- Research article
- Open Access
Factorial microarray analysis of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha: Dreissenidae, Bivalvia) adhesion
© Xu and Faisal; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 6 December 2009
Accepted: 28 May 2010
Published: 28 May 2010
The zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) has been well known for its expertise in attaching to substances under the water. Studies in past decades on this underwater adhesion focused on the adhesive protein isolated from the byssogenesis apparatus of the zebra mussel. However, the mechanism of the initiation, maintenance, and determination of the attachment process remains largely unknown.
In this study, we used a zebra mussel cDNA microarray previously developed in our lab and a factorial analysis to identify the genes that were involved in response to the changes of four factors: temperature (Factor A), current velocity (Factor B), dissolved oxygen (Factor C), and byssogenesis status (Factor D). Twenty probes in the microarray were found to be modified by one of the factors. The transcription products of four selected genes, DPFP-BG20_A01, EGP-BG97/192_B06, EGP-BG13_G05, and NH-BG17_C09 were unique to the zebra mussel foot based on the results of quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). The expression profiles of these four genes under the attachment and non-attachment were also confirmed by qRT-PCR and the result is accordant to that from microarray assay. The in situ hybridization with the RNA probes of two identified genes DPFP-BG20_A01 and EGP-BG97/192_B06 indicated that both of them were expressed by a type of exocrine gland cell located in the middle part of the zebra mussel foot.
The results of this study suggested that the changes of D. polymorpha byssogenesis status and the environmental factors can dramatically affect the expression profiles of the genes unique to the foot. It turns out that the factorial design and analysis of the microarray experiment is a reliable method to identify the influence of multiple factors on the expression profiles of the probesets in the microarray; therein it provides a powerful tool to reveal the mechanism of zebra mussel underwater attachment.
The Eurasian, non-native mollusk, the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), invaded the Laurentian Great Lakes in the 1980 s and has expanded since then to other regions in North America [1, 2]. The spread of the zebra mussel has been followed by ecologic and economic devastation of unprecedented magnitude . Through their unique ability to attach to underwater surfaces, the invading mussels interfered with navigation and flow of industrial effluents, a problem that has caused billions of dollars in losses [4, 5]. Moreover, the selective filtering capacity of the zebra mussel has modified the microbial communities in the Great Lakes to the extent that some resident species have become endangered and others are facing extinction . The problem is compounded by the fact that all control methods used to minimize the zebra mussel invasion impacts have been unsuccessful [6–8]. As a result, a pressing need has emerged to unravel the strategies used by the invading mollusk to survive and mechanisms governing its firm attachment to underwater surfaces.
The zebra mussel is unique among freshwater bivalves in that in the most of the life cycle, from post-veliger stage through adult stage, it keeps its byssus, a group of exocrine glands embedded in the mussel's foot that secretes threads with attachment pads through byssogenesis [9, 10]. Except for the morphological characteristics, the biochemical nature of the byssus and processes involved in zebra mussel's adhesion to substrates remain largely unexplored. The byssus apparatus is considered to be a masterpiece of underwater bioadhesion because of the rapid and robust production, as well as the relatively simple components of adhesive proteins . The silver hair-like structure that can be seen out of shells in most natural conditions is called byssal threads. All of the byssal threads are generated from the stem located at the root of the foot. The enlarged plaque end of the byssal thread is the structure holding all the adhesive proteins at the interface of the byssal thread and substrata surface. In the zebra mussel, the byssus also includes three main glands located in the foot, namely, the stem-forming gland, thread-forming land, and plaque-forming gland. The proteins needed for byssal thread formation and adhesion are secreted by the glands and expelled to the groove of the ventral side in the foot and transported out of the organ. The anatomic structure of the zebra mussel byssus and the production of the adhesive proteins have been well described by Rzepecki and Waite [9, 10].
Three main protein components have been reported to be involved in the formation of zebra mussel byssal threads, namely, D. polymorpha foot protein (Dpfp) -1, -2, and -3 [9, 10]. The preliminary studies on the Dpfp-1 and -2 suggested that both of these two foot proteins may serve as the component maintaining the byssal structures, rather than the adhesive proteins . Dpfp-1 and Dpfp-2 contain a number of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanines (DOPAs) in their primary sequence which significantly strengthen the cuticle of byssal threads .
Our previous studies have identified 716 genes that are unique to zebra mussel byssus using the suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) cDNA library technique . Besides the Dpfp-1 and -2, a number of molecules with different putative functions have also been produced by byssus glands, such as the excretory gland peptides homologous to the salivary gland peptides of Ixodes spp. , host defense related molecules, and the proteins without predictable functions. The subsequently developed cDNA microarray with these 716 unique genes was used to compare the expression profiles of the gland unique genes under different attachment status. The results indicated that the expressions of 52 genes are either up or down regulated in the attachment status . It is suggested that the microarray technique can be used as a high-throughput tool to study the mechanism of zebra mussel attachment at the molecular level.
Zebra mussel attachment is influenced by several environmental factors including water temperature , dissolved oxygen level , and current velocity . The mechanism(s) by which these factors influence zebra mussel attachment is currently unknown and involves a large number of molecules. Identifying the influence of environmental conditions on gene encoding is rather complicated and may require a novel way of computation and statistical analysis. In this context, the studies of retinal development in zebra fish (Danio rerio) have adapted the multifactorial analysis to cDNA microarray data and proved useful in deciphering the complicated developmental process . The factorial microarray analysis allows us to analyze the effects of more than one independent variable (the main factors involved in this study) on a dependent variable (the differentiation of gene expression) [21, 22]. In this study, a non-reference loop experimental design was performed to test the effects of multiple environmental factors on the expression profiles of the byssus unique genes. This experimental design has been reported as a reliable design that leads to less disparity in precision and power comparisons between any two groups .
The purpose of the factorial design that we are going to describe here is to identify the influence of the temperature, water current velocity, dissolved oxygen, and byssogenesis status on the expression profiles of the molecules unique to zebra mussel byssus glands to thereby to better understand the mechanism of zebra mussel attachment under the complex underwater environment.
Overview of the factorial analysis results
The genes whose expression profiles have been significantly modified by the change of experimental factors
Factor A (Temperature)
AAT92111.1| Excretory gland peptide NPL-2 [Ixodes pacificus]
BAE93436.1| Shematrin-4 [Pinctada fucata]
AAV80789.1| Excretory gland peptide [Ixodes scapularis]
AAV80789.1| Excretory gland peptide [Ixodes scapularis]
Factor B (Water agitation)
Factor C (Dissolved oxygen)
Factor D (Attachment status)
AAV80789.1| Excretory salivary gland peptide [Ixodes scapularis]
AAS92593.1| Excretory/secretory protein Juv-p120 precursor [Litomosoides sigmodontis]
AAV80789.1| Excretory gland peptide [Ixodes scapularis]
AAV80789.1| Excretory gland peptide [Ixodes scapularis]
ABI52762.1| 60S ribosomal protein L27 [Argas monolakensis]
AAN05585.1| Ribosomal protein L22 [Argopecten irradians]
While the gene expression profiles had been changed, however, the type and numbers of differentially expressed genes differed with each experimental factor used. At a 95% confidence level (P < 0.05), 73 genes (10% of the total genes on the slide) were differentially expressed by the accessibility of the mussel to attachment surfaces (S1). At the same confidence level, 27 genes (4% of the total number of genes) were found either up- or down-regulated with the temperature increased from 4°C to the room temperature of 22°C (S2). Twenty-six of the genes (4% of the total genes) were modulated by the level of dissolved oxygen (D.O.), which was close to that in the temperature group (S3). Surprisingly, only nine genes, 1% of the whole probesets on the array, were identified with their expression levels influenced by the current velocity (S4). With the P values set at 0.01, fewer probes were identified. Ten probes had their expression profiles modified by the status of attachment. Five genes demonstrated significantly different expression levels with the temperature change. With the level change, each of the other two environmental factors, D.O. and current velocity, modulated the transcription profiles of two genes only (Table 1).
RNA in situ hybridization
The factorial analysis used in this study was designed as three enclosed loops encompassing four biological replicates for each treatment. This design allowed the estimation of the effects of the experimental factors with a minimal number of hybridized slides and a fairly high statistical power. In contrast to conventional microarray analysis, the factorial analysis is unique as it can properly estimate the potential effects of an experimental condition that was not directly included in the hybridization . Most importantly, the factorial analysis of microarrays employed in this study is optimal for studies involving aquatic animals, as they are exposed simultaneously to a multitude of environmental factors that are in continuous fluctuation. Similar loop designs of microarray data were successfully applied by Wit et al  and Zou et al  and proved efficient in comparing gene expression modification due to multiple treatments. Despite the clear advantages of the factorial analysis of microarray data, the false discovery rate (FDR) continues to be a problem that cannot be ignored . To minimize FDR, several statistical methods have been integrated into the microarray data analysis. In this study, we presented the data using both P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 as the cutoff for the microarray results. Subsequent validation demonstrated that many of the differential expression, of several genes with either P values in our study were indeed positive.
Among the complete probesets identified by this array study, 62% were affected in response to adhesion status (Factor D), therefore, subsequent study of individual probes focused on this group of genes that were most probably associated with the zebra mussel's ability to attach. The four candidate genes selected for qRT-PCR were from this category. It was confirmed by qRT-PCR that after 48 hour treatment, the expression levels of these four genes were all upregulated during byssogenesis; however, curves of the relative expression levels of the four genes during the three-day byssognesis were not consistent. It is likely that these genes are involved at different stages during byssogenesis and are not always up- or downregulated. This periodical expression or depression may reflect the sequence of events of byssogenesis. Based on what has been observed in previous studies, within 12 hour post attachment, the temporary byssal threads are rapidly produced. Starting from 24 hours post attachment, permanent byssal threads become dominant . The genes differentially expressed at these time points are very likely to be involved in the production of temporary or permanent byssal threads.
One of the identified genes, DPFP-BG20_A01, that had been validated by qRT-PCR is homologous to the Dpfp1, which was previously identified as an important protein for byssal thread structure [9, 10] and was located by immunohistochemistry along the ventral groove of the zebra mussel foot . The in situ hybridization performed in this study located DPFP-BG20_A01 in an area along the groove of the mussel's foot that is dominated by thread forming glands . It is noticeable in this study that the expression profiles of many Dpfp-1 homologues were found in response to the change of adhesion status. This suggests that multiple foot proteins are involved in the byssogenesis of the zebra mussel in addition to the Dpfp-1. A number of foot proteins produced by byssus glands and playing different roles in the byssogenesis of Mytilids, another genus of mussels with a lifelong byssus apparatus, have been found over past decades [30–36]. It is very likely that, in the zebra mussel, there is also a group of foot proteins serving in different stages of byssogenesis.
Not only were foot proteins identified, but also the homologues of exocrine gland peptides (EGP)  were commonly found to be differentially expressed during byssogenesis. The transcription of one of the EGP-like molecules, EGP-BG97/192_B06, was also observed in the TFG cells area. This observation underscores the importance of these molecules in zebra mussel adhesion and that byssogenesis in the zebra mussel involves a myriad of proteins. The primary sequence of the EGP-BG97/192_B06 suggests its distinction from Dpfp-1, despite the domination of its amino acids with proline, tyrosine, aspartic acid, lysine, threonine, and glycine residues, which is similar to Dpfp-1 . However, according to Francischetti et al, the homologous genes encode for salivary gland peptides with a variety of functions in ticks, such as anti-coagulant, anti-microbial, and oxidant metabolism . In our analysis, the multiple sequences alignment with zebra mussel EGP-like genes in response to the byssogenic activities suggested that these molecules were structurally similar but not identical to each other. Therefore, their potential functions during byssogenesis are most likely different. It suggested that during the adhesion a number of molecules with various functions were involved in this process. Some of the molecules may be directly involved in the generation of the byssal threads and adhesive proteins, while others may play alternate roles in the complicated process such as protecting the byssal proteins from degeneration by microbes, releasing the adhesive proteins, and modification of byssal thread components.
Interestingly, more than one probeset in our data were homologous to Dpfp-1 or EGP encoding gene. However, the result of sequence alignment analysis on these sequences suggested that these sequences did not belong to a single Dpfp-1 or EGP. It has been reported that Dpfp-1 has 10-15 variants in natural conditions and this is a very typical structure for DOPA proteins, which are the main proteins in zebra mussel plaques to maintain the dove-tail structure of adhesive matrix . It is very likely that the multiple Dpfp-1 homologues existing in our database are the different variants encoded by Dpfp-1 encoding gene; however, there's no evidence suggesting that EGP also has variants. If this hypothesis is also turned out to be true, the EGP can be also used by zebra mussel as another important matrix protein to sustain the adhesion structure in the plaque.
Multiple Dpfp-1 and EGP like protein coding genes were also identified in our previous study on the gene expression profile of zebra mussel during the byssogenesis . Although sharing same homologues, these molecules may be involved in different process during byssus activities. For example, the transcripts of Dpfp-1 like protein encoding gene (BG15_F03-DPFP) was found in plaque-forming gland cells in previous study, while in this study we localize another Dpfp-1 like probe (DPFP-BG20_A01) in stem-forming gland. It indicated that these two Dpfp-1 homologues were involved in the activity of plaque and stem of byssus gland respectively . Similarly, the transcripts of two EGP like protein encoding genes were also found differently distributed in zebra mussel foot . Therefore, further study the homologues of Dpfp-1 and EGP is an essential step toward understanding the regulation of zebra mussel byssus glands.
The results of the study demonstrated that that very few genes had their expression profiles affected by more than one experimental factor. This suggests that each of the experimental factors affected only a few zebra mussel genes involved in byssogenesis independently; i.e., no uniformal response to all factors exists. A series of experiments was done by Clark and McMahon in 1996 to analyze the effects of temperature , hypoxia , and current velocity  on byssogenesis rate under laboratory conditions. The change of the water temperature seems to have the most significant effect on byssogenesis rate. From 5°C to 30°C, every 10°C shift caused dramatic difference in the rate of byssal thread regeneration. Even 5°C increase led to a significant increase of the byssogenesis rate when the temperature was above 25°C . Our results demonstrated that the number of differentially expressed genes in response to temperature changes was the highest of the four factors tested (27 genes). On the contrary, the byssogenesis rate of the zebra mussel showed the least sensitivity to the change of current velocity. Only in a certain flow speed (0.2 m/s) was the byssogenesis rate of zebra mussel significantly higher than that in the other speeds (0.1 m/s, 0.15 m/s, 0.27 m/s) . Consistently, the least number of genes (9 genes) identified by microarray showed the significantly differential expressions during the change of the current velocity. Comparing the genes significantly affected by the four experimental factors, we can easily see that adhesion status, temperature, and dissolved oxygen level tends to affect the byssogenesis by modulating similar genes. For example, the homologues of Dpfp-1, EGP, C. elegans neuropeptide-like proteins (NP_504109 and NP_505834), and oyster shematrins (BAE93436)  were widely identified. It is possible that the temperature and oxygen level along with the adhesion status, affect the byssogenesis through the similar pathway, while the current velocity seems to control this process through a different pathway.
For the genes that were modified by multiple experimental factors, it is also very interesting to observe how environmental factors can affect gene expression in different directions. For example, BG23_B03 is downregulated in attached status, while is upregulated with the decrease of the temperature; while BG97/192_B06 can be upregulated in the attached status and downregulated by the dissolved oxygen level. What these gene-environmental factor interactions mean to zebra mussel attachment and associated mechanisms, cannot be easily answered, primarily due to the fact that the putative functions of these genes remain largely unknown. In conclusion, the factorial analysis of the microarray results provides important information on how their expression is influenced by important environmental factors. This newly generated knowledge will help to better understand the molecular mechanism of zebra mussel underwater adhesion.
The factorial analysis of zebra mussel adhesion mechanism has provided for us a great tool to learn about the role of the four experimental factors during the zebra mussel attachment under controlled laboratory conditions. One can easily speculate that in the mussel's complex aquatic habitat more genes are likely to be involved in the attachment process. Additional studies, also using cDNA microarray factorial analysis, deem necessary to decipher the mechanisms governing zebra mussel byssogenesis, a process that has devastated the fragile ecosystem in infested waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes basin.
Among the four factors tested in this study, the status of zebra mussel byssogenesis had the most obvious effect on the gene expression profiles of zebra mussel byssus genes. The other three factors, related to environment, also modulated the expression patterns of certain genes. Among the three environmental factors, the change of the temperature caused the differential expression of the most number of genes followed by the dissolved oxygen level in the water. The least number of genes were differentially expressed in response to the change of current velocity. This is highly consistent to the previous study on the byssogenesis rate influenced by environmental factors. Moreover, none of the genes were found with expression patterns affected by more than two experimental factors, which suggested the specificity of the byssus unique genes in response to the effects of the different factors. Produced by the zebra mussel thread-forming gland cells, the genes encoding DPFP-like protein and EGP-like protein are probably heavily involved in the zebra mussel byssogenesis in natural conditions.
Zebra mussel collection and maintenance
Zebra mussels used in this study were collected from Vineyard Lake in Brooklyn, MI, USA (Latitude: 42°4'59"N; Longitude: 84°12'34"W). The mussels were thoroughly cleaned and rinsed with deionized water several times before they were allowed to acclimate in aerated, filtered Vineyard Lake water for eight weeks. The mussels were kept in a glass tank and fed weekly with a pure culture of the algae Ankistrodesmus falcatus.
Treatments of zebra mussels and experimental design
This model includes the overall mean of gene expression (μ g ), the main effects coefficients (A, B, C, D), the two-way interactions (AB, BC, CD, AC, BD, AD), the three-way interactions (ABC, BCD, ABD, ACD), the four-way interaction (ABCD), and the error term (ε). In each effect, two levels were created. To create two different attachment statuses of the mussels, we severed the byssal threads from randomly selected mussels and put them back into the tanks in different orientations. The mussels lying on the ventral side of their shells for 48 hours were considered to be attached individuals with byssogenic activity (A) while the ones with ventral sides facing up for 48 hours were taken as detached mussels without byssogenesis (D). Two temperature levels were used in this study: room temperature (R) and a low temperature level at 4°C. The two dissolved oxygen (D. O.) levels used were the normal D. O. level (N), which was maintained by airstones at about 10 mg/L, and the lower D. O. level, which was about 5 mg/L without airstones. The current of the water was performed by using VWR 371 Hotplate/Stirrer (VWR International LLC, West Chester, PA) and a magnetic stirring bar with a stirring speed of 60 rpm (F). The static water was used as non-current condition of Factor B in the experiment (S).
The null hypothesis and the interpretation of tested probesets.
Interpretation when null hypothesis is rejected
H 0 : A = 0
The expression profile of certain genes is modified in response to the surrounding temperature.
H 0 : B = 0
The expression profile of the gene is modified by the change of water movement.
H 0 : C = 0
The expression profile of the gene is modified by dissolved oxygen level.
H 0 : D = 0
The expression profile of the gene is modified by byssogenic activity.
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
The total RNAs used for microarray hybridization were extracted from pools of zebra mussel feet with six individuals in each pool. Each treatment has four pools as four biological replicates. Therefore, the total number of zebra mussel used for each treatment is 6 × 4 = 24. The total RNA purification kit, 5-PRIME PerfectPure RNA Tissue Kit (5 PRIME Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) was used for RNA purification and the protocol followed the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNAs of all samples were quantified by Qubit® Quantitation Platform with the Quant-iT™ Broad Range RNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The integrity of RNA was detected by 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).
The RNAs were then reverse transcribed to single strand cDNAs by using SuperScript Plus Indirect cDNA Labeling Kit (Invitrogen) containing Alexa Fluor 555 & 647 fluorescent dyes. The cDNA syntheses and dye labeling procedures were all followed as described by the kit's instructions.
Microarray hybridization and data analyses
The zebra mussel byssus cDNA microarray was developed and printed in the Center for Animal Functional Genomics, Michigan State University . The cDNA microarray was designed based on the 750 genes obtained from a normalized cDNA library, which included 3% foot protein genes, 37% exocrine gland peptide encoding genes, 1% host defense related gene, 6% housekeeping genes, and 53% unknown genes .
The GeneTAC HybStation (Genomic Solutions) was used as the hybridizer for all hybridizations and an 18-hour step-down protocol was applied as described in our previous study . The hybridized dual-channel array slides were scanned by GenePix 4000B two-laser Scanner (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA), and GenePix Pro 6.0 (Molecular Devices) software was then used for image processing and spot intensity file generation. The spot density files were analyzed with the Limma software package . The preliminary data processing includes background correction, within array normalization, and between array normalization. The differentially expressed genes were determined by least square regression. The coefficients obtained for the experimental factors were based on the "sum-to-zero" parameterization. The logarithmic value of fold change of the gene expression under the effect of each factor was estimated by double the coefficient of each factor.
The false discovery rate (FDR) of the microarray used in this study was determined with a method described in our previous study . Briefly, two cDNA samples synthesized from same RNA template isolated from zebra mussel feet were labelled with ALEXA 555 and 647 respectively. Then the two samples were hybridized to a single array slide. Two replicates were performed in this assay. The array data was analyzed with Limma and all the differentially expressed probesets were considered to be false positive results. It turned out that when we use P < 0.01 as selection criteria, only one false positive gene was identified no matter how big the fold change is. Therefore, P < 0.01 was used as selection standard in this study. The meaning of log (FC) when it was positive was explained in the legend of Table 1. The homologues of the genes are listed with the accession numbers and putative functions, as well as with the names of the species (Table 1). The up- or down-regulation of the factor to probes was decided by the coefficient. The dataset of this microarray study was deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with the series accession number GSE16397. Some of the identified genes with similar primary structures were differentiated by multiple sequence alignment with ClustalW . The putative function of each identified gene was predicted based on the BLAST against the nucleotide database in GenBank.
Microarray data validation
The gene specific primers used for qRT-PCR.
5'-ATG GGC CAT ATG ATA AGA AAC CA-3'
5'-TCC AGG AGG TTC CAA TGG AA-3'
5'-CGG TTG CTA TAC ATG TGT CCA AGT-3'
5'-GGG AGG TTA CGG CGG CTA T-3'
5'-CAT CCC CGT ATG GGA TCC A-3'
5'-GGT GCA ACG GCC AAG TTT AT-3'
5'-TCC GGA TAT TGG TTG TCC TCA T-3'
5'-TTC TCC GTA GCC ACA CCA TTT-3'
5'-GAC ACG GCT ACC ACA TCC AA-3'
5'-CTC GAA AGA GTC CCG CAT TG-3'
The qRT-PCR was also applied to validate the expression profiles of the genes that were affected by the attachment status identified by microarray. The zebra mussels were allowed to fully attach themselves on glass Petri-dishes for six weeks. Then byssal threads from all individuals were cut off with scalpels; thereafter, five mussels were dissected and the RNA extracted from their feet was considered as group 0. The rest of the mussels were put back in the Petri-dishes in water, and allowed to regenerate their byssal threads. The RNA samples were extracted from the feet of the mussels at 12 hours, one day, two days, and three days post re-attachment. Two biological replicates were used for each group. Then for each candidate gene, the qRT-PCR was performed with these five group samples. The information of the gene specific RT Primers are listed in Table 3.
RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
In order to locate the transcripts of two selected genes in situ, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used. The zebra mussel foot tissue was fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde phosphate buffer saline (0.02 M NaH2PO4, 0.0077 M Na2HPO4, 1.4 M NaCl, 2% w/v paraformaldehyde, pH 8.0) for five hours at room temperature. The sample was then conserved in absolute ethanol until needed. The conserved sample was buried in paraffin and longitudinally sectioned at the same level (Figure 5 and 6). The five μm thick sectioned sample was obtained and put on an RNase- and DNase-free glass slide. Ten slides were obtained with one stained by H&E method.
The antisense RNA strand of a fragment of each gene was produced. Briefly, the PCR product of the gene fragment was cloned into pGEM®-T Easy Vector Systems (Promega U.S., Madison, WI). Then the positive colony was picked for sequencing with the M13 forward primer to clarify the direction of the insert of the recombinant plasmid. Once the direction of the insert was known, the T7 or Sp6 RNA polymerase was selected to synthesize the antisense RNA with the linearized recombinant plasmid. In this study, T7 polymerase was used on both probes. The probe DPFP-BG20_A01 was labeled with fluorescent dye Alexa 488 (Invitrogen) while the probe EGP-BG97/192_B06 was labeled with Alexa 594 (Invitrogen). The steps of the RNA synthesis and labeling can be found in the instructions of the two kits: FISH Tag™ RNA Green Kit (Invitrogen) and Fish Tag™ RNA Red Kit (Invitrogen). The RNA FISH was performed following the recommended protocol in the appendix of the Fish Tag™ RNA Kit instruction. The hybridization buffer mentioned in the protocol was replaced by ULTRAhybTM Ultrasensitive Hybridization Buffer (Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin, TX). The hybridized slides were visualized by Olympus BX41 (Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA) microscope under the excitation of a mercury lamp and the images were captured by Olympus DP25 digital camera (Olympus America Inc.). The image processing software DP2-BSW (Olympus America Inc.) was used to combine the different color channels into a single image.
We would like to thank the Center for Animal Functional Genomics at Michigan State University for the microarray slides manufacturing. This study is supported by Michigan Sea Grant College Program, R/ZM-10 and R/NIS-13, under NA165RG1145 from National Sea Grant, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce, and funds from the State of Michigan.
- Hebert PDN, Muncaster BW, Mackie GL: Ecological and genetic studies on Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas): a new mollusc in the Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1989, 46: 1587-1591.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dreissena polymorpha. USGS nonindigenous aquatic species database. [http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.asp?speciesID=5]
- Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW: Zebra mussels: biology, impact and control. 1993, Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis PublisherGoogle Scholar
- New-York-Sea-Grant: Dreissena polymorpha information review. Book Dreissena polymorpha information review (Editor ed.^eds.). 1994, City: New York Sea Grant, 5 (1): 14-15.Google Scholar
- New-York-Sea-Grant: "Agency Activities." Dreissena!. Book "Agency Activities." Dreissena!. 1994, City: New York Sea Grant, 5 (3): 1-2.Google Scholar
- Bially A, MacIsaac HG: Fouling mussels (Dreissena spp.) colonize soft sediments in Lake Erie and facilitate benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biol. 2000, 43: 85-97. 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00526.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Molloy DP: The potential of using biological control technologies in the management of Dreissena. Book The potential of using biological control technologies in the management of Dreissena (Editor ed.^eds.). 1998, City: California Sea GrantGoogle Scholar
- Snyder FL, Hilgendorf MB, Garton DW: Zebra Mussels in North America: The invasion and its implications. Book Zebra Mussels in North America: The invasion and its implications (Editor ed.^eds.). 1997, City: Ohio Sea GrantGoogle Scholar
- Rzepecki LM, Waite JH: The byssus of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. I: Morphology and in situ protein processing during maturation. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1993, 2: 255-266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rzepecki LM, Waite JH: The byssus of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. II: Structure and polymorphism of byssal polyphenolic protein families. Molecular marine biology and biotechnology. 1993, 2: 267-279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waite JH: Adhesion à la Moule. Integr Comp Biol. 2002, 42: 1172-1180. 10.1093/icb/42.6.1172.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderson KE, Waite JH: Immunolocalization of Dpfp1, a byssal protein of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. The Journal of experimental biology. 2000, 203: 3065-3076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holten-Andersen N, Mates TE, Toprak MS, Stucky GD, Zok FW, Waite JH: Metals and the integrity of a biological coating: the cuticle of mussel byssus. Langmuir. 2009, 25: 3323-3326. 10.1021/la8027012.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu W, Faisal M: Putative Identification of Expressed Genes Associated with Attachment of the Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Biofouling. 2008, 24: 157-161. 10.1080/08927010801975345.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Francischetti IM, Pham My V, Mans BJ, Andersen JF, Mather TN, Lane RS, Ribeiro JM: The transcriptome of the salivary glands of the female western black-legged tick Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae). Insect biochemistry and molecular biology. 2005, 35: 1142-1161. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.05.007.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu W, Faisal M: Development of a cDNA microarray of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) foot and its use in understanding the early stage of underwater adhesion. Gene. 2009, 436: 71-80. 10.1016/j.gene.2009.01.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clarke M, McMahon RF: Effects of temperature on byssal thread production by the freshwater mussel, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas). Am Malacol Bull. 1996, 13: 105-110.Google Scholar
- Clarke M, McMahon RF: Effects of hypoxia and low-frequency agitation on byssogenesis in the freshwater mussel Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas). Biol Bull. 1996, 191: 413-419. 10.2307/1543014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clarke M, McMahon RF: Effects of current velocity on byssal-thread production in the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Can J Zool. 1996, 74: 63-71. 10.1139/z96-008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leung YF, Ma P, Link BA, Dowling JE: Factorial microarray analysis of zebrafish retinal development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 12909-12914. 10.1073/pnas.0806038105.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Montgomery DC: Design and Analysis of Experiments. 2005, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 6Google Scholar
- Wu C-F, Hamada M: Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization. 2000, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
- Tempelman RJ: Assessing statistical precision, power, and robustness of alternative experimental designs for two color microarray platforms based on mixed effects models. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005, 105: 175-186. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.02.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wit E, Nobile A, Khanin R: Near-optimal designs for dual channel microarray studies. J Royal Stat Soc, C. 2005, 54: 817-830. 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00519.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zou J, Rodriguez-Zas S, Aldea M, Li M, Zhu J, Gonzalez DO, Vodkin LO, DeLucia E, Clough SJ: Expression profiling soybean response to Pseudomonas syringae reveals new defense-related genes and rapid HR-specific downregulation of photosynthesis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2005, 18: 1161-1174. 10.1094/MPMI-18-1161.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pawitan Y, Michiels S, Koscielny S, Gusnanto A, Ploner A: False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2005, 21: 3017-3024. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sturn A, Quackenbush J, Trajanoski Z: Genesis: cluster analysis of microarray data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2002, 18: 207-208. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eckroat LR, Masteller EC, Shaffer JC, Steele LM: The byssus of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha): morphology, byssal thread formation and detachment. Zebra mussels: biology, impacts, and control. Edited by: Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW. 1993, Boca Raton, FL, USA.: Lewis, 239-263. 1Google Scholar
- Bonner TP, Rockhill R: Functional morphology of the zebra mussel byssus. Dreissena polymorpha Info Rev. 1994, 5: 4-7.Google Scholar
- Benedict CV, Waite JH: Location and analysis of byssal structural proteins of Mytilus edulis. J Morphol. 1986, 189: 171-181. 10.1002/jmor.1051890207.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papov VV, Diamond TV, Biemann K, Waite JH: Hydroxyarginine-containing polyphenolic proteins in the adhesive plaques of the marine mussel Mytilus edulis. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1995, 270: 20183-20192. 10.1074/jbc.270.34.20183.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin Q, Gourdon D, Sun C, Holten-Andersen N, Anderson TH, Waite JH, Israelachvili JN: Adhesion mechanisms of the mussel foot proteins mfp-1 and mfp-3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 3782-3786. 10.1073/pnas.0607852104.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cha HJ, Hwang DS, Lim S: Development of bioadhesives from marine mussels. Biotechnology journal. 2008Google Scholar
- Waite JH, Qin X: Polyphosphoprotein from the adhesive pads of Mytilus edulis. Biochemistry. 2001, 40: 2887-2893. 10.1021/bi002718x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao H, Waite JH: Linking adhesive and structural proteins in the attachment plaque of Mytilus californianus. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006, 281: 26150-26158. 10.1074/jbc.M604357200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Waite JH, Qin XX, Coyne KJ: The peculiar collagens of mussel byssus. Matrix Biol. 1998, 17: 93-106. 10.1016/S0945-053X(98)90023-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Narasimhan S, Deponte K, Marcantonio N, Liang X, Royce TE, Nelson KF, Booth CJ, Koski B, Anderson JF, Kantor F, Fikrig E: Immunity against Ixodes scapularis salivary proteins expressed within 24 hours of attachment thwarts tick feeding and impairs Borrelia transmission. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e451-10.1371/journal.pone.0000451.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderson KE, Waite JH: A major protein precursor of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) byssus: deduced sequence and significance. Biol Bull. 1998, 194: 150-160. 10.2307/1543045.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu W, Faisal M: Gene expression profiling during the byssogenesis of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Mol Genet Genomics. 2010, 283: 327-339. 10.1007/s00438-010-0517-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clarke M, McMahon RF: Effects of hypoxia and low-frequency agitation on byssogenesis in the freshwater mussel Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas). Biol Bull. 1996, 191: 413-419. 10.2307/1543014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yano M, Nagai K, Morimoto K, Miyamoto H: Shematrin: a family of glycine-rich structural proteins in the shell of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. 2006, 144: 254-262.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smyth GK: Limma: linear models for microarray data. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor. Edited by: Gentleman R, Carey V, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W. 2005, New York: Springer, 397-420. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davids BJ, Yoshino TP: Integrin-like RGD-dependent binding mechanism involved in the spreading response of circulating molluscan phagocytes. Developmental and comparative immunology. 1998, 22: 39-53. 10.1016/S0145-305X(97)00039-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu W, Faisal M: Identification of the molecules involved in zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) hemocytes host defense. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. 2009Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.