Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

A genomic scale map of genetic diversity in Trypanosoma cruzi



Trypanosoma cruzi, the causal agent of Chagas Disease, affects more than 16 million people in Latin America. The clinical outcome of the disease results from a complex interplay between environmental factors and the genetic background of both the human host and the parasite. However, knowledge of the genetic diversity of the parasite, is currently limited to a number of highly studied loci. The availability of a number of genomes from different evolutionary lineages of T. cruzi provides an unprecedented opportunity to look at the genetic diversity of the parasite at a genomic scale.


Using a bioinformatic strategy, we have clustered T. cruzi sequence data available in the public domain and obtained multiple sequence alignments in which one or two alleles from the reference CL-Brener were included. These data covers 4 major evolutionary lineages (DTUs): TcI, TcII, TcIII, and the hybrid TcVI. Using these set of alignments we have identified 288,957 high quality single nucleotide polymorphisms and 1,480 indels. In a reduced re-sequencing study we were able to validate ~ 97% of high-quality SNPs identified in 47 loci. Analysis of how these changes affect encoded protein products showed a 0.77 ratio of synonymous to non-synonymous changes in the T. cruzi genome. We observed 113 changes that introduce or remove a stop codon, some causing significant functional changes, and a number of tri-allelic and tetra-allelic SNPs that could be exploited in strain typing assays. Based on an analysis of the observed nucleotide diversity we show that the T. cruzi genome contains a core set of genes that are under apparent purifying selection. Interestingly, orthologs of known druggable targets show statistically significant lower nucleotide diversity values.


This study provides the first look at the genetic diversity of T. cruzi at a genomic scale. The analysis covers an estimated ~ 60% of the genetic diversity present in the population, providing an essential resource for future studies on the development of new drugs and diagnostics, for Chagas Disease. These data is available through the TcSNP database (


Trypanosoma cruzi is a protozoan parasite of the order Kinetoplastida, and the causative agent of Chagas Disease, one of the so called neglected diseases that disproportionately affect the poor. The disease is endemic in most Latin American countries, affecting in excess of 8 million people[1]. Chagas disease has a variable clinical outcome. In its acute form it can lead to death (mostly in infants), while in its chronic form, it is a debilitating disease producing different associated pathologies: mega-colon, mega-esophagus and cardiomyopathy, among others. These different clinical outcomes are the result of a complex interplay between environmental factors, the host genetic background and the genetic diversity present in the parasite population. As a result, these different clinical manifestations have been suggested to be, at least in part, due to the genetic diversity of T. cruzi[25].

The T. cruzi species has a structured population, with a predominantly clonal mode of reproduction[6], and a considerable phenotypic diversity[710]. Through the use of a number of molecular markers the population has been divided in a number of evolutionary lineages, also called discrete typing units. Some markers allow the distinction of two or three major lineages[1114], while other experimental strategies, such as RAPD and multilocus isoenzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) support the distinction of six subdivisions[1517] originally designated as DTUs I, IIa, IIb, IIc, IId, and IIe[16]. Recently, this nomenclature was revised as follows: TcI, TcII (former TcIIb), TcIII (IIc), TcIV (TcIIa), TcV (TcIId) and TcVI (TcIIe)[18, 19]. Lineages TcV and TcVI (which include the strain used for the first genomic sequence of T. cruzi, CL Brener) have a very high degree of heterozygosity but otherwise very homogeneous population structures with low intralineage diversity[20, 21]. The currently favoured hypothesis suggests that these two lineages originated after either one or two independent hybridization events between strains of DTUs TcII and TcIII[2123].

Knowledge of the genetic variation present in a genome (i.e. between the two alleles of a diploid individual) or in a species (i.e. in the population) is of central importance for a variety of reasons and applications: i) to understand the evolutionary forces underlying the biological and phenotypic properties observed in an individual; ii) to detect cases of apparent horizontal gene transfer; iii) to assess the potential for development of resistance when validating a target for drug development; iv) to prioritize targets for development of diagnostics or vaccines; v) in the design of constructs for genetic knockout experiments in order to increase the success rate when targeting specific alleles; and vi) as genetic markers in association studies or to further probe the population structure.

The genome sequence of the CL-Brener clone of T. cruzi was published in 2005[24], together with those of two other trypanosomatids of medical importance: Trypanosoma brucei (Sleeping sickness, African trypanosomiasis)[25] and Leishmania major (Leishmaniasis)[26]. However, the genome of T. cruzi was a particular case for a number of reasons: it was obtained from a hybrid TcVI strain composed of two divergent parental haplotypes; and it was sequenced using a whole genome shotgun strategy[24]. This choice of strain and sequencing strategy resulted in high sequence coverage from the two parental haplotypes, which were derived from ancestral TcII and TcIII strains. Because of the high allelic variation found within this diploid genome, a significant number of contigs were found to be present twice in the assembly[24]. These divergent haplotypes, which were assembled separately in many cases, were the basis of a recent re-assembly of the genome[27]. As a consequence, it is now possible to identify the genetic diversity present within this diploid genome.

More recently a number of whole genome sequencing data have become available from different strains of T. cruzi: the draft genomic sequence of the Sylvio X10 (TcI) strain[28], high-coverage transcriptomic data, from another TcI strain (Westergaard G, and Vazquez MP, manuscript in preparation), as well as 2.5X WGS shotgun data from the Esmeraldo cl3 (TcII) strain.

To take advantage of the hybrid genome of the CL-Brener strain, and of other genome and transcriptome datasets, we designed a bionformatics strategy to obtain information on the genetic diversity present in these data. As already observed for a significant number of molecular markers, each of the alleles identified in the majority of the polymorphic heterozygous site in strains from hybrid lineages TcV and TCVI can be observed in homozygosity in strains from either of the two proposed parental lineages (TcII and TCIII)[20, 21, 2931]. Therefore by uncovering the diversity within the CL-Brener and Sylvio X10 genomes, we expect to reveal a significant fraction of the diversity that can be observed between extant TcI, TcII, TcIII, and TcVI strains.

In this work we present an initial compilation of a genome-wide map of genetic diversity in T. cruzi, and its functional analysis, focussed mostly on protein-coding regions of the genome.


Sequence clustering, alignment and identification of polymorphic sites

To identify genetic variation in T. cruzi we took advantage of available sequence data in public databanks, including the genome sequence of the CL-Brener and Sylvio X10 strains, expressed sequence-tags and other sequences submitted by independent authors to these databanks. Our strategy to map this diversity relied on the generation of multiple sequence alignments and on the scanning of these alignments to identify polymorphisms[32]. As mentioned, the sequence of the T. cruzi genome was obtained using a whole genome shotgun strategy, from a hybrid clone (CL-Brener)[24]. Because of the sequence divergence between alleles of the CL-Brener clone, assembly of this genome resulted in many cases in the separation of these alleles into separate contigs[24, 27]. This allowed us to align these sequences and identify sequence differences. However, because of the repetitive nature of the T. cruzi genome[24, 33], we decided to focus this initial effort on mapping the genetic diversity in mostly single copy protein coding loci. These were defined as those sequences represented by no more than 2 coding sequences from the CL-Brener (reference) genome in our sequence alignments (see below).

Sequences used in this work include all the annotated coding sequences from the reference CL-Brener genome, and the corresponding coding sequences (CDS) from the Sylvio X10 genome, as well as other publicly available sequence data (see Table 1). After clustering sequences by similarity (see Methods) we obtained 7,639 multiple sequence alignments, 71.3% of which had 2 reference coding sequences from the CL-Brener genome (and therefore most probably representing single copy loci; see Table 1). Other alignments contain increasing numbers of reference coding sequences. These set of alignments contains sequences for most of the large gene families of T. cruzi, and were not considered further. Even after this stringent filtering, there were still a number of alignments that contained only two reference sequences from the CL-Brener genome, but that belonged to these large gene families – mucins, mucin-associated proteins (MASP), trans-sialidase-like proteins, etc. These correspond to cases where highly similar copies of members of a family were separated from their paralogs during the clustering or assembly steps. Finally, a number of alignments (~6%) had only one reference sequence from the CL-Brener hybrid. These cases may correspond to haploid regions in the hybrid genome or to cases where two highly divergent alleles were separated during the clustering step.

Table 1 Sequences, alignments and SNPs: summary of data generated and analyzed in this work

We then scanned the multiple sequence alignments and identified columns containing sequence differences and/or indels. From the set of all alignments we identified 325,355 sites with variation (putative single nucleotide polymorphisms, or fixed differences), of which 28,316 corresponded to small indels (Table 1). These polymorphic sites provide representative information on the diversity found in T. cruzi evolutionary lineages TcI (Sylvio X10), TcVI (CL-Brener), but also in lineages TcII and TcIII (represented by the variation found within the CL-Brener hybrid).

Columns containing variation in a multiple sequence alignment may correspond to polymorphic sites (SNPs) or to sequencing errors. To discriminate between these possibilities, we also analyzed the sequence neighborhood around each potential SNP. Based on this analysis we found 302,390 SNPs (and 10,523 small indels) located in regions with a low density of SNPs (good sequence neighborhoods, with < 3 SNPs in a 10 bp window, see Methods). To further assess the quality of the sequence around/in each SNP we used a statistical software package (PolyBayes[34]) together with quality values for each base that were derived from the expected error rate for each sequence (described in Methods). Using this approach we identified 288,957 SNPs (and 1,480 small indels) that have both a high probability according to PolyBayes (p > 0.7) and are located in good sequence neighborhoods. Using this conservative set of SNPs, we obtained a density of 2.4 SNPs per 100 bp for T. cruzi coding regions.

The great majority (99%) of the observed SNPs were bi-allelic (changing one specific nucleotide base for another), however there were 2,990 tri-allelic SNPs (0.98%) and 10 tetra-allelic SNPs (0.0033%, P > 0.7). These are very interesting SNPs that can be exploited in the design of strain typing assays. One such assay, based on one tetra-allelic and a number of tri-allelic SNPs has just been developed using this information[31].

All this information is available in the Additional file1: Table S1 and has also been integrated in a new release of the TcSNP database[32].

Experimental validation of candidate SNPs

To validate the strategy used in silico, and to assess the quality of the SNPs and the probability of them being true SNPs (as opposed to sequencing errors) we performed a small scale re-sequencing study on 47 loci (see Table 2). This set contained 1136 predicted SNPs with probabilities (as reported by PolyBayes) ranging from 0 to 1, obtained from genes with different numbers of predicted polymorphisms: low (e.g. 1–10 predicted SNPs), medium (11–25 SNPs) and high (> 25 SNPs). PCR amplification of selected fragments from these loci was followed by direct sequencing of the amplified products and identification of SNPs from the raw chromatogram sequence data, including heterozygous peaks (using Polyphred for this[35]). This re-sequencing experiment allowed us to validate ~ 96% of the predicted SNPs that had PolyBayes probabilities >= 0.7 (Table 2), whereas the success rate for SNPs with probabilities between 0–0.4 fell to 12.5%. The results of this small-scale study suggest that overall the scoring strategy used to rank the SNPs worked well. We also identified 43 new heterozygous SNPs within the CL Brener strain (SNPs not predicted by our in silico approach and not present in the original release of the TcSNP database[32]) and 1,261 new SNPs from other T. cruzi strains (RO Cosentino, L Panunzi, F Agüero, unpublished). The majority of these new CL-Brener SNPs escaped the initial in silico prediction because of artifacts in the assembly of the T. cruzi genome, which resulted, for example, in a missing allele for an hypothetical protein (TcCLB.511003.60) with high similarity to the yeast ERG10 gene (Acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase). In the T. cruzi genome database there is only one allele reported for this gene. As a consequence, the few polymorphisms identified by our computational strategy were derived from the comparison of this allele against a short CL-Brener EST sequence (TENG0250, accession number 3258889, see alignment tcsnp:436105). However upon PCR amplification from CL-Brener DNA, we were able to uncover additional heterozygous polymorphisms (see GenBank accession numbers HQ586976, and HQ586977). Both pieces of evidence suggest that there is a second allele that was probably merged or missed during genome assembly. Apart from this case, this small scale re-sequencing experiment confirmed the majority of the SNPs identified in silico, which is in agreement with the expected sequence coverage/quality of genomic and transcriptomic data used. A complete table listing all loci analyzed, and their SNPs is available in Additional file2: Table S2.

Table 2 Validation of the SNP scoring scheme by PCR-based re-sequencing

Based on the results from this re-sequencing experiment we decided to focus our analysis of genetic diversity on the subset of high-quality SNPs (P > 0.7) that are also located in regions of good sequence neighborhood. This subset was therefore used throughout the study. Because the candidate allelic copies of each reference coding sequence are now aligned in our dataset, we use the words gene and alignment interchangeably to refer to the genomic loci represented by these sequences.

A first genome-wide look at the genetic diversity of T. cruzi

In the subset of high-quality SNPs, we first looked at the types of changes observed at the DNA level: transitions and transversions. Theoretically, there are twice the number of possible transversions than transitions. However, because of the nature of the molecular mechanisms involved in the generation of these mutations transitions are found more frequently than transversions[36, 37]. And T. cruzi was not exception. As observed previously for rRNA genes[38] we observed an excess of transitions (70.1%) over transversions (29.1%, see Table 3).

Table 3 Transitions and transversions in T. cruzi

When analyzing the subset of high-quality SNPs at the codon level, SNPs were more frequently observed at the 3rd codon position (53%), followed by the 1st codon position (25%) and the 2nd (21%).

Functional characterization of polymorphic sites: nonsense SNPs

Using the set of high quality SNPs (p > 0.7, in good sequence neighborhoods) we observed 76,452 silent (synonymous) SNPs, 99,552 non-synonymous SNPs and 161 non-sense SNPs – those introducing or removing stop codons in proteins (see Table 1).

After manual inspection of alignments containing nonsense SNPs, to filter out cases that could be explained by genome assembly problems, we ended up with 113 alignments (loci) with clear nonsense polymorphisms, many of which correspond to hypothetical proteins (80%, see Additional file3: Table S3). These nonsense polymorphisms were produced by changes affecting different positions of the codon (see Additional file4: Figure S1).

Interestingly, we also observed a bias in the codon position affected by these nonsense SNPs. Even though, theoretically, we would expect nonsense SNPs in the 1st base of a codon in 9 out of 23 nonsense SNPs (39%), we observed a significantly higher number of nonsense SNPs arising from mutation of the 1st base of a codon (66/110, 60%, p < 0.0005 Chi-square test for the comparison of the observed-expected values for all 3 positions.

To further inspect whether these changes have been fixed by evolution or were potentially recent events, we analyzed these 113 loci in additional strains: the JR cl4 and Esmeraldo cl3 strains, taking advantage of preliminary assemblies available at the TriTrypDB resource[39]. These data is available in Additional file3: Table S3.

Depending on which allele we consider as the ancestral allele, we can describe these SNPs as either introducing a premature stop codon (therefore producing a truncated protein) or as generating a read-through codon (therefore producing a longer product). The comparison of nonsense mutations in the available data suggest that in 3 cases (hypothetical proteins TcCLB.509767.140, TcCLB.503905.50, and TcCLB.506691.70) the ancestral state of the codon was most probably a STOP (readily identified in 5 out of 6 strains) that was changed into a read-through codon in one strain/lineage only. In other cases the situation might be similar (TcCLB.506773.80, TcCLB.510533.80, TcCLB.508207.170, TcCLB.503525.4, TcCLB.508567.49, TcCLB.505229.20,  all hypothetical proteins;  and TcCLB.508181.140, an inorganic pyrophosphatase), although the corresponding CDS was missing from one of the strains. In contrast, in 44 cases (39%) the nonsense mutation was only observed once, and can therefore correspond to the alternative case, in which the ancestral codon was replaced by a premature stop, therefore generating a truncated protein product.

Analysis of the these cases, revealed that the majority of them (77%) contained the nonsense SNP in the final 10% of the corresponding coding sequence, near the 3’ end of the other allele (see Table S3), and therefore may not be associated with large functional changes. However, in a few cases the identified nonsense SNPs are producing predicted disruptive changes.

In the case of a putative GDP-mannose 4,6 dehydratase (alignment tcsnp:439464, TcCLB.503881.20), the nonsense SNP, present only in strains from the TcI lineage, is located near the N-terminus of the protein, therefore theoretically resulting in a complete truncation. Although there is a downstream ATG that could be used to produce a product with only a 11% reduction of its size, this product would lack the conserved NAD(P) nucleotide binding motif GGxGxxG[40], and therefore we believe it cannot produce a  functional  protein.  In  another  case  (alignment  tcsnp:438249, including reference sequences TcCLB.511907.190 and TcCLB.506801.70), the presence of a nonsense SNP in one CL-Brener allele, causes the shorter TcCLB.506801.70 allele to lose a potential glycosylphosphatidyl inositol C-terminal anchor sequence, generating a potential significant change in localization of the protein (secreted vs membrane anchored product). The number of SNPs identified between these two sequences is approximately twice the average found in other sequences (117 SNPs, 47 non-synonymous SNPs). This, together with the observed differences in sub-cellular targeting signals, suggests that these alleles may have divergent functions. Another case involving a potential change in sub-cellular localization due to a missing GPI-anchor in one allele, was identified in alignment tcsnp:442281 (containing reference sequences TcCLB.508951.80 and TcCLB.510121.80), encoding a putative proteins that belongs to the RNI-like superfamily of leucine-rich containing proteins, which are thought to mediate protein-protein interactions.

Distribution of SNPs in T. cruzi coding regions

Next, we analyzed the distribution of SNPs along the coding region, and in the context of different sequence features: trans- membrane domains, signal peptides, globular vs unstructured regions. We reasoned that the selection acting on the gene might be different in these different regions or domains. Based on this idea, we performed a number of comparisons, evaluating differences in the density of synonymous and non-synonymous changes in one of these domains vs the rest of the protein. However, although some significant signal can be observed when performing pairwise comparisons (e.g. between the Esmeraldo-like and Non-Esmeraldo-like alleles of CL-Brener), these differences are not significant when using the complete data that includes alleles from TcI, TcII (Esmeraldo, and Esmeraldo-like from CL-Brener), TcIII (non-Esmeraldo-like alleles from CL-Brener), and TcVI (CL-Brener).

One of the features analyzed, was the presence of SNPs in natively unstructured domains. Several recent papers report an observation that natively unfolded domains can support higher non-synonymous substitution rates[41, 42]. Based on predictions made using IUPred[41] we identified globular and natively unstructured domains in T. cruzi proteins (globular regions ranged from 10 to 90% of the protein). A comparison of the SNP density found in these regions showed no statistically significant differences (data in Additional file5: Figure S2). However, we did observe a great dispersion in the density of SNPs in non-globular regions, with more outliers with higher densities of non-synonymous SNPs in this category. Analysis of the functional annotation of these outliers showed enrichment in transporters, kinases (including some 13 protein kinases with no known function) and hydrolases (including a number of ubiquitin hydrolases). A particularly striking outlier is the TcCLB.506553.20 gene encoding a bromodomain containing protein, with a restricted phylogenetic distribution. As can be seen in Figure 1 (C-terminal domain) and in the Additional file6 (complete alignment), in which we also analyzed the alleles present in preliminary assemblies of the JR cl4 and Esmeraldo cl3 genomes, 70 out of a total of 94 SNPs (87 of which are non-synonymous), were located in a natively unstructured C-terminal tail. Besides being present in all trypanosomatids, this gene is also present in Trichomonas and in a a few other organisms such as Caenorhabditis, Cryptosporidium, and in one plant (Oryza sativa).

Figure 1
figure 1

A natively unstructured domain accumulating non-synonymous changes. Section of a multiple sequence alignment (starting at position 550 in the alignment) showing the C-terminal, natively unstructured, region of the TcCLB.506553.20 gene, and its allelic counterparts in other strains. Asteriks indicate non-synonymous changes. The nucleotide multiple sequence alignment was obtained with TranslatorX, using the aminoacid translation as a guide[71]. The complete multiple sequence alignment is available as a Additional file6.

Another interesting gene showing a striking accumulation of non-synonymous changes in a natively unstructured domain is the A2Rel-like protein of T. cruzi (alignment tcsnp:435203, alleles TcCLB.506859.110, TcCLB.511815.80), which was first described in Leishmania[43, 44]. In this case the majority of SNPs identified are located in a disordered N-terminal domain, as predicted by IUPred.

Assessment of selection pressure in T. Cruzi coding genes

Because SNPs identified in this work represent variation observed within a species, we decided to use the nucleotide diversity indicator π as an estimate of selection[45, 46]. In our set of high-quality alignments (at most 2 reference coding sequences from the CL-Brener genome), π ranged between 0 and 0.15 (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Allelic divergence observed in T. cruzi. Histogram of nucleotide diversity (π), showing the distribution of allelic variation in the analyzed data. Alignments (loci) meeting our criteria for good quality (see main text) and containing no more than 2 reference coding sequences from the CL-Brener genome, were used to calculate the nucleotide diversity values in the figure. The values of π were normalized over the effective length of the alignment (see Methods). For the histogram, the values were binned as shown in the x axis. Only values of π < 0.1, corresponding to 7,624 alignments (99.8%) were included in the graphic.

Not taking into account loci corresponding to singleton sequences (those not grouped and aligned with any other sequence), the remaining loci with nil values of π were those for which we could not identify high-quality SNPs (for example sequences aligned against 100% identical copies and/or mRNAs). As seen in Figure 2, there is an apparent enrichment of alignments with no SNPs identified. By inspecting the annotation of these genes, it is clear that many of these cases correspond to alignments containing highly identical copies of genes from large families. It has been observed already that many of these genes (e.g. mucins) are organized in tandem arrays, where copies of the array display unusually high nucleotide identity values[47]. It is clear that the diversity observed in one of these alignments (where highly identical sequences from a larger family were clustered and aligned together) is not representative of the overall diversity that can be seen at the family level (e.g. between paralogous copies). Apart from these cases, alignments with low π values were those of ribosomal proteins, histones and cytochromes among others.

To assess the functional relevance of the nucleotide diversity indicator, we looked at the distribution of π in different functional contexts: the functional annotation of the T. cruzi genome using the Molecular Function ontology (from the GO Gene Ontology); and the functional mapping of T. cruzi enzymes in metabolic pathways according to the KEGG Metabolic Pathways database (data available in Additional file7: Table S4 and Additional file8: Table S5). First, using a subset of terms from the Gene Ontology (GO Slim)[48] we grouped 2,158 alignments (loci) containing GO annotation into 27 broad classes as defined by their parent GO terms from the Molecular Function ontology. There were significant differences in the π values when comparing all classes using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0,0001, a posteriori test p < 0.05; see Figure 3). The categories showing less diversity were those with functions in oxidative stress response, protein ubiquitination, and those involved in RNA processing and translation. On the other extreme, classes showing a high nucleotide diversity were those corresponding to integral membrane proteins, ion binding (mostly Ca++) and retrotransposons. In all cases, we observed a significant dispersion of the π indicator for any one class. Secondly, we performed a similar analysis on genes with assigned EC numbers (655 alignments) that were mapped onto KEGG pathways. In this case, genes that participate in transcription and protein degradation (proteasome) showed less nucleotide diversity, similar to what we observed for GOSlim classes; whereas genes involved in glycan synthesis and degradation, metabolism of co-factors and vitamins, and xenobiotic metabolism showed a higher nucleotide diversity (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.004, a posteriori test p < 0.05; see Figure 4).

Figure 3
figure 3

Genetic diversity in functional classes (Gene Ontology). Alignments containing genes annotated with GO terms (2,158 alignments) were grouped into higher-level classes based on the GO ontology of terms using GOSlim, and also based on nucleotide diversity ([0–0.008); [0.008–0.016); [0.016–0.024); [0.024–0.032); >= 0.032). Differences between categories were observed and are marked in the figure (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.0001; a posteriori test, P < 0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences.

Figure 4
figure 4

Genetic diversity in metabolic pathways. 657 genes with EC numbers were mapped to the corresponding metabolic pathways in the KEGG database[72] and sorted based on the nucleotide diversity (π) estimator of the selection acting on the gene. Different letters (on the right) mean statistically significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.0013; a posteriori test P < 0.05).

The observed dispersion of the apparent selection pressure acting on a given metabolic pathway is not surprising, as the importance of different steps in the pathway (e.g. their centrality, connectivity) is not homogeneous. In the case of T. cruzi, the sterol biosynthesis pathway (one of the few validated pathways for drug development) is a nice example of this observation. Interestingly, current validated targets (e.g. the lanosterol demethylase and the C-24 sterol reductase) display low numbers of non-synonymous changes (10% and 28% non-synonymous SNPs, and π = 0.015, and 0.0065, respectively). However, at the same time, other enzymes of the pathway like the C-5 sterol desaturase (alignment tcsnp: 440342) apparently not required by the intracellular amastigotes[49] is accumulating more non-synonymous polymorphisms (53% non-synonymous SNPs, π = 0.012, although still at a level corresponding to a neutral accumulation of changes).

Predicted druggable targets display less genetic diversity in T. cruzi

Attractive targets for drug development have to meet a number of requirements. The most important of these is the essentiality of the target for survival of the parasite within the host. However, a number of other criteria are often used to prioritize drug targets[50], druggability – knowledge about inhibition or modulation of the target by a small molecule – being one such criteria. For human pathogens, the druggability of targets in whole genomes has been predicted based on their similarity against a database of known druggable targets, and on the presence of a number of sequence, and structural features[51]. Druggability predictions are available from the TDR Targets database[52] in the form of a druggability index associated with each target that goes from 0 (not druggable, or lack of prior information on druggability) to 1 (druggable, highly similar to a target with a known inhibitor/drug). For T. cruzi druggability predictions allowed the identification of 173 loci with a druggability index > 0.6.

In the context of the selection of drug targets for drug discovery, the evolutionary forces acting on a gene may be used as a surrogate marker for essentiality or to assess the risk of development of drug resistance. Taking advantage of the genetic variation identified within the T. cruzi genome we analyzed the apparent selection pressure in predicted druggable targets (druggability index >= 0.6) vs the rest of the genome – genes encoding products that are either not druggable (druggability index < 0.6) or for which there are currently no information about their druggability (5,231 genes). For this analysis we used the nucleotide diversity indicator π, or the dN/dS indicator (not shown). We then analyzed the distribution of π in these two groups of genes (see Figure 5). The two distributions were statistically different (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.0001), with the distribution of druggable targets shifted to lower values of π. This showed that a significant number of targets that are predicted to be druggable in T. cruzi displayed less variation (i.e. they are under apparent purifying selection). This may not be surprising, as many druggable targets are highly conserved genes with housekeeping cellular functions[53]. However, this result also highlights the fact that there are many genes, with low nucleotide diversity values, for which we don’t have information about their druggability (e.g. overlapping red/gray bars in quartile 1 of the distributions in Figure 5). Targets in this portion of the curve might represent novel classes of targets, not previously explored (e.g. parasite specific targets), and thus worthy of consideration.

Figure 5
figure 5

Genetic diversity of T. cruzi druggable genes. The plot shows the distribution of the nucleotide diversity (π) estimator for T. cruzi druggable genes (125 genes, druggability index >= 0.6[70]), and for genes that are either non-druggable or lack information about their druggability. The two distributions are statistically different according to the Wilcoxon test (P < 0,0001).

Following this reasoning, we suggest that it may be helpful to include genetic diversity information in target prioritization strategies, such as those discussed by Crowther et al.[54]. We therefore used the genetic diversity information described in this work to prioritize T. cruzi targets (see strategy in Methods), using a genetic diversity score based on a normalized inversion of the nucleotide diversity value. With this scoring system, genes with a low π value will attain a higher score, and vice versa (see Methods). The result of this prioritization is available from Additional file9: Table S6. In this list, three validated targets appear within the top 12 targets: the lanosterol 14-α demethylase (target of triazoles), the trypanothione reductase (essential in all trypanosomatids studied so far), and the protein farnesyltransferase (target of the drug tipifarnib), therefore serving as controls of the prioritization strategy. The list highlights a number of interesting targets, some of which are currently unexplored in T. cruzi. The top ranked target in this list is a dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (EC, an enzyme usually involved in both energy generation and defense mechanisms against oxidative and nitrosative attacks. Selective inhibitors for this enzyme have been identified in T. cruzi[55] and Mycobacterium tuberculosis[56]. The allelic variants identified display limited variation, with a π value of 0.01, and only 4 non-synonymous SNPs. Other interesting targets displaying low nucleotide diversity values include the RNA polymerase III (the target of tagetitoxin), an S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase that displays large biochemical differences with its human orthologue[57], a unique deoxyuridine triphosphatase[58], an inorganic pyrophosphatase, and a number of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, amongst others. A detailed analysis of this prioritized list is not within the scope of this work and will certainly be done by interested researchers in the field. However, it is worthwile to mention that using genetic information provides an additional, independent, measure to prioritize targets, selecting those that are under apparent purifying selection.


Identification and ranking of SNPs

In this study we identified hundreds of thousands of candidate SNPs located primarily in single-copy coding regions of the T. cruzi genome. The scoring strategy used to evaluate putative SNPs in the absence of raw chromatogram data proved to work reasonably well, as we were able to confirm >= 96% of the SNPs having a probability value >= 0.7 by re-sequencing. The genome-wide data shows that the T. cruzi genome is highly polymorphic, with almost 5 polymorphic sites every 200 bp (2.4%). This figure is similar, though not identical, to that reported by El-Sayed et al. for the CL-Brener whole genome (2%)[24]. However, there are differences in both strategies. In our case, the analysis is focused mostly on coding regions. This would have resulted in a slightly lower nucleotide diversity value if we had limited our analysis to the CL-Brener hybrid. However, by inclusion of data from other strains, we effectively sampled more genetic space, therefore arriving at a significantly higher diversity for protein coding regions.

The T. cruzi genome is highly repetitive[24, 33] with many large gene families often organized in tandem arrays. Assembly of this type of genomes from whole DNA shotgun is expected to be difficult[59], and the T. cruzi genome was no exception[24]. This could have made the identification of SNPs problematic, or caused the identification of false SNPs (misassembly, and/or sequencing errors). Nonetheless, the high sequence coverage attained (~ 11X for both CL-Brener and Sylvio X10 genomes) resulted in high confidence sequence (at the base level) for most of the single-copy portions of the genome. We have targeted these portions of the genome for mapping polymorphic sites, reasoning that these are the regions with a higher quality. This is certainly not true for all cases, as has been recently noted[60]. However, our strategy for validation of putative SNPs by re-sequencing worked reasonably well. The methodology was based on direct sequencing of PCR amplification products, and except for three cases, we did not observe amplification of bands of different sizes or an excess of heterozygous peaks in the sequence traces, which would be suggestive of amplification of a mixture of genes from different loci (e.g. paralogous copies). From a total of 47 loci that were selected for re-sequencing, one was discarded due to the presence of amplification products of different sizes, another was the result of an amplification of a tandem array containing two copies of the targeted gene (N-acetylglucosaminyl-phosphatidylinositol-  deacetylase,  putative; TcCLB.511481.40), while in the third case the excess of heterozygous sites revealed the missing allele for a single-copy gene (TcCLB.511003.60, see Results). Except for these cases, all other targeted loci showed the expected heterozygosity based on the in silico comparison of the two CL-Brener haplotypes. Notwithstanding this, the overall analysis presented in this paper is clearly focused on a core of genes that are single copy. Moreover, because of the way in which the bioinformatic strategy was devised, we are probably underestimating the number of highly polymorphic genes. Theoretically, single copy genes with highly divergent alleles could end up in separate clusters, and therefore in different alignments (or as singleton sequences), due to their high number of nucleotide differences. Our bioinformatics strategy, using a second BLAST stage to detect these cases worked well overall, but a number of such cases did escape the initial automated analysis, and have been corrected by manual merging of alignments. Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility of missing additional cases.

Polymorphisms or fixed differences?

 When comparing nucleotide changes between different species, it is mostly correct to assume that these differences are fixed (i.e. they are substitutions or mutations). In our particular case, we are analyzing changes within a species. Therefore we have chosen to call all observed nucleotide changes as polymorphisms or SNPs. These distinctions affect the choice of different estimates of selection, such as dN (the number of non-synonymous changes per non-synonymous site) and dS (the number of synonymous changes per synonymous site), or the nucleotide diversity (π)[46]. In this work we have decided to include results based on the use of the nucleotide diversity (π) as an estimate of selection instead of the dN/dS ratio. However, it should be noted that published results[21], and our own data from an ongoing re-sequencing study focussed on selected loci, show that a significant percentage of the identified changes can be verified by re-sequencing a different strain from the same evolutionary lineage. This percentage can be as high as ~ 96% for changes identified between the CL-Brener haplotypes (verified in strains from the corresponding parental lineages (R. Cosentino, L. Panunzi, F. Agüero, unpublished results), strongly suggesting that the great majority of the polymorphisms identified in this study are actually fixed differences. This is also in agreement with recent comparisons of two T. brucei genomes[61]. Nonetheless, the conclusions of analyses performed in this work (see Figures 2,3,4, and5), obtained using the π indicator, do not change subtantially if we use the dN/dS ratio instead (data not shown).

SNP types, functional changes

When we analyzed the set of high-quality SNPs identified according to the type of change they introduce at the protein level, we observed a slightly higher number of non-synonymous SNPs. This result is in agreement with similar observations made in other protozoan organisms: i) the comparison of the genomes of T. brucei brucei and T. brucei gambiense[61]; and ii) SNPs between Toxoplasma gondii strains from the 3 main evolutionary lineages available at ToxoDB[62]. However, this is in contrast to observations in other eukaryotes, such as humans and helminths (Schistosoma mansoni[63]) where a higher number of synonymous changes is observed. This observation most likely reflects the accumulation of changes in T. cruzi and the other protozoan genomes through a large time of divergence. The fact that most of the allelic diversity observed within the CL-Brener hybrid has been acquired through the proposed hybridization events between ancestral individuals from lineages TcII and TcIII, imply that the observed genetic diversity within the CL-Brener clone corresponds to the expected diversity between T. cruzi DTUs TcII and TcIII. As reported recently in an analysis of 32 loci in an expanded panel of strains, the distances between the Esmeraldo-like (TcII) and non-Esmeraldo-like (TcIII) alleles of CL-Brener were the maximum observed within T. cruzi[21]. The estimates for time of divergence for these ancestral lineages, therefore, are in agreement with a large time of divergence, justifying the observed number of synonymous and non-synonymous sites.

The distribution of synonymous SNPs along the coding regions was uniform. However in the case of non-synonymous SNPs, we observed a tendency for accumulation in signal-peptides, trans- membrane domains, and cleaved C-terminal tails (C-termini that are cleaved after the addition of glycosylphosphatidyl inositol anchors). Although not statistically significant at the genome scale, we did find a number of cases in which there was striking contrast in the accumulation of non-synonymous changes between natively unstructured vs globular regions.

A similar accumulation of non-synonymous changes in these regions has been reported by others in different biological models. In yeast, a survey of SNP data from 64 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggest that this accumulation is particularly associated with proteins whose function is related to adaptive processes[64]. Although T. cruzi lags behind S. cerevisiae in functional characterization of its protein coding gene set, it is tempting to speculate that a similar trend is likely to be observed. Proteins carrying natively unstructured or disordered domains, such as the human transcriptional regulator p53, are often at the center of large signaling networks, and serve as organizing scaffolds for protein complexes[65, 66]. In our dataset, a number of such proteins can be readily identified (see Results). One of these is the A2rel protein first described in Leishmania donovani[43, 44]. This is a protein of unknown function, that is expressed in the amastigote stages infecting host cells, and that has been implied in the process of visceralization of infection, as it is absent in Leishmania species causing cutaneous leishmaniasis. Recently, this protein has been shown to be upregulated during a temperature shift similar to that experienced by the parasite upon transmission from the insect to the vertebrate host (see Table 3 in[67]). It would be interesting to analyze the function of this protein in T. cruzi and also the functional consequences of the observed allelic diversity.

As reviewed recently by Uversky and colleagues[65], intrinsically disordered proteins are particularly attractive targets for modulating protein-protein interactions. However, in light of the observed allelic diversity in these domains, it would be important to take this into consideration when assaying these proteins.

Estimates of T. cruzi genetic diversity

The genetic diversity identified in this work gives a broad overview of the diversity present within the T. cruzi species, at a genomic scale. Based on the genome data analyzed herein, and on the limited re-sequencing of selected loci in a panel of representative strains (minimum of 3 per DTU[31], as well as other unpublished data, including the draft genomes of TcII and TcI strains), we estimate that ~ 50-60% of the genetic diversity of the species has been sampled. This is of course a gross estimate, but the support for this figure comes from the following observations. First, in our re-sequencing experiments we have found that 42% of the nucleotide changes can be discovered just by analyzing the CL-Brener hybrid. This is in agreement with other studies using a panel of reference strains[21]. This diversity corresponds to that observed between extant TcII and TcIII strains, and appears to be the maximal divergence observed between evolutionary lineages[21]. Sencondly, when re-sequencing the same loci in TcI strains, it was possible to identify new additional SNPs, corresponding to ~ 18% of the total genetic diversity that can be uncovered in this panel of 18 strains. However, 82% of the observed SNPs had already been identified by analyzing the CL-Brener hybrid genome. A similar figure (~17% new SNPs) is obtained for TcIV strains. However, by sequencing TcII or TcIII strains, only a minimal number of additional SNPs are uncovered, corresponding to 3-4% of the total. This reflects the fact that the majority of these nucleotide changes have already been identified from CL-Brener alleles. The same low rate of discovery of new SNPs is observed when re-sequencing strains from the TcV lineage. Strains from this lineage show very limited genetic diversity when compared with the TcVI strains. Although these observations are based on a small scale re-sequencing study, the same trend can be observed when analyzing additional loci from the draft genomic data for TcI and TcII strains (data not shown). According to this analysis, the next step to significantly increase the coverage of the genetic diversity identified for T. cruzi, should be the analysis of complete genomic or transcriptomic data from a TcIV strain.


By taking advantage of the genomic and transcriptomic sequence data from a number of strains representative of different evolutionary lineages of T. cruzi, we have compiled an initial map of genetic diversity for this important parasite, focused mostly on protein coding, single-copy regions of the genome. The picture emerging from this analysis reflects the highly divergent nature of the ancestral haplotypes of the hybrid CL-Brener strain. However, the analysis also shows that there is a highly conserved core of the genome under apparent purifying selection, and highlights a number of genes and domains deviating from this extreme. The work represents the first genome-wide map of genetic diversity for T. cruzi, covering about half of the estimated nucleotide diversity of the species.


Data sources

Data used for SNP identification included: the T. cruzi CL-Brener (DTU/genotype TcVI) and Sylvio X10 (DTU/genotype TcI) genomes (coding sequences, contigs, scaffolds; obtained from GenBank using the accession numbers AAHK00000000[24], and ADWP00000000[28], respectively), RNA-seq (transcriptomic) data from the TcAdriana strain (DTU TcI, obtained by 454 high-throughput sequencing of an epimastigote cDNA library, Westeergard G and Vazquez MP, manuscript in preparation), partial shotgun (genomic) data from the Esmeraldo strain (DTU TcII, obtained from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive), as well as other T. cruzi sequences obtained from GenBank in May, 2007 (see Table 1). T. cruzi ESTs were obtained from dbEST and manually curated to extract information about their source (strain)[68]. To validate SNPs identified in a limited number of genes, we have checked preliminary assemblies from the JRcl4 (DTU TcI), and Esmeraldo cl3 (DTU TcII) strains available at the TriTrypDB resource[39].

Sequence clustering and alignment

Before clustering, sequences were screened against a library of T. cruzi repetitive elements and vector (plasmid) sequences and the corresponding matching regions were masked[33]. Sequences containing at least 50 bp of non-masked bases were further processed. T. cruzi coding sequences from the genome project (CDS), and other nucleotide (mRNA, EST, genomic DNA) sequences were mapped to the reference genome sequence scaffolds using BLAT[69]. Sequences were grouped in clusters based on the following stringent mapping: any two sequences overlapping in their mapping against a given reference genome scaffold were put together into the same cluster. Subsequently, multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) were obtained for each cluster using phrap ( When more than one multiple sequence alignment was obtained for a group of clustered sequences, we manually merged the alignments if they met the following criteria: i) the sequences from the reference genome did not have an assembly warning note; ii) there were no more than two reference coding sequences from the CL-Brener genome in the merged alignment; and iii) the divergence between the reference sequences, as judged by manual inspection, would justify the merging (for example, manual inspection of these cases allowed us to merge cases of reference sequences differing only in the extension of their 5’ ends – usually arising from different annotation of the translational start codon in each allele – or in indels larger than a couple of codons, which would otherwise cause the sequences to end up in separate contigs due to the stringent criteria used in this step). Genomic data from the Sylvio X10 draft assembly, and from reconstructed transcripts from the TcAdriana 454 RNA-seq data were mapped against these CL-Brener reference alignments. Finally, the quality of each MSA was assessed using two parameters: the % identity, and an estimate of the effective length of the alignment. This latter figure provides the percentage of columns in the alignment where the alignment depth >= 2. MSAs with a % identity > 95% were considered further. MSAs that did not meet these criteria were manually inspected to evaluate further manual editing (split alignments). Because in some cases alignments might contain sequences that are shorter at one or both ends, the effective length of the alignment (ignoring regions covered by a single sequence) was used to compute alignment attributes, such as the SNP density.

SNP identification and scoring

Multiple sequence alignments were scanned using a custom Perl script to identify polymorphic columns. These putative SNPs were analyzed using PolyBayes[34] to obtain a numeric score for each SNP (the probability of this being a true polymorphism). PolyBayes can use individual base quality values for the calculation of SNP probabilities, but because original chromatogram data is not available for all sequences, we have assigned arbitrary base quality values to these sequences. These arbitrary quality values were derived based on the estimated sequencing error rate for the different types of sequences used: EST sequences were assigned an arbitrary base quality value of 20 (1 error per 100 bases), which is typical for single-pass, unedited sequences; while sequences derived from individual submissions to GenBank were assigned a quality value of 30 (1 error per 1000 bases). Sequences derived from the genome project were assigned a base quality value of 40 (1 error per 10,000 bases), based on the fact that they are derived from an ~11X coverage of the genome.

The nucleotide diversity indicator π (average proportion of nucleotide differences between all possible pairs of sequences)[45] was calculated for each alignment using the effective length of the multiple sequence alignment (not considering regions of the alignment where the depth was 1) as the total number of available sites.

SNP validation by re-sequencing

DNA from the CL-Brener and Sylvio X10 strains of T. cruzi was prepared by extraction with DNAZol (Invitrogen), according to the protocol provided by the supplier. To select the regions for amplification, we started from a multiple sequence alignment containing putative polymorphic sites, and identified regions in the alignment that correspond to blocks of conserved sequence (100% identity, devoid of indels and putative SNPs). Two such regions separated by a block of 400–600 bp and containing at least 2 putative polymorphic sites were selected in order to design the corresponding 5’ and 3’ amplification primers. The genes and oligonucleotides used for PCR-based re-sequencing are listed in the Additional file10: Table S7. These oligonucleotide primers were used both for the amplification and sequencing reactions. Each 25 μl reaction was composed of 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (Invitrogen), 2.5 μl 10X Buffer (Invitrogen), 2 μl 2.5 mM dNTPs (Invitrogen), 0.8 μl 50 mM MgCl2 (Invitrogen) and 16.2 μl MiliQ water (Millipore). Amplification products were checked in 1.2% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and if a single amplification product was observed, an aliquot of the amplification reaction was treated with Exonuclease I (Fermentas) and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (SAP) (Fermentas) and two sequencing reactions were prepared, each with one of the primers used for the amplification of the product. Sequencing was carried out in an Applied Biosystems 3130 capillary sequencer using a Big-Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit, according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Chromatogram data derived from these reactions was analyzed using PolyPhred[35] to identify polymorphisms, including heterozygous peaks. Information was collected for both homozygous high quality discrepancies between sequences and heterozygous peaks within sequences.

Target prioritization strategy

To prioritize targets, we used the functionality available within the TDR Targets database to assign different scores to genes depending on the presence/absence of different attributes or features[54, 70]. Briefly, in TDR Targets ( we ran a query for each selected attribute to filter the genome and obtain a subset of genes (for example, those with orthologs in other kinetoplastids). After running all queries we assigned different numerical weights to each subset of genes (see below), and calculated a weighted union of these lists. The final score of a gene is the cumulative sum of the weights derived from each list in which the gene was present. This possibility of obtaining weighted unions (instead of intersections) allowed us to make a comprehensive prioritization of the T. cruzi genome using a large number of criteria. The following attributes were evaluated (the score/penalty applied to each criteria is available in Additional file9: Table S6): essentiality of bacterial (E. coli, M. tuberculosis), yeast (S. cerevisiae) or C. elegans) orthologs; absence of orthologs in mammals (human/mouse); presence of orthologs in other kinetoplastids (T. brucei, L. major); proteomic evidence of expression in amastigotes and trypomastigotes (data obtained form TriTrypDB[39]); availability of literature records for the target; availability of biochemical assays for the target; precedence for production of soluble recombinant protein; low molecular weight (<100 kDa); target is an enzyme (has an EC number); target has a solved 3D structure or a calculated 3D model; target has trans-membrane spanning domains (penalized); target is present in multiple copies (> 2 copies per haploid genome) (penalized); presence of a signal peptide (ER-secretory route) (penalized); presence of a GPI signal sequence (penalized). To further improve on this prioritization, we assigned positive scores to genes that are likely to be under purifying selection (low π values). The score for each gene was calculated using a sigmoid normalization function:

score π , k = 1 + 20 π / k * 50

where π is the nucleotide diversity and k is a scaling factor (0.08 in this case). A list of genes with their corresponding scores calculated in this way was uploaded to TDR Targets as a tab-delimited text file, to finish the prioritization strategy. The result of this prioritization is shown in the Additional file9: Table S6 and is also available from TDR Targets (

Locus identifiers

According to recent changes related to standardization in trypanosomatid locus identifiers used in community databases, all such T. cruzi identifiers referenced in this work appear in their current shorter form, e.g. TcCLB.507853.10 (equivalent to the old locus identifier Tc00.1047053507853.10).

Data deposition

The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession numbers: HQ586966-HQ587039; SNPs identified in this paper have been deposited in the dbSNP database (submission batch id: 1050246) and are also available from the TcSNP database at All TcSNP alignment identifiers mentioned in this work (e.g. tcsnp:438249) can be accessed using the following standard URI, and replacing the alignment identifier (e.g. 438249) in each case:



Single nucleotide polymorphism


Discrete typing unit.


  1. Rassi A, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA: Chagas disease. Lancet. 2010, 375 (9723): 1388-1402. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60061-X. []

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miles MA, Cedillos RA, Póvoa MM, de Souza AA, Prata A, Macedo V: Do radically dissimilar Trypanosoma cruzi strains (zymodemes) cause Venezuelan and Brazilian forms of Chagas’ disease?. Lancet. 1981, 1 (8234): 1338-1340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Macedo AM, Pena SD: Genetic variability of Trypanosoma cruzi: implications for the pathogenesis of Chagas disease. Parasitol Today. 1998, 14 (3): 119-124. 10.1016/S0169-4758(97)01179-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrade LO, Machado CR, Chiari E, Pena SD, Macedo AM: Differential tissue distribution of diverse clones of Trypanosoma cruzi in infected mice. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1999, 100 (2): 163-172. 10.1016/S0166-6851(99)90035-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vago AR, Andrade LO, Leite AA, d’Avila Reis D, Macedo AM, Adad SJ, Tostes S, Moreira MC, Filho GB, Pena SD: Genetic characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi directly from tissues of patients with chronic chagas disease: differential distribution of genetic types into diverse organs. Am J Pathol. 2000, 156 (5): 1805-1809. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65052-3.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tibayrenc M, Kjellberg F, Ayala FJ: A clonal theory of parasitic protozoa: the population structures of Entamoeba, Giardia, Leishmania, Naegleria, Plasmodium, Trichomonas, and Trypanosoma and their medical and taxonomical consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87 (7): 2414-2418. 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2414.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrade V, Brodskyn C, Andrade SG: Correlation between isoenzyme patterns and biological behaviour of different strains of Trypanosoma cruzi. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983, 77 (6): 796-799. 10.1016/0035-9203(83)90292-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dvorak JA: The natural heterogeneity of Trypanosoma cruzi: biological and medical implications. J Cell Biochem. 1984, 24 (4): 357-371. 10.1002/jcb.240240406. []

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tibayrenc M, Ward P, Moya A, Ayala FJ: Natural populations of Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas disease, have a complex multiclonal structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986, 83: 115-119. 10.1073/pnas.83.1.115.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Revollo S, Oury B, Laurent JP, Barnabé C, Quesney V, Carrière V, Noël S, Tibayrenc M: Trypanosoma cruzi: impact of clonal evolution of the parasite on its biological and medical properties. Exp Parasitol. 1998, 89: 30-39. 10.1006/expr.1998.4216. []

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miles MA, Souza A, Povoa M, Shaw JJ, Lainson R, Toye PJ: Isozymic heterogeneity of Trypanosoma cruzi in the first autochthonous patients with Chagas’ disease in Amazonian Brazil. Nature. 1978, 272 (5656): 819-821. 10.1038/272819a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Souto RP, Fernandes O, Macedo AM, Campbell DA, Zingales B: DNA markers define two major phylogenetic lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996, 83 (2): 141-152. 10.1016/S0166-6851(96)02755-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robello C, Gamarro F, Castanys S, Alvarez Valin F: Evolutionary relationships in Trypanosoma cruzi: molecular phylogenetics supports the existence of a new major lineage of strains. Gene. 2000, 246 (1–2): 331-338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Freitas JM, Pinto LA, Pimenta JR, Rodrigues LB, Gonçalves VF, Teixeira SMR, Chiari E, Junqueira ÂCV, Fernandes O, Macedo AM, Machado CR, Pena SDJ: Ancestral genomes, sex, and the population structure of Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2 (3): e24-10.1371/journal.ppat.0020024. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnabé C, Brisse S, Tibayrenc M: Population structure and genetic typing of Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas disease: a multilocus enzyme electrophoresis approach. Parasitology. 2000, 120 (Pt 5): 513-526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brisse S, Barnabé C, Tibayrenc M: Identification of six Trypanosoma cruzi phylogenetic lineages by random amplified polymorphic DNA and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Int J Parasitol. 2000, 30: 35-44. 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00168-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brisse S, Verhoef J, Tibayrenc M: Characterisation of large and small subunit rRNA and mini-exon genes further supports the distinction of six Trypanosoma cruzi lineages. Int J Parasitol. 2001, 31 (11): 1218-1226. 10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00238-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zingales B, Andrade SG, Briones MRS, Campbell DA, Chiari E, Fernandes O, Guhl F, Lages Silva E, Macedo AM, Machado CR, Miles MA, Romanha AJ, Sturm NR, Tibayrenc M, Schijman M: A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104 (7): 1051-1054. 10.1590/S0074-02762009000700021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zingales B, Miles MA, Campbell DA, Tibyarenc M, Macedo AM, Teixeira MMG, Schijman AG, Llewellyn MS, Lages Silva E, Machado C, Andrade SG, Sturm NR: The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infect Genet Evol. 2012, 12 (2): 253-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeo M, Mauricio IL, Messenger LA, Lewis MD, Llewellyn MS, Acosta N, Bhattacharyya T, Diosque P, Carrasco HJ, Miles MA: Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for lineage assignment and high resolution diversity studies in Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011, 5 (6): e1049-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001049. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Flores López CA, Machado CA: Analyses of 32 loci clarify phylogenetic relationships among Trypanosoma cruzi lineages and support a single hybridization prior to human contact. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011, 5 (8): e1272-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001272. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Machado CA, Ayala FJ: Nucleotide sequences provide evidence of genetic exchange among distantly related lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (13): 7396-7401. 10.1073/pnas.121187198. []

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Westenberger SJ, Christian B, Campbell DA, Sturm NR: Two hybridization events define the population structure of Trypanosoma cruzi. Genetics. 2005, 171 (2): 527-543. 10.1534/genetics.104.038745. []

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. El Sayed NM, Myler PJ, Bartholomeu DC, Daniel N, Gautam A, Anh-Nhi T, Elodie G, Worthey EA, Delcher AL, Gaelle B, Westenberger SJ, Elisabet C, Cerqueira GC, Carole B, Brian H, Atashi A, Erik A, Lena A, Philip A, Esteban B, Frédéric B, Peter B, Eithon C, Campbell DA, Mark C, Jonathan C, Hamid D, da Silveira JF, de Jong P, Kimberly E, et al: The genome sequence of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas disease. Science. 2005, 309 (5733): 409-415. 10.1126/science.1112631. []

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matthew B, Elodie G, Christiane Hertz F, Gaelle B, Hubert R, Bartholomeu DC, Lennard NJ, Elisabet C, Hamlin NE, Brian H, Ulrike B, Linda H, Aslett MA, Joshua S, Lucio M, Lihua H, Bill W, Cecilia M, Alsmark U, Claire A, Atkin RJ, Barron AJ, Frederic B, Karen B, Mark C, Inna C, Tracey-Jane C, Carol C, Clark LN, Corton CH, et al: The genome of the African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei. Science. 2005, 309 (5733): 416-422. 10.1126/science.1112642. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ivens AC, Peacock CS, Worthey EA, Lee M, Gautam A, Matthew B, Ellen S, Marie-Adele R, Ellen A, Rita A, Atashi A, Zina A, Philip A, Nathalie B, Christopher B, Alfred B, Beverley SM, Gabriella B, Katja B, Gordana B, Bruschi CV, Matt C, Eithon C, Laura C, Christine C, Coulson RMR, Ann C, Cruz AK, Davies RM, Javier De G, et al: The genome of the kinetoplastid parasite, leishmania major. Science. 2005, 309 (5733): 436-442. 10.1126/science.1112680. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brent Weatherly D, Courtney B, Tarleton RL: Chromosome level assembly of the hybrid Trypanosoma cruzi genome. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 255-10.1186/1471-2164-10-255. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oscar F, Stephen O, Ellen S, Lewis MD, Llewellyn MS, Miles MA, Björn A: Shotgun sequencing analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi I Sylvio X10/1 and comparison with T. cruzi VI CL brener. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011, 5 (3): e984-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000984. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brisse S, Barnabé C, Bañuls AL, Sidibé I, Noël S, Tibayrenc M: A phylogenetic analysis of the Trypanosoma cruzi genome project CL brener reference strain by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and multiprimer random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998, 92 (2): 253-263. 10.1016/S0166-6851(98)00005-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lauthier JJ, Nicolás T, Christian B, Monje Rumi MM, Alberti D’Amato AM, Ragone PG, Matthew Y, Lewis MD, Llewellyn MS, Basombrío MA, Miles MA, Michel T, Patricio D: Candidate targets for multilocus sequence typing of Trypanosoma cruzi: validation using parasite stocks from the Chaco region and a set of reference strains. Infect Genet Evol. 2011, []

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cosentino RO, Agüero F: A simple strain typing assay for trypanosoma cruzi: discrimination of major evolutionary lineages from a single amplification product. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012, 6 (7): e1777-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001777. []

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ackermann AA, Carmona SJ, Fernán A: TcSNP: a database of genetic variation in Trypanosoma cruzi. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (Database issue): D544-D549. []

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Agüero F, Verdún RE, Frasch AC, Sánchez DO: A random sequencing approach for the analysis of the Trypanosoma cruzi genome: general structure, large gene and repetitive DNA families, and gene discovery. Genome Res. 2000, 10 (12): 1996-2005. 10.1101/gr.GR-1463R.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Marth GT, Korf I, Yandell MD, Yeh RT, Gu Z, Zakeri H, Stitziel NO, Hillier L, Kwok PY, Gish WR: A general approach to single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery. Nat Genet. 1999, 23 (4): 452-456. 10.1038/70570. []

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nickerson DA, Tobe VO, Taylor SL: PolyPhred: automating the detection and genotyping of single nucleotide substitutions using fluorescence-based resequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (14): 2745-2751. 10.1093/nar/25.14.2745.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Collins DW, Jukes TH: Rates of transition and transversion in coding sequences since the human-rodent divergence. Genomics. 1994, 20 (3): 386-396. 10.1006/geno.1994.1192. []

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ingo E, Dirk M, Carsten S, Svante P: Genomewide comparison of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 70 (6): 1490-1497. 10.1086/340787. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lake JA, de la Cruz VF, Ferreira PC, Morel C, Simpson L: Evolution of parasitism: kinetoplastid protozoan history reconstructed from mitochondrial rRNA gene sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85 (13): 4779-4783. 10.1073/pnas.85.13.4779.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Martin A, Cristina A, Matthew B, John B, Brunk BP, Mark C, Depledge DP, Steve F, Bindu G, Xin G, Gardner MJ, Alan G, Greg G, Harb OS, Mark H, Christiane Hertz F, Robin H, Frank I, John I, Kissinger JC, Eileen K, Wei L, Logan FJ, Miller JA, Siddhartha M, Myler PJ, Vishal N, Cary P, Isabelle P, Pinney DF, et al: TriTrypDB: a functional genomic resource for the Trypanosomatidae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38 (Database issue): D457-D462. []

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wierenga RK, Terpstra P, Hol WG: Prediction of the occurrence of the ADP-binding beta alpha beta-fold in proteins, using an amino acid sequence fingerprint. J Mol Biol. 1986, 187: 101-107. 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90409-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Keith Dunker A, Brown CJ, Zoran O: Identification and functions of usefully disordered proteins. Adv Protein Chem. 2002, 62: 25-49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Keith Dunker A, Oldfield CJ, Jingwei M, Pedro R, Yang JY, Jessica Walton C, Vladimir V, Zoran O, Uversky VN: The unfoldomics decade: an update on intrinsically disordered proteins. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9 (2): S1-10.1186/1471-2164-9-S2-S1. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ghedin E, Charest H, Matlashewski G: A2rel: a constitutively expressed leishmania gene linked to an amastigote-stage-specific gene. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998, 93: 23-29. 10.1016/S0166-6851(98)00027-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang WW, Matlashewski G: Characterization of the A2–rel gene cluster in leishmania donovani: involvement of A2 in visceralization during infection. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 39 (4): 935-948. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02286.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hartl DL, Clark AG: Principles of Population Genetics. 2007, Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc, 4

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sergey K, Plotkin JB: The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4 (12): e1000304-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Campo V, Di Noia JM, Buscaglia CA, Agüero F, Sánchez DO, Frasch ACC: Differential accumulation of mutations localized in particular domains of the mucin genes expressed in the vertebrate host stage of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004, 133: 81-91. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2003.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. the gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet. 2000, 25: 25-29. 10.1038/75556. []

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Liendo A, Visbal G, Piras MM, Piras R, Urbina JA: Sterol composition and biosynthesis in Trypanosoma cruzi amastigotes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1999, 104: 81-91. 10.1016/S0166-6851(99)00129-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hardy LW, Peet NP: The multiple orthogonal tools approach to define molecular causation in the validation of druggable targets. Drug Discov Today. 2004, 9 (3): 117-126. 10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02969-6. []

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bissan Al L, Anna G, Gaia P, Jerry L, John O, Andrew H: The Molecular Basis of Predicting Druggability. 2007, Wiley: Bioinformatics - From Genomes to Therapies, 1315-1334. Volume 3

    Google Scholar 

  52. Magariños MP, Carmona SJ, Crowther GJ, Ralph SA, Roos DS, Dhanasekaran S, Van Voorhis WC, Fernán A: TDR Targets: a chemogenomics resource for neglected diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (Database issue): D1118-D1127. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Jimenez Sanchez G, Childs B, Valle D: Human disease genes. Nature. 2001, 409 (6822): 853-855. 10.1038/35057050. []

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Crowther GJ, Dhanasekaran S, Carmona SJ, Doyle MA, Christiane Hertz F, Matthew B, Solomon N, Ralph SA, Roos DS, Van Voorhis WC, Fernán A: Identification of attractive drug targets in neglected-disease pathogens using an in silico approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010, 4 (8): e804-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000804. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ramos EI, Garza KM, Krauth Siegel RL, Julia B, Martinez LE, Maldonado RA: 2,3-diphenyl-1,4-naphthoquinone: a potential chemotherapeutic agent against Trypanosoma cruzi. J Parasitol. 2009, 95 (2): 461-466. 10.1645/GE-1686.1. []

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ruslana B, Nancy A, Aditya V, David Warren J, Yun-Hee P, Patel MS, Lima CD, Carl N: Triazaspirodimethoxybenzoyls as selective inhibitors of mycobacterial lipoamide dehydrogenase. Biochemistry. 2010, 49 (8): 1616-1627. 10.1021/bi9016186. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Qing-Shan L, Sumin C, Jianwen F, Borchardt RT, Krzysztof K, Russell Middaugh C, Schowen RL: Evaluation of NAD(H) analogues as selective inhibitors for Trypanosoma cruzi S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2009, 28 (5): 473-484. 10.1080/15257770903044572. []

    Google Scholar 

  58. Harkiolaki M, Dodson EJ, Villamor VB, Turkenburg JP, Pacanowska DG, Wilson KS: The crystal structure of Trypanosoma cruzi dUTPase reveals a novel dUTP/dUDP binding fold. Structure. 2004, 12: 41-53. 10.1016/j.str.2003.11.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Salzberg SL, Yorke JA: Beware of mis-assembled genomes. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (24): 4320-4321. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti769. []

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Erik A, Ellen K, Daniel N, Fatima F, Marcella F, Martti T, Bjorn A: Database of Trypanosoma cruzi repeated genes: 20 000 additional gene variants. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 391-10.1186/1471-2164-8-391. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Jackson AP, Mandy S, Andrew B, Jacqueline MQ, Aslett MA, Quail MA, Bridget C, Paul C, Annette ML, Melville SE, Wendy G, David Barry J, Matthew B, Christiane Hertz F: The genome sequence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, causative agent of chronic human African trypanosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010, 4 (4): e658-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000658. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bindu G, Amit B, John B, Jennifer D, Steve F, Xin G, Mark H, John I, Kissinger JC, Mackey AJ, Pinney DF, Roos DS, Stoeckert CJ, Haiming W, Brunk BP: ToxoDB: an integrated toxoplasma gondii database resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (Database issue): D553-D556. []

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mariana S, Diana B, Adhemar Z, Kleider T, François A, Goran N, Paula K, Guilherme O: Single nucleotide polymorphisms identification in expressed genes of Schistosoma mansoni. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007, 154 (2): 134-140. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.04.003. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Johan N, Mats G, Wright APH: Proteome-wide evidence for enhanced positive Darwinian selection within intrinsically disordered regions in proteins. Genome Biol. 2011, 12 (7): R65-10.1186/gb-2011-12-7-r65. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ, Keith Dunker A: Intrinsically disordered proteins in human diseases: introducing the D2 concept. Annu Rev Biophys. 2008, 37: 215-246. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125924. []

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ, Uros M, Hongbo X, Bin X, Slobodan V, Iakoucheva LM, Zoran O, Keith Dunker A: Unfoldomics of human diseases: linking protein intrinsic disorder with diseases. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10 (1): S7-10.1186/1471-2164-10-S1-S7. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Alcolea PJ, Ana A, Gómez MJ, Alicia Sánchez G, Mercedes Moreno P, Eduardo González P, Alfredo T, Víctor P, Vicente L: Temperature increase prevails over acidification in gene expression modulation of amastigote differentiation in leishmania infantum. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 31-10.1186/1471-2164-11-31. []

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Fernán A, Wenlong Z, Brent Weatherly D, Pablo M, Kissinger JC: TcruziDB an integrated, post-genomics community resource for Trypanosoma cruzi. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Database issue): D428-D431. []

    Google Scholar 

  69. James Kent W: BLAT–the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 2002, 12 (4): 656-664. []

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Fernán A, Bissan Al L, Martin A, Matthew B, Buckner FS, Campbell RK, Santiago C, Carruthers IM, Edith Chan AW, Feng C, Crowther GJ, Doyle MA, Christiane Hertz F, Hopkins AL, Gregg MA, Solomon N, Overington JP, Arnab P, Paolini GV, Ursula P, Ralph SA, Aaron R, Roos DS, Andrej S, Dhanasekaran S, Takashi S, Van Voorhis WC, Verlinde CLMJ: Genomic-scale prioritization of drug targets: the TDR targets database. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008, 7 (11): 900-907. 10.1038/nrd2684. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Federico A, Rafael Z, Telford MJ: TranslatorX: multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences guided by amino acid translations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38 (Web Server issue): W7-13. []

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M: KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 29-34. 10.1093/nar/27.1.29.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Zsuzsanna D, Veronika C, Peter T, István S: IUPred: web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (16): 3433-3434. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti541. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to acknowledge Dr. Gastón Westergaard and Martín Vazquez (Instituto de Agrobiotecnología Rosario, INDEAR-CONCET) for access to transcriptomic data from the TcAdriana strain, Dr. Gregory Buck, Virginia Commonwealth University, and The Genome Center, Washington University School of Medicine, for access to preliminary assemblies of the JR cl4 and Esmeraldo cl3 genomic data, and Ms Fernanda Peri for technical support. This work was funded by grants UNSAM S05/22, CONICET PIP 5454 and ANPCyT PICT-38209, and was also partially supported by a grant from the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO/UNDP/World Bank/UNICEF). DOS, AAA, LP, ROC and FA are fellows of the National Research Council (CONICET, Argentina). During part of this work, LP was supported by a fellowship of the National Agency for the Promotion of Science and Technology (ANPCyT, Argentina).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernán Agüero.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Authors' contributions

AA and LP assembled the alignments of CL-Brener coding sequences, LP mapped coding sequences from draft genome assemblies, AA and LP identified and characterized SNPs, performed statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. DOS participated in the design of the study. FA conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and wrote the manuscript. LP and ROC carried out the re-sequencing study to validate SNPs. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Table S1. Complete list of alignments used for the detection of SNPs in this work. The table contains information on the alignments and the type and number of SNPs identified in each case. The Calc/Excel workbook contains two spreadhseets: the first contains a complete legend, describing all columns in detail; the second contains the data itself. (XLS 2 MB)


Additional file 2: Table S2. Experimental validation of identified SNPs by PCR-based re-sequencing. The table shows, for each loci analyzed, the number of SNPs identified in silico, as well as those that have been validated (V) or not (NV) by re-sequencing. (XLS 38 KB)


Additional file 3: Table S3. List of nonsense polymorphisms identified in this work. For each nonsense SNP identified we show the corresponding codon for each genome/strain analyzed, and N/A if the gene has not been identified in a dataset. (XLS 89 KB)


Additional file 4: Figure S1. Nonsense SNPs observed in the CL-Brener genome. (A) List of observed nonsense SNPs, sorted by descending frequency. Nonsense changes shown in black require only a single mutation to produce a stop codon. SNPs shown in color require changing two bases in the same codon (Ts = transition; Tv = transversion). (B) List of observed nonsense mutations, by type (Ts/Tv). (C) Genetic code showing all possible single base changes that would produce a stop codon, and those observed in T. cruzi. (PDF 748 KB)


Additional file 5: Figure S2. SNP density in globular vs unstructured protein domains. The density of SNPs in globular vs intrinsically unstructured regions (predicted by IUPred) was compared for synonymous, and non-synonymous changes (left and middle panels). A third panel (right) showing all SNPs is shown for comparison. In all cases the differences between the distribution were not statistically different. (PDF 6 KB)


Additional file 6: Figure S3. A natively unstructured domain accumulating non-synonymous changes (complete alignment). Multiple sequence alignment showing the TcCLB.506553.20 gene, and its allelic counterparts in other strains (Additional file 10: Figure S3). The gene has a globular N-terminal domain, and an intrinsically unstructured C-terminal domain, as predicted by IUPred[73]. This figure contains the complete alignment shown in Figure 1. (PDF 40 KB)

Additional file 7: Table S4. GO Slim annotation of alignments used for the detection of SNPs in this work. (XLS 332 KB)


Additional file 8: Table S5. KEGG pathway mapping of alignments used for the detection of SNPs in this work. (XLS 134 KB)


Additional file 9: Table S6. Drug target prioritization using a score based on the nucleotide diversity estimator (π) as one of the main driving criteria. The spreadhsheet contains the top 300 targets. The complete ranked proteome, as well as the individual queries can be accessed online at (XLS 224 KB)

Additional file 10: Table S7. Primers and amplification products used in the SNP validation experiment. (XLS 44 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ackermann, A.A., Panunzi, L.G., Cosentino, R.O. et al. A genomic scale map of genetic diversity in Trypanosoma cruzi. BMC Genomics 13, 736 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: