Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Identification of a novel fused gene family implicates convergent evolution in eukaryotic calcium signaling

BMC Genomics201819:306

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4685-y

©  The Author(s). 2018

  • Received: 9 May 2017
  • Accepted: 16 April 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Both calcium signals and protein phosphorylation responses are universal signals in eukaryotic cell signaling. Currently three pathways have been characterized in different eukaryotes converting the Ca2+ signals to the protein phosphorylation responses. All these pathways have based mostly on studies in plants and animals.

Results

Based on the exploration of genomes and transcriptomes from all the six eukaryotic supergroups, we report here in Metakinetoplastina protists a novel gene family. This family, with a proposed name SCAMK, comprises SnRK3 fused calmodulin-like III kinase genes and was likely evolved through the insertion of a calmodulin-like3 gene into an SnRK3 gene by unequal crossover of homologous chromosomes in meiosis cell. Its origin dated back to the time intersection at least 450 million-year-ago when Excavata parasites, Vertebrata hosts, and Insecta vectors evolved. We also analyzed SCAMK’s unique expression pattern and structure, and proposed it as one of the leading calcium signal conversion pathways in Excavata parasite. These characters made SCAMK gene as a potential drug target for treating human African trypanosomiasis.

Conclusions

This report identified a novel gene fusion and dated its precise fusion time in Metakinetoplastina protists. This potential fourth eukaryotic calcium signal conversion pathway complements our current knowledge that convergent evolution occurs in eukaryotic calcium signaling.

Keywords

  • Calcium signaling
  • Protein phosphorylation
  • Metakinetoplastina protists

Background

In 1883, animals were first found to use Ca2+ as the signaling carrier [1], and in 1910, green plants were also found to rely on Ca2+ for plant cell development [2]. Later, cellular and molecular studies identified various types of Ca2+ influxes/oscillations known as Ca2+ signatures/signals (CS) [3–6] into the eukaryotic cell. Relying on specific types of signal decoding proteins, these CSs are converted into intracellular downstream protein phosphorylation responses (PPRs) [7, 8]. Thereby versatile genes in decoding CSs to PPSs are needed for robust cell signaling.

Up to date, three pathways converting CSs to PPRs have been identified [9, 10]. The type I pathway (Additional file 1: Figure S1) relies on the calmodulin (CaM) for receiving the CSs and convert them to PPRs with interacting kinases such as calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CCaMK) [11], calcium /calmodulin-binding protein kinase (CBK) [12], calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I, II, IV (CAMKI, II, IV) [13]. The type II pathway (Additional file 1: Figure S1) utilizes a single protein calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) [14] to convert CSs to PPRs. The type III (Additional file 1: Figure S1) employs the calcineurin B-like (CBL) protein to bind the Ca2+ and the CBL-interacting protein kinase (CIPK) [15] to convert CSs to PPRs [16, 17]. Based on the fact that CDPK is fused by interacting proteins CaM and CaMK [18], an intriguing yet unknown question is whether there is a convergent gene fusion occurred between CIPK and CBL (Additional file 1: Figure S1), similar to the fusion origin of CDPK.

In eukaryotes, type I CCaMKs exist only in land plants [19] and CaMKIs, IIs, IVs are found in animal and fungi [17, 20], and they also occur in the myxamoeba, Dictyostelium. CBKs are found only in plants [21]. Type II CDPK was characterized only in plants and certain protists [22–25]. Type III distributed only in plants and protists Naegleria gruberi and Trichomonas vaginalis [26]. Although Ca2+/CaM regulated protein kinases were also reviewed in Dictyostelium and the ciliate, Paramecium [27, 28], however, there is still limited analysis of calcium signaling mechanism in other eukaryotic clades Amoebozoa, Excavata, or Stramenopiles-Alveolata-Rizaria (SAR group) [29] compared to the abundant reports in animals and plants.

Here we report a novel fused gene family and date its origin and distribution in metakinetoplastina protists from the Excavata supergroup by mining all the eukaryotic genomes and transcriptomes. We further deduced that such fusion was mediated by an unequal crossover between the homologous chromosomes, yielding an insertion of a calmodulin-like (CML) III gene into the sucrose non-fermenting related kinase3 (SnRK3) kinase gene. We suggest naming this novel type as SCAMK genes. Furthermore, we studied the gene expression pattern, which was highly correlated to [Ca2+] changes in different life stages. Finally we proposed that SCAMKs serve as the potential target for drug design in human African trypanosomiasis (HAT).

Results

Discovery of a monophyletic gene group with a new structural constitution

We first set out to identify whether or not there is another kind of Ca2+-activated protein kinases by searching all eukaryotic clades based on two criteria, (i) kinome annotations from representatives of five eukaryotic supergroups, Homo sapiens [30], Entamoeba histolytica [31], Arabidopsis thaliana [32], Leishmania major [33], Plasmodium falciparum [34], and (ii) proteins CDPK, CRK, CCaMK, CIPK with biochemical evidence as the CS decoders [22]. A phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1a) of all the related 360 genes was constructed to show their relationships, with the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) as the outgroup sequence since it is not regarded as a CS decoder, but closely related to CDPK-SnRK superfamily genes according to all the surveyed kinomes in five supergroups [35, 36]. The complete tree was shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2. Furthermore, we found that all the proteins could be grouped into two monophyletic clusters (Fig. 1a). The cluster I was a well-supported monophyly with a near maximum-likelihood local supporting value (NMLV) 92 using FastTree and a maximum-likelihood bootstrap value (MBV) 86 using RAxML. The cluster I included the CDPKs, CCaMKs and CRKs from both plants and SAR supergroup, together with CaMK I&II&IVs from all eukaryotic supergroups. The cluster II was also a well-supported monophyletic group with an NMLV of 88 and an MBV of 62, which consisted of four subfamilies including three known families SnRK1s, SnRK2s, and SnRK3s. The SnRK3s covered sequences from supergroups Excavata, Arachaeplastida, and SAR. The fourth group from Excavata supergroup contained a kinase domain and EF-handed CaM-like domain. This group had not been reported and we hereby temporarily designated it as the X monophyly.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

All the Ca2+ signal decoders (360 genes) were grouped into two clusters, together with a MAPK gene (outgroup) for phylogenetic tree construction. a Phylogenetic relationships among the Ca2+ signal decoders identified two monophyletic clusters. Node supporting values of near maximum-likelihood and maximum-likelihood are shown from top to bottom. b Conserved sequence insertions (shown as black bars) confirmed the phylogenetic classifications and indicated a new structured monophyly with both N-terminal kinase domain and C-terminal EF hands (shown in purple bars) that were named as the X monophyly genes. Sequences in the tree from Archaeplastida were shown in green, Amoebozoa in black, SAR in red, Opisthokonta in blue, and Excavata in purple

Since CRKs, CCaMKs, and SnRKs have very different domain structures from CDPKs [22], we compared their protein structures to recheck the phylogenetic classification result. Among all the families, we found conserved sequence insertions supporting our classification (Additional file 3: Figure S3). All the four unique insertions were found in the kinase domain (Fig. 1b). The insertion I had one amino acid (AA), specific to the CRK, CDPK, PPCK, PEPRK, and CCaMK families. Both insertion II and IV had three AAs and they were specific to the cluster I. On the contrary, the insertion III, with one AA, was specific to the cluster II.

At the domain level, the kinase domain (KD) was found in all members in cluster I & II. The CaM-like domain (CaM-LD), which is composed of EF hands, was found in the CDPK, CCaMK families, and the X monophyly (Fig. 1b). SnRK3s from eukaryotic supergroups Excavata, Arachaeplastida, and SAR had the NAF motif, a signature domain of SnRK3 in the C-terminal following the kinase domain, for interaction with the CBL protein [26] (Fig. 1b). However, no exact NAF motif was found in the X monophyletic members.

Origin of the X monophyly genes in the ancestor of Metakinetoplastina protists

Since these results could not show clearly whether or not the KD of the X monophyly is a member of the SnRK1s/2 s/3 s or a new, fourth subfamily of SnRKs, we then studied the tree phylogeny (Fig. 1) with genome-wide mined X monophyly members (Additional file 4: Table S1), especially two genes in the X monophyly from two basal Metakinetoplastina protists Trypanoplasma borreli and Neobodo designis. For displaying purpose, we removed a few genes from other subfamilies constructed tree final with 130 genes. We obtained all the representative taxa samples containing the X monophyly genes from the NCBI’s GenBank, genome sequences, and transcriptome sequences (Additional file 4: Table S1). Relying on the KD of the X monophyly genes and all of the other full-length SnRKs, we chose three phylogenetic methods to infer the phylogenetic relationship. In the rooted tree (Fig. 2a) using a MAPK sequence as the outgroup, the X monophyly genes were grouped with the CIPK sequences using all three methods. The Bayesian posterior probability supporting value (BPPV) was notably as high as 97 and Bayesian inference is best for underlying the deep phylogeny. Thirdly, to further validate this phylogeny, we found the motif organizations supported the phylogenetic inference. As shown in Fig. 2b, we found three conserved motifs (motifs were shown as sequence logos in Additional file 5: Figure S4), one in the KD and two specific to the CIPK and the X monophyly genes in the C-terminal. Besides, we identified one motif in the C-terminal specific to the SnRK2s, supporting the improved phylogenetic relationship results in Fig. 2a.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

X monophyly genes had a SnRK3 kinase domain and a calmodulin-like domain. a Kinase domain-based phylogeny of 130 genes classified X monophyly genes into SnRK3 monophyly. Node supporting values from left to right: near maximum likelihood, maximum likelihood, Bayesian method. b SnRK3s had one specific motif in the kinase domain and three specific motifs at the C-terminal, and SnRK2s had one specific motif at the C-terminal

We next investigated the origin of the CaM-LD of the X monophyly genes, to examine our hypothesis that whether it was a CBL, or CaM, or CML, since these three types of four EF-hand proteins are phylogenetically related [37]. We built a tree based on the EF hands of X monophyly genes, CBL, CaM, CML, and the EF hands of CDPK. The whole tree divided CMLs into four subfamilies, CML1-4. The CML IIIs, X monophyly members, and CBLs were closely related (Additional file 6: Figure S5).

We further performed combined phylogenetic inference and structural motifs of the three closely related subfamilies CBLs, EF hands of X monophyly, CML IIIs for detailed phylogeny. We found that the X monophyly genes and CML IIIs clustered together with well supported values (NMLV = 82, MLV = 83, BPPV = 94) (Fig. 3a). The CBL was the outgroup to the CML III-X monophyly cluster. Two lines of evidence of gene structural information supported the phylogeny. First, we found two conserved motifs at the C-terminal specific to CML III and the X monophyly. Second, we found three conserved motifs in the middle of the X monophyly proteins that had the same order as those in CML IIIs, but reversed in all CBLs (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Origin of the calmodulin-like domain (CaM-LD) of the X monophyly genes. a The CaM-LD of the X monophyly genes was closely related to the CML IIIs as shown in the phylogenetic tree based on 89 protein sequences. Node supporting values from left to right: near maximum likelihood, maximum likelihood, Bayesian method. b The structures of the CaM-LD of the X monophyly genes shared two specific motifs at the C-terminal shown in the red box. The CBLs shared three motifs (in a light purple box) with CMLs, the X monophyly genes (in dark purple box) with a completely reversed order

Since the X monophyly genes were present in Metakinetoplastina organisms (subclade of Kinetoplastea) (Fig. 3a), and the genome of Perkinsela sp. CCAP 1560/4 (the genus formerly known as Perkinsiella) from Prokinetoplastina (subclade of Kinetoplastea) did not contain any X monophyly gene (Additional file 7: Figure S6), it was most likely that the X monophyly genes originated in the ancestor of Metakinetoplastina protists. According to two molecular timing studies based on 15 and 42 protein coding genes, the origin of Metakinetoplastina species occurred ~ 700-450 million-year-ago (mya) [38], and 695-463 mya [39], respectively. Thus, the evolutionary history of the X monophyly genes could be dated back to at least 450 mya. The birth of X monophyly genes coincided roughly with the emergence of hosts streptophytes [40] and vertebrates [38], also coincided with the emergence of vector insects (Fig. 4a) [41].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

SCAMK was proposed for the X monophyly genes based on its origin. a The X monophyly genes have been found in Metakinetoplastina protists, and the timing of origin of the parasitic dominant clade Metakinetoplastina coincide with the emergence of diverse hosts including Vertebrata, streptophyta plants, and the Insecta vector. This time period was highlighted in grey block. b X monophyly genes originated through the insertion of a calmodulin gene into the C-terminal of a SnRK3 genes. The insertion site located between the SnRK3 specific motif B and motif C, thereby we named it as SnRK3 fused calmodulin-like3 kinase, SCAMK, according to its origin. c Gene synteny between the non-SCAMK reverse complementary strand of LFNC01000585.1 of Perkinsela sp. and the SCAMK-containing reverse complementary contig NODE_83362 of Trypanoplasma borreli. d The insertion was most likely produced by an unequal crossover of homologous chromosomes

To explore the mechanism of the origin of X monophyly genes, we hypothesized that they could originate from gene fusion between a SnRK3 kinase and a CML III, which is similar to the origin of CDPK [18]. Since there was no intron in any X monophyly genes (Additional file 4: Table S2), the intron-mediated gene fusion mechanism was ruled out for the birth of the X monophyly genes. Secondly, we also found complete poly-A tail (such as nucleotides 24,774 to 24,779 on the scaffold) after the coding region from basal X monophyly gene from Trypanoplasma borreli, suggesting that the X monophyly gene was unlikely to have originated through fusion mediated by transposable elements. The X monophyly genes had one SnRK-specific motif B upstream of the CaM-LD (Fig. 4b), unlike NAF motif found in CIPKs, the cation AA residue N of the NAF motif was changed into anion AA [Q/K/R] in motif B, thereby possibly forbidding its interaction with CaM. Another two SnRK3 specific motifs C & D was found in downstream of the CaM-LD, proving that the CaM-LD in X monophyly genes was inserted into the C-terminal of SnRK3 (Fig. 4b). Therefore, the X monophyly gene was unlikely to have originated by inter-genic chromosome segment loss that resulted in a fusion of upstream and downstream genes.

Because none of the X monophyly gene was present in the genome of Perkinsela sp., but present in the genome of Trypanoplasma borreli, we further compared the synteny of two genomic blocks from Perkinsela sp. and Trypanoplasma borreli to show whether the two blocks have evolutionary correlation. We found that the X monophyly gene from Neobodo designis, the most basal branch of Metakinetoplastina, had the most related ortholog on the reverse complementary strand of LFNC01000585.1 (Additional file 7: Figure S6) from the genome of Perkinsela sp. (Fig. 4c). We also found that four upstream and downstream genes of the X monophyly gene on reverse strand of LFNC01000585.1 from Perkinsela sp. and reverse strand contig NODE_83362 from genome of Trypanoplasma borreli were conserved syntenic orthologous genes (Fig. 4c). Thus the X monophyly gene might have originated from an unequal crossover between homologous chromosomes in the ancestor of Metakinetoplastina (Fig. 4d). In the crossover stage, the CML III gene was inserted into the C-terminal of the kinase gene, leading to the birth of the X monophyly gene.

Considering the X monophyly gene most likely originated from a de novo fusion between an SnRK3 and a CML III gene and without any reported analysis, we propose to name the X gene as SCAMK, in which ‘CAM’ represents calmodulin-like3 domain, ‘S’ represents SnRK, and ‘K’ represents kinase. The name reflects its insertion evolutionary history.

Expression profile of the SCAMK ortholog from Trypanosoma brucei

To explore the possible molecular activity of the SCAMK gene, we studied the expression patterns of a SCAMK ortholog in the Trypanosoma brucei, a parasitic protozoan causing human African trypanosomiasis that is a neglected tropical disease (www.who.int/neglected_diseases/en/). This unicellular parasite has two main living forms: the procyclic form (PF) in the midgut of the vector tsetse fly (Glossina species) and the blood stream form (BSF) in the host human blood (Fig. 5a). In the BSF form, Ca2+ concentration was as low as 20-30 nM, but it was up-regulated to about 90 nM in the PF (Fig. 5b) as previously reported [42]. We then measured the expression of all protein coding genes from T. brucei between PF and BSF, and found a SCAMK ortholog Tb927.2.1820 expressed significantly higher in the PF than that in the BSF; and it ranked at the top 1.424% among all 9343 genes (Fig. 5c). Notably, Tb927.2.1820 ranked the highest among all calcium binding protein genes (Additional file 4: Table S3). Specifically, the expression of Tb927.2.1820 was about 10 Reads Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (RPKM) in BSF and increased significantly to ~ 52 RPKM in PF (Fig. 5d), and this increase in expression correlated with the two forms of life styles, as well as with the [Ca2+] changes in the cell. This result was further confirmed in a manual induction of the changes of life styles of Trypanosoma brucei [43] (Additional file 8: Figure S8). In the cell-dividing BSF stage, the expression was 29 RPKM, and when the cell went into non-dividing short stumpy BSF, the expression dropped significantly to 5 RPKM. In the cell dividing PF, the expression went back to 17 RPKM and reached the peak of 36 RPKM in the cell differentiation procyclic form (DIF) (Additional file 8: Figure S8).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

The expression profile of the gene Tb927.2.1820 from Trypanosoma brucei. a Life style of Trypanosoma brucei is divided into three stages (procyclic form, PF, differentiation procyclic form, DIF, and metacyclic form) in the vector tsetse fly’s midgut, and two stages (blood stream form (BSF) including long slender (could be induced with drug after 3 days) and short stumpy (could be induced after 6 days) in the mammalian blood of the host. b Ca2+ concentration was reported to be high in the BSF and low in the PF [42]. c Expression ratio of whole genome protein coding genes between PF and BSF, with Tb927.2.1820 marked. d Comparison of expressions in the BSF and the PF of the Trypanosoma brucei. The unit of the Y-axis is Reads Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (RPKM)

SCMAK genes may have potentially significant application. SCAMK proteins had a characteristic domain specific to the SCAMKs in protists (Additional file 9: Figure S9), and such a domain was not found in any of mammal hosts. Thereby, the TbSCAMK gene might serve as a potential molecular target for drug design through a protein-ligand docking simulation. It is highly possible to use TbSCAMK gene to treat the human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) and related diseases.

Discussion

The SCAMK is perhaps the fourth type of CS-PPR converter

Three types of CS decoding pathways [44] mediated by proteins CaMK with interacting CaM, CDPK, and CIPK with interacting CBL have been identified, and they work in two different mechanisms (Fig. 6). CDPK was derived from a fusion event of a CaMK and CaM. It has long been an intriguing evolutionary question whether there is the fourth type of CS decoders, namely a functionally convergent counterpart of CDPK, or, a fusion of CBL and CIPK. Answering such a question would facilitate better understanding of the evolution of CS decoding. In this study, we took advantages of massive genome and transcriptome data from all five supergroups of eukaryotes, and indeed discovered the fused gene by an SnRK3 gene and a CML III gene specifically in Metakinetoplastina protists. We named it as SCAMK according to its evolutionary origin. The SCAMKs were annotated previously as a CDPK gene [33] in GenBank (e.g. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/XP_009310904.1). The kinome-specific database neglected the SCAMK genes [45]. In this research, we discovered and proposed that SCAMKs originated independently from CDPKs by fusion of a SnRK3 kinase gene and a CML III gene, but not with a CaMK gene, nor a CaM/CBL gene. In contrast to CDPK, whose fusion was believed to be mediated by the intron [18], SCAMK was most likely fused by an unequal crossover of homologous chromosomes.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

The reported characterized Ca2+ signaling pathways and the proposed possible fourth pathway mediated by the SCAMK proteins. The schematic Ca2+ wave stands for Ca2+ signals. The pathways I and II are shown in bluish lines indicating they are evolutionarily related. The pathways III and IV are shown in reddish lines showing they are evolutionarily related, although the proposed fourth pathway still needs future biochemical validation. The pathway I CCaMK is only found in land plants, and CaMKIs, IIs, IVs are found in animal, fungi, myxamoeba, Dictiostelium. The pathway II is found only in plants and certain protists. The pathway III is found in plants and Excavata. The pathway IV is found in Metakinetoplastina protists

The convergently evolved SCAMKs have a conserved evolutionary pattern

This potential fourth type of CS decoder SCAMKs apparently had an independent origin from CDPK. SCAMK can be considered as a functional convergently evolved gene similar to CDPK and leads to a similar working mechanism by decoding the CS into PPS simultaneously in a single protein as the CDPK does (Additional file 10: Figure S7). The mechanism of the convergent origin of SCAMK was rather different from previously known mechanisms in which convergent evolution is mainly caused by AA mutations [46].

Since SCAMKs originated in the ancestor of Metakinetoplastina protists, they have maintained their structures and small copy numbers since ~ 450 mya inferred from basal and crown Metakinetoplastina protists. Although Metakinetoplastina protists vary greatly in morphology and in life styles such as free living style (Bodo and Neobodo), animal parasites (Leishmania and Trypanosoma), plant parasites (Phytomonas), dixenous parasites (=vertebrate or plant host and invertebrate vector) [39], numbers of SCAMK genes remain seemingly unchanged. This may be partly due to a lack of genome-wide duplications in Excavata protists [47, 48]. On the other hand, these genes might play vital cellular functional roles and big changes in copy number would lead to the lethal fate.

The presence of SCAMKs suggests ubiquitous existence of protein phosphorylation following Ca2+ binding in Ca2+ signaling

The functional convergent evolution of two types of fused CS-PPR converters (CDPK and SCAMK) suggests that evolutionary advantages of eukaryotic cells in utilizing CS to PPR signaling pathways. Prokaryotes rely on two component system (histidine kinase and response regulator protein) for cell signaling [49]. Prokaryotes rely on two component system (histidine kinase and response regulator protein) for cell signaling [49]. In eukaryotes, CDPKs are signaling hub in plant cell signaling [14]. Plants also utilize different combinations of CIPK and CaM for signaling [15]. CaMKI, II, IV and CaM are critical signaling molecules in animals [17, 20]. SCAMKs are active proteins in life form transition of metakinetoplastina protists. These examples show that eukaryotes independently evolved the same mechanism for calcium signaling, i.e. the cooperation of a kinase and a calcium binding protein for signal transduction from calcium signal to protein phosphorylation signals. Specifically, the functional convergent evolution of two types of fused CS-PPR converters (CDPK and SCAMK) suggests that evolutionary advantages of eukaryotic cells in utilizing CS to PPR signaling pathways. Since the emergence of parasitic Metakinetoplastina protists correlates to the emergence of hosts streptophytes and vertebrates, we thereby propose that the transition of free living styles into parasitic living styles might have served as the driving force in leading to the origin of SCAMK, because Ca2+ are highly abundant in seawater and terrestrial environments, while eukaryotic cellular Ca2+ concentration maintains at very low levels of 100–200 nM [19]. In the future, we could test this hypothesis whether Metakinetoplastina protists could change the life style by knocking out or knocking down the expression of calcium signaling genes such as SCAMKs.

SCAMK contributes to trypanosomal cell multiplication and differentiation and illuminates the drug development for HAT and related diseases

Currently, researchers have only identified several proteins that might act as putative drug targets in treating HAT, namely glycogen synthase kinase (GSK) [50], 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD), proteasome [51], and. However, all these genes are also found in the host human [30, 52] or human gut microbes, and the future drugs should be carefully evaluated for their inhibition to the human or human gut microbes. Other potential drug targets include Dihydrofolate reductase, trypanothione reductase, protein farnesyltransferase, N-myristoytransferase, cyclin-dependent kinases, 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor, which are all still being tested as candidates [53–55]. In this report, we found a new family of fusion genes specific to the Metakinetoplastina protists, which may potentially serve as drug targets for HAT. Although the proposed molecules needs biochemical and physiological validation, this potential target site nevertheless provides the ground and first step for future drug development. Similar scenario was proposed for treating malaria: the Plasmodium CDPK was proposed as a highly potential drug target in treating malaria [56, 57]. So the comparison of both types of molecular mechanisms would also inspire drug-developing scientists.

Furthermore, the other two neglected tropical diseases listed by the World Health Organization are leishmaniasis and Chagas disease, caused by Excavata protists Leishmania and Trypansosoma cruzi, respectively. An estimated 900,000-1.3 million new cases and 20,000 to 30,000 deaths of leishmaniasis occur annually. Eight million people estimated to be infected with Chagas disease worldwide, mostly in Latin America (www.who.int/neglected_diseases/en/). In this study, we found that SCAMK genes were present in both Leishmania spp. and Trypansosoma spp.. We also proposed that SCAMK genes may be potential molecular drug targets for these diseases based on their unique distribution in these protists, their small copy number, and their potential vital functions in cell signaling. Besides, treatment for leishmaniasis is limited because the currently available drugs vary greatly in efficacy depending on the infecting Leishmania spp. [58]. Meanwhile, trypanotolerance distributed widely in human and animals [59]. We have shown in this study that SCAMKs were very conserved both in structures and in numbers among Leishmania and Trypansosoma spp.. Considering its very conserved evolutionary pattern, we believed that SCAMKs are very promising candidate targets for treating diseases by Leishmania and Trypansosoma spp., as it has proved that genomics can lead to the development of treatments for these neglected tropical diseases today and in the future [60].

Methods

Datasets and sequence retrieval

Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CAMK) sequences from the kinomes of Arabidopsis thaliana (supergroup Archaeplastida), Trypanosoma brucei (supergroup Excavata), Plasmodium falciparum (supergroup SAR), Homo sapiens (supergroup Opisthokonta), and Entamoeba histolytica (supergroup Amoebozoa) were retrieved from curated databases (Additional file 4: Table S1). They were combined as the seed for hidden Markov model based search using HMMER software [61]. Data resources from Excavata species were retrieved from several public databases enclosed in Additional file 4: Table S1. The other CAMK sequences from plants, animals, and fungi were obtained using BLAST search against the NCBI database. All the sequence IDs were listed in the tree for clarity.

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree construction

Only protein sequences were used to infer the sequence evolution since they are more neutral than the DNA as we traced the origin of SCAMK genes to be as old as 0.4 billion year ago. Sequences were aligned using online tool mafft (www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/mafft/), which performs well with large dataset [62]. No manual adjustment were made to all the alignments. Near Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed by FastTree [63]. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed by RAxML software [64] with 1000 bootstrap samplings. Both RAxML and FastTree methods were used for tree construction in each figure. Bayesian phylogenetic tree was constructed using Mrbayes [65].

Gene, domain, motif, protein predictions

Genes on the scaffolds were predicted using Genescan [66]. Protein domains were predicted by searching against both the SMART domain database and the Pfam domain database using SMART software [67]. Motifs were predicted by MEME (meme-suite.org). The three-dimensional structure of the SCAMK protein was de novo modeled using the online I-TASSER server [68]. Protein-ligand docking was modeled relying on online server SwissDock [69].

Expression calculation

The transcriptome sequences and the expression value of all the protein-coding genes Trypanosoma brucei were obtained from reported projects [43, 70], which were both based on paired-end Illumina sequencing. We mapped and quantified expression values using reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM) method. Average expression values of 9343 genes among three biological replicates were calculated both at procyclic form and blood stream form of T. brucei. We tested for significant difference using Duncan’s new multiple range test implemented in the SPSS software [71].

Conclusions

The critical role that Ca2+ signaling played in many subcellular processes have been well established and known in plants and animals, whereas the role about protozoa is largely restricted. Relied on recent advances in genome and transcriptome development, this report identified a novel gene fusion and dated its precise fusion time in Metakinetoplastina protists. The fused gene family was termed as SCAMK based on its gene insertion history. Its copy number and expression pattern was studied in the parasite protist for the first time. This potential fourth eukaryotic calcium signal conversion pathway complements our current knowledge that convergent evolution occurs in eukaryotic calcium signaling.

Abbreviations

6PGD: 

6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase

AA: 

Amino acid

BPPV: 

Bayesian posterior probability supporting value

BSF: 

Blood stream form

CaM: 

Calmodulin

CaMK I/II/IV: 

Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I/II/IV

CaM-LD: 

Calmodulin-like domain

CBK: 

Calcium /calmodulin-binding protein kinase

CBL: 

Calcineurin B-like

CCaMK: 

Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase

CDPK: 

Calcium dependent protein kinase

CIPK: 

CBL-interacting protein kinase

CML: 

Calmodulin-like

CS: 

Ca2+ signatures/signal

GSK: 

Glycogen synthase kinase

HAT: 

Human African trypanosomiasis

IP3: 

1,4,5-trisphosphate

MAPK: 

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MBV: 

Maximum-likelihood bootstrap value

NMLV: 

Near maximum-likelihood local supporting value

PF: 

Procyclic form

PPRs: 

Protein phosphorylation responses

RPKM: 

Reads per kilobase per million mapped reads

SAR: 

Stramenopiles-Alveolata-Rizaria

SCAMK: 

SnRK3 and CML III fused kinase

SnRK: 

Sucrose non-fermenting related kinase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for helpful suggestions on this manuscript. We are grateful to Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Project (MMETSP), The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, TriTrypDB, The National Center for Biotechnology Information, for providing the online data access.

Funding

F.C. is supported by a China Scholarship Council (CSC) grant (NO. 201406850018) and a grant from State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops (SKB2017004). This project was supported by the Priority Academic Program Development of Modern Horticulture Science in Jiangsu Province, CX (14) 2051, China. This project was also partially supported by the Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Tennessee, No. 1009395. These funding bodies have no role in design of the study, or data collection, analysis, manuscript writing.

Availability of data and materials

Data resources from Excavata species were retrieved from several public databases enclosed in Additional file 4: Table S1. CAMK sequences from plants, animals, and fungi were obtained using BLAST search against the NCBI database. All the sequence IDs were listed in the tree for clarity. Transcriptome sequences and the expression value of Trypanosoma brucei were obtained from reported projects [43, 70].

Authors’ contributions

ZC and FC designed the research; FC performed the experiments; FC, ZC, LZ analyzed the data; FC wrote the draft manuscript; FC, ZC, LZ, ZL revised and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops; Center for Genomics and Biotechnology; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Corps; Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China
(2)
College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
(3)
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 37996, USA
(4)
Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, 63103-2010, USA

References

  1. Ringer S. A further contribution regarding the influence of the different constituents of the blood on the contraction of the heart. J Physiol. 1883;4:29–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Hansteen B. Über das verhaltender kulturpflanzenzu den bodensalzen. Jahrb Wiss Bot. 1910;47:289–376.Google Scholar
  3. Carafoli E. Calcium signaling: a tale for all seasons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:1115–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Whalley HJ, Knight MR. Calcium signatures are decoded by plants to give specific gene responses. New Phytol. 2013;197:690–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Roderick HL. Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2003;4:517–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Clapham DE. Calcium signaling. Cell. 2007;131:1047–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hetherington A, Trewavas A. Calcium-dependent protein kinase in pea shoot membranes. FEBS Lett. 1982;145:67–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lewandowski C. Properties of a calmodulin-activated Ca2+-dependent protein kinase from wheat germ. BBA-Gen Subj. 1983;761:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Luan S. Coding and decoding of calcium signals in plants. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Cai X. Unicellular Ca2+ signaling “toolkit” at the origin of metazoa. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1357–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Patil S, Takezawa D, Poovaiah BW. Plant calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase gene with a neural visinin-like calcium-binding domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:4897–901.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang L, Liu B, Liang S, Jones RL, Lu Y. Molecular and biochemical characterization of a calcium/calmodulin-binding protein kinase from rice. Biochem J. 2002;157:145–57.Google Scholar
  13. Nagata T. Comparative analysis of plant and animal calcium signal transduction element using plant full-length cDNA data. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:1855–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Harper J. A calcium-dependent protein kinase with a regulatory domain similar to calmodilin. Sci. 1991;252:951–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhu K, Chen F, Liu J, Chen X, Hewezi T, Cheng ZM. Evolution of an intron-poor cluster of the CIPK gene family and expression in response to drought stress in soybean. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28225.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Shi J, Kim K, Ritz O, Albrecht V, Gupta R, Harter K, et al. Novel protein kinases associated with calcineurin B-like calcium sensors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1999;11:2393–405.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Soderling T. The Ca2+ − calmodulin-dependent protein kinase cascade. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999;4:232–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang XS, Choi JH. Molecular evolution of calmodulin-like domain protein kinases (CDPKs) in plants and protists. J Mol Evol. 2001;53:214–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Edel KH, Kudla J. Increasing complexity and versatility: how the calcium signaling toolkit was shaped during plant land colonization. Cell Calcium. 2015;57:231–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Valle-aviles L, Valentin-berrios S, Gonzalez-mendez RR, Valle NR. Functional, genetic and bioinformatic characterization of a calcium/calmodulin kinase gene in Sporothrix schenckii. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang L, Lu YT. Calmodulin-binding protein kinases in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2003;8:123–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hrabak E. The Arabidopsis CDPK-SnRK superfamily of protein kinases. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:666–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen F, Fasoli M, Tornielli GB, Dal Santo S, Pezzotti M, Zhang L, et al. The evolutionary history and diverse physiological roles of the grapevine calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80818.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen F, Zhang L, Cheng Z-M. The calmodulin fused kinase novel gene family is the major system in plants converting Ca2+ signals to protein phosphorylation responses. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4127.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen F, Yin H, Liang Y, Cai B. Evolution of calcium-dependent portein kinase gene family in apple (Malus domestica). Acta Agric Jiangxi. 2013;25:15–20.Google Scholar
  26. Weinl S, Kudla J. The CBL–CIPK Ca2+-decoding signaling network: function and perspectives. New Phytol. 2009;184:517–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Paramecium N, Genazzani A, Ladenburger E. Calcium signaling in closely related protozoan groups (Alveolata): non-parasitic ciliates (Paramecium, Tetrahymena) vs. parasitic Apicomplexa (Plasmodium, Toxoplasma). Cell Calcium. 2012;51:351–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Plattner H. Molecular aspects of calcium signalling at the crossroads of unikont and bikont eukaryote evolution-the ciliated protozoan Paramecium in focus. Cell Calcium. 2015;57:174–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Burki F, Shalchian-Tabrizi K, Minge M, Skjæveland A, Nikolaev S, Jakobsen K, et al. Phylogenomics reshuffles the eukaryotic supergroups. PLoS One. 2007;2:e790.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Manning G, Whyte D, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Sci. 2002;298:1912–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Anamika K, Bhattacharya A, Srinivasan N. Analysis of the protein kinome of Entamoeba histolytica. Proteins. 2008;71:995–1006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zulawski M, Schulze G, Braginets R, Hartmann S, Schulze W. The Arabidopsis Kinome: phylogeny and evolutionary insights into functional diversification. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:548.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Parsons M, Worthey EA, Ward PN, Mottram JC. Comparative analysis of the kinomes of three pathogenic trypanosomatids: Leishmania major, Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma cruzi. BMC Genomics. 2005;6:127.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Talevich E, Tobin A, Kannan N, Doerig C. An evolutionary perspective on the kinome of malaria parasites. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2012;367:2607–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Adl SM, Simpson AGB, Lane CE, Lukes J, Bass D, Bowser SS, et al. The revised classification of eukaryotes. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2012;59:429–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang G, Lovato A, Liang YH, Wang M, Chen F, Tornielli GB, et al. Validation by isolation and expression analyses of the mitogen-activated protein kinase gene family in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2014;20:255–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu X, Dunand C, Snedden W, Galaud JP. CaM and CML emergence in the green lineage. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20:483–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Parfrey LW, Lahr DJG, Knoll AH, Katz LA. Estimating the timing of early eukaryotic diversification with multigene molecular clocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:13624–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Lukeš J, Skalický T, Týč J, Votýpka J, Yurchenko V. Evolution of parasitism in kinetoplastid flagellates. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2014;195:115–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Becker B. Snow ball earth and the split of Streptophyta and Chlorophyta. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:180–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Misof B, Liu S, Meusemann K, Peters RS, Donath A, Mayer C, et al. Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Sci. 2014;346:763–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Inositol LOF, Morenot SNJ, Docampos R, Trypanosoma W. Calcium homeostasis in procyclic and bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:6020–6.Google Scholar
  43. Alsford S, Turner DJ, Obado SO, Sanchez-flores A, Glover L, Berriman M, et al. High-throughput phenotyping using parallel sequencing of RNA interference targets in the African trypanosome. Genome Res. 2011;21:915–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Hashimoto K, Kudla J. Calcium decoding mechanisms in plants. Biochimie. 2011;93:2054–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin DMA, Miranda-saavedra D, Barton GJ. Kinomer v. 1.0 : a database of systematically classified eukaryotic protein kinases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:244–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Stern DL. The genetic causes of convergent evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:751–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Valdivia HO, Reis-Cunha JL, Rodrigues-Luiz GF, Baptista RP, Baldeviano GC, Gerbasi RV, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Leishmania (Viannia) peruviana and Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:715.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Berriman M, Ghedin E, Hertz-Fowler C, Blandin G, Renauld H, Bartholomeu DC, et al. The genome of the African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei. Sci. 2005;309:416–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Stock A, Robinson V, Goudreau P. Two component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000;69:183–215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Oduor RO, Ojo KK, Williams GP, Bertelli F, Mills J, Maes L, et al. Trypanosoma brucei glycogen synthase kinase-3, a target for anti-trypanosomal drug development: a public-private partnership to identify novel leads. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1017.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Khare S, Nagle AS, Biggart A, Lai YH, Liang F, Davis LC, et al. Proteasome inhibition for treatment of leishmaniasis, Chagas disease and sleeping sickness. Nat. 2016;537:229–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Douglas GR, Mcalpine PJ, Hamerton JL. Regional localization of loci for human PGM1 and 6PGD on human chromosome one by use of hybrids of Chinese hamster-human somatic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973;70:2737–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Croft SL, Coombs GH. Leishmaniasis – current chemotherapy and recent advances in the search for novel drugs. Trends Parasitol. 2003;19:502–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Huang G, Bartlett PJ, Thomas AP, Moreno SNJ, Docampo R. Acidocalcisomes of Trypanosoma brucei have an inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor that is required for growth and infectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:1887–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Hashimoto M, Enomoto M, Morales J, Kurebayashi N, Sakurai T, Hashimoto T, et al. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor regulates replication, differentiation, infectivity and virulence of the parasitic protist Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Microbiol. 2013;87:1133–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ward P, Equinet L, Packer J, Doerig C. Protein kinases of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum: the kinome of a divergent eukaryote. BMC Genomics. 2004;5:79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Lucet IS, Tobin A, Drewry D, Wilks AF. Plasmodium kinases as targets for new-generation antimalarials. Futur Med Chem. 2012;4:2295–310.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Croft SL, Olliaro P. Leishmaniasis chemotherapy-challenges and opportunities. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:1478–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Jamonneau V, Ilboudo H, Kabore J, Kaba D, Koffi M, Solano P, et al. Untreated human infections by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense are not 100% fatal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1691.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Croft SL. Neglected tropical diseases in the genomics era: re-evaluating the impact of new drugs and mass drug administration. Genome Biol. 2016;17:46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W29–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Yamada KD, Tomii K, Katoh K. Application of the MAFFT sequence alignment program to large data— reexamination of the usefulness of chained guide trees. Bioinform. 2016;32:3246–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26:1641–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinform. 2014;30:1312–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinform. 2003;19:1572–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Burge CB, Karlinb S. Finding the genes in genomic DNA. Curr Opin Struc Biol. 1998;8:346–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART: recent updates, new developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D257–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Yang J, Yan R, Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y. The I-TASSER suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods. 2015;12:7–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O. SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:270–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Nilsson D, Gunasekera K, Mani J, Osteras M, Farinelli L, Baerlocher L, et al. Spliced leader trapping reveals widespread alternative splicing patterns in the highly dynamic transcriptome of Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:21–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Verma J. Data analysis in management using SPSS. New Delhi: Springer India; 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us