Skip to main content

From methylglyoxal to pyruvate: a genome-wide study for the identification of glyoxalases and D-lactate dehydrogenases in Sorghum bicolor



The glyoxalase pathway is evolutionarily conserved and involved in the glutathione-dependent detoxification of methylglyoxal (MG), a cytotoxic by-product of glycolysis. It acts via two metallo-enzymes, glyoxalase I (GLYI) and glyoxalase II (GLYII), to convert MG into D-lactate, which is further metabolized to pyruvate by D-lactate dehydrogenases (D-LDH). Since D-lactate formation occurs solely by the action of glyoxalase enzymes, its metabolism may be considered as the ultimate step of MG detoxification. By maintaining steady state levels of MG and other reactive dicarbonyl compounds, the glyoxalase pathway serves as an important line of defence against glycation and oxidative stress in living organisms. Therefore, considering the general role of glyoxalases in stress adaptation and the ability of Sorghum bicolor to withstand prolonged drought, the sorghum glyoxalase pathway warrants an in-depth investigation with regard to the presence, regulation and distribution of glyoxalase and D-LDH genes.


Through this study, we have identified 15 GLYI and 6 GLYII genes in sorghum. In addition, 4 D-LDH genes were also identified, forming the first ever report on genome-wide identification of any plant D-LDH family. Our in silico analysis indicates homology of putatively active SbGLYI, SbGLYII and SbDLDH proteins to several functionally characterised glyoxalases and D-LDHs from Arabidopsis and rice. Further, these three gene families exhibit development and tissue-specific variations in their expression patterns. Importantly, we could predict the distribution of putatively active SbGLYI, SbGLYII and SbDLDH proteins in at least four different sub-cellular compartments namely, cytoplasm, chloroplast, nucleus and mitochondria. Most of the members of the sorghum glyoxalase and D-LDH gene families are indeed found to be highly stress responsive.


This study emphasizes the role of glyoxalases as well as that of D-LDH in the complete detoxification of MG in sorghum. In particular, we propose that D-LDH which metabolizes the specific end product of glyoxalases pathway is essential for complete MG detoxification. By proposing a cellular model for detoxification of MG via glyoxalase pathway in sorghum, we suggest that different sub-cellular organelles are actively involved in MG metabolism in plants.


Methylglyoxal (MG) was initially identified as a physiological growth inhibiting substance owing to its biological effects [1]. Subsequent studies established MG as a ubiquitous reactive dicarbonyl compound present under physiological as well as stress conditions. MG is primarily synthesised through non-enzymatic reactions as a by-product of various metabolic pathways including carbohydrate, protein and fatty acid metabolism [2,3,4]. Of these, glycolytic pathway remains the most important endogenous source of MG [5]. Further, reactions catalysed by enzymes such as, monoamine oxidase (MAO), cytochrome P450 (CP450) and MG synthase (MGS), can also synthesize MG using substrates derived from amino acids, fatty acids and glucose metabolism, respectively [6].

MG being a potent glycating agent can readily react with lipids, proteins and nucleic acids forming advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in turn, rendering its accumulation highly deleterious for the cell as it leads to subsequent cell death [7]. Among the various MG detoxification mechanisms reported so far, the glyoxalase system is considered to be the major route for its detoxification and other reactive dicarbonyl compounds in the living systems (Fig. 1). It plays a crucial role in cellular defence against glycation and oxidative stress [7,8,9]. In plants, depending on glutathione (GSH) requirement, the MG detoxifying enzymes can be classified as GSH-dependent or GSH-independent. Glyoxalase pathway is the GSH-dependent system which detoxifies MG via a two-step enzymatic reaction, catalysed by glyoxalase I (GLYI, lactoylglutathione lyase) and glyoxalase II (GLYII, hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase) enzymes. Here, the first step involves a spontaneous reaction between MG and GSH to form hemithioacetal (HTA), which is then isomerized to S-D-lactoylglutathione (SLG) by GLYI. In the second step, GLYII hydrolyzes SLG to release D-lactate and thus, recycles one GSH molecule into the system. In addition to the GSH-dependent glyoxalase system, there also exists a shorter GSH-independent, direct pathway for MG detoxification which has recently been reported in rice [10]. The enzyme involved is glyoxalase III, also known as DJ-1 protein due to its high sequence similarity with human DJ-1 protein (HsDJ-1). In humans, DJ-1 proteins are associated with early onset of Parkinson disease and it was only later that the presence of glyoxalase III activity was reported in such proteins [11]. The catalytic mechanism of this enzyme is completely different from the typical two-step glyoxalase pathway, as it neither requires GSH nor metal cofactors for activity [10].

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the glyoxalase pathway for methylglyoxal detoxification in plants. Methylglyoxal (MG) is converted to S-D-lactoylglutathione (SLG) by glyoxalase I (GLYI) enzyme which is then converted to D-lactate by glyoxalase II (GLYII). Glutathione is used in the first reaction catalysed by GLYI but is recycled in the second reaction catalysed by GLYII. D-lactate is further metabolized to pyruvate through D-lactate dehydrogenase (D-LDH) enzyme which passes electrons to cytochrome C (CYTc)

D-lactate, which is the product of MG detoxification catalyzed by either GLYI-GLYII system or GLYIII enzymes, is then further metabolised to pyruvate via D-lactate dehydrogenases (D-LDH) and thus, D-lactate formation can be termed as the final step in the MG detoxification pathway (Fig. 1). In fact, D-LDH links MG degradation with the electron transport chain through Cytochrome c (CYT c). In Arabidopsis, CYTc loss-of-function mutants and the D-LDH mutants, are sensitive to both D-lactate and MG, indicating that they function in the same pathway. On the other hand, over-expression of either of the two viz. D-LDH or CYTc, increases tolerance of the transgenic plants to D-lactate and MG [12]. Further, GLYI and D-LDH from Arabidopsis have been shown to confer tolerance to various abiotic stresses in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes [13]. In rice, silencing of D-LDH impedes glyoxalase system leading to MG accumulation and growth inhibition [14].

The production of MG in response to various environmental cues and its subsequent detoxification by the glyoxalase pathway, together with its ability to trigger a widespread plant response, makes MG and glyoxalases suitable biomarkers for stress tolerance [15]. A large volume of evidence resulting from in vivo and in silico studies has revealed MG to be a central metabolite controlling signal transduction, gene expression and protein modification [16, 17]. To date, several genome-wide analyses have been carried out that located the presence of multiple glyoxalase isoforms in all the plant species studied. A total of 11 GLYI and 5 GLYII genes in Arabidopsis thaliana [18], 11 GLYI and 3 GLYII in Oryza sativa [18], 24 GLYI and 12 GLYII in Glycine max [19], 29 GLYI and 14 GLYII in Medicago truncatula [20] and, 16 GLYI and 15 GLYII in Brassica rapa [21] have been identified. Very recently, 4 GLYI and 2 GLYII genes encoding putative functionally active glyoxalase isoforms have also been identified in grapes [22]. Similarly, a recent comparative analysis of glyoxalases genes in Erianthus arundinaceus and a commercial sugarcane hybrid has led to the identification of 9 GLYI and 7 GLYII genes in sugarcane, with the wild cultivar showing higher expression of glyoxalase genes under stress conditions than the commercial variety [23].

The existence of multiple forms of these enzymes indicates the presence of possibly different reaction mechanisms, regulations and their tissue-specific distribution across plant species, thereby suggesting several important physiological functions for these enzymes in plants. Few recent studies have in fact highlighted altogether different roles of glyoxalases in plants i.e. in pollination [24] and starch synthesis [25].

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench is truly a versatile crop that can be grown as a grain, forage or sweet crop. It is among the most efficient crops with regard to its ability to convert solar energy and also in use of water and thus, is known as a high-energy, drought-tolerant crop [26]. Owing to sorghum’s wide uses and adaptation, it is considered “one of the really indispensable crops” required for the survival of humankind (see Jack Harlan, 1971). Notably, sorghum is of interest to the US DOE (Department of Energy) as a bio-energy crop because of its resilience to drought and its ability to thrive on marginal lands. Since glyoxalases are important for stress adaptation in plants and since sorghum has remarkably high capacity to resist drought, we thought it pertinent to investigate the presence, regulation and distribution of glyoxalases in sorghum.

Towards this, in the present study, we carried out a genome-wide analysis of MG detoxification genes viz. GLYI, GLYII and D-LDH, in sorghum. Our results indicate the presence of 15 GLYI, 6 GLYII and 4 D-LDH genes in the sorghum genome with multiple members co-localising in mitochondria, chloroplast and cytoplasm. Of these, cytoplasm and mitochondria could be said to possess complete MG detoxification pathway, as the functionally active GLYI, GLYII and D-LDH genes could be predicted to exist in these sub-cellular compartments. However, while chloroplasts have been predicted to possess functional GLYI and GLYII, it is predicted to not possess any D-LDH protein. Further, we observed development and tissue specific variations in the expression of these three gene families. Though several similar studies have been carried out in other plant species, those have mainly focused on the first two enzymes of the pathway. We believe that D-LDHs are equally important for the complete detoxification of MG as D-lactate is exclusively formed from the reactions of glyoxalase enzymes. Future studies may focus on elucidating the physiological functions of these different forms with respect to both MG detoxification and various developmental processes in plants.


Identification and analysis of glyoxalase genes in sorghum

The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile search for conserved glyoxalase domain (PF00903 and PF12681) led to the identification of 15 putative SbGLYI genes, of which 6 genes, SbGLYI-1, SbGLYI-7, SbGLYI-8, SbGLYI-9, SbGLYI-10 and SbGLYI-11, were found to have varying transcript lengths (Table 1). Among these, SbGLYI-1 and SbGLYI-8 were predicted to form alternatively spliced products. As a result, a total of 17 SbGLYI proteins were identified in sorghum. However, PCR-based assessment of spliced variants of SbGLYI-7, SbGLYI-8, SbGLYI-10 and SbGLYI-11 genes using primers designed from the coding sequence (CDS) or 5′ or 3′- untranslated region (UTR), revealed several discrepancies. Amplicon of expected size was obtained only for SbGLYI-8 transcript thereby, validating the presence of two spliced variants (Additional file 1: Figure S1). However, no spliced variant could be detected for SbGLYI-10 and SbGLYI-11 genes. In contrast, we failed to PCR amplify SbGLYI-7 gene and as a result could not validate the presence or absence of spliced variants of this gene (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Table 1 List of putative glyoxalase I genes present in Sorghum bicolor

The chromosomal locations, orientations and CDS length of SbGLYI genes along with their various physico-chemical properties and sub-cellular localisation have been listed in Table 1. SbGLYI proteins were predicted to be localised in different cell organelles. While majority of them localised in the cytoplasm and chloroplast, others were predicted to be localised both in the chloroplast and mitochondria. Only SbGLYI-15 protein was predicted to be exclusively localised in the mitochondria. Interestingly, one of the SbGLYI protein namely, SbGLYI-8 and its isoform SbGLYI-8.1, were found to harbour nuclear localisation signals (NLS) as well and therefore, may even localise in the nucleus. To further confirm, SbGLYI-8/8.1 sequences were aligned to their closest rice (OsGLYI-8) and Arabidopsis (AtGLYI-2) orthologs. Both SbGLYI-8 and SbGLYI-8.1 were found to possess a 20 aa long NLS near the N-terminus of the protein, as also observed in OsGLYI-8 and AtGLYI-2.4 proteins (Additional file 2: Figure S2). The predicted iso-electric points (pI) of SbGLYI proteins were found to range between 5 to 7 with a few exceptions, as for SbGLYI-2 and SbGLYI-4, which had pI lesser than 5.

Similarly, HMM profile search for metallo-beta lactamase (PF00753) and HAGH_C (PF16123) domains led to the identification of 7 SbGLYII proteins encoded by 6 SbGLYII genes. Similar to SbGLYI proteins, several SbGLYII proteins were also predicted to be both chloroplast- and mitochondria-localised. Two out of 7 proteins were predicted to be cytoplasmic and only one was predicted to be solely localised in the chloroplast. The predicted iso-electric points (pI) of SbGLYII proteins ranged between 5 to 8 (Table 2).

Table 2 List of putative glyoxalase II genes present in Sorghum bicolor

Phylogenetic analysis of glyoxalase proteins of sorghum and other plant species

In order to study the evolutionary divergence of glyoxalase proteins, amino acid sequences of the putative SbGLYI and SbGLYII proteins were aligned to members of the well-characterised rice glyoxalase family. Sequence alignments revealed high similarity between SbGLYI and OsGLYI proteins and between SbGLYII and OsGLYII proteins. For instance, SbGLYI-7, SbGLYI-10, SbGLYI-11 and SbGLYI-14 clustered with OsGLYI-2, OsGLYI-7 and OsGLYI-11 whereas SbGLYI-8 and SbGLYI-8.1 were found to be more similar to OsGLYI-8 (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Likewise, SbGLYII-3 and SbGLYII-4 were more similar to rice OsGLYII-2 and OsGLYII-3, respectively, whereas SbGLYII-5 was closer to OsGLYII-1 in sequence (Additional file 4: Figure S4). Next, a phylogenetic tree was generated using Neighbour-Joining method for GLYI proteins from different plant species such as Arabidopsis, rice, soybean and Medicago (Fig. 2). The tree revealed clustering of proteins into three major groups, comprising of putative Ni2+-dependent proteins (Clade I), putative Zn2+-dependent GLYI proteins (Clade II) and functionally diverse GLYI-like proteins (Clade III) (Fig. 2a). Clade-III was the most populous cluster followed by Clade I and II. SbGLYI-7, SbGLYI-10, SbGLYI-11 and SbGLYI-14 clustered in the same clade as that of the previously characterised and functionally active, AtGLYI-3 and AtGLYI-6 from Arabidopsis and OsGLYI-2, OsGLYI-7, and OsGLYI-11 proteins from rice, with all these proteins belonging to the Ni2+-dependent GLYI category of proteins, whereas SbGLYI-8 grouped with Zn2+-dependent GLYI proteins from Arabidopsis (AtGLYI-2) and rice (OsGLYI-8). Overall, these GLYI protein encoding genes were predicted to be orthologous, and functionally similar. The third cluster contained greater number of proteins which have probably diverged in their functions and hence, were named as GLYI-like proteins [27].

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic analysis of glyoxalase proteins from sorghum and other plant species. Circular tree constructed for the (a) GLYI and (b) GLYII proteins from sorghum, rice, Arabidopsis, Medicago and Soybean using Neighbour-Joining method in MEGA 7.0 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The putative sub-cellular localisation of the proteins has been indicated as rings bordering the tree in different colours. Cytoplasm (red), Chloroplast (green), Mitochondria (blue), Nucleus (purple), Extracellular/peroxisomes (yellow), Chloroplast or Mitochondria (turquoise). The localisation of those marked with asterisk have been experimentally proven

In the case of GLYII proteins, two different subfamilies were observed in the phylogenetic tree, those with conserved active site motifs and therefore, enzymatically active and the other comprising of proteins which did not show conservation of active site residues. Of these, some were previously reported to possess sulphur dioxygenase (SDO) activity. It could be clearly seen from the tree that SbGLYII-3 shared more similarity to OsGLYII-2, and SbGLYII-4 was closer to OsGLYII-3 (Fig. 2b). Both OsGLYII-2 and OsGLYII-3 are functionally active GLYII proteins and therefore, SbGLYII-3 and SbGLYII-4 were also predicted to be enzymatically active. Further, we found SbGLYII-5 to be most similar to OsGLYII-1 and thus, was more likely to possess SDO activity (Fig. 2b).

Gene structure analysis of sorghum glyoxalase genes

Subsequent to phylogenetic analysis and prediction of the type of GLYI and GLYII activities in the sorghum GLY proteins, we analysed their gene structure to investigate any possible correlation of gene structure with their activity. For this, exon–intron structure of the genes was drawn using the Gene Structure Display Server tool [28]. The SbGLYI genes predicted to be functionally active as glyoxalases, shared similar exon-intron patterns among themselves. For instance, SbGLYI-7, SbGLYI-8 and SbGLYI-14 shared 8 exons and 7 introns each, while SbGLYI-10 and SbGLYI-11 shared 7 exons and 6 introns. Interestingly, GLYI-like protein encoding genes which clustered into two groups according to their sequence homology, also shared similarities in their gene structure within each cluster. First cluster comprising of genes, SbGLYI-1, SbGLYI-2, SbGLYI-3, SbGLYI-4 and SbGLYI-6 uniformly shared 2 exons and 1 intron each while the other cluster comprising of genes, SbGLYI-5, SbGLYI-9 and SbGLYI-13, shared 3 exons and 2 introns each (Fig. 3a). However, SbGLYII protein encoding genes did not show such characteristic exon-intron arrangements (Fig. 3b). SbGLYII-3 and SbGLYII-4 genes predicted to possess GLYII activity, consisted of 7 exons-6 introns and 8 exons-7 introns-based gene organization, respectively, whereas SbGLYII-5 predicted to be an SDO enzyme, consisted of 9 exons and 8 introns. Among the SbGLYII genes, SbGLYII-2 had the highest number of exons with both the spliced forms having 18 exons and 17 introns each (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3

Exon-intron organisation of glyoxalase gene family from sorghum. Exon-Intron structure of (a) SbGLYI and (b) SbGLYII genes were analysed using the Gene Structure Display Server tool. Length of exons and introns has been exhibited proportionally as indicated by the scale on the bottom. Order of GLY genes is represented as per their phylogenetic relationship. The branch lengths represent evolutionary time between the two nodes

Domain architecture analysis of putative glyoxalases

Domain architecture of putative SbGLYI proteins was analysed to determine the presence of functional domains and to draw similarities in protein features between glyoxalases from sorghum and other plant species. Analysis revealed that all the 17 SbGLYI proteins possessed only one type of domain viz. Glyoxalase/Bleomycin resistance protein/Dioxygenase (PF00903) domain. However, 4 GLYI proteins namely, SbGLYI-7, SbGLYI-10, SbGLYI-11 and SbGLYI-14 had two glyoxalase domains (Fig. 4a). In accordance with the previous studies, those proteins which possessed 2 GLYI domains of approximately 120 aa in a single polypeptide, served as the putative Ni2+-dependent forms, while those having approximately 142 aa long single GLYI domains and also possessing two extra stretches of sequences compared to other GLYI proteins, served as the putative Zn2+-dependent forms. Therefore, domain organisation pattern could also serve as an indicator for the type of metal ion dependency of the GLYI proteins. Based on this criterion, SbGLYI-7, SbGLYI-10, SbGLYI-11 and SbGLYI-14 could be classified as Ni2+-dependent and SbGLYI-8 as Zn2+-dependent (Table 3). This result is in line with the phylogenetic analysis, with metal binding sites also being conserved in these proteins (Additional file 3: Figure S3 and Table 3). Likewise, domain architecture analysis of GLYII proteins revealed the presence of metallo-β-lactamase domains in all GLYII proteins (Fig. 4b). However, out of the 7 SbGLYII proteins, only 2 proteins namely, SbGLYII-3 and SbGLYII-4, were found to possess HAGH_C (PF01623) domain in addition to the metallo-β-lactamase (PF00753) domain (Fig. 4b). The metal binding site THHHXDH, was found to be conserved in SbGLYII-3 and SbGLYII-4 (Table 4 and Additional file 4: Figure S4). In addition, the active site C/GHT residues were also present in SbGLYII-3 and SbGLYII-4, and even in SbGLYII-5 (Additional file 4: Figure S4). But SbGLYII-5 being similar to OsGLYII-1, was predicted to be a sulphur dioxygenase enzyme. The domain organisation of inactive GLYII proteins was very different from the active GLYII proteins having different additional domains. They were predicted to possess domains such as pre-mRNA 3′-end-processing endonuclease polyadenylation factor C-term, as found in SbGLYII-1 and SbGLYII-2, whereas SbGLYII-6 had Fer4_13 towards its N-terminus (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4

Schematic representation of domain architecture of glyoxalase proteins from sorghum. Domain architecture of (a) SbGLYI proteins showing the presence of glyoxalase domain (PF00903) and (b) SbGLYII proteins containing metallo-beta lactamase superfamily domain (PF00753) in all the predicted SbGLYII proteins. In addition, HAGH_C (PF16123) domain predicted to be important for the catalytic activity of SbGLYII proteins, was also found in some SbGLYII protein sequences while few SbGLYII proteins had other secondary domains. Domains were analysed using Pfam database. Exact position and number of domains are schematically represented along with the length of the protein

Table 3 Information on domain organisation of SbGLYI proteins for the prediction of enzymatic activity and metal ion dependency
Table 4 Information on domain organisation of putative SbGLYII proteins for the prediction of conserved motifs and enzyme activity

Developmental variations and stress-mediated expression profiling of sorghum glyoxalase genes

In order to study the anatomical and developmental regulation of glyoxalase genes in sorghum, gene expression profile of putative SbGLYI and SbGLYII genes was retrieved from the Genevestigator database. Expression data, however, could not be obtained for SbGLYI-3, SbGLYI-5, SbGLYI-7 and SbGLYI-13 genes. Expression analyses revealed that, of all the GLYI genes, the expression of SbGLYI-4 did not show tissue-specific variations and was constitutively expressed at higher levels in all the tissues (Fig. 5a, left panel). However, developmental stage mediated variations existed in the expression of SbGLYI-4, with its transcript levels being higher at the booting and dough stage of development (Fig. 5a, middle panel). Further, another GLYI-like gene, SbGLYI-6, showed relatively higher expression in leaves and even exhibited gradual increase in transcript abundance during different stages of development. However, putative Ni2+ −dependent forms, SbGLYI-11 and SbGLYI-14, were found to maintain higher levels of expression from the seedling stage till the flowering stage which thereafter, declined (Fig. 5a, middle panel). The expression of putative Zn2+ − dependent SbGLYI-8, was however, found to be similar in all the tissues and even at different developmental stages (Fig. 5a, middle panel). Among GLYII genes, SbGLYII-4 showed highest expression which was maintained across all the tissues (Fig. 5b, left panel). Developmental variations could be seen in its expression, being lowest at the stem elongation stage and highest during the dough stage, but still more than the other SbGLYII genes (Fig. 5b, middle panel).

Fig. 5

Developmental and stress-mediated regulation of glyoxalase family genes from sorghum. Expression profile of (a) GLYI and (b) GLYII genes was obtained from the publicly available Genevestigator Affymetrix sorghum genome array database. Normalized transcript data was obtained for different tissues, viz. underground tissues - root and, aerial tissues - leaf, internode, shoot and pith (left panel) at different developmental stages (middle panel). Normalized and curated perturbation expression data (right panel) of the genes was retrieved from Expression Atlas. Fold change in expression pertaining to ABA treatment (20 μM), PEG treatment (20% PEG 8000) and nutrient nitrogen limitation has been shown as heatmap generated using MeV software package. Colour scale below or on the right of the heatmap shows the level of expression. GLY genes have been represented in order as per their phylogenetic relationship. Branch length represents evolutionary time between the two nodes. Histogram depicting relative expression levels of (c) SbGLYI and (d) SbGLYII genes under different abiotic stress treatments viz. heat, cold, salinity (given to 7 d old seedlings for 6 h) and drought (water withheld for 48 h). Expression levels have been calculated with respect to the untreated control (having value of 1)

Further, normalised and curated perturbation expression data was retrieved from the publicly available database; Expression Atlas, with an aim to study the stress-mediated regulation of glyoxalase genes in sorghum. It was found that the expression of SbGLYI-6, SbGLYI-8, SbGLYI-11 and SbGLYI-14 was up-regulated in response to ABA treatment in both roots and shoots while SbGLYI-2 and SbGLYI-13 genes were induced only in roots upon ABA treatment (Fig. 5a, right panel). In response to PEG treatment, SbGLYI-1, SbGLYI-6 and SbGLYI-10 seemed to play a significant role as their expression levels were higher in comparison to the other GLYI genes. SbGLYI-2 and SbGLYI-13 were however, highly down regulated in response to PEG treatment. All the SbGLYI genes, except SbGLYI-6, SbGLYI-10 and SbGLYI-14 showed an induction in response to nitrogen starvation conditions in either root or shoot tissues (Fig. 5a, right panel).

Further, analysis of SbGLYII expression revealed that SbGLYII-3, SbGLYII-5 and SbGLYII-6 genes showed a similar pattern of expression in response to ABA treatment in shoot, osmotic stress in root, and nitrogen stress (Fig. 5b, right panel). However, expression data was not available for SbGLYII-1, SbGLYII-2 and SbGLYII-4. Taken together, the genes were found to be induced in response to abiotic stresses but were down-regulated in response to nutrient stress (Fig. 5b, right panel). Notably, expression of SbGLYII-5, which encodes SDO activity, was different from the other two proteins and was found to be unaltered in roots in response to ABA treatment and in shoots in response to osmotic stress.

Further, as glyoxalases have a well-established role in plant stress response, we also determined stress-mediated alterations in the expression levels of sorghum glyoxalase genes through qRT-PCR. Expression profiling of putative enzymatically active SbGLY forms was carried out under different abiotic stress conditions viz. heat, cold, salinity and drought (Fig. 5c & d). Interestingly, Ni2+-dependent SbGLYI genes namely, SbGLYI-7, SbGLYI-10, SbGLYI-11 and SbGLYI-14, were found to be induced in response to most of the stress treatments (Fig. 5c). The expression of putative Zn2+-dependent SbGLYI-8 was however, 4.7-fold and 7.3-fold increased under heat and cold stress, respectively but marginally declined under salinity conditions. Similarly, functionally active SbGLYII genes also showed stress-mediated perturbations in the expression levels. SbGLYII-3 expression was found to be ~ 3-fold up-regulated under heat stress whereas SbGLYII-4 expression was found to be 20-fold higher under cold stress (Fig. 5d).

Identification and analysis of genes encoding D-lactate dehydrogenase enzymes in sorghum

D-lactate dehydrogenases (D-LDH) have been found to be involved in the metabolism of MG catalysing the conversion of D-lactate to pyruvate, the last step of the pathway. However, no genome-wide study has ever been carried out, in particular for any plant D-LDH. Hence, in addition to the GLYI and GLYII genes, we also searched for the D-LDH genes in the sorghum genome. In order to identify the D-LDH encoding genes in sorghum, HMM profile of FAD_binding_4 (PF01565) was searched against the sorghum database because D-LDH belongs to the FAD binding super-family of proteins. Initial screening led to the identification of 43 genes having FAD _binding _4 domains (Additional file 5: Table S1). The proteins encoded by these genes share a conserved FAD binding domain, but may have different catalytic activities. Thus, it was important to identify genes specifically encoding for D-LDH activity. For this, multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses was performed for the 43 sequences which revealed 5 major clusters (Additional file 6: Figure S5 and Additional file 7: Figure S6). Proteins in these different clusters had additional domains specific to each cluster except for cluster II which did not possess a second domain (Additional file 7: Figure S6). Presence of different second domains in these proteins could be correlated to different catalytic functions. One of the clusters comprising of 5 proteins (Cluster III) contained previously characterised D-LDH from Arabidopsis and rice (Additional file 6: Figure S5 and Additional file 7: Figure S6). Further, the Cluster II proteins having no additional second domains were not predicted to possess any specific catalytic functions. Keeping in view, the features of Cluster II and III, we suggest that proteins in these clusters could possibly code for D-LDH proteins. Therefore, four genes from sorghum were ultimately predicted to code for proteins with D-LDH activity (Table 5). These putative D-LDH proteins had iso-electric point (pI) ranging from 6 to 8 and were predicted to be localised in mitochondria or cytoplasm.

Table 5 List of probable D-LDH genes present in Sorghum bicolor

Gene structure, domain organisation and phylogenetic analyses of sorghum D-LDH proteins

SbDLDH genes did not show characteristically similar exon-intron patterns as found for SbGLYI genes (Fig. 6a). SbDLDH-1 had the highest number of exons followed by SbDLDH-2. Both these proteins consisted of FAD _oxidase _C domain in addition to the FAD_binding_4 domain (Fig. 6b and Table 6). SbDLDH-3, SbDLDH-4.1 and SbDLDH-4.2 proteins consisted of only FAD_binding_4 domains. Further, phylogenetic analyses indicated SbDLDH-1 and SbDLDH-2 to cluster with AtDLDH, and hence, were predicted to be functionally similar (Fig. 6c). Likewise, both SbDLDH-1 and SbDLDH-2 were predicted to be mitochondrial proteins similar to their Arabidopsis AtDLDH ortholog (Fig. 6c). SbDLDH-3, SbDLDH-4.1 and SbDLDH4.2 proteins shared greater sequence similarity to rice OsDLDH, and likewise possessed both the domains. However, unlike OsDLDH which is a mitochondrial protein, SbDLDH-3, SbDLDH-4.1 and SbDLDH-4.2 were predicted to be cytoplasmic proteins (Table 5).

Fig. 6

Elucidation of exon-intron structure, protein domain architecture and phylogenetic relationship between sorghum D-LDH proteins. a Exon-Intron structure of SbDLDH genes. Length of exons and introns have been represented proportionally as indicated by the scale at the bottom. b Schematic representation of domain architecture of SbDLDH proteins indicating the presence of FAD_binding_4 and FAD_oxidase_C domains in SbDLDH proteins c Full length amino acid sequence of SbDLDH proteins were compared with the known D-LDH proteins from rice and Arabidopsis and phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbour-Joining method in MEGA 7.0 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Putative sub-cellular localisation of proteins have been indicated towards the right of the tree in different colours; cytoplasm (red) and mitochondria (blue)

Table 6 Domain architecture analysis of SbDLDH proteins from Sorghum bicolor

Developmental stage-specific and stress-mediated variations in the expression profile of D-LDH genes of sorghum

Similar to glyoxalases, development and tissue-specific variations in expression were determined for SbDLDH genes as well. Of the four sorghum D-LDH genes, SbDLDH-1 was found to be expressed at greater levels in shoots than roots (Fig. 7a) whereas expression of SbDLDH-3 and SbDLDH-4 was greater in roots than in shoots (Fig. 7a). SbDLDH-2 selectively showed lower expression in all the tissues and across different developmental stages except for the flowering stage (Fig. 7b). All the other SbDLDH genes showed stronger expression at the seedling stage. However, SbDLDH-3 had higher expression even at the stem elongation stage.

Fig. 7

Developmental and stress-mediated regulation of D-LDH genes from sorghum. Genome-wide microarray data of D-LDH genes was obtained from the publicly available Genevestigator Affymetrix sorghum genome array database. Normalized transcript data was obtained for (a) different tissues, including underground tissues-root and, aerial tissues- shoot, leaf, internode and pith and at (b) different developmental stages. c Normalized and curated perturbation expression data of the sorghum D-LDH genes was retrieved from Expression Atlas. Fold change in expression pertaining to ABA treatment (20 μM), PEG treatment (20% PEG 8000) and nutrient nitrogen limitation has been shown as heatmap generated using MeV software package. Colour scale below and on the right of the heatmap shows the levels of expression. Genes have been represented in order as per their phylogenetic relationship. Branch length represents evolutionary time between the two nodes. d Histogram depicting relative expression levels of SbDLDH genes under different abiotic stress treatments viz. heat, cold, salinity, (given to 7 d old seedlings for 6 h) and drought (water withheld for 48 h). Expression levels have been calculated with respect to the untreated control (having a value of 1)

To understand the regulation of D-LDH proteins in response to stress, transcript levels of SbDLDH genes were analysed under osmotic (PEG) and drought (ABA) stress conditions (Fig. 7b). Data could not be obtained for SbDLDH-3 and hence was not included in Fig. 7c. All the analysed SbDLDH genes were found to be down-regulated in response to ABA treatment in both roots and shoots except for SbDLDH-1 which was induced upon ABA treatment in roots. PEG treatment also led to an increase in SbDLDH-1 expression in shoots whereas SbDLDH-2 transcript levels increased in roots upon PEG treatment. Further, SbDLDH-2 and SbDLDH-4 but not SbDLDH-1 showed an increase in expression levels in response to nitrogen starvation (Fig. 7c). Further, a qRT-PCR-based expression profiling of putative functionally active SbDLDH isoforms under stress conditions revealed increased expression of these genes under heat, cold, salinity and drought conditions. The alteration in SbDLDH-2 expression was however, insignificant under cold and salinity stress as compared to the other two genes under the same conditions (Fig. 7d). Moreover, we could not determine stress-mediated variations in the SbDLDH-3 expression as its transcript remained undetected under stress conditions.

Three-dimensional homology modelling of SbDLDH proteins

Since no three-dimensional protein structures are yet available for any plant D-LDH proteins, a three-dimensional homology modelling study of SbDLDH proteins was attempted using information from the other systems. For structure prediction, the putative SbDLDH proteins were searched against the Protein Data Bank in the NCBI Blast server. A putative dehydrogenase from Rhodopseudomonas palostris (RhoPaDH, 3PM9_A) was found to be the closest available structural ortholog of the SbDLDH proteins. Once the structure of RhopaDH (Fig. 8a) was obtained from the Protein Data bank, the structure of the SbDLDH proteins (Fig. 8b-e) were modelled using the RhoPaDH structure as a template. Upon structural alignment and superposition onto the RhoPaDH protein, FAD-binding domain residues were found to be conserved in SbDLDH-1 and SbDLDH-2 (Fig. 8f, g) but lacking in SbDLDH-3 and SbDLDH-4 (data not shown). Further, structures of D-LDH proteins from sorghum were also modelled using Escherichia coli (E. coli) D-LDH (1F0X) as a template. Reports on the crystal structure of E.coli D-LDH (Fig. 8h) suggest that the flavin ring of FAD specifically interacts with the residues, Leu 81, Ile-147, Phe-39, Ser-144, Glu-528 and His-529 [29]. Although the position of the active site is not known, it is suggested that its location is close to the iso-alloxazine ring of FAD in the neighbourhood of Ile-142 and Ser-144, and is a part of the FAD-binding domain [29]. Upon structural alignment of SbDLDH proteins with the E.coli D-LDH protein, we found Glu-528 and His-529 residues to be conserved in SbDLDH-1 and SbDLDH-2 (Fig. 8i, j). It was however, observed that SbDLDH proteins were more similar to RhoPaDH than to the E.coli D-LDH.

Fig. 8

Three dimensional structure of putative D-LDH proteins from sorghum generated through homology modelling. Three dimensional structures of putative D-LDH proteins were modelled using Rhodopseudomonas palostris (RhoPaDH) putative dehydrogenase (RhoPADH) (a) as template. Structures of (b) SbDLDH-1, (c) SbDLDH-2, (d) SbDLDH-3 and (e) SbDLDH-4 showing conserved FAD binding sites (marked in pink). SbDLDH-1 and SbDLDH-2, closest in structural similarity to RhoPaDH, are shown as overlay with RhoPaDH (f&g). Three-dimensional structure of D-LDH from E. coli (h) has also been shown as overlay with SbDLDH-1 (i) and SbDLDH-2 (j). Red indicates FAD binding site in E. coli, blue indicates catalytic site of E. coli D-LDH


Agricultural productivity is adversely affected by various environmental factors resulting in extensive yield losses worldwide. Plants growing in the field generally face a combination of different stresses at any given time, severely limiting their growth and productivity [30]. But owing to their inherent plastic nature, plants have acquired a remarkable ability to adapt to variable climatic conditions and multiple stresses via the evolution of diverse mechanism for stress alleviation. Of these, some pathways are important not only for stress adaptation but also serve crucial housekeeping functions. The glyoxalase system, which is involved in the degradation of MG, can be termed as an apt example of one such mechanism. MG is a potent glycating agent that can readily modify proteins, lipids and nucleic acids [2] causing large-scale modifications in the plant cellular components and thus, its levels need to be tightly controlled [31, 32]. Since generation of MG in the living systems is inevitable, glyoxalases which detoxify MG are ubiquitously found in all organisms. Increase in MG levels during stress is in fact, a universal phenomenon in plants with a number of reports reiterating the role of MG and glyoxalases during stress conditions [33, 34]. Therefore, it would not be inappropriate to term MG and glyoxalases as possible biomarkers of plant stress tolerance [15]. To this end, over-expression of glyoxalase pathway genes has been carried out in various plant species wherein through improved MG detoxification as a result of increased activity of glyoxalase pathway enzymes, MG levels could be restricted from rising under stress, thereby imparting enhanced stress tolerance to plants [33, 35,36,37,38].

Previous genome-wide studies carried out in Arabidopsis, Oryza sativa [18], Glycine max [19], Medicago truncatula [20] and Brassica rapa [21] have identified the presence of glyoxalase pathway genes as multiple members in these plant species and shown them to be differentially regulated in response to various abiotic stresses. However, no previous studies, ever reported the status of D-LDH proteins in plants. Experimental evidence suggests a crucial role of NADH-independent D-LDH proteins in the MG detoxification pathway which constitutes the last step of this process [12,13,14]. Accumulation of D-lactate produced by the reactions of the glyoxalase pathway enzymes, can otherwise confer toxicity in the form of lactic acidosis, not being able to be utilized in any other metabolic pathway [39]. Therefore, with an aim to investigate the relevance of MG detoxification in sorghum, one of the top five most versatile and economically important cereal crops [26], we have undertaken a genome-wide distribution and expression profiling analysis of genes involved in the MG detoxification pathway.

A comprehensive genome-wide distribution study led to the identification of 15 GLYI, 6 GLYII and 4 D-LDH genes in the sorghum genome. Like in other plant species, SbGLYI proteins could also be broadly classified into two major categories. First category comprised of functionally active GLYI proteins, which based on their metal activation properties could be further classified into Zn2+- and Ni2+- dependent proteins. The metal specificity of SbGLYI proteins was predicted based on their domain sequence and length [40, 41]. Four SbGLYI proteins namely, SbGLYI-7, SbGLYI-10, SbGLYI-11 and SbGLYI-14, were found to be Ni2+-dependent showing greater homology to the previously characterised Ni2+-dependent GLYI proteins from rice and Arabidopsis [42, 43] and having a similar domain length, of approximately 120 aa. Similarly, only one GLYI protein namely, SbGLYI-8 was found to be Zn2+-dependent, having a domain length of 140 aa, much like rice OsGLYI-8 [44] and Arabidopsis AtGLYI-2 [43, 45] proteins. Interestingly, SbGLYI-8 possessed two spliced forms coding for almost similar length proteins (214 and 227 aa long), and both were predicted to be similarly localised in the mitochondria and/or chloroplast. This was unlike AtGLYI-2 from Arabidopsis, where three out of the four spliced forms coded for the same protein (AtGLYI-2.1/2/3, 187 aa) and only one was different (AtGLYI-2.4) being 236 aa long [45]. The longer AtGLYI-2.4 protein form was more similar to rice OsGLYI-8, both in length as well as in nuclear localization [44]. The AtGLYI-2.4 protein, however, also localizes to the chloroplast as reported by Schmitz et al. [45]. Likewise, SbGLYI-8/8.1 proteins were also found to harbour putative nuclear localization signals (NLS) and therefore, may get localized in the nucleus as well.

The other category of proteins comprised of functionally diverse and possibly inactive GLYI-like proteins. Schmitz et al. [27] have recently proposed the occurrence of functional divergence in the Arabidopsis glyoxalase family. In Arabidopsis, eight proteins were reported to be the members of the GLYI-like category of proteins which lacked conserved motifs and shared only 17–21% sequence identity to AtGLYI-2, the Zn2+-dependent form. Their biological activity is yet to be elucidated and even no close bacterial homologs have been identified to date. Importantly, Schmitz et al. [27] also pointed that the phylogenetic occurrence of GLYI-like proteins is restricted to bacteria and the green lineage.

Among the SbGLYII proteins, SbGLYII-3 and SbGLYII-4 were predicted to be active GLYII enzymes owing to the presence of conserved metal binding motifs and their high sequence similarity to the respective functionally active OsGLYII-2 [46] and OsGLYII-3 proteins from rice. SbGLYII-5, however, lacked the conserved THHHXDH metal binding motif and instead showed high sequence similarity to SDO activity-encoding OsGLYII-1 [47] and AtGLY2–3 proteins [48]. Hence, SbGLYII-5 was predicted as a putative SDO enzyme. It is now clear that, like GLYI family, functional divergence has also occurred in the GLYII family and this is seen in all plant species studied so far. GLYII proteins belong to the super-family of metallo-β-lactamase proteins which include proteins of different functions such as arylsulfatase, cyclase/dihydrase, lactams, phosphonate derivatives etc. [49]. Previously, distinction between different members of this super-family was not clear with all proteins possessing the metallo-β-lactamase fold being annotated as putative GLYII proteins, as also was done for rice [18]. However, with the sequence and crystal structure analysis of true GLYII proteins, a C-terminus located HAGH_C domain has been identified in the functionally active GLYII enzymes and it is suggested that substrate binding occurs at the interface between this domain and the catalytic β-lactamase domain [50]. Therefore, the presence of HAGH_C domain provides more confidence in the prediction of β-lactamase fold-containing protein as a true GLYII enzyme and our results are in accordance with it.

The last step of MG detoxification is catalysed by the D-LDH enzyme. These proteins belong to the FAD_binding_4 superfamily which use FAD as a cofactor. There are 43 such proteins in sorghum. In addition to the presence of FAD_binding_4 domain, most of these proteins contain an additional second domain which may be used to identify the catalytic functions of these proteins. In the case of D-LDHs, we found that out of the four possible D-LDHs identified on the basis of their sequence similarity to the previously characterized rice and Arabidopsis D-LDH proteins, two of them did not possess second domain while the other two had a FAD_oxidase_C domain. The remaining 39 proteins had different second domains such as, ALO (D-arabino-1,4-lactone oxidase), BBE (berberine and berberine like) and Cytokinin binding domain and are known to be involved in the D-erythroascorbic acid biosynthesis pathway [51], in biosynthesis of numerous isoquinoline alkaloids [52], and are present in plant cytokinin dehydrogenase, respectively [53]. SbDLDH proteins were predicted to be localized in either mitochondria or cytoplasm. Mitochondria is one of the potential sites for MG production and detoxification, possibly favouring the cell in protection against oxidative damage. The predicted presence of SbDLDH proteins in the mitochondria is in fact, in agreement with the known mitochondrial localization of D-LDH proteins from rice and Arabidopsis [12,13,14]. Further, it is possible that these mitochondrial D-LDH enzymes might acquire their substrate from within the organelle as few functionally active GLYI (SbGLYI-7 and SbGLYI-14) and GLYII (SbGLYII-4) proteins were also predicted to be present within the mitochondria (Fig. 9). Even otherwise, cytoplasm-generated D-lactate is also known to translocate to mitochondria for its metabolism to pyruvate by the mitochondrial D-LDH proteins [54]. Nonetheless, even cytoplasmic D-LDH proteins were predicted in the sorghum genome and included SbDLDH-3 and SbDLDH-4 proteins (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9

Proposed model of methylglyoxal detoxification via glyoxalase pathway proteins in various subcellular organelles of sorghum. Cellular defence against MG probably involves four different sub-cellular compartments viz. cytosol, chloroplast, mitochondria and nucleus. Cytosolic MG produced as an off shoot of glycolysis is converted to SLG by SbGLYI-10/11 which is further converted to D-lactate by SbGLYII-3. The conversion of D-lactate to pyruvate is catalysed either by SbDLDH-3, 4.1 or 4.2. Both in the mitochondria as well as chloroplast, MG detoxification is predicted to be catalysed by the same SbGLYI and SbGLYII proteins. D-lactate produced in the chloroplast can be converted to pyruvate either by cytosolic SbDLDH protein or transported in the mitochondria. In mitochondria, D-lactate is converted to pyruvate by SbDLDH-1/2 protein. Pyruvate is then fed into the Kreb’s cycle. In the nucleus, SbGLYI-8/SbGLYI-8.1, may catalyse the conversion of MG to SLG. Nuclear export of SLG is proposed as no nuclear GLYII could be predicted in the sorghum genome. TPI-Triose phosphate isomerase, GSH-Glutathione, G3P-Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate, F-1,-6-BP- Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, Ru-1,5-BP- Ribulose-1,5, bisphosphate, PGA- Phosphoglyceraldehyde

Transcript abundance analysis of putatively active SbGLY genes in different tissues and at different developmental stages revealed constitutive expression of SbGLYI-8, SbGLYI-11, SbGLYI-14, SbGLYII-3 and SbGLYII-4, similar to the observed constitutive expression pattern of active glyoxalases in rice (i.e OsGLYI-2, OsGLYI-8, OsGLYI-11.2, OsGLYII-2 and OsGLYII-3) and Arabidopsis (AtGLYI-2, AtGLYII-2 and AtGLYII-5) at all developmental stages and in all the tissues [18]. Schmitz et al. [27] have indeed suggested that functional glyoxalase enzymes are constitutively expressed probably for maintaining MG levels below toxic limits. It is well known that alterations in the expression of genes at the transcriptional level is one aspect of stress response. Glyoxalases from different plant species such as, AtGLYI-4, AtGLYI-7 (Arabidopsis), OsGLYI-6, OsGLYI-11 (rice), GmGLYI-6, GmGLYI-9, GmGLYI-20, GmGLYII-5, GmGLYII-10 (soybean), MtGLYI-8, MtGLYI-21, MtGLYII-9 (M. truncatula) and BrGLYI-3 (B. rapa) were previously reported to show high expression as a response to abiotic stress [18,19,20,21]. Likewise in the present study, we observed most of the members of sorghum glyoxalase family to be highly stress-responsive. For instance, the rice OsGLYI-8 ortholog SbGLYI-8, is significantly induced under both heat and cold stress and a GLYII-encoding SbGLYII-4 gene is induced under cold stress. Further, SbGLYI-8, SbGLYI-11, SbGLYI-14, SbGLYII-3 and SbGLYII-6 were also up-regulated in response to exogenous ABA treatment and osmotic stress. Previous studies show upregulation of SbGLYI-11 even in response to combined heat and drought stress [55], and is similar to the results obtained in the current study demonstrating increased SbGLYI-11 expression under both, heat and drought stress. Moreover, a SbGLYII gene isolated via RT-PCR from the Egyptian Sorghum cv. R3 by Assem et al. [56] has been identified as one of the two salt-tolerant alleles reported in the study. Further, the fungicide Maneb is also known to induce GLYI activity in sorghum indicating a pro-active antioxidant machinery operating in plants under such conditions [57]. However, among the D-LDH genes, only SbDLDH-1, encoding a putative mitochondrial protein, was found to be induced in response to ABA and PEG treatment.

Besides exogenous ABA and osmotic stress responsiveness, most of the GLYI genes are also induced in response to nitrogen (N) starvation. In the case of D-LDH, the significantly higher transcript abundance of SbDLDH genes under abiotic stresses viz. heat, cold, salinity and drought indicates their role in abiotic stress response in sorghum. In addition, SbDLDH-2 and SbDLDH-4 genes were also induced in response to nitrogen limitation suggestive of their role in MG detoxification during N stress in sorghum. In fact, a comparative study conducted in the two sorghum genotypes viz. 3P4 and 4P11, has revealed an increase in GLYI and GLYII activities in the plants subjected to both N-deficient and N-excess conditions, especially in the case, where ammonium was used as a N source [58]. In a similar context, the impact of MG in contributing towards NH4+ toxicity symptoms in Arabidopsis has been recently studied [59]. Since effective incorporation of ammonium ions into the amino acid structures entails high activity of mitochondrial TCA and engagement of the glycolytic pathway, generation of MG is unavoidable under such circumstances. In fact, MG generation was shown to supersede the repair capacity of detoxification enzymes leading to toxicity symptoms in plants. Hence, it can be safely said that a correlation exists between MG detoxification and N metabolism in plants.

Having identified the putatively active SbGLY and SbDLDH proteins in different sub-cellular compartments, we propose a cellular model for MG detoxification via the glyoxalase pathway in sorghum (Fig. 9). Our in silico analysis indicates that cellular defence against MG involves at least four different sub-cellular compartments viz. cytosol, chloroplast, mitochondria and nucleus. The cytosolic MG is converted to SLG by SbGLYI-10 and/or SbGLYI-11 which is then further converted to D-lactate by SbGLYII-3. Interestingly, we found two SbDLDH proteins to be localised in the cytosol which can convert D-lactate to pyruvate, which is then transported to mitochondria by the transport proteins like pyruvate translocase. In the chloroplast, MG produced as a result of degradation of triose sugars derived from Calvin-Benson cycle, may be converted to SLG by SbGLYI-7 and/or SbGLYI-14. The conversion of SLG to D-lactate can be catalysed by SbGLYII-4. The putative chloroplastic glyoxalase proteins which are, predicted to possess dual localization are likely to be present in the mitochondria as well. Therefore, MG in the mitochondria is probably detoxified by the same SbGLYI and SbGLYII proteins. The D-lactate so produced can thus, be converted to pyruvate by SbDLDH-1 and/or SbDLDH-2 proteins in the mitochondria. This pyruvate is ultimately fed into the Kreb’s cycle. Further, MG being a small metabolite can also enter the cell nucleus and exert its harmful effects [44, 60]. To counteract the deleterious effects of MG in the nucleus, SbGLYI-8/SbGLYI-8.1 proteins which possess NLS sequences like their rice and Arabidopsis orthologs, may catalyse the conversion of nuclear MG to SLG. However, as no nuclear GLYII could be predicted in the sorghum genome, we propose the nuclear export of SLG to cytosol for its detoxification. However, this model needs to be experimentally validated in order to confirm the role of multiple organelles in the detoxification of MG in the plant cell.


Unlike the previous reports, the current study has identified the presence of multiple D-LDH genes in sorghum, together with glyoxalase pathway genes, which are needed for complete metabolism of MG into a non-toxic compound, pyruvate. We believe that this study on MG detoxification genes, especially on glyoxalases which are well-established to play important roles in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance, will pave way for future studies aimed at understanding the abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms in sorghum and ultimately pave way for effective abiotic stress alleviation in plants through molecular biology interventions.

Material and methods

Identification and nomenclature of glyoxalases and D-LDH genes/proteins in sorghum

To identify all the putative GLYI, GLYII and D-LDH proteins, HMM profile of the conserved glyoxalase (PF00903 and PF12681), metallo-beta-lactamase (PF00753), hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase (PF16123) and FAD binding_4 (PF01565) domains obtained from the Pfam 32.0 database [61], was searched against the annotated proteins of sorghum using the PhytoMine tool [62] of the Phytozome genome database. For nomenclature, prefix ‘Sb’ was added to GLYI, GLYII and D-LDH followed by Arabic numbers in the increasing order of chromosome number. Alternate splice forms were chronologically numbered. Transcripts of putative functionally active GLY genes were validated using PCR employing primers listed in the Additional file 8: Table S2. The various physical parameters of the protein such as length, molecular weight and theoretical pI were predicted using the ProtParam tool [63]. Sub-cellular localisation of each of the proteins was predicted using the Localiser sub-cellular prediction tool [64], and if not found, WoLF PSORT prediction tool [65] was used. Chloroplast localisation of proteins was confirmed using the ChloroP server [66].

Evaluation of protein domain architecture

Detailed domain analysis of predicted GLYI, GLYII and D-LDH proteins was carried out using the HMMER Web version 2.31.0 [67]. Domain architecture was represented using the Domain Graph visualisation tool [68].

Phylogenetic analysis of glyoxalase and D-LDH proteins

For establishing evolutionary relationships, full length or domain amino acid sequence of the predicted sorghum proteins were aligned with the known GLYI, GLYII and D-LDH proteins from different plant species using Clustal in Jalview [69]. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbour-Joining method in MEGA 7.0 with 1000 bootstrap replicates [70]. Tree was visualised using the iTOL software [71].

Developmental and stress-mediated expression profiling of glyoxalase and D-LDH genes in sorghum

The anatomical and developmental microarray data of SbGLYI, SbGLYII and SbDLDH genes was retrieved from the publicly available Genevestigator Affymetrix sorghum genome array database [72]. The normalised and curated perturbation expression data (RNA seq) of the genes was obtained from the Expression Atlas repository from the experiments, E-GEOD-30249 [73] and E-GEOD-54705 [74], corresponding to ABA and PEG, and nitrogen tolerance conditions, respectively. The data was then used to generate heatmap using the Institute for Genomic Research MeV software package [75].

Three dimensional homology modelling of SbDLDH proteins

For homology modelling, the full length amino acid sequence of the putative SbDLDH proteins were searched against protein data bank in the NCBI BLAST server + 2.8. The 3D structure of the topmost hit with identity > 39% was retrieved from the Protein Data Bank [76]. The topmost hit 3PM9_A corresponding to Rhodopseudomonas palostris (RhopaDH) protein was then used as a template for modelling the putative SbDLDH proteins using the Swiss Model server [77]. The modelled structures were then visualised and compared for similarity to the previously characterised E.coli D-LDH (PDB ID: 1F0X) using the PyMOL 2.2 software.

Plant material and stress treatment for quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench (Maharashtra Hybrid) seeds were grown hydroponically under controlled conditions in a growth chamber maintained at 28 °C. Seven day old seedlings were exposed to different abiotic stresses such as salinity, cold, drought and heat. The seedlings were kept at 42 °C and 6 °C for heat and cold stress, respectively. For salinity stress, seedlings were subjected to 150 mM NaCl treatment. The treated seedlings were harvested after 6 h of treatment. For drought stress, water was withheld for a period of 48 h after which the seedlings were harvested. Untreated seedlings were used as control.

Expression profiling of SbGLY and SbDLDH genes under different abiotic stresses

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol™ reagent (Sigma Adrich, USA) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. First strand cDNA was synthesised using RevertAid first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific, USA). Primers used for the experiment are listed in Additional file 8: Table S2. The qRT-PCR was performed employing ABI 7500 Real Time PCR System and software (PE Applied Biosystems). The specificity of the amplification was tested by dissociation curve analysis. Three technical replicates were analysed for each sample. The relative expression ratio of each of the candidate genes was calculated using the delta Ct value method [78]. The eEF-1α gene was used as a reference for normalization of data.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files. The sequence data was obtained from Phytozome v12 ( for Sorghum bicolour, Medicago truncatula and Glycine max. For rice and Arabidopsis, sequence data was retrieved from RGAP ( and TAIR ( database, respectively. The sequences used in the study have been provided as Additional files 9, 10 and 11.



Abscisic acid


Cytochrome c


D-lactate dehydrogenase


Flavin adenine dinucleotide


Glyoxalase I


Glyoxalase II






Nuclear localisation signal


Polyethylene glycol


Sorghum bicolor




  1. 1.

    Kermack WO, Lambie CG, Slater RH. Studies in carbohydrate metabolism: influence of methylglyoxal and other possible intermediaries upon insulin hypoglycaemia. Biochem J. 1927;21:40–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thornalley PJ. Pharmacology of methylglyoxal: formation, modification of proteins and nucleic acids, and enzymatic detoxification-a role in pathogenesis and anti-proliferative chemotherapy. Gen Pharmacol. 1996;27:565–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kalapos MP. Methylglyoxal in living organisms: chemistry, biochemistry, toxicology and biological implications. Toxicol Lett. 1999;110:145–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vander Jagt DL, Hunsaker LA. Methylglyoxal metabolism and diabetic complications: roles of aldose reductase, glyoxalase-I, betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase and 2-oxoaldehyde dehydrogenase. Chem Biol Interact. 2003;143-144:341–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Richard JP. Mechanism for the formation of methylglyoxal from triose phosphates. Biochem Soc Trans. 1993;21:549–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chakraborty S, Karmakar K, Chakravortty D. Cells producing their own nemesis: understanding methylglyoxal metabolism. IUBMB Life. 2014;66:667–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rabbani N, Thornalley PJ. Glycation research in amino acids: a place to call home. Amino Acids. 2012;42:1087–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Thornalley PJ. The glyoxalase system in health and disease. Mol Asp Med. 1993;14:287–371.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kalapos MP. The tandem of free radicals and methylglyoxal. Chem Biol Interact. 2008;171:251–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ghosh A, Kushwaha HR, Hasan MR, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. Presence of unique glyoxalase III proteins in plants indicates the existence of shorter route for methylglyoxal detoxification. Sci Rep. 2016;6:18358.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lee JY, Song J, Kwon K, Jang S, Kim C, Baek K, Kim J, Park C. Human DJ-1 and its homologs are novel glyoxalases. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:3215–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Welchen E, Schmitz J, Fuchs P, García L, Wagner S, Wienstroer J, Schertl P, Braun HP, Schwarzlander M, Gonzales DG, Maurino VG. D-lactate dehydrogenase links methylglyoxal degradation and electron transport through cytochrome c. Plant Physiol. 2016;172:901–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jain M, Nagar P, Sharma A, Batth R, Aggarwal S, Kumari S, Mustafiz A. GLYI and D-LDH play key role in methylglyoxal detoxification and abiotic stress tolerance. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5451.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    An B, Lan J, Deng X, Chen S, Ouyang C, Shi H, Yang J, Li Y. Silencing of D-lactate dehydrogenase impedes glyoxalase system and leads to methylglyoxal accumulation and growth inhibition in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kaur C, Singla-Pareek SL, Sopory SK. Glyoxalase and methylglyoxal as biomarkers for plant stress tolerance. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2014;33:429–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kaur C, Sharma S, Singla-Pareek SL, Sopory SK. Methylglyoxal, triose phosphate isomerase and Glyoxalase pathway: implications in abiotic stress and signaling in plants. In: Pandey GK, editor. Elucidation of abiotic stress signaling in plants: a functional genomic perspective. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 347–66.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Banerjee S, Maity S, Chakraborti AS. Methylglyoxal-induced modification causes aggregation of myoglobin. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2016;155:1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mustafiz A, Singh AK, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. Genome-wide analysis of rice and Arabidopsis identifies two glyoxalase genes that are highly expressed in abiotic stresses. Funct Integr Genomic. 2011;11:293–305.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ghosh A, Islam T. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of glyoxalase gene families in soybean (Glycine max) indicate their development and abiotic stress specific response. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16:87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ghosh A. Genome-wide identification of glyoxalase genes in Medicago truncatula and their expression profiling in response to various developmental and environmental stimuli. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:836.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yan G, Xiao X, Wang N, Zhang F, Gao G, Xu K, Chen B, Qiao J, Wu X. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiles of glyoxalase gene families in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.). PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191159.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li T, Cheng X, Wang Y, Yin X, Li Z, Liu R, Liu G, Wang Y, Xu Y. Genome-wide analysis of glyoxalase-like gene families in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) and their expression profiling in response to downy mildew infection. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:362.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Vadakkancherry MM, Pushpanathan A, Peter CS, Selvarajan D, Jayanarayanan AN, Markandan M, Ramalingam S, Giriyapura SS, Govind H, Bakshi R, Chinnaswamy A. Comparative analysis of glyoxalase pathway genes in Erianthus arundinaceus and commercial sugarcane hybrid under salinity and drought conditions. BMC Genomics. 2019;19:986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sankaranarayanan S, Jamshed M, Samuel MA. Degradation of Glyoxalase I in Brassica napus stigma leads to self-incompatibility response. Nat Plants. 2015;1:15185.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    You X, Zhang W, Hu J, Jiang R, Cai Y, Feng Z, Kong F, Zhang J, Yan H, Chen W, Chen X, Ma J, Tang X, Wang P, Zhu S, Liu L, Jiang L, Wan J. FLOURY ENDOSPERM15 encodes a glyoxalase I involved in compound granule formation and starch synthesis in rice ENDOSPERM. Plant Cell Rep. 2019;38:345–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chepng’etich E, Nyamwaro SO, Bett KE, Kizito K. Factors that influence technical efficiency of sorghum production: a case of small holder sorghum producers in lower eastern Kenya. J Adv Agri. 2015;2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schmitz J, Rossoni AW, Maurino VG. Dissecting the physiological function of plant glyoxalase I and glyoxalase I-like proteins. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1618.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28. Accessed 14 Mar 2019.

  29. 29.

    Dym O, Pratt EA, Ho C, Eisenberg D. The crystal structure of D-lactate dehydrogenase, a peripheral membrane respiratory enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:9413–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pandey P, Irulappan V, Bagavathiannan MV, Senthil-Kumar M. Impact of combined abiotic and biotic stresses on plant growth and avenues for crop improvement by exploiting physio-morphological traits. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:537.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kaur C, Kushwaha HR, Mustafiz A, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. Analysis of global gene expression profile of rice in response to methylglyoxal indicates its possible role as a stress signal molecule. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:682.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rabbani N, Thornalley PJ. Methylglyoxal, glyoxalase 1 and the dicarbonyl proteome. Amino Acids. 2014;42:1133–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yadav SK, Singla-Pareek SL, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing glyoxalase enzymes resist an increase in methylglyoxal and maintain higher reduced glutathione levels under salinity stress. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:6265–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yadav SK, Singla-Pareek SL, Ray M, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Methylglyoxal levels in plants under salinity stress are dependent on glyoxalase I and glutathione. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;337:61–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Singla-Pareek SL, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Genetic engineering of the glyoxalase pathway in tobacco leads to enhanced salinity tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:14672–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Alvarez Viveros MF, Inostroza-Blancheteau C, Timmermann T, González M, Arce-Johnson P. Overexpression of GlyI and GlyII genes in transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum mill.) plants confers salt tolerance by decreasing oxidative stress. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:3281–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zeng Z, Xiong F, Yu X, Gong X, Luo J, Jiang Y, Kuang H, Gao B, Niu X, Liu Y. Over-expression of a glyoxalase gene, OsGly I, improves abiotic stress tolerance and grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;109:62–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gupta BK, Sahoo KK, Ghosh A, Tripathi AK, Anwar K, Das P, Singh AK, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. Manipulation of glyoxalase pathway confers tolerance to multiple stresses in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41:1186–200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Petersen C. D-lactic acidosis. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20:634–45.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Suttisansanee U, Lau K, Lagishetty S, Rao KN, Swaminathan S, Sauder JM, Burley SK, Honek JF. Structural variation in bacterial glyoxalase I enzymes: investigation of the metalloenzyme glyoxalase I from Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:38367–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kaur C, Vishnoi A, Ariyadasa TU, Bhattacharya A, Singla-Pareek SL, Sopory SK. Episodes of horizontal gene-transfer and gene-fusion led to co-existence of different metal-ion specific glyoxalase I. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3076.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mustafiz A, Ghosh A, Tripathi AK, Kaur C, Ganguly AK, Bhavesh NS, Tripathi JK, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. A unique Ni -dependent and methylglyoxal-inducible rice glyoxalase I possesses a single active site and functions in abiotic stress response. Plant J. 2014;78:951–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jain M, Batth R, Kumari S, Mustafiz A. Arabidopsis thaliana contains both Ni2+ and Zn2+ dependent glyoxalase I enzymes and ectopic expression of the latter contributes more towards abiotic stress tolerance in E. coli. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159348.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kaur C, Tripathi AK, Nutan KK, Sharma S, Ghosh A, Tripathi JK, Pareek A, Singla-Pareek SL, Sopory SK. A nuclear-localized rice glyoxalase I enzyme, OsGLYI-8, functions in the detoxification of methylglyoxal in the nucleus. Plant J. 2017;89:565–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Schmitz J, Dittmar IC, Brockmann JD, Schmidt M, Hüdig M, Rossoni AW, Maurino VG. Defense against reactive carbonyl species involves at least three subcellular compartments where individual components of the system respond to cellular sugar status. Plant Cell. 2017;29:3234–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ghosh A, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. A glutathione responsive rice glyoxalase II, OsGLYII-2, functions in salinity adaptation by maintaining better photosynthesis efficiency and anti-oxidant pool. Plant J. 2014;80:93–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kaur C, Mustafiz A, Sarkar AK, Ariyadasa TU, Singla-Pareek SL, Sopory SK. Expression of abiotic stress inducible ETHE1-like protein from rice is higher in roots and is regulated by calcium. Physiol Plant. 2014;152:1–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Holdorf MM, Owen HA, Lieber SR, Yuan L, Adams N, Dabney-Smith C, Makaroff CA. Arabidopsis ETHE1 encodes a sulfur dioxygenase that is essential for embryo and endosperm development. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:226–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Aravind L. An evolutionary classification of the metallo-beta-lactamase fold proteins. In Silico Biol. 1999;1:69–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Schilling O, Wenzel N, Naylor M, Vogel A, Crowder M, Makaroff C, Meyer-Klaucke W. Flexible metal binding of the metallo-lactamase domain: glyoxalase II incorporates iron, manganese, and zinc in vivo. Biochemistry. 2003;42:11777–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Huh W-K, Lee B-H, Kim S-T, Kim YR, Rhie GE, Back YWB, Hwang CS, Lee JS, Kang SO. D-erythroascorbic acid is an important antioxidant molecule in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30:895–903.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Facchini PJ, Penzes C, Johnson AG, Bull D. Molecular characterization of berberine bridge enzyme genes from opium poppy. Plant Physiol. 1996;112:1669–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Malito E, Coda A, Bilyeu KD, Fraaije MW, Mattevi A. Structures of Michaelis and product complexes of plant cytokinin dehydrogenase: implications for flavoenzyme catalysis. J Mol Biol. 2004;341:1237–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Pallotta ML. Mitochondrial involvement to methylglyoxal detoxification: D-lactate/malate antiporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102:163–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Johnson SM, Lim FL, Finkler A, Fromm H, Slabas AR, Knight MR. Transcriptomic analysis of Sorghum bicolor responding to combined heat and drought stress. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:456.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Assem SK, Hussein E, Assal SSE, Basry M. Isolation of glyoxalase II (gly II) and salt overly sensitive (SOS2) alleles from Egyptian sorghum and enhancing salt stress tolerance in yeast. Biosci Res. 2017;14:498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    El Omari R, Ben Mrid R, Amakran A, Nhiri M. Effect of fungicide (Maneb) on antioxidant system and carbon assimilation in leaves of sorghum plants. Russian J Plant Physiol. 2018;65:237–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mrid BR, El Omari R, El Mourabit N, Bouargalne Y, Nhiri M. Changes in the antioxidant and glyoxalase enzyme activities in leaves of two Moroccan sorghum ecotypes with differential tolerance to nitrogen stress. Aust J Crop Sci. 2018;12:1280–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Borysiuk K, Ostaszewska-Bugajska M, Vaultier MN, Hasenfratz-Sauder MP, Szal B. Enhanced formation of methylglyoxal-derived advanced glycation end products in Arabidopsis under ammonium nutrition. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:667.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kaur C, Sharma S, Singla-Pareek SL, Sopory SK. Methylglyoxal detoxification in plants: role of glyoxalase pathway. Ind J Plant Physiol. 2016;21:377–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61. Accessed 15 Sept 2018.

  62. 62. Accessed 15 Sept 2018.

  63. 63. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.

  64. 64. Accessed 2 May 2019.

  65. 65. Accessed 2 May 2019.

  66. 66. Accessed 2 May 2019.

  67. 67. Accessed 30 Dec 2018.

  68. 68. Accessed 7 Apr 2019.

  69. 69. Accessed 22 May 2019.

  70. 70.

    Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mo Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71. Accessed 22 May 2019.

  72. 72. Accessed 18 Sept 2018.

  73. 73. Accessed 30 Sept 2018.

  74. 74. Accessed 30 Sept 2018.

  75. 75.

    Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;95:14863–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76. Accessed 18 Nov 2018.

  77. 77. Accessed 28 Oct 2018.

  78. 78.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


SKS is thankful to Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) for the award of Distinguished fellowship. CK acknowledges Department of Science and Technology (DST) for the grant (IFA-14/LSPA-24) received from the DST-INSPIRE Faculty award. We are also thankful to Dr. Suresh Nair for critical reading of the manuscript.


The research was supported by funds received from ICGEB and DST (IFA-14/LSPA-24). The funding agency played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information




BB performed the data analysis and wrote the manuscript. SLS-P helped in critical evaluation and finalization of the manuscript. SKS and CK conceived the idea, designed the manuscript content and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sudhir K. Sopory or Charanpreet Kaur.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Determination of alternate splicing of putative functionally active SbGLYI transcripts. (A) Depiction of primer designing scheme. (B) Details of primers used for the determination of spliced variants of SbGLYI transcripts and respective amplification details. (C) Gel showing the amplification of SbGLYI transcripts.

Additional file 2: Figure S2. Alignment of SbGLYI-8/8.1 with its rice and Arabidopsis orthologs. Box indicates the location of putative nuclear localisation signal (NLS) sequences.

Additional file 3: Figure S3. Domain sequence alignment of predicted GLYI proteins from sorghum and rice. Conserved metal binding sites have been marked with an asterisk and region specific for Zn2+-dependent isoforms has been marked with a red line. Each domain of the two glyoxalase domain (PF00903)-containing putative GLYI proteins has been represented as a separate sequence, with domains being indicated by numbers 1 or 2 suffixed to the protein name thereby, indicating first and second domain, respectively.

Additional file 4: Figure S4. Multiple sequence alignment of predicted SbGLYII proteins with GLYII proteins from rice. Conserved THHHXDH and C/GHT motifs have been highlighted in blue (for active GLYII) and green (for SDO) colours and indicated by a bar.

Additional file 5: Table S1. List of FAD-binding-4 containing oxido-reductase superfamily members.

Additional file 6: Figure S5. Multiple sequence alignment of predicted SbDLDH proteins with the previously characterised rice and Arabidopsis D-LDH proteins.

Additional file 7: Figure S6. Phylogenetic tree representing all putative FAD_binding_4 oxido-reductase superfamily proteins in Sorghum bicolor. Differently coloured rings in the circular tree represent different domains present in the respective proteins.

Additional file 8: Table S2. List of primers used in the study.

Additional file 9. Glyoxalase I protein sequences from various species used for the phylogenetic analysis.

Additional file 10. Glyoxalase II protein sequences from various species used for the phylogenetic analysis.

Additional file 11. D-LDH protein sequences used for the phylogenetic analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhowal, B., Singla-Pareek, S.L., Sopory, S.K. et al. From methylglyoxal to pyruvate: a genome-wide study for the identification of glyoxalases and D-lactate dehydrogenases in Sorghum bicolor. BMC Genomics 21, 145 (2020).

Download citation


  • D-lactate dehydrogenase
  • Genome-wide analysis
  • Glyoxalase
  • Sorghum
  • Stress