- Research article
- Open Access
SNP Discovery for mapping alien introgressions in wheat
© Tiwari et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 23 December 2013
- Accepted: 31 March 2014
- Published: 10 April 2014
Monitoring alien introgressions in crop plants is difficult due to the lack of genetic and molecular mapping information on the wild crop relatives. The tertiary gene pool of wheat is a very important source of genetic variability for wheat improvement against biotic and abiotic stresses. By exploring the 5Mg short arm (5MgS) of Aegilops geniculata, we can apply chromosome genomics for the discovery of SNP markers and their use for monitoring alien introgressions in wheat (Triticum aestivum L).
The short arm of chromosome 5Mg of Ae. geniculata Roth (syn. Ae. ovata L.; 2n = 4x = 28, UgUgMgMg) was flow-sorted from a wheat line in which it is maintained as a telocentric chromosome. DNA of the sorted arm was amplified and sequenced using an Illumina Hiseq 2000 with ~45x coverage. The sequence data was used for SNP discovery against wheat homoeologous group-5 assemblies. A total of 2,178 unique, 5MgS-specific SNPs were discovered. Randomly selected samples of 59 5MgS-specific SNPs were tested (44 by KASPar assay and 15 by Sanger sequencing) and 84% were validated. Of the selected SNPs, 97% mapped to a chromosome 5Mg addition to wheat (the source of t5MgS), and 94% to 5Mg introgressed from a different accession of Ae. geniculata substituting for chromosome 5D of wheat. The validated SNPs also identified chromosome segments of 5MgS origin in a set of T5D-5Mg translocation lines; eight SNPs (25%) mapped to TA5601 [T5DL · 5DS-5MgS(0.75)] and three (8%) to TA5602 [T5DL · 5DS-5MgS (0.95)]. SNPs (gsnp_5ms83 and gsnp_5ms94), tagging chromosome T5DL · 5DS-5MgS(0.95) with the smallest introgression carrying resistance to leaf rust (Lr57) and stripe rust (Yr40), were validated in two released germplasm lines with Lr57 and Yr40 genes.
This approach should be widely applicable for the identification of species/genome-specific SNPs. The development of a large number of SNP markers will facilitate the precise introgression and monitoring of alien segments in crop breeding programs and further enable mapping and cloning novel genes from the wild relatives of crop plants.
- Translocation Line
- Alien Chromosome
- Heterozygous Allele
- Disomic Addition Line
- KASPar Assay
Crop plants have a narrow genetic base because of domestication and breeding. Moreover, many crop plants have gone through a polyploidization bottleneck. Introgressive hybridization with wild relatives, often described as alien introgression, is widely used to broaden the crop genetic base. Bread or hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L., 2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD genome), which accounts for 95% of the harvested wheat crop, traces its origin to a rare hybridization event ~6,000 years ago involving T. turgidum L. (2n = 4x = 28, AABB) and Aegilops tauschii Coss. (2n = 2x = 14, DD) [1–3]. McFadden and Sears , Kihara , and McFadden and Sears  have reproduced this hybridization event to generate ‘synthetic wheat’. These two species, and wheat landraces, constitute the primary gene pool of wheat . Synthetic wheats and direct crosses between T. aestivum and Ae. tauschii [5, 6] have been used to enrich the bread wheat genetic base. Extensive wheat genetic resources and marker systems [7–9] are transferable and can be used for mapping of alien introgressions , characterizing genetic diversity  and gene isolation [12, 13] from the primary gene pool.
Tetraploid, emmer wheat T. turgidum L. arose ~350,000 years ago from a hybridization between T. urartu Tuanian ex Gandilyan (2n = 2x = 14, AA) and a B-genome species, whose closest living relative is Ae. speltoides Tausch (2n = 2x = SS) [14–16]. These two species, together with the A-genome species T. monococcum L. subsps. monococcum and aegilopoides, the tetraploid wheat sibling species T. timopheevii Zhuk. (2n = 4x = 28, AAGG) and D genome cluster present in polyploid Aegilops species  constitute the secondary gene pool. Usually, wheat marker systems can be used to map alien introgressions from secondary gene pool.
Hundreds of other species in the Triticeae tribe contain genomes other than A, B and D, and these species constitute the tertiary gene pool of bread wheat. All of these species can be hybridized with hexaploid wheat to produce amphiploids, addition and translocation lines [18–20]. Chromosome engineering approaches have been used [4, 21–24] to produce small alien transfers without linkage drag. Cytological approaches have been extensively used to identify alien introgression lines. However, these approaches lack throughput and resolution and are not suitable when analyzing a very large number of progeny for detecting a rare recombination event .
Molecular markers can detect small chromosome segments not detectable cytologically and permit easier identification of the introgressed alien fragments. Microsatellite markers have been used extensively in the primary and secondary gene pools, however, they have low transferability to tertiary gene pool species, and the lack of locus specificity hampers their application . Wheat EST bin maps have been explored as a source of markers, but polymorphic markers are rare . Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers have become the technology of choice for all organisms because of their wide distribution in genomes and compatibility with high, multiplex detection systems [27–31]. Advances in SNP marker development in wheat and the availability of various SNP genotyping platforms now permit high-throughput and cost-effective genotyping [27, 28, 31].
Despite the progress in DNA marker technology, mapping large and polyploid genomes such as wheat remains a daunting task. Mapping and sequencing complex plant genomes can be simplified by dissecting the chromosomes by flow cytometric sorting . This approach reduces sample complexity and enables analysis at the subgenomic level. Flow cytometric chromosome sorting has been implemented successfully in many plant species, including cultivated cereals (such as bread and durum wheat), barley, rye, oats, rice and maize . Recently, Molnár et al. reported flow-sorting of individual chromosomes from Ae. umbellulata Zhuk. (2n = 2x = 14, UU) and Ae. comosa Sm. In Sibth. & Sm. (2n = 2x = 14, MM) and from their natural allotetraploid hybrids (Ae. biuncialis Vis. and Ae. geniculata) [34, 35]. This study provided opportunity for the next-generation sequencing of individual Aegilops chromosomes for the development of sequence-based markers and their application in wheat breeding.
Ae. geniculata, also called ovate goatgrass, is found widely distributed in the Middle East. A member of the tertiary gene pool of wheat, Ae. geniculata arose from hybridization between the diploid species Ae. umbellulata and Ae. comosa [36, 37] and is an important source of useful genes for wheat improvement [20, 38–41]. The Ae. geniculata genome has been introgressed into wheat, and single-chromosome, addition lines were developed by Friebe et al. . Previously, we have reported on the transfer of genes Lr57 and Yr40  and Sr53  from chromosome 5Mg of Ae. geniculata to chromosome 5D of wheat. In this study, we present the first report on alien chromosome-based SNP discovery and its application in mapping of alien introgression in wheat.
Flow-sorting and sequencing of the 5Mgshort arm
Mapping of reads and SNP calling
SNPs derived by comparing 5M g S sequences based on reads mapped on the 5AS, 5BS and 5DS reference sequence assemblies from the IWGSC
After mapping the 5MgS reads from Ae. geniculata on the group-5, short-arm assemblies of Chinese Spring, we focused on finding 5Mg-specific SNPs. SNPs that had the same alleles on 5A, 5B and 5D but a different allele on 5Mg were identified. It was found that 2,178 SNPs have the same alleles in the 5AS, 5BS and 5DS contigs and different alleles in the 5MgS sequences. These SNPs were putative 5Mg-specific SNPs (for convenience, we only kept the SNP positions belonging to 5AS contigs). To make sure that the flanking sequences of 5MgS-specific SNPs matched the 5MgS assemblies, flanking sequences of 5MgS-specific SNPs were blasted to the 5MgS assemblies so that the primers designed based on the flanking sequences would work for both 5A (5B, 5D) and 5Mg. To eliminate interference from variations that may locate in the flanking sequences, only 104 SNPs that showed no variation in the 100-bp flanking sequences of SNPs between the 5A and 5MgS contigs were selected (Additional file 3: Table S1).
For Sanger sequencing-based validation, we tested 15 primers derived from SNP sequences; three did not show any amplification in either line suggesting the need for PCR optimization. Of 12 primers tested between Chinese Spring and Ae. geniculata TA2899, the SNP validation rate was ~84%, which was similar to the results from the KASPar assay.
Validation percentage of 44 5M g S-specific SNPs on a set of seven Ae. geniculata lines against two wheat cultivars ( T. aestivum cv. Chinese Spring and WL711)
Validation of 5MgS-specific SNPs in selected Ae. geniculata accessions (%)
Application of 5Mg-specific SNPs
Validated SNPs between Chinese Spring and Ae. geniculata accession TA2899 were used to identify 5Mg chromosome in the chromosome complement of Chinese Spring wheat. In the 5Mg addition line, 5Mg-specific SNPs were expected to have heterozygous condition, because wheat chromosomes 5A, 5B and 5D carry the alternative allele. Out of 37 SNPs, 97% detected heterozygous alleles (Figure 2b), confirming the presence of both wheat and Ae. geniculata chromosomes in the tested addition line (TA7659).
Substitution and translocation lines
Two germplasm lines (KS11WGGRC53-J and KS11WGGRC53-O) were developed using TA5602. Of the three SNPs (gsnp_5ms62, gsnp_5ms83 and gsnp_5ms94) validated in terminal translocation line TA5602 (Figure 3e), two (gsnp_5ms83 and gsnp_5ms94) mapped in KS11WGGRC53-J (Figure 3f). Only one SNP (gsnp_5ms94) mapped in germplasm line KS11WGGRC53-O (Figure 3g).
The gene pools with the wild relatives of crops hold tremendous potential for crop improvement for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. In wheat, many alien introgression and translocation lines involving members from tertiary gene pool have been produced . Exploiting alien germplasm has been slow because of the time-consuming process of interspecific hybridization and isolation of addition and translocation lines with reduced linkage drag [19, 20]. A number of approaches are available to minimize alien chromatin for reducing linkage drag [20, 21, 45–49]; the most widely used approach is to induce meiotic recombination between alien chromosome and its homoeologous (partially homologous) wheat chromosome. However, the frequency of homoeologous recombination between wheat and alien chromosomes is low (~3%), and a large number of progeny must be screened to isolate recombinants with small alien transfers . Cytological methods, such as chromosome banding, genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), have been used extensively to identify introgression and translocation lines in wheat [22, 51–53], but these approaches are low throughput and have resolution limitations [25, 43]. Molecular markers have been used to identify alien fragments; but limited availability of alien, chromosome-specific molecular markers, especially for the tertiary gene pool species, hampers the characterization of useful lines with traits of interest . As an example, only a small number of U- and M-genome-specific SSR markers are available, greatly limiting marker-assisted selection of wheat-Ae. geniculata and wheat-Ae. biuncialis introgression lines [54–56]. Practically no non-radioactive markers were available for the analysis of the wheat-Ae. geniculata introgressions described herein, and all previous mapping was done using RFLP analysis . Qi et al.  used EST-STS markers to identify alien introgression lines, but polymorphism was very low and only three or fewer polymorphic markers were discovered for each arm . Because the selection was based on only a few markers, useful smaller translocation may have escaped detection. Therefore, the development of a system for a user-friendly high-throughput method of identifying alien chromosome(s)-based introgression and translocation lines as reported here is highly significant.
Flow cytometric chromosome sorting has been a foundation of the genomics of the Triticeae tribe [57–60]. Molnár et al.  applied the flow-sorting technique on the allotetraploid species Ae. biuncialis and Ae. geniculata and their diploid progenitors Ae. umbellulata and Ae. comosa [34, 35]. Their results provided an opportunity for the molecular analysis of wild Aegilops chromosomes and developing Aegilops chromosome-specific markers. To date, only a few studies have reported on the development of U- and M-genome-specific SSR markers [34, 35, 50]. In this study, we flow-sorted a ditelosomic addition wheat-Ae. geniculata line to isolate the short arm of the Ae. geniculata 5Mg chromosome with ~95% purity. This approach reduced DNA sample complexity and permitted the development of markers specific for the short arm of 5Mg (Figure 1). Approximately 145 million reads (~95%) of total sequence were obtained for mapping after trimming the data (~45X), and the deep sequencing data was used for SNP discovery.
SNP discovery using next generation sequencing (NGS) was successfully used in small-genome plants, such as Arabidopsis and rice, because their reference genomes are available [61, 62]. SNP discovery in complex genomes without a reference genome, such as wheat [28, 63] and barley [64, 65], can be achieved through NGS. However, the lack of accurate reference genome sequences can create ambiguities in SNP calling, which can be further complicated by the presence of paralogs and DNA repeats . We used stringent mapping parameters to minimize erroneous base calling and misaligned reads. Our SNP discovery was greatly assisted by the availability of 5AS, 5BS and 5DS chromosome shotgun sequences and assemblies developed under the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium Survey Sequencing Initiative. Only about 30%, 23% and 25% of 5Mg short arm reads could be mapped to the 5AS, 5BS and 5DS assemblies, respectively, due to the low coverage of 5MgS sequences on reference assemblies, small reads and probably the diversity of the sequences. Our SNP-filtering criterion was similar to that in previously published reports [67, 68] and yielded 277,770 (5AS), 203,522 (5BS) and 355,765 (5DS) high-quality SNPs (Table 1). In this research we generated single end sequencing reads, assembled data provided us ~7000 contigs > =500 bp. Blast against wheat EST database of these larger contigs suggested ~1400 contigs with genes on Ae. geniculata chromosome arm 5MgS.
The estimated SNP frequency in our study was ~1.3 SNPs/kb of the total analyzed sequences. This frequency is slightly lower than those of previous reports; Trick et al.  found an average density of 1.80 (±1.46) SNP/kb and Ravel et al.  estimated SNP frequency to be 2.99 SNP/kb . The lower estimated SNP frequency can be attributed to the low coverage of 5Mg sequences on reference assemblies and a stringent filtering criterion. For developing M-genome-specific SNPs, we needed identical SNP alleles in 5AS, 5BS and 5DS but different in 5MgS. We aligned the 100-bp flanking sequences of the SNPs that were discovered based on the three references (5AS, 5BS and 5DS contigs) and only those sequences were selected that showed 100% similarity on the flanking sequences of the SNP. Critical selection of SNPs against 5AS, 5BS and 5DS yielded 2,178 reliable 5Mg-specific SNPs which were around 1% of total SNPs discovered.
Our study identified ~2,178 chromosome 5MgS-specific SNPs, providing a quick approach for developing markers that would facilitate identifying alien addition and translocation lines. For M-genome-specific marker development, we shortlisted 104 sequences with unique SNPs. Using two different SNP validation approaches, we tested 59 randomly selected SNPs in wheat cultivar Chinese Spring and Ae. geniculata TA2899, and the validation rate was found to be ~84%. We tested Chinese Spring, WL711, and seven Ae. geniculata accessions. When comparing Chinese Spring against all the Ae. geniculata accessions, the average validation was 78.4%, with a range of 68.8% to 85.4%. For another set involving wheat line WL711 and the seven Ae. geniculata lines, the average validation rate was 76.0%, with a range of 65.7% to 81.4%. These results indicate the fixation of more than 70% of 5Mg-specific alleles in Ae. geniculata accessions (TA1800, TA1801, TA2847, TA2899, TA10029, TA2041 and TA10437), suggesting the usefulness of these SNPs in multiple Ae. geniculata accessions. We compared the validation rates of 59 SNPs (33 genic and 26 non-genic sequences). The validation rate for the genic and non-genic SNPs was very similar (86.1% and 85.2%, respectively). The validated 5MgS-specific markers (Additional file 3: Table S1) will be useful for monitoring introgression (5MgS) in Ae. comosa, Ae. geniculata and Ae. biuncialis, because they share a common M genome. The KASPar assay used in this study provides a cheap and high-throughput means for identifying alien introgressions because one assay mix is sufficient for ~2,500 reactions. Validated SNPs between Chinese Spring and Ae. geniculata TA2899 were used to identify an alien disomic addition line (TA7659). Approximately 97.3% of the validated SNPs identified the addition line with heterozygous alleles (Figure 2b), confirming the presence of both wheat and Ae. geniculata chromosomes in TA7659. Forty-four 5MgS-specific SNPs also were tested on WL711, the Ae. geniculata accession TA10437 and a set of their substitution and translocation lines. As expected 94.4%, 94.4%, 25%, and 8.3% of the validated SNPs showed heterozygous alleles in TA6675, TA5599, TA5601 short arm and TA5602, respectively. These data clearly indicate the applicability of SNP-based identification for alien addition, substitution and translocation lines.
We also validated two released germplasm lines (KW11wggrc53-J and KS11wggrc53-O) developed by crossing TA5602 with two susceptible winter wheat lines Jagger and Overley. Both lines were found to have 5MgS-specific SNPs mapped on TA5602 suggesting that two markers (gsnp_5ms83 and gsnp_5ms94) could be used for marker-assisted selection for disease resistance genes (Lr57 and Yr40).
All plant materials used in this study were procured, developed and maintained by the Wheat Genetics Resource Center at Kansas State University (http://www.k-state.edu/wgrc/). Plant materials include Ae. geniculata (accession TA2899) 5Mg chromosome disomic addition line (TA7659) in wheat cultivar Chinese Spring , a disomic substitution line [TA6675; DS5Mg(5D)], and three wheat-Ae. geniculata translocation lines TA5599, TA5601, and TA5602 with 75%, 25%, and 5% of Ae. geniculata (accession TA10437) 5Mg chromosome, respectively [43, 49]. Disomic addition line TA7659 was used to develop a ditelosomic (t5MgS) line (TA7670) in wheat . Translocation lines TA5599 [T5DL-5MgL · MgS (0.25)] and TA5601 [T5DL · 5DS-5MgS (0.75)] are BC2F5 hybrids derived from a disomic substitution line TA6675 [DS5Mg(5D)] and Chinese Spring (CS)Ph I stock , followed by backcrossing to the bread wheat cultivar WL711 [43, 49]. Translocation line TA5602 [T5DL · 5DS-5MgS (0.95)] is a BC3F6 line derived in a similar way . All the three translocation lines (TA5599, TA5601 and TA5602) carry Lr57 and Yr40 genes. A set of Ae. geniculata accessions (TA2899, TA1800, TA1801, TA2049, TA2786, TA10437 and TA10029) and wheat lines (Chinese Spring, WL711, Jagger and Overley) were also used in this study. Two germplasm lines (KS11WGGRC53-J and KS11WGGRC53-O) released by the WGRC (http://www.k-state.edu/wgrc/Germplasm/grmplsm.html) were used to validate the 5MgS SNPs mapped in TA5602. The germplasm KS11WGGRC53-J was developed by crossing the translocation line TA5602 and winter wheat cultivar Jagger (TA5602/3*Jagger; TA5089-L1) whereas KS11WGGRC53-O was developed by crossing TA5602 with winter wheat cultivar Overley (TA5602/3*Overley; TA5089-L2).
Flow-sorting and next-generation sequencing
Aqueous suspensions of mitotic metaphase chromosomes were prepared from wheat-Ae. geniculata ditelosomic addition line 5MgS (TA7670)  following the protocol of Vrána et al. . The samples were stained by DAPI and analyzed using an FACSAria II SORP flow cytometer and sorter (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA). Three independent samples of 100,000 chromosomes were sorted into 40 μl of sterile deionized water in a 0.5-ml PCR tube. The contamination of sorted fractions by other chromosomes was determined for each sorted run after analyzing 1,000 chromosomes on a microscopic slide. The chromosomes were identified using FISH with probes for the Afa-family and [GAA]n repeats . The DNA of chromosomes sorted into PCR tubes was purified and amplified using an Illustra GenomiPhi V2 DNA Amplification Kit (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, USA) as described by Šimková et al. . The three samples of amplified DNA were pooled to reduce possible amplification bias. Sequencing of amplified chromosomal DNA was performed with HiSEq 2000 (Illumina). Pooled MDA-amplified DNA was used to create the corresponding shotgun DNA-seq library. The library for the 5MgS was run in a single lane at DNA core facility services at University of Missouri, USA. For this project we opted for single read sequencing where only one end is sequenced. Sequence data generated from the short arm of Ae. geniculata chromosome arm 5M g was used for SNP discovery.
Rationale and strategy for read alignment and variant calling
Before aligning reads to references, all reads were first trimmed to remove the low-quality bases (phred score < =15) on the end of the reads; reads with more than 30 bp after quality trimming were then filtered with an overall quality (80% of bases must have quality ≥15). NGS-based SNP discovery involved two basic steps: (1) alignment of NGS on a reference genome sequence, also called read mapping, and (2) variant calling from the aligned sequences. Variant calling is much easier if a reference sequence is available, because short reads with deep sequencing coverage increases the confidence level for SNP discovery. In this study, we used Chromosome Shotgun Sequences (CSS) as reference sequences and assemblies from wheat chromosome arms 5AS, 5BS and 5DS developed under the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium Survey Sequencing Initiative (http://www.wheatgenome.org/). The 5MgS reads were mapped on these assemblies. In the second step, variants were called against each individual assembly (5AS, 5BS and 5DS). We used the Bowtie software (v1.3) (http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/index.shtml) to map quality filtered reads of 5Mg to the Chinese Spring 5A, 5B and 5D contigs separately (Figure 4). The parameters to control the mapping quality were: -k 1 –best –v 3. The alignment results were saved in SAM format files. SAMtools (v1.8) (http://samtools.sourceforge.net/) were used to generate pileup files, which were then fed to BCFtools (http://samtools.sourceforge.net/) to call raw variations using default parameters. All variations with coverage depth > =4, SNP quality > =50 were kept for subsequent analysis (Figure 4). We also assembled 5MgS contigs using the SOAPdenovo (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html) to assemble contigs for the 5Mg genome, with parameter -k 27.
Detection of Mg-genome-specific SNPs
To identify 5Mg-specific SNPs, the program BLAT was used to align the 100-bp flanking sequences of 5MgS-specific SNPs against the 5AS, 5BS and 5DS reference contigs. The alleles of SNPs that had 100% similarity on the flanking sequences in 5AS, 5BS and 5DS were then compared to select the potential 5MgS-specific SNPs.
Validation of SNPs
KASPar genotyping based validation
A set of 44 SNPs were selected for further validation and identification of alien addition and translocation lines. For each putative 5MgS-specific SNP, two allele-specific forward primers and one common reverse primer (Additional file 3: Table S1) were designed (KBioscience, Hoddesdon, UK). Genotyping reactions were performed in a final volume of 8.11 μl, which included a reaction mix: 4.0 μl of 2x reaction mix (per reaction) (KBioscience, Hoddesdon, UK), and 0.11 ul assay mix (per reaction) and ~20 ng of genomic DNA (4.0 μL). The following cycling conditions were used: 94°C for 15 minutes; and 35 cycles of 94°C for 10 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute, followed by 35°C for 30 seconds for plate reading. All reactions used a CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), which has an inbuilt fluorescence scanner, and data were analyzed using Bio-Rad CFX manager software under the allelic discrimination mode.
PCR product-based SNP validation
To assess the veracity of the discovered SNPs and estimate the false-positive SNP discovery rate, 15 sequences, with one SNP each, were randomly chosen from the SNP reference sequences. SNP flanking primers were designed with Primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/). Of 15 primers, only 12 primer pairs generated PCR products in both Chinese Spring and Ae. geniculata TA2899. Failure to amplify the target DNA by two primer pairs was due to suboptimal PCR conditions, later confirmed by optimization. The PCR products were eluted from the electrophoresis gels and purified. Purified products were then sequenced with an Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Life Technologies, USA) and sequences were aligned and compared for SNPs.
Availability of supporting data
The 5Mg short arm sequence data has been submitted to SRA under accession SRX474187. An additional table and two additional figures were also included in the manuscript.
We thank the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (Bethesda, USA) for providing pre-publication access to the shotgun sequence assemblies of wheat chromosomes 5AS, 5BS and 5DS. We thank our colleagues Jarmila Číhalíková, Romana Šperková and Zdeňka Dubská for assistance with chromosome sorting and DNA amplification. We thank Jon W. Raupp and Nidhi Rawat, WGRC, for critical reading of the manuscript. JD, JV and MK were supported by the Czech Science Foundation (award no. P501/12/G090) and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic and the European Regional Development Fund (Operational Programme Research and Development for Innovations No. ED0007/01/01). VKT was supported by a research agreement grant between Kansas State University and King Abdulaziz University. Part of the research in BSG lab was supported by grants from Kansas Wheat Commission and Heartland Plant Innovations. The computing for this project was performed on the Beocat Research Cluster at Kansas State University, which is funded in part by NSF grants CNS-1006860, EPS-1006860, and EPS-0919443. This is the contribution number 14-319-J from Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS 66506–502, USA. Work was done under the auspices of WGRC I/UCRC partially funded by NSF grant contract (IIP-1338897).
- McFadden ES, Sears ER: The artificial synthesis of Triticum spelta. Rec Genet Soc Am. 1944, 13: 26-27.Google Scholar
- Kihara H: Discovery of the DD-analyzer, one of the ancestors of vulgare wheats. Agric Hortic. 1944, 19: 889-890.Google Scholar
- McFadden ES, Sears ER: The origin of Triticum spelta and its free-threshing hexaploid relatives. J Hered. 1946, 37: 81-89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qi LL, Friebe B, Zhang P, Gill BS: Homoeologous recombination, chromosome engineering and crop improvement. Chromosome Res. 2007, 15: 3-19. 10.1007/s10577-006-1108-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogbonnaya FC, Abdalla O, Mujeeb-Kazi A, Kazi AG, Xu SS, Gosman N, Lagudah ES, Bonnett D, Sorrells ME: Synthetic hexaploid in wheat improvement. In: Janick J (ed). Plant Breeding Rev. 2013, 37: 35-122.Google Scholar
- Gill BS, Raupp J: Direct genetic transfers from Aegilops sqaarrosa L. to hexaploid wheat. Crop Sci. 1987, 27: 445-450. 10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700030004x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dvorak J, Luo MC, Yang ZL, Zhang HB: The structure of the Aegilops tauschii genepool and the evolution of hexaploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1998, 97: 657-670. 10.1007/s001220050942.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roder MS, Korzun V, Wendehake K, Plaschke J, Tixier MH, Leroy P, Ganal MW: A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics. 1998, 149: 2007-2023.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qi LL, Echalier B, Chao S, Lazo GR, Butler GE, Anderson OD, Akhunov ED, Dvorák J, Linkiewicz AM, Ratnasiri A, Dubcovsky J, Bermudez-Kandianis CE, Greene RA, Kantety R, La Rota CM, Munkvold JD, Sorrells SF, Sorrells ME, Dilbirligi M, Sidhu D, Erayman M, Randhawa HS, Sandhu D, Bondareva SN, Gill KS, Mahmoud AA, Ma XF, Miftahudin , Gustafson JP, Conley EJ, et al: A chromosome bin map of 16,000 expressed sequence tag loci and distribution of genes among the three genomes of polyploid wheat. Genetics. 2004, 168: 701-712. 10.1534/genetics.104.034868.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olson EL, Rouse MN, Pumphrey MO, Bowden RL, Gill BS, Poland JA: Introgression of stem rust resistance genes SrTA10187 and SrTA10171 from Aegilops tauschii to wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2013, 126 (10): 2477-2484. 10.1007/s00122-013-2148-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Luo MC, Chen Z, You FM, Wei Y, Zheng Y, Dvorak J: Aegilops tauschii single nucleotide polymorphisms shed light on the origins of wheat D-genome genetic diversity and pinpoint the geographic origin of hexaploid wheat. New Phytol. 2013, 198: 925-937. 10.1111/nph.12164.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang L, Brooks SA, Li W, Fellers JP, Trick HN, Gill BS: Map-based cloning of leaf rust resistance gene Lr21 from the large and polyploid genome of bread wheat. Genetics. 2003, 164: 655-664.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Periyannan S, Moore J, Ayliffe M, Bansal U, Wang X, Huang L, Deal K, Luo M-C, Kong X, Bariana H, Mago R, McIntosh R, Dodds P, Dvorak J, Lagudah E: The Gene Sr33, an ortholog of barley Mla Genes, encodes resistance to wheat stem rust race Ug99. Science. 2013, 16: 786-788.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dvorák J, Zhang HB: Variation in repeated nucleotide sequences sheds light on the phylogeny of the wheat B and G genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990, 87: 9640-9644. 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9640.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang S, Sirikhachornkit A, Su X, Faris J, Gill BS, Heselkorn R, Gorniki P: Genes encoding plastid acetyl-CoA carboxylase and 3-phosphoglycerate kinase of the Triticum/Aegilops complex and the evolutionary history of polyploid wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99: 8133-8138. 10.1073/pnas.072223799.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akhunov ED, Akhunova AR, Dvorak J: Mechanisms and rates of birth and death of dispersed duplicated genes during the evolution of a multigene family in diploid and tetraploid wheats. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 539-550.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gill BS, Friebe B, Raupp WJ, Wilson DL, Cox TS, Sears RG, Brown-Guedira GL, Fritz AK: Wheat genetics resource center: the first 25 years. Advan Agron. 2006, 89: 74-136.Google Scholar
- Sharma HC, Gill BS: Current status of wide hybridization in wheat. Euphytica. 1983, 32: 17-31. 10.1007/BF00036860.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiang J, Friebe B, Gill BS: Recent advances in alien gene transfer in wheat. Euphytica. 1994, 73: 199-212. 10.1007/BF00036700.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Friebe B, Jiang J, Raupp WJ, McIntosh RA, Gill BS: Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica. 1996, 91: 59-87. 10.1007/BF00035277.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sears ER: The transfer of leaf rust resistance from Aegilops umbellulata to wheat. Brookhaven Symp Biol. 1956, 9: 1-22.Google Scholar
- Mukai Y, Friebe B, Hatchett JH, Yamamoto M, Gill BS: Molecular cytogenetic analysis of radiation-induced wheat-rye terminal and intercalary chromosomal translocations and the detection of rye chromatin specifying resistance to Hessian fly. Chromosoma. 1993, 102: 88-95. 10.1007/BF00356025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lukaszewski AJ: Construction of midget chromosomes in wheat. Genome. 1997, 40 (4): 566-569. 10.1139/g97-074.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Friebe B, Zhang P, Linc G, Gill BS: Robertsonian translocations in wheat arise by centric misdivision of univalent at anaphase I and rejoining of broken centromeres during interkinesis of meiosis II. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005, 109: 293-297. 10.1159/000082412.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lukaszewski AJ, Lapinski B, Rybka K: Limitations of in situ hybridization with total genomic DNA in routine screening for alien introgressions in wheat. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005, 109: 373-377. 10.1159/000082422.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mullan DJ, Platteter A, Teakle NL, Appels R, Colmer TD, Anderson JM, Francki MG: EST-derived SSR markers from defined regions of the wheat genome to identify Lophopyrum elongatum specific loci. Genome. 2006, 48: 811-822.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akhunov ED, Nicolet C, Dvorak J: Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in polyploid wheat with the Illumina GoldenGate assay. Theor Appl Genet. 2009, 119: 507-517. 10.1007/s00122-009-1059-5.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allen AM, Barker GL, Berry ST, Coghill JA, Gwilliam R, Allen AM, Barker GL, Berry ST, Coghill JA, Gwilliam R, Kirby S, Robinson P, Brenchley RC, D’Amore R, McKenzie N, Waite D, Hall A, Bevan M, Hall N, Edwards KJ: Transcript-specific, single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery and linkage analysis in hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnol J. 2011, 9: 1086-1099. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00628.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paux E, Sourdille P, Mackay I, Feuillet C: Sequence-based marker development in wheat: advances and applications to breeding. Biotechnol Adv. 2011, 30 (5): 1071-1088.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berkman PJ, Lai K, Lorenc MT, Edwards D: Next generation sequencing applications for wheat crop improvement. Am J Bot. 2012, 99: 365-371. 10.3732/ajb.1100309.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cavanagh CR, Chao S, Wang S, Huang BE, Stephen S, Kiani S, Forres K, Saintenac C, Brown-Guedira GL, Akhunova A, See D, Bai G, Pumphrey M, Tomar L, Wong D, Kong S, Reynolds M, da Silva ML, Bockelman H, Talbert L, Anderson JA, Dreisigacker S, Baenziger S, Carter A, Korzun V, Morrell PL, Dubcovsky J, Morell MK, Sorrells ME, Hayden MJ, et al: Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cultivars. Proc Natl Aacad Sci. 2013, 110 (20): 8057-8062. 10.1073/pnas.1217133110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doležel J, Kubaláková M, Paux E, Bartoš J, Feuillet C: Chromosome-based genomics in the cereals. Chromosome Res. 2007, 15: 51-66. 10.1007/s10577-006-1106-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doležel J, Vrána J, Šafář J, Bartoš J, Kubaláková M, Šimková H: Chromosomes in the flow to simplify genome analysis. Funct Integr Genomics. 2012, 12: 397-416. 10.1007/s10142-012-0293-0.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Molnár I, Kubaláková M, Šimková H, Cseh A, Molnár-Láng M, Doležel J: Chromosome isolation by flow sorting in Aegilops umbellulata and Ae. comosa and their allotetraploid hybrids Ae. biuncialis and Ae. geniculata. PLoS ONE. 2011, 6 (11): e27708-10.1371/journal.pone.0027708.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Molnár I, Šimková H, Leverington-Waite M, Goram R, Cseh A, Vrána J, Farkas A, Doležel J, Molnár-Láng M, Griffiths S: Syntenic relationships between the U and M genomes of Aegilops, wheat and the model species Brachypodium and rice as revealed by COS markers. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8 (8): e70844-10.1371/journal.pone.0070844.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kihara H: Considerations on the evolution and distribution of Aegilops species based on the analyser method. Cytologia. 1954, 19: 336-357. 10.1508/cytologia.19.336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kimber G, Sallee PJ, Feiner MM: The interspecific and evolutionary relationships of Triticum ovatum. Genome. 1988, 30: 218-221. 10.1139/g88-037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gill BS, Sharma HC, Raupp WJ, Browder LE, Hatchett JH, Harvey TL, Mouseman G, Waines JG: Evaluation of Aegilops species for resistance to wheat powdery mildew, wheat leaf rust, Hessian fly, and greenbug. Plant Dis. 1985, 69: 314-316.Google Scholar
- Zaharieva M, Monneveux P, Henry M, Rivoal R, Valkoun J, Nachit MM: Evaluation of a collection of wild wheat relative Aegilops geniculata Roth and identification of potential sources for useful traits. Euphytica. 2001, 119: 314-316.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider A, Molnar I, Molnar-Lang M: Utilisation of Aegilops (goatgrass) species to widen the genetic diversity of cultivated wheat. Euphytica. 2008, 163: 1-19. 10.1007/s10681-007-9624-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rawat N, Tiwari VK, Singh N, Randhawa GS, Singh K, Chhuneja P, Dhaliwal HS: Evaluation and utilization of Aegilops and wild Triticum species for enhancing iron and zinc content in wheat. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2009, 56: 53-64. 10.1007/s10722-008-9344-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Friebe B, Tuleen N, Gill BS: Development and identification of a set of Triticum aestivum–Aegilops geniculata chromosome addition lines. Genome. 1999, 42: 374-380. 10.1139/gen-42-3-374.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuraparthy V, Chhuneja P, Dhaliwal HS, Kaur S, Bowden RL, Gill BS: Characterization and mapping of cryptic introgression from Ae. geniculata with new leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr57 and Yr40 in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2007, 114: 1379-1389. 10.1007/s00122-007-0524-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu W, Rouse M, Friebe B, Jin Y, Gill BS, Pumphrey MO: Discovery and molecular mapping of a new gene conferring resistance to stem rust, Sr53, derived from Aegilops geniculata and characterization of spontaneous translocation stocks with reduced alien chromatin. Chromosome Res. 2011, 19: 669-682. 10.1007/s10577-011-9226-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okamoto M: Asynaptic effect of chromosome V. Wheat Inf Serv. 1957, 5: 6-Google Scholar
- Sears ER, Okamoto M: Intergenomic chromosome relationships in hexaploid wheat. Proc X Int Congress Genet. 1958, Toronto, Canada: Univ Toronto Press, 258-259.Google Scholar
- Sears ER: Induced mutant with homoeologous pairing in common wheat. Can J Genet Cytol. 1977, 19: 585-593.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen PD, Tsujimoto H, Gill BS: Transfer of PhI genes promoting homoeologous pairing from Triticum speltoides to common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1994, 88 (1): 97-101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aghaee-Sarbarzeh M, Ferrahi M, Singh S, Singh H, Friebe B, Gill BS, Dhaliwal HS: PhI induced transfer of leaf and stripe rust resistance genes from Aegilops triuncialis and Ae. geniculata to bread wheat. Euphytica. 2002, 127: 377-382. 10.1023/A:1020334821122.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niu ZX, Klindworth DL, Friesen TL, Chao SM, Jin Y, Cai XW, Xu SS: Targeted introgression of a wheat stem rust resistance gene by DNA marker-assisted chromosome engineering. Genetics. 2011, 187: 1011-1021. 10.1534/genetics.110.123588.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu Z, Li DY, Zhang XY: Genetic relationships among five basic genomes St, E, A, B and D in Triticeae revealed by genomic Southern and in situ hybridization. J Integr Plant Biol. 2007, 49: 1080-1086. 10.1111/j.1672-9072.2007.00462.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qi LL, Pumphrey MO, Friebe B, Chen PD, Gill BS: Molecular cytogenetic characterization of alien introgressions with gene Fhb3 for resistance to Fusarium head blight disease of wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2008, 117: 1155-1166. 10.1007/s00122-008-0853-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tiwari VK, Rawat N, Singh N, Kumar S, Randhawa GS, Dhaliwal HS: Substitutions of 2S and 7U chromosomes of Aegilops kotschyi in wheat enhance grain iron and zinc concentration. Theor Appl Genet. 2010, 121 (2): 259-269. 10.1007/s00122-010-1307-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peil A, Korzun V, Schubert V, Schumann E, Weber WE, Roder MS: The application of wheat microsatellites to identify disomic Triticum aestivum-Aegilops markgrafii addition lines. Theor Appl Genet. 1998, 96: 138-146. 10.1007/s001220050720.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagy ED, Molna’r I, Schneider A, Kova’cs G, Molnár-Láng M: Characterisation of chromosome-specific S-SAP markers and their use to study genetic diversity in Aegilops species. Genome. 2006, 49: 289-296. 10.1139/G05-109.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider A, Molnár I, Molnár-Láng M: Selection of U and M genome specific wheat SSR markers using wheat–Aegilops biuncialis and wheat-Ae. geniculata addition lines. Euphytica. 2010, 175: 357-364. 10.1007/s10681-010-0180-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lysák MA, Číhalíková J, Kubaláková M, Šimková H, Künzel G, Doležel J: Flow karyotyping and sorting of mitotic chromosomes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Chromosome Res. 1999, 7: 431-444. 10.1023/A:1009293628638.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vrána J, Kubaláková M, Šimková H, Číhalíková J, Lysák MA, Doležel J: Flow-sorting of mitotic chromosomes in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetics. 2000, 156: 2033-2041.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kubaláková M, Valárik M, Bartoš J, Vrána J, Číhalíková J, Doležel J: Analysis and sorting of rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosomes using flow cytometry. Genome. 2003, 46: 893-905. 10.1139/g03-054.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kubaláková M, Kovářová P, Suchánková P, Číhalíková J, Bartoš J, Lucretti S, Watanabe N, Kianian S, Doležel J: Chromosome sorting in tetraploid wheat and its potential for genome analysis. Genetics. 2005, 170: 823-829. 10.1534/genetics.104.039180.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ossowski S, Schneeberger K, Clark RM, Lanz C, Warthmann N, Weigel D: Sequencing of natural strains of Arabidopsis thaliana with short reads. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 2024-2033. 10.1101/gr.080200.108.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto T, Nagasaki H, Yonemaru J, Ebana K, Nakajima M, Shibaya T, Yano M: Fine definition of the pedigree haplotypes of closely related rice cultivars by means of genomewide discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 267-10.1186/1471-2164-11-267.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trebbi D, Maccaferri M, de Heer P, Sørensen A, Giuliani S, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC, Massi A, van der Vossen EAG, Tuberosa R: High-throughput SNP discovery and genotyping in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Theor Appl Genet. 2011, 123: 555-569. 10.1007/s00122-011-1607-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Close TJ, Bhat PR, Lonardi S, Wu Y, Rostoks N, Ramsay L, Druka A, Stein N, Svensson JT, Wanamaker S, Bozdag S, Roose ML, Moscou MJ, Chao S, Varshney RK, Szucs P, Sato K, Hayes PM, Matthews DE, Kleinhofs A, Muehlbauer GJ, DeYoung J, Marshall DF, Madishetty K, Fenton RD, Condamine P, Graner A, Waugh R: Development and implementation of high-throughput SNP genotyping in barley. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 582-10.1186/1471-2164-10-582.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Waugh R, Jannink JL, Muehlbauer GJ, Ramsay L: The emergence of whole genome association scans in barley. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009, 12: 218-222. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Treangen TJ, Salzberg SL: Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions. Nat Rev Genet. 2012, 13: 36-46.Google Scholar
- Trick M, Adamski NM, Mugford SG, Jiang C-C, Febrer M, Uauy C: Combining SNP discovery from next-generation sequencing data with bulked segregant analysis (BSA) to fine-map genes in polyploid wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12: 14-10.1186/1471-2229-12-14.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ravel C, Praud S, Murigneux A, Canaguier A, Sapet F, Samson D, Balfourier F, Dufour P, Chalhoub B, Brunel D, Beckert M, Charmet G: Single-nucleotide polymorphism frequency in a set of selected lines of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome. 2006, 49: 1131-1139. 10.1139/g06-067.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Šimková H, Svensson JT, Condamine P, Hřibova’ E, Suchánková P, Bhat P, Bartoš J, Šafář J, Close T, Doležel J: Coupling amplified DNA from flow-sorted chromosomes to high-density SNP mapping in barley. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 294-299. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-294.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.