Skip to main content

PePPER: a webserver for prediction of prokaryote promoter elements and regulons



Accurate prediction of DNA motifs that are targets of RNA polymerases, sigma factors and transcription factors (TFs) in prokaryotes is a difficult mission mainly due to as yet undiscovered features in DNA sequences or structures in promoter regions. Improved prediction and comparison algorithms are currently available for identifying transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) and their accompanying TFs and regulon members.


We here extend the current databases of TFs, TFBSs and regulons with our knowledge on Lactococcus lactis and developed a webserver for prediction, mining and visualization of prokaryote promoter elements and regulons via a novel concept. This new approach includes an all-in-one method of data mining for TFs, TFBSs, promoters, and regulons for any bacterial genome via a user-friendly webserver. We demonstrate the power of this method by mining WalRK regulons in Lactococci and Streptococci and, vice versa, use L. lactis regulon data (CodY) to mine closely related species.


The PePPER webserver offers, besides the all-in-one analysis method, a toolbox for mining for regulons, promoters and TFBSs and accommodates a new L. lactis regulon database in addition to already existing regulon data. Identification of putative regulons and full annotation of intergenic regions in any bacterial genome on the basis of existing knowledge on a related organism can now be performed by biologists and it can be done for a wide range of regulons. On the basis of the PePPER output, biologist can design experiments to further verify the existence and extent of the proposed regulons. The PePPER webserver is freely accessible at


As early as in 1960 the term operon was coined for a group of genes of which the expression is coordinated by an operator [1]. Experimental methods like Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA), Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR), nuclease protection assays (DNAse-footprinting) and Chromatin Immuno Precipitation (ChIP) can all be used to demonstrate that an interaction exists between a transcription factor (TF) and DNA [2]. Experimentally proven TFBSs have been described in literature and are available via publicly accessible databases such as DBTBS [3], RegulonDB [4], PRODORIC [5], MicrobesOnline [6], RegTransBase [7] and RegPrecise [8]. Besides experimental proof for the existence of protein-DNA interaction, TFBS discovery algorithms have been developed to uncover conserved regions that might act as TFBSs (MEME [9], ARCS-Motif [10], GLAM2 [9], W-AlignACE [11], GIMSAN [12], RankMotif++ [13], GAME [14], and Tmod [15]). This so-called motif mining is based on a collection of genes having a certain correlation. Gene-to-gene correlations can be derived e.g., from transcriptome data or from functional relations like belonging to the same metabolic pathway or to certain COG or GO classes. Motif mining consists of a search for conserved DNA patterns in the upstream intergenic regions of the genes or the operons to which the gene(s) belong. A high probability (low p-value) that the occurrence of a certain DNA pattern is very specific for a gene set does not necessarily imply that this motif constitutes a TFBS but it is a good lead for biological functional analysis.


Genes and operons that are under control of the same TF are members of that TF’s regulon. Although methods for the prediction of regulons have been substantially improved [16], they are still far from perfect. Comparative genomics tools can be used to predict regulons in bacterial genomes but the procedure can lead to incorrect regulon calling. Despite this drawback, several regulon databases are available that are based on comparative genomics methods and lack experimental evidence. Probably the most extended and accurate databases of regulons are DBTBS for B. subtilis[3] and RegulonDB for E. coli[4]. The latest update of DBTBS brought the total number of B. subtilis TFs to 120, promoters to 1475 and regulated operons to 736, of which 463 operons have been experimentally validated [3]. Together, RegulonDB and DBTBS are the major resources for regulon network mining dedicated to prokaryotes. PRODORIC and RegTransBase are the most extended and manually curated databases on gene regulation in prokaryotes in general [5]. Besides regulon information they include TFBSs and bioinformatics tools for prediction, analysis and visualization of gene regulatory networks using ProdoNet [17] and furthermore, PRODORIC offers the tool “virtual footprint”, which can be used to mine for novel regulons. The in silico prediction of regulons is usually based on operons that share the same TFBS and the information is supplemented with the results from comparative genomics analysis of known regulons. This method is used in the recently launched webserver RegPrecise [8], which gives access to a database containing a collection of manually curated regulons grouped together by similar properties such as belonging to the same biological process or metabolic pathway. The database is limited to six closely related bacteria (Shewanella, Thermotogales Bacillales and Desulfovibrionales). On the other hand FITBAR [16] is dedicated to TFBS mining and discovery, RegAnalyst [18] and ProdoNet [17] are webservers enabling integration of data on proteomics and metabolic pathways and provide subsequent graphical representation of networks.

In this work, we designed and developed a novel tool, PePPER, to mine for regulons and TFBSs in any sequenced bacterial genome. As a showcase, we extended the existing regulon databases with a database of L. lactis regulons that is derived from literature on transcriptional regulation. The latter is accessible via the user-friendly PePPER web interface.


Data resources

MolgenRegDB is an integrated in house collection of TFs, TFBSs and regulons of L. lactis and is available via the PePPER webserver ( In addition, TF and TFBS data were downloaded from RegulonDB (E. coli) and DBTBS (B. subtilis) and subsequently reformatted and integrated together with MolgenRegDB in the PePPER database. Data of all publically available bacterial genomes are daily updated from NCBI ( and available via the PePPER webserver.

Implemented mining tools

Overrepresented DNA motifs are identified using MEME [9] and the position-specific probability matrices (PSPMs) obtained were converted to position weight matrices (PWMs) that are compatible with MOODS [19]. BLAST 2.2 [20] is used for protein comparisons. Glimmer3 [21] is used for automated gene detection (open reading frame or ORF calling) and Ribosomal Binding Sites (RBSs) are detected using RBSfinder [22]. In case of de novo ORF calling, the translation start is adapted to match the RBS prediction, otherwise the original annotation is used. TransTermHP [23] is implemented for the discovery of putative transcription terminators. Possible secondary RNA structures are predicted and plotted using RNAfold and RNAplot of the Vienna package [24]. A new prokaryote promoter prediction tool was developed and is based on PWMs and Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) of −35 and −10 consensus sequences and various sigma factor binding sites. PWMs and HMMs of B. subtilis and E. coli promoters are used as reference for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. A collection of individual tools used by PePPER are accessible via the webserver.

Building the L. Lactis TFBS library

A database of validated L. lactis TFBSs of regulons derived from literature data was made after which for each TFBS a PSPM was calculated using MEME and subsequently transposed to a MOODS compatible PWM format. To that end we used the upstream intergenic regions plus the first 20 bases of their genes as input for MEME in order to search for overrepresented DNA motifs. These motifs ranged in length from 6 to 18 bases and a database of all intergenic regions of L. lactis MG1363 was used as a background model. Subsequently, the overrepresented DNA motifs were manually compared to the literature data. Only those DNA motifs that resemble the experimentally verified TFBSs were included in the database, including the MOODS cutoff values. An overview of TFBSs of regulons, including WebLogos, is shown in Additional file 1: Table S 1; the database containing all the PSPM profiles is available via the PePPER webserver.

The PePPER toolbox

A powerful toolbox has been created in PePPER and is accessible via the PePPER webserver. By selecting a regulon on the basis of its TF and one or more genomes, the program will perform a Blast analysis between the proteins of the known regulon and all the proteins encoded by the genes in the selected genome(s). PePPER provides a clear overview in colors, of the predicted regulon(s), in each genome, which is based on the degree of protein homologies; detailed information is given in attached tables. More details about scoring and the color scheme are given on the PePPER webserver.

PePPER all-in-one

PePPER all-in-one is a parameter-free pipeline of the individual PePPER tools allowing fully automatic intergenic annotation combined with analysis of regulons. A schematic overview of the PePPER all-in-one process is shown in Figure 1. Two input formats are accepted for analysis: i) plain DNA sequences in FastA format, ii) a fully annotated file in the Genbank file format. DNA sequences lacking ORF information will be automatically annotated using Glimmer3 to discriminate between ORFs and intergenic regions. Input files in Genbank format, either uploaded or selected from the PePPER library of genomes, will produce the most extended results, including hyperlinks to NCBI resources such as protein annotation, protein domains and genomic context of the genes. The output is organized into three tables and one figure: i) Table 1, the “Summary of Results” contains links to detailed information on analysis of regulons, TFBS, promoters, transcription terminators, RNA folding and motif analysis using MEME, ii) Table 2 and Table 3, “Files available for download”, iii) Table 4, Combined results of the TFBS and regulon mining. Figure 1 gives a graphical presentation of the intergenic regions.

Figure 1

Flow diagram of PePPER all-in-one. The first step of PePPER all-in-one is to select a set of genes that putatively belong to a certain regulon in one organism (target; Box I represents all genes of the target organism) through comparison with the corresponding regulons in all other organisms (source) using protein Blast (genes in Box Ia). In parallel, the known TFBSs of these regulons are used to find genes in the target organism that carry this DNA motif in their upstream regions (genes in Box Ib). Subsequently, a MEME search is performed on the upstream regions of the genes in both independently obtained gene pools. This results in a set of genes that represents the putative regulon in the target organism with its predicted TFBS (genes in Box II). Finally, features such as RBSs, promoter and transcription terminators are added, after which the result is graphically represented. The information can be accessed and viewed separately per gene.

Table 1 Regulators of which the regulons have been studied in Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris MG1363 and Lactococcus lactis spp. lactis IL1403 and their literature references. -, strain/subspecies not specified
Table 2 Analysis of regulons
Table 3 Comparison of the WalRK TCS of B. subtilis to the L. lactis orthologs using PePPER’s multiple genome regulon mining tool

Promoter prediction using PePPER

A universal prokaryote transcription initiation DNA motif does not exist [2], but a common DNA pattern (the Pribnow box) 10 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) and a conserved sequence 35 base pairs upstream of the TSS are overrepresented in promoter regions. These patterns are searched for separately, after which putative promoters are only taken into account if the spacing between their −35 and −10 motifs is 16 to 18 bases. Although many different sigma factors binding sites are known (especially from B. subtilis) these are not used in the promoter prediction routine used here; they are implemented as conserved DNA motifs in the TFBS mining tool. The resulting promoter prediction algorithm is universal for prokaryotes, but we do offer the possibility to discriminate between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to improve the accuracy of the prediction algorithm. Furthermore, “incomplete” promoters, in which only a −35 or a −10 sequence is predicted are also shown in the results.


PePPER ( can be accessed through a user-friendly web interface for querying and browsing. The server runs on a linux platform (Ubuntu server LTS 10.04) with an Apache webserver (version 2.2) and a MySQL server (version 5.1) and Blast 2.2. Programming was done using PHP 5.0, Perl 5.12 and BioPerl 1.8. A combination of Joomla and jQuery 1.4 was used to build the user-friendly web interface.

Results and discussion

Regulons in lactococcus lactis

Each of the 154 known or predicted TFs of L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 [59] will probably regulate the transcription of one or more genes or operons. The functionality of 32 TFs of L. lactis MG1363 and L. lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 has been reported in literature, using techniques ranging from DNA microarray analysis to DNA footprinting. Although the two lactococcal subspecies are closely related, not each regulator or regulon of one is present or similar in the other. The majority of the TFs in MG1363 and IL1403 show a high degree of mutual similarity. Of the 154 TFs in L. lactis MG1363, 22 are not present in L. lactis IL1403 while 20 out of the 143 TFs identified in L. lactis IL1403 are not found in MG1363 (Tables 2 and Table 3). Analysis performed by PePPER showed that large regulons (those of CodY, CcpA, CmbR, CesSR, ArgR, and PurR) as well as some small regulons (those of RcfB, ZirR, BusR and LmrR) are well conserved in the two strains. The conservation of regulons between the closely related subspecies is illustrated by the CmbR regulon of cysteine and methionine biosynthesis, which has been studied in detail in both L. lactis IL1403 [60] and L. lactis MG1363 [36]. Analysis of both CmbR regulons shows that 16 out of 17 proteins in the IL1403 CmbR regulon have high similarity to MG1363 proteins (data not shown). Finally, all known TFs and TFBSs of L. lactis were collected in one database, the MolgenRegDB. This is currently the most comprehensive manually curated regulon database of L. lactis; it is available via the PePPER webserver (

Prediction of the WalR regulon in four L. Lactis strains

The B. subtilis operon walRKyycHIJK is a 6-cistron operon encoding among others the two-component system (TCS) WalRK that controls the expression of 23 genes. These genes represent the WalR regulon [6164]. This signal transduction pathway is crucial for the regulation of cell wall metabolism and is one the few TCS known to be a virulence factor in S. pneumoniae[61]. The presence of the WalR regulon has never been described in L. lactis. We validated PePPER by comparing its results to literature data and subsequently used it to unravel the putative WalR regulons and cognate TFBS in 4 sequenced strains of L. lactis. PePPER showed that the products of 4 of the genes of the walRKyycHIJK of B. subtilis are orthologous to kinC, llrC and vicX htrA of L. lactis MG1363 (see Table 3). Furthermore, PePPER showed that 13 out of the 23 proteins of the WalR regulon of B. subtilis show high similarity (Blast e-value <10−20) to proteins in L. lactis MG1363; they are organized in 6 operons (Table 2). Using PePPER’s multiple genome mining tool, it is clear that orthologs of the WalRK TCS and part of the WalR regulon genes of B. subtilis are present in all other fully sequenced L. lactis strains: IL1403, SK11 and KF147 (Table 3).

Streptococci are phylogenetically closely related to Lactococci and therefore we performed an analysis of the WalRK regulons in both groups using the PePPER toolbox. The result (Figure 2) shows the similarity of the known WalRK regulons (B. subtilis, S. pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus) with the predicted regulons of Lactococci and Streptococci. The B. subtilis regulon (Figure 2a) showed the high conservation between the two groups where 6 genes were not found and 9 genes out of 23 were found in all species (protein blast e-value cutoff of 10−20). The difference between the two groups is shown in Figure 2b where 11 out of 24 genes of the S. pneumoniae R6 WalRK regulon were not found in Lactococci.

Figure 2

Presence of regulon in query organisms by protein Blast. WalRK regulon genes of B. subtilis (a) and S. pneumoniae (b) were used to perform a protein Blast in order to examine whether a WalRK regulon might be present in Lactococci and Streptococci. Colors from light to dark blue are indicative of increasing protein similarity; for more details see the PePPER webserver.

TFBS prediction

The WalR binding site (TGTAA-n6-TGTAA) was mapped using DNAseI footprinting and EMSAs in 4 organisms; B. subtilis, Staph. aureus, S. pneumoniae and S. mutans[61]. We added the WalR TFBSs derived from these 4 organisms separately, as well as an averaged (combined) WalR motif (WalR[combined]) to the PePPER database and subsequently screened the genomes of the L. lactis strains for the presence of these DNA motifs. The upstream DNA regions of two genes of L. lactis MG1363 that are orthologous to WalRK regulon members carry the WalR[combined] TFBS, namely xynD (TGTAT-n6-TGTTA) and htrA (TGAAA-n6-TGAAG). In the upstream DNA region of the other 4 WalRK operon orthologs no WalR[combined] was found. Interestingly, WalR[combined] (Figure 3) was present upstream of the cell wall hydrolase genes acmA and acmB[65, 66], which could indicate that these genes might be regulated by WalRK and that the WalRK stress response system of L. lactis also influences their expression.

Figure 3

Annotation of the intergenic region upstream of acmA . The genes acmA and the first upstream gene, llmg_0281, are indicated with gray arrows and are not drawn to scale. The WebLogo is based on the MEME weight matrix; light grey box is the predicted RBS. No transcription terminator was found in this area.

PePPER all-in-one case study

The well-studied global transcriptional regulator CodY of L. lactis MG1363 [67, 68] binds to the CodY-box (AATTTTCWGAAAATT) and influences the expression of genes involved in (branched-chain) amino acid uptake and biosynthesis as well as several other genes involved in N-metabolism (proteolysis and peptide uptake). The CodY regulon of L. lactis MG1363 was used in the PePPER all-in-one system to mine the L. lactis IL1403 genome for the presence of homologs of the CodY[MG1363] regulon and the CodY-TFBS[MG1363]. Subsequently, a MEME search was performed. The results showed that a CodY-TFBS is present in the upstream intergenic regions of 5 genes/operons in L. lactis IL1403, namely codY, serCAB, gltA-citB-icd, dppA and dppPBCDF. In L. lactis IL1403, Dpp, erroneously annotated as Opt [69], functions as a di/tripeptide transporter, with DppA as the substrate binding protein, and as an oligopeptide transporter employing DppP. The dppP gene in the dppA-dppPBCDF gene cluster of L. lactis MG1363 is mutated; in this strain CodY binds upstream of dppA but not upstream of dppP. Oligopeptide uptake in L. lactis MG1363 is encoded by the oppDFBCA operon, which is under CodY control [68]. The Opp system in L. lactis IL1403 is present but non-functional [69] and no CodY-TFBS[MG1363] was found in the DNA region upstream of opp. Despite the differences in the activities of these transport systems, our analysis indicates that in both lactococcal strains CodY regulates di/tri- and oligopeptide transport. The graphical overview of intergenic regions (Figure 4) shows that CodY represses gene expression by binding in or closely downstream of the promoter regions. The DNA binding motif that was identified in L. lactis IL1403 resembles CodY-TFBS[MG1363][68] and the CodY-TFBS[IL1403] reported by Guedon et al. [67].

Figure 4

CodY regulon prediction by PePPER all-in-one. The inserted table shows the CodY-TFBS[MG1363] found in L. lactis IL1403 (p-value < 10-5); the drawings show the intergenic regions upstream of CodY regulon members. At the bottom of this figure the WebLogo is shown of the TFBS derived from the MEME search. Predicted promoters with a correct spacing between −35 and −10 are colored dark green. Green arrows indicate predicted TSSs, light green boxes represent individual conserved −10 and −35 DNA motifs.

We used the CodY[MG1363] regulon to screen for the presence of a similar regulon in a less closely related Gram-positive bacterium, the pathogen S. pneumoniae D39. The analysis revealed that seven genes/operons (ilvD, ilvE, asd, hom-thrB, amiACDEF, SPD_1878-thrC, livJHMGF) involved in amino acid transport or biosynthesis carry a sequence closely related to CodY-TFBS[MG1363] in their upstream DNA regions.


PePPER uses a novel approach, in which all available information on prokaryotic regulons and TFBSs is used to identify regulons in any query bacterium. In addition it offers a user-friendly web interface making the data provided byPePPER easily accessible for non-bioinformaticians. PePPER offers, next to all fully sequenced bacterial genomes, the possibility to upload un-annotated data, which is then processed automatically. Furthermore, prediction of intergenic region elements such as promoters, transcription terminators, sigma factor binding sites, RBSs, as well as that of possible secondary DNA structures therein, will lead to more detailed knowledge of the DNA regions under study. By adding our knowledge on L. lactis regulons as well as DBTBS and RegulonDB regulon data to the PePPER database, we provide an extended database of bacterial regulons and TFBSs. PePPER can be used to pinpoint a wide range of putative regulons and their cognate TFBSs in any bacterial genome on the basis of existing knowledge. This regulon information can subsequently be used by biologists to help them design experiments to authenticate the proposed regulons.


  1. 1.

    Jacob F, Perrin D, Sanchez C: MONOD J: Operon: a group of genes with the expression coordinated by an operator. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1960, 250: 1727-1729.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    van Hijum SAFT, Medema MH, Kuipers OP: Mechanisms and evolution of control logic in prokaryotic transcriptional regulation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009, 73 (3): 481-10.1128/MMBR.00037-08.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sierro N, Makita Y, de Hoon M, Nakai K: DBTBS: a database of transcriptional regulation in Bacillus subtilis containing upstream intergenic conservation information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (Database issue): D93-D96.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gama-Castro S, Salgado H, Peralta-Gil M, Santos-Zavaleta A, Muniz-Rascado L, Solano-Lira H, Jimenez-Jacinto V, Weiss V, Garcia-Sotelo JS, Lopez-Fuentes A, Porron-Sotelo L, Alquicira-Hernandez S, Medina-Rivera A, Martinez-Flores I, Alquicira-Hernandez K, Martinez-Adame R, Bonavides-Martinez C, Miranda-Rios J, Huerta AM, Mendoza-Vargas A, Collado-Torres L, Taboada B, Vega-Alvarado L, Olvera M, Olvera L, Grande R, Morett E, Collado-Vides J: RegulonDB version 7.0: transcriptional regulation of Escherichia coli K-12 integrated within genetic sensory response units (Gensor Units). Nucleic Acids Res. 2010,  : 1-8. 10.1093/nar/gkq1110.

  5. 5.

    Grote A, Klein J, Retter I, Haddad I, Behling S, Bunk B, Biegler I, Yarmolinetz S, Jahn D, Munch R: PRODORIC (release 2009): a database and tool platform for the analysis of gene regulation in prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (Database issue): D61-D65.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dehal PS, Joachimiak MP, Price MN, Bates JT, Baumohl JK, Chivian D, Friedland GD, Huang KH, Keller K, Novichkov PS, Dubchak IL, Alm EJ, Arkin AP: MicrobesOnline: an integrated portal for comparative and functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38 (Database issue): D396-D400.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kazakov AE, Cipriano MJ, Novichkov PS, Minovitsky S, Vinogradov DV, Arkin A, Mironov AA, Gelfand MS, Dubchak I: RegTransBase--a database of regulatory sequences and interactions in a wide range of prokaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35 (Database issue): D407-D412.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Novichkov PS, Laikova ON, Novichkova ES, Gelfand MS, Arkin AP, Dubchak I, Rodionov DA: RegPrecise: a database of curated genomic inferences of transcriptional regulatory interactions in prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38 (Database issue): D111-D118.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS: MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (Web Server issue): W202-

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhang S, Su W, Yang J: ARCS-Motif: discovering correlated motifs from unaligned biological sequences. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (2): 183-189. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chen X, Guo L, Fan Z, Jiang T: W-AlignACE: an improved Gibbs sampling algorithm based on more accurate position weight matrices learned from sequence and gene expression/ChIP-chip data. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24 (9): 1121-1128. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ng P, Keich U: GIMSAN: a Gibbs motif finder with significance analysis. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24 (19): 2256-2257. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chen X, Hughes TR, Morris Q: RankMotif++: a motif-search algorithm that accounts for relative ranks of K-mers in binding transcription factors. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (13): i72-i79. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wei Z, Jensen ST: GAME: detecting cis-regulatory elements using a genetic algorithm. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22 (13): 1577-1584. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sun H, Yuan Y, Wu Y, Liu H, Liu JS, Xie H: Tmod: toolbox of motif discovery. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26 (3): 405-407. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp681.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Oberto J: FITBAR: a web tool for the robust prediction of prokaryotic regulons. BMC Bioinforma. 2010, 11 (1): 554-10.1186/1471-2105-11-554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Klein J, Leupold S, Munch R, Pommerenke C, Johl T, Karst U, Jansch L, Jahn D, Retter I: ProdoNet: identification and visualization of prokaryotic gene regulatory and metabolic networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (Web Server issue): W460-W464.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sharma D, Mohanty D, Surolia A: RegAnalyst: a web interface for the analysis of regulatory motifs, networks and pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (Web Server issue): W193-W201.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Korhonen J, Martinmaki P, Pizzi C, Rastas P, Ukkonen E: MOODS: fast search for position weight matrix matches in DNA sequences. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (23): 3181-3182. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp554.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, Madden TL: NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (Web Server issue): W5-W9.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL: Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (6): 673-679. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Suzek BE, Ermolaeva MD, Schreiber M, Salzberg SL: A probabilistic method for identifying start codons in bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17 (12): 1123-1130. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kingsford CL, Ayanbule K, Salzberg SL: Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of Rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake. Genome Biol. 2007, 8 (2): R22-10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r22.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hofacker IL: Vienna RNA secondary structure server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (13): 3429-3431. 10.1093/nar/gkg599.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Larsen R, Buist G, Kuipers OP, Kok J: ArgR and AhrC are both required for regulation of arginine metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (4): 1147-1157. 10.1128/JB.186.4.1147-1157.2004.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Larsen R, Kok J, Kuipers OP: Interaction between ArgR and AhrC controls regulation of arginine metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (19): 19319-19330. 10.1074/jbc.M413983200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Romeo Y, Bouvier J, Gutierrez C: Osmotic regulation of transcription in Lactococcus lactis: ionic strength-dependent binding of the BusR repressor to the busA promoter. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581 (18): 3387-3390. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Romeo Y, Obis D, Bouvier J, Guillot A, Fourcans A, Bouvier I, Gutierrez C, Mistou MY: Osmoregulation in Lactococcus lactis: BusR, a transcriptional repressor of the glycine betaine uptake system BusA. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 47 (4): 1135-1147. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03362.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zomer AL, Buist G, Larsen R, Kok J, Kuipers OP: Time-resolved determination of the CcpA regulon of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189 (4): 1366-1381. 10.1128/JB.01013-06.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    den Hengst CD, Curley P, Larsen R, Buist G, Nauta A, van Sinderen D, Kuipers OP, Kok J: Probing direct interactions between CodY and the oppD promoter of Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (2): 512-521. 10.1128/JB.187.2.512-521.2005.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    den Hengst CD, Groeneveld M, Kuipers OP, Kok J: Identification and functional characterization of the Lactococcus lactis CodY-regulated branched-chain amino acid permease BcaP (CtrA). J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (9): 3280-3289. 10.1128/JB.188.9.3280-3289.2006.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wydau S, Dervyn R, Anba J, Dusko Ehrlich S, Maguin E: Conservation of key elements of natural competence in Lactococcus lactis ssp FEMS. Microbiol Lett. 2006, 257 (1): 32-42. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00141.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Magnani D, Barre O, Gerber SD, Solioz M: Characterization of the CopR regulon of Lactococcus lactis IL1403. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190 (2): 536-545. 10.1128/JB.01481-07.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Varmanen P, Ingmer H, Vogensen FK: ctsR of Lactococcus lactis encodes a negative regulator of clp gene expression. Microbiology. 2000, 146 (Pt 6): 1447-1455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Varmanen P, Vogensen FK, Hammer K, Palva A, Ingmer H: ClpE from Lactococcus lactis promotes repression of CtsR-dependent gene expression. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185 (17): 5117-5124. 10.1128/JB.185.17.5117-5124.2003.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fernandez M, Kleerebezem M, Kuipers OP, Siezen RJ, van Kranenburg R: Regulation of the metC-cysK operon, involved in sulfur metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184 (1): 82-90. 10.1128/JB.184.1.82-90.2002.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Akyol I, Shearman CA: Regulation of flpA, flpB and rcfA promoters in Lactococcus lactis. Curr Microbiol. 2008, 57 (3): 200-205. 10.1007/s00284-008-9174-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Barriere C, Veiga-da-Cunha M, Pons N, Guedon E, van Hijum SA, Kok J, Kuipers OP, Ehrlich DS, Renault P: Fructose utilization in Lactococcus lactis as a model for low-GC gram-positive bacteria: its regulator, signal, and DNA-binding site. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (11): 3752-3761. 10.1128/JB.187.11.3752-3761.2005.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sanders JW, Leenhouts K, Burghoorn J, Brands JR, Venema G, Kok J: A chloride-inducible acid resistance mechanism in Lactococcus lactis and its regulation. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 27 (2): 299-310. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00676.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sanders JW, Venema G, Kok J: A chloride-inducible gene expression cassette and its use in induced lysis of Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63 (12): 4877-4882.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Larsen R, Kloosterman TG, Kok J, Kuipers OP: GlnR-mediated regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (13): 4978-4982. 10.1128/JB.00025-06.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Savijoki K, Ingmer H, Frees D, Vogensen FK, Palva A, Varmanen P: Heat and DNA damage induction of the LexA-like regulator HdiR from Lactococcus lactis is mediated by RecA and ClpP. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 50 (2): 609-621. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03713.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bovee ML, Champagne KS, Demeler B, Francklyn CS: The quaternary structure of the HisZ-HisG N-1-(5′-phosphoribosyl)-ATP transferase from Lactococcus lactis. Biochemistry. 2002, 41 (39): 11838-11846. 10.1021/bi020243z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Champagne KS, Piscitelli E, Francklyn CS: Substrate recognition by the hetero-octameric ATP phosphoribosyltransferase from Lactococcus lactis. Biochemistry. 2006, 45 (50): 14933-14943. 10.1021/bi061802v.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    OConnell-Motherway M, van Sinderen D, Morel-Deville F, Fitzgerald GF, Ehrlich SD, Morel P: Six putative two-component regulatory systems isolated from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363. Microbiology. 2000, 146 (Pt 4): 935-947.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Martinez B, Zomer AL, Rodriguez A, Kok J, Kuipers OP: Cell envelope stress induced by the bacteriocin Lcn972 is sensed by the Lactococcal two-component system CesSR. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 64 (2): 473-486. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05668.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Agustiandari H, Lubelski J, van den Berg van Saparoea HB, Kuipers OP, Driessen AJ: LmrR is a transcriptional repressor of expression of the multidrug ABC transporter LmrCD in Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190 (2): 759-763. 10.1128/JB.01151-07.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Madoori PK, Agustiandari H, Driessen AJ, Thunnissen AM: Structure of the transcriptional regulator LmrR and its mechanism of multidrug recognition. EMBO J. 2009, 28 (2): 156-166. 10.1038/emboj.2008.263.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Andersson U, Radstrom P: Physiological function of the maltose operon regulator, MalR, in Lactococcus lactis. BMC Microbiol. 2002, 2: 28-10.1186/1471-2180-2-28.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cesselin B, Ali D, Gratadoux JJ, Gaudu P, Duwat P, Gruss A, El Karoui M: Inactivation of the Lactococcus lactis high-affinity phosphate transporter confers oxygen and thiol resistance and alters metal homeostasis. Microbiology. 2009, 155 (Pt 7): 2274-2281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kilstrup M, Martinussen J: A transcriptional activator, homologous to the Bacillus subtilis PurR repressor, is required for expression of purine biosynthetic genes in Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180 (15): 3907-3916.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Jendresen CB: Characterization of the molecular and genetic regulation of the nucleotide metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. 2010, Thesis, Technical University of Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Martinussen J, Schallert J, Andersen B, Hammer K: The pyrimidine operon pyrRPB-carA from Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183 (9): 2785-2794. 10.1128/JB.183.9.2785-2794.2001.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Madsen SM, Hindre T, Le Pennec JP, Israelsen H, Dufour A: Two acid-inducible promoters from Lactococcus lactis require the cis-acting ACiD-box and the transcription regulator RcfB. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 56 (3): 735-746. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04572.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Frees D, Varmanen P, Ingmer H: Inactivation of a gene that is highly conserved in Gram-positive bacteria stimulates degradation of non-native proteins and concomitantly increases stress tolerance in Lactococcus lactis. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 41 (1): 93-103. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02503.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Veiga P, Bulbarela-Sampieri C, Furlan S, Maisons A, Chapot-Chartier MP, Erkelenz M, Mervelet P, Noirot P, Frees D, Kuipers OP, Kok J, Gruss A, Buist G, Kulakauskas S: SpxB regulates O-acetylation-dependent resistance of Lactococcus lactis peptidoglycan to hydrolysis. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (27): 19342-19354. 10.1074/jbc.M611308200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Erlandson KA, Park JH, Wissam El K, Kao HH, Basaran P, Brydges S, Batt CA: Dissolution of xylose metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000, 66 (9): 3974-3980. 10.1128/AEM.66.9.3974-3980.2000.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Morello E, Bermudez-Humaran LG, Llull D, Sole V, Miraglio N, Langella P, Poquet I: Lactococcus lactis, an efficient cell factory for recombinant protein production and secretion. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 14 (1–3): 48-58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Wegmann U, O’Connell-Motherway M, Zomer A, Buist G, Shearman C, Canchaya C, Ventura M, Goesmann A, Gasson MJ, Kuipers OP, van Sinderen D, Kok J: Complete genome sequence of the prototype lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189 (8): 3256-3270. 10.1128/JB.01768-06.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sperandio B, Polard P, Ehrlich DS, Renault P, Guedon E: Sulfur amino acid metabolism and its control in Lactococcus lactis IL1403. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (11): 3762-10.1128/JB.187.11.3762-3778.2005.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Dubrac S, Bisicchia P, Devine KM, Msadek T: A matter of life and death: cell wall homeostasis and the WalKR (YycGF) essential signal transduction pathway. Mol Microbiol. 2008, 70 (6): 1307-1322. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06483.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Winkler ME, Hoch JA: Essentiality, bypass, and targeting of the YycFG (VicRK) two-component regulatory system in gram-positive bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190 (8): 2645-2648. 10.1128/JB.01682-07.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wayne KJ, Sham LT, Tsui HC, Gutu AD, Barendt SM, Keen SK, Winkler ME: Localization and cellular amounts of the WalRKJ (VicRKX) two-component regulatory system proteins in serotype 2 Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192 (17): 4388-4394. 10.1128/JB.00578-10.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Biller SJ, Wayne KJ, Winkler ME, Burkholder WF: The putative hydrolase YycJ (WalJ) affects the coordination of cell division with DNA replication in Bacillus subtilis and may play a conserved role in cell wall metabolism. J Bacteriol. 2010, 193 (4): 896-908.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Buist G, Kok J, Leenhouts KJ, Dabrowska M, Venema G, Haandrikman AJ: Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the major peptidoglycan hydrolase of Lactococcus lactis, a muramidase needed for cell separation. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177 (6): 1554-1563.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Huard C, Miranda G, Wessner F, Bolotin A, Hansen J, Foster SJ, Chapot-Chartier MP: Characterization of AcmB, an N-acetylglucosaminidase autolysin from Lactococcus lactis. Microbiology. 2003, 149 (Pt 3): 695-705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Guedon E, Sperandio B, Pons N, Ehrlich SD, Renault P: Overall control of nitrogen metabolism in Lactococcus lactis by CodY, and possible models for CodY regulation in Firmicutes. Microbiology. 2005, 151 (Pt 12): 3895-3909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    den Hengst CD, van Hijum SA, Geurts JM, Nauta A, Kok J, Kuipers OP: The Lactococcus lactis CodY regulon: identification of a conserved cis-regulatory element. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (40): 34332-34342. 10.1074/jbc.M502349200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Doeven MK, Kok J, Poolman B: Specificity and selectivity determinants of peptide transport in Lactococcus lactis and other microorganisms. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 57 (3): 640-649. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04698.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Tom Eckhardt and Jan Willem Veening for fruitful discussions. This project was partly supported by grants from the Top Institute Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, the Netherlands and The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), the Netherlands.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Kok.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AJ and JK devised the PePPER concept and web design and wrote the manuscript. OPK participated in the design of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. HP and MC contributed to the writing of the webserver scripts and to building of the PePPER database. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1 Table S1: Lactococcus lactis TFBS WebLogos. Column 1 presents all known (studied) regulons of L. lactis. Alternative names for TFBS are given in column 2. The consensus sequence given in columns 3 were taken from the literature references from Table 1. In column 4, the TFBS identities are given that are used by PePPER. The upstream sequences of the genes of the regulons indicated in column 1 were aligned using MEME [9]. The obtained DNA motifs (WebLogos) are presented in column 5. (PPTX 319 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Jong, A., Pietersma, H., Cordes, M. et al. PePPER: a webserver for prediction of prokaryote promoter elements and regulons. BMC Genomics 13, 299 (2012).

Download citation


  • Regulon
  • Bacterial Genome
  • dppP
  • Transcription Terminator
  • Regulon Member