Skip to main content
Download PDF

Metagenomic analysis reveals a dynamic microbiome with diversified adaptive functions that respond to ovulation regulation in the mouse endometrium

BMC Genomics volume 24, Article number: 615 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Understanding the microflora inhabiting the reproductive tract is important for a better understanding of female physiology and reproductive health. The endometrial fluid from mice in three reproductive stages (A: Unproductive mice; B: Postovulatory mice; C: Postpartum mice) was extracted for microbial DNA extraction and sequencing. Phenotypic and functional analyses of endometrial microbial enrichment was undertaken using LefSe. The results showed 95 genera and 134 species of microorganisms in the uteri of mice. There were differentially distributed genera, among which Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus were more abundant in the endometrial fluid of mice in the unproductive group. That of mice in the postovulatory group was colonized with Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter and was mainly enriched in metabolic pathways and steroid biosynthesis. The presence of Chlamydia, Enterococcus, Pseudomonadales, Acinetobacter, and Clostridium in the endometrial fluid of postpartum mice, in addition to the enrichment of the endocrine system and the Apelin and FoxO signaling pathways, resulted in a higher number of pathogenic pathways than in the other two groups. The results showed that the microbial diversity characteristics in the endometrium of mice in different reproductive states differed and that they could be involved in the regulation of animal reproduction through metabolic pathways and steroid biosynthesis, suggesting that reproductive diseases induced by microbial diversity alterations in the regulation of animal reproduction cannot be ignored.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Macrogenomics is used extensively to understand the structure of microbial communities, uncover new microbial species, elucidate microbial functions, monitor environmental changes, and analyze microbial interactions [1, 2]. Bacterial vaginitis, endometriosis, and polycystic ovarian syndrome can cause changes in the microbial community of the reproductive tract, demonstrating that microbial diversity is closely linked to reproductive tract health [3,4,5,6,7]. Therefore, the use of macrogenomics to explore the microbial diversity of the reproductive system is important for understanding the molecular mechanisms of microbial involvement in reproductive regulation and alteration of reproductive health. In recent years, the exploration of microbial characteristics has mainly focused on the vagina [8,9,10]. There is consequently a shortage of studies on microbial characteristics in the uterus related to ovulation regulation. Exploring the association between microbial communities colonizing the uteri of female animals and reproductive regulation will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of uterine health in females.

Progesterone and estrogen levels change according to the reproductive status of animals [11, 12], while microorganisms are engaged in the regulation of hormones and can trigger reproductive tract diseases. For example, changes in the percentage of microorganisms in the uteri of mice after parturition leads to a decrease in the abundance of Firmicutes and an increase in the abundance of Proteobacteria, both of which are closely associated with endometrial disease [13]. In addition, altered reproductive status in animals leads to fluctuations in hormone levels in the genital tract [14, 15]. For instance, estrogen affects the proportion of Candida albicans and Escherichia coli in the vagina [16,17,18]. Despite this, the regulation of microbial diversity in the mouse uterus has not yet been reported on. Therefore, observation of microflora within the uterus during reproductive regulation may contribute to an improved understanding of interactions between microorganisms and reproductive hormones. In this study, endometrial fluid samples were collected from unproductive, postovulatory, and postpartum mice to explore their uterine microbial diversity in different reproductive states and to predict the function of the dominant flora and its role in reproductive regulation and health using macrogenomic techniques.

Methods

Animals and samples

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Gansu Agricultural University, China (ethics approval file No. GSAU-Eth-VMC-2023-006). Animal experiments, including sample collection, were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Ethics Committee of Gansu Agricultural University. Furthermore, the experimental protocol complied with local animal welfare guidelines.

The sample size was calculated using G * Power, effect size f = 0.5, α = 0.05, 1-β = 0.8, and the total sample size was calculated to be nine mice, three in each group. The test animals consisted of nine 30-day-old SPF-grade BALB/c mice, which were purchased from the Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Their weights were between 18 and 22 g. Six unproductive female mice were randomly divided into two groups and labeled as groups A and B, respectively. Three postpartum female mice were chosen and labeled as group C. Group A and C was not treated and endometrial fluid samples were collected from mice. Immature mice from group B were injected intraperitoneally with five IU PMSG (Pregnant mare serum gonadotropin)to stimulate preovulatory follicle development followed 48 h later with five IU LH(Luteinizing hormone)to stimulate ovulation, which reference the methods described in previous studies [19,20,21]. Samples were collected 20 h after administration.

Nucleic acid extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted using a HiPure Bacterial DNA Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The OD260 / OD280 was between 1.6 and 1.8 detected by NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The DNA samples were subjected to 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis ( voltage: 120 V ), and then the total DNA amount of gel pores was detected by Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) fluorescence spectrophotometer. Sample concentration > 20ng / uL, total DNA ≥ 1 µg.

Metagenomic libraries construction and sequencing

Extracted genomic DNA was firstly fragmented by sonication to a size of 350 bp, before being end-repaired, A-tailed, and adaptor-ligated using the NEBNext® ΜLtra™ DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, USA) according to the preparation protocol. DNA fragments with lengths of 300–400 bp were amplified by PCR. Finally, PCR products were purified using the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and the libraries were analyzed for size distribution using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and quantified using real-time PCR. Genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencer with paired-end technology (PE 150) [22].

Data processing and bioinformatics analysis

Quality control

Raw data from the Illumina platform were filtered using FASTP software (version 0.18.0) [23]. Reads with ≥ 10% unidentified nucleotides (N), removing reads with ≥ 50% bases having phred quality scores ≤ 20, and those aligned to the barcode adapter were removed. After filtering, the clean reads were used for genome assembly.

Assembly, gene prediction and gene catalogue

Clean reads from each sample were assembled individually using MEGAHIT (version 1.1.2) [24] stepping over a k-mer range of 21–99 to generate a sample-derived assembly. Genes were predicted based on the final assembly contigs (> 500 bp) using MetaGeneMark (version 3.38) [25]. The predicted genes ≥ 300 bp in length from all samples were pooled and combined based on ≥ 95% identity and 90% reads coverage using CD-HIT (version 4.6) [26] in order to reduce the number of redundant genes for the downstream assembly step. The reads were realigned to the predicted gene using Bowtie (version 2.2.5) [27] to count read numbers. The final gene catalogue was obtained from non-redundant genes with a gene read count of > 2%.

Function annotations

The assembled sequences were annotated using complementary methods. Single genes were annotated using DIAMOND (version 0.9.24) [28] against proteins deposited in different protein databases, including the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Non-Redundant Protein (Nr) database, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Evolutionary Genealogy of Genes, and the Unsupervised Direct Lineage Group (eggNOG).

Taxonomic profiling

Using Kaiju (version 1.6.3) [29], clean reads were translated into amino acid sequences, and the species annotation of reads was obtained by comparing with the Nr microbial library. Based on the number of reads on the comparison, the species abundance was obtained. We use the stacking diagram to visually display the species abundance of each sample at each level of classification, and initially present the species distribution law between samples, dominant species and other information.

Comparative analysis

Multivariate statistical techniques, including principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of Bray–Curtis distances, were performed using the R vegan package (https://cran.r-project.org) and plotted using the R ggplot2 package (https://cran.r-project.org). The biomarker characteristics of each group were screened using Lefse software (version 1.0) [30].

RNA isolation and relative quantification using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was extracted using E.Z.N.A.® Bacterial RNA Kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions. A Nanodrop 2,000c spectrophotometer (xThermo Fisher Scientific) was used to analyze RNA concentrations. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using a HiScript II Q RT SuperMix, and qRT-PCR was performed using the SYBR method. The 16 S universal Eubacterial primers 530 F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCNGCGG-3′)-1100R (5′-GGGTTNCGNTCGTTG-3′) described by Dowd et al. [31], was selected and commonly used in earlier literature. Other primers used are listed in Table 1. The fold change in gene expression was determined using the ΔΔCT method. The experiments were performed in triplicate.

Table 1 List of primers for quantifying microbial genes from endometrial fluid samples
Full size table

Results

Libraries sequencing data and gene prediction

Sequencing produced 668,687,394 raw reads. After preprocessing, 662,461,780 usable clean reads, with an average of 73,606,864 reads per sample, remained in the dataset (Fig. 1A). The average number of bases per sample before quality control was 11,144,789,900 bp and the average number of effective bases per sample after quality control was 10,881,571,595 bp. In total, 662,461,780 high-quality reads were obtained using host-sequence filtering (Fig. 1B). Finally, the effective reads were assembled using MEGAHIT software, and the average contig length of each sample was 935.5 bp. There were no significant differences between the three groups (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Raw data processing results of endometrial samples

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

A Number of unigene; B Pathogenic microorganism distribution stack diagram

Full size image

Bacterial diversity and community structure of Intrauterine Microbiota

Community richness, as estimated by the Chao 1 index, was higher in group B than in groups A or C (Fig. 3A). The Shannon index, an alpha diversity estimator, was higher in group C than in groups A and B, indicating higher bacterial diversity of the endometrial microbiota in group C (Fig. 3B). Structural similarity was explored using PCoA of beta diversity analysis (Fig. 3C), which contained the first two principal coordinate axes (factors). Factor 1 accounted for 75.37% of the total variation, whereas factor 2 explained 12.82% of the variation. Clustering and ordination were correlated with the environmental variables that controlled microbial community composition. These data indicate that ovulation regulation can alter the diversity and composition of the uterine microbiota in mice.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A Chao 1 index for three groups; B Shannon index for three groups; C Principal coordinates analysis(PCoA) plot; D Phylum distribution stacking diagram of mice endometrial microorganisms

Full size image

To characterize the distribution of bacteria, the relative abundance of the endometrial microbiota was analyzed in groups A, B, and C. In total, 23 phyla, 35 classes, 55 orders, 71 families, 95 genera, and 134 species were identified. Group A comprised Lactobacillales, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus. Among the major phyla, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were the most abundant among the three groups (Fig. 3D) and constituted the major endometrial phyla. The main orders in group C included Enterococcus, Lactobacillales, Clostridiales, Rickettsiales, Pseudomonadales, and Acinetobacter. Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter, and Chlamydiae were the most abundant species in group B. The main order in group A was Lactobacillus, which included Enterococcus and Streptococcus. Species analysis in the three groups for pathogenic microorganisms (Fig. 2B) showed that group C had the highest proportions of pathogenicity, including Chlamydia abortus, Murine leukemia virus, Mouse intracisternal A particle, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Acinetobacter baumannii, Golden hamster intracisternal A particle H18, and Clostridiales bacterium 1_7_47FAA.

Comparison of microbial phenotypes in response to ovulation regulation

LefSe was used to identify the phylotype that most likely explained the differences between the endometrial fluid samples from groups A, B, and C. A circular cladogram was generated to show the differentially abundant taxa, and LDA coupled with effect size measurements was used to assess the effect size of the taxa (Figs. 4 and 5). Compared to group A, group B was mainly enriched in Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter. Group C consisted of Proteobacteria including Pseudomonadales, and Fimicutes including Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Clostridiales. Groups A and C were enriched in the same genus of Firmicutes [32]. The effect sizes and ranking of the LDA scores indicated that the differential enrichment of bacteria was owing to the different ovulation methods.

Fig. 4
figure 4

LDA score analysis of phenotypes among three groups

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Cladogram analysis of phenotypes among three groups

Full size image

Analysis of microbial functional differences in response to ovulation regulation

The potential functions of the uterine microbiota were analyzed using LEFSE (Figs. 6 and 7). They were enriched in NOD-like receptors, and IL-17 signaling pathways, which are involved in regulating various physiological processes in the uterus, such as immune response and metabolism [33, 34]. Compared to that of group A, enrichment in group B was concentrated among the metabolic, AMPK, mRNA surveillance, and Hippo signaling pathways, among which the AMPK and Hippo pathways were associated with ovulation. Group C was enriched in human diseases and cancers, suggesting that postpartum mouse uterine microorganisms are more likely to induce disease. In the comparison of the three groups (Fig. 8), group A transformed the immune system, histamine metabolism, and propionate metabolism. Group B transformed the metabolic pathways, steroid biosynthesis, and the AMPK signaling pathway. Group C intervention altered the endocrine system, Apelin and FoxO signaling pathways, colorectal cancer, microRNAs in cancer, endocrine and metabolic diseases, and platinum drug resistance.

Fig. 6
figure 6

LDA score analysis of functions among three groups

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Cladogram analysis of functions among three groups

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Cladogram and LDA score analysis of functions among three groups

Full size image

Validation of bacteria by qRT-PCR analysis

For validation, the marker genes of the bacteria with the highest content in the three groups were verified by qRT-PCR analysis at the mRNA level. Enterococcus had the highest expression levels in Group A, and Salmonella enterica had the highest expression in Group B. Rickettsiales had the highest expression levels in Group C (Fig. 9). Our validation study showed that all the qRT-PCR results were consistent with the results of macrogenomic analysis.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The mRNA expression of the marker gene of the highest content bacteria in the three grou ps of endometrial fluid

Full size image

Discussion

Mouse reproductive function depends on endometrial health, however, its microbial relevance to the genital tract has not been adequately studied. This study is the first to explore the microbial diversity of the uterus in different reproductive stages of animals and analyze the impact of microbial community alterations on reproductive health. The taxa in the endometrial samples collected from unproductive, post-ovulatory, and postpartum mice were distributed among 23 bacterial phyla, including the predominant phyla Proteobacteria and Fimicutes (Fig. 3A). Postovulatory mice were mainly enriched for Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter (Fig. 10); however, Chlamydia was detected, and Chlamydia infection may be associated with ovarian dysfunction due to reproductive hormones [35, 36]. In the present study, PMSG and LH were used to regulate estrus and ovulation in mice. The abundance of Chlamydia in the post-ovulatory group was higher than that in the unproductive group, indicating that changes in reproductive tract microbial diversity during superovulation and the induction of reproductive health diseases cannot be ignored. Pathogenic bacteria such as Chlamydia abortus, Pseudomonas pseudomonadales, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii were enriched in postpartum mice, which have a greater risk of disease or infertility due to low immunity. In general, these results suggest that the exploration of microbial diversity within the intrauterine environment in various reproductive stages is instructive for analyzing the association between microbes and reproductive regulation.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Microbial colonization and functional enrichment in mice endometrium under different reproductive st ates

Full size image

The diversity of the vaginal microflora is higher in unproductive healthy women [3, 9, 37, 38], whereas it is relatively stable and homogeneous in post-ovulatory women [39, 40]. Our results showed that the microbial diversity of unproductive mice was higher than that of postovulatory and postpartum mice, confirming that there were differences in microbial diversity between the prenatal and postnatal uteri of the mice. Changes in microbial diversity in the reproductive tract of postpartum mammals indicate that parturition increases the risk of microbial infections.

Our analysis showed that supernumerary ovulation using reproductive hormones altered microbial diversity in the uterus. Comparative analysis of the three groups of mice showed that changes in microbial populations led to alterations in metabolism, biosynthesis, ovulation regulation, and reproductive system functions. This is the first study to report the use of reproductive hormones to alter the microflora of the uterus during superovulation. PMSG and LH altered microbial diversity and decreased the number of beneficial bacteria in the mouse uterus. Changes in female estrogen levels cause microbial fluctuations in the vagina and gut [41,42,43,44] and elevated estrogen levels can enhance the adhesion and colonization abilities of vaginal Candida albicans and Escherichia coli [16, 18]. Based on the above results, we concluded that reproductive hormones alter the microbial diversity of the reproductive system and are involved in the regulation of animal reproduction.

In terms of reproductive regulation, we found that mice undergoing supernumerary ovulation are more likely to harbor pathogenicity. Compared to postovulatory mice, the percentage of pathogenic microorganisms was higher in postpartum mice, which were mainly enriched in disease-related signaling pathways, whereas postovulatory mice were enriched in ovulatory functions. In terms of reproductive tract health, the microorganisms in unproductive mice were mainly enriched in pathways that maintain uterine ecological homeostasis, whereas those in postpartum mice were enriched in disease pathways. Postpartum immunity declines in women, and conditionally pathogenic bacteria in the reproductive tract become dominant (e.g., Chlamydia, Enterococcus, Streptococcus) [45, 46], more easily triggering diseases such as endometritis and chorioamnionitis [47, 48]. This suggests that the reproductive tract of postpartum animals is more prone to inducing pathogenic microbial infections, and that females should pay attention to the prevention of conditionally pathogenic bacteria such as Chlamydia, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus after parturition.

Overall, there were differences in the characteristics of microbial diversity in the different reproductive states. Reproductive regulation and delivery change the microbial diversity of the intrauterine environment, allowing the dominant flora to participate in the regulation of animal reproduction through metabolic pathways and steroid biosynthesis, suggesting that reproductive diseases induced by altered microbial diversity during the regulation of animal reproduction cannot be ignored.

Availability of data and materials

The raw sequence data have been deposited in NCBI short read archive (SRA) under BioProject ID PRJNA970465. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Gong Y, Huang X, Wang M, Liang X. Intratumor microbiota: a novel tumor component. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04576-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen L, Wang S, Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Ma J, Zou X, Yao T, Li S, Chen J, et al. Multi-omics reveals specific host metabolism-microbiome associations in intracerebral hemorrhage. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.999627.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen X, Lu Y, Chen T, Li R. The female vaginal microbiome in Health and bacterial vaginosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:631972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.631972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Vazquez F, Fernandez-Blazquez A, Garcia B. Vaginosis. Vaginal microbiota. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2019;37(9):592–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2018.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN. The human microbiome during bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(2):223–38. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00075-15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Patel S, Homaei A, Raju AB, Meher BR. Estrogen: the necessary evil for human health, and ways to tame it. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;102:403–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marquardt RM, Kim TH, Shin JH, Jeong JW. Progesterone and Estrogen Signaling in the Endometrium: what goes wrong in endometriosis? Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153822.

  8. Chee WJY, Chew SY, Than LTL. Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19(1):203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01464-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Anahtar MN, Gootenberg DB, Mitchell CM, Kwon DS. Cervicovaginal Microbiota and Reproductive Health: the Virtue of simplicity. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(2):159–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chopra C, Bhushan I, Mehta M, Koushal T, Gupta A, Sharma S, Kumar M, Khodor SA, Sharma S. Vaginal microbiome: considerations for reproductive health. Future Microbiol. 2022;17:1501–13. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2022-0112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hudon Thibeault AA, Sanderson JT, Vaillancourt C. Serotonin-estrogen interactions: what can we learn from pregnancy? Biochimie. 2019;161:88–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2019.03.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen L, Zhang W, Yuan Y, Zhu W, Shang A. Vaginal microecological characteristics of women in different physiological and pathological period. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:959793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.959793.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Medina-Bastidas D, Camacho-Arroyo I, Garcia-Gomez E. Current findings in endometrial microbiome: impact on uterine diseases. Reproduction. 2022;163(5):R81. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-21-0120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuan KKW, Saunders PTK. Female Reproductive Systems: hormone dependence and receptor expression. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1390:21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11836-4_2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Walker WH, Cooke PS. Functions of Steroid Hormones in the male Reproductive Tract as revealed by mouse models. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032748.

  16. Liu X, Luan T, Zhou W, Yan L, Qian H, Mao P, Jiang L, Liu J, Rui C, Wang X, et al. The role of 17beta-Estrogen in Escherichia coli Adhesion on Human Vaginal epithelial cells via FAK phosphorylation. Infect Immun. 2021;89(11):e0021921. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00219-21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ripperda CM, Maldonado PA, Acevedo JF, Keller PW, Akgul Y, Shelton JM, Word RA. Vaginal estrogen: a dual-edged sword in postoperative healing of the vaginal wall. Menopause. 2017;24(7):838–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000840.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Luan T, Liu X, Mao P, Wang X, Rui C, Yan L, Wang Y, Fan C, Li P, Zeng X. The role of 17beta-Estrogen in Candida albicans Adhesion on Human Vaginal epithelial cells via FAK phosphorylation. Mycopathologia. 2020;185(3):425–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-020-00440-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye HJ, Shi LY, Quan XX, Xue X, Qian Y, Tian H, Xue SG, Sun LH. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in modified natural cycles: a retrospective analysis of pregnancy outcomes in ovulatory women with vs. without spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge. Bmc Pregnancy Childb. 2022;22(1). doi.org/ARTN 814. 1186/s12884-022-05161-5.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05161-5.

  20. Rahman NSA, Khan NAMN, Eshak Z, Sarbandi MS, Kamal AAM, Abd Malek M, Abdullah F, Abdullah MA, Othman F. Exogenous L-Glutathione improves vitrification outcomes in murine preimplantation embryos. Antioxidants-Basel. 2022;11(11). doi.org/ARTN 2100. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112100.

  21. Ji SY, Liu XM, Li BT, Zhang YL, Liu HB, Zhang YC, Chen ZJ, Liu JP, Fan HY. The polycystic ovary syndrome-associated gene Yap1 is regulated by gonadotropins and sex steroid hormones in hyperandrogenism-induced oligo-ovulation in mouse. Mol Hum Reprod. 2017;23(10):698–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gax046.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wen Q, Yu S, Wang S, Qin Y, Xia Q, Wang S, Chen G, Shen C, Song S. Impact of intestinal microbiota on metabolic toxicity and potential detoxification of amygdalin. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1030516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1030516.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(10):1674–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu W, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. Ab initio gene identification in metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(12):e132. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3150–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12(1):59–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Menzel P, Ng KL, Krogh A. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat Commun. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12(6):R60. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dowd SE, Callaway TR, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Hagevoort RG, Edrington TS. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). Bmc Microbiol. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Moreno I, Cicinelli E, Garcia-Grau I, Gonzalez-Monfort M, Bau D, Vilella F, De Ziegler D, Resta L, Valbuena D, Simon C. The diagnosis of chronic endometritis in infertile asymptomatic women: a comparative study of histology, microbial cultures, hysteroscopy, and molecular microbiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018, 218(6):602 e616https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.012.

  33. Kim YK, Shin JS, Nahm MH. NOD-Like receptors in infection, immunity, and Diseases. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gaffen SL, Jain R, Garg AV, Cua DJ. The IL-23-IL-17 immune axis: from mechanisms to therapeutic testing. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(9):585–600. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Alvarez D, Caro MR, Buendia AJ, Schnee C, Ortega N, Murcia-Belmonte A, Salinas J. Effect of female sex hormones on the developmental cycle of Chlamydia abortus compared to a penicillin-induced model of persistent infection. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2013-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Del Rio L, Murcia-Belmonte A, Buendia AJ, Navarro JA, Ortega N, Alvarez D, Salinas J, Caro MR. Effect of female sex hormones on the Immune response against Chlamydia abortus and on Protection conferred by an inactivated experimental vaccine in a mouse model. Pathogens. 2022;11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11010093.

  37. Saraf VS, Sheikh SA, Ahmad A, Gillevet PM, Bokhari H, Javed S. Vaginal microbiome: normalcy vs dysbiosis. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(7):3793–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02414-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Price TK, Wolff B, Halverson T, Limeira R, Brubaker L, Dong Q, Mueller ER, Wolfe AJ. Temporal Dynamics of the adult female lower urinary tract microbiota. mBio. 2020;11(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00475-20.

  39. Svoboda J, Ruzickova Z, Cuchalova L, Kralickova M, Rezacova J, Vrana M, Fiserova A, Richter J, Madar J. Ovulation stimulation protocols utilizing GnRH-antagonist/hCG, promote cytotoxic cell populations, predominant in patients with embryo implantation complications. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013;34(3):249–247.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao C, Wei Z, Yang J, Zhang J, Yu C, Yang A, Zhang M, Zhang L, Wang Y, Mu X, et al. Characterization of the vaginal microbiome in women with infertility and its potential correlation with hormone stimulation during in Vitro fertilization surgery. mSystems. 2020;5(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00450-20.

  41. Buchta V. Vaginal microbiome. Ceska Gynekol. 2018;83(5):371–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Baker JM, Al-Nakkash L, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Estrogen-gut microbiome axis: physiological and clinical implications. Maturitas. 2017;103:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.06.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu Y, Hang Z, Lei T, Du H. Intestinal Flora Affect Alzheimer’s disease by regulating endogenous hormones. Neurochem Res. 2022;47(12):3565–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-022-03784-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Qi X, Yun C, Pang Y, Qiao J. The impact of the gut microbiota on the reproductive and metabolic endocrine system. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1894070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shen J-n, Su M-j. Features of vaginal bacteria community in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Reprod Contracept. 2015;26:229–38.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Laniewski P, Ilhan ZE, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17(4):232–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-0286-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Schrey-Petersen S, Tauscher A, Dathan-Stumpf A, Stepan H. Diseases and complications of the puerperium. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021;118(Forthcoming):436–46. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0168.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Woodd SL, Montoya A, Barreix M, Pi L, Calvert C, Rehman AM, Chou D, Campbell OMR. Incidence of maternal peripartum infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019;16(12):e1002984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002984.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Gansu province (Grant No. 20JR10RA561), the Fund for Innovative Talent Project of Gansu Province (No. 20200624RCC0022), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32160859), Fuxi Foundation for Youth Talent at Gansu Agricultural University (No. Gaufx-02Y10), Scientific Research Foundation for the New Scholars, Gansu Agricultural University (Grant No. GSAU-RCZX201701). We thank Figdraw (www.figdraw.com) for expert assistance in the pattern drawing. We are grateful to Guangzhou Genedenovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd for assisting in sequencing analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Gansu province (Grant No. 20JR10RA561), the Fund for Innovative Talent Project of Gansu Province (No. 20200624RCC0022), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32160859), Fuxi Foundation for Youth Talent at Gansu Agricultural University (No. Gaufx-02Y10), Scientific Research Foundation for the New Scholars, Gansu Agricultural University (Grant No. GSAU-RCZX201701).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sisi Pu and Meng Wang are joint co-authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China

    Sisi Pu, Meng Wang, Jinglei Wang, Qian Zhang, Xin Ma, Rui Wang, Sijiu Yu, Libin Wang & Yangyang Pan

  2. Technology and Research Center of Gansu Province for Embryonic Engineering of Bovine and Sheep & Goat, Lanzhou, Gansu, China

    Meng Wang, Jinglei Wang, Qian Zhang, Xin Ma, Sijiu Yu, Libin Wang & Yangyang Pan

Authors
  1. Sisi Pu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinglei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sijiu Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Libin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yangyang Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, Yangyang Pan and Meng Wang; investigation, Qian Zhang, Sijiu Yu, Libin Wang, Jinglei Wang, Xin Ma, Rui Wang; writing—original draft preparation, Meng Wang and Sisi Pu; writing—review and editing, Meng Wang, Yangyang Pan, Qian Zhang and Sisi Pu; visualization, Sisi Pu; funding acquisition, Yangyang Pan. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangyang Pan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, in addition to the ARRIVE guidelines, and were approved by the Ethics Committee of Gansu Agricultural University, China.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pu, S., Wang, M., Wang, J. et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals a dynamic microbiome with diversified adaptive functions that respond to ovulation regulation in the mouse endometrium. BMC Genomics 24, 615 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09712-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09712-8

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us