Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effect of acute social isolation on neural molecular responses in components of the social decision-making network

BMC Genomics volume 25, Article number: 771 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Prolonged or chronic social isolation has pronounced effects on animals, ranging from altered stress responses, increased anxiety and aggressive behaviour, and even increased mortality. The effects of shorter periods of isolation are much less well researched; however, short periods of isolation are used routinely for testing animal behaviour and physiology. Here, we studied how a 3 h period of isolation from a cagemate affected neural gene expression in three brain regions that contain important components of the social decision-making network, the hypothalamus, the nucleus taeniae of the amygdala, and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, using a gregarious bird as a model (zebra finches). We found evidence suggestive of altered neural activity, synaptic transmission, metabolism, and even potentially pain perception, all of which could create cofounding effects on experimental tests that involve isolating animals. We recommend that the effects of short-term social isolation need to be better understood and propose alternatives to isolating animals for testing.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Prolonged social isolation dramatically affects animals at various levels (molecular, physiological, and behavioural). For example, a study over the lifespan of singly or group-housed female rats, found isolation associated with dysregulated endocrine responses, increased anxiety and fearfulness, and increased malignancy of spontaneous mammary tumours [1]. Studies in Drosophila melanogaster found that, after social isolation, flies displayed altered aggressive, courtship, and sleep behaviour [2]. In humans, social isolation has been linked to increased likelihood of mortality [3]. Several other animal species have been shown to be affected by prolonged isolation [2, 4, 5].

Although the consequences of prolonged isolation are significant and influence health, reproduction, and survival, the impacts of brief isolation periods remain less understood. Short and prolonged isolation may not necessarily be expected to exert the same effects. For example, laboratory mice show a significant increase in aggression at 48 h after isolation, but not at 24 h [6]. A 30 min period of social isolation led to a ~ 2-fold increase in the expression of the neuropeptide tachykinin 2 gene in brain regions of mice, while a 2 week period of social isolation led to a ~ 6-fold increase [7]. Interestingly, several laboratory tests not aimed at investigating social isolation involve short periods of isolation. For instance, in respirometry studies, animals are placed alone in respirometry chambers for a few hours [8]. For several standardized rodent behavioural tests, animals may be placed alone in mazes or other behavioural apparatus for different short periods of time [9, 10]. In experiments where vocalizations are recorded, animals may also be isolated prior to or during the recordings for varying periods of time (e.g., 20 min prior to recording in [11]; 5 h 30 min prior to recording in [12]; and 24 h prior to recording, as well as isolation during recording [13]). How are these instances of acute isolation affecting the outcomes being quantified?

Here, we used a gregarious bird species, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), to test how an acute period (3 h) of social isolation affected neural molecular responses in brain regions that are part of the vertebrate social decision-making network [14, 15]. The social decision-making network consists of a collection of brain structures, comprised of the social behaviour network and the mesolimbic reward system, that regulates most forms of social behaviours and is evolutionarily conserved across vertebrates [14, 15]. Specifically, we focused on the hypothalamus (HYPO), the nucleus taeniae of the amygdala (TN) (a mammalian amygdala homologue), and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST). In addition to regulating homeostatic functions, such as sleep, thermoregulation, and hunger [16,17,18], the hypothalamus contains several nuclei belonging to the social behaviour network, which are involved in aggressive, sexual, and parental behaviours [15]. The TN is the proposed equivalent to the mammalian medial amygdala (reviewed in [15]), and is involved in modulating behavioural responses to sexual and other social stimuli [19,20,21,22]. The BNST plays a role in aggressive and sexual behaviour [23,24,25,26,27], is involved in modulating stress and fear responses, and is proposed to assign valence to social stimuli [28,29,30]. More studies have been conducted on the effects of early life or long-term social isolation on the mesolimbic system, with structural alterations found in the amygdala, dopaminergic release and neural activation changes found in the ventral tegmental area, and transcriptional alterations in both (reviewed in [31]). Long-term social isolation also alters electrical responsiveness in the BNST and in various nuclei in the HYPO, following medial amygdala stimulation [32]. In addition, in the HYPO of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), a decrease in oxytocin receptor expression was found after prolonged isolation, and a decrease in corticotropin-releasing hormone was found both under acute (1 h) and repeated social isolation [33, 34], suggesting that isolation can affect neuropeptide signalling in this region. We chose 3 h of social isolation because we had previously observed that acute changes to the social environment affected how finches responded to an immune challenge [35, 36]. In addition, this is a period that reflects the amount of time during which animals may be isolated for the types of tests mentioned previously (i.e., respirometry, behavioural phenotyping, and vocalization recording).

Materials and methods

Animals

Adult zebra finches purchased from Magnolia Bird Farm (Anaheim, CA) were maintained in indoor aviaries (2.1 m by 1.5 m by 2.1 m) at Chapman University for five weeks before the start of the experiments. Birds were housed in mixed sex groups of 18 animals and provided with food (German millet mixed with canary seed), cuttlebones and water ad libitum. No nesting cups or nesting materials were provided. The light/darkness schedule was 13 L:11D, with lights on at 06:30 in the morning.

Treatments

On the day prior to the experiment, pairs of animals (one male and one female from the same aviary) were moved together to an experimental cage (41.9 cm by 30 cm by 55.9 cm) located in a separate testing room. The cage contained two perches, one food cup and one drinking bottle. Experiments took place in the morning. At 8:00, males received an intra-muscular injection of sterile phosphate buffered saline (Endotoxin-free PBS, Sigma-Aldrich TMS-012-A) as part of a separate experiment [36]. After the injection, the female in each cage was captured and either immediately placed back in the respective cage or permanently removed (and placed back in their original aviary). This procedure therefore created a treatment where males remained paired with a female (Paired treatment, n = 6) or where they became isolated (Isolation treatment, n = 11). Three hours later, males were euthanized via isoflurane inhalation, followed by decapitation. Brains were immediately extracted and flash frozen. Serum was collected from centrifuged trunk blood. These tissues were obtained within 3 min of entering the experimental room. Brains and serum were preserved at -80 °C until processing.

Brain region dissection

Brains were coronally sectioned at -18 °C, using a Leica CM1860UV cryostat. The brain regions of interest, namely the hypothalamus (HYPO), the nucleus taeniae (TN) and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), were identified based on the zebra finch brain atlas [37]. Each region was collected using distinct surgical micropunches (EMS Rapid Core Instruments) and punches were obtained from 100 μm slices, spaced apart by three 30 μm slices (Fig. S1). The internal diameter of the micropunch tools was 4 mm for HYPO and 3 mm for TN and BNST. Brain tissue from each region was preserved in separate beaded lysis tubes (ZR BashingBeads Lysis Tubes 2 mm, Zymo Research, item S6003-50), containing 1 mL of QIAzol lysis reagent (Qiagen, item #79,306). The beaded tubes containing the brain tissue were agitated at 7 m s− 1 for 20 s on a Beadbug 6 homogenizer (Benchmark Scientific) and then allowed to rest for 5 min. The homogenate was transferred to a new tube and kept at − 80 °C until the RNA isolation procedure.

RNA isolation

RNA was isolated from the aqueous layer produced after chloroform precipitation, using the RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit-5 (Zymo Research, item # R1013) following manufacturer’s instructions and including the DNase I in-column treatment step. For the Paired treatment, RNA of sufficient quality was recovered from 5 out of the 6 animals. For the Isolated treatment, RNA was only extracted from a randomly selected set of samples (from 6 animals), all of which yielded sufficient quantity and quality. These 11 RNA samples were sent to Novogene Corporation Inc. (Chula Vista, CA, USA) for quantification, library preparation, and sequencing.

RNA sequencing and quantification

RNA quantification, integrity, and purity were obtained on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA) was used to prepare cDNA libraries and the cDNA fragments (150 ~ 200 bp in length) obtained were then purified with the AMPure XP System (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, USA). Paired-end sequencing of libraries (PE150; Illumina Novaseq 6000) was performed using standard protocols. An average of 48.3 million paired-end raw reads per sample were obtained. An average of 75.91% of clean reads (i.e., after adapter removal and quality filtering) were mapped to the reference genome (taeGut3.2.4, release 96, downloaded from Ensembl) using HISAT2 [38]. HTSeq (v0.6.1) [39] was used to count numbers of mapped reads. Mapping statistics are in Table S1.

Bioinformatic analysis

Differential gene expression analysis

Differential gene expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 package (v.1.42.0) [40], to study the effect of the social treatment on gene expression. A principal component analysis (PCA) of normalized and variance stabilized counts was applied to the entire dataset using the plotPCA function from the package BiocGenerics v. 0.48.1, demonstrating clear separation of the samples along PC1 and PC2 based on brain region (Fig. S2). For each brain region, we then filtered low count genes as described in the pre-filtering step of the DESeq2 vignette. In this way, genes with less than 10 raw counts total across at least 5 samples were filtered, which resulted in 13,518 genes for HYPO, 13,569 for TN, and 13,533 for BNST left for analysis. After filtering, a PCA was applied to each brain region, revealing one outlier sample in HYPO which was separated from all other samples on both PCA axes (Fig. S3). This sample (HY5, from the Isolated treatment) was therefore removed, resulting in a HYPO sample size of 5 Isolated and 5 Paired animals, and containing 13,443 genes after repeating the pre-filtering step. Each brain region was analysed separately, and gene counts were modelled as a function of social treatment. The p-values resulting from Wald tests were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to control for false discovery rate due to multiple testing. When these adjusted p-values (henceforth padj) were < 0.05, genes were considered significantly differentially expressed between treatments.

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)

To understand how different biological pathways were affected by acute isolation, we performed gene set enrichment analysis. This was done using the GSEA function in the clusterProfiler package (v. 4.10.0) [41], with a minimum set size of 10 genes and maximum set size of 500 (defaults), and using FDR as the adjustment method for multiple comparisons, with an adjusted p-value cutoff of < 0.05. Ranked lists of genes used as input in the GSEA analysis were obtained by multiplying the sign of fold change (i.e., the direction of change) by the negative log10 p-value obtained from the DESeq2 analysis, following [42]. These scores were then rank ordered by decreasing value. We focused here on gene sets relevant to the brain by creating a list of GO terms that combines the GO terms found in the SynGO [43] and the NIGO [44] lists of Gene Ontologies. Using that list, a separate analysis was done for each Gene Ontology collection (i.e., Biological Process, Cellular Component, and Molecular Function). Dotplots for enrichment results were also prepared using the clusterProfiler package.

Behaviour

The GSEA results led us to examine videorecorded behaviours of the 11 sequenced animals. Behaviour was recorded over the 1 h period immediately preceding euthanasia using Axis M1065L network cameras (Axis Communications). Behaviour was analysed over a 50 min period, with a 10 min gap in the middle. The gap corresponded to the 5 min before and after a researcher was in the room. We focused on analysis of time resting [defined as amount of time (in seconds) spent immobile (i.e., not performing the other target behaviours, nor drinking, preening, or vocalizing)], number of hops, and number of times pecking at the inside of the food cups (coded as eating). The residuals of resting were normally distributed, and resting was analysed by using a Welch’s t-test. The other two behaviours consisted of count data and were analysed using a non-parametric test, the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. Results were considered statistically significant if p-value < 0.05.

Corticosterone

Corticosterone was quantified from serum samples using an enzyme immunoassay kit (ADI-900-097, Enzo Life Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI) in single microplate and calculated as described in [36]. Sufficient serum was available from 4 Isolated animals and 5 Paired animals, but not all these samples come from the animals for which the brains were sequenced (Table S6). Corticosterone was not normally distributed due to an outlier sample and was boxcox transformed for analysis. Analysis was done using a Welch’s t-test and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses in this study were carried out in R v. 4.3.2 [45], and unless otherwise noted, plots were prepared using the ggplot2 package (v. 3.4.4) [46]. Boxplots represent the median, the first and third quartiles (lower and upper hinges), and the smallest, and largest values (lower and upper whiskers) no further than the interquartile range.

Results

Genes differentially expressed under acute social isolation

Animals that spent 3 h in isolation (Isolated) had zero differentially expressed genes (DEGs) relative to Paired animals in the hypothalamus (HYPO), 29 in the nucleus taeniae (TN), and 24 in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) (Tables S2, S3 and S4, respectively; Fig. 1). Only one gene was upregulated after isolation across the three brain regions: MFSD6 (at a padj <0.1 in HYPO; Fig. 1). In terms of additional overlaps between brain regions, in both the TN and BNST NR4A1 and ENSTGUG00000018608 (a microRNA) were downregulated (at padj <0.05), with NR4A1 being one of the genes with the largest negative fold change in both regions. If considering a slightly more relaxed padj cutoff, MIDN, a DEG in BNST (padj <0.06) was also downregulated in TN, and TRIP4, a DEG in TN was also downregulated in BNST (padj <0.06). Two additional genes of interest to highlight are the only DE neuropeptide receptors: HTR1E, a serotonin receptor that was upregulated in the TN, and OPRL1, an opioid receptor that was upregulated in the BNST.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Differentially expressed genes in response to acute isolation in the hypothalamus (A), nucleus taeniae (B), and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (C). Genes with p-adjust < 0.05 without a symbol do not have a HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) Symbol

Full size image

Since a study of overnight isolation has been carried out in female zebra finches [47], we examined whether DEGs with the greatest effect size in that study could also be found in our study. Even though that study was conducted on a different brain region, the auditory lobule, we found 5 genes that were downregulated in both studies: FOS, ARC, EGR1, and MIDN (all in the BNST) and HIVEP2 (in the TN).

Pathways influenced by acute social isolation

In addition to determining the genes that most drastically changed in expression after acute social isolation, we also studied whether classes of genes that responded to the social treatment were over-represented in any brain region studied (Fig. 2, Table S5). Pathways containing upregulated genes were related to neuropeptide signalling in HYPO, translation in the TN, and oxidation-reduction in both the TN and the BNST. Downregulated pathways were related to voltage-gated potassium channel activity in both the HYPO and the BNST, regulation of transcription in the TN, and glutamatergic synapse in the BNST.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis results. Results show all enriched pathways detected within each GO category, for each brain region. The absence of a GO category plot indicates that no pathway was detected for that category. The size of the circles corresponds to the number of genes that responded to the Isolation treatment in a given pathway

Full size image

Behaviour and corticosterone

Because hypothalamic neuropeptide signalling is critically important for the regulation of numerous physiological and behavioural processes [48, 49], we investigated the genes contained in the only pathway activated in the HYPO. Out of the 18 genes in the neuropeptide signalling pathway gene set identified by GSEA, 4 are involved in regulating feeding behaviour: HCRTR2, NPY1R, AGRP, and NMUR2 [50]. For this reason, we examined video-recorded data to assess whether treatment was associated with differences in behaviour, particularly feeding behaviour (Fig. 3). While Isolated animals were significantly less active then their Paired counterparts, shown by increased resting time (Welch Two Sample t-test: t = 3.8786, d.f. = 8.7153, p-value = 0.003975) and decreased hopping (Kruskal-Wallis test: χ2 = 4.0333, d.f. = 1, p-value = 0.04461), feeding behaviour was not significantly different between treatments (Kruskal-Wallis test: χ2 = 2.4193, d.f. = 1, p-value = 0.1198). There was, however, larger variation in feeding behaviour in Isolated than in Paired animals (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Behaviours (A-C) (isolated: n = 6; paired: n = 5) and circulating corticosterone (D) (isolated: n = 4; paired: n = 5) of animals in Isolated relative to Paired treatment. ** used for p < = 0.01, * used for p < = 0.05, ns used for p > 0.05

Full size image

Isolation can increase circulating corticosterone in zebra finches relative to group housing (e.g., [47, 51, 52]). Since glucocorticoids are pleiotropic hormones, capable of affecting several aspects of physiology and behaviour [53], we compared free circulating levels of corticosterone between treatments at the time of brain collection. While overall, corticosterone appeared to be elevated in the Isolated animals, this difference was not statistically significant (Welch Two Sample t-test: t = 2.4053, d.f. = 6.3231, p-value = 0.05082; Fig. 3D).

Discussion

While previous research has shown that prolonged social isolation affects animal physiology, less is known about short term isolation. The current study was aimed at understanding whether a short period of isolation can change neural gene expression in zebra finches. We found large changes in expression in 29 or less genes per brain region studied. In addition, we found coordinated changes in gene expression in pathways indicative of alterations in synaptic transmission, neuropeptide signalling, and metabolism. These results suggest that even short periods of isolation kickstart neural changes that could lead to confounding results in experiments where separation from groupmates is necessary but not the goal of the study.

The only gene that was upregulated after isolation across all brain regions studied (albeit not significantly so in HYPO at p-adjust < 0.05) was MFSD6. MFSD6 is an atypical solute carrier (SLC) of the major facilitator superfamily. Like several other atypical SLCs (reviewed in [54]), the expression of MFSD6 is altered by nutritional status and food intake in the brains of rodents [55] and in Drosophila melanogaster [56]. In our experiment, we cannot directly link the upregulation in MFSD6 to altered food intake, since at the time point analysed, we detected no significant differences in food intake between treatments. We also did not quantify differences in food intake prior to the social manipulation, which could have led to variation in hunger at the time point analysed. It is also possible that Isolated animals fed less at an earlier time point during isolation, thereby activating hunger signals, or that they would have fed differently at a later time point after the shift in gene expression. In fact, 4 of the neuropeptides in the only pathway activated in the hypothalamus are involved in the modulation of appetite and food intake [50]. An experiment in humans using functional magnetic resonance imaging to quantify neural responses suggested that 10 h of social isolation (acute isolation) evoked craving responses in the midbrain that are similar to the ones cause by hunger after fasting [57]. The brains of Drosophila melanogaster after chronic isolation show activation of hunger signals and resemble, from a transcriptomic perspective, the brains of flies after 24 h of starvation [58]. It is therefore possible that social isolation affects patterns of food intake, hunger, or interest in food, which would be an important consideration in tests for food preferences or for drive to eat in isolated animals.

The other gene showing differential expression between the treatments in at least two brain regions was NR4A1, which was downregulated in Isolated animals in both the TN and the BNST. NR4A1 is an immediate early response gene and is rapidly expressed in response to various stimuli [59]. The expression of NR4A1 is under nutritional control and is involved in glucose homeostasis in several tissues and in modulating mitochondrial function [60,61,62]. Our GSEA results contribute to the idea of altered mitochondrial metabolism in both the TN and the BNST. Our behavioural results suggest differences in energy expenditure, given that Isolated animals were overall less active than Paired animals, which could also explain the potential neural differences in metabolism. Isolation-induced changes in metabolism are important to consider in many studies, particularly those involving isolation for respirometry.

In addition to downregulation of NR4A1, another three immediate early response genes (FOS, ARC, EGR1) were downregulated in the BNST. This is similar to findings in the auditory lobule (a distinct brain region) of female zebra finches isolated overnight [47]. Expression of these genes is rapidly upregulated after neuronal activation [63, 64] and, therefore, the difference in expression between isolated and paired animals could suggest differences in neural activation of this brain region. Both sexual and other social interactions have been shown to elicit activation of the BNST (reviewed in [30]), so it is therefore possible that the higher expression of immediate early genes in this brain region in Paired animals is due to interactions with a female.

The opioid receptor-like 1 (OPRL1) gene was upregulated in the BNST after isolation. This gene encodes the nociceptin opioid peptide receptor (NOP), which is activated by the nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide. At the level of the brain, the N/OFQ–NOP system is involved in pain perception, feeding, anxiety, locomotion, and response to stress [reviewed in [65]). Some of the effects of N/OFQ are complex and site-specific and still being clarified. For example, when administered supraspinally, N/OFQ leads to increased pain perception (hyperalgesia), but spinal N/OFQ is antinociceptive [65]. In the BNST, local administration of N/OFQ can block CRF-induced anorexia and CRF-induced anxiety (reviewed in [66]). The upregulation of NOP in the BNST could therefore lead to altered pain perception, anxiety, and food intake, all of which are responses important in many behavioural tests. The GSEA results suggest changes to glutamatergic synapse in the BNST. Glutamatergic transmission in this region is important in modulating stress and anxiety [67,68,69], which further contributes to the idea that social isolation may have activated anxiogenic responses.

In mammals, it is well established that modulation of neural circuits of the amygdala by the serotoninergic system is involved in fear-related behaviours [70]. Lesion studies of the arcopallium/amygdala complex (a brain region encompassing the TN) have also linked this region to fear- and escape-behaviour in birds [71, 72]. Serotonin/serotonin transporter systems also appear to modulate fear-related behaviours in chickens [73, 74]. In the TN, the serotoninergic system was shown to be involved in the modulation of ingestive behaviours in pigeons [75]. The increase in the expression of the gene encoding the 5-HTR1E serotonin receptor in the TN could suggest changes to serotonin activity in this region, with consequences for fear and ingestive behaviours. The functions of this particular serotonin receptor are not as well-known as those of other serotonin receptors, but its activation appears important for promoting neuronal survival against oxidative stress [76], which our results suggest was increased in the TN and BNST.

Although we did not find significant differences in circulating corticosterone between treatments, it is possible that differences occurred earlier and influenced the neural results found. In addition, it is important to note that the corticosterone analysis was done on a limited set of samples where we collected sufficient plasma from. While one study in zebra finches isolated for two days did not find differences in corticosterone between group-housed and isolated finches [77], a separate study found an elevation of corticosterone at 10 min (but not 30 min) after isolation from a mate [52]. In human cells, a genome-wide analysis identified 209 genes that show significant changes in expression in response to glucocorticoids [78]. Two genes that differed significantly in expression between treatments in our study coincide with genes that were downregulated by treatment with glucocorticoids on that human study: NR4A1 and MIDN. These genes showed lower expression in Isolated animals relative to Paired animals. It is therefore possible that some neural responses observed could be influenced by early differences in corticosterone between the treatments, but changes in corticosterone are not necessary for social isolation to lead to neural changes (e.g., [47, 79]).

The effects of social isolation and the duration threshold at which animals physiologically switch from experiencing acute to chronic effects of social isolation likely depend on various factors, including the social system and lifespan of the target species, seasonality, the environment in which social isolation takes place (e.g., novel or familiar), and the causes of the isolation (e.g., social rejection or defeat versus loss of social partner due to death). Regardless of these factors, the reality is that in many laboratory tests, animals are separated from their group or cagemate for short periods of time. Therefore, studying the effects of short-term social isolation is important for the interpretation of experimental results where brief social isolation is necessary. Here, we found that an isolation period of 3 h led to coordinated changes in transcripts associated with synaptic signalling and transmission and with metabolism. It is important to note that our study included only males. It is highly likely that sex differences exist in the neural response to social isolation. Studying these sex differences will be critical for determining when the effect of sex derives from a larger impact of brief social isolation in one of the sexes, rather than some other aspect of interest in the experimental manipulation. For example, a screen of behavioural experiments assessing neuropsychiatric phenotypes in mice [80], many of which involve placing animals alone in test arenas or in cages, found that female C57BL/6 N mice were less anxious than males because they spent more time in the centre of the arena in the open field test. Are females of that strain overall less anxious than males, or do they respond to social isolation differently? In addition to obtaining new knowledge on the effects of social isolation, developing tests that avoid the need for isolating animals will help circumvent this confounding variable. The IntelliCage allows for the assessment of a variety of behaviours and cognitive function of group-housed rodents [81]. Use of sophisticated RFID and detection systems has also allowed researchers to study spontaneous cage activity and wheel running in group-housed rodents [82], as well as time spent in groups, group size, territory size, and drinking behaviour, in groups of hundreds of mice living in a natural environment [83, 84]. In addition, automated image-based tracking is continuously and rapidly evolving [85], now permitting for tracking and pose-estimation of groups of animals (e.g., [86]). In conclusion, when social isolation cannot be avoided during an experiment by use of more sophisticated methods, its effects need to be understood to contextualize the experimental results found.

Data availability

Sequencing statistics, differential expression results, GSEA results, and raw behavioural and corticosterone data are provided in the supplementary tables. RNA-sequencing datasets are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (accession #GSE203528).

References

  1. Hermes GL, Delgado B, Tretiakova M, Cavigelli SA, Krausz T, Conzen SD, McClintock MK. 2009 Social isolation dysregulates endocrine and behavioral stress while increasing malignant burden of spontaneous mammary tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 22393–22398. (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910753106).

  2. Yadav RSP, Ansari F, Bera N, Kent C, Agrawal P. Lessons from lonely flies: Molecular and neuronal mechanisms underlying social isolation. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2024;156:105504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105504).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a Meta-Analytic Review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10:227–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Snyder-Mackler N, et al. Social determinants of health and survival in humans and other animals. Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax9553.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee CR, Chen A, Tye KM. The neural circuitry of social homeostasis: consequences of acute versus chronic social isolation. Cell. 2021;184:1500–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.028).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lister RG, Hilakivi LA. The effects of novelty, isolation, light and ethanol on the social behavior of mice. Psychopharmacology. 1988;96:181–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177558).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zelikowsky M et al. 2018 the neuropeptide Tac2 controls a distributed brain state induced by chronic social isolation stress. Cell 173, 1265–e127919. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.037).

  8. Speakman JR. Measuring Energy Metabolism in the mouse – theoretical, practical, and Analytical considerations. Front Physiol. 2013;4:34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00034).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Crawley JN. Behavioral phenotyping strategies for mutant mice. Neuron. 2008;57:809–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. HÃ¥nell A, Marklund N. 2014 Structured evaluation of rodent behavioral tests used in drug discovery research. Front Behav Neurosci 8.

  11. Ferhat A-T, Torquet N, Le Sourd A-M, de Chaumont F, Olivo-Marin J-C, Faure P, Bourgeron T, Ey E. Recording Mouse Ultrasonic vocalizations to evaluate Social Communication. J Vis Exp. 2016;53871. https://doi.org/10.3791/53871.

  12. Lopes PC, König B. Choosing a healthy mate: sexually attractive traits as reliable indicators of current disease status in house mice. Anim Behav. 2016;111:119–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.10.011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mello CV, Vicario DS, Clayton DF. Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1992;89:6818–22. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.15.6818.

  14. O’Connell LA, Hofmann HA. Evolution of a Vertebrate Social decision-making network. Science. 2012;336:1154–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218889).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Connell LA, Hofmann HA. The Vertebrate mesolimbic reward system and social behavior network: a comparative synthesis. J Comp Neurol. 2011;519:3599–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22735).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saper CB, Chou TC, Scammell TE. 2001 the sleep switch: hypothalamic control of sleep and wakefulness. Trends Neurosci 24, 726–31. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(00)02002-6).

  17. Romanovsky AA. Thermoregulation: some concepts have changed. Functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;292:R37–46. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00668.2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahima RS, Antwi DA. Brain regulation of appetite and satiety. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008;37:811–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2008.08.005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson R, Goodson J, Ruscio M, Adkins-Regan E. Role of the Archistriatal Nucleus taeniae in the sexual behavior of male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica): a comparison of function with the Medial Nucleus of the Amygdala in mammals. BBE. 1998;51:215–29. https://doi.org/10.1159/000006539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng M-F, Chaiken M, Zuo M, Miller H. Nucleus Taenia of the Amygdala of birds: anatomical and functional studies in Ring doves (Streptopelia risoria) and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Brain Behav Evol. 1999;53:243–70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000006597).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujii TG, Ikebuchi M, Okanoya K. Auditory responses to Vocal sounds in the Songbird Nucleus Taeniae of the Amygdala and the adjacent arcopallium. Brain Behav Evol. 2016;87:275–89. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447233).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayer U, Rosa-Salva O, Loveland JL, Vallortigara G. Selective response of the nucleus taeniae of the amygdala to a naturalistic social stimulus in visually naive domestic chicks. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9849. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46322-5).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin Ramirez J, Delius JD. Nucleus striae terminalis lesions affect agonistic behavior of pigeons. Physiol Behav. 1979;22:871–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(79)90331-7).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aste N, Balthazart J, Absil P, Grossmann R, Mülhbauer E, Viglietti-Panzica C, Panzica GC. Anatomical and neurochemical definition of the nucleus of the stria terminalis in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). J Comp Neurol. 1998;396:141–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980629)396:2%3C141::AID-CNE1%3E3.0.CO;2-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grossmann R, Jurkevich A, Köhler A. Sex dimorphism in the avian arginine vasotocin system with special emphasis to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Comp Biochem Physiol A: Mol Integr Physiol. 2002;131:833–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00021-1).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodson JL, Evans AK. Neural responses to territorial challenge and nonsocial stress in male song sparrows: segregation, integration, and modulation by a vasopressin V1 antagonist. Horm Behav. 2004;46:371–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.02.008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xie J, Kuenzel WJ, Sharp PJ, Jurkevich A. Appetitive and consummatory sexual and agonistic Behaviour elicits FOS expression in Aromatase and Vasotocin Neurones within the Preoptic Area and Bed Nucleus of the stria terminalis of male domestic chickens. J Neuroendocrinol. 2011;23:232–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02108.x).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodson JL, Wang Y. Valence-sensitive neurons exhibit divergent functional profiles in gregarious and asocial species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17013–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606278103).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lebow MA, Chen A. Overshadowed by the amygdala: the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis emerges as key to psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:450–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.1).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Flanigan ME, Kash TL. Coordination of social behaviors by the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Eur J Neurosci. 2022;55:2404–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiong Y, Hong H, Liu C, Zhang YQ. Social isolation and the brain: effects and mechanisms. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01835-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mar Sánchez M, Aguado F, Sánchez-Toscano F, Saphier D. Effects of prolonged social isolation on responses of neurons in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, preoptic area, and hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus to stimulation of the medial amygdala. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1995;20:525–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4530(94)00083-M).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pournajafi-Nazarloo H, Partoo L, Yee J, Stevenson J, Sanzenbacher L, Kenkel W, Mohsenpour SR, Hashimoto K, Carter CS. 2011 effects of social isolation on mRNA expression for corticotrophin-releasing hormone receptors in prairie voles. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36, 780–9. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.10.015).

  34. Pournajafi-Nazarloo H, Kenkel W, Mohsenpour SR, Sanzenbacher L, Saadat H, Partoo L, Yee J, Azizi F, Carter CS. 2013 exposure to chronic isolation modulates receptors mRNAs for oxytocin and vasopressin in the hypothalamus and heart. Peptides 43, 20–6. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2013.02.007).

  35. Lopes PC, Chan H, Demathieu S, González-Gómez PL, Wingfield JC, Bentley GE. The impact of exposure to a novel female on symptoms of infection and on the reproductive axis. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2013;20:348–60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353779).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lopes PC, Faber-Hammond JJ, Siemonsma C, Patel S, Renn SCP. The social environment alters neural responses to a lipopolysaccharide challenge. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;110:162–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2023.03.004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nixdorf-Bergweiler BE, Bischof H-J, Nixdorf-Bergweiler BE, Bischof H-J. A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the Zebra Finch, Taeniopygia Guttata. National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2007.

  38. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotech. 2019;37:907–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of Fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu T, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innov. 2021;2:100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Reimand J, et al. Pathway enrichment analysis and visualization of omics data using g:Profiler, GSEA, Cytoscape and EnrichmentMap. Nat Protoc. 2019;14:482–517. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0103-9).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Koopmans F, et al. SynGO: an Evidence-Based, Expert-Curated Knowledge Base for the synapse. Neuron. 2019;103:217–e2344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Geifman N, Monsonego A, Rubin E. The Neural/Immune Gene Ontology: clipping the gene ontology for neurological and immunological systems. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:458. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-458).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. R Core Team. 2023 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.

  46. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-; 2016. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319242750. See.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. George JM et al. 2020 Acute social isolation alters neurogenomic state in songbird forebrain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 23311–23316. (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820841116).

  48. Mendel HC, Kaas Q, Muttenthaler M. 2020 Neuropeptide signalling systems – an underexplored target for venom drug discovery. Biochem Pharmacol 181, 114129. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114129).

  49. Saper CB, Lowell BB. The hypothalamus. Curr Biol. 2014;24:R1111–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Austin J, Marks D. Hormonal regulators of Appetite. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2009;2009(141753). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/141753.

  51. Perez EC, Elie JE, Soulage CO, Soula HA, Mathevon N, Vignal C. The acoustic expression of stress in a songbird: does corticosterone drive isolation-induced modifications of zebra finch calls? Horm Behav. 2012;61:573–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.02.004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Banerjee SB, Adkins-Regan E. Effect of isolation and conspecific presence in a novel environment on corticosterone concentrations in a social avian species, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Horm Behav. 2011;60:233–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.05.011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating Permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative Actions*. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:55–89. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Perland E, Bagchi S, Klaesson A, Fredriksson R. Characteristics of 29 novel atypical solute carriers of major facilitator superfamily type: evolutionary conservation, predicted structure and neuronal co-expression. Open Biol. 2017;7:170142. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.170142).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Bagchi S, Perland E, Hosseini K, Lundgren J, Al-Walai N, Kheder S, Fredriksson R. Probable role for major facilitator superfamily domain containing 6 (MFSD6) in the brain during variable energy consumption. Int J Neurosci. 2020;130:476–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2019.1694020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ceder MM, Lekholm E, Klaesson A, Tripathi R, Schweizer N, Weldai L, Patil S, Fredriksson R. 2020 glucose availability alters gene and protein expression of several newly classified and putative solute carriers in mice Cortex Cell Culture and D. Melanogaster. Front Cell Dev Biology 8.

  57. Tomova L, Wang KL, Thompson T, Matthews GA, Takahashi A, Tye KM, Saxe R. Acute social isolation evokes midbrain craving responses similar to hunger. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:1597–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00742-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Li W, Wang Z, Syed S, Lyu C, Lincoln S, O’Neil J, Nguyen AD, Feng I, Young MW. 2021 chronic social isolation signals starvation and reduces sleep in Drosophila. Nature 597, 239–44. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03837-0).

  59. Maxwell MA, Muscat GEO. 2006 The NR4A Subgroup: Immediate Early Response Genes with Pleiotropic Physiological Roles. Nucl Recept Signal 4, nrs.04002. (https://doi.org/10.1621/nrs.04002).

  60. Close AF, Rouillard C, Buteau J. NR4A orphan nuclear receptors in glucose homeostasis: a minireview. Diabetes Metab. 2013;39:478–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2013.07.005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pearen MA, Muscat GEO. Minireview: nuclear hormone receptor 4A signaling: implications for metabolic disease. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24:1891–903. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2010-0015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Jeanneteau F, et al. 2018 the stress-Induced transcription factor NR4A1 adjusts mitochondrial function and synapse number in Prefrontal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2017;38:1335–50. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2793-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Guzowski JF, Timlin JA, Roysam B, McNaughton BL, Worley PF, Barnes CA. Mapping behaviorally relevant neural circuits with immediate-early gene expression. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:599–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.08.018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Minatohara K, Akiyoshi M, Okuno H. Role of Immediate-Early genes in synaptic plasticity and neuronal ensembles underlying the memory Trace. Front Mol Neurosci. 2016;8:78. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2015.00078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Lambert DG. The nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor: a target with broad therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:694–710. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2572).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kash TL, Pleil KE, Marcinkiewcz CA, Lowery-Gionta EG, Crowley N, Mazzone C, Sugam J, Hardaway JA, McElligott ZA. 2015 Neuropeptide Regulation of Signaling and Behavior in the BNST. Mol Cells 38, 1–13. (https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.2261).

  67. McElligott ZA, Winder DG. Modulation of Glutamatergic Synaptic Transmission in the Bed Nucleus of the stria terminalis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009;33:1329–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.05.022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Ch’ng S, Fu J, Brown RM, McDougall SJ, Lawrence AJ. The intersection of stress and reward: BNST modulation of aversive and appetitive states. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;87:108–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. O’Rourke T, Boeckx C. Glutamate receptors in domestication and modern human evolution. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2020;108:341–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.10.004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lawther AJ, Hale MW, Lowry CA. Chap. 29 - serotonin and the neurobiology of anxious states. In: Müller CP, Cunningham KA, editors. Handbook of behavioral neuroscience. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 505–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64125-0.00029-3).

  71. Saint-Dizier H, Constantin P, Davies DC, Leterrier C, Lévy F, Richard S. Subdivisions of the arcopallium/posterior pallial amygdala complex are differentially involved in the control of fear behaviour in the Japanese quail. Brain Res Bull. 2009;79:288–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.03.004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lowndes M, Davies DC. The effect of archistriatal lesions on ‘open field’ and fear/avoidance behaviour in the domestic chick. Behav Brain Res. 1995;72:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(95)00026-7).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Krause ET, Kjaer JB, van Lüders C. LP. 2017 a polymorphism in the 5′-flanking region of the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene affects fear-related behaviors of adult domestic chickens. Behav Brain Res 330, 92–6. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.04.051).

  74. Krause ET, Kjaer JB, Dudde A, Schrader L, Phi-van L. Fear but not social behaviour is affected by a polymorphism in the 5’-flanking region of the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene in adult hens. Behav Brain Res. 2019;361:50–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.12.029).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Campanella LCA, da Silva AA, Gellert DS, Parreira C, Ramos MC, Paschoalini MA, Marino-Neto J. Tonic serotonergic control of ingestive behaviours in the pigeon (Columba livia): the role of the arcopallium. Behav Brain Res. 2009;205:396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Sharma VK, Loh YP. The discovery, structure, and function of 5-HTR1E serotonin receptor. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21:235. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01195-0).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Lopes PC, Adelman J, Wingfield JC, Bentley GE. Social context modulates sickness behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2012;66:1421–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1397-1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Reddy TE, Pauli F, Sprouse RO, Neff NF, Newberry KM, Garabedian MJ, Myers RM. Genomic determination of the glucocorticoid response reveals unexpected mechanisms of gene regulation. Genome Res. 2009;19:2163–71. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.097022.109).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Scaccianoce S, Del Bianco P, Paolone G, Caprioli D, Modafferi AME, Nencini P, Badiani A. Social isolation selectively reduces hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor without altering plasma corticosterone. Behav Brain Res. 2006;168:323–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2005.04.024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Gallagher SJ, Tornabene BJ, DeBlieux TS, Pochini KM, Chislock MF, Compton ZA, Eiler LK, Verble KM, Hoverman JT. 2019 healthy but smaller herds: predators reduce pathogen transmission in an amphibian assemblage. J Anim Ecol 88, 1613–24. (https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13042).

  81. Iman IN, et al. The IntelliCage System: a review of its utility as a novel behavioral platform for a Rodent Model of Substance Use Disorder. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021;15:683780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.683780).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Reuser A, Wenzel K, Felix SB, Dörr M, Bahls M, Könemann S. Simultaneous assessment of spontaneous cage activity and voluntary wheel running in group-housed mice. Sci Rep. 2022;12:4444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08349-z).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. König B, Lindholm AK, Lopes PC, Dobay A, Steinert S, Buschmann FJ-U. A system for automatic recording of social behavior in a free-living wild house mouse population. Anim Biotelem. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-015-0069-0). 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Lopes PC, König B. Wild mice with different social network sizes vary in brain gene expression. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:506. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06911-5).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Dell AI, et al. Automated image-based tracking and its application in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014;29:417–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Lauer J, et al. Multi-animal pose estimation, identification and tracking with DeepLabCut. Nat Methods. 2022;19:496–504. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01443-0).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was funded with Chapman University start-up funds to PCL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA

    Patricia C. Lopes, Madeleine Chang, Faith Holloway, Biola Fatusin, Sachin Patel, Chandler Siemonsma & Morgan Kindel

  2. Neuroscience Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Morgan Kindel

Authors
  1. Patricia C. Lopes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Madeleine Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Faith Holloway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Biola Fatusin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sachin Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chandler Siemonsma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Morgan Kindel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PCL devised, carried out the experiments, analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript. MC, FH, BF, SP, CS, and MK helped process the tissues, and code video-recorded behaviours. MC, FH, and BF helped analyse the RNA-seq dataset.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia C. Lopes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Chapman University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol 2018-2). Experiments comply with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Methods are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopes, P.C., Chang, M., Holloway, F. et al. The effect of acute social isolation on neural molecular responses in components of the social decision-making network. BMC Genomics 25, 771 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10653-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10653-z

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us