Skip to main content
Download PDF

Accumulation of interspersed and sex-specific repeats in the non-recombining region of papaya sex chromosomes

BMC Genomics volume 15, Article number: 335 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The papaya Y chromosome has undergone a degenerative expansion from its ancestral autosome, as a consequence of recombination suppression in the sex determining region of the sex chromosomes. The non-recombining feature led to the accumulation of repetitive sequences in the male- or hermaphrodite-specific regions of the Y or the Yh chromosome (MSY or HSY). Therefore, repeat composition and distribution in the sex determining region of papaya sex chromosomes would be informative to understand how these repetitive sequences might be involved in the early stages of sex chromosome evolution.

Results

Detailed composition of interspersed, sex-specific, and tandem repeats was analyzed from 8.1 megabases (Mb) HSY and 5.3 Mb corresponding X chromosomal regions. Approximately 77% of the HSY and 64% of the corresponding X region were occupied by repetitive sequences. Ty3-gypsy retrotransposons were the most abundant interspersed repeats in both regions. Comparative analysis of repetitive sequences between the sex determining region of papaya X chromosome and orthologous autosomal sequences of Vasconcellea monoica, a close relative of papaya lacking sex chromosomes, revealed distinctive differences in the accumulation of Ty3-Gypsy, suggesting that the evolution of the papaya sex determining region may accompany Ty3-Gypsy element accumulation. In total, 21 sex-specific repeats were identified from the sex determining region; 20 from the HSY and one from the X. Interestingly, most HSY-specific repeats were detected in two regions where the HSY expansion occurred, suggesting that the HSY expansion may result in the accumulation of sex-specific repeats or that HSY-specific repeats might play an important role in the HSY expansion. The analysis of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) revealed that longer SSRs were less abundant in the papaya sex determining region than the other chromosomal regions.

Conclusion

Major repetitive elements were Ty3-gypsy retrotransposons in both the HSY and the corresponding X. Accumulation of Ty3-Gypsy retrotransposons in the sex determining region of papaya X chromosome was significantly higher than that in the corresponding region of V. monoica, suggesting that Ty3-Gypsy could be crucial for the expansion and evolution of the sex determining region in papaya. Most sex-specific repeats were located in the two HSY expansion regions.

Background

Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is a major tropical fruit crop, and the only species in the genus Carica. Papaya shared a common ancestor with Arabidopsis approximately 72 million years ago. Its short juvenile phase of 3 to 4 months, continuous flowering, short generation time of 9 months, and small genome size of 372 Mb [1] make papaya a promising model for tropical fruit tree genomics [2]. Though the papaya genome size is three times that of Arabidopsis, the annotation of papaya’s whole genome sequence revealed that it contains fewer genes than Arabidopsis[2], suggesting that the papaya genome might contain significantly more repetitive sequences than the Arabidopsis genome.

The Caricaceae family consists of 35 species; one monoecious, 32 dioecious, and two trioecious species, providing an invaluable system for studying plant sex determination. Vasconcellea Monoica is a monoecious species with no sex chromosomes, whereas all dioecious and trioecious species are likely to have sex chromosomes. Papaya is a trioecious species with three sex phenotypes; female, male, and hermaphrodite. The sex determination of papaya is controlled by a pair of primitive sex chromosomes. Female papaya has homogametic XX chromosomes, whereas male and hermaphrodite plants have heterogametic XY chromosomes. The male and the hermaphrodite have slightly different Y chromosomes, Y for males and Yh for hermaphrodites [3, 4].

The papaya hermaphrodite-specific Yh chromosome (HSY) region occupies approximately 13% of the Yh chromosome [5], and the chromosomal genetic recombination around this region is suppressed [6, 7], a typical feature of sex chromosomes [4]. The suppression of recombination creates conditions that are favorable for the accumulation of deleterious mutations in the non-recombining region of Yh chromosome, and consequently the HSY has evolved in both physical size and gene content to differentiate from the corresponding X [8]. The highly diverged human X and Y chromosomes only share about a dozen pairs of genes in the male specific region of the Y chromosome (MSY). The human Y chromosome is occupied by nearly 95% MSY, and only 5% terminal area, called pseudoautosomal regions, accounting for crossing over with the X chromosome [9]. The human Y chromosome contains a high percentage of repetitive elements and duplicated regions but low gene content [9, 10]. Compared to the human MSY, the papaya HSY is at the early stage of its evolution and occupies only 13% of the Yh chromosome [5], but analysis of HSY bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) revealed that the papaya HSY contained significantly higher repeat content [3, 11]. In addition, the sequence analysis of these BACs exhibited a higher content of Ty3-gypsy and some Ty1-copia retroelements, which are normally abundant near the centromeric region.

Although it is well known that the recombination suppression of homologous sex chromosomes causes the accumulation of repetitive sequences, little is known about the feature of sex-specific repeats in plants. Sex-specific markers are important for determining the presence of sex chromosomes [12]. In date palm (Phoenix dactylifera), the presence of sex chromosomes was verified by the identification of sex-specific DNA markers [13]. In hop (Humulus lupulus L.), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers were identified as sex-specific markers [14]. To date, dozens of sex-specific markers have been identified in various plant species and they are mostly used to support the presence of sex chromosomes [15]. If the Y chromosome is degenerated progressively, then sex-specific repeats could be a very useful marker to examine the lineage of Y chromosomes among plant species and perhaps they are useful to understand duplication events occurred in a given Y chromosome. Recently, four Y-specific satellite DNA families, RAYSI, RAE180, RAYSI-S, and RAYSI-J, were identified from Rumex acetosa and used successfully as the references to examine the degeneration of the Y chromosome among the genus Rumex[16, 17]. Therefore, identification of sex-specific repeats and analysis of their sequence features in papaya can provide valuable genomic resources for unraveling genetic lineages of sex chromosomes among dioecious and trioecious species in the Caricaceae family and for revealing the roles that sex-specific repeats play in the sex chromosome evolution. As for agricultural aspects of papaya or other fruit crops with different sex types, sex-specific repeats can be used to develop molecular markers that distinguish plant sex types at the seedling stage.

The insertions of transposable elements are believed to be one of the earliest triggers that cause the suppression of recombination [18]. Since papaya sex chromosomes are believed to be at an early stage of evolution, the information from papaya repetitive sequence analysis could be used to test whether such insertions of transposable elements are indeed a cause for the recombination suppression by out-crossing with monoecious V. monoica. Here, we report not only the detailed repetitive sequence features of the newly sequenced papaya HSY and the corresponding X, but also the comparison of repetitive sequence features between the papaya sex determining region and the orthologous autosomal region in V. monoica, which has no sex chromosomes [19], to provide insights into papaya sex chromosome evolution and their sequence features. As expected, the HSY is highly abundant with interspersed repeats compared to the corresponding X chromosome and the papaya genome. A new search of interspersed repeats in the given sequences enabled the identification of 36 new repeats with 21 of them being sex-specific repeats, which probably could be used as a reference for analysis of Y chromosomes among the other species in the Caricaceae family.

Results

Composition of interspersed repeats in the sex determining region of papaya

To examine repetitive sequences in both the HSY and the corresponding X, the sequences were masked by RepeatMasker using a customized repeat database as a library consisting of Repbase, TIGR repeat data, and papaya repeats [20]. Results showed that the interspersed repeats occupied approximately 77% of the HSY (6,226,262 bp), 64% of the corresponding X (3,379,825 bp), and only 20.9% of V. monoica (Table 1). Among all interspersed repeats identified, the retroelements were the most abundant repeats, 64%, 54%, and 16% in the HSY, the corresponding X, and V. monoica, respectively. These retroelements accounted for the vast majority of all identifiable interspersed repeats and only a small fraction (< 1%) of the interspersed repeats were DNA transposons in the HSY, the corresponding X, and V. monoica (Table 1). Therefore, it is likely that the majority of unclassified interspersed repeats (13.5% in the HSY and 9.6% in the corresponding X) could be classified into retroelements if they could be annotated (Table 1).

Table 1 Interspersed repeats in the sex determining region on papaya sex chromosomes
Full size table

Long terminal repeats (LTRs) accounted for more than 97% of all identifiable retroelements in all three sources of sequences and the Ty3-gypsy element was the most abundant LTR in the HSY and the corresponding X, whereas Ty1-copia element was more abundant in V. monoica (Table 1). The number and sequences of Ty3-gypsy elements increased notably along the increase of sequence length in the HSY and the corresponding X (Figure 1A and B). To examine the portion of papaya-specific repeats accounting for interspersed repeats, the HSY and the corresponding X sequences were also masked by only known repeats, consisting of Repbase and TIGR repeats excluding papaya repeats. The known repeat content was approximately 19.5% in the HSY; 2% higher than 17.5% in the corresponding X (Table 1). As a result, papaya-specific repeats were at least 57.8% and 46.3% in the HSY and in the corresponding X, respectively.

Figure 1
figure1

Cumulative distributions of Ty3-gypsy and Ty1-copia long terminal repeat (LTR) elements in the sex-determining chromosome regions. (A) The cumulative increase of sequences occupied by Ty3-gypsy and Ty1-copia LTR elements in hermaphrodite-specific Y (HSY) chromosome region and its corresponding X region. (B) The cumulative numbers of Ty3-gypsy and Ty1-copia LTR elements in the HSY and the corresponding X region. The distance between two dots represents 250 kb. Colored bars at an X-axis denote regions with significantly low repeat contents in the HSY (red) or in the corresponding X region (blue).

Full size image

Although the HSY and the corresponding X were highly occupied by interspersed repeats, there were potential gene rich regions with significantly low repeat accumulation. Two large sequence blocks with scarce or no repeats were detected from 1.8 to 2.2 Mb and from 3.2 to 3.7 Mb in the corresponding X [21], whereas only one large block with low repeat content was found from 4.6 to 5.3 Mb region in the HSY [21].

Identification of sex-specific repeats in the papaya sex determining region

From the extensive search for sex-specific repeats in the sex determining region, 36 putative sex-specific repeats were identified, 33 from the HSY and three from the corresponding X (Additional file 1: Note 1). In order to determine sex-specific repeats among the 36 newly identified repeats, all repeats were aligned against papaya genome sequences. Among them, 21 repeats were selected as potential sex-specific repeats because they had no match or very low occurrence in the papaya genome (< 10 times; Additional file 2: Table S1). Although the rest of the repeats were present in both the sex determining region and the papaya genome, they were more frequent in the sex determining region (Additional file 2: Table S1). The 36 new repeats occupied approximately 19.9% of the HSY, 12.9% of the corresponding X, and 5.7% of the papaya genome (Table 2). By contrast, the 21 sex-specific repeats accounted for 10.7% of the HSY sequences, 3.5% of the corresponding X, and 0.9% of the papaya genome (Table 2). To test whether papaya and V. monoica share any common repeat sequences, we analyzed the accumulation of the sex-specific repeats in V. monoica shotgun sequences and the 11 V. monoica BAC sequences corresponding to the sex determining region of the X chromosome. Both V. monoica genome and the BAC sequence showed much less sex-specific repeat accumulation (Table 2).

Table 2 Accumulation of newly identified repeats from the sex determining region
Full size table

To examine the localization of the sex-specific repeats in the sex determining region, all positions aligned with the sex-specific repeats were plotted to their corresponding locations in the HSY (Figure 2A) or in the corresponding X (Figure 2B). Most HSY-specific repeats were located in two regions in the HSY, from 2.0 to 4.0 and 5.0 to 7.5 Mb (Figure 2A), but rarely found in the corresponding X except for X-R55 (Figure 2B), an X-specific repeat. Remarkably, the two regions in the HSY with high HSY-specific repeats were matched to two HSY expansion regions very well [21].

Figure 2
figure2

Cumulative distributions of the sex-specific repeats identified from the sex-determining chromosome regions. (A) The accumulative number of each sex-specific repeat in the hermaphrodite-specific Y (HSY) chromosome region. (B) The accumulative number of each sex-specific repeat in the HSY-corresponding X region. In total, 21 sex-specific repeats were identified from the sex determining region; 20 from the HSY and one from the corresponding X. Most of HSY-specific repeats were located in two regions where the HSY expansion occurred.

Full size image

Among the 21 potential sex-specific repeats, two HSY-specific repeats, HSY-R29 and HSY-R162, and one X-specific repeat, X-R55, were selected for further analyses. Hermaphrodite specificity of both HSY-specific repeats was confirmed by PCR using genomic DNA samples as templates. Both repeats were confirmed to be present only in SunUp hermaphrodite plants having both the hermaphrodite Yh and X chromosomes, but not in SunUp females having two X chromosomes (Figure 3A). Since all HSY-specific repeats were present in more than 10 copies (Additional file 3: Table S2), it was of interest to examine the phylogenetic relationship among copies of each HSY repeat. Twenty-two aligned sequences to HSY-R29 and thirteen aligned sequences to HSY-R162 were retrieved from the HSY sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that there was no correlation between distance and sequence identity among copies (Figure 3B and C), which was further confirmed by the Mantel test (Additional file 4: Figure S1). The correlation coefficient of the Mantel test (Rxy) and the one-tailed p-value (rxy-rand ≥ rxy-data) were 0.014 and 0.511 for the HSY-R29 and -0.033 and 0.378 for the HSY-R162, respectively.

Figure 3
figure3

Identification, validation, and phylogenetic analyses of sex-specific repeats in the sex determining chromosome regions. (A) Gel image of genomic PCR result from male-specificity test of HSY-R29 and HSY-R162 (SF: SunUp female, SH: SunUp hermaphrodite, AU9F: AU9 Female, AU9M: AU9 male). Phylogenetic analyses of papaya HSY-specific repeats, HSY-R162 (B) and HSY-R29 (C). Individual repeat ID represents its proximal location (bp) in the HSY.

Full size image

The potential X-specific repeat, X-R55, appeared 22 times (> 100 bp) only in the corresponding X, but not in the HSY and papaya genome sequences (excluding X chromosome). The copies of the X-R55 repeat were present within a small range with ~50 kb (Figure 4A) in the corresponding X, and the repeat size ranged from 109 to 306 bp. Except for the two copies at both ends, the rest of the 20 copies were oriented in the same direction and tandemly repeated in three separate repeat blocks, apart from each other by about 8 to 15 kb (Figure 4A). The first repeat block near a zinc finger protein consisted of 4 tandem repeats, the second block of 11, and the third block of 5 (Figure 4A). Among the 22 copies of X-R55 repeat, the 17 copies longer than 200 bp were used for phylogenetic analysis. Similar to the result of phylogenetic analysis of two HSY-specific repeats, the distance among individual copies did not show correlation to the sequence similarity (Figure 4B, Additional file 4: Figure S1). An interesting feature of the X-R55 repeat was that it showed very high sequence identity (91%) with the third exon of a potential Carica papaya (Cp) zinc finger protein nearby (Figure 4A), whose expression was confirmed by an expressed sequence tag (GB: EX272522.1). If the X-R55 repeats originated from the third exon of the Cp zinc finger protein, the second repeat block could be the most recently duplicated, on the basis of phylogenetic analysis (Figure 4B). The presence of the X-R55 repeat was confirmed by PCR (Figure 4C). The expression of the Cp zinc finger protein was examined by RT-PCR and detected in all sex types of flowers and leaf tissues from ‘SunUp’ and ‘AU9’ papayas, and also in seed and half ripened fruit of ‘SunUp’ (Figure 4D). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the Cp zinc finger protein was closely related to Arabidopsis zinc finger gene (NP_565037) (Figure 4E).

Figure 4
figure4

Association of potential X-specific repeat in the exon duplication of papaya zinc finger protein. (A) Schematic demonstration of the duplication of X-specific repeat, X-R55, containing the 3rd exon of papaya zinc finger protein (accession ID: EX272522.1). (B) Phylogenetic tree of multiple X-R55 copies. The numbers at the root of each branch joining point are boot strap values. (C) Gel image of genomic PCR result for testing presence of the X-R55 (SF: SunUp female, SH: SunUp hermaphrodite, AU9F: AU9 Female, AU9M: AU9 male). (D) Gel image of RT-PCR result for testing the expression of papaya zinc finger protein in various tissues from SunUp and AU9 papaya (FF: female flower, FL: female leaf, HF: hermaphrodite flower, HL: hermaphrodite leaf, MF: male flower, ML: male leaf, SD: seeds, FT: 50% mature fruit). (E). Phylogenetic tree of papaya zinc finger protein (Cp zinc finger) with homologous proteins from other plant species with accession ID in NCBI.

Full size image

Accumulation of SSRs in the sex determining region

Accumulation of repetitive sequences is one of the key elements for the degeneration of sex chromosomes. Accordingly, high repetitive sequence accumulation was observed in papaya HSY and in the corresponding X compared to that of papaya genome [2, 21]. However, not only interspersed repeats but also tandem DNA repeats were accumulated in sex chromosomes [22]. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) of the short tandem DNA repeats normally originate from slippage during DNA replication. Therefore, SSRs were examined in the HSY and the corresponding X (Figure 5 and Table 3). The SSR densities were much lower in the HSY (one per 8.1 kb) than in the corresponding X (one per 5.4 kb) and the papaya genome (one per 3.2 kb). On the other hand, SSR densities of V. monoica BAC sequences were even higher (one per 2.3 kb) than papaya genome (Table 3). SSRs have been categorized into two classes, class I and class II. Class I includes hypervariable SSRs ≥ 20 bp, whereas class II consists of less variable SSRs ≥ 12 bp and < 20 bp [23]. Class I and class II SSR densities were lower either in the HSY or in the corresponding X compared to those in the papaya genome (Table 3). Class I and Class II SSR densities in V. monoica BAC sequence were comparable to those in V. monoica shotgun genome (Table 3). Class I SSR densities in the corresponding X, V. monoica BACs and shotgun sequence, and papaya genome were approximately two-fold less than that of class II SSR, but much less in the HSY compared to the rest. SSR density of di-nucleotide SSR units were similar between papaya genome and V. monoica shotgun or BAC sequences, but SSR density of tri-nucleotide SSR units in V. monoica genome was significantly higher than that of the papaya genome (Table 4). Therefore, it was evident that SSR frequency in the sex determining region was lower than that in papaya genome and V. monoica genome.

Figure 5
figure5

Cumulative distributions of simple sequences repeats (SSRs) in the sex determining chromosome regions. SSRs with a length greater than 12 nucleotides, motif lengths of 2 to 6 bp, and a minimum of 5 repeats, were detected from the HSY and the corresponding X sequences. Number of total SSRs identified from each 0.5 Mb was plotted at the corresponding positions on the HSY and the corresponding X.

Full size image
Table 3 Distribution of SSR classes identified in difference sources of sequences
Full size table
Table 4 SSR distribution by SSR unit size
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we characterized the detailed genomic structure of the papaya sex determining region by analyzing the interspersed and short tandem repeat distribution and identifying potential sex-specific repeats. Analysis of sex-specific repeats revealed that the accumulation and distribution of these repeats have a very close relationship with the expansion of the sex determining region, implying that sex-specific repeats may play crucial roles in the differentiation of sex chromosomes. In addition, the corresponding X was compared to orthologous autosomal sequences of V. monoica, revealing that the expansion of the papaya sex determining region is associated with increased frequency of Ty3-gypsy retroelements.

Distribution of repetitive sequences

Y chromosomes are featured by degeneration, duplication, and abundance of repetitive sequences due to a non-recombining property. The HSY sequences on the papaya Yh chromosome were occupied by higher repetitive sequences, compared to its X counterpart [2, 21]. The average repeat content of the HSY was approximately 77%, 13% higher than the 64% of the corresponding X (Table 1). These numbers were different from what we reported previously [2, 21], which was caused by the analysis of all 5.3 Mb X sequences including 1.8 Mb Knob 1 sequences that were not included in the previous report. The high accumulation of repetitive DNA sequences was shown in ancient Y chromosomes in human [24] and Drosophila melanogaster[25], also in the nascent Y chromosome in Drosophila Miranda[26] and Silene latifolia[22]. Repeat contents of the HSY and the corresponding X increased dramatically when masked by a repeat library containing both papaya and public repeat sequences, compared to the repeat contents of 19.5% of the HSY and 17.5% of the corresponding X when both sequences were masked by only publicly available known repeat sequences (Table 1), indicating that the majority of repeats accumulated in the sex determining regions are most likely papaya-specific [20]. It is worth noting that the conserved repetitive sequences in the HSY and its X counterpart were more than the genome-wide average of 14% [2] and also higher than the repeat content in V. monoica, which has no sex chromosomes, reinforcing the notion that increased repetitive sequences are a feature of the sex determining region.

Ty3-gypsy elements were highly accumulated in the sex determining region and accounted for 46.3% of the HSY and 37.7% of the corresponding X (Table 1 and Figure 1). The Ty3-gypsy content of the HSY was ~8% lower than that the previous study estimated from sequences of seven HSY BACs where it was 54% [2], which might be due to uneven distribution of Ty3-gypsy elements throughout the HSY. On the other hand, the Ty1-copia elements were less abundant compared to Ty3-gypsy in both the HSY and the corresponding X (Table 1 and Figure 1). Ty1-copia content in the corresponding X was 1.3% higher than that in the HSY (Table 1), suggesting that Ty1-copia elements were not a major contributor to repeat accumulation in both the HSY and the corresponding X. This result is different from the retroelement accumulation in S. latifolia Y chromosome where Ty1-copia elements are more abundant than Ty3-gypsy elements [27]. It could be due to the incomplete sequences of S. latifolia Y chromosome or the feature of the very early evolutionary stage of homomorphic Yh chromosome in C. papaya compared to heteromorphic Y chromosome such as in S. latifolia, Rumen acetosella, and Marchantia polymorpha.

Decreased SSR frequency in the sex determining region

SSR density was significantly lower in the HSY and in the corresponding X compared to that in papaya or V. monoica genomes (Table 3) due to the increase of the overall repetitive sequence and the decrease of gene content [21]. These results suggest that the HSY is less vulnerable to mutation caused by replication slippage compared to other chromosome regions to maintain its unique sequence feature. Class I and class II densities in V. monoica BAC sequences were comparable to those in V. monoica shotgun genome, whereas those densities in the sex determining region were much lower than those in the papaya genome (Table 3), indicating that low SSR density in the HSY and the corresponding X was most likely caused by the process of the evolution of papaya sex chromosomes accompanied by the insertion of repetitive sequences. The density of Class I SSR (longer than class II SSR) in the HSY was lower than the rest, suggesting that the longer SSRs might be more susceptible to degeneration in the HSY.

Sex-specific repeats

Papaya sex types are determined by a small non-recombining region of recently evolved sex chromosomes [2]. The suppression of recombination in the HSY accompanies the accumulation of repetitive sequences and chromosomal rearrangements. These changes might ultimately result in the evolution of sex-specific repeats and the differentiation of sex chromosomes from their ancestral autosomes. Phylogenetic analysis and Mantel test of three sex-specific repeats, HSY-R29, HSY-R162, and X-R55, revealed that the distance and sequence similarity among copies of each repeat had no correlation (Figure 3B and C, Additional file 4: Figure S1), indicating that the insertion of repeats occurred either in a random manner regardless of the physical distance between original and new target sites or rearrangements occurred after tandem duplications. The HSY-R29 and HSY-R162 did not show any similar sequence match from the NCBI nucleotide database and TIGR plant repeat database (http://plantrepeats.plantbiology.msu.edu/). However, many HSY-R29 flanking sequences (~500 bp) showed similarity to chloroplast DNA of papaya and other plant species (data not shown), suggesting that the possible origin of HSY-R29 might be associated with chloroplast DNA insertions. DNA fragments transferring from organelles are not rare. For example, there is over 100 kb chloroplast DNA in rice chromosome 10 [28]. The papaya genome also contains nearly 1 Mb chloroplast DNA [2]. The papaya HSY accumulated a staggering amount of chloroplast DNA due to its lack of recombination with the corresponding X chromosome. The chloroplast DNA insertion could be another means of sex chromosome evolution.

Several sex-specific repeats were identified in other plant species, such as the RAYSI - III family in the plant Rumex acetosa[17, 29], MADC1 in Cannabis sativa[30], and the tandem Y-specific DNA repeats in Marchantia polymorpha[31]. The RAYSI-III family is satellite DNAs and MADC1 is homologous to LINE-like retrotransposons with a site-specific accumulation of the long arm of the Y chromosome [30]. Like the Y-specific repeats in M. polymorpha[31], the HSY-R29 and HSY-R162 were identified as sex-specific repeats and exhibited no similarity to any known repetitive sequences such as retroelements or satellite DNAs, indicating that these repeats are specific to the sex determining region of the papaya genome.

The Y-specific repeats of M. polymorpha are not only tandemly duplicated, but also contain male-specific genes [31]. In humans, it was also reported that the active gene could be multiplied as a result of tandem duplications and large sequence inversions, such as the AZFc region of the Y chromosome [32, 33] and the ZNF91 gene family in chromosomes 19 and 7 [34, 35]. In this study, we identified a potential X-specific repeat X-R55, which contained the third exon of a papaya zinc finger protein (Figure 4A). The tandem duplication of X-R55 was quite similar to the ZNF91 subfamily of primate-specific zinc finger genes, consisting of large gene clusters with some dysfunctional copies [34]. Another interesting feature of the ZNF91 gene family was that the large gene clusters are located near the centromere of chromosomes 19 and 7 [34]. In papaya, gene duplication was reported [20], and some of those genes may be clustered as similar to the ZNF 91 gene family. Nevertheless, this finding raises questions about whether the X-R55 repeats are located near the centromere of papaya X chromosome and whether the duplication of the X-R55 passed through a similar process as ZNF91 after duplication, such as loss of function and alternative splicing. These questions remain to be further investigated.

Conclusions

We analyzed repetitive sequences and sex-specific repeats accumulated in the HSY and its X counterpart of papaya sex chromosomes. The sequences of the HSY and the corresponding X were highly repetitive as 77% of the HSY and 64% of the X counterpart sequences were found to be repetitive, of which the major repeat element was Ty3-gypsy. The HSY and its X counterpart contained sex-specific repeats, including 20 HSY-specific repeats and one X-specific repeat. Most HSY-specific repeats exhibited accumulation at specific locations in the HSY, where the HSY expansions took place. The HSY expanded at an accelerated pace compared to its X counterpart and the HSY-specific repeats contributed to its rapid expansion.

Methods

DNA sequences

The sequences of 13.4 Mb consisting of 8.1 Mb of HSY and 5.4 Mb of the corresponding X chromosome [21, 36] were used to examine repetitive genomic features and SSR distribution. In addition, a 245 Mb of V. monoica genomic shotgun sequences and a 1.1 Mb of 11 V. monoica BAC sequences [19] were used to compare accumulation and distribution of repetitive sequences and SSRs with those in the HSY, the corresponding X, and papaya genome.

Tandem repeats

A perl program, MIcroSAtellite identification tool (MISA; http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/download/misa.pl), was used to mine SSRs in the given sequences. SSRs with a length greater than 12 nucleotides, motif lengths of 2 to 6 bp, and a minimum of 5 repeats were detected and analyzed.

Interspersed repeats analysis against known repeat databases

The repeat library was generated by combining Repbase [37], TIGR plant repeats (ftp://ftp.tigr.org/pub/data/ TIGR_Plant_Repeats), and papaya repeats [20]. For analyzing the repeat composition in the HSY and the corresponding X, RepeatMasker (http://www.repeatmasker.org) was used to analyze the repeat composition in the HSY and the corresponding X using the repeat library with default settings.

Identification of new repeats in the sex determining region

To identify new repeats, the sequences of the HSY and the corresponding X were first run on RepeatScout [38] to generate putative repeat sequences. Then, the resulting repeats were run on RepeatMasker (http://repeatmasker.org) to mask the HSY or the corresponding X sequences and to screen the repeats with the occurrence of more than 10 times and aligned length longer than 100 bp. Next, the non-redundant repeats passing above criteria were determined as new repeats by comparing them to previously identified papaya repeats from female papaya genome sequence [20] using CD-HIT software [39] with a cutoff of 70% similarity. Finally, the new repeats were blasted against the HSY and the corresponding X sequences using Standalone BLAST software (NCBI) and screened based on the following more stringent criteria: 1) at least a 50% alignment over a consensus sequence, 2) occurrence of at least 10 times, and 3) an aligned region with at least 100 bp and > 75% identity. The repeats that met these criteria were re-screened with property of less than 10 hits in the papaya genome in order to obtain potential sex-specific repeats. Clustalw [40] and MEGA [41] software were used for phylogenetic analysis of the repeats.

PCR for sex-specific repeats

Samples from SunUp female, SunUp hermaphrodite, AU9 female, and AU9 male were used to isolate genomic DNAs as described by K Edwards, C Johnstone and C Thompson [42] with slight modifications. PCR was carried out with 5 ng of DNA as a template with the following primer sets: HSY-R162 (Forward: 5′-TTTGTTCTCCTCTCAGCTTGC-3′; Reverse: 5′-GCCATACACGTAATGGGAAAA3′), HSY-R29 (Forward: 5′-GAAACCCATGCGAAGGAATA-3′; Reverse: 5′-TGGGATTCTTTTTGGGTCAG), and X-R55 (Forward: 5′-CCTTAGGAAGTTGCATTATGCTG; Reverse: 5′-ATTTATGAATTGAAAAGTTCAAGCAA). One of the papaya BAC end sequences was used to amplify a positive control for PCR of sex-specific repeats using the following primers: Foward 5′-TGACTCCATTGCCTGAATTTT-3′, and Reverse5′-TCCTCTCCATACCTTCTCGTG-3′.

RT-PCR analysis

Total RNAs were extracted from samples (SunUp female, hermaphrodite plant, seeds and half ripen fruit, and AU9 female and male plant leaf) using the hot phenol extraction method (Sambrook et al., 1989). The cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II™ reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). The expression of the papaya zinc finger protein was examined by RT-PCR using the following primers: (F: 5′-CACTGGTTTTGCGGAAATTG; R: 5′-TGCACTTAGCATCATTGCAATG). As an internal control for RT-PCR analysis, papaya Actin gene was used [43].

Mantel test

To examine relationships between physical distances and sequence identities among sex-specific repeats, all pairwise sequence identities were obtained from the clastalW2 online tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2) and all pairwise physical distances were calculated manually. The sequence identities and the physical distances were used for Mantel test implemented in Genetic Analysis in Excel (GenAlEx 6.5) program [44]. Briefly, the sequence identities were manually arranged to Y matrix and the physical distances to X matrix as described in GenAlEx Tutorial 3. Then, Mantel test was performed with default set except for permutations of 9,999.

References

  1. 1.

    Arumuganathan K, Earle ED: Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1991, 9: 208-218. 10.1007/BF02672069.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ming R, Hou S, Feng Y, Yu Q, Dionne-Laporte A, Saw JH, Senin P, Wang W, Ly BV, Lewis KL, Salzberg SL, Feng L, Jones MR, Skelton RL, Murray JE, Chen C, Qian W, Shen J, Du P, Eustice M, Tong E, Tang H, Lyons E, Paull RE, Michael TP, Wall K, Rice DW, Albert H, Wang ML, Zhu YJ, et al: The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature. 2008, 452 (7190): 991-996. 10.1038/nature06856.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liu Z, Moore PH, Ma H, Ackerman CM, Ragiba M, Yu Q, Pearl HM, Kim MS, Charlton JW, Stiles JI, Zee FT, Paterson AH, Ming R: A primitive Y chromosome in papaya marks incipient sex chromosome evolution. Nature. 2004, 427 (6972): 348-352. 10.1038/nature02228.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ming R, Yu Q, Moore PH: Sex determination in papaya. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007, 18 (3): 401-408. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.11.013.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhang WL, Wang XU, Yu QY, Ming R, Jiang J: DNA methylation and heterochromatinization in the male-specific region of the primitive Y chromosome of papaya. Genome Res. 2008, 18 (12): 1938-1943. 10.1101/gr.078808.108.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen CX, Yu Q, Hou S, Li Y, Eustice M, Skelton RL, Veatch O, Herdes RE, Diebold L, Saw J, Feng Y, Qian W, Bynum L, Wang L, Moore PH, Paull RE, Alam M, Ming R: Construction of a sequence-tagged high-density genetic map of papaya for comparative structural and evolutionary genomics in brassicales. Genetics. 2007, 177 (4): 2481-2491. 10.1534/genetics.107.081463.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ma H, Moore PH, Liu Z, Kim MS, Yu Q, Fitch MM, Sekioka T, Paterson AH, Ming R: High-density linkage mapping revealed suppression of recombination at the sex determination locus in papaya. Genetics. 2004, 166 (1): 419-436. 10.1534/genetics.166.1.419.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D: The degeneration of Y chromosomes. Philos T Roy Soc B. 2000, 355 (1403): 1563-1572. 10.1098/rstb.2000.0717.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Skaletsky H, Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Hillier L, Brown LG, Repping S, Pyntikova T, Ali J, Bieri T, Chinwalla A, Delehaunty A, Delehaunty K, Du H, Fewell G, Fulton L, Fulton R, Graves T, Hou SF, Latrielle P, Leonard S, Mardis E, Maupin R, McPherson J, Miner T, Nash W, Nguyen C, Ozersky P, Pepin K, Rock S, et al: The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature. 2003, 423 (6942): 825-837. 10.1038/nature01722.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Graves JAM, Koina E, SankoviC N: How the gene content of human sex chromosomes evolved. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006, 16 (3): 219-224. 10.1016/j.gde.2006.04.007.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yu QY, Hou S, Hobza R, Feltus FA, Wang X, Jin W, Skelton RL, Blas A, Lemke C, Saw JH, Moore PH, Alam M, Jiang J, Paterson AH, Vyskot B, Ming R: Chromosomal location and gene paucity of the male specific region on papaya Y chromosome. Mol Gen Genomics. 2007, 278 (2): 177-185. 10.1007/s00438-007-0243-z.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ming R, Bendahmane A, Renner SS: Sex chromosomes in land plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011, 62: 485-514. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103914.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Younis RAA, Ismail OM, Soliman SS: Identification of sex-specific DNA markers for date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) using RAPD and ISSR techniques. J Agric Biol Sci. 2008, 4 (4): 278-284.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Danilova TV, Karlov GI: Application of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism for detection of sex-specific molecular markers in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Euphytica. 2006, 151 (1): 15-21. 10.1007/s10681-005-9020-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Milewicz M, Sawicki J: Sex-linked markers in dioecious plants. Plant Omics J. 2013, 6 (2): 144-149.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Navajas-Perez R, la Herran R, Jamilena M, Lozano R, Rejon CR, Rejon MR, Garrido-Ramos MA: Reduced rates of sequence evolution of Y-linked satellite DNA in Rumex (Polygonaceae). J Mol Evol. 2005, 60 (3): 391-399. 10.1007/s00239-004-0199-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Navajas-Perez R, Schwarzacher T, de la Herran R, Ruiz Rejon C, Ruiz Rejon M, Garrido-Ramos MA: The origin and evolution of the variability in a Y-specific satellite-DNA of Rumex acetosa and its relatives. Gene. 2006, 368: 61-71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Charlesworth D: Plant sex chromosome evolution. J Exp Bot. 2013, 64 (2): 405-420. 10.1093/jxb/ers322.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gschwend AR, Yu Q, Tong EJ, Zeng F, Han J, VanBuren R, Aryal R, Charlesworth D, Moore PH, Paterson AH, Ming R: Rapid divergence and expansion of the X chromosome in papaya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012, 109 (34): 13716-13721. 10.1073/pnas.1121096109.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nagarajan N, Navajas-Perez R, Pop M, Alam M, Ming R, Paterson AH, Salzberg SL: Genome-wide analysis of repetitive elements in papaya. Trop Plant Biol. 2008, 1: 191-201. 10.1007/s12042-008-9015-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang J, Na JK, Yu Q, Gschwend AR, Han J, Zeng F, Aryal R, VanBuren R, Murray JE, Zhang W, Navajas-Pérez R, Feltus FA, Lemke C, Tong EJ, Chen C, Wai CM, Singh R, Wang ML, Min XJ, Alam M, Charlesworth D, Moore PH, Jiang J, Paterson AH, Ming R: Sequencing papaya X and Yh chromosomes reveals molecular basis of incipient sex chromosome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012, 109 (34): 13710-13715. 10.1073/pnas.1207833109.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hobza R, Lengerova M, Svoboda J, Kubekova H, Kejnovsky E, Vyskot B: An accumulation of tandem DNA repeats on the Y chromosome in Silene latifolia during early stages of sex chromosome evolution. Chromosoma. 2006, 115 (5): 376-382. 10.1007/s00412-006-0065-5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Temnykh S, DeClerck G, Lukashova A, Lipovich L, Cartinhour S, McCouch S: Computational and experimental analysis of microsatellites in rice (Oryza sativa L.): frequency, length variation, transposon associations, and genetic marker potential. Genome Res. 2001, 11 (8): 1441-1452. 10.1101/gr.184001.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Erlandsson R, Wilson JF, Paabo S: Sex chromosomal transposable element accumulation and male-driven substitutional evolution in humans. Mol Biol Evol. 2000, 17 (5): 804-812. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026359.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pimpinelli S, Berloco M, Fanti L, Dimitri P, Bonaccorsi S, Marchetti E, Caizzi R, Caggese C, Gatti M: Transposable elements are stable structural components of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92 (9): 3804-3808. 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3804.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Steinemann M, Steinemann S: Degenerating Y-Chromosome of Drosophila-Miranda - a trap for retrotransposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89 (16): 7591-7595. 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7591.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kejnovsky E, Hobza R, Cermak T, Kubat Z, Vyskot B: The role of repetitive DNA in structure and evolution of sex chromosomes in plants. Heredity. 2009, 102 (6): 533-541. 10.1038/hdy.2009.17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rice Chromosome 10 Sequencing C: In-depth view of structure, activity, and evolution of rice chromosome 10. Science. 2003, 300 (5625): 1566-1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mariotti B, Manzano S, Kejnovsky E, Vyskot B, Jamilena M: Accumulation of Y-specific satellite DNAs during the evolution of Rumex acetosa sex chromosomes. Mol Genet Genomics. 2009, 281 (3): 249-259. 10.1007/s00438-008-0405-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sakamoto K, Ohmido N, Fukui K, Kamada H, Satoh S: Site-specific accumulation of a LINE-like retrotransposon in a sex chromosome of the dioecious plant Cannabis sativa. Plant Mol Biol. 2000, 44 (6): 723-732. 10.1023/A:1026574405717.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Okada S, Sone T, Fujisawa M, Nakayama S, Takenaka M, Ishizaki K, Kono K, Shimizu-Ueda Y, Hanajiri T, Yamato KT, Fukuzawa H, Brennicke A, Ohyama K: The Y chromosome in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha has accumulated unique repeat sequences harboring a male-specific gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (16): 9454-9459. 10.1073/pnas.171304798.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jamilena M, Mariotti B, Manzano S: Plant sex chromosomes: molecular structure and function. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008, 120 (3–4): 255-264.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Skaletsky H, Brown LG, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Waterston RH, Wilson RK, Silber S, Oates R, Rozen S, Page DC: The AZFc region of the Y chromosome features massive palindromes and uniform recurrent deletions in infertile men. Nat Genet. 2001, 29 (3): 279-286. 10.1038/ng757.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hamilton AT, Huntley S, Tran-Gyamfi M, Baggott DM, Gordon L, Stubbs L: Evolutionary expansion and divergence in the ZNF91 subfamily of primate-specific zinc finger genes. Genome Res. 2006, 16 (5): 584-594. 10.1101/gr.4843906.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tadepally HD, Burger G, Aubry M: Evolution of C2H2-zinc finger genes and subfamilies in mammals: species-specific duplication and loss of clusters, genes and effector domains. BMC Evol Biol. 2008, 8: 176-10.1186/1471-2148-8-176.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Na JK, Wang J, Murray JE, Gschwend AR, Zhang W, Yu Q, Navajas-Pérez R, Feltus FA, Chen C, Kubat Z, Moore PH, Jiang J, Paterson AH, Ming R: Construction of physical maps for the sex-specific regions of papaya sex chromosomes. BMC Genomics. 2012, 13: 176-10.1186/1471-2164-13-176.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J: Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005, 110 (1–4): 462-467.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Price AL, Jones NC, Pevzner PA: De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (Suppl 1): i351-i358. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1018.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li W, Godzik A: Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22 (13): 1658-1659. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG: Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (21): 2947-2948. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C: A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for Pcr analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19 (6): 1349-1349. 10.1093/nar/19.6.1349.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Blas AL, Ming R, Liu Z, Veatch OJ, Paull RE, Moore PH, Yu Q: Cloning of the papaya chromoplast-specific lycopene beta-cyclase, CpCYC-b, controlling fruit flesh color reveals conserved microsynteny and a recombination hot spot. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152 (4): 2013-2022. 10.1104/pp.109.152298.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Peakall R, Smouse PE: GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel: population genetic software for teaching and research–an update. Bioinformatics. 2012, 28 (19): 2537-2539. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Plant Genome Research Program to RM (Award Nos. DBI 0922545).

Author information

Author notes

    Affiliations

    1. Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

      Jong-Kuk Na, Jianping Wang & Ray Ming

    2. Molecular Breeding Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, Suwon, 441-701, Republic of Korea

      Jong-Kuk Na

    3. Department of Agronomy, Genetics Institute, Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA

      Jianping Wang

    4. FAFU and UIUC-SIB Joint Center for Genomics and Biotechnology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350002, China

      Jianping Wang & Ray Ming

    Authors
    1. Jong-Kuk Na
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Jianping Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Ray Ming
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Ray Ming.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’ contributions

    JKN carried out experiments. JKN and JW analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. RM conceived the study, coordinated, and organized all research activities. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Jong-Kuk Na, Jianping Wang contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Na, J., Wang, J. & Ming, R. Accumulation of interspersed and sex-specific repeats in the non-recombining region of papaya sex chromosomes. BMC Genomics 15, 335 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-335

    Download citation

    Keywords

    • Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)
    • Carica papaya
    • Hermaphrodite-specific region of the Y chromosome (HSY)
    • Recombination suppression
    • Repetitive sequence
    • Sex-specific repeat

    BMC Genomics

    ISSN: 1471-2164

    Contact us