Skip to main content

Genome-wide SNP discovery in tetraploid alfalfa using 454 sequencing and high resolution melting analysis



Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common type of sequence variation among plants and are often functionally important. We describe the use of 454 technology and high resolution melting analysis (HRM) for high throughput SNP discovery in tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), a species with high economic value but limited genomic resources.


The alfalfa genotypes selected from M. sativa subsp. sativa var. 'Chilean' and M. sativa subsp. falcata var. 'Wisfal', which differ in water stress sensitivity, were used to prepare cDNA from tissue of clonally-propagated plants grown under either well-watered or water-stressed conditions, and then pooled for 454 sequencing. Based on 125.2 Mb of raw sequence, a total of 54,216 unique sequences were obtained including 24,144 tentative consensus (TCs) sequences and 30,072 singletons, ranging from 100 bp to 6,662 bp in length, with an average length of 541 bp. We identified 40,661 candidate SNPs distributed throughout the genome. A sample of candidate SNPs were evaluated and validated using high resolution melting (HRM) analysis. A total of 3,491 TCs harboring 20,270 candidate SNPs were located on the M. truncatula (MT 3.5.1) chromosomes. Gene Ontology assignments indicate that sequences obtained cover a broad range of GO categories.


We describe an efficient method to identify thousands of SNPs distributed throughout the alfalfa genome covering a broad range of GO categories. Validated SNPs represent valuable molecular marker resources that can be used to enhance marker density in linkage maps, identify potential factors involved in heterosis and genetic variation, and as tools for association mapping and genomic selection in alfalfa.


DNA pyrosequencing using 454 sequencing technology enables sequencing millions of high-quality DNA bases per sequencing run [1, 2]. This method has been used successfully for transcriptome sequencing and identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in many plant species including maize (Zea mays L.) [3], sugarcane (Saccarum spp.) [4], eucalyptus (Eucalyptus grandis) [5], and the model legume and close relative of alfalfa, M. truncatula[6]. The M. truncatula genome is one of three legume genomes including Lotus japonicus and soybean (Glycine max) that have been assembled and annotated [7, 8]. SNPs are the most common sequence variation among plants and are often functionally important. SNPs can be converted into genetic markers that can be inexpensively assayed using high-throughput approaches [9]. Traditionally, molecular markers have been used to determine genetic relatedness between plant materials, to assist in the identification of novel sources of genetic variation, to study evolutionary relationships, to confirm the pedigree and identity of new varieties, in population structure analysis and association genetics, to locate quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and genes of interest, and for marker-assisted breeding [10]. The value and uses of DNA markers have been shaped in large part by innovations in marker technologies that increase throughput and reduce costs per data point [11]. A large number of molecular markers can be used in high-throughput genotyping platforms in association mapping studies to dissect complex traits and in molecular breeding approaches at the whole genome level [12].

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is one of the most important forage legume species worldwide and the third most valuable crop in the USA ($8 billion per annum). Alfalfa is a high yielding perennial species that requires little or no nitrogen fertilizer because of its ability to carry out symbiotic nitrogen fixation and can be harvested multiple times during the growing season. Therefore, it has been an important component of sustainable agricultural systems for many years and has recently been promoted as a potential bioenergy crop [13]. Cultivated alfalfa is tetraploid (2n = 4x = 32) and displays tetrasomic inheritance [14]. Alfalfa is partially self-incompatible and populations are extremely polymorphic due to their high degree of outcrossing. Inbreeding severely depresses plant vigor and fertility in tetraploid alfalfa due to the loss of complementary gene interactions [15, 16], preventing the development of inbred lines. A significant level of sequence conservation was reported between alfalfa and M. truncatula[17] allowing estimates of marker colinearity between the two species [18]. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers developed from M. truncatula and some alfalfa sequences are currently available [1921]. Alfalfa like many other crop species, lacks validated SNP markers which are required in large numbers for map-based gene isolation, association genetics and genomic selection approaches [10].

High-resolution melting (HRM) curve analysis has proven to be a highly sensitive method for mutation discovery and SNP genotyping [22]. Nucleic acid melting is tracked by monitoring the fluorescence of the samples across a defined temperature range generating high-resolution melting profiles that are used to identify the presence of sequence variation within the amplicon [23]. Base-pair mismatches shift the stability of a duplex by varying amounts depending on the particular mismatch, the mismatch position, and neighboring base pairs [24]. HRM was successfully implemented to assay SNP variation in diploid and tetraploid alfalfa [25].

We describe the generation of thousands of alfalfa ESTs (expressed sequence tags) obtained using 454 sequencing technology and the first iteration of genome-wide SNP identification in tetraploid alfalfa, a non-model plant species that currently lacks a sequenced genome. A sample of candidate SNPs were experimentally validated using a HRM platform.


Sequence assembly and annotation

Root and shoot samples were collected during progressively developing water stress from clonal propagules of each alfalfa genotype. RNA was purified and a pooled sample for each genotype was used to construct 454 Titanium cDNA libraries. The two libraries were sequenced on separate 454 half-plates that generated (after trimming and removal of reads less than 100 bp) 155,120 reads with a total length of 57.5 Mb from genotype Chilean and 177,871 reads with a total length of 67.6 Mb from genotype Wisfal (Table 1). The raw sequences were clustered and assembled separately for each genotype and also as a combined set using TGICL clustering utility [26]. The combined sequence assembly with the two genotypes resulted in 24,144 TCs and 30,072 singletons ranging from 100 to 6,662 bases, with an average length of 541 bases. Alfalfa transcriptome sequences were submitted to the short read database and transcript assembly database in GenBank ( and were assigned the accession numbers [Genbank: JL866457-JL881209], [Genebank: JL881210-JL898333], [Genbank: SRX040822], and [GenBank: SRX040823], respectively for Wisfal short reads, Chilean short reads, Chilean assembly, and Wisfal assembly. For the purposes of annotation, the combined alfalfa transcript assemblies were located on the Medicago truncatula Gene Index (MtGI) Release 10.0 maintained by the Dana Farber Cancer Institute ( A total of 41,350 alfalfa unique sequences (76%) had a blastn hit to 24,358 MtGI sequences (cut off E value 1e-10). For the 41,350 sequences with hits in the MtGI database, Gene Ontology (GO) categories of their best match were assigned to each sequence. The proportion of alfalfa 454 sequences in each category follows the same general trend as the MtGI (Figure 1), indicating sequence coverage of a broad range of genes in the alfalfa 454 sequences.

Table 1 Alfalfa sequence length distribution pre-and post-assembly
Figure 1

Comparative distribution of gene ontology assignment of sequences derived from 454 sequencing of cDNA from M. sativa and those in the M. truncatula gene index (MtGI release 10.0). Assignment is expressed as percent of singleton/TC allocated to functional groups within each of three broad categories.

Alignment of alfalfa sequences to the M. truncatula genome

The available M. truncatula genome sequence was used as a scaffold to align the alfalfa transcript sequences. Under stringent conditions using Blat, including a threshold of 95% identity and 90% coverage (Figure 2), 20,067 (10,911 TCs and 9,156 singletons) unique sequences (37%) were mapped to the MT 3.5.1 genome sequence assembly. Among these, a total of 20,270 candidate SNPs were identified in 3,491 TCs mapped to the M. truncatula genome (Table 2) and their likely map positions inferred. To identify the number of distinct loci represented in the alfalfa transcript assemblies, they were searched against the M. truncatula v 3.5 pseudomolecules annotation. At the nucleotide level, 32,606 (60%) of the alfalfa 454 sequences had a blastn (cut off E value 1e-10) hit with 15,932 M. truncatula CDS. We essentially obtained the same result at the amino acid level, in which 35,791 (66%) of the alfalfa 454 sequences had a blastx hit (cut off E value 10-5) to 15,870 M. truncatula predicted proteins.

Figure 2

Alfalfa sequences mapped to MT 3.5 pseudomolecules with a threshold of 95% identity and 90% coverage. Blue lines represent alfalfa sequences without candidate SNPs and green lines represent alfalfa sequences containing candidate SNPs.

Table 2 Summary of candidate SNP containing assemblies and their location on the MT3.5 chromosomes

When combined with the MtGI results, 46,086 (85%) alfalfa sequences had a blastn or blastx hit in MtGI and/or MT3.5 databases. Of the remaining 8,130 alfalfa sequences, 992 of them had a blastx hit (cut off E value 1e-5) with 763 proteins in the soybean Glyma1.0 high confidence gene protein database [27] and 732 alfalfa sequences had a blastx hit (cut off E value 1e-5) with 572 L. japonicus proteins [28] further supporting the notion of shared sequences among legumes. Only 12 of the remaining 7,057 alfalfa sequences without a match in any of the aforementioned databases had a hit in the Arabidopsis TAIR 9.0 protein database (cut off E value 1e-5). The remaining 7,045 sequences represent a total length of 2.3 Mb (8% of the total sequences post-assembly), did not have a significant match when blasted against the NCBI non-redundant nucleotide database suggesting they may be miss-assembled or novel sequences.

SNP discovery and validation

Candidate SNPs were called based on sequence alignments within and between the Chilean and Wisfal genotypes. A total of 40,661 candidate SNPs were identified in 7,342 TCs within or between the two genotypes. The SNPs were assigned to four Categories based on their allelic composition (Figure 3). Candidate SNPs in the first three Categories have only two variants and include 97% of all candidate SNPs identified. Category 1 SNPs are between the two genotypes and homozygous within each genotype (e.g. Chilean = A, and Wisfal = C). Category 2 SNPs are heterozygous within one genotype and homozygous in the other (e.g. Chilean = A/C and Wisfal = A, or Chilean = A and Wisfal = A/C). Category 2 is the most abundant type of SNPs and constitutes 60% of all candidate SNPs; Category 1 is the second most abundant type with 21% of all candidate SNPs. SNPs in Category 3 (16%) are biallelic and heterozygous within each genotype (e.g. Chilean = A/C and Wisfal = A/C). Category 4 SNPs have more than two variants (e.g. Chilean = A/C/G or/and Wisfal = A/C/T) and account for only 3% of all candidate SNPs identified. We focused on validating Category 2 SNPs due to their suitability for mapping in tetraploid alfalfa based on their segregation patterns in this population. Category 1 SNPs are heterozygous in all F1 individuals from the mapping population resulting from a cross between two homozygous genotypes and thus not suitable for mapping. In this study, candidate SNPs represented in Categories 3 and 4 were not considered for validation or mapping due to the complexity of their segregation patterns in this autotetraploid outcrossing species.

Figure 3

Categories of candidate SNPs identified through alignment of M. sativa subs. sativa var 'Chilean' vs. M. sativa subsp. falcata var 'Wisfal' 454 sequences.

A subset of 192 candidate SNPs (MSSNPV001 to MSSNPV192) identified in the alfalfa transcriptome were used to design primer pairs (Additional File 1) for SNP validation through PCR amplification and HRM analysis. The majority of SNP primers (176) were designed to target Category 2 candidate SNPs and 16 primer pairs targeted Category 1 candidate SNPs (Additional File 2). A Category 1 SNP is homozygous within each genotype but different between the two genotypes. The anticipated HRM profile for a Category 1 SNP includes two different and distinct HRM peaks, each of which corresponds to a different homozygous allelic state. Category 1 SNP marker MSSNPV002 (Figure 4A), results in a melting peak for Wisfal (AAAA, shown in black) and a melting peak for Chilean (GGGG, shown in red). Two of the 16 Category 1 candidate SNPs were not validated and resulted in overlapping melting peaks between the two genotypes, as shown for MSSNPV001 (Figure 4D). The melting curve peak from Category 2 SNP MSSNPV072 corresponding to Chilean, the heterozygous genotype, is shorter and wider than the peak corresponding to Wisfal, the homozygous genotype (Figure 5A). The HRM profiles from the remaining 13 Category 1 candidate SNPs were complex, indicating the existence of additional SNPs within the amplicon sequence that were not predicted by 454 sequencing (Figure 4B and 4C). Results from the HRM evaluation of the 176 Category 2 candidate SNPs indicate that 119 of them displayed the anticipated Category 2 SNP profile (Figure 5A), 49 showed complex profiles indicating the presence of additional SNPs not predicted based on the 454 sequences (Figure 5B and 5C), and eight candidate SNP were not validated (Figure 5D) based on overlapping melting curves and amplicon sequencing (Figure 5D). Sequencing of the PCR amplicon obtained from MSSNPV072 confirmed a single SNP at position 37 between the two genotypes (Figure 5A). A total of 120 SNPs were validated, while 62 SNP primers (32.3%) resulted in the identification of additional SNPs. For example, the predicted Category 1 SNP for MSSNPV008 at position 68 (G vs. C) was confirmed by sequencing and additional SNPs were identified at position 48 and position 99 (Figure 4B). The predicted Category 2 SNP at position 94 for MSSNPV075 was confirmed, and additional SNPs were identified at position 42 and position 48 (Figure 5B). In the case of SNP MSSNPV032, the predicted SNP at position 85 was confirmed, and three additional SNPs were also detected (Figure 5C). Variation in depth of sequence coverage was observed for the SNP-containing sequences between the two genotypes. Both genotypes were represented in at least 46 sequence reads in the case of validated SNP MSSNPV002 (data not shown). In contrast, candidate SNP MSSNPV001 had less than five sequence reads representing each genotype. Overall, validated candidate SNPs had higher depth of 454 sequence coverage than non-validated SNPs in both Category 1 and Category 2 SNPs.

Figure 4

High resolution melting peaks and amplicon sequences from Category 1 candidate SNPs between M. sativa subs. sativa var 'Chilean' (red) and M. sativa subsp. falcata var 'Wisfal' (gray). SNPs predicted by 454 sequencing are shown in blue and additional SNPs identified through amplicon sequencing are shown in black. A) Primers SNP MSSNPV002 confirms the presence of a single SNP at position 52 (Chilean = G, Wisfal = A) in a 106 bp amplicon. B) Primers SNP MSSNPV008 confirms the presence of SNP at position 68 (Chilean = G, Wisfal = C), and additional SNPs at position 48 (Chilean = G, Wisfal = C/G) and position 99 (Chilean = A/G, Wisfal = A) in a 138 bp amplicon. C) Validated candidate SNP MSSNPV009 at position 68 (Chilean = C, Wisfal = G), and additional SNPs at position 48 (Chilean = A/C, Wisfal = A), position 87 (Chilean = A/G, Wisfal = A/G), position 90 (Chilean = C/T, Wisfal = C/T), position 99 (Chilean = A/G, Wisfal = A/G), position 100 (Chilean = G, Wisfal = A/G), and position 155 (Chilean = A/G, Wisfal = A/G) in a 220 bp amplicon. D) Non-validated candidate SNP MSSNPV001 (Chilean = G, Wisfal = G) in a 136 bp amplicon.

Figure 5

High resolution melting peaks and amplicon sequences from Category 2 candidate SNPs and the corresponding amplicon sequences between M. sativa subs. sativa var 'Chilean' (red) and M. sativa subsp. falcata var 'Wisfal' (gray). SNPs predicted by 454 sequencing are shown in blue and additional SNPs identified through amplicon sequencing are shown in black. A) Primers SNP MSSNPV072 confirms the presence of a single SNP at position 37 (Chilean = A/T, Wisfal = T) in a 92 bp amplicon. B) Primers SNP MSSNPV075 confirms SNP at position 94 (Chilean = G, Wisfal = A/G), and additional SNPs at position 42 (Chilean = A/C, Wisfal = A/C), and position 48 (Chilean = C/T, Wisfal = C/T), in a 115 bp amplicon. C) Validated candidate SNP MSCWSNP032 at position 85 (Chilean = G, Wisfal = A/G), and additional SNPs at positions 26 and 27 (Chilean = C/T and A/C, and Wisfal = C/T and A/C, respectively), and position 61 (Chilean = A/T and Wisfal = A), in a 130 bp amplicon). D) Non-validated candidate SNP MSCWSNP058 (Chilean = A and Wisfal = A) in a 169 bp amplicon.


SNP markers have a broad range of applications and a large number of markers are needed to implement association genetics approaches and genomic selection in plants with low levels of LD [12, 29]. Large scale SNP discovery efforts in a wide range of crop plants are currently limited to a few species. Previous SNP discovery approaches in other species include sequence comparisons between the Arabidopsis ecotypes Landsberg and Columbia [30] and subspecies of rice [31]. Although alfalfa is the most widely cultivated forage legume, it lacks genomics resource development compared to other crop species, partly because it is an autotetraploid, perennial outcrossing species. Thus, a whole genome SNP discovery effort is among the most critical endeavors to develop the necessary tools and integrate molecular breeding approaches in alfalfa. In this study, we utilized 454 sequencing for genome-wide SNP discovery between and within two genotypes from M. sativa subsp. sativa (Chilean) and M. sativa subsp. falcata (Wisfal), which have contrasting phenotypes for water stress tolerance. Sequencing and SNP discovery based on transcriptome sequencing of water stressed plants increased the likelihood of having sequence coverage in genes relevant to water-stress and identification of allelic differences in these genes between the two alfalfa genotypes evaluated in this study.

Sequence assembly and alignment to M. truncatula

The close phylogenetic relationship between M. truncatula and alfalfa, same basic chromosome number (x = 8), high degree of sequence similarity and marker co-linearity [17, 18] facilitated using the M. truncatula genome sequence as a scaffold to align alfalfa transcriptome sequences. Despite the size and complexity of the alfalfa genome, alignments of alfalfa 454 sequences throughout the M. truncatula genome were apparent (Figure 2). The M. truncatula genome sequence project targeted the euchromatic region and available data indicate that 66% of the genes captured in the current pseudomolecules and 24% of the genes in M. truncatula captured in the fragmented Illumina assemblies are found within the euchromatin. Therefore, the M. truncatula genome provides a valuable resource for gene annotation of alfalfa sequences. The identification of some alfalfa sequences without alignment to the M. truncatula genome is not unexpected considering that M. truncatula is a selfing, annual diploid species and alfalfa is an outcrossing, perennial tetraploid species with a considerably larger genome. Additionally, non-alignment of alfalfa sequences to the M. truncatula genome could occur in regions where there have been authentic genome rearrangements between the two species. We demonstrated the feasibility of using genomic resources from model species to quickly assemble transcriptome sequences from related species. These alfalfa resources can also facilitate opportunities to further understand legume genome structure and evolution.

SNP discovery and validation

454 sequencing is a high-throughput approach to identify sequence variation and was utilized successfully here to identify SNP variation in tetraploid alfalfa. Alfalfa is genetically very diverse and the existence of heterosis between M. sativa subsp. sativa and M. sativa subsp. falcata was previously reported [32, 33]. Because Chilean and Wisfal are highly heterozygous outcrossing lines, transcriptome sequencing of alfalfa genotypes enabled the identification of gene-associated SNPs within and between genotypes covering a range of gene functions and location in the genome. Reports that 454 sequencing technology may be susceptible to indel-type errors [1] prompted us to consider only base substitutions (i.e. SNPs) with stringent SNP prediction criteria.

The HRM platform proved to be a suitable method for validation and genotyping of a large number of candidate SNPs. The HRM melting curve profiles enables identification of homozygous and heterozygous SNP genotypes [34]. We report a 62.5% rate of validation of single candidate SNPs (120 out of the 192) indicating that transcriptome sequencing of a crop legume with economic value and assembly of those transcript sequences using the genome of a closely related model species is a viable strategy for genome-wide SNP discovery efforts. Studies in eucalyptus reported a 83% rate of validation from the candidate SNPs [5]. Additional SNP in alfalfa were detected using HRM that were not predicted based on the bioinformatics analysis from the 454 sequences. These findings were partly due to our efforts to minimize the false discovery rate in sequences with low depth of sequence coverage. Therefore, the challenge for SNP discovery using 454 sequences in a highly heterozygous species such as alfalfa resides in limitations from the depth of sequence coverage rather than sequencing errors. In contrast to a diploid species, tetraploid species have four homologous chromosomes and therefore deeper sequence coverage is needed to accurately ascertain the SNP variation within and among genotypes. Although an increase in the rate of SNP prediction can be obtained using less stringent SNP parameters, it also increases the likelihood of false positive SNP calls. The discrepancy between SNP detection and validation could also be the result of preferential allele expression or allele silencing in the pooled cDNA sample that was used because the initial SNP identification was based on cDNA sequencing whereas validation was made using PCR fragments amplified from genomic DNA. The identified SNPs complement our current work identifying genomic regions associated with water stress tolerance in backcross populations developed from the same two genotypes used for 454 sequencing.

Previous efforts to identify sequence polymorphism in alfalfa include array hybridizations that identify single feature polymorphisms (SFP) using M. truncatula Affy Chips [35]. The approach described here enables the discovery of SNPs within genes that may not be present on an array developed for the model M. truncatula. Additionally, SNP discovery efforts based on transcriptome sequencing in a crop species may result in the identification of SNPs with functional relevance to agriculturally important traits such as persistence, likely not present in an annual model system.

The large number of candidate SNPs with potential functional relevance identified in this study provides a valuable tool for comparative genomic studies between M. truncatula and alfalfa, and potentially to other forage legume species including white and red clover. Evaluations of SNP variability, frequency, and distribution, as well as estimates of linkage disequilibrium in alfalfa are now attainable research targets. Applications of crop-related SNP discovery efforts include genetic diversity analysis, increasing the marker density of genetic maps to support high-resolution association and linkage mapping of target traits, facilitation of future genome assembly of this highly complex genome, integration of genetic and physical maps, and increasing the feasibility of integrating marker-dense molecular breeding approaches such as genomic selection in this important forage legume.


In order to enhance crop productivity, we need to improve our understanding of the genes involved in plant growth, development, and adaptation to a changing environment including suboptimal soil conditions and biotic and abiotic stress conditions. The 454 EST-based SNP discovery and validation pipeline described here focused on two tetraploid alfalfa subspecies with contrasting water stress tolerance provides a platform for the discovery of agriculturally-relevant genes and corresponding SNPs. The availability of a large number of validated SNPs is a valuable molecular marker resource for genetics, high-resolution linkage and association mapping, and molecular breeding approaches using genomic selection, for practical and agriculturally-relevant improvements in alfalfa which are not feasible using model systems.


Plant materials

Two tetraploid alfalfa genotypes (sampled from M. sativa subsp. sativa var. 'Chilean' and M. sativa subsp. falcata var. 'Wisfal' [36] were clonally propagated and grown in metromix and sand mixture (4:1 v:v). Plant tissue was sampled at seven time points during a progressively developing water deficit including: well-watered, three, seven, nine, 11 and 14 days after withholding water, and one-day re-watering on day 15. Roots and shoots were sampled separately. Two to four clonal propagules of each genotype were sampled at each time point. For each genotype, cDNA was prepared from shoot and root tissue of each clonally propagated sample grown under either well-watered or water-stressed conditions, and then equal amounts of cDNA from each sampling point were pooled for sequencing using 454 sequencing technology.

cDNA preparation and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) following the manufacturer's recommendations, digested with DNAseI (Ambion, Austin, TX), column purified with RNeasy MinElute Cleanup kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and quantified using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer ND-100 (NanoDrop Technologies, Willington, DE). Total RNA integrity was assessed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Messenger RNA (mRNA) isolation was performed using Poly(A)Purist(tm) MAG (Magnetic mRNA Purification Kit, Ambion, Austin, TX). For the first strand cDNA synthesis, three microgram of mRNA was used with Oligo (dT)12-18 and Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase followed by a second cDNA synthesis (dscDNA) using Superscript First and Double Stranded cDNA synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Double stranded cDNA from roots and shoots from the same genotype was pooled and deep sequenced using Titanium 454 technology at the J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI) with each genotype occupying half of a 454 sequencing plate.

Sequence analysis

The raw sequences were assembled for each genotype separately and then combined (Table 1) using TGICL clustering utility [24] with The Paracel Transcript Assembler instead of CAP3 and a modified version of the TIGR Gene Index pipeline. The blast searches were performed using TCs and singletons from the assembly with the two genotypes combined (Table 1). All TCs and singletons were blasted against the MtGI 10.0 database using Blastn with e-10 as a cut-off expected value. The TCs and singletons were assigned to the GO categories based on their top hit.

SNP discovery and validation

Candidate SNP calls were predicted using Perl scripts to parse the transcript assembly files and requiring a minimum coverage of at least two 454 reads for each form of the SNP at the variant position. A confidence score was generated based on the percent of nucleotides matching the surrounding regions of the location of the SNP. Low confidence regions with less than 90% identity where a SNP was called were not included in the final SNP predictions. SNPs were quality controlled by remapping the 454 reads back onto the assembly and checked against the ACE alignment files. Indels were ignored and the process was biased towards getting good quality SNPs vs. getting all the SNPs at the expense of false SNP calls. Primer3 was used to design primers targeting candidate SNPs. Criteria for primer design include a predicted annealing temperature (Tm) of 59°C to 61°C, primer length ranging between 18-24 bp and PCR amplicon lengths of 40 to 200 bp. All PCR reactions were performed in 384-well plates using a 9700 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using a total volume of 5 mL per well. The PCR reaction mixture consisted of 5 ng of genomic DNA, 0.25 μM of forward and reverse primer, 1X LightScanner High Sensitivity Master Mix (Idaho Technologies, Salt Lake, UT, USA) and 10 mL mineral oil. After an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 95°C, 45 PCR cycles were performed with 30 s of denaturation at 94°C and 30 s at the target annealing temperature, followed by a final hold at 4°C. Samples were then transferred to a LightScanner 384-well system (Idaho Technologies, Salt Lake, UT) and a melting cycle was performed by increasing the temperature at 0.1°C s-1 from 56 to 95°C. Melting data was analyzed and visualized with the LightScanner Software with CALL-IT 2.0 (Idaho Technologies, Salt Lake, UT) using the small amplicon module.

Re-sequencing PCR amplicons

The PCR amplicons from twenty candidate SNP primers were cleaned using Exo/SAP-IT PCR product cleanup kit following the manufacturer's instructions (Affymetrix, Inc., Cleveland, OH) and directly sequenced using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using both forward and reverse primers. The amplicons were analyzed using an ABI 3730 automated sequencer (PE-ABI, Foster City, CA). The sequence data was analyzed and aligned for SNP discovery with Sequencher 4.8 (Gene Codes).


  1. 1.

    Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, et al: Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005, 437: 376-380.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Barbazuk WB, Schnable PS: SNP discovery by transcriptome pyrosequencing. Methods Mol Biol. 2011, 729: 225-246. 10.1007/978-1-61779-065-2_15.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Barbazuk WB, Scott JE, Hsin DC, Li L, Patrick SS: SNP discovery via 454 transcriptome sequencing. Plant J. 2007, 51: 910-918. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03193.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bundock PC, Eliott FG, Ablett G, Benson AD, Casu RE, Aitken KS, Henry RJ: Targeted single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery in a highly polyploid plant species using 454 sequencing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2009, 7: 347-354. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00401.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Novaes E, Drost D, Farmerie W, Pappas G, Grattapaglia D, Sederoff R, Kirst M: High-throughput gene and SNP discovery in Eucalyptus grandis, an uncharacterized genome. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 312-10.1186/1471-2164-9-312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cheung F, Haas B, Goldberg S, May G, Xiao Y, Town C: Sequencing Medicago truncatula expressed sequenced tags using 454 Life Sciences technology. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 272-10.1186/1471-2164-7-272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Young ND, Udvardi M: Translating Medicago truncatula genomics to crop legumes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009, 12: 193-201. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.11.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cannon SB, May GD, Jackson SA: Three sequenced legume genomes and many crop species: rich opportunities for translational genomics. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151: 970-977. 10.1104/pp.109.144659.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kwok PY: Methods for genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2001, 2: 235-258. 10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.235.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ganal MW, Altmann T, Röder MS: SNP identification in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009, 12: 211-217. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Walker DR, Monteros MJ, Yates JL: Chapter 6: Molecular breeding. Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Crop Plants (Soybean). Edited by: Bilyeu K, Ratnaparkhe M, Kole C. 2010, Science Publishers Inc

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Heffner EL, Sorrells MK, Jannink JL: Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 2009, 49: 1-12. 10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ebert J: Alfalfa's bioenergy appeal. Ethanol Producer Magazine. 2007, BBI International, 88-94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    McCoy TJ, Bingham ET: Cytology and cytogenetics of alfalfa. Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement. Edited by: Hanson AA, Barnes, DK, Hill, RR. 1988, Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, 29: 737-776.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bingham ET, Groose RW, Woodfield DR, Kidwell KK: Complementary gene interactions in alfalfa are greater in autotetraploids than diploids. Crop Sci. 1994, 34: 823-829. 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040001x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Osborn TC, Brouwer D, McCoy TJ: Molecular marker analysis in alfalfa. Biotechnology and the improvement of forage legumes. Edited by: McKersie BD, Brown DCW. 1997, Guelph, Canada: CAB International, 91-109.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhu H, Choi HK, Cook DR, Shoemaker RC: Bridging model and crop legumes through comparative genomics. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137: 1189-1196. 10.1104/pp.104.058891.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Choi HK, Kim D, Uhm T, Limpens E, Lim H, Mun JH, Kalo P, Penmetsa RV, Seres A, Kulikova O, Roe BA, Bisseling T, Kiss GB, Cook DR: A sequence-based genetic map of Medicago truncatula and comparison of marker colinearity with M. sativa. Genetics. 2004, 166: 1463-1502. 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1463.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Diwan N, Bouton JH, Kochert G, Cregan PB: Mapping of simple sequence repeat (SSR) DNA markers in diploid and tetraploid alfalfa. Theor Appl Genet. 2000, 101: 165-172. 10.1007/s001220051465.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Eujayl I, Sledge M, Wang L, May G, Chekhovskiy K, Zwonitzer J, Mian M: Medicago truncatula EST-SSRs reveal cross-species genetic markers for Medicago spp. Theor Appl Genet. 2004, 108: 414-422. 10.1007/s00122-003-1450-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Flajoulot S, Ronfort J, Baudouin P, Barre P, Huguet T, Huyghe C, Julier B: Genetic diversity among alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cultivars coming from a breeding program, using SSR markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 111: 1420-1429. 10.1007/s00122-005-0074-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cho MH, Ciulla D, Klanderman BJ, Raby BA, Silverman EK: High-resolution melting curve analysis of genomic and whole-genome amplified DNA. Clin Chem. 2008, 54: 2055-2058. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.109744.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    deSilva D, Blackett J: Assay: High-resolution melting and unlabeled probes. Gen Eng & Biotech News. 2007, 27:

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    SantaLucia J, Allawi HT, Seneviratne PA: Improved nearest-neighbor parameters for predicting DNA duplex stability. Biochemistry. 1996, 35: 3555-3562. 10.1021/bi951907q.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Han Y, Khu D, Monteros M: High-resolution melting analysis for SNP genotyping in diploid and tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Mol Breeding. 2011, 10.1007/s11032-011-9566-x.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pertea G, Huang X, Liang F, Antonescu V, Sultana R, Karamycheva S, Lee Y, White J, Cheung F, Parvizi B, Tsai J, Quackenbush J: TIGR Gene Indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 651-652. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg034.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, Hyten DL, Song Q, Thelen JJ, Cheng J, Xu D, Hellsten U, May GD, Yu Y, Sakurai T, Umezawa T, Bhattacharyya MK, Sandhu D, Valliyodan B, Lindquist E, Peto M, Grant D, Shu S, Goodstein D, Barry K, Futrell-Griggs M, Abernathy B, Du J, Tian Z, Zhu L: Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature. 463: 178-183.

  28. 28.

    Sato S, Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Asamizu E, Kato T, Nakao M, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Ono A, Kawashima K, Fujishiro T, Katoh M, Kohara M, Kishida Y, Minami C, Nakayama S, Nakazaki N, Shimizu Y, Shinpo S, Takahashi C, Wada T, Yamada M, Ohmido N, Hayashi M, Fukui K, Baba T, Nakamichi T, Mori H, Tabata S: Genome structure of the legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 2008, 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yu J, Buckler ES: Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006, 17: 155-160. 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jander G, Norris SR, Rounsley SD, Bush DF, Levin IM, Last RL: Arabidopsis map-based cloning in the post-genome era. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129: 440-450. 10.1104/pp.003533.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Feltus AF, Wan J, Schulze SR, Estill JC, Jiang N, Paterson AH: An SNP resource for rice genetics and breeding based on subspecies indica and japonica genome alignments. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 1812-1819. 10.1101/gr.2479404.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Riday H, Brummer EC: Forage yield heterosis in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 2002, 42: 716-723. 10.2135/cropsci2002.0716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Robins JG, Luth D, Campbell TA, Bauchan GR, He C, Viands DR, Hansen JL, Brummer EC: Genetic mapping of biomass production in tetraploid alfalfa. Crop Sci. 2007, 47: 1-10. 10.2135/cropsci2005.11.0401.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Montgomery J, Wittwer CT, Palais R, Zhou L: Simultaneous mutation scanning and genotyping by high-resolution DNA melting analysis. Nat Protocols. 2007, 2: 59-66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yang SS, Xu WW, Tesfaye M, Lamb JFS, Jung HJG, Samac DA, Vance CP, Gronwald JW: Single-feature polymorphism discovery in the transcriptome of tetraploid alfalfa. Plant Genome. 2009, 2: 224-232. 10.3835/plantgenome2009.03.0014.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sledge M, Ray I, Jiang G: An expressed sequence tag SSR map of tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 111: 980-992. 10.1007/s00122-005-0038-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, grants from the Oklahoma Bioenergy Center to M.J. Monteros and M.K. Udvardi, and a grant from Forage Genetics International to M.J. Monteros. We would like to thank Shelby Bidwell for uploading the 454 sequences to Genebank and assisting in sequence assembly, Cook Ly for assistance with preparing figures, and Mark Sorrells for providing comments on the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria J Monteros.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

YH identified candidate SNPs, performed SNP validation, and drafted the manuscript. YK and ITJ collected the samples, extracted RNA and prepared cDNA for sequencing. FC and CDT performed 454 sequencing, data assembly, SNP predictions and alignment of reads to the M. truncatula genome. PXZ assisted in the bioinformatics analysis of sequence data and SNP identification. MU supervised sample preparation and sequencing. MM managed the overall project and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Yuanhong Han, Yun Kang contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, Y., Kang, Y., Torres-Jerez, I. et al. Genome-wide SNP discovery in tetraploid alfalfa using 454 sequencing and high resolution melting analysis. BMC Genomics 12, 350 (2011).

Download citation


  • Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
  • Genomic Selection
  • High Resolution Melting
  • Candidate SNPs
  • Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Marker