Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Genomics

Volume 18 Supplement 6

Selected articles from the International Conference on Intelligent Biology and Medicine (ICIBM) 2016: genomics

  • Research
  • Open Access

Circular RNA expression profiles and features in human tissues: a study using RNA-seq data

BMC Genomics201718(Suppl 6):680

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4029-3

©  The Author(s). 2017

Published: 3 October 2017

Abstract

Background

Circular RNA (circRNA) is one type of noncoding RNA that forms a covalently closed continuous loop. Similar to long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), circRNA can act as microRNA (miRNA) ‘sponges’ to regulate gene expression, and its abnormal expression is related to diseases such as atherosclerosis, nervous system disorders and cancer. So far, there have been no systematic studies on circRNA abundance and expression profiles in human adult and fetal tissues.

Results

We explored circRNA expression profiles using RNA-seq data for six adult and fetal normal tissues (colon, heart, kidney, liver, lung, and stomach) and four gland normal tissues (adrenal gland, mammary gland, pancreas, and thyroid gland). A total of 8120, 25,933 and 14,433 circRNAs were detected by at least two supporting junction reads in adult, fetal and gland tissues, respectively. Among them, 3092, 14,241 and 6879 circRNAs were novel when compared to the published results. In each adult tissue type, we found at least 1000 circRNAs, among which 36.97–50.04% were tissue-specific. We reported 33 circRNAs that were ubiquitously expressed in all the adult tissues we examined. To further explore the potential “housekeeping” function of these circRNAs, we constructed a circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network containing 17 circRNAs, 22 miRNAs and 90 mRNAs. Furthermore, we found that both the abundance and the relative expression level of circRNAs were higher in fetal tissue than adult tissue. The number of circRNAs in gland tissues, especially in mammary gland (9665 circRNA candidates), was higher than that of other adult tissues (1160–3777).

Conclusions

We systematically investigated circRNA expression in a variety of human adult and fetal tissues. Our observation of different expression level of circRNAs in adult and fetal tissues suggested that circRNAs might play their role in a tissue-specific and development-specific fashion. Analysis of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network provided potential targets of circRNAs. High expression level of circRNAs in mammary gland might be attributed to the rich innervation.

Keywords

  • Circular RNA
  • Expression profile
  • microRNA ‘sponge’
  • Tissue specificity
  • Regulatory network
  • Mammary gland

Background

Cellular RNAs can be separated into two categories: coding and noncoding. There are many noncoding RNAs, such as rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) and microRNA (miRNA). Numerous studies have reported that noncoding RNAs play important regulatory roles in biological processes. Among the noncoding RNA types, circular RNA (circRNA) has recently been found with promising regulatory roles in cellular systems, though its expression level is typically low. Compared with linear RNA, circRNA exhibits remarkable characteristics of undergoing non-canonical splicing without 5′-cap structure or 3′-polyadenylated tail; accordingly, Jeck et al. proposed two models of circRNAs formation [1]. Model 1 is termed ‘lariat-driven circularization’ or ‘exon skipping’, while model 2 is termed ‘intron-pairing-driven circularization’ or ‘direct backsplicing’. This class of noncoding RNAs is characterized by a stable structure in cells that is typically not affected by RNase R treatment [2, 3]. CircRNAs were first time reported in viroid in 1976 [4, 5]. With the rapid advances in next generation sequencing technologies, many circRNAs, along with other noncoding RNAs, have been identified in mammalian transcriptomes [6–13].

CircRNA represents a large class of noncoding RNAs. Recent studies indicated that circRNAs have regulatory potency to mediate gene expression. It was recently reported that circRNAs can function as miRNA’s ‘sponges’ that naturally sequester and competitively suppress miRNA activity [14–16]. For example, two circRNAs, ciRS-7/CDR1as (circular RNA sponge for miR-7 or CDR1 antisense) and Sry, have been shown to bind miRNAs without being degraded [14]. CiRS-7/CDR1as strongly suppresses miR-7 activity, which results in an increased expression of miR-7’s target genes. The sex-determining region Y (Sry) has been proven to serve as a miR-138 sponge [17]. Liu et al. discovered that circRNAs-CER regulated MMP13 expression by functioning as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) [18]. In addition, circRNAs may act as ‘scaffolding’ for RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), like AGO proteins and Pol II [14]; therefore, it could regulate the biological process of associated RBPs in cell. Other studies also demonstrated that circRNAs have been involved in the development of various diseases, including atherosclerosis, nervous system disorders, and cancer [18–20]. Guarnerio et al. showed that tumors harboring chromosomal translocation also harbor circRNAs derived from the rearranged genome: aberrant fusion-circRNA (f-circRNA). They further demonstrated that those f-circRNAs could be functionally relevant in promoting tumorigenesis, implicating their diagnostic and therapeutic potentials [21]. To investigate whether circRNAs could play critical roles in other diseases, it is important to understand how circRNAs are expressed in different human tissues and the differential expression of the circRNAs in disease samples versus normal samples. So far, there has been little information available in literatures about circRNA expression profiles in different human tissues, especially the features in adult versus fetal tissues. Such knowledge is important for the above investigation.

In this study, we performed a systematic examination of circRNAs in a variety of human normal tissues. We reported thousands of circRNAs in colon, kidney, heart, liver, lung and stomach tissues, respectively. Importantly, 33 circRNAs were identified to be pervasively expressed in all the human normal tissues and in both adult samples and fetal samples. These “housekeeping-like” circRNAs might have high conservation and play basic function in normal tissues. We also found 25,933 circRNAs in fetal samples, and 1094, 1991, 1664, 939, 1701, 638 circRNAs that had significantly higher expression in fetal colon, heart, kidney, liver, lung, and stomach tissues than their corresponding adult tissues. Our results suggested potentially critical roles of circular RNAs in human development. We also analyzed four types of gland normal tissues (adrenal gland, mammary gland, pancreas, and thyroid gland) in human body. The expression of circRNAs in mammary gland was higher than that in three other gland tissues. This result suggested that high level of circRNA expression in mammary gland might be attributed to the rich innervation.

Materials and methods

Datasets

We collected 36 publicly available datasets, including 27 rRNA-depleted total RNA-seq samples from six normal tissues (colon, heart, kidney, liver, lung, and stomach) and 9 rRNA-depleted total RNA-seq samples from four normal gland tissues (adrenal gland, mammary gland, pancreas, and thyroid gland). Here, rRNA denotes ribosomal RNA. There were 5 individual samples for adult stomach tissue, 3 individual samples for adult mammary gland, and 2 individual samples for each adult and fetal tissue. All these datasets were retrieved from NCBI [22] and ENCODE [23], and all were paired-end RNA-seq data (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Identification and quantification of human circRNAs

For each sample, the cleaned RNA-seq reads were first mapped to the human reference genome (GRCh37/hg19, UCSC Genome Browser [24]) by TopHat2 [25], a software tool that is capable of detecting the canonical splicing event. Then, the unmapped reads of each sample in the TopHat2 results were used to identify the circRNAs by UROBORUS pipeline [26]. Briefly, the unmapped reads were extracted to 20-bp anchors from head ends and tail ends. This short 20-bp paired-end seed was aligned to the human reference genome (hg19) with a maximum of 2 bp mismatches using TopHat2 with the default parameters. This process generated two sets of reads spanning the spliced site: balanced mapped junction (BMJ) reads and unbalanced mapped junction (UMJ) reads. BMJ reads are represented as reads aligned to the joining region of two back-spliced exons with minimum 20 bp of overhang at any end of the reads; UMJ reads are represented as reads aligned to the joining region of two back-spliced exons with less than 20 bp of overhang at one end of the reads. The UROBORUS pipeline designed special algorithm to deal with them, so the reads supporting circRNAs could be detected.

To evaluate the relative expression of circRNAs in different samples and different normal tissues, we counted all the reads mapped to the human reference genome (hg 19) and normalized the number of circular reads to per million number of reads mapped to the genome, abbreviated as RPM.

Evaluate the corresponding parental mRNAs’ expression level of circRNAs

To evaluate the corresponding parental mRNAs’ expression level of circRNAs, we used software Cufflinks [27] (version 2.2.1) to process the accepted_hits.bam file from TopHat2 results; this file contained all the reads mapped to the human reference genome. Consequently, we estimated the relative expression level of the parental mRNA in reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM).

Prediction of miRNAs related to circRNAs

To predict the relationship between the miRNAs and the identified circRNAs, the sequences and annotation of published miRNAs were obtained from miRBase database [28]. We selected the high confidence miRNAs in humans. Then, miRanda pipeline [29] was used to predict the circRNA-miRNA interaction network. We set the match score higher than 170 and the minimum free energy less than −30 to improve the reliability of our prediction.

Functional enrichment analysis using gene ontology (GO) terms

The potential target genes in circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interaction network of adult and gland normal tissue samples were used for the functional enrichment analysis. A total of 33 and 56 circRNAs in adult tissues and gland samples, respectively, were selected to construct the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interaction network. The enrichment analysis was performed using GO biological processes and molecular function terms through the software DAVID Bioinformatics Resource v6.8. [30].

Results and discussion

In summary, we used the RNA-seq data (total RNA with ribosomal RNA being depleted) from six adult and fetal normal tissues (colon, heart, kidney, liver, lung, and stomach) and four gland adult normal tissues (adrenal gland, mammary gland, pancreas, and thyroid gland) to identify the circRNAs using the tool UROBORUS.

CircRNA abundance in human adult normal tissues

In human adult normal tissues, 22,260 unique circRNAs were identified, among which 8120 circRNA candidates were supported by at least two reads spanning a head-to-tail splice junction (Fig. 1a). When we searched the previously published circRNAs deposited in database circBase [31], we found that 9332 circRNAs have been included in the circBase while a total of 12,928 were novel circRNAs (Additional file 1: Table S2-S3). These novel circRNAs included 3092 that were supported by at least two junction reads, that is, circRNAs with high confidence. We noticed that approximately 88% circRNAs were supported by less than 10 reads. Meanwhile, there were 10 circRNA candidates supported by more than 150 reads in all adult samples. Among them, circSLC8A1 (hsa_circ_0000994) had the largest number of supporting reads (823 reads).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Distribution of circRNAs in human adult normal tissues. a Distribution of circRNAs by the number of supporting reads in human adult normal tissues. b Distribution of the exon number of circRNAs in human adult normal tissues. c Distribution of the circRNAs among human chromosomes of six adult human normal tissues

We then examined the number of exons for the circRNAs having at least 2 supporting junction reads. We found that majority of the circRNAs (77.74%) had less than 6 exons, indicating that only a small proportion of circRNAs consist of multiple exons by back-splicing (Fig. 1b). This result is consistent with the previous report that circRNAs biogenesis may follow two mechanisms: “direct back-splicing” and “exon skipping” [1, 32, 33]. We manually checked these identified circRNAs’ parental gene using Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV). The parental genes for those circRNAs with two or more exons did not have corresponding exon-skipping phenomenon. However, the results showed that the derived gene of 35 circRNAs (35/495, 7.07%) had corresponding “exon skipping” transcripts; these circRNAs had only one exon. These results implied that these circRNAs with only one exon might be formed through the “exon skipping” mechanism, while the other circRNAs might be formed by “direct back-splicing” or other mechanism.

For all the adult normal tissues except stomach, the detected circRNAs were distributed on all the human chromosomes (autosomes and sex chromosomes). In stomach tissue, circRNAs were distributed on all the chromosomes but not on Y chromosome (Fig. 1c). In each tissue, our results showed that the number of circRNAs distributed on chromosome 1 was larger than any other chromosomes, while the number of circRNAs on Y chromosome was the smallest among all the chromosomes. This observation is consistent with the chromosome length – Y chromosome is the shortest and has the smallest number of genes in the human genome. In our comparison of the number of circRNAs versus chromosome length (in Megabase, Mb), we found that the circRNA density on chromosome 19 (4.69 per Mb) stood out, which had the highest density among all the chromosomes (average 2.55 per Mb). These results are interesting because the gene density of chromosome 19 is also the highest among chromosomes [34]. However, the distribution of circRNAs on autosomes and X chromosome is not uniform in each normal tissue. For example, the number of circRNAs on chromosome 6 (98) and chromosome 12 (83) in liver was higher than that of other tissues (mean values: 65.2 and 52.4). The number of circRNAs on chromosome 11 in stomach (95) was also higher than that of other tissues.

More than one thousand circRNAs (with at least two supporting junction reads) were identified in each human adult normal tissue (Fig. 2). Each tissue had a good number of unique circRNAs, for example, 441 (36.97%) in colon, 602 (50.04%) in heart, 474 (40.86%) in kidney, 668 (49.34%) in liver, 452 (36.92%) in lung, and 528 (40.80%) in stomach. Moreover, there were 141 circRNAs shared in all normal tissues, even though the expression level of circRNAs was different among these tissues. The result supported that some circRNAs are expressed in all tissues (e.g. in “housekeeping-like” role). These 141 circRNAs may have same or similar function in different adult normal tissues.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Venn diagram summarizing the circRNAs (supported by at least two reads) shared among six human adult normal tissues

Although we found that the number of circRNAs detected in each tissue type was nearly equivalent, the expression of the top ten circRNAs differed in tissue types, as illustrated in Additional file 2: Figure S1. Specifically, circHIPK3 (hsa_circ_0000284) and circUBXN7 (hsa_circ_0001380) were the top two ranked based on the expression in each tissue. The circHIPK3 expression, measured in RPM (junction reads per million mapped reads), was the highest in colon, kidney, lung and stomach tissues, and the average expression level of circSLC8A1 in heart tissue and the circZKSCAN1 (hsa_circ_0001727) in liver tissue was higher than other tissues, suggesting that the circSLC8A1 and circZKSCAN1 may respectively have special function in heart and liver than any other tissues.

There were a total of 33 circRNAs ubiquitously expressed in each sample of all adult normal tissues (Additional file 1: Table S4-S5). Figure 3 displays the heatmap of commonly expressed circRNAs (in RPM) and their parental mRNA expression level (FPKM – fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads). Of note, the expression of these circRNAs in stomach_#4 sample (average 0.04) and stomach_#5 sample (average 0.08) was lower than other tissues, and the circRNAs expressed in liver_#2 sample (average 0.18) was higher than other tissues. Moreover, these 33 circRNAs expressed in different samples of the same tissue were quite different, but the expression of the corresponding parental mRNAs in different individuals of tissue was pretty similar (Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) = 0.80–0.95), except in lung tissue (PCC = 0.35).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

The heatmaps of the 33 shared circRNAs and their parental mRNA expression level in six human adult normal tissues

As shown in the results above, these 33 circRNAs exert interesting features. Considering that circRNAs can play a role as miRNA ‘sponges’ to regulate gene expression, we selected 2588 published, high confidence human miRNAs from miRBase, and used the miRanda pipeline to test which miRNA can interact with these 33 circRNAs (more details were included in Materials and methods). Most circRNAs could bind multiple miRNAs and different circRNAs might have same potential miRNA targets. Therefore, we built a circRNA-miRNA interaction network, which contains 33 circRNAs and 158 miRNAs to reflect its complex interaction and regulation (Fig. 4). Next, we employed the dataset from miRTarBase [35], which contained the experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions to predict the potential role for circRNAs in molecular regulation. Then, we used network visualization software Cytoscape (version 3.3.0) [36] to display the network, and through the network analysis, we found a total of 17 circRNAs, 22 miRNAs and 90 mRNAs in circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interaction network. In the network, each gene corresponds to a node, and 2 genes are connected by an edge, indicating a tight correlation between those genes and a potential regulatory relationship (Fig. 5).
Figure 4
Fig. 4

CircRNA-miRNA interaction network. The network consists of 33 circRNAs and 158 miRNAs. The green node represents circRNA and the blue node represents miRNA. Edge denotes the relationship between circRNA and miRNA

Figure 5
Fig. 5

CircRNA-miRNA-mRNA interaction network. The network consists of 17 circRNAs, 22 miRNAs and 90 mRNAs. The green node represents circRNA, the purple node represents miRNA, and the blue node represents mRNA. Edge denotes their relationship

To further explore the potential function of these 17 circRNAs in organ development or differentiation, we analyzed the GO enrichment of these 90 mRNAs-derived genes in network (Additional file 3: Figure S2). We found the genes were enriched in the regulation of cell death or apoptosis. In GO molecular function category, these circRNAs were mostly enriched in transcription activity. There is no tissue-specific function detected in the cluster. Therefore, these results might explain why these circRNAs could be shared among the tissues we examined.

CircRNAs expression profile in human fetal normal tissues

In this work, we systematically analyzed 12 samples of human fetal normal tissues, including colon, heart, kidney, liver, lung, and stomach. We found a total of 47,278 circRNAs in human fetal tissues, among which 25,933 circRNAs were supported by at least two junction reads (Additional file 1: Table S6). Compared with the previously published databases obtained from circBase, 31,158 circRNAs were novel circRNA, including 14,241 circRNAs were supported by at least two reads. As shown in Fig. 6a, we identified 4537 circRNAs in colon, 7199 circRNAs in heart, 7962 circRNAs in kidney, 5760 circRNAs in liver, 9698 in lung, and 2584 circRNAs in stomach. Among these circRNAs, 637 circRNAs shared in all human fetal normal tissues. Compared to the corresponding human adult tissues, the circRNAs (average 6290) were substantially highly abundant in fetal tissues than that in adult tissues (average 1238) (Fig. 6b). For example, 9698 circRNA candidates were detected in fetal lung tissues, which is nearly an 8-fold increase to the number of circRNAs identified in adult lung tissues.
Figure 6
Fig. 6

Distribution of circRNAs in human fetal normal tissues. a Venn diagram summarizing the circRNAs (supported by at least two reads) shared among the human fetal tissues. b Comparison of the number of circRNAs (supported by at least two reads) in adult and fetal tissues

Compared with the circRNAs distributed in adult normal tissues, there were 1916 circRNAs (more than 10 supporting reads) only expressed in fetal human tissues. We analyzed the GO enrichment of potential target genes derived from the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network. A total of 487 GO function enrichment terms, among which 56 GO terms (11.4%) are related to the development (Additional file 1: Table S7). For one example, there were 105 genes involved in GO term ‘positive regulation of developmental process’ (GO ID: 0051094), resulting in a statistically significant enrichment (Fisher’s Exact test, p = 2.31E-36).

Furthermore, we examined the circRNA expression and their parental mRNA expression in human fetal normal tissues. As shown in Additional file 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9: Figures S3-S8, each sample had abundant high-expression specific circRNAs when compared to others, which might lead to individual specificity. We further found that there were a small number of circRNAs with high-expression, but the corresponding parental mRNA had low expression or even no expression; the results revealed that the formation mechanism of circRNAs might be different from mRNA.

The expression level of most circRNAs in each fetal tissue was generally higher than the corresponding circRNAs expressed in adult tissue of colon, liver, heart, kidney and lung, respectively. The same is true for the corresponding parental mRNA expression of each sample in different tissues. The heatmap in Additional file 9: Figure S8 showed that the circRNAs expressed in fetal stomach tissue was higher than that expressed in adult stomach tissue. However, their parental mRNA expression in adult stomach samples was higher than the circRNAs’ parental mRNA expression in fetal stomach samples.

Most of the circRNAs expression and their parental mRNA expression followed the same trend, that is, the expressed level was higher in fetal tissues than adult tissues. However, this is not always true for the samples from stomach tissue. The potential function of circRNAs in stomach tissue might be involved with different mechanism compared to other tissues. And this needs further investigation.

CircRNAs expression in human gland normal tissues

Gland is an organ that synthesizes substances for release into the bloodstream or into cavities inside the body or its outer surface. Thus, it plays an important role in the growth and development of human body. Accordingly, we selected four kinds of gland tissues: adrenal gland, mammary gland, pancreas, thyroid gland, to explore the distribution of circRNAs in human.

We found a total of 23,613 circRNAs in these human gland normal tissues, and 14,433 circRNAs were supported by at least two junction reads (Additional file 1: Table S8). As the Fig. 7 illustrates, there are 2311 circRNAs in adrenal gland, 9665 circRNAs in mammary gland, 1791 circRNAs in pancreas, and 3777 circRNAs in thyroid gland. These circRNAs were identified by UROBORUS (Fig. 7a). Among these circRNAs, we found 321 circRNAs shared among the four glands. The number of circRNAs in pancreas tissues was the least among these four gland tissues, but even so, it was still more abundant than that in any human adult tissues (Fig. 2). The number of circRNA candidates recognized in mammary gland tissues was higher than almost all the human adult and fetal tissues, except for fetal lung tissue. On the other hand, the expression level of circRNAs in mammary gland was also higher than that in other gland tissues (Fig. 7b). Previous studies indicated an abundance number of circRNAs expressed in brain, due to the neuronal activity in accordance with the biogenesis mechanism of circRNAs [37]. Thus, more circRNAs expressed in mammary gland than other tissues might connect with the rich innervation of mammary gland [38]. Other factors might contribute to this abundance of circRNAs in mammary gland, and future investigation is needed.
Figure 7
Fig. 7

Distribution of circRNAs in adult gland normal tissues. a Venn diagram summarizing the circRNAs (supported by at least two reads) shared among the four human gland tissues. b Heatmap showing the circRNA expression in each sample of adrenal gland, mammary gland, pancreas and thyroid gland

Furthermore, our results revealed 56 circRNAs had shared expression in different gland normal tissues. Most of circRNAs’ expression level was lower than their parental mRNAs’ expression, but six circRNAs (circFKBP8, circATP5C1, circFGFR2, circRAB3IP, circCORO1C, and circHIPK3) presented the opposite expression with their corresponding parental genes. CircFTO and circPICALM present same trend in adrenal gland, mammary gland and thyroid gland, but high expression of their parental mRNA was observed in pancreas (Fig. 8). In addition, there were 14 circRNAs identified in each sample of human adult tissues. Compared with circRNAs expression in adult tissues, these 14 circRNAs in gland tissues expressed higher than that in adult tissues (Fig. 9). Previous work has revealed that circHIPK3 can regulate cell growth by sponging multiple miRNAs [15]. Our finding also revealed that circHIPK3 expressed higher than their parental linear mRNA in each gland sample. These results might be attributed to the special function of glands in human body like secreting hormonal substances to regulate cell growth.
Figure 8
Fig. 8

Heatmap showing the expression of the 56 common circRNAs and their parental mRNAs in gland normal tissues

Figure 9
Fig. 9

Heatmap showing the expression of the 14 shared circRNA in each sample of adult tissues and gland tissues

Conclusions

In this work, we identified 8120 circular RNAs in six human adult normal tissues (colon, heart, kidney, liver, lung, and stomach), 25,933 in the human fetal normal tissues, and 13,374 in human gland normal tissues (adrenal gland, mammary gland, pancreas, and thyroid gland). Compared with the recent databases, 38% and 66% circRNAs in adult and fetal tissues were identified as novel. Further analysis showed that each adult tissue expressed a certain number of unique circRNAs: 441 (36.97%) in colon, 602 (50.04%) in heart, 474 (40.86%) in kidney, 668 (49.34%) in liver, 452 (36.92%) in lung, and 528 (40.80%) in stomach. The results indicated that expression of circRNAs was tissue-specific.

There were 33 circRNAs detected ubiquitously in each sample of adult normal tissues. We constructed two networks: one included these 33 circRNAs and their potential target miRNAs and the other is a circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network. These two networks indicated the potential associations between circRNAs and their target genes. The networks provided an important reference for studying the interaction of other differential expressed circRNAs and their potential targets.

The abundance of circRNAs in fetal tissues was stronger than that in adult tissues. The relative expression level of circRNAs and their parental mRNAs in colon and liver samples were higher in fetal tissue than adult tissue. The results suggested that circular RNA might have important roles during human tissue development. Future efforts should be directed to illuminate the specific molecular function of each circRNA during the development in each tissue type.

Finally, we studied the circRNA-specific expression profiles in four gland normal tissues (adrenal gland, mammary gland, pancreas, and thyroid gland). The abundance of circRNAs was stronger in gland tissues than human adult tissues. We identified 14 conserved circRNAs shared among samples of human tissues. These 14 circRNAs expressed higher in gland tissues than adult tissues. The circRNA expression level in mammary gland was higher than other gland tissues, indicating that circRNAs might have tissue-specific regulation in glands.

Abbreviations

BMJ: 

balanced mapped junction

GO: 

Gene Ontology

IGV: 

Integrative Genomics Viewer

UMJ: 

unbalanced mapped junction

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study and this article’s publication costs were supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61571223, No. 81270700, and No. 61171191), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 20133218110016), and the “Six Talent Peak” Project of Jiangsu Province under Grant No. SWYY-021. Z.Z. was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R21CA196508. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the findings in this study are included within the manuscript and the supplementary figures.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of BMC Genomics Volume 18 Supplement 6, 2017: Selected articles from the International Conference on Intelligent Biology and Medicine (ICIBM) 2016: genomics. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-18-supplement-6.

Authors’ contributions

XS and ZZ conceived the study and revised the manuscript, TX implemented the study, performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript, JW and PH joined the part work of data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
(2)
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
(3)
Center for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
(4)
Human Genetics Center, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA

References

  1. Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, Slevin MK, Burd CE, Liu J, Marzluff WF, Sharpless NE. circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. RNA. 2013;19(2):141–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Suzuki H, Zuo Y, Wang J, Zhang MQ, Malhotra A, Mayeda A. Characterization of rnase r-digested cellular rna source that consists of lariat and circular rnas from pre-mrna splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(8):e63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Suzuki H, Tsukahara T. A view of pre-mrna splicing from rnase r resistant rnas. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(6):9331–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Kolakofsky D. Isolation and characterization of Sendai virus DI-RNAs. Cell. 1976;8(4):547–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sanger HL, Klotz G, Riesner D, Gross HJ, Kleinschmidt AK. Viroids are single-stranded covalently closed circular RNA molecules existing as highly base-paired rod-like structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976;73(11):3852–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Cocquerelle C, Daubersies P, Majérus MA, Kerckaert JP, Bailleul B. splicing with inverted order of exons occurs proximal to large introns. EMBO J. 1992;11(3):1095–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Cocquerelle C, Mascrez B, H’etuin D, Bailleul B. Mis-splicing yields circular RNA molecules. FASEB J. 1993;7:155–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burd CE, Jeck WR, Liu Y, Sanoff HK, Wang Z, Sharpless NE. Expression of linear and novel circular forms of an INK4/ARF-associated non-coding RNA correlates with atherosclerosis risk. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(12):e1001233.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Braun S, Domdey H, Wiebauer K. Inverse splicing of a discontinuous pre-mrna intron generates a circular exon in a hela cell nuclear extract. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(21):4152–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Pasman Z, Been MD, Garcia-Blanco MA. Exon circularization in mammalian nuclear extracts. RNA. 1996;2(6):603–10.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo JU, Agarwal V, Guo H, Bartel DP. Expanded identification and characterization of mammalian circular RNAs. Genome Biol. 2014;15(7):409.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Lasda E, Parker R. Circular RNAs: diversity of form and function. RNA. 2014;20(12):1829–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, Xiang JF, Yin QF, Xing YH, Zhu S, Yang L, Chen LL. Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2013;51(6):792–806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jens M. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495(7441):1439–49.Google Scholar
  15. Li Z, Huang C, Bao C, Chen L, Lin M, Wang X, Zhong G, Yu B, Hu W, Dai L, Zhu P, Chang Z, Wu Q, Zhao Y, Jia Y, Xu P, Liu H, Shan G. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(3):256–64.Google Scholar
  16. Zheng Q, Bao C, Guo W, Li S, Chen J, Chen B, Luo Y, Lyu D, Li Y, Shi G, Liang L, Gu J, He X, Huang S. Circular RNA profiling reveals an abundant circHIPK3 that regulates cell growth by sponging multiple miRNAs. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, Kjems J. Natural rna circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495(7441):384–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu Q, Zhang X, Hu X, Dai L, Fu X, Zhang J, Ao Y. Circular RNA related to the chondrocyte ECM regulates MMP13 expression by functioning as a MiR-136 “sponge” in human cartilage degradation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22572.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen TB, Kjems J, Damgaard CK. Circular RNA and miR-7 in cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73(18):5609–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bachmayr-Heyda A, Reiner AT, Auer K, Sukhbaatar N, Aust S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Mesteri I, Grunt TW, Zeillinger R, Pils D. correlation of circular RNA abundance with proliferation – exemplified with colorectal and ovarian cancer, idiopathic lung fibrosis, and normal human tissues. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8057.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Guarnerio J, Bezzi M, Jeong JC, Paffenholz SV, Berry K, Naldini MM, Lo-Coco F, Tay Y, Beck AH, Pandolfi PP. oncogenic role of fusion-circRNAs derived from cancer-associated chromosomal translocations. Cell. 2016;165(2):289–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. NCBI. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra. Accessed 19 December 2015.
  23. ENCODE. https://www.encodeproject.org/. Accessed 11 March 2016.
  24. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, Haussler D. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12(6):996–1006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14(4):295–311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Song X, Zhang N, Ping H, et al. Circular RNA profile in gliomas revealed by identification tool UROBORUS. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(9):e87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kozomara A, Riffithsjones-Jones S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D68–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Betel D, Koppal A, Agius P, Sander C, Leslie C. Comprehensive modeling of microRNA targets predicts functional non-conserved and non-canonical sites. Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, et al. DAVID: database for annotation, aisualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Glažar P, Papavasileiou P, Rajewsky N. circBase: a database for circular RNAs. RNA. 2014;20(11):1666–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeck WR, Sharpless NE. detecting and characterizing circular RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(5):453–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Salzman J, Gawad C, Wang PL, Lacayo N, Brown PO. circular RNAs are the predominant transcript isoform from hundreds of human genes in diverse cell types. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30733.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao Z, Boerwinkle E. Neighboring-nucleotide effects on single nucleotide polymorphisms: a study of 2.6 million polymorphisms across the human genome. Genome Res. 2002;12(11):1679–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Chou CH, Chang NW, Shrestha S, Hsu SD, Lin YL, Lee WH, Yang CD, Hong HC, Wei TY, Tu SJ, Tsai TR, Ho SY, Jian TY, Wu HY, Chen PR, Lin NC, Huang HT, Yang TL, Pai CY, Tai CS, Chen WL, Huang CY, Liu CC, Weng SL, Liao KW, Hsu WL, Huang HD. miRTarBase 2016: updates to the experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D239–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. You X, Vlatkovic I, Babic A, Will T, Epstein I, Tushev G, Akbalik G, Wang M, Glock C, Quedenau C, Wang X, Hou J, Liu H, Sun W, Sambandan S, Chen T, Schuman EM, Chen W. Neural circular RNAs are derived from synaptic genes and regulated by development and plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(4):603–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Jaspars JJP, Posma AN, Immerseel AAHV, et al. The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: implications for surgery [J]. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(4):249–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us