- Research article
- Open Access
Extreme conservation of noncoding DNA near HoxD complex of vertebrates
© Sabarinadh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
- Received: 23 April 2004
- Accepted: 06 October 2004
- Published: 06 October 2004
Homeotic gene complexes determine the anterior-posterior body axis in animals. The expression pattern and function of hox genes along this axis is colinear with the order in which they are organized in the complex. This 'chromosomal organization and functional correspondence' is conserved in all bilaterians investigated. Genomic sequences covering the HoxD complex from several vertebrate species are now available. This offers a comparative genomics approach to identify conserved regions linked to this complex. Although the molecular basis of 'colinearity' of Hox complexes is not yet understood, it is possible that there are control elements within or in the proximity of these complexes that establish and maintain the expression patterns of hox genes in a coordinated fashion.
We have compared DNA sequence flanking the HoxD complex of several primate, rodent and fish species. This analysis revealed an unprecedented conservation of non-coding DNA sequences adjacent to the HoxD complex from fish to human. Stretches of hundreds of base pairs in a 7 kb region, upstream of HoxD complex, show 100% conservation across the vertebrate species. Using PCR primers from the human sequence, these conserved regions could be amplified from other vertebrate species, including other mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish. Our analysis of these sequences also indicates that starting from the conserved core regions, more sequences have been added on and maintained during evolution from fish to human.
Such a high degree of conservation in the core regions of this 7 kb DNA, where no variation occurred during ~500 million years of evolution, suggests critical function for these sequences. We suggest that such sequences are likely to provide molecular handle to gain insight into the evolution and mechanism of regulation of associated gene complexes.
- Homeotic Gene
- Bithorax Complex
- Naja Naja
- Extreme Conservation
- Horn Shark
Eukaryotic genome contains a large excess of non-coding sequences. Conservation of these sequences among species is a strong indication of their functional significance. With the availability of genome sequences it is possible to identify such sequences taking a comparative genomics approach [1–4]. The clusters of homeotic genes, which are expressed in a coordinated manner , are among the most conserved regions of the vertebrate genome. Clustering of genes that are regulated in a linked manner has been noticed in several other cases [6, 7]. However, the molecular mechanism behind such coordination in regulation is not yet understood. Several mechanisms have been proposed that link the organization of homeotic genes and the spatio-temporally controlled expression . Colinearity in hox complexes was first discovered in Drosophila  and later studies on the bithorax complex have demonstrated the role of chromatin organization in its regulation . Recent studies on the HoxD complex suggest a role for higher order chromatin organization in the regulation of this complex involving up to 20 kb upstream region .
Several recent reports using comparative genomics approach have identified conserved non-coding regions among different vertebrates [14–16] but none to the degree that we report here. The mechanism that may require such a high degree of conservation is not known. It is not, therefore, immediately clear what precisely is the role of these sequences. EST database search revealed that part of CR1 and CR3 are transcribed without any significant ORF but no EST corresponding to CR2 or any other part of the 7 Kb region was found, Fig. 1. A possible mechanism could involve RNA from this region that may function by base pairing to the genomic target sites. If that is the case, such high conservation could be expected. Role of transcription in the regulation of bithorax complex is emerging from recent studies .
While such an extreme conservation of several hundred nucleotides over half a billion years in a region that does not code for any known proteins certainly implicates essential role for such sequences, probably in the regulation of HoxD complex, no known regulatory element requires such extreme conservation extending up to hundreds of base pairs. It is, therefore, likely that these elements could be components of a novel mechanism common to all vertebrates that regulates this gene complex. We are tempted to suggest that such a strongly conserved region from fish to human linked to a gene complex that is known to determine body axis formation may be the key determinant of molecular basis of early ontogeny. Early embryos of all vertebrates show striking similarity and we suggest that these elements may control the early expression pattern of HoxD which leads to similar pattern of the embryo shape. The gradient of conservation seen in this region from fish to human may further signify the evolutionary history of this locus and diversification of the morphological features along the anterior-posterior body axis of the vertebrate classes.
The genomic sequences that contained Evx-2 and any of the Hoxd genes were downloaded and annotated using gene/ORF prediction tools. Similar approach was used for other hox complexes. Homology searches of the upstream sequences of HoxD region from human (AC009336; from nucleotide 56601 to 64095) was carried out using the BLAST program of NCBI. The sequences that showed significant homology were further used to analyze the extent of homology by BLAST 2 program. The conserved regions from each sequence was obtained and subjected to multiple sequence analysis using Clustal X. In order to identify the expressed sequences corresponding to the conserved sequence, the conserved sequences along with the unique sequences were BLASTed against EST databases (human, mouse and dbEST).
The contigs that showed significant homology to the upstream sequences of human HoxD were annotated using the tBLASTx program and searching the translated amino acid sequence in the Swissprot database. Repeat masker program was used to look for repeat content. Genebank sequences used in this study are as follows: AC116665 Papio hamadryas, AF224263 Heterodontus francisci, AC015584 Mus musculus, AC009336 Homo sapiens, CAAB01000449 Fugu rubripes and NW_042732 Rattus norvegicus.
DNA isolation, PCR amplification, sequencing and Southern hybridization
For the isolation of genomic DNA blood samples of human, chick and cobra (Naja naja) were used while liver tissue of mouse and muscle tissue of frog (Bufo melanostictus) and zebra fish were used. Standard protocol of DNA isolation was followed which included lysis, RNase A and proteinase K digestions followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and precipitation. Concentration and quality of the genomic DNA was checked on 0.7% agarose gel and UV absorption spectrophotometry. Based on the sequence of conserved regions primers were designed to amplify the three regions CR1, CR2 and CR3.
Primers used in this study to amplify conserved regions from different vertebrate species were:CR1 forward- GAGGCTGTTCACACTGGTGG,CR1 reverse- ATCATGCTCTCTGATGGACC,CR2 forward- GCATCGTAATCAGTTCGGTC,CR2 reverse- TGATACAAGCTGATACCGTC,CR3 forward- GCTATTCAAAATGTTATTTGAG and CR3 reverse- CTGTAATGAAGAAAAGATTTATG.
The 25 μl reaction was performed using 100 ng template DNA and 5 pmol each of forward and reverse primers. PCR protocol was as follows: initial denaturation step of 94°C for 3 min was followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 57°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1.30 min and final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. Authenticity of the PCR products was confirmed by direct sequencing and Southern hybridization, using the corresponding human DNA as probe.
An earlier version of this article was deposited in the 'Deposited Research' section of Genome Biology, http://genomebiology.com/2003/4/4/P2, . While this manuscript was in reviewing process, a report comparing human genome to several other mammalian sequences identified many highly conserved noncoding sequences . Interestingly, this study also identified CR2 as uc.108 near HOXD and, in agreement to our observation, noted only a "core" conserved region in fish, suggesting that additional parts of the ultraconserved region were innovations after the common ancestor with fish.
This work was supported by a young investigators grant (RGY0316/2001-M) from Human Frontier Science Program to RKM.
- Pennacchio LA, Rubin EM: Genomic strategies to identify mammalian regulatory sequences. Nature Rev Genet. 2001, 2: 100-109. 10.1038/35052548.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kondrashov AS, Shabalina SA: Classification of common conserved sequences in mammalian intergenic regions. Human Mol Genet. 2002, 11: 669-674. 10.1093/hmg/11.6.669.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dehal P, Predki P, Olsen AS, Kobayashi A, Folta P, Lucas S, Land M, Terry A, Ecale Zhou C, Rash S, Zhang Q, Gordon L, Kim J, Elkin C, Pollard MJ, Richardson P, Rokhsar D, Uberbacher E, Hawkins T, Branscomb E, Stubbs L: Human Chromosome 19 and Related Regions in Mouse: Conservative and Lineage-Specific Evolution. Science. 2001, 293: 104-111. 10.1126/science.1060310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glazko GV, Koonin EV, Rogozin IB, Shabalina SA: A significant fraction of conserved noncoding DNA in human and mouse consists of predicted matrix attachment regions. Trends Genet. 2003, 19: 119-124. 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00016-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGinnis W, Krumlauf R: Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell. 1992, 68: 283-302. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-N.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boutanaev AM, Kalmykova AI, Shevelyov YY, Nurminsky DI: Large clusters of co-expressed genes in the Drosophila genome. Nature. 2002, 420: 666-669. 10.1038/nature01216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lercher MJ, Urrutia AO, Hurst LD: Clustering of housekeeping genes provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2002, 31: 180-183. 10.1038/ng887.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duboule D: Vertebrate hox gene regulation: clustering and/or colinearity?. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998, 8: 514-518. 10.1016/S0959-437X(98)80004-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewis EB: A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature. 1978, 276: 565-570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mihaly J, Hogga I, Barges S, Galloni M, Mishra RK, Hagstrom K, Muller M, Schedl P, Sipos L, Gausz J, Gyurkovics H, Karch F: Chromatin domain boundaries in the Bithorax complex. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1998, 54: 60-70. 10.1007/s000180050125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kondo T, Duboule D: Breaking colinearity in the mouse HoxD complex. Cell. 1999, 97: 407-417. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80749-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manzanares M, Wada H, Itasaki N, Trainor PA, Krumlauf R, Holland PW: Conservation and elaboration of Hox gene regulation during evolution of the vertebrates. Nature. 2000, 408: 854-857. 10.1038/35048570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seo HC, Edvardsen RB, Maeland AD, Bjordal M, Jensen MF, Hansen A, Flaat M, Weissenbach J, Lehrach H, Wincker P, Reinhardt R, Chourrout D: Hox cluster disintegration with persistent anteroposterior order of expression in Oikopleura dioica. Nature. 2004, 431: 67-71. 10.1038/nature02709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wassermann WW, Palumbo M, Thompson W, Fickett JW, Lawrence CE: Human-mouse genome comparisons to locate regulatory sites. Nat Genet. 2000, 26: 225-228. 10.1038/79965.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aparicio S, Morrison A, Gould A, Gilthorpe J, Chaudhuri C, Rigby PWJ, Krumlauf R, Brenner S: Detecting conserved regulatory elements with the model genome of the Japanese puffer fish Fugu rubripes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 1684-1688.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dermitzakis ET, Reymond A, Lyle R, Scamuffa N, Ucla G, Deutsch S, Stevenson BJ, Flegel V, Bucher P, Jongeneel CV, Antonarakis SE: Numerous potentially functional but non-genic conserved sequences on human chromosome 21. Nature. 2002, 420: 578-582. 10.1038/nature01251.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drewell RA, Bae E, Burr J, Lewis EB: Transcription defines the embryonic domains of cis-regulatory activity at the Drosophila bithorax complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 16853-16858. 10.1073/pnas.222671199.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sabarinadh Ch, Subramanian S, Mishra RK: Extreme conservation of non-repetitive non-coding regions near HoxD complex of vertebrates. Genome Biology. 2003, 4: P2-10.1186/gb-2003-4-4-p2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bejerano G, Pheasant M, Makunin I, Stephen S, Kent WJ, Mattick JS, Haussler D: Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science. 2004, 304: 1321-1325. 10.1126/science.1098119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.