- Research article
- Open Access
The RHNumtS compilation: Features and bioinformatics approaches to locate and quantify Human NumtS
BMC Genomics volume 9, Article number: 267 (2008)
To a greater or lesser extent, eukaryotic nuclear genomes contain fragments of their mitochondrial genome counterpart, deriving from the random insertion of damaged mtDNA fragments. NumtS (Nuclear mt Sequences) are not equally abundant in all species, and are redundant and polymorphic in terms of copy number. In population and clinical genetics, it is important to have a complete overview of NumtS quantity and location. Searching PubMed for NumtS or Mitochondrial pseudo-genes yields hundreds of papers reporting Human NumtS compilations produced by in silico or wet-lab approaches. A comparison of published compilations clearly shows significant discrepancies among data, due both to unwise application of Bioinformatics methods and to a not yet correctly assembled nuclear genome. To optimize quantification and location of NumtS, we produced a consensus compilation of Human NumtS by applying various bioinformatics approaches.
Location and quantification of NumtS may be achieved by applying database similarity searching methods: we have applied various methods such as Blastn, MegaBlast and BLAT, changing both parameters and database; the results were compared, further analysed and checked against the already published compilations, thus producing the Reference Human Numt Sequences (RHNumtS) compilation. The resulting NumtS total 190.
The RHNumtS compilation represents a highly reliable reference basis, which may allow designing a lab protocol to test the actual existence of each NumtS. Here we report preliminary results based on PCR amplification and sequencing on 41 NumtS selected from RHNumtS among those with lower score. In parallel, we are currently designing the RHNumtS database structure for implementation in the HmtDB resource. In the future, the same database will host NumtS compilations from other organisms, but these will be generated only when the nuclear genome of a specific organism has reached a high-quality level of assembly.
In greater or lesser abundance, eukaryotic nuclear genomes contain fragments of their mitochondrial (mt) genome counterpart, deriving from "random" insertion of damaged mtDNA fragments . The discovery of these genomic "elements" dates back to 1967, when du Buy and Riley  discovered mtDNA sequences in the nuclear genome by means of hybridization experiments on mouse liver. The presence of mtDNA in the nuclear genome was confirmed in 1983, in yeast, locust, fungi, sea urchin, man, maize and rat [3–9]. In 1994 Lopez et al.  called these fragments numt, in this paper renamed NumtS, Nuclear mt Sequences. One hypothesis on the mechanism of their generation suggests that fragments of mtDNA may escape from mitochondria to avoid mutagenic agents or other forms of cellular stress, reach the nucleus and, during repair of chromosomal breaks, insert into the nuclear DNA . Papers published so far report that NumtS loci do not show a common feature at integration sites . The NumtS generation process may have started soon after endosymbiosis. It seems obvious that the genomic region where the mt sequence is inserted may be involved in further recombination events, thus generating duplication of the mt fragment. In some organisms, such as primates, the same mt region occurs several times along the nuclear genome, but only detailed evolutionary analysis may help in identifying "duplicated" NumtS, because recombination and mutation occurring after duplication may well mask the latter event. Once this problem is solved, each NumtS may be associated with a given copy number, although this may differ even among tissues or cells of the same individual. NumtS have been shown in fact to be polymorphic: a specific NumtS may be present in heterozygosis in the same individual or may be totally absent in a specific tissue or individual. The first evidence of the polymorphic nature of NumtS was reported by Zischler et al. , in which an insert of 540 bp (reverse positions (59–16089) of the revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS) ), located on chromosome 11 and detected on total DNA extracted from sperm, was screened in various populations using primers designed on the sequences flanking the insertion. Among the screened individuals, some were homozygous, some were heterozygous and some did not show the insertion. When present, the inserted sequence was highly conserved in all populations, thus revealing a "nuclear fossil". The inserted sequence with its nuclear flanking region is available through GenBank entry S80333 but, when this sequence is blasted against Human nuclear genome Build 36.2, the resulting hit matches only the flanking region. This means that the samples used for sequencing the Human Genome did not harbour the "insertion". Further examples of polymorphic NumtS are reported in "The case of siblings"  and the Ricchetti compilation .
NumtS are not equally abundant in all species. For instance a much higher number of NumtS occurs in plants with respect to Metazoa. Within Metazoan, NumtS are more abundant in mammals and birds, but a very small number can be found in Plasmodium, Caenorhabditis and Drosophila. The debate about the presence or absence of NumtS in fugu is open [17, 18]. The great abundance of NumtS in Apis mellifera, comparable to that in plants, has been published recently . A complete knowledge of Human NumtS is of fundamental importance in the study of human population migrations, which utilize mtDNA as a phylogenetic marker, and also in the study of mitochondrial diseases. NumtS are in fact a potential source of contamination when PCR is used to study mtDNA. This is particularly important in the case of ancient DNA or tissue with a reduced quantity of mtDNA copy number, in both physiological (sperm) and pathological states [20, 21]. Bensasson et al.  presented an exhaustive vademecum suggesting how to check and avoid NumtS contamination. A final consideration concerns the observation that since NumtS reside in the nucleus, they should evolve much more slowly than their functional counterparts in the nucleus, so that they represent nuclear fossils, "snapshots" of mtDNA at the time of transfer. This allows them to be used as outgroups in phylogenetic studies [22–25]. Searching PubMed for NumtS or Mitochondrial pseudogenes in November 2006 yielded hundreds of papers, 113 of which on humans. Many of them report the compilation of Human NumtS and other Eukaryotic Genomes [1, 16, 23, 26–31], and usually mention the location and length of each NumtS. Such data were mainly obtained by in silico approaches and only a minority derived from a wet-lab approach, sequencing or nDNA-mtDNA hybridizations [32, 16]. Parr et al.  demonstrated by sequencing that the entire mitochondrial genome is present within the nuclear genome in multiple copies: the "pseudo-mitochondrial genome". A comparison of published compilations highlights great discrepancies among data (Figure 1). The reason for this lies in two important facts: incautious usage of Bioinformatics methods and application of methods to a still not yet correctly assembled nuclear genome. However, the trends common to all papers are that the number of NumtS varies among species and that the human genome apparently contains the highest number of NumtS within Metazoan. But the data are still incomplete and imperfect. NumtS quantification needs revision, particularly starting from Human data. The present paper, describing the bioinformatics approaches used to optimize quantification and localization of NumtS, reports the Consensus Reference Human NumtS Compilation (RHNumtS) and the results of the amplification and sequencing approach applied to 41 selected NumtS
The location and quantification of NumtS may be achieved by applying database similarity searching methods, comparing the human mt DNA sequence with human nuclear genome sequences. The goal of database similarity searching methods is to seek for regions showing statistically meaningful similarity, but these methods are too sensitive: slight changes in parameters and/or in both query and database sequences may give rise to considerable changes in the resulting hits. In this study the available human mt DNA sequences total at present more than 3000, of which about 90% represent different haplotypes, thus choosing the query sequence is the first problem. Moreover available human nuclear genome sequences are consensus sequences, obtained from the DNA of five different individuals, and suffer from physiological assembly limits, due to great repetition in the genome. This means that there are slight differences which may lead to poorly reproducible results, due to mitochondrial polymorphic sites and to a still not completely defined nuclear genome. Thus, changing methods or parameters or applying the method to different human genome sequence collections produce diverse results. Here, we suggest the usage of different approaches and the comparison of the obtained results, in order to minimize both false positive and negative results with the aim to optimize quantification and localization of human NumtS. Our overall proposal is to apply several bioinformatics approaches, to compare the results, to produce a consensus compilation and then validate the results through PCR and sequencing analysis. This last step is not the primary scope of this work although we report some preliminary results. Available bioinformatics programs for this type of analysis are BLAST, BLAT and FASTA. We used only BLAST [33, 34] and BLAT , the performance of which better suited our needs. BLAST is implemented in many versions, Blastn, Blastx, tBLastn, MegaBlast, etc. We used Blastn and MegaBlast, the versions most frequently adopted in reports on human NumtS compilation.
Tables 1 and 2 summarise the results obtained with Blastn, searching the revised Reference Cambridge Sequence  (J01415.2) similarity versus various human nucleotide sequence datasets by changing limits by Entrez and limits on number of positive hits to be displayed (see Methods section). The data in the tables clearly show how easy it is to obtain false positive or negative hits. Among the various results, we chose the one producing 2145 hits, comparing the J01415.2 sequence against the Chromosome Genome database with the Entrez limit "homo sapiens [ORGN] NOT (mitochondrion OR mitochondrial) [ALL]" since in this case hits on the mitochondrial genome were not obtained (query #19 in Table 2). The data shown here were produced in March 2007, when the old version of Blast was available. At present, some of the Blast options we used are no longer available.
We used MegaBlast to compare the J01415.2 Human mt sequence against the last assembled Human genome database and Human Genome Reference sequence sets (Build 36.2, January 2007): when the E threshold was set at 0.001, the resulting hits were 288 and 186 respectively.
We applied the BLAT program by submitting the J01415.2 Human mt sequence to the four available Human Builds, obtaining 118, 122, 124 and 117 hits for the hg15, hg16, hg17 and hg18 human genome assemblies. In parallel, we applied the same runs with the NC_001807.4 human mt genome, reported by NCBI as the reference human mt genome sequence. There are 22 differences between these two genomes, which cause differing results (data not shown). This is a further explanation of the differing results obtained in published compilations in which different query sequences were used.
The RHNumtS compilation production
Comparisons of our results with the published ones allowed us to produce the RHNumtS compilation. The resulting NumtS total 190. Each NumtS in the compilation refers to an mtDNA fragment; thus, if 2 mtDNA regions are contiguous on nuclear DNA, they are considered as two distinct NumtS. This is the case, for example, of the repeated NumtSs 41–54 that was here validated experimentally (see Figure 2a). Table 3 reports RHNumtS data for NumtS whose mt fragment length is greater than 2000 bp. The complete compilation is available in Additional file 1. The rationale used to produce the compilation is described here. The reference results are those obtained through BlastN (code 19 in Table 2). Hits less than 2000 nucleotides from each other, on both nuclear and mt genomes were merged. The results were compared with those from Megablast [Human Genome all assemblies (Build 36.2, January 2007)] and BLAT (Assembling hg18): the more reproducible the results obtained with the various methods, the higher the probability that NumtS exists in the Human Genome. Each NumtS in RHNumtS is identified by a numeric code (RHNumtS identifier); only three were identified by a letter. To each NumtS we associated: chromosome and strand location, both mt and nuclear coordinates of the NumtS ("mt start" and "mt end", "chr start" and "chr end"); mitochondrial and nuclear fragment lengths and differences between mitochondrial and nuclear fragment lengths; the longer the NumtS, the higher the number of gaps within the NumtS, thus indicating that it likely underwent several modifications since the time of its insertion in the nuclear genome. Additional file 2 reports the comparison of Blastn obtained data vs BLAT and Megablast results. Of the 190 NumtS available through RHNumtS, 122 (64%) were matched with both Blastn and BLAT, 60 (32%) with Blastn only and eight (4%) with Blastn, but located on the Celera assembly instead of the public Human Genome consortium. The compilation was compared with some published compilations. For each NumtS, Additional file 3 lists its presence (OK) or absence (-) in some of the published compilations. Question marks (?) indicate ambiguous cases. With respect to the Parr compilation , the sequenced NumtS are all present in RHNumtS; this validates our results, although some sequenced NumtS could not be present in our compilation, due to their polymorphic features. The same applies to the two NumtS sequenced by Collura , located on chromosome 7. In order to quantify the strength of our approach, RHNumtS quality scores were assigned to each NumtS for each program applied and for each match with the selected published compilations, according to defined criteria: 0.25 or 0.50 for an ambiguous or perfect match with each of the selected published compilations [16, 23, 26, 28], 2.00 for matches with Parr and Collura sequenced NumtS, 0.25 for ambiguous matches with Megablast hits, 1.00 for perfect matches with MegaBlast and BLAT hits, and 0.75 for NumtS not directly identified by BLAT. Score values range from 6 to 0.25. The last column of Additional file 1 and Table 3 lists the total score for each NumtS. NumtS with scores higher than 3 (16.3% of the total Reference Human NumtS compilation) are highlighted. Perfect matches with published compilations are at most 12%: this is the case of the comparison with the Wallace compilation .
Human NumtS Sequencing
The assigned scores are theoretical indicators of the quality of our prediction, but experimental validation of the predicted RHNumtS compilation is definitely a must and this is our goal in the immediate future. Starting from the RHNumtS compilation, we propose to test the real presence of each NumtS in a set of different healthy subjects belonging to different geographic areas and various haplogroups, in order to verify if the NUMTS presence/absence may be different in various phylogenetic lineages. Experimental validation will be based on the amplification and sequencing of the NumtS. This requires a great effort in terms of manpower and funds. However such project is currently ongoing and here we report only preliminary results obtained for 41 of the 190 NumtS, selected among the NumtS with lower scores. Indeed, the lower the score, the higher the probability that the NumtS is a false positive. Table 4 reports the list of the analyzed NumtS with information about samples where amplification and sequencing has been successful. Figure 2 reports the PCR amplification of (a) 27 of the selected NumtS in 4 healthy subjects from different ethnic groups and (b) 14 NumtS in a European sample. With respect to NumtS 41–54, the H2b and L2a1c1 samples have shorter amplicons, due to the presence of a lower number of repeats, as confirmed in the multi-alignment (Additional file 4).
The 122 NumtS sequence of the Latin American sample and the European sample of NumtS 170, 178 and 187 were not obtained. For NumtS 87, 122 and 41–54 Additional file 4 reports the nucleotide multi-alignment of the amplified and sequenced NumtS in the samples from the 4 different haplogroups, compared with the NumtS sequence as extracted from the Human Genome build 36.2 through the UCSC genome browser (hg18 release), and the sequences of the corresponding mitochondrial region for the same samples. As it appears from the multi-alignment there is a high conservation of the NumtS among the different subjects, although heterozygous sites can be observed (nucleotide ambiguity letter such as Y for C/T, R for A/G, etc.). NumtS sites reporting ambiguous nucleotides do in fact refer to sites where two alleles are evidenced in the sequence. The comparison of NumtS sequence with the corresponding mtDNA also clearly shows divergence among them. Additional file 5 reports the multialignments of the other 21 NumtS whose sequences have been so far produced for the European sample only. The NumtS sequence is aligned with the hg18 and mitochondrial corresponding sequences.
The resulting compilation was further analyzed, in order to qualify and quantify the process of transfer of Human mtDNA into the nuclear genome.
NumtS distribution along the genome
Chromosome 2 hosts the largest amount of NumtS, whereas chromosomes 19 and 22 do not show to harbour NumtS although, due to their polymorphic features, some individuals may present them on the latter chromosomes. Generally speaking, the longer the chromosome, the greater the chance of locating NumtS, partly because, as reported below, selection operates in the direction of avoiding NumtS inside genes, so that shorter chromosomes with a higher density of genes are less prone to hosting NumtS. In addition, with respect to the chromosome region where NumtS are located, no preference between euchromatin or etherochromatin regions has been observed. However, for each NumtS chromosome band, Additional file 6 lists information contributing to an overview about where NumtS are integrated.
For each NumtS Additional file 1 also lists the mt and chromosomal fragment lengths, besides the mt and nuclear coordinates. These values do not coincide since, after insertion, NumtS undergo rearrangements such as deletions, insertions, and single nucleotide substitutions. The older the NumtS, the greater the difference between mitochondrial and chromosomal fragments (see difference column in Table 3 and additional file 1). The longest mt fragment located on the nuclear genome is NumtS no. 81, 14654 mt bp, located on chromosome 4 and highly compacted: the 81 NumtS chromosomal fragment is in fact 14587 bp long. The shortest NumtS is 45 bp long. More than 30% of NumtS derive from mt fragments longer than 2000 mt bp (Table 3). NumtS chromosomal fragment length is listed in Additional File 6: the longest one is NumtS 120, 18604 chromosomal BP, containing a mt fragment 12281 bp long, located on chromosome 9, with an RHNumtS score of 1.5. NumtS 103, 12053 bp long and derived from an mt fragment of 12106 nucleotides, located on chromosome 7, received a score of 6, because it was entirely sequenced from both Parr  and Collura .
Estimation of similarity
Although Blastn, Megablast and BLAT provide scores and percentages of identity, the values are approximate for each hit, due to the heuristic algorithms implemented in these programs. We thus further analysed each NumtS by applying both the Needleman and Wunsch algorithm for global alignment and the Waterman and Smith algorithm for local ones. Additional file 7 shows alignment scores compared with BLAT scores. The highest score is that of NumtS 81, which contains the longest mt fragment. Half of the NumtS have similarity values between 99% and 80%, thus showing a high degree of conservation from the time of their insertion in the nucleus.
NumtS in nuclear genes
Once the NumtS had been located through the UCSC Genome Browser  and NCBI Map viewer , we checked their location in nuclear genes. For NumtS located in genomic regions coding for genes, Additional file 6 lists both the gene name and the region of the gene where the NumtS are mapped. There are 16 NumtS inside genes; they are always located inside introns, and only two (13 and 88) are located in 5'UTR regions.
NumtS and isochores
Isochores are large DNA segments (> 300 kb on average) characterized by an internal variation in GC well below the full variation observed in the mammalian genome . The previous definition of human isochores, based on ultracentrifugation in Cs2SO4 density gradients, has recently been revised by simply scanning the GC% content along the entire genome, and the five isochore families L1, L2, H1, H2 and H3, were defined according to GC content, values increasing from L1 to H3. We mapped the NumtS on isochores according to the data published in . Results are listed in Additional file 6. Only 9% of total NumtS in RHNumtS were not located within isochores; 5% maps with the highest GC dense isochores (H2, H3); 30% on isochore H1, and 33% and 23% on isochores L2 and L1, respectively. Thus, NumtS prefer locations with low GC contents, corresponding to poor gene-containing regions. Indeed, the presence of a NumtS inside a gene may cause loss of function, so selection may act to clean out the genome from disrupting NumtS insertion events. This is also confirmed by the fact that, when NumtS are located in a gene, the gene region is always an intron and in some rare cases a UTR.
Mapping of Human NumtS along Human mt genome
As already reported by Parr et al. , human NumtS are made up of mt fragments covering the entire human mt genome, "the pseudo-mitochondrial human genome". For each human mt gene, Figure 3 shows the RHNumtS identifiers containing it: all mt regions are present in the NumtS, but the number of NumtS containing any mt gene is highly variable. Moreover, not all NumtS contain an mt gene entirely, because the locus may be located partially at the 5' and 3' ends of the NumtS or because it may have been truncated after insertion by rearrangement events. The mt genes most frequently present in the "pseudo-human mt-genome" are the two ribosomal RNAs, ND5 and COI genes; the least represented is the D-loop region. At present, no explanation for such preferences can be made. Certainly, the higher the number of locus copies in the nuclear genome, the higher the risk of co-amplification of mt-nuclear DNA, in any study on mtDNA variations.
The RHNumtS compilation proposed here results from the application of several bioinformatics approaches and from comparisons of resulting data with previously published Human NumtS compilations. It thus represents a highly reliable reference basis on which to start designing a lab protocol to test the truthfulness of each NumtS. Two experimental procedures are proposed: nDNA-mtDNA hybridisation, as already done with the Canis familiaris genome , or by amplifying and sequencing NumtS themselves. The latter approach, here adopted to validate 25% of the NumtS whose score in our compilation is lower than 3, confirms the quality of our bioinformatics approach; however, a systematic and complete experimental validation will be designed. In parallel, we are already designing the RHNumtS database structure for implementation in the HmtDB resource . This database will report the NumtS sequences annotated with the attributes derived from both in silico and in vitro analyses. This work will be important because until now no database concerning NumtS has ever been published, so that we will be able to offer an updated reference for consultation on-line to the scientific community interested in analysis of foreign DNA integration. In the future, the same database will host NumtS compilations from other organisms, but these will be generated only when the nuclear genome of a specific organism has reached a high-quality level of assembly. Once the Reference Compilations for other organisms have been produced, pairwise NumtS compilation comparisons, based on the UCSC Genome Browser Alignment net option, will be used to define orthologous NumtS. This procedure has been already implemented in  in the Human-Chimp comparison. Lastly, some features of Human NumtS will be investigated. We will also analyze SNPs located inside NumtS through dbSNP at NCBI. These data may offer new perspectives in population mitochondrial genetics, preferentially in those NumtS that comparative genomics may indicate as being conserved. Lastly, with respect to the NumtS insertion site, we have started some preliminary pattern analysis by applying the WORDUP program  to the NumtS flanking region, although no significant results have yet been found (data not shown). This should mean that NumtS integration is not guided by specific DNA signals or does not generate any specific pattern, as is the case for retrotransposons, in which LTR sequences are generated after integration. Gherman et al. have recently confirmed the randomness of NumtS site integration .
Blastn compares a nucleotide query sequence against a nucleotide database. It can produce differing results if the parameters selected among those available differ. The input data for a Blastn run are: query sequence, sequence set to be searched, Expected number of chance matches in a random model (E-value), maximum number of hits to be displayed, maximum number of aligned sequences to be displayed, size of the string to be searched in pairwise comparison (word size), scoring parameters, and filtering and masking options. In addition, within the "sequence set to be searched" section, a specific sequence subset can be selected with the Limits option, available through the Entrez retrieval system . We submitted several runs, changing: a) the sequence set to be searched ("chromosome", "nr" (not redundant nucleotide sequences) or "refseq_genome"), with and without Limits by Entrez; b) Maximum number of Hits to be displayed (egg. Description# = 1000, Graphic display# = 500, Alignments view# = 1000). The threshold E-value was always fixed at 0.001. The query sequence was that of the revised Reference Cambridge Sequence (GenBank Accession J01415.2, ). As already stated above, if the reference human mitochondrial genome is changed, the Blast result also changes.
As reported in the NCBI Handbook , "MEGABLAST is specifically designed to efficiently find long alignments between very similar sequences and thus it is the best tool to find the identical match to the query sequence. In addition to the expected value significance cut-off, MEGABLAST also provides an adjustable percent identity cut-off that overrides the significance threshold."
BLAT (BLAST-Like Alignment Tool)  is a very fast sequence alignment tool similar to BLAST. On DNA queries, BLAT is designed to find quickly sequences with 95% or greater similarity 40 BP long or more. It may miss genomic alignments that are more divergent or shorter than these minima, although it will find perfect sequence matches of 33 bases and sometimes as few as 22. The tool is capable of aligning sequences containing large intron sequences. Thus, because NumtS, after insertion in the nuclear genome, undergoes further arrangements, losing or acquiring new interspersed fragments and/or single nucleotides, BLAT is definitely a good tool for locating them. Instead, Blast locates single fragments of the entire NumtS. As both approaches are useful for a complete view of NumtS, this is the reason for our using both methods. The BLAT program available at the UCSC site has the great advantage of allowing the comparison of a query sequence against a repertoire of four different Human Builds, starting from April 2004 up to October 2006. Each Human Build also reports the absolute coordinate for each Chromosome, thus ensuring a good referencing system for locating NumtS in the genome. Each hit in BLAT corresponds to a wide region where several blocks are located. These can be displayed and analysed starting from the BLAT output page and clicking on "details", so that the sequences of each block and their alignment appear. Thus, aligned blocks with gaps less than or equal to 8 BP are merged, when only one sequence has a gap or when gaps in both sequences are of the same size. This implies that the identity percentage is the sum of the matches in each block divided by the sum of the block lengths.
Amplification and Sequencing
In order to carry out a preliminary validation of the compilation, we selected 41 NumtS whose score is lower than 3 and submitted them to PCR amplification and sequencing. The 41 NumtS were amplified on DNA extracted from the blood of a European individual available in G. Romeo laboratory. Moreover 27 among the 41 NumtS were also amplified from DNA extracted from the blood of 3 healthy subjects belonging to different geographic areas and different haplogroups, in order to verify the NumtS presence/absence in phylogenetic lineages. Samples selected for analysis were individuals coming from Japan (A. Torroni laboratory), Latin America and North Africa (V. Carelli laboratory), and belonged respectively to haplogroups H2b, G1a1a, I3a and L2a1c1. Among the 27 NumtS, 16 were sequenced in all the samples: NumtS 87, 122 and 41–54. NumtSs 41–54, because they were tandemly repeated, were amplified and sequenced all together. For some of the amplified NumtS, the sequencing failed. These are marked in Table 4. PCR conditions were not always equal. Primers were designed with PRIMER3 software, testing the amplification of the full NumtS (external-external primers) or part of it (external-internal primers or internal-internal primers) as reported in Table 4 and Figures 2a and 2b. Before the application of the PRIMER3 program to the NumtS sequence and its flanking regions, the sequence was submitted to further bioinformatics test by blasting it against the J01415.2 reference mt sequence using the Blast2 program .
This produces new results allowing a refinement of the RHNumtS compilation as far as it concerns NumtS region extension.
Primer sequences are available on request. The sequences were produced starting from the amplified fragments. Sequencing was performed with BigDye v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions, on an AB3730 capillary analyzer. The produced sequences have been multialigned by applying MAFFT  and MUSCLE  programs both available at  in the tools section.
Bensasson D, Zhang D, Hartl DL, Hewitt GM: Mitochondrial pseudogenes: evolution's misplaced witnesses. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001, 16 (6): 314-321. 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02151-6.
Du Buy HG, Riley FL: Hybridization between the nuclear and kinetoplast DNAs of Leishmania enriettii and between nuclear and mitochondrial DNAs of mouse liver. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1967, 57: 790-797. 10.1073/pnas.57.3.790.
Farrelly F, Butow RA: Rearranged mitochondrial genes in the yeast nuclear genome. Nature. 1983, 301: 296-301. 10.1038/301296a0.
Gellissen G, Bradfield JY, White BN, Wyatt GR: Mitochondrial DNA sequences in the nuclear genome of a locust. Nature. 1983, 301: 631-634. 10.1038/301631a0.
Wright RM, Cummings DJ: Integration of mitochondrial gene sequences within the nuclear genome during senescence in a fungus. Nature. 1983, 302: 86-88. 10.1038/302086a0.
Jacobs HT, Posakony JW, Grula JW, Roberts JW, Xin JH, Britten RJ, Davidson EH: Mitochondrial DNA sequences in the nuclear genome of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. J Mol Biol. 1983, 165: 609-632. 10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80270-8.
Tsuzuki T, Nomiyama H, Setoyama C, Maeda S, Shimada K: Presence of mitochondrial DNA like sequences in the human nuclear DNA. Gene. 1983, 25: 223-229. 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90226-3.
Kemble RJ, Mans RJ, Gabay-Laughnan S, Laughnan JR: Sequences homologous to episomal mitochondrial DNAs in the maize nuclear genome. Nature. 1983, 304: 744-747. 10.1038/304744a0.
Hadler HI, Dimitrijevic B, Mahalingam R: Mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA from normal rat liver have a common sequence. Genomics. 1983, 22: 487-489.
Lopez JV, Yuhki N, Masuda R, Modi W, O'brien SJ: Numt a recent transfer and tandem amplification of mitochondrial DNA to the nuclear genome of the domestic cat. J Mol Evol. 1994, 39: 174-190.
Bravi CM, Parson W: Numts Revisited. Human Mitochondrial DNA and the Evolution of Homo Sapiens. Edited by: Bandelt V, Macaulay M, Richards HJ. 2006, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, chapter 3 (Part 1): 31-
Gherman A, Chen PE, Teslovich TM, Stankiewicz P, Withers M, Kashuk CS, Chakravarti A, Lupski JR, Cutler DJ, Katsanis N: Population Bottlenecks as a Potential Major Shaping Force of Human Genome Architecture. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3 (7): e119-10.1371/journal.pgen.0030119.
Zischler H, von Haeseler A, Paabo S: A nuclear fossil of the mitochondrial D-loop and the origin of the modern humans. Nature. 1995, 378: 489-492. 10.1038/378489a0.
Andrews RM, Kubacka I, Chinnery PF, Lightowlers RN, Turnbull DM, Howell N: Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA. Nat Genet. 1999, 23 (2): 147-10.1038/13779.
Yuan JD, Shi JX, Meng GX, An LG, Hu GX: Nuclear pseudogenes of mitochondrial DNA as a variable part of the human genome. Cell Res. 1999, 9: 281-290. 10.1038/sj.cr.7290027.
Ricchetti M, Tekaia F, Dujon B: Continued colonization of the Human Genome by mitochondrial DNA. Plos Biology. 2004, 2 (9): e273-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020273.
Antunes A, Ramos MJ: Discovery of a large number of previously unrecognised mitochondrial pseudogenes in fish genomes. Genomics. 2005, 86 (6): 708-717. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.08.002.
Venkatesh B, Dandona N, Brenner S: Fugu genome does not contain mitochondrial pseudogenes. Genomics. 2006, 87: 307-310. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.11.007.
Behura SK: Analysis of nuclear copies of mitochondrial sequences in honey bee Apis mellifera genome. Mol Biol and Evol. 2007, 24 (7): 1492-505. 10.1093/molbev/msm068.
Woodward SR, Weyand NJ, Bunnell M: DNA sequence from Cretaceous period bone fragments. Science. 1995, 268: 1194-10.1126/science.268.5214.1194.
Wallace DC, Stugard C, Murdock D, Schurr T, Brown MD: Ancient mtDNA sequences in the human nuclear genome: a potential source of errors in identifying pathogenic mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94 (26): 14900-14905. 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14900.
Adcock GJ, Dennis ES, Easteal S, Huttley GA, Jermiin LS, Peacock WJ, Thorne A: Mitochondrial DNA sequences in ancient Australians: Implications for modern human origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (2): 537-42. 10.1073/pnas.98.2.537.
Hazkani-Covo E, Sorek R, Graur D: Evolutionary dynamics of large NUMTs in the Human Genome: rarity of independent insertions and Abundance of Post-insertion duplications. J Mol Evol. 2003, 56: 169-174. 10.1007/s00239-002-2390-5.
Schmitz J, Piskurek O, Zischler H: Forty million years of independent evolution: a mitochondrial gene and its corresponding nuclear pseudogene in primates. J Mol Evol. 2005, 61 (1): 1-11. 10.1007/s00239-004-0293-3.
Lopez JV, Culver M, Stephens JC, Johnson WE, O'Brien SJ: Rates of nuclear and cytoplasmic mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence in mammals. Mol Biol Evol. 1997, 14 (3): 277-86.
Mishmar D, Ruiz-Pesini E, Brandon M, Wallace DC: Mitochondrial DNA like sequences in the Nucleus (NUMTs):Insights onto our african origins and the mechanism of foreign DNA integration. Human mutation. 2004, 23: 125-133. 10.1002/humu.10304.
Tourmen Y, Baris O, Dessen P, Jacques C, Malthiery Y, Reynier P: Structure and chromosomal distribution of human mitochondrial pseudogenes. Genomics. 2002, 80 (1): 71-77. 10.1006/geno.2002.6798.
Mourier T, Hansen AJ, Willerslev E, Arctander P: The Human Genome Project reveals a continuous transfer of Large Mitochondrial Fragments to the Nucleus. Mol Biol and Evol. 2001, 18: 1833-1837.
Woischnick M, Moraes CT: Pattern of organization of human mitochondrial pseudogenes in the nuclear genome. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 885-893. 10.1101/gr.227202. Article published online before print in May 2002.
Bensasson D, Feldman MW, Petrov DA: Rates of DNA duplication and Insertion in the Human Genome. J Mol Evol. 2004, 57 (3): 343-354. 10.1007/s00239-003-2485-7.
Hazkani-Covo E, Graur D: A Comparative Analysis of Numt Evolution in Human and Chimpazee. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (1): 13-8. 10.1093/molbev/msl149.
Parr RL, Maki J, Reguly B, Dakubo GD, Aguirre A, Wittock R, Robinson K, Jakupciak JP, Thayer RE: The pseudomitochondrial genome influences mistakes in heteroplasmy interpretation. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 185-10.1186/1471-2164-7-185.
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215 (3): 403-410.
Altschul SF, Boguski MS, Gish W, Wootton JC: Issues in searching molecular sequence databases. Nature Genet. 1994, 6: 119-129. 10.1038/ng0294-119.
Kent WJ: BLAT – The BLAST-Like Alignment Tool. Genome Res. 2002, 12 (4): 656-664. 10.1101/gr.229202. Article published online before March 2002.
Madden T: The BLAST sequence analysis tool. NCBI Handbook part 3. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=handbook]
Collura R, Stewart CB: Insertions and duplications of mtDNA in the nuclear genomes of Old World Monkeys and Hominoids. Nature. 1995, 378: 485-489. 10.1038/378485a0.
UCSC Genome Browser. [http://genome.ucsc.edu/]
NCBI Map viewer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview]
Bernardi G: Isochores and the evolutionary genomics of vertebrates. Gene. 2000, 241 (1): 3-17. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00485-0.
Costantini M, Clay O, Auletta F, Bernardi G: An isochore map of human chromosomes. Genome Res. 2006, 16 (4): 536-541. 10.1101/gr.4910606.
Ishiguro N, Nakajima A, Horiuchi M, Shinagawa M: Multiple nuclear pseudogenes of mitochondrial DNA exist in the canine genome. Mamm Genome. 2002, 13 (7): 365-72. 10.1007/s00335-001-2139-2.
Attimonelli M, Accetturo M, Santamaria M, Lascaro D, Scioscia G, Pappada G, Russo L, Zanchetta L, Tommaseo-Ponzetta M: HmtDB, a Human Mitochondrial Genomic Resource Based on Variability Studies Supporting Population Genetics and Biomedical Research. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005, 6 (Suppl 4): S4-10.1186/1471-2105-6-S4-S4.
Pesole G, Prunella N, Liuni S, Attimonelli M, Saccone C: WordUP: an efficient algorithm for discovering statistically significant patterns in DNA sequences. Nucl Acids Res. 1992, 20 (11): 2871-2875. 10.1093/nar/20.11.2871.
Entrez home. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Entrez]
Katoh K, Misawa1 K, Kuma K, Miyata T: MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research. 2002, 30 (14): 3059-3066. 10.1093/nar/gkf436.
Edgar RC: MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 113-10.1186/1471-2105-5-113.
EBI home. [http://www.ebi.ac.uk]
Blast2 site. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/bl2seq/wblast2.cgi]
We thank students G. Macchia, N. Quaranta, M.P. Tomasino and G. Girolimetti who, while preparing their degree theses, contributed to the compilation; the student S. Carlucci for Primers selection. This work was supported by the University of Bari, "PROGETTO DI RICERCA MIUR-PNR FIRB "Laboratorio Internazionale di Bioinformatica"", and PRIN 2006 (project # 2006064992_003). We thank also Prof. A. Torroni (University of Pavia, Italy) and Prof. V. Carelli (University of Bologna, Italy) for kindly giving us the DNA samples used in the NumtS validation experiments.
MA: study design and coordination; SC and DL: bioinformatics analysis and results organization; GG: NumtS amplification and sequencing; CS: supervisor; GR: supervisor and sequencing fund support. All authors discussed the data and participated in the production of the manuscript.
Electronic supplementary material
Additional file 1: . A detailed legend is reported in Table 3. (XLS 30 KB)
Additional file 2: Comparison of BLAT and Megablast results. For each NumtS in the RHNumtS compilation, Megablast and BLAT programs either did or did not detect it (yes/no); if yes, table shows mt coordinates, BLAT code assigned, number of aligned blocks and fragments as reported in BLAT details, and %identity value as reported in BLAT output. NumtS reporting code "Yes_1" in "BLAT hits correspondence table" were recovered by submitting mt fragment corresponding to a NumtS obtained through Blastn to BLAT, and not through submission of entire mt genome (J01415.2 or NC_01807.4) to BLAT. (XLS 38 KB)
Additional file 4: Multi-alignments of sequenced NumtS from 4 different phylo-geographic samples. The nucleotide multi-alignments of the amplified (fig 2a in the manuscript) and sequenced NumtS 87, 122 and 41–54 of individuals coming from Europe, Japan, Latin America and North Africa belonging respectively to haplogroups H2b, G1a1a, I3a and L2a1c1 compared with the NumtS sequence as it can be extracted from the Human Genome build36.2 through the UCSC genome browser (hg18 release) and the sequences of the corresponding mitochondrial region for the same samples, are reported. Multi-alignments of NumtS 87 and 122 include the rCRS sequence (accession number J01415.2 in GenBank) also, thus allowing the exact localization of the variant sites respect to the universally used human mitochondrial reference sequence. As far as NumtS 41-54 the reference sequence has been added to NumtS 43 only in a distinctly reported multialignment. The conservation of NumtS is evident from the multialignment among the different subjects, although heterozygous sites can be observed (nucleotide ambiguity letter such as Y for C/T, R for A/G etc.). Each multi-alignment refers to the nuclear region (from Chromosome start to Chromosome end), as reported in additional file 1. The NumtS sequences produced in our validation experiments are named with a code defined by the NumtS code and the haplogroup of the sample. The corresponding mtDNA regions are coded as mt, followed by the haplogroup code. The reference sequence for 122 NumtS is extracted from Celera genome chromosome 9 (CM00260). Sequencing of L2a1c1 122 NumtS, H2b and L2a1c1 41, 42 and 54 NumtS failed. (PDF 533 KB)
Additional file 5: Sequences of 22 NumtS from a European sample (haplogroup L2a1c1). Each sequence has been multi-aligned with the NumtS sequence as it can be extracted from the Human Genome build36.2 through the UCSC genome browser (hg18 release), the sequence of the corresponding mitochondrial region for the same sample and the rCRS sequence (accession number J01415.2 in GenBank ). Each multi-alignment refers to the nuclear region (from Chromosome start to Chromosome end), as reported in additional file 1. The NumtS sequences produced in our validation experiments are named with a code defined by the NumtS code and the haplogroup of the sample. The corresponding mtDNA regions are coded as mt, followed by the haplogroup code. (PDF 2 MB)
Additional file 6: NumtS in RHNumtS featuring data. Scores obtained through application of NeedleN program. Chromosome map location, isochore family in which NumtS is located, name of gene and its region, if any, and NumtS location are all listed. NumtS are ordered according to decreasing length. (XLS 37 KB)
Additional file 7: Alignment results obtained with NeedlN and WaterN programs, available through EBI SRS server, compared with BLAT scores. Table shows results for each NumtS from both Needleman and Wunsch and Waterman and Smith algorithms for global and local alignments. Results of alignments are compared with BLAT scores. Each NumtS is identified by a numeric code in NumtS Code column. Columns list % similarity, % gaps, score, alignment length and ratio obtained by application of alignment programs. BLAT scores for each NumtS Code are shown in last column. (XLS 54 KB)
About this article
Cite this article
Lascaro, D., Castellana, S., Gasparre, G. et al. The RHNumtS compilation: Features and bioinformatics approaches to locate and quantify Human NumtS. BMC Genomics 9, 267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-267
- Nuclear Genome
- Query Sequence
- UCSC Genome Browser
- Bioinformatics Approach
- Revise Reference Cambridge Sequence