related to the hair thickness [35,36,37]. We also focused on DE lncRNA and DE miRNA target genes, including CD40, MAP3K3, KLF4, and SOX18, which were associated with vascular development (GO:0001568) and endothelial cell migration (GO:0043534, GO:0043537, GO:0043536, GO:0090050, and GO:0043535).

These results indicate that ncRNAs play an important role in skin and are involved in regulating hair growth.

In this study, the analysis of DE lncRNAs found that MSTRG.11813.4, MSTRG.28026.4, and MSTRG.26322.32 shared a common target gene COL5A1, which was annotated to skin development (GO: 0043588). The common target gene of MSTRG.49210.1, MSTRG.2199.13, MSTRG.34920.1, and MSTRG.25997.1 was PTCH2, which was annotated to hair cycle and development (GO: 0042633). We noted that the relative expression level of MSTRG.2199.13 was maesured by qRT-PCR, and the results were consistent with the trend of the RNA-seq results (Fig. 6D). The common target gene of MSTRG.6557.1, MSTRG.53893.2, MSTRG.27055.1 and MSTRG.51287.1 is SOX18, which is also involved in hair follicle development (GO:0001942). In our previous study, it was found that COL5A1, PTCH2 and SOX18 were differentially expressed in the Fe and Ce groups of Jiangnan cashmere goats [1]. These results indicated that the expression levels of COL5A1, PTCH2 and SOX18 in skin were regulated by lncRNAs. In addition, keratin intermediate filament and keratin association protein are the two main proteins in cashmere fibres. lncRNA analysis revealed that seven keratin family genes, including KRT7, KRT36, LOC102188618, LOC102185150, LOC100861174, LOC108636556, and LOC102168573, can target a total of 64 targeted DE lncRNAs. Activation of WNT signalling pathways in the skin is essential, and these pathways are related to normal hair follicle development, hair follicle distribution in the matrix, and hair phenotype [38]. Therefore, DE miRNA target gene annotation has attracted our attention in the GO term (GO:0090090, GO:0060070, GO:0090263, GO:0042813, GO:0017147, and GO:1,990,851) associated with the Wnt signalling pathway.

Different types of ncRNAs can synergistically play important regulatory functions at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels [21, 39]. The ceRNA mechanism based on microRNA response elements can explain the regulatory complexity of ncRNAs and coding RNAs to a certain extent. CeRNA-mediated gene regulation is an emerging area of research that will greatly increase our understanding of hair follicle development and hair growth [40,41,42]. Currently, through high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis, it has been reported that ceRNA networks with chi-miR-221-5p, chi-miR-214-3p, chi-miR-331-5p and chi-miR-17-5p as response elements play a regulatory role in the hair follicles of cashmere goats [5, 22]. In our study, some ceRNA networks were obtained. However, miRNA involvement in the network is novel (Fig. 6C). Therefore, their influence on the fineness of cashmere still needs further study.

Conclusion

In this study, the changes in ncRNA expression profiles in skin samples of Jiangnan cashmere goats with different levels of fineness were identified. Combined with the results of previous studies, the regulatory roles of ncRNA and coding RNA in the fineness traits of cashmere were analysed. The results provide experimental data for interpreting hair follicle development and hair growth. In future studies, we will elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which ncRNAs regulate cashmere fineness at the molecular and cellular levels.

Methods

Experimental animals

In this study, the experimental farm was the Baihutai cashmere goat breeding centre in Aksu Prefecture, Xinjiang. Eight 12-month-old cashmere goat ewes were selected as experimental animals. We divided the experimental animals into the Fe group (n = 4) and Ce group (n = 4), and their average fibre diameters were 13.64 ± 0.04 μm and 15.31 ± 0.04 μm, respectively. We collected skin tissue from the left shoulder blade of eight Jiangnan cashmere goats. The feeding conditions of the experimental animals were basically the same before and after the experiment. From May to October for grazing feeding, from November to April for grazing plus supplementary feeding.

Sequencing of ncRNA

The RNA of skin tissue from 8 southern Xinjiang cashmere goats was extracted using TRIzol and and RNA extraction kit. Chain-specific and small RNA libraries were constructed for RNA of 8 samples. The constructed library was inspected by the Qsep-400 method. Eight chain-specific libraries and eight small RNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000.

The Base Quality Score was used to evaluate the raw sequencing data. The Capra_hircus reference genome (Capra hircus ARS 1.97) was used to compare lncRNA data with HISAT2 [43], and StringTie was used to compare read pairs. LncRNAs were identified by four methods: CPC analysis [44], CNCI analysis [45], CPAT analysis [46], and Pfam protein domain [47] analysis. Circular RNA prediction was performed using CIRI [48] and find_circ [49] software. Using Bowtie [49] software, clean reads of miRNA were mapped to reference genome. In addition, reads were compared in the miRBase (v22) database to identify known miRNAs. Novel miRNAs were predicted using miRDeep2 [50] software.

Analysis of ncRNA expression levels

FPKM was used as a measure of lncRNA expression levels [51]. Statistics on circRNA expression were standardized using SRPBM methods. The miRNA expression was statistically normalized by the TPM algorithm [52]. Using fold change ≥ 2 and P value ≤ 0.05 as the standard, the edgeR package was used to identify out DE ncRNAs in the Fe and Ce groups, including DE lncRNAs, DE circRNAs and DE miRNAs.

Prediction of ncRNA target genes

In lncRNA analysis, Perl scripts were used to identify cis target genes of DE lncRNA. The LncTar [53] target gene prediction tool was used to predict the trans target gene of DE lncRNAs based on the complementary sequence between DE lncRNAs and mRNAs. In the miRNA analysis, we used miRanda [48] and TargetScan [48] to predict the target genes of DE miRNAs. In addition, circRNAs contains multiple miRNA binding sites. Therefore, miRNA target gene prediction can be used to identify circRNA binding to miRNA. Finally, Cytoscape 3.6.1 software was used to visualize the ncRNA and target gene networks.

Functional annotation of noncoding RNAs

To explain the function of ncRNAs, we annotated the function of lncRNA and miRNA target genes. Functional annotation of circRNA host genes was performed. BLAST software was used to compare genes with the NR [54], Swiss-Prot [55], GO [56], and KEGG [57] databases. The functional annotation of target genes was enriched and analysed. The bubble map was drawn by the ggplot2 package for the first 10 items or the combination with the lowest significant Q value.

Verify of transcriptome sequencing results

To determine the reliability of the sequencing data, eight DE lncRNAs were randomly selected to verify their expression levels by qRT-PCR. Primers for DE lncRNA and GAPGH were designed with Primer 5.0 (Table S6). After transcriptome sequencing was complete, the RNA returned by the company was used as a template. The qRT-PCR procedure for lncRNA was performed in the Roche LightCycler 480 II fluoroquantitative PCR instrument with reference to previous experiments [1]. The qRT-PCR results were analysed by the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Data Availability

The original sequencing data of chain-specific libraries and small RNA libraries are stored in the SRA database (Submission ID: PRJNA778726. Download address: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA778726).

References

  1. Wu C, Li J, xu X, Xu Q, Qin C, Liu G et al. Effect of the FA2H gene on cashmere fineness of Jiangnan cashmere goats based on transcriptome sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2022;23.

  2. Fu X, Zhao B, Tian K, Wu Y, Suo L, Ba G, et al. Integrated analysis of lncRNA and mRNA reveals novel insights into cashmere fineness in tibetan cashmere goats. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10217.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu YS, Cao Y, Piao QL, Luo XT, Jin HG. Screening of genes related to cashmere diameter in Liaoning cashmere goats. China Herbivore Science. 2014(S1):147–9.

  4. Zheng YY, Sheng SD, Hui TY, Yue C, Sun JM, Guo D et al. An Integrated analysis of Cashmere Fineness lncRNAs in Cashmere Goats. Genes. 2019;10(4).

  5. Zheng Y, Hui T, Yue C, Sun J, Guo D, Guo S, et al. Comprehensive analysis of circRNAs from cashmere goat skin by next generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):516.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Anastasiadou E, Jacob LS, Slack FJ. Non-coding RNA networks in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(1):5–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Djebali S, Davis CA, Merkel A, Dobin A, Lassmann T, Mortazavi A, et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature. 2012;489(7414):101–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams BD, Parsons C, Walker L, Zhang WC, Slack FJ. Targeting noncoding RNAs in disease. J Clin Investig. 2017;127(3):761–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mattick JS, Makunin IV, Non-coding RNA. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15 Spec No 1:R17–29.

  10. Lin CM, Liu Y, Huang K, Chen XC, Cai BZ, Li HH, et al. Long noncoding RNA expression in dermal papilla cells contributes to hairy gene regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;453(3):508–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kopp F, Mendell JT. Functional classification and experimental dissection of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2018;172(3):393–407.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Statello L, Guo CJ, Chen LL, Huarte M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(2):96–118.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bartel DP, MicroRNAs. Genomics, Biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin SL, Miller JD, Ying SY. Intronic microRNA (miRNA). J Biomed Biotechnol. 2006;2006(4):26818.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang L, Stokes N, Polak L, Fuchs E. Specific MicroRNAs are preferentially expressed by skin stem cells to Balance Self-Renewal and early lineage commitment. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8(3):294–308.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Andl T, Murchison EP, Liu F, Zhang Y, Yunta-Gonzalez M, Tobias JW, et al. The miRNA-processing enzyme dicer is essential for the morphogenesis and maintenance of hair follicles. Curr biology: CB. 2006;16(10):1041–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Han W, Yang F, Wu Z, Guo F, Zhang J, Hai E, et al. Inner Mongolian Cashmere Goat secondary follicle development Regulation Research based on mRNA-miRNA co-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4519.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Y, Wang L, Li X, Han W, Yang K, Wang H, et al. High-throughput sequencing of hair follicle development-related micrornas in cashmere goat at various fetal periods. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018;25:1494–508.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao B, Luo H, He J, Huang X, Chen S, Fu X, et al. Comprehensive transcriptome and methylome analysis delineates the biological basis of hair follicle development and wool-related traits in Merino sheep. BMC Biol. 2021;19(1):197.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan C, Wang X, Geng R, He X, Qu L, Chen Y. Discovery of cashmere goat (Capra hircus) microRNAs in skin and hair follicles by Solexa sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:511.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou G, Kang D, Ma S, Wang X, Gao Y, Yang Y, et al. Integrative analysis reveals ncRNA-mediated molecular regulatory network driving secondary hair follicle regression in cashmere goats. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):222.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang S, Ge W, Luo Z, Guo Y, Jiao B, Qu L, et al. Integrated analysis of coding genes and non-coding RNAs during hair follicle cycle of cashmere goat (Capra hircus). BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):767.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Haake A, Scott GA, Holbrook KA. Structure and function of the skin: overview of the epidermis and dermis. Adv Biology Skin. 2001:19–45.

  24. Celleno L, Tamburi F. Structure and function of the skin - ScienceDirect. Nutritional Cosmetics. 2009;16(5):3–45.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bing Z, Teng X, Yuan J, Guo X, Liu D. Transcriptome sequencing reveals differences between primary and secondary hair follicle-derived dermal papilla cells of the Cashmere Goat (Capra hircus). PLoS ONE. 2013;8.

  26. Ge W, Zhang WD, Zhang YL, Zheng YJ, Wang X. A single-cell transcriptome atlas during cashmere goat hair follicle morphogenesis. 2020.

  27. Bernard BA. Advances in Understanding Hair Growth. F1000Res. 2016;5.

  28. Rishikaysh P, Dev K, Diaz D, Qureshi WM, Filip S, Mokry J. Signaling involved in hair follicle morphogenesis and development. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(1):1647–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Millar SE. Molecular mechanisms regulating hair follicle development. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118(2):216–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aarts S, Seijkens TTP, van Dorst KJF, Dijkstra CD, Kooij G, Lutgens E. The CD40-CD40L Dyad in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1791.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Takada YK, Yu J, Shimoda M, Takada Y. Integrin Binding to the Trimeric Interface of CD40L Plays a Critical Role in CD40/CD40L Signaling. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2019;203(5):1383-91.

  32. Aesoey R, Need EF, Trotta A, Buchanan G, Risbridger GP. 695 mechanisms of ER beta action in prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2010;8(5):175.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rutberg SE, Kolpak ML, Gourley JA, Tan G, Henry JP, Shander D. Differences in expression of specific biomarkers distinguish human beard from scalp dermal papilla cells. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(12):2583–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Inui S, Fukuzato Y, Nakajima T, Yoshikawa K, Itami S. Identification of androgen-inducible TGF-beta1 derived from dermal papilla cells as a key mediator in androgenetic alopecia. J Invest dermatology Symp Proc. 2003;8(1):69–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Alonso L, Fuchs E. The hair cycle. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 3):391–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kulessa H, Turk G, Hogan BL. Inhibition of Bmp signaling affects growth and differentiation in the anagen hair follicle. EMBO J. 2000;19(24):6664–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang C-C, Cotsarelis G. Review of hair follicle dermal cells. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;57(1):2–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Andl T, Reddy ST, Gaddapara T, Millar SE. WNT signals are required for the initiation of hair follicle development. Dev Cell. 2002;2(5):643–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Huang B, Zhang R. Regulatory non-coding RNAs: revolutionizing the RNA world. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(6):3915–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ge W, Wang S-H, Sun B, Zhang Y-L, Shen W, Khatib H, et al. Melatonin promotes Cashmere goat (Capra hircus) secondary hair follicle growth: a view from integrated analysis of long non-coding and coding RNAs. Cell Cycle. 2018;17(10):1255–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(7):522–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kartha RV, Subramanian S. Competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs): new entrants to the intricacies of gene regulation. Front Genet. 2014;5:8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kong L, Zhang Y, Ye ZQ, Liu XQ, Zhao SQ, Wei L et al. CPC: assess the protein-coding potential of transcripts using sequence features and support vector machine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W345–9.

  45. Sun L, Luo H, Bu D, Zhao G, Yu K, Zhang C, et al. Utilizing sequence intrinsic composition to classify protein-coding and long non-coding transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(17):e166.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang L, Park HJ, Dasari S, Wang S, Kocher JP, Li W. CPAT: coding-potential Assessment Tool using an alignment-free logistic regression model. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(6):e74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D222–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, Marks DS, Sander C. The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Database issue):D149–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495(7441):333–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Friedländer MR, Mackowiak SD, Li N, Chen W, Rajewsky N. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(1):37–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Li B, Ruotti V, Stewart RM, Thomson JA, Dewey CN. RNA-Seq gene expression estimation with read mapping uncertainty. Bioinf (Oxford England). 2010;26(4):493–500.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Li J, Ma W, Zeng P, Wang J, Geng B, Yang J, et al. LncTar: a tool for predicting the RNA targets of long noncoding RNAs. Brief Bioinform. 2015;16(5):806–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Yangyang D, Jianqi LI, Songfeng WU, Yunping ZHU, Yaowen C, Fuchu HE. Integrated nr database in protein annotation system and its localization. Comput Eng. 2006;32.

  55. Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH, Barker WC, Boeckmann B, Ferro S, et al. UniProt: the Universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Database issue):D115–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Database issue):D277–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and development Program (Grant No. 2021YFD1200902), Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region “Tianchi Talents”, and Xinjiang Autonomous Region Innovation Environment Construction Special Project (2021D04008, 2020Q035).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi, China

    Cuiling Wu

  2. Key Laboratory of Special Environmental Medicine, Xinjiang Military General Hospital, Urumqi, China

    Qin Xu & Jianying Li

  3. Aksu Prefecture Animal Husbandry Technology Extension Center, Aksu, China

    Chongkai Qin

  4. Key Laboratory of Genetics Breeding and Reproduction of Xinjiang Wool-sheep & Cashmere-goat (XJYS1105), Institute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Sciences, Urumqi, China

    Hanikezi Tulafu, Wenna Liu, Qingwei Lu & Xuefeng Fu

  5. College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China

    Wenna Liu & Qingwei Lu

  6. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Breeding sheep and wool Cashmere Quality Safety Supervision and Inspection Center, Institute of Animal Husbandry Quality Standard, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Sciences, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China

    Wenxin Zheng

Authors
  1. Cuiling Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianying Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chongkai Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hanikezi Tulafu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wenna Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qingwei Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wenxin Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xuefeng Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.W., X.F., and W.Z. wrote the main manuscript text. Q.X., X.F., and C.Q. prepared Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. J.L., H.T., and W.L. prepared Fig. 6 and figure S1. C.W., Q.L., and W.Z prepared Supplementary material. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenxin Zheng or Xuefeng Fu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures pertaining to the handling of experimental animals were conducted in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines. Sample collection was carried out under license in accordance with the Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of China and all study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science (Approval number 2020008). The experimental animals were cared for after the sampling was completed. Permissions were obtained from the Xinjiang Aksu White Tiger Cashmere Goat Breeding Center to collect the sample.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1: Figure S1

. Statistical analysis of noncoding RNA of 8 samples. Table S1. Quality control and reference genome alignment of lncRNA and circRNA sequencing. Table S2. Quality control and reference genome alignment of miRNA sequencing. Table S3. Summary of DE ncRNA and DE target mRNA. Table S4. Summary of GO annotation of non-coding RNAs target genes associated with epidermal epithelial cells. Table S5. KEGG annotation results of non-coding RNA target gene. Table S6. Primer information of lncRNA.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, C., Xu, Q., Li, J. et al. Regulation of cashmere fineness traits by noncoding RNA in Jiangnan cashmere goats. BMC Genomics 24, 604 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09531-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09531-x

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us