Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Genomics

Open Access

Genome-wide analysis of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters in the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci

BMC Genomics201718:330

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3706-6

Received: 30 October 2016

Accepted: 12 April 2017

Published: 26 April 2017

Abstract

Background

ABC transporter superfamily is one of the largest and ubiquitous groups of proteins. Because of their role in detoxification, insect ABC transporters have gained more attention in recent years. In this study, we annotated ABC transporters from a newly sequenced sweetpotato whitefly genome. Bemisia tabaci Q biotype is an emerging global invasive species that has caused extensive damages to field crops as well as ornamental plants.

Results

A total of 55 ABC transporters containing all eight described subfamilies (A to H) were identified in the B. tabaci Q genome, including 8 ABCAs, 3 ABCBs, 6 ABCCs, 2 ABCDs, 1 ABCE, 3 ABCFs, 23 ABCGs and 9 ABCHs. In comparison to other species, subfamilies G and H in both phloem- and blood-sucking arthropods are expanded. The temporal expression profiles of these 55 ABC transporters throughout B. tabaci developmental stages and their responses to imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid insecticide, were investigated using RNA-seq analysis. Furthermore, the mRNA expression of 24 ABC transporters (44% of the total) representing all eight subfamilies was confirmed by the quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). Furthermore, mRNA expression levels estimated by RT-qPCR and RNA-seq analyses were significantly correlated (r = 0.684, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

It is the first genome-wide analysis of the entire repertoire of ABC transporters in B. tabaci. The identification of these ABC transporters, their temporal expression profiles during B. tabaci development, and their response to a neonicotinoid insecticide lay the foundation for functional genomic understanding of their contribution to the invasiveness of B. tabaci.

Keywords

ATP-binding cassette transporter Bemisia tabaci GenomeGene family expansionInvasiveness

Background

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters constitute one of the largest protein superfamily and exists in all living organisms [13]. These transporters share highly conserved nucleotide binding domains (NBDs), which contain Walker A, Walker B and a signature motif, the C loop, linking the two Walker boxes [4, 5]. In addition to NBDs, a eukaryotic ABC transporter typically consists of one or two transmembrane domains (TMDs), which contain 6–11 membrane-spanning α-helices and dictate substrate specificity [1]. A classic domain architecture of a full-transporter has a TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD arrangement from the N- to C-terminus, while half-transporters have only one set of NBD-TMD. Based on the homology of their NBDs, human ABC transporters have been categorized into seven subfamilies, ABCA to ABCG [1]. ABCH, which was first discovered in Drosophila melanogaster, exists in arthropods and zebrafish but not in mammals, plants and fungi [612].

Most ABC transporters encodes membrane-bound proteins that carry a wide range of molecules (e.g., amino acids, peptides, vitamins, sugars, lipids, sterols, hormones, endogenous metabolites, inorganics and xenobiotics) across membranes [1]. ABC transporters use energy released by ATP hydrolysis at the NBDs to transport molecular cargoes across the membrane. ABC transporters also function in cell signaling, ribosome assembly and translation [3, 13]. For example, ABCE and ABCF proteins do not function as classic transporters but participate in transcription, translation and ribosome assembly [14, 15]. Furthermore, plant ABC transporters also contribute to osmolality and phytoalexin functions (plant-pathogen interactions) [16].

The advent of Genomics Era has greatly improved our understanding of the diversity and function of invertebrate ABC transporters, including 56 in the fruit fly D. melanogaster [1], 64 in the water flea Daphnia pulex [13], 51 in the silkworm Bombyx mori [8], 73 in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum [17] and 103 in the spider mites Tetranychus urticae [10]. Based on the transcriptome data, Epis et al. suggested that ABC transporters were involved in the permethrin resistance in a malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi [18]. Similarly, ABC transporters were implicated in the degradation of plant secondary metabolites in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera [19].

The sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), is a phloem-feeding insect pest that cause substantial damages through feeding on over 600 host plants as well as by transmitting over 100 plant viruses [20]. As one of the most invasive pests, B. tabaci is generally considered as a species complex consisting of many biotypes or putative species with different biological and genetic characteristics [21]. The two most invasive and destructive B. tabaci biotypes are the Q (also known as Mediterranean, MED) and B (also known as Middle East-Asia Minor 1, MEAM1) [21]. B. tabaci has demonstrated a remarkable ability to develop resistance to insecticides in the field, including organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, neonicotinoids and juvenile hormone mimics [2224]. Insecticide was the driving force facilitating the B. tabaci biotype replacement events in China (B replaced indigenous biotypes in early 2000, and the subsequent replacement by Q in 2009) [25]. The overall goal of this research is to understand the involvement of ABC transporters, a family of phase III detoxification enzymes, in the metabolic resistance in B. tabaci. To archive this goal, we 1) provided the first genome-wide analysis of the entire repertoire of ABC transporters in the whitefly B. tabaci Q; 2) investigated the temporal expression profiles of these ABC transporters in different developmental stages; and 3) documented their transcriptomic response to imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid insecticide.

Results and discussion

Identification of ABC transporters in B. tabaci

A total of 55 ABC transporters was identified in B. tabaci Q genome (Table 1). The number of ABC transporters in B. tabaci Q is comparable with other arthropod species; however, subfamilies G and H expanded in phloem- and blood-sucking arthropods (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S1). For example, ABCG and ABCH account for 58% (42 and 16%, respectively) of ABC transporters in the phloem-sucking B. tabaci, and 49% (45 and 4%, respectively) in the blood-sucking Cimex lectularius. The percentage reduces to 21% (18% + 3%) in the red flour beetle, T. castaneum. The expansion of ABCG and ABCH subfamilies in these polyphagous and phloem-sucking arthropods, including the whitefly B. tabaci, the wheat aphid D. noxia and the spider mite T. urticae, suggest the potential contribution of ABC transporters to their adaptability and invasiveness. Phylogenetic analysis categorized the 55 B. tabaci ABC transporters into eight subfamilies (Fig. 1). To further understand the evolutionary placement of B. tabaci ABC transporters, in-depth phylogenetic analyses were conducted for each subfamily. The results of these analyses were described and discussed in the following sections.
Table 1

ABC transporters identified in the B. tabaci Q genome

Subfamily

Gene ID

Length (aa)

Location (strand)

Exon

Topology (SMART)

Matched gene (Accession no.)

N-Glca

O-Glcb

CDS statusc

ABCA

Btabq017043.1

1655

Scaffold_3468:1006:32679+

20

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCA3 (AIN44094.1)

10

7

C

Btabq003223.3

1387

Scaffold_13:22456:46016-

18

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCA3 (XP_008199154.1)

7

12

C

Btabq003232.1

1710

Scaffold_13:231650:263916+

22

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCA3 (XP_008580143.1)

13

13

C

Btabq009375.1

1607

Scaffold_204:588616:628011+

24

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCA3 (XP_004627914.1)

11

11

C

Btabq009376.1

1642

Scaffold_204:635079:664477:-

24

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCA3 (XP_007499572.1)

6

14

C

Btabq022409.1

1642

Scaffold_499:371203:397123:+

23

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCA3 (XP_007499572.2)

6

16

C

Btabq022410.1

1653

Scaffold_499:405484:424414:-

21

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCA3 (XP_007499572.3)

11

15

C

Btabq008198.1

1730

Scaffold_188:144605:225978+

25

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCA5 (XP_015513231.1)

11

25

C

ABCB

Btabq001304.1

837

Scaffold_11:1763748:1779600:-

13

TMD-NBD

ABCB6 (KDR08849.1)

5

0

C

Btabq028971.1

684

Scaffold_89:122752:135916:+

13

TMD-NBD

ABCB7 (XP003707011.1)

3

12

C

Btabq013065.1

903

Scaffold_266:334207:358911:-

19

TMD-NBD

ABCB8 (KDR20884.1)

2

8

C

ABCC

Btabq000311.1

1543

Scaffold_102:620714:659592:+

28

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCC1 (XP_012252456.1)

8

10

C

Btabq019529.2

1457

Scaffold_400:253922:298887:+

30

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCC1 (KYM99989.1)

11

5

C

Btabq026695.3

1422

Scaffold_728:117063:145027:+

27

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCC4 (XP_003487856.1)

8

11

C

Btabq008004.1

1302

Scaffold_1847:75114:101542:-

21

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCC4 (XP_015366071.1)

11

4

C

Btabq004618.1

1527

Scaffold_1440:62283:85796:-

24

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCC7 (KDR17053.1)

11

3

C

Btabq003933.1

1558

Scaffold_137:590708:610342:+

25

TMD-NBD-TMD-NBD

ABCC9 (XP_012225332.1)

9

3

C

ABCD

Btabq026746.1

733

Scaffold_732:28889:99259:+

4

TMD-NBD

ABCD2 (AIN44106.1)

3

5

C

Btabq017051.1

670

Scaffold_347:310155:194947:-

15

TMD-NBD

ABCD3 (XP_008186233.1)

4

9

C

ABCE

BtabqABCE1

608

Scaffold_2889:666:11372:+

10

NBD-NBD

ABCE1 (XP_014275278.1)

1

5

C

ABCF

Btabq009873.1

595

Scaffold_2118:27608:29395:+

1

NBD-NBD

ABCF1 (XP_971562.1)

5

0

C

Btabq014578.1

626

Scaffold_354:220262:229341:+

10

NBD-NBD

ABCF2 (XP_966990.1)

4

2

C

Btabq016264.1

746

Scaffold_3286:21844:40980:-

13

NBD-NBD

ABCF3 (KDR22359.1)

3

5

C

ABCG

Btabq003568.1

679

Scaffold_133:520218:533101:-

14

NBD-TMD

ABCG1 (KDR13078.1)

6

0

C

Btabq006006.1

634

Scaffold_1598:84277:126599:+

11

NBD-TMD

ABCG1 (XP_001943523.1)

1

4

C

Btabq007377.1

594

Scaffold_176:564047:611847:-

11

NBD-TMD

ABCG1 (XP_001947776.2)

1

10

C

Btabq020594.1

703

Scaffold_434:86892:119931:-

14

NBD-TMD

ABCG1 (XP_001942514.1)

1

6

C

Btabq029952.1

654

Scaffold_973:236:11383:+

9

NBD-TMD

ABCG1 (KDR12258.1)

1

6

C

Btabq009742.1

300

Scaffold_434:92701:149213:-

6

NBD

ABCG1 (XP_008476671.1)

1

3

P

Btabq029281.1

676

Scaffold_910:266071:279898:-

12

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (XP_003246360.1)

6

0

C

Btabq007131.3

649

Scaffold_1729:110948:148435:+

13

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (XP_008472465.1)

2

4

C

Btabq023008.1

590

Scaffold_523:150957:167280:-

11

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (XP_003246361.1)

2

6

C

Btabq009608.1

590

Scaffold_208:388361:402826:-

10

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (XP_003246361.1)

2

6

C

Btabq009611.1

590

Scaffold_208:557522:571601:+

11

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (XP_003246361.1)

2

6

C

Btabq023919.1

639

Scaffold_563:13213:51650:-

10

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (XP_008470161.1)

3

9

C

Btabq013894.1

590

Scaffold_282:256960:283064:+

11

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (XP_003246361.1)

2

6

C

Btabq000844.1

655

Scaffold_1057:77963:94241:+

10

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (XP_015509620.1)

2

0

C

Btabq026080.1

692

Scaffold_683:129726:137969:+

3

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (KDR08336.1)

6

11

C

Btabq020567.1

692

Scaffold_4326:21216:33527:+

4

NBD-TMD

ABCG4 (KDR08336.1)

6

11

C

Btabq001288.1

612

Scaffold_11:1463363:1478800:-

10

NBD-TMD

ABCG5 (KDR20187.1)

2

19

C

Btabq001290.1

952

Scaffold_11:1493109:1530869:+

15

TMD

ABCG8 (XP_001944045.2)

4

19

P

Btabq023890.1

755

Scaffold_561:73328:85538:-

15

NBD-TMD

ABCG14 (XP_014258500.1)

3

1

C

Btabq014028.1

607

Scaffold_2842:67736:80804:+

12

NBD-TMD

Scarlet (XP_014276471.1)

3

11

C

Btabq015484.1

645

Scaffold_3117:65588:78996:+

14

NBD-TMD

Scarlet (XP_014279356.1)

5

9

C

Btabq002474.1

667

Scaffold_121:146665:158695:-

11

NBD-TMD

Scarlet (NP_001306193.1)

3

6

C

Btabq022510.1

700

Scaffold_50:595327:617912:+

13

NBD-TMD

White (KDR20987.1)

3

8

C

ABCH

Btabq015123.1

685

Scaffold_304:505925:535800:-

15

NBD-TMD

ABCG23 (XP_001945365.2)

6

2

C

Btabq003158.1

627

Scaffold_129:187020:214919:-

14

NBD-TMD

ABCG23 (XP_001945365.2)

4

1

C

Btabq006712.2

687

Scaffold_167:585953:624494:-

16

NBD-TMD

ABCG23 (XP_001945365.2)

6

2

C

Btabq018898.1

679

Scaffold_386:127646:145952:-

15

NBD-TMD

ABCG23 (XP_001945365.2)

4

6

C

Btabq019352.1

685

Scaffold_398:364203:394966:+

15

NBD-TMD

ABCG23 (XP_015364832.1)

6

2

C

Btabq026264.1

647

Scaffold_7:597935:614293:-

14

NBD-TMD

ABCG23 (XP_001942931.1)

5

1

C

Btabq028063.1

749

Scaffold_82:494722:529828:-

16

NBD-TMD

ABCG23 (XP_001945213.1)

6

11

C

Btabq009745.1

695

Scaffold_21:1506328:1537013:-

12

NBD-TMD

ABCG20 (XP_014289229.1)

5

3

C

BTA027409.1

764

Scaffold_791:944:21302:+

16

NBD-TMD

ABCG20 (XP_001951744.1)

6

8

C

aN-glycosylation sites were predicted using the NetNGlyc 1.0 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/); only N-glycosylation sites with a “potential” score > 0.5 and with a jury agreement were considered

bO-glycosylation sites were predicted using the NetOGlyc 4.0 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetOGlyc/) [96]; if the G-score was > 0.5, the residue was considered to be O-glycosylated; this table shows the total number of O-glycosylated sites (glycosylated serines and threonines)

cC indicates a complete sequence; P indicates a partial sequence

Table 2

The distribution of ABC transporter subfamilies in B. tabaci Q and in other arthropod species

 

Phloem-sucking

Blood-sucking

Chewing/Sucking

Chewing

Subfamily

B. tabaci

D. noxia

T. urticae

An. gambiae

P. humanus

C. lectularius

A. mellifera

D. melanogaster

B. mori

H. armicoverpa

T. castaneum

ABCA

8

3

9

9

2

6

3

10

6

7

10

ABCB

3

6

4

5

6

7

7

8

8

11

6

ABCC

6

24

39

13

5

6

9

14

15

11

35

ABCD

2

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

ABCE

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

ABCF

3

3

3

3

3

4

3

3

3

3

3

ABCG

23 (42%)

26 (32%)

23 (23%)

16 (31%)

13 (33%)

23 (45%)

15 (35%)

15 (27%)

13 (26%)

16 (30%)

13 (18%)

ABCH

9 (16%)

11 (13%)

22 (21%)

3 (6%)

6 (15%)

2 (3.9%)

3 (7%)

3 (5.3%)

3 (5.8%)

3 (5.5%)

3 (4%)

Others

 

5

  

2

      

Total

55 (100%)

82 (100%)

103 (100%)

52 (100%)

40 (100%)

51 (100%)

43 (100%)

56 (100%)

51 (100%)

54 (100%)

73 (100%)

Species in this survey included Bemisia tabaci, Diuraphis noxia, Tetranychus urticae, Anopheles gambiae, Pediculus humanus humanus, Cimex lectularius, Bombyx mori, Helicoverpa armigera, Apis mellifera, Drosophila melanogaster, and Tribolium castaneum. “Others” refers to uncharacterized genes. The values without parentheses indicate the number of transporters detected; for subfamilies ABCG and ABCH, the values in parentheses indicate the percentage of all ABC transporters represented by the indicated subfamily

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic relationship of 55 ABC transporters in B. tabaci Q. Amino acid sequences of nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) were aligned using ClustalW and subjected to a maximum likelihood analysis by MEGA5 [97]. Numbers at the branch point of the node represent the value resulting from 1000 replications. All positions with less than 95% site coverage were eliminated

ABCA subfamily

A phylogeny tree of the eight ABCA proteins identified in B. tabaci and other organisms was presented in Additional file 2: Figure S2. All of the B. tabaci ABCA proteins are full-transporters (Table 1), which is consistent with D. pulex and T. urticae [10, 13]. The silkworm ABCA subfamily, in contrast, contains two full-transporters, one half-transporter and three incomplete ABC transporters [8]. Furthermore, no ABCA protein has been identified in yeast [26].

The B. tabaci ABCA subfamily has one of the largest B. tabaci ABC transporters, Btabq008198.1, encoding 1730 amino acids (Table 1). Btabq008198.1 clustered with the ABCA5 group, including Anopheles gambiae AGAp010416-PA, D. noxia DnXP_015375463.1 and H. sapiens ABCA5 cluster (hABCA5, 6, 8, 9 and 10) (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Although these ABCA5-related genes in mammalians (human, dog and mouse) cluster with ABCA5 on the same chromosomes [6, 27], no counterpart of the ABCA5-related genes has been identified in invertebrates, such as B. mori [8] and T. urticae [10]. Besides Btabq008198.1, the other seven B. tabaci ABCA genes (Btabq017043.1, Btabq003223.3, Btabq003232.1, Btabq009375.1, Btabq009376.1, Btabq022409.1, and Btabq022410.1) form a sister-group with a high bootstrap support. This sister-group clustered with D. noxia DnXP_015366480.1 (ABCA3), T. japonicas TjABCA3 and seven T. urticae genes. These genes then clustered with D. melanogaster DmCG31731 with a moderate bootstrap support. DmCG31731 was down-regulated in the salivary glands of a D. melanogaster E93 mutant [28]. As an early ecdysone responsive gene, E93 was a primary regulator of programmed cell death in D. melanogaster development [29]. Injection of dsRNAs synthesized from the two ABCA genes, TcABCA-9A and TcABC A-9B, led to approximately 30% mortality in the red flour beetle, T. castaneum [17].

ABCB subfamily

In B. tabaci Q, we identified three ABCB half-transporters but no full-transporters (Table 1). These B. tabaci half-transporters (Btabq001304.1, Btabq013065.1 and Btabq013065.1) belong to three clades, indicating that these genes are homologous to ABCB genes in human, fruit fly and other insects (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Btabq001304.1 clustered with ABCB6 proteins from other species, including D. noxia DnXP_015376167.1, An. gambiae AGAP002278, D. melanogaster DmCG4225, T. japonicas TjABCB6, and H. sapiens hABCB6. Similarly, Btabq028971.1 formed an ABCB7 clade with D. noxia DnXP_015378905.1, D. melanogaster DmCG7955, T. japonicas TjABCB7, and H. sapiens hABCB7. Meanwhile, Btabq013065.1 was clustered with ABCB8 from D. melanogaster (DmCG1824), T. urticae (Tu17g02000), T. japonicas (TjABCB8) and H. sapiens (hABCB8).

In H. sapiens, hABCB6, hABCB7 and hABCB8/MABC1 are mitochondrial transporters with roles in iron metabolism and transportation of Fe/S protein precursors [30, 31]. Drosophila melanogaster DmCG4225 (ABCB6) was tolerant to cadmium [32]. Disruption of C. elegans ABTM- 1, a homologue of ABCB7, induced oxidative stress and premature cell death [33]. Furthermore, a homologous gene of H. sapiens ABCB7 in Aedes aegypti was up-regulated in an insecticide resistant strain [34]. Disruption of mouse ABCB8 decreased mitochondrial iron export and led to cardiomyopathy [35]. Similar to D. pulex, B. tabaci Q do not have homologous genes of human ABCB half-transporters that were associated with antigen processing (hABCB2, hABCB3, and hABCB9) [13].

ABCC subfamily

Insects typically have different number of ABCC transporters (Table 2). In B. tabaci Q, we identified six ABCC full-transporters, including Btabq019529.2, Btabq000311.1, Btabq008004.1, Btabq026695.3, Btabq004618.1 and Btabq003933.1. ABCC subfamily proteins are full-transporters with diverse functions, such as cell-surface receptor, ion transport and translocation of a broad range of substrates including drugs and endogenous compounds [3639]. Due to their diverse functions, human ABCC subfamily members refer to multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRPs), which function as transporters; the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR, ABCC7), which forms a chloride channel; and sulfonylurea receptors (SUR1/2, ABCC8/9), which function as regulators of potassium channels [40]. In H. sapiens, “long” MRPs like ABCC1, 2, 3, 6 and 10 (MRP1, 2, 3, 6 and 7, respectively) have a TMD0, the third N-terminal transmembrane-spanning domain, while “short” MRPs like ABCC4, 5, 11 and 12 (MRP4, 5, 8 and 9, respectively) lack TMD0 [40].

In our phylogenetic analysis, two B. tabaci ABCC1 genes, Btabq019529.2 and Btabq000311.1, clustered with D. noxia DnXP_015366208.1, DnXP_015366209.1, D. melanogaster DmCG6214, T. japonicus ABCC1 and a group of H. sapiens “long” MRPs (MRP1, 2, 3 and 6) (Additional file 4: Figure S4). MRP1/ABCC1 transports a structurally diverse range of endogenous substances (e.g. leukotrienes and estrogen conjugates), xenobiotics and their metabolites [41]. These MRPs have been extensively studied as transporters of natural product drugs such as anthracyclines and plant alkaloids [42]. As a homologous gene to H. sapiens MRP1, MRP2, MRP3 and MRP6, DmCG6214 functions as a high capacity ATP-dependent organic anion transporter and acts as a transporter of ecdysteroid and juvenile hormone conjugates [43]. The other two ABCC genes in B. tabaci, Btabq008004.1 and Btabq026695.3, gathered with a large clade of ABCC4 in D. noxia, An. gambiae and a cluster of Drosophila ABCC proteins, including DmCG10505, DmCG14709 and others. MRP4/ABCC4 can remove a wide range of endogenous and exogenous molecules from cells [44]. The ABCC transporter encoded by CG10505 in D. melanogaster was regulated by heavy metals and was involved in biochemical detoxification of zinc and copper [45]. Drosophila DmCG14709 gene, a homologue of H. sapiens MRP4/ABCC4, was tightly regulated by oxygen [46]. The human body louse ABCC4 gene, PhABCC4, was up-regulated after exposed to the pesticide ivermectin. Injection of female lice with PhABCC4 dsRNA significantly increased their sensitivity to ivermectin [47].

Btabq004618.1 clustered with D. noxia DnXP_015373973.1, T. japonicas TjABCC7, D. melanogaster DmCG7806, H. sapien hABCC10/MRP7 and T. urticae Tu03g07840. hABCC10/MRP7 was able to transport amphipathic anions and conferred resistance to some antitumor drugs [48]. In addition, Btabq003933.1 clustered with sulfonylurea receptors (SURs) in D. noxia, D. melanogaster, T. japonicas, T. urticae and H. sapiens. Unlike other ABCC subfamily genes, SURs help form ATP-sensitive potassium (KAT P) channels [38, 49]. Although SUR was considered to be a direct target of chitin synthesis inhibitors [50], it did not express in D. melanogaster epidermis, where chitin disruption was observed [51]. Moreover, data obtained from D. melanogaster suggested that chitin synthesis was independent of SUR [52]. Similarly, RNAi knockdown of SUR homologue in T. castaneum did not result in a phenotype [17]. ABCC subfamily is not only involved in detoxification and multidrug resistance in Manduca sexta but also participate in host plant selection in T. urticae [10, 53].

ABCD subfamily

Bemisia tabaci Q has two ABCD transporters, Btabq026746.1 and Btabq017051.1 (Table 1). The same amount of ABCDs have also been found in other insects [8], while more ABCDs were identified in D. pulex, H. sapiens and C. elegans. Members of ABCD subfamily are half-transporters and involve in the import of fatty acids and acyl-CoAs into this organelle [55]. ABCD transporters participated in peroxisome-related developmental progress in C. elegans [56]. Mutations in hABCD1/ALDP gene resulted in adrenoleukodystrophy, a genetic disorder that occurs primarily in males [57]. Our phylogenetic analysis suggested that three clades of ABCDs in metazoans, with the two B. tabaci ABCDs distributed in two clades (Additional file 5: Figure S5). Btabq026746.1 clustered with D. noxia, DnXP_015374078.1, An. gambiae AGAP002071, D. melanogaster DmCG216, T. japonicas TjABCD2, H. sapiens hABCD2 and hABCD1. Meanwhile, Btabq017051.1 belongs to ABCD3 clade.

ABCE and ABCF subfamilies

ABCE and ABCF subfamilies contain atypical ABC transporters characterized by a pair of linked NBDs with no TMDs [1]. Their structure implied their roles in biological processes other than transportation. ABCE1 is one of the most evolutionarily conserved proteins and expressed in all organisms except eubacteria. Because of its role in translation and ribosome biosynthesis, ABCE1 is essential for all life stages [58]. Homo sapiens ABCE1/RNase L was initially identified as an inhibitor of RNase L [58]. Members of the ABCE subfamily in human and yeast also have a role in translation initiation [59]. However, the ABCE and ABCF transporters have not been well characterized in invertebrates. RNAi knockdown of an ABCE gene, TcABCE-3A, resulted in significant mortality in penultimate T. castaneum larvae [17]. ABCE subfamily has only one member in all metazoans studied to date [9, 60], and B. tabaci follows this rule (BtabqABCE1, Table 1 and Additional file 6: Figure S6).

For ABCF subfamily, three transporters, Btabq009873.1, Btabq014578.1, and Btabq016264.1, were annotated and showed well-supported sister clades (Additional file 7: Figure S7). Btabq009873.1, Btabq014578.1, and Btabq016264.1 were placed within the ABCF1, ABCF2, and ABCF3 clades, respectively. In human and yeast, ABCF proteins participated in gene regulation systems and ribosome assembly [14]. Mutations in the yeast GCN20 gene, which was involved in the initiation and control of translation, reduced Eif2α phosphorylation and translation in the ribosome [61]. Knockdown of TcABCF-2A led to 100% mortality in penultimate T. castaneum larvae [17].

ABCG subfamily

ABCGs have a typical reverse domain architecture, with a NBD localized at the N-terminus and a TMD at the C-terminus (NBD-TMD). The ABCG transporters in metazoans are half-transporters and can be a functional transporter only after dimerization. In plants and fungi, however, ABCGs are full-transporters, also called pleiotropic drug resistance proteins (PDRs) [16, 62]. Because of their duplicated domain structure, yeast PDRs were not included in the phylogenetic analyses in this study.

ABCG proteins represent the largest ABC subfamily (23 members) in B. tabaci (Table 1) and also form the largest ABC subfamily in D. noxia [63], An. gambiae [7], bed bug (Cimex lectularius) [64], human body louse (Pediculus humanus humanus) [65], Drosophila [1] and A. mellifera [8] (Table 2). According to Sturm et al. [13], the expansion of ABCG transporters in D. pulex and D. melanogaster genomes was resulted from extensive lineage specific gene duplications.

Among the 23 ABCG members in B. tabaci Q, 17 are ABCG1 and ABCG4 transporters. These ABCG1 and ABCG4 proteins clustered with those in D. noxia, An. gambiae, T. urticae, and D. melanogaster (DmCG9664, DmCG32091, DmCG4822, DmCG31689, DmCG9663, DmCG17646, DmCG5853 and DmCG3164) (Additional file 8: Figure S8). The ABCG4 gene has the same intron/exon structure as ABCG1, suggesting that they arose by a relatively recent gene duplication event [66]. Similar to ABCG1, ABCG4 can be inducible by oxysterols and retinoids [67]. In H. sapiens, hABCG1 and hABCG4 were involved in cellular cholesterol efflux [68]. In addition, the elevated expression of ABCG4 in An. stephensi suggested its involvement in the degradation of a pyrethroid insecticide [18, 69].

Btabq001288.1 and Btabq001290.1 clustered with DnXP_01579755.1, DnXP_015379710.1, DmCG11069, DmCG31121, Tu01g16280, TjABCG5, hABCG5 and hABCG8. hABCG5 and hABCG8 mediated the intestinal and biliary efflux of cholesterol and sterols [68]. A clear subclass was formed with Btabq023890.1, D. melanogaster DmCG3327, and T. urticae tetur17g02510. DmCG3327 (also named E23), a 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E)-induced ABC transporter, regulated metamorphosis, probably by removing 20E from cells [70]. Similarly, ABCG expression in silkworm midgut was also regulated by 20E [8]. RNAi-based functional study confirmed a similar role in metamorphosis of TcABCG-8A, a homologue of E23 in T. castaneum [17].

Among invertebrates, the functions of ABCGs were first characterized in Drosophila as pigment precursor transporters (brown, scarlet and white genes) [71, 72]. In our phylogenetic analysis, four B. tabaci ABCG proteins, Btabq014028.1, Btabq015484.1, Btabq002474.1 and Btabq022510.1, showed homologous relationships with these pigment precursor transporters in D. noxia, An. gambiae and D. melanogaster. Besides transporting pigment precursors, these transporters also function in courtship behavior [73], transport of biogenic amines [74] and up-take of uric acid [75]. RNAi-mediated suppression and genetic linkage analysis confirmed that down-regulation of Pxwhite gene was tightly linked to Cry1Ac resistance in Plutella xylostella [76].

Based on a recent review, 80% of the peer-reviewed publications involving arthropod ABC transporters (50) linked ABC transporters with insecticides-resistance [77]. Members of ABCG subfamily were over-expressed in thiamethoxam-resistant B. tabaci, suggesting the involvement of these genes in insecticide resistance [78]. In addition, ABCG subfamily not only participated in multi-pesticide resistance in T. urticae but also reduced the chemical defense from host plants [10]. In B. mori, at least five ABCG genes acted as 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E)-response genes and participated in hormonal regulation [8]. These results suggested that members of the ABCG subfamily play significant roles in the development and the removal of amphiphilic xenobiotics. Although ABC transporters in subfamilies B, C, and G are involved in the metabolic resistance to various xenobiotics, B. tabaci Q, however, contains predominantly G, but few B and C family members (Table 2). This bias reflects the importance of ABCG subfamily in B. tabaci to fend off xenobiotic offences derived from host plants as well as agroecosystems.

ABCH subfamily

As inverse half-transporters, ABCH proteins share the same domain architecture as ABCG transporters. ABCH transporters were first discovered in D. melanogaster and have only annotated in arthropods and zebrafish [6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 17]. ABCH proteins have not been identified in fungi, C. elegans, plants and mammals [1, 16, 54, 62]. ABCH subfamily was documented in zebrafish but not in catfish, fugu or cod [79].

A total of nine ABCH transporters were identified in B. tabaci. Phylogenetic analysis showed that ABCH subfamily members were species-specific. Bemisia tabaci ABCH clustered with genes in D. noxia with a high bootstrap value (Additional file 9: Figure S9). An RNAi screen of D. melanogaster genes revealed that silencing of D. melanogaster CG9990 was lethal [80, 81]. In two insecticide-resistant P. xylostella strains, an ABCH (Px014955), was the most up-regulated ABC transporter [82]. Knockdown of TcABCH-9C, an ABCH in T. castaneum, resulted in 100% larval mortality and a significant reduction of fecundity and hatching rate. In addition, T. castaneum larvae injected with TcABCH-9C dsRNA showed a lack of lipids in their epicuticle, indicating that TcABCH-9C may be required for the formation of a waterproof barrier in the epicuticle [17]. In the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera and Manduca sexta, the expression of ABCH subfamily was highly induced after larvae fed with secondary metabolites [19, 53].

Expression profiles across developmental stages

Based on RNA-seq data, all 55 ABC transporters were expressed with a RPKM (Reads Per Kilobases per Million reads) >1 in at least one of the B. tabaci life stages (Additional file 10: Table S1). Members from ABCE and ABCF subfamilies were ubiquitous and expressed highly throughout B. tabaci developmental stages (Fig. 2). In the polyphagous spider mite, T. urticae, an ABCE (tetur30g01400), showed high expression level throughout the life cycle [10]. Moreover, TcABCE-3A transcripts were abundant in all developmental stages of T. castaneum [17]. The expression profile of ABCE genes in the intertidal copepod, T. japonicas, and sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus, showed similar trends as well [83, 84]. Btabq014578.1 (ABCF2) had the highest expression level throughout the life cycle. ABCE1, ABCF1 and ABCF2 were highly expressed in all developmental stages of B. tabaci. ABCF3, also ubiquitously expressed, exhibited a lower expression level. These gene expression patterns were consistent with the fundamental functions in ribosome biogenesis and translation regulation [17, 85, 86]. The results suggest that ABCE and ABCF transporters were possibly essential to maintain “housekeeping” function in B. tabaci.
Fig. 2

Expression profiles of ABC transporters throughout B. tabaci Q life cycle. The codes on the left are the gene ID numbers of the 55 ABC transporters in B. tabaci Q. The mRNA levels, as represented by log2 (RPKM + 1) values, are shown in the gradient heat map with colors ranging from blue (low expression) to yellow (high expression). For each stage, values are normalized data from three biological replicates. E, egg; N1-2, 1st- and 2nd-instar nymphs; N3, 3rd-instar nymph; N4, 4th-instar nymph; F, adult female; M, adult male

The expression levels for ABCA transporters in B. tabaci were relatively low with the exception of Btabq003232.1 (ABCA3), which was highly expressed in all life stages (Fig. 2). ABCA3 is critical for the proper formation of lamellar bodies and surfactant function and may participate in surfactant phospholipid metabolism [87]. Btabq001304.1 (ABCB6) expressed in all life stages of B. tabaci and highly expressed in eggs and nymphs. Btabq028971.1 (ABCB7) expressed in all developmental stages, especially in the fourth nymph stage and adult. Btabq013065.1 (ABCB8) expressed in all stages but at a lower level than other ABCB genes. Homo sapiens ABCB half-transporters, ABCB6, ABCB7, ABCB8 and ABCB10, were localized at mitochondria and functioned in iron metabolism [88].

Expression levels of all ABCC members were documented in each developmental stage of B. tabaci Q, and the expression patterns were different among these genes (Fig. 2). Only Btabq008004.1 was highly expressed throughout life stages (Fig. 2). The two B. tabaci ABCDs, Btabq026746.1 and Btabq017051.1, showed stable expressional level among different developmental stages (Fig. 2). Btabq026746.1 was highly expressed while Btabq017051.1 showed slight lower expression level. Because the two ABCDs are homologous to those of mammal and insect transporters, similar functions such as roles in fatty acid metabolism can be inferred in B. tabaci Q.

Members of the ABCG subfamily showed different expression patterns in B. tabaci Q. Btabq003568.1, Btabq029281.1 and Btabq007131.3 were ubiquitously with high expression profiles. Expression levels were also high for Btabq006006.1, Btabq007377.1, Btabq029952.1 and Btabq000844.1. Overall, ABCG1 and ABCG4 members in B. tabaci Q had moderate to high expressional levels in all developmental stages. The ABCG4 in An. stephensi showed an increased expressional level in defense against the pyrethroid insecticide [18, 69]. Btabq001288.1 (ABCG5) and Btabq001290.1 (ABCG8) showed high expression in all stages of B. tabaci. Homologues of ABCG5 and ABCG8 in D. melanogaster and T. castaneum function, respectively, in metamorphosis [17] and may have a similar function in B. tabaci. Furthermore, Btabq022510.1 was annotated as a white gene and its expression level in nymph and adult stages was especially high. Recently, a Pxwhite gene was shown to be tightly linked to Cry1Ac resistance in P. xylostella [76].

ABCH transporters differed in expression patterns during B. tabaci development. Btabq027409.1 and Btabq026264.1 were highly expressed in all developmental stages. Moreover, Btabq015123.1, Btabq009745.1, and Btabq019352.1 also showed high expression level, especially in the 4th-instar nymphs and adults. One ABCH subfamily gene, CG9990, was presumed to be involved in mortality [81]. Silencing of T. castaneum TcABCH-9C reduced oviposition and pupal molting [17]. ABCH transporters are highest expressed in the head of H. armigera when the larvae were ingested secondary metabolism [19].

Expansion of ABCG and ABCH subfamilies do exist in B. tabaci Q. Combined with their expressional profiles, we suspect that these ABCG and ABCH genes are involved in development-related metabolism and in the detoxification of xenobiotics including insecticides and secondary metabolites from host plant.

mRNA expression of selected ABC transporters by RT-qPCR

The expression profiles of 24 selected ABC transporters were confirmed by the RT-qPCR (Fig. 3). Within ABCA subfamily, Btabq003232.1 had the highest expressional level, followed by Btabq008198.1 and Btabq017043.1. This trend is consistent with RNA-seq analysis. Similarly, gene expression level of ABCB genes from high to low was Btabq028971.2, Btabq001304.1 and Btabq013065.1. Expression profiles of ABCC, ABCD, ABCE and ABCF subfamilies were also consistent with our RNA-seq data. In ABCG subfamily, the trend persisted. Only two genes in ABCH subfamily, Btabq028063.1 and Btabaq026264.1, exhibited lower expressional level, which is not consistent with the RNA-seq data. Statistical analysis by SPSS demonstrated a significant correlation between transcriptome data and RT-qPCR data (r = 0.684, p < 0.01).
Fig. 3

mRNA expressions of selected B. tabaci Q ABC transporters by RT-qPCR. The bars represent expression level of B. tabaci Q ABC transporters relative to the Btabq008198.1. Data are presented as means ± SE. Spots indicated log2 (RPKM + 1) values of ABC transporters in adults. Significant correlation between RT-qPCR and transcriptomic analyses were assessed by SPSS

Transcriptional response to imidacloprid treatments

A total of five genes were significantly up-regulated in imidacloprid-treated B. tabaci (Fig. 4, Additional file 11: Table S4). Btabq008198.1, an ABCA5 gene, can regulate accumulation of cholesterol [89]. The other four belong to ABCG subfamily, including Btabq003568.1 (ABCG1), Btabq020594.1 (ABCG1), Btabq007131.3 (ABCG4), and Btabq029281.1 (ABCG4).
Fig. 4

Transcriptional response of ABC transporters in B. tabaci Q adults to imidacloprid. The mRNA expression levels, i.e., log2 (RPKM + 1) values, are represented in a gradient heat map from low (blue) to high (yellow). Values were averaged from the three biological replications. The B. tabaci Q adults were fed with either water (CK) or imidacloprid at 25, 50, and 100 mg/L concentration (IM25, IM50, or IM100, respectively). An asterisk indicates a significant difference

The metabolic detoxification of xenobiotics likely involves a set of detoxification enzymes, which are general classified into three categories. Besides Phase I (e.g., cytochrome P450 monooxygenases) and Phase II (e.g., glutathione S-transferases), ABC transporters represent a major class of Phase III enzymes.

ABC transporters, especially those in the ABCG subfamily, facilitated H. armigera defense against secondary metabolites such as nicotine and tomatine [19]. The high expression of ABCG11 in H. armigera was the results of nicotine ingestion [19]. In addition, ABCG4 in An. stephensi was up-regulated in response to pyrethroid insecticide [18, 69]. The expression levels of three ABC transporters, ABCG20-3, ABCG23-5 and ABCH-B, were higher in field-collected resistant populations of C. lectularius [90]. Then knockdown of ABCG20-3 reduced deltamethrin resistance [90]. ABC transporters, particularly ABCG1 and ABCG4, may have important role in response to xenobiotics. Moreover, ABCG4 gene has the same intron/exon structure as ABCG1, suggesting that they arose by a relatively recent gene duplication event [66]. Overall, feeding on imidacloprid significantly affected the expression of ABC transporters especially those in ABCG subfamily, suggesting the potential involvement of these genes in the B. tabaci metabolic resistance.

Conclusion

In this study, we identified 55 ABC transporters in the sweetpotato whitefly B. tabaci Q genome. ABC transporter subfamilies G and H are expanded in B. tabaci Q genome. The expression profiles of these ABC transporters were validated using both RT-qPCR and RNA-seq analyses. Furthermore, 80% of the significantly up-regulated ABC transporters in imidacloprid-challenged B. tabaci were ABCGs. These combined results imply the potential contribution of ABCGs to the adaptability of this emerging global invasive pest.

Methods

Colony maintenance and sample preparation

Bemisia tabaci Q biotype (Mediterranean, MED) population maintained on cotton plant at 27 ± 1 °C, with a photoperiod of 16 h light: 8 h darkness and 70 ± 10% relative humidity. Every 3–5 generations, the purity of the strain was monitored using a mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mtCOI) marker [91].

The different developmental stage samples (eggs, four nymph stages, females and males) were collected from the Q biotype population described above. Newly emerged (within 5 days) adults of B. tabaci Q on cotton were collected to be treat with imidacloprid following adult leaf-dip bioassay method [92, 93]. In brief, leaf discs (22 mm in diameter) from cotton plants were dipped in imidacloprid at 0 (distilled water control), 25, 50 and 100 mg/L for 10s. When dry, the leaf discs were placed on agar in a flat-bottomed glass tube, 20 B. tabaci adults were added to each tube. After 48 h, adults were collected, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and transferred to −80 °C for the long-term storage. Three biological replications for all B. tabaci samples were carried out independently. A total of 100 individuals were collected for each biological replication, and these samples were subjected to RNA-seq analysis.

Identification and annotation of ABC transporters

To identify open reading frames (ORFs) encoding putative ABC transporters, we carried out tblastn searches against the B. tabaci Q genome [94] and transcriptome assembled from SRP064690. We subsequently used the highly conserved NBDs (as defined by InterPro domain IPR003439/PF00005) and full-sequences of all 56 ABC genes in D. melanogaster as queries to search against the updated GLEAN gene in B. tabaci genome with an E-value threshold of 10−5 to identify ABC transporters. Each putative ABC transporter gene was confirmed by subjected it to BLASTX analysis with the non-redundant protein sequence (NR) at GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

The exon/intron boundary and start/stop codons of each ABC gene were confirm from the genome and transcriptome. The conserved domains of these identified ABC proteins were predicted using SMART (simple modular architecture research tool, http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) [95] and confirmed by using the NCBI conserved domain search service tool. Putative N-glycosylation sites were predicted using NetNGlyc 1.0 server and O-glycosylation sites were predicted using NetOGlyc 4.0 server [96].

Phylogenetic analyses

To analyze the evolutionary placement of ABC transporters in B. tabaci, we collected the readily available ABC transporters from the fruit fly, D. melanogaster, wheat aphid, D. noxia, mosquito, An. gambiae, spider mite, T. urticae, intertidal copepod, T. japonicus, human, H. sapiens, nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, and yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. NBDs of B. tabaci ABC transporters were used to resolve their phylogenetic relationships at the subfamily level. Within each ABC subfamily, we used the full-length protein sequences to construct their respective phylogeny trees [9, 10]. Additional file 12: Table S5 lists models of the constructed phylogenetic trees. Sequences of entire transporters aligned using ClustalW and then subjected to phylogenetic analysis by MEGA5 with 1000 bootstrap replications [97]. The phylogenetic trees were constructed using the maximum-likelihood method.

Expression profiling of ABC transporters

Expression profiling of ABC transporters was assessed using transcriptome data of different developmental stages and imidacloprid-treated whitefly as described earlier. ABC genes were also verified by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) meanwhile purity was checked on 1% agarose gels. RNA-seq libraries were constructed as previously described [98] and sequenced on a HiSeq 2500 system according to the manufacturer’s instructions with sequenced at 125 bp (PE125, library size is 280–320 bp). RNA-seq libraries of imidacloprid-treated samples were constructed by the same method and sequenced on a HiSeq 4000 system according to the manufacturer’s instructions with sequenced at 150 bp (PE150, library size is 450–550 bp). The raw reads were filtered with Fastq clean software [99] to trim low quality (Q value < 20) nucleotides on both ends, clipping the adapter and barcode sequences from the 3’ end and discarding the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequence. The high-quality cleaned reads were then aligned to the pre-prepared RNA sequence dataset with the Bowtie program [100] allowing one mismatch. After alignments, raw counts for each B. tabaci transcript and each sample were derived and were normalized to Reads Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (RPKM). Differentially expressed genes (fold changes > 2 and adjusted P-value < 0.05) were identified by the DESeq package [101103].

Besides transcriptomic validation, mRNA expressions of ABC transporters in B. tabaci Q biotype were confirmed using RT-qPCR analysis as well. Based on the RPKM value generated from the RNA-seq data, we selected 24 transcripts representing all eight subfamilies of the B. tabaci Q biotype ABC transporters for the RT-qPCR validation study (Additional file 13: Table S2 and Additional file 14: Table S3). RT-qPCR was conducted using an ABI PRISM 7500 Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA), and non-treated B. tabaci adults were subjected to the analysis. All RT-qPCR analyses included three technical replicates for each of three biological replicates. Elongation factor 1 (EF1) and TAF10 RNA polymerase II (TAF) were selected as reference genes [104, 105]. The RT-qPCR was carried out in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 12.5 μL 2 × SuperReal PreMix Plus, 0.5 μL 50 × ROX Reference Dye, 0.75 μL forward primer (10 μM), 0.75 μL reverse primer (10 μM), 1.0 μL cDNA (300 ng/μL), and 9.5 μL RNase-free ddH2O, following the instructions of the SuperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR Green) kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The thermal cycling conditions were polymerase activation at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s and elongation at 72 °C for 32 s. The amplification efficiency was estimated using the equation: E = [10^(−1/slope) − 1] × 100%, in which the slope was derived from plotting the cycle threshold (Ct) value versus six serially diluted template concentrations. The transcript levels of ABC genes were quantified according to the 2−ΔΔCt method [106]. SPSS 19.0 was used to analyze correlations between RT-qPCR data and RNA-seq data.

Abbreviations

20E: 

20-hydroxyecdysone

ABC: 

ATP-binding cassette

CFTR: 

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator

MRP: 

Multidrug resistance associated protein

NBD: 

Nucleotide binding domain

PDR: 

Pleiotropic drug resistance protein

RPKM: 

Reads Per Kilobases of per Million reads

RT-qPCR: 

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

SUR: 

Sulfonylurea receptor

TMD: 

Transmembrane domain.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Authors thank anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31420103919 and 31672032), and China Agriculture Research System (CARS-26 10). These agencies had no role in study design, data collection/analysis, manuscript preparation, or the decision to publish.

Availability of data and materials

Bemisia tabaci Q ABC transporter dataset will be available from the corresponding authors on reasonable requests. Transcriptome datasets of B. tabaci Q at different development stages and following the exposure to imidacloprid insecticide have been deposited, respectively, in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under the accession number SRP064690 and SRP090405.

Authors’ contributions

LT, XZ and YZ designed this research. LT carried out the experiments, LT, TS, RH analyzed data. XZ and YZ contributed the materials and reagents. LT, WX, QW, SW, XZ and YZ revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Plant Protection, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
(2)
College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University
(3)
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky

References

  1. Dean M, Rzhetsky A, Allikmets R. The human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. Genome Res. 2001;11:1156–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Dassa E, Bouige P. The ABC of ABCs: a phylogenetic and functional classification of ABC systems in living organisms. Res Microbiol. 2001;152:211–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Holland IB, Cole SP, Kuchler K, Higgins CF. ABC proteins: from bacteria to man. Academic Press. 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Walker JE, Saraste M, Runswick MJ, Gay NJ. Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J. 1982;1(8):945.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Davidson AL, Dassa E, Orelle C, Chen J. Structure, function, and evolution of bacterial ATP-binding cassette systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:317–64.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Dean M, Annilo T. Evolution of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily in vertebrates. Annu Rev Genom Hum G. 2005;6:123–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Roth CW, Holm I, Graille M, Dehoux P, Rzhetsky A, Wincker P, Weissenbach J, Brey PT. Identification of the Anopheles gambiae ATP binding cassette transporter superfamily genes. Mol Cells. 2003;15(2):150–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu S, Zhou S, Tian L, Guo E, Luan Y, Zhang J, Li S. Genome-wide identification and characterization of ATP-binding cassette transporters in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:491.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dermauw W, Van Leeuwen T. The ABC gene family in arthropods: comparative genomics and role in insecticide transport and resistance. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;45:89–110.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dermauw W, Osborne EJ, Clark RM, Grbić M, Tirry L, Van Leeuwen T. A burst of ABC genes in the genome of the polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:317.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Annilo T, Chen ZQ, Shulenin S, Costantino J, Thomas L, Lou H, Stefanov S, Dean M. Evolution of the vertebrate ABC gene family: analysis of gene birth and death. Genomics. 2006;88:1–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Moon S, Jung KH. Genome-wide expression analysis of rice ABC transporter family across spatio-temporal samples and in response to abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol. 2014;171(14):1276–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sturm A, Cunningham P, Dean M. The ABC transporter gene family of Daphnia pulex. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:170.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tyzack JK, Wang X, Belsham GJ, Proud CG. ABC50 interacts with eukaryotic initiation factor 2 and associates with the ribosome in an ATP-dependent manner. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:34131–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhao Z, Fang LL, Johnsen R, Baillie DL. ATP-binding cassette protein E is involved in gene transcription and translation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;323:104–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Verrier PJ, Bird D, Burla B, Dassa E, Forestier C, Geisler M, Klein M, Kolukisaoglu U, Lee Y, Martinoia E, Murphy A, Rea PA, Samuels L, Schulz B, Spalding EJ, Yazaki K, Theodoulou FL. Plant ABC proteins-a unified nomenclature and updated inventory. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13:151–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Broehan G, Kroeger T, Lorenzen M, Merzendorfer H. Functional analysis of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter gene family of Tribolium castaneum. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Epis S, Porretta D, Mastrantonio V, Urbanelli S, Sassera D, De Marco L, Mereghetti V, Montagna M, Ricci I, Favia G, Bandi C. ABC transporters are involved in defense against permethrin insecticide in the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi. Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:349.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bretschneider A, Heckel DG, Vogel H. Know your ABCs: Characterization and gene expression dynamic s of ABC transporters in the polyphagous herbivore Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;72:1–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown JK, Coats SA, Bedford ID, Markham PG, Bird J, Frohlich DR. Characterization and distribution of esterase electromorphs in the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Biochem Genet. 1995;33(7–8):205–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. De Barro PJ, Liu SS, Boykin LM, Dinsdale AB. Bemisia tabaci: a statement of species status. Annu Rev Entomol. 2011;56:1–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Cahill M, Gorman K, Day S, Denholm I. Baseline determination and detection of resistance to imidacloprid in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bull Entomol Res. 1996;86:343–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Horowitz AR, Kontsedalov S, Ishaaya I. Dynamics of resistance to the neonicotinoids acetamiprid and thiamethoxam in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). J Econ Entomol. 2004;97:2051–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Nauen R, Denholm I. Resistance of insect pests to neonicotinoid insecticides: current status and future prospects. Arch Insect Biochem. 2005;58(4):200–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Pan H, Preisser EL, Chu D, Wang S, Wu Q, Carrière Y, Zhang Y. Insecticides promote viral outbreaks by altering herbivore competition. Ecol Appl. 2015;25(6):1585–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Decottignies A, Goffeau A. Complete inventory of the yeast ABC proteins. Nat Genet. 1997;15:137–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Li G, Shi P, Wang Y. Evolutionary dynamics of the ABCA, chromosome 17q24 cluster genes in vertebrates. Genomics. 2007;89(89):385–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Dutta S. Genetic regulation of autophagic cell death in Drosophila melanogaster (doctoral dissertation). 2008.Google Scholar
  29. Lee CY, Wendel DP, Reid P, Lam G, Thummel CS, Baehrecke EH. E93, Directs Steroid-Triggered Programmed Cell Death in Drosophila. Mol Cell. 2000;6(2):433–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Krishnamurthy PC, Du G, Fukuda Y, Sun D, Sampath J, Mercer KE, Wang J, Sosa-Pineda B, Murti KG, Schuetz JD. Identification of a mammalian mitochondrial porphyrin transporter. Nature. 2006;443(7111):586–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pondarré C, Antiochos BB, Campagna DR, Clarke SL, Greer EL, Deck KM, McDonald A, Han AP, Medlock A, Kutok JL, Anderson SA, Eisenstein RS, Fleming MD. The mitochondrial ATP-binding cassette transporter Abcb7 is essential in mice and participates in cytosolic iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:953–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sooksa-Nguan T, Yakubov B, Kozlovskyy VI, Barkume CM, Howe KJ, Thannhauser TW, Rutzke MA, Hart JJ, Kochian LV, Rea PA, Vatamaniuk OK. Drosophila ABC transporter, DmHMT-1, confers tolerance to cadmium: DmHMT-1 and its yeast homolog, SpHMT-1, are not essential for vacuolar phytochelatin sequestration. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:354–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Gonzalez-Cabo P, Bolinches-Amoros A, Cabello J, Ros S, Moreno S, Baylis HA, Palau F, Vazquez-Manrique RP. Disruption of the ATP-binding cassette B7(ABTM-1/ABCB7) induces oxidative stress and premature cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:21304–14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Bariami V, Jones CM, Poupardin R, Vontas J, Ranson H. Gene amplification, ABC transporters and cytochrome P450s: unraveling the molecular basis of pyrethroid resistance in the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1692.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ichikawa Y, Bayeva M, Ghanefar M, Potini V, Sun L, Mutharasan RK, Wu R, Khechaduri A, Jairaj Naik T, Ardehali H. Disruption of ATP-binding cassette B8 in mice leads to cardiomyopathy through a decrease in mitochondrial iron export. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:4152–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Fukuda Y, Schuetz JD. ABC transporters and their role in nucleoside and nucleotide drug resistance. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;83:1073–83.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Akrouh A, Halcomb SE, Nichols CG, Sala-Rabanal M. Molecular biology of K-ATP channels and implications for health and disease. IUBMB Life. 2009;61:971–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Jordan IK, Kota KC, Cui G, Thompson CH, McCarty NA. Evolutionary and functional divergence between the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and related ATP-binding cassette transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18865–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Kruh GD, Belinsky MG. The MRP family of drug efflux pumps. Oncogene. 2003;22:7537–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Deeley RG, Westlake C, Cole SPC. Transmembrane transport of endo- and xenobiotics by mammalian ATP-binding cassette multidrug resistance proteins. Physiol Rev. 2006;86:849–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. He SM, Li R, Kanwar JR, Zhou SF. Structural and functional properties of human multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1). Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(3):439–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Borst P, Evers R, Kool M, Wijnholds J. A family of drug transporters: the multidrug resistance-associated proteins. J Natll Cancer I. 2000;92(16):1295–302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Tarnay JN, Szeri F, Ilias A, Annilo T, Sung C, Le Saux O, Robinow S. The dMRP/CG6214 gene of Drosophila is evolutionarily and functionally related to the human multidrug resistance-associated protein family. Insect Mo Biol. 2004;13(5):539–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Russel FGM, Koenderink JB, Masereeuw R. Multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4/ABCC4): a versatile efflux transporter for drugs and signalling molecules. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29(4):200–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Yepiskoposyan H, Egli D, Fergestad T, Selvaraj A, Treiber C, Multhaup G, Georgiev O, Schaffner W. Transcriptome response to heavy metal stress in Drosophila reveals a new zinc transporter that confers resistance to zinc. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:4866–77.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Huang H, Haddad GG. Drosophila dMRP4 regulates responsiveness to O2 deprivation and development under hypoxia. Physiol Genomics. 2007;29(29):260–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Yoon KS, Strycharz JP, Baek JH, Sun W, Kim JH, Kang JS, Pittendrigh BR, Lee SH, Clark JM. Brief exposures of human body lice to sublethal amounts of ivermectin over-transcribes detoxification genes involved in tolerance. Insect Mol Biol. 2011;20:687–99.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Hopper-Borge E, Xu X, Shen T, Shi Z, Chen ZS, Kruh GD. Human multidrug resistance protein 7 (ABCC10) is a resistance factor for nucleoside analogues and epothilone B. Cancer Res. 2009;69(1):178–84.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Bryan J, Muñoz A, Zhang X, Düfer M, Drews G, Krippeit-Drews P, Aguilar-Bryan L. ABCC8 and ABCC9: ABC transporters that regulate K+ channels. Pflügers Archiv - Eur J Physiol. 2007;453(5):703–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Abo-Elghar GE, Fujiyoshi P, Matsumura F. Significance of the sulfonylurea receptor (SUR) as the target of diflubenzuron in chitin synthesis inhibition in Drosophila melanogaster and Blattella germanica. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;34:743–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Gangishetti U, Breitenbach S, Zander M, Saheb SK, Mueller U, Schwarz H, Moussian B. Effects of benzoylphenylurea on chitin synthesis and orientation in the cuticle of the Drosophila larva. Eur J Cell Biol. 2009;88:167–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Meyer F, Flötenmeyer M, Moussian B. The sulfonylurea receptor SUR is dispensable for chitin synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Pest Manag Sci. 2013;69(10):1136–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Koenig C, Bretschneider A, Heckel DG, Grosse-Wilde E, Hansson BS, Vogel H. The plastic response of Manduca sexta to host and non-host plants. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;63:72–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Sheps JA, Ralph S, Zhao Z, Baille DL, Ling V. The ABC transporter gene family of Caenorhabditis elegans has implications for the evolutionary dynamics of multidrug resistance in eukaryotes. Genome Biol. 2004;5(3):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Theodoulou FL, Holdsworth M, Baker A. Peroxisomal ABC transporters. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:1139–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Petriv OI, Pilgrim DB, Rachubinski RA, Titorenko VI. RNA interference of peroxisome-related genes in C. elegans: a new model for human peroxisomal disorders. Physiol Genomics. 2002;10:79–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Berger J, Gartner J. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: clinical, biochemical and pathogenetic aspects. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763(12):1721–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Barthelme D, Dinkelaker S, Albers SV, Londei P, Ermler U, Tampé R. Ribosome recycling depends on a mechanistic link between the FeS cluster domain and a conformational switch of the twin-ATPase ABCE1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(8):3228–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhou A, Hassel BA, Silverman RH. Expression cloning of 2-5A-dependent RNAase: a uniquely regulated mediator of interferon action. Cell. 1993;72(5):753–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Chen ZQ, Dong J, Ishimura A, Daar I, Hinnebusch AG, Dean M. The essential vertebrate ABCE1 protein interacts with eukaryotic initiation factors. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(11):7452–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Marton MJ, Vazquez de Aldana CR, Qu H, Chakraburtty K, Hinnebusch AG. Evidence that GCN1 and GCN20, translational regulators of GCN4, function on elongating ribosomes in activation of eIF2 α kinase GCN2. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(8):4474–89.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Kovalchuk A, Driessen AJ. Phylogenetic analysis of fungal ABC transporters. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):177.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Nicholson SJ, Nickerson ML, Dean M, Song Y, Hoyt PR, Rhee H, Kim C, Puterka GJ. The genome of Diuraphis noxia, a global aphid pest of small grains. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Benoit JB, Adelman ZN, Reinhardt K, et al. Unique features of a global human ectoparasite identified through sequencing of the bed bug genome. Nat Commun. 2016;7.Google Scholar
  65. Lee SH, Kang JS, Min JS, Yoon KS, Strycharz JP, Johnson R, Mittapalli O, Margam VM, Sun W, Li HM, Xie J, Wu J, Kirkness, Berenbaum MR, Pittendrigh BR, Clark JM. Decreased detoxification genes and genome size make the human body louse an efficient model to study xenobiotic metabolism. Insect Mol Biol. 2010;19(5):599–615.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Annilo T, Tammur J, Hutchinson A, Rzhetsky A, Dean M, Allikmets R. Human and mouse orthologs of a new ATP-binding cassette gene, ABCG4. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2002;94(2–3):196–201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Engel T, Lorkowski S, Lueken A, Rust S, Schluter B, Berger G, Cullen P, Assmann G. The human ABCG4 gene is regulated by oxysterols and retinoids in monocyte-derived macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;288(2):483–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Kusuhara H, Sugiyama Y. ATP-binding cassette, subfamily G (ABCG family). Pflugers Arch. 2007;453(5):735–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Epis S, Porretta D, Mastrantonio V, Urbanelli S, Sassera D, Marco L, Mereghetti V, Montagna M, Ricci I, Favia G, Bandi C. Temporal dynamics of the ABC transporter response to insecticide treatment: insights from the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7435.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Hock T, Cottrill T, Keegan J, Garza D. The E23 early gene of Drosophila encodes an ecdysone-inducible ATP-binding cassette transporter capable of repressing ecdysone-mediated gene activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(17):9519–24.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Sullivan DT, Grillo SL, Kitos RJ. Subcellular localization of the first three enzymes of the ommochrome synthetic pathway in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Zool. 1974;188(2):225–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Mackenzie SM, Brooker MR, Gill TR, Cox GB, Howells AJ, Ewart GD. Mutations in the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster affecting ABC transporters that determine eye colouration. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1419:173–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang SD, Odenwald WF. Misexpression of the white (omega) gene triggers male-made courtship in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:5525–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Borycz J, Borycz JA, Kubow A, Lloyd V, Meinertzhagen IA. Drosophila ABC transporter mutants white, brown and scarlet have altered contents and distribution of biogenic amines in the brain. J Exp Biol. 2008;211:3454–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Tatematsu K, Yamamoto K, Uchino K, Narukawa J, Iizuka T, Banno Y, Katsuma S, Shimada T, Tamura T, Sezutsu H, Daimon T. Positional cloning of silkworm white egg2 (w-2) locus shows functional conservation and diversification of ABC transporters for pigmentation in insects. Genes Cells. 2011;16:331–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Guo Z, Shi K, Xun Z, Xia J, Wu Q, Wang S, Xie W, Zhang Y. Down-regulation of a novel ABC transporter gene (Pxwhite) is associated with Cry1Ac resistance in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;59:30–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Porretta D, Epis S, Mastrantonio V, Ferrari M, Bellini R, Favia G, Urbanelli S. How heterogeneous is the involvement of ABC transporters against insecticides? Acta Trop. 2016;157:131–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Yang NN, Xie W, Jones CM, Bass C, Jiao XG, Yang X, Liu BM, Li RM, Zhang YJ. Transcriptome profiling of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci, reveals stage-specific gene expression signatures for thiamethoxam resistance. Insect Mol Biol. 2013;22(5):485–96.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Liu S, Li Q, Liu Z. Genome-wide identification, characterization and phylogenetic analysis of 50 catfish ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter genes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63895.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Mummery-Widmer JL, Yamazaki M, Stoeger T, Novatchkova M, Bhalerao S, Chen D, Dietzl G, Dickson BJ, Knoblich JA. Genome-wide analysis of Notch signalling in Drosophila by transgenic RNAi. Nature. 2009;458:987–92.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhang S, Feany MB, Saraswati S, Littleton JT, Perrimon N. Inactivation of Drosophila Huntingtin affects long-term adult functioning and the pathogenesis of a Huntington’s disease model. Dis Model Mech. 2009;2:247–66.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. You M, Yue Z, He W, Yang X, Yang G, Xie M, Zhan D, Baxter SW, Vasseur L, Gurr GM, et al. A heterozygous moth genome provides insights intoherbivory and detoxification. Nat Genet. 2013;45:220–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Jeong CB, Kim BM, Lee JS, Rhee JS. Genome-wide identification of whole ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus japonicus. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):1–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Ren J, Chung-Davidson YW, Yeh CY, Scott C, Brown T, Li WM. Genome-wide analysis of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter gene family in sea lamprey and Japanese lamprey. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):1–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Pisarev AV, Skabkin MA, Pisareva VP, Skabkina OV, Rakotondrafara AM, Hentze MW. The Role of ABCE1 in Eukaryotic Posttermination Ribosomal Recycling. Mol Cell. 2010;37(2):196–210.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Paytubi S, Wang X, Lam YW, Izquierdo L, Hunter MJ, Jan E, Hundal HS, Proud CG. ABC50 promotes translation initiation in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:24061–73.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Shulenin S, Nogee LM, Annilo T, Wert SE, Whitsett JA, Dean M. ABCA3 gene mutations in newborns with fatal surfactant deficiency. New Engl J Med. 2004;350(13):1296–303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Zutz A, Gompf S, Schägger H, Tampé R. Mitochondrial ABC proteins in health and disease. BBA-Bioenergetics. 2009;1787(6):681–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. DeStefano GM, Kurban M, Anyane-Yeboa K, Dall’Armi C, Di Paolo G, Feenstra H, Fantauzzo KA, et al. Mutations in the cholesterol transporter gene ABCA5 are associated with excessive hair overgrowth. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(5):e1004333.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhu F, Gujar H, Gordon JR, Haynes KF, Potter MF, Palli SR. Bed bugs evolved unique adaptive strategy to resist pyrethroid insecticides. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1456.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhang LP, Zhang YJ, Zhang WJ, Wu QJ, Xu BY, Chu D. Analysis of genetic diversity among different geographical populations and determination of biotypes of Bemisia tabaci in China. J Appl Entomol. 2005;129:121–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Feng YT, Wu QJ, Xu BY, Wang SL, Chang XL, Xie W, Zhang YJ. Fitness costs and morphological change of laboratory-selected thiamethoxam resistance in the B-type Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). J Appl Entomol. 2009;133:466–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Feng YT, Wu QJ, Wang SL, Chang XL, Xie W, Xu BY, Zhang YJ. Cross-resistance study and biochemical mechanisms of thiamethoxam resistance in B-biotype Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pest Manag Sci. 2010;66:313–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Xie W, Chen C, Yang Z, Guo L, Yang X, Wang D, Chen M, Huang J, Wen Y, Zeng Y, Liu Y, Xia J, Tian L, Cui H, et al.: Genome sequencing of the sweetpotato whitefly Bemsia tabaci MED/Q. GigaScience. 2017;(in press).Google Scholar
  95. Letunic L, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART: recent updates, new developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(D1):D257–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Steentoft C, Vakhrushev SY, Joshi HJ, Kong Y, Vester-Christensen MB, Schjoldager KT, Lavrsen K, Dabelsteen S, Pedersen NB, Marcos-Silva L, Gupta R, Bennett EP, Mandel U, Brunak S, Wandall HH, Levery SB, Clausen H. Precision mapping of the human O-GalNAc glycoproteome through Simple Cell technology. EMBO J. 2013;32(10):1478–88.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Boil Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Xie W, Guo L, Jiao X, Yang N, Yang X, Wu Q, Wang S, Zhou X, Zhang Y. Transcriptomic dissection of sexual differences in Bemisia tabaci, an invasive agricultural pest worldwide. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4088.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Zhang M, Sun H, Fei Z, Zhan F, Gong X, Gao S. Fastq clean: An optimized pipeline to clean the Illumina sequencing data with quality control. Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE. 2014;44–48.Google Scholar
  100. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Xu Y, Gao S, Yang Y, Huang M, Cheng L, Wei Q, Fei Z, Gao J, Hong B. Transcriptome sequencing and whole genome expression profiling of chrysanthemum under dehydration stress. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):662.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Gao S, Ou J, Xiao K. R language and Bioconductor in bioinformatics applications (Chinese Edition). Tianjin: Tianjin Science and Technology Translation and Publishing Co.; 2014.Google Scholar
  103. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Li RM, Xie W, Wang S, Wu QJ, Yang NN, Yang X, Pan HP, Zhou XM, Bai LY, Xu BY, Zhou XG, Zhang YJ. Reference gene selection for qRT-PCR analysis in the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Plos One. 2013;8(1):e53006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Su YL, He WB, Wang J, Li JM, Liu SS, Wang XW. Selection of endogenous reference genes for gene expression analysis in the mediterranean species of the Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) complex. J Econ Entomol. 2013;106(3):1446–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement