Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

A transcriptome resource for the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus): insights into koala retrovirus transcription and sequence diversity

  • 1,
  • 2, 3,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 1,
  • 5,
  • 1,
  • 3, 6,
  • 5,
  • 7,
  • 8,
  • 9,
  • 1Email author and
  • 3, 6
BMC Genomics201415:786

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-786

  • Received: 23 May 2014
  • Accepted: 3 September 2014
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The koala, Phascolarctos cinereus, is a biologically unique and evolutionarily distinct Australian arboreal marsupial. The goal of this study was to sequence the transcriptome from several tissues of two geographically separate koalas, and to create the first comprehensive catalog of annotated transcripts for this species, enabling detailed analysis of the unique attributes of this threatened native marsupial, including infection by the koala retrovirus.

Results

RNA-Seq data was generated from a range of tissues from one male and one female koala and assembled de novo into transcripts using Velvet-Oases. Transcript abundance in each tissue was estimated. Transcripts were searched for likely protein-coding regions and a non-redundant set of 117,563 putative protein sequences was produced. In similarity searches there were 84,907 (72%) sequences that aligned to at least one sequence in the NCBI nr protein database. The best alignments were to sequences from other marsupials. After applying a reciprocal best hit requirement of koala sequences to those from tammar wallaby, Tasmanian devil and the gray short-tailed opossum, we estimate that our transcriptome dataset represents approximately 15,000 koala genes. The marsupial alignment information was used to look for potential gene duplications and we report evidence for copy number expansion of the alpha amylase gene, and of an aldehyde reductase gene.

Koala retrovirus (KoRV) transcripts were detected in the transcriptomes. These were analysed in detail and the structure of the spliced envelope gene transcript was determined. There was appreciable sequence diversity within KoRV, with 233 sites in the KoRV genome showing small insertions/deletions or single nucleotide polymorphisms. Both koalas had sequences from the KoRV-A subtype, but the male koala transcriptome has, in addition, sequences more closely related to the KoRV-B subtype. This is the first report of a KoRV-B-like sequence in a wild population.

Conclusions

This transcriptomic dataset is a useful resource for molecular genetic studies of the koala, for evolutionary genetic studies of marsupials, for validation and annotation of the koala genome sequence, and for investigation of koala retrovirus. Annotated transcripts can be browsed and queried at http://koalagenome.org.

Keywords

  • Transcriptome
  • Koala
  • Phascolarctos cinereus
  • Koala retrovirus
  • Alpha amylase
  • Aldehyde reductase

Background

The koala (Phascolarctos cinereus, Goldfuss 1817) is an arboreal Australian marsupial. The species is of scientific interest because of its unique biological adaptations, evolutionary distinctiveness as well as growing concern about its conservation and the impacts of disease on the health of individuals and populations [1]. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies such as whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (mRNA-Seq) can generate insights into these areas of interest.

Biological adaptations

The koala feeds almost exclusively on Eucalyptus (“gum tree”) foliage [1] which is a relatively poor source of energy and is also high in toxins [2]. Koalas display multiple distinctive anatomical, physiological and behavioural characteristics which are thought to be adaptations to this low energy diet. They are highly selective about the leaves they eat and have powerful jaws and ridged molars to enable efficient mastication [1]. Koalas are hindgut fermenters, and have a caecum that is proportionally the largest of any mammal. This enables them to retain and ferment part of their food for long periods, which aids in digestion as well as the retention and cycling of nitrogen [3]. Koalas produce dry faecal pellets to conserve water, as they seldom drink [4]. The brain is very small relative to body weight, perhaps an adaptation to their low energy nutrition [5]. Additionally, koalas have low metabolic rates, and spend much of the day resting [3]. Finally there are likely to be novel aspects to metabolism of toxins in the koala, with several studies published on koala cytochrome P450 genes [69], a family of enzymes with key roles in the oxidative metabolism of a wide range of both xenobiotic and endogenous compounds.

Koalas reach sexual maturity when they are around two years old, with an annual breeding season from October to May. Males use a unique vocal organ [10] to bellow frequently during the breeding season, advertising their presence to each other and to receptive females [1]. As in other marsupials, gestation is brief and is followed by a period of six to eight months growing and developing in the mother’s pouch.

Evolutionary relationships

Modern marsupials (~270 recent species) are confined to Australasia and the Americas, having diverged from eutherian mammals ~160 million years ago (mya) [11]. The Australasian order Diprotodontia is the most diverse of the seven orders of marsupial mammals. This order includes the endemic Australian family Phascolarctidae, of which P. cinereus is the only living representative. The family was more diverse at earlier periods with 18 extinct koala species (in eight genera) known from the fossil record of the last 25 million years [12].

There are currently well-annotated genome sequences available for only three marsupial species (Table 1): the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica)[13], the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii)[14] and the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii)[15], the latter also belonging to a family within the Diprotodontia. The koala last shared a common ancestor with the Tasmanian devil ~60 mya and the tammar wallaby ~55 mya [1618].
Table 1

Characteristics of marsupial species commonly referenced in this study

Common name

Binomial name

Order

Time since divergence from koala (mya)1

Occurrence

Genome sequence

Assembly

N502

NCBI assembly ID

No. Ensembl r.72 coding genes

koala

Phascolarctos cinereus

Diprotodontia

-

Australia

-

-

-

-

tammar wallaby

Macropus eugenii

Diprotodontia

55

Australia

Meug_1.0 3

14.5 kb

GCA_000004035.1

15290

Tasmanian devil

Sarcophilus harrisii

Dasyuromorphia

60

Australia

DEVIL7.0

1.8 Mb

GCA_000189315.1

18788

gray short-tailed opossum

Monodelphis domestica

Didelphimorphia

75

South America

MonDom5

59 Mb

GCF_000002295.2

21327

1According to [16, 17].

2For supercontigs/scaffolds.

3The Meug_2.0 assembly is available but at the time of writing has not been annotated by either Ensembl or NCBI.

Disease

There are a number of diseases which affect koala populations, the two most significant being infection with the pathogenic bacteria Chlamydia and the koala retrovirus (KoRV). The low genetic variation found in some koala populations [1921] may pose an additional threat because low genetic diversity in immune genes could reduce the potential response to disease [22]. This means that any new disease could impact on a high proportion of individuals in a population.

Chlamydia

The manifestations of chlamydial infection vary and include: conjunctivitis, which can lead to blindness; reproductive tract disease, which can cause infertility in females; respiratory tract disease, which can lead to pneumonia; and urinary tract disease, which can spread to the kidneys and eventually cause death [23].

KoRV

KoRV is a gamma retrovirus related to gibbon ape leukemia virus. It is thought to have been introduced relatively recently into koala populations by interspecies transmission [24] although the source remains unknown. Infection with KoRV possibly causes neoplastic disease [24], and may also compromise the immune system, thereby predisposing to other diseases including chlamydiosis [25]. Besides its importance in koala health, KoRV is of interest to virologists because it exists in endogenous (integrated into the germline) and exogenous (infectious) forms [26, 27]. A PCR-based study [28] of KoRV in populations in various parts of Australia found higher prevalence and proviral copy numbers in northern Australia than in southern Australia, and suggested that KoRV endogenisation is ongoing. The 8.4 kb KoRV genome has been sequenced [29] and has the genetic organisation typical of other gamma retroviruses, with 505 bp terminal repeats and three coding regions: gag, encoding core and structural proteins; pol, encoding reverse transcriptase, protease and integrase; and env, encoding coat proteins.

Two subtypes of KoRV (KoRV-A and KoRV-B/KoRV-J) are now recognised, as defined by sequence differences and by the cellular receptor used during infection [30]: KoRV-A uses the sodium-dependent phosphate transporter encoded by the Pit-1 (SLC20A1) gene [31], whereas KoRV-B uses the thiamine transporter encoded by the THTR1 (SLC19A2) gene [25, 32]. This difference in receptor specificity is reflected in sequence variation in a putative receptor binding region in the envelope protein. KoRV-A has been found in Australian koalas [28, 29, 33], in animals kept in zoos in other countries [3436], as well as in museum specimens [37]. KoRV-B is the more recently described subtype and has been found in animals at the Los Angeles Zoo [25]. KoRV-J, a subtype of KoRV isolated at a Japanese zoo [32], was described as a novel subtype but is now considered to belong to the KoRV-B clade [30]. It appears that KoRV-B has a more limited distribution than KoRV-A, is perhaps not endogenized, and has invaded the koala population more recently.

Conservation

At the time of the European settlement of Australia (1788), koalas were widespread in eastern Australia but their current distribution has become highly fragmented. Over most of their distribution, European settlement has had a negative impact due to clearing of habitat, hunting, predation by dogs, injury from cars, and perhaps also introduction of disease [4, 38]. These effects have caused local extinctions, but in some areas (e.g. southern Australia), lack of natural predators and relatively high fecundity has resulted in overpopulation of koalas [1]. Hence, in some areas of Australia koala populations are declining, while in others they are relatively stable, or even increasing, making management strategies for the species complex.

The conservation status of the koala varies across Australia but the national government lists the species as “vulnerable” under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 for combined populations of the states of New South Wales and Queensland and of the Australian Capital Territory.

Aims

Our aim was to develop a transcriptome resource that will be useful for future molecular genetic studies of the koala, evolutionary studies of marsupials, as well as for the koala genome sequencing project which is currently in progress. In this study we used de novo transcriptome assembly to generate a catalog of koala gene transcripts, quantified and annotated these sequences, compared them to the genomes of other marsupials, and examined the transcription of the koala retrovirus.

Methods

Our study uses data obtained from two koala individuals. The tissue sampling, RNA preparation and RNA sequencing were done independently for these individuals following the different procedures described separately below. Subsequently the same post-sequencing bioinformatic procedures were applied to both datasets. A summary of all the RNA-Seq libraries produced is given in Table 2.
Table 2

Sequence reads

Animal

Tissue

Sampling comment

Library

No. raw read pairs

No. trimmed read pairs

No. trimmed unpaired reads

Total trimmed sequence (Gb)

PC

Spleen

Cross section of organ

PC001

58334597

55363111

2335398

10.9

Liver

Cross section of organ

PC004

113366107

96407712

12468062

18.8

Uterus

Cross section of organ

PC005

50835874

48175221

2068163

9.5

Kidney

Mainly renal cortex

PC006

52894485

50152880

2190771

9.9

Lung

Cross section of organ

PC008

57722900

54667996

2369470

10.8

Heart

Heart muscle limited penetration

PC009

108773370

103882594

13127007

20.4

Brain

Neocortex frontal lobe (olfactory lobe not available)

PC010

60678718

57283405

2660545

11.3

Adrenal gland

Cross section of organ

PC011

54127792

51165338

2338177

10.1

Total

-

-

556733843

517098257

39557593

101.8

Bi

Bone marrow

-

-

78316465

78163966

152426

14.1

Kidney

-

-

82942780

82852879

89882

14.9

Liver

-

-

76971566

76062051

908596

13.8

Lymph node

-

-

74560669

74384819

175789

13.4

Salivary gland

-

-

78748770

78670628

78101

14.2

Spleen

-

-

83176067

83083468

92385

15.0

Testes

-

-

81482406

81302672

179622

14.6

Total

-

-

556198723

554520483

1676801

99.9

A study by some of us of the koala immunome, which was based on transcriptomic analysis of a subset of the male individual’s tissues, was recently reported [39].

Female individual

Tissue sampling

A female koala “Pacific Chocolate” (PC; Australian Museum registration number M.45022) from a wild population was euthanized by veterinary staff at the Port Macquarie Koala Hospital following unsuccessful treatment of severe chlamydiosis. Samples from nine tissues (liver, heart, lung, brain, kidney, adrenal gland, spleen, uterus and pancreas) were collected immediately after euthanasia into the gaseous phase of liquid nitrogen (-190°C) to protect the RNA from degradation. Where possible a corer was used to subsample a cross-section of each organ. Multiple small extractions (~10 mg) were performed on tissue samples known to be high in proteins, lipids or nucleases. Samples were stored short term at -80°C until processed for RNA extraction.

RNA preparation

Total RNA was extracted using a Qiagen RNeasy Mini kit with Qiashredder columns and “on-column” RNase-free DNase1 digestion to eliminate genomic DNA. Yields of RNA extracted varied between tissue types giving between ~3 μg and ~25 μg total RNA/sample. A260/A280 absorbance ratios were between 2.0 and 2.1. All samples passed RIN evaluation except for the RNA from pancreas which was not processed further.

cDNA library preparation and sequencing

For mRNA-Seq sample preparation, the Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using 1 μg of total RNA as input. This protocol included steps for selection of polyA-containing RNA, and for enrichment of cDNA fragments with adapters ligated on both ends by using 12 cycles of PCR. The resulting cDNA library insert sizes ranged from 80 bp to 350 bp. The libraries were sequenced as 100 bp paired end (PE) reads using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 and Illumina TruSeq v3 SBS reagents, at the Ramaciotti Centre for Genomics at the University of NSW.

Male individual

Tissue sampling

All animal handling was performed by wildlife veterinarians at Australia Zoo Wildlife Hospital. Samples from seven tissues (bone marrow, kidney, liver, lymph node, salivary gland, spleen, testes) were collected from a single male koala “Birke” (Bi), approximately five years in age, a wild animal which was euthanized as a part of veterinary care following admission to the Hospital because of a dog attack. Samples were immediately stored in 15 mL of RNALater (Ambion) for RNA extraction and stored on ice. All tissue samples were transported to the molecular genetics research facility at Queensland University of Technology and stored at -80°C until further use.

RNA preparation

Total RNA was extracted from ~100 mg of starting tissue using the TRIzol chloroform method (Life Technologies) and purified using an RNeasy Midi extraction kit (Qiagen) for each tissue separately. Following RNA extraction, genomic DNA was removed using the Turbo DNA-free kit according to the manufacturers protocol (Life Technologies). The integrity of total RNA was measured as a RIN score measured on an RNA 6000 Nano-chip (Agilent Technologies) and all samples had RIN scores above eight.

cDNA library preparation and sequencing

Oligo(dT) magnetic beads were used to isolate messenger RNA from > 20 μg of total RNA for each sample and mRNA was sheared into 200–700 bp fragments. Fragmented RNA was converted into cDNA using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) and random hexamer primers (Illumina). Double stranded cDNA was purified with a Qiaquick PCR extraction kit (Qiagen). Fragments underwent end repair and an A-tailing procedure before ligation to Illumina paired-end adapters. These fragments were then size selected (~200 bp) by gel purification. Twelve cycles of PCR were used to increase the concentration of the final cDNA library and sequencing was undertaken using 91 bp paired-end sequencing on a HiSeq 2000 (Illumina), at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI)-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. Each tissue library was sequenced separately.

Sequence trimming and screening

We used the read trimming tool Trimmomatic [40] in paired end mode to clean sequences by applying the following steps. Firstly an ILLUMINILLUMINACLIP step (with parameters seed mismatches = 2, palindrome clip threshold = 40, simple clip threshold = 1) was used to identify and remove matches to Illumina Truseq adapor sequences. Next LEADING and TRAILING steps removed bases from the ends of a read if below a threshold quality of 28. A SLIDINGWINDOW step was used to perform a sliding window trim, with a window size of 4 and a required mean quality of 25. Finally a MINLENGTH step was used to discard sequences shorter than 30b. As well as pairs in which both reads passed filtering, single reads with discarded mates were also retained. We used FastQC [41] to check various measures of sequence quality in both raw and trimmed datasets.

Transcriptome de novoassembly

We constructed single sample and global (all samples from an individual) de novo assemblies with two methods, Trinity [42, 43] and Velvet-Oases [44, 45]. For global assemblies only a digital normalization procedure was first applied to the trimmed sequences by using the script normalize_by_kmer_coverage.pl, which is part of the Trinity software package, with parameters “kmer_size = 25 --min_kmer_cov = 2”.

The Velvet-Oases assemblies were run by using the Python wrapper script oases_pipeline.py which accomplishes the following steps. Firstly the hashing program velveth (version 1.2.0.8) was run using as input the trimmed reads (both the read pairs and the “orphaned” reads whose mates were removed by filtering) in fastq format. Secondly, data were assembled into contigs with velvetg (version 1.2.0.8) using k values stepping by 8 from 75 to 91. Thirdly, velveth and velvetg were used to merge individual k results. Finally the program oases (version 0.2.08) was then used to derive transcripts (including putative isoforms, allelic variants and paralogous variants) from the merged contig sequences. The Trinity assemblies were run by using the wrapper script Trinity.pl with default options.

Non-redundant (NR) transcript sets were created by clustering sequences with cd-hit-est version 4.6 [46] with sequence identity threshold set to 1.0 and retaining cluster representatives (the longest sequences).

Estimation of transcript expression levels and differential expression

For each sample, trimmed sequence reads were aligned to NR transcript sequences using bowtie2 version 2.1.0 [47] with parameters “-X 600 --rdg 6,5 --rfg 6,5 --score-min L,-.6,-.4 --no-discordant --no-mixed -k30 -t”. The resulting alignments were stored in Sequence Alignment/Map (SAM) format and used as input to the program express version 4.0 [48] which estimated transcript expression levels within the sample as fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM).

For each individual we used version 3.4.0 of the BioConductor package edgeR [49] to prepare lists of transcripts whose expression was enriched in a particular library. Our data have no replication and so we used a dispersion value of 0.1 when running the edgeR exactTest function.

Alignment of transcripts to marsupial genomes

For three marsupial species (tammar wallaby, Tasmanian devil and gray short-tailed opossum; see Table 1), genome and predicted protein sequence data were downloaded for use in locally run sequence alignment programs. Genome sequences were downloaded from NCBI. From the Ensembl (release 72) annotations of these three genomes we downloaded protein sequences (translations of all known or novel Ensembl genes) and cDNA sequences. The program blastx version 2.2.27+ [50] was used to align koala transcript sequences to the Ensembl protein sequences.

The program gmap [51] was used to align koala transcript sequences to the opossum genome and to the Tasmanian devil genome and was run with options “ -d genome --cross-species --batch = 4 --tolerant --prunelevel = 3 --npaths = 0 --nthreads = 10 --format = gff3_gene”. We then used the program intersectBed from the bedtools software package [52] to look for overlap between koala gmap alignment features and Ensembl gene features. As input we used two feature format files: a GFF file with the features produced by gmap with type “gene”, and a second file in GTF format describing the Ensembl gene structure (release 72) for opossum and for Tasmanian devil (downloaded from the Ensembl ftp site). The intersectBed program was run with parameters requiring the same strand for both features, and 100% coverage of the Ensembl feature, and the output filtered in the bash shell to produce a non-redundant list of Ensembl gene identifiers.

ORF identification, protein sequence extraction and clustering

We used the Trinity plugin script transcripts_to_best_scoring_ORFs.pl with default settings to derive putative protein products from transcript sequences. To remove redundancy, protein sequences were clustered with cd-hit version 4.6 [46] with sequence identity threshold set to 1.0, and cluster representatives (the longest sequences) were saved.

Protein sequence similarity searches

Protein sequence similarity searches were run on the Barrine HPC cluster at the National Computational Infrastructure Specialised Facility (NCI-SF) in Bioinformatics. The program blastp version 2.2.28+ [50] was run with an expect value cutoff of 1x10-7 and output saved in BLAST archive format which was subsequently reformatted as XML and/or tabular text format using the program blast_formatter.

For annotation of koala sequences, cluster representative protein sequences were used as queries in searches of a local copy of the NCBI nr protein sequence database. Alignment information for the best ten subject sequences was retained.

For reciprocal best hit (RBH) analysis we first used the program makeblastdb to construct BLAST databases from koala cluster representative protein sequences, and from sequences of wallaby, Tasmanian devil and opossum proteins predicted by Ensembl. We searched each of the three Ensembl databases with the koala sequences, retaining information about only the single top scoring alignment. Subsequently the three reciprocal searches (i.e. querying the koala sequence database) were performed, again keeping only the top alignment. Results were imported into a custom MySQL database and an SQL query used to retrieve sequence pairs with a RBH relationship.

Annotation of protein sequences

We used version 2.5.0 of b2g4pipe, the command line interface pipeline script from Blast2GO [53], to map protein BLAST hits to gene ontology (GO) terms and to produce sequence descriptions. A local version of the blast2go relational database was installed for use by b2g4pipe.

KoRV transcript analysis

To identify KoRV transcripts within the koala Velvet-Oases transcriptome, transcript sequences were searched with the program blastn version 2.2.27+ [50] with parameters “-gapopen 1 –gapextend 1” and using as a query the KoRV genome sequence with database accession [GenBank:AF151794].

To detect KoRV splicing events we used the programs TopHat and Cufflinks. Trimmed read pairs were mapped to the KoRV genome sequence AF151794 with version 2.0.11 of TopHat [54] which was run with the parameter “--b2-sensitive”. For the alignment step TopHat called version 2.1.0 of the Bowtie2 alignment program [47]. KoRV transcript structures were predicted by running version 2.1.1 of the program CuffLinks [55] with default parameters using as input the TopHat alignments.

To reassemble KoRV transcripts we produced a subset of reads which align only with the non-LTR portion of the KoRV genome. Firstly, reads were aligned to two KoRV genome reference sequences (KoRV-A variant with accession [GenBank:AF151794] and KoRV-B variant with accession [GenBank:KC779547]) with version 0.6.2-r126 of the program bwa [56]. Aligned reads were identified by filtering with version 0.1.18 of samtools [57]. Read pairs with either read alignment within an LTR were removed and the resulting set of filtered reads were assembled with Trinity [42, 43] using default settings.

Potential protein products of gag, pol and env genes were identified by using the program tblastn version 2.2.27+ [50] to search koala transcript sequences from the Velvet-Oases transcriptome as well as from the reassembled KoRV transcriptome, using as queries the KoRV protein sequences with database accessions [GenBank:AAF15097], [GenBank:AAF15098] and [GenBank:AAF15099].

To detect SNPs and small indels we interrogated the bam files produced by the bwa alignment procedure described above. We filtered redundant reads by running the rmdup command of the samtools program [57] using the “-S” flag. We used the samtools mpileup command to format the alignments in “pileup” format. The “-B” flag was used to disable base alignment quality (BAQ) calls. The “bcftools view” command was then used to convert the alignments to Variant Call Format (VCF) [58]. Variant calling programs in common use such as bcftool’s vcfutils.pl assume VCF data is from a single locus with alleles in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and so are not appropriate for use in this analysis. We therefore filtered these results requiring a minimum read depth of 100 and that the proportion of reads with the alternate allele be at least 0.1. Filtered SNPs and indels were annotated with version 3.5 of the program SnpEff [59].

Multiple sequence alignment

Where necessary, input sequences were reformatted with the EMBOSS program seqret [60]. Multiple sequence alignments were created with the program muscle version 3.8.31 [61] and reformatted with version 2.8 of the JalView multiple sequence alignment editor [62].

Koala genome website

The koala genome website [63] was implemented with version 1.1 of the tripal online genome database construction toolkit [64]. Koala sequence annotations (including GO term assignments and expression levels) were summarized in GFF3 format files. GFF3 files, sequences and BLAST results were loaded into the koala genome database with tools from the tripal toolkit. Online genome browsers are implemented with gbrowse version 2.55 [65] and share the same chado database used by the website.

Ethical approval

No animal ethics committee (AEC) approval was necessary for this work. The two animals referred to in our work were both euthanased as part of standard veterinary care, as is mentioned in the Methods section. Euthanasia was NOT instigated in order to harvest tissue samples. A relevant Australian state government authority (the Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry) makes it clear that AEC approval is not required for "Use of cadavers or samples from animals killed at veterinary clinics or shelters for other (veterinary or management) reasons" (see http://www.daff.qld.gov.au/animal-industries/welfare-and-ethics/using-animals-for-scientific-purposes/what-needs-aec-approval#17141).

Results

Sequence assembly

We constructed de novo transcriptome assemblies from two individual koalas, “Pacific Chocolate” (PC), a female, and “Birke” (Bi), a male. Eight PC tissues and seven Bi tissues were sampled, and mRNA was prepared and used to generate mRNA-Seq sequence data. The number of sequence read pairs generated from each tissue library ranged from 51-113 million in PC and 75-83 million in Bi, and for all tissues combined was 556 million in each individual. After applying adapter removal and quality control procedures there remained in total, for each individual, over half a billion read pairs plus a much smaller number of unpaired reads, together making up approximately 100 Gb of usable sequence per individual (Table 2).

We performed three sets of de novo transcriptome assemblies. In a first set of pilot assemblies (Additional file 1) we investigated two different assembly methods (Velvet-Oases and Trinity). In a second set of assemblies (Additional file 1) we investigated the effect on Velvet-Oases assembly outcomes of reducing the size of the input data with a digital normalization procedure. Finally, based on the pilot assembly results, we chose to construct our global (all tissue libraries) assemblies for PC and for Bi using digital normalization followed by assembly with Velvet-Oases. Normalization reduced the global input size in PC from 1,073,754,107 reads to 86,495,216 reads (8%), and in Bi from 1,110,717,767 reads to 74,146,546 reads (7%). After assembly with Velvet-Oases and then clustering with cd-hit-est we obtained non-redundant sets of 370,030 sequences for PC and 381,958 sequences for Bi (Table 3). The number of Tasmanian devil genes covered was 15,490 for PC and 15,328 for Bi, both of which are appreciably larger than the numbers produced by any of the individual library assemblies. These numbers are also consistent with the number of genes (15,500) which result from merging the lists of all genes covered by the individual non-normalized Velvet-Oases assemblies given in Additional file 1. We conclude that the normalization has not caused significant loss of gene coverage and that the global assemblies represent a large number of genes. The two global Velvet-Oases assemblies were used in all our subsequent analyses.
Table 3

Koala transcriptome assemblies

Input sequences

No. transcripts

Max. length

Mean length

N50

No. proteins hit1

No. genes2

All PC libraries

370030

82521

1688

3381

17357

15490

All Bi libraries

381958

22721

1124

2531

17078

15328

1Total number of distinct protein sequences in best-hit translated BLAST alignments of koala transcripts with Ensembl Tasmanian devil proteins.

2Total number of distinct Tasmanian devil genes.

Alignment of transcripts to marsupial genomes

Koala transcriptome sequences were aligned to the opossum and Tasmanian devil genomes. A large proportion (72%) of PC transcripts could be aligned to the Tasmanian devil genome, although the proportion was slightly lower for Bi (Table 4). As expected, the proportion of reads aligned to the opossum genome is lower (since this species is evolutionarily more distant) with the proportion of aligned reads being 55% and 45% for PC and Bi, respectively. We looked at the extent to which alignment locations overlap the locations of predicted genes. There were a large number of Ensembl genes (nearly 16,000 in each genome) that could be identified this way (Table 5). The vast majority of these were protein-coding genes but other categories of gene were also represented, although this was at a proportionally lower level. The number of Tasmanian devil protein-coding genes with overlapping koala transcripts was consistent with the number of genes previously found using BLAST (Table 3).
Table 4

Alignment of koala transcripts to two marsupial genomes

Animal

Opossum genome

Tasmanian devil genome

No. mapped transcripts

No. unmapped transcripts

No. mapped transcripts

No. unmapped transcripts

PC

204041 (55%)

165989 (45%)

267830 (72%)

102200 (28%)

Bi

172910 (45%)

209048 (55%)

195308 (51%))

186650 (49%)

Table 5

Ensembl genes which overlap with aligned koala transcripts

Gene category

Total

Overlapping PC transcript(s)

Overlapping Bi transcript(s)

Overlapping either PC or Bi transcript(s)

Opossum

protein_coding

21327

14624

14170

15584

pseudogene

722

214

211

288

snRNA

843

118

98

138

snoRNA

319

206

184

227

miRNA

412

107

82

127

rRNA

176

22

19

25

misc_RNA

77

10

8

10

Mt_tRNA

21

3

0

3

Mt_rRNA

2

1

0

1

total

23899

15305

14772

16403

Tasmanian devil

protein_coding

18788

14971

14480

15773

pseudogene

178

114

115

128

snRNA

503

94

57

102

snoRNA

277

202

185

213

miRNA

486

166

113

182

rRNA

87

14

10

14

misc_RNA

113

20

20

21

Mt_tRNA

22

0

0

0

Mt_rRNA

2

0

0

0

total

20456

15581

14980

16433

Annotation of protein sequences

For each animal, Velvet-Oases transcripts were scanned for likely open reading frames which were translated and then clustered to produce a non-redundant set of protein sequences (Table 6). The two sets of protein sequences were also combined to produce an overall set of 117,563 sequences. Clustered sequences were used as queries in protein BLAST searches of the NCBI nr protein database. These results were then used with blast2go to annotate sequences with gene ontology (GO) terms. In the PC protein sequence dataset there were 23,658 sequences annotated with at least one GO term, while in the Bi set there were 34,524 GO-term annotated sequences.
Table 6

Similarity searching and blast2go annotation of koala NR proteins

Animal

No. proteins

With nr database protein BLAST hit

With GO term(s) assigned

PC

78208

56872

23658

Bi

63554

47161

34524

The majority (77%) of the top-scoring alignments were to sequences from other marsupials and this was examined in greater detail in a second set of protein BLAST similarity searches. Koala protein sequences were compared with the predicted proteomes of three marsupials, wallaby, devil and opossum (Table 7). In each of the three proteomes there are more than 12,000 sequences which were “hit”, even after a reciprocal best hit (RBH) requirement is applied. We also show the number of genes since multiple proteins can be encoded by a single gene, although this is not common in our dataset. Some of the variation in the number of genes found (smallest number in the wallaby and largest in the opossum) is probably due to differences in the sequence assembly and annotation: the number of Ensembl genes is 15,290 in wallaby, 18,788 devil and 21,327 in opossum. The RBH results are summarized in Additional file 2 and indicate that our transcriptome data represent approximately 15,000 koala genes.
Table 7

Number of sequences (and genes, in parentheses) with which koala protein sequences were aligned in protein BLAST searches of three marsupial proteomes

Animal

Macropus eugenii

Sarcophilus harrisii

Monodelphis domestica

BH

RBH

BH

RBH

BH

RBH

PC

12842 (12820)

12206 (12198)

15882 (14548)

14065 (13761)

15391 (15045)

14203 (14101)

Bi

12554 (12538)

11770 (11763)

15379 (14259)

13494 (13,269)

14981 (1473)

13589 (13507)

PC + Bi

13344 (13318)

12673 (12663)

16957 (15285)

14931 (14457)

16233 (15799)

14922 (14774)

BH: best hit. RBH: reciprocal BH.

Tissue expression levels

The 100 most abundant transcripts with BLAST annotations in each tissue are listed in a spreadsheet (Additional file 3). We also produced lists of transcripts expressed in a tissue-specific manner (Additional file 4), although this categorization is not robust because our study was not designed to identify differential expression of transcripts. Prominent in the lists of highly expressed sequences are transcripts encoding viral proteins which are derived from KoRV (see below).

Gene duplications

We used the comparisons of our koala protein sequences with opossum, devil and wallaby protein sequences to identify possible gene duplications by looking for cases where two or more koala sequences share the same subject sequence as their “best hit” in a protein BLAST search. There are several factors that complicate this approach, including sequencing errors, assembly errors, coding region prediction errors, allelic variation, isoforms, and incomplete or inaccurate annotation of reference genomes. Nevertheless there were two putative examples of gene expansion which we investigated.

The most obvious gene duplication candidate was alpha amylase, a gene known to undergo copy number variation in a number of species [66]. In the human genome there are several variants of this gene as well as copy number variation which is subject to positive selection [67]. In both opossum and devil genomes, there is only a single gene annotated by Ensembl, while in the wallaby there are two genes, although both appear incomplete, perhaps because of the low-coverage genome assembly employed. In contrast, in the PC and Bi koala transcriptomes, we found nine and ten distinct full length alpha amylase protein sequences respectively (Additional file 5). Even allowing for the possibility that some of this variation is allelic, this result suggests that there may have been expansion of the alpha amylase gene in koala of up to 5-10 gene copies. The protein sequences of alpha amylase showed between 86% and 99% pairwise sequence identity. Interestingly the koala transcripts are not expressed in the salivary gland sample, and are instead expressed most highly in lung (PC) and in liver, testis and spleen (Bi).

The second gene for which we found convincing evidence for gene family expansion in the koala is an aldehyde reductase gene, encoding aflatoxin aldehyde reductase, which is involved in detoxification of aldehydes and ketones. Ensembl annotations predict two genes in the opossum genome, two in the wallaby genome and one in the Tasmanian devil genome, although we note that the NCBI gene database includes two Tasmanian devil genes. As with the alpha amylase genes, the wallaby sequences appear to be incomplete. In the PC and Bi koala transcriptomes we found seven and eight distinct full length aldehyde reductase protein sequences respectively (Additional file 6). Even allowing for the possibility that some of this variation is allelic, this result suggests that there may have been expansion of the gene of up to 4-8 gene copies. The protein sequences show between 83% and 99% pairwise sequence identity. We speculate that the enzyme has a role in the metabolism of toxins and that the expansion of this gene is part of the koala’s evolutionary adaptation to its diet of Eucalyptus leaves.

For both the alpha amylase gene and the aldehyde reductase gene we eliminated the possibility that variations were due to sequencing error by inspecting alignments of sequence reads to the predicted transcripts (analyses not shown).

Koala retrovirus transcription

KoRV transcripts are present in the transcriptomes of both individuals studied. Due to its importance to koala health and also because of its intrinsic interest, we examined KoRV transcription in more detail.

KoRV transcripts in Velvet-Oases assemblies

In both individuals, KoRV transcripts are expressed in all tissues sampled. The expression profiles are shown in Figure 1. In PC, expression is highest in lung, liver and spleen, and in Bi, expression is highest in bone marrow and salivary gland and relatively low in testis. The proportion of the total level of expression (as estimated by summing FPKM values for all transcripts within a tissue) which is due to KoRV, ranges from 0.2% to 0.7% (lung) in PC and 0.01% (testes) to 1.3% (salivary gland) in Bi.
Figure 1
Figure 1

KoRV expression profile in PC and Bi.

Splicing of KoRV transcripts

We aligned reads to a reference KoRV genome sequence with Bowtie2 and then used Cufflinks to predict transcript structure and to estimate the abundance of predicted transcripts. Cufflinks predicted two transcripts: a near-full-length unspliced transcript, and an env transcript with a single intron (Figure 2). This is consistent with the canonical transcriptional arrangement observed in this class of retrovirus [68]. The env transcript intron extends from positions 566-5691 with respect to the KoRV genome sequence we used as a reference (database accession [GenBank:AF151794]). Figure 3 shows a comparison of the env splice sites of KoRV and Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV), a well-characterised gamma retrovirus. The KoRV donor site is equivalent to that reported for MMLV [69, 70] although the acceptor site is in a slightly different position and corresponds to one of the potential minor acceptor sites discussed in reference [70].
Figure 2
Figure 2

Transcription of KoRV. A. Organisation of the KoRV genome [GenBank:AF151794]. B. structure of transcripts predicted by Cufflinks. C. two transcripts from reassembled KoRV transcriptome (PC spleen). Note LTR sequences excluded from this assembly. D. Depth of coverage with reads aligned with bwa (PC spleen).

Figure 3
Figure 3

KoRV splice sites. Alignment of env transcript splice donor (A) and acceptor (B) regions from Moloney murine retrovirus (MMLV; database accession [GenBank:AF462057]) and koala retrovirus (KoRV; database accession [GenBank:AF151794]). Positions with identical nucleotides are shaded blue. Intronic sequences are in lower case. Red triangles indicate splice sites supported by experimental evidence.

Figure 2D shows the depth of coverage of the KoRV genome by aligned sequence reads. It is apparent that the level of coverage over the env gene is higher than over the other genes. There is uneven coverage across env which might be explained by sequence variation in the early part of the gene (see below), lowering the efficiency of alignment of reads to that region. Nevertheless, the overall pattern is consistent with a model in which two transcripts are expressed, with the spliced env transcript at a higher level than the unspliced transcript. The Cufflinks estimation of FPKM expression level of the env transcript is approximately three times higher than that for the longer unspliced transcript.

Reassembly of KoRV transcripts

There are 141 PC transcripts and 94 Bi Velvet-Oases transcripts which contain KoRV sequences. However these transcripts do not appear to be correctly assembled, most likely because of the presence of the 505 bp LTR repeat, and so we reassembled KoRV transcripts using only non-LTR reads. The resulting transcripts show much less rearrangement than initial Oases assemblies and are likely to be a better representation of the KoRV transcriptome. In both individuals we were able to reconstruct transcripts over 7 kb in length, corresponding to the non-LTR portion of the KoRV genome. The reassembled KoRV transcriptome includes spliced env transcripts consistent with the Cufflinks results. Figure 2C shows selected transcripts from reassembly of transcripts from the PC spleen library.

SNP and small indel variations

We compared our KoRV sequences to a published KoRV-A genome sequence ([GenBank: AF151794]) and found 233 sites at which there are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or small insertions/deletions (indels). These are summarized in Additional file 7. There are 138 sites in PC only, 61 sites in Bi only, and 34 sites in common. There are 32 sites which also occur in a list of 138 polymorphisms reported in a recent study of KoRV sequence variation in modern and museum koala DNA samples [71]. Most of the variations we observed occur within an individual and are not just a difference between our samples and the reference. There are variations which occur within the gag, pol and env coding regions and these have various effects, including synonymous and nonsynonymous codon changes, premature termination and frame shifts caused by indels. Of note is a G/A polymorphism at position 6413 which changes Ala to Thr and restores the “CETTG” motif which is implicated in viral fusion activity [72]. To an extent, variation can be attributed to the accumulation of random mutations at multiple endogenised KoRV proviral sites within the genome. However, the number of changes in PC is higher than in Bi (particularly in the env gene) suggesting that in PC there is an additional cause of variation.

Variation in predicted protein sequences

We examined the reassembled KoRV sequences to find gag, pol and env sequences, and compared these with published sequences. We found examples of full length gag, pol and env protein sequences in both individuals. In addition there are transcripts with partial sequences and also some with mutations such as frameshifts or short deletions (not shown).

An alignment of full-length (521 amino acid) gag protein sequences is shown in Additional file 8. There are three distinct sequences: two sequences are found in both PC and Bi, and one additional sequence is found only in PC. All the sequences are nearly identical with only two amino acid changes between the two most divergent sequences.

We found six distinct full-length (1,127 amino acid) pol protein sequences (Additional file 9). One of these is found in both PC and Bi, one in Bi only and four in PC only. As with the gag proteins all these sequences are very closely related (over 99% identity) and there are only six amino acid changes between the two most divergent sequences.

In contrast to gag and pol, the env protein sequences show considerably more variation. Most variation occurs between positions 90-150 within a hypervariable region which has been called “variable region A” (VRA) [31]. We found eight distinct full-length (659 to 667 amino acid) sequences which we divided into three groups on the basis of similarity to published sequences. The first group (aligned in Additional file 10) consists of five sequences most closely related to the published KoRV-A env sequence with database accession [GenBank:BAM67147] [36]. PC and Bi each share a sequence identical to the published sequence and PC has four additional closely related sequences.

A second group of env sequences (aligned in Additional file 11) is most closely related to the published KoRV-A env sequence with database accession [GenBank:BAN63360] [32]. PC has a single sequence with 20 amino acid differences from the published sequence and Bi a single sequence with 23 differences. The Bi and PC sequences are 97% identical (17 amino acid changes over 665). Although BAN63360 has a high level (94%) of sequence identity to the published exemplar of the first group (BAM67147) we nevertheless consider it categorically distinct because of the necessity for introducing gaps into the alignment at three positions, and also because of the concentration of amino acid changes at positions 99-145 which is within variable region A (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Alignment of three PC KoRV env protein sequences. The red line marks variable region A.

The third group (Additional file 12) comprises a single sequence found in PC only which is most closely related to the published sequence with database accession [GenBank:AGO86848] [25]. In contrast to the published sequences mentioned above, [GenBank:AGO86848] is a KoRV-B sequence. There are no KoRV-B-like env sequences in the Bi transcriptome. To check this we aligned Bi reads to a KoRV-B reference sequence. Although reads align to regions conserved in KoRV-A and KoRV-B there are no alignments in the KoRV-B variable region A (result not shown). In summary there is a KoRV-B-like env gene expressed in PC but not in Bi. PC-derived sequences representing each of the three groups are aligned in Figure 4.

Discussion

Transcriptome resource

Our transcriptome dataset covering approximately 15,000 koala genes is a valuable resource for koala genetic studies and evolutionary studies of marsupials and other vertebrates. The transcript sequences have been quantified, annotated, and made available for browsing and searching at http://koalagenome.org. We envisage several uses of the dataset, some of which can be summarised as follows. Firstly, it is straightforward to get the sequences of all koala transcripts relevant to a field of interest. As an example, characterisation of the immune capability of the koala can inform prophylactic and therapeutic strategies but despite interest in this area there has as yet been only a handful of genes that have been identified and characterised. The expression of the koala interferon gamma gene has been investigated [39] because of its key role in the immune response to chlamydial infection. A more recent study [73] identified and studied the expression profiles of interferon gamma and several other koala immune response genes. Our transcriptome resource now enables the identification of a much larger number of koala immune response genes. Secondly, the dataset can used to help improve gene annotation of other marsupial genomes. We note that many of our sequences align to non-annotated regions of the opossum and Tasmanian devil genomes (not shown). Some may correspond to genes which are as yet unannotated by Ensembl. Thirdly, although there are only two individuals in this study, given their geographic separation, it should be possible to generate candidate SNPs for use in population studies. Fourthly, since we have studied a male and a female it may be possible to investigate gender-specific gene expression. Finally, the transcriptome will also aid with assembly and annotation of the koala genome, a project that is in progress.

KoRV

This work is the most detailed report to date of KoRV transcription, and the first report of variation in KoRV expression levels in different tissues. We have analysed the KoRV transcriptional organisation and detailed its sequence variation, including the observation of a KoRV-B sequence. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of a KoRV-B sequence in a wild population.

Transcriptional organization

The genetic organisation of gamma retroviruses, including KoRV and MMLV, is well understood [68, 74]. Transcription proceeds from a promoter in the 5′ LTR and proceeds through the viral genes to the 3′ LTR which contains a polyadenlylation signal. This polygenic transcript is used to express the gag-pol polyprotein. The virus usually also produces a spliced transcript which contains the env gene only. Our analysis of KoRV transcripts confirms that an env is spliced in accordance with the standard model, with splice sites very similar to those in MMLV, a well-characterised gamma retrovirus. Although our data also include non-canonical KoRV transcripts (unspliced portions of the genome) these are likely to be the result of assembly artefacts.

KoRV-B-like sequences

We approached the assessment of KoRV sequence variation in two ways: by calling SNPs and indels from reads aligned to a KoRV reference sequence; and by examining assembled transcripts. Both approaches indicate that there is a higher level of sequence diversity in PC than in Bi. Both individuals have a variety of KoRV-A sequences which is consistent with earlier reports of KoRV-A env sequence variation within an individual [27, 30, 32, 35]. In addition, the PC transcriptome includes an env sequence which appears to belong to the KoRV-B subtype. Animals from the Los Angeles Zoo studied by Xu et al. [25] were positive for both KoRV-A and KoRV-B, with the mode of spread of KoRV-B consistent with that of an exogenous virus. A possibility is that while PC and Bi are both positive for endogenous KoRV-A, PC has, in addition, an exogenous KoRV-B infection.

KoRV-B is thought to have emerged more recently than KoRV-A but its origin is not understood. A possibility is that it derived from recombination between KoRV-A and another, as yet, unidentified retrovirus. We searched our transcriptome data for sequences that might provide a clue as to the origin of KoRV-B. We note that some Velvet-Oases transcripts are similar to the possum gamma retrovirus sequence with database accession [GenBank:AF224725] [75] (alignments not shown). However, this virus does not seem to be complete and is most likely an endogenised retrovirus incapable of infection, and the sequences are quite distinct from the KoRV sequences.

Xu et al. [25] suggest that KoRV-B is linked with the development of neoplastic disease and propose that assessment of the KoRV-B status of animals should become part of the management of captive populations. The KoRV-B-like sequences we have assembled, together with the KoRV SNP data, should be useful in the development of sequence-based screening tests.

Assembly artefacts

Assembly of KoRV transcripts proved challenging. Our Velvet-Oases assembly procedure produced a number of KoRV transcripts but three observations suggest that they needed improvement. Firstly, some of the KoRV transcript sequences are derived from Velvet-Oases loci that have been partitioned into thousands of transcripts. Although this number was subsequently greatly reduced (in the cd-hit step to remove redundant sequences) it shows that reconstruction of KoRV transcripts is categorically different from reconstruction of most other transcripts, whose Velvet-Oases loci are not partitioned to such a degree. Secondly, in no case is the organisation of KoRV transcripts consistent with the classic transcriptional organisation of gamma retrovirus genomes. There is considerable variation in the makeup of these transcripts: the amount of the KoRV genome (which is 8.4 kb in total) present varies from fragments as small as 40 bp to near full-length. In many cases parts of the KoRV genome are repeated or rearranged and the LTR is placed centrally rather than at an end. Thirdly, some transcripts also contain reading frame errors which, on inspection of read alignments to KoRV reference sequence, are not supported (analysis not shown). Together, these observations suggested to us that in this particular set of transcripts i) the Velvet-Oases merging step is introducing errors and ii) the repetitious nature of the virus is confounding assembly. There are two sources of KoRV repeats: firstly, KoRV, like other retroviruses, contains a long terminal repeat (LTR) sequence (the KoRV-A LTR is 505 bp); and secondly, the integrated virus is present at multiple loci in the genome (viral copy number has been estimated at up to 200 copies per cell [28]). Reassembly with non-LTR reads seemed to mitigate the problem since we were able to produce reconstructed KoRV transcripts with the expected structure. We have confidence in the KoRV sequences reported here since i) in some cases the sequences match exactly with previously published data; and ii) the assembly is supported by alignments of sequence reads back to the transcripts (analysis not shown). The sequencing of the genome of these two individuals will reveal the full extent of KoRV provirus sequence diversity.

Conclusions

The transcriptome resource presented here is a useful resource for studies of genetic diversity within populations, of genes underlying disease resistance, and of the genetic basis of the unique adaptive features of the koala. The results increase our knowledge of KoRV transcription and of the extent of KoRV sequence variation.

Availability of supporting data

Accession numbers

Sequence reads have been deposited with the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and have received accessions SRR1203868, SRR1205138, SRR1205176, SRR1205998, SRR1205218, SRR1205223, SRR1205222 and SRR1205224 (PC); and SRR1106690, SRR1106707, SRR1121764, SRR1122141, SRR1207973, SRR1207974 and SRR1207975 (Bi).

Assembled sequences can be queried and browsed at the koala genome website [63]. Alignments of koala transcripts to the opossum and Tasmanian devil genomes are available as DAS sources summarised on the koalagenome.org DSN page [76].

Authors’ information

The authors are involved in the Koala Genome Consortium [63].

These authors Rebecca N Johnson and Peter Timms are joint last authors of this work.

Abbreviations

PC: 

Pacific Chocolate

Bi: 

Birke

KoRV: 

koala retrovirus

mya: 

Million years ago

FPKM: 

Fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped

Bp: 

Base pairs

kb: 

Kilobase pairs

Mb: 

Megabase pairs

Gb: 

Gigabase pairs.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Bioplatforms Australia funded the transcriptome sequencing of the eight tissues from Pacific Chocolate (PC). Sequencing of the tissues from Birke (Bi) was part funded via an ARC Linkage grant to PT. The Australian Museum Foundation funded Australian Museum bioinformatics staff time. This research also has the assistance of resources provided at the National Computational Infrastructure Specialised Facility (NCI-SF) in Bioinformatics through the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme supported by the Australian Government. MRW and ZC acknowledge support from the Australian Government EIF Super Science Scheme, the New South Wales State Government Science Leveraging Fund and the University of New South Wales.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
(2)
School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4001, Australia
(3)
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, 4059, Australia
(4)
School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4001, Australia
(5)
Systems Biology Initiative, School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
(6)
Present address: Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC, Queensland, 4558, Australia
(7)
Port Macquarie Koala Hospital, Cnr. Roto Place and Lord St, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, Australia
(8)
Australia Zoo Wildlife Hospital, 1638 Steve Irwin Way, Beerwah, Queensland, 4519, Australia
(9)
Endeavour Veterinary Ecology Pty Ltd, 1695 Pumicestone Road, Toorbul, Queensland, 4510, Australia

References

  1. van Dyke S, Strahan R: The Mammals of Australia. 2008, Australia: New Holland Publishers, 3Google Scholar
  2. Pahl LI, Hume ID: Preferences for Eucalyptus species of the New England Tablelands and initial development of an artificial diet for koalas. Biology of the Koala. Edited by: Lee AK, Handasyde KA, Sanson GD. 1990, Sydney: Surrey Beatty and Sons, 123-128.Google Scholar
  3. Hume ID: Marsupial Nutrition. 1999, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Martin RW, Handasyde KA: The Koala. Natural History, Conservation and Management. 1999, Sydney: UNSW PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Haight JR, Nelson JE: A brain that doesn’t fit its skull: a comparative study of the brain and endocranium of the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus (Marsupialia: Phascolarctidae). Possums and Opossums: Studies in Evolution. Edited by: Archer M. 1987, Sydney, Australia: Royal Zoological Society of NSW, 331-352.Google Scholar
  6. El-Merhibi A, Ngo SN, Crittenden TA, Marchant CL, Stupans I, McKinnon RA: Cytochrome P450 CYP3A in marsupials: cloning and characterisation of the second identified CYP3A subfamily member, isoform 3A78 from koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011, 154 (4): 367-376. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2011.07.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones BR, El-Merhibi A, Ngo SN, Stupans I, McKinnon RA: Hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes belonging to the CYP2C subfamily from an Australian marsupial, the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008, 148 (3): 230-237. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.05.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kong S, Ngo SN, McKinnon RA, Stupans I: Cloning and expression of koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) liver cytochrome P450 reductase. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009, 150 (1): 1-9. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2009.01.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ngo SN, McKinnon RA, Stupans I: Cloning and expression of koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) liver cytochrome P450 CYP4A15. Gene. 2006, 376 (1): 123-132. 10.1016/j.gene.2006.02.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlton BD, Frey R, McKinnon AJ, Fritsch G, Fitch WT, Reby D: Koalas use a novel vocal organ to produce unusually low-pitched mating calls. Curr Biol. 2013, 23 (23): R1035-R1036. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.069.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Luo ZX, Yuan CX, Meng QJ, Ji Q: A Jurassic eutherian mammal and divergence of marsupials and placentals. Nature. 2011, 476 (7361): 442-445. 10.1038/nature10291.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Black KH, Camens AB, Archer M, Hand SJ: Herds overhead: Nimbadon lavarackorum (Diprotodontidae), heavyweight herbivores in the Miocene forests of Australia. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (11): e48213-10.1371/journal.pone.0048213.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Mikkelsen TS, Wakefield MJ, Aken B, Amemiya CT, Chang JL, Duke S, Garber M, Gentles AJ, Goodstadt L, Heger A, Jurka J, Kamal M, Mauceli E, Searle SM, Sharpe T, Baker ML, Batzer MA, Benos PV, Belov K, Clamp M, Cook A, Cuff J, Das R, Davidow L, Deakin JE, Fazzari MJ, Glass JL, Grabherr M, Greally JM, Gu W: Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences. Nature. 2007, 447 (7141): 167-177. 10.1038/nature05805.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Murchison EP, Schulz-Trieglaff OB, Ning Z, Alexandrov LB, Bauer MJ, Fu B, Hims M, Ding Z, Ivakhno S, Stewart C, Ng BL, Wong W, Aken B, White S, Alsop A, Becq J, Bignell GR, Cheetham RK, Cheng W, Connor TR, Cox AJ, Feng Z-P, Gu Y, Grocock RJ, Harris SR, Khrebtukova I, Kingsbury Z, Kowarsky M, Kreiss A, Luo S-J: Genome sequencing and analysis of the Tasmanian devil and its transmissible cancer. Cell. 2012, 148 (4): 780-791. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.065.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Renfree MB, Papenfuss AT, Deakin JE, Lindsay J, Heider T, Belov K, Rens W, Waters PD, Pharo EA, Shaw G, Wong ESW, Lefevre CM, Nicholas KR, Kuroki Y, Wakefield MJ, Zenger KR, Wang C, Ferguson-Smith M, Nicholas FW, Hickford D, Yu H, Short KR, Siddle HV, Frankenberg SR, Chew KY, Menzies BR, Stringer JM, Suzuki S, Hore TA, Delbridge ML, Wong ESW, Lefevre CM, Nicholas KR, Kuroki Y, Wakefield MJ, Zenger KR, Wang C, Ferguson-Smith M, Nicholas FW, Hickford D, Yu H, Short KR, Siddle HV, Frankenberg SR, Chew KY, Menzies BR, Stringer JM, Suzuki S, Hore TA, Delbridge ML, et al: Genome sequence of an Australian kangaroo, Macropus eugenii, provides insight into the evolution of mammalian reproduction and development. Genome Biol. 2011, 12 (8): R81-10.1186/gb-2011-12-8-r81.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Meredith RW, Westerman M, Case JA, Springer MS: A phylogeny and timescale for marsupial evolution based on sequences for five nuclear genes. J Mammal Evol. 2008, 15 (1): 1-36. 10.1007/s10914-007-9062-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Meredith RW, Westerman M, Springer MS: A phylogeny of Diprotodontia (Marsupialia) based on sequences for five nuclear genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009, 51: 554-571. 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.02.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Archer M, Hand SJ, Godthelp H: Riversleigh. The Story of Animals in Ancient Rainforests of Inland Australia. 1991, Sydney: Reed BooksGoogle Scholar
  19. Cristescu R, Cahill V, Sherwin WB, Handasyde KA, Carlyon K, Whisson D, Herbert CA, Carlsson BLJ, Wilton AN, Cooper DW: Inbreeding and testicular abnormalities in a bottlenecked population of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Wildl Res. 2009, 36: 299-308. 10.1071/WR08010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Houlden BA, England PR, Taylor AC, Greville WD, Sherwin WB: Low genetic variability of the koala Phascolarctos cinereus in south-eastern Australia following a severe population bottleneck. Mol Ecol. 1996, 5 (2): 269-281. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1996.tb00314.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Seymour AM, Montgomery ME, Costello BH, Ihle S, Johnsson G, St John B, Taggart DA, Houlden BA: High effective inbreeding coefficients correlate with morphological abnormalities in populations of South Australian koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Anim Conserv. 2001, 4 (3): 211-219. 10.1017/S1367943001001251.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lau Q, Jaratlerdsiri W, Griffith JE, Gongora J, Higgins DP: MHC class II diversity of koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) populations across their range. Heredity. 2014, Advance online publication, doi:10.1038/hdy.2014.30Google Scholar
  23. Polkinghorne A, Hanger J, Timms P: Recent advances in understanding the biology, epidemiology and control of chlamydial infections in koalas. Vet Microbiol. 2013, 165 (3–4): 214-223.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Denner J, Young PR: Koala retroviruses: characterization and impact on the life of koalas. Retrovirology. 2013, 10: 108-10.1186/1742-4690-10-108.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu W, Stadler CK, Gorman K, Jensen N, Kim D, Zheng H, Tang S, Switzer WM, Pye GW, Eiden MV: An exogenous retrovirus isolated from koalas with malignant neoplasias in a US zoo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013, 110 (28): 11547-11552. 10.1073/pnas.1304704110.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Stoye JP: Koala retrovirus: a genome invasion in real time. Genome Biol. 2006, 7 (11): 241-10.1186/gb-2006-7-11-241.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Tarlinton RE, Meers J, Young PR: Retroviral invasion of the koala genome. Nature. 2006, 442 (7098): 79-81. 10.1038/nature04841.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Simmons GS, Young PR, Hanger JJ, Jones K, Clarke D, McKee JJ, Meers J: Prevalence of koala retrovirus in geographically diverse populations in Australia. Aust Vet J. 2012, 90 (10): 404-409. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.00964.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanger JJ, Bromham LD, McKee JJ, O’Brien TM, Robinson WF: The nucleotide sequence of koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) retrovirus: a novel type C endogenous virus related to Gibbon ape leukemia virus. J Virol. 2000, 74 (9): 4264-4272. 10.1128/JVI.74.9.4264-4272.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Shimode S, Nakagawa S, Yoshikawa R, Shojima T, Miyazawa T: Heterogeneity of koala retrovirus isolates. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588 (1): 41-46. 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.10.046.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Oliveira NM, Farrell KB, Eiden MV: In vitro characterization of a koala retrovirus. J Virol. 2006, 80 (6): 3104-3107. 10.1128/JVI.80.6.3104-3107.2006.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Shojima T, Yoshikawa R, Hoshino S, Shimode S, Nakagawa S, Ohata T, Nakaoka R, Miyazawa T: Identification of a novel subgroup of Koala retrovirus from Koalas in Japanese zoos. J Virol. 2013, 87 (17): 9943-9948. 10.1128/JVI.01385-13.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Canfield PJ, Sabine JM, Love DN: Virus particles associated with leukaemia in a koala. Aust Vet J. 1988, 65 (10): 327-328. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1988.tb14518.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Fiebig U, Hartmann MG, Bannert N, Kurth R, Denner J: Transspecies transmission of the endogenous koala retrovirus. J Virol. 2006, 80 (11): 5651-5654. 10.1128/JVI.02597-05.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Miyazawa T, Shojima T, Yoshikawa R, Ohata T: Isolation of koala retroviruses from koalas in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2011, 73 (1): 65-70. 10.1292/jvms.10-0250.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Shojima T, Hoshino S, Abe M, Yasuda J, Shogen H, Kobayashi T, Miyazawa T: Construction and characterization of an infectious molecular clone of Koala retrovirus. J Virol. 2013, 87 (9): 5081-5088. 10.1128/JVI.01584-12.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Avila-Arcos MC, Ho SY, Ishida Y, Nikolaidis N, Tsangaras K, Honig K, Medina R, Rasmussen M, Fordyce SL, Calvignac-Spencer S, Willerslev E, Gilbert MT, Helgen KM, Roca AL, Greenwood AD: One hundred twenty years of koala retrovirus evolution determined from museum skins. Mol Biol Evol. 2013, 30 (2): 299-304. 10.1093/molbev/mss223.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Reed PC, Lunney D, Walker PA: A 1986-1987 survey of the koala Phascolarctos cinereus (Goldfuss) in New South Wales and an ecological interpretation of its distribution. Biology of the Koala. Edited by: Lee AS, Handasyde KA, Sanderson LA. 1990, Sydney: Surrey Beatty and Sons, 55-74.Google Scholar
  39. Mathew M, Pavasovic A, Prentis PJ, Beagley KW, Timms P, Polkinghorne A: Molecular characterisation and expression analysis of interferon gamma in response to natural Chlamydia infection in the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus. Gene. 2013, 527 (2): 570-577. 10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.019.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B: Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014, Advance online publication, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170Google Scholar
  41. Babraham bioinformatics - FastQC a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. [http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/]
  42. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q, Chen Z, Mauceli E, Hacohen N, Gnirke A, Rhind N, di Palma F, Birren BW, Nusbaum C, Lindblad-Toh K, Friedman N, Regev A: Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011, 29 (7): 644-652. 10.1038/nbt.1883.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M, Macmanes MD, Ott M, Orvis J, Pochet N, Strozzi F, Weeks N, Westerman R, William T, Dewey CN, Henschel R, Leduc RD, Friedman N, Regev A, Macmanes MD, Ott M, Orvis J, Pochet N, Strozzi F, Weeks N, Westerman R, William T, Dewey CN, Henschel R, Leduc RD, Friedman N, Regev A, et al: De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2013, 8 (8): 1494-1512. 10.1038/nprot.2013.084.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Schulz MH, Zerbino DR, Vingron M, Birney E: Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics. 2012, 28 (8): 1086-1092. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts094.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Zerbino DR, Birney E: Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008, 18 (5): 821-829. 10.1101/gr.074492.107.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Li W, Godzik A: Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22 (13): 1658-1659. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Langmead B, Salzberg SL: Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012, 9 (4): 357-359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Roberts A, Pachter L: Streaming fragment assignment for real-time analysis of sequencing experiments. Nat Methods. 2013, 10 (1): 71-73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK: edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26 (1): 139-140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL: BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009, 10: 421-10.1186/1471-2105-10-421.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu TD, Watanabe CK: GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (9): 1859-1875. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti310.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Abbott I: Improving the conservation of threatened and rare mammal species through translocation to islands: case study Western Australia. Biol Conserv. 2000, 93: 195-201. 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00144-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, Robles M, Talon M, Dopazo J, Conesa A: High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (10): 3420-3435. 10.1093/nar/gkn176.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL: TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013, 14 (4): R36-10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L: Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010, 28 (5): 511-515. 10.1038/nbt.1621.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Li H, Durbin R: Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (14): 1754-1760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing S: The sequence alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (16): 2078-2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, McVean G, Durbin R: The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27 (15): 2156-2158. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Cingolani P, Platts A, le Wang L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM: A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 2012, 6 (2): 80-92. 10.4161/fly.19695.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A: EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000, 16 (6): 276-277. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Edgar RC: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (5): 1792-1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM, Clamp M, Barton GJ: Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (9): 1189-1191. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Koala genome consortium. [http://koalagenome.org/]
  64. Ficklin SP, Sanderson LA, Cheng CH, Staton ME, Lee T, Cho IH, Jung S, Bett KE, Main D: Tripal: a construction toolkit for online genome databases. Database (Oxford). 2011, 2011: bar044-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Stein LD, Mungall C, Shu S, Caudy M, Mangone M, Day A, Nickerson E, Stajich JE, Harris TW, Arva A, Lewis S: The generic genome browser: a building block for a model organism system database. Genome Res. 2002, 12 (10): 1599-1610. 10.1101/gr.403602.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Ensembl gain/loss tree for AMY1A (ENSG00000237763) gene encoding alpha amylase A1 (salivary). [http://Feb2014.archive.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Gene/SpeciesTree?db=core;g=ENSG00000237763;r=1:104197912-104207173]
  67. Mandel AL, Peyrot des Gachons C, Plank KL, Alarcon S, Breslin PA: Individual differences in AMY1 gene copy number, salivary alpha-amylase levels, and the perception of oral starch. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (10): e13352-10.1371/journal.pone.0013352.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. ViralZone: Gammaretrovirus. [http://viralzone.expasy.org/all_by_species/67.html]
  69. Lazo PA, Prasad V, Tsichlis PN: Splice acceptor site for the env message of Moloney murine leukemia virus. J Virol. 1987, 61 (6): 2038-2041.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Shinnick TM, Lerner RA, Sutcliffe JG: Nucleotide sequence of Moloney murine leukaemia virus. Nature. 1981, 293 (5833): 543-548. 10.1038/293543a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Tsangaras K, Siracusa MC, Nikolaidis N, Ishida Y, Cui P, Vielgrader H, Helgen KM, Roca AL, Greenwood AD: Hybridization capture reveals evolution and conservation across the entire koala retrovirus genome. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (4): e95633-10.1371/journal.pone.0095633.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Oliveira NM, Satija H, Kouwenhoven IA, Eiden MV: Changes in viral protein function that accompany retroviral endogenization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104 (44): 17506-17511. 10.1073/pnas.0704313104.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Maher IE, Griffith JE, Lau Q, Reeves T, Higgins DP: Expression profiles of the immune genes CD4, CD8beta, IFNgamma, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10 in mitogen-stimulated koala lymphocytes (Phascolarctos cinereus) by qRT-PCR. Peer J. 2014, 2: e280-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Coffin J, Hughes S, Varmus H: Retroviruses. 1997, Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
  75. Baillie GJ, Wilkins RJ: Endogenous type D retrovirus in a marsupial, the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). J Virol. 2001, 75 (5): 2499-2507. 10.1128/JVI.75.5.2499-2507.2001.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. DAS sources available from koalagenome.org. [http://koalagenome.org/cgi-bin/gb2/das/dsn]

Copyright

Advertisement