Skip to main content
Download PDF

MIR396-GRF/GIF enhances in planta shoot regeneration of Dendrobium catenatum

BMC Genomics volume 25, Article number: 543 (2024) Cite this article

Summary

Recent studies on co-transformation of the growth regulator, TaGRF4-GIF1 chimera (Growth Regulating Factor 4-GRF Interacting Factor 1), in cultivated wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum), showed improved regeneration efficiency, marking a significant breakthrough. Here, a simple and reproducible protocol using the GRF4-GIF1 chimera was established and tested in the medicinal orchid Dendrobium catenatum, a monocot orchid species. TaGRF4-GIF1 from T. aestivum and DcGRF4-GIF1 from D. catenatum were reconstructed, with the chimeras significantly enhancing the regeneration efficiency of D. catenatum through in planta transformation. Further, mutating the microRNA396 (miR396) target sites in TaGRF4 and DcGRF4 improved regeneration efficiency. The target mimicry version of miR396 (MIM396) not only boosted shoot regeneration but also enhanced plant growth. Our methods revealed a powerful tool for the enhanced regeneration and genetic transformation of D. catenatum.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

In the past few decades, plant transformation proved to be a basic tool for the characterization of gene functions and the development of genetically modified crops [1, 2]. Plant genetic transformation is highly species- and genotype-dependent, often causing bottlenecks in crop genetic engineering and gene editing. With Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation efficiency being low in hormone-based tissue culture of orchids, several transformation and regeneration systems were developed in various orchid species [3]. However, these methods were time-consuming and inefficient, resulting in the production of only a small number of plants. Another challenge in the genetic transformation of orchids was the extended juvenile phase of immature tissues [4], hindering the functional analyses of genes. Additionally, compared to dicots, monocot orchids are more difficult to transform with A. tumefaciens as dicots are the natural hosts of the pathogen [5]. Hence, effective transformation and regeneration methods were required for orchids to produce a large number of uniform seedlings within a short time.

The constitutive expression of a small class of transcription factors (TFs), including the GRF (Growth Regulating Factor) and its corresponding co-activator GIF (GRF Interacting Factor), significantly enhanced the transformation and regeneration of fertile plants with normal phenotypes [6, 7]. This rendered the conditional expression or removal of the transgenes unnecessary. GRFs are highly conserved plant-specific TFs that influence cell proliferation and size [8, 9], thereby regulating meristem formation and plant growth and development [10]. GRF proteins may interact with corresponding co-factor GIFs to create a functional transcriptional complex in vivo [8], with the activity of the complex being precisely regulated at multiple levels. Studies showed that microRNA396 (miR396) post-transcriptionally repressed most GRF members and guided GRF mRNAs for cleavage or transcriptional arrest, thereby controlling the GRF-GIF-dependent processes [8]. Mutating the miR396 target sites in GRFs showed an increase in the GRF transcripts, with enhanced activities in the GRF-GIF complexes [11]. The miR396-GRF/GIF module was found to recruit Switch/Sucrose Nonfermenting (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complexes to regulate the expression of target genes and determine the meristematic identity for organogenesis [8, 12]. For instance, the PpnGRF-GIF complex from poplar inhibited the expression of Cytokinin Oxidase/Dehydrogenase 1 (PpnCKX1), leading to cytokinin accumulation and meristematic induction [13]. The GRF4-GIF1 fusion protein from wheat, citrus, and grape significantly enhanced transformation efficiency, yielding fertile transgenic plants with normal phenotypes in multiple plant species, including wheat (Triticum aestivum), rice (Oryza sativa), citrus (Citrus sp.), grape (Vitis vinifera), and hemp (Cannabis sativa) [7]. Introducing synonymous mutations to the miR396 target site of TaGRF4 resulted in the mTaGRF4-GIF1 complex, outperforming the original TaGRF4-GIF1 complex [11]. The ClGRF4-GIF1 chimera from Citrullus lanatus boosted the transformation efficiency of watermelon in a genotype-independent manner [1]. AtGRF5 and its homologs from Arabidopsis thaliana enhanced shoot regeneration and transformation efficiency in maize (Zea mays), canola (Brassica napus), soybean (Glycine max), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris), and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) [6]. Superior performance in both monocots and dicots and the accelerated transformation process highlighted the broad application potential of the GRF-GIF chimera.

This study aimed to investigate the impact of the GRF4-GIF1 chimera on the regeneration efficiency of juvenile explant tissues from the monocot species D. catenatum. Our findings demonstrated that a constitutive expression of the GRF4-GIF1 chimera, its mutated variant mGRF4-GIF1, and the target mimicry version MIM396 significantly enhanced shoot regeneration efficiencies in D. catenatum. Notably, the introduction MIM396 into D. catenatum significantly enhanced plant growth. Compared to the traditional methods of orchid regeneration, our strategy proved to be efficient, with significant potential to expedite orchid research and molecular breeding in the future.

Results

Identification of DcGRF4 and DcGIF1, and the construction of the GRF4-GIF1 chimera

Based on recent reports demonstrating the regeneration-improving effects of the GRF4-GIF chimera in various plant species [7, 11], we speculated whether it could be applied to orchids having time-consuming and inefficient regeneration processes. To study this, the presence of GRFs in D. catenatum was initially examined, with ten homologues being identified using the profile Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1A). Of them, DcGRF4 (LOC110113908) was designated to have the highest homology to TaGRF4, a GRF transcription factor gene from T. aestivum [7]. Additionally, eight of the ten DcGRFs were predicted to be targeted by miR396, except for LOC110104491 and LOC110094773 (Fig. 1B). To create mDcGRF4, five mutations were introduced into the miR396 binding site of DcGRF4 (Fig. 1C), following the corresponding sequence in mTaGRF4. To create the DcGRF4-GIF1 chimera, a phylogenetic tree was constructed to identify the closest homologue of TaGIF1, designated as DcGIF1 (Fig. 1D). There were six members of DcGIFs in the D. catenatum genome.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of DcGRFs. (A) Phylogenetic relationship between DcGRFs and TaGRF4. The phylogenetic tree was based on the sequence of the ten proteins bearing QLQ and WRC domains identified in D. catenatum and the TaGRF4 protein. The combined tree, conserved domains, and motifs were constructed using TBtools. (B) Comparison of the complementary site of miR396 with the DcGRF genes is indicated by the black frame. (C) Schematic representation of TaGRF4, TaGIF1, mutated TaGRF4 (left panel), DcGRF4, DcGIF1, and mutated DcGRF4 (right panel). The interaction between SNH and QLQ domains is indicated. mTaGRF4 and mDcGRF4 were created by introducing five single-site mutations into the miR396 target sites of TaGRF4 and DcGRF4, respectively. (D) Phylogeny of DcGIFs from D. catenatum. Protein sequences were used for the analysis. TaGIF1 was used to identify the DcGIF1 homologue in D. catenatum

Full size image

GRF4-GIF1 chimera enhances in planta shoot regeneration of D. catenatum

To evaluate the robustness of the GRF-GIF chimera in monocot orchids, we transformed in planta TaGRF4-GIF1 from T. aestivum, DcGRF4-GIF1 from D. catenatum, mutated versions of GRF4-GIF1 (mTaGRF4-GIF1 and mDcGRF4-GIF1), as well as a miR396 target-mimicry MIM396 vector (Fig. 2A), into the D. catenatum stem nodes. Tissue-culture-derived nine-month-old D. catenatum seedlings were pruned to remove all visible shoot meristems. The cut sites and stem nodes were perfused with Agrobacterium solutions containing either an empty vector or a vector with the GRF4-GIF1 chimera. The infected seedlings were grown in bark pots. The expression of the constructs used was verified by qRT-PCR (quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction) analysis, demonstrating enhanced expression of the target genes (Fig. 2B). Groups infiltrated with the GRF4-GIF1 chimeras showed increased shoot formation compared to the vector control (Fig. 2C). Similarly, mTaGRF4-GIF1 and mDcGRF4-GIF1 also increased shoot regeneration efficiency, with MIM396 further boosting the efficiency (Fig. 2D). This resulted in faster growth of the regenerated plantlets compared to the vector control (Fig. 2E). When mDcGRF4-GIF1 infiltrated plantlets were transferred to the shoot induction medium (SIM) in sealed bottles, an increase in the number of shoots and roots was observed (Fig. 2F-H). The stable moisture and rich nutrients in sealed bottles likely facilitated the initiation of shoots and roots.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The GRF4-GIF1 chimera enhanced in planta regeneration of D. catenatum. (A) Diagrams illustrating T-DNAs used, including the left border (LB), poly A tail (Poly A), hptII, 35 S CaMV promoter (p35S), and the right border (RB). Elements in the vector backbone were not shown. (B) qRT-PCR verification of GRF4-GIF1 and MIM396 expression in respective constructs. Ctrl means empty vector control. The bar graph shows the relative levels of transcripts with respect to the internal control gene Actin7. Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Cumulative changes indicate that GRF4-GIF1 promoted shoot regeneration. (D) Cumulative changes demonstrate that both mGRF4-GIF1 and MIM396 enhanced shoot regeneration. Regeneration frequency = regenerated shoots/total plantlets × 100%. At least three replicates with five plantlets in each were included for each construct. (E) Representative images display improved shoot regeneration and growth by mGRF4-GIF1 and MIM396. (F) Shoot regeneration of in planta-infiltrated plantlets on SIM in sealed bottles. (G-H) Statistical analysis of regenerated shoots (G) and total roots (H) from in planta-infiltrated plantlets in sealed bottles (n ≥ 5). At least five replicates with five plantlets in each were included for each construct. The scale bar represents 1 cm

Full size image

To further demonstrate its effectiveness, the GRF4-GIF1 chimera was applied to three-year-old adult plants of D. catenatum. Clear protrusion (2 dpi) and elongation (10 dpi) of apical shoots were observed from the cut sites injected with mDcGRF4-GIF1, while those injected with an empty vector remained unchanged (Fig. 3A). Three weeks after injection, the shoot regeneration rate for mTaGRF4-GIF1 transformants reached 20%, followed by mDcGRF4-GIF1 (15%), and MIM396 transformants (10%). However, no protrusion or elongation was observed at the cut sites of empty vector transformants (Fig. 3B). Thus, the GRF4-GIF1 chimera not only improved the shoot regeneration efficiency of young seedlings but also enhanced shooting in the adult plants of D. catenatum, reconfirming the robustness of this technology in D. catenatum.

Fig. 3
figure 3

In planta transformation of GRF4-GIF1 improved shoot regeneration of adult plants. Three-year-old adult plants of D. catenatum were decapped and Agrobacterium carring GRF4-GIF1 or EV constructs were injected in planta at the cut sites. (A) Representative images of regenerated shoots were shown. (B) Shoot regeneration rates were recorded three weeks after injection. Bar in (A) represents 1 cm

Full size image

GRF4-GIF1 chimera boosts transformation in D. catenatum

All plasmid vectors used in this study contained the hptII (hygromycin phosphotransferase II) gene. To confirm the presence of transgenes in the genome of independently regenerated shoots, genomic PCR was performed (Fig. 4A). Of the 60 shoots regenerated from GRF4-GIF1 and MIM396 of in planta-transformed D. catenatum seedlings, nine were found to be hptII positive, accounting for 15.0% (Fig. 4B-G). To avoid contamination, nptII (neomycin phosphotransferase II) in the plasmid backbone was amplified in MIM396 transformants (Fig. 4H). Notably, mDcGRF4-GIF1 displayed the highest transformation efficiency of 22.2%, while none of the shoots from the vector control showed positive results (Fig. 4I). These results indicated that the GRF4-GIF1 chimera not only enhanced shoot regeneration but also increased the in planta transformation efficiency of D. catenatum.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Genomic PCR identification of transgenes. (A) Representative images of regenerated shoots used for transgene detection. (B-G) Genomic PCR detection of regenerated shoots for hptII transgenes. “+” indicates the plasmid of pNC-Cam1304-35 S used as a positive control. “-” indicates genomic DNA from wild-type plants used as a negative control. The target bands were marked with underlined red triangles. (H) Amplification of nptII in MIM396 transformants to avoid bacterial contamination. (I)In planta transformation efficiencies using GRF4-GIF1-based technology. The transformation efficiency of hptII was calculated by dividing the number of hptII positive shoots by the total number of shoots tested. The bars in the graph represent 1 cm

Full size image

MIM396 promotes D. catenatum growth

Further studies were made using in planta-transformed transgenic plants to verify that MIM396 improved plant growth. One-month-old MIM396 transgenic plants exhibited robust growth (Fig. 5A), with higher plant height (Fig. 5B) and larger stem diameter compared to the vector control (Fig. 5C). Moreover, the leaves of MIM396 transgenic plants were larger (Fig. 5D), with longer leaf length (Fig. 5E) and broader leaf width (Fig. 5F). The presence of MIM396 and hptII transgenes was identified in plants with strong phenotypes but not in wild-type plants or plants without phenotypes (Fig. 5G). These results strongly demonstrated that miR396 regulated not only shoot regeneration but also plant growth and leaf development in D. catenatum.

Fig. 5
figure 5

MIM396 enhanced plant growth and leaf development in D. catenatum. (A) Representative images showing enhanced plant growth by MIM396, with zoomed-in details given below. (B) Statistical analysis of the length of the regenerated shoots. (C) Statistical analysis of the width of the regenerated shoots. (D) Representative images comparing the leaves of MIM396 with those of vector control transgenic plantlets. (E-F) Statistical analysis of leaf length (E) and leaf width (F) for MIM396 or vector control transformants. (G) Genomic PCR verification of MIM396 in transgenic D. catenatum plantlets. To avoid contamination, nptII in the plasmid backbone was amplified. “-” indicates wild-type plants while “+” represents the MIM396 plasmid used as a positive control. The scale bar represents 1 cm

Full size image

Discussion

Agrobacterium infects a wide range of plant species, with host restrictions that are generally more efficient in dicots than in monocots [14]. Despite advancements in transformation technology, achieving successful genetic transformation in certain plant species remains a major challenge [15]. To overcome genotype dependence partially and improve the efficiencies of plant transformation and regeneration, the introduction of developmental genes (DGs) in both monocots and dicots was found effective. This was demonstrated by the combined use of GRF and GIF genes [7, 11, 16]. Over the past four decades, pioneering studies identified DGs to play a crucial role in growth and development. Overexpression of DGs showed significant improvements in somatic embryogenesis and shoot regeneration as well as transformation frequency, along with a reduction in the duration of the transformation process and the expansion of transformable genotypes [17, 18]. Some DGs encode transcription factors (TFs), including WUSCHEL (WUS), which maintains pluripotent stem cell identity in shoot and flower meristems [19] and BABY BOOM (BBM), which controls embryo identity [20]. Functions of WUS and BBM orthologs are widely conserved across different plant species, including dicots and monocots. By ectopically expressing WUS orthologs or combining WUS with BBM from various species, efficient transformation and regeneration were achieved in different genotypes, including in Z. mays [21], O. sativa [22], Populus tomentosa [23], Coffea canephora [24], Gossypium hirsutum [25], Capsicum chinense [26], A. thaliana [27], Nicotiana tabacum [28], and Sorghum bicolor [29]. Another strategy was to use different combinations of DGs to induce de novo meristems in dicots without tissue culture [30]. However, when DGs, including WUS and BBM, were constitutively expressed, negative pleiotropic effects were observed on further development, including disorganized shoots and floral meristems [27], infertility, and shoot necrosis [21]. Hence, it was necessary to carefully control their expression strength and remove them from the engineered plants [31, 32]. Consequently, there was a need for new transformation methods with high efficiency, ease of use, and less genotype-dependent characteristics. DGs-based transformation reduced genotype dependence, with improved efficiency and speed. The miR396-GRF/GIF signaling module recently emerged as an alternative to BBM and WUS to enhance plant regeneration capacity and transformation efficiency [7, 11]. TaGRF4 and TaGIF1 were fused in a chimera, with the forced proximity increasing the chimera’s ability to induce regeneration [7]. By mutating the miR396 target sites in TaGRF4 within the TaGRF4-GIF1 complex, regeneration efficiency was improved further [7, 11].

Based on the previous works, our study utilized the Ta/mTaGRF4-GIF1 fusion protein with additional modifications. First, TaGRF4 and TaGIF1 homologs were cloned and verified in D. catenatum to enhance shoot regeneration. Second, MIM396, the miR396 target mimicry version, was tested. Our results showed that overexpression of GRF4-GIF1 and MIM396 significantly increased shoot regeneration efficiency of D. catenatum. The method developed for in planta D. catenatum transformation showed potential for research and molecular breeding. With GRF-GIF chimeras being plant-specific TF complexes and highly conserved in all land and charophyte plants [8], the GRF4-GIF1 chimera-based technology can be readily extended to other orchid species having low regeneration efficiencies.

In Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, the GRF-GIF chimera interacted with the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeler to repress the Polycomb Repressive Compex 2 (PRC2) in the transcription of developmental regulators [32]. This consequently triggered cell proliferation in a wide range of organs [6]. However, the role of the GRF genes in somatic embryogenesis is still poorly understood [33], with further research being required to uncover the functional mechanisms of the GRF genes in the transcriptional regulation of key meristematic or embryonic regulators. Additionally, MIM396 transgenic D. catenatum was observed to exhibit enhanced plant growth and leaf development, eliminating the need for laborious and time-consuming removal or inactivation of transgenes. Similar functions of miR396 were also well-documented in rice and Arabidopsis [34, 35]. However, the beneficial growth-promoting effect of D. catenatum in breeding and commercial production might not be suitable for developmental biology research.

Though this technology demonstrated robustnees in D. catenatum, it cannot be assumed to have equal success in the given orchid species. Variations among genotypes could still exist, with different success rates for different constructs used. However, as GRFs are widely distributed and highly conserved among plant species, it could be worthwhile to examine the activity of all GRFs in a given species to determine its most effective member in boosting regeneration and organogenesis. Hence, in certain cases, including plants deemed recalcitrant, an optimized specific set of GRFs, either individually or in combination, could yield better results. For instance, when heterologously expressed in canola, Arabidopsis AtGRF9 performed better in plant regeneration compared to AtGRF5 [6]. AtGRF5 exhibited no activity in maize and was less effective compared to endogenous GRF5 homologues in soybean and sunflower [32]. Alternatively, to overcome the specificity of the GRF-GIF chimera, a synthetic complex can be created containing only the conserved functional domains [32]. These methods can be tested in D.catenatum and other orchid species in the future.

To bypass the tedious in vitro tissue culture regeneration, alternative in planta approaches were developed to introduce transgenes directly into intact plant tissues of various species, including Arabidopsis, rice, wheat, and maize [36, 37]. This approach took advantage of natural biological processes to regenerate transgenic plants, simplifying the procedure and reducing its dependence on genotype [31]. Here, we developed a method for in planta transformation of D. catenatum using Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of the GRF4-GIF1 chimera. The method utilized the meristematic tissues of young seedlings, without the need for embryogenic callus induction, regeneration, or antibiotic selection. Vegetative meristems were targeted for in planta transformation, as demonstrated in studies using snapdragons [38], sweet potato [39], and sugarcane [40], where the formation of chimera was not a major concern.

Conclusion

The present study provides a straightforward and replicable protocol for higher regeneration efficiency of D. catenatum. The expression of the GRF4-GIF1 chimera, mGRF4-GIF1, and MIM396 improved shoot regeneration efficiency through in planta transformation. The performance of the GRF4-GIF1 chimera in D. catenatum demonstrated its wide-range potential to enhance the plant regeneration efficiency of various orchid species in the future.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Monocot orchid species, Dendrobium catenatum was used in this study. The source plants of Dendrobium catenatum were collected from Guangdong province, P.R. China, in 2012. They were authenticated by Professor Zhongjian Liu from the National Orchid Conservation Center of China and a voucher specimen (Z.J.Liu6870) has been deposited there. Seeds of Dendrobium catenatum were collected and stored at our orchid conservation center (China National Orchid Conservation Center, Shenzhen, China). Potted Dendrobium catenatum plants were cultured in either sphagnum moss or bark medium and maintained in a greenhouse under natural light conditions at temperatures ranging from 25 to 28℃.

Bacterial strains and binary vector

For cloning, DH5α competent cells from TransGen (CD501-03, Beijing, China) and ccdB survival[TM] [2] cells DB3.1 from Biomed (BC111-01, Beijing, China) were used. For transformation, hypervirulent disarmed Agrobacterium strains, EHA105 (BC307-01) was used. The TaGRF4-GIF1 fragment was chemically synthesized and cloned into the pNC-Cam1304-35 S vector from NC Biotech (Hainan, China) under a 35 S Cauliflower mosaic virus (35 S) promoter. Agrobacterium was electroporated following the standard protocol [37] and grown on solidified or liquid Luria Broth (LB) medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics (rifampicin, 25 mg/L; spectinomycin, 50 mg/L; kanamycin, 50 mg/L; Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) at 28℃. For plant transformation, Agrobacterium was streaked from glycerol stocks on LB media with appropriate antibiotics. Growing colonies were picked and inoculated in freshly prepared liquid LB media, in which the bacterium was grown overnight in the dark at 28℃. Suspension cultures were adjusted to OD600 = 1.0 with 200 µM acetosyringone (D134406, Sigma, Germany).

Vector construction

GatewayTM-compatible destination vector pNC-Cam1304-35 S, containing the target gene cloning cassette controlled by a double CaMV 35 S promoter (2 × p35S) [41] was used. The resulting expression vector was electroporated into Agrobacterium for plant transformation. Primers used in this study are listed in the supplementary Table S1. Endogenous D. catenatum genes DcGRF4 (LOC110113908) and DcGIF1 (LOC110105545) were linked by a 4 × Ala linker and cloned into pNC-Cam1304-35 S with a hygromycin selectable marker, resulting in the final construct pNC-Cam1304-35 S-DcGRF4-GIF1. Mutated GRF4 within miR396-targeting sites was similarly fused with GIF1. The coding regions of TaGRF4-GIF1, mTaGRF4-GIF111, and MIM396 [42] were chemically synthesized by the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Beijing, China) and PCR-amplified using corresponding primers.

In planta transformation

A single colony of Agrobacterium carrying Ta/DcGRF4-GIF1, mTa/mDcGRF4-GIF1, and MIM396 was inoculated into 10.0 mL LB liquid medium with 50.0 mg/L kanamycin and 25.0 mg/L rifampicin. The cultures were incubated overnight in an orbital shaker with 180 rpm at 28℃. The Agrobacterium cultures were multiplied by diluting 10% of the bacterial culture with 40 mL liquid LB supplemented with antibiotics and continued to grow. When the Agrobacterium cultures reached an OD600 of 1.0, the cells were harvested by centrifuging at 6000 rpm for 10 min. The resulting pellets were resuspended in 40 mL of fresh liquid Murashige & Skoog medium supplemented with 5.0% sucrose, 0.1% Silwet L-77, and 50.0 mg/L acetosyringone for injection. Tissue-culture-derived nine-month-old D. catenatum seedlings or three-year-old adults were used as starting materials. Plants were decaped and the cutting sites and the stem nodes were inoculated with the Agrobacterium suspension carrying the GRF4-GIF1 chimera and MIM396 constructs using a syringe. Excess Agrobacterium suspension was removed by air drying on a Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The infected plantlets were then planted in bark pots covered with plastic film to maintain moisture for two days. New shoots regenerated approximately two weeks after injection.

Genomic PCR

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted for PCR analysis of the transformed plants. Approximately 100.0 mg of tissue from the regenerated shoots was collected and ground using liquid nitrogen. gDNA was isolated from the crushed, frozen materials using the Genomic DNA Purification kit (DP350-03, Tiangen, Beijing, China). PCR amplification of the 400-bp fragment of the hptII gene from the gDNA samples was performed using the 2×EasyTaq® PCR SuperMix (AS111-12, TansGen, Beijing, China). To avoid contamination of the bacterium, a 200-bp fragment of nptII was amplified. Equal loading was controlled through the amplification of a 200-bp fragment of DcActin-7 (LOC104111011). The resulting PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 2.0% (w/v) agarose gels. To calculate the transformation efficiency of hptII, the number of hptII positive shoots was divided by the total number of the tested shoots.

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis

To confirm the expression of the constructs, total RNA was extracted from the infiltrated one-month-old N. tobacum leaves using the Quick RNA isolation Kit (0416-50gk, Huayueyang, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1.0 µg of total RNA using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (RR047B, Takara, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR was performed using the Green qPCR MasterMix (MT521-03, Biomed, Beijing, China) in an ABI PRISM 7500 Fluorescent Quantitative PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Singapore). NtActin7 (X63603.1) was used as the reference gene for internal control. Each sample was analyzed in triplicates and the 2−ΔΔCt method was used to determine the relative gene expression.

Statistical analysis

Regeneration frequency data was collected for each construct and means and standard deviation (SD) values were determined. All data was organized and formatted using the GraphPadPrism8 software package (La Jolla, CA, USA). Significance of difference between treatments and controls was assessed using an unpaired Student’s t-test, with a significance level of p < 0.05. All experiments followed a completely randomized design, with three to ten replicates per treatment.

Data availability

The authors confirm that all data from this study are available and can be found in this article and in Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Su W, Xu M, Radani Y, Yang L. Technological development and application of plant genetic transformation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feng Q, Xiao L, He Y, Liu M, Wang J, Tian S, Zhang X, Yuan L. Highly efficient, genotype-independent transformation and gene editing in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) using a chimeric ClGRF4-GIF1 gene. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021;63(12):2038–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mursyanti E, Purwantoro A, Moeljopawiro S, Semiarti E. Induction of somatic embryogenesis through overexpression of ATRKD4 genes in Phalaenopsis Sogo Vivien. Ind J Biotech. 2015;20(1):42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang SL, Viswanath KK, Tong CG, An HR, Jang S, Chen FC. Floral induction and flower development of orchids. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Aregawi K, Shen J, Pierroz G, Sharma MK, Dahlberg J, Owiti J, Lemaux PG. Morphogene-assisted transformation of Sorghum bicolor allows more efficient genome editing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(4):748–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kong J, Martin-Ortigosa S, Finer J, Orchard N, Gunadi A, Batts LA, Thakare D, Rush B, Schmitz O, Stuiver M, et al. Overexpression of the transcription factor GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR5 improves transformation of dicot and monocot species. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:572319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Debernardi JM, Tricoli DM, Ercoli MF, Hayta S, Ronald P, Palatnik JF, Dubcovsky J. A GRF–GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(11):1274–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JH. Biological roles and an evolutionary sketch of the GRF-GIF transcriptional complex in plants. BMB Rep. 2019;52(4):227–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liebsch D, Palatnik JF. MicroRNA miR396, GRF transcription factors and GIF co-regulators: a conserved plant growth regulatory module with potential for breeding and biotechnology. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020;53:31–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Omidbakhshfard MA, Proost S, Fujikura U, Mueller-Roeber B. Growth-regulating factors (GRFs): a small transcription factor family with important functions in plant biology. Mol Plant. 2015;8(7):998–1010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qiu F, Xing S, Xue C, Liu J, Chen K, Chai T, Gao C. Transient expression of a TaGRF4-TaGIF1 complex stimulates wheat regeneration and improves genome editing. Sci China Life Sci. 2022;65(4):731–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim JH, Tsukaya H. Regulation of plant growth and development by the growth-regulating factor and GRF-Interacting factor duo. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(20):6093–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu W, Li J, Wang Q, Lv K, Du K, Zhang W, Li Q, Kang X, Wei H. Growth-regulating factor 5 (GRF5)-mediated gene regulatory network promotes leaf growth and expansion in poplar. New Phytol. 2021;230(2):612–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gelvin SB. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: the biology behind the gene-jockeying tool. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67(1):16–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Altpeter F, Springer NM, Bartley LE, Blechl AE, Brutnell TP, Citovsky V, Conrad LJ, Gelvin SB, Jackson DP, Kausch AP, et al. Advancing crop transformation in the era of genome editing. Plant Cell. 2016;28(7):1510–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bull T, Debernardi J, Reeves M, Hill T, Bertier L, Van Deynze A, Michelmore R. GRF–GIF chimeric proteins enhance in vitro regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiencies of lettuce (Lactuca spp). Plant Cell Rep. 2023;42(3):629–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Masters A, Kang M, McCaw M, Zobrist JD, Gordon-Kamm W, Jones T, Wang K. Agrobacterium-mediated immature embryo transformation of recalcitrant maizeinbred lines using morphogenic gene. J Vis Exp. 2020;156:e60782.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maren NA, Duan H, Da K, Yencho GC, Ranney TG, Liu W. Genotype-independent plant transformation. Hortic Res. 2022;9:uhac047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jha P, Ochatt SJ, Kumar V. WUSCHEL: a master regulator in plant growth signaling. Plant Cell Rep. 2020;39(4):431–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ikeda M, Takahashi M, Fujiwara S, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M. Improving the efficiency of adventitious shoot induction and somatic embryogenesis via modification of WUSCHEL and LEAFY COTYLEDON 1. Plants. 2020;9:1434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, Cho MJ, Scelonge C, Lenderts B, Chamberlin M, Cushatt J, et al. Morphogenic regulators Baby Boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. Plant Cell. 2016;28(9):1998–2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamiya N, Nagasaki H, Morikami A, Sato Y, Matsuoka M. Isolation and characterization of a rice WUSCHEL-type homeobox gene that is specifically expressed in the central cells of a quiescent center in the root apical meristem. Plant J. 2003;35(4):429–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Zhang J, Jia H, Liu B, Sun P, Hu J, Wang L, Lu M. The WUSCHEL-related homeobox 5a (PtoWOX5a) is involved in adventitious root development in poplar. Tree Physiol. 2018;38(1):139–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arroyo-Herrera A, Ku Gonzalez A, Canche Moo R, Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Loyola-Vargas VM, Rodriguez-Zapata LC, Burgeff D′Hondt C, Suárez-Solís VM, Castaño E. Expression of WUSCHEL in Coffea canephora causes ectopic morphogenesis and increases somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2008;94(2):171–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bouchabké-Coussa O, Obellianne M, Linderme D, Montes E, Maia-Grondard A, Vilaine F, Pannetier C. WUSCHEL overexpression promotes somatic embryogenesis and induces organogenesis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) tissues cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Rep. 2013;32(5):675–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Solís-Ramos LY, González-Estrada T, Nahuath-Dzib S, Zapata-Rodriguez LC, Castaño E. Overexpression of WUSCHEL in C. Chinense causes ectopic morphogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2009;96(3):279–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gallois JL, Nora FR, Mizukami Y, Sablowski R. WUSCHEL induces shoot stem cell activity and developmental plasticity in the root meristem. Gene.Dev 2004, 18 (4), 375–380.

  28. Rashid SZ, Yamaji N, Kyo M. Shoot formation from root tip region: a developmental alteration by WUS in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26(9):1449–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lowe K, La Rota M, Hoerster G, Hastings C, Wang N, Chamberlin M, Wu E, Jones T, Gordon-Kamm W. Rapid genotype independent Zea mays L. (maize) transformation via direct somatic embryogenesis. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2018;54(3):240–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maher MF, Nasti RA, Vollbrecht M, Starker CG, Clark MD, Voytas DF. Plant gene editing through de novo induction of meristems. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(1):84–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nagle M, Déjardin A, Pilate G, Strauss SH. Opportunities for innovation in genetic transformation of forest trees. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1443.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Luo G, Palmgren M. GRF-GIF chimeras boost plant regeneration. Trends Plant Sci. 2021;26(3):201–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Szczygieł-Sommer A, Gaj MD. The miR396–GRF regulatory module controls the embryogenic response in Arabidopsis via an auxin-related pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2019; 20(20), 5221.

  34. Miao C, Wang D, He R, Liu S, Zhu JK. Mutations in MIR396e and MIR396f increase grain size and modulate shoot architecture in rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(2):491–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hou N, Cao Y, Li F, Yuan W, Bian H, Wang J, Zhu M, Han N. Epigenetic regulation of miR396 expression by SWR1-C and the effect of miR396 on leaf growth and developmental phase transition in Arabidopsis. J Eep Bot. 2019;70(19):5217–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shah SH, Ali S, Jan SA, Jalal Ud D, Ali GM. Piercing and incubation method of in planta transformation producing stable transgenic plants by overexpressing DREB1A gene in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill). Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2015;120(3):1139–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmed T, Biswas S, Elias SM, Sazzadur Rahman M, Tuteja N. Seraj, Z. I. In planta transformation for conferring salt tolerance to a tissue-culture unresponsive indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar. Vitro Cell Dev-Pl. 2018;54(2):154–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lian Z, Nguyen CD, Liu L, Wang G, Chen J, Wang S, Yi G, Wilson S, Ozias-Akins P, Gong H, Huo H. Application of developmental regulators to improve in planta or in vitro transformation in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(8):1622–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu X, Wang Y, Zhu H, Mei G, Liao Y, Rao S, Li S, Chen A, Liu H, Zeng L, et al. Natural allelic variation confers high resistance to sweet potato weevils in sweet potato. Nat Plants. 2022;8(11):1233–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mayavan S, Subramanyam K, Jaganath B, Sathish D, Manickavasagam M, Ganapathi A. Agrobacterium-mediated in planta genetic transformation of sugarcane setts. Plant Cell Rep. 2015;34(10):1835–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yan P, Tuo D, Shen W, Deng H, Zhou P, Gao X. A nimble cloning-compatible vector system for high-throughput gene functional analysis in plants. Plant Commun. 2023;4(2):100471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Todesco M, Rubio-Somoza I, Paz-Ares J, Weigel D. A collection of target mimics for comprehensive analysis of microRNA function in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 2010, 6 (7), e1001031.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their critical suggestions. We also thank the anonymous native speaker for polishing the language.

Funding

This project was supported by Shenzhen Science and Technology Program from The Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (KCXFZ20211020164200001, JCYJ20210324123005016, and JCYJ20230807151000001).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhenyu Yang and Meili Zhao contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, the National Orchid Conservation Center of China and the Orchid Conservation & Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518114, China

    Zhenyu Yang, Meili Zhao, Xiaojie Zhang, Jian Li, Meina Wang & Zhicai Wang

  2. Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, the National Orchid Conservation Center of China and the Orchid Conservation & Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518114, China

    Zhenyu Yang, Meili Zhao, Xiaojie Zhang, Jian Li, Meina Wang & Zhicai Wang

  3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China

    Zhenyu Yang & Feng Ming

  4. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology, College of Grassland Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, China

    Xiaojie Zhang & Lili Gu

Authors
  1. Zhenyu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meili Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaojie Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lili Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Feng Ming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Meina Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhicai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZW conceived the research idea and designed the experimental scheme. ZY conducted transformation experiments in D. catenatum, and XZ constructed the vectors. MZ assisted with the gene expression analysis and genetic transformation. ZW, MW, and FM provided technical suggestions and supervised the research. ZY and ZW analyzed the data. ZW wrote the manuscript. JL, LG, and FM revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feng Ming, Meina Wang or Zhicai Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study did not involve the use of any endangered or protected species. Dendrobium catenatum seedlings are widely planted and commercially available in China. The materials used in the present study do not require ethical approval.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Declarations

The study is conducted with plant materials that comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Associated content

Supplementary Table S1, Figure S1, and Figure S2.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Zhao, M., Zhang, X. et al. MIR396-GRF/GIF enhances in planta shoot regeneration of Dendrobium catenatum. BMC Genomics 25, 543 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10360-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10360-9

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us