Open Access

MicroRNA expression profiles from eggs of different qualities associated with post-ovulatory ageing in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

  • Hao Ma1,
  • Gregory M Weber2,
  • Mark A Hostuttler2,
  • Hairong Wei3,
  • Lei Wang1 and
  • Jianbo Yao1Email author
BMC Genomics201516:201

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1400-0

Received: 15 September 2014

Accepted: 24 February 2015

Published: 17 March 2015

Abstract

Background

Egg quality is an important aspect in rainbow trout farming. Post-ovulatory aging is one of the most important factors affecting egg quality. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are the major regulators in various biological processes and their expression profiles could serve as reliable biomarkers for various pathological and physiological conditions. The objective of this study was to identify miRNAs that are associated with egg qualities in rainbow trout using post-ovulatory aged eggs.

Results

Egg samples from females on day 1, day 7, and day 14 post-ovulation (D1PO, D7PO and D14PO), which had the fertilization rates of 91.8%, 73.4% and less than 50%, respectively, were collected and small RNAs isolated from these samples were subjected to deep sequencing using the Illumina platform. The massive sequencing produced 27,342,477, 26,910,438 and 29,185,371 reads from the libraries of D1PO, D7PO and D14PO eggs, respectively. A three-way comparison of the miRNAs indicated that the egg samples shared 392 known and 236 novel miRNAs, and a total of 414, 481, and 470 known and 243, 298, and 296 novel miRNAs were identified from D1PO, D7PO and D14PO eggs, respectively. Four known miRNAs (omy-miR-193b-3p, omy-miR-203c-3p, omy-miR-499-5p and omy-miR-7550-3p) and two novel miRNAs (omy-miR-nov-95-5p and omy-miR-nov-112-5p) showed significantly higher expression in D1PO eggs relative to D14PO eggs as revealed by both deep sequencing and real time quantitative PCR analysis. GO analysis of the predicted target genes of these differentially expressed miRNAs revealed significantly enriched GO terms that are related to stress response, cell death, DNA damage, ATP generation, signal transduction and transcription regulation.

Conclusions

Results indicate that post-ovulatory ageing affects miRNA expression profiles in rainbow trout eggs, which can in turn impact egg quality. Further characterization of the differentially expressed miRNAs and their target genes may provide valuable information on the role of these miRNAs in controlling egg quality, and ultimately lead to the development of biomarkers for prediction of egg quality in rainbow trout.

Keywords

microRNA Egg quality Post ovulation Rainbow trout

Background

Fish egg quality is defined as the capability of an egg to become fertilized and subsequently develop into a normal embryo or the probability of eggs to exhibit low mortalities at fertilization, eyeing, hatching, and first feeding [1]. The production of high quality eggs is a major objective of the aquaculture industry, as egg quality not only affects fertilization rate, but also is an important attribute of robust embryonic development [2,3]. However, visible differences between good and bad eggs at oviposition is not usually conspicuous in rainbow trout, and therefore, the inclusion of eggs from individual females with poor egg quality into mass incubation units not only results in unexpected losses in egg production, but also problems associated with the removal of dead eggs and embryos after fertilization and fungi infection in the hatchery [4]. Therefore, enabling evaluation of the egg quality before fertilization is highly desirable in aquaculture production.

In teleost fish, a mature egg is developed through multiple phases, including primary oocyte growth, secondary growth including the cortical alveolus stage and vitellogenesis, follicle maturation and ovulation [5,6]. The coordinated multiple developmental stages can be affected by many genetic, biological, and environmental factors [3]. It has been reported that the quality of rainbow trout eggs is dependent not only on the genetic characteristics of parents [5], but also the age of female [7], and are susceptible to environmental influences, such as the diet of brood fish [8-12], stress [13-15], photoperiod [16], and the physiochemical conditions of the water [17]. All of these factors make egg quality highly variable and difficult to control [18,19]. As the ovulated eggs in reared rainbow trout do not usually oviposit naturally, post-ovulatory aging of the eggs is widely accepted as a common determinant for egg quality [20-22].

The importance to distinguish good and bad quality eggs before fertilization has driven studies on the identification of markers associated with egg quality in rainbow trout. Wojtczak and coworkers found that very poor quality eggs turn water turbid [23]. Egg survival rate has also been associated with aspects of egg composition [20]. The total amount of water imbibed after 30 minute incubation has been recognized as an indicator of egg quality [24]. In addition, molecular markers that are potential indicators of egg quality have also been reported. Such markers include the maternally-derived IGF-I and IGF-II [25], and LVII fragments as well as other proteins identified from the coelomic fluid [26]. Many specific genes that are potentially involved in the regulation of oocyte maturation, egg developmental potential, and embryo survival were identified by microarray and quantitative real time PCR (RT-qPCR) analyses [3,27,28]. Although the above studies have attempted to address the critical factors responsible for the observed variability of egg quality, the molecular mechanisms underpinning the regulation of egg quality in rainbow trout remain largely elusive.

Recent advances in epigenetic research have demonstrated that the evolutionarily conserved microRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in differentiation and maturation of various cell types [29,30]. In zebrafish, mutant embryos lacking mature miRNAs had severe deformity during embryogenesis [31-34]. In mouse, although the miRNA functions are suppressed during oocyte maturation, the maternal miRNAs are critical to normal embryonic development [35-38]. In addition, many miRNAs have been shown to play roles in programmed cell death [38-42]. A comprehensive review of miRNAs in teleost fish development, reproduction and response to environmental stimuli was published recently [43]. In order to identify the miRNAs that might play important roles in oocyte and embryonic development in rainbow trout, the expression of miRNAs in rainbow trout eggs and early embryos have been studied and some novel egg-predominant miRNAs were identified [44,45]. In this study, post-ovulatory aged rainbow trout eggs with different qualities were collected and used to generate miRNA transcriptome profiles for identifying specific miRNAs associated with egg quality, which could potentially be used as biomarkers for evaluating egg quality. The study also provides new information and insights for future studies to elucidate the gene regulatory networks involved in the control of egg quality.

Results

Identification of known and novel miRNAs in eggs of different qualities

Small RNA libraries constructed from eggs of different ages post-ovulation were subjected to deep sequencing using the Illumina platform. The massive sequencing produced 27,342,477, 26,910,438 and 29,185,371 reads from the libraries constructed from D1PO, D7PO and D14PO eggs, respectively (Table 1). After removing the impurity sequences, known mRNAs, non-coding RNA families without miRNA, and repetitive DNA sequences, the remaining 23,554,621, 26,144,764 and 28,408,709 sequences from these three samples were used for identification of known miRNAs and prediction of new miRNAs.
Table 1

Number of sequences generated from small RNA libraries of eggs with different qualities

Items

D1PO

D7PO

D14PO

Total reads

27,342,477

26,910,438

29,185,371

Mappable reads

23,554,621

26,144,764

28,408,709

Reads mapped to miRbase

2,945,228

2,261,910

1,464,754

Reads for novel miRNA prediction

13,421,585

14,105,022

15,709,247

A total of 2,945,228, 2,261,910 and 1,464,754 sequences from D1PO, D7PO and D14PO eggs, respectively, were mapped to miRbase database (Release 21). Based on the criteria described in “Methods” section for known miRNAs, a total of 496 known miRNAs were identified from the three samples (Additional file 1: Table S1). Predication of novel miRNAs was carried out according to the criteria that the extended sequences of the miRNAs at the aligned rainbow trout genomic locations have the propensity of forming hairpin structures, and the sequences do not meet the criteria of known miRNAs. The number of novel miRNAs predicted from our datasets was 306 (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Identification of differentially expressed miRNAs in eggs of different qualities

A three-way comparison of the miRNAs among the samples indicated that D1PO, D7PO and D14PO eggs shared 392 known and 236 novel miRNAs (Figure 1). A total of 414, 481, and 470 known miRNAs and 243, 298, and 296 novel miRNAs were identified from D1PO, D7PO, and D14PO samples, respectively (Table 2). To identify miRNAs that are related to egg quality, the miRNA reads in D1PO and D14PO samples were quantile normalized and compared. A total of 189 miRNAs showed differential expression between the 2 samples (fold change greater than 3). Eighty-eight miRNAs showed higher expression in high quality eggs, while 101 miRNAs displayed higher expression in low quality eggs (Additional file 1: Table S3). Differentially expressed miRNAs with a fold change greater than 10 are shown in Figure 2. Interestingly, the majority of the miRNAs highly expressed in D1PO eggs are known miRNAs (70.45%), while majority of the miRNAs with higher expression in D14PO eggs are novel miRNAs (64.36%) (Figure 3).
Figure 1

Three way Venn diagrams showing the number of miRNAs among D1PO, D7PO and D14PO eggs. (A). Known miRNAs identified. (B). Novel miRNAs predicted. D1PO, D7PO, and D14PO are day 1, 7, and 14 post-ovulatory eggs, respectively.

Table 2

Number of known and novel miRNAs identified from eggs of different qualities

miRNAs

D1PO

D7PO

D14PO

Known (total)

414

481

470

Novel (total)

243

298

296

Known (specific)

8

9

2

Novel (specific)

3

4

4

Figure 2

Expression profiles of miRNAs in eggs of different qualities. The miRNAs with more than 10 times difference in expression between D1PO and D14PO eggs are shown.

Figure 3

Percentage of known and novel miRNAs showing higher expression in high quality eggs (D1PO) or low quality eggs (D14PO).

The differentially expressed miRNAs with a fold change greater than 10 and normalized reads greater than 50 in both samples were subjected to real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis. Based on melting curve analysis, we selected 7 miRNAs that showed specific amplifications for further analysis (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Six of the 7 miRNAs that were successfully analyzed by RT-qPCR showed significantly higher expression in D1PO vs. D14PO eggs, which is consistent with the deep sequencing results, although the magnitude of fold changes shown by the two methods was not the same (Figure 4). Of the 6 miRNAs, 4 are known miRNAs (omy-miR-193b-3p, omy-miR-203c-3p, omy-miR-499-5p and omy-miR-7550-3p) and 2 are novel miRNAs (omy-miR-nov-95-5p, omy-miR-nov-112-5p).
Figure 4

RT-qPCR validation of differentially expressed miRNAs identified by deep sequencing between D1PO and D14PO eggs. Data were normalized using β-actin and 18S rRNA. The means of the normalized miRNA expression values (n = 4 pools) were calculated and expressed as relative fold changes. Only omy-miR-192a-5p does not match the sequencing data.

Analysis of predicted targets of the differentially expressed miRNAs

PITA and miRanda algorithms were used to predict the target genes of the 6 differentially expressed miRNAs that were validated by RT-qPCR analysis, A total of 178 gene entries from gene index database (http://www.animalgenome.org/repository) were predicted, which represent 114 known genes and 23 unknown genes (Additional file 1: Table S3). In addition, when mitochondrial genome was used as a query, a gene encoding cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COX6B1) was predicted as the target of omy-miR-nov-95-5p. GO functional enrichment analysis of the target genes was carried out using Blast2GO software [46]. The results indicated that the top three GO terms (second level) in biological process include cellular process, metabolic process, and single organismal process, and the most significant GO terms in molecular function are binding, catalytic activity, and transporter activity (Figure 5). In comparison with the recent transcriptome data in rainbow trout [47], the significantly enriched GO terms are single-organism process and membrane. Interestingly, the GO term of cell death, which is one of the indicators of egg quality, is under the children branches of single-organism process.
Figure 5

Top 3 GO terms (second level) of the target genes of 6 miRNAs highly expressed in high quality eggs (D1PO) compared with the same GO terms of whole transcriptome in rainbow trout. (A) Molecular function. (B) Biological process. (C) Cellular component. Solid fill bar: Top 3 GO terms of the target genes of 6 differentially expressed miRNAs; Pattern fill bar: the corresponding GO terms analyzed using whole genome transcriptome. ** indicates significant difference at P < 0.001.

GO enrichment analysis using 96,546 rainbow trout unique transcript sequences as the background showed that 23, 23, and 90 GO terms in cellular component, molecular function, and biological process, respectively, are significantly enriched (Adjusted p-value < 0.05) (Additional file 1: Table S5). The genes associated with the significantly enriched GO terms are mainly involved in response to stress and DNA/RNA damage (RPB4, RECQ4A, CHD1L, WDR61, and CNOT1), cell death and signal transduction (RASSF5, GEM, RAB14, and CACNA1E), energy and transcription regulation (ATP5A1, COX6B1, CDT1, GTF2A2, SIX1, and GMEB2).

Discussion

Using deep sequencing in combination with RT-qPCR, we have identified 6 miRNAs that are associated with egg quality in rainbow trout. These miRNAs could potentially be used as biomarkers for prediction of egg quality in rainbow trout. Our results showed that the numbers of known and novel miRNAs do not show dramatic changes among eggs of different qualities (Table 2), however, most of the highly expressed miRNAs in high quality eggs are known miRNAs and most of the highly expressed miRNAs in low quality eggs are novel miRNAs.

In the study, we used post ovulatory aged eggs with different fertilization rates to identify miRNAs that are associated with egg quality. The D1PO, D7PO and D14PO eggs contained both “good” and “bad” eggs of varying proportions resulting from temporal change of eggs held in the body cavity. Therefore, the miRNAs among these egg samples have only quantitative discrepancy. It is conceivable that identification of evident miRNA expression discrepancy among these samples with varying proportion of “good” and “bad” eggs is challenging, and such difficulties have also been documented in previous studies [25,48]. The SYBR green based RT-qPCR method for miRNA detection has its limitations. As both the universal primer and the miRNA specific primer are fixed, it makes optimization of the assay very difficult. Only 7 miRNAs showed specific amplification based on melting curve analysis and many more did not show specific amplifications, although different annealing temperatures were tried.

Mitochondrion is not only vital in ATP generation and maintenance of cell homeostasis, but also central in the apoptotic signaling pathways [49]. It has been reported that some miRNAs were involved in the regulation of mitochondrion-mediated apoptosis [50,51]. In this study, one of the differentially expressed novel miRNAs, omy-miR-nov-95-5p, was predicted to target mitochondrial gene (COX6B1). COX6B1 is known to catalyze the electron transfer from reduced cytochrome c to oxygen in respiratory chain, and deficiency of cytochrome c oxidase is linked to many human diseases [52]. Therefore, down-regulated expression of omy-miR-nov-95-5p in aged eggs may cause abnormal expression of COX6B1, thereby affecting normal mitochondrial respiratory chain and egg quality. In addition, many predicted target genes of omy-miR-nov-95-5p and omy-miR-193b-5p are associated with significantly enriched GO terms, which include cell death, stress response, DNA damage and repair, and RNA degradation. These genes include RASSF5, RPB4, RECQ4A, CHD1L, WDR61, and CNOT1. Abnormal expression of these important genes may also contribute to decreased quality of D14PO eggs. Some of the differentially expressed miRNAs identified in this study, such as miR-449 and miR-203, have been reported to affect cell death and tumor suppression [53,54], but the other differentially expressed miRNAs have not been characterized with regard to their functions. Therefore, a comprehensive study of these miRNAs and their target genes would help understanding the factors contributing to egg quality.

Many factors can affect miRNA expression [41,55]. In rainbow trout, the eggs kept in the cavity for extended time are associated with reduced levels of IGF I and IGF II, and increased levels of KRT8, CTSZ and other transcripts [25,48]. Increased activities of GOT1, ACPP, LVII fragments and others biomolecules in the coelomic fluid have also been shown to be related to egg quality [22,26]. In addition, the levels of 17α 20β-P and 17α-OH-P in blood vary significantly before and after ovulation [21]. It is not known if these changes may directly or indirectly affect miRNA expression, leading to the changes in target gene expression. Furthermore, some miRNAs have regulatory roles in controlling other miRNAs [56]. Therefore, in order to understand the mechanisms underlying the changes in egg quality such as those associated with post-ovulation aging in rainbow trout, it would be important to systematically study the interaction networks among physiological and environmental factors affecting egg quality, the miRNAs and their target genes.

Conclusions

This study identified 6 differentially expressed miRNAs that are associated with egg quality in rainbow trout. Further characterization of these miRNAs, especially the novel ones, and their target genes may provide valuable information on the roles of these miRNAs in controlling egg quality, and ultimately lead to the development of novel biomarkers for evaluation of egg quality in rainbow trout.

Methods

Ethics statement

All experiments were conducted under a protocol approved by the USDA/ARS National Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #70).

Sample collection and determination of fertilization rate

Samples from commercial populations of Troutlodge Inc. (Sumner, WA) were reared for at least two generations using commercial trout feed under the temperature of 12.0-12.5°C in treated spring water recirculating partially in the National Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture (Kearneysville, WV). The fish were checked daily for ovulation as described previously [57]. Eggs were collected from 32 females on day 1, day 7, and day 14 post-ovulation (D1PO, D7PO, and D14PO) as described previously [57,58]. The eggs for RNA isolation were placed in microcentrifuge tubes and frozen in liquid nitrogen after removal of coelomic fluid, and then stored in −80°C freezer until extraction of RNA.

Eggs fertilized using pooled milt from at least three males were placed in Davidson’s solution for microscopic analysis to determine fertilization rate. Fertilization rate was based on cleavage evaluation of 50 embryos per group as described previously [57,58]. The fertilization rates for D1PO, D7PO, and D14PO were 91.8%, 73.4% and less than 50%, respectively.

Sequencing and analysis of egg miRNAs

Total RNA from the eggs was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions followed by additional purification steps with lithium chloride precipitation. The RNA integrity was evaluated by gel electrophoresis, and the RNA purity was checked by the ratio of OD260/OD280. The RNAs isolated from eggs of different females were pooled, and the pooled RNAs were used for sequencing of miRNAs, which was performed on an Illumina GAIIx by LC Sciences (Huston, TX) as described previously [45]. The software package, ACGT101-miR v3.5 from LC Sciences (Houston, TX), was used for analyzing the sequencing data. Sequences with low resolution, copy number less than 10, length shorter than 15 nt or longer than 26 nt, adapter sequences, junk sequences, and simple sequence were filtered out. In addition, the sequences mapped to the databases of mRNA (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/D_rerio/RNA/Gnomon_mRNA.fsa.gz), Rfam (http://rfam.janelia.org) and Repbase (http://www.girinst.org/repbase) were also removed. The remaining sequences were used to BLAST against all miRNAs in the miRBase database (release 21) to identify known miRNAs (less than 2 mismatches in the first 18 nt or E-values equal or smaller than 0.01) [59,60]. The sequences that did not match known miRNAs were mapped to the rainbow trout genome [61] to identify potentially novel miRNAs. Novel miRNAs were predicted if the extended sequences (~60 nt in both directions) at the aligned positions have the propensity to form hairpin structures as analyzed using RNAfold program.

The reads for each miRNA (either known or novel) were aligned by Clustal analysis using CLC Genome Workbench (CLC bio, MA). Quantile normalization in Limma package was used to normalize the miRNA reads [62]. The difference in miRNA expression between high quality egg (D1PO) and low quality egg (D14PO) was evaluated by Z-test [63].

RT-qPCR analysis of miRNA expression

Two μg of DNase-treated RNAs (4 pools from D1PO or D7PO or D14PO eggs) were converted to cDNA using miScript reverse transcriptase mix (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The cDNA samples were used for RT-qPCR quantification and melting curve analysis of miRNAs using miRNA specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S6) in combination with the miScript universal primer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Rainbow trout β-actin and 18S rRNA genes were used as endogenous controls. RT-qPCR was performed in duplicate for each cDNA on a Bio-Rad CFX96 system. The iQ™ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used in 20 μl reaction volumes containing 100 nM of each primer and 5 μl of 1:150 diluted cDNA. Cycling parameters were 95°C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec and 50 to 62°C for 1 min. Melting curve analyses were programmed following the amplifications. Standard curves for all miRNAs and the endogenous controls were constructed using a serial dilution of a pooled cDNA sample. For each sample, the quantity of the specific miRNAs and the reference genes was determined from respective standard curves. The mean quantity of the specific miRNAs was then divided by the geometric mean of the 2 reference genes to obtain a normalized value. Mean differences in expression levels were reported as relative fold changes using the lower expression value as a calibrator. Differences in miRNA expression were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using R software.

Identification of miRNA targets via computational analysis

Two miRNA target prediction algorithms, miRanda (http://www.microrna.org/microrna/home.do) [64] and PITA (http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/mir07/mir07_exe.html) [65] were used to identify the target genes of the egg quality related miRNAs. Sequences of 15,387 3’UTRs and 14,788 coding regions fetched from rainbow trout transcripts as described previously [45] were used in the analysis. The rainbow trout mitochondrial genome sequence (L29771) was downloaded from the GenBank database [66]. The thresholds of miRanda for candidate target sites were paring score S ≥ 150 and energy score ΔG ≤ −18 kcal/mol, where S is the sum of single-residue-pair match scores over the alignment trace and ΔG is the free energy of duplex formation from a completely dissociated state which was calculated using the Vienna package [64]. The score ΔΔG ≤ −15.0 was used for PITA [67].

Gene ontology analysis

The online software blast2go (http://www.blast2go.com) was used to analyze the target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs. Enrichment of the gene ontology (GO) terms was tested using hypergeometric function as described earlier [68], and the 96,546 rainbow trout unique transcript sequences (http://www.animalgenome.org/repository/aquaculture) were used as background. Adjusted p-values by Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) method were used to determine significance of GO enrichment.

Abbreviations

miRNA: 

microRNA

RT-qPCR: 

Real-time quantitative PCR

D1PO: 

One day post ovulation

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

GO: 

Gene ontology

3′UTR: 

3′untranslated region

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the USDA-ARS Cooperative Agreement No. 58-1930-0-059. It is published with the approval of the director of the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station as scientific paper No. 3235.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Animal and Nutritional Sciences, West Virginia University
(2)
National Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture, USDA/ARS
(3)
School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University

References

  1. Bromage N, Jones J, Randall C, Thrush M, Davies B, Springate J, et al. Broodstock Management, Fecundity, Egg Quality and the Timing of Egg-Production in the Rainbow-Trout (Oncorhynchus-Mykiss). Aquaculture. 1992;100(1–3):141–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobe J, Labbe C. Egg and sperm quality in fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010;165(3):535–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonnet E, Fostier A, Bobe J. Microarray-based analysis of fish egg quality after natural or controlled ovulation. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:55.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciereszko A, Wojtczak M, Dietrich GJ, Kuzminski H, Dobosz S. A lack of consistent relationship between distribution of lipid droplets and egg quality in hatchery-raised rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture. 2009;289(1–2):150–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks S, Tyler CR, Sumpter JP. Egg quality in fish: what makes a good egg? Rev Fish Biol Fish. 1997;7(4):387–416.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Tyler CR, Sumpter JP. Oocyte growth and development in teleosts. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 1996;6(3):287–318.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bromage NR, Cumaranatunga PRT. Egg production in the rainbow trout. In: Muir JF, Roberts RJ, editors. Recent Advances in Aquaculture, vol. 3. London: Croom Helm; 1988. p. 65–138.Google Scholar
  8. Crespo D, Planas JV, Bobe J. Lipopolysaccharide administration in preovulatory rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reduces egg quality. Aquaculture. 2010;300(1–4):240–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Blom JH, Dabrowski K. Reproductive Success of Female Rainbow-Trout (Oncorhynchus-Mykiss) in Response to Graded Dietary Ascorbyl Monophosphate Levels. Biol Reprod. 1995;52(5):1073–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Washburn BS, Frye DJ, Hung SSO, Doroshov SI, Conte FS. Dietary-Effects on Tissue Composition, Oogenesis and the Reproductive-Performance of Female Rainbow-Trout (Oncorhynchus-Mykiss). Aquaculture. 1990;90(2):179–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sandnes K, Ulgenes Y, Braekkan OR, Utne F. The Effect of Ascorbic-Acid Supplementation in Brood-Stock Feed on Reproduction of Rainbow-Trout (Salmo-Gairdneri). Aquaculture. 1984;43(1–3):167–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Palace VP, Werner J. Vitamins A and E in the maternal diet influence egg quality and early life stage development in fish: a review. Sci Mar. 2006;70:41–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Contreras-Sanchez WM, Schreck CB, Fitzpatrick MS, Pereira CB. Effects of stress on the reproductive performance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Biol Reprod. 1998;58(2):439–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell PM, Pottinger TG, Sumpter JP. Stress Reduces the Quality of Gametes Produced by Rainbow-Trout. Biol Reprod. 1992;47(6):1140–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell PM, Pottinger TG, Sumpter JP. Preliminary Evidence That Chronic Confinement Stress Reduces the Quality of Gametes Produced by Brown and Rainbow-Trout. Aquaculture. 1994;120(1–2):151–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bonnet E, Fostier A, Bobe J. Characterization of rainbow trout egg quality: A case study using four different breeding protocols, with emphasis on the incidence of embryonic malformations. Theriogenology. 2007;67(4):786–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hokanson KE, Mccormic JH, Jones BR, Tucker JH. Thermal Requirements for Maturation, Spawning, and Embryo Survival of Brook Trout, Salvelinus-Fontinalis. J Fish Res Board Can. 1973;30(7):975.Google Scholar
  18. Aegerter S, Jalabert B. Effects of post-ovulatory oocyte ageing and temperature on egg quality and on the occurrence of triploid fry in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture. 2004;231(1–4):59–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Su GS, Liljedahl LE, Gall AAE. Genetic and environmental variation of female reproductive traits in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture. 1997;154(2):10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Craik JCA, Harvey SM. Egg Quality in Rainbow-Trout - the Relation between Egg Viability, Selected Aspects of Egg Composition, and Time of Stripping. Aquaculture. 1984;40(2):115–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Springate JRC, Bromage NR, Elliott JAK, Hudson DL. The Timing of Ovulation and Stripping and Their Effects on the Rates of Fertilization and Survival to Eying, Hatch and Swim-up in the Rainbow-Trout (Salmo-Gairdneri R). Aquaculture. 1984;43(1–3):313–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lahnsteiner F. Morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters characterizing the over-ripening of rainbow trout eggs. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2000;23(2):107–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Wojtczak M, Kowalski R, Dobosz S, Goryczko K, Kuzminski H, Glogowski J, et al. Assessment of water turbidity for evaluation of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) egg quality. Aquaculture. 2004;242(1–4):617–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lahnsteiner F, Patzner RA. Rainbow trout egg quality determination by the relative weight increase during hardening: a practical standardization. J Appl Ichthyol. 2002;18(1):24–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Aegerter S, Jalabert B, Bobe J. mRNA stockpile and egg quality in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Physiol Biochem. 2003;28(1–4):317–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Rime H, Guitton N, Pineau C, Bonnet E, Bobe J, Jalabert B. Post-ovulatory ageing and egg quality: a proteomic analysis of rainbow trout coelomic fluid. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004;2:26.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bobe J, Montfort J, Nguyen T, Fostier A. Identification of new participants in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) oocyte maturation and ovulation processes using cDNA microarrays. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4:39.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nagler JJ, Cavileer TD, Stoddard JW, Parsons JE. Maternal mRNA differences in unfertilized rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) eggs from batches exhibiting variable embryonic survival. Cybium. 2008;32(2):233.Google Scholar
  29. Jima DD, Zhang J, Jacobs C, Richards KL, Dunphy CH, Choi WW, et al. Deep sequencing of the small RNA transcriptome of normal and malignant human B cells identifies hundreds of novel microRNAs. Blood. 2010;116(23):e118–27.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Takacs CM, Giraldez AJ. MicroRNAs as genetic sculptors: Fishing for clues. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21(7):760–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wienholds E, Koudijs MJ, Van Eeden FJM, Cuppen E, Plasterk RHA. The microRNA-producing enzyme Dicer1 is essential for zebrafish development. Nat Genet. 2003;35(3):12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Giraldez AJ, Cinalli RM, Glasner ME, Enright AJ, Thomson JM, Baskerville S, et al. MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish. Science. 2005;308(5723):833–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Giraldez AJ, Mishima Y, Rihel J, Grocock RJ, Van Dongen S, Inoue K, et al. Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs. Science. 2006;312(5770):75–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schier AF, Giraldez AJ. MicroRNA function and mechanism: insights from zebra fish. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2006;71:195–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma J, Flemr M, Stein P, Berninger P, Malik R, Zavolan M, et al. MicroRNA Activity Is Suppressed in Mouse Oocytes. Curr Biol. 2010;20(3):265–70.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Suh N, Baehner L, Moltzahn F, Melton C, Shenoy A, Chen J, et al. MicroRNA Function Is Globally Suppressed in Mouse Oocytes and Early Embryos. Curr Biol. 2010;20(3):271–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tang F, Kaneda M, O’Carroll D, Hajkova P, Barton SC, Sun YA, et al. Maternal microRNAs are essential for mouse zygotic development. Gene Dev. 2007;21(6):644–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Medeiros LA, Dennis LM, Gill ME, Houbaviy H, Markoulaki S, Fu D, et al. Mir-290-295 deficiency in mice results in partially penetrant embryonic lethality and germ cell defects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(34):14163–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Farazi TA, Spitzer JI, Morozov P, Tuschl T. miRNAs in human cancer. J Pathol. 2011;223(2):102–15.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu P, Guo M, Hay BA. MicroRNAs and the regulation of cell death. Trends Genet. 2004;20(12):617–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kulshreshtha R, Davuluri RV, Calin GA, Ivan M. A microRNA component of the hypoxic response. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15(4):667–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sachdeva M, Mo YY. miR-145-mediated suppression of cell growth, invasion and metastasis. Am J Transl Res. 2010;2(2):170–80.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Bizuayehu TT, Babiak I. MicroRNA in teleost fish. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6(8):1911–37.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramachandra RK, Salem M, Gahr S, Rexroad CE, Yao J. Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Their expression during early embryonic development. BMC Dev Biol. 2008;8:41.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ma H, Hostuttler M, Wei H, Rexroad 3rd CE, Yao J. Characterization of the Rainbow Trout Egg MicroRNA Transcriptome. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39649.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, et al. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(10):3420–35.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Salem M, Rexroad CE, Wang JN, Thorgaard GH, Yao JB. Characterization of the rainbow trout transcriptome using Sanger and 454-pyrosequencing approaches. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:564.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Aegerter S, Jalabert B, Bobe J. Large scale real-time PCR analysis of mRNA abundance in rainbow trout eggs in relationship with egg quality and post-ovulatory ageing. Mol Reprod Dev. 2005;72(3):377–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Suen DF, Norris KL, Youle RJ. Mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis. Genes Dev. 2008;22(12):1577–90.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Gao P, Tchernyshyov I, Chang TC, Lee YS, Kita K, Ochi T, et al. c-Myc suppression of miR-23a/b enhances mitochondrial glutaminase expression and glutamine metabolism. Nature. 2009;458(7239):762–5. U100.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nakagawa Y, Iinuma M, Naoe T, Nozawa Y, Akao Y. Characterized mechanism of alpha-mangostin-induced cell death: Caspase-independent apoptosis with release of endonuclease-G from mitochondria and increased miR-143 expression in human colorectal cancer DLD-1 cells. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;15(16):5620–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lazarou M, Smith SM, Thorburn DR, Ryan MT, McKenzie M. Assembly of nuclear DNA-encoded subunits into mitochondrial complex IV, and their preferential integration into supercomplex forms in patient mitochondria. FEBS J. 2009;276(22):6701–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lize M, Klimke A, Dobbelstein M. MicroRNA-449 in cell fate determination. Cell Cycle. 2011;10(17):2874–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sonkoly E, Lovén J, Xu N, Meisgen F, Wei T, Brodin P, et al. MicroRNA-203 functions as a tumor suppressor in basal cell carcinoma. Oncogenesis. 2012;1(3):e3.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Donnell KA, Wentzel EA, Zeller KI, Dang CV, Mendell JT. c-Myc-regulated microRNAs modulate E2F1 expression. Nature. 2005;435(7043):839–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tang R, Li L, Zhu D, Hou D, Cao T, Gu H, et al. Mouse miRNA-709 directly regulates miRNA-15a/16-1 biogenesis at the posttranscriptional level in the nucleus: evidence for a microRNA hierarchy system. Cell Res. 2012;22:504–15.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Weber GM, Hostuttler MA. Factors affecting the first cleavage interval and effects of parental generation on tetraploid production in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture. 2012;344:231–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Hershberger WK, Hostuttler MA. Variation in time to first cleavage in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss embryos: A major factor in induction of tetraploids. J World Aquacult Soc. 2005;36(1):96–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Buchold GM, Coarfa C, Kim J, Milosavljevic A, Gunaratne PH, Matzuk MM. Analysis of microRNA expression in the prepubertal testis. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15317.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: microRNA sequences and annotation. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2010; Chapter 12:Unit 12 19 11–10. doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi1209s29.Google Scholar
  61. Berthelot C, Brunet F, Chalopin D, Juanchich A, Bernard M, Noel B, et al. The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3657.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Garmire LX, Subramaniam S. Evaluation of normalization methods in mammalian microRNA-Seq data. RNA. 2012;18(6):1279–88.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Kal AJ, van Zonneveld AJ, Benes V, van den Berg M, Koerkamp MG, Albermann K, et al. Dynamics of gene expression revealed by comparison of serial analysis of gene expression transcript profiles from yeast grown on two different carbon sources. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10(6):1859–72.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Enright AJ, John B, Gaul U, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 2003;5(1):R1.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kertesz M, Iovino N, Unnerstall U, Gaul U, Segal E. The role of site accessibility in microRNA target recognition. Nat Genet. 2007;39(10):1278–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Zardoya R, GarridoPertierra A, Bautista JM. The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial DNA genome of the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. J Mol Evol. 1995;41(6):942–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Betel D, Koppal A, Agius P, Sander C, Leslie C. Comprehensive modeling of microRNA targets predicts functional non-conserved and non-canonical sites. Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R90.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wei HR, Yordanov YS, Georgieva T, Li X, Busov V. Nitrogen deprivation promotes Populus root growth through global transcriptome reprogramming and activation of hierarchical genetic networks. New Phytol. 2013;200(2):483–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ma et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement