Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Preliminary comparative genomics revealed pathogenic potential and international spread of Staphylococcus argenteus

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 4Email author
BMC Genomics201718:808

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4149-9

  • Received: 10 June 2017
  • Accepted: 2 October 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Staphylococcus argenteus and S. schweitzeri, were recently proposed as novel species within S. aureus complex (SAC). S. argenteus has been reported in many countries and can threaten human health. S. schweitzeri has not been associated with human infections, but has been isolated from non-human primates. Questions regarding the evolution of pathogenicity of these two species will remain elusive until an exploratory evolutionary framework is established.

Results

We present genomic comparison analysis among members of SAC based on a pan-genome definition, which included 15 S. argenteus genomes (five newly sequenced), six S. schweitzeri genomes and 30 divergent S. aureus genomes. The three species had divergent core genomes and rare interspecific recombination was observed among the core genes. However, some subtypes of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) elements and prophages were present in different species. Of 111 tested virulence genes of S. aureus, 85 and 86 homologous genes were found in S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri, respectively. There was no difference in virulence gene content among the three species, but the sequence of most core virulence genes was divergent. Analysis of the agr locus and the genes in the capsular polysaccharides biosynthetic operon revealed that they both diverged before the speciation of SAC members. Furthermore, the widespread geographic distribution of S. argenteus, sequence type 2250, showed ambiguous biogeographical structure among geographically isolated populations, demonstrating an international spread of this pathogen.

Conclusions

S. argenteus has spread among several countries, and invasive infections and persistent carriage may be not limited to currently reported regions. S. argenteus probably had undergone a recent host adaption and can cause human infections with a similar pathogenic potential.

Keywords

  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Staphylococcus argenteus
  • Staphylococcus schweitzeri
  • Comparative genomics
  • Virulence gene
  • Capsular polysaccharides
  • Agr
  • Biogeographical structure

Background

Staphylococcus aureus is a bacterial species often associated with primate hosts, and specific sequence types (ST) can be found frequently living on different domestic animals [1]. In humans, S. aureus is frequently isolated from nasal membranes and skin as residents or transients [2]. Because of its association with clinically significant infections and foodborne diseases [3, 4], S. aureus has been extensively investigated, leading to massive datasets on its species diversity. After the genetically divergent ST 75 was first reported in Australia in 2002 [5], many other isolates genetically related to clonal complex 75 (CC 75) were described in Belgium [6], Cambodia [7], China [8], Fiji [9, 10], France [11], French Guiana [12], New Zealand [9], Thailand [13, 14], Trinidad & Tobago [15], and the UK [16]. Genomic data tracking showed that this lineage also appeared in the United States [17]. Meanwhile, another S. aureus lineage has recently been recovered from nonhuman primates [18, 19] and bats [20] in Africa. Recently, these two genetically divergent lineages have received formal taxonomic classification and were recognized as S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri, respectively, two novel species within the S. aureus complex (SAC) [16].

S. argenteus cannot be distinguished from S. aureus using routine diagnostic microbiology identification methods [7, 8, 10, 12, 13], and PCR amplification of the gene nucA, which is used as a standard confirmatory marker for S. aureus, may be positive in S. argenteus [16]. However, considerable difficulties were observed in amplification of some multilocus sequence typing (MLST) gene loci from S. argenteus using standard MLST primers used for typing S. aureus [7, 21]. These difficulties may result in S. argenteus isolates being excluded from or misidentified as S. aureus. Data on clinical features of S. argenteus infection are limited, but these studies indicated that S. argenteus was associated with skin and soft tissue infections, nosocomial infections, invasive staphylococcal sepsis, and even death [13, 14, 22]. Genes encoding the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) cytotoxin and staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) were detected in S. argenteus isolates [11, 12, 14]. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant “S. aureus” (CA-MRSA) isolates, which were subsequently characterized as S. argenteus, were predominant in remote aboriginal communities of Australia [23]. Therefore, there is no doubt that S. argenteus is a threat to human health.

The emergence of S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri results in the need to determine whether they should be distinguished from S. aureus in routine practice. Chantratita et al. suggested that this might be necessary if the infection is associated with different clinical manifestations, and/or requires different antimicrobial regimens [14]. According to this suggestion, S. schweitzeri is clearly separated from the other two species though one isolate was obtained from human (ST 1822, cause no infection) [24], but S. argenteus is difficult to make a judgment based on current available data. In this study, we sequenced the genomes of five S. argenteus isolates, and performed a genomic comparison among SAC, so as to clarify their evolutionary relationships, to evaluate their pathogenic potential, and to identify genomic differences. This study is expected to establish an exploratory evolutionary framework regarding the evolution of pathogenicity of SAC.

Results

Genomic features of SAC species

The sequences of 51 SAC genomes were used in this study and shown in Fig. 1. The draft genome sequences of five S. argenteus strains previously identified in our laboratory [8] were sequenced in this study. Thirty S. aureus genomes, which represent a genetically diverse collection of strains of several different STs (Additional file 1: Figure S1), were selected from the complete genome sequences available in the NCBI genome database. Ten S. argenteus and six S. schweitzeri genomes (complete or draft) were also downloaded from NCBI.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic relationship, genome information, and relevant typing information of SAC species. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of SAC was constructed based on concatenated deduced amino acid sequences of 1375 single copy core genes of the 51 strains used in this study. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1000 replications) greater than 70% are shown at the branch points and the asterisk (*) indicates a bootstrap value of 100. The color-coded clades denote different species: red, S. aureus; green, S. argenteus; blue, S. schweitzeri. S. simiae was used as an outgroup (not shown). S. argenteus strains, SJTU F20124 (GenBank accession number: LWAN00000000), F20419 (LWAO00000000), F21164 (LWAP00000000), F21224 (LWAQ00000000), and F21285 (LWAR00000000) were sequenced as part of this study. For Sequence type, CRISPR, SCCmec, agr type, Serotype, and Prophage data: -, not detected/absent; +, detected/present; NA, data not available in the MLST database; and #, the type is close but divergent from the indicated subtype

For S. aureus, the genome sizes varied from 2.74 Mb (strain ST398/S0385) to 2.99 Mb (TW20), the GC contents varied from 32.75% (MN8) to 32.96% (LGA251), and the number of coding sequences (CDS) per genome varied from 2399 (RKI4) to 3009 (TW20) (Fig. 1). For S. argenteus, the genome sizes varied from 2.71 Mb (M051_MSHR) to 2.87 Mb (SJTU F21285), the GC contents varied from 32.20% (M051_MSHR) to 32.42% (SJTU F21285), and the number of CDSs per genome varied from 2490 (M051_MSHR) to 2662 (SH3) (Fig. 1). For S. schweitzeri, the genome sizes varied from 2.67 Mb (FSCB1B) to 2.81 Mb (FSA096), the GC contents varied from 32.21% (FSA096) to 32.28% (FSCB5), and the number of CDSs per genome varied from 2434 (FSCB1B) to 2587 (FSA096) (Fig. 1).

The genome size, GC content and number of CDSs were significantly different between S. aureus and the two new species (p < 0.01), while no significant differences were observed between S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri (P > 0.01; Additional file 2: Figure S2). The number of genomes used in this study was limited, particularly for S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri. Furthermore, some genome sizes and CDS numbers were estimated from draft genome assemblies and remained incomplete. Nevertheless, the difference in GC content, which is less affected by the quality of genome assembly, suggests an apparent divergence between S. aureus and the other two members of the SAC.

Pan-genome of SAC species

To facilitate a genomic comparison and achieve a sound comparison at the whole genome scale, the pan-genome of SAC was defined. A pan-genome was previously described to include two distinct components, the core and variable genomes, which represent the essence and the diversity of the population, respectively [25]. The core genome consists of genes that are common to all strains while the variable genome is composed of genes absent or present at least in one strain, due to either gene loss or acquisition [26]. Here we expanded the classification of the SAC pan-genome into four genomic components: 1) core genes (CR), present in all strains; 2) core variable genes (CV), present in all strains with at least one pseudogene; 3) variable genes (VR), present in at least two strains and absent at least in one strain; and 4) unique genes (UQ), present in only one strain. The pan-genome of the 51 SAC genomes was grouped into 4249 homologous gene families, including 1671 CRs, 328 CVs, 1634 VRs, and 616 UQs (Additional file 3: Table S1; Additional file 4: Figure S3). The pan-genome of the 30 S. aureus genomes was grouped into 3966 homologous gene families, including 1752 CRs, 330 CVs, 1329 VRs, and 555 UQs. The sizes of CRs, CVs, VRs and UQ were also calculated for S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri (Additional file 5: Figure S4). The category analysis of the Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COGs) [27] for the pan-genome of the SAC and each species showed similar profiles.

Clearly, the pan-genomes for each group were all open (i.e., not complete), due to the limited number of genomes included in the analyses. The accumulation curves and pan-genome sizes largely depend on sampling size and diversity [25]. In this study, S. aureus was better sampled than S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri in both the number of strains and strain diversity. For example, of the fifteen S. argenteus genomes examined, nine were ST2250 demonstrating little genome diversity (see below). Therefore, a brief comparison of the pan-genome is shown in Additional files 6: Figure S5, and the details will not be discussed here. However, it is worth noting that the 1999 common gene families (CR plus CV) in the SAC pan-genome were approximately three quarters of the size of an individual SAC genome, and the 2578 sharing gene families (genes present in at least one genome of each species, including CR, CV and partial VR) were approximately equivalent to the CDS number of an individual SAC species genome. This is indicative of high level of sharing of homologous gene families between the species and strains of the SAC. It is predictable that S. aureus, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri share many biological characteristics, many of which have been demonstrated in previous studies as a common phenotypes [16].

Core genome of the SAC species

Similar metabolic pathways and phenotypes between species may be the result of frequent genetic exchanges, such as horizontal gene transfer (HGT) mediated by bacteriophage [28, 29], or limited evolutionary time for divergence from a common ancestor. HGT mediated by mobilome mainly contributes to the VRs and UQs, respectively as follows (Additional file 4: Figure S3; Additional file 5: Figure S4, code X): SAC, VRs and UQs accounting for 62.7% and 34.7% of the genes assigned to X class, respectively; S. aureus, 63.5% and 33.6%; S. argenteus, 61.5% and 32.3%; and S. schweitzeri, 64.8% and 27.8%. Also, it is believed that distinct species are separated by apparent genetic distances that can act as barriers to recombination [3032]. To better understand the genetic distances, the average nucleotide identities based on BLAST (bANI) were calculated using the core genes shared among SAC species (Fig. 2). Most of the intraspecific sequence identity values were greater than 95%, which was consistent with the species definition of an ANI cutoff of 95–96% [33]. The interspecific values from different groups formed three peaks similar to normal distributions and exhibited apparently differences: the peak of S. argenteus versus S. schweitzeri was near 95% while those of S. argenteus versus S. aureus and S. schweitzeri versus S. aureus were 86–89%. The core genome of S. schweitzeri (90.92 ± 4.77%) was closer related to that of S. aureus than S. argenteus (89.79 ± 4.63%, Fig. 2). Notably, in pairwise comparisons between species, bANI values greater than 95% were a small but notable part of the total. To determine whether these identity values (> 95%) were generated from highly conserved house-keeping genes (evolving very slowly), the pairwise distance among alleles of each gene family was tested. It was found that the number of gene families with an average interspecific identity greater than 95% was 188 between S. aureus and S. argenteus, 307 between S. aureus and S. schweitzeri, and 698 between S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri (161 in common). Meanwhile, 34 gene families between S. aureus and S. argenteus, 33 between S. aureus and S. schweitzeri, and 80 between S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri (28 in common) had the same amino acid sequence. It indicated that the bANI values greater than 95% were mainly due to slowly evolving genes, but horizontal gene transfer between species may also be present.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Pairwise bANI of SAC species. Pairwise bANI of S. simiae, S. aureus, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri were determined based on the 1375 common single copy genes. For comparison of S. simiae to S. aureus, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri, the mean bANI values were 84.63 ± 5.18% (median 84.14%), 84.89 ± 5.25% (84.26%), and 84.85 ± 5.19% (84.17%), respectively. Among the members of the SAC 1596 common genes were used determine the bANI. Interspecific mean bANI values were as follows: S. aureus, 98.76 ± 1.92% (median 99.23%); S. argenteus, 99.6 ± 0.85% (99.79%); and S. schweitzeri, 98.87 ± 1.74% (99.38%). The intraspecific mean bANI values were as follows: S. aureus vs. S. argenteus, 89.79 ± 4.63% (median 89.39%); S. aureus vs. S. schweitzeri, 90.92 ± 4.77% (90.64%); and S. argenteus vs. S. schweitzeri, 94.08 ± 3.69% (94.81%). The group interval was 0.1%

The species of SAC have identical 16S rRNA gene while MLST and other house-keeping genes can be used to distinguish them from each other [16, 21]. Nevertheless, the MLST loci are just a small part of the genome. Here, an upgraded MLST method [34] was used to compare 1375 single copy core genes of SAC and S. simiae (used as an outgroup), which was previously considered as the closest taxa to S. aureus [35], were used to infer phylogeny. The Maximum Likelihood (ML) algorithm was used and a well-supported topology was obtained (Fig. 1). S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri clustered together (3.05% in distance based on amino acid sequence) and then clustered with S. aureus (4.42% in distance) in the core-genome tree, with perfect supporting bootstrap values (100%). S. simiae grouped far away from SAC with 21.34% in distance. This suggests that SAC members separated from each other much later than from other staphylococci, resulting in species divergence from a shared global core genome of a common ancestor.

Population structure

The program Structure version 2.3.4 [36], which implements a model-based clustering method, was used to infer the SAC population structure using genotype data of the 1596 single copy core genes. Structure Harvester was used for collating results generated by the program Structure [37]. The ΔK values, an ad hoc quantity related to the second order rate of change of the log probability of data with respect to the number of clusters, were calculated by Structure Harvester to detecting the number of K populations that best fit the data. A higher ΔK means a better fitness of the K value. The highest ΔK value (= 5840) emerged when K = 2 (Fig. 3). It indicated that staphylococcal strains investigated here fall into two distinct populations corresponding to S. aureus and S. argenteus, respectively (Fig. 3a). Six individuals of S. schweitzeri seemed to be hybrids between S. aureus (24–25%) and S. argenteus (75–76%). Five S. aureus strains, JKD6159, CA-347, H-EMRSA-15, JS395 and ST398/S0385, appeared to be hybrids among the S. aureus (red) and the S. argenteus (green) populations, with all individuals showing < 3.2% ancestry from S. argenteus (green) population. None of S. argenteus strains was found to be a hybrid. We also observed a higher ΔK value (= 579) when K = 3, and the three distinct populations corresponded to S. aureus, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri, respectively (Fig. 3a). None of S. schweitzeri strains was found to be a hybrid, but four strains of S. argenteus were hybrids showing < 1.5% ancestry from S. aureus (red) and S. schweitzeri (blue) populations. And five strains of S. aureus were hybrids showing < 2.3% ancestry from S. argenteus (green) and S. schweitzeri (blue) populations. These results suggested that S. argenteus had an independent population structure with rare recombination occurred between the core genomes of S. argenteus and the other two species during the speciation. Notably, S. schweitzeri was found to be hybrids when K = 2, and it was independent population when K = 3, which implied this species might be the descendant of an ancient hybrid between S. aureus and S. argenteus. Nevertheless, it was not further discussed in this study, considering limited genomes and knowledge on this species.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Population structure of Staphylococcus aureus complex. a The population memberships of the inspected species for a priori defined number of clusters K = 2–4 inferred by the Structure software. Each individual is represented by a thin vertical line divided into K colored segments that represent the individual’s estimated membership fractions in K clusters. Populations are labeled below the figure. b The detection of the true number of clusters inferred by the Structure software and set ΔK = mean(|L"(K)|)/ sd(L(K)) as a function of K. ΔK attains its highest value when K = 2

SAC species-specific genes

The species-specific genes (present or absent in all strains of one species) among SAC species were identified and shown in Table 1. We arbitrarily defined one gene is acquired in one species if the gene (including related pseudogene) is not found in the other species, and one gene is lost in one species if the gene is found in the other species. It shoud be a gene loss event if a pseudogene is found in one species and the related gene is present in the other species. Based on this definition, S. aureus acquired 24 unique genes while S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri acquired six and zero, respectively. S. aureus lost four genes while S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri lost 16 and ten, respectively. Some newly acquired genes were not required for growth under some conditions and became pseudogenes in some strains, for example, a gene encoding a protein N-acetyltransferase was acquired by but became pseudogenes in some strains (gene family 2832 in Table 1). Meanwhile, some genes were inherited from the common ancestor but were kept as pseudogenes in all strains of one species (Table 1). These pairwise species-specific genes and single species-specific genes were reannotated in COG, UniPro database, and KEGG Automatic Annotation Server [27, 38, 39], but most of their functions were unknown, especially those of S. aureus (Table 1). S. aureus and S. schweitzeri are different from S. argenteus in that S. argenteus lacks the crtOPQMN operon encoding the staphyloxanthin pathway (resulting in yellow colonies) [8, 16, 22]. Our data also indicated that white-colony forming S. aureus isolates might have resulted from inactivation of crtM, crtN, and crtO (Table 1) or a non-functional sigB operon [40]. Some species-specific genes are also prevalent in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) with low identities (< 90%), indicating that they might be inherited from the common staphylococcal ancestor, with some species of SAC losing them during speciation. The other species-specific genes, which were absent or present in a limited number of CoNS, probably were gained by HGT. Interestingly, all S. aureus-specific genes, most encoding small proteins (< 80 aa) with unknown functions, were absent in other staphylococci.
Table 1

Species-specific gene list of S. aureus complex (SAC)

Representitive sequence

Function

S. aureus a

S. argenteus a

S. schweitzeri a

Prevelence in CoNSb

Gene familyc

SAOUHSC_01325

Unknown

+

-#

-#

2409

SAOUHSC_01339

Unknown

+

2410

SAOUHSC_01834

Unknown

+

2411

SAOUHSC_01853

Unknown

+

2412

SAOUHSC_01883

Unknown

+

-#

-#

2413

SAOUHSC_02518

Unknown

+

2415

SAOUHSC_02657

Unknown

+

2416

SAOUHSC_02734

Unknown

+

2417

SAOUHSC_02890

Unknown

+

2418

SAOUHSC_02934

Unknown

+

2419

SAOUHSC_00208

Unknown

+

-#

2427

KQ76_RS08635

Unknown

+

-#

-#

2439

SAOUHSC_02533

Unknown

+

2442

KQ76_RS11720

Unknown

+

2443

KQ76_RS13490

Unknown

+

2446

KQ76_RS13520

Unknown

+

2447

SAOUHSC_02332

Unknown

+

-#

-#

2504

SAOUHSC_01003

Unknown

+*

2433

SAOUHSC_01357

Unknown

+*

2436

SAOUHSC_02705

Unknown

+*

2444

SAOUHSC_00238

Unknown

+*

2460

SAOUHSC_01603

Unknown

+*

2465

SAOUHSC_01770

Unknown

+*

2467

SAOUHSC_A02189

Unknown

+*

-#

-#

2472

SAOUHSC_01765

Unknown

+*

2495

KQ76_RS11950

Unknown

+*

2499

SAOUHSC_02572

Unknown

+*

2518

SACOL_RS11100

Unknown

+*

2779

KQ76_RS10810

Unknown

+*

3372

SAOUHSC_A02577

Unknown

+*

2603

SAMSHR1132_RS10135

Unknown

+

2769

SAMSHR1132_RS12985

NADP-dependent 3-hydroxy acid dehydrogenase

+

S. carnosus, S. condimenti (2)

2770

SAMSHR1132_RS12990

Fermentation-respiration switch protein FrsA

+

S. simiae, S. intermmedius (5)

2771

SAMSHR1132_RS13595

Unknown

+

S. delphini

2775

SAMSHR1132_RS03050

Uncharacterized protein YqcI

+*

S. warneri, S. epidermidis (2)

2814

SAMSHR1132_RS02070

Protein N-acetyltransferase, RimJ/RimL family

+*

S. capitis, S. warneri (13)

2832

SAMSHR1132_RS13575

Carboxylesterase type B

+

+

2599

SAMSHR1132_RS13600

Unknown

+

+

2600

SAMSHR1132_RS04625

Unknown

+

+

S. simiae

2774

ERS140266_RS13125

Unknown

+*

+

S. lugdunensis, S. intermedius (6)

2693

SAOUHSC_00229

Iron-sulfur cluster repair protein ScdA

+

+

S. simiae, S. epidermidis (22)

2276

SAOUHSC_00237

Methyltransferase domain protein UbiE

+

+

S. simiae, S. agnetis (11)

2277

SAOUHSC_00492

Unknown

+

+

2313

SAOUHSC_02880

4,4′-diaponeurosporenoate glycosyltransferase CrtQ

+

+

S. simiae, S. caprae (6)

2280

SAOUHSC_02881

Diapolycopene oxygenase CrtP

+

+

S. simiae, S. capitis (16)

2281

ERS140266_RS00255

Dehydrosqualene desaturase CrtN

+*

+

S. simiae, S. lugdunensis (17)

2294

ERS140266_RS00260

Dehydrosqualene synthase CrtM

+*

+

S. simiae, S. capitis (8)

2295

ERS140266_RS00275

Glycosyl-4,4′-diaponeurosporenoate acyltransferase CrtO

+*

+

2296

ERS140266_RS02765

Unknown

+*

+*

2488

ERS140266_RS07180

Unknown

+*

-#

+

3141

SAOUHSC_00355

Uncharacterized protein YxeA

+

+

2176

SAOUHSC_00867

Unknown

+

+

-#

2198

SAMSHR1132_RS12095

Probable amino acid-proton symporter YbeC

+*

+

S.simiae, S. caprae (20)

2192

SAMSHR1132_RS03980

Uncharacterized protein YwqG

+*

+

S. lugdunensis

2211

SAMSHR1132_RS02265

Unknown

+*

+

-#

2234

a,*,present as pseudogene in some strains; #, gene function lost, pseudogenes in all strains. bCoNS, coagulase negative staphylococci; number in parentheses indicates how many strains of the non-SAC Staphylococcus species harbor a homolog with both identity and percentage of matches > 50%. cgene family numbers come from the complete detailed gene list presented in Additional file 3: Table S1

Mobile genetic elements (MGE), agr and the capsular polysaccharide gene cluster

Temperate bacteriophages of the major Siphoviridae family play an important role in the pathogenicity of S. aureus by mediating the HGT of virulence factors [29]. The detection of genes encoding these prophages’ integrases, integrase groups Sa1–3, indicated the presence of the prophages in the genomes of S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri (Fig. 1), which take many virulence genes along with them [29]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains are of particular importance because they are a leading cause of nosocomial infections worldwide [41]. Methicillin resistance in MRSA is due to an acquisition of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) element. Evidence for the presence of SCCmec in S. argenteus has been reported previously [6, 23] and is further substantiated in this study (Additional file 3: Table S1; mecA, gene family 2509; ccrA, family 2525; ccrB/C, family 2583). The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) modules are adaptive immunity systems that are present in many archaea and bacteria [42], but are not very common in S. aureus (Fig. 1). Some strains of S. argenteus and S. aureus harbor a characteristic cas10/csm1 (gene family 2896 in Additional file 3: Table S1), and a subtype of CRISPR-Cas system III was present in them according to previous classification [42], especially strains of ST2250. Related genes of S. argenteus CRISPR-Cas system are a somewhat divergent from those of S. aureus strain JS395 (nucleotide sequence similarity 93.8%). However, further comparison with other S. aureus strains in NCBI showed that some S. aureus strains, such as M1169 (JEKD00000000) possessed a CRISPR-cas system with high similarity to that of S. argenteus (> 99%), suggesting that CRISPR loci can be mobilized and can transfer between different but closely related species.

The staphylococcal agr locus encodes a quorum sensing system (QS) that controls the expression of virulence and other accessory genes by a classical two-component signaling module, and it is distinct among staphylococcal species [43]. However, S. argenteus harbors S. aureus arg type I and IV while S. schweitzeri type I, II, and IV (Fig. 1). Further analysis suggested that agrA was highly conserved within species and had no common sequence differences among agr types. The agrB gene may suffer ancient HGT among species, especially that of S. schweitzeri agrI and ‘agrIII’ (maybe novel type), while the agrCD genes cluster primarily by arg type and secondarily by species (Additional file 7: Figure S6). The agrD alignment is shown in Fig. 4. It looks like that the evolution of agr locus among SAC species was polyphyletic. Based on this conjecture, the same agr types in different SAC species would have evolved independently. Gene agrD produces a ribosomal propeptide of which the middle section encodes the seven to nine residue autoinducing peptide (AIP) used as a QS signal molecule [43]. We found two possible novel types of agr most closely related to type III agr (Fig. 4). These novel agr types were present in three strains of S. argenteus (SJTU F20124, H115100079 and M051_MSHR) and one strain of S. schweitzeri (FSA090) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Comparisons of the predicted AgrD amino acid sequences from SAC species and agr types. Strains of the same agr type for each species have a same common sequence and are represented by a single sequence in this figure. Known autoinducing peptide (AIP) molecule sequences are marked in red rectangles. Potential novel AIP molecule sequences are marked in green rectangles

Like many other bacterial pathogens, S. aureus produces capsular polysaccharide (CP) that enhances its resistance to clearance by host innate immune defenses, with strains of serotypes 5 and 8 being the most among clinical isolates [44]. We compared the CP gene clusters among SAC members (Additional file 8: Figure S7). For most of the genes common region of the CP gene cluster (capA-P, see reference 4 for a review), S. aureus, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri were all phylogenetically distinct from each other. The exceptions were for the capM and capN genes where the phylogenetic trees showed that S. aureus and S. schweitzeri clustered together and HGT is likely to have occurred. In the serotype specific gene region (capHIJK), S. aureus was clearly divided into two groups consisting of strains of serotype 5 and 8, respectively. Strain S. schweitzeri FSA090 clustered with 14 S. argenteus strains in a group more closely related to S. aureus strains of serotype 5. Similarly, one strain S. argenteus, H115100079, clustered with five S. schweitzeri strains in a group most closely related to S. aureus strains of serotype 8. These results suggest that S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri may express their own serotype(s) that could have been derived from the ancestors of S. aureus serotype 5 and 8, respectively.

Virulence gene distribution

A hallmark of S. aureus infections is their frequent recurrence, which results from the manipulation of host immune responses by dozens of virulence genes [45]. Several virulence genes have been reported in S. argenteus and S. schweizeri, such as nuc m , pvl, sak, scn, seb, sec, selk, selq, and tsst [6, 11, 14, 18, 46], but the presence of many other potential virulence genes have not been tested for yet. Here, we performed a systematic investigation of genome sequences for the virulence gene distribution among SAC. The results indicated that (Additional file 9: Table S2): of 111 virulence genes previously reported in S. aureus, only five were not found in the genome sequences of any strain examined in this study, 92 (82.9%) were present in at least two SAC species, 85 (76.6%) in S. argenteus, and 86 (77.5%) in S. schweizeri. Of the 19 (17.1%) genes absent in S. argenteus or S. schweizeri, 11 encode enterotoxins or related superantigen-like proteins, and four encode leukocidins related proteins. Besides, of the 71 (64.0%) genes that were present in at least two species and at least three strains per species, 56 (50.5%) showed a significant difference in nucleotide sequence identity in a pairwise comparison of genes between species (p < 0.01). It is notable that nine genes (clfA-B, fnbA-B, sdrC-E, spa and coa) have repeat regions of uneven numbers in some strains, of which a subtyping method targeting spa gene (coding Staphylococcus Protein A) is widely used to characterize S. aureus isolates [47]. This could result in inaccurate identification of the genetic divergence based on these genes because of difficulties to align homologous nucleotide loci and a rapid change in the number of repeats within these regions. The principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to evaluate the differences in gene content and overall divergence of virulence genes among SAC members. The results suggested that the virulence gene content of each SAC species did not differ from each other while the divergence in core virulence gene is noteworthy (Fig. 5). In fact, most virulence genes were divergent at nucleotide sequence level among S. aureus, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri (please find the ML trees in Additional file 9: Table S2). However, HGT may occur in some non-MGE-associated virulence genes, such as nucA of S. aureus JS395.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Principal Component Analysis of SAC virulence genes. a PCA based on the presence (1) and absence (0) of 106 virulence genes; b PCA based on the mean distance of one strain against the rest 50 strains among 30 core virulence genes. Five genes, sed, see, sej, selr and etb, were excluded from the gene because they were not present in any strain. Species are marked using different colored dots: S. aureus (red), S. argenteus (green) and S. schweitzeri (blue). The cluster of dots representing S. argenteus ST2250 strains is indicated by the arrow. The genes that provide the best strain differentiation are shown in the biplot

Overall, the S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri pan-genome harbor all the virulence genes expressing the essential functions required for the pathogenicity in S. aureus. For examples, icaA-D encodes polysaccharide biosynthesis, which is critical to biofilm elaboration [48]; esaA-C, essA-C, and esxAB encodes the ESAT-6 system for secretion of exoenzymes or exotoxins into the extracellular milieu [49]; isdA-G and srtB code for heme uptake [50]. The genomic islands νSaα and νSaβ are also present in these two species, which carry many virulence determine genes [4]. Most of the virulence genes absent in the S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri pan-genome code for enterotoxins and other exotoxins (Additional file 9: Table S2), which are usually located in MGE and easily acquired or lost.

Geographic characteristics of S. argenteus ST2250

S. argenteus ST2250 was the most frequent lineage isolated, and strains of this ST have a broad geographic distribution [6, 8, 11, 1317]. The widespread distribution of S. argenteus ST2250 may have occurred long ago or may have occurred only recently. Signatures from core housekeeping genes and variable genes suggest that geographic barriers promote divergence among microbial populations in the environment [26, 51]. However, increased mobility of human populations may break these geographical barriers for pathogenic bacteria [52]. To clarify the question as to why S. argenteus ST2250 was well distributed, the core and variable genes were further analyzed. The core genome of ST2250 contained 2348 single copy gene families, of which the concatenated alignment had a length of 2.07 M bp and 1177 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). However, more than a half of the SNPs (653 bp) were due to indel variation located in the tandem repeat regions of three genes, including a hypothetic serine protease gene (gene family 1742 in Additional file 3: Table S1), a serine-rich adhesin for platelets gene (sraP, gene family 2098), and a hypothetic membrane anchored protein gene (gene family 2132). Due to the high rate of mutation, these loci were excluded from the analysis. The remaining 524 SNPs were used to infer maximum likelihood phylogenies (Fig. 6a). This phylogenetic tree matches the core gene nucleotide phylogeny (Fig. 1) very well with significant bootstrap support, but does not resolve a distinct population in each geographical region. Strains SH3, SJTU F21164 and F21224 were isolated from China (CN) and clustered with LBSA043 from Australia (AU) and 1299_SAUR from America (US). The presence/absence of gene content matrix based on variable genes also showed similar clustering (Fig. 6b). Notably, the number of SNPs was very small compared with S. aureus ST239 lineage, which were also distributed intercontinentally and from which 4310 SNPs were found among the isolates from different countries [52]. By comparison, only 382 VR and UQ gene families were identified in the S. argenteus pan-genome, of which strain LSBA043 was present in the least gene families (43) and strain SH3 in the most (167). All 382 gene families were annotated by ACLAME web site [53] and homologues of 247 were reported to be located in MGE. These results demonstrated that isolates of S. argenteus ST2250 lineage were very closely related and might have spread internationally by human hosts.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Maximum likelihood phylogenies of nine S. argenteus ST2250 genomes. Phylogenies were inferred from (a) the concatenated SNP-containing genes of core genome and (b) a presence/absence of gene content matrix. Numbers near each node correspond to bootstrap values in percentage of 1000 replications and the asterisk (*) indicates a bootstrap value of 100%. Geographical origins of the strains are marked on the branches: US, United States; AU, Australia; CN, China

Discussion

Isolates of S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri were originally classified as parts of lineages of S. aureus because they share many phenotype and genotype properties [8, 16]. However, when using some molecular subtyping methods, considerable difficulties were observed, such as PCR amplification of aroE and glpf in MLST [8], and nucA identification of S. schweitzeri [16]. Few large-scale virulence gene investigations on S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri have been reported, and studies relying on PCR amplification of virulence targets should be regarded with skepticism because many S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri virulence genes are significantly divergent from those in S. aureus (Additional file 9: Table S2). Nonetheless, there is a great deal of genetic relatedness among SAC species, and homologous genes have been leveraged to develop many broadly recognized descriptive indexes among SAC, such as MLST, SCCmec, spa, agr, and prophage typing. Obviously, S. aureus, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri are more closely related to each other than they are to other Staphylococcus species, of which these descriptive indexes are very distinct, for example, agr and prophage types of SAC never reported to be present in other staphylococci [29, 43]. Therefore, as previously suggested [16], the term SAC can be used to describe the closely related group of species including S. aureus, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri.

Taking SAC as a starting point, many descriptions should be re-examined, for example, MRSA could refer to any SAC isolate harboring a SCCmec element. There is also a need to unify other descriptive indexes as well as diagnostic and typing methods, especially virulence gene detection and molecular subtyping. For example, we recently reported redesigned aroE and glpf primers for MLST of SAC and proposed a simple PCR method for identification and differentiation of SAC isolates [8]. The gene family list generated in the current study will also accelerate the development of uniform methods for the detection of many virulence genes (Additional file 3: Table S1; Additional file 9: Table S2). However, some virulence genes (especially core genes) may evolve quickly, with several very divergent subtypes occurring among or within SAC species. For example, alleles of S. schweitzeri nuc2 formed two distant clades, one closely related to S. aureus and the other closely to S. argenteus. Furthermore, divergent subtypes appear in many virulence genes of S. aureus and S. schweitzeri (note the high intraspecific average distance in Additional file 9: Table S2). The nuc M recently identified in S. schweitzeri [46] is a divergent homolog of the S. aureus nucA, and S. argenteus harbors an additional nucA variant. Thus, the current nomenclature of nuc M does not properly reflect its relationships to nucA (ortholog) and nuc2 (paralog). Therefore, much effort needs to be devoted to properly name genes among species of SAC.

We demonstrated here that, S. schweitzeri and S. argenteus have a similar distance to S. aureus, and that they are much closer to each other than to S. aureus (Fig. 2; ML trees in Additional file 9: Table S2). The relationships of these two species to S. aureus were reflected by whole genome ANI and DNA–DNA hybridization analysis in previous study [16]. Therefore, the most recent common ancestor of all three was earlier than that of S. schweitzeri and S. argenteus. However, this relationship is in contrast to host association for SAC infection. That is, S. aureus and S. argenteus are commonly associated with human disease, while S. schweitzeri rarely. S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri have lower GC content compared to S. aureus, which may be the result of mutation and selection involving multiple factors, such as the environment, symbiotic lifestyle and aerobiosis [54]. Additionally, S. argenteus shows a low occurrence in many regions where it has been reported [6, 8, 13]. It seems unlikely that S. argenteus emerged as a human pathogen and can escape clinical monitoring until the last decade. It is more likely that S. argenteus may have originally been a different ecotype from S. aureus and a host adaption occurred to allow it to infect humans, which is also implied by a very recent report [55]. Nonethelessly, we can not deny another possibility that S. argenteus have been previously mistaken as S. aureus and failed to spread and draw enough attention.

Although MRSA of S. argenteus was predominant in community-acquired isolates in some regions [23], S. argenteus showed resistances to fewer antimicrobials than is typical in S. aureus [12, 14]. Thus it seems that there is currently no need to modify therapeutic regimes for S. aureus and S. argenteus infections. Nevertheless, genes responsible for antimicrobial resistance are often located in MGEs and easily acquired, enhancement of S. argenteus antimicrobial resistance may be just a matter of time and the rapid international spread of S. aureus [52], and S. argenteus (this study) may aggravate the situation. In this study, it was suggested that S. argenteus harbors all the core virulence genes of S. aureus (Additional file 9: Table S2), but the expression and regulations of most of these virulence factors have not yet been characterized. In addition, many species-specific genes were recognized that presently have unknown functions (Table 1). The population structure analysis (Fig. 3) suggested distinct evolution background of the core genome between S. aureus and S. argenteus. These differences may result in different mechanisms of virulence to S. argenteus and S. aureus and different invasiveness between S. schweitzeri and S. aureus, which will impact the development of approaches to targeted drug design and therapeutic regimens in the post-antibiotic era [56]. For example, it was recently shown that diapophytoene desaturase (CrtN, the second enzyme of the staphyloxanthin biosynthesis pathway) is a potential target for drug development against S. aureus infections [57], but, to date, this drug targets are absent in all S. argenteus isolates. The future development of targeted drug therapies and diagnostic tests that distinguish these two species should allow for improved patient outcomes.

S. argenteus was found to possess most of the virulence genes of S. aureus (Fig. 5; Additional file 9: Table S2), which implied a pathogenic potential similar to S. aureus at a genomic level, and the international spread of S. argenteus ST2250, most likely anthropogenically, may worsen the situation. Furthermore, species-specific genes among SAC members recognized in this study may be responsible for the different ecotypes. Further investigation on the function of these unique gene products will help determine their contribution to speciation and ecotype. It is fascinating that the diversity of the agr locus indicates a polyphyletic relationship among SAC, suggesting that each species of SAC was derived from more than one common ancestor [58]. However, the number of available genome sequences for S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri are still very limited and their diversity is unclear, so it was not discussed in this study.

Conclusions

We proposed to use the term SAC to cover S. aureus, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri to indicate their close relationships. Considering difficulties in subtyping and virulence gene detecting using the methods designed for S. aureus, much effort needs to be devoted to developing universal and robust methods among SAC species. It is found in this study that S. argenteus harbored most virulence genes of S. aureus and had spread internationally, which suggested that S. argenteus may have a similar pathogenic potential as S. aureus. However, genomic divergence was also observed, especially regions of virulence genes, which draw necessary to distinguish S. argenteus from S. aureus in routine practice. Data from this study and previous ones draws a hypothesis that S. argenteus should have originally been a different ecotype from S. aureus and a host adaption occurred to allow it to infect humans. Finally, the clinical importance of S. argenteus underscores the need for broader genomic epidemiological investigations. Such studies would be expected to provide clarification on the origin of S. argenteus and the evolution of its infectivity and pathogenicity. Additional microbiological studies are also needed to determine the species environmental niche and further elaborate mechanisms of pathogenicity.

Methods

Strains and genomes

The five S. argenteus strains were isolated from China and characterized previously [8]. The genomes were sequenced using a MiSeq 300PE sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at GENEWIZ (Suzhou, China). Velvet version 1.2.10 [59], SSPACE version 3.0 [60], and GapFiller version 1–10 [61] software packages were used for genome assembly. Annotation was performed by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/). An additional 46 genomes, including ten of S. argenteus, six of S. schweitzeri, and 30 of S. aureus, were obtained from the NCBI public database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/refseq/bacteria/Staphylococcus_aureus/) and Whole Genome Shotgun (WGS) sequencing projects databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/wgs/) in May 2016. The genomic data was generated from the genome sequences and related files from NCBI. The STs were assigned by the public MLST database of S. aureus (http://saureus.mlst.net/), using the seven homologous fragments from the genome sequences.

Assignment of homologous gene families

The deduced amino acid sequences of all CDSs from the 51 genomes were adjusted to a prescribed format and were grouped into homologous gene families using OrthoMCL version 2.0.9 [62] based on sequence similarity. The BLAST reciprocal best hit algorithm [63] was employed with a 70% match cutoff and 1e-5 e-value cutoff, and Markov Cluster Algorithms (MCL) [64] were applied with an inflation index of 1.5.

To account for pseudogenes and cases where genes were missed in the gene-calling step, BLAST (blast + package, version 2.2.29) [65] was used to align all genes of one family (assigned by OrthoMCL) against the genome sequence of the strains in which the family was not previously identified. If an alignment with at least 90% nucleotide sequence identity covering at least 90% of the sequence length was detected in the genome, the gene/pseudogene was considered present and the related location was recorded in the complete homologous gene families list using a different font (Additional file 3: Table S1). This produced a more robust pan-genome outcome and accommodated the differences in the gene prediction. For example, 137 and 140 genes were newly detected in genomes of strains S. aureus DAR4 and RKI4, respectively. The sizes of the four components of the pan-genome (CR, CV, VR and UQ) were simulated as has been done in previous studies [66] using Perl scripts. For example, pan-genome analysis of SAC was conducted starting from one single genome to 51 genomes. Genomes were added 1000 times in a randomized order without replacement for each fixed number of genomes, and the gene reservoir was accumulated. The functional category of each homologous gene family was determined by using the BLAST program locally or on the web server against the Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COGs), UniProt, KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS), and ACLAME database [27, 38, 39, 53], with 50% identity cutoff and 1e-5 e-value.

Phylogenetic analysis and bANI

To determine the phylogenetic relationships of SAC members based on genomic data, both supermatrix and gene content methods were applied to infer phylogenetic trees. For the supermatrix approach, 1375 single-copy orthologous genes shared by all 51 SAC strains and S. simiae CCM 7213 (AEUN00000000.1) were selected from the homologous gene families. For each orthologous family, protein sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega version 1.2.1 [67] and the resulting alignments of individual proteins were concatenated to infer the phylogeny using the maximum likelihood algorithm (ML) in RAxML version 8.1.2 [68] under the substitution matrix JTTDCMUT which was selected by the Perl script in the software package. The gene content matrix was parsed for the gene content method using a phyletic pattern indicating the presence (1) or absence (0) of the respective non-core genes of all strains. The Neighbor-Joining distance between pairwise genomes was calculated based on the gene content matrix to reconstruct the gene content dendrogram using package Splits Tree version 4.13.1 [69].

The SNPs among S. argenteus ST2250 strains were detected, extracted and concatenated from nucleotide sequence alignments of 2348 orthologous gene families using Perl scripts. The maximum likelihood algorithm (ML) in RAxML version 8.1.2 [68] was used to infer the phylogeny under the substitution matrix GTR. The Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic trees of 16 genes of capsular polysaccharide (CP) were constructed based on amino acid sequence using the Poisson correction method in MEGA6 [70]. The bANI tests were simulated as done in previous studies [26]. Briefly, the core genes’ nucleotide sequences of each of the genomes were extracted and used in BLAST against the other whole genome sequences, and all the identity values were grouped into six groups, including three intraspecific groups and three interspecific groups. Then the data of each group were counted and presented as percentages in a histogram.

Population structure

To investigate the population structure of the SAC and the relationships among species groups, the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) based program Structure version 2.3.4 [36] was used to cluster individuals into populations. Initially, we treated core genes as MLST sequence data from Extended FASTA Format into the Structure Format using xmfa2struct (available from http://www.xavierdidelot.xtreemhost.com/clonalframe.htm). The admixture ancestry model with the assumption of correlated allele frequencies among populations was used. We ran the simulation five times under a burn-in period of 10,000 and a run length of 20,000 MCMC, without prior population information. K values from one to seven were tested to identify the best K value, represented by the highest value of K and ΔK [36]. Results of the five independent runs were averaged for each K value was used to determine the most likely model, i.e., the one with the highest likelihood, and they were subsequently plotted using Distruct version 1.1 [71]. The identification of the best K was evaluated following the ΔK-method through local program Structure Harvester [37].

Species-specific genes and virulence genes

Species-specific genes were inferred from the homologous gene families list (Additional file 3: Table S1) and reanalyzed against the missing species genome using BLAST algorithm to confirm that they were lost or became pseudogenes. The 111 virulence genes were identified and collected from a virulence factor database (VRprofile, http://bioinfo-mml.sjtu.edu.cn/VRprofile/) [72] and a recent review of the literature [45]. Reference sequences of these genes were used with BLAST algorithm to find the homologous gene families presented in Additional file 3: Table S1. Some virulence genes, which have a paralogous relationship and may be assigned to one gene family by OrthoMcl software (Additional file 9: Table S2), were separated for subsequent analysis. The pairwise k-tuple distance among each of these virulence genes was calculated and outputted from the Clustal Omega (version 1.2.1) created alignment [67]. The distance matrix was then parsed using Perl script. Principal component analysis (PCA) were performed using software Past software version 3.13 (http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/), and other statistical analyses were performed using the R package (version 3.1.1, http://www.R-project.org).

Abbreviations

AIP: 

Autoinducing peptide

AU: 

Australia

bANI: 

Average nucleotide identities based on BLAST

CA-MRSA: 

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus

CC: 

Coding sequence

CDS: 

Clonal complex

CN: 

China

COG: 

Cluster of Orthologous Groups

CoNS: 

Coagulase-negative staphylococci

CP: 

Capsular polysaccharide

CR: 

Core genes

CRISPR-Cas: 

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins

CrtN: 

Diapophytoene desaturases

CV: 

Core variable genes

HGT: 

Horizontal gene transfer

KAAS: 

KEGG Automatic Annotation Server

MCL: 

Markov Cluster Algorithms

MCMC: 

Markov chain Monte Carlo

MGE: 

Mobile genetic elements

ML: 

Maximum Likelihood

MLST: 

Multilocus sequence typing

MRSA: 

Methicillin-resistant S. aureus

PCA: 

Principal component analysis

PVL: 

Panton-Valentine leukocidin

QS: 

Quorum sensing system

SAC: 

S. aureus complex

SCCmec

Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

SRA: 

Sequence Read Archive

ST: 

Sequence type

UQ: 

Unique gene

US: 

United States of America

VR: 

Variable genes

WGS: 

Whole Genome Shotgun

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Xiangyu Deng and Hong-Yu Ou for their valuable comments on the manuscript. We would also like to thank Xiao-Yang Gao and Ji-Cheng Yao for their helps on bioinformatics analysis.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2016YFD0401102) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31671943). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, or in the writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Most of the data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its Additional files. The genome datasets of five S. argenteus strains generated during the current study are available in the GenBank and NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, under accession numbers: SJTU F20124, LWAN00000000 and SRP072812; F20419, LWAO00000000 and SRP072817; F21164, LWAP00000000 and SRP072819; F21224, LWAQ00000000 and SRP072820; F21285, LWAR00000000 and SRP072821. All the phylogenetic data generated in this study were deposited in TreeBASE database under the accession URL: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S21534. Other datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript. DFZ and XS conceived and designed the study. DFZ, XYZ, JZ, YC and CS performed the experiments and data analyses. DFZ finalised the data. DFZ, GCP and XS wrote the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. No ethics approval is required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MOST-USDA Joint Research Center for Food Safety, School of Agriculture and Biology & State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China
(2)
Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China
(3)
USDA-MOST Joint Research Center for Food Safety & Molecular Characterization of Foodborne Pathogens Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, PA 19038, USA
(4)
Present address: No. 800 Dongchuan RD. Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, China

References

  1. Schleifer KH, Bell JA. Staphylococcus Rosenbach 1884, 18AL (nom. Cons. Opin. 17 Jud. Comm. 1958, 153.) In: De VP, editor. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology second edition, vol. Three, 2009. second ed. Heidelberg: Springer. p. 392–421.Google Scholar
  2. Wertheim HFL, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, Nouwen JL. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus Aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(12):751–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. DeLeo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF. Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2010;375(9725):1557–68.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Argudin MA, Mendoza MC, Rodicio MR. Food poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins. Toxins. 2010;2(7):1751–U1342.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Okuma K, Iwakawa K, Turnidge JD, Grubb WB, Bell JM, O'Brien FG, Coombs GW, Pearman JW, Tenover FC, Kapi M, et al. Dissemination of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in the community. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(11):4289–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Argudin MA, Dodemont M, Vandendriessche S, Rottiers S, Tribes C, Roisin S, de Mendonca R, Nonhoff C, Deplano A, Denis O. Low occurrence of the new species Staphylococcus argenteus in a Staphylococcus aureus collection of human isolates from Belgium. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(6):1017–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ruimy R, Armand-Lefevre L, Barbier F, Ruppe E, Cocojaru R, Mesli Y, Maiga A, Benkalfat M, Benchouk S, Hassaine H, et al. Comparisons between geographically diverse samples of carried Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(18):5577–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang DF, Xu X, Song Q, Bai Y, Zhang Y, Song M, Shi C, Shi X. Identification of Staphylococcus argenteus in eastern China based on a nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) gene. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:1113–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ritchie SR, Thomas MG, Rainey PB. The genetic structure of Staphylococcus aureus populations from the Southwest Pacific. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e100300.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Jenney A, Holt D, Ritika R, Southwell P, Pravin S, Buadromo E, Carapetis J, Tong S, Steer A. The clinical and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infections in Fiji. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:160.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Dupieux C, Blonde R, Bouchiat C, Meugnier H, Bes M, Laurent S, Vandenesch F, Laurent F, Tristan A. Community-acquired infections due to Staphylococcus argenteus lineage isolates harbouring the Panton-valentine leucocidin, France, 2014. Eur Secur. 2015;20(23):6–8.Google Scholar
  12. Ruimy R, Angebault C, Djossou F, Dupont C, Epelboin L, Jarraud S, Armand Lefevre L, Bes M, Lixandru BE, Bertine M, et al. Are host genetics the predominant determinant of persistent nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage in humans? J Infect Dis. 2010;202(6):924–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Thaipadungpanit J, Amornchai P, Nickerson EK, Wongsuvan G, Wuthiekanun V, Limmathurotsakul D, Peacock SJ. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus argenteus infections in Thailand. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(3):1005–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Chantratita N, Wikraiphat C, Tandhavanant S, Wongsuvan G, Ariyaprasert P, Suntornsut P, Thaipadungpanit J, Teerawattanasook N, Jutrakul Y, Srisurat N, et al. Comparison of community-onset Staphylococcus argenteus and Staphylococcus aureus sepsis in Thailand: a prospective multicentre observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(5):458. e11-e19Google Scholar
  15. Monecke S, Stieber B, Roberts R, Akpaka PE, Slickers P, Ehricht R. Population structure of Staphylococcus aureus from Trinidad & Tobago. PLoS One.2014;9(2): e89120.Google Scholar
  16. Tong SY, Schaumburg F, Ellington MJ, Corander J, Pichon B, Leendertz F, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, Holt DC, Peters G, et al. Novel staphylococcal species that form part of a Staphylococcus aureus-Related Complex: the non-pigmented Staphylococcus argenteus sp. nov. and the non-human primate-associated Staphylococcus schweitzeri sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:15–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Roach DJ, Burton JN, Lee C, Stackhouse B, Butler-Wu SM, Cookson BT, Shendure J, Salipante SJ. A year of infection in the intensive care unit: prospective whole genome sequencing of bacterial clinical isolates reveals cryptic transmissions and novel microbiota. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(7):e1005413.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Schaumburg F, Pauly M, Anoh E, Mossoun A, Wiersma L, Schubert G, Flammen A, Alabi AS, Muyembe-Tamfum JJ, Grobusch MP, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Complex from animals and humans in three remote African regions. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(4):345. e341-348View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schaumburg F, Alabi AS, Kock R, Mellmann A, Kremsner PG, Boesch C, Becker K, Leendertz FH, Peters G. Highly divergent Staphylococcus Aureus isolates from African non-human primates. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012;4(1):141–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Akobi B, Aboderin O, Sasaki T, Shittu A. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from faecal samples of the straw-Coloured fruit bat (Eidolon helvum) in Obafemi Awolowo university (OAU), Nigeria. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:279.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ng JWS, Holt DC, Lilliebridge RA, Stephens AJ, Huygens F, Tong SYC, Currie BJ, Giffard PM. Phylogenetically distinct Staphylococcus aureus lineage prevalent among indigenous communities in northern Australia. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(7):2295–300.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Tong SYC, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Thaden JT, Whitney AR, Yang SJ, Mishra NN, Rude T, Lilliebridge RA, Selim MA, Ahn SH, et al. Virulence of endemic nonpigmented northern Australian Staphylococcus aureus clone (Clonal complex 75, S-argenteus) is not augmented by Staphyloxanthin. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(3):520–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. McDonald M, Dougall A, Holt D, Huygens F, Oppedisano F, Giffard PM, Inman-Bamber J, Stephens AJ, Towers R, Carapetis JR, et al. Use of a single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping system to demonstrate the unique epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in remote aboriginal communities. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(10):3720–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Ngoa UA, Schaumburg F, Adegnika AA, Kosters K, Moller T, Fernandes JF, Alabi A, Issifou S, Becker K, Grobusch MP, et al. Epidemiology and population structure of Staphylococcus Aureus in various population groups from a rural and semi urban area in Gabon, Central Africa. Acta Trop. 2012;124(1):42–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Medini D, Donati C, Tettelin H, Masignani V, Rappuoli R. The microbial pan-genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005;15(6):589–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Reno ML, Held NL, Fields CJ, Burke PV, Whitaker RJ: Biogeography of the Sulfolobus islandicus pangenome. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106(44):18873-18873.Google Scholar
  27. Galperin MY, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D261–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas CM, Nielsen KM. Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(9):711–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Goerke C, Pantucek R, Holtfreter S, Schulte B, Zink M, Grumann D, Broker BM, Doskar J, Wolz C. Diversity of prophages in dominant Staphylococcus aureus clonal lineages. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(11):3462–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Fraser C, Alm EJ, Polz MF, Spratt BG, Hanage WP. The bacterial species challenge: making sense of genetic and ecological diversity. Science. 2009;323(5915):741–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Achtman M, Wagner M. Microbial diversity and the genetic nature of microbial species. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6(6):431–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fraser C, Hanage WP, Spratt BG. Recombination and the nature of bacterial speciation. Science. 2007;315(5811):476–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Richter M, Rossello-Mora R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(45):19126–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Maiden MCJ, van Rensburg MJJ, Bray JE, Earle SG, Ford SA, Jolley KA, McCarthy ND. MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(10):728–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Pantucek R, Sedlacek I, Petras P, Koukalova D, Svec P, Stetina V, Vancanneyt M, Chrastinova L, Vokurkova J, Ruzickova V, et al. Staphylococcus simiae sp. nov., isolated from south American squirrel monkeys. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:1953–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Earl DA, Vonholdt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4(2):359–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. UniProt C. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D204–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W182–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Kullik I, Giachino P, Fuchs T. Deletion of the alternative sigma factor sigmaB in Staphylococcus aureus reveals its function as a global regulator of virulence genes. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(18):4814–20.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome E. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 2009;53(12):4961–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Alkhnbashi OS, Costa F, Shah SA, Saunders SJ, Barrangou R, Brouns SJ, Charpentier E, Haft DH, et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Reviews Microbiol. 2015;13(11):722–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Thoendel M, Kavanaugh JS, Flack CE, Horswill AR: Peptide signaling in the staphylococci. Chem Rev 2011, 111(1):117-151.Google Scholar
  44. O'Riordan K, Lee JC. Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(1):218–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Thammavongsa V, Kim HK, Missiakas D, Schneewind O. Staphylococcal manipulation of host immune responses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(9):529–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Schaumburg F, Pauly M, Schubert G, Shittu A, Tong S, Leendertz F, Peters G, Becker K. Characterization of a novel thermostable nuclease homolog (NucM) in a highly divergent Staphylococcus aureus clade. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(11):4036–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Hallin M, Friedrich AW, Struelens MJ. Spa typing for epidemiological surveillance of Staphylococcus Aureus. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;551:189–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gotz F. Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43(6):1367–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Burts ML, Williams WA, DeBord K, Missiakas DM. EsxA and EsxB are secreted by an ESAT-6-like system that is required for the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(4):1169–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Skaar EP, Schneewind O. Iron-regulated surface determinants (Isd) of Staphylococcus aureus: stealing iron from heme. Microbes Infect. 2004;6(4):390–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitaker RJ, Grogan DW, Taylor JW. Geographic barriers isolate endemic populations of hyperthermophilic archaea. Science. 2003;301(5635):976–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Harris SR, Feil EJ, Holden MT, Quail MA, Nickerson EK, Chantratita N, Gardete S, Tavares A, Day N, Lindsay JA, et al. Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science. 2010;327(5964):469–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Leplae R, Lima-Mendez G, Toussaint A. ACLAME: a CLAssification of mobile genetic elements, update 2010. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D57–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hildebrand F, Meyer A, Eyre-Walker A. Evidence of selection upon genomic GC-content in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 2010:6(9).Google Scholar
  55. Moradigaravand D, Jamrozy D, Mostowy R, Anderson A, Nickerson EK, Thaipadungpanit J, Wuthiekanun V, Limmathurotsakul D, Tandhavanant S, Wikraiphat C, et al. Evolution of the Staphylococcus argenteus ST2250 clone in northeastern Thailand is linked with the Acquisition of Livestock-Associated Staphylococcal Genes. MBio. 2017;8(4):e00802–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Rasko DA, Sperandio V. Anti-virulence strategies to combat bacteria-mediated disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(2):117–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Chen F, Di H, Wang Y, Cao Q, Xu B, Zhang X, Yang N, Liu G, Yang CG, Xu Y, et al. Small-molecule targeting of a diapophytoene desaturase inhibits S. aureus virulence. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12(3):174–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rossello-Mora R, Amann R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001;25(1):39–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18(5):821–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(4):578–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Nadalin F, Vezzi F, Policriti A. GapFiller: a de novo assembly approach to fill the gap within paired reads. BMC bioinformatics. 2012;13 Suppl 14:S8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13(9):2178–89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Latimer K. Choosing BLAST options for better detection of orthologs as reciprocal best hits. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(3):319–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(7):1575–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC bioinformatics. 2009;10:421.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Touchon M, Hoede C, Tenaillon O, Barbe V, Baeriswyl S, Bidet P, Bingen E, Bonacorsi S, Bouchier C, Bouvet O, et al. Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia coli species results in highly diverse adaptive paths. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(1):e1000344.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Soding J, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(2):254–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosenberg NA. DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4(1):137–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Li J, Tai C, Deng Z, Zhong W, He Y, Ou HY. VRprofile: gene-cluster-detection-based profiling of virulence and antibiotic resistance traits encoded within genome sequences of pathogenic bacteria. Brief Bioinform. 2017; 10.1093/bib/bbw141.

Copyright

Advertisement