Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification, validation and candidate gene analysis of major QTL for Supernumerary spikelets in wheat

BMC Genomics volume 25, Article number: 675 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The number of spikelets per spike is a key trait that affects the yield of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Identification of the QTL for spikelets per spike and its genetic effects that could be used in molecular assistant breeding in the future.

Results

In this study, four recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations were generated and used, having YuPi branching wheat (YP), with Supernumerary Spikelets (SS) phenotype, as a common parent. QTL (QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D) related to SS trait were mapped on chromosomes 2 A and 2D through bulked segregant exome sequencing (BSE-Seq). Fourteen molecular markers were further developed within the localization interval, and QSS.sicau-2 A was narrowed to 3.0 cM covering 7.6 Mb physical region of the reference genome, explaining 13.7 − 15.9% the phenotypic variance. Similarly, the QSS.sicau-2D was narrowed to 1.8 cM covering 2.4 Mb physical region of the reference genome, and it explained 27.4 − 32.9% the phenotypic variance. These two QTL were validated in three different genetic backgrounds using the linked markers. QSS.sicau-2 A was identified as WFZP-A, and QSS.sicau-2D was identified a novel locus, different to the previously identified WFZP-D. Based on the gene expression patterns, gene annotation and sequence analysis, TraesCS2D03G0260700 was predicted to be a potential candidate gene for QSS.sicau-2D.

Conclusion

Two significant QTL for SS, namely QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D were identified in multiple environments were identified and their effect in diverse genetic populations was assessed. QSS.sicau-2D is a novel QTL associated with the SS trait, with TraesCS2D03G0260700 predicted as its candidate gene.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important staple crops in the world, and estimates suggest that wheat production needs to increase 70% to fulfill food demand [1]. Therefore, maintaining food security and increasing yields to meet the higher demand of a growing global population has become a top priority for breeding programs [2].

Thousand gain weight (TGW), grain number per spike (GNS) and spike number per unit area are three major components of grain yield [3]. Among the above factors, the grain number per spike is affected by inflorescence architecture [4,5,6]. Plant inflorescences are small florets arranged on an axis, which can be divided into many types, such as racemes, spikes, corymbs, panicles etc. [7]. The wheat inflorescence is a spike, that usually consists of sessile spikelets arranged in opposite rows along the spike axis, each producing 3–5 florets [8]. Therefore, inflorescences, which determine the classification of Gramineae and the yield of food crops, have long been the subject of study of botanists and breeders [9]. In wheat germplasm resources, Supernumerary Spikelets (SS) is a special germplasm with many flowers and grains, which has the potential to improve the yield per unit area in wheat [10, 11]. SS can be divided into two types. One kind is called branched spikelets, where a spare spike extends on the stem node of the original spikelets and spikelets are born on it. The other type of spikelets is that the stem node does not extend, and two or more lateral spikelets are attached to the spike node, which is called supernumerary spikelets [12]. Identification of the QTL for spikelet number per spike (SNS) and its genetic effects that could be used in molecular assistant breeding in the future.

SNS is a complicated trait and controlled by quantitative trait loci (QTL) in wheat. To comprehend the molecular mechanisms that control this trait and to utilize it in breeding, QTL analyses have been conducted in wheat [13, 14]. Six QTL on chromosomes 1 A, 2D, 3B, 6 A, 7 A, and 7D, were found to have dominant and epistatic effects [13]. Cui (2015) detected three QTL on chromosomes 2 A, 5 A, and 7B for SNS that were significant across multiple environments in two recombinant inbred lines (RILs) populations [15]. Four genomic regions affecting SNS on chromosomes 1 A, 1B, 3 A, and 7 A were detected via a population of 191 F9 RIL was developed from a cross of two winter cultivars Yumai8679 with Jing 411 [16]. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and the iSelect 9 K assay were used on a doubled-haploid (DH) soft red winter wheat population that showed a wide range of phenotypic variation for spike traits, and a major QTL QSl.cz-1 A/QFsn.cz-1 A which explained up to 30.9% of the phenotypic variation for spike length (SL) was identified [17]. In addition, QFSN4B.4–17 responsible for SNS in multiple environments using a RIL population of 173 lines derived from a cross of the common winter wheat lines Shannong 01–35 and Gancheng 9411 was also identified previously [18].

To date, several genes affecting inflorescence structure and SNS have been identified and designated. For example, the HvMADS1 can directly regulate the expression of HvCKX3 by binding to the promoter through a CArG-box domain, which affect the cytokinin homeostasis and inflorescence structure in barley [19]. In rice, APO1 interacts with APO2 to synergistically control cell proliferation in meristem and regulates panicle formation, and the overexpression of APO1 or APO2 has been associated with significantly increasing the spikelet number [4, 20, 21]. Several genes related to SNS were identified in wheat, including WFZP [22], Ppd-1 [23], FT2 [24], WAPO1 [25], Q gene [26], and Grain Number Increase 1 [27].

Although there are many reports about QTL related to wheat spikelet number, only few of QTL have been genetically verified, offering a foundation for fine mapping and map-based cloning. This has greatly restricted the dissection of the molecular mechanisms underlying spikelet number as well as improvement of spikelet number in wheat breeding. Thus, the identification and validation of novel QTL/genes for spikelet number is important. In this study, we used a RIL population (YC) derived from a cross between YuPi branching wheat (YP) and Chinese spring wheat (CS), to identify QTL associated with SS trait using a high-density genetic map and phenotypic data obtained from a multiple environmental trial, in different genetic backgrounds.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

The common parent YP is a bread wheat germplasm with the SS character [28, 29]. An RIL population generated by the single seed descent method from a cross YP × CS (YC population, 215 F6/F7 lines), was used for BSE-Seq and QTL mapping. Three RIL populations derived from the crosses YP × CM107 (YCM population, 132 F6/F7 lines), YP × CM104 (YJ population, 60 F6/F7 lines) and YP × 11N21 (NY2 population, 73 F6/F7 lines), were used to validate the QTL in different genetic backgrounds.

Phenotypic evaluation and statistical analysis

YC RIL population were planted in three environments: Chongzhou (CZ, 103° 38′ E, 30° 32′ N) in 2021–2022 (2022CZ), Chongzhou and Wenjiang (WJ, 103° 41′ E, 30° 36′ N) in 2022–2023 (2023CZ and 2023WJ). A randomized complete block design was adopted in all environments. YCM, YJ and NY2 populations were planted at Chongzhou in 2022–2023. Fifteen seeds of each family were planted in 1.5 m rows spaced 30 cm apart. Field management was performed according to recommendations for wheat production. After maturity, five plants from the center rows were selected and used for phenotypic evaluation, including the number of SS per spike (NSS), SNS, TGW, GNS, grain weight per spike (GWS), grain length (GL), grain width (GW), flag leaf length (FLL) and flag leaf width (FLW). The SNS was determined by counting the total spikelets in the main spike, NSS was calculated by deducing the number of nodes per spike from SNS. GNS, GWS, GL and GW were measured by a Wanshan SC-G automatic seed test system (Hangzhou Wanshen Detection Technology Co., Ltd., CN). The TGW was calculated as 10-fold of the weight of 100 seeds measured with an electronic balance, in three replicates for each line [1].

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the NSS in each trial and Pearson correlations between variables were computed in SPSS v27 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). To minimize environmental effects, the best linear unbiased estimates (BLUE) for NSS in three replicates was calculated using SAS 8.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). According to the method described by Smith, broad-sense heritability (h2) across environments was estimated, according to the equation h2 = VG/(VG + VGE/r + VE), where VG = genotypic variance, VGE = genotype × environment variance, r = number of replicates, and VE = environmental variance. Student’s t-tests (P < 0.05) were applied to compare lines classified by genotype [30, 31].

Bulked Segregant Analysis and Exome sequencing

Total genomic DNAs were isolated from young leaves of the tested cultivars and RILs using a CTAB method followed by RNase-A digestion [32]. Isolated DNA was quality checked by resolving on a 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and concentration was determined using a UV spectrometer [33, 34]. Two DNA pools were constructed by mixing equal amounts of DNA normalized to the concentration 100 ng/µL from 30 extreme SS (SS-pool) and 30 normal spike types (NS-pool), respectively. The DNA libraries were constructed through DNA fragmentation, end-repair, adaptor ligation, PCR and hybridization capture as previously described [35]. Curated sequence data was aligned to the CS reference genome sequence (RefSeq) v2.1 by BWA software [36]. The BCFtools software was used to detect and extract the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and InDel [37]. The SNP and InDel were annotated using ANNOVAR, which mainly included different regions of the genome and different types of exon regions [38]. SNP-index methods were used to screen the SNP and InDel sites with candidate regions between the progeny mixed pools in this study [39,40,41,42]. To identify candidate regions associated with the SS trait, the ΔSNP-index of each locus was calculated by subtracting the SNP-index of the SS-pool from that of the NS-pool according to previous method [43]. To confirm the results of ΔSNP-index, an algorithm was further performed to identify the SNPs and InDels associated with the SS trait using the equation reported previously [31, 40], and the absolute value of Δ(SNP-index) was used for Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS) to obtain the correlation threshold [2]. The greater the ΔSNP-index, the more likely the SNPs and InDels contribute to the trait of SS or is linked to a locus that controls the trait.

Marker development, genetic map construction and QTL identification

To validate the BSE-seq results and further narrow down the region, primers were designed to the flank the sequences of the targeted SNPs using an online tool of the wheatomics platform (http://wheatomics.sdau.edu.cn/PrimerServer/). Polymorphic SNPs between YP and CS in the initial mapping region were converted to KASP markers following previously described methods [44]. The PCR for InDel primers was conducted in a 20 µL reaction volume with 1.0 µM primer mix, 2.5 ng/µL DNA and 1× Taq Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, CN). PCR was performed using routine procedures, and the polyacrylamide gel (8%) electrophoresis was used for resolving amplified products [34]. The polymorphisms of the markers were confirmed by parental liens and some progenies.

Linkage mapping was conducted using JoinMap v4.0 [45]. The maximum likelihood mapping algorithm and Kosambi’s function were used to determine the marker order and distance, respectively. QTL analysis of SS trait was performed by Interval Mapping (IM) with the software MapQTL v5.0 [46]. For each trial, a test of 1,000 permutations was performed to identify the LOD threshold corresponding to a genome-wide false discovery rate of 1% (P < 0.01).

QTL validation

For QTL validation, the NSS from all homozygous lines in each of the three RIL populations (YCM, YJ and NY2) were counted. Based on marker profiles, individuals in each population were grouped into two classes as described above, and the difference in the average spikelet number between these classes was used for measuring the QTL effects within each validation population. The Student’s t-test was used to determine the significance in differences between the two groups in each population at P < 0.05.

Prediction of candidate genes for QTL

The physical interval of QTL was obtained by conducting a homolog search of the flanking makers against the Chinese Spring reference genome (IWGSC_Refseq v2.1), and the genes mapped to the region were identified. Further, information on the genes were obtained from the wheatomics platform (http://wheatomics.sdau.edu.cn/). The expression values as transcripts per million (TPM) in roots, stems, leaves, spikes, and grain were obtained from the GeneExpression of Wheatomics platform. Genes were annotated through BLAST against the corresponding protein sequences in rice and Arabidopsis thaliana on KOBAS v3.0 [47]. The total RNA was extracted by using the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen, CN) from CS and YP at the correct stage, and the products after reverse transcription were used for quantitative RT-qPCR. The genomic DNA of parents was used to amplify candidate genes for sequence analysis.

Results

The NSS of YC RIL population in different environments

In the different environments, the NSS of CS remained stable at 0, while that of YP ranged from 56.4 to 65.8, with the NSS of YP being significantly (P < 0.01) higher than that of CS (Table 1; Fig. 1). The NSS trait in YC population was also observed in different environments, ranged from 0 to 63.6, and the broad-sense heritability was estimated as 0.96 (Table 1). The correlation coefficients between the different environments were all significant and ranged from 0.922 (P < 0.01) to 0.982 (P < 0.01) (Table 2). The BLUE values of SNS, GWS, TGW, GNS, GL, GW, FLL and FLW were shown in Table 1 and were used to assess the effect of SS QTL on these traits.

Table 1 Distribution of NSS in the YC population
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Spike features of YuPi branching wheat (YP) and Chinese spring wheat (CS)

Full size image
Table 2 Correlation coefficients for the NSS in the YC population
Full size table

BSE-seq analysis

The results obtained from the exome capture sequencing of bulked segregants were compared with the CS reference genome v2.1. We use the ΔSNP-index algorithm to calculate the allele segregation of the SNPs and InDels between two extreme DNA pools. ΔSNP-index algorithm showed abundant candidate SNPs/InDels enriched on chromosome 2 A and 2D (Chr2A and Chr2D). ΔSNP-index greater than 95% confidence interval was selected as the threshold for screening [48]. A 16.3 Mb region of Chr2A (63.8–80.1 Mb) and a 9.1 Mb region of Chr2D (68.1–77.2 Mb) were identified as the candidate regions for SS trait (Figure S1).

Linkage map construction and QTL identification

To confirm the preliminarily identified genomic regions responsible for SS trait, SNPs and InDels in the target regions were converted into KASP and InDel markers, and were used for the construction of the genetic map. In total, 13 KASP markers and one InDel marker were used for the construction of the genetic maps. Six KASP markers developed for Chr2A generated a linkage map spanning 18.0 cM, while seven KASP markers and one InDel marker developed for Chr2D generated a linkage map spanning 25.2 cM (Fig. 2, Table S1). The phenotypic data of SS trait evaluated in the three environments were used for QTL mapping. Two stable QTLs named QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D were detected in three environments and BLUE. QSS.sicau-2 A located between A11 and A17, explained 13.7–15.9% of the phenotypic variance with the LOD values ranging from 6.9 to 8.1. QSS.sicau-2D located between INDEL and D3, explained 27.4–32.9% of the phenotypic variance with the LOD values ranging from 15.0 to 18.7 (Table 3). The favorable alleles of the two QTL were all contributed by YP.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Linkage map of chromosome 2 A and chromosome 2D. (a) Physical map of chr2A, with QSS.sicau-2 A mapped on a region of the 3.0 cM genetic map. (b) Physical map of Chr2D, with QSS.sicau-2D mapped on a region of the 1.8 cM genetic map

Full size image
Table 3 QTL analysis for SS in different environments and the BLUE datasets
Full size table

Effects of supernumerary spikelet QTL in different genetic backgrounds

Three KASP markers (A4, D3, 2DYC) and one InDel marker (INDEL) were used to assess the effects of QTL on NSS in validation populations (A4 is linked to QSS.sicau-2 A and exhibits polymorphism across the three validation populations. INDEL, 2DYC and D3 are linked to QSS.sicau-2D and exhibit polymorphism in YJ, G2 and NY2 populations, respectively). In YJ population, the average NSS in homozygous “AA, DD” genotype was 17.71, that was significantly (P < 0.01) increased than that in homozygous “aa, dd”, “AA, dd” and “aa, DD” genotypes. Similarly, in G2 and NY2 populations, the average NSS in homozygous “AA, DD” genotypes were 15.75 and 14.52, respectively, that significantly (P < 0.01) increased than that in other three homozygous genotypes (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effects of QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D on NSS in the validation populations. (a) YP/CM104 RIL population. (b) YP/CM107 RIL population. (c) YP /11N21 RIL population. ** indicate significance level at P < 0.01 by the Student’s t-test. NSS, the number of SS per spike

Full size image

Candidate gene prediction

According to the CS genome (IWGSC Refseq v2.1), QSS.sicau-2 A was located between 70.6 Mb and 78.2 Mb on Chr2A, and 91 high-confidence genes, including WFZP-A (TraesCS2A03G0239400) spanned the region. Sequence analysis of the WFZP-A (Table S2), revealed a 4-bp deletion in WFZP-A resulting a frame-shift in YP (Figure S2, Table S3), and the variation type is consistent with Zang734 [49]. These results suggest that WFZP-A is likely responsible for QSS.sicau-2 A.

QSS.sicau-2D was mapped between 72.7 Mb and 75.1 Mb on Chr2D, revealing 34 high-confidence genes in the region (Table S4). Eight spike/grain-specific genes were identified by gene expression of WheatOmics (http://202.194.139.32/expression/index.html), that might probably be involved in spike growth and development (Table S5, Figure S3). Exome sequencing data of YP reveal one T to A substitution which converts the codon (TAT) to a translational stop codon (TAA) in TraesCS2D03G0260700 (Fig. 4). Additionally, we examined the coding sequences of the known branching gene WZFP-D (TraesCS2D03G0248500, chr2D: 69,940,372.69,941,615). No sequence variation between YP and CS was identified for WZFP-D, and no significant difference (P > 0.05) in gene expression in YP and CS (Figure S4, Table S3).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Variation sequence and expression patterns of TraesCS2D03G0260700. (a) The nucleotide of YP and CS are shown in red and black, respectively. (b) The amino acid sequence encoded by the TraesCS2D03G0260700 in YP and CS. (c) TraesCS2D03G0260700 expression patterns in different tissues, the data (TPM value) were downloaded from the GeneExpression of WheatOmics (http://wheatomics.sdau.edu.cn/). Z10, first leaf through coleoptile. Z13, 3 leaves unfolded. Z23, main shoot and 3 tillers. Z30, pseudo stem erection. Z32, 2nd node detectable. Z39, flag leaf ligule/collar just visible. Z65, anthesis half-way. Z71, caryopsis water ripe. Z75, medium milk. Z85, soft dough

Full size image

Effects of QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D on yield-related traits

Two QTL, QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D, were identified in YC population. Their effects on the yield-related traits were analyzed by linking markers. The YC population was divided into four genotypes of “aa, dd” “AA, dd”, “aa, DD” and “AA, DD” by molecular markers. The SNS, GNS and GWS of homozygous “AA, DD” genotypes were significantly higher than that of other three genotypes, the TGW, GL and GW of homozygous “AA, DD” genotypes were significantly lower than that of other three genotypes (Fig. 5a and f). Additionally, the FLL and FLW were not affected by QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D (Fig. 5g and h).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D on grain traits and flag leaf. Bar pattern and significance analysis of (a) SNS, (b) GNS, (c) GWS, (d) TGW, (e) GL, (f) GW, (g) FLL and (h) FLW. Each bar shows mean ± SD. Different letters indicate significance level at P < 0.05 by the Tukey’s test. SNS, spikelets number per spike. GNS, grain number per spike. GWS, grain weight per spike. TGW, thousand gain weight. GL, grain length. GW, grain width. FLL, flag leaf length. FLW, flag leaf width

Full size image

Discussion

The complexity of the wheat genome combined with the fewer spikelet number mutants, hinder the identification of beneficial variants associated with spikelet number. To enhance the yield potential of wheat, breeders have tried to alter its sink capacity by modifying spike morphology [50]. The supernumerary spikelet (SS) character of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an abnormal spike morphology with extra spikelets per rachis node. In some materials, the SS trait was unstable, and some environmental factors and photoperiod could affect the expression of bh gene for SS character [51, 52]. In this study, YP maintained SS trait in multiple environments, which provides an available germplasm resource for improving wheat spikelets.

Comparison of QTL identified for wheat spikelet number with previous studies

In recent years, many QTLs related to SNS have been widely reported and were mapped to all 21 chromosomes of wheat [14, 53,54,55,56]. QSns.Y4Y-2 A, a QTL related to SNS, was detected in multiple environments and mapped between 85.6 Mb and 91.1 Mb [57]. Li [58] found one local cultivar YM44 that has SS phenotype, which was linked to the marker Xwmc522 and cfd56 mapped on chromosome 2 A and 2D, respectively, and further confirmed that WFZP-A is the functional gene of chromosome 2 A that causes SS phenotype. In this study, we found that WFZP-A (Chr2A: 71,582,645.71,583,948) exists in the QSS.sicau-2 A (70.6–78.2 Mb) interval, and the similar variation existed in YP by the sequences analysis of WFZP-A in YP and CS (Figure S2). Therefore, we speculate that WFZP-A may be responsible for QSS.sicau-2 A.

In addition, several QTL controlling SNS trait have been reported on chromosome 2D in wheat. QSns.sau-2D was mapped on chromosome arm 2DS flanked by the markers AX-109,836,946 (32.8 Mb) and AX-111,956,072 (34.4 Mb) [59]. Gene Mrs1 on the short arm of chromosome 2D, that closely linked to Xgwm 484 (50.6 Mb), and further identified the candidate gene WFZP-D (chr2D: 69,940,372.69,941,615) by homologous function annotation [22, 60]. In this study, QSS.sicau-2D was mapped to the genomic region of Chr2D between 72.7- and 75.1 Mb, and no overlap between the QTL interval associated with SNS and indicating QSS.sicau-2D may be a novel QTL for SS trait.

Potential candidate genes for QSS.sicau-2D

To screen the candidate gene for QSS.sicau-2D, we amplified WFZP-D in the cDNA of both parents even though WFZP-D is not in the interval of QSS.sicau-2D. The results showed that WFZP-D had no sequence difference between YP and CS. Furthermore, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the expression of WFZP-D in YP and CS by RT-qPCR analysis (Figure S4). One SNP was identified between CS and YP 60 bp downstream of the WFZP-D and a KASP marker named D21 was developed to assay the polymorphism. The D21 marker was mapped 9.4 cM away from QSS.sicau-2D in the reconstructed genetic map (Figure S5). These results indicated the WFZP-D is not the candidate gene for QSS.sicau-2D.

Eight spikelet/grain specific expressed genes were identified in the QSS.sicau-2D region, among which, one SNP converts the codon (TAT) to a translational stop codon (TAA) of TraesCS2D03G0260700 in YP by exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing analysis. In addition, TraesCS2D03G0260700 encoding cyclin-like F-box domain protein, and previous studies have shown that cyclin-like F-box domain is specifically expressed in wheat inflorescence and involved in the development of wheat inflorescence [61,62,63,64,65]. Overall, TraesCS2D03G0260700 was predicted to be a potential candidate gene for QSS.sicau-2D.

Effects of QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D on yield-related traits

Consistent with previous studies, GL, GW and TGW have decreased while GNS has increased, with the increase of SNS (Fig. 5), such as a single mutation in WFZP-D can significantly increase the SNS and GNS [49, 58, 59]. GWS is an important trait influencing wheat yield [66]. In this study, we found that the GWS exhibited a significant increase in YC population when QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D coexisted. This may be attributed to the compensatory increase in grain number per spike (GNS) offsetting the decrease in thousand-grain weight (TGW). In conclusion, the SS trait have the value of increasing the yield potential of wheat.

Conclusion

In this study, two major SS QTL were identified in multi-environments and validated in different genetic populations. QSS.sicau-2D is a new QTL of SS trait, and predicted TraesCS2D03G0260700 to be its candidate gene. At the same time, the combined effect of QSS.sicau-2 A and QSS.sicau-2D significantly increased GWS, which has the application value of increasing the yield potential of wheat.

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) SRA repository under accession number PRJNA1041571.

References

  1. Ji GS, Xu ZB, Fan XL, Zhou Q, Yu Q, Liu XF, et al. Identification of a major and stable QTL on chromosome 5A confers spike length in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Mol Breeding. 2021;41:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ji GS, Xu ZB, Fan XL, Zhou Q, Chen LG, Yu Q, et al. Identification and validation of major QTL for grain size and weight in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Crop J. 2023;11(2):564–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Simmonds J, Scott P, Leverington-Waite M, Turner AS, Brinton J, Korzun V, et al. Identification and independent validation of a stable yield and thousand grain weight QTL on chromosome 6A of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L). BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikeda K, Ito M, Nagasawa N, Kyozuka J, Nagato Y. Rice ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION 1, encoding an F-box protein, regulates meristem fate. Plant J. 2007;51(6):1030–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolde GM, Trautewig C, Mascher M, Schnurbusch T. Genetic insights into morphometric inflorescence traits of wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132:1661–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu HY, Wang K, Tang HL, Gong Q, Du LP, Pei XW, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of wheat TaQ genes alters spike morphogenesis and grain threshability. J Genet Genomics. 2020;479:563–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coen ES, Nugent JM. Evolution of flowers and inflorescences Development, 1994 (Supplement): 107–16.

  8. Poursarebani N, Seidensticker T, Koppolu R, Trautewig C, Gawronski P, Bini F, et al. The genetic basis of composite spike form in barley and ‘Miracle-Wheat’. Genetics. 2015;201(1):155–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu Y, Wagner D. Plant inflorescence architecture: The formation, activity, and fate of axillary meristems Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2020;12(1):a034652.

  10. Yen C, Zheng YL, Yang JL. An ideotype for high yield breeding in theory and practice. Proceedings of the 8th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Beijing, China. Edited by ZS Li and ZY Xin. 1993;(pp: 1113–1118).

  11. Rajaram S. Prospects and promise of wheat breeding in the 21st century. Euphytica. 2001;119(1–2):3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng ZS, Song XH, Zhang M. Cytogenetic studies on supernumerary spikelet wheat. Seed. 2000;(03): 3–6.

  13. Ma ZQ, Zhao DM, Zhang CQ, Zhang ZZ, Xue SL, Lin F, et al. Molecular genetic analysis of five spike-related traits in wheat using RIL and immortalized F2 populations. Mol Genet Genomics. 2007;277:31–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen ZY, Cheng XJ, Chai LL, Wang ZH, Du DJ, Wang ZH, et al. Pleiotropic QTL influencing spikelet number and heading date in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133:1825–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cui F, Ding AM, Li J, Zhao CH, Wang L, Wang XQ, et al. QTL detection of seven spike-related traits and their genetic correlations in wheat using two related RIL populations. Euphytica. 2012;186:177–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhai HJ, Feng ZY, Li J, Liu XY, Xiao SH, Ni ZF, et al. QTL analysis of spike morphological traits and plant height in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a high-density SNP and SSR-based linkage map. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou YP, Conway B, Miller D, Marshall D, Cooper A, Murphy P, et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping for spike characteristics in hexaploidy wheat. Plant Genome. 2017;10(2):plantgenome2016–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu K, Sun XX, Ning TY, Duan XX, Wang QL, Liu TT, et al. Genetic dissection of wheat panicle traits using linkage analysis and a genome-wide association study. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131:1073–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li G, Kuijer HNJ, Yang XJ, Liu HR, Shen CQ, Shi J, et al. MADS1 maintains barley spike morphology at high ambient temperatures. Nat Plants. 2021;78:1093–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ikeda K, Maekawa M, Izawa T, Itoh JI, Nagato Y. ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION 2/RFL, the rice ortholog of Arabidopsis LEAFY, suppresses the transition from inflorescence meristem to floral meristem through interaction with APO1. Plant J. 2012;69:168–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshida A, Sasao M, Yasuno N, Takagi K, Daimon Y, Chen RH, et al. TAWAWA1, a regulator of rice inflorescence architecture, functions through the suppression of meristem phase transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(2):767–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dobrovolskaya O, Pont C, Sibout R, Martinek P, Badaeva E. FRIZZY PANICLE drives supernumerary spikelets in bread wheat. Plant Physiol. 2015;167:189–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. James B, Adrian T, Simon G, John W, Snape DA, Laurie. A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115:721–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shaw LM, Bo L, Turner R, Li C, Dubcovsky J. FLOWERING LOCUS T2 (FT2) regulates spike development and fertility in temperate cereals. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(1):193–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuzay S, Xu YF, Zhang JL, Katz A, Pearce S, Su ZQ, et al. Identification of a candidate gene for a QTL for spikelet number per spike on wheat chromosome arm 7AL by high-resolution genetic mapping. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132:2689–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Greenwood JR, Finnegan EJ, Watanabe N, Trevaskis B, Swain SM. New alleles of the wheat domestication gene Q reveal multiple roles in growth and reproductive development. Development. 2017;144:1959–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakuma S, Golan G, Guo ZF, Ogawa T, Tagiri A, Sugimoto K et al. Unleashing floret fertility in wheat through the mutation of a homeobox gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(11):5182–5187.

  28. Peng ZS, Yen C, Yang JL. Genetic control of supernumerary spikelet in common wheat line LYB. Wheat Inform Service. 1998;86:6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peng ZS, Yen C, Yang JL. Chromosomal location of genes for supernumerary spikelet in bread wheat. Euphytica. 1998;103:109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith SE, Kuehl RO, Ray IM, Hui R, Soleri D. Evaluation of simple methods for estimating broad-sense heritability in stands of randomly planted genotypes. Crop Sci. 1998;38(5):1125–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lei L, Zheng HL, Bi YL, Yang LM, Liu HL, Wang JG, et al. Identification of a major QTL and candidate gene analysis of salt tolerance at the bud burst stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using QTL-Seq and RNA-Seq. Rice. 2020;13:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Allen GC, Flores-Vergara MA, Krasynanski S, Kumar S, Thompson WF. A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2320–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1984;81(24):8014–8018.

  34. Yu Q, Feng B, Xu ZB, Fan XL, Zhou Q, Ji GS, et al. Genetic dissection of Three Major Quantitative Trait Loci for Spike Compactness and length in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:882655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Guo ZF, Yang QN, Huang FF, Zheng HJ, Sang ZQ, Xu YF et al. Development of high-resolution multiple-SNP arrays for genetic analyses and molecular breeding through genotyping by target sequencing and liquid chip. Plant Commun. 2021;2(6).

  36. Zhu TT, Wang L, Rimvert H, Rodriguez JC, Deal KR, Oliveria RD, et al. Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum Cv. Chinese spring genome assembly. Plant J. 2021;107(1):303–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Danecek P, Stephan S, Richard D. Multiallelic calling model in bcftools (-m). 2014.

  38. Wang K, Li MY, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(16):e164–164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, Natsume S, Takagi H, Kanzaki H, et al. Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:174–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hill JT, Demarest BL, Bisgrove BW, Gorsi B, Su YC, Yost HJ. MMAPPR: mutation mapping analysis pipeline for pooled RNA-seq. Genome Res. 2013;23:687–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Takagi H, Abe A, Yoshida K, Kosugi S, Natsume S, Mitsuoka C, et al. QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 2013;74(1):174–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Li CL, Ling FL, Su GH, Sun WF, Liu HS, Su YC, et al. Location and mapping of the NCLB resistance genes in maize by bulked segregant analysis (BSA) using whole genome re-sequencing. Mol Breeding. 2020;40:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Han YH, Khu DM, Monteros MJ. High-resolution melting analysis for SNP genotyping and mapping in tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L). Mol Breeding. 2019;29:489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tan CT, Yu HJ, Yang Y, Xu XY, Chen MS, Rudd JC, et al. Development and validation of KASP markers for the greenbug resistance gene Gb7 and the hessian fly resistance gene H32 in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2017;130:1867–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Van Ooijen JW. Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations Kyazma BV. Wageningen, Netherlands. 2006.

  46. Van Ooijen JW. MapQTL version 5.0, software for the map-ping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations. Wageningen: Kyazma BV; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chen A, Kong L. CGPS: a machine learning-based approach integrating multiple gene set analysis tools for better prioritization of biologically relevant pathways. J Genet Genomics. 2018;45:489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Luo W, Zhou JG, Liu JJ, Liu YL, Mu Y, Tang HP, et al. Fine mapping of the hairy glume (hg) gene in a chromosome variation region at the distal terminus of 1AS. Front Plant Sci. 2012;13:1006510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Du DJ, Zhang DX, Yuan J, Feng M, Li ZJ, Wang ZH, et al. FRIZZY PANICLE defines a regulatory hub for simultaneously controlling spikelet formation and awn elongation in bread wheat. New Phytol. 2021;231:814–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Reynolds MP, Rajaram S, Sayre KD. Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post–green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Sci. 1999;39(6):1611–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. PENNELL A, Halloran GM. Influence of vernalization and photoperiod on supernumerary spikelet expression in wheat. Ann Botany. 1984;53(6):821–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Swaminathan MS, Chopra VL, Sastry GRK. Expression and stability of an induced mutation for ear branching in bread wheat. Curr Sci. 1966;35(4):91–2.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Katz A, Byrne P, Reid S, Bratschun S, Haley S, Pearce S. Identification and validation of a QTL for spikelet number on chromosome arm 6BL of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Mol Breeding. 2022;42(4):17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Jiang C, Xu ZB, Fan XL, Zhou Q, Ji GS, Chen LG, et al. Identification and validation of quantitative trait loci for fertile spikelet number per spike and grain number per fertile spikelet in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Theor Appl Genet. 2023;136(4):69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kuang CH, Zhao XF, Yang K, Zhang ZP, Ding L, Pu ZE, et al. Mapping and characterization of major QTL for spike traits in common wheat. Physiol Mol Biology Plants. 2020;26:1295–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Koppolu R, Schnurbusch T. Developmental pathways for shaping spike inflorescence architecture in barley and wheat. J Integr Plant Biol. 2019;61(3):278–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hu WJ, Zhu DM, Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhao D, Liao S, et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping for heading date and spikelet number in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based on two recombinant inbred line populations. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2023;70:1179–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Li YP, Li L, Zhao MC, Guo L, Guo XX, Zhao D, et al. Wheat FRIZZY PANICLE activates VERNALIZATION1-A and HOMEOBOX4‐A to regulate spike development in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19(6):1141–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ma J, Ding PY, Liu JJ, Li T, Zou YY, Habib A, et al. Identification and validation of a major and stably expressed QTL for spikelet number per spike in bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132:3155–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Dobrovolskaya O, Martinek P, Voylokov AV, Korzun V, Röder MS, Börner A. Microsatellite mapping of genes that determine supernumerary spikelets in wheat (T. aestivum) and rye (S. cereale). Theoretical and applied genetics. 2009;119:867–874.

  61. Hong MJ, Kim JB, Seo YW, Kim DY. F-box genes in the wheat genome and expression profiling in wheat at different developmental stages. Genes. 2020;11:1154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Li HY, Wei CR, Meng YY, Fan RQ, Zhao WQ, Wang XD, et al. Identification and expression analysis of some wheat F-box subfamilies during plant development and infection by Puccinia Triticina. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;155:535–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kipreos ET, Pagano M. The F-box protein family. Genome Biol. 2000;1:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang XB, Gonzalez-Carranza ZH, Zhang SL, Miao YC, Liu CJ, Roberts JA. F-Box proteins in plants. Annu Plant Rev. 2019;2:307–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hong MJ, Kim DY, Kang SY, Kim DS, Kim JB, Seo YW. Wheat F-box protein recruits proteins and regulates their abundance during wheat spike development. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:9681–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Protich R, Todorovich G, Protich N. Grain weight per spike of wheat using different ways of seed protection. Bulgarian J Agricultural Sci. 2012;18(2):185–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by the Key Program of Sichuan Natural Science Foundation (2022NSFSC0015), the Key Research of State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China (SKL-KF202212) and the Research of State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China (SKL-ZY202231).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhiqiang Wang and Haojie Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China, Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, Chengdu, 611130, China

    Zhiqiang Wang, Haojie Li, Xinjian Zhou, Yuzhou Mou, Ying Zhang, Lang Yu, Xudong Chen, Fangkun Wu, Hong Zhou, Yu Lin, Caixia Li & Yaxi Liu

  2. Chengdu Agricultural College, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China

    Zhiqiang Wang

Authors
  1. Zhiqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haojie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xinjian Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuzhou Mou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xudong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fangkun Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yu Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Caixia Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yaxi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YXL designed and supervised the project. ZQW and HJL performed most of the experiments, with the assistance of XJZ, YZM, YZ, LY and XDC. FKW, HZ, YL and CXL participated in data analysis. ZQW drafted the manuscript and revised by YXL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaxi Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No specific permit is required for the samples in this study. We comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation for plant studies.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Li, H., Zhou, X. et al. Identification, validation and candidate gene analysis of major QTL for Supernumerary spikelets in wheat. BMC Genomics 25, 675 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10540-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10540-7

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us