Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Gut microbiota dysbiosis and bacterial community assembly associated with cholesterol gallstones in large-scale study

BMC Genomics volume 14, Article number: 669 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Elucidating gut microbiota among gallstone patients as well as the complex bacterial colonization of cholesterol gallstones may help in both the prediction and subsequent lowered risk of cholelithiasis. To this end, we studied the composition of bacterial communities of gut, bile, and gallstones from 29 gallstone patients as well as the gut of 38 normal individuals, examining and analyzing some 299, 217 bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences from 120 samples.

Results

First, as compared with normal individuals, in gallstone patients there were significant (P < 0.001) increases of gut bacterial phylum Proteobacteria and decreases of three gut bacterial genera, Faecalibacterium, Lachnospira, and Roseburia. Second, about 70% of gut bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) from gallstone patients were detectable in the biliary tract and bacteria diversity of biliary tract was significantly (P < 0.001) higher than that of gut. Third, analysis of the biliary tract core microbiome (represented by 106 bacteria OTUs) among gallstone patients showed that 33.96% (36/106) of constituents can be matched to known bacterial species (15 of which have publicly available genomes). A genome-wide search of MDR, BSH, bG, and phL genes purpotedly associated with the formation of cholesterol gallstones showed that all 15 species with known genomes (e.g., Propionibacterium acnes, Bacteroides vulgates, and Pseudomonas putida) contained at least contained one of the four genes. This finding could potentially provide underlying information needed to explain the association between biliary tract microbiota and the formation of cholesterol gallstones.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to discover gut microbiota dysbiosis among gallstone patients, the presence of which may be a key contributor to the complex bacteria community assembly linked with the presence of cholesterol gallstones. Likewise, this study also provides the first large-scale glimpse of biliary tract microbiota potentially associated with cholesterol gallstones. Such a characterization of the biliary tract core microbiome has potentially important biological and medical implications regarding the role of bacteria in the formation cholesterol gallstones.

Background

With a prevalence among adults somewhere between 10–15% in Europe and the USA, gallstones are the most common gastrointestinal disorder requiring hospitalization in the West[1]. Most literature to date points to abnormal metabolism and secretion of cholesterol and bile acids as the primary pathophysiological defect in the formation of gallstones[2, 3], but rather intriguingly, gut microbiota enables the regulation of bile acid metabolism by reducing bile acid pool size and composition[4]. This role indicates that gut microbiota is likely to be at least partially associated with the formation of gallstones[5]. Similarly, the presence of gut microbiota members in lithogenic bile[6, 7] could be an indication of increased intestinal permeability during biliary obstruction[8], which then may contributing to increased inflammatory response and stone formation[5]. Such an association is not illogical— recent studies continue to show that human-associated microbial communities are linked with a variety of diseases, e.g., cirrhosis with minimal hepatic encephalopathy, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and Crohn’s disease (CD)[9–13]. However, little is known about whether gut microbiota dysbiosis is connected with cholelithiasis or could be correlated to the complex bacterial colonization associated with the formation of gallstone. Consequently, a better understanding of bacterial communities in both gut and biliary tract of gallstone patients is crucial in developing a greater understanding of the connection between disease and the microflora communities in the body and then developing strategies to promote digestive tract health.

Bacteria may be one of major factors at play in the pathogenesis of gallstones. MAKI[14] first proposed that bacterial infection may play a key role in the pathogenesis of pigment gallstones, and since then, studies continue to highlight the association of bacterial infection with the formation of gallstones,[1, 15–23], especially among cholesterol stones, which make up nearly 80% of all cases of gallstones in the USA. Although debate continues regarding the role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstone[24, 25], outright denial of the presence of bacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Entercoccus spp., Escherichia coli, and H. pylori) in cholesterol gallstones is simply incorrect[21–23], especially as living bacteria can be cultured from cholesterol gallstones[20].

An increasing number of molecular studies continue to indicate that, to some extent, an underlying association exists between bacterial infection and gallstone formation. For example, multidrug-resistance (MDR) efflux pump proteins expressed by bacteria can produce bile resistance that allows bacteria to survive in certain ecological niches alongside bile salts[26–30]. To date, there are five known families of MDR efflux-pump proteins: the ABC super-family, and the MFS, MATE, SMR, and RND families[26]. Of these, the bacteria Campylobacter jejuni efflux pump CmeABC has been shown to confer resistance to bile[31, 32]. Other potential bacterial factors associated with the formation of gallstones have also been identified, such as β-glucuronidase (bG), phospholipases (phL), and bile acid hydrolases (BSH)[33, 34].

Increasing evidences may be implicating the role of bacteria role in the formation of cholesterol gallstones. For example, enterohepatic helicobacters can promote formation of cholesterol gallstones in vivo[15]. Urease-positive Helicobacter spp can precipitate calcium salts in vitro[35]. Monoinfection with ureasepositive helicobacters or coinfection with at least one urease-positive helicobacter is necessary to induce cholesterol gallstones[15, 35]. Interestingly, mice coinfected with several bacteria developed cholesterol gallstones at higher prevalence of 80% than that infected with single bacteria at prevalence of below 40%[15]. These findings indicated that bacterial community assembly might be more important than single species in the formation of cholesterol gallstones. Therefore, to better understand the role bacteria play in the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstones, large-scale discovery of microbial composition and diversity associated with cholesterol gallstones is critical first step.

Previous studies yielded little insight regarding gallstone-associated microbiota, due largely to the insensitivity of cultivation[18, 36] and the relative paucity of sequence analysis of sequenced gene fragments based on molecular finger-printing methods[37] and cloned microbial small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes [16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA)][17, 19, 22]. The unfortunate outcome of these shortcomings is that despite substantial progress in a number of fields, we still lack an integrated view of the composition, structure, and origin of gallstone-associated bacterial community. Recent advances in the technology (e.g., a cost-effective method based on culture-independent 454 pyrosequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene) used to identify and to analyze components of the microbiome have substantially improved our understanding of the microbial communities associated with this human disease[38]. In this study, using 454-barcoded- pyrosequencing, we undertook a large-scale molecular analysis of 16S rDNA sequences in order to gain a clearer picture of four crucial issues: 1) the disorder of gut microbiota with cholelithiasis; 2) the structure and component of biliary tract microbial communities in patients with cholesterol gallstones; 3) the relation between bacterial communities in both the gut and biliary tract; 4) the characteristics of biliary tract core microbiome and its potential connection in the formation of cholesterol gallstones.

Results

Sample and data collection

In total, we collected samples from 29 patients with gallbladder stones (hereafter referred to as patients) and 38 healthy subjects (hereafter referred to as subjects) (see Methods for detailed information). From the 29 gallbladder-stone patients we obtained samples of bile, gallstones and feces: 26 bile samples, 27 gallstones (2 with 50% cholesterol content, 24 with 70-90%, and 1 over 95%), and 29 fecal samples. According to the definition of cholesterol stones with the main composition of 50-90% cholesterol contents recommended by Marschall et al.[39], all collected 27 gallstones are properly classified as cholesterol gallstones. More strictly, however, using 70% cholesterol content cutoff proposed by Swidsinski et al.[25] and Portincasa et al.[1], 92.59% of our sampled gallstones are cholesterol gallstones. We further collected 38 normal human feces samples (data of 27 samples was collected in one of our recent studies[13]), yielding a total of 120 samples, which were used in our molecular analysis of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes.

For each sample, variable regions (V1-V2) of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene was amplified vi polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a primer set with a unique 10-nt barcode. From all the bile, stone and fecal samples, we obtained a dataset consisting of 299, 217 high-quality 16S rRNA gene sequences with an average of 2493 ± 127 (S.E.) (n = 120) sequences per sample (Table 1). From the dataset, we identified a total of 4637 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on the conventional criterion of 97% sequence similarity (equal to species level), with 3696 OTUs in bile, 3456 OTUs in gallstones (we detected bacteria irrespective of cholesterol content in all gallstones), 1772 OTUs in patient feces, and 1497 OTUs in normal feces,[40], with an average of 321 ± 29 [Good’s Coverage[41]: 92.8 ± 0.6%] per sample (n = 120) (Table 1). The taxonomic summary of microbial components from all samples (Additional file1: Figure S1) yielded a total of 20 different bacterial phyla across all samples, with 20 present in gallstones, 19 in bile, 13 in patient feces, 14 in normal feces, with the most dominant being the phylum Firmicutes in bile, gallstone, and feces.

Table 1 454 Data summary
Full size table

Comparative metagenomic analysis between and within gut and biliary tract

Comparative metagenomic analysis uncovered a significantly higher difference (P < 0.001) of microbial diversity in the biliary tract as compared with the gut (richness given by OTUs and singletons as well as evenness by Shannon index, Chao1, and PD-whole tree), though not within the biliary tract (bile vs. gallstone) (Table 1). This level of microbial community diversity found in biliary tract of gallstone patients was unprecedented in our current knowledge of the healthy human body, as only the human skin harbors a more diverse microbial community[42].

At the phylum level (Figure 1), we found no significant differences between and within gut and biliary tract in either the most dominant phylum Firmicutes or the rare phylum Fusobacteria. Conversely, when compared with gut, we found significantly (P < 0.001) decreased levels of the bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes in the biliary tract. We further observed significantly (P < 0.001) increase of six bacterial phyla in the biliary tract, including Proteobacteria, TM7, Tenericutes, Actinobacteria, Thermi, and Cyanobacteria. Within the gut, the relative abundance of the bacterial phylum Proteobacteria among patients were significantly (P < 0.001) higher than that in normal. Within biliary tract, we observed no difference of those bacterial phyla between bile and gallstones. At the genus level (Figure 2), 7 bacteria genera showed no significant differences between and within the gut and biliary tract. Compared with the gut genus composition, in the biliary tract, there was a significant (P < 0.001) decrease of 2 bacterial genera accompanied by an increase in 16 other bacterial genera Within the gut, the relative abundance of 3 bacterial genera (Faecalibacterium, Lachnospira, and Roseburia) were significantly (P < 0.001) lower in patients as compared with healthy subjects.

Figure 1
figure 1

Phyla level comparisons of microbial components between the gut and biliary tract. Only top nine phyla shown. ***P < 0.001.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

Genera level comparisons of microbial components between gut and biliary tract. In total, 38 genera distributions are shown, including those genera of each type of sample with relative abundance of at least 0.01%, respectively. Taxons marked by stars were unclassified. C., Clostridiaceae family. L., Lachnospiraceae family. R., Ruminococcaceae family. *P < 0.05.

Full size image

Our results further found that 120 samples could be divided into three distinct clusters (A-C) (Figure 3). Gut microbiota was predominant within cluster A, biliary tract microbiota within cluster C, and the crossover between gut (in particular among patients) and the biliary tract within cluster B. A similar pattern was also discovered via PLS-DA plot (Additional file2: Figure S2) and weighted & unweighted UniFrac PCoA plot (Additional file3: Figure S3) based on microbiota analysis. We further found that over 85% of bacterial OTUs were shared in both bile and gallstones (Figure 4), but only 60% of gut bacterial OTUs were shared by patients and healthy subjects. Around 70% of gut bacterial OTUs from patients and 40% OTUs from healthy subjects were found in the biliary tract.

Figure 3
figure 3

Microbiota analysis of separates samples based upon where they live in the community. Hierarchical average clustering based on the Spearman/Pearson correlation coefficients of the proportion of all taxons, filtered for taxonomic variables with over 50% percent zeroes. Non-informative variables are characterized using the coefficient of variation (mean/standard deviation). Data normalization between samples was conducted by Sum, and those between taxons Pareto Scaling (mean-centered and divided by the square root of standard deviation of each variable). In total, 35 taxonomic features are shown in the heatmap, with statistical significance among four types of samples based on T-test/ANOVA analyses.

Full size image
Figure 4
figure 4

Quantitative comparisons of bacterial OTUs between the gut and biliary tract. Numbers in brackets denote OTU number discovered from each of four different types of samples, corresponding to four different colored boxes. Number in brackets located at the colored boxes denotes shared OTUs (at overlapped boxes) across either the four types of samples or those unique to a given sample type.

Full size image

Characteristics of the biliary tract core microbiome in gallstone patients

We identified a core microbiome of both bile and gallstones by using a general rule[43] of including a bacterial OTU (species) if it was shared by at least half of the samples in a given group (i.e., either patient bile or gallstones). The bile core microbiome consisted of 208 bacterial OTUs while the gallstone core microbiome consisted of 179 bacterial OTUs. Based on those datasets, we identified a biliary tract core microbiome for gallstone patients, which includes 106 bacterial OTUs belonging to 6 bacterial phyla. Results from using the QIIME pipeline revealed 33.96% (36/106) of the constituent members of the biliary tract core microbiome could be matched to known bacterial species (Figure 5), according to at least 97% identity (Additional file4: Table S1).

Figure 5
figure 5

Pipeline for identifying biliary tract core microbiome and potential microbial species associated with the presence of gallstones.

Full size image

Though the results of our previously mentioned analysis was intriguing, further characterizing the functional features of the biliary tract microbiome via a culture approach proved quite difficult. To overcome this defect, we found relative clues by searching function gene contents of similar species with available sequenced genomes. Previous reports have confirmed the feasibility of this study[44]. Pipline analysis results (Figure 5) also showed that 15 of the 36-matched bacterial species have publicly available genomes. Based on reference genomes of those 15 bacterial species, we searched for the presence or absence of four genes potentially associated with the formation of gallstones: MDR, BSH, bG, and phL. The results (Additional file5: Table S2) found 15 species that contained at least contained one of the four genes, 20% of which had all four genes, 40% had three of them, and 40% had two of them. The MDR gene was the most abundant in all 15 species (totally identified gene number ranging from 16 to 59), while the BSH gene was discovered in 5 species (33%) (ranging from 1 to 3), bG gene in 7 species (47%) (the most 24 members in Bacteroides vulgates, others with 1 to 3), and the phL gene in 13 species (87%) (ranging from 1 to 5).

Discussion

The results of this study, which used a targeted amplicon sequencing approach, demonstrates an underlying gut microbiota dysbiosis present with cholelithiasis and that biliary tract microbiota has the potential to promote the formation of gallstones, in particular cholesterol gallstones. This is the first study to use a 454-based pyrosequencing of bacterial 16S rDNAs to clarify the composition of both gut and biliary tract microbiota with cholelithiasis. While methods such as ANOVA, hierarchical clustering via heatmap, and UniFrac-based PCoA analysis can identify differences of microbial components and diversity both between and within the gut and biliary tract, culture-independent 454 pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes provides unprecedented insight into gallstone-associated microbiota. Two of our recent studies demonstrated an association between gut microbiota dysbiosis and human diseases, e.g., colorectal cancer[45] and cirrhosis with minimal hepatic encephalopathy[13], validating the relevant methods used in this study.

Our results discovered significant changes of gut microbial components between gallstone patients and healthy subjects. Within the gut of patients, there exists an overgrowth of the bacterial phylum Proteobacteria which generally includes a wide variety of pathogens such as Escherichia, Salmonella, Vibrio, and Helicobacter. These pathogens have variously been linked with many gastrointestinal tract (GIT) diseases. A classical case is that a major pathogenic Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak occurred in central Europe during late spring of 2011[46]. Furthermore, three gut bacterial genera—Faecalibacterium, Lachnospira, and Roseburia— were significantly reduced in gallstone patients. The decrease of F. prausnitzii has been closely related to gut dysbiosis in patients with CD[47], but F. prausnitzii were significantly increased after specific oligosaccharide (e.g., inulin–oligofructose) consumption[48]. Meanwhile, the gut bacteria R. inulinivorans are inulin and starch consumers[49], while Lachnospira are pectin degraders[50]. The previous experimental studies showed that via the consumption of oligosaccharide, R. inulinivorans and Lachnospira may selectively stimulate the growth of potentially beneficial gut bacteria such as F. prausnitzii. The co-occurrence of those three gut bacteria likely has potential effects on gut health of gallstone patients, though what those effects may be is not currently known. Ultimately, the co-occurring gut microbiota dysbiosis demonstrated in this study is indicative of unpredictable GIT health risks among gallstone patients that remain largely unknown.

This study supports mounting evidence that culture-independent 454-based 16S rDNA sequencing is necessary as a diagnostic tool in gallstone-associated bacterial infection, because it provides more detailed information than cultivation or other molecular finger-printing methods currently employed[37] and sequence analysis of cloned microbial 16S rDNA[17, 19, 21]. Our results likewise demonstrated less than 5% of 3456 bacterial OTUs identified in gallstones have been reported in previous studies[14, 15, 17–19, 21–23, 25, 51–59]. Conservatively, only 34% (36) of 106 core bacteria OTUs in the biliary tract of gallstone patient are known to date, such as Escherichia coli[60]. Surprisingly though, around 70% of gut bacterial OTUs from gallstone patients were detectable in the biliary tract. This raises a possibility that biliary tract microbiota could be originated from the gut. Further evidence is obviously needed to explore this possibility, but nonetheless it is an intriguing prospect.

Interestingly, members of Lactococcus, which are generally used as probiotics in human gastrointestinal tract,[61] were enriched in biliary tract of those patients with cholelithiasis (Figure 2). However, unlike the bile salt hydrolytic activities of Lactobacilli[62], the underlying physiological role of Lactococcus in cholelithiasis remains unclear. Such unknowns are compounded by significant inter-subject variations of the biliary tract microbiota were also observed (Additional file6: Figure S4). For example, the highest abundance of Firmicutes phylum in one gallstone patient was 93.30% and the lowest was 1.17% in another; a similar result was also seen in bile with a high of 55.10% and low of 0.08%. High person-to-person variation in biliary tract microbiota could be related to a number of factors—host diets, lifestyles, genotypes, disease status, etc.

Aside from interpersonal variation, there are several potential factors that may affect the colonization or survival of bacteria in biliary tract of gallstone patients. First, MDR efflux-pump proteins expressed by bacteria can produce bile resistance, allowing bacteria to survive in their ecological niche[26–30], as well as BSH activity[62, 63] produced by bacteria that can protect the bacterial cells which produce it from the toxicity of conjugated bile salts. Our results found abundant MDR and BSH genes in the bile tract microbiome, partially supporting the above inference. Second, biopsies taken from the bile ducts of healthy individuals are either free of bacteria or bacteria is quite rare. Though there is not a clear explanation for this based on our existing knowledge, it is possible that a loss of host resistance to microbial colonization in biliary tract may lead to the presence of biliary tract microbiota. Third, developing gallstones play a significant role in gallbladder colonization and carrying of specific bacteria species, such as Salmonella species[64], implying that the gallstones themselves may actually aggravate the overgrowth of bacteria in the biliary tract.

Colonization of the biliary tract by varying bacteria may contribute to bile cholesterol super-saturation, which is one of the risk factors in the formation of cholesterol calculus. According to the ternary equilibrium “bile salt-phospholipid-cholesterol” ternary phase diagram[65–68], cholesterol is only slightly soluble in an aqueous media, but is made soluble in bile via mixed micelles by bile salts and phospholipids, mainly phosphatidylcholine, whose concentrations determine the degree of cholesterol saturation. Studies further indicate that two bacterial factors bG and PhL genes facilitate gallstone formation[34]. The most abundant member of the PhL gene in bile, phospholipase A(2), can induce cholesterol gallstone formation by hydrolyzing bile phospholipids into lysolecithin and free fatty acids[69]. The results of the present study showed that both the bG and PhL genes were abundant in the biliary tract microbiome of gallstone patients (Additional file5: Table S2), which is partially indicative of increasing risks of cholesterol gallstone that may be a potential consequences of bacterial colonization in human biliary tract. Further research is needed to verify this and some of the other suggestive conclusions, but, despite the preliminary nature of some of our results, the most poignant implication of this study is that prevention and management of bacterial infections in the biliary tract may be a target for lowering the risks of cholesterol gallstones.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to discover a potential association of the gut microbiota dysbiosis that is present among gallstone patients. Likewise, our characterization of the biliary tract core microbiome provides potentially significant biological implications about both the unexpected diversity of the microbiome among patients with cholesterol gallstones, as well as the probable roles of bacteria in the formation of cholesterol gallstones. Further research on the bile tract microbiome’s functionality will likely complement our findings on biliary tract microbiome and clarify some of the implications that arose from our conclusions. Ultimately, these findings have numerous medical implications for both prevention and therapeutics for cholelithiasis or other relative GIT healthy risks, warranting further follow-up studies that are needed to verify these findings and move forward.

Methods

Studied subjects and sample collection

All protocols and procedures of this study conformed to the ethical guidelines outlined in the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected by a priori approval from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University of China. Prior to inclusion in this study, all participants provided written informed consent.

Patients with gallstone disease were diagnosed with cholecystolithiasis via B-mode ultrasonography. In total, 29 definite patients from Kunming, China were used in this study with (49.2 ± 14.3) (SD) average age, (23.7 ± 3.2) body mass index (BMI), and (13:16) male/female ratio, and all patients had occurrences of chronic cholecystitis. No patients indicated they had suffered any diseases of the gastrointestinal tract except gallbladder stones, and none had taken antibiotics or probiotics within the previous three months prior to this study. During open cholecystectomy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy, one stone was removed aseptically from the gall bladder from each patient. Concurrently, gallbladder bile from each patient was extracted using 2 mL sterile needle tubing. Likewise, prior to the operation, feces from all patients were also collected. All samples were placed in cryovials without preservative, immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70°C and then transported on dry ice to the Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for sequencing analysis. All samples were stored in their original tubes at −80°C until further processing.

To discover whether there was any significant alteration to the gut microbiome among cholelithiasis patients with chronic cholecystitis, as a normal gut control we used 38 normal Chinese individuals (data from 27 of these was obtained from our recent study[13]) from Kunming, China with a (40.7 ± 14.5) (SD) average age, (21.9 ± 2.4) body mass index (BMI), and male/female ratio of (7:12) all of whom permanently reside in Kunming . All healthy individuals volunteered to accept free routine health examinations at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. The health status of the healthy volunteers was self-reported. No volunteers indicated they had suffered any diseases of the gastrointestinal tract or any other metabolic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. None had been subjected to surgical procedures for several years prior to this study. None had taken antibiotics or probiotics within the previous three months of fecal sample collection. Feces samples from all normal individuals were collected and stored in their original tubes at −80°C until further processing.

Sample preparation, molecular methods and bioinformatics

One stone (≥1.0 cm diameter) from each patient was quadrisected with a fresh, sterile, disposable steel blade. Interior stone material was then loosened with a fresh surgical blade. DNA was extracted from the inner halves of the gallstones, with blades changed between scrapings. Inert materials (e.g., tubings and swabs) collected during the surgical operations were processed identically, and subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect possible contamination during sample storage and processing.

Following pre-treatment of the stones, an aliquot (Gallstone and feces, 180–220 mg; bile, 200 μl) of each sample was suspended while frozen in a solution containing 200 μl buffer ATL (QIAGEN Kit Buffer for bacterial cell lysis) and 200 μl of a slurry of 0.1-mm-diameter zirconia/silica beads (BioSpec Products, Bartlesville, OK). The mixed sample was then lysed by mechanical disruption with a bead beater (BioSpec Products) for 2 min at 20°C), followed by extraction with a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen) using its protocol for isolation of DNA for pathogen detection. Lysis temperature was increased to 95°C for cells which proved difficult to lyse. DNA from each sample was eluted in a final volume of 200 μl elution buffer and stored at – 20°C. Tubes containing only the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit extraction controls were included throughout the lysis and PCR steps to serve as negative controls.

Amplicons of the 16S rRNA gene V1-V2 region were sequenced on a 454 Genome Sequencer FLX Titanium platform, according to previous study[45]. Sequencing reads were quality filtered, OTU clustered, ChimeraSlayer filtered and further analyzed using the QIIME pipeline[45, 70], RDP-classifier[71], and weighted & unweighted UniFrac PCoA analyses[72]. All OTUs found in at least two samples were retained for performing the following further analyses. Both hierarchical clustering and PLS-DA plotting of samples based on microbiota analysis were performed using METAGENassist, a comprehensive web server for comparative metagenomics[73].

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was performed using SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat Software, Inc.) and R software packages. General characteristics were expressed as median and mean or percentages. Multiple samples comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA (parametric) or Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks (non- parametric). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Quantitation of cholesterol in gallstones

Representative gallstone portions were weighed and extracted overnight in 5 ml of chloroform/methanol (2:1). To calculate the cholesterol percentage by weight of each stone, cholesterol was quantified using the enzymatic CHOD-PAP method[74] on a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo-Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

Availability of supporting data section

All raw 454 sequence data used in this study was deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (accession number SRA096351) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra).

Abbreviations

bG:

β-glucuronidase

BSH:

Bile acid hydrolases

CD:

Crohn’s disease

GIT:

Gastrointestinal tract

MDR:

Multidrug-resistance efflux pump proteins

OTUs:

Operational taxonomic units

phL:

Phospholipases

rRNA:

Ribosomal RNA.

References

  1. Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Palasciano G: Cholesterol gallstone disease. Lancet. 2006, 368 (9531): 230-239. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69044-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang DQ-H, Cohen DE, Carey MC: Biliary lipids and cholesterol gallstone disease. J Lipid Res. 2009, 50 (Supplement): S406-S411.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Erpecum KJ, Van Berge-Henegouwen GP: Gallstones: an intestinal disease?. Gut. 1999, 44 (3): 435-438. 10.1136/gut.44.3.435.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sayin Sama I, Wahlström A, Felin J, Jäntti S, Marschall H-U, Bamberg K, Angelin B, Hyötyläinen T, Orešič M, Bäckhed F: Gut microbiota regulates bile acid metabolism by reducing the levels of tauro-beta-muricholic acid, a naturally occurring FXR antagonist. Cell Metab. 2013, 17 (2): 225-235. 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.01.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Antunes LCM, Finlay BB: Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2010, 90 (3): 859-904. 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Capoor MR: Microflora of bile aspirates in patients with acute cholecystitis with or without cholelithiasis: a tropical experience. Braz J Infect Dis. 2008, 12: 222-225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abeysuriya VDK, Wijesuriya T, Salgado SS: Microbiology of gallbladder bile in uncomplicated symptomatic cholelithiasis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2008, 7 (6): 633-637.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. White JS, Hoper M, Parks RW, Clements WDB, Diamond T: Patterns of bacterial translocation in experimental biliary obstruction. J Surg Res. 2006, 132 (1): 80-84. 10.1016/j.jss.2005.07.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Diamant M, Blaak EE, de Vos WM: Do nutrient–gut–microbiota interactions play a role in human obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes?. Obes Rev. 2011, 12 (4): 272-281. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00797.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Henao-Mejia J, Elinav E, Jin C, Hao L, Mehal WZ, Strowig T, Thaiss CA, Kau AL, Eisenbarth SC, Jurczak MJ: Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature. 2012, 482 (7384): 179-185.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T: A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010, 464 (7285): 59-65. 10.1038/nature08821.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S, Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D: A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012, 490 (7418): 55-60. 10.1038/nature11450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Z, Zhai H, Geng J, Yu R, Ren H, Fan H, Shi P: Large-scale survey of gut microbiota associated with MHE via 16S rRNA-based pyrosequencing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013, DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.221

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maki T: Pathogenesis of calcium bilirubinate gallstone: role of E. coli, beta-glucuronidase and coagulation by inorganic ions, polyelectrolytes and agitation. Ann Surg. 1966, 164 (1): 90-100. 10.1097/00000658-196607000-00010.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maurer KJ, Ihrig MM, Rogers AB, Ng V, Bouchard G, Leonard MR, Carey MC, Fox JG: Identification of cholelithogenic enterohepatic Helicobacter species and their role in murine cholesterol gallstone formation. Gastroenterology. 2005, 128 (4): 1023-1033. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.01.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Julka K, Ko CW: Infectious diseases and the gallbladder. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2010, 24 (4): 885-898. 10.1016/j.idc.2010.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alexander S, Wolfgang L, Hartmut P, Friedrich P: Molecular genetic evidence of bacterial colonization of cholesterol gallstones. Gastroenterology. 1995, 108 (3): 860-864. 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90461-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaufman HS, Magnuson TH, Lillemoe KD, Frasca P, Pitt HA: The role of bacteria in gallbladder and common duct stone formation. Ann Surg. 1989, 209 (5): 584-591. 10.1097/00000658-198905000-00011. discussion 591–582

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee DK, Tarr PI, Haigh WG, Lee SP: Bacterial DNA in mixed cholesterol gallstones. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94 (12): 3502-3506. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01614.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hazrah P, Oahn KT, Tewari M, Pandey AK, Kumar K, Mohapatra TM, Shukla HS: The frequency of live bacteria in gallstones. HPB (Oxford). 2004, 6 (1): 28-32. 10.1080/13651820310025192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawai M, Iwahashi M, Uchiyama K, Ochiai M, Tanimura H, Yamaue H: Gram-positive cocci are associated with the formation of completely pure cholesterol stones. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002, 97 (1): 83-88. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05425.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Swidsinski A, Khilkin M, Pahlig H, Swidsinski S, Priem F: Time dependent changes in the concentration and type of bacterial sequences found in cholesterol gallstones. Hepatology. 1998, 27 (3): 662-665. 10.1002/hep.510270304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Monstein H-J, Jonsson Y, Zdolsek J, Svanvik J: Identification of Helicobacter pylori DNA in human cholesterol gallstones. Scand J Gastroentero. 2002, 37 (1): 112-119. 10.1080/003655202753387455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cariati A, Cetta F: Re: Kawai et al. [mdash] bacteria are not important in the formation of pure cholesterol stones. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002, 97 (11): 2921-2922.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Swidsinski A, Schlien P, Pernthaler A, Gottschalk U, Bärlehner E, Decker G, Swidsinski S, Strassburg J, Loening-Baucke V, Hoffmann U: Bacterial biofilm within diseased pancreatic and biliary tracts. Gut. 2005, 54 (3): 388-395. 10.1136/gut.2004.043059.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Piddock LJV: Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps ? not just for resistance. Nat Rev Micro. 2006, 4 (8): 629-636. 10.1038/nrmicro1464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin J, Sahin O, Michel LO, Zhang Q: Critical role of multidrug efflux pump CmeABC in bile resistance and in vivo colonization of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect Immun. 2003, 71 (8): 4250-4259. 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4250-4259.2003.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kullak-ublick GA, Stieger B, Meier PJ: Enterohepatic bile salt transporters in normal physiology and liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2004, 126 (1): 322-342. 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.06.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Begley M, Gahan CGM, Hill C: The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005, 29 (4): 625-651. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.09.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Glavinas H, Krajcsi P, Cserepes J, Sarkadi B: The role of ABC transporters in drug resistance, metabolism and toxicity. Current drug delivery. 2004, 1 (1): 27-42. 10.2174/1567201043480036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin J, Michel LO, Zhang Q: CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46 (7): 2124-2131. 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2124-2131.2002.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pumbwe L, Randall LP, Woodward MJ, Piddock LJV: Expression of the efflux pump genes cmeB, cmeF and the porin gene porA in multiple-antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter jejuni. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004, 54 (2): 341-347. 10.1093/jac/dkh331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cahalane MJ, Neubrand MW, Carey MC: Physical-chemical pathogenesis of pigment gallstones. Semin Liver Dis. 1988, 8 (4): 317-328. 10.1055/s-2008-1040553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stewart L, Grifiss JM, Jarvis GA, Way LW: Biliary bacterial factors determine the path of gallstone formation. Am J Surg. 2006, 192 (5): 598-603. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Belzer C, Kusters JG, Kuipers EJ, van Vliet AHM: Urease induced calcium precipitation by Helicobacter species may initiate gallstone formation. Gut. 2006, 55 (11): 1678-1679. 10.1136/gut.2006.098319.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Csendes A, Becerra M, Burdiles P, Demian I, Bancalari K, Csendes P: Bacteriological studies of bile from the gallbladder in patients with carcinoma of the gallbladder, cholelithiasis, common bile duct stones and no gallstones disease. Eur J Surg. 1994, 160 (6–7): 363-367.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zoetendal EG, von Wright A, Vilpponen-Salmela T, Ben-Amor K, Akkermans ADL, de Vos WM: Mucosa-associated bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract are uniformly distributed along the colon and differ from the community recovered from feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68 (7): 3401-3407. 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3401-3407.2002.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuczynski J, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Parfrey LW, Clemente JC, Gevers D, Knight R: Experimental and analytical tools for studying the human microbiome. Nat Rev Genet. 2012, 13 (1): 47-58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Marschall HU, Einarsson C: Gallstone disease. J Intern Med. 2007, 261 (6): 529-542. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01783.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Turnbaugh PJ, Quince C, Faith JJ, McHardy AC, Yatsunenko T, Niazi F, Affourtit J, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Knight R: Organismal, genetic, and transcriptional variation in the deeply sequenced gut microbiomes of identical twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107 (16): 7503-7508. 10.1073/pnas.1002355107.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Relman DA: Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005, 308 (5728): 1635-1638. 10.1126/science.1110591.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R: Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science. 2009, 326: 1694-1697. 10.1126/science.1177486.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shade A, Handelsman J: Beyond the Venn diagram: the hunt for a core microbiome. Environ Microbiol. 2012, 14 (1): 4-12. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02585.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, Fernandes GR, Tap J, Bruls T, Batto J-M: Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011, 473 (7346): 174-180. 10.1038/nature09944.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Geng J, Fan H, Tang X, Zhai H, Zhang Z: Diversified pattern of the human colorectal cancer microbiome. Gut Pathogens. 2013, 5 (1): 2-10.1186/1757-4749-5-2.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Karch H, Denamur E, Dobrindt U, Finlay BB, Hengge R, Johannes L, Ron EZ, Tønjum T, Sansonetti PJ, Vicente M: The enemy within us: lessons from the 2011 European Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak. EMBO Mol Med. 2012, 4 (9): 841-848. 10.1002/emmm.201201662.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Joossens M, Huys G, Cnockaert M, De Preter V, Verbeke K, Rutgeerts P, Vandamme P, Vermeire S: Dysbiosis of the faecal microbiota in patients with Crohn’s disease and their unaffected relatives. Gut. 2011, 60 (5): 631-637. 10.1136/gut.2010.223263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ramirez-Farias C, Slezak K, Fuller Z, Duncan A, Holtrop G, Louis P: Effect of inulin on the human gut microbiota: stimulation of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Brit J Nutr. 2009, 101 (4): 541-550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Scott KP, Martin JC, Chassard C, Clerget M, Potrykus J, Campbell G, Mayer C-D, Young P, Rucklidge G, Ramsay AG: Substrate-driven gene expression in Roseburia inulinivorans: importance of inducible enzymes in the utilization of inulin and starch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108 (Supplement 1): 4672-4679.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Rode LM, Genthner BRS, Bryant MP: Syntrophic association by cocultures of the methanol- and CO2-H2-utilizing species Eubacterium limosum and pectin-fermenting Lachnospira multiparus during growth in a pectin medium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981, 42 (1): 20-22.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cryan EMJ, Falkiner FR, Mulvihill TE, Keane CT, Keeling PWN: Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-infection following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Hosp Infect. 1984, 5 (4): 371-376. 10.1016/0195-6701(84)90004-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kosowski K, Karczewska E, Kasprowicz A, Andziak J, Heczko P: Bacteria in bile of patients with bile duct inflammation. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987, 6 (5): 575-578. 10.1007/BF02014251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cetta F: The role of bacteria in pigment gallstone disease. Ann Surg. 1991, 213 (4): 315-326. 10.1097/00000658-199104000-00006.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kawaguchi M, Saito T, Ohno H, Midorikawa S, Sanji T, Handa Y, Morita S, Yoshida H, Tsurui M, Misaka R: Bacteria closely resembling Helicobacter pylori detected immunohistologically and genetically in resected gallbladder mucosa. J Gastroenterol. 1996, 31 (2): 294-298. 10.1007/BF02389534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Fox JG, Dewhirst FE, Shen Z, Feng Y, Taylor NS, Paster BJ, Ericson RL, Lau CN, Correa P, Araya JC: Hepatic Helicobacter species identified in bile and gallbladder tissue from chileans with chronic cholecystitis. Gastroenterology. 1998, 114 (4): 755-763. 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70589-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Abayli B, Colakoglu S, Serin M, Erdogan S, Isiksal YF, Tuncer I, Koksal F, Demiryurek H: Helicobacter pylori in the etiology of cholesterol gallstones. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005, 39 (2): 134-137.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Maurer KJ, Rogers AB, Ge Z, Wiese AJ, Carey MC, Fox JG: Helicobacter pylori and cholesterol gallstone formation in C57L/J mice: a prospective study. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006, 290 (1): G175-G182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yucebilgili K, Mehmetoglu T, Gucin Z, Salih BA: Helicobacter pylori DNA in gallbladder tissue of patients with cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009, 3: 856-859.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Karagin PH, Stenram U, Wadstrom T, Ljungh A: Helicobacter species and common gut bacterial DNA in gallbladder with cholecystitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010, 16 (38): 4817-4822. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i38.4817.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tabata M, Nakayama F: Bacteria and gallstones. Digest Dis Sci. 1981, 26 (3): 218-224. 10.1007/BF01391633.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang Z-G, Ye Z-Q, Yu L, Shi P: Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update. BMC Evol Biol. 2011, 11 (1): 1-10.1186/1471-2148-11-1.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. De Smet I, Van Hoorde L, Vande Woestyne M, Christiaens H, Verstraete W: Significance of bile salt hydrolytic activities of lactobacilli. J Appl Microbiol. 1995, 79 (3): 292-301. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb03140.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jones BV, Begley M, Hill C, Gahan CGM, Marchesi JR: Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105 (36): 13580-13585. 10.1073/pnas.0804437105.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Crawford RW, Rosales-Reyes R, Ramírez-Aguilar ML, Chapa-Azuela O, Alpuche-Aranda C, Gunn JS: Gallstones play a significant role in Salmonella spp. gallbladder colonization and carriage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107 (9): 4353-4358. 10.1073/pnas.1000862107.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mazer NA, Carey MC: Quasi-elastic light-scattering studies of aqueous biliary lipid systems. Cholesterol solubilization and precipitation in model bile solutions. Biochemistry. 1983, 22 (2): 426-442. 10.1021/bi00271a029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang DQ, Carey MC: Complete mapping of crystallization pathways during cholesterol precipitation from model bile: influence of physical-chemical variables of pathophysiologic relevance and identification of a stable liquid crystalline state in cold, dilute and hydrophilic bile salt-containing systems. J Lipid Res. 1996, 37 (3): 606-630.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Somjen GJ, Gilat T: A non-micellar mode of cholesterol transport in human bile. FEBS Lett. 1983, 156 (2): 265-268. 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80510-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Moschetta A, van Berge-Henegouwen GP, Portincasa P, Palasciano G, van Erpecum KJ: Cholesterol crystallization in model biles: effects of bile salt and phospholipid species composition. J Lipid Res. 2001, 42 (8): 1273-1281.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sunami Y, Tazuma S, Chayama K: Is a role of phospholipase A2 in cholesterol gallstone formation phospholipid species-dependent?. BBA-Mol Cell Biol L. 2001, 1532 (1–2): 51-59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI: QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010, 7 (5): 335-336. 10.1038/nmeth.f.303.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR: Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73 (16): 5261-5267. 10.1128/AEM.00062-07.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Kelley ST, Knight R: Quantitative and qualitative β diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73 (5): 1576-1585. 10.1128/AEM.01996-06.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Arndt D, Xia J, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Guo AC, Cruz JA, Sinelnikov I, Budwill K, Nesbø CL, Wishart DS: METAGENassist: a comprehensive web server for comparative metagenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (W1): W88-W95. 10.1093/nar/gks497.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Siedel J, Hägele EO, Ziegenhorn J, Wahlefeld AW: Reagent for the enzymatic determination of serum total cholesterol with improved lipolytic efficiency. Clin Chem. 1983, 29 (6): 1075-1080.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kunming Biological Diversity Regional Center of Large Apparatus and Equipments, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for their superb technical assistances as well as Andrew Willden (Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for assistance with the manuscript. This research was supported by grants from Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (Grant No. 2010CD147 to TW and Grant No. 2011FA035 to PS) and from both the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 31100916 to ZZ) and the Young Talent Project of the Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. Y106541131 to ZZ) and “A Hundred Talent Program” from Chinese Academy of Sciences to PS.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650032, China

      Tao Wu, Bin Liu, Dezhi Hou & Yun Liang

    2. State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Laboratory of Evolutionary & Functional Genomics, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, Yunnan, China

      Zhigang Zhang & Peng Shi

    3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Clinical College of Kunming Medical University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China

      Jie Zhang

    Authors
    1. Tao Wu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Zhigang Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Bin Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Dezhi Hou
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Yun Liang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Jie Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Peng Shi
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding authors

    Correspondence to Jie Zhang or Peng Shi.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

    Authors’ contributions

    TW and ZZ performed the research, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; BL, DH, and YL performed research; PS and JZ conceived and supervised the study and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Tao Wu, Zhigang Zhang contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    12864_2013_7119_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

    Additional file 1: Figure S1: Phylum composition of varying samples. A, top three phyla and other rare phyla. B, all 16 rare phyla. (PDF 389 KB)

    12864_2013_7119_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

    Additional file 2: Figure S2: PLS-DA plot of microbial communities present in bile, gallstones, and the gut. (PDF 561 KB)

    12864_2013_7119_MOESM3_ESM.pdf

    Additional file 3: Figure S3: Sample clustering from the gut and biliary tract based on a Unifrac PCoA analysis of bacterial 16S rRNA-derived OTUs. (PDF 408 KB)

    12864_2013_7119_MOESM4_ESM.doc

    Additional file 4: Table S1: Potentially significant bacteria species associated with the presence of gallstones. (DOC 69 KB)

    12864_2013_7119_MOESM5_ESM.doc

    Additional file 5: Table S2: Identification of bacterial factors facilitating gallstone formation from 15 similar bacteria species with known genomes. (DOC 42 KB)

    12864_2013_7119_MOESM6_ESM.pdf

    Additional file 6: Figure S4: Inter-subject variations of the top four bacteria phyla present in bile and gallstones. (PDF 410 KB)

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Wu, T., Zhang, Z., Liu, B. et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis and bacterial community assembly associated with cholesterol gallstones in large-scale study. BMC Genomics 14, 669 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-669

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-669

    Keywords

    BMC Genomics

    ISSN: 1471-2164

    Contact us