Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Genomic and transcriptomic differences in community acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 and USA400 strains

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 7,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6 and
  • 2, 7
Contributed equally
BMC Genomics201415:1145

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1145

  • Received: 11 July 2014
  • Accepted: 8 December 2014
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Staphylococcus aureus is a human pathogen responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality through its ability to cause a number of human infections including bacteremia, pneumonia and soft tissue infections. Of great concern is the emergence and dissemination of methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains (MRSA) that are resistant to nearly all β-lactams. The emergence of the USA300 MRSA genetic background among community associated S. aureus infections (CA-MRSA) in the USA was followed by the disappearance of USA400 CA-MRSA isolates.

Results

To gain a greater understanding of the potential fitness advantages and virulence capacity of S. aureus USA300 clones, we performed whole genome sequencing of 15 USA300 and 4 USA400 clinical isolates. A comparison of representative genomes of the USA300 and USA400 pulsotypes indicates a number of differences in mobile genome elements. We examined the in vitro gene expression profiles by microarray hybridization and the in vivo transcriptomes during lung infection in mice of a USA300 and a USA400 MRSA strain by performing complete genome qRT-PCR analysis. The unique presence and increased expression of 6 exotoxins in USA300 (12- to 600-fold) compared to USA400 may contribute to the increased virulence of USA300 clones. Importantly, we also observed the up-regulation of prophage genes in USA300 (compared with USA400) during mouse lung infection (including genes encoded by both prophages ΦSa2usa and ΦSa3usa), suggesting that these prophages may play an important role in vivo by contributing to the elevated virulence characteristic of the USA300 clone.

Conclusions

We observed differences in the genetic content of USA300 and USA400 strains, as well as significant differences of in vitro and in vivo gene expression of mobile elements in a lung pneumonia model. This is the first study to document the global transcription differences between USA300 and USA400 strains during both in vitro and in vivo growth.

Keywords

  • SCCmec Type
  • Necrotizing Pneumonia
  • Arginine Catabolic Mobile Element
  • USA300 Isolate
  • USA300 Clone

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates have emerged as a leading cause of infectious diseases [16]. Once confined primarily to hospitals and patients with defined risk factors, infections caused by community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) isolates have become epidemic in the United States and now frequently occur among previously healthy individuals without these risk factors [7, 8]. Although the majority of CA-MRSA infections are mild, some CA-MRSA infectious syndromes such as complicated skin and soft tissue infections, necrotizing pneumonia, bacteremia, and sepsis can be life-threatening [710]. After the first report of CA-MRSA deaths in children in it became recognized that the strain type was USA400 [1114]. During the early emergence of CA-MRSA, isolates of both MRSA and MSSA with the USA400 pulsed field pattern were identified as causes of severe sepsis and death characterized by rapidly progressive clinical deterioration, with necrotizing pneumonia and multiple-organ-system involvement and bilateral adrenal hemorrhage characteristic of the Waterhouse–Friderichsen syndrome [14]. However, among community associated MRSA infections, USA400 has been nearly completely replaced by another CA-MRSA background, called USA300 [1523]. The reasons for the replacement of USA400 by USA300 are not known.

Many have speculated that the dominance of USA300 is evidence of altered fitness. In support of this notion, USA300 strains are hypervirulent, compared with USA400 strains, in several animal models of skin infection and pneumonia [24]. Although the relationship between fitness and virulence is not clear, understanding the mechanisms of the extraordinary virulence of USA300 strains will shed light onto the reasons for its emergence. The virulent nature of S. aureus is mediated by a wide array of cell surface proteins, secreted toxins and mobile genetic elements [15, 2531]. As such there are at least two possible explanations for the virulence of USA300. One is that USA300 strains have acquired novel genomic content that enhances its fitness and/or virulence. For example, among sequenced S. aureus isolates, the arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) is present in most USA300 strains circulating in the United States, but not USA400 isolates [22]. ACME is a large mobile genetic element also found in some Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates encoding at least 33 open reading frames [22, 32]. Deletion of ACME from USA300 enhanced survival in a rabbit model of bacteremia [32], but ACME was not necessary for virulence in rodent models of pneumonia or skin infection [33]. However, ACME encodes an arginine deiminase gene, called arcA that allows for enhanced survival in acidic environments [34]. Interestingly, this process drives the synthesis of host polyamines that are toxic to S. aureus. It is likely not a coincidence that ACME therefore also encodes a spermine acetyl transferase, speG, which counteracts the toxic effects of polyamines. In this regard, ACME appears to at least partially account for the observed pathogenesis of USA300 in skin infection [35, 36]. Nevertheless, ACME-deficient USA300 clinical isolates have been described supporting the data from animal models that ACME is not a necessary component of pathogencity or survival in humans.

An alternative explanation is that USA300 has evolved to alter the expression/activity of S. aureus regulatory genes that are part of the core genome. In support of this idea, USA300 isolates have increased expression of the global regulatory systems agr and saeRS, and attendant increased expression of downstream toxins such as the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL, encoded by lukSF-PV), the alpha-hemolysin (Hla, encoded by hla), and phenol soluble modulins (PSMs), compared to USA400 [24, 37, 38]. Although there is a strong epidemiologic association of PVL carriage with severe disease caused by CA-MRSA, its role in pathogenesis is controversial. Since PVL is present in both USA300 and USA400 isolates, it is not likely that its presence accounts for the differences in virulence between the genomic backgrounds. In contrast, agr, saeRS, hla and the PSMs which are core genes present in almost all S. aureus strains, clearly advance the pathogenesis of USA300 in animal models [37, 39, 40]. Although it is known that USA300 has altered regulation of selected global regulators and virulence genes compared with USA400, it is not known whether there are global differences in the transcription profiles between USA300 and USA400.

By comparing the in vitro transcriptional profiles of USA300 and USA400 using DNA microarray technology, we tested our hypothesis that USA300 strains have global regulatory alterations that contribute to their hypervirulent phenotype. To identify the possibility that the in vivo environment in host tissues can influence bacterial gene expression, we quantified bacterial gene expression in the lungs of animals infected with MRSA strains USA300 and USA400. Together our data offer a glimpse into CA-MRSA USA300 and USA400 pathogenesis and suggest a potential model for the observed increased virulence of S. aureus USA300 strains.

Results

Genomic characterization of USA300 and USA400 strains

To better understand the genomic diversity of USA300 and USA400 strains and the features that distinguish these two lineages, 15 USA300 clinical isolates and 4 USA400 isolates (Table 1) were sequenced using Roche 454 FLX sequencing technology. The completely sequenced USA300_FPR3757 strain was used as a reference for comparison to USA300 isolates, whereas USA400 strains were compared to S. aureus USA400 strain MW2. These comparisons allowed us to identify 2,279 genes that are uniformly conserved between all of the sequenced USA300 and USA400 isolates. The number of genes unique to either lineage was similar. USA400 genomes uniquely encode 57 genes (Additional file 1: Table S1) across all isolates, whereas USA300 isolates uniquely encode 46 genes (Additional file 2: Table S2) across all isolates. These genes were examined in greater detail by assessing their predicted functional roles. Novel genes present in USA300 include a toxin-antitoxin system, the chemotaxis-inhibiting protein (CHiPS), and a number of hypothetical proteins in the ΦSa3usa phage. Each of these sequences displays an overall strong conservation within USA300 isolates. Specifically, there were 35 genes that were unique to USA300 isolates compared to USA400 isolates in the ΦSa3usa phage, as well as the ACME element. All USA300 and 400 isolates were also compared to a variety of S. aureus sequence-types in a PanGenome analysis (Additional file 3: Tables 3 and Additional file 4: Table S4; Additional file 5: Figure S1). Pangenome analysis revealed 2 major branches (Additional file 5: Figure S1). These branches demonstrate strong clustering of our USA300 and USA400 lineages, compared to other sequence-type (Additional file 3: Table S3). Genes specific to the USA300 lineage appear to be associated with bacteriophage and mobile genomic elements present in USA300 that are absent in the USA400 lineages. Furthermore, kSNP analysis of core genes within our USA300 and 400 lineages (Additional file 6: Table S5; Additional file 7: Figure S2) demonstrate a strong correlation with S. aureus strain sequence type.
Table 1

USA300 and USA 400 isolates

USA Pulsotype

Strain name

ST

coverage

Year

Site of isolation or syndrome

Onset

SRA ID

USA400

staph649

ST1

99.02

2004

Skin infection

CA

SRX026443

USA400

gsast11506

ST1

99

2000

 

CA

SRX026318

USA400

gsast2674

ST1

99

2000

Respiratory, severe sepsis nec pneumonia

CA

SRX025928

USA400

gsastq2352

ST1

99

2000

Respiratory, severe sepsis nec pneumonia

CA

SRX025931

USA300

gsast10243

ST8

98.15

2007

Blood

CA

SRX026310

USA300

gsast10329

ST8

99.27

2007

Peritoneal/body fluid

HA

SRX026315

USA300

gsast1135

ST8

98.15

2004

Skin infection

CA

SRX026317

USA300

gsast11578

ST8

99.3

2002

 

CA

SRX025942

USA300

gsast1185

ST8

96.65

2004

Skin infection

CA

SRX025925

USA300

gsast13205

ST8

97.37

2008

Blood, nec pneumonia, sepsis

 

SRX025943

USA300

gsast2145

ST8

99.28

2005

Skin infection

CA

SRX026311

USA300

gsast5319

ST8

99.32

2005

Skin infection

CA

SRX026314

USA300

gsast9376

ST8

97.91

2007

Respiratory

HA

SRX025927

USA300

gsast9549

ST8

99.26

2007

Screen

HA

SRX025926

USA300

gsast9636

ST8

99.28

2007

Respiratory

HA

SRX025944

USA300

gsast9750

ST8

98.82

2007

Screen

HA

SRX025939

USA300

gsastca11

ST8

95.94

1998

 

CA

SRX025929

USA300

staph923

ST8

99.31

2004

Skin infection

CA

SRX025930

In vitrodifferential gene expression between USA300 and USA400 isolates

In order to test our hypothesis that USA300 and USA400 strains differ in their global gene expression patterns, we compared global gene expression between a clinical USA300 isolate (strain 923) and a clinical USA400 isolate (strain 649) using DNA microarrays. We compared gene expression patterns of cells grown in TSB medium at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes of growth. An analysis of significant differences in gene expression using SAM revealed 480 genes (342 genes more highly expressed in USA300 isolate and 138 genes more highly-expressed in the USA400 strain. Role category analysis of genes considered to be part of the shared core USA300/USA400 genomes demonstrated an overall higher gene-expression profile in most functional categories in the USA300 isolate compared with the USA400 isolate (Figure 1). The USA300 isolate displayed increased expression for genes encoding cell envelope proteins (including several lipoproteins and superantigen-like proteins) and a large number of hypothetical and genes of unknown function compared with the USA400 isolate 649. Interestingly, genes belonging in mobile elements were more highly expressed in the USA400 strain compared to the USA300 isolate.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Role category analysis of S. aureus USA300 and USA400 genes differentially expressed in vitro and in vivo growth. X- axis represents individual role categories based on gene function. Y-axis values indicate the mathematical difference in the number of genes significantly differentially expressed between USA300 and USA400 isolates during in vitro and in vivo growth. Positive values indicate a higher number of genes differentially expressed in the corresponding role category in USA300 isolate 923 compared to USA400 isolate 649. Negative values indicate a higher number of genes differentially expressed in the corresponding role category in USA400 isolate 649 compared to USA300 isolate 923. Blue bars indicate values from the 30 min in vitro time point; Yellow bars indicate 60 min in vitro time point; Green bars indicate 90 min in vitro time point; Maroon bars indicate 120 min in vitro time point; and Red bars indicate bars indicate the in vivo time point.

Among the genes with differential expression between the strains, there is higher expression in transcription of regulatory genes including agrBDC and rot, and differential expression of the two prophages present in the genomes of the sequenced USA300 and USA400 genomes. Interestingly, among the genes deemed significantly differentially expressed that reside in the prophage ΦSa2usa (Additional file 8: Table S6), 20 were more highly expressed in the USA400 isolate, whereas 6 genes were more highly expressed in the USA300 strain. In contrast, the genes residing in prophage ΦSa3usa were highly expressed in the USA300 strain and not detected in the USA400 strain (Additional file 9: Table S7). This is consistent with the fact that the prophage ΦSa3usa insertion was only found to be present in the USA300 isolate and absent in the USA400 isolate, which is consistent with the reference USA300 and USA400 genomes.

Analysis of genes known to play a role in neutrophil evasion functions displayed differential expression (Additional file 10: Table S8). Genes that had significantly higher expression in the USA300 isolate compared with the USA400 strain included: immunoglobulin G binding protein A precursor (SAUSA300_0113), fibrinogen-binding protein (SAUSA300_1055), superantigen-like protein (SAUSA300_0407) and a leukocidin family protein (SAUSA300_1975). Several genes encoded in the pathogenicity islands vSAα and vSAβ also more highly expressed in the USA300 isolate Additional file 11: Table S9). Interestingly, compared with USA400, we observed an overall reduced expression of genes located in the S. aureus pathogenicity island SaPI5, with the exception of the gene encoding the ear exoprotein that is associated with virulence in USA300. There were also a number of lipoproteins and proteases more highly expressed in the USA300 isolate compared with USA400 strain. The gene encoding the IgG binding protein, Sbi, displayed slightly increased expression in the USA300 isolate. Surprisingly, expression of agrA and the δ-hemolysin were more highly expressed in the USA400 strain. Other genes of interest that were more highly expressed in the USA400 strain included two antibacterial proteins and lukF-PV.

In vivodifferential gene expression comparison of USA300 and USA400

Because it is not known if in vitro gene expression correlates with that seen in vivo, we sought to determine the differential expression of USA300 and USA400 isolates in vivo in a mouse model of lung infection by using complete genome qRT-PCR analysis. We chose to assess in vivo expression of bacteria during infection of lungs of mice 4 hours after inoculation with S. aureus because the number of bacteria recovered from the lungs at this time point is the same, regardless of the infecting isolate, because all animals are sick at this time, and because it is before the onset of mortality. Consistent with this, all infected animals appeared ill at 6 hours post-infection. Our results recapitulate other virulence studies as, nearly all (4/5) mice infected with USA300 strains died within 24 to 48 hours after inoculation, whereas none (0/5) of the mice infected with USA400 strains died. When using a cutoff of two-fold change in expression, we observed 624 genes with higher expression in the USA300 isolate compared to 1075 genes displaying elevated expression in the USA400 strain. Among these USA300 genes were encoded in ACME, the prophages ΦSA2usa and ΦSA3usa, the pathogenicity islands vSAα and vSAβ, and genes arcC, argR, and coa. These data suggest that, although the USA300 isolate has increased in vitro expression compared with USA400 strains, the converse is true in vivo (Figure 1).

As we observed in the in vitro expression analysis, there were striking differences in the expression of the prophages ΦSA2usa and ΦSA3usa between USA300 and USA400 in vivo (Additional file 8: Table S6 and Additional file 9: Table S7). In concordance with the in vitro data, genes in ΦSA3usa were more highly expressed during lung infection in the USA300 isolate compared with the USA400 strain. However, whereas genes encoded in ΦSA2usa were generally expressed at higher levels in USA400 compared with USA300 in vitro, the in vivo expression was generally higher in the USA300 isolate. This suggests that in vivo cue(s), and a potentially novel signal transduction network, is required for full expression of ΦSa2usa, and other virulence genes, in S. aureus USA300.

The in vivo expression of genes contained in ACME was detected in lungs infected with USA300 but not USA400. This was expected and validates our DNA sequence data showing that ACME is not present in the USA400 strain. As we observed in vitro, there were a number of lipoproteins whose expression during lung infection was higher in USA300 compared with USA400. Interestingly, there was strongly induced expression of the epidermin immunity protein operon after infection with USA300, compared with USA400. This operon has been previously associated with increased fitness of CA-MRSA strains due to its role in lantibiotic resistance [41]. Notably, there was also higher expression of a cluster of urease genes in USA300 during infection of lungs compared with USA400. These genes have been demonstrated to be induced during acid shock, and may serve as a mechanism to neutralize acidification of the phagolysosomal compartment and promote intracellular survival [42]. Among the genes in USA400 whose expression increased during lung infection compared with USA300, we were surprised to find the two-component global regulatory system saeRS and δ-hemolysin, in part, which is under the control of the agr effector, RNAIII. There was also increased in vivo expression of the toxin encoding genes hla, hlb, and hlc in USA400 strain (Additional file 10: Table S8).

Discussion

USA300 MRSA isolates have emerged as the dominant cause of CA-MRSA infections in the United States. However, it has been unclear why USA300 has replaced its predecessor (USA400) in CA-MRSA infection. Furthermore, understanding the rapid evolution that led to increased virulence of S. aureus USA300 isolates, compared with highly virulent USA400 isolates, can inform better strategies for treating and preventing CA-MRSA infections. Previous work has suggested that the increased virulence of USA300 isolates might be due to increased expression of global regulators and toxin genes [24]. Although this would explain the hypervirulent phenotype of USA300 isolates, the relationship between virulence and fitness is less well understood. In an effort to understand the contribution of genetic factors that contribute to the success of USA300, we performed comparative genome sequencing of USA300 and USA400 isolates, in vitro gene expression analysis, and assessed in vivo gene expression by means of complete genome qPCR in an established mouse model of S. aureus necrotizing pneumonia.

Analysis of the sequenced isolates revealed a strong conservation of genes between ST1 (USA400) and ST8 (USA300) isolates as expected. However, genes that were deemed unique to USA300 isolates include genes encoded in the ACME element, the prophage ΦSA3usa and a toxin-antitoxin system. However, many of these genes are not functionally characterized and are annotated as hypothetical with no defined function. It is well documented that mobile elements often encode genes that provide a fitness advantage in the form of antibiotic resistance determinants, toxins and intracellular survival determinants. It is plausible that many of the hypothetical genes we identified that are unique to USA300 isolates may have provided an in vivo fitness advantage and increased the virulence compared with USA400 and other S. aureus isolates.

Although S. aureus gene expression was globally higher in isolate USA300 compared with USA400 in vitro, expression was globally higher in vivo during lung infection in USA400 isolate 649 compared with USA300 isolate 923. In some cases, there was higher expression of lipoproteins in USA300 compared with USA400 during infection, just as there was in vitro. Expression of the ACME element was also increased in USA300 after infection, compared with USA400; this was expected because ACME is only present in USA300 but it serves as a validation of the experiment. There was also increased expression of agrB, agrD, and ΦSA3usa in USA300 during infection of lungs compared with USA400, in concordance with the in vitro data. Also to note was the increased expression of agrA and hla in USA400 compared with USA300 during in vitro growth. Previously, we observed increased in vitro expression of both agrA and hla in USA300 compared with USA400, however that observation was at a later time point during infection [39].

On the other hand, expression of saeRS and δ-hemolysin (encoded within agr) was higher in USA400 during infection compared with USA300. Both sae and agr are necessary for virulence in S. aureus necrotizing pneumonia caused by USA300 and it is likely that these are also important in USA400 necrotizing pneumonia [43]. There was also increased expression of the agr- and saeRS- controlled toxin genes hla, lukS-PV, and 2 PSMs in USA400 compared with USA300 during infection. Although USA400 has a higher LD50 than USA300 in rodent experimental models, it is nevertheless capable of producing a high mortality rate in groups of mice infected at its lethal dose [24]. Moreover, when USA400 was still in circulation among humans in the United States, it was highly virulent as it was recognized for causing severe sepsis and rapidly progressive disease leading to death [14]. Therefore, The finding that agr- and saeRS- controlled toxin genes hla, lukS-PV, and 2 PSMs were expressed at higher levels in USA400 in this study reinforces the observation that USA400 was a virulent strain of S. aureus in humans. We note that our study is a single time point, and S. aureus gene expression may differ significantly at different stages of growth/infection [44].

One possible scenario for the discordance in S. aureus gene expression during in vitro and in vivo growth is the absence of complex host/immune factors that act as environmental cues resulting in modulation of S. aureus gene expression. Data generated from in vitro growth conditions have provided the wealth of knowledge that has given the scientific community the foundation required to understand the complex regulatory networks that modulate signaling/expression pathways. However, conclusions drawn from in vitro gene expression studies must be interpreted with caution as numerous details of the S. aureus transcriptome may differ significantly between in vitro and in vivo growth as our study attests. Thus, effort must be made to measure virulence gene expression of signal transduction networks directly from infection models using approaches similar to the one described in this study if we are to identify vaccine targets relevant to infection.

An intriguing possibility of the features bestowed to USA300 strains to be successful may be related to increased emphasis on immune evasion during infection. This hypothesis is supported by the increased expression of ΦSA3usa observed after infection with USA300 compared with USA400. ΦSA3usa encodes a number of immune evasion genes, including CHIPs and staphylokinase [22]. There was also higher expression of the epidermin immunity protein operon in USA300 during infection, compared with USA400. This cluster of genes has been previously associated with increased fitness of CA-MRSA strains due to its role in lantibiotic resistance. Along these lines, there was higher expression of genes encoding urease subunits and metabolism in USA300 during infection compared with USA400. These genes have been demonstrated to be induced during acid shock, and may serve as a mechanism to neutralize acidification of the phagolysosome and promote intracellular survival and fitness. Therefore, USA300 may exploit increased urease activity under low pH, to neutralize the phagolysosomal compartment, allowing USA300 isolates to survive an acute immune response and may explain why USA300 is associated with persistent and recurrent infections. Our hypothesis is supported by recent observation of a S. aureus strain that inhibits acidification of a phagolysosome following phagocytosis [45].

Conclusion

Our findings have important implications in the characterization of pathogenesis and virulence effectors in S. aureus. The discordant findings between the in vitro and in vivo settings suggest that studies to characterize S. aureus virulence should attempt to mimic the hostile host environment (e.g. pH shock); and must be comparatively analyzed with ex vivo and in vivo time-course models to fully reconstruct the arsenal of virulence factors and pathogenesis of S. aureus. Complete understanding of the host-pathogen signal interaction during acute and persistent infections is critical for the treatment and prevention of CA-MRSA and all other S. aureus infections. In summary, there are differences in the genetic content of USA300 and USA400 strains. This is the first study to document the global transcription differences between USA300 and USA400 strains during both in vitro and in vivo growth.

Methods

Bacterial strains

Strain 649 is a well characterized USA400 MRSA isolate (SCCmec type IV, pvl+) that belongs to multilocus sequence type (ST) 1. This isolate was obtained from the respiratory tract of an infant with necrotizing pneumonia who died of severe sepsis [12, 14]. Strain 923 is a USA300 MRSA isolate (SCCmec type IV+, pvl+) that belongs to ST8 [46] and carries the arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) [33]; it was obtained from a skin abscess. Strain 923 is more virulent than strain 649 in lung and skin infection rodent models [24]. Additional strains sequenced are shown in Table 1.

Genome sequencing and assembly

All strains were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) and genomic DNAs were isolated. All genomic DNAs were sequenced using the Roche 454 sequencing platform. The sequences of strains USA300 and USA400 were assembled using Newbler from the Roche 454 software suite. Quality assessment of the assembled genomes was based on depth of coverage calculated from the ACE files and also breadth of coverage by mapping to their respective reference genomes. All strains were annotated using the Manatee tool developed at JCVI. All reads were submitted to SRA (Table 1.)

Bacterial growth and RNA isolation from in vitrogrowth

S. aureus RNA was isolated from in vitro bacterial cultures grown in TSB at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes post inoculation. Two volumes of RNA protect (Qiagen) was directly added to the growth media and subsequently pelleted and stored at −20°C until RNA extraction, using the Ambion mirVana RNA kit (Austin, TX). RNA quantity and quality was assessed by measuring total RNA on a nanodrop and visualizing RNA on an agarose gel. Purified RNA was stored at −80°C. Murine lungs harvested from infected mice were homogenized in the Ambion Mirvana lysis-binding buffer and further extracted using the PCT pressure cycler (Pressure Biosciences). Total RNA was extracted from homogenized and lysed tissues as described by the manufacturer (Ambion).

Generation of probes for microarray experiments, microarray hybridization, normalization and data analysis

DNA probes for microarray experiments were generated by adding 2 μg of total RNA to a mixture containing 6 μg of random hexamers (Invitrogen), 0.01 M dithiothreitol, an aminoallyl-deoxynucleoside triphosphate mixture containing 25 mM each dATP, dCTP, and dGTP, 15 mM dTTP, and 10 mM amino-allyl-dUTP (aa-dUTP) (Sigma), reaction buffer, and 400 units of SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) at 42°C overnight. The RNA template was then hydrolyzed by adding NaOH and EDTA to a final concentration of 0.2 and 0.1 M, respectively, followed by incubatation at 70°C for 15 min. Unincorporated aa-dUTP was removed with a QIAquick column (Qiagen). The probe was eluted with PE buffer (4 mM KPO4, pH 8.5, in ultrapure water), dried to completion, and resuspended in 0.1 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.0). To couple the amino-allyl cDNA with fluorescent labels, Cy3 or Cy5 mono-reactive dye (Amersham) was added for 1 h. Uncoupled label was removed using the Qiagen QIAquick PCR purification kit (Valencia, CA).

Aminosilane-coated slides representing a set of 4,589 S. aureus unique open reading frame sequences derived from seven reference genomes and plasmid, pLW043 (http://www.jcvi.org) were prehybridized in 5× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) (Invitrogen), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 1% bovine serum albumin at 42°C for 60 min. The slides were then washed at room temperature with distilled water, dipped in isopropanol, and allowed to dry. Equal volumes of the appropriate Cy3- and Cy5-labeled probes were combined, dried and resuspended in a solution of 40% formamide, 5× SSC, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate. Resuspended probes were heated to 95°C prior to hybridization. The probe mixture was then added to the microarray slide and allowed to hybridize overnight at 42°C. Hybridized slides were washed sequentially in solutions of 1x SSC-0.2% SDS, 0.1× SSC-0.2% SDS, and 0.1× SSC at room temperature, then dried in air, and scanned with an Axon GenePix 4000 scanner. Agilent hybridizations were performed as described by the manufacturer. Individual TIFF images from each channel were analyzed with TIGR Spotfinder (available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mev-tm4/files/mev-tm4/). Microarray data were normalized by LOWESS in TIGR MIDAS software (available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mev-tm4/files/mev-tm4/). All gene expression data is publicly available at GEO under GSE26255.

Mouse infection model

All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Committee on the Care and Use of Animals at the University of Chicago. Our mouse model of S. aureus necrotizing pneumonia has been described [39]. Briefly, bacteria were subcultured from frozen stocks onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) and incubated overnight at 37°C. The following evening, one colony was subcultured in 5 ml TSB and incubated overnight with shaking (250 rpm) at 37°C. The following morning, the overnight culture was diluted 1:100 in fresh TSB (flask:volume ratio 7:1) and grown to mid-exponential phase. The bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation (4000 × g, 15 min), washed in sterile PBS, and resuspended in PBS to a final concentration of 2 × 108 CFU/20 μl. The inoculum was confirmed by plating serial dilutions on TSA. Six week old C57Bl/6 mice (10 mice with each isolate) (Jackson labs) were sedated with ketamine and xylazine, after which they were inoculated with 20 μl of the bacterial preparation. Four hours after inoculation, 5 mice from each group were euthanized by forced CO2 inhalation. The lungs were removed aseptically and placed in RNAprotect.

cDNA generation and qPCR assays

qPCR plates were prepared using 1:10 dilutions of a combined stock of forward and reverse primers at a final concentration of 1.25 μM (Invitrogen). 10 μl of diluted 0.125 μM primers was dispensed in quadruplicate to 384-well plates and were subsequently dried. cDNA samples were generated using the overnight method described above to generate probes for microarray experiments without the use of aa-dUTP. 10 ng of each sample was then combined with 2.5 μl of 2X SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche) to a total reaction volume of 5 μl per well. Median Crossing point (Cp) values for the qPCR quadruplicate reactions were calculated. The relative expression changes for each gene were calculated by ΔΔCp normalization based on 4 control genes (SAUSA300_0175, SAUSA300_2543, SAUSA300_2001 and SAUSA300_1747). To determine fold change, the normalized Cp values of USA300 and USA400 gene expression were used to calculate the ΔΔCp during in vivo growth. The difference of the gene expression was regarded as significant when ΔΔCp ≥1 or ≤ −1 (>2-fold).

Availability of supporting data

All microarray gene expression data is publicly available at GEO at the NCBI (GenBank) under GSE26255. All 454 sequencing data may be found in the short read achieve (SRA: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/).

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. David T. Pride and Dr. Mark Adams for discussion and editing of our manuscript. We also thank Mr. Derek Harkins, Ms. Lauren Brinkac and Ms. Pamela Mishra for support in PanGenome and PanSNP analysis. This work was supported by a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) White Paper Award to Drs. Robert S. Daum and Susan Boyle-Vavra, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Pediatric Critical Care Scholar Development Program, HD047349, to C.P.M.), NIAID (AI076596, to C.P.M. and AI040481, to R.S.D.) and the Grant Healthcare Foundation to Drs. Susan Boyle-Vavra and Robert S. Daum. This work was also supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases award N01-AI15447 to Drs. Scott. N. Peterson and Robert Fleischmann.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
J. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
(2)
Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
(3)
Department of Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Pathogens, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
(4)
Battelle National Biodefense Institute, National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
(5)
J. Craig Venter Institute, 9704 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
(6)
Sanford Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
(7)
Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

References

  1. Wang X, Towers S, Panchanathan S, Chowell G: A population based study of seasonality of skin and soft tissue infections: implications for the spread of CA-MRSA. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (4): e60872-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Phillips AW, Cranfield KJ, Horgan AF: MRSA infections following colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis: Offic J Assoc Coloproctology Great Brit Ireland. 2013, 15 (1): 97-101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fowler JR, Greenhill D, Schaffer AA, Thoder JJ, Ilyas AM: Evolving incidence of MRSA in urban hand infections. Orthopedics. 2013, 36 (6): 796-800.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sola C, Paganini H, Egea AL, Moyano AJ, Garnero A, Kevric I, Culasso C, Vindel A, Lopardo H, Bocco JL, Study Group of Ca-Mrsa in Children A: Spread of epidemic MRSA-ST5-IV clone encoding PVL as a major cause of community onset staphylococcal infections in Argentinean children. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e30487-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. McCullough AC, Seifried M, Zhao X, Haase J, Kabat WJ, Yogev R, Blumenthal RM, Mukundan D: Higher incidence of perineal community acquired MRSA infections among toddlers. BMC Pediatr. 2011, 11: 96-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Sisirak M, Zvizdic A, Hukic M: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a cause of nosocomial wound infections. Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences/Udruzenje basicnih mediciniskih znanosti =. Assoc Basic Med Sci. 2010, 10 (1): 32-Google Scholar
  7. Long CB, Madan RP, Herold BC: Diagnosis and management of community-associated MRSA infections in children. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010, 8 (2): 183-195.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. David MZ, Daum RS: Update on epidemiology and treatment of MRSA infections in children. Curr Pediatr Rep. 2013, 1 (3): 170-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Perez A, Orta L, Pascual M, Padilla E, Mesquida X, Gonzalez M, Huguet O: Management of mild CA-MRSA skin infections: more complicated that it looks at a glance. Eur J Dermatol: EJD. 2012, 22: 800-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pardo L, Machado V, Mollerach M, Mota MI, Tuchscherr LP, Gadea P, Gardella N, Sordelli DO, Vola M, Schelotto F, Varela G: Characteristics of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) Strains Isolated from Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections in Uruguay. Int J Microbiol. 2009, 2009: 472126-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus - Minnesota and North Dakota, 1997-1999. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 1999, 48 (32): 707-710.Google Scholar
  12. Mongkolrattanothai K, Boyle S, Kahana MD, Daum RS: Severe Staphylococcus aureus infections caused by clonally related community-acquired methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant isolates. Clin Infect Dis: Offic Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2003, 37 (8): 1050-1058.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Herold BC, Immergluck LC, Maranan MC, Lauderdale DS, Gaskin RE, Boyle-Vavra S, Leitch CD, Daum RS: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk. JAMA. 1998, 279 (8): 593-598.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Adem PV, Montgomery CP, Husain AN, Koogler TK, Arangelovich V, Humilier M, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS: Staphylococcus aureus sepsis and the Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome in children. New Engl J Med. 2005, 353: 1245-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Thurlow LR, Joshi GS, Richardson AR: Virulence strategies of the dominant USA300 lineage of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012, 65 (1): 5-22.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. D'Agata EM, Webb GF, Horn MA, Moellering RC, Ruan S: Modeling the invasion of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus into hospitals. Clin Infect Dis: Offic Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2009, 48 (3): 274-284.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Como-Sabetti K, Harriman KH, Buck JM, Glennen A, Boxrud DJ, Lynfield R: Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: trends in case and isolate characteristics from six years of prospective surveillance. Public Health Rep. 2009, 124: 427-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Manzur A, Dominguez AM, Pujol M, Gonzalez MP, Limon E, Hornero A, Martin R, Gudiol F, Ariza J: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: an emerging threat in Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008, 14: 377-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. David MZ, Rudolph KM, Hennessy TW, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS: Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, rural southwestern Alaska. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008, 14 (11): 1693-1699.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Date SV, Modrusan Z, Lawrence M, Morisaki JH, Toy K, Shah IM, Kim J, Park S, Xu M, Basuino L, Chan L, Zeitschel D, Chambers HF, Tan MW, Brown EJ, Diep BA, Hazenbos WL: Global gene expression of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 during human and mouse infection. J Infect Dis. 2014, 209 (10): 1542-1550.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tattevin P, Diep BA, Jula M, Perdreau-Remington F: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 clone in long-term care facility. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15 (6): 953-955.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, Lin F, Lin J, Carleton HA, Mongodin EF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F: Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2006, 367 (9512): 731-739.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim S, Chung DR, Baek JY, Kim SH, Peck KR, Lee NY, Song JH: A third case of USA300 community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Korea. Korean J Intern Med. 2013, 28 (2): 258-260.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Montgomery CP, Boyle-Vavra S, Adem PV, Lee JC, Husain AN, Clasen J, Daum RS: Comparison of virulence in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pulsotypes USA300 and USA400 in a rat model of pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198 (4): 561-570.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Krakauer T, Stiles BG: The staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) family: SEB and siblings. Virulence. 2013, 4: 7-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Los FC, Randis TM, Aroian RV, Ratner AJ: Role of pore-forming toxins in bacterial infectious diseases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev: MMBR. 2013, 77 (2): 173-207.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoong P, Torres VJ: The effects of Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxins on the host: cell lysis and beyond. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013, 16 (1): 63-69.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zecconi A, Scali F: Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors in evasion from innate immune defenses in human and animal diseases. Immunol Lett. 2013, 150 (1-2): 12-22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Deghorain M, Van Melderen L: The Staphylococci phages family: an overview. Viruses. 2012, 4 (12): 3316-3335.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Humphreys H: Staphylococcus aureus: the enduring pathogen in surgery. Surg: J Roy Colleges Surg Edinburgh Ireland. 2012, 10 (6): 357-360.Google Scholar
  31. Hao H, Dai M, Wang Y, Huang L, Yuan Z: Key genetic elements and regulation systems in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7 (11): 1315-1329.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Diep BA, Stone GG, Basuino L, Graber CJ, Miller A, Des Etages SA, Jones A, Palazzolo-Ballance AM, Perdreau-Remington F, Sensabaugh GF, DeLeo FR, Chambers HF: The arginine catabolic mobile element and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec linkage: convergence of virulence and resistance in the USA300 clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197: 1523-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Montgomery CP, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS: The arginine catabolic mobile element is not associated with enhanced virulence in experimental invasive disease caused by the community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 genetic background. Infect Immun. 2009, 77 (7): 2650-2656.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Thurlow LR, Joshi GS, Clark JR, Spontak JS, Neely CJ, Maile R, Richardson AR: Functional modularity of the arginine catabolic mobile element contributes to the success of USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Host Microbe. 2013, 13 (1): 100-107.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Planet PJ, LaRussa SJ, Dana A, Smith H, Xu A, Ryan C, Uhlemann AC, Boundy S, Goldberg J, Narechania A, Kulkarni R, Ratner AJ, Geoghegan JA, Kolokotronis SO, Prince A: Emergence of the epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300 coincides with horizontal transfer of the arginine catabolic mobile element and speG-mediated adaptations for survival on skin. mBio. 2013, 4 (6): e00889-13.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ellington MJ, Yearwood L, Ganner M, East C, Kearns AM: Distribution of the ACME-arcA gene among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from England and Wales. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008, 61 (1): 73-77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang R, Braughton KR, Kretschmer D, Bach TH, Queck SY, Li M, Kennedy AD, Dorward DW, Klebanoff SJ, Peschel A, DeLeo FR, Otto M: Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. Nat Med. 2007, 13 (12): 1510-1514.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Bubeck Wardenburg J, Patel RJ, Schneewind O: Surface proteins and exotoxins are required for the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Infect Immun. 2007, 75 (2): 1040-1044.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Montgomery CP, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS: Importance of the global regulators Agr and SaeRS in the pathogenesis of CA-MRSA USA300 infection. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (12): e15177-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Otto M, Echner H, Voelter W, Gotz F: Pheromone cross-inhibition between Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun. 2001, 69 (3): 1957-1960.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Daly KM, Upton M, Sandiford SK, Draper LA, Wescombe PA, Jack RW, O'Connor PM, Rossney A, Gotz F, Hill C, Cotter PD, Ross RP, Tagg JR: Production of the Bsa lantibiotic by community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192 (4): 1131-1142.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Bore E, Langsrud S, Langsrud O, Rode TM, Holck A: Acid-shock responses in Staphylococcus aureus investigated by global gene expression analysis. Microbiology. 2007, 153 (Pt 7): 2289-2303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Wirtz C, Witte W, Wolz C, Goerke C: Transcription of the phage-encoded Panton-Valentine leukocidin of Staphylococcus aureus is dependent on the phage life-cycle and on the host background. Microbiology. 2009, 155 (Pt 11): 3491-3499.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Chaffin DO, Taylor D, Skerrett SJ, Rubens CE: Changes in the Staphylococcus aureus Transcriptome during Early Adaptation to the Lung. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (8): e41329-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Lam TT, Giese B, Chikkaballi D, Kuhn A, Wolber W, Pane-Farre J, Schafer D, Engelmann S, Fraunholz M, Sinha B: Phagolysosomal integrity is generally maintained after Staphylococcus aureus invasion of nonprofessional phagocytes but is modulated by strain 6850. Infect Immun. 2010, 78 (8): 3392-3403.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Boyle-Vavra S, Yin S, Daum RS: The VraS/VraR two-component regulatory system required for oxacillin resistance in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006, 262 (2): 163-171.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement