Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transcriptional response of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 sessile cells to treatments with high doses of hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite

BMC Genomics volume 11, Article number: 90 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria are opportunistic pathogens, which can cause severe respiratory tract infections in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). As treatment of infected CF patients is problematic, multiple preventive measures are taken to reduce the infection risk. Besides a stringent segregation policy to prevent patient-to-patient transmission, clinicians also advise patients to clean and disinfect their respiratory equipment on a regular basis. However, problems regarding the efficacy of several disinfection procedures for the removal and/or killing of B. cepacia complex bacteria have been reported. In order to unravel the molecular mechanisms involved in the resistance of biofilm-grown Burkholderia cenocepacia cells against high concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the present study focussed on the transcriptional response in sessile B. cenocepacia J2315 cells following exposure to high levels of H2O2 or NaOCl.

Results

The exposure to H2O2 and NaOCl resulted in an upregulation of the transcription of 315 (4.4%) and 386 (5.4%) genes, respectively. Transcription of 185 (2.6%) and 331 (4.6%) genes was decreased in response to the respective treatments. Many of the upregulated genes in the NaOCl- and H2O2-treated biofilms are involved in oxidative stress as well as general stress response, emphasizing the importance of the efficient neutralization and scavenging of ROS. In addition, multiple upregulated genes encode proteins that are necessary to repair ROS-induced cellular damage. Unexpectedly, a prolonged treatment with H2O2 also resulted in an increased transcription of multiple phage-related genes. A closer inspection of hybridisation signals obtained with probes targeting intergenic regions led to the identification of a putative 6S RNA.

Conclusion

Our results reveal that the transcription of a large fraction of B. cenocepacia J2315 genes is altered upon exposure of sessile cells to ROS. These observations have highlighted that B. cenocepacia may alter several pathways in response to exposure to ROS and they have led to the identification of many genes not previously implicated in the stress response of this pathogen.

Background

The Burkholderia cepacia complex is a group of Gram-negative β-proteobacteria that comprises at least 17 species [1]. Originally identified as plant pathogens [2], these versatile microorganisms have emerged as notorious pathogens in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients [3]. One of the best-studied aspects of these opportunistic pathogens is their high level of resistance to a broad range of antimicrobial agents. Due to this multi-drug resistance, treatment of B. cepacia complex infected CF patients is problematic [4] and a B. cepacia complex positive status is often associated with increased morbidity and mortality [5].

As several outbreaks with genetically distinct B. cepacia complex strains have occurred, stringent infection control guidelines were brought into force; these guidelines not only aim to segregate infected patients from non-infected ones, but also emphasize the importance of good hand hygiene practices and frequent disinfection of environmental surfaces and respiratory equipment [6].

In a recent study, we showed that some of the current disinfection protocols are inadequate to effectively remove and kill biofilm-grown Burkholderia cenocepacia cells [7]. Biofilm formation has been described for several B. cepacia complex strains and is considered to be an important virulence trait [5]. The observation that these sessile cells are highly resistant against H2O2 and NaOCl is worrying since these oxidative agents are also very important in the endogenous defence against microorganisms. During infection, neutrophils normally produce a variety of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide, H2O2 and hypochlorite [8]. H2O2 and NaOCl can react with intracellular iron via the Fenton reaction and the resulting highly reactive hydroxyl radicals will damage lipids, proteins and DNA [9, 10].

In addition, B. cepacia complex bacteria are one of the most common contaminants of pharmaceutical and industrial products [11] and this feature is probably highly dependent on their ability to form persistent biofilms.

The fact that B. cenocepacia cells can survive high doses of exogenous ROS, suggests that this microorganism possesses various protective mechanisms involved in the scavenging and neutralization of ROS. Thus far, the role of KatA and KatB in the survival of planktonic B. cenocepacia cells has been studied [12] and the presence of genes encoding catalases and alkyl hydroperoxide reductases within the B. cenocepacia J2315 genome has been described [13]. A recent transcriptomic study of B. cenocepacia planktonic growth in CF sputum, an environment that is rich in ROS, demonstrated that an organic hydroperoxide resistance gene (BCAL2753) and an OsmC-like oxidative stress gene (BCAL1766) were highly upregulated [14]. However, no data are available yet regarding the wider molecular mechanisms used by sessile B. cenocepacia cells to survive acute exposure to H2O2 or NaOCl. In view of the large fractions of sessile cells that can survive high levels of ROS, a better insight into the genomic basis of this major virulence trait is required.

Over the last decade, many studies have been performed on the molecular mechanisms involved in bacterial resistance against ROS. These studies include microarray analyses in which the transcriptional response in untreated planktonic cells was compared with the transcriptional response in ROS-exposed planktonic cells [15–21]. In addition, the effect of various mutations on the survival of bacteria in the presence of ROS and oxygen has been evaluated in a number of other studies [22–28]. Although the biofilm mode of growth is the prevailing microbial lifestyle [29], no microarray analyses focussing on the transcriptional response of sessile cells exposed to ROS have been performed thus far. In the present study, we compared gene expression in treated and untreated B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms, using microarray analysis and qPCR. In addition, the role of several genes was further examined using mutant strains.

Results and discussion

Treatment of B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms with H2O2 and NaOCl

Previous research indicated that disinfection protocols based on the use of H2O2 (3%, 30 min) and NaOCl (0.05%, 5 min) (as recommended by several CF patient organisations) have insufficient activity against B. cenocepacia biofilms [7]. Based on these disinfection protocols, we determined the H2O2- and NaOCl-concentrations (using similar treatment times) that resulted in a reduction in the number of viable cells of approximately 50% compared to untreated biofilms. Using this approach, we ensured that a sufficient number of viable cells would remain as a source of mRNA for microarray analyses. A resazurin based viability staining performed on treated and untreated B. cenocepacia J2315 cells revealed that exposure to 0.3% H2O2 (30 min) or 0.02% NaOCl (5 min) killed approximately half the sessile B. cenocepacia J2315 population (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Effect of treatments with H 2 O 2 or NaOCl on the number of viable sessile B. cenocepacia J2315 cells. The average relative fluorescence signals (%) show the fraction of viable B. cenocepacia J2315 sessile cells in untreated biofilms and in biofilms treated with H2O2 (0.3%, 30 min; dark grey bars) or NaOCl (0.02%, 5 min; pale grey bars). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Full size image

Transcriptomic response to high levels of oxidative stress: microarray data analysis

Compared to the normalized signal intensities obtained for the untreated B. cenocepacia J2315 sessile cells, the normalized signal intensity for 618 (6.0%) and 854 (8.3%) probes was significantly altered after treatments with H2O2 and NaOCl, respectively (Table 1). In response to the treatment with H2O2, using a fold change cut off of 2 (p < 0.05), the expression of 315 (4.4%) genes was significantly higher (Additional file 1), while the expression of 185 (2.6%) genes was lower (Additional file 2). Using the same data analysis parameters, treatment of the biofilms with 0.02% NaOCl resulted in a significant upregulation of 386 (5.4%) genes (Additional file 3) and downregulation of 331 (4.6%) genes (Additional file 4). A total of 171 (2.4%) and 117 (1.6%) genes showed a higher or lower expression in response to both treatments. The fraction of up- and downregulated genes is comparable to the fraction of genes showing a significantly altered expression in planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 cells exposed to sublethal concentrations of H2O2 or NaOCl (fold change >2; p < 0.05) [21].

Table 1 Overview of the number (fraction) of probes for which a significant up- or downregulation was observed in response to treatments with H2O2 or NaOCl.
Full size table

Among the upregulated genes, many were known to prevent, counteract or repair damage resulting from oxidative stress. Furthermore, the expression of various genes involved in the synthesis and the assembly of the flagellum was also increased. In addition to the changes in expression of a variety of protein-encoding genes and tRNA-encoding sequences, a change in expression was observed for many intergenic regions (IGs), which might contain non-coding regulatory RNA (ncRNA). The transcription of several genes belonging to a BcepMu prophage was also significantly increased in biofilms exposed to H2O2 for 30 or 60 min. These gene sets with significantly altered expression are discussed in more detail below.

Genes involved in protection against oxidative stress

A large proportion of the upregulated genes were known to be involved in the protection against oxidative stress (Table 2). In other Gram-negative microorganisms such as Escherichia coli and P. aeruginosa, coordinated regulation of many genes associated with oxidative stress is mediated by the transcriptional regulator OxyR [15, 26]. In E. coli, oxidation of OxyR leads to an increased expression of various genes, including genes coding for alkyl hydroperoxide reductases C and F (ahpCF; B. cenocepacia homologues: BCAM1217 and BCAM1216) and hydroperoxidase I (katG; homologue: BCAL3299 [annotated as KatB]) [15]. In P. aeruginosa, oxidized OxyR increases the expression of ahpCF and katB (homologue: BCAM0931) [26]. A putative OxyR-binding site was found upstream of all genes encoding homologues of the latter proteins in B. cenocepacia J2315 (katB, BCAM0931 and ahpCF; Figure 2). Furthermore, a putative OxyR box was also found upstream of the highly upregulated gene BCAL2297, which encodes a hypothetical protein (Figure 2).

Table 2 List of genes involved in the (oxidative) stress response of sessile B. cenocepacia J2315 cells exposed to H2O2 or NaOCl.
Full size table
Figure 2
figure2

Putative OxyR-binding sites upstream of BCAL2297, BCAL3299 ( katB ), BCAM0931 and ahpCF (BCAM1217-BCAM1216). The four tetranucleotide sequences in the E. coli OxyR-binding consensus sequence are underlined and the nucleotides matching the consensus sequence are indicated by grey shading [74].

Full size image

Although the transcription of both ahpCF (BCAM1217-BCAM1216) and BCAM0931 was markedly increased after treatment with H2O2 (Table 2), the increased transcription of BCAL3299 (katB) was less pronounced: the microarray data revealed a statistically significant 1.8-fold upregulation following treatment with H2O2, which was confirmed by qPCR (Table 2). The importance of the AhpC protein in the protection against oxidative stress has been reported previously [30] and the high upregulation of both ahpC and ahpF confirms these data. Yet, the limited upregulation of katB was surprising, as KatB is supposed to be the major catalase/peroxidase in B. cenocepacia and hypersensitivity of planktonic B. cenocepacia MDL2 (katB mutant) cells to H2O2 has been reported [12]. As expected, the expression of the minor catalase/peroxidase encoding gene katA (BCAM2107) was not altered in response to exogenous oxidative stress [12].

In order to further clarify the importance of KatB for the survival of B. cenocepacia biofilms exposed to H2O2, biofilms of two wild type strains (B. cenocepacia C5424 and J2315) and of two mutant strains (B. cenocepacia MDL1 [katA mutant] and MDL2 [katB mutant]) were treated with 0.3% H2O2 and the fraction of surviving sessile cells was determined using a resazurin based viability staining [31]. In addition, the remaining fraction of H2O2 was determined in the supernatants of these biofilms after treating them for 15, 30 or 60 min. It should be noted that strains J2315 and C5424 are not identical, although they both belong to the ET12 lineage; it is at present unclear whether this has an impact on our results. These results show that, in contrast to the observations for the wild type strains and for the katA mutant strain, less than 5% and 0.5% of all sessile cells present in the B. cenocepacia katB mutant biofilms survived 15 and 60 min treatments with 0.3% H2O2, respectively (Figure 3). In addition, approximately 90% of all initially added H2O2 was still present in the supernatant of the B. cenocepacia katB mutant biofilms, whereas only trace amounts of H2O2 were recovered in the supernatants of the biofilms of the wild type strains and of the katA mutant (data not shown). In keeping with these observations, strong effervescence was observed when H2O2 was added to the biofilms of both wild type strains and of the katA mutant, whereas no effervescence was observed for the B. cenocepacia katB mutant biofilms. The data obtained in these experiments clearly indicate that KatB is not only essential for the survival of planktonic B. cenocepacia cells exposed to H2O2, but that this catalase/peroxidase is also crucial for the protection of sessile B. cenocepacia cells against exogenous H2O2. Conforming with previous data for stationary phase planktonic cultures [12], we observed a substantial expression of katB in untreated biofilms, which suggests the involvement of other factors in the regulation of the expression of this particular gene during sessile growth. The transcriptional regulation by various transcription factors might also explain the limited upregulation of katB under conditions of oxidative stress [32].

Figure 3
figure3

Effect of treatment with H 2 O 2 on the number of viable sessile B. cenocepacia cells. The average relative fluorescence signals (%) show the fraction of viable sessile cells in untreated biofilms and in biofilms treated with H2O2 (0.3%) for 15, 30 or 60 min. Data were obtained for biofilms of B. cenocepacia J2315 (black bars), C5424 (dark grey bars), MDL1 (katA mutant; pale grey bars) and MDL2 (katB mutant; white bars). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Full size image

In addition to the upregulation of katB by these sessile populations, an increased transcription of two other catalase encoding genes (BCAM0931 and BCAL3477) was observed in the H2O2-treated biofilms. These two catalase encoding genes possessed differential expression patterns in relation to the length of H2O2 exposure: while BCAM0931 showed the highest upregulation in the biofilms treated for 15 min, the transcription of BCAL3477 was much more pronounced in the 60 min treated biofilms (Table 2). As only trace amounts of H2O2 were still present after a 15 min treatment, the increased transcription of BCAL3477 in biofilms treated for longer periods suggests that it does not participate in the direct neutralization of exogenous H2O2 and that the expression of this catalase is triggered indirectly. We also observed that the increased transcription of BCAM0931 was accompanied by the increased expression of its flanking gene ankB (BCAM0930; Table 3). In P. aeruginosa, these two genes are part of a small operon and the lack of a functional AnkB protein results in a decreased KatB activity and an increased sensitivity to H2O2 [25].

Table 3 Clusters of adjacent genes that show similar changes in expression when B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms are exposed to H2O2 or NaOCl.
Full size table

In E. coli the OxyR regulon also comprises genes encoding glutaredoxin 1 (grxA) and a glutathione reductase (gorA) [33], yet no significant upregulation of gorA or of any of the glutaredoxin encoding genes was observed in the ROS exposed sessile B. cenocepacia J2315 cells. We did observe a significant upregulation of the expression of a thioredoxin reductase (TrxB; encoded by BCAL3035), of thioredoxin A (TrxA; encoded by BCAL1900) and of a putative thioredoxin (BCAL2780), although no OxyR-boxes are present upstream of these genes. Since thioredoxins are capable of reducing oxidized proteins and of scavenging hydroxyl radicals [34], their upregulated expression in H2O2-treated B. cenocepacia cells was not unexpected. In addition, the strong upregulation of a carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase encoding gene (BCAL3214) in response to NaOCl exposure and the significant upregulation of a second carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase encoding gene (BCAL2014) in response to exposure to both H2O2 and NaOCl, suggest that both these proteins are also involved in the neutralization of exogenous ROS in B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms (Table 2).

Treatments with H2O2 or NaOCl resulted in the increased transcription of three organic hydroperoxide resistance (ohr) genes: BCAS0085, BCAM0896 and BCAL1766. Although the latter gene encodes a protein that is annotated as an OsmC-like protein, the protein has the typical characteristics of the Ohr subfamily ([35]; Figure 4). Furthermore, BCAL1766 and BCAM0896 are both located in close proximity of putative OhrR encoding genes (BCAL1761 and BCAM0897 [43% and 53% identity to Xanthomonas campestris OhrR, respectively]). In a recent study by Drevinek et al. [14], the upregulation of a further ohr family gene, BCAM2753, was observed in planktonic cells exposed to sub-inhibitory concentrations of H2O2 and organic hydroperoxides; however, no such upregulation was observed in H2O2-treated sessile cells. Overall, such a strong upregulation of the expression of ohr genes in response to H2O2 or NaOCl treatments has not been reported thus far [36]. Ohr expression in P. aeruginosa PAO1 appears to be triggered specifically by organic hydroperoxides [26] and Ohr proteins preferably reduce organic, rather than inorganic hydroperoxides [37]. In addition to the upregulation of BCAS0085 and BCAL1766, similar expression patterns were observed for their neighbouring genes, suggesting that the genes in both clusters are co-transcribed (Table 3). Overall, our results suggest that Ohr proteins are very important for the protection of biofilm-grown B. cenocepacia cells against ROS and that it can draw on multiple genes associated with this family of stress proteins.

Figure 4
figure4

The protein encoded by BCAL1766 belongs to the Ohr family. Amino acid sequences of three upregulated Ohr proteins in B. cenocepacia J2315 (encoded by BCAS0085, BCAM0896 and BCAL1766) and of P. aeruginosa PAO1 Ohr (OhrPAO1) and OsmC (OsmCPAO1) and E. coli K-12 MG1655 OsmC (OsmCK12) were aligned using the CLUSTAL W program using standard settings [75]. The regions of black shading and white lettering show the conserved regions found in either the Ohr homologues or the OsmC homologues. Grey shading indicates that identical amino acid sequences are found in both Ohr and OsmC homologues. The triangles point to the highly conserved C residues in both families.

Full size image

In addition to the upregulation of BCAS0085, we also observed a marked increase in the expression of BCAS0086, which encodes an exported lipase. This overexpression is probably the result of the cotranscription of this gene with BCAS0085. In order to determine whether this overexpression results in an increased extracellular lipase activity, the cleavage of three fluorogenic 4-methylumbelliferyl substrates (4-MU palmitate, 4-MU stearate and 4-MU oleate) was determined in the supernatants of treated and untreated biofilms [38]. For all substrates used, the fluorescent signal was higher in the treated biofilms compared to the untreated biofilms, confirming the increased extracellular lipase activity for the treated biofilms (Figure 5). Within the genomes of the sequenced B. cepacia complex strains, orthologues of BCAS0085 and BCAS0086 are organised in a similar operon-like fashion and therefore we examined the induction of lipase expression by H2O2 in biofilms of six B. cepacia complex reference strains. For B. cenocepacia C5424, HI2424, Burkholderia ambifaria LMG 19182 and Burkholderia dolosa AU0158, an increased lipase activity was observed in the supernatant of all treated biofilms. Similarly, lipase activity was increased in the supernatant of B. cenocepacia AU1054 biofilms treated for 30 and 60 min, and in the supernatant of a 60 min treated Burkholderia multivorans LMG 17588 biofilm (data not shown). These data confirmed that lipase activity in the supernatant of B. cepacia complex biofilms following exposure to oxidative stress is increased, which is probably due to the co-transcription of BCAS0086 orthologues with BCAS0085 orthologues.

Figure 5
figure5

Increased lipase activity in the supernatant of H 2 O 2 -treated B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms. Lipase activity was determined in the supernatant of B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms that were either untreated (diamonds) or that were treated with 0.3% H2O2 for 15 (rectangles), 30 (triangles) or 60 min (circles). The graph shows a representative example of the obtained curves using 4-MU oleate as fluorogenic substrate. Signals are expressed as normalized fluorescence units (RFU). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Full size image

The transcription of a cytochrome b561 encoding gene (BCAL1106) and of its adjacent genes (BCAL1105 and BCAL1107) was also highly increased when the biofilms were exposed to exogenous ROS (Table 3). The qPCR data clearly indicate that prolonged exposure to H2O2 results in an increasing overexpression of BCAL1106 (Table 2). Yet, even after a 5 min exposure to NaOCl, a considerable overexpression of all three genes was observed (Table 3). Drevinek et al. [14] recently reported a high upregulation of these genes in B. cenocepacia J2315 cells grown in CF sputum and they suggested that this may result from the presence of ROS in CF sputum. The microarray data also revealed that the transcription of BCAL0771, a gene encoding a non-heme chloroperoxidase increased drastically in biofilms exposed to H2O2. This finding was confirmed by qPCR and an increased expression was observed in response to prolonged treatments (Table 2). Although four genes encoding a non-heme chloroperoxidase are present in the B. cenocepacia J2315 genome (BCAL0771, BCAM2106, BCAM2109, BCAS0079), overexpression was only observed for BCAL0771, indicating the ability of our microarray-based strategy to highlight the most active gene in Burkholderia genomes where multiple paralogous functional pathways exist [13].

Upregulation of recA

H2O2 and NaOCl can both damage nucleic acids. In the Fenton reaction, H2O2 reacts with Fe2+ resulting in the formation of highly reactive hydroxyl radicals [9]. Similarly, NaOCl can also generate hydroxyl radicals via a Fenton-type reaction [10]. Because positively charged Fe2+ ions are often localized along the negatively charged phosphodiester backbone of nucleic acids, DNA is a vulnerable target for harmful reactions with these radicals [39]. As exposure to ROS can result in extensive DNA damage, processes for DNA protection and DNA repair are vital [40]. The microarray analysis revealed a significant increase in the transcription of recA (BCAL0953) in response to a 5 min treatment with NaOCl and a 30 min treatment with H2O2 (Table 2). In the qPCR experiments, no significant increase in transcription of recA was observed in the biofilms treated with H2O2 for 15 min (Table 2). In contrast, in the 30 min treated biofilms, the transcription of this gene was significantly increased. We also observed a slight upregulation of recA following a 60 min treatment (1.4-fold upregulation) but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.076). Our hypothesis is that, although most of the H2O2 has disappeared after 15 min, the transcriptional response to DNA damage caused by H2O2 is delayed. Upregulation of the recA gene has previously already been described for planktonic P. aeruginosa cultures treated with oxidizing agents [16, 17].

No increased transcription of dps (BCAL3297), encoding the non-specific DNA-binding protein Dps, was neither observed in the H2O2- nor in the NaOCl-treated biofilms; these data are similar to previous observations in Burkholderia pseudomallei [41]. In E. coli, the transcription of dps is regulated by OxyR in exponentially growing planktonic cultures, whereas in stationary phase cultures, dps is transcribed in an RpoS-dependent manner [42, 43]. The high expression of dps in the untreated biofilms and the absence of an increased expression in the ROS-treated biofilms suggest that RpoS rather than OxyR regulates the transcription of dps in mature B. cenocepacia biofilms [41, 44].

Upregulation of the iscRSUA-hscAB-fdx-iscX gene cluster

Iron-sulfur cluster-containing proteins are highly sensitive to the cellular redox status and they are very vulnerable to oxidants such as H2O2 [39, 45]. In order to restore their function, iron-sulfur clusters are either repaired or they can be assembled de novo [45]. In E. coli, apo-IscR will increase the transcription of the isc gene cluster, and together with OxyR it will also stimulate the production of oxidation-resistant Suf proteins [46]. As no homologues of the E. coli suf gene cluster are found within the B. cepacia complex, the transcriptional response in the H2O2-treated biofilms only involves the increased transcription of the iscSUA-hscAB-fdx-iscX gene cluster (BCAL2192-BCAL2198; Table 2&3). In addition, an increase in the number of transcripts for iscR (BCAL2199) was also observed (Table 2&3). The latter gene has been identified in a recent screening of 1500 mutants of P. aeruginosa PAO1, which also lacks the suf operon, as an essential gene in the resistance to H2O2 [47]. Our data suggest that the increased transcription of the iscRSUA-hscAB-fdx-iscX gene cluster is important to regain intact iron-sulfur clusters in the ROS-treated B. cenocepacia J2315 cells.

As a consequence of the damage by oxidants to the iron-sulfur clusters, [4Fe-4S]2+ and [2Fe-2S]2+ containing enzymes, including aconitase B (AcnB), are inactivated [9]. Although AcnB is the major aconitase during normal growth conditions, it loses all activity in response to strong oxidants [48]. Usually, this drop in aconitase activity is compensated by the increased production of aconitase A (AcnA), which is invulnerable to oxidative inactivation in vivo [39, 49]. However, in the present study no increased expression of acnA (BCAM0961) was observed, while the number of mRNA transcripts of acnB (BCAL1833) increased both in the H2O2- and in the NaOCl-treated biofilms; the data obtained for the H2O2-treated biofilms were confirmed by qPCR (Table 2). This observation is puzzling, yet it may be the result of an increased stability of acnB mRNA by the accumulating apo-aconitases, as previously observed in E. coli [48].

Identification of ncRNA

The custom made 4 × 44K B. cenocepacia J2315 microarray does not only contain probes for protein encoding genes, but also 1,520 probes for selected IGs. A significant upregulation was observed in 39 (2.6%) and 56 (3.7%) of these IGs after treatments with H2O2 or NaOCl, respectively, whereas the expression of 54 (3.6%) and 68 (4.5%) IGs was significantly downregulated in response to these treatments (Table 1). A closer inspection of these IGs revealed that many are located in close proximity of genes with a similar expression pattern, suggesting that co-transcription of the IGs occurs synchronously with their adjacent genes. However, certain IGs demonstrated markedly different expression patterns compared to their flanking genes, and the basal expression levels of several of these IGs were also high. Of the 39 IGs, which showed a significant upregulation after exposure to H2O2, 11 displayed an expression pattern different from their flanking genes. These IGs include seven previously shown to be either significantly up- or downregulated in B. cenocepacia J2315 cells grown in sputum [14]. Two IGs, IG1_2935724 and IG1_3008003 identified by Yoder-Himes et al. [50] to contain putative ncRNA, were also overexpressed. Finally, the transcription of two IGs, IG1_950309 (Bc1) and IG1_2242852, which have been identified previously to contain putative ncRNA in a computational search [51], was also increased in response to exogenous oxidative stress.

Of the 56 IGs significantly upregulated in response to a NaOCl-treatment, 20 displayed a different expression pattern than their flanking genes. Again, a significant upregulation of the expression of IG1_2935724 and IG1_3008003 as well as IG1_950309 was observed. In order to confirm these microarray data, we performed qPCR experiments for IG1_2935724 and IG1_3008003 as well as for their flanking genes. The expression of IG1_2935724 was clearly higher when the biofilms were treated with H2O2, whereas no such upregulation was observed either for BCAL2667 (encoding a cell division protein ZapA) or for BCAL2668 (encoding a hypothetical protein) (Figure 6). In addition, the transcription of BCAL2667 and BCAL2668 in the untreated biofilms was clearly lower compared to the transcription of IG1_2935724 (data not shown). The secondary structure for the mRNA transcript (spanning the region from nucleotide 2935805 to nucleotide 2935985) has a marked similarity to the 6S RNA consensus structure (Figure 7) [52].

Figure 6
figure6

Effect of treatments with H 2 O 2 on the expression of the IGs IG1_2935724 and IG1_3008003 and their adjacent genes. The expression of the genes BCAL2667 and BCAL2737 (grey bars) and BCAL2668 and BCAL2738 (black bars) and of the IGs (IG1_2935724 and IG1_3008003 [white bars]) in the treated biofilms is compared to the expression observed in the untreated biofilms. Error bars represent SEM. *: significant upregulation in treated biofilms compared to untreated biofilms (p < 0.05).

Full size image
Figure 7
figure7

Secondary structure of the putative 6S RNA in IG1_2935724 and the 6S RNA consensus structure. A. Secondary structure obtained for the intergenic region spanning nucleotides 2935805 to 2935985 (B. cenocepacia J2315; chromosome 1) as predicted by mfold using standard settings [76]. B. Secondary structure of the 6S RNA consensus structure (RFAM database [53]).

Full size image

The qPCR results also revealed a significant upregulation of IG1_3008003 in the H2O2-treated biofilms (Figure 6). However, the transcription of the neighbouring genes BCAL2737 (coding for a pseudouridine synthase) and BCAL2738 (coding for a hypothetical protein) was not altered to the same extent and the CT values obtained for IG1_3008003 in the untreated biofilms were markedly lower than the corresponding CT values of BCAL2737 and BCAL2738. Although the presence of putative ncRNA in IG1_3008003 has been reported previously [50], no ncRNA was identified in this IG using the RFAM database [53].

Three IGs (IG2_551370; IG2_2731412 and IG2_794541) in which putative ncRNAs were identified in a computational search [51] were downregulated in the H2O2- as well as in the NaOCl-treated biofilms.

Sigma factors

As the present study focussed on the changes in gene expression in sessile cells following treatment with high concentrations of ROS, major (general) stress responses were observed and the expression of multiple σ factors was increased (Table 2). These σ factors included an RNA polymerase σ32 factor (BCAL0787), an ECF (extracytoplasmic function) σ70 factor OrbS (BCAL1688), a putative σ factor (BCAL3478) and an ECF σ70 factor FecI (BCAL1369).

The ECF σ70 factor encoded by BCAL1688 has been annotated as OrbS or EcfI, a regulatory σ factor located adjacent to the ornibactin gene cluster in B. cenocepacia [54–56]. The transcription of orbS is regulated by the Fur repressor, which represses the orbS promoter when cells are growing under iron-replete conditions [56]. In correspondence to the high increase of the transcription of orbS, two of the genes belonging to the ornibactin gene cluster, orbH (BCAL1689) and orbG (BCAL1690), were also found to be upregulated (Table 3). The IG sequence between orbS and orbH also showed elevated expression (Table 3). However, none of the other genes present in the ornibactin gene cluster (orbE and orbI-orbL) were upregulated. Other studies have shown that orbH and orbG are cotranscribed with orbS [56], correlating to the increases we observed in these two genes and the intervening IG region. The lack of transcription of the other orb genes suggests that the levels of OrbS under our experimental conditions were insufficient to induce the transcription of orbE and orbI-orbL [57, 58]. Alternatively, the transcription of orbE and orbI-orbL may depend on a post-transcriptional regulation of OrbS activity [59]. This posttranscriptional regulation might result from the interaction of OrbS with 6S RNA [52]. An increased transcription of a second σ70 factor involved in iron-uptake, FecI (encoded by BCAL1369), was also observed. Similar observations have been described for H2O2-treated P. aeruginosa cells [16]. The increased transcription of orbS as well as of fecI suggests that the cells apparently suffer from some degree of iron starvation or that the Fur repressor function is transiently lost [16].

The exact roles of the σ factors, encoded by BCAL0787 and BCAL3478, in relation to these conditions of oxidative stress remain to be elucidated. Remarkably, the expression pattern of BCAL3478 is highly similar to that of its divergently transcribed neighbouring gene BCAL3477 (Table 3). Neither rpoN (σ54; BCAL0813), nor rpoE (σE; BCAL0998 and BCAL2872) showed an increased transcription following exposure to exogenous ROS, corroborating previous data that neither RpoN nor RpoE are involved in the resistance towards H2O2 [60, 61].

Genes involved in motility and chemotaxis

B. cepacia complex bacteria are motile rods, equipped with flagella. These flagella are multi-component structures, which are synthesized and assembled in a complex process involving over 40 hierarchically expressed genes [62]. Flagella are not only important in the formation of biofilms, they also play a key role in the adherence to and the invasion into host cells [63]. In addition, intact flagella evoke host immune responses [64]. The data obtained in the microarray analysis reveal that many B. cenocepacia J2315 flagellum-related genes and genes involved in chemotaxis show an increased expression in biofilms exposed to exogenous ROS. The overexpressed genes in the H2O2-treated biofilms include those that belong to two major gene clusters: (i) BCAL0520-BCAL0525 and BCAL0526-BCAL0528, and (ii) BCAL0564-BCAL0572, BCAL0575 and BCAL0576-BCAL0577. The expression of the majority of these genes was also significantly increased in response to a short exposure to NaOCl (data not shown). In addition, the increased transcription of the flagellar motor protein encoding gene motA was also observed (the upregulation of motB was not significant). Furthermore, the transcription of five and nine genes coding for (putative) methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins was increased in the H2O2- and NaOCl-treated biofilms, respectively. Although our data clearly indicate that sessile B. cenocepacia J2315 cells exposed to exogenous oxidative stress overexpress many flagellar and chemotaxis genes, previous experiments demonstrated that treatments with 0.3% H2O2 did not result in significant decreases in total biofilm biomass [7]. The latter observation suggests that the overexpression of these genes does not result in a global dispersal event. Further research is required to elucidate the role of the increased transcription of these genes in response to exogenous ROS.

Phage-related genes

The microarray analysis revealed a significant upregulation of multiple phage-related genes in sessile cells after exposure to H2O2 (Table 4). BcepMu is a Mu-like prophage that is present in many B. cenocepacia ET12 strains and it has been annotated BcenGI14 (B. cenocepacia J2315 Genomic Island 14; [13]). The prophage sequence was found to encode 53 proteins and it has been divided in three functional clusters, including a module involved in replication, regulation and pathogenesis [65]. The transcription of these genes probably results in a monocistronic mRNA as a similar upregulation of multiple IGs within this cluster was observed (Table 4). This prophage module contains many genes coding for small hypothetical proteins. In addition, it contains two genes (BcepMu8 and BcepMu9) that show high similarities to Pseudomonas phage B3 transposase B and A subunits (57% and 60% identity, respectively) [66, 67]. The results of the qPCR analysis for three selected genes (BCAS0543 [BcepMu12], BCAS0546 [BcepMu9] and BCAS0547 [BcepMu8]) indicated that none of these genes was upregulated after a 15 min treatment with H2O2; yet, a significant upregulation was observed when B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms were treated for 30 or 60 min (Figure 8). Thus far, the transcriptional mechanism resulting in the upregulation of these BcepMu prophage genes has not been elucidated.

Table 4 Genes of the BcepMu prophage that have an increased expression in H2O2 exposed B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms (30 min).
Full size table
Figure 8
figure8

Effect of treatments with H 2 O 2 on the expression of three selected BcepMu prophage genes. The expression of BCAS0543 (BcepMu12; grey bars), BCAS0546 (BcepMu9; white bars) and BCAS0547 (BcepMu8; black bars) in the H2O2-treated biofilms is compared with the expression observed in the untreated biofilms. Error bars represent SEM. *: significant upregulation in treated biofilms compared to untreated biofilms (p < 0.05).

Full size image

Downregulated genes in the H2O2- and NaOCl-treated biofilms

Although 185 (2.6%) genes showed a significant downregulation of the transcription in biofilms exposed to H2O2, a more than five fold change in expression was only observed for 17 genes. Similarly, for 43 of the 331 (4.6%) downregulated genes in the NaOCl-treated biofilms, transcription was decreased more than five fold. A total of 117 (1.6%) genes was downregulated in response to both treatments. Despite the large numbers of genes showing a decreased expression in response to these ROS, no obvious patterns were observed. qPCR experiments were performed for two selected genes: BCAM1335 (encoding a glycosyltransferase) and BCAM1554 (encoding a diguanylate cyclase) and they confirmed that both genes were significantly downregulated in response to exposure to H2O2 (data not shown).

Fold change correlation between qPCR experiments and microarray analysis

In order to determine the correlation between the fold changes in gene expression observed in the microarray analysis and the qPCR experiments, a regression analysis was performed. The results of the regression analysis between the log2 fold changes obtained in the qPCR experiments and the microarray analysis showed a good linear correlation between both datasets, with a correlation coefficient of 0.89 (p < 0.01) and a slope of 0.67. This suggests that the custom made 4 × 44K microarray for B. cenocepacia is highly reliable to evaluate changes in global gene expression in B. cenocepacia J2315.

Conclusions

Our data show that the successful defence of sessile B. cenocepacia J2315 cells against high doses of ROS involves a plethora of protective mechanisms. These include mechanisms that allow cells to neutralize and scavenge ROS and mechanisms that are involved in the repair of the cellular damage resulting from the exposure to ROS. Several results in the present study corroborate data from previous studies that focussed on the transcriptional response to sublethal doses of exogenous ROS [15–21]. Rather unexpected observations included the high upregulation of three Ohr encoding genes in H2O2-treated sessile B. cenocepacia J2315 cells and the increased extracellular lipase activity in several H2O2-treated B. cepacia complex biofilms. In addition, our data revealed an increased transcription of multiple phage-related genes, IGs and chemotaxis- and motility-related genes in the treated biofilms. These observations contribute to a better insight in the molecular mechanisms involved in the resistance of sessile B. cenocepacia J2315 cells against exogenous ROS.

Methods

Strains and culture conditions

The strains used in the present study are shown in Table 5. All wild type strains were cultured routinely on Luria-Bertani agar (LBA, Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) at 37°C. Both B. cenocepacia MDL1 and MDL2 mutant strains were cultured on LBA containing trimethoprim (100 μg/ml; Certa, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium).

Table 5 Strains used in the present study.
Full size table

Biofilm formation and treatment

Starting from an overnight culture, an inoculum suspension containing appr. 5 × 107 CFU/mL was prepared in Luria-Bertani broth (LBB). Subsequently, 100 μL of this suspension was added to the wells of a round-bottomed polystyrene 96-well microtiter plate (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland). After 4 h of adhesion at 37°C, the supernatant (containing non-adhered cells) was removed and the wells were rinsed using 100 μL saline (0.9% NaCl), 100 μL of sterile LBB was added to all wells and the biofilms were allowed to grow for an additional 20 h period (under static conditions). Preliminary experiments in which the number of cells present in these biofilms was quantified (by plating) indicated that 5 × 107 to 7 × 107 CFUs are present in each of these biofilms following 4 h of adhesion and 20 h of biofilm formation. The supernatant was then again removed and 120 μl of a 0.3% H2O2 solution (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) or 120 μl of a 0.02% NaOCl solution (Forever, Courcelles, Belgium) was added. H2O2-treated biofilms were exposed to this disinfectant for 15, 30 or 60 min; NaOCl-treated biofilms were exposed for 5 min. Similarly, 120 μL of saline was added to biofilms that served as untreated controls. After the prescribed contact times, the disinfectant/saline was removed. All disinfectant solutions were prepared using MQ water (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and were filter-sterilized before use (Puradisk FP30; Whatman, Middlesex, UK).

Resazurin-based viability staining

For all strains included in the present study, the fraction of surviving sessile cells in the H2O2-treated biofilms (15, 30 or 60 min) was determined by using a resazurin-based viability staining assay, as described previously [31]. In brief, after the various treatments, the supernatant was removed and 100 μl of sterile saline and 20 μl of CellTiter-Blue (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was added to all wells. Plates were incubated aerobically for 1 h at 37°C and fluorescence (λexc: 560 nm, λem: 590 nm) was measured using a multilabel microtiter plate reader (Wallac Victor2, Perkin Elmer LAS, Waltham, MA, USA).

RNA extraction, labelling and hybridization

In the microarray and qPCR experiments, treated and untreated B. cenocepacia J2315 cells were harvested by scraping and sonication (30 s; Branson 3510, Branson Ultrasonics Corp, Danbury, CT, USA) and transferred to sterile tubes. RNA was extracted using the Ambion RiboPure Bacteria Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and the procedure included a DNase I treatment of 1 h at 37°C. After extraction, the RNA was concentrated using Microcon YM-50 filter devices (Millipore). Prior to the cDNA synthesis, RNA yields and RNA quality were assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The results of this control revealed that despite the harsh treatments imposed on the sessile cells, the extracted RNA fulfilled the stringent requirements for microarray experiments (data not shown). Subsequently, 10 μg of total RNA was used to synthesize labelled cDNA using a two-step amino-allyl procedure (CyScribe Post-Labelling Kit, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Spike-in controls were included in the labelling procedure for quality control purposes (Agilent). The labelled cDNA was purified using the CyScribe GFX Purification Kit (GE Healthcare) and the fluorescent signal of each labelled sample was determined using electrophoretic separation of 1 μL of the final labelled cDNA in agarose, followed by scanning (GeneTAC GLS IV Scanner, Genomic Solutions Inc, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).

The hybridization and washing of the custom made 4 × 44K arrays was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions with some minor modifications. These modifications included the heat-denaturation of the mix of cDNA and blocking agent for 3 min at 98°C, followed by a cooling down to room temperature before addition of the hybridization buffer. After 17 h of hybridization at 65°C, the microarrays were washed and the washing routine included the use of an acetonitrile solution and the Agilent Stabilization and Drying Solution. The signal intensities were scanned using a microarray scanner (G2565 BA, Agilent) and processed using the Feature Extraction software (version 9.5.1., Agilent) with default settings. Three independent experiments were performed for treatments with 0.3% H2O2 (30 min) and 0.02% NaOCl (5 min). Similarly, six biological replicates were included for the untreated biofilms.

Microarray experimental design and analysis

The custom-made 4 × 44K microarray for B. cenocepacia was previously developed using Agilent's two-colour 60-mer ink jet synthesis platform [68]. In the present study, a reference design was applied; to this end all Cy5 labelled samples were compared to a Cy3 labelled reference sample, which was generated by pooling RNA extracted in ten independent (untreated) biofilm experiments. The gene expression analysis was performed using GeneSpring GX 7.3 (Agilent) and data were normalized using the Affymetrix FE data normalization procedure recommended for two-colour Agilent microarrays. Only features dedicated to B. cenocepacia J2315 that were labelled "present" or "marginal" were included in the analysis. After these initial filter steps, an arbitrary cut-off value of a two-fold ratio change was applied to identify differentially expressed genes. Subsequently, a one way ANOVA analysis was performed (p < 0.05). The experimental protocols and the raw microarray data can be found in ArrayExpress under the accession number E-MEXP-2502.

Quantitative RT-PCR

In order to validate the microarray results, the expression of 36 genes and two IGs in the H2O2-treated biofilms was examined by using RT-qPCR (Additional file 5). In addition to the confirmation of the microarray results for the 30 min treated biofilms, the expression of the selected genes was also examined in biofilms treated with H2O2 for 15 and 60 min. Five biological replicates were included for each test condition. Biofilm formation, treatments, RNA extraction and DNase I treatments were performed as described above. cDNA was synthesized using the SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using 1 μg of total RNA as starting material. Subsequently, cDNA was diluted (1:10) in DEPC water (Invitrogen) and stored at -20°C until further use. Forward and reverse primers were developed using Primer Express Software (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and they were compared to the B. cenocepacia J2315 database using BLAST to determine their specificity.

All qPCR experiments were performed on a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time System C1000 Thermal Cycler. 2 μL FW and RV primers (final concentration 600 nM), 2 μl of cDNA sample, 4 μl of DEPC water and 10 μl of iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were added to the wells of a 96-well hard shell PCR-plate (100923; Bio-Rad). Each sample was spotted in duplo and an interrun calibrator as well as control samples without added cDNA were included in each experiment. The initial 3 min denaturation step at 95°C was followed by 40 amplification cycles, consisting of 15 s at 95°C and 60 s at 58°C. A melting curve analysis was included at the end of each run.

In addition to the 36 genes described in Additional file 5, primers were also designed for ten candidate reference genes (Additional file 6). These ten genes included (i) five genes (BCAL1459, BCAL1659, BCAL2694, BCAM2784 and BCAS0175), which encode functionally diverse proteins and which showed a moderate and stable expression under all test conditions in the microarray experiments (fold difference between test conditions was between 0.9 and 1.1 and raw fluorescence values >300) and (ii) five of the housekeeping genes used in the B. cepacia complex MLST scheme (BCAL0036, BCAL0289, BCAL0421, BCAL1861 and BCAM0991) [69]. The gene stability analysis using GeNorm [70] revealed that all these candidate reference genes were stably expressed under all test conditions. Pairwise variation analysis (data not shown) resulted in the selection of five genes (BCAL1659, BCAL2694, BCAL1459, BCAS0175 and BCAL1861) necessary for an accurate normalization of our data.

Lipase activity in biofilm supernatant

In order to determine the lipase activity in the supernatant of untreated and H2O2-treated biofilms, B. cenocepacia J2315, AU1054 and HI2424, B. multivorans LMG 17588, B. ambifaria LMG 19182 and B. dolosa AU0158 biofilms were grown as described above. Subsequently, 120 μl of 0.3% H2O2 (1% for B. dolosa AU0158) was added to the biofilms for 15, 30 or 60 min; 120 μl of saline was added to untreated control biofilms. After the prescribed contact times, the supernatants were collected separately, they were filter sterilized (0.2 μm) and retained on ice. Extracellular lipase activity was determined as described previously [38]. In brief, 20 μl of fluorogenic 4-MU based substrates (4-MU palmitate, 4-MU stearate or 4-MU oleate) was added to 180 μl sterile supernatant in black 96-well microtiter plates (CulturPlate-96F, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Plates were incubated at 37°C and every 30 min, fluorescence was measured using a multilabel microtiter plate reader (Wallac Victor2) (λexc: 355 nm, λem: 460 nm). Three replicates were included per test condition and per fluorogenic substrate.

Quantification of H2O2 in biofilm supernatant

To determine the importance of KatA and KatB for the survival of B. cenocepacia biofilms in the presence of high concentrations of H2O2, the degradation of H2O2 was monitored for B. cenocepacia J2315, C5424, MDL1 (katA mutant) and MDL2 (katB mutant) biofilms. To this end, supernatants were removed from the biofilms after 15, 30 and 60 min of treatment and H2O2 concentrations were determined titrimetrically using KMnO4, as described previously [71].

Evaluation of the fold change correlation between qPCR experiments and microarray analysis

For each gene and IG examined by qPCR, the fold change in expression between the untreated and H2O2-treated (0.3%, 30 min) biofilms was compared to the corresponding fold change determined in the microarray analysis. To this end, the log2 fold changes were subjected to bivariate regression analysis and Pearson correlation coefficients were determined using SPSS 15 [72, 73].

References

  1. 1.

    Vanlaere E, Baldwin A, Gevers D, Henry D, De Brandt E, LiPuma JJ, Mahenthiralingam E, Speert DP, Dowson C, Vandamme P: Taxon K, a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, comprises at least two novel species, Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009, 59: 102-111. 10.1099/ijs.0.001123-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Burkholder WH: Sour skin, a bacterial rot of onion bulbs. Phytopathology. 1950, 40: 115-117.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jones AM, Dodd ME, Webb AK: Burkholderia cepacia: current clinical issues, environmental controversies and ethical dilemmas. Eur Respir J. 2001, 17: 295-301. 10.1183/09031936.01.17202950.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Burns JL: Antibiotic resistance of Burkholderia spp. Burkholderia: Molecular Microbiology and Genomics. Edited by: Coenye T, Vandamme P. 2007, Norfolk: Horizon Bioscience, 81-91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, Goldberg JB: The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3: 144-156. 10.1038/nrmicro1085.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Saiman L, Siegel J: Infection control in cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17: 57-71. 10.1128/CMR.17.1.57-71.2004.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Peeters A, Nelis HJ, Coenye T: Evaluation of disinfection procedures against Burkholderia cenocepacia biofilms. J Hosp Infect. 2008, 70: 361-368. 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.08.015.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    McDonald KJ, Speert DP: Interaction of Burkholderia species with the phagocytic system. Burkholderia: Molecular Microbiology and Genomics. Edited by: Coenye T, Vandamme P. 2007, Norfolk: Horizon Bioscience, 111-127.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Imlay JA: Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008, 77: 755-776. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061606.161055.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dukan S, Touati D: Hypochlorous acid stress in Escherichia coli: resistance, DNA damage, and comparison with hydrogen peroxide stress. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 6145-6150.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jimenez L: Microbial diversity in pharmaceutical product recalls and environments. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2007, 61: 383-399.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lefebre MD, Flannagan RS, Valvano MA: A minor catalase/peroxidase from Burkholderia cenocepacia is required for normal aconitase activity. Microbiology. 2005, 151: 1975-1985. 10.1099/mic.0.27704-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Holden MT, Seth-Smith HM, Crossman LC, Sebaihia M, Bentley SD, Cerdeño-Tárraga AM, Thomson NR, Bason N, Quail MA, Sharp S, Cherevach I, Churcher C, Goodhead I, Hauser H, Holroyd N, Mungall K, Scott P, Walker D, White B, Rose H, Iversen P, Mil-Homens D, Rocha EP, Fialho AM, Baldwin A, Dowson C, Barrell BG, Govan JR, Vandamme P, Hart CA, Mahenthiralingam E, Parkhill J: The genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315, an epidemic pathogen of cystic fibrosis patients. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 261-277. 10.1128/JB.01230-08.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Drevinek P, Holden MT, Ge Z, Jones AM, Ketchell I, Gill RT, Mahenthiralingam E: Gene expression changes linked to antimicrobial resistance, oxidative stress, iron depletion and retained motility are observed when Burkholderia cenocepacia grows in cystic fibrosis sputum. BMC Infect Dis. 2008, 8: 121-10.1186/1471-2334-8-121.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zheng M, Wang X, Templeton LJ, Smulski DR, Larossa RA, Storz G: DNA microarray-mediated transcriptional profiling of the Escherichia coli response to hydrogen peroxide. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 4562-4570. 10.1128/JB.183.15.4562-4570.2001.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Palma M, DeLuca D, Worgall S, Quadri LEN: Transcriptome analysis of the response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrogen peroxide. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 248-252. 10.1128/JB.186.1.248-252.2004.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chang W, Small DA, Toghrol F, Bently WE: Microarray analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals induction of pyocin genes in response to hydrogen peroxide. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 115-10.1186/1471-2164-6-115.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Salunke P, Töpfer T, Buer J, Tümmler B: Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the steady-state response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrogen peroxide. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 2565-2572. 10.1128/JB.187.8.2565-2572.2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stohl EA, Criss AK, Seifert HS: The transcriptome response of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to hydrogen peroxide reveals genes with previously uncharacterized roles in oxidative damage protection. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 58: 520-532. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04839.x.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Harrison A, Ray WC, Baker BD, Armbuster DW, Bakaletz LO, Munson RS: The OxyR regulon in nontypable Haemophilus influenzae. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 1004-1012. 10.1128/JB.01040-06.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Small DA, Chang W, Toghrol F, Bentley WE: Comparative global transcription analysis of sodium hypochlorite, peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 76: 1093-1105. 10.1007/s00253-007-1072-z.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bsat N, Chen L, Helmann JD: Mutation of the Bacillus subtilis alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (ahpCF) operon reveals compensatory interactions among hydrogen peroxide stress genes. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 6579-6586.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Elkins JG, Hassett DJ, Stewart PS, Schweizer HP, McDermott TR: Protective role of catalase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm resistance to hydrogen peroxide. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999, 65: 4594-4600.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rocha ER, Smith CJ: Role of the alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (ahpCF) genes in oxidative stress defence of the obligate anaerobe Bacteriodes fragilis. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 5701-5710.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Howell ML, Alsabbagh E, Ma JF, Ochsner UA, Klotz MG, Beveridge TJ, Blumenthal KM, Niederhoffer EC, Morris RE, Needham D, Dean GE, Wani MA, Hassett DJ: AnkB, a periplasmic ankyrin-like protein in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is required for optimal catalase B (KatB) activity and resistance to hydrogen peroxide. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 4545-4556. 10.1128/JB.182.16.4545-4556.2000.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ochsner UA, Hassett DJ, Vasil ML: Genetic and physiological characterization of ohr, encoding a protein involved in organic hydroperoxide resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 773-778. 10.1128/JB.183.2.773-778.2001.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Seaver LC, Imlay JA: Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase is the primary scavenger of endogenous hydrogen peroxide in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 7173-7181. 10.1128/JB.183.24.7173-7181.2001.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lau GW, Britigan BE, Hassett DJ: Pseudomonas aeruginosa OxyR is required for full virulence in rodent and insect models of infection and for resistance to human neutrophils. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 2550-2553. 10.1128/IAI.73.4.2550-2553.2005.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Watnick P, Kolter R: Biofilm, city of microbes. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 2675-2679. 10.1128/JB.182.10.2675-2679.2000.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chung JW, Speert DP: Proteomic identification and characterization of bacterial factors associated with Burkholderia cenocepacia survival in a murine host. Microbiology. 2007, 153: 206-214. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/000455-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Peeters E, Nelis HJ, Coenye T: Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates. J Microbiol Methods. 2008, 72: 157-165. 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.11.010.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lushchak : Oxidative stress and mechanisms of protection against it in bacteria. Biokhimiya. 2001, 66: 592-609.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mongkolsuk S, Helmann JD: Regulation of inducible peroxide stress responses. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 45: 9-15. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03015.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zeller T, Klug G: Thioredoxins in bacteria: functions in oxidative stress response and regulation of thioredoxin genes. Naturwissenschaften. 2006, 93: 259-266. 10.1007/s00114-006-0106-1.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Atichartpongkul S, Loprasert S, Vattanaviboon P, Whangsuk W, Helmann JD, Mongkolsuk S: Bacterial Ohr and OsmC paralogues define two protein families with distinct functions and patterns of expression. Microbiology. 2001, 147: 1775-1782.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sukchawalit R, Loprasert S, Atichartpongkul A, Mongkolsuk S: Complex regulation of the organic hydroperoxide resistance gene (ohr) from Xanthomonas involves OhrR, a novel organic peroxide inducible negative regulator, and posttranscriptional modifications. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 4405-4412. 10.1128/JB.183.15.4405-4412.2001.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lesniak J, Barton WA, Nikolov DB: Structural and functional characterization of the Pseudomonas hydroperoxide resistance protein Ohr. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 6649-6659. 10.1093/emboj/cdf670.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Coenye T, Peeters E, Nelis HJ: Biofilm formation by Propionibacterium acnes is associated with increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and increased production of putative virulence factors. Res Microbiol. 2007, 158: 386-392. 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.02.001.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Storz G, Imlay JA: Oxidative stress. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999, 2: 188-194. 10.1016/S1369-5274(99)80033-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Imlay JA, Linn S: Mutagenesis and stress responses induced in Escherichia coli by hydrogen peroxide. J Bacteriol. 1987, 169: 2967-2976.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Loprasert S, Whangsuk W, Sallabhan R, Mongkolsuk S: DpsA protects the human pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei against organic hydroperoxide. Arch Microbiol. 2004, 182: 96-101. 10.1007/s00203-004-0694-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Altuvia S, Almiron M, Huisman G, Kolter R, Storz G: The dps promotor is activated by OxyR during growth and by IHF and a sigma(S) in stationary phase. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 13: 265-272. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00421.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Weber H, Polen T, Heuveling J, Wendisch VF, Hengge R: Genome-wide analysis of the general stress response network in Escherichia coli: sigma(S)-dependent genes, promoters and sigma factor selectivity. J Bacteriol. 2006, 187: 1591-1603. 10.1128/JB.187.5.1591-1603.2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lelong C, Aguiluz K, Luche S, Kuhn L, Garin J, Rabilloud T, Geiselmann J: The Crl-RpoS regulon of Escherichia coli. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007, 6: 648-659. 10.1074/mcp.M600191-MCP200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ayala-Castro C, Saini A, Outten FW: Fe-S cluster assembly pathways in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008, 72: 110-125. 10.1128/MMBR.00034-07.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Johnson DC, Dean DR, Smith AD, Johnson MK: Structure, function, and formation of biological iron-sulfur clusters. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005, 74: 247-281. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133518.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Choi YS, Shin DH, Chung IY, Kim SH, Heo YJ, Cho YH: Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa genes crucial for hydrogen peroxide resistance. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 17: 1344-1352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Tang Y, Guest JR: Direct evidence for mRNA binding and post-transcriptional regulation by Escherichia coli aconitases. Microbiology. 1999, 145: 3069-3079.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Varghese S, Tang Y, Imlay JA: Contrasting sensitivities of Escherichia coli aconitases A and B to oxidation and iron depletion. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 221-230. 10.1128/JB.185.1.221-230.2003.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Yoder-Himes DR, Chain PSG, Zhu Y, Wurtzel O, Rubin EM, Tiedje JM, Sorek R: Mapping the Burkholderia cenocepacia niche response via high-throughput sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 3976-3981. 10.1073/pnas.0813403106.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Coenye T, Drevinek P, Mahenthiralingam E, Shah SA, Gill RT, Vandamme P, Ussery DW: Identification of putative noncoding RNA genes in the Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 genome. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007, 276: 83-92. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00916.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wassarman KM: 6S RNA: a small RNA regulator of transcription. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007, 10: 164-168. 10.1016/j.mib.2007.03.008.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gardner PP, Daub J, Tate JG, Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Lindgreen S, Wilkinson AC, Finn RD, Griffiths-Jones S, Eddy SR, Bateman A: Rfam: updates to the RNA families database. Nucl Acids Res. 2009, 37: 136-140. 10.1093/nar/gkn766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Thomas MS: Iron acquisition mechanisms of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Biometals. 2006, 20: 431-452. 10.1007/s10534-006-9065-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Menard A, Estrada De Los Santos P, Graindorge A, Cournoyer B: Architecture of Burkholderia cepacia complex σ-70 gene family: evidence of alternative primary and clade-specific factors, and genomic instability. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 308-10.1186/1471-2164-8-308.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Agnoli K, Lowe CA, Farmer KL, Husnain I, Thomas MS: The ornibactin biosynthesis and transport genes of Burkholderia cenocepacia are regulated by an ECF σ factor which is a part of the Fur regulon. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 3631-3644. 10.1128/JB.188.10.3631-3644.2006.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Grigorova IL, Phleger NJ, Mutalik VK, Gross CA: Insights into transcriptional regulation and sigma competition from an equilibrium model of RNA polymerase binding to DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 5332-5337. 10.1073/pnas.0600828103.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Gruber TM, Gross CA: Multiple sigma subunits and the partitioning of bacterial transcription space. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2003, 57: 441-466. 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090913.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Tiburzi F, Imperi F, Visca P: Intracellular levels and activity of PvdS, the major starvation sigma factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 2008, 67: 213-227.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Flannagan RS, Valvano MA: Burkholderia cenocepacia requires RpoE for growth under stress conditions and delay of phagolysosomal fusion in macrophages. Microbiology. 2008, 154: 643-653. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/013714-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Saldias MS, Lamothe J, Wu R, Valvano MA: Burkholderia cenocepacia requires the RpoN sigma factor for biofilm formation and intracellular trafficking within macrophages. Infect Immun. 2008, 76: 1059-1067. 10.1128/IAI.01167-07.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    McCarter LL: Regulation of flagella. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006, 9: 180-186. 10.1016/j.mib.2006.02.001.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Tomich M, Herfst CA, Golden JW, Mohr CD: Role of flagella in host cell invasion by Burkholderia cepacia. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 1799-1806. 10.1128/IAI.70.4.1799-1806.2002.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Urban TA, Griffith A, Torok AM, Smolkin ME, Burns JL, Goldberg JB: Contribution of Burkholderia cenocepacia flagella to infectivity and inflammation. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 5126-5134. 10.1128/IAI.72.9.5126-5134.2004.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Summer EJ, Gonzalez CF, Carlisle T, Mebane LM, Cass AM, Savva CG, LiPuma JJ, Young R: Burkholderia cenocepacia phage BcepMu and a family of Mu-like phages encoding potential pathogenesis factors. J Mol Biol. 2004, 340: 49-65. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.053.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Summer EJ, Gill JJ, Upton C, Gonzalez CF, Young R: Role of phages in the pathogenesis of Burkholderia, or 'Where are the toxin genes in Burkholderia phages?'. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007, 10: 410-417. 10.1016/j.mib.2007.05.016.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Braid MD, Silhavy JL, Kitts CL, Cano RJ, Howe MM: Complete genomic sequence of bacteriophage B3, a Mu-like phage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 6560-6574. 10.1128/JB.186.19.6560-6574.2004.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Leiske DL, Karimpour-Fard A, Hume PS, Fairbanks BD, Gill RT: A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 72-10.1186/1471-2164-7-72.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Baldwin A, Mahenthiralingam E, Thickett KM, Honeybourne D, Maiden MC, Govan JR, Speert DP, LiPuma JJ, Vandamme P, Dowson CG: Multilocus sequence typing scheme that provides both species and strain differentiation for the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 4665-4673. 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4665-4673.2005.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F: Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002, 3: 7-10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Directorate for the Quality of Medicines of the Council of Europe: 2004, European Pharmacopoeia. Strasbourg

  72. 72.

    MAQC Consortium: The microarray quality control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol. 2006, 24: 1151-1161. 10.1038/nbt1239.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Arikawa E, Sun Y, Wang J, Zhou Q, Ning B, Dial SL, Guo L, Yang J: Cross-platform comparison of SYBR Green real-time PCR with TaqMan PCR, microarrays and other gene expression measurement technologies evaluated in the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) study. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 328-10.1186/1471-2164-9-328.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Toledano MB, Kullik I, Trinh F, Baird PT, Schneider TD, Storz G: Redox-dependent shift of OxyR-DNA contacts along an extended DNA-binding site: a mechanism for differential promoter selection. Cell. 1994, 78: 897-909. 10.1016/S0092-8674(94)90702-1.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Zuker M: Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucl Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3406-3415. 10.1093/nar/gkg595.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Govan JRW, Brown PH, Maddison J, Doherty CJ, Nelson JW, Dodd M, Greening AP, Webb AK: Evidence for transmission of Pseudomonas cepacia by social contact in cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 1993, 342: 15-19. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91881-L.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Mahenthiralingam E, Campbell ME, Henry DA, Speert DP: Epidemiology of Burkholderia cepacia infection in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34: 2914-2920.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Vandamme P, Holmes B, Vancanneyt M, Coenye T, Hoste B, Coopman R, Revets H, Lauwers S, Gillis M, Kersters K, Govan JRW: Occurrence of multiple genomovars of Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis patients and proposal of Burkholderia multivorans sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1997, 47: 1188-1200. 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1188.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    LiPuma JJ, Spilker T, Coenye T, Gonzalez CF: An epidemic Burkholderia cepacia complex strain identified in soil. Lancet. 2002, 359: 2002-2003. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08836-0.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Chen JS, Witzmann KA, Spilker T, Fink RJ, LiPuma JJ: Endemicity and inter-city spread of Burkholderia cepacia genomovar III in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2001, 139: 643-649. 10.1067/mpd.2001.118430.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    King EB, Parke JL: Biocontrol of Aphanomyces root rot and Pythium damping-off by Pseudomonas cepacia strain AMMD on four pea cultivars. Plant Dis. 1993, 77: 1185-1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Coenye T, LiPuma JJ, Henry D, Hoste B, Vandemeulebroecke K, Gillis M, Speert DP, Vandamme P: Burkholderia cepacia genomovar VI, a new member of the Burkholderia cepacia complex isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001, 51: 271-279.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Kim De Bruecker for technical assistance in the biofilm and qPCR experiments. They also thank Dr. Miguel Valvano for providing them with B. cenocepacia C5424 and the B. cenocepacia MDL1 and MDL2 mutant strains. The microarray analysis was funded by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics (CFFT) Inc. (grant BA-004A); EM and AS also acknowledge funding from the CFFT (grant MAHENT06V0). This research was financially supported by the BOF of Ghent University (EP) and FWO-Vlaanderen (TC).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Elke Peeters, Hans Nelis & Tom Coenye

  2. Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Andrea Sass & Eshwar Mahenthiralingam

Authors
  1. Elke Peeters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Sass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eshwar Mahenthiralingam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hans Nelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tom Coenye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Coenye.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

EP performed all procedures associated with the biofilm experiments, the RNA extractions and the qPCR experiments, did all data analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AS performed the RNA quality control and all microarray experiments. EM provided assistance with the design of the microarray study. TC, EP and HN planned the original study and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read the final paper and contributed to its written content.

Electronic supplementary material

Upregulated genes, intergenic regions and tRNA- and rRNA- encoding sequences in H

Additional file 1: 2 O 2 -treated biofilms. Complete list of all B. cenocepacia J2315 genes, intergenic regions and tRNA- and rRNA- encoding sequences showing a significantly increased expression (>2-fold change; p < 0.05) in H2O2-treated biofilms compared to the expression in the untreated biofilms. (PDF 54 KB)

Downregulated genes, intergenic regions and tRNA- and rRNA- encoding sequences in H

Additional file 2: 2 O 2 -treated biofilms. Complete list of all B. cenocepacia J2315 genes, intergenic regions and tRNA- and rRNA- encoding sequences showing a significantly decreased expression (>2-fold change; p < 0.05) in H2O2-treated biofilms compared to the expression in the untreated biofilms. (PDF 36 KB)

Upregulated genes, intergenic regions and tRNA- and rRNA- encoding sequences in NaOCl-treated biofilms

Additional file 3: . Complete list of all B. cenocepacia J2315 genes, intergenic regions and tRNA- and rRNA- encoding sequences showing a significantly increased expression (>2-fold change; p < 0.05) in NaOCl-treated biofilms compared to the expression in the untreated biofilms. (PDF 62 KB)

Downregulated genes, intergenic regions and tRNA- and rRNA- encoding sequences in NaOCl-treated biofilms

Additional file 4: . Complete list of all B. cenocepacia J2315 genes, intergenic regions and tRNA- and rRNA- encoding sequences showing a significantly decreased expression (>2-fold change; p < 0.05) in NaOCl-treated biofilms compared to the expression in the untreated biofilms. (PDF 55 KB)

Additional file 5: FW and RV primers used in the qPCR experiments. (PDF 32 KB)

FW and RV primers used in the qPCR experiments for ten selected reference genes

Additional file 6: . Five genes encoding functionally diverse proteins were selected based on their moderate and stable expression under all test conditions in the microarray experiments. The other selected candidate reference genes are five of the housekeeping genes used in the B. cepacia complex MLST scheme (in italic) [69]. Based on the pairwise variation analysis (GeNorm) [70], five genes (in bold) were selected for the normalization of the qPCR data. (PDF 15 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peeters, E., Sass, A., Mahenthiralingam, E. et al. Transcriptional response of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 sessile cells to treatments with high doses of hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite. BMC Genomics 11, 90 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-90

Download citation

Keywords

  • NaOCl
  • Candidate Reference Gene
  • J2315 Cell
  • OxyR
  • qPCR Experiment

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us