- Research article
- Open Access
Characterization of the chicken inward rectifier K+ channel IRK1/Kir2.1 gene
© Mutai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 27 August 2004
Accepted: 29 November 2004
Published: 29 November 2004
Inward rectifier potassium channels (IRK) contribute to the normal function of skeletal and cardiac muscle cells. The chick inward rectifier K+ channel cIRK1/Kir2.1 is expressed in skeletal muscle, heart, brain, but not in liver; a distribution similar but not identical to that of mouse Kir2.1. We set out to explore regulatory domains of the cIRK1 promoter that enhance or inhibit expression of the gene in different cell types.
We cloned and characterized the 5'-flanking region of cIRK1. cIRK1 contains two exons with splice sites in the 5'-untranslated region, a structure similar to mouse and human orthologs. cIRK1 has multiple transcription initiation sites, a feature also seen in mouse. However, while the chicken and mouse promoter regions share many regulatory motifs, cIRK1 possesses a GC-richer promoter and a putative TATA box, which appears to positively regulate gene expression. We report here the identification of several candidate cell/tissue specific cIRK1 regulatory domains by comparing promoter activities in expressing (Qm7) and non-expressing (DF1) cells using in vitro transcription assays.
While multiple transcription initiation sites and the combinatorial function of several domains in activating cIRK1 expression are similar to those seen in mKir2.1, the cIRK1 promoter differs by the presence of a putative TATA box. In addition, several domains that regulate the gene's expression differentially in muscle (Qm7) and fibroblast cells (DF1) were identified. These results provide fundamental data to analyze cIRK1 transcriptional mechanisms. The control elements identified here may provide clues to the tissue-specific expression of this K+ channel.
The inward rectifier potassium channel IRK1/Kir2.1 helps controls cell excitability through setting the resting membrane potential . Its dominant role of inward rectification for the normal function of skeletal and cardiac muscles is shown by the complete loss of inward rectifying current and K+-induced dilations in arterial myocytes from Kir2.1 knockout mice  and periodic paralysis, and by cardiac arrhythmias in Anderson's syndrome caused by point mutation of human Kir2.1 .
Kir2.1 expression is detected in excitable cells in brain, heart, and skeletal muscle in both mouse and chick [4–8]. In addition, chicken IRK1 (cIRK1) is expressed in the cochlea , a feature not observed in mammals [9, 10]. In this report, we first analyzed cIRK1 genomic DNA to identify transcriptional initiation sites and distinct motifs that are important for the expression of this potassium channel gene. Using in vitro promoter assays with fragments of the cloned cIRK1 locus, we also identified several candidate control domains that may participate in regulating the channel's exquisite tissue-specific transcription.
Structure of the chick IRK1 genomic locus
Identification of transcription initiation sites
Comparison of the 5'-flanking regions of cIRK1 and mKir2.1
We then analyzed the motifs contained in the cIRK1 5'-flanking region, based on the presumption that there might be significant divergence between chicken and mammal IRK1/Kir2.1 promoter regions that could account for their different gene expression patterns. The 5'-flanking region of cIRK1, shown in Fig. 2, shares no evident homology with the comparable region of the mKir2.1 promoter . The corresponding region of the putative human Kir2.1 promoter shows high similarity to the mKir2.1 promoter (62.6% over1,017 bp), however, the hKir2.1 promoter also failed to show significant homology with the cIRK1 5'-flanking region. While both the cIRK1 5'-flanking region and the mKir2.1 promoter have high GC contents, the chick promoter is substantially more GC-rich (71.0% in chick and 62.8% in mouse from position -390 to -1) and contains 38 CpG dinucleotides as compared to 17 CpGs in mouse. The cIRK1 promoter region has four consensus Sp1 binding elements (at positions -216, -194, -182, and -70; Fig. 2), while the mKir2.1 promoter contains three Sp1 sites . Consensus binding sites for several other factors were also identified. E boxes (CANNTG) were present at -316 and at -46, and an inverted CCAAT (NF-Y element)  was found at -98, while the mKir2.1 promoter region contains 3 E boxes and one NF-Y element. A striking difference from mKir2.1 is that the cIRK1 promoter was found to contain a putative TATA box (TATTAA), absent in mKir2.1, at -56. Overall, while GC-rich domains and motifs are present in both the chick and mouse promoter regions, the extent and number of the motifs are different between the cIRK1 and mKir2.1 promoters. In addition, a TATA box-like sequence is present only in the chick promoter.
In vitro promoter analysis and cell-specific regulatory regions
The relative promoter activities exhibited by 3B-399 and shorter constructs were similar in the two cell lines. Activities decreased significantly between 3B-399 and 3B-226, but not between 3B-226 and 3B-206. Candidate active regulatory elements in this region included three Sp1 consensus sites arranged in tandem at -216, -194, and -182. The construct 3B-206, which lacks the NF-Y element activated transcription as well or slightly better than 3B-226. Point mutation of this element in the mKir2.1 minimal promoter resulted in a significant increase of promoter activity, suggesting a significant role for the NF-Y element in mouse compared with chicken . Specific mutation of the putative TATA box led to a 60.3 % loss of activity in DF1 cells, and an 80.6 % loss in Qm7 cells, but not to a complete loss of promoter activity. The construct 3B-109 showed no significant activity compared with the mock vector, indicating that the 5'-flanking region up to -92 upstream is necessary for promoter activity. Taken together, two distal regions, -1115 to -727 and -417 to -286, were found to be candidate cell/tissue specific regulatory domains in the cIRK1 promoter, while the 5' flanking region proximal to -285 is predicted to activate ubiquitously. The GC rich regions, including Sp1 motifs, and the putative TATA box regulate the promoter positively.
This is the first report describing a promoter analysis of an avian potassium channel. Our data show that cIRK1 and mKir2.1 have similar genomic organizations comprised of a single intron dividing the 5'UTR. In addition, in the 5'-flanking region, the cIRK1 promoter appears to contain a unique putative TATA box. Our results demonstrating positive regulatory activity of the domain that includes the TATTAA sequence strongly suggest that this element does indeed recruit and bind TATA-binding protein , thereby contributing significantly to gene expression. No TATA boxes are found in mammalian K+ channel promoters such as those for Kir2.1 , Kir3.1 , Kir3.4 , Kv1.4 , Kv1.5  and Kv3.1 [19, 20]. Further studies may determine whether chick orthologous K+ channel genes share their genomic organizations with those of mammals.
It should also be emphasized that elements other than the putative TATA box also participate in, although to a lesser extent, transcription initiation of cIRK1. Just upstream of the transcription initiation site lie several binding sites for transcriptional regulation, including Sp1 sites and an E box; these are also present in mKir2.1 and have been shown to activate that gene's expression . While the significant role shown for the NF-Y site in mKir2.1  was not apparent in the case of cIRK1 promoter activation, Sp1 and E box-binding proteins may work cooperatively in promoter activation, as this mechanism has been reported in the study of telomerase reverse transcriptase gene regulation . Overall, the difference in transcriptional regulation of IRK1/Kir2.1 between chicken and mouse is that regulation of cIRK1 expression depends not only on the Sp1 sites and E box, but also on the putative TATA box. It is known that IRK1/Kir2.1 is expressed in the sensory epithelium of the chick cochlea , but that it is not expressed in the mature cochlea of the mouse  or rat . Whether the putative TATA box leads to the expression of cIRK1 in the cochlea awaits further analysis.
While the results of our in vitro transcription analyses indicate that cIRK1 transcription can be activated both in expressing Qm7 and in non-expressing DF1 cell lines, and therefore likely in a variety of tissues, they also showed the existence of several cell specific regulatory domains. Examination of transcriptional regulation by the region -417 to -286 indicated that element(s) in this region increase promoter activity only in the myoblast cell line Qm7. Candidate elements within this region that might have cell-specific activity are an E box (CAGGTG) at -316 and an activating component of transcription activator NF-κB (GGGRNNYYCC; where R is A or G, Y is C or T, and N is any base) at -296 [22, 23]. Various mouse helix-loop helix transcription factors such as atonal homolog Math1  and MyoD  are reported to associate with E boxes and are required for tissue-specific cell type determination. The chicken Math1 ortholog Cath1 is expressed in the developing brain regions that express cIRK1 . However, our co-expression of Math1 with the cIRK1 promoter construct 3B-531 did not enhance promoter activity (data not shown).
We also identified a region between -1115 and -727 with weak repressor activity that exhibited different properties in the two cell lines. Potential binding motifs present in this region are: a site for interferon regulatory factor-1 at -1030, an AP-4 site at -978, a thyroid hormone beta receptor binding element (TRE) at -962, another E box at -954, a binding site for the potent repressor CTF/NF-I at -859 , and a Drosophila homeotic gene Antennapedia binding motif  at -786. Among these, TRE has been shown to regulate a fast-activating K+ conductance in inner hair cells , and an E box has been shown to function as a repressive element when bound by Mad1/Max in differentiated HL60 cells .
Our observation of the transcriptional activation of cIRK1 in DF1 cells which do not express the gene endogenously clearly suggests the existence of additional mechanisms to repress cIRK1 in DF1 cells. Since domains acting to strongly silence cIRK1 expression in DF1 cells were missing in the 5'-flanking region characterized in this study, additional distant control regions may lie further upstream, downstream, or in the intronic sequences. Although at this point clearly speculative, the existence of many CpG dinucleotides in cIRK1 suggests the possibility of gene repression through DNA methylation of CpG dinucleotides leading to heterochromatin condensation of the adjacent genomic locus . Tissue-specific expression of cIRK1 might consequently be explained by a combination of regulation via the specific motifs studied here, regulation via additional domains outside this region, and the potential modification of the cIRK1 genomic locus through DNA methylation.
We have identified multiple transcription initiation sites and several candidate regulatory elements in the chicken potassium channel gene cIRK1. These results provide fundamental data to further analyze cIRK1 transcriptional mechanisms. While the use of multiple transcription initiation sites and the combinatorial participation of multiple domains in activating cIRK1 expression are similar to those seen for mouse Kir2.1, the cIRK1 promoter is distinct in that it exhibits a higher GC-content than does the mKir2.1 promoter, and by the presence of a functional putative TATA box that is not observed in the mKir2.1 promoter. Transcriptional control domains identified here form the foundation of an in-depth analysis of tissue-specific expression of this K+ channel as well as the species-specific expression of cIRK1 in the chicken cochlea.
cIRK1 genomic cloning and upstream sequence analysis
Chick IRK1 genomic clones were isolated by screening a chick genomic library in the lambda FIX II vector (Stratagene) using cIRK1 cDNA (GenBank U20216) as a screening probe. Briefly, the probe was random primer-labeled with 32P-α-dCTP and hybridized with phage plaques blotted onto HybondN nylon membranes (Amersham Biosciences) overnight at 65°C in 6x SSC, 250 μg/ml salmon sperm DNA, 5x Denhardt's solution, and 0.1% SDS. The membranes were washed in 1x SSC and 0.1% SDS, and exposed to x-ray film. Four positive clones were further analyzed following digestion with XbaI and/or EcoRI, and subcloning into pBlueScript-KS. The promoter region (AF375660) was sequenced from both ends. Comparisons between the putative human Kir2.1 promoter region (AC005242), the mouse Kir2.1 promoter region (AF072673), and the coding regions of mKir2.1 cDNA (AF021136) and hKir2.1 cDNA (U24055) were performed using the Wilbur-Lipman DNA alignment method. Transcription factor binding elements were predicted based on the TRANSFAC algorithm  and the transcription element search system http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/tess/.
Primer extension, 5'RACE, and northern blot analysis
Total RNA was extracted from tissues and cells using TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen) and treated with DNaseI. Three micrograms of total RNA (brain, DF1, or yeast tRNA) were reverse transcribed with 32P-end-labeled primer in 10 mM DTT, 50 μg/ml actinomycin D and 0.5 mM dNTP using Superscript II (Invitrogen) at 47°C for 60 min. The primer was designed at 61–41 of cIRK1 cDNA (U20216) [5'-TGT TAA GAT CCG CGG GGA CAC-3']. Reaction mixtures were fractionated on 7% polyacrylamide (PAA)/7 M Urea gels. The 3'-most transcription initiation site was numbered +1.
RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of 5' cDNA ends (5'RACE) was carried out using the GeneRacer kit (Invitrogen). In brief, 3 μg of total RNA were dephosphorylated, decapped and ligated with a 44-base RNA-oligo, according to manufacturer protocols. Next, the RNA was reverse transcribed using R1 primer designed at 146-122 of cIRK1 cDNA [5'-GCA GAG TTA GCT TAA CAA GTA ACC G-3'] at 42°C for 1 hr. The PCR was performed in a reaction mix containing 1x PCR buffer, 200 nM each of 5'-forward primer [5'-CGA CTG GAG CAC GAG GAC ACT GA-3'] and R1, 100 μM dNTPs, 5 μCi 32P-α-dCTP, 5% DMSO, and 1.25 U of AmpliTaq (Perkin-Elmer). Reaction conditions were; 94°C for 3 min, 5 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 57°C for 5 min, 72°C for 2 min, and then 30 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 57°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, followed by 72°C for 5 min. Nested PCR was performed using the same conditions, with first round PCR products as template, and using the 5'-nested forward primer [5'-GGA CAC TGA CAT GGA CTG AAG GAG TA-3'] and R2 primer designed at 64-41 of cIRK1 cDNA [5'-GGG TGT TAA GAT CCG CGG GGA CAC-3']. Reaction products were eluted from the 7% non-denaturing PAA gel, re-amplified, then ligated into the pCR4-TOPO-TA cloning vector (Invitrogen) and sequenced.
Northern blotting was performed using poly A(+) RNA isolated using the FastTrak 2.0 kit (Invitrogen). Five micrograms of poly A(+) RNA were applied to each lane, fractionated on a 0.8% agarose gel, and transferred to a HybondN membrane. The membrane was hybridized with a random-primed 32P-labeled cIRK1 cDNA fragment (522 bp; 1,384–1,915) overnight at 42°C, washed, and exposed to x-ray film. A quail glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (g3pdh) gene fragment (696–968 bp, 97.4% identical to chick) was used as an internal control. Message sizes were estimated by comparisons with RNA molecular weight markers (Invitrogen) run in the adjacent lane.
In vitro transcription assay
Primers were designed to amplify each promoter region of interest. Constructs 3B-2256 (4201–6456 bp of cIRK1 5'-flanking region, AF375660), 3B-1229 (5228–6456 bp), 3B-531 (5926–6456 bp), and 3B-226 (6231–6456 bp) were generated by PCR, cloned into pBS-KS, and then subcloned into the multiple cloning site (between KpnI and XhoI) of pGL-3B (Promega). Constructs 3B-1089 (5368–6456 bp) and 3B-840 (5617–6456 bp) were obtained from a PCR fragment (1229 bp) with the 5'-region digested by SpeI and PvuII or XbaI, respectively. 3B-399 (6058–6456 bp) was derived from 3B-531 by removing the 5'-region by SacI and SmaI digestion, and 3B-206 was generated by exonuclease III digestion of 3B-226 followed by recircularization. 3B-109 (6348–6456 bp) was generated by SpeI and NheI digestion of 3B-206. Construction of 3B-206 with a mutated putative TATA box (3B-206dT) was accomplished by replacing the putative TATA box (TATTAA) with a StuI site (AGGCCT) by amplifying the original construct using primer sets designed to be complementary to sequences just outside the elements of interest, yet including StuI sites at their 5'-ends.
The chick fibroblast cell line DF1 was purchased from ATCC and cultured at 5% CO2 and 39°C in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium (DMEM) with 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 10% fetal calf serum, and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin. The quail myoblast cell line Qm7  was cultured in medium 199 with 10% tryptose phosphate, 10% fetal calf serum and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin in 5% CO2 at 37°C. The ability of Qm7 cells to differentiate into myotube-like morphology was confirmed periodically as previously described . One microgram of each construct with 0.1 μg of control vector pRL-TK were mixed in 50 μl of calcium phosphate buffer (140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 750 μM Na2HPO4, 6 mM dextrose, 25 mM HEPES at pH = 7.15, and 120 mM of CaCl2), and were incubated with 2 × 104 cells in 24-well dishes for 8 hrs in 500 μl of DMEM. The transfection mixes were replaced with fresh growth media and incubation was continued for 48 hrs. In vitro promoter activities were determined using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). Briefly, transfected cells in each well were lysed in 100 μl of 1x Passive Lysis Buffer for 15 min at room temperature. Lysates were centrifuged briefly, and 20 μl of the supernatant was mixed with 100 μl of Luciferase Assay Reagent II, followed by 100 μl of SG reagent. Luciferase activities reflecting cIRK1 promoter activities and control thymidine kinase promoter activities were measured for 10 seconds after premeasurement periods of 2 seconds. All experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated at least 3 times (n= 3–6). The data were analyzed using a t-test assuming equal variance between two samples. Results are shown as fold increases ± standard error when compared with the basal luciferase activities from cells transfected with mock vector pGL-3B.
We thank Dr. Charles Emerson for the gift of Qm7 cells. We also thank Dr. James Davis and Dr. Stefan Heller for reading the manuscript and providing helpful suggestions. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders to J.C.O. (DC02755).
- Stanfield PR, Nakajima S, Nakajima Y: Constitutively active and G-protein coupled inward rectifier K+ channels: Kir2.0 and Kir3.0. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2002, 145: 47-179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zaritsky JJ, Eckman DM, Wellman GC, Nelson MT, Schwarz TL: Targeted disruption of Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 genes reveals the essential role of the inwardly rectifying K+ current in K+-mediated vasodilation. Circ Res. 2000, 87 (2): 160-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plaster NM, Tawil R, Tristani-Firouzi M, Canun S, Bendahhou S, Tsunoda A, Donaldson MR, Iannaccone ST, Brunt E, Barohn R: Mutations in Kir2.1 cause the developmental and episodic electrical phenotypes of Andersen's syndrome. Cell. 2001, 105 (4): 511-519. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00342-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karschin C, Dissmann E, Stuhmer W, Karschin A: IRK(1–3) and GIRK(1–4) inwardly rectifying K+ channel mRNAs are differentially expressed in the adult rat brain. J Neurosci. 1996, 16 (11): 3559-3570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kubo Y, Baldwin TJ, Jan YN, Jan LY: Primary structure and functional expression of a mouse inward rectifier potassium channel. Nature. 1993, 362 (6416): 127-133. 10.1038/362127a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mi H, Deerinck TJ, Jones M, Ellisman MH, Schwarz TL: Inwardly rectifying K+ channels that may participate in K+ buffering are localized in microvilli of Schwann cells. J Neurosci. 1996, 16 (8): 2421-2429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morishige K, Takahashi N, Findlay I, Koyama H, Zanelli JS, Peterson C, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Mori N, Kurachi Y: Molecular cloning, functional expression and localization of an inward rectifier potassium channel in the mouse brain. FEBS Lett. 1993, 336 (3): 375-380. 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80840-Q.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Navaratnam DS, Escobar L, Covarrubias M, Oberholtzer JC: Permeation properties and differential expression across the auditory receptor epithelium of an inward rectifier K+ channel cloned from the chick inner ear. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270 (33): 19238-19245. 10.1074/jbc.270.33.19238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marcotti W, Geleoc GS, Lennan GW, Kros CJ: Transient expression of an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance in developing inner and outer hair cells along the mouse cochlea. Pflugers Arch. 1999, 439 (1–2): 113-122. 10.1007/s004240051134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hibino H, Horio Y, Inanobe A, Doi K, Ito M, Yamada M, Gotow T, Uchiyama Y, Kawamura M, Kubo T: An ATP-dependent inwardly rectifying potassium channel, KAB-2 (Kir4. 1), in cochlear stria vascularis of inner ear: its specific subcellular localization and correlation with the formation of endocochlear potential. J Neurosci. 1997, 17 (12): 4711-4721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Redell JB, Tempel BL: Multiple promoter elements interact to control the transcription of the potassium channel gene, KCNJ2. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (35): 22807-22818. 10.1074/jbc.273.35.22807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maruyama K, Sugano S: Oligo-capping: a simple method to replace the cap structure of eukaryotic mRNAs with oligoribonucleotides. Gene. 1994, 138 (1–2): 171-174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mantovani R: A survey of 178 NF-Y binding CCAAT boxes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26 (5): 1135-1143. 10.1093/nar/26.5.1135.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wobbe CR, Struhl K: Yeast and human TATA-binding proteins have nearly identical DNA sequence requirements for transcription in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1990, 10 (8): 3859-3867.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schoots O, Voskoglou T, Van Tol HH: Genomic organization and promoter analysis of the human G-protein-coupled K+ channel Kir3.1 (KCNJ3/HGIRK1). Genomics. 1997, 39 (3): 279-288. 10.1006/geno.1996.4495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spauschus A, Lentes KU, Wischmeyer E, Dissmann E, Karschin C, Karschin A: A G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channel (GIRK4) from human hippocampus associates with other GIRK channels. J Neurosci. 1996, 16 (3): 930-938.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wymore RS, Negulescu D, Kinoshita K, Kalman K, Aiyar J, Gutman GA, Chandy KG: Characterization of the transcription unit of mouse Kv1.4, a voltage-gated potassium channel gene. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (26): 15629-15634. 10.1074/jbc.271.26.15629.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mori Y, Folco E, Koren G: GH3 cell-specific expression of Kv1.5 gene. Regulation by a silencer containing a dinucleotide repetitive element. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270 (46): 27788-27796. 10.1074/jbc.270.46.27788.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gan L, Hahn SJ, Kaczmarek LK: Cell type-specific expression of the Kv3.1 gene is mediated by a negative element in the 5' untranslated region of the Kv3.1 promoter. J Neurochem. 1999, 73 (4): 1350-1362. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0731350.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gan L, Perney TM, Kaczmarek LK: Cloning and characterization of the promoter for a potassium channel expressed in high frequency firing neurons. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (10): 5859-5865. 10.1074/jbc.271.10.5859.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kyo S, Takakura M, Taira T, Kanaya T, Itoh H, Yutsudo M, Ariga H, Inoue M: Sp1 cooperates with c-Myc to activate transcription of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (hTERT). Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (3): 669-677. 10.1093/nar/28.3.669.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blondeau N, Widmann C, Lazdunski M, Heurteaux C: Activation of the nuclear factor-kappaB is a key event in brain tolerance. J Neurosci. 2001, 21 (13): 4668-4677.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mattson MP, Culmsee C, Yu Z, Camandola S: Roles of nuclear factor kappaB in neuronal survival and plasticity. J Neurochem. 2000, 74 (2): 443-456. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.740443.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akazawa C, Ishibashi M, Shimizu C, Nakanishi S, Kageyama R: A mammalian helix-loop-helix factor structurally related to the product of Drosophila proneural gene atonal is a positive transcriptional regulator expressed in the developing nervous system. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270 (15): 8730-8738. 10.1074/jbc.270.15.8730.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pinney DF, de la Brousse FC, Faerman A, Shani M, Maruyama K, Emerson CP: Quail myoD is regulated by a complex array of cis-acting control sequences. Dev Biol. 1995, 170 (1): 21-38. 10.1006/dbio.1995.1192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ben-Arie N, McCall AE, Berkman S, Eichele G, Bellen HJ, Zoghbi HY: Evolutionary conservation of sequence and expression of the bHLH protein Atonal suggests a conserved role in neurogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 1996, 5 (9): 1207-1216. 10.1093/hmg/5.9.1207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rusch A, Erway LC, Oliver D, Vennstrom B, Forrest D: Thyroid hormone receptor beta-dependent expression of a potassium conductance in inner hair cells at the onset of hearing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (26): 15758-15762. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15758.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu D, Popov N, Hou M, Wang Q, Bjorkholm M, Gruber A, Menkel AR, Henriksson M: Switch from Myc/Max to Mad1/Max binding and decrease in histone acetylation at the telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter during differentiation of HL60 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (7): 3826-3831. 10.1073/pnas.071043198.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jethanandani P, Goldberg E: ldhc expression in non-germ cell nuclei is repressed by NF-I binding. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (38): 35414-35421. 10.1074/jbc.M101269200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Affolter M, Percival-Smith A, Muller M, Leupin W, Gehring WJ: DNA binding properties of the purified Antennapedia homeodomain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990, 87 (11): 4093-4097.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaenisch R, Bird A: Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003, 33 (Suppl): 245-254. 10.1038/ng1089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wingender E, Chen X, Hehl R, Karas H, Liebich I, Matys V, Meinhardt T, Pruss M, Reuter I, Schacherer F: TRANSFAC: an integrated system for gene expression regulation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2000, 28: 316-319. 10.1093/nar/28.1.316.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Antin PB, Ordahl CP: Isolation and characterization of an avian myogenic cell line. Dev Biol. 1991, 143 (1): 111-121. 10.1016/0012-1606(91)90058-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.