- Open Access
Mosaic structure of Mycobacterium bovis BCG genomes as a representation of phage sequences’ mobility
BMC Genomics volume 17, Article number: 1009 (2016)
The control of genome stability is relevant for the worldwide BCG vaccine preventing the acute forms of childhood tuberculosis. BCG sub-strains whole genome comparative analysis and revealing the triggers of sub-strains transition were the purpose of our investigation.
Whole genome sequencing of three BCG Russia seed lots (1963, 1982, 2006 years) confirmed the stability of vaccine sub-strain genome.
Comparative analysis of three Mycobacteruim bovis and nine M. bovis BCG genomes shown that differences between “early” and “late” sub-strains BCG genomes were associated with specific prophage profiles. Several prophages common to all BCG genomes included ORFs which were homologues to Caudovirales. Surprisingly very different prophage profiles characterized BCG Tice and BCG Montreal genomes. These prophages contained ORFs which were homologues to Herpesviruses. Phylogeny of strains cohort based on genome maps restriction analysis and whole genomes sequence data were in agreement with prophage profiles. Pair-wise alignment of unique BCG Tice and BCG Montreal prophage sequences and BCG Russia 368 genome demonstrated only similarity of fragmetary sequences that suggested the contribution of prophages in genome mosaic structure formation.
Control of the extended sequences is important for genome with mosaic structure. Prophage search tools are effective instruments in this analysis.
BCG (Bacille-Calmette-Guérin) vaccine is used broadly in various regions for the prevention of acute forms of childhood tuberculosis as part of the national childhood immunization programme. Despite these efforts, worldwide 9.6 million people are estimated to have fallen ill with TB in 2014. TB prevalence in 2015 was 42% lower than in 1990, as a result of vaccination against TB . BCG vaccine is under control of the World Health Organization (WHO). The development of international requirements for the manufacture and control of BCG vaccine was first considered by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS). In 2009 year WHO ECBS established WHO Reference Reagents for BCG vaccines of three different sub-strains (Danish1331, Tokyo 172-1 and Russian BCG-I) and quality control requirements, including genetic characterization of final lots and working seeds of BCG vaccines .
According to WHO and GMP requirements, BCG Russia sub-strain genome was sequenced in Russian research laboratories [3–5]. Now it is available in GenBank along with the sequences of other BCG sub-strains, because since the 1920s numerous sub-strains have evolved from the original strain BCG. And now Mycobacterium bovis BCG sub-strains comprise an excellent source for investigating the bacterial evolution. In this context, the endpoints of evolution are assessed likewise in the study of Darwinian biological species evolution . Moreover, the progenitor of BCG strain was lost, a data describing sub-strain cultivation that could impact the sub-strain fitness are not available. Thus, genome characteristics can be used for searching a trigger of BCG sub-strains transition. Since phages are considered as an evolution tool, and prophages, as incomplete inserted phage sequences, contribute to the diversification of the bacterial genome architecture, the special emphasis was made on these mobile elements of bacterial genome.
Following Brussow H. et al. , 12 years later we can re-affirm that there is a renaissance of phage research. The information on whole bacterial genome collected in the international databases provides increasing resources for prophage sequences discovering. While discussing reintroduction of the fitness factor by phages, the researches usually refer to virulent factors of pathogenic bacteria . Taking into account an essential role played by phages in the short-term adaptation processes, our goal was to assess a potential contribution of prophages in the mosaic structure of vaccine BCG sub-strains.
“368 shch” generation of sub-strain NSCPM 700001 Mycobacterium bovis BCG-I (Russia) from National State Collection of Pathogenic Microorganisms of “The Scientific Center for Expertise of Medical Application Products,” Russia’s Ministry of Health, was produced in 2006 and named ‘BCG Russia 368’. This generation is used for the production of the Russian BCG vaccine.
M. bovis complete genomes and one genome assembled in chromosome were imported from GenBank. They represented 11 biosamples. Three M. bovis strains were isolated from Bos taurus: AF2122/97 (Accession Number NC_002945.3); 1595 (NZ_CP012095.1); 30 (CP010332.1), one strain M. bovis BCG was isolated from a human patient with tuberculosis – 3281 (NZ_CP008744.1), and, the other strains were vaccine BCG sub-strains: Tokyo 172 (NC_012207.1), Pasteur 1173P2 (NC_008769.1), Moreau RDJ (NZ_AM412059.1), Mexico (NC_016804.1), Korea 1168P (NC_020245.2), 26/ATCC 35735/Montreal (CP010331.1), 63839/ATCC 35743/Tice (NZ_CP003494.1).
Genome sequencing and assembly
Two types of libraries were used for BCG Russia 368 genome sequencing by 454 Roche platform: shortgun and paired-end. The latter was built according to the 3 kb protocol. Sequencing procedure was performed using the GS Junior Titanium Sequencing Kit, i.e. GS Junior + Series XL+ Kit according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.
Assembly was performed with 454 Sequencing System Software v.2.7 and v.3.0 (Roche), yielding five scaffolds. PCR and Sanger sequencing were used for gap closure with primers presented in Additional file 1: Table S1. Most gaps were found in the sequences of PPE/PE-PGRS genes. Prediction of the secondary structures of this DNA sequences and calculation of the minimum free energy (MFE) structure were performed using RNAfold web server . GC-reach DNA fragments amplification was optimized by both the involvement of 10% DMSO (Sigma) and 5% D-(+)-Trehalose dehydrate (Sigma). Sanger sequencing of amplicons was successful only in 5% DMSO presence.
Whole genome map creating
Whole genome map (WGM) of the sub-strain BCG Russia 368 was created by the laboratory of OpGen Incorporated Company (Maryland, USA), according to the Argus™ Optical Mapping System User Manual . DNA was digested with Nhel. Map Solver software version 3.2 was employed for creating the final circular WGM.
Restriction maps analysis
GenBank files of the reference strains were taken for the restriction maps in silico generation with Nhel digestion. Map Solver software version 3.2 was utilized for the maps alignment and the cluster tree drawing. The lengths of tree branches indicated the relative differences between two nodes.
Genome map analysis and visualization
M. bovis BCG Russia 368 genome map was performed in GeneWiz  and GenomeVx browsers [13, 14]. Genome atlas option of GeneWiz primarily GC Skew was selected as an appropriate instrument for verifying the accuracy of genome assemblies and OriC detection. Other DNA properties: Intrinsic Curvature, Stacking Energy, Position Preference, Global Direct repeats, Global Inverted repeats, AT content – were essential for genome structure description. GenomeVx browser was useful for the visualization of combination of different structural elements position.
The software Rapid Annotations Subsystems Technology and SEED [15, 16] were employed for annotating the genome BCG Russia 368. Complementary analysis was made with conserved domains search services: KEGG , KEGG OC , COGs ; protein subcellular localization prediction software: TMHMM Server v.2.0 , SignalP 4.1 Server , PSORTb version 3.0.2 , InterPro server [23, 24].
ISfinder was used for the prediction of insertion sequences (IS) elements and the additional annotation of resolvases, transposases and inregrases genes. IS elements family and sub-groups; as well as inverted repeats flanking IS elements were determined using ISfinder database [25, 26].
The search for prophage sequences was made with PHAST (PHAge Search Tool) [29, 30]. GenVision Plug-In of the DNASTAR Lasergene programm package was selected for the visualization of prophages sequences.
BCG Russia 368 genome sequence was deposited in GenBank with the accession number NZ_CP009243.1.
BCG Russia sub-strain genome stability
BCG sub-strain genome stability is the most important question of the vaccine manufacture. According to the WHO requirements for the production and control of BCG vaccines molecular genetic characterization should be included in the quality control of BCG vaccines. Thus, we made WGS of the last BCG Russia seed lot of 2006 named BCG Russia 368. Also, we sequenced two previous generations of BCG Russia sub-strain: BCG Russia 311 from seed lot of 1963 and BCG Russia 977 from seed lot 1982. Searching variants in DNA sequences demonstrated that SNP in the sub-strain BCG Russia 368 in position 3175301 according to the BCG Tokyo as reference, in uridylyltransferase gene, was a synonymous mutation without replacement in the protein sequence. However, this mutation was not present in the earlier generations. The second finding was an insertion of TGT instead of C in position 2744580, in glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gene (Fig. 1). This mutation truncated the protein. It was shorter than original product, but contained the conservative domain and could be functional. Not all reads had this replacement: 14% in BCG Russia 311 and 54% in BCG Russia 977. It is important that this mutation was absent in the last generation (BCG Russia 368). These data could prove the stability of the sub-strain BCG Russia genome. The last generation genome BCG Russia 368 was deposited in GenBank with the Accession Number NZ_CP009243.1. In the text below we will discuss only the last generation of this sub-strain.
Comparison of the “early” sub-strains genomes
BCG sub-strain Tokyo 172 genome, belonging to the “early” sub-strains group, was used as reference in the genome sequence comparison. First, BCG Tokyo is an “early” sub-strain closest to BCG Russia sub-strain as regards the time of its provision by the Pasteur Institute to Tokyo (in 1925). Second, as BCG Russia sub-strain it was lyophilized in 1940s and used later as a freeze-dried vaccine. Then, in 1960 the 172nd transfer on bile-potato medium was freeze-dried and adopted as a primary seed lot . Finally, the genome of this seed lot was one of the first BCG genomes that were accurately sequenced, assembled and submitted to GenBank .
No substantial differences in genome sequences of BCG Russia 368 and BCG Tokyo 172 were found. The identified genomic differences were presented in Table 1 and could be subdivided into three groups: RD (region of differences), ins/del and SNP (Additional file 2: Table S2). Only two RD were detected between the “early” sub-strains. The first one was a 22 bp insertion in TetR family transcriptional regulator gene of BCG Russia 368 genome. This deletion (RD16) in BCG Tokyo genome was found in one variant of Japan BCG vaccine (Type I), submitted in GenBank. Type II had an RD16 band identical to those of other BCG sub-strains .
The second RD was a 1602 bp deletion in BCG Russia 368 genome, corresponding to the region from 4110452 to 4112053 bp in BCG Tokyo 172, beginning in JTY_RS19265 (ribonuclease gene), including JTY_RS19270 (antitoxin VapB48 gene) and finishing inside JTY_RS19275 (glutamate-cysteine ligase gene).
The sub-strain BCG Russia was a progenitor of the sub-strains used for vaccine production in Bulgaria (BCG Sofia) and India. Nowadays, these BCG vaccines are among four variants used by the UNICEF (The United Nations Children’s Fund) on behalf of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization: BCG-Denmark produced by the Statens Serum Institute in Denmark, BCG-Russia (genetically identical to BCG-Bulgaria) produced by Bulbio (BBNCIPD) in Bulgaria and by the Serum Institute in India, and BCG-Japan produced by the Japan BCG Laboratory .
Based on the published data we could trace the genome characteristics of BCG Russia daughter sub-strains. The BCG sub-strain used for production in Bulgaria (named Sofia SL222) was analyzed by Stefanova T. et al. with M. tuberculosis microarrays. 1.6-kb deletion that affects the Rv3697c and Rv3698 homologues was detected. The authors also noted the deletion of this region in BCG Russia but not in any other strain . It is concluded that RD 1602 bp is an old deletion, because BCG Pasteur was replaced with BCG Russia in Bulgaria BCG Laboratory in 1950s.
It should be noted that differences between the “early” sub-strain Tokyo and the “late” sub-strain Pasteur were more significant and the number of RD increased tenfold, according to Seki M. et al. .
Only ten ins/del (1–9 bp) differences were found between BCG Russia and BCG Tokyo genomes. Their number and size were lower than the ins/del differences between BCG Tokyo and BCG Pasteur genomes .
However, the number of SNPs was nearly the same in the two pairs of the genomes. Sixty percent of the SNP in BCG Russia 368 genome were nonsynonymous, but most of them were associated with conservative substitutions in the proteins. Only seven proteins had radical substitutions (Additional file 1: Table S2), though three of them were from PE-PGRS/PPE family. This finding has emphasized the significance of these proteins for BCG sub-strains adaptation.
Restriction analysis of genome maps
Genome comparison demonstrated that RD has played a more important role in BCG sub-strains differentiation. Method and equipment for performing this analysis were offered by OpGen Incorporated Company. As the first step, the assembling of DU2 region in BCG Russia 368 genome and the number of tandem duplications in this region were tested with the Argus™ Optical Mapping System. The WGM of BCG Russia 368 sub-strain is shown in Fig. 2. The comparison of DU2 regions was made separately (see Fig. 3). As you can see, the restriction maps of BCG Russia 368 and BCG Tokyo 172 are identical in this region, but differ from BCG Pasteur optical map. These data suggest the presence of triple tandem duplications in DU2 region of BCG Russia 368.
The optical maps of six reference BCG sub-strains were added to the map similarity cluster construction (Fig. 4). The cluster was subdivided into two groups. BCG Tice (ATCC 35743) was included in the group of the “early” sub-strains, while BCG Mexico was added to the “late” sub-strains in accordance with the Nhel restriction fragments.
Genome map analysis
After the verification of all tandem repeats and the gap closure, the sequence of assembling genome BCG Russia 368 was visualized in GeneWiz (Fig. 5). The place of the change in GC-Skew agreed with the OriC and the first nucleotide position in BCG Russia 368 genome. Different types of repeats, shown in this Figure, correlated with the specific genome elements identified with the specific resources (see “Methods”, Table 2). The position of these elements in BCG Russia 368 genome was marked on circles in Fig. 6 (Additional file 3: Table S3). As demonstrated, most of these elements are coinciding, overlapping or interconnecting. Therefore, the BCG genome can be described as repeat of repeats. Even prophage fragments have repeats in the genome sequence. However, while characterizing PE/PGRS genes, sometimes it is impossible to differentiate bacterial and phage genes.
Prophages in M. bovis genomes
Phages seem to be the best candidates for indentifying mosaic genome structure in the regions of repeats. We used PHAST for the computational identification of prophages in M. bovis genome sequences. All the discovered prophages (see Fig. 7) were split into three groups. The first group included the common prophages of M. bovis and M. bovis BCG. A 7.5 kb prophage was found in three M. bovis genomes and in the most of BCG genomes, except BCG Tice and Montreal sub-strains. A 20.3 kb prophage of M. bovis was replaced with 11.2 kb prophage in the “early” sub-strains genomes (BCG Tokyo, Moreau, Russia), but the former prophage was lost in “late” sub-strains genomes. The second group comprised six BCG Montreal prophages, and the third – 15 BCG Tice prophages. The prophages in these groups were specific and did not coincide with prophages of other sub-strains (see Fig. 6, circle B). The most of phage ORFs in the common M. bovis prophages were annotated as genes of Caudovirales (Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, Podoviridae) – typical bacteriophages. However, the most of phage ORFs in BCG Tice or BCG Montreal prophages were similar to the genes of various Herpes viruses (Human, Bovine, Macaci, Alcela, Anguil).
Comparative prophage analyses confirmed the mosaic BCG genome structure. Alignment of BCG Montreal and BCG Tice phage sequences with BCG Russia 368 complete genome indentified a high similarity only for fragments of BCG Tice/BCG Montreal prohages. They are shown in Fig. 6 (circle B) as the purple (BCG Tice) and blue (BCG Montreal) bars. Thus, 13.4 and 13.9 kb prophage of BCG Tice were subdivided into 5 and 3 fragments, respectively, in BCG Russia 368 genome. The comparison demonstrated multiple gaps ranging from 14 to 128 bp in the sequences of BCG Russia 368 that are homologous to BCG Montreal prophages.
In contrast, the alignment of 7.5 kb BCG Russia 368 prophage versus BCG Tice and Montreal genomes demonstrated that 0.9 and 6.6 kb fragments were residing in different regions of BCG Tice/ Montreal genomes. The transposase gene sequence from 7.5 kb BCG Russia 368 prophage was absent in BCG Tice / Montreal genomes.
Moreover, 7.5 kb BCG Russia 368 prophages sequence had 922 bp repeat in BCG Russia 368 genome (marked as red bar in Fug. 6, circle B). This sequence located in the same region as insertion element ISMt1. It should be noted that not just a fragment, but two whole prophages predicted by PHAST in BCG Russia 368 genome were also associated with the incretion elements. Thus, 7.5 kb prophage sequence was associated with IS1560 and 11 kb - with IS6110. The correlation between locations of the prophage sequences and the IS elements emphasizes a considerable contribution made by phages to the BCG genome evolution.
Phylogeny reconstruction was made using the genome sequences of analyzed M. bovis strains and BCG sub-strains. The tree demonstrated in Fig. 8 was compared with known genealogical data of vaccine sub-strains based on DU2 region [38, 39] and with prophage profile. BCG sub-strains and M. bovis strains fall in two separate clades. In BCG clade the “early” (Russia, Tokyo) and the “late” sub-strains (Pasteur 1173P2, Korea 1168P, Mexico) have formed discrete closely related groups with a few exceptions. BCG Moreau sub-strain has formed a basal branch. The most outstanding discrepancies were associated with positions of BCG Tice and BCG Montreal. BCG Tice took the most divergent place on the tree and BCG Montreal unexpectedly fell into the group of the “early” sub-strains. BCG 3281, isolated from an adult patient with pulmonary tuberculosis, was close to the “late” sub-strains. Interestingly, each of group on the tree had specific sets of prophage sequences.
DU2 region genealogy correlated with the whole genome phylogeny in DU2-I “early” sub-strain group. BCG 3281 represented DU2-III group  creating a separate branch on the phylogenetic tree. But DU2-IV group was heterogeneous, since it included the above mentioned sub-strains BCG Tice and BCG Montreal. The discrepancy could be explained by the genome rearrangements caused by numerous prophage sequences.
The genomic variability of BCG sub-strains arose from one progenitor has been shown in multiple studies using comparative genome analysis. Identification of RDs, ins/del differences and SNPs indicates the continuous nature of in vitro evolution, which is still going on in BCG sub-strains. We assumed that prophages can contribute to genomic evolution and the BCG sub-strains diversity. Prophages are known to constitute as much as 10–20% of a bacterium genome. Many of these prophages appear to be defective and are in a state of mutational decay. However, recombination has occurred between related prophages that reside at different locations in a bacterium genome. In addition, many genes in defective prophages remain functional . So prophages, including defective ones, can be important biological cause of genomic rearrangements. The analysis of these prophages revealed unexpected evolutionary patterns suggesting widespread contribution of prophages to bacterial fitness .
The comparative genome analysis of nine BCG sub-strains and three M. bovis strains suggested our assumption and revealed remarkable differences between their prophage profiles. On the other hand, unexpected changes in the genomes associated with the number and composition of prophages were discovered in the genomes of the late strains Tice and Montreal.
Both BCG Tice and BCG Montreal or Frappier were taken from the Pasteur Institute after 1934 and, according to the Brosch et al., they had close phylogenetic relations because they fall in one phylogenetic group “DU2 IV, Δint”. The analysis of the history of BCG Tice sub-strain demonstrated that the first Tice sub-strain received by Dr. Rosenthal from the Pasteur Institute was a progenitor of at least six different daughter BCG sub-strains: H, K, E, L, LH, and BL. This fact emphasizes the heterogeneity of the “late” BCG sub-strains. In 1952 the sub-strain BL, shown to be strongly attenuated in laboratory studies, was mixed in the ratio 3:1 with a new routine ‘P’ strain, received from the Pasteur Institute in 1951. This new sub-strain, called BLP, was freeze-dried in 1952, and since 1953 only freeze-dried BCG vaccine from this mixed strain has been produced . The history of BCG Montreal sub-strain is also known completely, because three times BCG sub-strains were sent to Canada from the Pasteur Institute .
The appearance of new prophage profiles in BCG Tice and BCG Montreal sub-strains reflects substantial changes of BCG genomes, which can also affect vaccine properties of the sub-strains. According to Zhang et al.  BCG Montreal/Frappier and BCG Tice along with BCG Phipps, BCG Prague sub-strains have lost the largest number of T-Cell epitopes, associated with its vaccine properties. In contrast, BCG Russia and BCG Tokyo sub-strains are still characterized by the largest number of T-Cell epitopes among other BCGs.
These findings prove the need for extensive genomic regions sequencing to identify prophages as potential markers of genomic rearrangement. Prophage studies allow better understanding of the genetic differences and characteristics of various BCG sub-strains and may also be useful for monitoring genetic stability of the seed lot sub-strain.
The 21st century has been marked by the growth of human migration from the regions with high TB incidence and the increase in number of HIV-infected individuals. As a result, the emphasis in TB vaccination campaign has been shifted from children to adolescents and adults.
Fifteen vaccine candidates were assessed in clinical trials in 2015. They were designed either for BCG replacement vaccine or as a potential boost vaccine for the protection of adolescents and adults. The list included recombinant BCGs, attenuated M. tuberculosis strains, recombinant viral-vectored platforms, protein/adjuvant combinations, and mycobacterial extracts . A subunit vaccine based on the mycobacterial proteins fused to cellulose-binding domain was developed in N.F. Gamaleya Research Center .
On the other hand, new area of BCG vaccine application has been proposed. As most humans are born in bacteriological environments characterized by a low microbial diversity, the effects of BCG vaccine administrated immediately after birth, as a modulator of Th-1/Th-2 responses, is very important and should be analyzed .
In this context, the task of BCG genome stability control is crucial and will continue to be relevant.
WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization
Insertion sequences elements
Open reading frame
Region of differences
Whole genome map
World Health Organization
Global tuberculosis report. WHO, 20th edition; 2015. URL: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/191102/1/9789241565059_eng.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
Ho MM, Southern J, Kang H-N, Knezevic I. Meeting Report. WHO informal consultation on standardization and evaluation of BCG vaccines. Geneva, Switzerland; 2009, URL:http://who.int/biologicals/publications/meetings/areas/vaccines/bcg/BCG_meeting_report_2009v7_FOR_WEB_10JUNE.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
Kunda MS, Voronina OL, Aksenova EI, Semenov AN, Ruzhova NN, Lunin VG, Gintsburg AL. Analyzing of the BCG substrains diversity formed by the human influence. In: Troitsky A, Rusin L, Petrov N, Troitsky A, Rusin L, Petrov N, editors. Molecular Phylogenetics: Contributions to the 4th Moscow International conference “Molecular Phylogenetics” (MolPy-4). Moscow: Torus Press; 2014. p. 34–90. ISBN: 978-5-94588-153-2.
Ludannyy R, Alvarez Figueroa M, Levi D, Markelov M, Dedkov V, Aleksandrova N, Shipulin G. Whole-genome sequence of mycobacterium bovis BCG-1 (Russia). Genome Announc. 2015;3(6). doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01320-15.
Sotnikova EA, Shitikov EA, Malakhova MV, Kostryukova ES, Ilina EN, Atrasheuskaya AV, Ignatyev GM, Vinokurova NV, Gorbachyov VY. Complete Genome Sequence of Mycobacterium bovis Strain BCG-1 (Russia). Genome Announc. 2016;4(2). doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00182-16.
Arnoldt H, Strogatz SH, Timme M. Toward the Darwinian transition: Switching between distributed and speciated states in a simple model of early life. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015;92(5):052909. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.92.052909.
Brüssow H, Canchaya C, Hardt WD. Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68(3):560–602. doi:10.1128/MMBR.68.3.560-602.2004.
Fortier LC, Sekulovic O. Importance of prophages to evolution and virulence of bacterial pathogens. Virulence. 2013;4(5):354–65. doi:10.4161/viru.24498.
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Kate Wilson Unit 2.4 Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. Wiley online library; 2001. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0204s56.
Argus™ Optical Mapping System User Manual. MAN-11207-001.02 OpGen, Inc. © 2010 All Rights Reserved. URL: http://opgen.com/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
RNAfold web server of the Theoretical Biochemistry Group within the Institute for Theoretical Chemistry which in turn is part of the University of Vienna. URL: http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
The Main Site of the Center for Biological Sequence Analysis at the Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, Denmark. URL: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/gwBrowser. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
The Main Site of University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. URL: http://wolfe.ucd.ie/GenomeVx/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
Conant GC, Wolfe KH. GenomeVx: simple web-based creation of editable circular chromosome maps. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(6):861–2. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm598.
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-75.
Overbeek R, Begley T, Butler RM, Choudhuri JV, Chuang HY, et al. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:5691–702. doi:10.1093/nar/gki866.
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. The site of Kanehisa Laboratories. URL: http://www.genome.jp/kegg/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
KEGG OC (KEGG Ortholog Cluster). URL: http://www.genome.jp/tools/oc/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
COGs, Phylogenetic classification of proteins encoded in complete genomes. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
Center for Biological Sequence Analysis Server. URL: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016. Hosted in Technical University of Denmark.
Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane region. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–6. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1701.
Yu NY, Wagner JR, Laird MR, Melli G, Rey S, Lo R, Dao P, Sahinalp SC, Ester M, Foster LJ, Brinkman FSL. PSORTb 3.0: Improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(13):1608–15.
Mitchell A, Chang HY, Daugherty L, Fraser M, Hunter S, Lopez R, et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1243.
Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1236–40. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031.
Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D32–6. doi:10.1093/nar/gkj014.
The Main Site of the Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics. Toulouse Cedex: National Center for Scientific Research. URL: http://www-is.biotoul.fr/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
CRISPRs web server of the Institute of Genetic and Microbiology at the Paris-Sud University, France. URL: http://crispr.u-psud.fr/Server/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W52–7. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm360.
Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Web Server issue):W347–52. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr485.
The PHAST website is maintained by Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. URL: http://phast.wishartlab.com/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–25.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9.
Oettinger T, Jørgensen M, Ladefoged A, Hasløv K, Andersen P. Development of the Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine: review of the historical and biochemical evidence for a genealogical tree. Tuber Lung Dis. 1999;79(4):243–50.
Seki M, Honda I, Fujita I, Yano I, Yamamoto S, Koyama A. Whole genome sequence analysis of Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Tokyo 172: a comparative study of BCG vaccine substrains. Vaccine. 2009;27(11):1710–6. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.034.
Ho MM, Southern J, Kang H-N, Knezevic I. Meating report. WHO consultation on the characterization of BCG vaccine. Geneva: WHO; 2004. URL: http://www.who.int/biologicals/publications/meetings/areas/vaccines/bcg/. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
Luca S, Mihaescu T. History of BCG vaccine. Maedica. 2013;8(1):53–8.
Stefanova T, Chouchkova M, Hinds J, Butcher PD, Inwald J, Dale J, Palmer S, Hewinson RG, Gordon SV. Genetic composition of Mycobacterium bovis BCG substrain Sofia. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(11):5349.
Brosch R, Gordon SV, Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Frigui W, Valenti P, Dos Santos S, Duthoy S, Lacroix C, Garcia-Pelayo C, Inwald JK, Golby P, Garcia JN, Hewinson RG, Behr MA, Quail MA, Churcher C, Barrell BG, Parkhill J, Cole ST. Genome plasticity of BCG and impact on vaccine efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(13):5596–601.
Joung SM, Ryoo S. BCG vaccine in Korea. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2013;2(2):83–91. doi:10.7774/cevr.2013.2.2.83.
Li X, Chen L, Zhu Y, Yu X, Cao J, Wang R, Lv X, He J, Guo A, Huang H, Zheng H, Liu S. Genomic analysis of a Mycobacterium bovis bacillus [corrected] Calmette-Guérin strain isolated from an adult patient with pulmonary tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122403. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122403. eCollection 2015.
Casjens S. Prophages and bacterial genomics: what have we learned so far? Mol Microbiol. 2003;49(2):277–300. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03580.x.
Bobay LM, Touchon M, Rocha EP. Pervasive domestication of defective prophages by bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(33):12127–32. doi:10.1073/pnas.1405336111.
Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zheng H, Pan Y, Liu H, Du P, Wan L, Liu J, Zhu B, Zhao G, Chen C, Wan K. Genome sequencing and analysis of BCG vaccine strains. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71243. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071243.
Sergienko OV, Liashchuk AM, Aksenova EI, Galushkina ZM, Poletaeva NN, Sharapova NE, Semikhin AS, Kotnova AR, Veselov AM, Bashkirov VN, Kulikova NL, Khlebnikov VS, Kondrat’eva TK, Kariagina-Zhulina AS, Apt AS, Lunin VG, Gintsburg AL. Production of mycobacterial antigenes merged with cellulose binding protein domain in order to produce subunit vaccines against tuberculosis. Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol. 2012;(1):16–20. URL:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Sergienko+OV%2C+Liashchuk+AM%2C+Aksenova+EI%2C+Galushkina+ZM%2C+Poletaeva+NN##. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
Odent MR. The future of neonatal BCG. Med Hypotheses. 2016;91:34–6. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2016.04.010.
We acknowledge Philipova Nataliya E., the Director of affiliate “Medgamal” of the N.F. Gamaleya Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, for support and provision of the producing sub-strains Mycobacterium bovis BCG-I (Russia), and Isachkova Irina P., the Senior Researcher of “Medgamal”, for BCG-I sub-strain cultivation.
This article has been published as part of BMC Genetics Vol 17 Suppl 14, 2016: Selected articles from BGRS\SB-2016: genomics. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-17-supplement-14.
This work was supported by the State Order to the N.F. Gamaleya Federal Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology and by the Grant of the President of the Russian Federation; State Contract of 04.02.2013. The publication costs were funded by the budget of the State Order to the N.F. Gamaleya Federal Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
OV, MK, EA conceived and designed the experiments, sequenced, assembled and annotated the genomes of the BCG sub-strain generations; OV supervised the study and contributed to manuscript writing; MK performed genome map analysis and assisted in the preparation of figures and text; EA participated in data interpretation; AS contributed to bioinformatic analysis, NR was responsible for the phylogenetic analysis, contributed to data interpretation and manuscript writing; VL contributed reagents/materials tools; AG performed general supervision of the research group. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Primers used for BCG Russia 368 genome gaps closure by PCR and Sanger sequencing. (XLSX 14 kb)
Localization and description of mutation in BCG Russia 368 genome vs. BCG Tokyo 172. (XLSX 17 kb)
Localization of specific genome elements in BCG Russia genome. (XLSX 23 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Voronina, O.L., Kunda, M.S., Aksenova, E.I. et al. Mosaic structure of Mycobacterium bovis BCG genomes as a representation of phage sequences’ mobility. BMC Genomics 17, 1009 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3355-1
- Mycobacterium bovis
- Daughter sub-strain
- Genome rearrangement