Skip to main content
Download PDF

Characterization and gene expression analysis reveal universal stress proteins respond to abiotic stress in Gossypium hirsutum

BMC Genomics volume 25, Article number: 98 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Universal stress proteins (USPs) are a class of stress-induced proteins that play a crucial role in biotic and abiotic stress responses. These proteins have previously been reported to participate directly in responses to various stress and protect plants against unfavorable environmental conditions. However, there is limited research on USPs in cotton, and systematic characterization of USPs in Gossypium species is lacking.

Results

In the present study, the USP genes in Gossypium hirsutum were systematically identified and classified into six distinct subfamilies. The expansion of USPs in Gossypium species is mainly caused by dispersed duplication and whole genome duplication. Notably, the USPs that have expanded through allotetraploidization events are highly conserved in the allotetraploid species. The promoter regions of GhUSPs contain a diverse range of cis-acting elements associated with stress response. The RNA-Seq analysis and RT-qPCR assays revealed a significant induction of numerous GhUSPs expressions in response to various abiotic stresses. The co-expression network of GhUSPs revealed their involvement in stress response.

Conclusions

This study systematically analyzed the biological characteristics of GhUSPs and their response to abiotic stress. These findings serve as a theoretical basis for facilitating the breeding of cotton varieties in future research.

Peer Review reports

Background

The initial discovery of the universal stress protein (USP) was documented in Escherichia coli. As the name suggests, USP proteins are known to have a significant impact on various biotic and abiotic stress factors [1, 2]. The subsequent studies have demonstrated the widespread presence of USP proteins in a variety of organisms, including bacteria, archaea, fungi, protists, plants, and animals [3, 4].

In the field of plant biology, USP proteins play a crucial role in responding to both abiotic and biotic stress. In Arabidopsis, a significant up-regulation of the expression levels of AtUSP19 (At3g62550) and AtUSP17 (At3g53990) wereobserved in drought treatment [5]. Subsequently, the over-expression of AtUSP17 was found to enhance the resistance to extreme temperatures (low temperature and heat shock), oxidative stress, and pathogenic infection [6,7,8]. In Solanum pennellii, SpUSP was significantly upregulated in response to extreme temperatures, mechanical damage, and phytohormones (such as abscisic acid, gibberellic acid, and ethylene). Furthermore, it was found that overexpression of SpUSP could enhance drought tolerance and improve photosynthetic efficiency [9]. In Solanum lycopersicum, SlRd2 could interact with SlCipk6 and effectively improve the tolerance to both salt and osmotic stress [10]. In Oryza sativa, OsUsp1 plays a critical role in the activation of ethylene signaling pathway in response to plant hypoxia [11]. In Salicornia brachiata, the ectopic expression of SbUSP1 in Nicotiana tabacum significantly enhanced salt tolerance [12]. In Morus alba, overexpression of MaUSP1 in N. tabacum enhanced tolerance to drought, salinity, and oxidative stress [12]. In the case of Medicago falcata, overexpression of MfUSP1 enhanced various abiotic stresses, including freezing, salinity, and osmotic stress [13]. In addition, USPs participate in the growth and development of plants. Some USP genes were found to play a role in the seed germination process of A. thaliana [14]. Some USPs have been demonstrated to participate in the process of fruit ripening through the modulation of ethylene-mediated signaling pathways [5].

The Gossypium species is an ideal model to study polyploidization. Compared to the genome of Theobroma cacao, the Gossypium species underwent one more round of whole genome duplication (WGD) event approximately 60 million years ago (MYA) [15, 16]. Around 1 ~ 1.5 million MYA, Gossypium hirsutum (AD1) originated from the transoceanic hybridization between Gossypium arboreum (A2) and Gossypium raimondii (D5) [15, 17]. G. hirsutum, commonly known as upland cotton, dominates over 95% of global cotton cultivation due to its superior fiber and oil quality for worldwide industries. Nevertheless, in light of the escalating impacts of global warming and drastic weather changes, the cotton production is constrained by multiple abiotic stresses, such as drought, low temperature, and salinity. Thus, it is indispensable to mine the genes associated with abiotic tolerance. In previous research, the USP genes have been genome-wide identified in many plant species, and some of them have proven to play a vital role in the resistance of abiotic stress. However, the identification of the USP genes in cotton is still lacking [18,19,20,21].

In this study, the USP genes in four Gossypium species were systematically identified, and their evolutionary relationship and gene structure were analyzed. The USP genes in Gossypium species were mainly expanded by WGD and allotetraploidization events, and they were under purified selection during the evolution. The analysis of the cis-elements showed that GhUSPs were involved in abiotic stress. In addition, by performing the RNA-seq analysis and the qRT-PCR assays, we found that many GhUSPs were induced by low temperature stress. The WGCNA analysis showed that GhUSPs could co-express with many transcription factors in a salt and PEG stress-related network. This study provides a comprehensive view of USP genes in cotton, which will provide potential genes to evaluate the resistance to abiotic stresses.

Results

Genome-wide identification and characterization of GhUSP genes in cotton

The comprehensive analysis of genome-wide identification and conserved domain analysis revealed that the USP genes are prevalent in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant species. However, the number of USP genes, exhibited significant variation across different plant species, ranging from 23 to 131 (Fig. 1). A total of 49, 52, 102, and 104 USP genes were identified in G. arboreum(A2, 2n = 2x = 26), G. raimondii (D5, 2n = 2x = 26), G. hirsutum (AD1, 2n = 4x = 52), and G. barbadense (AD2, 2n = 4x = 52), the number of USP genes in the two tetraploid Gossypium species is nearly equal to the combined number of USP genes in the two diploid Gossypium species (Table S1). According to their genomic location, the USP members of Gossypium species were designated as GaUSP1 to GaUSP49, GrUSP1 to GrUSP52, GhUSP1 to GhUSP102, and GbUSP1 to GbUSP104, respectively. The protein length, protein molecular weight (MWs), isoelectric point (pIs), protein hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity of allotetraploid cotton and their diploid progenitors exhibited similar average distributions. (Table S1 and Fig. S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The identified USP genes in chosen plant genome and the related duplication events. The phylogenetic tree shown in the left side was obtained from the TimeTree website (http://www.timetree.org/), and the yellow pentagram and blue hexagon represented genome duplication event (WGD) and whole genome triplication event (WGT), respectively

Full size image

Phylogenetic analysis and structure analysis of USP members

As shown in the phylogenetic tree, the USP proteins of G. hirsutum can be classified into six distinct subfamilies, labeled as subfamilies A to F. Each subfamily contained multiple members from G. hirsutum and at least one member from the AtUSPs, which suggests that no subfamily specific to Gossypium was identified. Among the previously mentioned subfamilies, subfamily B had the largest number of members, accounting for 28.6% of the total. In contrast, subfamily D accounted for a significantly smaller portion, representing only 7.6% of the total (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic relationship of USP proteins. From A to F, six subfamilies are represented by different backgroud colors. The sequences of USP proteins in A.thaliana and G.hirsutum were used to construct the phylogenetic tree were marked with pink triangle and yellow circle, respectively

Full size image

The analysis of the protein domains revealed that all GhUSP proteins possessed a single USP domain, the majority of which span almost the entire length of the protein sequence. However, certain members of subfamily B were found to possess the protein tyrosine and serine/threonine kinase, protein kinase domain, and U-box domain, suggesting that they may serve a distinct purpose (Fig. 3). On the other hand, the gene structure (exon-intron structure) of the GhUSPs also varied distinctly in different subfamilies. All of the members within subfamily E contained 0 ~ 1 intron, while the members in subfamily B contained 6 ~ 9 introns (Fig. 3), suggesting that the gene structure and protein architecture of GhUSPs are conserved within each specific subfamily, which is consistent with the classification of the phylogenetic analysis (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Conserved domain and gene structure analysis of USP members in G.hirsutum. The identified domains in USP proteins are represented by the boxes in different colors. The exons and introns of the USP genes are represented by green boxes and black lines, respectively. The scale at the bottom indicates the length of proteins and genes, respectively

Full size image

Chromosome location, gene Dduplication, and selection pressure of USP genes

The USP genes of four Gossypium species are unevenly distributed in all chromosomes (Fig. 4 and Table S1). The USP genes in the genome of G.arboreum were predominantly found on chromosomes 13 and 11. The USP genes from G. raimondii were mainly distributed on chromosomes 13 and 12. For the allotetraploid species G.hirsutum, USPs were mainly detected in the A05, A13, D13, and D04. The chromosome location of the majority of the GhUSPs was conserved after the allopolyploidization events (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Chromosome distribution and collinearity analysis of USP genes in G.hirsutum, G.arboreum, and G.raimondii. Collinear gene pairs between GhUSP genes and GaUSP genes, between GhUSP and GrUSP genes, are represented by blue and orange lines, respectively

Full size image

To investigate the expansion pattern of USP genes, we further examined the duplication pattern. Multiple types of duplication events were detected in cotton’s USP genes, the dispersed duplication event and WGD event were found to be primary drivers of the expansion of USP genes Gossypium species (Fig. 1). Among the other selected plant species, the USP genes were mainly expanded through dispersed duplication (86.67% in Carica papaya and 75.00% in Aquilegia coerulea) and WGD event (91.94% in Linum usitatissimum and 91.18% in Glycine max) (Fig. 1). However, tandem duplication events played a significant role in the expansion of USP genes in certain cases, accounting for 60.0% and 52.94% of USP genes in Citrus sinensis and Citrus clementina, respectively (Fig. 1). These findings suggest that the expansion of USP genes in the majority of species was likely driven by dispersed events and WGD, whereas tandem duplication events may also contribute to the expansion of USP genes. Additionally, the allopolyploidization event was identified as a significant factor contributing to the expansion of USP genes in tetraploid cotton. The number of USP genes present in each tetraploid cotton is nearly equivalent to the sum of two diploid Gossypium species (Figs. 1 and 4). The similar result was also shown in the Brassica species. The number of USP genes in tetraploid species B.napus is roughly equal to the sum of diploid species B.rapa and B.oleracea (Fig. 1).

All the Ka/Ks ratios of gene pairs of USP genes in Gossypium species, resulting from various duplication events, are lower than 1. This observation suggests that the USP genes have likely undergone strong purifying selection pressure throughout their evolutionary history. Furthermore, it indicates that the protein functions of these genes may be conserved after the expansion (Table S2).

cis-elements analysis and expression pattern of GhUSPs

Multiple cis-elements associated with stress response were detected in 2000 bp upstream of the start codon of GhUSPs, including STRE, MYB, and w-box (Fig. S2). Therefore, we speculated that GhUSPs may have a vital role in regulating the defense against the stress from the external environment. On the other hand, based on the analysis of the RNA-seq data, it was observed that the expression levels of numerous GhUSPs exhibited up-regulation under various abiotic stress conditions. Under cold stress conditions, the expression of several GhUSPs was upregulated, including GhUSP11, 29, 32, 43, 64, 82, 88, and 94 (Fig. S3A). After the salt treatment, the expression of many GhUSPs was highly induced, such as GhUSP11, 29, 32, 43, 82, 88, and 94 (Fig. S3B). After the treatment with polyethylene glycol (PEG), the expression level of numerous GhUSPs was upregulated, including GhUSP11, 29, 32, 43, 82, 88, and 94 (Fig. S3C).

To further confirm the expression pattern of GhUSPs under abiotic stress, the aforementioned GhUSPs were chosen to perform the RT-qPCR assays. Under the cold stress, GhUSP11, 29, and 59 were up-regulated at the beginning. The expression of GhUSP7 was induced at 1, 9, and 12 h while decreased to the normal expression at 3, 6, and 24 h, the expression of GhUSP88 increasing continuously but decreased at 24 h (Fig. 5). For the salt treatment, the expression of most GhUSPs was highly induced, GhUSP43 exhibited multiple times more relative expression than that in the control group (Fig. 6). For PEG stress, the expression of GhUSP7, 64, 82, and 94 continuously increased and peaked at 6 or 9 h but decreased at the following time points, the expression of the GhUSP43 peaked at 24 h (Fig. 7). Taken together, these results suggest that GhUSPs might play potential regulatory roles in the response to abiotic stress.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression analysis of GhUSPs in leaves under cold treatment via RT–qPCR. The samples were collected at 0 h, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 and 24 h after cold treatment on TM-1 cotton seedlings. GhActin7 was used as an internal reference. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent biological replicates. Statistically significant difference was evaluated by one-way ANOVA analysis (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001). The primers used are listed in Table S3

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Expression analysis of GhUSPs in leaves under salt treatment via RT–qPCR. The samples were collected at 0 h, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 and 24 h after salt treatment on TM-1 cotton seedlings. GhActin7 was used as an internal reference. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent biological replicates. Statistically significant difference was evaluated by one-way ANOVA analysis (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001). The primers used are listed in Table S3

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Expression analysis of GhUSPs in leaves under PEG treatment via RT–qPCR. The samples were collected at 0 h, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 and 24 h after PEG treatment on TM-1 cotton seedlings. GhActin7 was used as an internal reference. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent biological replicates. Statistically significant difference was evaluated by one-way ANOVA analysis (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001). The primers used are listed in Table S3

Full size image

WGCNA network analysis of GhUSPs related to abiotic stress

Further WGCNA analysis showed that four and five modules were identified in PEG and salt stress, respectively. Among these molules, GhUSPs could act as hub genes within the co -expression. In the co-expression network related to salt stress, GhUSP43 exhibits co-expression with numerous stress-related genes, including GhZTP29 (GH_A08G0168), GhNST1 (GH_D12G1658), and several members of the CYP450 gene family (GH_D09G0584, GH_D11G1438, GH_D11G1957, and GH_D12G0969) (Fig. S4A). In the co-expression network related to PEG stress, GhUSP11, 32, 43, and 94 were identified, and numerous transcription factors were also found in this network. It was shown that many genes associated with reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling are also present in this network, such as GhEGY3 (GH_D01G0096) and GhRIPK (GH_D13G2178) (Fig. S4B). Therefore, we speculated that GhUSPs, such as GhUSP43, might play a significant role in responding to salt and drought stress.

Discussion

Cotton is often referred to as “white gold” and is one of the most economically significant crops globally, accounting for approximately 35% of the world’s annual demand for textile fiber [15]. Abiotic stresses, such as extreme temperatures, drought, and salinity, commonly pose a threat to the yield of cotton [22, 23]. Previous studies indicate that ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) play a significant role in responding to both abiotic and biotic stress responses [8,9,10, 13, 24, 25]. However, this gene family has not been systematically characterized in cotton.

In the present study, a comprehensive identification and analysis of USP genes was conducted. The USP genes were systematically identified in G. arboretum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense, and G. hirsutum (Fig. 1). The identified members were classified into six distinct subfamilies based on the results of phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). It is noteworthy that the conservation of the number of exons is observed within each subfamily, which is consistent with the classification of the GhUSPs (Figs. 2 and 3).

To effectively respond to dynamic environmental conditions, various types of gene duplication events have the potential to generate novel genes and functions [26, 27]. The Gossypium species is commonly used as a model system to study plant polyploidization, including allotetraploidization and WGD events [15, 16, 28]. The number of USP members in each allotetraploid species is nearly equivalent to thesum of the diploid parental species. Furthermore, the analysis of chromosome location revealed a consistent pattern in the diploid species (Fig. 4). Additionally, the WGD play a significant role in expanding the USP genes in Gossypium species, followed by dispersed duplication, and they have undergone purifying selection pressure (Fig. 1, Table S2). The Brassica species have also been served as excellent models for studying WGD and allotetraploidization events [29]. Similarly, the allotetraploid species B. napus exhibits a nearly cumulative count of USP genes when compared to the diploid species B.rapa and B.olerecea (Fig. 1). Additionally, the physical and chemical characteristics of the allotetraploid cotton were found to be similar to those of the diploid species (Table S1). These findings demonstrate the substantial contribution of polyploidization events, including WGD and allotetraploidization events to the expansion of the expansion of the USP genes in Gossypium species. These findings provide additional evidence to reinforce the previous assertion that allotetraploid cotton species have their origins in the natural hybridization of two diploid progenitors.

cis-regulatory elements have the potential to regulate gene expression during plant development and in response to environmental stimuli [30]. In the present study, an enrichment of MYB and MYC motifs was observed in the promoter sequences of GhUSPs (Fig. S2). Previous research has shown that MYB and MYC motifs in plants can respond to abiotic stress [31,32,33]. Furthermore, by analyzing the previous transcriptome data and subsequently confirming it through qRT-PCR assays, it was observed that numerous GhUSPs could respond to the cold, salt, and PEG stress. For instance, the expression of GhUSP43 was upregulated in response to both salt and PEG treatments (Figs. 5, 6 and 7 and S3). Therefore, we propose a preliminary hypothesis that GhUSPs may potentially contribute to the modulating various abiotic stress factors.

WGCNA has been demonstrated as a cost-effective approach for identifying critical players within specific modules, thereby enabling the prediction of the function of novel genes [34]. In this study, an analysis was conducted on the transcriptome data obtained from a previous research. The analysis revealed that several GhUSPs were identified in the co-expression networks associated with salt and PEG stress [17] (Fig. S4, Table S4, and Table S5). Many genes identified within these networks have been found to be involved in responding to abiotic stress and the signaling process of ROS [35,36,37,38,39,40].

Conclusions

In this study, we systematically analyzed the GhUSP gene family in cotton. A total of 102 GhUSP genes were identified. Their chromosome localization, evolutionary tree, linear analysis, gene duplication, selective pressure, gene structure, motif distribution, cis-acting elements, and WGCNA were analyzed and characterized. We further investigated the expression patterns of GhUSP genes in response to salt, drought, and cold treatment. Our findings provide valuable information and a theoretical framework for further research into their specific roles in various development processes and abiotic stress. This is of great significance for breeding cotton with resistance.

Materials and methods

The data retrieval and identification of USP proteins

In this study, we obtained the sequenced genomes of multiple plant species. Detailed information on these genomes is provided in Table S6. The Hidden Markov Model of the USP domain (PF00582) was obtained from the InterPro database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/), and the USP proteins were scanned by the Hmmsearch program [41, 42]. Next, the Interproscan software was used to identify the domain of the above protein sequences, the sequences without the USP domain were removed [42]. The protein properties of USP proteins were predicted by the ProtParam module in Biopython [43].

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

The identified USP proteins from A.thaliana and G.hirsutum were analyzed for multiple sequence alignment using MAFFT software [44]. Next, by employing trimAl software, the gaps in the alignment results were further removed [45]. Based on the above results, the phylogenetic tree was generated by FastTree software [46]. Finally, the phylogenetic tree was visualized by the EvolView v3.0 [47].

The analysis of chromosome location and gene collinearity

By extracting the genomic annotation data (gff/gtf files) of the USP members, the chromosomal locations of USP members from four Gossypium species were retrieved. By performing the BLASTP and MCScanX program, the collinearity of gene pairs within the USP members was identified, and the above results were visualized by circos software [48,49,50].

The duplication event related to USP members was identified by MCScanX [51]. By performing the Dupgen_finder pipeline, the gene pairs generated by the above duplication events were retrieved [52]. By employing the ParaAT pipeline, the protein and coding sequences of USP members were aligned to generate the alignment results with the AXT format [53]. The synonymous rate (Ks) and nonsynonymous rate (Ka) values were analyzed by Kaks_calculator 2.0 [54].

cis-acting element analysis

Based on the annotation file (gtf file), the 2000 bp from the upstream genomic DNA sequences of GhUSP genes were obtained. The cis-acting elements were identified by the PlantCARE website (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) [55].

RNA-seq and WGCNA analysis

The transcriptome data (accession number: PRJNA490626) was retrieved from SRA database, including four-week-old seedlings under the salt, PEG, 4°C, and 37°C treatments for 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h [17, 56]. By performing the trimmomatic (v0.3.9) software, the low-quality reads were filtered [57]. The ZJU2.1 version of G.hirsutum genome was chosen as the reference genome in this study, and the index file was built by HISAT2 (version 2.1.0) software [58]. The clean reads were mapped to the reference genome by performing the HISAT software [17, 58]. The transcripts were assembled by Stringtie (v2.0) software [59]. The FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads) value was generated by the R software.

The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed by edgeR package in R software, which is based on the rule of| logFC| > 1 and p-value < 0.05 [60]. The modules dividing and weighted gene co-expression network constructing were performed by the WGCNA (version 1.69) package, the weight value was calculated by the pickSoftThreshold program [61]. The networks were visualized by the CytoHubba package of Cytoscape software (v3.9.1) [62].

Plant materials and treatments

The seeds of G. hirsutum cultivar TM-1 were grown in the growth room with a condition of 16 h light at 27 °C/8 h dark at 22 °C. After three weeks, the seedlings at the three-leaf stage were treated with cold (4 °C), salt (200 mM NaCl), and simulate drought stress (30% PEG6000), the leaves were collected at 0 h (control), 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h, and 24 h. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a − 80 °C refrigerator for subsequent RNA extraction.

The RNA extraction and RT–qPCR analysis

The RNA of the collected samples was extracted using the Vazyme RNA extraction kit (FastPure Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit, RC411-C1). The RNA reverse transcription used the Vazyme reverse transcription kit (HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR, R223-01). Next, the RT–qPCR assays were performed on a Thermofisher ABI instrument (7500 Real Time PCR System). The reaction procedure is: preheat denaturation of 95 °C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 15 s; 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min for the melting curve programs. The reaction system is: 10.0 µL 2xUltra SYBR Mixture, 0.6 µL (10 µmol L− 1) PCR forward primer (10 µM), 0.6 µL (10 µmol L− 1) PCR reverse primer (10 µM), 0.8 µL cDNA templates and 8 µL sterile ddH2O. G.hirsutum Actin (GhActin) was used as the internal reference gene, and the relative expression levels was calculated by the 2−△△CT algorithm [63]. The primers are listed in Table S3.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical tests were using GraphPad Prism 8 software performed one-way ANOVA method (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001).

Data availability

The RNA-seq data used in this study were retrieved from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under the accession code PRJNA490626.

References

  1. Kvint K, Nachin L, Diez A, Nyström T. The bacterial universal stress protein: function and regulation. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6(2):140–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nyström T, Neidhardt FC. Isolation and properties of a mutant of Escherichia coli with an insertional inactivation of the uspA gene, which encodes a universal stress protein. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(13):3949–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Isokpehi RD, Mahmud O, Mbah AN, Simmons SS, Avelar L, Rajnarayanan RV, Udensi UK, Ayensu WK, Cohly HH, Brown SD, et al. Developmental Regulation of Genes Encoding Universal Stress Proteins in Schistosoma mansoni. Gene Regul Syst Biology. 2011;5.

  4. Chi YH, Koo SS, Oh HT, Lee ES, Park JH, Phan KAT, Wi SD, Bae SB, Paeng SK, Chae HB, et al. The Physiological Functions of Universal Stress Proteins and their molecular mechanism to protect plants from environmental stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10.

  5. Isokpehi RD, Simmons SS, Cohly HHP, Ekunwe SIN, Begonia GB, Ayensu WK. Identification of Drought-Responsive Universal Stress Proteins in Viridiplantae. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2011;5.

  6. Jung YJ, Melencion SMB, Lee ES, Park JH, Alinapon CV, Oh HT, Yun D-J, Chi YH, Lee SY. Universal stress protein exhibits a redox-dependent chaperone function in Arabidopsis and enhances Plant Tolerance to heat shock and oxidative stress. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6.

  7. Melencion SMB, Chi YH, Pham TT, Paeng SK, Wi SD, Lee C, Ryu SW, Koo SS, Lee SY. RNA chaperone function of a Universal stress protein in Arabidopsis confers enhanced cold stress tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(12).

  8. Park S-C, Jung YJ, Lee Y, Kim IR, Seol M-A, Kim E-J, Jang M-K, Lee JR. Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis Universal stress protein AtUSP with an antifungal activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;486(4):923–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Loukehaich R, Wang T, Ouyang B, Ziaf K, Li H, Zhang J, Lu Y, Ye Z. SpUSP, an annexin-interacting universal stress protein, enhances drought tolerance in tomato. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(15):5593–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gutiérrez-Beltrán E, Personat JM, de la Torre F, del Pozo O. A Universal stress protein involved in oxidative stress is a phosphorylation target for protein kinase CIPK6. Plant Physiol. 2017;173(1):836–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sauter M. The novel ethylene-regulated gene OsUsp1 from rice encodes a member of a plant protein family related to prokaryotic universal stress proteins. J Exp Bot. 2002;53(379):2325–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhanyalakshmi KH, Nataraja KN, Luo ZB. Universal stress protein-like gene from mulberry enhances abiotic stress tolerance in Escherichia coli and transgenic tobacco cells. Plant Biol. 2021;23(6):1190–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gou L, Zhuo C, Lu S, Guo Z. A Universal stress protein from Medicago falcata (MfUSP1) confers multiple stress tolerance by regulating antioxidant defense and proline accumulation. Environ Exp Bot. 2020;178.

  14. Gorshkova DS, Getman IA, Voronkov AS, Chizhova SI, Kuznetsov VV, Pojidaeva ES. The Gene Encoding the Universal stress protein AtUSP is regulated by phytohormones and involved in seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana. Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2018;479(1):105–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paterson AH, Wendel JF, Gundlach H, Guo H, Jenkins J, Jin D, Llewellyn D, Showmaker KC, Shu S, Udall J, et al. Repeated polyploidization of Gossypium genomes and the evolution of spinnable cotton fibres. Nature. 2012;492(7429):423–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wendel JF, Flagel LE, Adams KL. Jeans, genes, and genomes: cotton as a model for studying Polyploidy. In: Polyploidy and Genome Evolution 2012: 181–207.

  17. Hu Y, Chen J, Fang L, Zhang Z, Ma W, Niu Y, Ju L, Deng J, Zhao T, Lian J, et al. Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum genomes provide insights into the origin and evolution of allotetraploid cotton. Nat Genet. 2019;51(4):739–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhuria M, Goel P, Kumar S, Singh AK. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of genes encoding universal stress proteins (USP) identify multi-stress responsive USP genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Rep. 2019;24(3):434–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Arabia S, Sami AA, Akhter S, Sarker RH, Islam T. Comprehensive in silico characterization of universal stress proteins in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) with insight into their stress-specific transcriptional modulation. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12.

  20. Cui X, Zhang P, Hu Y, Chen C, Liu Q, Guan P, Zhang J. Genome-wide analysis of the Universal stress protein A gene family in Vitis and expression in response to abiotic stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;165:57–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diao J, Gu W, Jiang Z, Wang J, Zou H, Zong C, Ma L. Comprehensive Analysis of Universal Stress Protein Family Genes and their expression in Fusarium oxysporum response of Populus davidiana × P. Alba var. Pyramidalis Louche based on the transcriptome. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(6).

  22. Abro S, Rizwan M, Deho ZA, Abro SA, Sial MA. Identification of heat tolerant cotton lines showing genetic variation in cell membrane thermostability, Stomata, and Trichome size and its effect on yield and Fiber quality traits. Front Plant Sci. 2022;12.

  23. Saud S, Wang L. Mechanism of cotton resistance to abiotic stress, and recent research advances in the osmoregulation related genes. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13.

  24. Udawat P, Jha RK, Sinha D, Mishra A, Jha B. Overexpression of a Cytosolic Abiotic Stress Responsive Universal Stress Protein (SbUSP) mitigates salt and osmotic stress in Transgenic Tobacco Plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7.

  25. Wang X-F, Su J, Yang N, Zhang H, Cao X-Y, Kang J-F. Functional characterization of selected Universal stress protein from Salvia miltiorrhiza (SmUSP) in Escherichia coli. Genes. 2017;8(9).

  26. Hittinger CT, Carroll SB. Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch. Nature. 2007;449(7163):677–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. Turning a hobby into a job: how duplicated genes find new functions. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(12):938–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. He P, Zhang Y, Xiao G. Origin of a subgenome and genome evolution of Allotetraploid Cotton Species. Mol Plant. 2020;13(9):1238–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S, Parkin IA, Tang H, Wang X, Chiquet J, Belcram H, Tong C, Samans B, et al. Plant genetics. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science. 2014;345(6199):950–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marand AP, Eveland AL, Kaufmann K, Springer NM. cis-Regulatory Elements in Plant Development, Adaptation, and evolution. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2023.

  31. Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell. 2003;15(1):63–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chinnusamy V, Ohta M, Kanrar S, Lee BH, Hong X, Agarwal M, Zhu JK. ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003;17(8):1043–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Agarwal M, Hao Y, Kapoor A, Dong CH, Fujii H, Zheng X, Zhu JK. A R2R3 type MYB transcription factor is involved in the cold regulation of CBF genes and in acquired freezing tolerance. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(49):37636–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ko DK, Brandizzi F. Network-based approaches for understanding gene regulation and function in plants. Plant J. 2020;104(2):302–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang M, Xu Q, Yu J, Yuan M. The putative Arabidopsis zinc transporter ZTP29 is involved in the response to salt stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;73(4–5):467–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang M, Xu Q, Yuan M. Zinc homeostasis is involved in unfolded protein response under salt stress. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;6(1):77–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pandian BA, Sathishraj R, Djanaguiraman M, Prasad PVV, Jugulam M. Role of cytochrome P450 enzymes in plant stress response. Antioxidants 2020;9(5).

  38. Wang H, Guo Y, Hao X, Zhang W, Xu Y, He W, Li Y, Cai S, Zhao X, Song X. Alternative splicing for Leucanthemella Linearis NST1 contributes to Variable Abiotic Stress Resistance in transgenic Tobacco. Genes. 2023;14(8).

  39. Zhuang Y, Wei M, Ling C, Liu Y, Amin AK, Li P, Li P, Hu X, Bao H, Huo H, et al. EGY3 mediates chloroplastic ROS homeostasis and promotes retrograde signaling in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 2021;36(2).

  40. Singh P, Mishra V, Tripathi DK, Corpas FJ, Singh VP. RIPK: a crucial ROS signaling component in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2022;27(3):214–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(suppl):W29–W37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1236–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cock PJA, Antao T, Chang JT, Chapman BA, Cox CJ, Dalke A, Friedberg I, Hamelryck T, Kauff F, Wilczynski B, et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(11):1422–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1972–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree: Computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a Distance Matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26(7):1641–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Subramanian B, Gao S, Lercher MJ, Hu S, Chen WH. Evolview v3: a webserver for visualization, annotation, and management of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W270–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Y, Tang H, Debarry JD, Tan X, Li J, Wang X, Lee TH, Jin H, Marler B, Guo H, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(7):e49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol İ, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1639–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10(1).

  51. Wang Y, Tang H, DeBarry JD, Tan X, Li J, Wang X, Lee T, Jin H, Marler B, Guo H, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(7):e49–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Qiao X, Li Q, Yin H, Qi K, Li L, Wang R, Zhang S, Paterson AH. Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization–diploidization cycles in plants. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1).

  53. Zhang Z, Xiao J, Wu J, Zhang H, Liu G, Wang X, Dai L. ParaAT: a parallel tool for constructing multiple protein-coding DNA alignments. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;419(4):779–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang D, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhu J, Yu J. KaKs_Calculator 2.0: a Toolkit incorporating Gamma-Series methods and sliding window strategies. Genom Proteom Bioinform. 2010;8(1):77–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, Rouze P, Rombauts S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):325–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M. The sequence read Archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;39(Database):D19–D21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang T-C, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(3):290–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(1).

  62. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2– ∆∆CT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The experiment was performed at the College of Ecology of Lishui University and College of Plant Science and Technology of Huazhong Agricultural University.

Funding

This research was supported by the Starting Fund for Doctoral Research of Lishui University (QDZK112023013; QDZK112022010), Research and Development Program of Hebei Province (21326314D), and National Cotton Industry Technology System (CARS-15-28).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yunqing Li and Ao Zheng contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Ecology, Lishui University, Lishui, 323000, China

    Yunqing Li & Lina Yao

  2. College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Ao Zheng & Jing Wang

  3. College of Mathematics and Physics, Henan University of Urban Construction, Pingdingshan, 467000, China

    Zhuang Li

  4. Shijiazhuang Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, 050041, China

    Hu Wang, Zhanghui Dong & Xiao Han

  5. Zhengzhou Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Integrated Utilization, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China

    Fei Wei

Authors
  1. Yunqing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ao Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhuang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhanghui Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lina Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiao Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Fei Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yunqing Li and Ao Zheng conceived and designed the experiments; Zhuang Li, Hu Wang, and Zhanghui Dong performed experiments; Jing Wang and Lina Yao analyzed the data; Yunqing Li took the lead in writing the manuscript with input from all authors; Xiao Han provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript. Fei Wei made the final confirmation of the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lina Yao, Xiao Han or Fei Wei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study, the cotton varieties were obtained from Zhengzhou University. These plant materials do not include any wild species at risk of extinction. No specific permits were required for sample collection in this study. We complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation for plant study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

: Table S1. Basic information on USP genes in Gossypium species

Supplementary Material 2

: Table S2. Ka/Ks ratios for duplicated GhUSP gene pairs

Supplementary Material 3

: Table S3. Primers used in RT–qPCR

Supplementary Material 4

: Table S4. The information of genes displayed in the WGNCA network related to salt stress

Supplementary Material 5

: Table S5. The information of genes displayed in the WGNCA network related to PEG stress

Supplementary Material 6

: Table S6. The information of the chosen plant genome used in this study

Supplementary Material 7

: Fig.S1. The physical and chemical parameters USP proteins in Gossypium species. The original data was list in Table S1

Supplementary Material 8

: Fig.S2. Analysis of cis-elements in promoters of GhUSP genes. The color scale represents the number of the identified cis-elements retrieved from the PLANTCARE website (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/). Red indicates a high number level and blue indicates a low number level

Supplementary Material 9

: Fig.S3. The transcript profiling of GhUSP genes under the (A) cold, (B) salt, and (C) PEG treatment. The scale bar means the scaled expression level, red indicates a high expression level and white indicates a low expression level. The number displayed in each boxes represent log2 transformed FPKM values. The raw RNA-seq data was retrieved from a previous study (accession number: PRJCA004262)

Supplementary Material 10

: Fig.S4. Gene co-expression network contained GhUSPs related to abiotic stress. (A) The co-expression network under salt treatment. (B) The co-expression network under PEG treatment. The red triangle symbolizes GhUSPs. The displayed genes and their corresponding description are presented in Table S4 and Table S5

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Zheng, A., Li, Z. et al. Characterization and gene expression analysis reveal universal stress proteins respond to abiotic stress in Gossypium hirsutum. BMC Genomics 25, 98 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09955-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09955-5

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us