Skip to main content

Characterization and expression profiles of the B-box gene family during plant growth and under low-nitrogen stress in Saccharum



B-box (BBX) zinc-finger transcription factors play crucial roles in plant growth, development, and abiotic stress responses. Nevertheless, little information is available on sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) BBX genes and their expression profiles.


In the present study, we characterized 25 SsBBX genes in the Saccharum spontaneum genome database. The phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, and expression patterns of these genes during plant growth and under low-nitrogen conditions were systematically analyzed. The SsBBXs were divided into five groups based on phylogenetic analysis. The evolutionary analysis further revealed that whole-genome duplications or segmental duplications were the main driving force for the expansion of the SsBBX gene family. The expression data suggested that many BBX genes (e.g., SsBBX1 and SsBBX13) may be helpful in both plant growth and low-nitrogen stress tolerance.


The results of this study offer new evolutionary insight into the BBX family members in how sugarcane grows and responds to stress, which will facilitate their utilization in cultivated sugarcane breeding.

Peer Review reports


Numerous crucial roles are played by transcription factors (TFs) in various plant biological processes [1], such as developmental regulation, stress responses, and secondary metabolic pathway mediation [2]. Among them, B-box proteins (BBXs) are a type of zinc finger TF that possesses one or two N-terminal B-box domains in the absence or presence of a C-terminal CCT (CONSTANS, CO-like, and TOC1) domain mediating transcriptional regulation, protein interactions, and nuclear transport [3,4,5]. As a result of the systematic identification and classification of the BBX family in Arabidopsis thaliana, 32 members can be distinguished into five groups based on the number of B-box domains and the presence of a CCT domain [3]. The AtBBX members of Group I and II contain two B-box domains and a CCT domain, whereas the members of Group III contain a single B-box domain and a CCT domain; Group IV contains two B-box domains without the CCT domain, and Group V has only a single B-box domain [3, 4]. To date, BBX genes have been well characterized in many plants, such as Arabidopsis [3], rice [6], pear [7], pepper [8], tomato [9], and wolfberry [10].

A large number of analyses have reported that BBX genes are indispensably involved in the regulation of growth and development, flowering, and response to abiotic stress [4, 11]. In A. thaliana, AtBBX18 plays an adverse role in both photomorphogenesis and thermotolerance [12], AtBBX20 participates in the brassinolide and light signal pathways [13], and AtBBX24 is involved in salt stress signaling and root growth [14]. In Chrysanthemum morifolium, CmBBX24 delays flowering and enhances cold and drought tolerance [15]. In Solanum sogarandinum, SsBBX24 is responsive to salt and PEG stress, but not to the absence of low temperature or water [16]. In apple (Malus domestica), MdBBX20 regulates ultraviolet-b and low temperature signaling [17], and MdBBX37 down-regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis [18]. In Asian pear (Pyrus pyrifolia), PpBBX16 up-regulates light-induced anthocyanin accumulation [19]. In sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), IbBBX24 promotes tolerance to Fusarium wilt via the jasmonic acid pathway [20].

Cultivated sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is an important sugar and energy crop that is cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions of the world with high economic value [21]. Commercial sugarcane cultivars are derived from interspecific hybridization between octoploid S. officinarum (2n = 8x = 80, x = 10) and S. spontaneum (2n = 5x - 16x = 40–128; x = 8) [22] with large and complex genomes. However, during the cultivation process, it is susceptible to extreme weather or unfavorable environmental stress. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the molecular mechanism of sugarcane stress resistance and adaptation. Stress is a vital environmental factor that limits plant growth and productivity. Plants have evolved an effective mechanism to cope with environmental stress over time. The nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of sugarcane genotypes varies considerably, and high NUE varieties are an important issue [23]. Only 20% (or less) of the nitrogen can be obtained from dry biomass in sugarcane during harvest [24]. Therefore, understanding the use of nitrogen is critical for improving NUE through conventional breeding techniques and genetic engineering tools. BBX members from several Poaceae species including 25 from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), 36 from maize (Zea mays), and 30 from rice (Oryza sativa) have been retrieved [6, 25]. However, to date, little is known about the members of the BBX family in Saccharum. The release of the S. spontaneum genome provides a platform for genome-wide identification of the BBX gene family in sugarcane [26].

In the present study, the gene structures and evolutionary relationships of the BBX gene family in wild sugarcane were comprehensively characterized based on S. spontaneum genome data. In addition, the transcription profiles of BBXs in various tissues, and under low-nitrogen stress were assessed. The results provide new insight into the evolutionary history of BBXs in S. spontaneum as well as information on the potential biological functions associated with the regulation of plant growth and abiotic stress in sugarcane.

Materials and methods

Identification of BBX family members in the Saccharum spontaneum genome

The genome data of wild sugarcane (S. spontaneum cv AP85–441) were retrieved from the Ming laboratory database [26]. A BlastP search of the S. spontaneum genome database was performed using the amino acid sequences of the BBX genes in Arabidopsis thaliana (32), Oryza sativa (30), Sorghum bicolor (25), and Zea mays (36) extracted from Phytozome v13 ( To verify the identified genes, a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile (PF00643) of the B-box conserved domain [27] was downloaded from the Pfam database (, and then all non-redundant protein sequences were checked based on the default settings of HMMER software (v3.2) [28]. Redundant sequences were removed to retain the longest protein sequence. The BBX genes were named following the nomenclature scheme proposed by Khanna [3]. Furthermore, the SMART database ( and the NCBI-CDD database ( were consulted to investigate the domains of the BBX proteins that have been identified. The isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (kDa) of the BBX proteins in S. spontaneum were estimated using the ExPASy online tool ( The subcellular localization of sugarcane BBX proteins was calculated using the online tool WoLF PSORT ( and Plant-mPLoc ( A comparison of the BBX proteins between S. spontaneum and S. bicolor was conducted using BioEdit v7.2.5 [29].

Phylogenetic and evolution analysis

The protein sequences of BBXs from S. spontaneum, A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. bicolor, and Z. mays were used for multiple alignment analysis in ClustalW software [30]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA X software [31] using the neighbor-joining algorithm. Bootstrap analysis was carried out with 1000 replicates. The phylogenetic trees were visualized with iTOL v6.0 [32]. The tertiary structure model of the SsBBX protein was established by SWISS-MODEL software ( The interspecies and intraspecies duplication of BBX genes was identified using MCScanX software. The conditions for determining gene duplication events were as follows: (1) the matching length of two gene sequences is greater than 80% of the length of the longer sequence; (2) the similarity of the matching portion of the two gene sequences is greater than 80%; and (3) among closely linked genes, they only participated in one replication event [33]. The association between the number of gene family and a particular genome-wide duplication mode was identified by enrichment analysis using Fisher’s exact test [34]. The Ka and Ks values of duplicated gene pairs were calculated using a described pipeline [35]. To estimate selection pressure, orthologous BBX gene pairs between sugarcane and sorghum were compared using the Ka/Ks rate. The divergence time (T) was calculated using the method previously reported [36]. The collinear and tandem relationships as well as the gene-chromosome locations of BBX genes were visualized by Circos software v0.69 [37].

Characteristics of the BBX protein and gene structure

The exon-intron structures of the S. spontaneum BBX genes were analyzed using TBtools v1.098 software [38]. The conserved domains and motifs of the S. spontaneum BBX protein sequences were determined using the MEME program and the NCBI-CDD online portal. Multiple sequence alignments of the BBX protein were performed using ClustalW (v 2.0) and sequence logos were displayed using the WebLogo platform ( The physical gene-chromosome locations of the BBXs in the Z. mays, S. bicolor, O. sativa, and S. spontaneum genomes were extracted from the genome annotation. The chromosomal locations of all identified S. spontaneum BBX genes were mapped to O. sativa, S. bicolor, and Z. mays chromosomes using MapChart software (Version 2.1) [39]. The circular linkage map of syntenic gene analysis in the S. spontaneum, O. sativa, S. bicolor, and Z. mays genome was constructed using TBtools software v1.098 [38].

Cis-acting element analysis

To predict the cis-acting elements, the DNA sequences 2000 bp upstream of the translation start site were extracted from the genome sequences of S. spontaneum [26], and then these sequences were accessed through the PlantCARE program ( to identify possible cis-acting elements in the SsBBX gene promoter regions [40].

Subcellular localization analysis

The SsBBX13 ORF was cloned and inserted into the pBWA(V)HS-GFP vector by infusion cloning (Table S5). The pBWA(V)HS-GFP vector expressing GFP alone was used as a control. The red fluorescent protein mKATE with a nuclear localization signal (NLS, DPKKKRKV) [41], NLS-mKATE, was used as a nuclear marker. Tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaf infiltration was performed according to a previous protocol [42]. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 coexpressing SsBBX13-GFP and NLS-mKATE as well as those coexpressing GFP and NLS-mKATE were separately infiltrated into the two halves of a leaf. The leaves were harvested at 48 h postinoculation. Confocal images were acquired on a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope using a Plan-Apochromat 20×/0.8 M27 objective. The 488-, 561-, and 640-nm lasers were used to excite GFP, mKATE, and chlorophyll fluorescence, respectively. Emitted fluorescence was detected by GaAsP-Detector, set to detect 510 nm for GFP, 580 nm for mKATE, and 685 nm for chlorophyll fluorescence.

Gene expression analysis

The expression profiles of the BBXs in sugarcane were analyzed based on previous research with four groups of transcriptome data (different developmental stages and tissues, leaf gradient, circadian rhythm, and low-nitrogen (LN) stress) [43, 44]. RNA preparation, cDNA library construction, and RNA-Seq library sequencing were performed as previously described [45, 46]. The raw transcriptome data were aligned to the reference gene model S. spontaneum AP85–441 using Trinity ( Expression levels were calculated and normalized as fragments per kilobase million (FPKM) values as previously described [45, 46]. The heatmaps of gene expression levels were visualized using TBtools v1.098 [38] based on log2-transformed (FPKM) data values.

Plant material cultivation and treatments

To analyze expression patterns, two Saccharum species, S. spontaneum cultivar ‘SES-208’ (2 N = 8× = 64) and S. officinarum cultivar ‘LA-Purple’ (2 N = 8× = 64) were grown in the greenhouse of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University. To study their expression profiles at multiple developmental stages, tissue samples including stems and leaves at the seedling stage, as well as leaf rolls, leaves, internode-3 (upper), internode-6 (central), and internode-9 (bottom) at the pre-mature and mature stages were collected as previously described [43]. To explore the expression profiles of leaf development, the second leaf of SES-208 (11-day-old) and LA-Purple (15-day-old) was divided into 15 segments and 4 regions, and leaf samples including the basal zone (sink tissue), transitional zone (sink-source transition), maturing zone, and mature zone (activated photosynthetic zone with full differentiation) were collected using a previously described procedure [47]. To analyze the expression profile of the circadian rhythm, leaf samples from mature plants of SES-208 and LA-Purple were consistently collected 12 times at a 2-hour interval in the first 24 hours, followed by 7 times at a 4-hour interval in the next 24 hours. The tissues were collected according to a method described previously between 6:00 a.m. on March 2, 2017, and 6:00 a.m. on March 4, 2017 [48].

To determine the expression pattern of sugarcane under low-nitrogen stress, two Saccharum hybrid cultivars, YT55 (LN-tolerant) and YT00–236 (LN-sensitive), belonging to sister lines were cultivated in sugarcane breeding bases (Wengyuan, Guangdong Province) of the Institute of Nanfan & Seed Industry, Guangdong Academy of Sciences. Seedlings of 1-month-old YT55 and YT00–236 were transplanted to a greenhouse with a temperature range of 20 to 28 °C and a relative humidity range of 50 to 75% in a normal nitrogen level (7.5 mmol/L) for 20 days and then switched to a nitrogen-deficient nutrient solution (0.1 mmol/L) for starvation treatment according to a previous report [44]. Three biological replicates of the leaves and roots of a half dozen plants in individual pots were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen at time points of 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after starvation and stored at − 80 °C until further analysis.

Validation of BBX gene expression levels by RT–qPCR analysis

The expression levels of 2 BBX genes (BBX1 and BBX13) were verified at 6 different time points (0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h) in the leaves and roots of Saccharum hybrid varieties YT55 and YT00–236 under LN conditions by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The total RNA of the collected roots and leaves was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) was used to measure RNA quality after electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. Reverse transcription, RT-qPCR, and relative expression analysis were performed as previously described [46]. To normalize the expression levels, the constitutively expressed eukaryotic elongation factor 1a (eEF-1a) and β-actin genes were used as the reference genes [49]. The relative gene expression level of each gene was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method [50]. A total of three biological and three technical replicates were performed for each sample. The primers for quantitative PCR analysis were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 (Premier Biosoft, USA). The primer sequences are cataloged in Table S6. A three-step PCR procedure was conducted with the aid of the 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA).


Identification of SsBBX genes in Saccharum spontaneum

The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and the A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. bicolor, and Z. mays BBX protein sequences downloaded from the Phytozome v13 database were applied to search the BBX family members in S. spontaneum. A total of 25 nonredundant BBXs were identified from wild sugarcane S. spontaneum AP85–441 [26] without considering 69 redundant alleles (Table S2). The 25 nonredundant BBX genes were renamed SsBBX1–25 (Table 1) in terms of the relative linear arrangement on every chromosome and extensive nomenclature. All details of the SsBBX family members are listed in Table 1. Each SsBBX had a mean of four alleles (range two to six alleles) (Table S2). These BBXs were unequally distributed on all eight S. spontaneum chromosomes. Whole-length cDNA ranged from 615 to 1497 bp, and their protein translation products varied from 205 (SsBBX4) to 499 (SsBBX7) residues. The predicted isoelectric points (pI) of the SsBBXs ranged from 4.31 to 9.90, with a mean of 5.64. The calculated molecular weight (Mw) ranged from 22.56 to 54.94 kDa, with an average value of 35.36 kDa. The BBX proteins lacked transmembrane helical segments (TMHs) except for ZmBBX30 (Table S4). The subcellular localization results of the two online tools are inconsistent. The WoLF PSORT prediction results indicated that the SsBBX proteins were mainly located in the nucleus, followed by the chloroplast and cytoplasm. However, the Plant-mPLoc prediction results showed that all SsBBX family members were distributed in the nucleus. The TMH and subcellular localization of BBX proteins in S. spontaneum were compatible with those of other orthologous species, suggesting that they may play similar roles (Table S4). Protein sequence alignment of SsBBXs with their orthologs in sorghum revealed that sugarcane and sorghum shared similarities between 80.0 and 97.0%, with a mean of 89.8% (Table 1). The comparisons of SsBBX amino acid sequence alignments revealed the highest degree of similarity (70.0%) between SsBBX9 and SsBBX17 but the least amount of similarity between SsBBX7 and SsBBX16 (5.2%) (Table S1). These results indicated that a few members of the SsBBX family showed distinct functional diversification during evolution, whereas most others exhibited very little functional diversity.

Table 1 The characteristics of BBX family members in Saccharum

Subcellular localization of the SsBBX13 protein

To verify the subcellular localization of BBX, SsBBX13, which displays high plant growth and developmental expression patterns or is highly responsive to various stresses was selected. The ORFs of SsBBX13 together with green fluorescent protein GFP were cloned and transiently expressed in tobacco leaf epidermal cells. GFP alone was used as a control. Confocal scanning results indicated that the SsBBX13-GFP fusion protein was present in the nucleus, while GFP was distributed throughout the whole cell (Fig. 1). These results were in accordance with sequence predictions by the online tool Plant-mPLoc, which indicated that SsBBX13 was mainly located in the nucleus.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Subcellular location of GFP-fused SsBBX13 protein in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf epidermal cells. The SsBBX13-GFP or GFP was transiently co-expressed with the nuclear localization marker NLS-mKATE by Agrobacterium. Images of epidermal cells were captured using green fluorescence, mKATE fluorescence, chlorophyll fluorescence, visible light, and merged light. Confocal laser microscopy scanning was carried out 48 h after dark culture with a Zeiss LSM 800. Scale bars was 20 μm

Phylogenetic and gene structure analysis

The evolutionary relationships of BBX proteins among S. spontaneum, A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. bicolor, and Z. mays were determined using neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis. Based on the phylogenetic tree topology and a previous report in Arabidopsis [3, 4], all 148 BBX proteins were categorized into five groups (designated Groups I-V), and representatives of each species were found in every cluster (Fig. 2). The 25 SsBBX genes have a closer relationship with those of sorghum than with those of the other three species, which corresponds to a higher protein similarity between sugarcane and sorghum (Table 1 and Table S1). In all five species, Group IV had the most BBXs (52). Comparatively, Groups I and II each comprised 31 and 29 BBXs, whereas Groups III and V each included 18 BBXs (Fig. 2). Similarly, in S. spontaneum, Group IV had the most SsBBXs (10), and Groups I and II each comprised five SsBBXs, while Groups III and V each included three and two SsBBXs (Fig. 3a). The distribution of conserved domains in SsBBX proteins is shown in Fig. 3b. Groups I and II SsBBXs contained two B-box domains and one CCT domain, Group III SsBBXs included a single B-box domain and a CCT domain, Group IV SsBBXs had two B-box domains but no CCT domain, and Group V SsBBXs only had a single B-box domain. Some of the SsBBXs were not classified as expected. For instance, SsBBX10 and SsBBX19 were in Group I, despite having only one B-box domain and the CCT domain, indicating that they should be in Group III; likewise, SsBBX2, SsBBX3, and SsBBX18 were in Group II, but they should also be in Group III. Protein sequence alignment and WebLogos were generated for the SsBBXs depicted in Fig. 4 and Fig. S1. The results confirmed the complete structure of the domains and suggested that the two B-box domains and the CCT domain were highly conserved in S. spontaneum.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic tree of BBX peptide sequences of S. spontaneum, A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. bicolor, and Z. mays. Sequences were aligned using ClustalW software and the subsequent phylogenetic tree was constructed applying the Neighbor-joining algorithm by MEGA X software, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values below 70% are not shown. Roman numerals (I–V) represent different gene clusters. The genes from each group are differentiated by color. Black solid triangles are the new BBXs found in Saccharum

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic tree (a), conserved domain (b), conserved motifs (c), and exon/intron organization (d) of BBX gene family from S. spontaneum. Protein sequences were aligned by ClustalW and the tree was constructed by MEGA X software using the neighbor-joining method, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values below 70% are not shown. Black solid triangles are the new BBXs found in Saccharum. The B-box domains and CCT domain are highlighted by green and yellow boxes, respectively. Motifs of each of the SsBBXs, and 10 different motifs, are each denoted by different colored boxes. Exons and introns are represented by yellow boxes and black lines, and untranslated (UTR) 5′ - and 3′ -regions are indicated by green boxes, respectively

Fig. 4
figure 4

Domain composition of SsBBX proteins. Multiple sequence alignments of the domains of the SsBBXs. Multiple sequence alignments of the B-box 1, B-box 2, and CCT domains are shown. The identical and similar conserved amino acids were represented by black and pink shaded, respectively

To functionally characterize the SsBBX genes, a total of 10 motifs were determined, of which motif 1 was most conserved (Fig. 3c). Almost all genes in Group I encoded motifs 1, 2, 4, and 10 (except for SsBBX11). The majority of the genes in Group II contained motifs 1, 2, 4, and 7. The majority of the genes in Group III contained motifs 1, 2, and 9. The majority of the genes in Group IV contained motifs 1, 3, 4, and 5. All genes in Group V contained motif 1.

To better understand the evolution of the SsBBX gene family, the exons and introns were analyzed (Fig. 3d). The number of exons in the SsBBX genes ranged from 2 to 5. Almost all genes in Groups I, III, and IV had 2 or 3 exons, whereas Group II contained 4 or 5 exons. The last two genes in Group V comprised 1 or 2 exons. These findings demonstrate the structural similarities between the S. spontaneum BBX genes and the gain and loss of exons throughout evolutionary history. Moreover, the tertiary structures of the same subgroup of SsBBX proteins are highly similar (Fig. S2), indicating that the protein structure is related to species evolution.

Synteny analysis and gene duplication prediction

The synteny among BBX orthologous pairs of S. spontaneum, O. sativa, S. bicolor, and Z. mays was conducted by comparative analysis to determine the evolution of the BBXs. There were 260 pairs of orthologous genes that had syntenic relationships among these four species, including 22 pairs between S. spontaneum and S. bicolor, 26 pairs between S. spontaneum and Z. mays, 23 pairs between S. spontaneum and O. sativa, 51 pairs between S. bicolor and Z. mays, 41 pairs between S. bicolor and O. sativa, 54 pairs between Z. mays and O. sativa, and 2, 9, 9, and 23 intragenomic pairs among the four species, respectively (Table S3 and Fig. 5). Two species-specific syntenic relationships in S. spontaneum were observed (Table S3), namely, SsBBX8/SsBBX9 and SsBBX12/SsBBX13. Four SsBBXs (SsBBX3, SsBBX5, SsBBX6, and SsBBX17) were not mapped on any other BBXs, indicating that S. spontaneum has the fewest orthologous gene pairs of the four species, which implies that the BBXs are less conserved in S. spontaneum under evolutionary dynamics. In general, orthologous genes belong to the same group based on their synteny. For instance, SsBBX4 (Group IV) was syntenic with OsBBX29, SbBBX3, and ZmBBX6 (Group IV) (Fig. 2 and Table S3).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Collinearity relationships of BBX genes from S. spontaneum, O. sativa, S. bicolor, and Z. mays. BBX collinear gene pairs were mapped to their respective locus in their genome in a circular diagram. The chromosomes of S. spontaneum, O. sativa, S. bicolor, and Z. mays are indicated by boxes of different colors with the prefixes ‘Ss’, ‘Os’, ‘Sb’, and ‘Zm’, respectively. The numbers along each chromosome box represent the sequence length of the corresponding chromosome in mega-bases. Lines of different colors represent the duplication pairs of BBX genes

For S. spontaneum, the BBX genes were unequally distributed on the chromosomes (chrs) (Table 1 and Fig. 5). In S. spontaneum, chr4 had the most SsBBX genes (7), followed by chr5 (4), chr8 (4), and chr6 (3), and the remaining chrs contained 2 except chr3, which contained only one. According to the chr distribution analysis, the BBX genes were found mainly on chr4 in all examined S. spontaneum, possibly due to gene duplication events.

For the purpose of exploring the relationship between duplications and BBX genes, the gene duplication events of the four species above were analyzed and classified into four types (Table S4). Among the SsBBXs, 16 out of 25 genes (64.0%) were identified as WGD or segmental duplication genes, while six out of 25 genes (24.0%) were classified as dispersed duplicates. Similarly, the other three BBXs were mostly labeled as WGD or segmental duplication genes (67 out of 91, 73.6%), and the remaining BBXs were considered dispersed duplicates (23 out of 91, 25.3%). These results indicated that the expansion of the BBX gene family was primarily driven by WGD or segmental duplication.

Molecular evolution and functional divergence may occur from gene duplication events. To explore the selection pressure related to the duplication of BBX gene pairs within species, the ratio of the nonsynonymous substitution rate to the synonymous substitution rate (Ka/Ks) was determined. The orthologous BBX family members between S. spontaneum and S. bicolor were identified. The results showed that the Ka/Ks ratios of each BBX gene pair in S. spontaneum and S. bicolor were below one (Table 2), suggesting that the evolution of these gene pairs might have been driven mainly by purifying selection. According to the Ks value, the divergence times of SsBBXs and SbBBXs were calculated (Table 2). In terms of divergence time, S. spontaneum diverged from S. bicolor 7.779 million years ago (Mya) [51]. In the present study, SsBBX1, SsBBX4, SsBBX7, SsBBX8, SsBBX10, SsBBX11, SsBBX12, SsBBX15, SsBBX21, and SsBBX23 diverged with their orthologous SbBBXs ranging from 5.056 Mya to 7.689 Mya, respectively, indicating that they separated after S. spontaneum and S. bicolor (7.779 Mya). In contrast, the remaining 12 SsBBXs diverged from their orthologs 7.967 Mya and 17.092 Mya, respectively, indicating that they separated before S. spontaneum and S. bicolor.

Table 2 Nonsynonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) substitution rates and estimated divergence time for paralogous BBX genes in Saccharum and sorghum

Cis-acting elements of the SsBBX gene family

The cis-acting element sequences in the promoter regions were used to better understand the transcriptional regulation and gene function of the SsBBXs. In total, 773 cis-acting elements were identified and divided into four categories, including plant growth and development, phytohormone responsive, light responsive, and abiotic/biotic stress (Fig. 6). Among the plant growth and development elements (Fig. 6c), 56% were associated with meristem expression (CAT-box), followed by zein metabolism regulation (O2-site), endosperm expression regulation (GCN4_motif), and circadian rhythm. The phytohormone responsive and light responsive elements accounted for the largest proportion (both up to 41%) (Fig. 6a and b). The light responsive elements contain diverse kinds of cis-acting elements, including the G-box, Sp1, Box 4, TCT-motif, I-box, GT1-motif, GATA-motif, TCCC-motif, and MRE (Fig. 6c). Among the phytohormone responsive elements (Fig. 6c), ABA-related elements (ABRE) were the most common cis-acting elements (38%). The other elements were the MeJA responsive (CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif), the salicylic acid responsive (TCA-element), the gibberellin responsive (GARE-motif, P-box, and TATC-box), and the auxin responsive (TGA-element and AuxRR-core), suggesting that SsBBXs might be regulated by different hormones. Among the abiotic and biotic stress elements (Fig. 6c), anaerobic induction (ARE) was the most common cis-acting element (35%), followed by the low temperature response element (LTR), GC-motif element, drought stress response element (MBS), and defense stress related element (TC-rich repeats), implying that SsBBXs contribute to various stress responses.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Identification of cis-acting elements in all SsBBXs. a Four categories of cis-acting elements in the SsBBXs. Different colors and numbers of the heatmap box represented the number of different elements in these SsBBXs. Red indicates higher elements while blue indicates lower elements. b Histogram of the cis-acting elements in each SsBBX gene. c Pie charts of different sizes indicated the ratio of each promoter element in each category, respectively

Expression patterns of BBX genes during various plant developmental stages and in different tissues

To explore the expression patterns of the BBX genes in diverse plant growth and development processes, we investigated the expression patterns of the sugarcane BBX genes during development. The expression patterns of the BBXs in 2 Saccharum species, S. spontaneum and S. officinarum, were analyzed and compared using available transcriptome data [43] during 3 developmental stages in various tissues (Fig. 7a). Gene expression levels varied among genes, and some genes were expressed differently depending on the tissue. Among the 25 BBX genes analyzed, 2 genes (BBX1 and BBX13) were relatively highly expressed throughout all developmental stages and tissues in sugarcane, suggesting their overall involvement in plant development, whereas 7 genes (BBX3/9/17/21/22/23/24) demonstrated extremely low or undetectable levels in all examined tissues in different growth stages. Additionally, almost all BBXs (except BBX10 and BBX18) were more highly expressed in leaves than in stems. Notably, 9 genes (BBX5/8/11/12/13/14/15/16/19) were expressed at higher levels in S. spontaneum than in S. officinarum, while 5 genes (BBX2/4/7/10/20) showed the opposite trend, and 4 genes (BBX1/6/18/25) were expressed at equal levels in 2 Saccharum species. The results presented here suggested that BBX genes function differently at various developmental stages and might affect biological processes in diverse tissues. To confirm this finding, detailed analyses of their expression levels in roots and in meristematic and reproductive tissues are needed for a more complete understanding of their functions.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The expression pattern of BBX genes based on log2-transformed FPKM values in three treatments. a Heatmap based on gene expression in different tissues at different stages in S. spontaneum and S. officinarum.b Heatmap based on gene expression across leaf gradients in S. spontaneum and S. officinarum. c&d) Heatmap based on gene expression during the diurnal cycles in S. spontaneum and S. officinarum. The heat map was plotted with the TBtools software (v1.098). Expression values were normalized to genes based on the average linkage algorithm. The scale bar represents the log2 normalized expression. Red indicates higher expression while blue indicates lower expression

The study of the expression pattern of BBX genes in continuously developing leaf segment gradients from S. spontaneum and S. officinarum provided further insights into the functional divergence of BBX genes for photosynthesis and sugar transport in source tissues (Fig. 7b). Similar to the expression pattern at different developmental stages, 2 genes (BBX1 and BBX13) were relatively highly expressed in all examined leaf segments, indicating their overall involvement in sugarcane photosynthesis and sugar transport, whereas the expression of 8 genes (BBX3/7/9/17/21/22/23/24) was low or undetectable, suggesting their limited contribution to photosynthesis and sugar transport. Interestingly, the expression of 8 genes (BBX1/10/11/12/13/14/15/16) increased from the basal zone to the mature zone in S. spontaneum, while the expression of these genes increased in the transition zone and mature zone but extremely low in the basal zone in S. officinarum. Notably, 11 genes (BBX4/5/6/8/11/12/13/14/15/16/23) were expressed at higher levels in S. spontaneum than in S. officinarum, while only 3 genes (BBX1/18/25) were expressed at equal levels in the 2 Saccharum species. These results indicated functional divergence of the BBX genes in leaf segment gradients, and interspecies differentiation could also contribute to this divergence.

To examine the expression patterns of the BBXs during diurnal cycles, we examined the expression patterns of mature leaves in the 2 Saccharum species over a 24 h period at 2 h intervals followed by 4 h intervals over another 24 h (Fig. 7c and d). Similar to the RNA-seq profiles at different developmental stages as well as in the leaf segment gradient, 2 genes (BBX1 and BBX13) were expressed at very low or undetectable levels in both Saccharum species, whereas 8 genes (BBX3/8/9/17/21/22/23/24) were expressed at either very low or undetectable levels in all examined leaf segments, further supporting their involvement or limited roles in growth and development. Additionally, 6 genes (BBX4/10/14/16/19/20) were expressed higher in the daytime than at night and displayed the lowest expression level at night in both Saccharum species, whereas some genes (BBX2/6/7/15/18/25) were expressed at the highest levels in the evening and constitutively expressed at other times in either S. spontaneum or S. officinarum. Notably, 10 genes (BBX4/5/6/10/11/12/13/16/18/25) were expressed at higher levels in S. spontaneum than in S. officinarum. These findings imply functional differences of the BBX genes in diurnal rhythms.

Expression patterns of BBX genes under low-nitrogen stress

To determine the functional differentiation of the sugarcane BBX genes in response to low-nitrogen (LN) stress, we evaluated the expression profiles of the BBXs under LN stress (Fig. 8a). The expression patterns were observed for the BBX genes in roots and leaves of 2 Saccharum hybrid varieties YT55 and YT00–236 at 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. A different expression pattern was exhibited under LN treatment in the BBX family. Among the 25 BBX genes analyzed in both Saccharum hybrid varieties, 2 genes (BBX1 and BBX13) were significantly highly expressed in the leaves, while 10 genes (BBX3/5/6/9/15/17/21/22/23/24) showed noticeably low or undiscovered expression levels under all levels of LN stress, implying their involvement or restricted functions in abiotic stress. Obviously, 4 genes ((BBX1/4/13/16) were down-regulated at 12 h and 48 h but up-regulated at 24 h and maintained a constant high level at 72 h in the leaves of both Saccharum hybrid varieties. Importantly, 12 genes (BBX1/2/4/7/10/11/12/13/14/16/20/25) showed higher expression levels in leaves than in stems, while 3 genes (BBX8/18/19) showed the opposite trend. Intriguingly, in both roots and leaves, BBX1 and BBX13 expressions were higher in YT00–236 than in YT55. These results may elucidate the differential tolerance to LN between YT55 and YT00–236. The transcriptional expression levels of BBX1 and BBX13 at 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h under LN stress in YT55 and YT00–236 were validated by RT-qPCR (Fig. 8b, c, d, and e). The FPKM values and relative expression levels were favorably correlated, supporting the validity of the transcriptome-based estimates of gene expression.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The expression pattern of BBX genes in Saccharum hybrid YT55 and YT00–236 under low-nitrogen stress conditions based on log2-transformed FPKM values (a) and verification of BBX1 and BBX13 expressions in root and leaf under low-nitrogen stress by RT-qPCR (b, c, d, and e). YT55 and YT00–236 seedlings were subjected to 100 mM nitrogen treatment, and samples were collected at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after the treatment. The expression at 0 h was set to 1.0. Values are mean ± SD of three replicates


The BBX gene family is extensively distributed in plants as a kind of transcription factor that participates in diverse developmental processes, including light signal transduction, flowering, and stress signaling pathways [4]. The function and evolution of the BBX genes in different species have been evaluated with an unbiased bioinformatics method including Arabidopsis [3], rice (Oryza sativa) [6], pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) [7], and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) [9]. Previous research has revealed wide variation in the number of BBXs among plant species [6, 52]. Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is a vital crop worldwide and offers essential sugar and energy for daily life [53]. Therefore, the investigation of sugarcane BBX genes will help elucidate and improve sugarcane development. However, knowledge about the sugarcane BBX family is scarce. In this study, 25 SsBBXs were found in the wild sugarcane S. spontaneum genome database. Characterization of the phylogenetic relationship, gene structure, synteny, gene duplication, and expression profiling of the BBX gene family in sugarcane was carried out to explore their evolution and possible functional divergence.

The localization of proteins in diverse organelles may correlate with their function [54, 55]. Previous reports have suggested that the nuclear localization signal (NLS) plays a crucial role in localizing the BBX protein to the nucleus and is a part of the CCT domain [4], which was supported by our results on the subcellular location of BBXs in sugarcane, sorghum, maize, and rice (Table S4). SsBBX protein sequences were Blast search, and the results indicated that 5.2% ~ 70.0% sequence similarities within the members and 80.0% ~ 97.0% shared homology with S. bicolor (Table S1). The findings of this study were in agreement with those of earlier studies on A. thaliana [3] and other higher plants [6], suggesting high differentiation among the members of the BBX gene family and great conservation among the same type of BBXs.

Gene function of the BBX family in various species can be predicted based on evolutionary history analyses [5]. According to the analysis of the phylogenetic relationships, the sugarcane BBX family members were divided into five groups, with Group IV containing the most SsBBX genes, which was consistent with the BBXs in A. thaliana, pear, potato, and tomato [3, 7, 9, 56, 57]. The results implied that BBXs clustering in the same group shared common gene structures, whereas slight differences played a vital role in gene evolution. The SsBBX family members from Groups I, II, and IV harbored two B-box domains, with the exception of SsBBX10/19 and SsBBX2/3/18. These five SsBBXs should have been in Group III, yet they were in Group I and II, respectively (Fig. 3). Similar to previous reports, during the process of evolution, the B-box 2 domain of some BBX proteins was lost, indicating that a deletion event might have occurred in the B-box 2 domain [52, 58]. WebLogos analysis verified that the CCT domain was highly conserved and that the two B-box domains were highly homologous in the various SsBBX genes, suggesting that the BBX genes of diverse plant species might have a similar ancestor, which was consistent with previous studies [59, 60]. Furthermore, the rapid expansion of BBX gene families during evolution, and the fact that BBX proteins are highly conserved throughout the plant kingdom indicate that these proteins might play vital roles in the adaptation of terrestrial plants [4, 61, 62].

Increasingly, research on higher plant genome sequencing has revealed that the generation of novel genes is related to gene duplication. Repeated episodes of tandem duplication and segmental duplication (or whole-genome duplication, WGD) are two main classes of gene duplication events across the plant genome [63]. Segmental duplication/WGD is a large-scale duplication event that leads to amplification of a gene family [64]. The Saccharum genome has undergone two WGD events, which were directly involved in most of the expansion of numerous gene families [26]. In S. spontaneum, almost all SsBBXs were associated with segmental/WGD, and none of the SsBBX genes were defined to be tandem duplications (Table S4). These results implied that WGD or segment duplications were the major driving force for the expansion of SsBBX gene family members, which was consistent with the previously described expansion of BBX family members in Poaceae [25] and other plant species [5]. Moreover, previous research reported that tandem duplication often occurred in the large and rapidly evolving gene family, whereas segmental duplication normally occurred in the slowly evolving gene family [63]. The present results suggested that the SsBBX gene family should be categorized as a slow-evolving gene family. The ancestor of S. officinarum, S. spontaneum, diverged approximately 7.779 Mya from sorghum, whereas S. spontaneum diverged approximately 769 thousand years ago from S. officinarum [51]. In this study, the divergence times of ten out of 22 SsBBXs with their ortholos Sorghum bicolor BBXs (SbBBXs) were shorter than 7.779 Mya (Table 2), whereas the remaining 12 of the 22 SsBBXs diverged longer ago than 7.779 Mya. Based on these findings, the duplications of the SsBBXs with their orthologs most likely occurred near the divergence of S. spontaneum and sorghum. The Ka/Ks ratios among paralogous pairs of SsBBXs and their orthologous SbBBXs were calculated (Table 2). Generally, Ka/Ks ratios greater than and less than 1 indicate positive and purifying selection pressures, respectively. Ka/Ks ratios equal to 1 indicate neutral selection. All Ka/Ks ratios of BBXs in sugarcane were less than 1, suggesting that the evolution of BBX members was influenced by strong purifying selection. Purifying selection pressure may be a contributor to the conserved structures of BBX family members during evolution. Generally, these results suggest that the large-scale duplication event (WGD or segmental duplication) may help sustain the conserved structures of the SsBBX gene family during evolution under purifying selection pressure.

There is evidence that BBX genes are involved in a variety of plant growth and development processes, such as shade avoidance, seedling photomorphogenesis, chlorophyll accumulation, and flowering [4, 11]. There is increasing evidence that BBXs exhibit specialized gene expression patterns associated with their functions. The expression profiles revealed that more than half of the SsBBXs showed spatial variations under multiple plant growth and development processes in sugarcane, and similar findings were found in other plants [5]. Almost all BBXs in sugarcane were highly expressed in leaves, suggesting that they might perform functions in controlling leaf growth, which is consistent with the functional activities of the BBX genes that have previously been discovered [25, 65]. Expression analysis was carried out with BBX1 and BBX13, which were mainly expressed at different stages of vegetative growth, suggesting the conservation and importance of gene function. We observed that BBX1/10/11/12/13/14/15/16 may have similar functions to A. thaliana AtBBX genes and were most highly expressed in the mature zone of leaves; these genes are primarily involved in processes associated with light and controlled by circadian rhythm [4]. Taken together, our results imply that sugarcane BBX family members contribute to leaf development as well as photosynthesis and sugar transport.

Environmental conditions affect the growth and development of plants as well as their productivity [66]. In the current study, cis-acting element analysis, transcriptome data, and RT-qPCR approaches were applied to explore the functions of sugarcane BBXs under various stresses and hormone treatments (Fig. 6, Fig. 8, and Fig. S3). Transcriptome data and RT-qPCR were used to deeply understand the stress and hormonal response mechanisms in sugarcane BBXs. Our results showed that the BBXs exhibited divergent expression profiles under hormonal treatment and stresses in roots, leaves, and buds. For instance, BBX1 and BBX13 were up-regulated by low-nitrogen, cold, drought, smut, and ABA in both leaves and buds at most of the time points, while BBX1 was significantly down-regulated by low-nitrogen and low-potassium conditions in roots at most of the time points. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that plant BBX genes are involved in response to various stresses, and can be regulated by exogenous hormones [9, 25, 60]. In pear, 43.2% of PbBBXs (16 out of 37) were controlled by drought stress, and 81.3% (13 out of 16) were up- or down-regulated after dehydration stress within 12 h [57]. CmBBX19 was down-regulated under drought treatment [67]. In Petunia, three PhBBX genes were regulated by drought treatment, eight PhBBX genes were regulated by salt treatment, and 18 PhBBX genes were regulated by cold treatment [68]. In apple, MdBBX10 was significantly affected by sodium chloride and polyethylene glycol (PEG) in leaves and roots [69]. In rice, OsBBX9 was up-regulated under nickel stress [25]. In Brassica napus, BnaBBXs participated in regulating nutrient assimilation [70]. In this research, it was revealed that the transcriptional levels of more than half of the SsBBXs (15 out of 25) were affected by low-nitrogen stress, indicating that most of the genes are involved in the sugarcane stress response. Gene expression profiles can provide important information into gene function, and the RT-qPCR sinvestigation of two chosen SsBBXs revealed tissue-specific expression patterns in roots and leaves (Fig. 8). On YT55 and YT00–236, several studies have been done to study how nitrogen is used and regulated [71, 72]. By examining physiological and morphological variables like as nitrogen concentration, dry matter content, and root phenotype, it was possible to determine how these two varieties used nitrogen. All of the indicators between YT55 and YT00–236 showed a discernible, implying that YT55 had a greater NUE than YT00–236 [71, 72]. Nevertheless, there was no obvious justification for the variation in NUE between YT55 and YT00–236. In the present study, the expression levels of BBX1 and BBX13 in both leaves and roots of YT00–236 were typically higher than those of YT55. The expression levels of BBX1 and BBX13 under LN stress may explain the differentiation in NUE between YT55 and YT00–236. Since a limited number of researchers have examined the role of the BBX genes in nutritional stress, additional studies will be conducted to investigate the function of BBX gene family members as they relate to abiotic stress tolerance.


In the current study, we characterized 25 SsBBXs in the wild sugarcane genome database and systematically researched their genome-wide identification and expression patterns. Phylogenetic relationships, evolutionary analysis, and gene structure analysis elucidated the conservation of SsBBXs and revealed that some members had diverged from their ancestors. The transcription of certain sugarcane BBXs can be induced or repressed under various stresses and hormonal treatments (low-nitrogen, low-potassium, cold, drought, smut, and ABA), indicating that they may have essential functions in various biological processes. In summary, the data produced in this work may lay the foundation for further functional characterizations of sugarcane BBX genes, particularly concerning abiotic stress responses and plant development, thereby promoting their application in cultivated sugarcane breeding.

Availability of data and materials

All RNA-seq data can be downloaded from the GenBank website with the BioProject ID- PRJNA262715, PRJNA636260, PRJNA590595, and PRJNA555450, and the NGDC databases with the BioProject ID- PRJCA011580. The S. spontaneum genome project was deposited into Genbank with accession numbers: QVOL00000000.


  1. Riechmann JL, Heard J, Martin G, Reuber L, Jiang C, Keddie J, et al. Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science. 2000;290(5499):2105–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takatsuji H. Zinc-finger transcription factors in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 1998;54(6):582–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khanna R, Kronmiller B, Maszle DR, Coupland G, Holm M, Mizuno T, et al. The Arabidopsis B-box zinc finger family. Plant Cell. 2009;21(11):3416–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gangappa SN, Botto JF. The BBX family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19(7):460–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu L, Lyu Z, Liu H, Zhang G, He C, Zhang J. Insights into the evolutionary origin and expansion of the BBX gene family. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2022;16(2):205–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang J, Zhao X, Weng X, Wang L, Xie W. The rice B-box zinc finger gene family: genomic identification, characterization, expression profiling and diurnal analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao Y, Han Y, Meng D, Li D, Jiao C, Jin Q, et al. B-BOX genes: genome-wide identification, evolution and their contribution to pollen growth in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Yang G, Chen Y, Dai Y, Yuan Q, Shan Q, et al. Genome-wide characterization and anthocyanin-related expression analysis of the B-BOX gene family in Capsicum annuum L. Front Genet. 2022;13:847328.

  9. Chu Z, Wang X, Li Y, Yu H, Li J, Lu Y, et al. Genomic organization, phylogenetic and expression analysis of the B-BOX gene family in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1552.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin Y, Shi H, Mi J, Qin X, Zhao J, Zhang D, et al. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the BBX gene family and its role in carotenoid biosynthesis in wolfberry (Lycium barbarum L.). Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15):8440.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Talar U, Kiełbowicz-Matuk A. Beyond Arabidopsis: BBX regulators in crop plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):2906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Q, Tu X, Zhang J, Chen X, Rao L. Heat stress-induced BBX18 negatively regulates the thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40(3):2679–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan X, Sun Y, Cao D, Bai M, Luo X, Yang H, et al. BZS1, a B-box protein, promotes photomorphogenesis downstream of both brassinosteroid and light signaling pathways. Mol Plant. 2012;5(3):591–600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagaoka S, Takano T. Salt tolerance-related protein STO binds to a Myb transcription factor homologue and confers salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2003;54(391):2231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y, Ma C, Xu Y, Wei Q, Imtiaz M, Lan H, et al. A zinc finger protein regulates flowering time and abiotic stress tolerance in chrysanthemum by modulating gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(5):2038–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiełbowicz-Matuk A, Rey P, Rorat T. Interplay between circadian rhythm, time of the day and osmotic stress constraints in the regulation of the expression of a Solanum double B-box gene. Ann Bot-London. 2014;113(5):831–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fang H, Dong Y, Yue X, Hu J, Jiang S, Xu H, et al. The B-box zinc finger protein MdBBX20 integrates anthocyanin accumulation in response to ultraviolet radiation and low temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 2019;42(7):2090–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. An J, Wang X, Espley RV, Lin-Wang K, Bi S, You C, et al. An apple B-box protein MdBBX37 modulates anthocyanin biosynthesis and hypocotyl elongation synergistically with MdMYBs and MdHY5. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020;61(1):130–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bai S, Tao R, Tang Y, Yin L, Ma Y, Ni J, et al. BBX16, a B-box protein, positively regulates light-induced anthocyanin accumulation by activating MYB10 in red pear. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(10):1985–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang H, Zhang Q, Zhai H, Gao S, Yang L, Wang Z, et al. IbBBX24 promotes the jasmonic acid pathway and enhances fusarium wilt resistance in sweet potato. Plant Cell. 2020;32(4):1102–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoang NV, Furtado A, Botha FC, Simmons BA, Henry RJ. Potential for genetic improvement of sugarcane as a source of biomass for biofuels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. D'Hont A, Ison D, Alix K, Roux C, Glaszmann JC. Determination of basic chromosome numbers in the genus Saccharum by physical mapping of ribosomal RNA genes. Genome. 1998;41(2):221–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang Y, Gao S, Jiang Y, Lin Z, Luo J, Li M, et al. The physiological and agronomic responses to nitrogen dosage in different sugarcane varieties. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Franco HCJ, Otto R, Faroni CE, Vitti AC, de Oliveira ECA, Trivelin PCO. Nitrogen in sugarcane derived from fertilizer under Brazilian field conditions. Field Crop Res. 2011;121(1):29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shalmani A, Jing X, Shi Y, Muhammad I, Zhou M, Wei X, et al. Characterization of B-BOX gene family and their expression profiles under hormonal, abiotic and metal stresses in Poaceae plants. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang J, Zhang X, Tang H, Zhang Q, Hua X, Ma X, et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat Genet. 2018;50(11):1565–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar GA, Sonnhammer EL, et al. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D412–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(10):e1002195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hall T. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W256–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nian L, Zhang X, Liu X, Li X, Liu X, Yang Y, et al. Characterization of B-box family genes and their expression profiles under abiotic stresses in the Melilotus albus. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:990929.

  34. Wang Y, Tang H, DeBarry JD, Tan X, Li J, Wang X, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(7):e49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Qiao X, Li Q, Yin H, Qi K, Li L, Wang R, et al. Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization–diploidization cycles in plants. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lynch M, Conery JS. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 2000;290(5494):1151–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1639–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu J. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167(2):313–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):325–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao F, Zhao T, Deng L, Lv D, Zhang X, Pan X, et al. Visualizing the essential role of complete Virion assembly machinery in efficient hepatitis C virus cell-to-cell transmission by a viral infection-activated Split-Intein-mediated reporter system. J Virol. 2017;91(2):e01720–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sparkes IA, Runions J, Kearns A, Hawes C. Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat Protocol. 2006;1(4):2019–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang Q, Hu W, Zhu F, Wang L, Yu Q, Ming R, et al. Structure, phylogeny, allelic haplotypes and expression of sucrose transporter gene families in Saccharum. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):1–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu Z, Gao X, Zhang N, Feng X, Huang Y, Zeng Q, et al. Genome-wide identification and transcriptional analysis of ammonium transporters in Saccharum. Genomics. 2021;113(4):1671–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu W, Hua X, Zhang Q, Wang J, Shen Q, Zhang X, et al. New insights into the evolution and functional divergence of the SWEET family in Saccharum based on comparative genomics. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Y, Hua X, Xu J, Chen Z, Fan T, Zeng Z, et al. Comparative genomics revealed the gene evolution and functional divergence of magnesium transporter families in Saccharum. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Li P, Ponnala L, Gandotra N, Wang L, Si Y, Tausta SL, et al. The developmental dynamics of the maize leaf transcriptome. Nat Genet. 2010;42(12):1060–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ming R, VanBuren R, Wai CM, Tang H, Schatz MC, Bowers JE, et al. The pineapple genome and the evolution of CAM photosynthesis. Nat Genet. 2015;47(12):1435–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Feng X, Wang Y, Zhang N, Gao S, Wu J, Liu R, et al. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of CBL reveals the gene family evolution and functional divergence in Saccharum spontaneum. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Yin J, Liu M, Ma D, Wu J, Li S, Zhu Y, et al. Identification of circular RNAs and their targets during tomato fruit ripening. Postharvest Biol Tec. 2018;136:90–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang J, Zhang Q, Li L, Tang H, Zhang Q, Chen Y, et al. Recent polyploidization events in three Saccharum founding species. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(1):264–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Shalmani A, Fan S, Jia P, Li G, Muhammad I, Li Y, et al. Genome identification of B-BOX gene family members in seven Rosaceae species and their expression analysis in response to flower induction in Malus domestica. Molecules. 2018;23(7):1763.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Qi Y, Gao X, Zeng Q, Zheng Z, Wu C, Yang R, et al. Sugarcane breeding, germplasm development and related molecular research in China. Sugar Tech. 2022;24:73–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang W, Wu H, Liu J. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of copper-containing amine oxidase genes in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Tree Genet Genomes. 2017;13(2):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gao Y, Ma J, Zheng J, Chen J, Chen M, Zhou Y, et al. The elongation factor GmEF4 is involved in the response to drought and salt tolerance in soybean. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(12):3001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Talar U, Kiełbowicz-Matuk A, Czarnecka J, Rorat T. Genome-wide survey of B-box proteins in potato (Solanum tuberosum)—identification, characterization and expression patterns during diurnal cycle, etiolation and de-etiolation. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e177471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zou Z, Wang R, Wang R, Yang S, Yang Y. Genome-wide identification, phylogenetic analysis, and expression profiling of the BBX family genes in pear. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2018;93(1):37–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bu X, Wang X, Yan J, Zhang Y, Zhou S, Sun X, et al. Genome-wide characterization of B-box gene family and its roles in responses to light quality and cold stress in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:698525.

  59. Magadum S, Banerjee U, Murugan P, Gangapur D, Ravikesavan R. Gene duplication as a major force in evolution. J Genet. 2013;92(1):155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wei H, Wang P, Chen J, Li C, Wang Y, Yuan Y, et al. Genome-wide identification and analysis of B-BOX gene family in grapevine reveal its potential functions in berry development. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kenrick P, Crane PR. The origin and early evolution of plants on land. Nature. 1997;389(6646):33–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Crocco CD, Botto JF. BBX proteins in green plants: insights into their evolution, structure, feature and functional diversification. Gene. 2013;531(1):44–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Cannon SB, Mitra A, Baumgarten A, Young ND, May G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004;4(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature. 2011;473(7345):97–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang C, Guthrie C, Sarmast MK, Dehesh K. BBX19 interacts with CONSTANS to repress FLOWERING LOCUS T transcription, defining a flowering time checkpoint in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(9):3589–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Datta S, Hettiarachchi C, Johansson H, Holm M. SALT TOLERANCE HOMOLOG2, a B-box protein in Arabidopsis that activates transcription and positively regulates light-mediated development. Plant Cell. 2007;19(10):3242–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Xu Y, Zhao X, Aiwaili P, Mu X, Zhao M, Zhao J, et al. A zinc finger protein BBX19 interacts with ABF3 to affect drought tolerance negatively in chrysanthemum. Plant J. 2020;103(5):1783–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Wen S, Zhang Y, Deng Y, Chen G, Yu Y, Wei Q. Genomic identification and expression analysis of the BBX transcription factor gene family in Petunia hybrida. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(8):6027–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Liu X, Li R, Dai Y, Yuan L, Sun Q, Zhang S, et al. A B-box zinc finger protein, MdBBX10, enhanced salt and drought stresses tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2019;99(4):437–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Zheng L, Ma S, Zhou T, Yue C, Hua Y, Huang J. Genome-wide identification of Brassicaceae B-BOX genes and molecular characterization of their transcriptional responses to various nutrient stresses in allotetraploid rapeseed. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Xing Y, Jiang Z, Tan Y, Liao Q, Chen G, Wang Y, et al. Study on nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium accumulation and utilization for three sugarcane genotypes. Sugarcane Canesugar. 2013;1:10–3.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wei L, Chen D, Zhou W, Huang Y, Ying-lin L, Ao J, et al. Analysis on NPK-nutrient characteristics in shoot of different sugarcane genotypes. Sugarcane Canesugar. 2015;4:10–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are grateful to the Center for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University for providing access to Saccharum data.


This research was supported by the GDAS’ Project of Science and Technology Development (2020GDASYL-20200103057), the Zhanjiang plan for navigation (2020LHJH006), the Technical System Innovation Team for Sugarcane Sisal Industry of Guangdong Province (2022KJ104–05), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-170112), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901512).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ZW, DF, and NZ conceived the study and designed the experiments. ZW carried out the bioinformatic analysis. ZW, DF, XG, QZ, and XC performed the experiments and analyzed the data. ZW wrote the manuscript. JW and NZ revised and improved the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved this submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nannan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All necessary permissions have been obtained, and all plant materials during the current study were provided free of charge and maintained following international guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

 The amino acid sequences of the BBX family used in this study.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 1.

Sequence matrix identities (%) of BBX proteins calculated by BioEdit software.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 2.

The BBX gene alleles in Saccharum spontaneum.

Additional file 4: Table S3.

Information about orthologous genes among S. spontaneum, maize, rice and sorghum.

Additional file 5: Table S4.

Gene duplications, number of transmembrane domains, and subcellular location of the BBXs among S. spontaneum, maize, rice and sorghum.

Additional file 6: Table S5.

The cloning primers for SsBBX13.

Additional file 7: Table S6.

The primers for RT-qPCR verification of two BBX genes in Saccharum hybrid YT55 and YT00-236.

Additional file 8: Fig. S1.

WebLogos of the amino acid sequences alignment of B-box1, B-box2, and CCT were shown. The y-axis and x-axis indicated the conservation rate of each amino acid and the conserved sequences of the domain, respectively. The height of each letter indicates how conserved the residue is across all proteins. Fig. S2. The tertiary structure modeling of SsBBX proteins. The structure image was generated using the SWISS-MODEL software. Fig. S3. Expression patterns of the sugarcane BBX genes from the sugarcane transcriptome data in five different conditions. (a) Expression patterns of the BBX genes in the roots of Saccharum hybrid cultivar YT55 under low-potassium stress, and samples were collected at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h (PRJNA262715). (b) Expression patterns of the BBX genes in the leaves of Saccharum hybrid cultivar GX87–16 under cold stress, and samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, and 6 h (PRJNA636260). (c) Expression patterns of the BBX genes in the leaves of Saccharum hybrid cultivar Co_06022 (susceptible cultivar) and Co_8021 (resistant cultivar) after 0, 2, 6, and 10 d drought stress and recovery treatment (PRJNA590595). (d) Expression patterns of the BBX genes in the buds of Saccharum hybrid cultivar ROC22 (susceptible cultivar) and YC05–179 (resistant cultivar) after smut pathogen infection at 0, 1, 2, and 5 d (PRJCA011580). (e) Expression patterns of the BBX genes in the buds of Saccharum hybrid cultivar ROC22 (susceptible cultivar) and GT42 (resistant cultivar) after ABA treatment at 0, 1, and 6 h (PRJNA555450). The heat map was plotted with the TBtools software (v1.098), with the transcript level of the BBX genes transformed as log2 FPKM (fragments per kilobase million), ranging from blue (low expression level) to red (high expression level).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Fu, D., Gao, X. et al. Characterization and expression profiles of the B-box gene family during plant growth and under low-nitrogen stress in Saccharum. BMC Genomics 24, 79 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • B-box
  • Sugarcane
  • Gene expression
  • Abiotic stress