Skip to main content

Identification, systematic evolution and expression analyses of the AAAP gene family in Capsicum annuum

Abstract

Background

The amino acid/auxin permease (AAAP) family represents a class of proteins that transport amino acids across cell membranes. Members of this family are widely distributed in different organisms and participate in processes such as growth and development and the stress response in plants. However, a systematic comprehensive analysis of AAAP genes of the pepper (Capsicum annuum) genome has not been reported.

Results

In this study, we performed systematic bioinformatics analyses to identify AAAP family genes in the C. annuum ‘Zunla-1’ genome to determine gene number, distribution, structure, duplications and expression patterns in different tissues and stress. A total of 53 CaAAAP genes were identified in the ‘Zunla-1’ pepper genome and could be divided into eight subgroups. Significant differences in gene structure and protein conserved domains were observed among the subgroups. In addition to CaGAT1, CaATL4, and CaVAAT1, the remaining CaAAAP genes were unevenly distributed on 11 of 12 chromosomes. In total, 33.96% (18/53) of the CaAAAP genes were a result of duplication events, including three pairs of genes due to segmental duplication and 12 tandem duplication events. Analyses of evolutionary patterns showed that segmental duplication of AAAPs in pepper occurred before tandem duplication. The expression profiling of the CaAAAP by transcriptomic data analysis showed distinct expression patterns in various tissues and response to different stress treatment, which further suggest that the function of CaAAAP genes has been differentiated.

Conclusions

This study of CaAAAP genes provides a theoretical basis for exploring the roles of AAAP family members in C. annuum.

Background

Plants obtain nitrogen by absorbing ammonia, nitrate, amino acids, and soluble peptides from the soil. Nitrogen absorption and transport is mediated by several types of transport proteins, including ammonium transport proteins (AMTs), nitrate transport proteins (NRTs), amino acid transport proteins (AATs) and peptide transport proteins (PTRs) [1]. In plants, AATs are transmembrane (TM) proteins that transport amino acids from the extracellular environment to the intracellular environment [2]. According to conserved sequence and structure motifs, the plant AAT superfamily consists of the amino acid/auxin permease (AAAP) and amino acid-polyamine-choline (APC) gene families [3]. The AAAP subfamily includes eight subclasses of transporters: amino acid permeases (AAPs), lysine-histidine transporters (LHTs), proline transporters (ProTs), γ-aminobutyric acid transporters (GATs), putative auxin transporters (AUXs), similar to ANT1-like aromatic and neutral amino acid transporters (ANTs), and amino acid transporter-like (ATLa and ATLb) subfamilies [4, 5]. AAAP genes are widely present in plants, including Arabidopsis (46 genes) [6], rice (58 genes) [7], maize (71 genes) [8], poplar (71 genes) [9], potato (52 genes) [10], moso bamboo(55 genes) [11] and Medicago truncatula(86 genes) [12].

The first amino acid transporter protein (AtAAP1/NAT2) isolated from plants belongs to the AAP family. There are eight members in Arabidopsis, and AtAAP transports neutral, acidic and cationic amino acids with different specificities and affinities [13, 14]. AtAAP1 is highly expressed in Arabidopsis cotyledons and the endosperm, and mediates uptake of amino acids to developing embryo or root cells [15,16,17]. AtAAP2 is localized to the plasma membrane and the phloem, and the aap2 mutant exhibits altered xylem-phloem transfer of amino acids, which affects metabolism and results in increased seed yield and oil content in Arabidopsis [18]. AtAAP3 is exclusively expressed in roots and AtAAP4 is primarily expressed in source leaves, stems, and flowers, AtAAP5 has been observed in all tissues [19]. In the aap6 mutant, the amino acid content of the Arabidopsis sieve elements was reduced but not affect leaves aphid herbivores [20]. AtAAP8 participates in the early seed development in Arabidopsis [21]. OsAAP3 and OsAAP5 regulate tiller number and grain yield in rice [22, 23], and overexpression of OsAAP6 increases grain protein content and improves rice nutritional quality [24]. In addition, there are reports of AAP subfamily members in other species, including StAAP1 [25], PvAAP1 [26], PtAAP11 [27], VfAAP1 and VfAAP3 [28].

AtLHT1 localizes on the surface of roots in young seedlings and in pollen and mediates uptake of amino acids from the root to the mesophyll cells through the xylem [29, 30]. Under conditions of nitrogen deficiency in particular, overexpression of AtLHT1 can increase the efficiency of nitrogen utilization [30]. AtLHT2 localizes to the tapetum of Arabidopsis anthers [31]. AtLHT6 is expressed in buds, flowers, and roots; AtLHT4 expression is increased in developed buds compared to mature flowers; and expression of AtLHT5 peaks in flowers [32, 33]. OsLHT6 is specifically expressed in new shoot meristems [7], and PgLHT plays an important role in the growth and development of the ginseng root system [34]. The GAT subfamily mainly transports γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and GABA-related compounds; the highest expression of AtGAT1 is observed in flowers and under conditions of elevated GABA [35]. AtANT1 is expressed in all organs, with the highest abundance in flowers and cauline leaves, and mediates transport of aromatic and neutral amino acids, arginine, indole-3-acetic acid, and 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid [36]. AtAUX1 is a high-affinity transporter of indoleacetic acid (IAA), and AtAUX1 and AtLAX3(a homolog of AtAUX1) are mainly expressed in roots and promote lateral root formation [37, 38]. The expression of OsAUX subfamily members is also tissue-specific: OsAUX4 is preferentially expressed in new shoot meristems, and OsAUX2 and OsAUX5 are specifically expressed in young roots, which suggests a role in the formation and development of root systems [7]. MtLAX2, a functional homolog of AtAUX1, is required for nodule organogenesis [39]. The ProTs subfamily is responsible for transporting proline, glycinebetaine (GB) and GABA. AtProT1 is expressed in the phloem or phloem parenchyma cells, which indicates a role in the long-distance transport of proline [40]. By contrast, AtProT2 is only expressed in root epidermis and cortical cells; AtProT3 is more highly in leaf epidermal cells [40]. HvProT2 is constitutively expressed in both leaves and roots, and heterologous expression experiments have shown that the affinity of HvProT2 is highest for glycinebetaine [41]. AtAVT3 and AtAVT4 encode amino acid efflux proteins located in the vacuolar membrane, where they mediate transport of alanine and proline [42].

Pepper is an annual or perennial plant that belongs to the Solanaceae family; it is an important vegetable crop in China, which is number one in the world in terms of planting area and output (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/). The pepper Zunla-1 (C. annuum L.) genome contains 34,476 protein-coding loci on 12 different chromosomes. Although the roles of many AAAPs in plants have been well characterized, members of the AAAP gene family in pepper have not been studied. We used bioinformatics to identify the AAAP gene family members in pepper and systematically analyzed the chromosome distribution, gene structure, evolution characteristics, and expression patterns of AAAP genes to provide a theoretical basis for exploring the roles of AAAPs in pepper.

Results

Identification of AAAP genes in pepper

To explore the AAAP protein family in pepper, we used one domain (PF01490) searche of Pepper Genome Database2 (http://peppersequence.genomics.cn/page/); the HMM profile was used as a query and each putative AAAP protein sequences was verified by SMART, CDD and Pfam analyses. A total of 53 AAAP genes were identified and renamed in pepper according to their affinities within gene subfamilies; CaGAT1, CaANL4 and CaVAAT1, were not anchored to chromosomes (Table 1). Gene lengths ranged from 669 (CaLHT4) to 2532 bp (CaAAP4), the molecular weight varies from 24.43 kDa (CaLHT4) to 93.22 kDa (CaAAP4). The isoelectric points (pIs) of CaAAAP proteins ranged from 4.27(CaVAAT5) to 10.06(CaANT5); the majority of proteins (83%) had pIs more than 7.0, which indicates that AAAP proteins in pepper may represent a class of basic protein.

Table 1 The general information and sequence characterization of 53 CaAAAP genes

We studied the exon/intron arrangement of the coding sequences of CaAAAP genes in their genome sequences and found that 13.21% (7/53) of pepper AAAP genes contained a single exon, 3.77% (2/53) had a single intron, and 83.02% had 1 to 14 introns (Fig. 1). Prediction of TM regions showed that most CaAAAPs (77.36%) had 8–11. Similar numbers of TMs regions were found in several subfamilies (e.g., 10 TMs in the AUX subfamily and 11 TMs in the ANT and ATLa subfamilies; Table 1 and Additional file 1:Figure S1). Thus, members of the same subfamily have a conserved structure.

Fig. 1
figure1

Phylogenetic relationship, gene structures and conserved motifs of CaAAAPs. A Phylogenetic tree of 53 CaAAAPs proteins. Neighbor-joining tree was constructed using MEGA7. Bootstrap support values from 1000 reiterations are indicated at each node. The 53 CaAAAPs in the tree were divided into eight subfamilies. B Exons and introns were indicated by green rectangles and gray lines respectively. C Conserved motifs of CaAAAPs proteins. Each colored box represents a specific motif in the protein identified using the MEME motif search tool. The order of the motifs corresponds to their position within individual protein sequences

Conserved domains of pepper AAAP proteins were analyzed with the MEME server and a total of 20 conserved motifs were identified (Fig. 1, Additional file 3: Table S1). Motifs 1 (44/53), 2 (42/53), and 7 (49/53) were widespread among members of the CaAAAP family. Some subfamilies included several specific motifs. For example, the LHT and GAT subfamilies contained motifs 3, 12, 13, and 14, whereas motif 5 was only found in the LHT, AAP, GAT, and ProT subfamilies. Motifs 9, 10, and 17 were only present in the AUX subfamily; motifs 15 and 18 were only present in the ANT subfamily; motifs 16 and 19 were only present in the ATLa subfamily. Similar numbers of motifs were found in the ProT and AUX subfamilies (Fig. 1), which suggests that the structures of these subfamilies are highly conserved.

Phylogenetic and structural analyses of AAAP proteins in pepper

To further understand the homology between the AAAP gene families of pepper and other plant species (Table 2), we constructed an unrooted phylogenetic tree of full-length AAAPs from pepper, potato, rice and Arabidopsis was constructed (Fig. 2). We found that the genes CaAAAP, StAAAP, OsAAAP and AtAAAP were divided into eight distinct subfamilies, which indicates that the AAAP gene family has eight subfamilies in angiosperms. In pepper, the LHT subfamily was the largest (26.42%; 14 genes), whereas the GAT subfamily comprised only two genes. and the numbers of genes in the subgroups GAT, ProT,AUX and ANT were the same as or similar to those in potato, rice, and Arabidopsis.

Table 2 Comparative analysis of Amino acid/auxin permease (AAAP) proteins between Capsicum and other plant species
Fig. 2
figure2

Phylogenetic relationships of pepper, potato, rice, and Arabidopsis AAAP proteins. Multiple sequence alignment of full-length proteins was performed by Clustal X1.83 and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA7 with the neighbor-joining method. The tree was divided into eight subgroups, marked by different color backgrounds

Chromosomal location and duplication analyses

We used Mapchart 2.30 mapping to identify the chromosomal location of AAAP genes in the pepper genome (Fig. 3). In addition to CaGAT1, CaANL4 and CaVATT1, the remaining 50 genes were unevenly distributed on 11 of 12 chromosomes; no genes were mapped to chromosomes 1 (Fig. 3, Table 1). Most of the genes were mapped to the bottom of chromosomes 2, 5, 7 and 8, whereas the genes on chromosome 11 were mostly mapped to the top. A total of 58.5% (31/53) of genes were mapped to chromosome 2, 3, 4 and 5, which contained 8, 6, 11 and 6 genes, respectively. Only one gene was located on chromosome 9, and two to four genes were mapped to the remaining chromosomes (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Chromosomal localization and gene duplication events of CaAAAP genes. Respective chromosome numbers are indicated at the top of each bar. Tandem duplicated genes are marked on a blue background. Segmental duplicated genes are shown by red line

To identify the duplication events of AAAP genes in pepper, we analyzed the 53 full-length AAAP protein sequences using MCScanX. According to the defined criterion of separation five or fewer genes with more than 50% similarity at protein level, 33.96% (18 of 53) originated from the duplication events (Fig. 3). Twelve genes (22.64%) were arranged in tandem duplication and organized into four groups. Two pairs of tandem duplicate genes were identified on chromosome 2; chromosomes 5 and 7 each contained one pair (Fig. 3). Three segmental duplication blocks were located on chromosomes 2, 4 and 12, representing 11.32% of all CaAAAP genes (6/53) (Fig. 3, Additional file 2: Figure S2). Furthermore, high-sequence similarity occurred in duplicated genes: CaAAP1 and CaAAP3, which originated via tandem duplication, were 94.28% similar, whereas CaANT1 and CaANT4, which were a result of segmental duplication, exhibited 81.79% similarity.

Based on chromosomal distribution and phylogenetic and sequence similarity analyses, we identified seven pairs of paralogs in the pepper AAAP family (Table 3). Two pairs of paralogs (CaANT1 and CaANT4, and CaAAP5 and CaAAP6) participated in segmental duplications on different chromosomes. Five pairs (CaANT1 and CaANT2, CaANT2 and CaANT3, CaANT1 and CaANT3, CaLHT1 and CaLHT3, and CaAAP1 and CaAAP3) were the result of a putative tandem duplication event. We further estimated nonsynonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) nucleotide substitution rates in the coding sequences of paralog pairs to explore the selective pressures and duplication time of AAAP gene family members in pepper (Table 3). In general, Ka/Ks ratios less than 1 indicate purifying selection, and Ka/Ks ratios greater than 1 indicate positive selection [43]. The Ka/Ks ratios of all seven paralog pairs were < 1.0, which indicates that CaAAAP genes evolved under purifying selection (Table 3). We also estimated the dates of duplication events of paralog pairs using the formula T = Ks/2λ (assuming a clock-like rate (λ) of 6.96 × 10 − 9 synonymous substitutions per years [44]); duplication events were estimated to have occurred 8.53 to 68.69 million years ago (Mya), with an average duplication time of 43.61 Mya. We estimate that the duplication time of two AAAP paralog pairs in pepper occurred 58.87 to 54 Mya and that of five of the paralogous gene pairs occurred 40.96 to 8.53 Mya (Table 3).

Table 3 Ka-Ks calculation for each pair of AAAP paralogs in pepper

Expression patterns of CaAAAP genes in various tissues

We investigated the expression profiles of all CaAAAP genes in roots, stems, leaves, floral buds, flowers and different developmental stages of fruits (Fig. 4, Additional file 4: Table S2). 48 (90.5%) of the CaAAAP genes were detected in at least one tissue (RPKM ≥1), and 19(35.8%) genes were detected in all tissues tested (RPKM ≥1). In particular, approximately half of the CaAAAP genes showed low expression in fruits. By contrast, approximately 50% CaAAAP genes showed high expression in flowers and buds (RPKM ≥10). The CaAAAP genes clustered into three distinct clades based on expression patterns (Fig. 4). Seven genes (CaAAP2, CaAAP3, CaAAP5, CaAAP9, CaATL6, CaATL7, and CaVAAT8) in group I were expressed at relatively high levels in all tissues. In addition to several genes exhibited relatively high expression in specific organs (such as CaLHT3, CaLHT5, CaLHT8, VAAT1 and VAAT6 in buds; CaATL4 in fruits; CaLHT9 and CaGAT2 in roots; CaLHT12 in roots, stems and leaves), the other genes in group II were expressed at relatively low levels in all tested tissues. Group III comprised 20 genes that were expressed at relatively high levels in most organs.

Fig. 4
figure4

Expression profiles of CaAAAP genes in different tissues. The relative expression levels corresponding to log 10-transformed RPKM values after the addition of a pseudocount of 1 are shown. The scale represents the relative signal intensity of the RPKM values

Differential expression profiling of CaAAAP genes in response to hormones and abiotic stress

To study whether CaAAAPs are involved in responses to hormones and abiotic stresses in pepper, we investigated the expression levels of the CaAAPs in the roots and leaves of 40-day old seedlings in response to cold, heat, salt, osmotic, oxidative, ABA, IAA, GA3, JA and SA treatment (Fig. 5, Additional file 5: Table S3). In addition to CaLHT2, CaLHT5, CaLHT7, CaLHT8, CaLHT13, and CaAAP10, most AAAP genes were induced in at least one of the treatment as compared with the control (Fig. 5). Interestingly, some AAAP genes varied greatly between the leaves and roots in the response to abiotic or hormones stress. For instance, CaAAP4, CaLHT9, CaLHT10, CaATL3, CaATL6, CaATL7, CaAUX3, and CaVAAT7 were found to be upregulated under cold, heat, osomotic, oxidative and salt in the roots, but downregulated in the leaves. There were 28, 10, 20, and 18 CaAAAP genes were also upregulated by ABA, GA3, IAA, and JA treatment in the roots respectively, but downregulated in the leaves. Whereas there were 4, 5, and 7 CaAAAP genes were observed to be upregulated in the leaves but downregulated in the roots under the cold, IAA and salt stress treatment, respectively. In contrast, the highest number of CaAAAP genes were upregulated in the SA response in the leaves and roots (33 genes). There were several stress-responsive cis-elements showing in the promoter regions of these members, such as ABRE, ARE, LTR, MBS, TGACG-motif, CGTCA-motif, TCA-element, GARE-motif, AuxRR-core, and TC-rich repeats (Additional file 6: Table S4). Among the 53 AAAP genes, the CaAAP7 promoter had no these stress-responsive elements, while CaVAAT2 had maximum 14 elements. These results reaveled that a number of CaAAAP genes might involved in regulating abiotic and hormone stress responses.

Fig. 5
figure5

Expression patterns of CaAAAP genes in response to different hormone treatments and abiotic stress in the leaves and roots. Relative expression changes corresponding to log 10-transformed FPKM values between experimental and control tissues are shown. To avoid a situation where a FPKM equals 0, 1 was added to all the FPKM values. The scale represents the relative signal intensity of the FPKM values

Discussion

The AAAP gene family, which contains eight subfamilies, encodes integral TM proteins that play a pivotal role in various aspects of normal plant growth and development. This gene family has been identified in many plants, including Arabidopsis [6], rice [7], maize [8], poplar [9], potato [10], moso bamboo [11] and Medicago truncatula [12]. Although the role of AAAP genes in plants has been previously suggested, systematic study of the AAAP gene family in pepper has not been performed. We identified 53 CaAAAPs genes in C.annuum.Zunla-1 in this work. The number of CaAAAPs identified was similar to those in potato [10] and moso bamboo [11]. In addition, AAAP proteins account for 0.13 to 0.18% of the total proteins in many plant species studied (Table 2), and the percentage of CaAAAPs identified in the present study was 0.15%. Thus, the number of AAAP genes in most plants appears to be similar, regardless of genome size. Consistent with that in other plants, the pepper AAAP gene family can be divided into eight subfamilies (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Although the clade patterns are consistent with previous results from in other plants, the number of AAAP genes within sevearl subfamilies is significant difference (Table 2), which indicates that the expansion of each subfamily occurred after the split of dicot and monocot.

In addition to CaGAT1, CaVATT1 and CaATL4, the remaining 50 genes were unevenly distributed on 11 of 12 chromosomes, and most of the genes were mapped on chromosomes 2, 3, 4 and 5 (Fig. 3). Meanwhile, four groups of tandem duplicate genes were identified on chromosome 2, 5 and 7, respectively, and segmental duplication blocks were located on chromosomes 2, 4 and 12 respectively (Fig. 3). In addition, gene structure analysis indicated the same subgroup had the same or similar numbers and types of exon/intron, TM regions, and motif compositions (Fig. 1, Table 1), which suggests that those groups have been relatively conserved during evolution.

Gene duplication is generally considered a major source of gene family expansion and functional diversity during evolution [45]. Previous studies also showed that 50% (29/58) of AAAP genes are duplicated gene in rice [7], duplicated genes represented 32.69% (17/52) in potato [10] and 30.43% (14/46) in Arabidopsis [6]. In the present study, 33.96% of AAAP genes (18/53) in pepper were duplicated genes, 12 genes (22.64%) are involved in the tandem duplication, and 6 genes (11.32%) in segmental duplication. These results suggest that tandem gene duplication is the main cause of expansion of the CaAAAP gene family; similar results have been reported in potato and Arabidopsis [6, 10]. The two pairs (CaANT1 and CaANT4, and CaAAP5 and CaAAP6) of paralogs participated in segmental duplications occurred from 54 to 58.87 Mya, and five pairs (CaANT1 and CaANT2, CaANT2 and CaANT3, CaANT1 and CaANT3, CaLHT1 and CaLHT3, and CaAAP1 and CaAAP3) participated in tandem duplications occurred from 41.43 to 8.53 Mya (Table 3). This indicated that the segmental duplication of AAAPs in pepper occurred before tandem duplication. The pepper/potato separation occurred approximately 36 Mya [46], the duplication of most AAAP paralog pairs occurred before their separation from pepper and potato, and only two paralogous pairs were duplicated after the pepper/potato split. The Ka/Ks ratios of seven paralog pairs were < 1 (Table 3), which indicates that these paralog pairs evolved under purifying selection. Similar results have been reported in moso bamboo [11] and poplar [9], which have no paralog pairs in the AAAP family that underwent positive selection.

Gene duplication often causes changes in gene expression patterns and original functions of these genes may be retained [45]. Comparative analysis of the expression pattern of duplicated CaAAAP genes revealed that CaANT2 and CaANT3 (tandem duplicated genes) exhibited similar expression patterns in various development stages and stresses, which indicated that they may have overlapping functions (Figs. 4 and 5). However, most duplicated CaAAAP genes exhibited distinct expression patterns, such as CaAAP5 and CaAAP6 (segmental duplicated genes); as well as CaAAP1 and CaAAP3, CaLHT1 and CaLHT3 (tandem duplicated genes) (Figs. 4 and 5). These results indicate that the expression and functional divergence of duplicated genes under selection pressure, contributing to adapt to the diversity of the environment.

Gene expression patterns are usually closely linked to plant growth and development, and comparative expression analyses of gene families can provide useful information for establishing their putative functions [47]. In this study, the expression profiles of CaAAAP differed across different organs and stages, consistent with the results of studies in other species such as potato [10]. Approximately 50% CaAAAP genes were expressed at relatively high levels in flowers and buds. 24 and 19 CaAAAPs genes showed relatively high expression levels in the roots and leaves, respectively. Similarly, 19 StAATs in potato were expressed at relatively high levels in the leaves [10]. Our data showed that CaAAP5, an orthologous of StAAP1 and AtAAP6, was highly expressed in flowers, roots, leaves, and stems (Fig. 4). AtAAP6 is responsible for the long-distance transport of amino acids [20]. StAAP1, which is highly expressed in leaves, stem, stolon and young tuber, is also responsible for the long-distance transport of amino acids [25]. Therefore, CaAAP5 might be involved in the long-distance transport of amino acid in pepper. In Arabidopsis, AtAUX1 and AtLAX3 are highly expressed in roots [37, 48]. AUX subfamily genes are also mainly expressed in roots of rice and potato [7, 10]. In the study, AUX subfamily genes exhibited relatively high expression in roots, which indicates that CaAUXs might be involved in root growth and development. CaATL4 was only expressed at a high level in F-Dev-8 and F-Dev-9, suggesting that CaATL4 could play important roles in the late fruit developmen. Taken together, these results indicate that CaAAAPs may play an important role in the growth and development of pepper.

It has been reported that AAAPs is regulated by low temperature, high salt, and/or drought stress treatments in many plants [40, 49]. Under abiotic stress, 47 genes were regulated in at least one of the treatment as compared with the control and the expression of 48 genes were observed in all tissue analysis (Figs. 4 and 5). It has been reported that HvProT and AtProT2 were strongly induced by salt stress [49, 50] . Similarly, we found that CaProT1 had a close relationship with AtProT2, was specifically upregulated by cold, heat, salt, osmotic, oxidative, IAA, GA3, JA and SA stress in leaves. On the contrary, AtAAP6 were found to be downregulated by salt stress [50]. CaAAP5, which is orthologous to AtAAP6, was downregulated under salt stress in leaves, but upregualtaed in roots. In moso bamboo, the AAP subfamily gene PeAAAP9 has low expression level in leaf, but it is strongly induced by drought, cold and salt stress treatment [11]. Similary, CaAAP6 was highly expressed under all ten stresses treatment in the roots. However, low expression of this gene was observed in root, suggesting that CaAAP6 may take part in abiotic stress signaling pathways. With respect to the ten treatments, the expression of most CaAAAP was induced in the leaves or roots, suggesting that CaAAAP may play different roles in stress responses in pepper.

Conclusions

Overall, 53 AAAP gene family members were identified in the ‘Zunla-1’ pepper genome and could be divided into eight subgroups. Throughout its evolutionary history, CaAAAPs were highly conserved and expanded slowly. CaAAAP genes exhibit tissue-specific expression and coordinate to regulate growth and development in pepper.

Methods

Data retrieval and identification of gene families

All pepper protein sequences were obtained from the Pepper Genome Database2 (http://peppersequence.genomics.cn/page/). The HMM profile for the AAAP domain (PF01490) downloaded from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org) [51], was used to identify potential AAAP genes from the pepper genome with HMMER 3.2.1 (http://hmmer.janelia.org/), with an E-value of 10− 2 [47]. BLAST analyses using the rice and Arabidopsis AAAPs as queries against the pepper genome with an E-value threshold of 10− 10. The sequences of the rice and Arabidopsis AAAP family were obtained from JGI (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html). After merging all of the putative pepper AAAP sequences, the candidate protein sequences were further verified for the presence of conserved domains with the online tools Conserved Domain Database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/), SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/), and pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/). The results were integrated and redundant genes were discarded. Molecular weights and pIs of the proteins encoded by the identified genes were predicted with the online EXPASY serve (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/).

Phylogenetic tree, gene structure and conserved motif analyses of CaAAAP genes

Multiple sequence alignments analyses of AAAP amino acid sequences of Arabidopsis, rice, potato and pepper were performed with ClustalW. We built the phylogenetic tree using the neighbor-joining method with MEGA7 [52] and 1000 bootstrap replications, a Poisson model, and partial deletion gap parameters. We determined the exon/intron organization of CaAAAP genes by aligning the coding sequences with genomic sequences using the Gene Structure Display Server (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) [53]. Conserved motifs were generated with MEME (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme) with the following parameters: zero or one motif in each sequence, 10 and 100 width of motifs, and a maximum of 20 motifs. Motifs were visualized with TBtools [54].

Chromosomal location and syntenic analyses

The physical positions of the CaAAAP genes were obtained from the pepper annotation file deposited in the Sol Genomics database, mapped to 12 chromosomes, and visualized with Mapchart v.2.32 [55]. For syntenic analyses of CaAAAP genes, we used MCScanX [56] with the default settings to identify gene pairs of segmental and tandem duplications within the pepper genome.

Expression patterns of CaAAAP genes in various tissues and different stresses

To study the expression patterns of pepper AAAP genes in the pepper plant, we downloaded transcriptome sequencing data from the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; accession no.GSE45037) [46]. These data covered a wide range of developmental stages of pepper: roots, stems and leaves from plants at the full-bloom stage; unopened flower buds (buds) and fully open flowers (flowers) from mature plants; and fruits lengths of 0–1, 1–3, 3–4, and 4–5 cm (F-Dev-1, F-Dev-1, F-Dev-3 and F-Dev-4, respectively); mature green fruit (F-Dev-5); fruit turning red (F-Dev-6); and fruit 3, 5, and 7 days after turning red (F-Dev-7, F-Dev-8, and F-Dev-9, respectively). A heat map representing digital expression profile of CaAAAP genes was created with R 3.6.3 with log-transformed values.

The gene expression data of pepper in roots and leaves under different stresses were downloaded from (http://pepperhub.hzau.edu.cn/) [57]. The 40-day-old seedlings were separately treated with 10 stress conditions in 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h: cold stress (10 °C), heat stress (42 °C), salt stress (200 mM NaCl), osmotic stress (400 mM D-mannitose), oxidative stress (30 mM H2O2), ABA stress (30 μM), IAA stress (2 μM), GA3 (2 μM), JA (10 μM) and SA (2 mM). A heat map representing digital expression profile of CaAAAP genes was created with R 3.6.3 with log-transformed values.

Availability of data and materials

All the data obtained in the current study have been presented in this article.

Abbreviations

RPKM:

Reads Per Kilo bases per Million reads

FPKM:

Fragments Per Kilo bases per Million reads

References

  1. 1.

    Williams LE, Miller AJ. Transporters responsible for the uptake and partitioning of nitrogenous solutes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001;52(1):659–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.659.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tegeder M. Transporters for amino acids in plant cells: some functions and many unknowns. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15(3):315–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.02.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Saier MH Jr, Reddy VS, Tsu BV, Ahmed MS, Li C, Moreno-Hagelsieb G. The transporter classification database (TCDB): recent advances. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D372–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Okumoto S, Pilot G. Amino acid export in plants: a missing link in nitrogen cycling. Mol Plant. 2011;4(3):453–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssr003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fischer WN, André B, Rentsch D, Krolkiewicz S, Tegeder M, Breitkreuz K, et al. Amino acid transport in plants. Trends Plantence. 1998;3(5):188–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01231-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rentsch D, Schmidt S, Tegeder M. Transporters for uptake and allocation of organic nitrogen compounds in plants. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(12):2281–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhao H, Ma H, Yu L, Wang X, Zhao J. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of amino acid transporter gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plos One. 2012;7(11):e49210.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sheng L, Deng L, Yan HW, Zhao Y, Dong Q, Li Q, Li XY, Cheng BJ, Jiang HY. A genome-wide analysis of the AAAP gene family in maize. J Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2014; 07(1).

  9. 9.

    Wu M, Wu SN, Chen Z, Dong Q, Yan HW, Xiang Y. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the amino acid transporter gene family in poplar. Tree Genet Genomes. 2015;11(4):83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0908-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ma HL, Cao XL, Shi SD, Li SL, Gao JP, Ma YL, et al. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the amino acid transporter superfamily in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;107:164–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.06.007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu HL, Wu M, Zhu DY, Pan F, Wang Y, Wang YJ, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the AAAP gene family in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0980-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Qu Y, Ling L, Wang D, Zhang T, Guo CH. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the AAAP family in Medicago truncatula. Genetica. 2019;147(2):185–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-019-00062-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fischer WN, Kwart M, Hummel S, Frommer WB. Substrate specificity and expression profile of amino acid transporters (AAPs) in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(27):16315–20. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.27.16315.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Okumoto S, Schmidt R, Tegeder M, Fischer WN, Rentsch D, Frommer WB, et al. High affinity amino acid transporters specifically expressed in xylem parenchyma and developing seeds of Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(47):45338–46. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M207730200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hirner B, Fischer WN, Rentsch D, Kwart M, Frommer WB. Developmental control of H+/amino acid permease gene expression during seed development of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 1998;14(5):535–44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00151.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lee YH, Foster J, Chen J, Voll LM, Weber AP, Tegeder M. AAP1 transports uncharged amino acids into roots of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2007;50(2):305–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03045.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sanders A, Collier R, Trethewy A, Gould G, Sieker R, Tegeder M. AAP1 regulates import of amino acids into developing Arabidopsis embryos. Plant J. 2009;59(4):540–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03890.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang LZ, Tan QM, Lee R, Trethewy A, Lee YH, Tegeder M. Altered xylem-phloem transfer of amino acids affects metabolism and leads to increased seed yield and oil content in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22(11):3603–20. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.073833.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Okumoto S, Koch W, Tegeder M, Fischer WN, Biehl A, Leister D, et al. Root phloem-specific expression of the plasma membrane amino acid proton co-transporter AAP3. J Exp Bot. 2004;55(406):2155–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh233.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hunt E, Gattolin S, Newbury HJ, Bale JS, Tseng HM, Barrett DA, et al. A mutation in amino acid permease AAP6 reduces the amino acid content of the Arabidopsis sieve elements but leaves aphid herbivores unaffected. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(1):55–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp274.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Schmidt R, Stransky H, Koch W. The amino acid permease AAP8 is important for early seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta. 2007;226(4):805–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-007-0527-x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lu K, Wu B, Wang J, Zhu W, Nie HP, Qian JJ, et al. Blocking amino acid transporter OsAAP3 improves grain yield by promoting outgrowth buds and increasing tiller number in rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16(10):1710–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12907.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang J, Wu B, Lu K, Wei Q, Qian JJ, Chen YP, et al. The amino acid permease 5 (OsAAP5) regulates tiller number and grain yield in rice. Plant Physiol. 2019;180(2):1031–45. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00034.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Peng B, Kong H, Li Y, Wang L, Zhong M, Sun L, et al. OsAAP6 functions as an important regulator of grain protein content and nutritional quality in rice. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):4847. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5847.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Koch W, Kwart M, Laubner M, Heineke D, Stransky H, Frommer WB, et al. Reduced amino acid content in transgenic potato tubers due to antisense inhibition of the leaf H+/amino acid symporter StAAP1. Plant J. 2003;33(2):211–20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01618.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tan Q, Grennan AK, Hélène C, Pélissier RD, Tegeder M. Characterization and expression of French bean amino acid transporter PvAAP1. Plant Sci. 2008;174(3):348–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.12.008.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Couturier J, de Faÿ E, Fitz M, Wipf D, Blaudez D, Chalot M. PtAAP11, a high affinity amino acid transporter specifically expressed in differentiating xylem cells of poplar. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(6):1671–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq036.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Miranda M, Borisjuk L, Tewes A, Heim U, Sauer N, Wobus U, et al. Amino acid permeases in developing seeds of Vicia faba L.: expression precedes storage protein synthesis and is regulated by amino acid supply. Plant J. 2001;28(1):61–71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01129.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chen L, Bush DR. LHT1, a lysine- and histidine-specific amino acid transporter in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1997;115(3):1127–34. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.115.3.1127.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hirner A, Ladwig F, Stransky H, Okumoto S, Keinath M, Harms A, et al. Affiliations expand Arabidopsis LHT1 is a high-affinity transporter for cellular amino acid uptake in both root epidermis and leaf mesophyll. Plant Cell. 2006;18(8):1931–46. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.041012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lee YH, Tegeder M. Selective expression of a novel high-affinity transport system for acidic and neutral amino acids in the tapetum cells of Arabidopsis flowers. Plant J. 2004;40(1):60–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02186.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Perchlik M, Foster J, Tegeder M. Different and overlapping functions of Arabidopsis LHT6 and AAP1 transporters in root amino acid uptake. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(18):5193–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru278.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Foster J, Lee YH, Tegeder M. Distinct expression of members of the LHT amino acid transporter family in flowers indicates specific roles in plant reproduction. Sex Plant Reprod. 2008;21(2):143–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-008-0074-z.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhang R, Zhu J, Cao HZ, Xie XL, Hung JJ, Chen XH, et al. Isolation and characterization of LHT-type plant amino acid transporter gene from Panax ginseng Meyer. J Ginseng Res. 2013;37(3):361–70. https://doi.org/10.5142/jgr.2013.37.361.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Meyer A, Eskandari S, Grallath S, Rentsch D. AtGAT1, a high affinity transporter for gamma-aminobutyric acid in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(11):7197–204. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M510766200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chen L, Ortiz-Lopez A, Jung A, Bush DR. ANT1, an aromatic and neutral amino acid transporter in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;125(4):1813–20. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.4.1813.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ugartechea-Chirino Y, Swarup R, Swarup K, Péret B, Whitworth M, Bennett M. The AUX1 LAX family of auxin influx carriers is required for the establishment of embryonic root cell organization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ann Bot. 2010;105(2):277–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp287.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Marchant A, Kargul J, May ST, Muller P, Delbarre A, Perrot-Rechenmann C, et al. AUX1 regulates root gravitropism in Arabidopsis by facilitating auxin uptake within root apical tissues. EMBO J. 1999;18(8):2066–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.8.2066.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Roy S, Robson F, Lilley J, Liu CW, Cheng X, Wen J, et al. MtLAX2, a functional homologue of the Arabidopsis auxin influx transporter AUX1, is required for nodule organogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2017;174(1):326–38. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.01473.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Grallath S, Weimar T, Meyer A, Gumy C, Suter-Grotemeyer M, Neuhaus JM, et al. The AtProT family. Compatible solute transporters with similar substrate specificity but differential expression patterns. Plant Physiol. 2005;137(1):117–26. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.055079.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fujiwara T, Mitsuya S, Miyake H, Hattori T, Takabe T. Characterization of a novel glycinebetaine/proline transporter gene expressed in the mestome sheath and lateral root cap cells in barley. Planta. 2010;232(1):133–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1155-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fujiki Y, Teshima H, Kashiwao S, Kawano-Kawada M, Ohsumi Y, Kakinuma Y, et al. Functional identification of AtAVT3, a family of vacuolar amino acid transporters, in Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett. 2017;591(1):5–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.12507.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Koonin EV, Rogozin IB. Getting positive about selection. Genome Biol. 2003;4(8):331. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2003-4-8-331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Moniz de Sá M, Drouin G. Phylogeny and substitution rates of angiosperm actin genes. Mol Biol Evol. 1996;13(9):1198–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kong H, Landherr LL, Frohlich MW, Leebens-Mack J, Ma H, dePamphilis CW. Patterns of gene duplication in the plant SKP1 gene family in angiosperms: evidence for multiple mechanisms of rapid gene birth. Plant J 2007;50(5):873–885, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03097.x.

  46. 46.

    Qin C, Yu C, Shen Y, Fang X, Chen L, Min J, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of cultivated and wild peppers provides insights into Capsicum domestication and specialization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(14):5135–40. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400975111.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Liu AK, Liu CL, Lei HY, Wang ZJ, Zhang M, Yang XR, et al. Phylogenetic analysis and transcriptional profiling of WRKY genes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): genetic diversity and their responses to different biotic and abiotic stresses. Ind Crops Products. 2020;148(6):112268.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yang Y, Hammes UZ, Taylor CG, Schachtman DP, Nielsen E. High-affinity auxin transport by the AUX1 influx carrier protein [published correction appears in Curr biol. Curr Biol 2006;16(11):1123–1127, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.029.

  49. 49.

    Ueda A, Shi W, Sanmiya K, Shono M, Takabe T. Functional analysis of salt-inducible proline transporter of barley roots. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42(11):1282–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pce166.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rentsch D, Hirner B, Schmelzer E, Frommer WB. Salt stress-induced proline transporters and salt stress-repressed broad specificity amino acid permeases identified by suppression of a yeast amino acid permease-targeting mutant. Plant Cell. 1996;8(8):1437–46. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.8.8.1437.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D427–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky995.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hu B, Jin J, Guo AY, Zhang H, Luo J, Gao G. GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(8):1296–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Chen CJ, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He YH, et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Voorrips RE. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered. 2002;93(1):77–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.1.77.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wang Y, Tang H, Debarry JD, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(7):e49. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1293.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Liu F, Yu H, Deng Y, Zheng J, Liu M, Ou L, et al. PepperHub, an informatics hub for the chili pepper research community. Mol Plant. 2017;10(8):1129–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

The research was financially supported by the Chongqing Technology Innovation and Application Development Project (cstc2020jscx-msxmX0054).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The study was conceived and designed by KL and XP, MH, ZW, and HW contributed to data collection and bioinformatics analysis. KL and XP participated in preparing and writing the manuscript. All authors contributed to revising the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kairong Lei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Prediction of the transmembrane regions of 53 CaAAAPs. The transmembrane regions of the 53 CaAAAPs were predicted using the TMHMM Server v2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dkservicesTMHMM).

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Segmental duplication of 53 CaAAAPs. Gray lines indicate all synteny blocks in the pepper genome, the red lines indicate segmental duplicated genes.

Additional file 3: Table S1.

MEME motif sequences and lengths of AAAP gene family proteins in pepper.

Additional file 4: Table S2.

The RPKM expression values of CaAAAP genes at various developmental stages. These primary data was downloaded from NCBI, and then the relative expression level (log10 expression values) of 14 different tissues or evelopment stages was obtained after a series of manual processing.

Additional file 5: Table S3.

Sample list and the FPKM data of CaAAAP genes under various stress treatment.

Additional file 6: Table S4.

Summary of abiotic-stress inducible cis-elements in the promoter regions of AAAP genes in pepper.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, X., Hu, M., Wang, Z. et al. Identification, systematic evolution and expression analyses of the AAAP gene family in Capsicum annuum. BMC Genomics 22, 463 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07765-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Capsicum annuum
  • Amino acid/auxin permease
  • Systematic evolution
  • Gene expression analyses