Skip to main content
Download PDF

Selection signatures for local and regional adaptation in Chinese Mongolian horse breeds reveal candidate genes for hoof health

BMC Genomics volume 24, Article number: 35 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Thousands of years of natural and artificial selection since the domestication of the horse has shaped the distinctive genomes of Chinese Mongolian horse populations. Consequently, genomic signatures of selection can provide insights into the human-mediated selection history of specific traits and evolutionary adaptation to diverse environments. Here, we used genome-wide SNPs from five distinct Chinese Mongolian horse populations to identify genomic regions under selection for the population-specific traits, gait, black coat colour, and hoof quality. Other global breeds were used to identify regional-specific signatures of selection.

Results

We first identified the most significant selection peak for the Wushen horse in the region on ECA23 harbouring DMRT3, the major gene for gait. We detected selection signatures encompassing several genes in the Baicha Iron Hoof horse that represent good biological candidates for hoof health, including the CSPG4, PEAK1, EXPH5, WWP2 and HAS3 genes. In addition, an analysis of regional subgroups (Asian compared to European) identified a single locus on ECA3 containing the ZFPM1 gene that is a marker of selection for the major domestication event leading to the DOM2 horse clade.

Conclusions

Genomic variation at these loci in the Baicha Iron Hoof may be leveraged in other horse populations to identify animals with superior hoof health or those at risk of hoof-related pathologies. The overlap between the selection signature in Asian horses with the DOM2 selection peak raises questions about the nature of horse domestication events, which may have involved a prehistoric clade other than DOM2 that has not yet been identified.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

For millennia horses have played a central role in the nomadic life of Mongolic ethnic groups. For Mongols, known as an ‘ethnic group on horseback’, the horse has had considerable cultural and economic significance with the horse relied on for transportation, use in warfare and as a source of food (meat and mare’s milk). Horse racing is recognised as one of the ‘three manly games’ and a wealth of cultural literary accounts in songs and poems relate to horses. Today, the Mongolian horse is recognised as one of the oldest known horse breeds in the world [1]. Present-day Mongolian horses are mainly distributed in parts of northeast and north China (mainly Inner Mongolia), Mongolia and some areas of eastern Russian [2]. For the present study, we focused on the Mongolian horse and derived breeds from the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (IMAR), China, hereafter referred to as the Chinese Mongolian horse.

Chinese Mongolian horses are found in the IMAR, western parts of the provinces of Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning and some parts of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XUAR) [1, 3]. The earliest written record of the Chinese Mongolian horse is found in the Book of Han which records that “as early as King Yao’s and Shun’s time (2,377 – 2,178 BC) this horse lived in the river basin depending on the natural pastures along with cattle and sheep” [4]. It has been noted that historical records may have existed before horses were ridden because it is considered likely that the Chinese Mongolian horse was domesticated ~ 4 kya in northern China near the present-day Mongolian border [1]. At present, the Chinese Mongolian horse is generally classified as a breed in toto; however, as a result of long-term selection for adaptation to local environments by herdsmen, four phenotypically distinct sub-types have evolved: Wushen (desert type), Wuzhumuqin (steppe type), Baicha Iron Hoof (mountain type) and Baerhu (steppe type). Other breeds (e.g. Sanhe, Keerqin and Abaga Black) found in Inner Mongolia have been developed from local Mongolian stock following crossbreeding with imported horses from Europe and elsewhere.

Horses in Inner Mongolia have adapted to harsh environments, grazing year-round without supplemental feeding even when the ground is covered with snow and experiencing temperatures below − 40 °C in severe winters. Generally, they display traits for adaptation to extreme cold and dry hot conditions. Several metabolic, morphological, and physiological adaptations have been proposed to have evolved in Chinese Mongolian populations in response to their environment. For instance, the horses exhibit morpho-anatomical adaptations to the cold winter, developing extremely hairy coats in the winter that are shed by late spring before the hot summer. In addition, anecdotally it has been suggested that these horses exhibit reduced susceptibility to certain infectious diseases [3]. Some Chinese Mongolian horse populations have been further shaped by local herdsmen for traits such as alternative gait (Wushen), black coat colour (Abaga Black) and strong hooves (Baicha Iron Hoof). We have recently described the fine-scale characterization of the population genetic structure of five Chinese Mongolian horse populations using genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data [5]. In a principal component analysis (PCA), Abaga Black was the most genetically distinct from the other four populations while the Baicha Iron Hoof was partitioned into two clusters, one of which was similar to the Sanhe, Wuzhumuqin and Wushen populations. Although Wuzhumuqin, Wushen and Sanhe clustered in the first two principal components (PCs), the pairwise fixation index (FST) value of 0.005 estimated for the most closely related populations, Wushen and Wuzhumuqinm, was higher than the pairwise FST value (0.002) estimated for Paint and Quarter Horse, which are recognised as distinct breeds [6, 7]. Therefore, we hypothesised that long-term selection pressure for population-specific traits (i.e. gaitedness, strong hooves and black coat colour) may have contributed to the observed genomic diversity among the Chinese Mongolian populations. Furthermore, these five Chinese Mongolian as well as two other Asian populations (the Mongolian horse populations in Mongolia and Tuva) were genetically similar to each other but distinct from other global horse populations and were positioned between two large regional groups (European and American/Iberian/Middle Eastern) in the PCA analysis [5]. These results therefore lead to the hypothesis that natural and artificial selection will have left signatures in the Chinese Mongolian populations for long-term environmental adaptation when compared to other global horse populations.

Here, we report novel genome-wide signals of selection in the Baicha Iron Hoof population identified by comparison with four other Chinese Mongolian populations and signals for adaptation to regional environmental conditions in Asian horses compared with European as well as American/Iberian/Middle Eastern horse populations by applying the composite selection signals (CSS) approach [8] that summarises multiple tests for selection using genome-wide SNP data for 30 global horse breeds, including five Chinese Mongolian populations grouped by phenotype.

Results

Selection signals for alternative gait in Wushen horse

The ability to pace (a two-beat lateral gait) has been selected in Wushen horses by local herdsmen since pacing improves the comfort of riding, particularly over long distances. In addition, Wushen horses are bred to race with a paced gait since gaited horse racing is a popular type of racing in Inner Mongolia. The CSS test approach successfully identified the DMRT3 gene on ECA23, that has a well-established major effect on alternative gait (pace) [9] by comparing Wushen (n = 22) to the four other Chinese Mongolian populations (n = 78) (Fig. 1, Table S10).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A chromosome-wide plot of composite selection signals (CSS) scores for the Gaited (n = 22 Wushen) vs. Non-gaited (n = 78 other Mongolian) horses in dataset cohort. 1) Unsmoothed results, 2) Smoothed results, obtained by averaging the CSS scores of SNPs within 100 kb sliding windows. The dashed red lines indicate the genome-wide 0.1% thresholds of the empirical scores. The red arrow indicates the location of DMRT3 on ECA23

Full size image

Selection signals for black coat colour in Abaga Black horse

Contrary to the results for gaitedness, the genomic region containing the ASIP gene on ECA22 was not immediately evident as a selection signature in Abaga Black, when Abaga Black (n = 15) horses were compared with other Mongolian horses (n = 85) (Fig. S1, Table S2 and S10). The CSS component statistics for SNPs within or proximal to the ASIP locus were therefore examined in more detail, but none of the three statistics (ΔSAF, FST and XP-EHH) was significant for any proximal SNPs using the threshold for significance among the top 0.1% SNPs (data not shown). However, by relaxing the threshold to include the top 1% SNPs, there was evidence for variation at the ECA22 locus containing ASIP (Fig. S2, Table S3).

Selection signals for ‘Iron Hoof’

The Baicha Iron Hoof horse is the mountain-type of Chinese Mongolian horse and it is also commonly known simply as the ‘Iron Hoof’ for its strong, tough hooves. To test the hypothesis that the ‘Iron Hoof’ trait is underpinned by genes on which positive selection is acting, we performed CSS for the comparison of the Baicha Iron Hoof (n = 19) versus other Chinese Mongolian horses (n = 81). Genome-wide distribution of the smoothed CSS (−log10P) for the comparison identified 10 genomic regions with clusters of significant SNPs among the top 0.1% SNPs on ECA1, ECA3, ECA4, ECA7, ECA11, ECA18, ECA21, ECA26 and ECA31(Fig. 2, Table S4). In the selection peaks and their flanking regions, a total of 193 genes were identified (Table S4). Genes within selection peaks and flanking regions with functions that may be associated with hoof health are summarized in Table 1. The highest ranked region by CSS score (including the flanking region) spanned ~ 1.44 Mb on ECA1 and contained the genes CSPG4, PEAK1, SEMA7A, CSK and PSTPIP1 (also known as CD2BP1). The second ranked region on ECA7 flanked the EXPH5 gene. Furthermore, six candidate genes were identified on ECA3; WWP2, PSMD7, NQO1, NOB1, NFAT5 and HAS3. Additionally, we identified several genes (SEMA7A [10], CSK [11], GUCY1A2 [12], EMCN [13], OPRM1 [14]) that are associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A chromosome-wide plot of the composite selection signals (CSS) scores for Iron Hoof (n = 19) vs. Non-Iron Hoof (n = 81) in the dataset cohort. 1) Unsmoothed results, 2) Smoothed results, obtained by averaging the CSS scores of SNPs within 100 kb sliding windows. The dashed red lines indicate the genome-wide 0.1% thresholds of the empirical scores. Ten genomic regions with clusters of significant SNPs among the top 0.1% SNPs were identified on ECA1, ECA3, ECA4, ECA7, ECA11, ECA18, ECA21, ECA26 and ECA31

Full size image
Table 1 Genes within selection peaks and flanking regions with functions that may be associated with hoof health were detected in the Baicha Iron Hoof horse
Full size table

Selection signals relating to geographic origin / adaptation

To understand genomic variation contributing to regional adaptation we searched for selection signals in the Asian populations (n = 133) that distinguish them from European (n = 191) and America/Middle Eastern breeds (n = 281). To assess functional significance of genes in selected regions, we assigned functional annotation to all genes in the regions defined by the top 0.1% SNPs (including those with < 5 SNPs) using the DAVID functional annotation tool [15] as well as the GeneCards [16].

The genome-wide distribution of the smoothed CSS (−log10P) for Asian versus American/Middle Eastern population groups revealed six genomic regions on ECA6, ECA17, ECA21, ECA26 and ECA27 exhibiting signatures of selection (Table S5, Fig. S3). These six regions with flanking regions contained 113 genes including those associated with deafness, immune response, response to cold, intellectual disability, nervous system development, mitochondria, muscular dystrophy, muscle contraction, heart development, spermatogenesis, heart contraction, and brain development (Table 2, Table S6).

Table 2 Genes with functional significance identified in the selection peaks and flanking regions in the Asian versus American/Middle Eastern horse cohorts
Full size table

On the other hand, comparison of the Asian versus European population groups localised a single significant genomic region on ECA3 that spanned ~ 1.5 Mb. The selection and its flanking regions contained 52 genes including genes that are related to lactation and grooming behaviour, mitochondria, inflammatory response, innate immune system, motor coordination, metabolic pathways, nervous system development, heart development, pigmentation, sperm mobility and gonad development, and intellectual disability (Fig. 3, Table 3, Table S7–8).

Fig. 3
figure 3

A chromosome-wide plot of composite selection signals (CSS) scores for the Asian (n = 133) vs. European horse (n = 191) populations in the dataset cohort. 1) Unsmoothed results, 2) Smoothed results, obtained by averaging the CSS scores of SNPs within 1 Mb sliding windows. The dashed red lines indicate the genome-wide 0.1% thresholds of the empirical scores. A single region with clusters of significant SNPs among the top 0.1% SNPs was identified on ECA3 containing the ZFPM1 gene within the selection peak

Full size image
Table 3 Genes with functional significance identified in the selection peaks and flanking regions in the Asian versus European horse cohorts
Full size table

Most strikingly, the selection peak contained the ZFPM1 gene (Fig. S4), which overlaps with one of the two selection peaks identified among the domestic horse clade, DOM2, representing the earliest domesticates that became geographically widespread following 4200 YBP [17].

Discussion

Tests for genome-wide selection signatures were performed using the CSS approach in regional subgroups of Chinese Mongolian and Asian horse breeds that have experienced long-term natural and artificial selection as discrete population units. This contrasts with previous studies that have identified selection signals for traits in domestic horse breeds that have experienced intense selection pressure applied over a relatively recent evolutionary time period [7, 8].

The major genetic determinants of the ability to perform an alternative form of gait (i.e. pace) and various coat colour traits in the horse are well understood and therefore provide phenotypes to demonstrate the utility of the CSS test in these populations. Here, the detection of a known genomic selection signal for gaitedness in the Wushen population suggests that this method can be used to identify other genomic regions containing genes for traits under selection within the studied populations.

The genomic region containing the ASIP gene on ECA22 was not immediately evident as a selection signature in Abaga Black, which has been bred for black coat colour (Fig. S1 and Table S2). However, when we included the top 1% SNPs, evidence for variation at the ECA22 locus containing ASIP was identified (Fig. S2, Table S3). The weaker than expected signal may be explained by the breeding history of this population. Although it is recorded that local herdsmen have favoured black horses since the thirteenth century and it is common to see black horses in this geographic area, the Abaga Black has only been officially recognised as a distinct breed since 2006, therefore the selection history may not be long enough to be captured by the initial stringent threshold criteria. Also, it is possible that there is a novel gene in this population contributing to the coat colour phenotype observed in this population that may be different from the common black coat colour observed in modern horse breeds [3]. Indeed, a number of rare coat colours have been identified in Mongolian horse populations that are not found in the more common modern European/American breeds [18]. Since several genomic regions on other chromosomes were identified in the Abaga Black, these genomic regions may harbour genes and/or genomic regulatory elements influencing the coat colour phenotype and other uncharacterised traits in this population.

Selection signals for ‘Iron Hoof’

The equine hoof is a highly complex structure of the integument, which is produced by a modified epidermal layer covering the tip of the distal phalanx. The heritabilities of hoof shape and hoof wall quality phenotypes have previously been estimated as 0.12 and 0.10, respectively [9] indicating a modest genetic contribution to variation in hoof characteristics in the horse. Furthermore, a recent study that investigated the environmental effect on the morphometrics of the hooves of 100 feral Australian horses from five populations has suggested that a hard ground surface environment has an effect on the hooves, such as thickening of the hoof wall [10].

For the detection of selection signals in ‘Iron Hoof’, the CSPG4 gene on ECA1 has been observed to be expressed in connective tissues, basement membranes and developing blood vessels [19]. Both CSPG4 and PEAK1 are expressed in equine hoof lamellar tissue [20] and involved in MMP-2 activity [21, 22], a member of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) family that is present in normal hoof wall lamellae [23]. The lamellar basement membrane changes may be the first step in lamellar failure occurring prior to detection with conventional methods [24]. Considering their function in MMP activity and expression in equine lamellar tissue, we hypothesise that genetic variation in CSPG4 and PEAK1 may influence MMP activity in the epidermal lamellae for maintenance of lamellar health. CSPG4 could represent a strong candidate as it is also involved in dermal thickness, skin vascularization, vessel development [25] and keratinization [26].

There are several other candidate genes contained within the selection signals with functions that may be relevant to hoof biology. The selected region on ECA7 flanked the EXPH5 gene, which is related to inherited skin fragility [27]. Six candidate genes on ECA3, WWP2, PSMD7, NQO1, NOB1, NFAT5 and HAS3, are expressed in equine lamellar tissue and are likely to be involved in the biology of the hoof (Table 1). For example, in humans, a SNP (rs62051384) located within WWP2 is associated with plantar fibromatosis, a rare fibrous hyperproliferation of the deep connective tissue of the foot [28]. A polymorphism (rs17336700) in the PSMD7 gene is associated with ankylosing spondylitis in Chinese subjects [29]. The NQO1 is a representative target of the nuclear factor, erythroid 2 like 2 (NFE2L2) transcription factor, which causes suppression of the macrophage inflammatory response [30]; inflammatory damage to the lamellae is one of the biological processes known to cause laminitis [31]. The protein product of NFAT5 regulates synovial proliferation and angiogenesis in chronic arthritis [32]; the NOB1-encoded protein is likely to be a potential target for the treatment of osteosarcoma [33]; and the HAS3 product is related to hyaluronan metabolism in human keratinocytes and atopic dermatitis skin [34].

Finally, several genes (SEMA7A [10], CSK [11], GUCY1A2 [12], EMCN [13], OPRM1 [14]) are associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA is a complex genetic disease that is relatively common and affects the joints with occasional skin manifestations [35]. However, it is unclear how this may relate directly to hoof strength, therefore further investigation of the association between RA-associated candidate genes and hoof strength may provide new insights to understand equine hoof physiology and possibly shed further light on RA in humans. Also, it may be possible that the Iron Hoof horses have been selected for traits other than the principle hard hooves phenotype.

Selection signals relating to geographic origin

No genomic regions were common across the Asian versus European and Asian versus American/Middle Eastern population group comparisons. Only one selection signal was identified for the Asian versus American/Middle Eastern comparison. This selection signal contained the HMGA2 gene, which has been reported to be associated with height variation and metabolic traits in ponies [36,37,38]. Generally, Asian horses tend to have smaller stature than western breeds. However, in the absence of additional phenotypic information for the horses used in this study, it is not possible to understand which trait the selection signal may be underpinning.

For the Asian versus European comparison, the selection peak for the highest ranked selection signal on ECA3 (35,533,253 bp) was closest to two genes, ZNF469 (3:35654813–35,666,467 bp) and ZFPM1 (35,728,941-35,748,261 bp) (Fig. S4). To our knowledge, there are no known associations for ZNF469 among horse breeds. However, it is noteworthy that this selection signal overlaps with one of the two selection peaks identified among the domestic horse clade, DOM2. This clade represents the earliest domesticates that became geographically widespread following 4200 YBP [17]. The previously described selection peak at ZFPM1 distinguished DOM2 from non-DOM2 archaeological specimens representing an early domestic group that did not contribute to modern horse populations. This selection signature has been hypothesised to reflect the emergence of docility and stress traits, which may reflect cognitive changes accompanying horse husbandry practices among intensively managed populations.

Two possible explanations may be proposed for the concordance of the ZFPM1 selection peaks. First, extant Asian and European populations differ considerably in their mode of husbandry, with Mongolian horses being free-ranging, mimicking natural herd structures with little human interaction, and therefore they may have quite different cognitive requirements [1]. However, examination of genotype frequencies of the top SNP (chr3.35533253, rs68458737) among 806 horses from a range of global breeds (Table S9 and Fig. S5), suggests that the selection signal may be driven by native British Isles horse breeds rather than a behavioural phenotype distinctive of the Asian horses. The highest frequency of the GG genotype was observed in Shire (0.82), Clydesdale (0.71), Fell Pony (0.48) and Exmoor (0.33) and was absent or at low frequency (< 0.05) in six of the seven Asian breeds (Baicha Iron Hoof, Wuzhumuqin, Sanhe, Mongolian, Tuva and Wushen). Notably, Clydesdale and Shire are among the largest horse breeds [39], and the ZC3H18 gene, located within the selection peak, is associated with body weight in other species [40]. However, an association of the G allele with body mass traits is not supported by the observation that Exmoor and Fell Pony breeds are small breeds and because the alternative homozygous genotype (AA) is fixed in the Belgian Draught sample.

We recently suggested that Mongolian horse populations may preserve ancient genomic variants that do not exist in other global horse breeds [5] as their paternal lineages can be dated to the early domesticates, at least 1400 YBP [41]. Therefore, a second possible explanation is that DOM2 horses did not replace all locally domesticated horse populations and Chinese Mongolian (and Mongolian and Tuva) horses may be the result of an entirely separate domestication event not linked to the Volga-Don origins. However, this is not supported by modelling of ancestral population structure in the Chinese Mongolian horses [5]. Consequently, based on these observations, a distinct contribution from native British Isles horses to modern horse genetic variation becomes plausible. Indeed, there is historical, morphological, and genetic evidence that has led to the assertion that wild horses survived in Great Britain and the Exmoor pony, for example, may be an ancient relic of pre-domestic horses [42]. Therefore, accurate reconstruction of the history of horse domestication using paleogenomes requires integration of sufficient genome-wide data from geographically representative modern horse populations, including older landrace or heritage breeds.

To further study regional adaptations in Chinese Mongolian horse populations, future research should focus on genome sequencing data for appropriate regional populations, rather than genotype data arising from SNP genotyping arrays. There can be considerable ascertainment bias in equine genomic studies that focus on the more common European and European-derived breeds. This is because the EquineSNP50 Genotyping BeadChip was designed predominately using information from polymorphic SNPs observed in seven European breeds [43], which has resulted in a genotyping array with low representation of rare variants within non-European breeds such as Asian horses. This ascertainment bias may therefore be responsible for the lower number of selection signatures detected using the 36 K SNP data set compared to the 511 K SNP data set. In addition, one of the component tests of CSS, the XP-EHH test, is haplotype-based and likely compromised by lower SNP densities [44].

Conclusion

We have identified several genomic regions that underlie adaptive traits that have been shaped by long term microevolutionary processes in Asian horse populations. Importantly, plausible candidate genes that may be involved in hoof health have been identified in the Baicha Iron Hoof horse. The Baicha Iron Hoof is a critically endangered breed and the identification of genetic variants under selection in this population, that distinguish them from other local populations, emphasises the need for efforts to protect and conserve ancient, heritage and landrace livestock with distinct microevolutionary histories. In addition, the signal of selection detected in Asian populations highlights the importance of inclusion of modern breeds in the interpretation of paleogenomic data for inference of population history. The coincidence of a selection peak among modern horse breeds at an evolutionarily critical locus, raises the question whether DOM2 horses replaced all locally domesticated horses, or whether some other archaic lineages still survive, with their ancestors not yet identified.

Methods

DNA samples and genotypic data

Methods for sample collection were performed in accordance with approval from the University College Dublin Animal Research Ethics Committee (AREC-E-15-14-Hill). Tail hair samples were collected from horses and 155 horses from five distinct Chinese Mongolian populations were genotyped using the Axiom™ MNEC670 Equine Genotyping Array (Applied Biosystems/ThermoFisher Scientific). Following removal of closely related horses (pi_hat > 0.3 in PLINK v1.9) [45], 100 horses were included for analysis. Sample information and SNP data are described in detail in [5]. After SNP quality control (genotype missing rate > 0.05 and MAF < 0.01) 511,913 autosomal SNPs that mapped to EquCab 3.0 were used for the Chinese Mongolian population genomics analyses.

To expand the number of comparator horse populations, publicly available genotypes generated from the Illumina EquineSNP50 Genotyping BeadChip were obtained and merged with the Chinese Mongolian horse data. After SNP quality control (genotype missing rate > 0.05 and MAF < 0.01), 36,351 autosomal SNPs that mapped to EquCab 3.0 were retained. The publicly available horse samples and SNP genotypes have been previously reported [46] and the data were obtained from www.animalgenome.org/repository/pub/UMN2013.0125. Imputation of missing genotypes and haplotype phasing were performed using BEAGLE 3.3 [47].

Composite selection signature (CSS) cohorts of contrasting phenotypes of interest

The phenotypes for the five Chinese Mongolian horse populations were documented and photographs of each horse taken at the time of sample collection. The detailed information has been previously described [5]. Contrasting cohorts selected from additional global breeds were defined to identify signatures of selection. The overall comparison cohorts are shown in Table S10.

To validate the CSS approach, two datasets (A and B) were created from the Chinese Mongolian populations (511 K SNPs) to evaluate selection for traits known to be under the control of single genes with major effects, namely gait and black coat colour. Dataset A included a single gaited horse population (Wushen) and four non-gaited horse populations. A SNP (23:22359351) tagging the DMRT3 gene located on ECA23 (ECA23: 22,378,399 – 22,392,510) is highly associated with the ability to pace in horses [9]. Dataset B consisted of animals from a population selected for black coat colour (Abaga Black) and four non-black coat colour populations. The ASIP gene for black coat colour is located on ECA22 (ECA22: 26,009,341 – 26,072,655). Horses that are homozygous for an 11 bp deletion in exon 2 of the ASIP gene are black in colour [48].

Dataset C (511 K SNPs) included the ‘Iron Hoof’ population (Baicha Iron Hoof) and four non-Iron hoof horse populations; Dataset D and dataset E (36 K SNPs) were generated to identify signatures of selection in Asian populations (five Chinese Mongolian horse populations and two publicly available Asian populations) compared with American/Iberian/Middle Eastern and European populations: dataset D was for Asian versus American/Iberian/Middle Eastern; dataset E was for Asian versus European.

Composite selection signal (CSS) method

The composite selection signals (CSS) approach was developed to investigate genomic signatures of selection and has been successful at localising genes for monogenic and polygenic traits under selection in livestock [8, 49]. As the CSS uses fractional ranks of constituent tests and does not incorporate the statistics with P-values, it allows a combination of the evidence of historical selection from different selection tests. For the present study, the CSS combined the fixation index (FST), the change in selected allele frequency (ΔSAF) and the cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH) tests into one composite statistic for each SNP. FST statistics were computed as the differentiation index between the population/s of interest (as selected) and the contrasting/reference population/s (as non-selected). XP-EHH and ΔSAF statistics were computed for the selected population/s against the reference population (as non-selected). The composite selection statistics (CSS) were computed as followed by [8]. To reduce spurious signals, the individual test statistics were averaged (smoothed) over SNPs across chromosomes within 100 kb sliding windows for the 511 K SNP data and 1 Mb for the 36 K SNP data, respectively.

Identification of selected genomic regions, candidate gene mining

To localise genomic regions and genes under selection, for the both SNP data sets (~ 511 K SNPs and ~ 36 K SNPs), significant genomic regions (called as cluster regions) were defined as those that harbour at least one significant SNP (top 0.1%) surrounded by at least five SNPs among the top 1%. SNPs among the top 0.1% smoothed CSS values within the sliding windows were considered significant. Consecutive clusters spaced < 1 Mb apart were merged into a single cluster. Genes underlying the selection peaks as well as flanking regions (±0.5 Mb) were mapping to an annotated protein-coding gene list from EquCab3.0 downloaded from Ensembl. These genes were then examined for function annotation using review of literature, DAVID functional annotation tool [50, 51] and the GeneCards database [52].

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in this study has been deposited in the European Variation Archive (Project ID: PRJEB55177; the link to access: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/eva/?eva-study=PRJEB55177).

Abbreviations

IMAR:

Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

XUAR:

Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

SNP:

Single-nucleotide polymorphism

PCA:

Principal component analysis

PCs:

Principal components

F ST :

Pairwise fixation index

CSS:

Composite selection signals

MMP:

The matrix metalloproteinases

ΔSAF :

Selected allele frequency

XP-EHH :

Extended haplotype homozygosity

References

  1. Hendricks BL. International encyclopedia of horse breeds: University of Oklahoma Press; 2007. p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang H. Animal genetic resources: Science Press; 2009. p. 498.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources Committee. Annals of livestock and poultry genetic resources in China (donkeys, horses and camels). Beijing (China): China Agricultural Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Qian, S. Book of Han : Traditions of the Xiongnu. 111. Available from: https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%8C%88%E5%A5%B4%E5%88%97%E4%BC%A0#3. [Cited 2018 02–08].

  5. Han H, et al. Refinement of global domestic horse biogeography using historic landrace Chinese Mongolian populations. J Hered. 2019;110(7):769–81.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Association, T.A.P.H., Official APHA Rule Book. 2010: Online.

  7. Petersen JL, et al. Genetic diversity in the modern horse illustrated from genome-wide SNP data. PLoS One. 2013;8(1).

  8. Randhawa IAS, et al. Composite selection signals can localize the trait specific genomic regions in multi-breed populations of cattle and sheep. BMC Genet. 2014:15.

  9. Andersson LS, et al. Mutations in DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and spinal circuit function in mice. Nature. 2012;488(7413):642–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xie J, Wang H. Semaphorin 7A as a potential immune regulator and promising therapeutic target in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Remuzgo-Martinez S, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor 22 and C-Src tyrosine kinase genes are down-regulated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gang X, et al. Identification of key genes associated with rheumatoid arthritis with bioinformatics approach. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(31):e7673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishimoto K, et al. Association of EMCN with susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis in a Japanese population. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(2):221–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gauri L, et al. Role of micro-opioid receptor polymorphism in patients of rheumatoid arthritis and their correlation with severity of disease. J Assoc Physicians India. 2019;67(4):22–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sherman BT, et al. DAVID knowledgebase: a gene-centered database integrating heterogeneous gene annotation resources to facilitate high-throughput gene functional analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fishilevich S, et al. GeneHancer: genome-wide integration of enhancers and target genes in GeneCards. Database (Oxford). 2017;2017.

  17. Librado P, et al. The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes. Nature. 2021;598(7882):634–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Masuda M, et al. New primitive marking (Bider) in Mongolian native horse and Equus przewalskii. J Equine Sci. 2007;18:145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang F, et al. Cell surface chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) binds to the basement membrane heparan sulphate proteoglycan, perlecan, and is involved in cell adhesion. J Biochem. 2018;163(5):399–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Holl HM, et al. Generation of a de novo transcriptome from equine lamellar tissue. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding C, et al. Overexpression of PEAK1 contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor metastasis in lung cancer through modulating ERK1/2 and JAK2 signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(8):802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Iida J, et al. Cell surface chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycan in melanoma: role in the activation of pro-MMP-2 (pro-gelatinase a). Biochem J. 2007;403(3):553–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pollitt CC, Equine laminitis: current concepts. 2009, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation p 39.

  24. Visser MB, Pollitt CC. The timeline of lamellar basement membrane changes during equine laminitis development. Equine Vet J. 2011;43(4):471–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Giangreco A, et al. Human skin aging is associated with reduced expression of the stem cell markers beta1 integrin and MCSP. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(2):604–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kose O, et al. Changes in the expression of stem cell markers in oral lichen planus and hyperkeratotic lesions. J Oral Sci. 2007;49(2):133–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McGrath JA, et al. Germline mutation in EXPH5 implicates the Rab27B effector protein Slac2-b in inherited skin fragility. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91(6):1115–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim SK, et al. Two genetic variants associated with plantar Fascial disorders. Int J Sports Med. 2018;39(4):314–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Niu Z, et al. A polymorphism rs17336700 in the PSMD7 gene is associated with ankylosing spondylitis in Chinese subjects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(4):706–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kobayashi EH, et al. Nrf2 suppresses macrophage inflammatory response by blocking proinflammatory cytokine transcription. Nat Commun. 2016:7.

  31. Brooks SA, Bailey E. RT-qPCR comparison of mast cell populations in whole blood from healthy horses and those with laminitis. Anim Genet. 2010;41:16–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoon HJ, et al. NF-AT5 is a critical regulator of inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(7):1843–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Luo L, et al. Effects of NOB1 on the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma and its expression on the chemosensitivity to cisplatin. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(3):3548–51.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Malaisse J, et al. Hyaluronan metabolism in human keratinocytes and atopic dermatitis skin is driven by a balance of hyaluronan synthases 1 and 3. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(8):2174–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar BS, et al. Identification of novel mutations in CD2BP1 gene in clinically proven rheumatoid arthritis patients of South India. Eur J Med Genet. 2016;59(8):404–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Norton EM, et al. Evaluation of an HMGA2 variant for pleiotropic effects on height and metabolic traits in ponies. J Vet Intern Med. 2019;33(2):942–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu S, et al. Novel variants in the HMGA2 gene are associated with withers height in Debao pony. J Equine Vet Sci. 2020;88:102948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Frischknecht M, et al. A non-synonymous HMGA2 variant decreases height in Shetland ponies and other small horses. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brooks SA, et al. Morphological variation in the horse: defining complex traits of body size and shape. Anim Genet. 2010;41(Suppl 2):159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tarsani E, et al. Discovery and characterization of functional modules associated with body weight in broilers. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Han H, et al. Chinese Mongolian horses may retain early domestic male genetic lineages yet to be discovered. Anim Genet. 2019;50(4):399–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rijkers H. On the origins of the Exmoor pony: did the wild horse survive in Britain? Lutra. 2013;56(2):129–36.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McCue ME, et al. A high density SNP array for the domestic horse and extant Perissodactyla: utility for association mapping, genetic diversity, and phylogeny studies. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(1):e1002451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Neto LRP, Barendse W. Effect of SNP origin on analyses of genetic diversity in cattle. Anim Prod Sci. 2010;50(8):792–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Purcell S, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Petersen JL, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals selection for important traits in domestic horse breeds. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(1).

  47. Browning BL, Browning SR. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(2):210–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rieder S, et al. Mutations in the agouti (ASIP), the extension (MC1R), and the brown (TYRP1) loci and their association to coat color phenotypes in horses (Equus caballus). Mamm Genome. 2001;12(6):450–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Randhawa IAS, et al. Composite selection signals for complex traits exemplified through bovine stature using multibreed cohorts of European and African Bos taurus. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics. 2015;5(7):1391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sherman BT, et al. DAVID: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022.

  51. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Safran M, et al. The GeneCards suite. In: Abugessaisa I, Kasukawa T, editors. Practical Guide to Life Science Databases. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2021. p. 27–56.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the horse owners who kindly supported sample collection.

Funding

This work was supported by Science Foundation Ireland (grant number 11/PI/1166), National Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (grant number: 2021BS03040), Youth Fund Project of College of Animal Science of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (grant number: QN202127).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Equine Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Equine Research Centre, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China

    Haige Han & Manglai Dugarjaviin

  2. Animal Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Imtiaz A. S. Randhawa

  3. UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland

    David E. MacHugh & Emmeline W. Hill

  4. UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, D04V1W8, Ireland

    David E. MacHugh

  5. Plusvital Ltd, The Highline, Dun Laoghaire Business Park, Dublin, A96 W5T3, Ireland

    Beatrice A. McGivney & Emmeline W. Hill

  6. UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, D04V1W8, Ireland

    Lisa M. Katz

Authors
  1. Haige Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Imtiaz A. S. Randhawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David E. MacHugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Beatrice A. McGivney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lisa M. Katz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Manglai Dugarjaviin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Emmeline W. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HH and EWH conceived of the study and wrote the manuscript. IASR provided the CSS script and provided technical assistance. HH performed the sampling, laboratory work and data analyses. MD helped with access to the Chinese Mongolian horse data. BAM assisted with data manipulation. DEM and LMK revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmeline W. Hill.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.. Methods for sample collection were performed in accordance with approval from the University College Dublin Animal Research Ethics Committee (AREC-E-15-14-Hill). The movement of genetic material for the research was granted by the Inner Mongolia Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, the Inner Mongolia Agricultural University and the Department of Agriculture, Ireland.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

We declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

A chromosome-wide plot of composite selection signals (CSS) scores for Abaga Black vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations (top 0.1% SNPs threshold). Figure S2. A chromosome-wide plot of composite selection signals (CSS) scores for Abaga Black vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations (top 1% SNPs threshold). Figure S3. A chromosome-wide plot of composite selection signals (CSS) scores for Asian vs. American/Middle Eastern populations. Figure S4. Composite selection signals (CSS) scores for individual SNPs at the ECA3 selection peak (Asian vs. European populations) showing peak close to the ZFPM1 gene. Figure S5. Genotype frequencies of top SNP on ECA3 (chr3.35533253, rs68458737) in a range of horse breeds. The highest frequency of the GG genotype was among British Isles horse breeds.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Wushen vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations. Table S2. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Abaga Black vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations (top 0.1% SNPs threshold). Table S3. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Abaga Black vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations (top 1% SNPs threshold). Table S4. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Iron Hoof vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations (top 0.1% SNPs threshold). Table S5. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Asia vs. American/ Middle Eastern horse. Table S6. Functional annotation table for the genes identified within the selection signals in the comparison Asia vs. American/Middle Eastern horse. Table S7. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Asian vs. European horse. Table S8. Functional annotation table for the genes identified within the selection signals in the comparison Asian versus European horse. Table S9. Genotype frequencies for the top SNP (chr3.35533253, rs68458737) were calculated for a range of global horse breeds. Table S10. Traits, contrasting groups, number of populations and individuals, genotype information (SNPs), known genes for the traits of interest and dataset code.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, H., Randhawa, I.A.S., MacHugh, D.E. et al. Selection signatures for local and regional adaptation in Chinese Mongolian horse breeds reveal candidate genes for hoof health. BMC Genomics 24, 35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09116-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09116-8

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us