Skip to main content
Download PDF

A phenomics-based approach for the detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 29 biochemical indices in southern Chinese men

BMC Genomics volume 20, Article number: 983 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Phenomics provides new technologies and platforms as a systematic phenome-genome approach. However, few studies have reported on the systematic mining of shared genetics among clinical biochemical indices based on phenomics methods, especially in China. This study aimed to apply phenomics to systematically explore shared genetics among 29 biochemical indices based on the Fangchenggang Area Male Health and Examination Survey cohort.

Result

A total of 1999 subjects with 29 biochemical indices and 709,211 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were subjected to phenomics analysis. Three bioinformatics methods, namely, Pearson’s test, Jaccard’s index, and linkage disequilibrium score regression, were used. The results showed that 29 biochemical indices were from a network. IgA, IgG, IgE, IgM, HCY, AFP and B12 were in the central community of 29 biochemical indices. Key genes and loci associated with metabolism traits were further identified, and shared genetics analysis showed that 29 SNPs (P < 10− 4) were associated with three or more traits. After integrating the SNPs related to two or more traits with the GWAS catalogue, 31 SNPs were found to be associated with several diseases (P < 10− 8). Using ALDH2 as an example to preliminarily explore its biological function, we also confirmed that the rs671 (ALDH2) polymorphism affected multiple traits of osteogenesis and adipogenesis differentiation in 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes.

Conclusion

All these findings indicated a network of shared genetics and 29 biochemical indices, which will help fully understand the genetics participating in biochemical metabolism.

Background

Complex traits are the product of various biological signals and some intermediate traits may be affected either directly or indirectly by these signals [1]. A phenome is the sum of many phenotypic characteristics (phenomics traits) that signifies the expression of the whole genome, proteome and metabolome under a specific environmental influence [2, 3]. The study of phenomes (called phenomics) provides a suite of new technologies and platforms that have enabled a transition from focused phenotype-genotype studies to a systematic phenome-genome approach [4]. Many recent studies have found that, compared to considering only binary patients vs. healthy controls, mapping intermediate steps in disease processes, such as various disease-related clinical quantitative traits or gene expression, is more informative [5, 6].

Pleiotropy, which is a DNA variant or mutation that can affect multiple traits, is a common phenomenon in genetics [7]. For example, Joseph Pickrell and colleagues [8] performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of 42 traits or diseases to compare the genetic variants associated with multiple phenotypes and identified 341 loci associated with multiple traits. Heid IM et al [9] performed a GWAS of fasting insulin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels to identify 53 loci associated with a limited capacity to store fat in a healthy way, and this multi-trait approach could increase the power to gain insights into an otherwise difficult-to-grasp phenotype. Furthermore, many studies have found that diseases or clinically quantitative traits can be interconnected. For example, increasing circulating fatty acids (Fas) could lead to the development of obesity-associated metabolic complications, such as insulin resistance [10]. Goh et al [11] found that essential human genes tended to encode hub proteins and were widely expressed in multiple tissues. Many shared genetic variants are identified in linkage disequilibrium with variants associated with other human traits or diseases, and these pleiotropic connections connect the human traits together [8, 12]. Therefore, understanding the complex relationships among human traits and diseases is important for learning about the molecular function of hub genes.

The Fangchenggang Area Male Health and Examination (FAMHES) cohort was initiated in 2009 in Fangchenggang City, Guangxi, China. It is a comprehensive demographic and health survey that focuses on investigating the interaction between the environment and genetic factors on men’s health. In a previous study, we reported that biochemical indices are closely associated with disease. For example, higher complement 3 (C3) and complement 4 (C4) were associated with an increase in metabolic syndrome (MetS) [13]. Low serum osteocalcin levels were a potential marker for MetS [14] and impaired glucose tolerance [15]. Uric acid (UA) was positively correlated with the prevalence of MetS [16]. Additionally, a genome-wide assay indicated that genes or loci associated with lipid traits are related to biochemical indices. For example, alcohol consumption and the ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism affected serum TG levels [17]. Although the role of genetic factors and gene polymorphisms in biochemical indices has been reported, the network of biochemical indices themselves, biochemical indices and genetic types are still puzzling. With the rapid advances in bioinformatics techniques, clarifying the biochemical indices network with genetic types becomes feasible.

The aim of this study was to identify the shared genetics responsible for 29 biochemical indices in the FAMHES cohort using a phenomics approach. Our findings shed light on the relationships between these 29 biochemical indices, including their shared genetic basis and genetic risk loci.

Results

Genetic and trait-based characteristics of 1999 samples

A total of 1999 subjects with 29 biochemical indices that passed the QC call rate of 95% were analysed, and a total of 709,211 SNPs in these subjects were subjected to the subsequent genetic analysis. The average GWAS inflation factor for all 29 biochemical indices was 1.029 (range: 0.975–1.060), suggesting that the stratification correlation worked well (Additional file 5: Table S1). The heatmaps based on the Pearson correlation coefficient showed that 106 correlated pairs were found among these 29 traits (correlation coefficient was over 0.3 or less than − 0.3 and the P value was less than 0.01) (Fig. 1). In addition, cluster analysis with the hclust package in the R package classified these 29 biochemical indices into 2 groups, with one group including blood urea nitrogen (BUN), cholesterol, glucose, testosterone (TE), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), insulin, immunoglobulin G (IgG), homocysteine (HCY), folate (FOL), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), immunoglobulin A (IgA), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), immunoglobulin M (IgM), C3, how-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), TGs, and C-reactive protein (CRP). The other group included vitamin B12 (B12), ferritin (FRRR), uric acid, immunoglobulin E (IgE), anti-streptococcus haemolysin “O” (ASO), creatinine, osteocalcin (OSTEOC), oestradiol, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and alanine transaminase (ALT) (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Each group contained common lipid metabolism indices, suggesting that these traits were correlated with lipid metabolism.

Fig. 1
figure1

The heatmaps based on the Pearson correlation for 29 biochemical indices in the FAMHES cohort. The coefficient in each cell ranges from − 1 to 1. A negative value denotes a negative correlation, a positive value denotes a positive correlation, 1 indicates a complete correlation, and 0 indicates no correlation. The correlations between clinical quantitative traits shown in this matrix are shown in blue and red. Blue represents a positive correlation, and the darker the colour, the stronger the positive correlation. Red indicates a negative correlation, and the darker the colour, the stronger the negative correlation. If the correlation coefficients were greater than 0.3 or less than − 0.3 and P value< 0.01, we considered the pairs to be correlated

Full size image

Correlation analysis based on network medicine

For each trait, we used a linear mixed model estimate fixed value, adjusted with PC1 and PC2 of population stratification and age, respectively, to perform a GWAS. A total of 86,556 SNPs (P value 1 × 10− 3) associated with all 29 biochemical indices were obtained and then annotated using the SNP function database with default parameters and the south Asian population option [18]. A total of 12,521 genes were obtained, and protein-protein interactions were determined using the BioGRID database [19]. A total of 5313 genes with known proteins were obtained, and the interactional network was built with Cytoscape 3 [20]. The topological coefficient, clustering coefficient and degree distribution were important indices to evaluate network nodes. Details of these three factors for 5313 genes are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2 (A, B, C, D).

The Jaccard correlation matrix heatmaps showed that there were 63 correlated pairs among 435 pairwise combinations among these 29 traits indices with an MCI over 0.6 (Fig. 2). In these pairs, HCY, IgG, SHBG, B12, IgA and C4 were closely related with more than six other traits. However, because the information regarding gene/protein interactions in public databases is limited, interaction information for most of the genes/proteins in this study could not be obtained, and the Jaccard index was computed based on a small number of genes/proteins.

Fig. 2
figure2

Molecular comorbidity index (MCI) for 29 biochemical indices in the FAMHES cohort. The MCI value is between 0 and 1. The darker blue indicates a stronger correlation between the two clinical biochemical indicators. If the MCI was over 0.6, we considered the pairs to be correlated

Full size image

Correlation analysis based on linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC)

Genetics can help to elucidate cause and effect. However, single variants tend to have minor effects, and reverse causation involves an even smaller list of confounding factors. Therefore, interrogating genetic overlap via GWAS that focuses on genome-wide significant SNPs is predicted to be an effective means of mining the correlation between different phenotypes. The GWAS effect size estimate for a given SNP will capture information about SNPs near the linkage disequilibrium [21]. The correlations based on GWAS of the 29 quantitative clinical traits were estimated using cross-trait LDSC. The genetic correlation estimates for all 435 pairwise combinations among these 29 traits. After removing the outlier values, 68 significantly correlated pairs (p < 0.05) were found (Fig. 3). The details for these 68 selected pairs of traits are shown in Additional file 6: Table S2.

Fig. 3
figure3

Correlation analysis based on linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) for 29 biochemical indices in the FAMHES cohort. The genetic correlation estimate (Rg) ranges between − 1 and 1. A negative value denotes a negative correlation, a positive value denotes a positive correlation, 1 indicates a complete correlation, and 0 indicates no correlation. The correlations between clinical biochemical indicators shown in this matrix are represented by blue and red. Blue represents a positive correlation, and the darker the colour, the stronger the positive correlation. Red indicates a negative correlation, and the darker the colour, the stronger the negative correlation

Full size image

Integration and interpretation of important pairs identified by these three methods

To identify the correlation pairs among these three methods, we integrated the correlated traits fitting at least one of the following: Pearson coefficient was greater than 0.3 or less than − 0.3 and P value less than 0.01, Jaccard coefficient was greater than 0.6, or P value of LDSC was less than 0.05. In total, 208 correlated pairs among biochemical indices were found; among them 106, 63, 68 correlated pairs were found by Pearson coefficient, Jaccard coefficient, and LDSC, respectively. Only 1 correlated pair was found by all three methods. Ten correlated pairs, both by Pearson coefficient and LDSC were found, 15 by Pearson and Jaccard coefficient, and 5 by Jaccard coefficient and LDSC. (Additional file 3: Figure S3, A). The related traits were integrated if they fulfilled the following conditions: the Pearson coefficient was greater than 0.3 and P value less than 0.01, the Jaccard coefficient was greater than 0.6, or the LDSC p value was less than 0.05. Six traits (IgA, IgG, HCY, AFP, IgE and B12) were the first top factors in the network of these 29 traits and were related to more than 20 traits. Additionally, IgM, CRP, C4, BUN, TG, creatinine and FSH were the second top factors and connected with more than 15–20 traits, and OSTEOC, oestradiol, glucose, FOL, TE, SHBG, FERR, BMI, ALT and HDL were the third top traits, which correlated with more than 10 traits (Additional file 3: Figure S3, B).

Genes and SNPs that are potentially important across multiple traits

We selected SNPs with P < 10− 3 for each trait, resulting in a total of 60,644 SNPs for all 27 traits. The essential genes have a tendency to be expressed in multiple tissues and are topologically and functionally central [12]. After integrating all 5313 genes and removing the free notes in the total network among 29 biochemical indices, 427 genes (with P < 10− 3 at least one SNP) were correlated with more than 5 traits. After filtering the genes with SNPs (P < 10− 4), there were 71 genes correlated with more than or equal to 3 traits, especially aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 family member (ALDH2), BRCA1 associated protein (BRAP), cadherin 13 (CDH13) and CUB and Sushi multiple domains 1 (CSMD1), which was related to more than 5 traits. In these 71 genes, 38 genes were found to connect more than 5 other genes in the interactional network annotated from the BioGRID database [19] (Additional file 7: Table S3), which showed that essential genes related to multiple traits were located in the central gene interactional network.

Among all the genome-wide variation SNPs, 481 (P < 1✕10− 3) were associated with three or more clinical biochemical quantitative traits, and 13 of these 481 SNPs were related to more than 5 traits. In these SNPs, rs12229654 (near cut like homeobox 2 (CUX2)), rs2188380 (located in CUX2), rs3809297 (located in CUX2) and rs3782886 (located in BRAP) were related to more than 10 traits. Six SNPs in CUX2 were correlated with more than 5 traits, which indicates that CUX2 should play an important role on this net. In addition, for all the SNPs with P < 1 × 10− 4, 29 SNPs were related to three or more biochemical indices (Fig. 4). After annotating 29 SNPs with P < 1 × 10− 4 using the HaploReg database [22], we found that almost all these SNPs were related to enhancer histone binding, promoter DNase binding and transcript binding, which affected protein binding or the presence of eQTLs (Additional file 8: Table S4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Circos plot of shared SNPs related to more than 3 biochemical indices based on analysis of individuals in the FAMHES cohort. Each plot presents one trait with a specific colour. ASO and IgE have no common SNPs in these 481 SNPs, so they are not in this Circos. The black dash denotes the shared SNPs, and the upper line denotes the significant value with the log (p value). The chromosome number is marked on the outside of the Circos plot. The chromosome positions of 29 common sites (P value< 10− 4) associated with more than four biochemical indices are marked on the outside of the Circos plot

Full size image

After integrating the SNPs associated with more than 2 traits(P < 1 × 10− 4) with the GWAS catalogue [23], we found that 31 SNPs in 18 genes were in the GWAS catalogue (Additional file 9: Table S5). Among those SNPs, five SNPs (rs579459, rs649129, rs507666, rs495828, and rs651007) in ABO were associated with more than 10 quantitative traits and diseases. One SNP (rs671) in ALDH2 was related to 21 traits, six SNPs (rs10519302, rs16964211, rs2305707, rs2414095, rs6493487 and rs727479) in or near CYP19A1 were mainly associated with hormone measurements. This finding supports the idea that shared genetics for traits can produce correlations among these traits.

The rs671 polymorphism in ALDH2 affects osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes

An interaction between a SNP (rs671) in ALDH2 was related to 13 traits found in this study. The relationship between rs671 and lipid metabolism or osteocalcin has been found in some studies [24, 25]; however, their function needs to be investigated. Rs671 is a nonsynonymous (ns) SNP (G504 L) in the ALDH2 gene, which is located on chromosome 12. To evaluate the effects of the rs671 polymorphism on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes, a lentivirus vector was used to overexpress ALDH2-WT or ALDH2-G504 L-mut in 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes (Additional file 4: Figure S4). The cell growth curve of ALDH2-G504 L-mut showed no obvious change compared with that of the control, but expression of ALDH2-WT induced a significant increase in cell proliferation (Fig. 5a). The cell apoptosis results were consistent with this finding; overexpression of ALDH2-WT resulted in a 3.935-fold decrease in late apoptotic cells in comparison to that of ALDH2-G504 L-mut or control cells (Fig. 5b, c). We next investigated the impact of the ALDH2 G504 L mutation on the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes. At 7 days after osteoblast induction, cells were subjected to Alizarin red S staining. ALDH2-WT cells showed more mineralized nodules than the control cells or those expressing ALDH2-G504 L-mut (Fig. 5d, e). In addition, the mRNA expression of osteoblast-related genes, such as alkaline phosphatase (AKP), osteocalcin, RUNX family transcription factor 2 (Runx2), and collagen type I (Col1), was significantly higher in ALDH2-WT cells than in ALDH2-G504 L-mut or control cells (Fig. 5f). After 7 days of adipogenic induction, the ALDH2-WT cells displayed accumulation of lipid vacuoles, as detected by oil red O staining, when compared with ALDH2-G504 L-mut or control cells (Fig. 5g, h). The expression levels of adipogenesis-related proteins, such as adiponectin, C/EBPα (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α), C/EBPβ, adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (Fabp4), and Pparγ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor), were much higher in ALDH2-WT cells than in ALDH2-G504 L-mut or control cells (Fig. 5i). Taken together, these results suggest that ALDH2-G504 L-mut affected the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes.

Fig. 5
figure5

The impact of ALDH2 rs671 on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes. a The cell growth curve measured as 450 nm absorbance by using Cell Counting Kit-8 Annexin V-FITC/PI–labelled cells was detected by flow cytometry to measure osteoblast apoptosis. Representative dot plots b and quantified data as the percentage of total cells c At 7 days after osteoblast induction, cells were stained with Alizarin Red S solution to measure calcium content. Representative photographs d and quantified Alizarin red S staining in cells. e Expression of osteocalcin-related genes (AKP, osteocalcin, Runx2, Col1) in ALDH2 WT- or Glu504Lys-overexpressing 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes after 7 days of induction refer to 3 T3-L1 RFP. f At 7 days after adipocyte induction, cells were stained with Oil Red O to measure triglyceride (TG) content. Representative photographs g and quantified Oil Red O staining in cells. h qPCR analysis of adipogenic (adiponectin, C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, Fabp4, Pparγ) expression in ALDH2 WT- or Glu504Lys-overexpressing 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes after 7 days of induction refer to 3 T3-L1 RFP. i Data are shown as the mean ± SE from 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

A network of shared genetics and 29 biochemical indices were found in this research study. Not only did one intermediate phenotype have multiple associated SNPs, interestingly, one SNP associating with multiple intermediate phenotypes was also common. The phenomenon of some genes or loci having the ability to affect multiple distinct phenotypic traits is called pleiotropy. Increasing attention has been paid to pleiotropy. In 2011, according to the data of the NIH GWAS website, Sivakumaran found that nearly 5% of SNPS and 17% of genes or gene regions were related to two or more diseases or traits [26]. In 2018, Chesmore used the same method and database and found that 44% of genes or gene regions were associated with two or more diseases or traits, a nearly two-fold increase to that of Sivakumaran S [27]. It has been suggested that pleiotropy facilitates the accurate diagnosis and treatment of human diseases [28]. Moreover, pleiotropy research is also helpful for understanding the association between sequence variation and phenotype in plants or animals. Gene co-expression networks and novel mutations associated with many phenotypic traits were identified in maize [29, 30]. It has been proven that the wing shape of Drosophila is affected by multiple genetic sites [31].

Immunoglobulin is produced by plasma cells and lymphocytes and is characteristic of these types of cells and plays an essential role in the body’s immune system. In this study, we found that IgG, IgA, IgE and IgM were the central traits in the biochemical indices network, and these traits could be linked to 19 or more traits. HCY, a naturally occurring amino acid found in blood plasma, plays a central role in biochemical indices by connecting with 23 traits. High levels of HCY have been associated with several body dysfunctions, such as vasculature [32] and endothelial injury [33]. Interestingly, vitamin B12 was identified as having a central role in the biochemical indices network by correlating to 21 other traits. Similar to previous studies, vitamin B12 correlates with several quantitative traits, such as bone mineral density, FOL and FERR [34,35,36].

Pleiotropy refers that some genes or loci that have the ability to affect multiple distinct phenotypic traits. After integrating all the related genes among 29 biochemical indices, surprisingly, ALDH2 and BRAP can be related to 9 traits and are connected with 19 and 13 genes, respectively. ALDH2 belongs to the aldehyde dehydrogenase family of proteins, which is the second enzyme of the major oxidative pathway of alcohol metabolism. ALDH2 dysfunction will lead to several diseases, such as cancer [33, 37], alcoholic fatty liver [38], and cardiovascular diseases [39]. BRAP is a cytoplasmic protein, which can bind to the nuclear localization signal of BRCA1 and other proteins [40]. The polymorphisms in this gene are associated with myocardial infarction [41] and metabolic syndrome [42]. Additionally, the common CSMD1 was related to 8 traits. CSMD1 is a large (~ 390 kDa) membrane-bound complement inhibitor [43]. Mutations of this gene participate in complement activation and inflammation in the central nervous system, which leads to Parkinson’s disease [44]. These three genes may be hub genes in biochemical indices networks.

If the SNPs located in sites related to promoter DNase binding, enhancer histone binding and transcript binding, the marginally significant SNPs play regulatory roles affecting protein binding or the presence of eQTL [45, 46]. In this research, 29 SNPs (P < 10–4) were associated with three or more traits and correlated with each other. These results revealed that the shared regulatory genetics are most likely to drive association signals and play important roles in clinical biological function. This phenomenon may provide important “scaffolding” to support a framework to explore the basic mechanism of biochemical indices.

Shared genetics are commonly used to build disease-diseased relationship and mine the common disorder of diseases [47, 48]. An important general insight from this study was that associated genes across traits tend to gather in trait-specific network modules. We found that 31 SNPs in 18 genes were associated with several traits and diseases; five SNPs (rs579459, rs649129, rs507666, rs495828 and rs651007) of ABO were associated with cholesterol and LDL levels. Six SNPs (rs10519302, rs16964211, rs2305707, rs2414095, rs6493487, rs727479) of CYP19A1 were associated with oestradiol levels. Rs671 in ALDH2 was associated with glucose, OSTEOC, and SHBG levels. These findings suggest that shared genetics on traits can produce correlations between different traits of disease. For example, the ABO gene located near 9q34.2 encodes glycosyltransferases related to the first discovered ABO blood group system [49]. The abnormal expression or polymorphism of this gene is correlated with several body dysfunctions, such as ischaemic stroke [50], large artery atherosclerotic stroke [51] and pancreatic cancer [52]. The CYP19A1 gene, located on 15q21.2, encodes a key enzyme for oestrogen biosynthesis. SNPs in CYP19A1 might affect aromatase activity and influence oestradiol levels, thereby impacting human health. Previous research has reported correlations with SNPs of CYP19 and disease, such as polycystic ovarian syndrome [53], coronary heart disease [54], and coronary artery disease (CAD). The ALDH2 gene, located on 12q24.12, encodes aldehyde dehydrogenase, the second enzyme of the major oxidative pathway of alcohol metabolism. Rs671 is nonsynonymous mutation site on exon 12. The rs671 mutation was found to be associated with several traits (BMI, osteocalcin, renal function-related traits [55], response to alcohol consumption [56, 57], triglyceride [17], haematological and biochemical traits [58], intracranial aneurysm [59], mean corpuscular haemoglobin [17]). Using ALDH2 as an example to preliminarily explore its biological function, the in vitro function testing of rs671 played a role in the proliferation and osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes.

With the emergence of GWAS, a large number of loci and disease-related information were elucidated. However, due to its strict restriction on the P value of correlation analysis, a great deal of potential information was lost while significant loci were obtained. Some loci did not achieve a P cut-off value but itself, but if these loci were located in a short range or were involved in similar functions, these lower p value loci may also affect biological function [60]. Furthermore, it was challenging to identify common pathways and biological functionality core regulatory networks across loci. During more efficient analysis of these lower p value loci functions, more complex models emerged. Raychaudhuri designed GRAIL to set a lower threshold in considering relatedness for those genes in narrow regions. They systematically examined 370 SNPs from 179 independent loci with P < 1 × 10− 3, and three gene regions in CD28, PRDM1 and CD2/CD58 were identified that were closely related to rheumatoid arthritis [61]. To assess new asthma risk loci, Demenais interrogated the GWAS catalogue using set P value thresholds from 5 × 10− 8 to 10− 3, and performed a meta-analysis on genetic variation and blood indexes and environmental exposure histories [62]. Kostem performed a follow-up analysis of SNPs associated with disease by setting a lower cut-off value and then analysed the particular values of the tag SNP statistic, pairwise correlation, and the effect size of the candidate SNP [63].

Because there are no mature methods of research on the genetic relationship between traits at the level of genome-wide summary statistics, we set a lower threshold value for obtaining more SNPs for analysis, and then analysed the association of these candidate SNPs by three different methods: Pearson correlation coefficient, LDSC or Jaccard correlation. As we show, even with three different calculation methods, most of the top important traits are similar. Of these, IgA, IgG, HCY, AFP, IgE and B12 were the first top factors in the network. Our research is an experimental attempt to assess the network of shared genetics and 29 biochemical indices.

Conclusion

We investigated the correlations among 29 biochemical indices through three biological information methods. First, we found that IgA, IgG, IgE, IgM, HCY, AFP and B12 were in the central community of 29 biochemical indices. Second, the shared genetics analysis showed that 29 SNPs (P < 10− 4) were associated with more than 3 traits. Thirty-one SNPs were associated with several diseases (P < 10− 8) by integrating the SNPs related with 2 or more traits with the GWAS catalogue. Third, using ALDH2 as an example to preliminarily explore its biological function, we found that the rs671 (ALDH2) polymorphism could affect the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes. We clarified that 29 biochemical indices were from a network and that hub variations/genes played a vital role in biological processes. These findings highlight a network of shared genetics and 29 biochemical indices.

Methods

Study samples

Our study included 2012 unrelated healthy Chinese men aged 20–69 years from the FAMHES [14, 15], which was conducted among non-institutionalized Chinese men in Guangxi and was designed to investigate the effects of environmental and genetic factors and their interaction with the development of age-related chronic diseases. Men aged ≥18 years were requested to participate in the study upon large-scale physical examination at the Medical Center of Fangchenggang First People’s Hospital from September 2009 to December 2009. The included participants all self-reported that they were free of hyperthyroidism, diabetes mellitus, stroke, coronary heart disease, rheumatoid arthritis, impaired hepatic or renal function, and tumours. Our study research protocol was approved by the Guangxi Medical University Ethics Committee. All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation in this study.

Measurements of 29 biochemical indices

Overnight (≥8 h) fasting venous blood specimens were obtained between 7:00 am and 10:00 am, and serum samples were extracted and stored at − 80 °C. Triglyceride, cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, glucose, ALT, BUN, uric acid and creatinine were measured enzymatically on a Dimension-RxL Chemistry Analyzer (Dade Behring, Newark, DE) in the Department of Clinical Laboratory Science at the Fangchenggang First People’s Hospital. CRP, C3, C4, IgA, IgE, IgG, IgM, and ASO were measured with immunoturbidimetric methods on a HITACHI 7600 Biochemistry Analyzer (Hitachi Corp, Tokyo, Japan). Ferritin, folate and vitamin B12, TE, oestradiol, FSH, SHBG, insulin, AFP and OSTEOC were measured with the same batch of reagents by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and HCY assayed by enzyme cycle method using a COBAS 6000 system E601 (Elecsys module) Immunoassay Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).

SNP genotyping and quality control (QC) analysis

Genome-wide SNP genotyping was performed with an Illumina Omni 1 M chip (Illumina, San Diego, USA). Among 2012 genotyped subjects, 1999 passed the QC call rate of 95% and were included in the final data analysis. A total of 709,211 SNPs in these subjects passed the QC criteria as follows: the P value for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) test was greater than 1 × 10− 3, the minor allele frequency (MAF) was greater than 0.01, and the genotype call rate was greater than 95%. The inferred genotypes of SNPs in the genome that were not directly genotyped were computed by the IMPUTE program [64] (e.g., SNPs catalogued in HapMap Phase II CHB population release #24). All genotypes with a posterior probability of > 90% based on IMPUTE software imputation were retained.

Jaccard coefficient

Phenotypes are linked if they share alterations in genetics. The pathobiology of human diseases might be understood by creating molecular and phenotypic networks [65, 66]. We used the SNP function [18] (https://snpinfo.niehs.nih.gov/) tool to identify the genes containing all of the SNPs for which the P value for the GWAS was less than 1 × 10− 3. The human interactome was obtained by combining protein-protein interaction (PPI) information from the BioGRID database [19].

We built correlations among 29 clinical phenomes based on the common genes/proteins between two traits. To minimize the bias in estimating the correlation between two given traits, we calculated the molecular comorbidity index (MCI) by adapting the formula from Grosdidier S [67] to further consider the different coefficients of distance between the two diseases. The MCI was defined as follows:

$$ {MCI}_{trait1, trait2}=\left(\left({proteins}_{trait1}\cap {proteins}_{trait2}\right)\cup {proteins}_{trait1\to trait2}\cup {proteins}_{trait2\to trait1}\right)/\left({proteins}_{trait1}\cup {proteins}_{trait2}\right) $$

Where proteinstrait1 and proteinstrait2 are the proteins related to clinical traits 1 and 2, respectively. proteinstrait1 → trait2 are those proteins related to trait 1 that interact with the proteins associated with trait 2 (and vice versa proteinstrait2 → trait1). The two operators ∩ and ∪ denote the intersection and union between the two sets of elements (proteinstrait1 and proteinstrait2, respectively).

Correlation analysis by LDSC

The genetic correlations derived from the summary statistics were evaluated by the GWAS effect size for a given SNP and integrated the effects of all SNPs that were in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with that SNP. The LDSC (which targets genetic correlation) uses variants across the whole genome and is a symmetrical (i.e., nondirectional) analysis for the risk factor and the outcomes [21]. In short, LDSC assumes that, for polygenic traits, SNPs will also capture information about SNPs near the LD. This relationship between the LD and the associated signal can also be used to test the relationship between the two traits for all SNPs in the genome. To further elucidate the correlations of these 29 biochemical indices in FAMHES from the genetic architecture, we applied LDSC to estimate the correlation of these 29 traits.

Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes

Full-length ALDH2-WT and ALDH2-G504 L-mut cDNA were cloned into the pTSBOE-CMV-MSC-3flag-EF1-tRFP-F2A-Puro lentivirus vector (Quanyang, Shanghai). The 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. The osteoblast-inducing medium used was α-MEM (α-minimum Eagle’s medium) containing 10% FBS (foetal bovine serum), 100 nM dexamethasone, 5 mM β-phosphoglyceride and 5 μg/mL vitamin C. The adipogenesis-inducing medium included A and B medium. The A medium was DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100 nM dexamethasone, 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine and 5 μg/mL insulin. The B medium was DMEM containing 10% FBS and 5 μg/mL insulin. For adipocyte induction, cells were cultured for two cycles of A medium for 2 days and then B medium for 1 day. Cell proliferation was measured by a CCK-8 assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (DOJINDO, Japan). Cell apoptosis was examined by Annexin V-APC/7-AAD staining followed by flow cytometry detection. For Oil Red O or Alizarin Red S staining, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and stained with 4% Oil Red O solution or 0.4% Alizarin Red S. Lipid droplets and calcium nodules were quantified using ImageJ software. Cellular RNA was extracted using an RNA extraction kit (Promega, China). Reverse transcription was performed with the Transcriptor Reverse Transcriptase Kit (Kangwei, China). Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR was performed using a Roche Light Cycler 480 and KANGWEI qPCR Kit (KANGWEI, China). Per-primer sequences are listed in Additional file 10: Table S6.

Statistical analysis

The correlations among the 29 biochemical indices were computed by the CORR procedure using SAS 9.0 and defined as the Pearson correlation coefficient between the rank variables. With the exception of BUN, HCY, B12, FERR, OSTEOC, creatinine, uric acid, cholesterol, HDL, LDL, TE and C3, 17 traits without normal distribution were logarithmically transformed to normalize the distribution. The association of the SNPs with 29 clinical quantitative traits was evaluated using a linear regression adjusted for population stratification factors (PC1 and PC2) and age. Population stratification was evaluated by a principal component approach with EIGENSTRAT software [68].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the Genome variation Map (GVM) of National Genomics Data Center (NGDC) (Accession Number: GVM000052).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Abbreviations

AFP:

Alpha-fetoprotein

ALDH2:

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 family member

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

ASO:

Anti-streptococcus haemolysin “O”

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

C3:

Complement 3

C4:

Complement 4

CRP:

C-Reactive protein

FAMHES:

The Fangchenggang Area Male Health and Examination cohort

Fas:

Fatty acids

FOL:

Folate

FRRR:

Ferritin

FSH:

Follicle-stimulating hormone

GWAS:

Genome-wide association studies

HCY:

Homocysteine

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

IgA:

Immunoglobulin A

IgE:

Immunoglobulin E

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

IgM:

Immunoglobulin M

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDSC:

Linkage disequilibrium score regression

MetS:

Metabolic syndrome

OSTEOC:

Osteocalcin

SNPs:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

TE:

Testosterone

TG:

Triglyceride

UA:

Uric acid

References

  1. 1.

    Falconer DS. MTF: Introduction to quantitative geneticsics (4th edn). Trends Genet. 1996;2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(96)81458-2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Oti M, Huynen MA, Brunner HG. Phenome connections. Trends Genet. 2008;24(3):103–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Houle D, Govindaraju DR, Omholt S. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(12):855–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cai T, Zhang Y, Ho YL, Link N, Sun J, Huang J, Cai TA, Damrauer S, Ahuja Y, Honerlaw J, et al. Association of Interleukin 6 receptor variant with cardiovascular disease effects of interleukin 6 receptor blocking therapy: a Phenome-wide association study. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(9):849–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Emilsson V, Thorleifsson G, Zhang B, Leonardson AS, Zink F, Zhu J, Carlson S, Helgason A, Walters GB, Gunnarsdottir S, et al. Genetics of gene expression and its effect on disease. Nature. 2008;452(7186):423–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Korte A, Vilhjalmsson BJ, Segura V, Platt A, Long Q, Nordborg M. A mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies of correlated traits in structured populations. Nat Genet. 2012;44(9):1066–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Visscher PM, Yang J. A plethora of pleiotropy across complex traits. Nat Genet. 2016;48(7):707–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pickrell JK, Berisa T, Liu JZ, Segurel L, Tung JY, Hinds DA. Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits. Nat Genet. 2016;48(7):709–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Heid IM, Winkler TW. A multitrait GWAS sheds light on insulin resistance. Nat Genet. 2016;49(1):7–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Schweiger M, Romauch M, Schreiber R, Grabner GF, Hutter S, Kotzbeck P, Benedikt P, Eichmann TO, Yamada S, Knittelfelder O, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of adipose triglyceride lipase corrects high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance and hepatosteatosis in mice. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14859.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Goh KI, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabasi AL. The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(21):8685–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lauc G, Huffman JE, Pucic M, Zgaga L, Adamczyk B, Muzinic A, Novokmet M, Polasek O, Gornik O, Kristic J, et al. Loci associated with N-glycosylation of human immunoglobulin G show pleiotropy with autoimmune diseases and haematological cancers. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(1):e1003225.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Liu Z, Tang Q, Wen J, Tang Y, Huang D, Huang Y, Xie J, Luo Y, Liang M, Wu C, et al. Elevated serum complement factors 3 and 4 are strong inflammatory markers of the metabolic syndrome development: a longitudinal cohort study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:18713.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tan A, Gao Y, Yang X, Zhang H, Qin X, Mo L, Peng T, Xia N, Mo Z. Low serum osteocalcin level is a potential marker for metabolic syndrome: results from a Chinese male population survey. Metabolism. 2011;60(8):1186–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liang Y, Tan A, Liang D, Yang X, Liao M, Gao Y, Jiang Y, Yao Z, Lin X, Lu Z, et al. Low osteocalcin level is a risk factor for impaired glucose metabolism in a Chinese male population. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7(4):522–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen D, Zhang H, Gao Y, Lu Z, Yao Z, Jiang Y, Lin X, Wu C, Yang X, Tan A, et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between serum uric acid and metabolic syndrome: results from Fangchenggang area male health and examination survey in China. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;446:226–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tan A, Sun J, Xia N, Qin X, Hu Y, Zhang S, Tao S, Gao Y, Yang X, Zhang H, et al. A genome-wide association and gene-environment interaction study for serum triglycerides levels in a healthy Chinese male population. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(7):1658–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Xu Z, Taylor JA. SNPinfo: integrating GWAS and candidate gene information into functional SNP selection for genetic association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W600–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chatr-Aryamontri A, Breitkreutz BJ, Oughtred R, Boucher L, Heinicke S, Chen D, Stark C, Breitkreutz A, Kolas N, O'Donnell L, et al. The BioGRID interaction database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D470–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lotia S, Montojo J, Dong Y, Bader GD, Pico AR. Cytoscape app store. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(10):1350–1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Anttila V, Gusev A, Day FR, Loh PR, ReproGen C, Psychiatric Genomics C, Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control C, Duncan L, et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet. 2015;47(11):1236–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ward LD, Kellis M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D930–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Welter D, MacArthur J, Morales J, Burdett T, Hall P, Junkins H, Klemm A, Flicek P, Manolio T, Hindorff L, et al. The NHGRI GWAS catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D1001–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Imatoh T, Yengo L, Rocheleau G, Kamimura S, Maeda S, Miyazaki M, Froguel P. ALDH2 polymorphism rs671, but not ADH1B polymorphism rs1229984, increases risk for hypo-HDL-Cholesterolemia in a/a carriers compared to the G/G carriers. Lipids. 2018;53(8):797–807.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hoshi H, Hao W, Fujita Y, Funayama A, Miyauchi Y, Hashimoto K, Miyamoto K, Iwasaki R, Sato Y, Kobayashi T, et al. Aldehyde-stress resulting from Aldh2 mutation promotes osteoporosis due to impaired osteoblastogenesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(9):2015–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sivakumaran S, Agakov F, Theodoratou E, Prendergast JG, Zgaga L, Manolio T, Rudan I, McKeigue P, Wilson JF, Campbell H. Abundant pleiotropy in human complex diseases and traits. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89(5):607–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chesmore K, Bartlett J, Williams SM. The ubiquity of pleiotropy in human disease. Hum Genet. 2018;137(1):39–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Solovieff N, Cotsapas C, Lee PH, Purcell SM, Smoller JW. Pleiotropy in complex traits: challenges and strategies. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(7):483–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Z L, Y Q, JC S. Functionally, structurally, and evolutionarily distinct set of genes linked to phenome wide variation in maize. bioRxiv preprint first posted online; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Schaefer RJ, Michno JM, Jeffers J, Hoekenga O, Dilkes B, Baxter I, Myers CL. Integrating Coexpression networks with GWAS to prioritize causal genes in maize. Plant Cell. 2018;30(12):2922–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pitchers W, Nye J, Marquez EJ, Kowalski A, Dworkin I, Houle D. A multivariate genome-wide association study of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2019;211(4):1429–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ganguly P, Alam SF. Role of homocysteine in the development of cardiovascular disease. Nutr J. 2015;14:6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gao YH, Wu ZX, Xie LQ, Li CX, Mao YQ, Duan YT, Han B, Han SF, Yu Y, Lu HJ, et al. VHL deficiency augments anthracycline sensitivity of clear cell renal cell carcinomas by down-regulating ALDH2. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15337.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Berenson AB, Rahman M. Effect of hormonal contraceptives on vitamin B12 level and the association of the latter with bone mineral density. Contraception. 2012;86(5):481–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bala KA, Dogan M, Kaba S, Mutluer T, Aslan O, Dogan SZ. Hormone disorder and vitamin deficiency in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2016;29(9):1077–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mohan IK, Khan SA, Jacob R, Sushma Chander N, Hussain T, Alrokayan SA, Radha Rama Devi A, Naushad SM. Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) to delineate estradiol, glutathione and homocysteine interactions. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2017;20:41–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wu C, Kraft P, Zhai K, Chang J, Wang Z, Li Y, Hu Z, He Z, Jia W, Abnet CC, et al. Genome-wide association analyses of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese identify multiple susceptibility loci and gene-environment interactions. Nat Genet. 2012;44(10):1090–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhong W, Zhang W, Li Q, Xie G, Sun Q, Sun X, Tan X, Sun X, Jia W, Zhou Z. Pharmacological activation of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 by Alda-1 reverses alcohol-induced hepatic steatosis and cell death in mice. J Hepatol. 2015;62(6):1375–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Millwood IY, Walters RG, Mei XW, Guo Y, Yang L, Bian Z, Bennett DA, Chen Y, Dong C, Hu R, et al. Conventional and genetic evidence on alcohol and vascular disease aetiology: a prospective study of 500 000 men and women in China. Lancet. 2019;393(10183):1831–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Asada M, Ohmi K, Delia D, Enosawa S, Suzuki S, Yuo A, Suzuki H, Mizutani S. Brap2 functions as a cytoplasmic retention protein for p21 during monocyte differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(18):8236–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ozaki K, Sato H, Inoue K, Tsunoda T, Sakata Y, Mizuno H, Lin TH, Miyamoto Y, Aoki A, Onouchi Y, et al. SNPs in BRAP associated with risk of myocardial infarction in Asian populations. Nat Genet. 2009;41(3):329–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Avery CL, He Q, North KE, Ambite JL, Boerwinkle E, Fornage M, Hindorff LA, Kooperberg C, Meigs JB, Pankow JS, et al. A phenomics-based strategy identifies loci on APOC1, BRAP, and PLCG1 associated with metabolic syndrome phenotype domains. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(10):e1002322.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Escudero-Esparza A, Kalchishkova N, Kurbasic E, Jiang WG, Blom AM. The novel complement inhibitor human CUB and sushi multiple domains 1 (CSMD1) protein promotes factor I-mediated degradation of C4b and C3b and inhibits the membrane attack complex assembly. FASEB J. 2013;27(12):5083–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Patel M. Parkinson disease: CSMD1 gene mutations can lead to familial Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(11):641.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nicolae DL, Gamazon E, Zhang W, Duan S, Dolan ME, Cox NJ. Trait-associated SNPs are more likely to be eQTLs: annotation to enhance discovery from GWAS. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(4):e1000888.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Mifsud B, Tavares-Cadete F, Young AN, Sugar R, Schoenfelder S, Ferreira L, Wingett SW, Andrews S, Grey W, Ewels PA, et al. Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture hi-C. Nat Genet. 2015;47(6):598–606.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Brainstorm C, Anttila V, Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Walters RK, Bras J, Duncan L, Escott-Price V, Falcone GJ, Gormley P, et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science. 2018;360(6395). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8757.

  48. 48.

    Zhao H, Yang Y, Lu Y, Mort M, Cooper DN, Zuo Z, Zhou Y. Quantitative mapping of genetic similarity in human heritable diseases by shared mutations. Hum Mutat. 2018;39(2):292–301.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yamamoto F, Clausen H, White T, Marken J, Hakomori S. Molecular genetic basis of the histo-blood group ABO system. Nature. 1990;345(6272):229–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ling X, Zheng Y, Tao J, Zheng Z, Chen L. Association study of polymorphisms in the ABO gene with ischemic stroke in the Chinese population. BMC Neurol. 2016;16(1):146.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zhang H, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Xu L, Ye Z, Hao Y, Cai B, Zhou S, Liu K, Sun L, et al. Fine-mapping of ABO gene identifies two novel SNPs associated with large artery atherosclerotic stroke in a Chinese Han population. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(3):2107–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Nakao M, Matsuo K, Hosono S, Ogata S, Ito H, Watanabe M, Mizuno N, Iida S, Sato S, Yatabe Y, et al. ABO blood group alleles and the risk of pancreatic cancer in a Japanese population. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(5):1076–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Wang H, Li Q, Wang T, Yang G, Wang Y, Zhang X, Sang Q, Wang H, Zhao X, Xing Q, et al. A common polymorphism in the human aromatase gene alters the risk for polycystic ovary syndrome and modifies aromatase activity in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod. 2011;17(6):386–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wang B, Fu ZY, Ma YT, Huang D, Liu F, Dong CL, Wang T, Meng YJ. Identification of a CYP19 gene single-nucleotide polymorphism associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2016;20(1):2–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Okada Y, Sim X, Go MJ, Wu JY, Gu D, Takeuchi F, Takahashi A, Maeda S, Tsunoda T, Chen P, et al. Meta-analysis identifies multiple loci associated with kidney function-related traits in east Asian populations. Nat Genet. 2012;44(8):904–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Quillen EE, Chen XD, Almasy L, Yang F, He H, Li X, Wang XY, Liu TQ, Hao W, Deng HW, et al. ALDH2 is associated to alcohol dependence and is the major genetic determinant of "daily maximum drinks" in a GWAS study of an isolated rural Chinese sample. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2014;165B(2):103–10.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Takeuchi F, Isono M, Nabika T, Katsuya T, Sugiyama T, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi S, Ogihara T, Yamori Y, Fujioka A, et al. Confirmation of ALDH2 as a major locus of drinking behavior and of its variants regulating multiple metabolic phenotypes in a Japanese population. Circ J. 2011;75(4):911–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kamatani Y, Matsuda K, Okada Y, Kubo M, Hosono N, Daigo Y, Nakamura Y, Kamatani N. Genome-wide association study of hematological and biochemical traits in a Japanese population. Nat Genet. 2010;42(3):210–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Low SK, Takahashi A, Cha PC, Zembutsu H, Kamatani N, Kubo M, Nakamura Y. Genome-wide association study for intracranial aneurysm in the Japanese population identifies three candidate susceptible loci and a functional genetic variant at EDNRA. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(9):2102–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Raychaudhuri S, Plenge RM, Rossin EJ, Ng AC, International Schizophrenia C, Purcell SM, Sklar P, Scolnick EM, Xavier RJ, Altshuler D, et al. Identifying relationships among genomic disease regions: predicting genes at pathogenic SNP associations and rare deletions. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(6):e1000534.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Raychaudhuri S, Thomson BP, Remmers EF, Eyre S, Hinks A, Guiducci C, Catanese JJ, Xie G, Stahl EA, Chen R, et al. Genetic variants at CD28, PRDM1 and CD2/CD58 are associated with rheumatoid arthritis risk. Nat Genet. 2009;41(12):1313–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Demenais F, Margaritte-Jeannin P, Barnes KC, Cookson WOC, Altmuller J, Ang W, Barr RG, Beaty TH, Becker AB, Beilby J, et al. Multiancestry association study identifies new asthma risk loci that colocalize with immune-cell enhancer marks. Nat Genet. 2018;50(1):42–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kostem E, Lozano JA, Eskin E. Increasing power of genome-wide association studies by collecting additional single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Genetics. 2011;188(2):449–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Marchini J, Howie B, Myers S, McVean G, Donnelly P. A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes. Nat Genet. 2007;39(7):906–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Barabasi AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(1):56–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Faner R, Agusti A. Network analysis: a way forward for understanding COPD multimorbidity. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(3):591–2.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Grosdidier S, Ferrer A, Faner R, Pinero J, Roca J, Cosio B, Agusti A, Gea J, Sanz F, Furlong LI. Network medicine analysis of COPD multimorbidities. Respir Res. 2014;15:111.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38(8):904–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81770759, 81472414, 81560608 and 81460388), the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (No. 2015GXNSFBB139008), the Guangxi Medical University Training Program for Distinguished Young Scholars, the Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi Medical University (No. GXMUYSF201603) and the Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Biological Molecular Medicine Research Foundation (No. GXBMR201603). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yanling Hu, Aihua Tan, Lei Yu, Chenyang Hou and Haofa Kuang contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China

    Yanling Hu, Aihua Tan, Lei Yu, Jinghan Su, Haiying Zhang, Xiaobo Yang, Yong Gao, Tianyu Li, Yonghua Jiang & Zengnan Mo

  2. Life Sciences Institute, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China

    Yanling Hu, Haofa Kuang, Yuanyuan Zhu, Chenqi Zhang, Wei Wei, Weidong Li, Yuanjie Huang, Hongli Huang & Xing Xie

  3. Department of chemotherapy, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China

    Aihua Tan

  4. Department of Information and Management, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China

    Chenyang Hou, Lianfeng Li & Tingxi Lu

  5. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Pre-Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China

    Qunying Wu & Qingniao Zhou

Authors
  1. Yanling Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aihua Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lei Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chenyang Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haofa Kuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qunying Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jinghan Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qingniao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yuanyuan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chenqi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Wei Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Lianfeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Weidong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yuanjie Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Hongli Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Xing Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Tingxi Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Haiying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Xiaobo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Yong Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Tianyu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Yonghua Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Zengnan Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YH, YJ, ZM conceived and designed the experiments. AT, HZ, XY, YG, TL, ZM performed the epidemiologic study. YJ performed the cell biology experiment. LYu, CH, HK, QWu, JS, QZ, YZ, CZ, WW, LL, WL, YH, HH, XX, and TL performed the bioinformatics analysis experiments. YH and YJ wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yonghua Jiang or Zengnan Mo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Guangxi Medical University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

The cluster dendrogram for the 29 biochemical indices from the FAMHES cohort created with the hclust win R package. In this analysis, two main clusters were produced among these 29 traits. FERR (ferritin), CRP (C-reactive protein), C3 (complement 3), C4 (complement 4), AFP (serum alpha-fetoprotein), TG (triglycerides), LDL (low density lipoprotein), ALT (alanine transaminase), BMI (body mass index), ASO (anti streptolysin) (anti-streptolysin “O”), IgG (immunoglobulin G), IgA (immunoglobulin A), IgM (immunoglobulin M), BUN (blood urea nitrogen), FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone), HDL (high-density lipoprotein), TE (testosterone), SHBG (sex hormone binding globulin), IgE (immunoglobulin E), B12 (vitamin B12), HCY (homocysteine).

Additional file 2: Fig. S2.

Network characteristics of 5313 associated genes for 29 biochemical indices in individuals from the FAMHES cohort were analysed by Cytoscape. (A) Topological coefficient, (B) degree, (C) clustering coefficient, and (D) closeness centrality.

Additional file 3: Fig. S3.

The integration of correlated traits from three methods. (A) Venn diagram of the integration of correlated traits from three methods. (B) The related traits were integrated if they fulfilled the following conditions: the Pearson coefficient was greater than 0.3, the P value was less than 0.01, the Jaccard coefficient was greater than 0.6, or the LDSC p value was less than 0.05. Each testing method was denoted by a specific colour: green for Jaccard, and blue for LDSC.

Additional file 4: Fig. S4.

A lentiviral vector was used to overexpress ALDH2-WT or ALDH2-G504 L-mut in 3 T3-L1 preadipocytes. (A) Localization of the Glu504Lys substitution mutation in ALDH2. Ex: exon. (B) The plasmid used to express the ALDH2-Gluc504Lys mutant protein in 3 T3-L1, ALDH2-WT was expressed using the same plasmid backbone. (C) Sequencing analysis of the ALDH2 gene exogenously expressed in 3 T3-L1 cells infected with ALDH2-WT (top) or ALDH2-G504 L-mut (bottom). (D) Expression of the transfected ALDH2 protein in 3 T3-L1 cells was indirectly assessed by the detection of RFP expression from the lentiviral vector. An RFP signal was detected by fluorescence microscopy at 48 h after infection in both 3 T3-L1 cells infected with ALDH2-WT and ALDH2-G504 L-mut. RFP control means 3 T3-L1 cells infected with plasmid backbone.

Additional file 5: Table S1.

Information on the 27 clinical quantitative traits from 1999 populations.

Additional file 6: Table S2.

Genetic correlation estimates, standard errors and P values for selected pairs of traits.

Additional file 7: Table S3.

The information on essential genes correlated with more than 3 traits.

Additional file 8: Table S4.

Twenty-nine SNPs (P < 1 × 10− 4) related to more than 3 traits were annotated in the HaploReg database.

Additional file 9: Table S5.

The annotation of 31 (P < 1 × 10− 4) SNPs was associated with more than 1 trait.

Additional file 10: Table S6.

The primer sequences of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation in 3 T3-L1 cells.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Y., Tan, A., Yu, L. et al. A phenomics-based approach for the detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 29 biochemical indices in southern Chinese men. BMC Genomics 20, 983 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6363-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Phenomics
  • FAMHES cohort
  • Biochemical indices
  • Shared genetics
  • Lipid metabolism

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us