Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Genomics

Open Access

Fatty acid composition of developing tree peony (Paeonia section Moutan DC.) seeds and transcriptome analysis during seed development

  • Shan-Shan Li1, 2,
  • Liang-Sheng Wang1Email author,
  • Qing-Yan Shu1,
  • Jie Wu1, 2,
  • Li-Guang Chen3,
  • Shuai Shao1, 4 and
  • Dan-Dan Yin1, 2
BMC Genomics201516:208

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1429-0

Received: 16 September 2014

Accepted: 2 March 2015

Published: 18 March 2015

Abstract

Background

Tree peony (Paeonia section Moutan DC.) is known for its excellent ornamental and medicinal values. In 2011, seeds from P. ostii have been identified as novel resource of α-linolenic acid (ALA) for seed oil production and development in China. However, the molecular mechanism on biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids in tree peony seeds remains unknown. Therefore, transcriptome data is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms.

Results

In this study, lipid accumulation contents were measured using GC-MS methods across developing tree peony seeds, which exhibited an extraordinary ALA content (49.3%) in P. ostii mature seeds. Transcriptome analysis was performed using Illumina sequencing platform. A total of 144 million 100-bp paired-end reads were generated from six libraries, which identified 175,874 contigs. In the KEGG Orthology enrichment of differentially expressed genes, lipid metabolism pathways were highly represented categories. Using this data we identified 388 unigenes that may be involved in de novo fatty acid and triacylglycerol biosynthesis. In particular, three unigenes (SAD, FAD2 and FAD8) encoding fatty acid desaturase with high expression levels in the fast oil accumulation stage compared with the initial stage of seed development were identified.

Conclusions

This study provides the first comprehensive genomic resources characterizing tree peony seeds gene expression at the transcriptional level. These data lay the foundation for further understanding of molecular mechanism responsible for lipid biosynthesis and the high unsaturated fatty acids (especially ALA) accumulation. Meanwhile, it provides theoretical base for potential oilseed application in the respect of n-6 to n-3 ratio for human diets and future regulation of target healthy components of oils.

Keywords

Paeoniaceae Tree peonyTranscriptomeα-linolenic acidOmega-3 fatty acidTriacylglycerols

Background

Tree peony (Paeonia section Moutan DC.) is a perennial deciduous shrub with excellent ornamental and medicinal values [1-3]. It is indigenous to China and the ornamental cultivation has a history of more than 2000 years [4]. The legume of tree peony has a star-shaped fruit. It contains dark oval seeds characterized by abundant unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs, >90%) and a high proportion of n-3 fatty acids, which has been linked with all kinds of diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, etc. [5,6]. Specially, α-linolenic acid (ALA) in tree peony oil accounts for circa 45% of the total FA content, whilst linoleic acid (LA) and oleic acid (OA) comprise ca. 26% and 21%, respectively [7-9]. With the exception of perilla seed and flaxseed oil, such high levels of n-3 FAs are uncommon in seed oils. Tree peony seeds are also abundant in phenolic and monoterpene glycosides, which are used for food and pharmaceutical purpose [10].

It is generally known that n-3 FAs are essential dietary nutrients, but cannot be synthesized by the human body independently. The recommended dietary n-6 to n-3 FA ratio is lower than 5:1 [11]. A lack of n-3 dietary intake causes the high ratio in our daily diet up to as much as 15:1 to 20:1. Due to the increasing accumulation of environmental pollutants and overharvesting, plants rich in n-3 FAs may offer a sustainable source of these essential FAs instead of fish. Currently, the most significant vegetable dietary form of n-3 FAs is ALA. However, ALA in most common edible oil, such as olive oil, corn oil, peanut oil, camellia oil, sesame oil and sunflower oil, is less than 3% [12-14]. Considerable research efforts are being put towards the exploration of new ALA-enriched resources, including the seeds of Sacha Inchi (ca. 50%), tree peony (ca. 45%), sea buckthorn (ca. 39%), cypress (ca. 35%), and cress (ca. 30%), etc. [8,15-18]. The unique health benefit of tree peony oil lies in the low n-6 to n-3 ratio (3:5), and it could be sustainable exploited as an alternative source of edible oil. Simultaneously, it is a good model to dissect metabolic pathways involved in UFA biosynthesis.

The increased ease and efficiency of RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) tools will facilitate the study of the mechanisms underlying metabolite variation. De novo transcriptome sequencing has enabled the rapid identification and profiling of differentially expressed genes in flaxseed [19], castor bean [20], soybean [21], olive [22], peanut [23], sea buckthorn [24], Sacha Inchi [25], and oil palm [26]. These oilseed datasets provide large numbers of targeted gene information and can be referenced. However, due to the temporal and spatial characteristics of transcriptome, it is essential to explore the transcriptome of tree peony seeds during its development for further understanding the molecular mechanism of lipid biosynthesis. Nevertheless, most tree peony researchers committed to the molecular mechanism of flower bud development [27], endo-dormancy [28], reblooming [29], and prolonging vase life of cut flowers [30]. The physiological mechanism responsible for UFA biosynthesis remains unknown, meanwhile, the genetic control of the ALA accumulation is currently unexplored. In this study, we analyzed the FA compositions in developing tree peony seeds and generated the first tree peony seed transcriptome using high-throughput Illumina sequencing technology to uncover genes related to oil biosynthesis. In total, 175,874 contigs were obtained from six tree peony seeds transcriptome within three developing stages, and we identified most of the genes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis. The assembled, annotated transcriptome sequences and gene expression profiles establish a basis for dissecting metabolic pathways involved in UFA and TAG biosynthesis. It may provide new insights for the use of genetic engineering to increase the ALA content of traditional crops as well as its breeding.

Results

Lipid accumulation at different stages of seed development

Seeds of P. ostii at different developmental stages were harvested and flash frozen. The methodology validated in our previous study was applied to analyze the FA composition by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry at ten developmental stages [8]. As shown in Figure 1, there were five dominant components, namely, α-linolenic acid (C18:3Δ9c, 12c, 15c, 49.3% of total FAs at S9), linoleic acid (C18:2Δ9c, 12c, 26.2%), oleic acid (C18:1Δ9c, 15.6%), palmitic acid (C16:0, 5.8%), and stearic acid (C18:0, 1.6%). The combined content of these five FAs always predominated across the ten developmental stages at high percentages (more than 98.5% of total FA). The other four minor FAs (<1.5%) were also detectable at trace levels including myristic acid (C14:0), cis-11-octadecenoic acid (C18:1Δ11c), eicosanoic acid (C20:0), and cis-11-eicosenoic acid (C20:1Δ11c). Although the FA compositions and contents achieved in this study were not completely identical to the results of previous studies, the identity of the dominant compounds (ALA as dominant and LA as subdominant) and the high proportion of UFAs were consistent [7,8]. Additionally, the presence of γ-linolenic acid (GLA) was reported in the seed kernel and coat of P. rockii [7], while it was not detected in other researches, neither in the present study. We had demonstrated that GLA did not exist in the seeds of 60 tree peony cultivars by co-elution of GLA and ALA mix [8], which was confirmed in this study due to lack of expression information of genes encoding for delta-6 desaturase through transcriptome analysis.
Figure 1

Observation and measurement of lipids across the developmental period of tree peony seeds. (A) The developmental progress of P. ostii seeds (S1-S10). Pods were harvested at 10 days after pollination (DAP, immature stage), and then every 10 days until 100 DAP (pods containing mature seeds). (B) The five dominant fatty acids at ten time points during tree peony seed development (mean ± SD, n = 3).

The accumulation of major FAs during seed development was examined, finding that FA contents varied markedly as seeds matured. Ten developmental time points can be divided into three different periods, with low level of FAs in the initial period (S1-S3), followed by a period of rapid oil accumulation (S3-S9), and a subsequent decline as seeds approaching full maturation (S9-S10) (Figure 1A). Total FAs in P. ostii seeds increased almost continuously throughout developmental stages and reached maxima of 158.44 mg g−1 at S9. While, UFAs—mainly ALA, LA, and OA—were major contributors to this notable increase (Figure 1B). FA levels of the five major compounds increased uninterrupted during maturation, reached maxima at S9 and had a slight decrease at S10 (Figure 1B). Previous reports showed that the activity and abundance of β-oxidation enzymes were increased during seed dehydration and maturity, resulting in the degradation of storage oil and a loss of lipids [31,32]. The result was very important for guiding the optimum harvest time of tree peony seeds in order to obtain maximum yield of the oil. Among all fatty acids, UFAs dominated with relatively high proportions ranging from 74.2% to 92.1% during the course of seed maturation (Additional file 1). It exhibited an extraordinary ALA content in P. ostii, followed by LA and OA (Additional file 1). As seeds matured, ALA content increased from an initial 0.28 mg g−1 to 78.18 mg g−1. Meanwhile, LA and OA were maintained at relatively high levels and exhibited the same tendency as ALA did during seed development (Figure 1B).

Illumina paired-end sequencing and de novo assembly

In order to explore the molecular mechanism of seeds development, lipids synthesis and accumulation in tree peony, six cDNA libraries constituting two biological repeats were constructed from three stages of developing seeds (i.e., the initial stage S3, the fast oil accumulation stage S6 and the highest content stage S9) (Figure 1) and sequenced using Illumina high-throughput sequencing platform. The data sets from each stage were compared pairwise, and the correlation of duplicate samples was determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient. The high Pearson correlation coefficient, ranging from 0.929 to 0.995, indicated high reproducibility between replica samples. We obtained a total of 144 million 100-bp paired-end reads from six libraries (24 million for each), encompassing 4.8 Gb of the sequence data for each library (Table 1). After stringent quality assessment and data filtering, 23.2, 23.5, 23.4, 23.2, 23.2 and 23.2 million reads with a base quality score greater than 20 were selected and deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Short Read Archive (accession number: SRP051810). The GC contents of the six libraries were 49.2%, 48.8% (S3), 49.9%, 49.7% (S6), 47.8% and 47.8% (S9), respectively (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary of tree peony seed transcriptome data sequenced by Illumina platform

 

S3-1

S3-2

S6-1

S6-2

S9-1

S9-2

Total reads

24000000

24000000

24000000

24000000

24000000

24000000

Clean reads

23178989

23460290

23381675

23229451

23157379

23218522

Clean data (Gb)

4.64

4.70

4.68

4.65

4.63

4.64

GC percentage (%)

49.2%

48.8%

49.9%

49.7%

47.8%

47.8%

The de novo transcriptome assembly performed with Trinity with default parameters, which was developed specifically for de novo assembly of full-length transcripts [33]. In total, 175,874 non-redundant contigs ranging from 201 to16,860 nt long with a mean length of 581.4 nt were obtained with a total length of 97.52 Mb (Additional file 2). The size distribution of contigs showed that 25,783 contigs (14.66%) were longer than 1000 nt (Figure 2A).
Figure 2

Characteristics of Illumina reads and homology search of assembled contigs. (A) Size distribution of tree peony Illumina reads. (B) E-value distribution of best BLASTX hits for each unigenes. (C) Species distribution of top BLAST hits of tree peony sequences with other plant species. (D) Length of unigenes with hits or no hits.

Characterization of the nonredundant unigenes of tree peony

Of the 175,874 nonredundant contigs, we tried to annotate possible open reading frames (ORFs) and their further inferred protein sequences by the program GetORF in the EMBOSS package [34]. In total, the protein coding regions of 175,874 contigs were predicted.

To annotate these genes, a homology search using the BLASTX program (E-value cut-off, 1.0E-5) revealed that 45,677 (25.97%), 12,726(7.24%), 13,405 (7.62%), 34,461 (19.59%) and 19,426 (11.04%) of the 175,874 tree peony contigs had significant matches with sequences in the NCBI nonredundant, GO, KOG, KEGG and Uniprot protein databases, respectively. These genes were tentatively annotated according to the known sequences with the best match. Altogether, 46,206 (26.27%) genes were successfully annotated based on public databases, and the low annotation rate may be attributable to the limited genomic information for tree peony. The E-value distribution of the top hits demonstrated that 15.26% of the unigenes had strong homology to previously deposited sequences (<1.0E-50), and 10.99% ranged from 1.0E-5 to 1.0E-50 (Figure 2B). Likewise, the species with the best match for each gene showed 9.87% matches with that of Vitis, 1.80% with popular (Populus), 1.66% with castor bean (Ricinus), and 0.68% with Glycine max (Figure 2C). It was in coincided with earlier studies, which fits nicely with tree peony being woody perennial [28,30]. While, 55.95% genes less than 300 nt long, could not be matched to known genes (Figure 2D), suggesting that the shorter sequences may lack a characterized protein domain or may be too short to show sequence matches, resulting in false-negative results. Due to lack of genomic and transcriptome information from seeds of tree peony in databases, other genes longer than 1 kb (4.54% of total unigenes) without hits may be considered putative novel transcribed sequences which is worthy to be studied in future.

Functional classification of tree peony genes by Gene Ontology, Eukaryotic Orthologous Groups, and KEGG

Functional annotation using gene ontology (GO) terms was carried out using the BLASTp algorithm against the Swiss Prot and TrEMBL databases by the GoPipe program according to gene2go software (E-value cut-off, 1.0E-5) [35]. Altogether, a total of 12,726 predicted proteins were categorized into 57 functional groups under three main divisions (biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions) (Figure 3). In the biological processes category, cellular process (26.97%) and macromolecule metabolism (16.96%) were the predominant groups, followed by nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism (9.67%), response to stimulus (7.75%), biosynthesis (6.64%), regulation of biological process (6.52%), and transport (6.01%). In the cellular components category, cell (31.38%) and intracellular (24.80%) were the most representative ones, followed by cytoplasm (17.27%), membrane (12.42%), and nucleus (9.68%). With regard to molecular function category, the predominant categories were catalytic activity (22.17%) and binding (other binding, 19.97%), followed by protein binding (9.09%), hydrolase activity (8.57%), nucleic acid binding (8.06%) and transferase activity (7.96%). The distribution of genes in different functional categories in tree peony seeds were different from transcripts of flowers for reblooming and prolonging vase life due to the spatial and temporal characteristics of transcripts [29,30].
Figure 3

Functional classification of Gene Ontology annotation of tree peony unigenes. Unigenes were assigned to three categories: biological processes, cellular components, or molecular functions.

To further evaluate the completeness of the transcriptome and the effectiveness of the annotation process, the annotated unigenes were compared with the eukaryotic orthologous groups (KOG) database for functional prediction and classification. In total, 14,244 annotated putative proteins were classified functionally into 24 KOG groups (Figure 4). Among the 24 categories, “signal transduction mechanisms” represented the largest group (1,641; 11.52%), followed by transcripts associated with “post-translational modification, protein turnover and chaperones” (1,498; 10.52%). The categories “cell motility” (2; 0.01%), “extracellular structures” (23; 0.16%), nuclear structure (67; 0.47%) and “defense mechanisms” (126; 0.88%) represented the smallest groups. However, categories with no concrete assignment “general function prediction only” (1,724; 12.01%) accounted for a large fraction of transcripts.
Figure 4

Eukaryotic of orthologous groups (KOG) classification of assembled unigenes. A: RNA processing and modification. B: Chromatin structure and dynamics. C: Energy production and conversion. D: Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning. E: Amino acid transport and metabolism. F: Nucleotide transport and metabolism. G: Carbohydrate transport and metabolism. H: Coenzyme transport and metabolism. I: Lipid transport and metabolism. J: Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis. K: Transcription. L: Replication, recombination and repair. M: Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis. N: Cell motility. O: Posttranslational modification, protein turnover and chaperones. P: Inorganic ion transport and metabolism. Q: Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism. R: General function prediction only. S: Signal transduction mechanisms. T: Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport. U: Defense mechanisms. V: Extracellular structures. W: Nuclear structure. Y: Cytoskeleton.

Pathway-based analysis can further our understanding of the biological functions and interactions of genes. A total of 7,065 genes were assigned to 167 pathways in the KEGG database. The most represented pathways included “ribosome” (215 unigenes), “biosynthesis of amino acids” (187 unigenes) and “carbon metabolism” (174 unigenes) (Additional file 3). Notably, some pathways were closely linked to changes in oil content and composition responsible for tree peony seed ripening, such as “fatty acid biosynthesis” (24 unigenes), “biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids” (22 unigenes), “α-linolenic acid metabolism” (21 unigenes), “fatty acid elongation” (18 unigenes), “glycerolipid metabolism” (39 unigenes) and “glycerophospholipid metabolism” (56 unigenes) (Additional file 3). These identified unigenes for lipids provided critical clues to identify and characterize key functional genes involved in unsaturated FA and TAG biosynthesis in tree peony seeds.

Analysis of differentially expressed genes during tree peony seed development

Tissues at 30 days after pollination (DAP) were served as the control, and a total of 683 and 1816 differentially expressed unigenes were identified at 60 and 90 DAP, respectively. Among them, 366 unigenes were mutually present in both contrast groups, while 317 and 1450 were specifically expressed only in the 60 vs 30 DAP and 90 vs 30 DAP groups, respectively (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Venn diagram of transcripts (both identified and unknown) that were up- or down-regulated between seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP (A) and 90 DAP vs 30 DAP (B). The “+” and “−” indicate up- and down-regulated transcripts, respectively. A total of 2133 transcripts were significantly (FDR < 0.05) expressed during developing seeds. 186: unique up-regulated transcripts in seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP; 619: unique up-regulated transcripts in seeds of 90 DAP vs 30 DAP; 131: unique down-regulated transcripts in seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP; 831: unique down-regulated transcripts in seeds of 90 DAP vs 30 DAP; 168: commonly up-regulated transcripts between seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP and 90 DAP vs 30 DAP; 197: commonly down-regulated transcripts between seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP and 90 DAP vs 30 DAP; 1: down-regulated in seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP but up-regulated in seeds of 90 DAP vs 30 DAP.

There were 354 and 788 up-regulated unigenes in both contrast groups, respectively, while 329 and 1028 unigenes were down-regulated. Among the up-regulated unigenes, 168 were co-expressed genes showing ≥2-fold expression difference (log2 ratio ≥ 1), in contrast, 186 and 619 of the up-regulated genes were specific to each respective group. Among the down-regulated unigenes, 197 were co-expressed genes showing decreases of at least 2-fold (log2 ratio ≤ −1), whilst, 131 and 831 of the down-regulated genes were unique to each respective group (Figure 5).

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) provide clues about the molecular events related to seed development. Further investigation of DEGs may be warranted to determine the functional roles they played in the developmental tree peony seeds especially in the synthesis and accumulation of lipids. To evaluate the potential functions of genes that showed significant transcriptional changes between the two contrast groups, 747 differentially expressed genes with a Gene Ontology annotation were further classified into subsets. In terms of the categories, the two contrast groups showed similar patterns (Additional file 4). These genes were related to 16 biological processes, including cellular process, macromolecule metabolism, response to stimulus, and metabolism. With regard to cellular components, the analysis revealed a high percentage of transcripts in the cell, intracellular, cytoplasm, membrane, and nucleus. The unigenes were finally classified into 24 categories based on molecular function, and the two most overrepresented groups were binding (other binding, protein binding, nucleic acid binding) and catalysis (catalytic activity, transferase activity, hydrolase activity, oxidoreductase activity). To exploring the significantly enriched terms compared with the genome background, the hypergeometric test was used to map all DEGs in the GO database. The results showed that most of the characterized topological modules were assigned unambiguously to at least one cellular function, including extracellular, external encapsulating structure, metabolism, response to stimulus, and oxidoreductase activity, etc. From the large datasets, we found that down-regulated genes were more abundant than those of up-regulated genes during tree peony seed development, which was in coincidence with genes during soybean seed development [21]. KEGG functional enrichment analysis was performed to uncover their biological functions. The most represented pathways within contrast group 60 DAP vs 30 DAP included xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism (12 enzymes), biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites (12), cell growth and death (16), metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides (8), and lipid metabolism (14). In the contrast group 90 DAP vs 30 DAP, the most represented KEGG pathways were carbohydrate metabolism (185), biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites (136), energy metabolism (64), xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism (31), amino acid metabolism (71), lipid metabolism (52), metabolism of other amino acids (27), and metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides (23) (Additional file 5). In this study, it was worthy to be mentioned that unigenes in the pathways responsible for seed oil biosynthesis included FA biosynthesis, biosynthesis of UFAs, fatty acid elongation, glycerolipid metabolism and glycerophospholipid metabolism may provide valuable resource for the identification of unique genes involved in ALA synthesis.

Identification and characterization of genes involved in fatty acids and triacylglycerols biosynthesis in tree peony seeds

Most enzymes involved in the lipid biosynthesis were identified in the tree peony seed transcriptome. In total, 388 unigenes implicated in FA biosynthesis and TAG assemblage were identified (Additional file 6). Among the differentially expressed genes, more were down-regulated, and some showed a differential expression pattern between three contrast groups. Pathway-based analysis helps to clarify the biological functions of genes. Thereof, 106 genes were involved in the initiation and acyl chain elongation steps of de novo FA biosynthesis (Additional file 6, Initiation and Elongation). Most of these genes had at least one isoform significantly down-regulated in S9 compared with S3, suggesting their functional involvement in the beginning of FA biosynthesis. The acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) catalyzed the first reaction to generate an intermediate malonyl-CoA, which is a regulatory enzyme that controls, at least in part, the rate of fatty acid synthesis (Figure 6A). It was reported that plastidic ACCase was the enzymatic target of feedback inhibition in tobacco suspension cells and Brassica napus embryo-derived cells [36,37]. Subsequently, repeated condensations of malonyl-ACP with a growing acyl-ACP chain were primed by fatty acid synthase (FAS) subunits, consecutively adding two carbon units to form 16:0-ACP (Figure 6A). Unigenes comp38788 and comp79316 encoding KAS II (elongation of palmitoyl-ACP to stearoyl-ACP) were highly expressed at S3, which was consistent with the high proportion of 18-carbon fatty acids in tree peony seeds [38]. The FAS generally terminated at saturated 16-carbon fatty acids in the plastid, which is catalyzed by palmitoyl-ACP thioesterase [39]. Unigenes comp52856, comp76036_c0_seq2, and comp76036_c0_seq5 encoding FATA and FATB were down-regulated more than 4-fold compared with that of S9 to S3. In addition, 21 unigenes were identified to encode long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases (LACS), and four unigenes encoded acyl-CoA binding proteins (ACBP), generating the ER acyl-CoA pool (Figure 6B).
Figure 6

Tree peony sequences associated with de novo fatty acid (A) and triacylglycerols (B) biosynthetic pathways. Lipid substrates are abbreviated: C16:0, palmitic acid; C16:1, hexadecenoic acid; C18:0, stearic acid; C18:1, oleic acid; C18:2, linoleic acid; C18:3, linolenic acid. Enzyme/protein abbreviations are: α-PDHC, pyruvate dehydrogenase alpha subunit; β-PDHC, pyruvate dehydrogenase beta subunit; DHLAT, dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase; LPD, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; α-CT, carboxyl transferase alpha subunit; β-CT, carboxyl transferase beta subunit; BC, biotin carboxylase; BCCP, biotin carboxyl carrier protein; MCAAT, malonyl-CoA ACP transacylase; ACP, acyl carrier protein; KAS I, II, III, ketoacyl-ACP synthase I, II, III; KAR, ketoacyl-ACP reductase; HAD, hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydrase; EAR, enoyl-ACP reductase; SAD, stearoyl-ACP desaturase; FAD6, oleate desaturase (chloroplast); FAD8, linoleate desaturase (chloroplast); FAD2, oleate desaturase (endoplasmic reticulum); FAD3, linoleate desaturase (microsomal); FATA/B, acyl-ACP thioesterase A/B; PCH, palmitoyl-CoA hydrolase; GPAT, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; LPAAT, 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; PAP, phosphatidic acid phosphatase; DGAT1/2, acyl-CoA: diacylglycerolacyltransferase 1/2; PLA2/C, phospholipase A2/C; CK, choline kinase; CCT, choline-phosphate cytidylyltransferase; LPCAT, 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphocholine acyltransferase; EK, ethanolamine kinase; ECT, ethanolamine-phosphate cytidylyltransferase; LPEAT, 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphoethanolamine acyltransferase; PDAT, phospholipid:diacylglycerolacyltransferase; DAG-EPT, DAG-ethanolaminephosphotransferase.

In oilseeds, the major fate of newly synthesized FAs is exported from plastids as acyl-CoA to enter the glycerolipid synthesis [40]. Triacylglycerols are the main components of storage lipids in oil seed plants, with the major constituents being 16- and 18-carbon FAs. Generally, TAG can be synthesized through the sequential acyl-CoA dependent acylation of a glycerol backbone (known as the Kennedy pathway), in which 62 unigenes were identified in tree peony seeds (Figure 6B) [41]. TAG can also be formed in plants via two different acyl-CoA independent pathways, catalyzed by phospholipid:diacylglycerolacyltransferase (PDAT) and diacylglyceroltransacylase (DGTA), in which DGTA was absent in tree peony seeds [42]. Unigenes encoding PDAT had low transcript levels, implying that this route might not be a major pathway in tree peony seeds (Figure 6B and Additional file 6). In contrast, unigenes relevant to acyl editing, PE-DAG and PC-DAG interconversion were relatively active, which was believed to facilitate the incorporation of UFAs into TAG in tree peony seeds [43,44].

Among the 103 unigenes encoding phospholipases, 18 unigenes had relatively higher transcript levels (Additional file 6, Phospholipases). These unigenes may be related to the formation of membrane lipids and cell division. While, lipases that arose in developing seeds of castor bean was indicated to take part in remodeling of TAGs after synthesis [20,45]. Totally, 19 unigenes encoding triacylglycerol lipase were identified from our libraries. The function of these genes in tree peony developing seeds needed to be further studied. In the mature oilseed, TAGs are stored in the form of small subcellular spherical oil bodies [46]. Five unigenes encoding oil-body oleosins were identified with high expression level in developing seeds (Additional file 6, Oil accumulation). Unigenes comp55793, comp81207, comp68377, comp92379, and comp84664 were of 2-fold to 16-fold up-regulation, suggesting their active involvement in oil accumulation in tree peony seeds. The above identified specific genes would provide clues to understand the molecular mechanism on oil accumulation of tree peony seeds.

Most FAs produced in the plastid were not immediately available for TAG biosynthesis before desaturation. In tree peony seeds, 18 unigenes encoding fatty acid desaturase (FAD) were detected, including one unigenes for stearoyl-ACP desaturase (SAD), nine unigenes for oleate desaturase (eight for FAD2 and one for FAD6) and eight unigenes for omega-3 fatty acid desaturase (one for FAD3, five for FAD7 and two for FAD8) (Additional file 6, Desaturation). There were no related unigenes encoding FAD4 and FAD5 detected in tree peony seeds. Fatty acid desaturase is responsible for sequential modification of OA to LA and ALA. FAD2 and FAD6 remove two hydrogen atoms from OA to form LA, while FAD3, FAD7 and FAD8 catalyze the conversion from LA to ALA [40]. However, most of them exhibited low expression levels across seed development, and only three unigenes were differentially expressed. Thereinto, the abundant transcripts of comp79170 and comp84636 separately encoding SAD and FAD2 in S3 and S6 were consistent with the relatively high levels of oleic acid and its downstream products. The expression of comp77478 encoding FAD8 was up-regulated 2.69-fold in S6 and then down-regulated 9.65-fold in S9, which indicated its correspondent function in ALA accumulation. Further cloning and functional analyses of the three genes would probably reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying UFAs biosynthesis in tree peony seeds.

Expression analysis of candidate DEGs related to seed development

We analyzed transcript abundance by qRT-PCR in tree peony seeds at three different developmental stages described in Figure 1 (S3, S6 and S9). According to the genes annotated in KEGG and the results of lipid biosynthesis obtained in many plants [24,25], ten DEGs were selected for expression analysis (Additional file 7). A reliable R2 correlation coefficient of 0.74 was obtained between qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq results by linear regression analyses (Additional file 8), confirming the validity of the transcriptome results.

To see if any correlations existed between UFA accumulation in developing seeds and expression patterns of desaturation genes, we analyzed transcript abundance of three related genes (SAD, FAD2 and FAD8) by qRT-PCR from ten different developmental stages described in Figure 1. The three genes catalyzed the sequential desaturation of stearic acid at Δ9, Δ12 and Δ15 position, generating oleic acid, linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid, respectively. The results indicated that they were expressed across the seed development period, but the levels of expression varied considerably at different developmental stages (Figure 7). Genes exhibited relatively low transcript abundance during initial development (S1-S2), and then their expression increased gradually (S3-S8) and dropped thereafter (S9-S10). The significantly high-level expression of FAD8 than SAD and FAD2 after S3 was in agreement with the higher ALA content than OA and LA. Specifically, expression of the desaturases SAD and FAD2 peaked in the S8, consistent with the maximum OA and LA contents observed in the seed oil at S9. The reduced expression of both genes in later stages of seed development indicated a reduced accumulation of oleic acid and linoleic acid at S10 (Figure 1 Figure 7). The expression of FAD8 was characterized by a bell-shape transcript curve, with low levels of expression at the initial stage followed by a substantial increase during the rapid phase of oil accumulation and a subsequent decline toward seed maturation. The similar gene profiles in Brassica napus, Arabidopsis and sea buckthorn were observed [24,45,47]. The high levels of FAD8 transcripts during critical developmental period (S3-S7) coincided with the high number of reads obtained for this gene by Illumina sequencing (Figure 7).
Figure 7

RT-PCR analysis of genes involved in fatty acid desaturation in P. ostii seed at different developmental stages. Relative expression values, normalized to ubiquitin, were shown as 2−ΔΔCt relative to 10 DAP. Error bars represent the SD of three biological replicas with three technical replicas each.

Discussion

ALA exerts a wide range of biological activities (e.g., as a nootropic) and prophylactic effects (including anti-hyperlipidemic, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and anti-hypertensive) [48-50]. Due to the high value and growing demand for ALA, exploiting oleaginous resources and dissecting the mechanism of oil biosynthesis and UFA accumulation have been extensively studied [22,51,52]. Recent years, tree peony is expectedly gaining popularity as a resource in food and nutraceutical industries. Compared with traditional oil crops—soybean, rapeseed, peanut, corn, sunflower, etc., tree peony oil, with its high ALA level (ca. 45%) together with a near 3:5 ratio of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids, represents a very balanced source of polyunsaturated fatty acids for human health and nutrition. The medical and nutritional applications of tree peony oil warrant further exploration and it can be developed as important nutritional supplements for specific populations, weanling infants, preschool children, and pregnant and lactating mothers, etc. [5,12]. Furthermore, the statistics indicate that the global oil consumption from oilseed crops was approximately 165.3 million tons in 2013 [53]. Vegetable oil consumption is expected to double by 2040 [54]. Therefore, considerable research efforts related to the exploration of new oleaginous resources and oil biosynthesis in seeds are urgently needed, and it is believed to be a promising avenue for the next decade.

Many plants deposit TAG in seeds and fruits as the major form of storage lipid, which is stored in densely packed oil bodies [55]. The acyl-CoA-dependent pathway catalyzed by diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) is considered the major pathway for TAG assembly in plants [40]. TAG can also be formed by two acyl-CoA independent acyltransferase (PDAT and DGTA) [42]. The expression levels of genes encoding DGAT and PDAT were relatively low, while DGTA was absent in tree peony seed transcript in this study. Nevertheless, it was surprising that genes related to oilbody formation were still largely expressed. The characterized phenomenon has remained elusive since the temporal patterns of gene expression for the enzymes relevant to TAG assembly are very different during seed development. So far, there is a fundamental lack of clarity about the regulation of gene expression and enzyme activity for these later steps in oil biosynthesis [56,57].

The diversity of UFA composition in TAG could be enriched by phosphatidylcholine (PC) or phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) acyl editing. PC-DAG and PE-DAG interconversion allowed acyl-CoA newly exported from the plastid to enter PC or PE for FA modification, while desaturated FAs depart for TAG. Alternatively, the acyl in DAG was converted to PC or PE by DAG-cholinephosphotransferase (DAG-CPT) and DAG-ethanolaminephosphotransferase (DAG-EPT). The reversibility of this reaction allows the entire DAG portion of PC or PE, including any modified FAs, to participate in TAG synthesis [58]. The vast majority of FAs (>90%) within the seed flux through PC before incorporation into TAG, suggesting that PC is a central intermediate in the flux of FAs or DAG, or both substrates into TAG [59]. However, genes encoding DAG-CPT were weakly expressed in our libraries, but it did not mean the inactivity of PC-DAG interconversion. Previous researches showed that Saccharomyces cerevisiae ethanolaminephosphotransferase activity was capable of efficiently utilizing CDP-ethanolamine, CDP-monomethylethanolamine, CDP-dimethylethanolamine, and CDP-choline in vitro. This broad substrate specificity implied that EPT1 gene product might synthesize both PE and PC in vivo [44,46]. Additionally, PC also can be synthesized from PE by two rounds of methylation [40].

Desaturation is the key step that resulted in the desirable n-3 and n-6 fatty acids. Arabidopsis thaliana mutants have provided the evidence that there are seven genetic loci, fad2, fad3, fad4, fad5, fad6, fad7 and fad8, in which fad3, fad7 and fad8 encoded omega-3 fatty acid desaturase [40]. Generally, the contents of UFAs were consistent with expression levels of genes for desaturases. Genes in tree peony seed corresponded to those from the seeds of flax, Sacha Inchi and sea buckthorn, suggesting that the regulatory pathways involved in the FAs biosynthesis are conserved. FAD3 genes would be specifically expressed in perilla and Sacha Inchi seeds, in which ALA accumulations were more than 50% of the total fatty acid contents [25,60]. In the sea buckthorn transcriptome, FAD2, FAD3, FAD6, FAD7 and FAD8 were expressed at similar levels, which was consistent with the 1:1 ratio of n-6:n-3 fatty acids [24]. These plant resources enriched in ALA differed in the mechanism of fatty acid desaturation, signifying their unique metabolic pathways in the process of evolution [19,24,25]. FAD2 and FAD8 were highly expressed in tree peony seeds, indicating that FAD2 and FAD8 might play a vital role in the formation of polyunsaturated fatty acids. The verification of selected genes with qRT-PCR confirmed the changes, in which the relative expression level of FAD8 was much higher than FAD2. We could deduce that the high content of ALA in tree peony seeds was attributed to the activity and abundance of FAD8 enzymes. Further studies related to expression, substrate specificity or regulation of activity of enzymes related to fatty acids desaturation in tree peony seeds will shed light on the understanding of its special synthetic pathway, and simultaneously lay a foundation for the artificial regulation and molecular breeding.

Conclusions

In conclusion, lipid accumulation across developing tree peony seeds was monitored. Our results indicate that tree peony oil can benefit human health in the long run owing to its high levels of α-linolenic acid (49.3%) and a low ratio of n-6/n-3 ration (3:5). Additionally, we report here the first transcript dataset derived by using high-throughput sequencing technology (Illumina) for tree peony seed. Transcriptome analyses from three developmental stages of tree peony seeds resulted in 175,874 contigs. Expression of 683 and 1816 unigenes differed at least 2-fold in the 60 and 90 days after pollination compared to the initial stage, respectively. Focusing on lipid genes, we identified 388 unigenes associated with the de novo FA biosynthesis, the formation of UFAs, TAG assembly and oleosin formation from tree peony seeds. These unigenes provide a comprehensive molecular biology background for researches on tree peony seed development, particularly with respect to the process of oil accumulation. In particular, those candidate genes (such as SAD, FAD2, FAD8) associated with UFA biosynthesis would provide critical clues to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying the high levels of α-linolenic acid biosynthesis in tree peony seeds.

Methods

Plant material

Seeds of P. ostii were collected in 2012 at Beijing Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Lat. 39°48’ N, 116°28’ E, Alt. 76 m), China. It had been introduced to the garden and grown in the same eco-environmental and cultivation conditions for ten years. We observed the seed development process from pollination till maturation in May-August, 2012. Pods were hand-collected at intervals of ten days, from the beginning of podding until full maturity (Figure 1), covering a total range of 100 d, and the oil content of developing seeds were measured as described in our previous study [8]. For the transcriptome sampling, seeds at three developing stages (30, 60, 90 DAP) were collected from the same individual, and pods with the same developing stage from two trees comprised of two replicates. The collected samples were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until further use.

Total RNA extraction, cDNA library construction, and high throughput sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from the seeds collected at 30, 60 and 90 DAP, respectively, using a TIANGEN RNA Prep Pure Plant kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd, Beijing, China), and purified with the Dynabeads® Oligo (dT)25 kit (Life, USA). RNA integrity was evaluated with a 2.0% agarose gel stained with Goldview. The yield and quality of the RNA samples were determined using a NanoDrop®ND-1000 spectrophotometer. The cDNA library was constructed by using a NEBNext® Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit, the quality of retrieved cDNA was checked using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (RNA Nano Chip, Agilent), and it was sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 paired-end sequencing system.

Sequences analysis and assembly

Sequencing-received raw image data were transformed by base calling into sequence data. Low quality reads and reads with adaptors or N% more than 5% were removed before data analysis. Clean reads from six libraries were assembled using the program Trinity [33], which is an efficient method for de novo assembly of full-length transcripts. Trinity combined three independent software modules: Inchworm, Chrysalis and Butterfly. Firstly, reads with overlapping sequences were merged to form contigs using Inchworm, which often generate full-length transcripts for a dominant isoform. Secondly, Chrysalis clustered the contigs into clusters and constructed complete de Bruijn graphs for each cluster, each graph reflecting the full transcriptional complexity for a given gene. Finally, the de Bruijn graphs were then processed and paired-end matched to form longer sequences using Butterfly, resolving alternatively spliced isoforms and transcripts derived from paralogous genes. Gene prediction was determined by EMBOSS package. Contigs were aligned by BLASTX (E-value <1e − 5) to the NCBI nonredundant, GO (http://www.geneontology.org/), Swiss-Prot (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot/), KOG (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/), and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) protein databases to annotate the functions. We used the GoPipe to determine Gene Ontology annotation of contigs [35]. KEGG Orthology annotations of the unigenes were conducted using BlastX algorithm against KEGG database.

Differential expression of unigenes

The DESeq package in the R software environment was used to analyze differential gene expression between developing stages. The DESeq models count data using a negative binomial distribution, with variance and mean linked by local regression [61]. P-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction (p < 0.05). P-value <0.05 and absolute value of the log2 ratio >1 were used as the threshold to determine significant differences in gene expression.

Gene Ontology and KEGG Orthology enrichment analyses for differentially expressed unigenes

Gene Ontology and KEGG Orthology enrichment analyses of the differentially expressed genes were then carried out. Enriched p-values were calculated according to the hypergeometric test [62]. All p-values were adjusted with the Bonferroni correction. We selected the corrected p-value of 0.05 as the threshold to determine significant enrichment of the gene sets. For KEGG Orthology enrichment analysis, we used the false discovery rate 0.05 as the threshold to determine significant enrichment of the gene sets.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated from frozen seeds of S1-S10. cDNA synthesis was prepared with 1 μg total RNA using PrimeScript® RT reagent Kit With gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Japan) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Q-PCR was performed with SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM (Perfect Real Time) (TaKaRa, Japan). Gene transcript levels were quantified by real-time PCR with the Roche LightCycler 480 instrument (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The following standard thermal profile was used for all PCR experiments: 95°C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. Fluorescence signals were captured at the end of each cycle, and the melting curve analysis was performed from 65°C to 95°C. The ubiquitin gene was used as internal control in this study [63]. The amplification system (e.g., primer and template concentrations) was properly optimized, and the efficiency was close to 1. Relative expression levels of target genes were calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method [64]. All gene-specific primers in this paper were showed in Additional file 7.

Abbreviations

ALA: 

α-linolenic acid

FA: 

Fatty acid

UFA: 

Unsaturated fatty acid

LA: 

Linoleic acid

OA: 

Oleic acid

PA: 

Palmitic acid

SA: 

Stearic acid

GLA: 

γ-linolenic acid

TAG: 

Triacylglycerol

ACP: 

Acyl carrier protein

ACCase: 

Acetyl-COA carboxylase

KAS: 

Ketoacyl-ACP synthase

FATA/B: 

Thioesterase A/B

DAG: 

Diacylglycerol

PC: 

Phosphatidylcholine

PE: 

Phosphatidylethanolamine

DAP: 

Days after pollination

ER: 

Endoplasmic reticulum

GO: 

Gene ontology

KOG: 

Eukaryotic orthologous groups

DEG: 

Differentially expressed genes

SAD: 

Stearoyl-ACP desaturase

FAS: 

Fatty acid synthase

FAD: 

Fatty acid desaturase

GPAT: 

Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase

LPAAT: 

Lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase

DGAT: 

Diacylglycerolacyltransferase

EST: 

Expressed sequence tag

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program: 2011AA10020702).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Plant Resources and Beijing Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(2)
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(3)
Institute of Forest Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry
(4)
College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University

References

  1. Li CH, Du H, Wang LS, Shu QY, Zheng YR, Xu YJ, et al. Flavonoid composition and antioxidant activity of tree peony (Paeonia section moutan) yellow flowers. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(18):8496–503.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Li SS, Chen LG, Xu YJ, Wang LJ, Wang LS. Identification of floral fragrances in tree peony cultivars by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Sci Hortic. 2012;142:158–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Picerno P, Mencherini T, Sansone F, Del Gaudio P, Granata I, Porta A, et al. Screening of a polar extract of Paeonia rockii: composition and antioxidant and antifungal activities. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;138(3):705–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen FY, Li JJ. Exportation of Chinese tree peonies (Mudan) and their development in other countries: cultivated. J Northwest Norm Univ (Nat Sci). 1998;34(1):109–16.Google Scholar
  5. Simopoulos AP. The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002;56(8):365–79.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Simopoulos A. Evolutionary aspects of diet, the omega-6/omega-3 ratio and genetic variation: nutritional implications for chronic diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2006;60(9):502–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Li ZX, Qin GW, He JH, Cao XY. Comparative analysis of fatty acid composition in seed kernel and coat of Paeonia rockii seeds. Seed. 2010;29(1):34–6.Google Scholar
  8. Li SS, Yuan RY, Chen LG, Wang LS, Hao XH, Wang LJ, et al. Systematic qualitative and quantitative assessment of fatty acids in the seeds of 60 tree peony (Paeonia section Moutan DC.) cultivars by GC-MS. Food Chem. 2015;173:133–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Qi JC, Zhou HM, Ma JQ, Li P. Analysis of the chemical constituents in peony seed oil by GC-MS. Cereals and Oils. 2005;11:22–3.Google Scholar
  10. He CN, Peng Y, Xiao W, Liu HB, Xiao PG. Determination of chemical variability of phenolic and monoterpene glycosides in the seeds of Paeonia species using HPLC and profiling analysis. Food Chem. 2013;138(4):2108–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO & WHO. Fats and oils in human nutrition: report of a joint expert consultation. Rome: Agriculture and Consumer Protection; 1994.Google Scholar
  12. Simopoulos AP. n−3 fatty acids and human health: defining strategies for public policy. Lipids. 2001;36(1):S83–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee DS, Noh BS, Bae SY, Kim K. Characterization of fatty acids composition in vegetable oils by gas chromatography and chemometrics. Anal Chim Acta. 1998;358(2):163–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Connor WE. α-Linolenic acid in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(5):827–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Follegatti-Romero LA, Piantino CR, Grimaldi R, Cabral FA. Supercritical CO2 extraction of omega-3 rich oil from Sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis L.) seeds. J Supercritical Fluids. 2009;49(3):323–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang B, Kallio HP. Fatty acid composition of lipids in sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.) berries of different origins. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(4):1939–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nehdi IA, Sbihi H, Tan CP, Al-Resayes SI. Garden cress (Lepidium sativum Linn.) seed oil as a potential feedstock for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol. 2012;126:193–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nehdi IA. Cupressus sempervirens var. horizentalis seed oil: Chemical composition, physicochemical characteristics, and utilizations. Ind Crop Prod. 2013;41:381–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Venglat P, Xiang D, Qiu S, Stone SL, Tibiche C, Cram D, et al. Gene expression analysis of flax seed development. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:74.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown AP, Kroon JT, Swarbreck D, Febrer M, Larson TR, Graham IA, et al. Tissue-specific whole transcriptome sequencing in castor, directed at understanding triacylglycerol lipid biosynthetic pathways. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30100.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen H, Wang FW, Dong YY, Wang N, Sun YP, Li XY, et al. Sequence mining and transcript profiling to explore differentially expressed genes associated with lipid biosynthesis during soybean seed development. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12(1):122.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Munoz-Merida A, Gonzalez-Plaza JJ, Canada A, Blanco AM, Garcia-Lopez Mdel C, Rodriguez JM, et al. De novo assembly and functional annotation of the olive (Olea europaea) transcriptome. DNA Res. 2013;20(1):93–108.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yin D, Wang Y, Zhang X, Li H, Lu X, Zhang J, et al. novo assembly of the peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seed transcriptome revealed candidate unigenes for oil accumulation pathways. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73767.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Fatima T, Snyder CL, Schroeder WR, Cram D, Datla R, Wishart D, et al. Fatty acid composition of developing sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berry and the transcriptome of the mature seed. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34099.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang XJ, Xu RH, Wang RL, Liu AZ. Transcriptome analysis of Sacha Inchi (Plukenetia volubilis L.) seeds at two developmental stages. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(1):716.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Dussert S, Guerin C, Andersson M, Joet T, Tranbarger TJ, Pizot M, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of three oil palm fruit and seed tissues that differ in oil content and fatty acid composition. Plant Physiol. 2013;162(3):1337–58.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Shu QY, Wischnitzki E, Liu ZA, Ren HX, Han XY, Hao Q, et al. Functional annotation of expressed sequence tags as a tool to understand the molecular mechanism controlling flower bud development in tree peony. Physiol Plant. 2009;135(4):436–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Gai SP, Zhang YX, Mu P, Liu CY, Liu S, Dong L, et al. Transcriptome analysis of tree peony during chilling requirement fulfillment: assembling, annotation and markers discovering. Gene. 2012;497(2):256–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou H, Cheng FY, Wang R, Zhong Y, He C. Transcriptome comparison reveals key candidate genes responsible for the unusual reblooming trait in tree peonies. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79996.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang C, Wang YJ, Fu JX, Dong L, Gao SL, Du DN. Transcriptomic analysis of cut tree peony with glucose supply using the RNA-Seq technique. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33(1):111–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Baud S, Boutin J-P, Miquel M, Lepiniec L, Rochat C. An integrated overview of seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype WS. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2002;40(2):151–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Chia TY, Pike MJ, Rawsthorne S. Storage oil breakdown during embryo development of Brassica napus (L.). J Exp Bot. 2005;56(415):1285–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–52.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet. 2000;16(6):276–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Chen Z, Xue C, Zhu S, Zhou F, Ling X, Liu G, et al. GoPipe: streamlined gene ontology annotation for batch anonymous sequences with statistics. Prog Biochem Biophys. 2005;32(2):187–90.Google Scholar
  36. Shintani DK, Ohlrogge JB. Feedback inhibition of fatty acid synthesis in tobacco suspension cells. Plant J. 1995;7(4):577–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Andre C, Haslam RP, Shanklin J. Feedback regulation of plastidic acetyl-CoA carboxylase by 18:1-acyl carrier protein in Brassica napus. PANS. 2012;109(25):10107–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Shimakata T, Stumpf PK. Isolation and function of spinach leaf β-ketoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1982;79(19):5808–12.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Roughan PG, Slack CR. Cellular organization of glycerolipid metabolism. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1982;33(1):97–132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ohlrogge J, Browse J. Lipid biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 1995;7(7):957.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kennedy EP. Biosynthesis of complex lipids. Fed Proc. 1961;20:934.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lung SC, Weselake RJ. Diacylglycerol acyltransferase: a key mediator of plant triacylglycerol synthesis. Lipids. 2006;41(12):1073–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Lu CF, Xin ZG, Ren ZH, Miquel M, Browse J. An enzyme regulating triacylglycerol composition is encoded by the ROD1 gene of Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(44):18837–42.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Bates PD, Durrett TP, Ohlrogge JB, Pollard M. Analysis of acyl fluxes through multiple pathways of triacylglycerol synthesis in developing soybean embryos. Plant Physiol. 2009;150(1):55–72.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Hu Y, Wu G, Cao Y, Wu Y, Xiao L, Li X, et al. Breeding response of transcript profiling in developing seeds of Brassica napus. BMC Mol Biol. 2009;10(1):49.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Huang A. Oleosins and oil bodies in seeds and other organs. Plant Physiol. 1996;110(4):1055.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Peng FY, Weselake RJ. Gene coexpression clusters and putative regulatory elements underlying seed storage reserve accumulation in Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):286.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Shahidi F, Miraliakbari H. Omega-3 fatty acids in health and disease: part 2-health effects of omega-3 fatty acids in autoimmune diseases, mental health, and gene expression. J Med Food. 2005;8(2):133–48.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Shahidi F, Miraliakbari H. Omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids in health and disease: Part 1-cardiovascular disease and cancer. J Med Food. 2004;7(4):387–401.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Innis SM. Dietary (n-3) fatty acids and brain development. J Nutr. 2007;137(4):855–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Grover A, Kumari M, Singh S, Rathode SS, Gupta SM, Pandey P, et al. Analysis of Jatropha curcas transcriptome for oil enhancement and genic markers. Physiol Mol Biol Plant. 2014;20(1):139–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Mudalkar S, Golla R, Ghatty S, Reddy AR. De novo transcriptome analysis of an imminent biofuel crop, Camelina sativa L. using Illumina GAIIX sequencing platform and identification of SSR markers. Plant Mol Biol. 2014;84(1–2):159–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. The American Soybean Association. International: World Vegetable Oil Consumption. USDA Foreign Agriculture Service, Washington. 2013. http://soystats.com/international-world-vegetable-oil-consumption/.
  54. Economic and Social Development Department. World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030. FAO corporate document repository, Rome. 2013. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4252e/y4252e05c.htm.
  55. Huang AH. Oil bodies and oleosins in seeds. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1992;43(1):177–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Troncoso‐Ponce MA, Kilaru A, Cao X, Durrett TP, Fan J, Jensen JK, et al. Comparative deep transcriptional profiling of four developing oilseeds. Plant J. 2011;68(6):1014–27.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Bourgis F, Kilaru A, Cao X, Ngando-Ebongue G-F, Drira N, Ohlrogge JB, et al. Comparative transcriptome and metabolite analysis of oil palm and date palm mesocarp that differ dramatically in carbon partitioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(30):12527–32.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. McMaster CR, Bell RM. CDP-ethanolamine: 1, 2-diacylglycerol ethanolaminephosphotransferase. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Lipids and Lipid. Metabolism. 1997;1348(1):117–23.Google Scholar
  59. Bates PD, Browse J. The significance of different diacylgycerol synthesis pathways on plant oil composition and bioengineering. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3(147):1–13.Google Scholar
  60. Chung CH, Kim JL, Lee YC, Choi YL. Cloning and characterization of a seed-specific ω-3 fatty acid desaturase cDNA from Perilla frutescens. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999;40(1):114–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Anders S. Analysing RNA-Seq data with the DESeq package. Mol Biol. 2010:1–17.Google Scholar
  62. Mao X, Cai T, Olyarchuk JG, Wei L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(19):3787–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang YJ, Dong L, Zhang C, Wang XQ. Reference gene selection for real-time quantitative PCR normalization in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.). J Agric Biotechnol. 2012;20(5):521–8.Google Scholar
  64. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement