Skip to main content
Download PDF

Whole-genome resequencing provides insights into the diversity and adaptation to desert environment in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle

BMC Genomics volume 25, Article number: 176 (2024) Cite this article

Background

Xinjiang Mongolian cattle is an indigenous breed that inhabits the Taklimakan Desert and is characterized by its small body size. However, the genomic diversity, origin, and genetic basis underlying the adaptation to the desert environment have been poorly studied.

Results

We analyzed patterns of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle genetic variation by sequencing 20 genomes together with seven previously sequenced genomes and comparing them to the 134 genomes of nine representative breeds worldwide. Among the breeds of Bos taurus, we found the highest nucleotide diversity (0.0024) associated with the lower inbreeding coefficient (2.0110-6), the lowest linkage disequilibrium (r2 = 0.3889 at distance of 10 kb), and the highest effective population size (181 at 20 generations ago) in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle. The genomic diversity pattern could be explained by a limited introgression of Bos indicus genes. More importantly, similarly to desert-adapted camel and same-habitat sheep, we also identified signatures of selection including genes, GO terms, and/or KEGG pathways controlling water reabsorption and osmoregulation, metabolic regulation and energy balance, as well as small body size in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle.

Conclusions

Our results imply that Xinjiang Mongolian cattle might have acquired distinct genomic diversity by virtue of the introgression of Bos indicus, which helps understand the demographic history. The identification of selection signatures can provide novel insights into the genomic basis underlying the adaptation of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle to the desert environment.

Peer Review reports

Cattle, comprising two subspecies of Bos taurus and Bos indicus, can be traced back to early domestication events that occurred approximately 8,000–10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent and 6,000–8,000 years ago in the Indus Valley Cattle [1, 2]. Subsequent to that period, the interplay of natural adaptability, human migration, and selection has led to the emergence of more than 800 distinct breeds of cattle [3]. These breeds are distinguished by their diverse purposes, coat colors, geographical distributions, and other relevant aspects.

However, owing to variations in practice across different nations as well as disparities in significance, quantity, or other factors within the same country, the definition of certain breeds remains ambiguous. One illustrative instance of such a phenomenon is represented by Mongolian cattle, mostly found in the Inner Mongolia region of China, Mongolia, and the East Siberian regions of Russia. Based on a comprehensive investigation of whole-genome sequences, it was determined that the Mongolian cattle originating from Inner Mongolia of China and Mongolia were classified under the East Asian taurine group, clustering with the Mishima and Hanwoo cattle [4], also known as Turano-Mongolian taurine. At the level of the mitochondrial genome, Mongolian cattle exhibit the presence of four distinct haplotypes (T2, T3, T4, and I) [5], indicating intricate population dynamics.

Xinjiang Mongolian cattle, also referred to as Mongolian cattle, are primarily found in Bayangol Mongol of Xinjiang, China. The breed’s core regions are Hejin County and Heshuo County. It serves as a valuable source of milk and meat for the local Mongolian herdsmen. Xinjiang Mongolian cattle are characterized by their small body size, with females reaching a height at the withers of only 121 cm at the age of 15–16 months. Along with the implementation of genetic improvement via crossbreeding with other breeds like Simmental and Hereford cattle, the number of the breed has greatly decreased to about 6000. In terms of appearance, the coat color of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle is mixed, with a predominant yellow hue, followed by black. These cattle also possess crescent-shaped horns [6,7,8].

However, apart from the revelation of maternal (Bos taurus and Bos indicus) and paternal origin (Bos taurus) via SNP analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop region and Y chromosome [9], limited studies have focused on Xinjiang Mongolian cattle in molecular genetic research. On a global scale, analyses of whole-genome sequences of domesticated cattle have shown the presence of five to six ancestries, with some adaptive introgression events occurring during their migration from the domestication center to their current habitats [10,11,12].

Xinjiang Mongolian cattle are also known to inhabit the Taklimakan Desert, an environment characterized by arid and water-scarce conditions. Studies comparing the genomes of non-desert sheep breeds and desert sheep breeds in the same habitat as Xinjiang Mongolian cattle have identified a set of candidate genes responsible for water retention and reabsorption, ion transmembrane transport, and bicarbonate absorption [13]. Furthermore, in the context of adaptation to desert environments, the genetic mechanisms of camels have been extensively studied. Comparative genomic analyses have revealed the camel’s genetic adaptations to desert environments, including metabolic pathways such as water and salt metabolism, insulin resistance, oxidative stress responses, and osmoregulation [14,15,16,17], etc. Additionally, genomic studies of other desert-dwelling mammals have implicated genes related to regulation of thyroid levels [18], immune defense [19], response to radiation [20], body size [21].

In the present study, we sequenced the whole genomes of 20 Xinjiang Mongolian cattle and compared them to the public-available genomes of 141 samples of 10 breeds/populations (including seven genomes of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle). We not only identified the genomic diversity of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle, but also reconstructed the phylogenetic relationship between Xinjiang Mongolian cattle and other nine cattle breeds/populations to understand population dynamics of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle. More importantly, we delved into the selection signatures of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle by comparing the differences in nucleotide diversity, allele frequency and haplotype length to reveal the genetic basis of the adaptation to desert environment.

Materials and methods

Animal sampling

A total of 20 Xinjiang Mongolian cattle were obtained from the preserving farm after obtaining permission from farm owner, in Heshuo County of Bayangol Mongol Prefecture of Xinjiang in China. The whole blood was collected from the jugular vein of each individual with a blood collection needle by an experienced veterinarian and then placed in a blood collection tube containing EDTA.

Genomic DNA extraction, genome sequencing, and SNP detection

The collected whole blood was delivered to the Beijing Genome Institute (Shenzhen, China) for DNA extraction, library construction and genome sequencing. The genomic DNA was extracted using the standard phenol-chloroform procedure. The concentration of genomic DNA was assessed by a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA), while the integrity of the DNA was verified using agarose gel electrophoresis. The qualified genomic DNA was randomly fragmented, and fragments with an average insert size of 313 bp were selected. Subsequently, the fragmented DNA underwent end-repair and 3′ adenylation. Adaptors were then ligated to the ends of these 3′-adenylated fragments. Following this, a PCR reaction and library quality control were performed to amplify the product and ensure it met the required standards.

The denatured single-stranded PCR products were subjected to a reaction system and program for circularization, resulting in the production of single-stranded cyclized products. Meanwhile, uncyclized linear DNA molecules were digested. The single-stranded circular DNA molecules were replicated using rolling cycle amplification, generating DNA nanoballs (DNBs) containing multiple copies of DNA. High-quality DNBs were then loaded into patterned nanoarrays using the high-intensity DNA nanochip technique and sequenced through combinatorial Probe-Anchor Synthesis (cPAS) using the DNBSEQ-T7 platform (BGI, Shenzhen, China), finally generating 2 × 150 bp pair-end reads. The sequenced raw reads were filtered using SOAPnuke software [22] with the parameters: “-n 0.01 -l 20 -q 0.3 --adaMR 0.25 --ada_trim --polyX 50”.

To place Xinjiang Mongolian cattle into the global context of six ancestries worldwide reported by previous studies [11, 12] and to compare Xinjiang Mongolian cattle to other Mongolian cattle, we downloaded 141 public-available genomes of 10 breeds/populations, including 7 Xinjiang Mongolian cattle, 24 Angus (European taurine), 22 Swiss Brown (Eurasian taurine), 13 Muturu (African taurine), 9 Kazakh (another indigenous cattle in Xinjiang), 10 Mongolia Mongolian, 14 Inner Mongolia Mongolian, 21 Hanwoo (East Asian taurine), 12 Sahiwal (Indian indicine) and 9 Leiqiong cattle (Chinese indicine) from the NCBI SRA database (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1). The downloaded reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic [23] with the following parameters: “LEADING:20 TRAILING:20 SLIDINGWINDOW:3:15 AVGQUAL:20 MINLEN:35 TOPHRED33”.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographic map illustrates the origins of the 10 cattle breeds/populations in the present study

Full size image

The clean reads were aligned to the Bos taurus assembly ARS-UCD1.2 using the BWA MEM algorithm [24] with the default parameters. The aligned reads were sorted on their coordinates and duplicates were marked using the SortSam and MarkDuplicates modules of the Picard software.

The BaseRecalibrator and PrintReads modules of GATK [25] were exploited to produce a base quality recalibration table and recalibrate the aligned BAM files. The HaplotypeCaller, CombineGVCFs, GenotypeGVCFs and SelectVariants modules of GATK were sequentially utilised for the purpose of SNP calling. The raw SNPs were filtered using VariantFiltration modules of GATK with the following parameters: “QD < 2.0||FS > 60.0||MQ < 40.0||MQRankSum < − 12.5||ReadPosRankSum < − 8.0||SOR > 3.0”.

Population structure and phylogenetic analysis

Principle component analysis (PCA) of whole-genome SNPs for two sets: all 161 individuals and 140 Bos taurus individuals, was performed using smartpca modules of EIGENSOFT [26]. A neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed using MEGA11 [27] based on the Hamming distance obtained by PLINK with the --distance-matrix option. A maximum likelihood tree was constructed using treemix [28], where the number of anticipated migration events (m) varied from 0 to 10. The optimal number of assumed migration events was determined using the OptM method [29]. In addition, the process of estimating ancestry was conducted using the ADMIXTURE algorithm [30], where the range of presumed genetic clusters K varied from 2 to 10.

General genomic characteristic

The nucleotide diversity of each breed was calculated using VCFtools [31], employing a window size of 50 Kb and a step size of 20 Kb. The identification of runs of homozygosity (ROH) in each individual was performed using PLINK [32] with the following parameters: “--homozyg --allow-no-sex --homozyg-window-snp 50 --homozyg-window-het 1 --homozyg-window-missing 5 --homozyg-density 50 --homozyg-kb 1000 --homozyg-snp 100”. The inbreeding coefficient based on runs of homozygosity (FROH) was calculated for each individual as the ratio of the total length of ROH segments to the length of the autosomal genome. The average linkage disequilibrium (r2) for each length of distance for each breed was calculated using PopLDdecay [33]. In addition, the estimation of the recent effective population size (Ne) for each breed was conducted using SNeP [34] with the default settings.

Detection of selection signatures

In order to elucidate the genomic patterns of adaptation to desert environments, we employed three different methodologies to identify selection signatures in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle. This involved comparing the genomes of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle to those of Mongolia Mongolian and Inner Mongolia Mongolian cattle, which served as the control group.

The first approach was the calculation of the nucleotide diversity (π) ratio derived by dividing the nucleotide diversity of the control group by that of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle, in which the π of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle and its counterpart was computed using VCFtools with the windows of 50 kb and steps of 20 kb.

The second approach was the measurement of the genetic differentiation between Xinjiang Mongolian cattle and the control group (FST), whose genome-wide distribution was determined using VCFtools with the same window and step size as the π.

Third, the clean SNPs underwent further filtering using VCFtools with the following parameters: “--min-alleles 2 --max-alleles 2 --max-missing 0.9”. Subsequently, the imputation and phasing processes were carried out using Beagle [35]. The cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH) score for every site was calculated using selscan and then was normalized using the norm module of selscan [36]. The average normalized XP-EHH score for each 50 kb region with 20 kb increments was defined as the XP-EHH statistic, which was the third algorithms.

Finally, the outlier windows supported by two or three approaches (top 1%) were defined as candidate regions under positive selection and then annotated using a custom perl script based on the annotation GFF file of the Bos taurus genome (ARS-UCD1.2). Based on the candidate genes under selection, the functional enrichment tests of the Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways and Gene Ontology (GO) database were performed using the DAVID server [37]. For multiple testing of the enrichment analysis, the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) was applied.

Results

Summary of sequencing and SNP detection

Whole-genome sequencing of 20 samples of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle generated a total of 4.7 billion reads with an average depth of 12.80 (12.76–12.84). The average sequence depth was 11.56 (10.45–12.33) for seven publicly available genomes of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle and 12.48 (4.91–39.04) for the remaining 134 publicly available genomes of nine breeds/populations (Supplementary Table 1).

Combining the genomes of Xiangjiang Mongolian cattle and other nine breeds/populations, a total of 61,528,133 SNPs were identified. The majority of the SNPs were found in the intergenic region (59.37%), followed by intronic regions (37.22%), while only a small number of the SNPs (1.14%), with 255,920 non-synonymous SNPs and 425,549 synonymous SNPs, were found in exonic regions (Supplementary Table 2).

Population structure

PCA for all 161 samples revealed the first principal component (PC1) and the second principal component (PC2), explaining 15.95% and 5.38% of the total variation, respectively. This analysis successfully distinguished Bos taurus, Leiqiong, and Sahiwal cattle (Fig. 2A). Within the Bos taurus subspecies, the first two principal components (PCs) explained 3.43% and 2.80% of the overall variation, respectively. These PCs primarily reflected distinctions among three distinct clusters: European commercial breeds (Angus and Swiss Brown cattle), Xinjiang Mongolian cattle, and African Muturu cattle. The remaining four breeds/populations occupied an intermediate position in this regard (Fig. 2B). The maximum likelihood tree with the best number of migration events (Supplementary Fig. 1) provided evidence for the gene flow from Bos indicus into Xinjiang Mongolian cattle (Fig. 2C). Meanwhile, the genetic differentiation (FST) observed between Xinjiang Mongolian cattle and Bos indicus was comparatively smaller when compared to the differentiation shown between other Bos taurus populations and Bos indicus (Fig. 2D). The NJ tree displayed two distinct groups, namely Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Among the Bos taurus group, Xinjiang Mongolian cattle had the closest genetic connection with Bos indicus (Fig. 2E). The ADMIXTURE analysis recapitulated the divergence of Bos taurus and Bos indicus, and a small proportion of indicine ancestry in our Xinjiang Mongolian cattle (around 16%.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic relationship of the 10 cattle breeds. A Plots of the first and the second principal components for all the 161 individuals. B Plots of the first and the second principal components for the 140 taurine individuals. C Maximum likelihood tree was constructed with TreeMix using the best two migration events supported by OptM. D Breed hierarchical clustering (left) and heatmap (right) based on the genetic differentiation (FST). E Neighbor-joining tree of the relationships of the 161 individuals was constructed based on Hamming genetic distances matrix. F Proportion of ancestry components for all the 161 individuals was determined using the ADMIXTURE model with K = 2 and K = 5. K = 5 is a sensible modeling choice of the standard error of the cross-validation error

Full size image

on average) at K = 2. At K = 5, the most reasonable biological interpretation (Supplementary Fig. 2), Xinjiang Mongolian, Inner Mongolia Mongolian and Kazakh cattle have four genomic compositions, and among these three populations, Xinjiang Mongolian cattle demonstrate the highest degree of Bos indicus inheritance (Fig. 2F).

Genome diversity

The highest nucleotide diversity was observed in Bos indicus (Leiqiong and Sahiwal cattle), followed by three Mongolian cattle populations, Kazakh and Hanoo cattle, while the lowest nucleotide diversity was observed in two commercial Bos taurus (Swiss Brown and Angus cattle) and Muturu cattle (Fig. 3A). In ROH, the Bos indicus breeds showed the lowest inbreeding coefficient, while two commercial Bos taurus showed the highest inbreeding coefficient, other six breeds/populations are in the middle (Fig. 3B). LD analysis showed that the highest average LD (r2) was found in Muturu cattle, followed by two commercial Bos taurus breeds, Mongolia Mongolian, Inner Mongolia Mongolian, Kazakh, Sahiwal and Hanwoo cattle, while the lowest average LD was found in Leiqiong and Xinjiang Mongolian cattle at the time of the short distance between SNPs. The LD analysis also showed the fastest decay in the two commercial Bos taurus breeds (Fig. 3C). In addition, the highest Ne was found in Xinjiang Mongolian and Hanwoo cattle, while the lowest Ne was found in Sahiwal and Mongolia Mongolian cattle in the recent generations ago (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Genomic characteristics of the 10 cattle breeds. A Box plots of nucleotide diversity for each breed in 50 kb sliding windows with 20 kb steps. The boxplots were made using ggplot2, and the outliers were not shown. B ROH-based inbreeding coefficient (FROH) on cattle autosomes estimated from each individual. C Decay of Linkage disequilibrium (r2) was assessed for each breed. D The recent effective population size was estimated for each breed

Full size image

Selection signatures in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle

To identify the genomic regions under selection in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle, we compared their genomes to the genomes of Mongolia Mongolian and Inner Mongolian cattle using the π ratio, FST, and XP-EHH. After merging consecutive outlier windows supported by two or three approaches, a total of 94 unique regions containing 130 genes were identified (Fig. 4A, B and C, Supplementary Table 3).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Genomic regions with selection signatures in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle. Genome-wide distribution of the π ratio (A), FST (B) and XP-EHH (C). The red line represents the threshold value for the top 1% based on three metrics: the π ratio (1.61), FST (0.11), and XP-EHH (2.13). D Functional annotation of several candidate selected genes responsible for the adaptation to desert environment. The names of the KEGG pathways, GO terms, or other functions are shown in green. The candidate genes positively selected are shown in black. The potential mechanisms behind the adaptation to desert environment are shown in blue. Four genes belonging to the cytochrome P450 family 2, subfamily J are implicated in various functions

Full size image

In the functional enrichment analysis of the 130 candidate selected genes, we identified four over-represented GO terms (FDR < 0.05). The most significant GO term was oxidoreductase activity. Other significant enrichments included ATPase binding, NAD + ADP-ribosyltransferase activity, and steroid hydroxylase activity. Genes related to branching morphogenesis of an epithelial tube, protein ADP-ribosylation, L-lysine transmembrane transporter activity, arginine transmembrane transporter activity, L-ornithine transmembrane transporter activity, and iron ion binding were also enriched (Supplementary Table 4). In addition, the enrichment analysis of the KEGG pathway was performed, resulting in four metabolic related pathways in the top 10 significant categories (Supplementary Table 5), including linoleic acid metabolism, arachidonic acid metabolism, metabolic pathways, and purine metabolism.

Among 94 putatively selected regions, the cytochrome P450 family involved in oxidoreductase activity showed an extreme π ratio and XP-EHH, including four genes (LOC107132327, LOC521656, LOC530929, LOC511936). Other noteworthy genes with selection signatures included those with water reabsorption and osmoregulation (PDE11A, DIS3L2, SLIT2, KCNIP4, OSGEP, PKHD1, LOC617141, LOC112442378, LOC527385, FECH, LOC107132327, LOC521656, LOC530929, LOC511936, CLIC4, FGF10), metabolic regulation and energy balance (NCSTN, PEX19, PDE4D, TOR1AIP2, TOR1AIP1, ART1, PARP6, PARP2, LOC407145), and small body size (PPARGC1A, NPPC, APPL2, DOCK5, SLC30A8) (Fig. 4D).

Discussion

In this study, we compared the genomes of 27 Xinjiang Mongolian cattle (20 resequenced and seven publicly available genomes) to the 134 genomes of nine representative breeds worldwide. Our exploration of the cattle genetic variations and selection signatures focused specifically on genomic diversity, breed origin, and candidate selected genes responsible for the adaptation to the desert environment in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle.

The findings from the PCA and NJ tree indicate that our Xinjiang Mongolian cattle clustered with Angus cattle, a breed with single Bos taurus ancestry [10, 11, 38, 39], and clearly separated from Sahiwal cattle, a breed with single Bos indicus ancestry [10, 11, 39]. In-depth analyses on ancestry proportion estimation and migration events showed clear evidence of genetic heterogeneity with small genomic composition with Bos indicus (Sahiwal cattle) in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle. This observation is supported by the lowest level of genetic differentiation observed in the Xinjiang Mongolian cattle when compared to the relationships between Bos taurus populations and Bos indicus. Moreover, the genetic differentiation between Xinjiang Mongolian and Sahiwal cattle was lower than that between Xinjiang Mongolian and Leiqiong cattle, a Bos indicus breed with introgression from other bovine species [10, 11], suggesting that the Bos indicus ancestry observed in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle was probably derived from Indian indicine rather than Chinese Southern indicine, which was consistent with previous inference from mitochondrial SNPs [9].

Compared with other Bos taurus breeds, our Xinjiang Mongolian cattle have the highest nucleotide diversity associated with the lower inbreeding coefficient, the lowest linkage disequilibrium, and the highest effective population size with the exception of a period between 54 and 454 generations ago. This unique diversity pattern could be explained by the Bos taurus group of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle with small introgression from Bos indicus. The phenomenon of increased diversity introduced from other ancestry was also reported in other breeds [10] even species [40]. In addition, we also observed the highest nucleotide diversity of Bos indicus (Sahiwal and Leiqiong cattle) with lower artificial selection or introgression from different bovine species [10], the faster LD decay of commercial European taurine with stronger artificial selection suggested by the highest inbreeding coefficient [4] and the lowest nucleotide diversity of African endangered Muturu cattle [41].

The most crucial attribute of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle is their adaptability to the desert environment. The identification of candidate genes under selection is of significant importance in elucidating the genetic basis underlying the well-adapted characteristics of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle residing in desert environments. Among the candidate selected genes identified by two or three approaches, functional enrichment analysis showed the most significance of oxidoreductase activity, consisting of four genes of the cytochrome P450 family 2, subfamily J. The cytochrome P450 enzymes, a type of monooxygenase with a prosthetic group of heme-iron, are involved in the metabolism of arachidonic acid, the secretion of the final metabolites in urine or bile, and the transformation of a potent vasodilator of renal preglomerular vessels stimulating water reabsorption [42]. Among these families, the CYP2J2 activity has been demonstrated to be regulated by high-salt diet and its suppression could result in hypertension [43]. It is noteworthy that in camel whose most distinctive feature is the adaptation to the desert environment, the number of the copies of CYP2J is higher than that in cattle, horse and human [14,15,16]. In fact, other members of cytochrome P450 family were also selected in other species in desert regions [44, 45]. The above studies indicate that variations in CYP2J subfamily genes may play an important in the adaptation of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle to the desert environment.

As has been said, kidneys play a major role in the process of water reabsorption through increasing the osmolarity of urine. We surveyed published literature and identified several selected genes associated with the kidney or urinary system. PDE11A gene along with extreme π ratio and XP-EHH encodes a dual-specificity phosphodiesterase and is expressed in adrenal cortex. It has been reported that a germline mutation at PDE11A locus is associated with adrenocortical hyperplasia in human [46]. DIS3L2 gene also along with extreme π ratio and XP-EHH, encodes an exoribonuclease, and its germline mutations caused the Perlman syndrome with kidney abnormalities [47]. Among the selection candidates in our list are SLIT2 (a ligand in ureteric bud and metanephric mesenchyme) in which the mutations confer for congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract in human [48], KCNIP4 a potassium channel-interacting protein whose translocation implicates renal cell cancer [49], OSGEP enabling N(6)-L-threonylcarbamoyladenine synthase activity and metal ion binding activity and associated with a renal defect manifesting in proteinuria and hypomagnesemia [50], CLIC4 a cytosolic protein in which null mouse embryos exhibit impaired renal tubulogenesis [51], FGF10 a multifunctional FGF family member implicated renal ischemia/reperfusion injury [52] and ureter and kidney development [53], and PKHD1 a large transmembrane protein fibrocystin involved in polycystic kidney disease [54]. Notably, the GO term of branching morphogenesis of an epithelial tube (PKHD1, CLIC4, SLIT2, FGF10) was enriched, which is critical to ureteric bud formation and epithelial branching during kidney development [55]. Moreover, the enrichment analysis also showed three GO terms (including three genes LOC617141, LOC112442378, LOC527385) associated with transmembrane transporter activity involved in osmoregulation in the renal medulla in camel [17]. In addition, an overrepresentation of categories associated with iron ion binding was also detected, including five genes FECH, LOC107132327, LOC521656, LOC530929, LOC511936). In fact, similar GO terms were also detected in enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes between water-restricted and normal condition in renal cortical and medullary of bactrian camel [17]. Similarly, an excellent study also revealed several selected genes related to renal vasodilation, ion transmembrane transport, water-salt metabolism, and bicarbonate absorption in Taklimakan Desert sheep [13]. From the above results, we can conclude that these genes could have been affected by selection targeting at water reabsorption and osmoregulation during the adaptation to desert environment.

The scarcity of food in desert environments presents a secondary barrier to adaptation, hence emphasizing the significance of energy and metabolism. The second-ranked GO term identified by enrichment analysis is ATPase binding, which is related to catalyze the hydrolysis of ATP, a key player in biological energy capture and use, including five genes (NCSTN, PEX19, PDE4D, TOR1AIP2, TOR1AIP1). The third-ranked GO term is NAD + ADP-ribosyltransferase activity involved in cellular energy levels [56], including four genes (ART1, PARP6, PARP2, LOC407145). Moreover, four of the top 10 KEGG pathways identified by enrichment analysis are related to metabolism, and one of them is arachidonic acid metabolism which is also implicated in adaptation to desert environments in camel [16] and sheep [13], including four genes (LOC107132327, LOC521656, LOC530929, LOC511936). Therefore, we could speculate that these genes, GO terms, or pathways may play a role in metabolic regulation and energy balance in desert environment adaptations.

For animals living in extreme environments, small body size could help overcome the challenge of scarce food supply by virtue of lower metabolic requirement and less energy consumption [13, 57]. After reviewing published literature on candidate selected genes, a total of five genes were found to be associated with body size traits. One interesting observation was the presence of PPARGC1A with strong signature of selection. PPARGC1A encodes a transcriptional coactivator that regulates the genes involved in energy metabolism and plays an important role in insulin signaling, mitochondrial regulation and adaptive thermogenesis [58,59,60]. Its mutations have been reported to be associated with body mass index in human [61]. Another candidate gene is NPPC, a natriuretic peptide that regulates endochondral ossification of the cartilaginous selected growth plate, in which SNP markers are associated with human height [62]. Other noteworthy genes in our candidate list were APPL2, an adiponectin receptor associated with overweight and obesity in a Chinese population [63], DOCK5, a susceptibility gene for severe obesity [64], and SLC30A8, a zinc efflux transporter implicated in type 2 diabetes and obesity in Asians [65]. These genes together may be under selection for the reduced body size of Xinjiang Mongolian in the adaptation to the desert environment.

Conclusions

This study reports the current genetic status and novel insights on the adaptation of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle in the Taklimakan Desert using whole-genome sequence data. The unique diversity pattern observed advances our understanding of historical population dynamics in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle. In a similar manner to camels and sheep that reside in desert environments, selection signatures for genes involved in the regulation of water reabsorption, energy balance, and small body size are indicative of their heightened adaptation to desert environments. This observation offers valuable insights into the genetic mechanisms that underlie the process of environmental adaptation.

Availability of data and materials

Whole genome sequencing data of Xinjiang Mongolian cattle have been successfully submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information. SRA data: PRJNA844484.

References

  1. Loftus R, Machugh D, Bradley D, Sharp P, Cunningham P. Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1994;91(7):2757–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Larson G, Piperno DR, Allaby RG, Purugganan MD, Andersson L, Arroyo-Kalin M, Barton L, Vigueira CC, Denham T. Dobney K: Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2014;111(17):6139–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Consortium SA, Elsik CG, Tellam RL, Worley KCJS. The genome sequence of taurine cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science. 2009;324(5926):522–8.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Q, Shen J, Hanif Q, Chen N, Huang Y, Dang R, Lan X, Chen H, Lei C. Whole genome analyses revealed genomic difference between European taurine and east Asian taurine. J Anim Breed Genetetics. 2021;138(1):56–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia XT, Achilli A, Lenstra JA, Tong B, Ma Y, Huang YZ, Han JL, Sun ZY, Chen H, Lei CZ, et al. Mitochondrial genomes from modern and ancient Turano-Mongolian cattle reveal an ancient diversity of taurine maternal lineages in East Asia. Heredity (Edinb). 2021;126(6):1000–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guang Y, Sangire, Niman C. Study on germplasm characteristics and purification and rejuvenation of Mongolian cattle breed resources (in Chinese). XINJIANGXUMUYE. 2012;169(3):2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yimiti M, Jianming C, Abola A, Cairendaoerji, Changhai G. Suggestions for the Protection and Development of Mongolian Cattle Genetic Resources in Bazhou, Xinjiang (in Chinese). Chin Livest Poult Breed. 2023;19(10):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fedotova GV, Slozhenkina MI, Natyrov AK, Erendzhenova MV. Comparative analysis of economic and biological features of Kalmyk and Mongolian cattle breeds. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020;548(8):082076.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yue X, Li R, Liu L, Zhang Y, Huang J, Chang Z, Dang R, Lan X, Chen H, Lei C. When and how did Bos indicus introgress into Mongolian Cattle? Gene. 2014;537(2):214–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen N, Cai Y, Chen Q, Li R, Wang K, Huang Y, Hu S, Huang S, Zhang H, Zheng Z, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals world-wide ancestry and adaptive introgression events of domesticated cattle in East Asia. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen N, Xia X, Hanif Q, Zhang F, Dang R, Huang B, Lyu Y, Luo X, Zhang H, Yan H, et al. Global genetic diversity, introgression, and evolutionary adaptation of indicine cattle revealed by whole genome sequencing. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):7803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen N, Fu W, Zhao J, Shen J, Chen Q, Zheng Z, Chen H, Sonstegard TS, Lei C, Jiang Y. BGVD: an Integrated Database for Bovine Sequencing Variations and selective signatures. Genomics Proteom Bioinf. 2020;18(2):186–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J, Li WR, Lv FH, He SG, Tian SL, Peng WF, Sun YW, Zhao YX, Tu XL, Zhang M, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of native Sheep provides insights into Rapid adaptations to Extreme environments. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(10):2576–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kandeel M, Al-Taher A, Venugopala KN, Marzok M, Morsy M, Nagaraja S. Camel Proteins and enzymes: a growing resource for functional evolution and environmental adaptation. Front Veterinary Sci. 2022;9:911511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ali A, Baby B, Vijayan RJF. From desert to medicine: a review of camel genomics and therapeutic products. Front Genet. 2019;10:17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bactrian Camels Genome S, Analysis C, Jirimutu, Wang Z, Ding G, Chen G, Sun Y, Sun Z, Zhang H, Wang L, et al. Genome sequences of wild and domestic bactrian camels. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1202.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu H, Guang X, Al-Fageeh MB, Cao J, Pan S, Zhou H, Zhang L, Abutarboush MH, Xing Y, Xie Z, et al. Camelid genomes reveal evolution and adaptation to desert environments. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Malaspinas AS, Westaway MC, Muller C, Sousa VC, Lao O, Alves I, Bergström A, Athanasiadis G, Cheng JY, Crawford JE, et al. A genomic history of Aboriginal Australia. Nature. 2016;538(7624):207–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Apata M, Arriaza B, Llop E, Moraga M. Human adaptation to arsenic in andean populations of the Atacama Desert. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017;163(1):192–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Skoglund P, Thompson JC, Prendergast ME, Mittnik A, Sirak K, Hajdinjak M, Salie T, Rohland N, Mallick S, Peltzer A, et al. Reconstructing Prehistoric Afr Popul Struct. Cell. 2017;171(1):59-71.e21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim ES, Elbeltagy AR, Aboul-Naga AM, Rischkowsky B, Sayre B, Mwacharo JM, Rothschild MF. Multiple genomic signatures of selection in goats and sheep indigenous to a hot arid environment. Heredity. 2016;116(3):255–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen Y, Chen Y, Shi C, Huang Z, Zhang Y, Li S, Li Y, Ye J, Yu C, Li Z, et al. SOAPnuke: a MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. Gigascience. 2018;7(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, et al. The genome analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2(12): e190.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biology Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pickrell J, Pritchard J. Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(11):e1002967.

  29. Fitak RR. OptM: estimating the optimal number of migration edges on population trees using Treemix. Biol Methods Protoc. 2021;6(1):bpab017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1655–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry STJB. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(15):2156–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, De Bakker PI, Daly MJ. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang C, Dong S-S, Xu J-Y, He W-M, Yang T-LJB. PopLDdecay: a fast and effective tool for linkage disequilibrium decay analysis based on variant call format files. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(10):1786–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Barbato M, Orozco-terWengel P, Tapio M, Bruford MW. SNeP: a tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data. Front Genet. 2015;6:109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Browning SR, Browning BL. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(5):1084–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Szpiech ZA, Hernandez RD. Selscan: an efficient multithreaded program to perform EHH-based scans for positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(10):2824–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sherman BT, Hao M, Qiu J, Jiao X, Baseler MW, Lane HC, Imamichi T, Chang W. DAVID: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(W1):W216-221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim J, Hanotte O, Mwai OA, Dessie T, Bashir S, Diallo B, Agaba M, Kim K, Kwak W, Sung S, et al. The genome landscape of indigenous African cattle. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim K, Kwon T, Dessie T, Yoo DA, Mwai OA, Jang J, Sung S, Lee S, Salim B, Jung J, et al. The mosaic genome of indigenous African cattle as a unique genetic resource for African pastoralism. Nat Genet. 2020;52(10):1099–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cao YH, Xu SS, Shen M, Chen ZH, Gao L, Lv FH, Xie XL, Wang XH, Yang H, Liu CB, et al. Historical introgression from wild relatives enhanced climatic adaptation and resistance to pneumonia in sheep. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(3):838–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tijjani A, Utsunomiya YT, Ezekwe AG, Nashiru O, Hanotte O. Genome sequence analysis reveals selection signatures in endangered trypanotolerant west African Muturu cattle. Front Genet. 2019;10: 442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Carroll MA, Balazy M, Margiotta P, Huang DD, Falck J, McGiff JC. Cytochrome P-450-dependent HETEs: profile of biological activity and stimulation by vasoactive peptides. Am J Physiology-Regulatory Integr Comp Physiol. 1996;271(4):R863-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao X, Pollock DM, Inscho EW, Zeldin DC, Imig JD. Decreased renal cytochrome P450 2 C enzymes and impaired vasodilation are associated with angiotensin salt-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension. 2003;41(3 Pt 2):709–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cheng J, Peng X, Li H, Feijó A, Xia L, Shenbrot GI, Ge D, Wen Z, Wang D, Yang Q. Similar adaptative mechanism but divergent demographic history of four sympatric desert rodents in eurasian inland. Commun Biology. 2023;6(1):33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ababaikeri B, Abduriyim S, Tohetahong Y, Mamat T, Ahmat A, Halik M. Whole-genome sequencing of Tarim red deer (Cervus elaphus yarkandensis) reveals demographic history and adaptations to an arid-desert environment. Front Zool. 2020;17:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Horvath A, Boikos S, Giatzakis C, Robinson-White A, Groussin L, Griffin KJ, Stein E, Levine E, Delimpasi G, Hsiao HP, et al. A genome-wide scan identifies mutations in the gene encoding phosphodiesterase 11A4 (PDE11A) in individuals with adrenocortical hyperplasia. Nat Genet. 2006;38(7):794–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Astuti D, Morris MR, Cooper WN, Staals RH, Wake NC, Fews GA, Gill H, Gentle D, Shuib S, Ricketts CJ, et al. Germline mutations in DIS3L2 cause the Perlman syndrome of overgrowth and Wilms tumor susceptibility. Nat Genet. 2012;44(3):277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hwang DY, Kohl S, Fan X, Vivante A, Chan S, Dworschak GC, Schulz J, van Eerde AM, Hilger AC, Gee HY, et al. Mutations of the SLIT2-ROBO2 pathway genes SLIT2 and SRGAP1 confer risk for congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Hum Genet. 2015;134(8):905–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bonne A, Vreede L, Kuiper RP, Bodmer D, Jansen C, Eleveld M, van Erp F, Arkesteijn G, Hoogerbrugge N, van Ravenswaaij C, et al. Mapping of constitutional translocation breakpoints in renal cell cancer patients: identification of KCNIP4 as a candidate gene. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2007;179(1):11–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Edvardson S, Prunetti L, Arraf A, Haas D, Bacusmo JM, Hu JF, Ta-Shma A, Dedon PC, de Crecy-Lagard V, Elpeleg O. tRNA N6-adenosine threonylcarbamoyltransferase defect due to KAE1/TCS3 (OSGEP) mutation manifest by neurodegeneration and renal tubulopathy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25(5):545–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Chou SY, Hsu KS, Otsu W, Hsu YC, Luo YC, Yeh C, Shehab SS, Chen J, Shieh V, He GA, et al. CLIC4 regulates apical exocytosis and renal tube luminogenesis through retromer- and actin-mediated endocytic trafficking. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 10412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Tan X, Zhu H, Tao Q, Guo L, Jiang T, Xu L, Yang R, Wei X, Wu J, Li X, et al. FGF10 protects against Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by regulating Autophagy and Inflammatory Signaling. Front Genet. 2018;9:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Michos O, Cebrian C, Hyink D, Grieshammer U, Williams L, D’Agati V, Licht JD, Martin GR, Costantini F. Kidney development in the absence of Gdnf and Spry1 requires Fgf10. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(1):e1000809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Burgmaier K, Brinker L, Erger F, Beck BB, Benz MR, Bergmann C, Boyer O, Collard L, Dafinger C, Fila M, et al. Refining genotype-phenotype correlations in 304 patients with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease and PKHD1 gene variants. Kidney Int. 2021;100(3):650–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Michos O. Kidney development: from ureteric bud formation to branching morphogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19(5):484–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Yu J, Auwerx J. The role of sirtuins in the control of metabolic homeostasis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1173(Suppl 1):E10-19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Silanikove N. The physiological basis of adaptation in goats to harsh environments. Small Ruminant Res. 2000;35(3):181–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Puigserver P, Wu Z, Park CW, Graves R, Wright M, Spiegelman BM. A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis. Cell. 1998;92(6):829–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Li X, Monks B, Ge Q, Birnbaum MJ. Akt/PKB regulates hepatic metabolism by directly inhibiting PGC-1α transcription coactivator. Nature. 2007;447(7147):1012–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Rohas LM, St-Pierre J, Uldry M, Jäger S, Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. A fundamental system of cellular energy homeostasis regulated by PGC-1α. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(19):7933–8.

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Myles S, Lea RA, Ohashi J, Chambers GK, Weiss JG, Hardouin E, Engelken J, Macartney-Coxson DP, Eccles DA, Naka I, et al. Testing the thrifty gene hypothesis: the Gly482Ser variant in PPARGC1A is associated with BMI in tongans. BMC Med Genet. 2011;12:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Estrada K, Krawczak M, Schreiber S, van Duijn K, Stolk L, van Meurs JB, Liu F, Penninx BW, Smit JH, Vogelzangs N, et al. A genome-wide association study of northwestern europeans involves the C-type natriuretic peptide signaling pathway in the etiology of human height variation. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(18):3516–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Jiang S, Fang Q, Yu W, Zhang R, Hu C, Dong K, Bao Y, Wang C, Xiang K, Jia W. Genetic variations in APPL2 are associated with overweight and obesity in a Chinese population with normal glucose tolerance. BMC Med Genet. 2012;13:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. El-Sayed Moustafa JS, Eleftherohorinou H, de Smith AJ, Andersson-Assarsson JC, Couto Alves A, Hadjigeorgiou E, Walters RG, Asher JE, Bottolo L, Buxton JL, et al. Novel association approach for variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs) identifies DOCK5 as a susceptibility gene for severe obesity. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(16):3727–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ng MC, Park KS, Oh B, Tam CH, Cho YM, Shin HD, Lam VK, Ma RC, So WY, Cho YS, et al. Implication of genetic variants near TCF7L2, SLC30A8, HHEX, CDKAL1, CDKN2A/B, IGF2BP2, and FTO in type 2 diabetes and obesity in 6,719 asians. Diabetes. 2008;57(8):2226–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was sponsored by Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2022D01A64) and also financed by the Key Discipline of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China

    Lei Xu, Kaiqing Zhou, Xixia Huang, Hong Chen & Qiuming Chen

  2. Institute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China

    Hong Dong

Authors
  1. Lei Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaiqing Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xixia Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hong Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qiuming Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Lei Xu: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing-original draft. Kaiqing Zhou: Formal analysis. Xixia Huang: Supervision. Hong Chen: Writing – review and editing. Hong Dong: Investigation, Resources. Qiuming Chen: Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hong Dong or Qiuming Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal treatments were according to the recommendation of the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals of China, and approved by the Animal Care Committee of Xinjiang Agricultural University responsible for overseeing the ethical use of animals in research within the university. All methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines for the reporting of animal experiments.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

 Supplementary Figure 1. The output produced by OptM. A total of 5 iterations were run for each possible number of migration edges, m = 1–10. (A) The mean and standard deviation (SD) for the composite likelihood L(m) (left axis, black circles) and proportion of variance explained (right axis, red “x”s). (B) The second-order rate of change (Δm) across values of m. The arrow indicates the peak in Δm at m = 2 edges. Supplementary Figure 2. Cross-validation plot for the 161 genomes. Supplementary Table 1. Summary of sequencing data. Supplementary Table 2. Functional classification of the detected SNPs. Supplementary Table 3. Functional classification of the exonic SNPs. Supplementary Table 4. list of selected regions in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle. Supplementary Table 5. The top ten significant GO terms from the enrichment analysis of selected candidate genes Supplementary Table 6. The top ten significant KEGG pathways from the enrichment analysis of selected candidate genes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, L., Zhou, K., Huang, X. et al. Whole-genome resequencing provides insights into the diversity and adaptation to desert environment in Xinjiang Mongolian cattle. BMC Genomics 25, 176 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10084-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10084-w

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us