Skip to main content

Differential transcriptome dynamics during the onset of conceptus elongation and between female and male porcine embryos



Porcine embryos undergo rapid differentiation and expansion between Days 8 and 12 before attaching to the maternal uterine epithelial surface after Day 13. It is known that maternal recognition of pregnancy and successful implantation are driven by mutual interactions between the elongated conceptus and the maternal endometrium. While most of the genes involved in regulation of embryo development are located on autosomal chromosomes, gene expression on sex chromosomes is modulating development through sex-specific transcription. To gain more insights into the dynamic transcriptome of preimplantation embryos at the onset of elongation and into X-linked gene expression, RNA-seq analyses were performed for single female and male porcine embryos collected on Days 8, 10, and 12 of pregnancy.


A high number of genes were differentially expressed across the developmental stages (2174 and 3275 for Days 8 vs 10, and 10 vs 12, respectively). The majority of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were involved in embryo elongation, development, and embryo-maternal interaction. Interestingly, a number of DEGs was found with respect to embryo sex (137, 37, and 56 on Days 8, 10 and 12, respectively). At Day 8, most of these DEGs were X-linked (96). Strikingly, the number of DEGs encoded on the X chromosome dramatically decreased from Day 10 to Day 12.


The obtained results deepen the understanding about temporary transcriptomic changes in porcine embryos during the phase of conceptus elongation, meanwhile reveal dynamic compensation of X chromosome in the female and distinct transcriptional differences between female and male embryos.


Porcine embryos undergo a morphological transformation before attaching to the uterine surface, which is supposed to maximize the intimate embryo-maternal communication. This is essential for maternal recognition of pregnancy and proper embryonic development during the preimplantation period, and thus a prerequisite for a successful pregnancy [1]. The transformation of morphology is likewise essential for embryo survival as the increased contact surface area improves the nutrient exchange between the conceptus and the uterus [2]. Embryos in the morula stage are transported into the anterior tips of the uterine horns around 60–72 h after estrus, thereafter developing into blastocysts until Day 5 of pregnancy. The blastocysts start hatching around Day 8 [3]. After hatching, porcine embryos continue to grow and form a sphere of around 2 to 6 mm in diameter on Day 10. Finally, the spherical blastocysts are transformed to tubular and then a long and thin filament approximately 100–150 mm in length on Day 12 of pregnancy [4]. Unlike the ruminant trophoblast-growth-driven elongation, the elongation from spherical to filamentous form of the pig conceptus is mainly contributed by comprehensive cellular migration and reorganization [5, 6].

Along with embryo elongation, estrogens secreted from the conceptuses on Days 11 and 12 initiate the most pronounced phase of maternal recognition of pregnancy [7, 8]. A number of genes from the uterine epithelium mediating cell growth, adhesion, transcription, transport, as well as prostaglandins, amino acids, and glucose synthesis are stimulated by estrogens [8, 9]. Besides, the cellular signaling pathways and their corresponding receptors located in the conceptuses were found to play a role in modulating cell proliferation, movement, adhesion, and trophectoderm cells survival during preimplantation and implantation periods [3]. The developing conceptus also contributes to the accumulation of prostaglandin F2α (PGF) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE) in the uterine luminal content [5, 10, 11]. According to previous studies, porcine conceptus interleukin one beta (IL1B) mRNA and protein abundance is increasing during the transformation from the tubular to the filamentous stage, reaching a maximum at the highly elongating period [12]. It is known that IL1B binds to a large number of receptors and its antagonists, together with an accessory protein, thereby regulating innate immunity and inflammation [13, 14]. Furthermore, interleukin 1 receptor (IL1R1) in the endometrium activated by conceptus IL1B2 triggers a cellular signaling pathway cascade through extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), mitogen activated kinase-like protein (MAPK) [15] and nuclear factors kappa-B (NFKB) [16]. Then, the NFKB activation mediates numerous biological networks including cytokines, chemokines, and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) expression [17]. However, the dynamic changes of gene expression during the preimplantation period in the conceptus are still poorly understood.

Genes located on the sex chromosomes can modulate the genome machinery resulting in differences in the development of female and male embryos. However, the sole determinant in phenotypic differences is different chromosome dosages during embryo preimplantation development [18]. In females, most genes on one X chromosome are silenced because of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) during early development [19]. As the model of dosage compensation during preimplantation development is proved by previous studies, a reversible dynamic X inactivation may cause X-linked gene up-regulation in female embryos [20]. The molecular events that cause differences between male and female embryos were observed in in vitro culture experiments including embryo developmental speed, blastocyst cell number, and metabolism [21]. In a global gene expression study of bovine Day 7 embryos, 193 X-linked transcripts were upregulated in female compared to male embryos, suggesting that XCI is partially achieved at the blastocyst stage [21]. To date, this is not clear in porcine embryos.

Considering the limited knowledge in pigs in terms of transcriptome changes of preimplantation embryos during the onset of elongation and respective differences between female and male embryos, this study was designed to analyze global gene expression in individual porcine embryos during the preimplantation period (Day 8, 10, and 12 of pregnancy) with the aims of (i) characterizing the dynamics of gene expression profiles and the involved functions and thereby (ii) investigating X-linked gene expression between female and male embryos.


RNA sequencing of porcine embryo samples

At least two embryos (one female and one male) were selected from the same sow in each stage and they were mixed within the same treatment. The embryos size collected on Days 10 and 12 ranged from 2.2 to 3 mm, and from 45 to 200 mm, respectively. RNA-seq libraries were prepared from 30 individual embryos (5 female and 5 male embryos each on Days 8, 10, and 12). The number of raw reads (100-bp single-end reads) ranged from 19 to 41 million per sample. From these, 18 to 39 million clean reads were obtained after quality filtering and adapter clip. All data used in this study have been included in the article and its Additional files. The sequence data (GSE113366) is available at National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus. The principal component analysis for all detected genes (13103) in these embryos (Fig. 1) revealed that embryos with the same days of pregnancy were grouped together. It was notable that embryo from Day 12 showed a higher distance with embryos from Days 8 and 10, besides the variation between embryos on Day 10 was highest compared with the rest embryos.

Fig. 1

Principal component analysis of all genes expression patterns of embryos. The multidimensional scaling plot displays that embryos from the same stage are grouped together. Samples from the same stage with the same symbol (square, round, triangle shape indicate samples of Day 8, 10, and 12, respectively). Red and blue colors indicate female and male embryos, respectively

Differentially expressed genes across the stages during the preimplantation phase

Based on the analysis of DEG (FDR 0.1%, log2 fold change > 1), the total number of 2174 DEG were found between Days 8 and 10, and even more genes (3275 DEG) were differentially expressed between Days 10 and 12 (Fig. 2a). A number of 1072 DEG were shared by these two comparisons and many of them shared a similar expression profile. The DEG of each comparison were combined (4377 DEG) for analysis of typical expression profiles across the developmental stages. Hierarchical cluster analysis provided an overview of the expression profiles for all the combined DEG (Fig. 2b). To have a closer look into the regulation of these DEGs, the genes with similar expressions at the same stage were identified by Self-Organizing Tree Algorithm (SOTA) analysis (Fig. 3), which revealed the expression of almost half of the genes was similar on Days 8 and 10 but increased on Day 12 (genes of cluster 1 and 5). Inversely, a number of genes showed increased expression on Days 8 and 10 but decreased expression on Day 12 (cluster 3). Furthermore, clusters of genes were found that showed increased expression only on Day 8 (contained in cluster 3) and only on Day 10 (cluster 2), respectively. In cluster 4, the gene expression dramatically increased on Day 10, and kept a stable upregulated expression level on Day 12. The DEGs across the three stages are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Fig. 2

Venn diagram for differentially expressed genes identified across the three developmental stages (a). Green, Day 8 vs Day 10 of embryos; blue, Day 10 vs Day 12 of embryos. Hierarchical cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes identified for three stages (b). Mean-centered expression values (log2 counts per million of sample – mean of log2 counts per million of all samples) for the embryos of the Day 8 vs Day 10 and Day 10 vs Day 12 are shown for genes with significant differences in gene expression (FDR < 0.1% and │log2 fold change│ > 1). The color scale is from −2 (blue, lower than mean) to 2 (red, higher than mean). Each row represents 1 gene, each column 1 sample

Fig. 3

Clustering of gene expression profiles for three stages of the embryos. The SOTA of MeV software (version 4.9.0) was used to obtain groups of genes with similar expression profiles. Clusters 1 to 5 are from left to right and top to down. Vertical axis is in log2 scale and shows the deviation from the mean expression value. Numbers of genes for each cluster are shown (top left corner). F and M mean female and male embryos, respectively

Functional category analysis of gene expression profile clusters

A functional annotation clustering analysis was performed with the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) tool for the individual SOTA clusters. Highly significant functional annotation clusters (geometric mean of member categories’ P-values < 0.001 which was calculated based on Fisher’s exact test) for each of the 5 SOTA expression profile clusters are shown in Table 1. Strong enrichment of functional categories related to cell communication, cell motility and migration, cell adhesion and junction, cytoskeleton organization, embryo development, apoptosis, and immune response was found for genes specifically upregulated on Day 12 (clusters 1 and 5). For genes up-regulated genes on Day 10 (cluster 2), lipid biosynthetic and metabolic process, transport, developmental and homeostasis were enriched. Genes upregulated on Days 8 and 10 (cluster 3) revealed overrepresented functional categories such as vacuole, lipid metabolic and biosynthetic process, cell-cell junction, and ion transport. For cluster 4, containing genes with increased expression on Days 10 and 12 functional categories involved in development and morphogenesis, cell-cell signaling, and apoptotic process were overrepresented. More detailed information is shown in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Table 1 Overrepresented DAVID annotation clusters for the obtained SOTA expression clusters

An overview of a network of enriched functional classification categories for the obtained DEG of the SOTA clusters is shown in Fig. 4. The DEG from these five clusters were analyzed with the online tool ToppCluster for Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway analysis. The most overrepresented categories including response to estrogen, cell migration, actin filament-based process, vasculature development, as well as animal organ morphogenesis were shared in most of the SOTA expression profile clusters (Fig. 4). In addition, there were also functional categories specifically overrepresented in cluster 1, e.g., interferon signaling, extracellular matrix organization, cytokine signaling in immune system, heparin binding, growth factor binding, and cell adhesion molecule binding. Cluster 3 was enriched for transport and cluster 4 in actin cytoskeleton organization, developmental growth, epithelial tube formation, and cytoskeletal protein binding. In addition, neuron development was specifically enriched in cluster 5.

Fig. 4

Gene Ontology (GO) functional classification network of clusters. All significant differential genes (human Entrez Gene IDs) from clusters were used as input for the ToppCluster. The following databases were used, i.e. “biological process”, “cellular component”, “molecular function” and pathway. Finally, the data were uploaded in Cytoscape 3.6.0 to modify the network. Nodes were colored based on specificity: red nodes specific for different cluster; nodes for the three GO functions and pathway were in different colors

Top 5% functional annotations of upregulated genes from the embryos on Day 12

To explore more details of the upregulated genes on Day 12, our data were subjected to the online tool DAVID (Gene Ontology (GO) categories and KEGG pathways) to show the systematic functional classification for upregulated genes in the embryos from Day 12 compared with Day 10. The functional categories were selected based on the condition of FDR < 1%, then filtered by a score combining FDR and fold enrichment. The overrepresented GO terms and pathways with the top 5% scores were selected and the results were shown in Table 2. The categories related to ‘morphogenesis’ and ‘development’ were disclosed to be the main functions on Day 12.

Table 2 Top 5% functional annotation of upregulated genes of the embryos on Day 12

Signaling pathways related to maternal recognition of pregnancy on Day 12

In the embryos of Day 12, a number of 164 DEGs assigned to a selection of particularly interesting pathways and processes, e.g., estrogen signaling, steroid hormone biosynthesis, prostaglandin (PG) metabolism, signaling and transport are shown in Additional file 3: Table S3. A total number of 24 DEGs including 16 up- and 8 down-regulated genes were found in the estrogen signaling pathways. For PG synthesis, regulation, and transporting, 73 gene were identified as DE (including 47 upregulated and 26 downregulated genes) on Day 12. The networks of these DEGs involved in estrogen and PG signaling pathways are shown in Fig. 5a and b, respectively.

Fig. 5

The networks of DEGs involved in estrogen (a) and prostaglandin (b) signaling pathways. The sources of co-expression, physical interactions, co-localization, pathway, shared protein domains, and genetic interactions were selected to weight the network. One edge indicates one source, and one node means one gene

Comparison of DEGs in the elongating conceptus between pig and sheep

Data of dynamic transcriptome changes from ovoid to a filamentous conceptus in sheep [22] have been adopted to compare with our findings (from Day 10 to Day 12 in pigs, and from Day 12 to Day 14 in sheep). The results show that the majority of the DEGs (1829) were identified as upregulated specifically in porcine embryos (Fig. 6), and 1025 gene were identified as downregulated. A number of 1093 downregulated genes and 795 upregulated genes were specifically expressed in sheep embryos. Besides, 133 upregulated and 77 downregulated genes were commonly expressed during the elongation in both species, while 209 genes had different regulations in pig and sheep embryos. The detailed information of these DEGs is depicted in Additional file 4: Table S4.

Fig. 6

Upset plots illustrating the number of differentially expressed genes in porcine and ovine embryos (B). Green and blue indicate the up- and down-regulated genes in porcine embryos. Yellow and red indicates the up- and dwon-regulated genes in ovine embryos. The green, red, blue, and yellow points indicates the genes were specifically expressed in one species, while the black plots mean these genes are commonly expressed in two species

Analysis of expression of genes located on the X chromosome in the three embryo stages

At an FDR of 5%, a number of 137, 37, and 56 differentially DEG between female and male embryos were obtained on Days 8, 10, and 12, respectively. A hierarchical cluster analysis of these DEG is shown in Fig. 7a, b, and c. With respect to higher or lower expression of DEG in female compared to male embryos, 107 upregulated and 30 downregulated, 23 upregulated and 14 downregulated, and 31 upregulated and 25 downregulated genes were identified on Days 8, 10, and 12, respectively (Additional file 5: Table S5). Regarding chromosomal location of these DEG, a number of 96, 19, and 11 X-linked DEG were found on Days 8, 10, and 12, respectively (Fig. 8a). The number of DEG located on the X chromosome decreased on Day 12 compared with Day 8 embryos (20% vs 70% of the DEG). Four X-linked genes, namely B-cell receptor-associated protein 31 (BCAP31), family with sequence similarity 3 member A (FAM3A), ribosomal protein L10 (RPL10), and tafazzin (TAZ), were upregulated in female embryos on all 3 days (Additional file 5: Table S5). All DEG located on the X chromosome were upregulated except three genes, namely family with sequence similarity 155 member B (FAM155B), collagen type IV alpha 5 chain (COL4A5) and spindlin-2B (LOC100526148), that were downregulated in female embryos on Day 8 (Fig. 8b). More detailed information about the DEG between female and male embryos for each stage is shown in Additional file 5: Table S5.

Fig. 7

Hierarchical cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes between female and male embryos identified for the (a) Day 8, (b) Day 10, and (c) Day 12 embryos. Mean-centered expression values (log2 counts per million of sample – mean of log2 counts per million of all samples) for the female and male embryos are shown with significant differences in gene expression (FDR < 5%). Color scale is from − 2 (blue, lower than mean) to 2 (red, higher than mean). Each row represents one gene, each column represents one embryo

Fig. 8

Venn diagram for X-linked differentially expressed genes (a) and expression profile of X-linked differentially expressed genes (b). Green, blue, and pink filed in Venn graph indicate X-linked differentially expressed genes on Day 8, 10, and 12 of the embryos, respectively. The red and blue plots in the scatter mean the up and down-regulated genes on the X chromosome in female embryos, respectively

Functional annotations for sex-based DEGs and X-linked DEGs in the embryos

The functional classification based on the DEGs from the comparison between female and male embryos was identified at each stage (Table 3). A number of 22 functional categories were identified on Day 8. Among these categories, genes involved in “phosphatidylinositol-3,5-bisphosphate 3-phosphatase activity” had the highest enrichment. Interestingly, on Days 10 and 12, only one category, the “translational initiation”, was enriched in both two stages.

Table 3 Overrepresnted functional categories for the DEGs between female and male embryos

X-linked DEGs were analyzed to reveal the related functional categories (Table 4). The majority of functions were similar as the categories from the sex-based DEGs on Day 8. However, no functional categories with significant fold enrichment from the X-linked genes were identified on days 10 and 12.

Table 4 Overrepresnted functional categories for the X-linked DEGs between female and male embryos on Day 8


Prior to attaching to the maternal uterine epithelial surface, porcine embryos normally undergo programmed differentiation and expansion. This reflects the rapid morphological changes between Days 8 and 12, which results from various hormonal and gene expression changes. The transcriptome of the embryo either in autosomal or sex chromosomes is hypothesized to be dynamic, but only little evidence supports this hypothesis. By using RNA-Seq, the present study analyzed embryos sampled at three critical time points and revealed a range of phase-specific gene expressions regulating embryo elongation, development and communication with the maternal uterus. These events are critical for successful implantation in pigs.

Genes related to conceptuses elongation (cell growth, cell movement, and cellular remolding)

The current results revealed that the elongating conceptuses under investigation displayed various dynamic gene expression changes most highly expressed on Day 12, especially relating to cell growth, cell movement as well as cellular remolding.

A number of growth factors were found to have increased gene expression on Day 12, including insulin growth factor (IGF) family, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1), transforming growth factor beta 2 (TGFβ2), platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA), insulin like growth factor binding protein 5 (IGFBP5), and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2). These results confirm a related study in mouse, where a range of growth factors were produced by the preimplantation embryo and the reproductive tract, and many of the respective receptors were detected on the embryo surface [23]. The TGFβ was regarded as an essential factor in modulating extracellular matrix (ECM) protein expression and the accumulation of ECM proteins results in increasing cell migration [24]. Expression of TGFβ1 and TGFβ3 were observed to be unregulated in porcine conceptuses on Day 10 compared with Day 8, and mRNA of TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβI were still increasing except TGFβ3 was decreasing from Day 10 to Day 12. From our findings, the increasing TGFβ may contribute to some extent to morphological changes of the embryo via migrating cells and remolding tissues. Growth differentiation factor 6 (GDF6) was observed with the highest expression on Day 12. Recently, GDF6 gene was detected in several distinct embryonic locations in mouse, which facilitates the skeletal and soft tissues formation [25]. We found placenta expressed transcript 1 (PLET1) upregulated on Day 12, which is in line with the previous result that PLET1 was found with high expression in elongated conceptuses [26], indicating a strong activity of trophoblast differentiation [27].

Coordination between assembly and disassembly of actin filaments is a key factor to provide a driving force that initiates the cell movement in animals [28]. It is reported that the cellular motility in vitro can be reconstituted by a core set proteins including actin, actin related protein2/3 (Arp2/3) complex, actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin, profilin, and capping protein [29]. Consistently, the current study observed that genes coding actin proteins, actin binding LIM protein 1 (ABLIM1), actin related protein 2/3 complex subunit 1B (ARPC1B), cofilin 2 (CFL2), profilin 1 (PFN1), and capping actin protein gelsolin like (CAPG) were differently expressed from Days 8 to 12. With reference to porcine embryos, the filamentous actin cytoskeleton reassembly is rather outstanding in the early pregnant stage implying that compaction and blastogenesis are activated during the preimplantation period [30]. Herein, we report that the gene coding for cytoskeleton associated protein 4 (CKAP4) revealed highest expression on Day 12 suggesting that stage-specific changes in actin organization occur between Days 8 and 12 of pregnancy. This is consistent with the formation of cytoskeletal elements occurring during mouse embryo preimplantation stage [31]. On the other hand, the low expression of genes coding for two major cytoskeletal proteins (desmin (DES) and vimentin (VIM)) was observed. The expression of VIM was greater in Day 12 conceptuses compared to Day 8 and 10 conceptuses, which is in line with previously observed VIM protein patterns indicating that mesodermal differentiation and migration activities are greater during the filamentous stage [32,33,34]. Though DES and VIM proteins were confirmed to be expressed dynamically, their transcripts were kept a low level based on the present results. Though DES and VIM regulating filaments were found not to be essential for embryo development, the cytokeratin formation is an initial step for the epithelium differentiation [31]. A DES and VIM co-expression may exist to make up the insufficient filament protein production in developing embryonic tissue [35].

The majority of genes regulating the cell differentiation, growth and movement were expressed highly on Day 12. As indicated in Fig. 2b, the total number of activated genes increased gradually along developmental progression suggesting that Day 12 of pregnancy is a critical period with more pathways and functions involved in embryo elongation. Meanwhile, the expressions of some genes reached the peak on Day 10, like KRT, MDK that are responsible for blastocyst formation [36] and embryo survival [37].

Genes related to embryo development

It is known that the transformation of morphology is essential for embryo survival as the increased placental surface area can improve the nutrient exchange between the conceptus and the uterus [2]. Lipids are not only components of cellular membrane and cytoplasm but also of great importance in producing energy that is essential for proper embryo development [38]. Genes related with lipid biosynthetic process, such as lipoprotein (LPL) and acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 3 (ACSL3), were found to be expressed in the present study, especially fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3) and ELOVL fatty acid elongase 6 (ELOVL6), which reached a peak on Day 10. As reported previously, the content of lipids in pig embryos was markedly decreased in the late blastocyst stage [38], which proves that the energy for embryo development from Day 8 to Day 10 is provided by lipid synthesis and metabolism. As the embryo achieves a more advanced development from Day 10 onwards, genes involved in the category of energy production were rationally downregulated on Day 12.

Significant different gene expression of KRT8 and KRT18 were found between bovine morula and blastocyst embryos indicating their roles in blastocyst formation and embryo implantation [39]. The latter, KRT18 mRNA and protein were confirmed to be differentially expressed in bovine embryo development and it was regarded as a marker for blastocyst formation [36]. The present findings were in line with a previous report that expression of KRT18 mRNA was decreased in the filamentous conceptus compared with the ovoid conceptus, implying that KRTs play a role in trophectoderm development [40]. The neurite growth-promoting factor, midkine (MDK) protein is a developmentally regulated heparin binding cytokine that is induced by retinoic acid [41, 42]. The MDK transcripts reached at a peak in the Day 10 conceptus of our study suggesting that it may be associated with extra-embryonic tissue development from Day 8 to Day 10 [40] rather than the tissue remodeling from Day 10 to Day 12. The genes under similar regulations between porcine and ovine elongating embryos (as shown in Fig. 6), revealing the conserved DEGs in two species. While the opposite regulated genes from these two species may likely indicate the distinct pathways that facilitate embryo elongation in pig different from sheep.

The genes involved in nutrient requirements displayed stage-specific expression. For example, Day 10 embryos required more energy reflected by the high gene expression coding for lipid and energy synthesis. In addition, novel and stage-specific genes transcripts were discovered regarding estrogen and embryo development.

Genes related to embryo-maternal interaction

Seven integrin alpha genes (ITGA2, ITGA3, ITGA5, ITGA6, ITGA9, ITGA10, and ITGAL) and five integrin beta genes (ITGB2, ITGB3, ITGB5, ITGB6, and ITGB8) were notably differentially expressed. A higher abundance of ITGA3, ITGB6, and ITGB8 was identified on Day 10 compared with Day 8. However, expression level of nine integrin genes (including ITGA2, ITGA3, ITGA6, ITGA10, ITGAL, ITGB2, ITGB3, ITGB5, and ITGB6) higher abundant at Day 12 compared to Day 10. Integrins have been recognized as cell surface adhesion receptors [43]. According to the network of ligand receptor-mediated multicellular signaling from the FANTOM5 database of human cells [44], the ligand of integrin has been located in the endometrium on Day 12 of pregnancy in pigs [45, 46]. The expression of integrins with the detection of their ligands indicates the role of cell adhesion taking place in the maternal-embryo crosstalk, especially on Day 12, a time with an intensive embryo-maternal interaction.

A number of genes coding gap junction protein (GJA1, GJB1, GJB3, GJB5) were highly expressed, especially on Day 12. Gap junction is a complex of proteins locating distinctly on the plasma membrane of bordering cells to establish the intercellular connection [47]. The gene coding desmosome associated protein, PNN, was likewise among the highly expressed transcripts in the present study. Desmosomes were reduced in the mouse uterine epithelium during the preimplantation revealing that the reduction in desmosome adhesion contributes to embryonic-penetration in luminal epithelium [48]. In contrast to the invasive implantation in mouse, a high expression of PNN was observed in all three stages of development under investigation, which leads us to assume that there was no penetrating process due to the specific non-invasive implantation in pigs. In our study, genes coding tight junction proteins (TJP1, TJP2), and TJP3 were upregulated, which are produced by embryonic cells during preimplantation period and act as a tight junction for polarized transporting, and intercellular integrity and signaling [49].

The expression of IL1B in the embryo during the preimplantation was reported with dynamic changes, however, the pattern currently seems to be controversial. Ross et al. reported that the expression of IL1B was increasing from Day 10 to Day 12 along with the embryo elongation [12]. Another related study showed that the level of IL1B mRNA of porcine conceptus was decreased on Day 12 when compared with Day 11 [50]. Similar to the later, we noticed that transcripts of IL1B mRNA reached a peak on Day 10 compared to Days 8 and 12. It has been shown that IL1 was induced by estrogen and progesterone, while high levels of estrogen and progesterone could inversely inhibit IL1 secretion [51, 52]. Therefore, we propose that from Days 8 to 10, the increasing secretion of estrogen by the elongating conceptuses most likely stimulates IL1B expression. However, the large amount of accumulated estrogen on Day 12 thereafter inhibit ILIB transcription. IL1B has a unique form in pig conceptuses, namely IL1B2, which was highly expressed on Day 10. Though interleukin 1 receptor type 1 (IL1R1) and interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP), receptors for the IL1B-signaling system, were found low expression from Day 8 to 12. The IL1B of the embryo together with IL1R1 and IL1RAP initiate the IL1B-signaling system plays an important role in implantation by regulating expression of endometrial genes for prostaglandin (PG) synthesis [53].

Along with morphological changes, expression patterns indicate the intimate dialogue between endometrium and embryo. Over time, the communication intensity increases indicated by the increased expressions of various genes involved in the cell surface adhesion and gap junction.

The maternal recognition of pregnancy on Day 12

The rapidly elongated embryo secretes large amount of estrogen on Day 12, which initiates the maternal recognition of pregnancy in pigs. Expression of estrogen receptor has been described in the endometrium of sows during early pregnancy [54]. Cytochrome P450 family members are involved in estrogen synthesis and metabolism [55, 56]. In the current study, a number of genes coding specific CYP members, i.e. CYP11A1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, CYP2S1, and CYP4F22 were identified as DEGs specifically on Day 12. Hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 1 (HSD17B1) catalyzes cholesterol to estrogen in endometriosis [57], and is massively expressed in the trophectoderm rather than in the embryonic disc of the porcine conceptus tissue on the day 12 [58]. Compared with Day 10, the expression of HSD17B1 was decreased on Day 12, suggesting that HSD17B1 secreted from the trophectoderm was not the most important component in the estrogen synthesis. Phospholipase A2 family members (PLA2s), the key enzymes for the release of PG precursor molecules [59], were upregulated in the embryos on Day 12. In contrast, endometrial PLA2s were described as downregulated on Day 12 in pigs [46]. The differential expression of PLA2s in embryos and endometrial cells point towards the regulation of the corpus luteum maintenance via PG. The transporter of PGs, the solute carrier organic anion transport family member 2A1 (SLCO2A1) mRNA was upregulated in the embryos on Day 12 compared with Day 10. The large amount of estrogen secreted from the embryos could stimulate the endometrium to switch the secretion of PG from endocrine to exocrine. Taken together, the genes involved in estrogen secretion and regulation of PG synthesizing, metabolizing and transporting proteins revealed a complex pattern of maternal recognition of pregnancy.

DEGs between female and male

Dosage compensation for X-linked genes occurs by inactivating one X chromosome in the female during embryonic development, the event of which is highly conserved in the mammal and essential for embryogenesis [60]. The current findings revealed a number of differentially expressed genes between female and male pig embryos, namely 137, 37, and 56 on Day 8, 10, and 12, respectively. Distributing the gene location on the chromosomes, 100, 19, and 11 genes were X-linked DEG on the respective days. In bovine blastocysts, more DEG, namely 382 genes, were detected between female and male embryos, from which 218 genes were X-linked [21]. In previous study, around 600 DEG were discovered in between female versus male mouse blastocysts using transgenesis and microarray analyses [61]. Thus, less X-linked genes were detected in pigs than mouse and cows. Sex chromatin as a part of the X chromosome was first detected at the blastocyst stage with 45 cells in porcine embryos, which was an approximate guide to the presence of an inactive chromosome [62]. This could also be a reason that XCI started partially before Day 8 in porcine embryos. Additionally, the majority of the upregulated genes in female embryos were X-linked on Day 8, similar to the results observed in bovine [21]. Despite that parts of the X-linked genes were not differentially expressed before Day 8, our results still provide the evidence that 81 X-linked gene expression are changed between male and female embryos from Day 8 to Day 10, and eight from Day 10 to Day 12. Therefore, the data allow the assumption that XCI probably proceeds gradually and causes the decreasing of X-linked DEG from Day 8 to Day 12.

Prior to the initiation of XCI, all X-linked genes should be present as 2-fold dose in females [63]. In fact, most X-linked genes determined here were less than two-fold expressed in female embryos on Day 8 compared to males. The housekeeping X-linked gene glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) has been considered as a potential candidate involved in sex difference [64]. In our findings, G6PD transcripts were high abundant, but only 1.5-fold in female embryos on Day 8 compared to males. Moreover, G6PD was not differentially expressed on Days 10 and 12. Previous studies reported that inactivation of paternal X-linked genes was often incomplete, which is associated with the specific locus, species, and tissue, respectively [65, 66]. In addition, it is known for many years that sex chromatin and late replication of a X chromosome do not occur in all cells of the embryo at the same time [67]. This is likely the reason for most genes on X chromosomes being differentially expressed on Day 8 and no difference observed on Days 10 and 12. Functional annotations for the sex-based DEGs and X-linked DEGs revealed that the majority of functional categories were attributed by the DEGs on the X chromosome rather than the autosome on Day 8. Neither on Day 10 nor Day 12, significant functional categories were detected, indicating that the compensation on the X chromosome has balanced the difference between female and male embryos. Overall, based on the comparison of X-linked genes between female and male preimplantation embryos, the number of DEG on X chromosome were decreasing along with the progression of pregnancy. These finding suggested that the compensation between female and male has occurred before Day 8, and would persist until Day 12 with most X-linked genes expressed with similarity between male and female embryos.


In conclusion, we identified comprehensive transcriptome changes associated with embryo elongation, development, and embryo-maternal interaction during the preimplantation period. A number of biological processes and pathways with temporal changes were revealed governing the embryonic cell movement and remodeling to form the elongated embryo. Genes involved in cell communication and adhesion were highly expressed on Day 12, which indicates the increased interaction between the mother and embryo. Bioinformatics analyses of gene expression between female and male embryos showed that a number of X-linked genes were differentially expressed on Day 8. These DEGs disappeared gradually along with the embryo elongation on Days 10 and 12. The latter findings suggest that dynamic changes of transcriptome on the X chromosome may reveal the changed dosage compensation between sexes before embryo implantation in pigs.


The animal experiment was conducted in Freising, Germany and approved by the District Government of Upper Bavaria and were in accordance with the accepted standards of humane animal care in Germany.

Animal experiment

The animals were owned and kept at the Research station “Thalhausen” of the Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. Twelve German Landrace × Pietrain crossbred gilts were cycle synchronized using Altrenogest ReguMate® for twelve days, then Intergonan® (PMSG) at 750 iU was applied once in the following evening, and Ovogest® (human chorion gonadotropin) at 750 iU was applied once 3.5 days later. The next day (day 0), all animals were inseminated with sperm of the same single Pietrain boar. The animals were slaughtered in a commercial slaughterhouse. Four gilts were slaughtered by stabbing in the neck for bloodletting after anesthesia each on Days 8, 10, and 12 post insemination, respectively. The respective gilts were randomly assigned to the date of slaughtering. The reproductive tracts were collected immediately after slaughter.

Embryo collection

The complete embryos (including embryonic disc and trophectoderm cells) were flushed from the uterus using 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) per horn, and then were transferred into a petri-dish containing PBS for morphological observation. All embryos were then individually shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately and stored at − 80 °C for further DNA and RNA analyses.

DNA sex determination and RNA-seq library preparation

All embryos underwent total DNA and RNA extraction using the AllPrep DNA/RNA Micro Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. The integrity and the quantity of the RNA were assessed on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The DNA samples were used for sex determination by measuring relative gene expression with quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Gene-specific primers (SRY and Histone genes) were designed with online tool NCBI Primer-BLAST (see Additional file 6: Table S6). The amplification products were obtained from qPCR with reaction mixture including 2 × FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master 10 μl, DNA 1 μl, forward primer 0.6 μl, reverse primer 0.6 μl, and add water to 20 μl. The following qPCR program: 95 °C for 10 min, amplification for 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s, and ∆Ct value method was used for relative quantification.

We then randomly selected 5 embryos per time point and sex of high RNA quality (RIN > 8) for RNA-seq. After RNA extraction, 100 ng total RNA was used as input for the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA library construction (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) regarding the manufacturer’s recommendation. Briefly, RNA was fragmented and random primers were hybridized for cDNA synthesis. The resulting cDNA was followed by 3′ adenylation and adapter ligation. Finally, PCR amplification was performed with the subsequent protocol (98 °C for 30 s; 15 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s; 72 °C for 5 min). Library quality control was performed with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany), followed by sample pooling. Finally, pooled libraries was sequenced as 100-bp single-end on the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina Inc.) platform.

RNA sequencing data analysis

Analysis of RNA-seq data was performed using a locally installed version of Galaxy [68]. Raw reads were quality trimmed with Trim Galore and 3 bp were removed from the 5′ end of each read. All sequences were mapped to the Sus scrofa genome (version 11.1) from NCBI ( and filtered by CPM cutoff. The resulting read count table with CPM was used for statistical analysis in EdgeR to identify differentially expressed genes (DEG) by using GLM robust method [69]. The DEG between the female and male embryos were filtered with a false discovery rate (FDR) at 5%, and DEG between the different stages were filtered with FDR < 0.1% and │log2 fold change│ > 1. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed for preliminary assessments of the number of gene clusters in MultiExperiment Viewer (MeV) [70], then the list of DEGs from three stages were used for Self Organizing Tree Algorithm (SOTA) clustering. Gene ID of DEGs in each cluster were uploaded into DAVID for gene ontology (GO) and pathway analyses [71]. DEGs from individual clusters were analyzed with the online tool Toppcluster ( to generate the overview networks between the GO categories and pathways and the p-Value cutoff was set at 0.05 then improved on Cytoscape to show the final results [72]. The network of the DEGs involved in the estrogen and prostaglandin signaling pathway was analyzed on online tool GeneMANIA.

Availability of data and materials

All date used in this study have been included in the article and its Additional files. The sequence data (GSE113366) is available at National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (



Actin binding LIM protein 1


Acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 3


Actin related protein2/3


Actin related protein 2/3 complex subunit 1B


B-cell receptor-associated protein 31


Capping actin protein gelsolin like


Cofilin 2


Cytoskeleton associated protein 4


Collagen type IV alpha 5 chain


Cytochrome P450 family members


Differentially expressed genes




Extracellular matrix


ELOVL fatty acid elongase 6


Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2


Fatty acid binding protein 3


Family with sequence similarity 155 member B


Family with sequence similarity 3 member A


Fibroblast growth factor


Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2


Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase


Growth differentiation factor 6


Gap junction protein


Gene Ontology


Hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 1


Insulin growth factor


Insulin like growth factor binding protein 5


Interleukin one beta


Interleukin 1 receptor


Interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein


Integrin genes






Mitogen activated kinase-like protein


Nuclear factors kappa-B


Platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha


Profilin 1




Prostaglandin E2


Prostaglandin F2α


Phosphoglycerate kinase 1


Placenta expressed transcript 1


PG-endoperoxide synthase


Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2


Ribosomal protein L10


18S ribosomal RNA




Transforming growth factor beta


Tight junction proteins






X-chromosome inactivation


  1. 1.

    Bazer FW, Johnson GA. Pig blastocyst–uterine interactions. Differentiation. 2014;87(1):52–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Stroband HW, Van der Lende T. Embryonic and uterine development during early pregnancy in pigs. J Reprod Fertil. 1990;40:261–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Geisert RD, Whyte JJ, Meyer AE, Mathew DJ, Juárez MR, Lucy MC, et al. Rapid conceptus elongation in the pig: an interleukin 1 beta 2 and estrogen regulated phenomenon. Mol Reprod Dev. 2017;84(9):760–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Blomberg LA, Zuelke KA. Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) during porcine embryo development. Reprod Fert Develop. 2003;16(2):87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Geisert RD, Brookbank JW, Michael Roberts R, Bazer FW. Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: II. Cellular remodeling of the porcine blastocyst during elongation on day 12 of pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1982;27(4):941–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mattson BA, Overstrom EW, Albertini DF. Transitions in trophectoderm cellular shape and cytoskeletal organization in the elongating pig blastocyst. Biol Reprod. 1990;42(1):195–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Moffatt RJ, Blair RM, Yellin T. Embryonic steroids and the establishment of pregnancy in pigs. J Reprod Fertil. 1990;40:293–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Geisert RD, Lucy MC, Whyte JJ, Ross JW, Mathew DJ. Cytokines from the pig conceptus: roles in conceptus development in pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014;5(1):51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bazer FW, Wu G, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bayless K. Novel pathways for implantation and establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in mammals. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(3):135–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Davis DL, Pakrasi PL, Dey SK. Prostaglandins in swine blastocysts. Biol Reprod. 1983;28(5):1114–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stone BA, Seamark RF, Kelly RW, Deam S. Production of steroids and release of prostaglandins by spherical pig blastocysts in vitro. Aust J Biol Sci. 1986;39(3):283–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ross JW, Malayer JR, Ritchey JW, Geisert RD. Characterization of the interleukin-1β system during porcine trophoblastic elongation and early placental attachment. Biol Reprod. 2003;69(4):1251–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sims JE, Smith DE. The IL-1 family: regulators of immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(2):89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Garlanda C, Dinarello CA, Mantovani A. The interleukin-1 family: back to the future. Immunity. 2013;39(6):1003–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jeong W, Kim J, Bazer FW, Song G, Kim J. Stimulatory effects of interleukin-1 beta on development of porcine uterine epithelial cell are mediated by activation of the ERK1/2 MAPK cell signaling cascade. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;419:225–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mathew DJ, Newsom EM, Guyton JM, Tuggle CK, Geisert RD, Lucy MC. Activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B in uterine luminal epithelial cells by interleukin 1 Beta 2: a novel interleukin 1 expressed by the elongating pig conceptus. Biol Reprod. 2015;92(4):107–1.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ali S, Mann DA. Signal transduction via the NF-κB pathway: a targeted treatment modality for infection, inflammation and repair. Cell Biochem Funct. 2004;22(2):67–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bermejo-Alvarez P, Rizos D, Rath D, Lonergan P, Gutierrez-Adan A. Epigenetic differences between male and female bovine blastocysts produced in vitro. Physiol Genomics. 2008;32(2):264–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Avner P, Heard E. X-chromosome inactivation: counting, choice and initiation. Nature Rev Genet. 2001;2(1):59.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gutiérrez-Adán A, Oter M, Martínez-Madrid B, Pintado B, De La Fuente J. Differential expression of two genes located on the X chromosome between male and female in vitro–produced bovine embryos at the blastocyst stage. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;55(2):146–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bermejo-Alvarez P, Rizos D, Rath D, Lonergan P, Gutierrez-Adan A. Sex determines the expression level of one third of the actively expressed genes in bovine blastocysts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(8):3394–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Brooks K, Burns GW, Moraes JG, Spencer TE. Analysis of the uterine epithelial and conceptus transcriptome and luminal fluid proteome during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy in sheep. Biol Reprod. 2016;95(4):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kane MT, Morgan PM, Coonan C. Peptide growth factors and preimplantation development. Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3(2):137–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Klinowska TCM, Ireland GW, Kimber SJ. A new in vitro model of murine mesoderm migration: the role of fibronectin and laminin. Differentiation. 1994;57(1):7–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mortlock DP, Guenther C, Kingsley DM. A general approach for identifying distant regulatory elements applied to the Gdf6 gene. Genome Res. 2003;13(9):2069–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhao S-H, Simmons DG, Cross JC, Scheetz TE, Casavant TL, Soares MB, et al. PLET1 (C11orf34), a highly expressed and processed novel gene in pig and mouse placenta, is transcribed but poorly spliced in human. Genomics. 2004;84(1):114–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Murray A, Sienerth AR, Hemberger M. Plet1 is an epigenetically regulated cell surface protein that provides essential cues to direct trophoblast stem cell differentiation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25112.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nobes CD, Hall A. Rho GTPases control polarity, protrusion, and adhesion during cell movement. J Cell Biol. 1999;144(6):1235–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pollard TD, Borisy GG. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell. 2003;112(4):453–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Albertini DF, Overstrom EW, Ebert KM. Changes in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton during preimplantation development of the pig embryo. Biol Reprod. 1987;37(2):441–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jackson BW, Gund C, Schmid E, BürkiI K, Franke WW, Illmensee K. Formation of cytoskeletal elements during mouse embryogenesis: intermediate filaments of the cytokeratin type and desmosomes in preimplantation embryos. Differentiation. 1980;17(1–3):161–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Prelle K, Holtz W, Osborn M. Immunocytochemical analysis of vimentin expression patterns in porcine embryos suggests mesodermal differentiation from day 9 after conception. Anat Histol Embryol. 2001;30(6):339–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fléchon JE, Degrouard J, Fléchon B. Gastrulation events in the prestreak pig embryo: ultrastructure and cell markers. Genesis. 2004;38(1):13–25.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Miles JR, Freking BA, Blomberg LA, Vallet JL, Zuelke KA. Conceptus development during blastocyst elongation in lines of pigs selected for increased uterine capacity or ovulation rate. J Animal Sci. 2008;86(9):2126–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Traub P. Intermediate filaments: a review: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Goossens K, Van Soom A, Van Poucke M, Vandaele L, Vandesompele J, Van Zeveren A, et al. Identification and expression analysis of genes associated with bovine blastocyst formation. BMC Dev Biol. 2007;7(1):64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rauvala H. An 18-kd heparin-binding protein of developing brain that is distinct from fibroblast growth factors. EMBO J. 1989;8(10):2933.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Romek M, Gajda B, Krzysztofowicz E, Smorąg Z. Lipid content of non-cultured and cultured pig embryo. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009;44(1):24–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    El-Halawany N, Ponsuksili S, Wimmers K, Gilles M, Tesfaye D, Schellander K. Quantitative expression analysis of blastocyst-derived gene transcripts in preimplantation developmental stages of in vitro-produced bovine embryos using real-time polymerase chain reaction technology. Reprod Fert Develop. 2005;16(8):753–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Blomberg LA, Garrett WM, Guillomot M, Miles JR, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, et al. Transcriptome profiling of the tubular porcine conceptus identifies the differential regulation of growth and developmentally associated genes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006;73(12):1491–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Schweigert FJ, Siegling C, Tzimas G, Seeger J, Nau H. Distribution of endogenous retinoids, retinoid binding proteins (RBP, CRABPI) and nuclear retinoid X receptor beta (RXR beta) in the porcine embryo. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2002;42(4):285–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Quadro L, Hamberger L, Gottesman ME, Wang F, Colantuoni V, Blaner WS, et al. Pathways of vitamin a delivery to the embryo: insights from a new tunable model of embryonic vitamin a deficiency. Endocrinology. 2005;146(10):4479–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hynes RO. Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell. 1992;69(1):11–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ramilowski JA, Goldberg T, Harshbarger J, Kloppmann E, Lizio M, Satagopam VP, et al. A draft network of ligand–receptor-mediated multicellular signalling in human. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7866.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Samborski A, Graf A, Krebs S, Kessler B, Bauersachs S. Deep sequencing of the porcine endometrial transcriptome on day 14 of pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 2013;88(4):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zeng S, Bick J, Ulbrich SE, Bauersachs S. Cell type-specific analysis of transcriptome changes in the porcine endometrium on day 12 of pregnancy. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):459.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sozen B, Can A, Demir N. Cell fate regulation during preimplantation development: a view of adhesion-linked molecular interactions. Dev Biol. 2014;395(1):73–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Illingworth IM, Kiszka I, Bagley S, Ireland GW, Garrod DR, Kimber SJ. Desmosomes are reduced in the mouse uterine luminal epithelium during the preimplantation period of pregnancy: a mechanism for facilitation of implantation. Biol Reprod. 2000;63(6):1764–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Eckert JJ, Fleming TP. Tight junction biogenesis during early development. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778(3):717–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Tuo W, Harney JP, Bazer FW. Developmentally regulated expression of interleukin-1β by peri-implantation conceptuses in swine. J Reprod Immunol. 1996;31(3):185–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Polan ML, Daniele A, Kuo A. Gonadal steroids modulate human monocyte interleukin-1 (IL-1) activity. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):964–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Polan ML, Loukides J, Nelson P, Carding S, Diamond M, Walsh A, et al. Progesterone and estradiol modulate interleukin-1 β messenger ribonucleic acid levels in cultured human peripheral monocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;69(6):1200–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Seo H, Choi Y, Shim J, Choi Y, Ka H. Regulatory mechanism for expression of IL1B receptors in the uterine endometrium and effects of IL1B on prostaglandin synthetic enzymes during the implantation period in pigs. Biol Reprod. 2012;87(2):31 31-11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Sukjumlong S, Persson E, Dalin AM, Janson V, Sahlin L. Messenger RNA levels of estrogen receptors alpha and beta and progesterone receptors in the cyclic and inseminated/early pregnant sow uterus. Anim Reprod Sci. 2009;112(3–4):215–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sasaki M, Kaneuchi M, Fujimoto S, Tanaka Y, Dahiya R. CYP1B1 gene in endometrial cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;202(1):171–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sasaki M, Kaneuchi M, Sakuragi N, Dahiya R. Multiple promoters of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene are selectively inactivated by CpG hypermethylation in endometrial cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63(12):3101–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Attar E, Tokunaga H, Imir G, Yilmaz MB, Redwine D, Putman M. Prostaglandin E2 via steroidogenic factor-1 coordinately regulates transcription of steroidogenic genes necessary for estrogen synthesis in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(2):623–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Isom SC, Spollen WG, Blake SM, Bauer BK, Springer GK, Prather RS. Transcriptional profiling of day 12 porcine embryonic disc and trophectoderm samples using ultra-deep sequencing technologies. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010;77(9):812–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Andersen S, Sjursen W, Laegreid A, Austgulen R, Johansen B. Immunohistologic detection of non-pancreatic phospholipase A2 (type II) in human placenta and its possible involvement in normal parturition at term. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1994;51(1):19–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Jegalian K, Page DC. A proposed path by which genes common to mammalian X and Y chromosomes evolve to become X inactivated. Nature. 1998;394(6695):776.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kobayashi S, Isotani A, Mise N, Yamamoto M, Fujihara Y, Kaseda K, et al. Comparison of gene expression in male and female mouse blastocysts revealed imprinting of the X-linked gene, Rhox5/Pem, at preimplantation stages. Curr Biol. 2006;16(2):166–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Axelson M. Sex chromatin in early pig embryos. Hereditas. 1968;60(3):347–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Schulz EG, Heard E. Role and control of X chromosome dosage in mammalian development. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2013;23(2):109–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Rieger D. Relationships between energy metabolism and development of early mammalian embryos. Theriogenology. 1992;37(1):75–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Cooper DW, Johnston PG, VandeBerg JL, Robinson ES. X-chromosome inactivation in marsupials. Aust J Zool. 1990;37(3):411–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Cooper DW, Johnston PG, Watson JM, Graves JAM. X-inactivation in marsupials and monotremes. Seminars in Dev Biol. 1993;4:117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Park WW. The occurrence of sex chromatin in early human and macaque embryos. J Anat. 1957;91(Pt 3):369.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Giardine B, Riemer C, Hardison RC, Burhans R, Elnitski L, Shah P, et al. Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res. 2005;15(10):1451–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Saeed A, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, Bhagabati N, et al. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques. 2003;34(2):374–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Dennis G, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC, et al. DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4(9):R60.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the staff of the research station (Thalhausen of the TUM, Germany) supporting the work and Functional Genomics Center Zurich (FGCZ) for performing Illumina sequencing of the RNA-Seq libraries.


The work was partially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation SNSF (IZCOZ0_177141) for study design, sample collection and data assessment (including RNA-seq). The China Scholarship Council allocated a personal scholarship to SZ for the data analysis and manuscript writing.

Author information




SZ carried out the data analysis and prepared the manuscript. JB developed the program for data analysis. The lab work and animal trail were conducted by DK, JK, and VLF. SB provided the pipeline for data analysis and revised the manuscript. SEU supervised the experiment, designed the study and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne E. Ulbrich.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The animals were owned and kept at the Research station “Thalhausen” of the Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. The animal experiment was conducted in Freising, Germany and approved by the Committee on District Government of Upper Bavaria, Germany, which is the legal body to grant ethical approval. All experimental procedures were in accordance with the accepted standards of humane animal care in Germany.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Table S1. DEGs across the stages from porcine embryos on Day 8, 10, and 12, respectively. (XLSX 2707 kb)

Additional file 2:

Table S2. Functional category analyses for genes differentially expressed in each cluster. (XLSX 665 kb)

Additional file 3:

Table S3. DEGs involved in signaling pathways of maternal recognition of pregnancy. (XLSX 431 kb)

Additional file 4:

Table S4. Comparison of DEGs in the elongating embryos between pigs and sheeps. (XLSX 133 kb)

Additional file 5:

Table S5. DEGs between female and male embryos on Day 8, 10, and 12, respectively. (XLSX 68 kb)

Additional file 6:

Table S6. Gene-specific primers for SRY and Histone genes. (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, S., Bick, J., Kradolfer, D. et al. Differential transcriptome dynamics during the onset of conceptus elongation and between female and male porcine embryos. BMC Genomics 20, 679 (2019).

Download citation


  • Pig
  • Embryo
  • X-linked gene
  • Transcriptomics
  • Preimplantation
  • RNA-Seq