Open Access

Sequence differences in the seed dormancy gene Qsd1 among various wheat genomes

BMC Genomics201718:497

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3880-6

Received: 13 March 2017

Accepted: 20 June 2017

Published: 29 June 2017

The Erratum to this article has been published in BMC Genomics 2017 18:663

Abstract

Background

Pre-harvest sprouting frequently occurs in Triticum aestivum (wheat) and Hordeum vulgare (barley) at the end of the maturity period due to high rainfall, particularly in Asian monsoon areas. Seed dormancy is a major mechanism preventing pre-harvest sprouting in these crops.

Results

We identified orthologous sequences of the major Hordeum vulgare (barley) seed dormancy gene Qsd1 in hexaploid wheat cv. Chinese Spring by performing genomic clone sequencing, followed by transcript sequencing. We detected 13 non-synonymous amino acid substitutions among the three sub-genomes of wheat and found that the Qsd1 sequence in the B sub-genome is most similar to that in barley. The Qsd1 sequence in A genome diploid wheat is highly similar to that in the hexaploid A sub-genome. Wheat orthologs of Qsd1 showed closer similarities to barley Qsd1 than did those of other accessions in the DNA database. Like barley Qsd1, all three wheat Qsd1s showed embryo-specific gene expression patterns, indicating that barley and wheat Qsd1 share an orthologous origin. The alignment of four hexaploid wheat cultivars indicated that the amino acid sequences of three spring cultivars, Chinese Spring, Haruyo Koi, and Fielder, are exactly the same in each sub-genome. Only Kitahonami has three amino acid substitutions at the B sub-genome.

Conclusions

Kitahonami has a longer seed dormancy period than does Chinese Spring. Sequence polymorphisms between Chiniese Spring and Kitahonami in the B sub-genome may underlie the phenotypic differences in seed dormancy between these hexaploid wheat cultivars.

Keywords

Aegilops Alanine aminotransferase Orthologs Pre-harvest sprouting Quantitative trait locus Triticum

Background

Seed dormancy is one of the most important agronomic traits of small grain cereals growing in temperate climates. Pre-harvest sprouting frequently occurs in Triticum aestivum (wheat) and Hordeum vulgare (barley) at the end of the maturity period due to high rainfall, particularly in Asian monsoon areas. Seed dormancy is a major mechanism preventing pre-harvest sprouting in these crops.

Phytohormones, particularly abscisic acid (ABA), have been shown to regulate seed dormancy in several plant species [15]. In Arabidopsis, MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (MFT1) is directly regulated by ABA-INSENSITIVE3 (ABI3) and ABI5 and is upregulated by DELLA proteins in the GA signaling pathway [6]. Nakamura et al. [7] found that a homolog of MFT1, MFT, positively regulates seed dormancy in hexaploid wheat. Recent gene isolation studies have shown that other factors also regulate seed dormancy. Nakamura et al. [8] reported that Qsd2, encoding MAP3K (mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade), regulates seed dormancy in barley, with longer periods of dormancy found among East Asian landraces. Sato et al. [9] identified a major seed dormancy QTL, Qsd1, by analyzing the progeny of a cross between a wild ancestral form of barley and a cultivated barley. Qsd1 encodes an alanine aminotransferase (AlaAT) family member, which has not hitherto been reported to function in dormancy in any plant species. Of the five AlaAT genes present in barley [9], only Qsd1 is specifically expressed in embryos at maturation. A homolog of Qsd1 in rice also shows embryo-specific gene expression, but has not been shown to be responsible for seed dormancy. Thus, the main function of AlaAT appears to be other than the control of seed dormancy [10, 11].

Several studies have focused on seed dormancy in wheat. The major QTLs controlling seed dormancy were found on chromosome 3AS (QPhs.ocs-3A.1) [12] and chromosome 4AL (Phs-1) [13], respectively. Phs-1 was identified as an orthologue of barley Qsd2 [14]. Nakamura et al. [7] mapped MFT on chromosome 3A, which co-localizes with the seed dormancy QTL QPhs.ocs-3A.1 [12]. Hori et al. [15] identified a major QTL on chromosome 5 using a mapping population of einkorn wheat (T. boeoticum x T. monococcum) that might be an ortholog of barley Qsd1. However, to date, barley Qsd1 orthologs have not been identified or characterized in hexaploid wheat.

Seed dormancy in barley and wheat is often controlled by recessive genes [7, 8, 1517]. These genetic components might have developed via human selection for dominant, non-dormancy mutations during the pre-domestication period and subsequent cultivation/utilization processes after domestication. Since non-dormancy mutations might occur frequently during cultivation, it is difficult to identify an entire seed dormancy QTL in a species.

Since hexaploid wheat (T. aestivum) has three sub-genomes, A, B, and D, the contributions of these sub-genomes to a trait are difficult to estimate in most cases, since non-functional alleles in a sub-genome cannot be observed as a phenotype in a plant. On the other hand, it is also possible to collect non-functional (recessive) alleles from every sub-genome in order to establish a novel phenotype, as demonstrated by developing a hexaploid waxy wheat line [18].

The aim of the current study was to identify orthologs of barley Qsd1 in hexaploid wheat. Barley and wheat have closely related genomes, with similarities in the sequences of genes and repeated elements. We also aimed to identify dormancy loci to develop ways to prevent pre-harvest sprouting, since the dormancy period of wild barley harboring Qsd1 is more than 5 weeks, whereas no seed dormancy QTL having a comparable effect on dormancy period has been reported in hexaploid wheat. To identify wheat with high levels of seed dormancy, we obtained sequence information for Qsd1 in the sub-genomes of wheat and compared these genes to those in barley and other wheat haplotypes.

Methods

Plant materials

Twenty seeds of hexaploid wheat cv. Chinese Spring (CS) were sown in a plastic box (650 × 225 mm) and grown in a greenhouse in Obihiro, Japan under natural conditions until heading. After heading, the plants were moved to a greenhouse under controlled temperature conditions (ca. 22 °C day/16 °C night) with natural light until maturity. Each 20 seeds of diploid wheat lines T. monococcum ssp. monococcum (syn. T. monococcum) KT3–5 and T. monococcum ssp. aegilopoides (syn. T. boeoticum) KT1–1 and recombinant inbred line RIL 56 (long dormancy) derived from a cross between KT3–5 and KT1–1 [15] were grown in an experimental greenhouse in Kurashiki, Japan. For DNA extraction, five seeds of hexaploid wheat cvs. Kitahonami, Haruyo Koi and Fielder were used. To obtain DNA and RNA samples, the seeds were germinated on Petri dishes and the seedlings were grown for 1 week in an incubator at 20 °C. Small pieces of first leaf tissue were collected for both DNA and RNA extraction, and seminal roots were collected for RNA extraction. To prepare RNA from CS embryos, developing embryos were collected every 5 days from 10 days after anthesis until maturity (35 days after anthesis).

BAC clone selection and sequencing of cv. Chinese spring

The full-length cDNA sequence (RFL_Contig4246, GenBank: AK333743.1) of CS was identified in the Wheat Genetic Resources Database (http://shigen.nig.ac.jp/wheat/komugi/ests/blast.jsp), representing an ortholog of Qsd1 from barley. A pair of primers was designated (Additional file 1: Table S1) based on the sequence of AK333743.1 using Primer3 (http://primer3.ut.ee) and was used for BAC library screening of CS. Distinct BAC clones were identified via fingerprinting of NotI-digested DNA. Each shotgun library of BAC clones was sequenced using a 3730xl Sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Reads were assembled into contigs using Phred/Phrap software (http://www.phrap.org/phredphrapconsed.html). PCR analysis was performed using DNA samples from a set of nullisomic-tetrasomic CS lines [19] for the homoeologous group 5 chromosomes to identify the origins of the sub-genomes.

RNA extraction and qPCR of hexaploid wheat

Total RNA was extracted from developing embryos of CS using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). First-strand cDNA was synthesized with ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). qRT-PCR analysis was performed using the LightCycler® 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche) and a LightCycler® 480 Instrument II (Roche). Gene-specific primers were designated for Qsd1 in each sub-genome as follows: forward, 5′-GCGAGGAGAAGATCAAGGAG-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCTTAATTTACAGGGTAGGGTAGAT-3′ for the A sub-genome; forward, 5′-GGCGAGGACAAGATCAAGGC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTTACAAGGTAGTGAAGATCACACCT-3′ for the B sub-genome; and forward, 5′-TTCATGAACGAGTTCCGT-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTAATTTACAGGGTAGGGTAGTGA-3′ for the D sub-genome. The Actin gene was used as an internal control. A primer pair developed by Nakamura et al. [7], qRT-Actin-F: 5′-CTATGTTCCCGGGTATTGCT-3′ and qRT-Actin-R: 5′-AAGGGAGGCAAGAATCGAC-3′, was used to amplify Actin. Biological replicates of three independent RNA extractions per sample were performed.

RACE-PCR and sequencing

To determine the full-length nucleotide sequences of Qsd1 in the B and D sub-genomes, RACE-PCR was performed using RNA from CS with a SMARTer® RACE 5′/3′ Kit (Clontech, CA, USA). The 5′ end fragments of Qsd1 in the B and D sub-genomes were amplified using genome-specific primers 5′-GATTACGCCAAGCTTTTTACAAGGTAGTGAAGATCACACCT-3′ and 5′-GATTACGCCAAGCTTAGGCTTAATTTACAGGGTAGGGTAGTG-3′, respectively. For the 3′ end, 5′-GATTACGCCAAGCTTGTCCCAAGAAGATGGCATTC-3′ and 5′-GATTACGCCAAGCTTATGTCGTACAACAAGACGGCGTC-3′, respectively, were utilized. The PCR products were cloned into the pRACE vector with an In-Fusion® HD Cloning Kit (Clontech) and sequenced on an ABI PRISM® 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Haplotype sequencing and alignment in hexaploid wheat

To sequence the three Qsd1 genes in the A, B, and D sub-genomes of cvs. Haruyo Koi, Kitahonami, and Fielder, genome-specific primers were designed based on the alignment of three Qsd1 sequences in CS BAC clones (Additional file 1: Table S1). Amplification of genome-specific regions was confirmed by gel electrophoresis using nullisomic-tetrasomic lines for the homoeologous group 5 chromosomes [19]. Amplicons were purified on a Labo Pass™ Gel using a DNA Purification Reagent Kit (Hokkaido System Science Ltd., Sapporo, Japan). Purified amplicons were sequenced using a Big Dye Terminator Kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) and analyzed using a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA).

Diploid wheat sequencing

DNA samples were harvested for PCR from diploid wheat accessions T. monococcum, T. boeoticum, and RIL 56. Primer sets were developed based on primer information from Sato et al. [9] with some modifications (Additional file 1: Table S2). The amplicons were sequenced using a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).

Total RNA was extracted from maturing grains (embryos) at 4 weeks after flowering using the NucleoSpin® RNA Plant system (MACHEREY-NAGEL, Düren, Germany). First-strand cDNA was synthesized with ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The qRT-PCR analysis was performed using THUNDERBIRD® SYBR® qPCR Mix (Toyobo) on a StepOnePlus™ Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A primer pair developed by Nakamura et al. [7], qRT-Actin-F: 5′-CTATGTTCCCGGGTATTGCT-3′ and qRT-Actin-R: 5′-AAGGGAGGCAAGAATCGAC-3′, was used to amplify Actin. Biological replicates of three independent RNA extractions per sample were performed. The cDNA sequences of these three accessions were obtained using primer sets based on the barley Qsd1 amino acid sequence (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Results

BAC sequencing of Qsd1 homeologs in cv. Chinese Spring

We used a pair of primers (Contig4246-1_L and Contig4246-1_R) based on the full-length cDNA sequence homologous to barley Qsd1 (RFL_Contig4246, GenBank: AK333743.1) to select BAC clones harboring Qsd1 homeologs. Two distinct BAC clones (WCS0334P24 and WCS0897G21) were identified based on fingerprinting of NotI-digested DNA. We mapped the primer sequences onto contig sequences to confirm that the target sequences were included in the BAC clones. We designed primer pair 0334P24-L1–1 and 0334P24-R1–2 to distinguish between amplicons from WCS0334P24 and WCS0897G21 based on the presence of an indel at intron 14 (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Using DNA samples from a set of nullisomic-tetrasomic (NT) lines [19] for homoeologous group 5 chromosomes, we obtained three amplicons by PCR, two of which corresponded to WCS0334P24 and WCS0897G21, respectively. The sequences from WCS0334P24 (DDBJ no. LC209615) and WCS0897G21 (LC209617) were derived from chromosomes 5A and 5D, respectively, and the additional amplicon was derived from chromosome 5B (Additional file 1: Figure S2). To identify positive BAC clones from chromosome 5B, we conducted a second screening of the BAC library using primer pair 0334P24-L1–1 and 0334P24-R1–2 and sequenced one BAC clone, WCS1890O23, derived from chromosome 5B (LC209616).

Structures of Qsd1 in wheat

Since only one homologous full-length Qsd1 sequence was available from the Wheat Genetic Resources Database, which was identified as belonging to the wheat A sub-genome by BAC sequencing, we obtained transcript sequences from the other sub-genomes by 5′ and 3′ RACE using RNA samples isolated from embryos (Fig. 1). The amino acid sequences deduced from the Qsd1 sequences in the B and D sub-genomes (LC209618 and LC209619) completely matched the deduced amino acid sequences (UniProt ID W5FER5 and W5FWW5, respectively) from transcripts in the genome assembly TGACv1 in Ensemble Plants (http://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Info/Index). We aligned the BAC clone sequences, full-length cDNA sequence (AK333743.1), and transcript sequences (LC209618 and LC209619) using CLUSTALW (http://www.genome.jp/tools/clustalw/) to estimate exon/intron structures and start/stop codons (Additional file 2: Figure S3a). There were no differences in exon/intron structures among the three sub-genomes (Additional file 2: Figure S3a). All transcript sequences of Qsd1 were aligned to estimate amino acid substitutions among the wheat and barley genomes (Fig. 1). We detected 13 amino acid substitutions among the three amino acid sub-genome sequences in CS. Numerous sequence polymorphisms are also present among the intron regions of the sub-genomes, as shown in Additional file 2: Figure S3a.
Fig. 1

Comparison of amino acid sequences of Qsd1 among barley cv. Haruna Nijo (Qsd1-HN; short dormancy), wild accession H602 (qsd1-H602: long dormancy), and the three sub-genomes of wheat cv. Chinese Spring (TaA-CS, TaB-CS, and TaD-CS). Amino acids highlighted in gray show minor substitutions among haplotypes. Barley-specific amino acid substitutions are underlined. The amino acid numbers and substituted amino acids beneath the alignment show barley-specific substitutions between Haruna Nijo and H602

We sequenced the locus (LC209620 and LC209621) and mRNA (LC209622 and LC209623) of Qsd1 orthologs in diploid wheat lines T. monococcum KT3–5 (Tm) and T. boeoticum KT1–1 (Tb), respectively. We also sequenced the locus of RIL 56, and found that it was identical to that of Tm. We aligned the genomic and mRNA sequences of two A genome diploid wheat accessions and the CS A sub-genome; the exons, start/stop codons, and polymorphic nucleotides are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S3b. Very high sequence similarity was observed among the three haplotypes, especially between Tm (TmA) and Tb (TbA).

Amino acid sequence alignment of Qsd1 orthologs

We identified amino acid sequences from accessions showing similarity to QSD1 (protein from short dormancy barley cv. Haruna Nijo) by Blastp analysis (E-value < E-145) of sequences in NCBI nr. The sequences of Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum, T. monococcum, T. boeoticum, Aegilops tauschii, Oryza sativa (rice), Sorghum bicolor (sorghum), Brachypodium distachyon, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Medicago truncatula were aligned to estimate the evolutionary distances among orthologs (Fig. 2). The distances between wheat and barley QSD1 were the shortest among the plant amino acid comparisons. Both barley and rice contain five members of the Qsd1 gene family [9]. The same Blastp search of T. aestivum (Ta) resulted in the identification of only one partial sequence (Ta2part); however, every member of this gene family was available for Ae. tauschii, which is a donor of the D genome in hexaploid wheat (Fig. 2). The amino acid sequence of CS-TaB was the most different among the three sub-genomes of Ta, but it was closer to Tm, Tb, and barley QSD1 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Multiple alignment of QSD1 amino acid sequences (Hv1: Haruna Nijo). The listed sequences are from accessions showing similarity to QSD1 (E-value < E-145) by Blastp analysis of NCBI nr. Species and homologs (with accession numbers) are as follows: Hordeum vulgare: Hv1 (BAK04026.1), Hv2 (BAK07780.1), Hv3 (P52894.1), Hv4 (BAK05632.1), Hv5part (BAJ90574.1); Triticum aestivum: TaA (AK333743.1), TaB (LC209618), TaD (LC209619), Ta2part (CAE54279.1); T. monococcum: Tm (LC209623); T. boeoticum: Tb (LC209622); Aegilops tauschii: Aet1 (EMT25616.1), Aet2 (EMT05433.1), Aet3 (EMT23015.1), Aet4 (EMT08497.1), Aet5EMT29455.1); Oryza sativa: Os1 (NP_001063248.1), Os2 (NP_001064504.1) Os3 (NP_001064505.2), Os4 (NP_001060284.1), Os5 (NP_001058716.1); Sorghum bicolor: Sb1 (XP_002463187.1), Sb2 (XP_002467302.1); Brachypodium distachyon: Bd1 (XP_003578159.1), Bd2 (XP_010235387.1), Bd3 (XP_003557680.1); Arabidopsis thaliana: At1 (NP_173173.3), At2 (AAK68842.1); Medicago truncatula: Mt1 (XP_003627448.1), Mt2 (XP_003613139.1). Scale bar indicates Poisson Correction distance. Numerals show test values for 1000 bootstrap replications

Expression profiles of wheat Qsd1

We investigated the expression profiles of all three orthologs of Qsd1 in the A, B, and D sub-genomes of CS (TaA, TaB, and TaD, respectively) via qRT-PCR using homeolog-specific primer pairs designed based on exon 15 and the 3’UTRs (Additional file 1: Table S1). Like Qsd1/qsd1 in barley, transcripts for all homeologs were detected in developing embryos, whereas very low levels of expression were found in leaves and roots (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Figure S4). For all homeologous orthologs of Qsd1, the expression levels increased until 20 to 30 days after anthesis and decreased toward maturation. TaA was expressed at relatively low levels compared to TaB and TaD during the maturation period. TaD was highly expressed at most time points but was expressed at very low levels at the last time point (during maturity; day 35).
Fig. 3

Relative expression levels of wheat Qsd1/Actin (Additional file 1: Figure S5) in the three sub-genomes of cv. Chinese Spring (open bar:TaA, grey bar:TaB, and black bar:TaD) in different organs and at different growth stages. Error bars represent standard error, n = 3

We measured Qsd1 expression in diploid wheat (Tm, Tb, and RIL56) on day 28, finding no difference in expression among accessions (Additional file 1: Figures S5 and S6).

Sequence comparison of Qsd1 among elite wheat haplotypes

We determined the sequences of Qsd1 loci for the A, B, and D sub-genomes of Japanese winter cultivar Kitahonami, Japanese spring wheat cultivar Haruyo Koi, and Canadian spring wheat cultivar Fielder (DDBJ no. LC209824 - LC209832) and compared them with those of CS (Fig. 4). There were no sequence polymorphisms in the A sub-genome, whereas there were two nucleotide sequence differences in TaD between CS and Haruyo Koi. Numerous sequence polymorphisms were identified in the B sub-genome derived from the difference between CS and Kitahonami (Fig. 4). Compared to the CS sequences, three non-synonymous substitutions were found in exons 3, 6, and 11 of TaB in Kitahonami, whereas no polymorphisms were found in exons of the A and D sub-genomes. Finally, no sequence polymorphisms were found between CS and Fielder, indicating that these haplotypes share a closely related phylogeny.
Fig. 4

Comparison of sequences of loci in four haplotypes of hexaploid wheat cultivars. Square: exon; line: synonymous SNP; line with rounded end: asynonymous SNP; upward arrow: insertion; downward arrow: deletion. Vertical lines beneath the chromosome indicate polymorphisms between Kitahonami and Chinese Spring (CS). The vertical line above the chromosome indicates a polymorphism between Haruyo Koi and CS. Fielder and CS did not show any differences among the three sub-genomes

We aligned the amino acid sequences of the three sub-genomes of CS, diploid wheat (Tm and Tb), and the B sub-genome of Kitahonami with the sequences of both Haruna Nijo (Qsd1: short dormancy) and H602 (qsd1: long dormancy) in barley (Additional file 1: Figure S7). We detected four amino acid substitutions between Haruna Nijo and H602, but no amino acid sequence polymorphisms were found in wheat at the critical L214F substitution, which is responsible for the difference in seed dormancy period between Haruna Nijo and H602. While polymorphisms were detected among wheat sub-genomes at the M422V substitution, no polymorphisms were found between CS and Kitahonami at this position.

Discussion

Sequence similarity of Qsd1 among wheat and barley accessions

The AlaAT gene family has five members, as determined based on a similarity search for barley Qsd1 by Blastp in NCBI nr. These orthologous sequences are present in rice, Aegilops tauschii, and barley, although only a partial sequence is currently available for barley (Hv5part) (Fig. 2). The availability of amino acid sequences depends on the progress in annotating in each species. Since the complete genome sequence of hexaploid wheat has not yet published, the annotation information for hexaploid wheat is not fully available in the public database. Brachypodium distachyon (Bd) is thought to be more closely related to Triticeae species (Hordeum, Triticum, Secale, and Aegilops in Fig. 2) than to rice, but only three AlaAT gene family members have been identified in Bd. The sequences of Qsd1 gene family members in Ae. tauschii showed a closer relationship to barley than to rice in every comparison of the five members of this family. Although only one partial amino acid sequence (Ta2part) is available for the Qsd1 gene family in hexaploid wheat (as of March 2, 2017), all five members might be identified for each sub-genome after the release of the genome sequence, or perhaps a few might have been lost during the polyploidization of hexaploid wheat.

All three wheat Qsd1 orthologs from CS share close sequence similarity with barley Qsd1. There are 13 amino acid substitutions among the CS sub-genomes and 20 additional substitutions between barley cv. Haruna Nijo and CS (Fig. 1). Sato et al. [9] proposed that the change from a phenylalanine residue in cv. Haruna Nijo (short dormancy) to a leucine residue at amino acid position 214 in wild barley H602 (long dormancy) is a major mutation that occurred during the transition from long-dormancy to short-dormancy barley during the selection of short-dormancy barley for malting purposes. While in every CS sub-genome, the amino acid at position 214 is leucine (Fig. 1), the results suggest that the 214F mutation is barley-specific and is not common among major plant species and wheat sub-genomes.

The mutation underlying the transition from long dormancy to short dormancy is dominant and gain of function, as Sato et al. [9] demonstrated in an RNAi experiment to obtain long dormancy transgenic plants in barley cv. Golden Promise (Qsd1: short dormancy). Dominant short dormancy was also found in another dormancy QTL, Qsd2, in barley [8], whose homolog is present in hexaploid wheat [14]. Takeda and Hori [20] evaluated 4365 cultivated barley and 177 wild barley (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum) accessions from Okayama University and found that most showed long dormancy. Suzuki [21] evaluated seed dormancy in wild and cultivated Triticum and Aegilops species and found that wild wheat accessions had longer dormancy periods. We propose that the short dormancy mutation occurred during the evolutionary process, particularly after domestication, and that shorter dormancy genotypes were selected by humans. While there are many amino acid substitutions among the wheat sub-genomes, the sequence differences among cultivars are smaller than those among sub-genomes in a cultivar, and in A genome diploids. We only detected differences in the B sub-genome of winter wheat cv. Kitahonami; these differences may be investigated in the future for their role in longer dormancy.

Differentiation of Qsd1 orthologs

We demonstrated that the Qsd1 orthologs were expressed in wheat embryos but not in leaves or roots (Fig. 3). These results are in agreement with the expression profiles and organ specificity of Qsd1 in barley, as well as the rice Qsd1 ortholog [9]. The results also support the homeology of barley and wheat Qsd1 sequences observed in the present study. While there are some differences in the expression profiles of the three Qsd1 orthologs in the wheat sub-genomes, all of these genes are expressed and may be functional throughout maturation (Fig. 3). The amino acid substitutions among the three sub-genome sequences in CS (Fig. 1) suggest that each protein derived from a sub-genome has a different structure and that TaB is the most distinct of the sub-genomes. However, based on the evolutionary relationship among related species, TaB may share a closer origin with other species, especially barley, and TaA and TaD are more distantly related to other species. The expression of this gene did not significantly differ among diploid wheat accessions at maturity (Additional file 1: Figure S5).

Application of wheat Qsd1 homeologs

We expanded our sequence comparison to three other hexaploid wheat cultivars with available dormancy information. The alignment of four hexaploid wheat cultivars indicated that the amino acid sequences of three spring cultivars, CS, Haruyo Koi, and Fielder, are exactly the same in each sub-genome. Only Kitahonami has three amino acid substitutions at TaB from spring wheat cultivars. Fielder is in a Canadian wheat class of Canada Western Soft White Spring with white-seed-coat which is reported as a class with low level of seed dormancy [22]. Chono et al. [23] tested the germination indices of 324 wheat cultivars to evaluate pre-harvest sprouting (0 [tolerant] to 100 [sensitive]), finding that Kitahonami had indices of 11.4 (2007) and 11.9 (2008) and that CS had indices of 83.8 (2007) and 97.6 (2008). Yanagisawa et al. [24] also scored the level of pre-harvest sprouting in Kitahonami as moderately tolerant. Onishi (unpublished data) scored Haruyo Koi and CS for 2 years, finding no differences in seed dormancy. Germination rates (20 °C, 10 days) of CS and Haruyo Koi were 63.6% (n = 10) and 72.1% (n = 3) in 2013 (p = 0.62, t-test), 75.0% (n = 6) and 72.5% (n = 3) in 2014 (p = 0.61, t-test), respectively. As Cao et al. [25] mapped a seed dormancy QTL derived from CS, which has a certain level of dormancy, the pre-harvest sprouting score of CS is assumed to be moderate. Since some substitutions exist in the B sub-genomes between CS and Kitahonami, these substitutions should be evaluated for their roles in seed dormancy in the future.

Conclusions

The sequence information obtained in this study and the PCR primers used to identify each sub-genome may contribute to resequencing efforts for other wheat haplotypes with known levels of seed dormancy. On the other hand, no extremely long dormancy effect (such as that observed for the qsd1 allele in wild barley) has been found in wheat. The results of sequence comparison among barley and wheat genomes suggest that the 214F mutation is barley-specific and is not common among major plant species and wheat sub-genomes. We only detected differences in the B sub-genome of winter wheat cv. Kitahonami; these differences may be investigated in the future for their role in longer dormancy. Since extremely long dormancy levels are found among wild wheat species [21], perhaps their Qsd1 orthologs could be resequenced to identify allelic mutations as an alternative strategy for mining longer dormancy sources in cultivated wheat.

Notes

Abbreviations

BAC: 

Bacterial artificial chromosome

qRT-PCR: 

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

QTL: 

Quantitative trait locus

RACE: 

Rapid amplification of cDNA ends

RNAi: 

RNA interference

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Wheat seed samples were provided through the National BioResource Project of Wheat, MEXT of Japan.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (Genomics-based Technology for Agricultural Improvement, TRS1001).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional files]. Sequence data are also deposited at DDBJ nucleotide database with accession codes LC209615 - LC209623 and LC209824 - LC209632.

Authors’ contributions

JW, TK, and KS designed the research; KO, MK, NY, HK, and MT conducted the experiments; and KO, TK, and KS wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine
(2)
Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University
(3)
Institute of Crop Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization

References

  1. Gubler F, Hughes T, Waterhouse P, Jacobsen J. Regulation of dormancy in barley by blue light and after-ripening: effects on abscisic acid and gibberellin metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:886–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Gerjets T, Scholefield D, Foulkes MJ, Lenton JR, Holdsworth MJ. An analysis of dormancy, ABA responsiveness, after-ripening and pre-harvest sprouting in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) caryopses. J Exp Bot. 2010;61:597–607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gu XY, Liu T, Feng J, Suttle JC, Gibbons J. The qSD12 underlying gene promotes abscisic acid accumulation in early developing seeds to induce primary dormancy in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;73:97–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Leymarie J, Robayo-Romero ME, Gendreau E, Benech-Arnold RL, Corbineau F. Involvement of ABA in induction of secondary dormancy in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seeds. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49:1830–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nakamura S, Komatsuda T, Miura H. Mapping diploid wheat homologues of Arabidopsis seed ABA signaling genes and QTLs for seed dormancy. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;114:1129–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Xi W, Liu C, Hou X, YuXi H. MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 regulates seed germination through a negative feedback loop modulating ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22:1733–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Nakamura S, Abe F, Kawahigashi H, Nakazono K, Tagiri A, Matsumoto T, et al. A wheat homolog of MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 acts in the regulation of germination. Plant Cell. 2011;23:3215–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Nakamura S, Pourkheirandish M, Morishige H, Kubo Y, Nakamura M, Ichimura K, et al. Mitogen-activated protein Kinase Kinase 3 regulates grain dormancy in barley. Curr Biol. 2016;26:775–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sato K, Yamane M, Yamaji N, Kanamori H, Tagiri A, Schwerdt JG, et al. Alanine aminotransferase controls seed dormancy in barley. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11625.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Duff SM, Rydel TJ, McClerren AL, Zhang W, Li JY, Sturman EJ, et al. The enzymology of alanine aminotransferase (AlaAT) isoforms from Hordeum vulgare and other organisms, and the HvAlaAT crystal structure. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;528:90–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shrawat AK, Carroll RT, DePauw M, Taylor GJ, Good AG. Genetic engineering of improved nitrogen use efficiency in rice by the tissue-specific expression of alanine aminotransferase. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008;6:722–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mori M, Uchino N, Chono M, Kato K, Miura H. Mapping QTL for grain dormancy on wheat chromosome 3A and the group 4 chromosomes, and their combined effect. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;110:1315–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Torada A, Koike M, Ikeguchi S, Tsutsui I. Mapping of a major locus controlling seed dormancy using backcrossed progenies in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome. 2008;51:426–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Torada A, Koike M, Ogawa T, Takenouchi Y, Tadamura K, Wu J, et al. A causal gene for seed dormancy on wheat chromosome 4A encodes a MAP kinase kinase. Curr Biol. 2016;26:782–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hori K, Takehara S, Nankaku N, Sato K, Sasakuma T, Takeda K. Barley EST markers enhance map saturation and QTL mapping in diploid wheat. Breed Sci. 2007;57:39–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Han F, Ullrich SE, Clancy JA, Jitkov V, Kilian A, Romagosa I. Verification of barley seed dormancy loci via linked molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet. 1996;92:87–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sato K, Matsumoto T, Ooe N, Takeda K. Genetic analysis of seed dormancy QTL in barley. Breed Sci. 2009;59:645–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakamura T, Yamamori M, Hirano H, Hidaka S, Nagamine T. Production of waxy (amylose-free) wheats. Mol Gen Genet. 1995;248:253–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sears ER. Nullisomic-tetrasomic combinations in hexaploid wheat. In: Rilly R, Lewis KR, editors. Chromosome manipulations and plant genetics. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1966. p. 29–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Takeda K, Hori K. Geographical differentiation and diallel analysis of seed dormancy in barley. Euphytica. 2007;153:249–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Suzuki Y. Intra- and inter- specific variation of dormancy in seeds of Triticum and Aegilops. Environ Control Biol. 1990;28:13–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. McCaig TN, DePauw RM. Breeding for preharvest sprouting tolerance in white-seed-coat spring wheat. Crop Sci. 1992;32:19–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chono M, Matsunaka H, Seki M, Fujita M, Kiribuchi-Otobe C, Oda S, et al. Molecular and genealogical analysis of grain dormancy in Japanese wheat varieties, with specific focus on MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 on chromosome 3A. Breed Sci. 2015;65:103–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Yanagisawa A, Yoshimura Y, Amano Y, Kobayashi S, Nishimura T, Nakamichi K, et al. A new winter wheat variety “Kitahonami”. Bull Hokkaido Agr Exp Sta. 2007;91:1–13. (In Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  25. Cao L, Hayashi K, Tokui M, Mori M, Miura H, Onishi K. Detection of QTLs for traits associated with pre-harvest sprouting resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Breed Sci. 2016;66:260–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement