Skip to main content
Download PDF

Whole-genome selection signature differences between Chaohu and Ji’an red ducks

BMC Genomics volume 25, Article number: 522 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Assessing the genetic structure of local varieties and understanding their genetic data are crucial for effective management and preservation. However, the genetic differences among local breeds require further explanation. To enhance our understanding of their population structure and genetic diversity, we conducted a genome-wide comparative study of Chaohu and Ji’an Red ducks using genome sequence and restriction site-associated DNA sequencing technology. Our analysis revealed a distinct genetic distinction between the two breeds, leading to divided groups. The phylogenetic tree for Chaohu duck displayed two branches, potentially indicating minimal impact from artificial selection. Additionally, our ROH (runs of homozygosity) analysis revealed that Chaohu ducks had a lower average inbreeding coefficient than Ji’an Red ducks. We identified several genomic regions with high genetic similarity in these indigenous duck breeds. By conducting a selective sweep analysis, we identified 574 candidate genes associated with muscle growth (BMP2, ITGA8, MYLK, and PTCH1), fat deposits (ELOVL1 and HACD2), and pigmentation (ASIP and LOC101797494). These results offer valuable insights for the further enhancement and conservation of Chinese indigenous duck breeds.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Ducks play a crucial role in enhancing the ecological diversity of species in regions with rich breeding potential. Over time, ducks have been selectively bred for meat and eggs, resulting in significant variations in shape, productivity, and reproductive rates. Meat ducks are known for their fast growth rate and high meat production, whereas egg-laying ducks are valued for their exceptional laying performance and durability, although they tend to be smaller in size [1]. The domestication of indigenous ducks in China dates back 2000 years, with recent research indicating their evolution from Anas platyrhynchos and Anas zonorhyncha [2]. The substantial improvements in production performance and phenotypic differences between domestic ducks and mallards can be attributed to directional selection and domestication to meet market demands [3]; for instance, there are significant differences in their skeletal systems [4], as well as differences in the production performance of meat and egg-laying ducks. Nonetheless, the specific details regarding the timing and process of differentiation between meat and egg-laying ducks in Chinese indigenous breeds remain unclear, and the genetic mechanisms underlying the differences in production performance remain poorly understood.

Natural pigments accumulate in the tissues and organs of animals, playing roles in various biological processes and regulating organism metabolism. In birds, plumage color is primarily determined by melanin, carotenoids, and porphyrin pigments [5]. Plumage color serves primarily for protection [6], mate selection [7], signal recognition [8] and detoxification [9]. The genes MITF and EDNRB2 [10] regulate black and white plumage colouration in ducks, while red plumage colors are less studied. Recent studies have revealed complex differences in feather colouring between geographic locations [11], feather growth regions [12], and genders [13]. Some of these factors also have a relatively high heritability.

The Middle-lower Yangtze Plain is a middle and lower coastal strip plain below the Three Gorges of the Yangtze River in China. Most of this area falls within the northern subtropics, with a small portion at the northern edge of the meso-subtropics. The plain has an average elevation of 5–100 m and is known for its abundant water resources. The region’s average annual temperature ranges from 14 to 18 degrees Celsius, creating excellent ecological conditions for waterfowl rearing. Consequently, a diverse range of local duck breeds have thrived in this area. For our study, we selected two representative breeds to investigate the genetic differences resulting from direct selection. Chaohu duck (CH), a meat and egg variety of mallards, originates from Lujiang County in Anhui Province (31°23′ N, 117°29′ E). These ducks exhibit strong adaptability, tolerance to roughage, and high disease resistance. The average weight of the males was 2.5 kg, while that of the females was approximately 2 kg. Ji’an Red duck (JA), another meat and egg variety of the mallard, originated in Suichuan County, Ji’an City, Jiangxi Province (26°33′ N, 114°5′ E). These ducks have a short and round body shape, moderate size, and a red coat color, making them ideal for the processing of dried salted duck meat. The average weight of the males is 1.5 kg, while females weigh around 1.335 kg.

The decreasing cost of high-throughput sequencing and continuous advancements in sequencing technologies have led to an increase in genomic-level analyses of various species. Previous studies on ducks have utilized selective sweep analysis to identify genes associated with feed conversion rate [14], lipid metabolism, muscle function [15], and feather color differentiation [10, 16]. Selective sweep analyses in other species have identified numerous genes that are beneficial for production efficiency and species conservation [17,18,19]. Furthermore, analysing inbreeding relationships between populations can aid in optimizing conservation and breeding plans for local breeds [20]. In the analysis of runs of homozygosity (ROH), genomic regions with high levels of inbreeding are referred to as ROH islands, which may serve as indicators of positive selection, possibly arising due to linkage disequilibrium. Previous studies on other species have used continuous ROH analysis to quantify ROH islands and uncover numerous genomic regions influenced by environmental changes and human interventions [20]. However, relevant analyses of indigenous ducks in China still have substantial gaps.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between CH and JA after selection in different environments. We aimed to describe the genetic relationships between these two indigenous duck populations in China using principal component analysis, structure analysis, and phylogenetic tree analysis. ROH analysis is employed to evaluate valuable genomic information related to inbreeding. Based on this analysis, we identified and analysed the fixed mutant regions in the two indigenous ducks through selective sweep analysis. The averaged population differentiation index (Fst) is calculated, and the cross-population composite likelihood ratio test (XP-CLR) is conducted to reduce false-positive rates in Fst calculations [21]. The findings of this study can contribute to a better understanding of the genomic structure of the Middle-lower Yangtze Plain indigenous ducks and provide insights into potential selection signs in ROH islands. These findings are useful for developing conservation strategies for geneticists and breeders, as well as improvement schemes for the future.

Results

RAD sequencing of Chaohu and Ji’an red ducks

Following sequencing, the average amount of raw pair-reads per sample was 1.5 Gb. Reads containing ≥10% unidentified nucleotides and > 50% of bases with a Phred quality score below 20 were discarded. The remaining reads were aligned to the barcode adapter. Finally, clean pairs of reads were obtained after quality filtering. The sequence analysis revealed that the quality range of Q20 was between 96.00 and 96.64%, with a mean value of 96.26%. Meanwhile, the quality range of Q30 was between 89.11 and 90.62%, with a mean value of 89.72%. Genome comparison revealed a total of 4,566,782 SNPs, 150,805 insertions, and 211,058 deletions.

Population structure analysis

To determine the proportions of different ancestry groups, we used ADMIXTURE software for optimal clustering analysis. Additionally, we examined population structure based on cross-validation (CV) error result. The results of the CV error indicated that 2 clusters were optimal (Fig. S1). The population structure analysis was conducted assuming ancestral populations with parameter K (Fig. 1A). When K = 2, the separation between CH and JA was more pronounced, which aligns with the results for the samples we collected. However, when K = 3, CH exhibited mixed ancestry with a notable observation that the C1 individual displayed 3.57% JA ancestry. This finding suggests that the genealogy of CH is more complex than that of JA, potentially due to JA’s increased tendency for inbreeding during the breeding process.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Analysis of population variation and structure analysis of duck breeds. A: Population structure of two ducks. B: Principal component analysis (PCA) for the first and second components. C: Phylogenetic trees showing the genetic structure of the 60 indigenous duck individuals

Full size image

To explore the genetic background of the two local duck breeds, genome-wide SNP data were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA). The analysis revealed a distinct genetic structure, with each breed forming a separate cluster (Fig. 1B). In the first component, CH and JA were clearly separated into distinct clusters. For the second and third components (Fig. S2), the JA group exhibited greater concentrations than did the CH group, further supporting the complexity of the genealogy of CH in comparison to that of JA. Additionally, the second and third components displayed numerous overlapping points between CH and JA, implying the possibility of a shared ancestor between the two breeds.

Phylogenetic trees provide valuable insights into the genetic relationships among populations. The sampling process was repeated 1000 times using the Kimura two-parameter model to ensure the robustness of the phylogenetic tree results. Samples with high sequence similarity were aggregated to construct a neighbor-joining (NJ) tree, whose topology was supported by a bootstrap value of 80% or greater. This high bootstrap value indicates the high reliability of the constructed phylogenetic tree. The results (displayed in Fig. 1C) demonstrate that all individuals of the same variety clustered together, highlighting significant genetic differentiation between CH and JA. Furthermore, the NJ tree was divided into three branches, with JA forming an independent branch and CH being divided into two branches. This division may imply that CH was subject to less artificial selection than was JA.

Runs of homozygosity detection and analysis

A total of 15,981 ROHs were detected in both species. Among these, 7475 (46.77%) ROHs with an average length of 134.88 MB were identified in CH, while 8506 (53.23%) ROHs with an average length of 162.72 MB were identified in JA. The number and total length of ROHs (Fig. 2A) were smaller in CH than in JA.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Genome-wide scan for ROH. A: Number of ROH per breed (X-axis) and the total ROH length of each animal (Y-axis). B: Box plot of the inbreeding coefficients inferred from ROH (FROH) for duck breeds. C: Manhattan plot of the incidence of each SNP in the runs of homozygosity among the duck breeds

Full size image

In this study, we utilized ROH data to assess the average inbreeding coefficient among two duck populations (Fig. 2B). JA exhibited a greater mean inbreeding coefficient (FROH = 0.1445) than CH (FROH = 0.1198). At the individual level, JA had the highest genomic inbreeding coefficient (ROHMAX = 0.249), while CH had the lowest (ROHMIN = 0.014). These findings indicate that JA has a greater degree of inbreeding than CH. We calculated the proportion of SNPs in ROH segments, sorted the values, and established the top 1% as a threshold for identifying ROH islands (Fig. 2C, Table S1).

Selective sweep screening and analysis

We integrated the SNP data and conducted screening using the Fst method (Fig. 3A, Table S2). Subsequently, we employed the XP-CLR method (Fig. 3B, Table S3) with CH as the reference population and JA as the selected population. By combining the results of both screening methods, we identified a total of 574 selected genes (Fig. 3C, Table S4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Select Sweep Analysis. A: Significant loci from Fst screening. B: Significant loci from XP-CLR. C: Duplicate loci from Fst and XP-CLR screening

Full size image

Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were then performed on the 574 genes. The results revealed showed that 259 GO terms were enriched in the GO functional enrichment analysis, and 104 pathways were enriched in the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. The majority of the genes were associated with developmental process (GO:0032502), growth (GO:0040007), pigmentation (GO:0043473) (Fig. S3, Table S5) and fatty acid elongation pathway (ko00062) (Fig. S4, Table S5). Several candidate genes related to muscle growth were identified, such as BMP2, ITGA8, MYLK, and PTCH1. Additionally, the following genes associated with fat deposits were detected: ELOVL1 and HACD2. Furthermore, we identified ASIP, a gene related to pigmentation.

Discussion

Detecting the imprints of positive selection on a species’ genome through changes in gene polymorphisms enables the exploration of genetic mutations resulting from adaptive evolution. It also allows the detection of genetic mutations arising from differentiation due to spatial and temporal segregation. Previous studies on ducks have relied mainly on genome-wide association analyses, with only a few utilizing whole-genome resequencing [14]. In the present study, we employed whole-genome restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) to comparatively analyse two duck breeds based on SNP markers in their genomes. Our objective was to characterize the genetic diversity and population structure of both breeds. The results of the structural analysis and PCA were consistent with the phylogenetic tree, providing evidence that the two duck species are independent ecological populations. Furthermore, the ROH analysis revealed a high degree of genetic diversity in both the CH and JA breeds.

This study involved the sequencing and analysis of 60 ducks to examine their population structure via structure analysis, principal component analysis, and phylogenetic tree analysis. Based on the structural analysis and PCA, the ducks were classified into distinct two groups, which was further supported by the division of the phylogenetic tree into two sub-branches. These findings indicate the divergence of the two duck species. The CH breed primarily originates from Chaohu city, Hefei city, Anhui Province, China, and is highly esteemed. Historical records indicate that this breed has been raised for more than 200 years. The JA breed, on the other hand, is mainly found in Ji’an County, Ji’an City, Jiangxi Province, and is known for its exceptional duck production capabilities. Historical records show that the JA breed has been raised for more than 150 years, with local residents actively selecting and refining the breed through artificial selection.

The analysis of ROH is a commonly used method for assessing the extent of inbreeding in animal populations and identifying traits associated with population selection [20]. It is deemed one of the most effective methods for detecting inbreeding [22, 23]. In this study, we identified 56 ROH islands located on chromosomes 10, W, and Z, providing further insights into the genetic landscape of the duck breeds.

Fst analysis is commonly used to identify loci with high levels of differentiation. However, these loci may not always be directly associated with the traits or environmental factors of the target species. To complement the Fst approach, the XP-CLR method was used to model frequency differences in shared alleles between populations. By simulating genetic drift under neutral conditions using Brownian motion and estimating the impact of selection clearance on nearby SNPs using a deterministic model, XP-CLR is widely used for detecting natural selection. Previous studies on livestock and poultry have shown that combining XP-CLR with Fst can effectively reduce the false-positive rate of Fst, thereby increasing the reliability of the findings [19, 24, 25]. In our study, we conducted joint screening and identified a total of 574 genes with significant differences, including 180 non-coding RNA genes and 394 protein-coding genes. Among the protein-coding genes, we identified specific genes associated with adipose tissue accumulation, myogenesis, and color divergence in feathers.

GO annotations indicated that BMP2 is enriched in the pathway of striated muscle tissue development. ITGA8, MYLK, and PTCH1 are enriched in the smooth muscle tissue development pathway. ELOVL1 and HACD2 are enriched in fatty acid elongation and very long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic process. BMP2 encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-β protein superfamily, which initiates the classical BMP signaling cascade by associating with type I receptor BMPR1A and type II receptor BMPR2 [26]. BMPR2 phosphorylates and activates BMPR1A [27], which in turn relays the phosphorylation signal to the nucleus via SMAD proteins. These proteins act as suppressors of target genes. Previous research has shown that proliferation of chondrocytes can regulate osteoclastogenesis via the BMP2/SMAD1-induced expression of RANKL [28]. Studies in chickens have demonstrated that BMP2 impacts comb quality, egg production, marrow bone area, and the total area and density of bone cavities [29]. Li’s research demonstrated that the SAMD signaling pathway, which involves BMP2, plays a role in the proliferation and differentiation of chicken skeletal muscle satellite cells. When SAMD3 is overexpressed, myostatin secretion increases [30]. Hence, the greater expression of BMP2 might contribute to the larger body size of CH ducks than of JA ducks. ITGA8 encodes the alpha 8 subunit of the heterodimeric integrin α8β1 protein, a transmembrane receptor protein belonging to the alpha integrin family [31]. Pezeshkian et al. reported a strong correlation between the protein encoded by ITGA8 and chicken growth and feed efficiency, with ITGA8 being one of the most down-regulated genes in chickens with high feed efficiency [32, 33]. Research on Longyan Shanma ducks revealed that ITGA8 regulates egg production through the control of actin cytoskeleton formation [34]. MYLK encodes myosin light chain kinase, a calcium-dependent enzyme. Malila, Y et al. reported a significant increase in MYLK expression in the hypoxic muscles of broiler chickens [35]. PTCH1 encodes a member of the patched protein family that is located on the plasma membrane and functions as a receptor for sonic hedgehog (SHH), indian hedgehog (IHH), and desert hedgehog (DHH). PTCH1 mutant mice exhibited impaired glucose tolerance and symptoms of pancreatic malformation in studies [36, 37]. Zhang et al. discovered that PTCH1 plays a critical role in the development of testes in broiler chickens [38]. In summary, these genes may regulate the larger body size of CH ducks than of JA ducks.

The flavour of meat is strongly linked to its fat composition. ELOVL1 encodes an enzyme called fatty acid elongase, which plays a significant role in the production of fatty acids and sphingolipids. A study conducted by Castell on rats revealed that ELOVL1 is involved in the synthesis of very-long-chain (VLC) sphingolipids and contributes to the pancreatic β cell proliferation induced by oleic acid [39]. Tanno et al. conducted research on ELOVL isoenzymes and reported that ELOVL1 plays a role in the production of branched VLC acyl-CoA, which initiates the mitochondrial β-oxidation of long-chain fatty acids ranging from 14 to 20 carbons in length [40, 41]. Liu et al. conducted a study on the feeding performance of Xupu geese and Landes wild geese and reported a significant increase in abdominal fat weight in Xupu geese compared to Landes wild geese [42]. This increase was accompanied by a substantial increase in oleic acid content and a significant decrease in ELOVL1 mRNA expression. According to Liu et al., ELOVL1 is a member of a gene family responsible for the synthesis of polyunsaturated fatty acids in chickens [43]. Wang et al. demonstrated that the expression of ELOVL1–6 in different chicken organs is closely related to fat deposition and is negatively regulated by estrogen [44].

HACD2 encodes an enzyme called 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 2, which dehydrates very-long-chain fatty acids during elongation. A study conducted on subcutaneous white adipose tissue revealed lower gene expression of HACD2 in individuals with lower body weight [45]. Du et al. proposed HACD2 and ELOVL5 as potential genes associated with subcutaneous fat deposition in beef cattle [46]. A study on Qinchuan cattle conducted by Yu et al. indicated that HACD2 is closely related to intramuscular fat deposition [47]. Based on these results, it can be inferred that ELOVL1 and HACD2 may play more significant roles in the synthesis and metabolism of fatty acids in CH ducks than in JA ducks. Furthermore, ELOVL1 may help explain the larger body size observed in male ducks than in female ducks.

CH ducks have predominantly brown plumage, while JA ducks have red plumage. KEGG annotation suggested enrichment of ASIP in the pigment deposition pathway and enrichment of LOC101797494 in the pathway of cytochrome P450 metabolism of xenobiotics. LOC101797494 encodes cytochrome P450 1B1, named by the International Commission on Cytochrome P450 Nomenclature. ASIP encodes the Agouti signaling protein, which acts as an antagonist of the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) and plays a role in pigment synthesis [48]. Studies on Japanese quails have shown that ASIP leads to decreased melanin pigmentation in feathers [49, 50]. In research on Putian ducks and Longsheng ducks, ASIP expression was found only in Longsheng ducks, indicating potential differences in melanin regulation between these species [51]. Cui et al. discovered that ASIP exhibits a more ancient mutation than MC1R in Monarcha (castaneiventris), potentially explaining the variations in melanin regulation among bird species [52]. The protein encoded by LOC101797494 contributes to the formation of the cytochrome P450 1B1 enzyme, which is essential for maintaining normal cellular and tissue functions and is a heme-containing monooxygenase [53]. Previous studies suggest that birds produce red pigments through the endogenous conversion of yellow carotenoids to red carotenoids via oxidation catalyzed by ketolase enzymes upon ingestion. An investigation of the Eurasian tree sparrow indicated that cytochrome P450 enzymes might play a role in red pigment production in birds [54]. This could account for the difference in body feather color between CH and JA. Additionally, cytochrome P450 enzymes may offer protection against harmful endogenous and environmental compounds, including reactive oxygen species [55].

To the best of our knowledge, while validating genes associated with muscle growth, fat deposition, and pigment deposition in previous studies on domestic ducks, we have also identified genes that may impact the stress resistance and pigment deposition of indigenous ducks in China. Further mechanistic studies are necessary to confirm our findings. Nonetheless, our work contributes to a greater understanding of the genetic factors related to growth benefits, stress resistance, and pigment deposition in the genomic context of Chinese indigenous ducks.

Conclusion

This study conducted a comprehensive analysis of the population structure and genetic diversity of two local duck breeds on the Middle-lower Yangtze Plain of China, from a genome-wide perspective. Various methods using genomic data were used to assess the inter- and intra-population characteristics of these breeds. The analyses revealed that both breeds were independent populations, with artificial selection currently driving variation in muscle growth, fat deposition, and pigmentation. Additionally, several genes were strongly associated with the expression of economic traits in the breeds. As such, the population structure and candidate genes described in this paper have significant implications for understanding the differentiation of local ducks in southeastern China, improving their breeding programs, managing genetic resources, preserving genetic diversity, and promoting local breeds.

Materials and methods

DNA extraction and RAD sequencing

Chaohu and Ji’an Red ducks were raised on a conservation farm at the National Institute of Waterfowl Gene Bank (Shishi, China). Blood samples were collected from the wing veins of 30 CHs and 30 JAs. The ducks represented three generations without a common ancestor, including the existing genetic relationships of each breed. All animal procedures were approved by the Experimental Animal Care and Use Committee of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (PZCASFAFU23079) according to the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology, China, revised in July 2013).

Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood samples using a Blood Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and integrity of the DNA were assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Leicester, UK) and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The DNA libraries of RAD-seq were prepared by Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq™ 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using 150 bp paired-end reads.

Variant calling

After obtaining the original reads, fastp was used to screen high-quality clean reads. The screening process followed three stringent filtering standards: (1) removing reads aligned to the barcode adapters; (2) removing reads with > 50% bases with Phred quality scores of ≤20; and (3) removing reads with ≥10% unidentified nucleotides (N). Picard mark duplicates (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/, v2.18.24) were used to remove the PCR-duplicate reads. The clean reads were then mapped to the Anas platyrhynchos reference genome (GCF_015476345.1). The Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA) v0.7.17 with default settings was used to obtain sorted binary bam files, which were generated via SAMtools v1.9 [56, 57]. Variant calling for all samples was performed using GATK’s Unified Genotyper (v3.5). Gvcf files were generated by HaplotypeCaller module, and joint genotypes were determined using the GenotypeGVCFs module [58]. GATK’s Variant Filtration was utilized to filter SNPs based on the following criteria: -window 4, −filter “QD < 2.0 || FS > 60.0 || MQ < 40.0”, −G filter “GQ < 20”. The minor alleles frequency (maf) and missing genotype rate (geno) were calculated using PLINK (v1.9, Boston, MA, USA) with the parameters “--maf 0.05 --geno 0.2 --allow-extra-chr --chr-set 33”. The “--allow-extra-chr” and “--chr-set” parameters were included to accommodate nonhuman organisms processed by PLINK [59].

Population structure analysis

A distance matrix was constructed to represent the evolutionary distance between two breeds based on the obtained SNP information. Using the continuous merging method, the samples were cluster analyzed to infer the genetic relationships between populations. MEGA11 software and NJ method were used to construct the phylogenetic tree, which was then visualized using the R package ggtree [60,61,62]. The SmartPCA program in EIGENSOFT software was used to perform PCA based on SNPs [63]. Population structure analysis was conducted using ADMIXTURE (v1.3.0) software with kinship (K) set from 1 to 9 to observe the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium [64]. An algorithmic Bayesian model-based analysis was used to calculate the possibility that the genomic variation of each sample originated from the Kth subpopulation, thus inferring the population structure of the samples.

ROH analysis

ROH were defined as long and continuous homozygous extensions in the genome composed of two identical haplotypes in individuals. PLINK was utilized to estimate the ROH. The minimum number of SNPs required to constitute an ROH was set at 30, with a minimum SNP density of at least 1 SNP per 100 kb per ROH. Additionally, the minimum length of an ROH was set to 300 kb, and the presence of up to two missing and one possible heterozygous genotype was allowed within an ROH. The maximum spacing between consecutive pure heterozygous SNPs was set at 1000 kb. The individual genome inbreeding coefficients (FROH) were calculated by dividing the total length of the duck autosomal genome covered by the SNP by the aggregate length of all detected ROHs in an individual. The top 1% of SNP regions were considered ROH islands after sorting the calculated percentages. The distribution of ROH on these chromosomes in the two indigenous duck populations was mapped using the R package rMVP [65].

Selective sweep analysis

To identify the genome selection signatures, we employed Fst and XP-CLR calculation methods. The CH and JA samples were categorized together for analysis. Each chromosome was divided into 100 kb windows, and the values of each window on every chromosome were calculated independently. The first window began at the first base, and the starting base position of each subsequent window was positioned 10 kb from the starting base of the previous window. The SNPs contained within the windows were used for Fst and XP-CLR calculations. Fst was determined using the R package PopGenome, while XP-CLR was calculated using XP-CLR software [21, 66]. This approach facilitated the detection of genetic differentiation between CH and JA by establishing a hypothetical selection region for Fst calculations. Considering previous research findings [14, 25], we regarded the top 5% of the results as the selected region and extracted genes within this region. Notably, Fst relies on genomic unit point scanning, which can introduce uncertainty due to genetic drift and other variables, resulting in a lower reliability of the population history factor. Based on previous research [17, 25, 66] and as a supplement to the present study, the top 1% of the XP-CLR index was used as the selected region, as this amplifies the selection signal. Genes within this region were also extracted for further examination. To explore the functional implications of the extracted genes, we conducted GO function and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses. The resulting data were visualized using the R package ggplot2 [67,68,69]. For these analyses, we utilized the WebGestalt website in conjunction with the David database, and the Genecards website, as well as any available relevant literature, were consulted as references [70,71,72].

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available with links to BioProject accession number PRJNA1017640.

References

  1. Gu H, Zhu T, Li X, Chen Y, Wang L, Lv X, et al. A joint analysis strategy reveals genetic changes associated with artificial selection between egg-type and meat-type ducks. Anim Genet. 2020;51(6):890–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Y, Bao Q, Cao Z, Bian Y, Zhang Y, Cao Z, et al. Chinese Domestic Ducks Evolved from Mallard Duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and Spot-Billed Duck (A. zonorhyncha). Animals-Basel. 2023;13(7):1156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformat. 2018;34(17):i884–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu T, Qi X, Chen Y, Wang L, Lv X, Yang W, et al. Positive selection of skeleton-related genes during duck domestication revealed by whole genome sequencing. Bmc Ecol Evol. 2021;21(1):165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Toomey MB, Ronald KL. Avian color expression and perception: is there a carotenoid link? J Exp Biol. 2021;224(12):jeb203844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chuong C, Homberger DG. Development and evolution of the amniote integument: current landscape and future horizon. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2003;298(1):1–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen C, Foley J, Tang P, Li A, Jiang TX, Wu P, et al. Development, regeneration, and evolution of feathers. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2015;3(1):169–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruxton GD, Persons WS IV, Currie PJ. A continued role for signaling functions in the early evolution of feathers. Evolut. 2017;71(3):797–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cantarero A, Mateo R, Camarero PR, Alonso D, Fernandez-Eslava B, Alonso-Alvarez C. Testing the shared-pathway hypothesis in the carotenoid-based coloration of red crossbills. Evolut. 2020;74(10):2348–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo Q, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Bi Y, Chen G, Bai H, et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies candidate genes encoding feather color in ducks. Genes-Basel. 2022;13(7):1249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ornelas JF, González C, Hernández-Baños BE, García-Moreno J. Molecular and iridescent feather reflectance data reveal recent genetic diversification and phenotypic differentiation in a cloud forest hummingbird. Ecol Evol. 2016;6(4):1104–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Prieto-Torres DA, Cuervo AM, Bonaccorso E. On geographic barriers and Pleistocene glaciations: tracing the diversification of the russet-crowned warbler (Myiothlypis coronata) along the Andes. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0191598.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu X, Wang S, Feng Z, Song Y, Zhou Y, Mabrouk I, et al. Sex identification of feather color in geese and the expression of melanin in embryonic dorsal skin feather follicles. Animals-Basel. 2022;12(11):1427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu H, Wang L, Guo Z, Xu Q, Fan W, Xu Y, et al. Genome-wide association and selective sweep analyses reveal genetic loci for FCR of egg production traits in ducks. Genet Sel Evol. 2021;53(1):98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng P, Zeng T, Yang H, Chen G, Du J, Chen L, et al. Whole-genome resequencing provides insights into the population structure and domestication signatures of ducks in eastern China. BMC Genom. 2021;22(1):401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou Z, Li M, Cheng H, Fan W, Yuan Z, Gao Q, et al. An intercross population study reveals genes associated with body size and plumage color in ducks. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fu W, Lee WR, Abasht B. Detection of genomic signatures of recent selection in commercial broiler chickens. BMC Genet. 2016;17(1):122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee W, Park KD, Taye M, Lee C, Kim H, Lee HK, et al. Analysis of cross-population differentiation between thoroughbred and Jeju horses. Asian Austral J Anim. 2018;31(8):1110–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang X, Qu K, Jia P, Zhang J, Liu J, Lei C, et al. Assessing genomic diversity and productivity signatures in Dianzhong cattle by whole-genome scanning. Front Genet. 2021;12:719215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gorssen W, Meyermans R, Janssens S, Buys N. A publicly available repository of ROH islands reveals signatures of selection in different livestock and pet species. Genet Sel Evol. 2021;53(1):2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pfeifer B. Wittelsb U Rger U, Ramos-Onsins SE, Lercher MJ: PopGenome: an efficient Swiss army knife for population genomic analyses in R. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(7):1929–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bortoluzzi C, Crooijmans RP, Bosse M, Hiemstra SJ, Groenen MA, Megens H. The effects of recent changes in breeding preferences on maintaining traditional Dutch chicken genomic diversity. Heredity. 2018;121(6):564–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Marchesi J, Buzanskas ME, Cantao ME, Ibelli A, Peixoto JO, Joaquim LB, et al. Relationship of runs of homozygosity with adaptive and production traits in a paternal broiler line. Animal. 2018;12(6):1126–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yuan Y, Zhang W, Liu C, He Y, Zhang H, Xu L, et al. Genome-wide selective analysis of Boer goat to investigate the dynamic Heredity evolution under different stages. Animals-Basel. 2022;12(11):1356.

  25. Gu J, Liang Q, Liu C, Li S. Genomic analyses reveal adaptation to hot arid and harsh environments in native chickens of China. Front Genet. 2020;11:582355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Keller S, Nickel J, Zhang J, Sebald W, Mueller TD. Molecular recognition of BMP-2 and BMP receptor IA. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11(5):481–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu F, Ventura F, Doody J, Massagu EJ. Human type II receptor for bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs): extension of the two-kinase receptor model to the BMPs. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15(7):3479–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Usui M, Xing L, Drissi H, Zuscik M, O'Keefe R, Chen D, et al. Murine and chicken chondrocytes regulate osteoclastogenesis by producing RANKL in response to BMP2. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(3):314–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnsson M, Gustafson I, Rubin CJ, Sahlqvist AS, Jonsson KB, Kerje S, et al. A sexual ornament in chickens is affected by pleiotropic alleles at HAO1 and BMP2, selected during domestication. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(8):e1002914.

  30. Li X, McFarland DC, Velleman SG. Effect of Smad3-mediated transforming growth factor-β1 signaling on satellite cell proliferation and differentiation in chickens. Poult Sci. 2008;87(9):1823–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hung CF, Wilson CL, Chow Y, Schnapp LM. Role of integrin alpha8 in murine model of lung fibrosis. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e197937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pezeshkian Z, Mirhoseini SZ, Ghovvati S. Identification of hub genes involved in apparent metabolizable energy of chickens. Anim Biotechnol. 2022;33(2):242–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bottje W, Kong B, Reverter A, Waardenberg AJ, Lassiter K, Hudson NJ. Progesterone signalling in broiler skeletal muscle is associated with divergent feed efficiency. BMC Syst Biol. 2017;11(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun Y, Wu Q, Pan J, Li T, Liu L, Chen D, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes and signalling pathways in the ovary of higher and lower laying ducks. Brit Poultry Sci. 2020;61(6):609–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Malila Y, Thanatsang K, Arayamethakorn S, Uengwetwanit T, Srimarut Y, Petracci M, et al. Absolute expressions of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF1A) transcript and the associated genes in chicken skeletal muscle with white striping and wooden breast myopathies. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e220904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hebrok M, Kim SK, St-Jacques B, McMahon AP, Melton DA. Regulation of pancreas development by hedgehog signaling. Develop. 2000;127(22):4905–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jalabert A, Vial G, Guay C, Wiklander OP, Nordin JZ, Aswad H, et al. Exosome-like vesicles released from lipid-induced insulin-resistant muscles modulate gene expression and proliferation of beta recipient cells in mice. Diabetol. 2016;59(5):1049–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang H, Yu J, Yang L, Kramer LM, Zhang X, Na W, et al. Identification of genome-wide SNP-SNP interactions associated with important traits in chicken. BMC Genom. 2017;18(1):892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Castell A, Vivoli A, Tippetts TS, Frayne IR, Angeles ZE, Moull EVS, et al. Very-long-chain unsaturated sphingolipids mediate oleate-induced rat β-cell proliferation. Diabetes. 2022;71(6):1218–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Leslie ND. Saenz-Ayala S: very long-chain acyl-coenzyme a dehydrogenase deficiency. GeneReviews®; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tanno H, Sassa T, Sawai M, Kihara A. Production of branched-chain very-long-chain fatty acids by fatty acid elongases and their tissue distribution in mammals. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-molecular cell biol Lipids. 2021;1866(1):158842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu X, Li P, He C, Qu X, Guo S. Comparison of overfed Xupu and Landes geese in performance, fatty acid composition, enzymes and gene expression related to lipid metabolism. Asian Austral J Anim. 2020;33(12):1957.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu Y, Sun D, Li X, Ge M, Hou Z. Research Note: Identification of core promoter region of the polyunsaturated fatty acid synthesis-related gene family in chicken. Poult Sci. 2023;102(9):102857.

  44. Wang D, Li X, Zhang P, Cao Y, Zhang K, Qin P, et al. ELOVL gene family plays a virtual role in response to breeding selection and lipid deposition in different tissues in chicken (Gallus gallus). BMC Genom. 2022;23(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kwok KH, Ryd ENM, Andersson DP, Beauchef G, Guere C, Vie K, et al. Lundb a Ck V, Arner P, Dahlman I: prospective analyses of white adipose tissue gene expression in relation to long-term body weight changes. Int J Obesity. 2020;44(2):377–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Du L, Li K, Chang T, An B, Liang M, Deng T, et al. Integrating genomics and transcriptomics to identify candidate genes for subcutaneous fat deposition in beef cattle. Genomics. 2022;114(4):110406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu H, Wang J, Zhang K, Cheng G, Mei C, Zan L. Integrated multi-omics analysis reveals variation in intramuscular fat among muscle locations of Qinchuan cattle. BMC Genom. 2023;24(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang J, Wang C, Liu Y, Liu J, Wang HY, Liu AF, et al. Agouti signalling protein (ASIP) gene: molecular cloning, sequence characterisation and tissue distribution in domestic goose. Brit Poultry Sci. 2016;57(3):288–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Li Y, Zhang X, Pang Y, Qi Y, Zhao S. Construction of MC1R and ASIP eukaryotic expression vector and its regulation of plumage color in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). J Poult Sci. 2019;56(2):84–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Robic A, Morisson M, Leroux S, Gourichon D, Vignal A, Thebault NEM, et al. Two new structural mutations in the 5′ region of the ASIP gene cause diluted feather color phenotypes in Japanese quail. Genet Sel Evol. 2019;51(1):12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Lin R, Li J, Zhao F, Zhou M, Wang J, Xiao T. Transcriptome analysis of genes potentially associated with white and black plumage formation in Chinese indigenous ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Brit Poultry Sci. 2022;63(4):466–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Cui H, Dai W, Zhu Y, Kan X, Gu AAC, Lukemire J, et al. Braingb: a benchmark for brain network analysis with graph neural networks. Ieee T Med Imag. 2022;42(2):493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Song Y, Zaitoun IS, Wang S, Darjatmoko SR, Sorenson CM, Sheibani N. Cytochrome P450 1B1 expression regulates intracellular Iron levels and oxidative stress in the retinal endothelium. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):2420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Mundy NI, Stapley J, Bennison C, Tucker R, Twyman H, Kim K, et al. Red carotenoid coloration in the zebra finch is controlled by a cytochrome P450 gene cluster. Curr Biol. 2016;26(11):1435–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Almeida D, Maldonado E, Khan I, Silva L, Gilbert MTP, Zhang G, et al. O Brien SJ, Johnson WE, Antunes a: whole-genome identification, phylogeny, and evolution of the cytochrome P450 family 2 (CYP2) subfamilies in birds. Genome Biol Evol. 2016;8(4):1115–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows--Wheeler transform. Bioinform. 2009;25(14):1754–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigasci. 2021;10(2):giab8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, Del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A, et al. From FastQ data to high-confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformat. 2013;43(1):10–1.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Yu G. Using ggtree to visualize data on tree-like structures. Curr Protoc Bioinformat. 2020;69(1):e96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kimura M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press; 1983.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. Molyt EA, Urnikyt EA. Ku V C Inskas V: a comparative analysis of mathematical methods for homogeneity estimation of the Lithuanian population. Acta Medica Lituanica. 2019;26(4):211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1655–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Yin L, Zhang H, Tang Z, Xu J, Yin D, Zhang Z, et al. rMVP: a memory-efficient, visualization-enhanced, and parallel-accelerated tool for genome-wide association study. Genom Proteom Bioinf. 2021;19(4):619–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Chen H, Patterson N, Reich D. Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res. 2010;20(3):393–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Consortium GO. Gene ontology consortium: going forward. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(D1):D1049–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  70. Sherman BT, Hao M, Qiu J, Jiao X, Baseler MW, Lane HC, et al. DAVID: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(W1):W216–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Stelzer G, Rosen N, Plaschkes I, Zimmerman S, Twik M, Fishilevich S, et al. The GeneCards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses. Curr Protoc Bioinformat. 2016;54(1):1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Liao Y, Wang J, Jaehnig EJ, Shi Z, Zhang B. WebGestalt 2019: gene set analysis toolkit with revamped UIs and APIs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W199–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all the authors for their contributions to the study.

Funding

The project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31702109), Special Fund for Science and Technology Innovation of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (KFb22064XA), Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2017 J01596 and 2023 J01446), Fujian Province Young and Middle-Aged Teacher Education Research Project (JAT220059).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, People’s Republic of China

    Ruiyi Lin, Huihuang Li, Weilong Lin, Fan Yang, Xinguo Bao, Chengfu Pan, Lianjie Lai & Weimin Lin

Authors
  1. Ruiyi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huihuang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weilong Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xinguo Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chengfu Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lianjie Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Weimin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Ruiyi Lin, and Huihuang Li designed the experiments. Huihuang Li, and Weimin Lin performed the data analysis of genome. Lianjie Lai, Chengfu Pan and Weilong Lin participated in the sample collection and preparation work. Ruiyi Lin, and Huihuang Li completed the manuscript writing. Fan Yang and Xinguo Bao participated in the writing instruction and revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weimin Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods strictly obeyed the Guide for the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines 2.0. The protocols for all animal experiments were approved by the Experimental Animal Care and Use Committee of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (FAFU2013–0012), according to the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology, China, revised in July 2013).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, R., Li, H., Lin, W. et al. Whole-genome selection signature differences between Chaohu and Ji’an red ducks. BMC Genomics 25, 522 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10339-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10339-6

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us