Open Access

Carbohydrate-active enzymes in Trichoderma harzianum: a bioinformatic analysis bioprospecting for key enzymes for the biofuels industry

  • Jaire Alves Ferreira Filho1, 2,
  • Maria Augusta Crivelente Horta1,
  • Lilian Luzia Beloti1,
  • Clelton Aparecido dos Santos1 and
  • Anete Pereira de Souza1, 3Email author
BMC Genomics201718:779

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4181-9

Received: 28 May 2017

Accepted: 5 October 2017

Published: 12 October 2017

Abstract

Background

Trichoderma harzianum is used in biotechnology applications due to its ability to produce powerful enzymes for the conversion of lignocellulosic substrates into soluble sugars. Active enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism are defined as carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), and the most abundant family in the CAZy database is the glycoside hydrolases. The enzymes of this family play a fundamental role in the decomposition of plant biomass.

Results

In this study, the CAZymes of T. harzianum were identified and classified using bioinformatic approaches after which the expression profiles of all annotated CAZymes were assessed via RNA-Seq, and a phylogenetic analysis was performed. A total of 430 CAZymes (3.7% of the total proteins for this organism) were annotated in T. harzianum, including 259 glycoside hydrolases (GHs), 101 glycosyl transferases (GTs), 6 polysaccharide lyases (PLs), 22 carbohydrate esterases (CEs), 42 auxiliary activities (AAs) and 46 carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs). Among the identified T. harzianum CAZymes, 47% were predicted to harbor a signal peptide sequence and were therefore classified as secreted proteins. The GH families were the CAZyme class with the greatest number of expressed genes, including GH18 (23 genes), GH3 (17 genes), GH16 (16 genes), GH2 (13 genes) and GH5 (12 genes). A phylogenetic analysis of the proteins in the AA9/GH61, CE5 and GH55 families showed high functional variation among the proteins.

Conclusions

Identifying the main proteins used by T. harzianum for biomass degradation can ensure new advances in the biofuel production field. Herein, we annotated and characterized the expression levels of all of the CAZymes from T. harzianum, which may contribute to future studies focusing on the functional and structural characterization of the identified proteins.

Keywords

Trichoderma harzianum CAZymes Glycoside hydrolases Phylogeny RNA-Seq Cellulases

Background

Brazil harbors a highly diverse fungal community and many of these species are of great biotechnological relevance [1]. Fungal species produce important enzyme classes that play a key role in the decomposition of organic materials, particularly those derived from plants. These enzymes can be applied in various industrial areas [2], such as the production of biofuels from vegetal biomass. Cellulose is a major component of the cell wall of plants. This structural polysaccharide is a complex polymer, and only a specific set of enzymes can breakdown cellulose [3]. Many of these enzymes are produced by fungi, such as those of the genera Aspergillus, Neurospora and Trichoderma.

Trichoderma harzianum is a filamentous fungus [4] and a recognized biocontrol agent that is effective against phytopathogenic fungi [5]. T. reesei is the best-studied cellulolytic fungus for which there are available resolved crystallographic structures among enzymes of the cellulolytic complex [6, 7]. However, T. harzianum also produces enzymes capable of hydrolyzing and metabolizing the cellulose present in plant biomass [8, 9].

Studies on T. harzianum strains show that they are able to produce a cellulolytic complex with higher beta-glucosidase activity than that shown by T. reesei [8, 10]. Furthermore, significant endoglucanase, xylanase and cellobiohydrolase activities have also been detected [11]. Although the enzymes produced by T. harzianum harbor great biotechnological potential, most studies in this species have been directed toward the area of biological control [12, 13]. Thus, there is a shortage of studies exploring genomic data related to its capacity to degrade biomass and the regulation and expression of the genes involved in biodegradation.

Enzymes active in carbohydrate metabolism are defined in the international literature as carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) [14]. The families of enzymes that compose this group can be found in the CAZy database (www.cazy.org). The protein families in the CAZy database are grouped into five different classes, as follows: glycoside hydrolases (GHs); glycosyl transferases (GTs); polysaccharide lyases (LPs); carbohydrate esterases (CEs); and auxiliary activities (AAs). The most abundant family in the CAZy database is the GHs; the enzymes in this family play a fundamental role in the decomposition of plant biomass and have therefore been the target of several studies on enzymatic hydrolysis [15, 16]. Recent studies have revealed the importance of the AA family as aids in the process of cellulose degradation [17].

In this work, we used the available structural genomic data from T. harzianum T6776 [18] to perform a complete functional annotation of the CAZyme content. In addition, we employed the data generated from a previous RNA-Seq study [19] to analyze the expression of this set of genes. To investigate the functional diversity of these proteins, phylogenetic analyses of the AA9/GH61, CE5 and GH55 families were performed. Based on our results, we delineated specific CAZyme clusters that act on biomass substrates for depolymerization. These data should contribute to the search for more efficient enzymatic systems for the biomass degradation process and for the functional and heterologous expression of important proteins with hydrolytic activity.

Methods

Data sources

The nucleotide and protein sequences of T. harzianum T6776 - Th (PRJNA252551), T. reesei RUT C-30 - Tr (PRJNA207855), T. atroviride IMI 206040 - Ta (PRJNA19867) and T. virens Gv29–8 - Tv (PRJNA19983) were downloaded from the NCBI database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The T. harzianum IOC-3844 RNA-Seq reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA175485.

Functional annotation of CAZymes

Information derived from the CAZy database [14] was downloaded for each CAZyme family (www.cazy.org). The protein sequences of T. harzianum, T. reesei, T. atroviride and T. virens were used as queries in BLASTp (Basic local alignment search tool) searches against the locally built CAZy BLAST database. Only blast matches showing an e-value less than 10−11, identity greater than 30% and queries covering greater than 70% of the sequence length were retained and classified according CAZyme catalytic group as GHs, GTs, PLs, CEs, CBMs or AAs (Additional files 1, 2, 3 and 4).

Annotations were performed with Blast2Go [20] using BLASTx. All of the protein sequences of the T. harzianum CAZymes were functionally annotated based on homology. The T. harzianum CAZymes were further aligned to the PFAM profiles [21] of the families through a search of the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) of NCBI [22] and a search against the PFAM v28.0 database. InterPro protein domains were predicted using InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/) [23].

Signal peptides of the T. harzianum CAZymes were predicted using SignalP v.4.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) [24] with default parameters, and all of the proteins with signal peptides were analyzed for the presence of transmembrane domains using the web server TMHMM v.2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) [25] with default parameters. TargetP v.1.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/) [26] with the following parameters: organism group – “Non-plant” and cutoffs – default, and Cello v.2.5 (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/) [27] with default parameters, were employed for the prediction of subcellular localization.

Transcriptional analysis of T. harzianum CAZymes

The expression levels of the T. harzianum CAZymes were analyzed using RNA-Seq data obtained from a previous study [19] in which the transcripts were obtained following growth of the fungus on three different carbon sources, lactose (LAC), cellulose (CEL), and delignified sugarcane bagasse (DSB), to induce mycelial growth. The quality control of the reads were as follows: quality limit - 0.03; ambiguous limit - 2; minimum final number of nucleotides in read - 65; and phred scale - 15 [19].

The reads from the RNA-Seq library were mapped against the T. harzianum CAZymes using the CLC Genomics Workbench (CLC bio – v9.0; Finlandsgade, Dk) [28] with the following parameters: mapping settings (minimum length fraction = 0.9, minimum similarity fraction = 0.8, and maximum number of hits for a read = 15) and paired settings (minimum distance = 180 and maximum distance = 250, including the broken pairs counting scheme). The expression values were expressed in reads per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads (RPKM) and the normalized value for each sample was calculated in transcripts per million (TPM) [29] according to the following formula:

$$ {\boldsymbol{TPM}}_{\boldsymbol{i}}=\left[\frac{{\boldsymbol{RPKM}}_{\boldsymbol{i}}}{\sum_{\boldsymbol{j}}{\boldsymbol{RPKM}}_{\boldsymbol{j}}}\right]\times {10}^6 $$

where RPKM i is the expression value for each gene in a sample and j RPKM j is the sum of the RPKM values of all genes in a sample. A total of the TPM expression values was calculated for each GH family according to the summing the expression level of all the genes that were identified for that particular family. A hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted with CLC bio using the single linkage method and Euclidian distance according to the cluster features of the log2-transformed expression values.

Phylogenetic analysis of CAZymes

The CAZyme sequences from the AA9/GH61, CE5 and GH55 families from T. harzianum, T. reesei, T. atroviride, T. virens and ten other species of fungi (Additional file 5) were used as the basis for constructing the phylogenetic trees. The sequences were aligned using ClustalW [30], implemented in the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 7.0 [31] with the following parameters: gap opening penalties of 10 and 3 and gap extension penalties of 0.1 and 5 for the pairwise alignment and multiple alignment, respectively. The phylogenetic analyses were performed in MEGA7 using the maximum likelihood (ML) method inference [32] based on the Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) matrix-based model and 1000 bootstrap replicates [33] for each analysis. The initial tree is drawn to scale, obtained automatically by applying the Neighbor-joining and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the JTT model and the topology with superior log likelihood values. Pairwise deletion was employed to address alignment gaps and missing data. The trees were visualized and edited using the Figtree program (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

Results

Identification of CAZymes in T. harzianum

In this study, protein prediction for T. harzianum T6776 was used as a tool to annotate and analyze the total CAZyme content of this fungus. The identified proteins were re-annotated based on their functional classification, protein domains and secretion signal prediction. In addition, an expression analysis was performed by mapping the reads obtained from RNA-Seq under three biological conditions, and three CAZyme families were employed for the analysis of phylogenetic diversity. Using genomic, transcriptomic and phylogenetic association data, this study describes and characterizes the total (and more complete) set of CAZymes for T. harzianum, which is a species that presents high potential in prospecting for hydrolytic enzymes for the degradation of lignocellulosic biomass.

The initial set of CAZymes was identified by mapping all of the proteins of T. harzianum against the CAZy database using the BLASTp search tool. After removing the proteins that did not meet the filtering criteria, a total of 430 proteins were maintained, which corresponds to 3.7% of the total of 11,498 proteins predicted for this organism [18]. The total protein pool was grouped according to the classification criteria of the CAZy database. Thus, a total of 259 GHs, 101 GTs, 6 PLs, 22 CEs, and 42 AAs as well as an additional 46 proteins that also contained a CBM were identified (Fig. 1 and Tables 1 and Additional file 6: Table S1). A total of 63 GHs families were identified in the T. harzianum genome (Table 2).
Fig. 1

Number of CAZymes in T. harzianum, T. reesei, T. virens and T. atroviride. Total of the CAZyme classes for the evaluated species (a); number of GH families: GH18, GH16, GH3, GH2, GH5 and GH55 (b); number of CE families: CE1, CE5, CE3, CE9 and CE16 (c); number of AA families: AA3, AA9, AA11, AA7 and AA8 (d); and number of CBM modules: CBM1, CBM18, CBM50, CBM24 and CBM43 (e)

Table 1

Total CAZymes from T. harzianum and other fungal species

Species

GH

GT

PL

CE

AA

CBM

Total

Reference

T. harzianum

259

101

6

22

42

46

430

This study

T. reesei RUT C-30

198

92

5

20

40

35

355

This study

T. virens

256

104

5

29

47

68

441

This study

T. atroviride

244

105

7

25

41

57

422

This study

T. reesei QM6a

201

99

5

22

24

327

[39]

F. graminearum

253

110

21

45

72

87

501

*

A. nidulans

266

91

21

30

33

44

441

*

N. crassa

173

78

4

21

35

42

311

*

S. cerevisiae

57

73

0

2

5

12

137

*

A. oryzae

306

117

23

29

29

37

504

*

A. niger

253

121

8

68

68

55

518

*

*CAZy database (www.cazy.org)

Table 2

Evaluation of the GH classes in T. harzianum

GH family

Number

Principal enzyme activitya

EC numbera

RNA-Seq (TPM)b

    

CEL

DSB

LAC

GH1

4

β-glucosidase

3.2.1.21

26,464.6

24,945.6

25,780.2

GH2

13

β-mannosidase

3.2.1.25

10,109.9

10,652.8

10,615.0

GH3

17

β-glucosidase

3.2.1.21

23,132.5

24,232.1

24,991.6

GH4

1

α-glucosidase

3.2.1.22

1405.5

1866.2

1500.3

GH5

12

Endo- β-1,4-glucanase

3.2.1.4

15,970.5

17,669.5

16,084.8

GH6

1

cellobiohydrolase

3.2.1.91

35,003.8

46,112.3

48,148.5

GH7

2

Endo- β-1,4-glucanase

3.2.1.4

56,503.3

62,881.9

73,957.0

GH10

2

Endo-1,4- β-xylanase

3.2.1.8

46,748.0

61,201.9

53,469.7

GH11

4

Endo-1,4- β-xylanase

3.2.1.8

53,279.5

69,046.4

64,929.2

GH12

3

Endo- β-1,4-glucanase

3.2.1.4

10,362.0

12,937.4

10,779.4

GH13

8

α-amylase

3.2.1.1

5028.8

4708.1

4757.5

GH15

2

Glucoamylase

3.2.1.3

3776.3

3476.4

3103.1

GH16

16

Xyloglucanase

3.2.1.151

59,203.1

56,083.1

62,280.8

GH17

4

Endo-1,3- β-glucosidase

3.2.1.39

11,593.9

11,757.2

13,578.5

GH18

23

Chitinase

3.2.1.14

63,673.6

84,188.2

93,866.4

GH20

3

β-hexosaminidase

3.2.1.52

35,521.8

33,517.7

23,889.0

GH23

1

Lysozyme

3.2.1.17

1227.2

849.4

1093.1

GH24

1

Lysozyme

3.2.1.17

2492.6

1450.6

1586.9

GH25

1

Lysozyme

3.2.1.17

1885.9

1657.9

1559.4

GH26

2

β-mannanase

3.2.1.78

314.0

315.2

308.3

GH27

9

α-galactosidase

3.2.1.22

1524.0

1354.3

1373.8

GH28

3

polygalacturonase

3.2.1.15

38,662.7

26,783.2

27,177.1

GH30

6

Endo- β-1,4-xylanase

3.2.1.8

4233.3

3652.1

4332.6

GH31

5

α-glucosidase

3.2.1.20

6161.9

5753.5

7524.8

GH32

2

Invertase

3.2.1.26

0.0

0.0

0.0

GH33

1

neuraminidase

3.2.1.18

0.0

0.0

0.0

GH35

1

β-galactosidase

3.2.1.23

1814.5

1099.7

1961.4

GH36

2

α-galactosidase

3.2.1.22

308.4

255.6

240.4

GH37

2

α-trehalase

3.2.1.28

2379.5

1017.6

1640.6

GH38

1

α-mannosidase

3.2.1.24

964.8

1116.1

960.2

GH39

3

β-xylosidase

3.2.1.37

648.2

444.7

446.0

GH43

5

β-xylosidase

3.2.1.37

3643.7

3004.4

4153.1

GH45

3

Endoglucanase

3.2.1.4

4845.5

4891.1

4353.0

GH47

6

α-mannosidase

3.2.1.113

8278.3

6385.7

7684.9

GH49

1

Dextranase

3.2.1.11

0.0

0.0

0.0

GH54

2

α-L-arabinofuranosidase

3.2.1.55

1253.1

1234.0

2333.9

GH55

9

Endo- β-1,3-glucanase

3.2.1.39

3113.4

2662.3

3444.8

GH62

2

α-L-arabinofuranosidase

3.2.1.55

9919.7

8963.6

14,790.8

GH63

1

α-glucosidase

3.2.1.106

812.5

509.6

521.8

GH64

3

β-1,3-glucanase

3.2.1.39

9176.4

8197.0

8943.6

GH65

1

α-trehalase

3.2.1.28

1585.3

1273.2

1085.3

GH67

2

α-glucuronidase

3.2.1.139

1300.6

732.9

1057.3

GH71

6

α-1,3-glucanase

3.2.1.59

13,633.2

15,112.4

16,804.9

GH72

5

β-1,3-glucanosyltransglycosylase

2.4.1-

26,604.3

25,458.0

26,995.4

GH75

5

Chitosanase

3.2.1.132

3030.0

4812.3

4033.0

GH76

9

α-1,6-mannanase

3.2.1.101

14,462.0

11,978.6

10,448.3

GH78

3

α-L-rhamnosidase

3.2.1.40

111.9

44.6

55.3

GH79

3

β-glucuronidase

3.2.1.31

299.1

232.8

219.4

GH81

2

Endo- β-1,3-glucanase

3.2.1.39

244.0

164.1

137.3

GH88

2

d-4,5-unsaturated β-glucuronyl hydrolase

3.2.1

263.6

100.3

80.0

GH89

2

α-N-acetylglucosaminidase

3.2.1.50

1059.2

760.0

533.5

GH92

8

Mannosyl-oligosaccharide α-1,2-mannosidase

3.2.1.113

7002.9

5376.4

5435.1

GH93

4

Exo- α-L-1,5-arabinanase

3.2.1

7736.1

4164.5

4140.9

GH95

5

α-L-fucosidase

3.2.1.51

680.7

554.0

602.6

GH105

1

Unsaturated rhamnogalacturonyl hydrolase

3.2.1.172

0.0

0.0

0.0

GH114

1

Endo- α-1,4-polygalactosaminidase

3.2.1.109

2290.2

1929.7

1214.4

GH115

1

Xylan α-1,2-glucuronidase

3.2.1.131

3420.7

3848.9

3455.7

GH125

2

Exo- α-1,6-mannosidase

3.2.1

3221.8

2177.3

2401.5

GH127

1

β-L-arabinofuranosidase

3.2.1.185

628.6

399.2

378.0

GH128

4

β-1,3-glucanase

3.2.1.39

5748.1

3170.0

3356.8

GH132

2

Activity on β-1,3-glucan

4211.0

5376.7

5835.3

GH133

1

Amylo- α-1,6-glucosidase

3.2.1.33

1480.5

1058.1

1132.8

GH135

2

α-1,4-galactosaminogalactan hydrolase

3.2.1

153.7

134.0

121.9

TPM, transcripts per million

aCAZy database ( www.cazy.org )

bThe expression values for the different GH families were calculated by summing the level of TPM expression in each gene composing the family

Among the 430 CAZymes identified, 204 (47%) were predicted to harbor a signal peptide and were classified as potential secreted proteins, including 155 GHs, 17 CEs, 8 GTs, 6 PLs and 18 AAs. The proteins that contained a signal peptide were also investigated for the presence of transmembrane domains, resulting in the identification of 19 proteins containing such domains within this group. Searches for mitochondrial proteins were also performed in the CAZymes set, and 37 proteins were identified.

The CAZyme contents of T. reesei RUT C-30 were also investigated, and 198 GHs, 92 GTs, 5 PLs, 20 CEs, 40 AAs and 35 CBMs were identified, totaling 355 CAZymes (Table 1 and Additional file 6: Table S1). In T. virens and T. atroviride, 441 and 422 CAZymes were identified, respectively. The GH18 family, represented mainly by chitinase-like proteins, was the most frequent in the four species, while the GH3 family, which includes enzymes important for the process of cellulose degradation, was the second most frequent in the studied species (Fig. 1).

Enzymes related to cellulose and hemicellulose degradation in T. harzianum

The GHs are the main class of enzymes within the CAZymes responsible for cellulose degradation, and the GH5, GH7, GH12, GH45, GH1, GH3 and GH6 families play particularly important roles (Table 3). Twenty-three CBM1 domains have been identified in T. harzianum. Two auxiliary families were identified that are related to the cellulose degradation mechanism in T. harzianum: AA8 (2 proteins) and AA9 (4 proteins).
Table 3

Cellulolytic enzymes of Trichoderma spp

Species

GH5

GH7

GH12

GH45

GH1

GH3

GH6

Total

T. harzianum

12

2

3

3

4

17

1

42

T. reesei

7

2

2

1

2

13

1

28

T. atroviride

11

2

3

1

4

15

1

37

T. virens

12

2

4

2

2

19

1

42

The major families involved in the degradation of hemicellulose in T. harzianum are GH95, GH67, GH62, GH54, GH43, GH26, GH11, and GH10, and the total number of enzymes, including all families, is 24. The greatest number of enzymes belong to the GH43 and GH95 family (5 proteins) and the fewest to the GH67, GH62, GH54, GH26 and GH10 families (with 2 proteins each) (Table 4).
Table 4

Hemicellulose-degrading enzymes of Trichoderma spp

Species

GH95

GH67

GH62

GH54

GH43

GH26

GH11

GH10

Total

T. harzianum

5

2

2

2

5

2

4

2

24

T. reesei

4

1

1

2

2

0

3

1

14

T. atroviride

4

2

2

2

6

0

4

1

21

T. virens

4

2

3

2

4

2

4

2

23

Expression analysis using T. harzianum RNA-Seq data

The relative expression of the 430 CAZymes of T. harzianum was studied through computational analysis with the T. harzianum IOC3844 RNA-Seq reads (Fig. 2a and Table 2 and Additional file 7: Table S2). The enzymes that exhibited expression greater than zero under the cellulose condition included 400 CAZymes, as follows: 243 GHs, 19 CEs, 4 PLs and 35 AAs. The GH families with the greatest number of expressed genes were GH18 (23 genes – 63,673.6 TPM in CEL), GH3 (17 genes – 11,593.9 TPM in CEL), GH16 (16 genes – 59,203.1 TPM in CEL), GH2 (13 genes – 5028.8 TPM in CEL) and GH5 (12 genes – 15,970.5 TPM in CEL).
Fig. 2

Evaluation of CAZyme expression in T. harzianum by means of RNA-Seq. Quantification of the expression of the main CAZyme classes (GH, GT, AA and CE) in TPM (a) and hierarchical clustering of the log2-transformed expression values of the 26 CAZymes of T. harzianum (b). TPM, transcripts per million

The most highly expressed genes were an exoglucanase 1 (CBM1 module) from the GH7 family (KKO99004.1), under conditions of CEL and LAC induction, and an endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the GH10 family (KKP04658.1), under DSB induction. Among the 430 genes, 30 were not expressed in CEL, 17 were not expressed in DSB, and 16 were not expressed in LAC.

The CAZyme genes related to the degradation of cellulose (GH1, GH3, GH5, GH6, GH45 and AA9), hemicellulose (GH31 and GH62), and glucan (GH17 and GH55) as well as esterase enzymes (CE5 and CE15) were further employed for an analysis of their expression levels by means of hierarchical grouping, and it was possible to observe five expression groups (Fig. 2b).

Group I contained the genes expressed at lower levels, including the GH55 endo-1,3-β-glucosidase (KKO98539.1) and a subgroup consisting of a GH3 β-glucosidase H (KKP04308.1) and GH45 endoglucanase (KKO98959.1).

Group II was composed of 7 β-glucosidase, including three β-glucosidase A genes belonging to the GH3 family (KKP00605.1, KKP05725.1, and KKP05758.1), a β-glucosidase F from the GH3 family (KKP01385.1), a β-glucosidase E from the GH3 family (KKO97125.1) and a β-glucosidase B from the GH5 family (KKP05604.1).

Group III was formed by two subgroups. Subgroup III.a was composed of an endoglucanase II from the GH5 family (KKP03485.1) and a β-glucosidase M from the GH3 family (KKO97043.1), while subgroup III.b was composed of an endo-1,3-β-glucosidase M from the GH17 family (KKP05999.1) and a glucan-1,3-β-glucosidase from the GH55 family (KKP03210.1).

Group IV consisted of an esterase with a CBM1 module from the CE5 family (KKP06491.1), an α-glucosidase from the GH31 family (KKP03969.1), a 1,3-β-glucosidase from the GH17 family (KKP05186.1), a methylesterase from the CE15 family (KKO96622.1), an endoglucanase from the GH45 family (KKP04958.1), a β-glucosidase 3A from the GH3 family (KKP07011.1) and an endoglucanase from the GH5 family (KKO98175.1).

Group V consisted of two genes: an endoglucanase from the GH7 family (KKP04531.1) and an α-1-arabinofuranosidase from the GH62 family (KKP03811.1).

A β-glucosidase 1B gene from the GH1 family (KKO98105.1), a cellobiohydrolase from the GH6 family (KKP03494.1) and an AA9/GH61 protein with a CBM1 module (KKP05760.1) were not grouped.

Phylogenetic analysis and functional diversity

A phylogenetic analysis was performed to study the functional diversity of the three CAZyme families from T. harzianum (GH55, AA9/GH61 and CE5) and nine other species of fungi. The GH55 family was formed by nine glucan 1,3-β-glucosidase proteins in T. harzianum (identified as: KKO97443.1, KKO99433.1, KKP07835.1, KKO98539.1, KKP02807.1, KKP03210.1, KKP01538.1, KKP04907.1 and KKP00524.1). Most of the T. harzianum GH55 family proteins formed a separate clade with species from the same genus, including T. reesei, T. atroviride and T. virens. However, KKP00524.1 formed an external group that was closest to the GH55 of Cordyceps militaris (EGX89976.1) (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree of the GH55, AA9/GH61 and CE5 families. The tree includes the GH55 (a), AA9/GH61 (b), and CE5 (c) proteins from twelve species and the predicted functional domains of the major proteins of the families in T. harzianum (d). T. harzianum proteins are highlighted in red in the tree

The AA9/GH61 family (Copper-dependent lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases – LPMOs) was formed by three proteins in T. harzianum, KKO97863.1, KKP05760.1 and KKO97781.1, and it formed a separate clade with other AA9 proteins from T. reesei, T. atroviride and T. virens. KKO97781.1 was grouped with a T. virens AA9 (XP_013954128.1) protein with 92% bootstrap support (Fig. 3b).

The CE5 family was formed by five proteins in T. harzianum, including two cutinase (KKP01664.1 and KKO97447.1) and three acetylxylan esterases (KKP00250.1, KKP06491.1 and KKP05135.1). All T. harzianum CE5 proteins were grouped with T. virens proteins throughout the tree. Wide phylogenetic diversity was observed among the CE5 family of T. harzianum, distributed in nearly all clades of the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3c).

Functional diversity was also analyzed using the functional domains and ontologies. The functional domains validated the CAZyme classifications and confirmed the characteristic module of each family (Fig. 3d and Additional file 8: Table S3). A total of 281 sequences were annotated with gene ontology (GO) terms (Fig. 4), and all of the proteins presented correspondence with the InterPro database (Additional file 9: Table S4). Catalytic activity was the main function under the molecular function term with 262 annotated sequences, while for the biological process term, the main functions were metabolic processes (202 sequences) and cellular processes (127 sequences).
Fig. 4

GO terms for the CAZymes of T. harzianum. The sequences were annotated according to three main GO terms: biological process (a), cellular components (b), and molecular functions (c)

Discussion

In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the total content of the CAZymes in T. harzianum T6776, which is widely used in biologic control and has recently been the focus of studies related to enzymes involved in the degradation of vegetal biomass. Furthermore, we performed a comparison with other Trichoderma spp. (T. reesei, T atroviride and T. virens), completed an expression analysis via RNA-Seq and explored functional diversity through a phylogenetic analysis. Thus, we present the most complete report on the total CAZymes annotated for the cellulolytic fungus T. harzianum.

Until recently, most studies involving T. harzianum were restricted to investigating its high biocontrol capacity [5, 34]. However, our research group has performed many studies evaluating the biotechnological potential of this species. Horta et al. (2014) [19] determined the transcriptome profile of this fungus during biomass degradation and delimited groups of overexpressed genes. Crucello et al. (2015) [35] constructed the first bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library and found a cluster of CAZymes that were probably co-expressed, and Santos et al. (2016) [36] heterologously expressed a GH1 beta-glucosidase from T. harzianum in Escherichia coli and characterized its structure and function.

Several previous studies have described the contents of CAZymes in bacteria [37, 38], fungi [3941] and plants [42, 43]. We identified a large number of CAZymes in T. harzianum, T. reesei, T. atroviride and T. virens (430, 355, 441 and 422 CAZymes, respectively), with a high diversity of families (Fig. 1 and Table 1). These results demonstrate the importance and complexity of the system involved in the degradation of vegetal biomass that has developed in these fungi over evolutionary time [44]. The contents of CAZymes have been determined in several fungi of biotechnological importance, including Fusarium graminearum, Aspergillus nidulans, Neurospora crassa and A. niger, and 501, 441, 311 and 518 CAZy proteins were identified, respectively (CAZy database [14]).

T. harzianum presented 259 GHs, a number that is greater than that found in T. reesei RUT C-30 (198 GHs) (Table 1). Although T. reesei presents a lower CAZyme content than T. harzianum, its high efficiency in the production of hydrolytic enzymes has been demonstrated in several studies [45, 46]. This result indicates that the number of enzymes is not related to the efficiency of the biomass degradation process. In addition, previous studies in which genomic comparisons of Trichoderma species were performed confirmed that T. reesei has suffered events involving loss of CAZy genes [44, 47]. The number of CAZymes identified in T. reesei RUT C-30 (198 GHs, 20 CEs and 5 PLs) in our analysis was close to that found in a study in which the CAZyme content of T. reesei QM6a was re-annotated [39], which identified 201 GHs, 22 CEs and 5 PLs.

The CAZyme class with the greatest number of proteins among all species evaluated was the GHs. This class of enzymes is important in several metabolic routes in the fungus, including those for chitin and cellulose [48, 49]. Within this class, the most representative family was GH18, whose members are mainly involved in the degradation of chitin, which is an important route both biologically and economically, since they are applied in the biological control [50]. Another very representative family in the analysis was GH3, including enzymes showing beta-glucosidase and xylosidase activities, which are important in the metabolism of glucose and xylose [51], respectively.

We analyzed the expression of the 430 CAZymes of T. harzianum by mapping previously obtained RNA-Seq data from three biological conditions (with cellulose, lactose or sugarcane bagasse as a carbon source) [19]. In total, 243 GHs were expressed in the cellulose condition, which was expected because a high proportion of the enzymes that act in the degradation of biomass are from the GH family [52]. In an experiment using T. harzianum grown in the presence of sugarcane bagasse, a large number of GH5 and GH16 family members were observed [19]. The AA family also exhibited a large number of expressed genes, and 35 of the 42 total genes from this group were expressed in the cellulose condition. This finding reinforces that auxiliary enzymes are of great importance in the efficiency of the synergism of the main enzymes that act in the process of cellulose degradation [53].

The phylogenetic analysis of three CAZyme families (GH55, CE5 and AA9) from T. harzianum showed high functional diversity in these groups of proteins. This functional diversity may be a reflection of changes in the functional domains of these proteins that imply different biological actions and efficiencies of these enzymes in biological processes [54]. In addition, a large majority of the enzymes of T. harzianum formed groups with enzymes from T. reesei, T. virens and T. atroviride, demonstrating the phylogenetic proximity of these species. This result reinforces the hypothesis that the CAZymes of Trichoderma spp. evolved from a common ancestor [47].

Conclusions

Searching for the main proteins used by T. harzianum in the degradation of biomass ensures new advances in the field of biofuel production. Herein, we annotated and characterized all of the CAZymes from T. harzianum at the expression level. The obtained data will contribute to future studies focusing on the functional and structural characterization of the identified proteins. We found a large variety of enzyme families that are related to the cellulose degradation process, and based on our results, groups of enzymes can be selected for testing enzymatic efficiency and characterizing functionality using heterologous expression. Through phylogenetic analysis of the three CAZyme families (AA9/GH61, CE5 and GH55), it was possible to observe high functional diversity within a given family, which may have implications in the process of choosing the most efficient enzymes.

Abbreviations

AA: 

Auxiliary enzymes

BLAST: 

Basic local alignment search tool

CAZymes: 

Carbohydrate-active enzymes

CDD: 

Conserved Domain Database

CE: 

Carbohydrate esterases

CEL: 

Cellulose

DSB: 

Delignified sugarcane bagasse

GH: 

Glycoside hydrolases

GO: 

Gene ontology

GT: 

Glycosyl transferases

LAC: 

Lactose

LP: 

Polysaccharide lyases

LPMOs: 

Cooper-dependent lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases

Ta: 

Trichoderma atroviride

Th: 

Trichoderma harzianum

TPM: 

transcripts per million

Tr: 

Trichoderma reesei

Tv: 

Trichoderma virens

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the funding by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2015/09202-0), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Computational Biology Programme) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2015/09202–0), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Computational Biology Programme) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). JAFF received a PhD fellowship from CAPES-PROEX (Academic Excellence Program); MACH received a PD fellowship from FAPESP (2014/18856–1); LLB received PD fellowship from CAPES - Computational Biology Programme; CAS received a PD fellowship from FAPESP (2016/19775–0); and APS is the recipient of a research fellowship from CNPq.

Availability of data and materials

We have deposited our phylogeny analysis in the TreeBASE Web (https://treebase.org/), and the data can be accessed under the ID S21560.

Authors’ contributions

JAFF and APS conceived and designed the study. JAFF, MACH, LLB and CAS performed the data analysis. JAFF, MACH, LLB, CAS and APS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP)
(2)
Graduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP
(3)
Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP

References

  1. Valencia EY, Chambergo FS. Mini-review: Brazilian fungi diversity for biomass degradation. Fungal Genet Biol. 2013;60:9–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chandel AK, Chandrasekhar G, Silva MB, Silvério da Silva S. The realm of cellulases in biorefinery development. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2012;32(3):187–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. York WS, Darvill AG, McNeil M, Stevenson TT, Albersheim P. Isolation and characterization of plant cell walls and cell wall components. In: Methods in Enzymology. Vol. volume 118: New York: Academic Press; 1986. p. 3–40.Google Scholar
  4. Samuels GJ. Trichoderma: Systematics, the sexual state, and ecology. Phytopathology. 2006;96(2):195–206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Küçük Ç, Kivanç M, Kinaci E, Kinaci G. Biological efficacy of Trichoderma harzianum isolate to control some fungal pathogens of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Turkey. Biologia. 2007;62(3):283–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Adav SS, Chao LT, Sze SK. Quantitative Secretomic analysis of Trichoderma reesei strains reveals enzymatic composition for Lignocellulosic biomass degradation. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(7)Google Scholar
  7. Peciulyte A, Anasontzis GE, Karlström K, Larsson PT, Olsson L. Morphology and enzyme production of Trichoderma reesei rut C-30 are affected by the physical and structural characteristics of cellulosic substrates. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;72:64–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Benoliel B, Torres FAG, de LMP M. A novel promising Trichoderma harzianum strain for the production of a cellulolytic complex using sugarcane bagasse in natura. SpringerPlus. 2013;2:656.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Vizoná Liberato M, Cardoso Generoso W, Malagó W, Henrique-Silva F, Polikarpov I. Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of endoglucanase III from Trichoderma harzianum. Acta Crystallographica section F: structural biology and crystallization. Communications. 2012;68(Pt 3):306–9.Google Scholar
  10. da Silva Delabona P, Lima DJ, Robl D, Rabelo SC, Farinas CS, da Cruz Pradella JG. Enhanced cellulase production by Trichoderma harzianum by cultivation on glycerol followed by induction on cellulosic substrates. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;43(5):617–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. de Castro AM, Pedro KCNR, da Cruz JC, Ferreira MC, Leite SGF, Pereira N. Trichoderma harzianum IOC-4038: a promising strain for the production of a Cellulolytic complex with significant β-Glucosidase activity from sugarcane Bagasse Cellulignin. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;162(7):2111–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Perazzolli M, Moretto M, Fontana P, Ferrarini A, Velasco R, Moser C, Delledonne M, Pertot I. Downy mildew resistance induced by Trichoderma harzianum T39 in susceptible grapevines partially mimics transcriptional changes of resistant genotypes. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(1):660.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Marzano M, Gallo A, Altomare C. Improvement of biocontrol efficacy of Trichoderma harzianum vs. Fusarium oxysporum f. Sp. lycopersici through UV-induced tolerance to fusaric acid. Biol Control. 2013;67(3):397–408.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(D1):D490–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy C, Powlowski J, Wu M, Butler G, Tsang A. Curation of characterized glycoside hydrolases of fungal origin. Database (Oxford). 2011;2011:bar020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Valadares F, Gonçalves TA, Gonçalves DSPO, Segato F, Romanel E, Milagres AMF, Squina FM, Ferraz A. Exploring glycoside hydrolases and accessory proteins from wood decay fungi to enhance sugarcane bagasse saccharification. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9(1):110.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Levasseur A, Drula E, Lombard V, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. Expansion of the enzymatic repertoire of the CAZy database to integrate auxiliary redox enzymes. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(1):41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Baroncelli R, Piaggeschi G, Fiorini L, Bertolini E, Zapparata A, Pè ME, Sarrocco S, Vannacci G. Draft whole-genome sequence of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum T6776. Genome Announc. 2015;3(3):e00647–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Horta MAC, Vicentini R, Delabona PS, Laborda P, Crucello A, Freitas S, Kuroshu RM, Polikarpov I, Pradella JGC, Souza AP. Transcriptome profile of Trichoderma harzianum IOC-3844 induced by sugarcane Bagasse. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88689.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(18):3674–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, Potter SC, Punta M, Qureshi M, Sangrador-Vegas A, et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;Google Scholar
  22. Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Geer LY, Geer RC, He J, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, et al. CDD: NCBI's conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(D1):D222–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell A, Chang H-Y, Daugherty L, Fraser M, Hunter S, Lopez R, McAnulla C, McMenamin C, Nuka G, Pesseat S, et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D213–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Meth. 2011;8(10):785–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer ELL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305(3):567–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol. 2000;300(4):1005–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. C-S Y, Lin C-J, Hwang J-K. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins for gram-negative bacteria by support vector machines based on n-peptide compositions. Protein Sci. 2004;13(5):1402–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. CLC Genomics Workbench QAAS. Manual for CLC Genomics Workbench 9.0 Windows, Mac OS X and Linux Denmark. In.; 2016.Google Scholar
  29. Conesa A, Madrigal P, Tarazona S, Gomez-Cabrero D, Cervera A, McPherson A, Szczesniak MW, Gaffney DJ, Elo LL, Zhang X, et al. A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biol. 2016;17:13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22(22):4673–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992;8(3):275–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39(4):783–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Carvalho DDC, Geraldine AM, Lobo Junior M, Mello SCM. Biological control of white mold by Trichoderma harzianum in common bean under field conditions. Pesq Agrop Brasileira. 2015;50:1220–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Crucello A, Sforça DA, Horta MAC, dos Santos CA, AJC V, Beloti LL, de Toledo MAS, Vincentz M, Kuroshu RM, de Souza AP. Analysis of genomic regions of Trichoderma harzianum IOC-3844 related to biomass degradation. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122122.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Santos CA, Zanphorlin LM, Crucello A, Tonoli CCC, Ruller R, Horta MAC, Murakami MT, de Souza AP. Crystal structure and biochemical characterization of the recombinant ThBgl, a GH1 β-glucosidase overexpressed in Trichoderma harzianum under biomass degradation conditions. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9(1):71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Manzo N, D'Apuzzo E, Coutinho PM, Cutting SM, Henrissat B, Ricca E. Carbohydrate-active enzymes from pigmented bacilli: a genomic approach to assess carbohydrate utilization and degradation. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11(1):198.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Berlemont R, Martiny AC. Phylogenetic distribution of potential Cellulases in bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(5):1545–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Häkkinen M, Arvas M, Oja M, Aro N, Penttilä M, Saloheimo M, Pakula TM. Re-annotation of the CAZy genes of Trichoderma reesei and transcription in the presence of lignocellulosic substrates. Microb Cell Factories. 2012;11:134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Chang H-X, Yendrek CR, Caetano-Anolles G, Hartman GL. Genomic characterization of plant cell wall degrading enzymes and in silico analysis of xylanses and polygalacturonases of Fusarium virguliforme. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16(1):147.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Benoit I, Culleton H, Zhou M, DiFalco M, Aguilar-Osorio G, Battaglia E, Bouzid O, Brouwer CPJM, El-Bushari HBO, Coutinho PM, et al. Closely related fungi employ diverse enzymatic strategies to degrade plant biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8(1):107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Tyler L, Bragg JN, Wu J, Yang X, Tuskan GA, Vogel JP. Annotation and comparative analysis of the glycoside hydrolase genes in Brachypodium distachyon. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):600.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Pinard D, Mizrachi E, Hefer CA, Kersting AR, Joubert F, Douglas CJ, Mansfield SD, Myburg AA. Comparative analysis of plant carbohydrate active enZymes and their role in xylogenesis. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Xie B-B, Qin Q-L, Shi M, Chen L-L, Shu Y-L, Luo Y, Wang X-W, Rong J-C, Gong Z-T, Li D, et al. Comparative genomics provide insights into evolution of Trichoderma nutrition style. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6(2):379–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Jun H, Kieselbach T, Jönsson LJ. Enzyme production by filamentous fungi: analysis of the secretome of Trichoderma reesei grown on unconventional carbon source. Microb Cell Factories. 2011;10(1):68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Alvira P, Gyalai-Korpos M, Barta Z, Oliva JM, Réczey K, Ballesteros M. Production and hydrolytic efficiency of enzymes from Trichoderma reesei RUTC30 using steam pretreated wheat straw as carbon source. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2013;88(6):1150–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Kubicek CP, Herrera-Estrella A, Seidl-Seiboth V, Martinez DA, Druzhinina IS, Thon M, Zeilinger S, Casas-Flores S, Horwitz BA, Mukherjee PK, et al. Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma. Genome Biol. 2011;12(4):R40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Limón MC, Chacón MR, Mejías R, Delgado-Jarana J, Rincón AM, Codón AC, Benítez T. Increased antifungal and chitinase specific activities of Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 by addition of a cellulose binding domain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64(5):675–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pellegrini VOA, Serpa VI, Godoy AS, Camilo CM, Bernardes A, Rezende CA, Junior NP, Franco Cairo JPL, Squina FM, Polikarpov I. Recombinant Trichoderma harzianum endoglucanase I (Cel7B) is a highly acidic and promiscuous carbohydrate-active enzyme. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(22):9591–604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Binod P, Sukumaran RK, Shirke SV, Rajput JC, Pandey A. Evaluation of fungal culture filtrate containing chitinase as a biocontrol agent against Helicoverpa armigera. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103(5):1845–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Singhania RR, Patel AK, Sukumaran RK, Larroche C, Pandey A. Role and significance of beta-glucosidases in the hydrolysis of cellulose for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol. 2013;127:500–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao Z, Liu H, Wang C, Xu J-R. Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):274.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Nekiunaite L, Arntzen MØ, Svensson B, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Abou Hachem M. Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases and other oxidative enzymes are abundantly secreted by Aspergillus nidulans grown on different starches. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2016;9(1):187.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Das S, Dawson NL, Orengo CA. Diversity in protein domain superfamilies. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2015;35:40–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement