Skip to main content
Download PDF

Construction of a BAC library and mapping BAC clones to the linkage map of Barramundi, Lates calcarifer

BMC Genomics volume 9, Article number: 139 (2008) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Barramundi (Lates calcarifer) is an important farmed marine food fish species. Its first generation linkage map has been applied to map QTL for growth traits. To identify genes located in QTL responsible for specific traits, genomic large insert libraries are of crucial importance. We reported herein a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library and the mapping of BAC clones to the linkage map.

Results

This BAC library consisted of 49,152 clones with an average insert size of 98 kb, representing 6.9-fold haploid genome coverage. Screening the library with 24 microsatellites and 15 ESTs/genes demonstrated that the library had good genome coverage. In addition, 62 novel microsatellites each isolated from 62 BAC clones were mapped onto the first generation linkage map. A total of 86 BAC clones were anchored on the linkage map with at least one BAC clone on each linkage group.

Conclusion

We have constructed the first BAC library for L. calcarifer and mapped 86 BAC clones to the first generation linkage map. This BAC library and the improved linkage map with 302 DNA markers not only supply an indispensable tool to the integration of physical and linkage maps, the fine mapping of QTL and map based cloning genes located in QTL of commercial importance, but also contribute to comparative genomic studies and eventually whole genome sequencing.

Background

Barramundi (Lates calcarifer), also called Asian seabass or the giant sea perch, belonging to the family Latidae is widely distributed in the coast and freshwater of the tropical Indo-west Pacific, from the Persian Gulf to India and Northern Australia [1, 2]. Because of good meat quality and relatively high market value of L. calcarifer, it has become an attractive commodity of both large and small-scale aquaculture enterprises. It is commercially cultivated in Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Hong Kong, China and Australia in both brackishwater and freshwater ponds, as well as in cages in coastal waters. The global annual production of L. calcarifer was 400,000 MT according to FAO statistics. However, detailed breeding programs for genetic improvement of Asian seabass are still quite rare [3]. Identification of genomic regions and genes responsible for economically important traits could facilitate genetic improvement through marker-assisted selection [4], which is of importance for future aquaculture of L. calcarifer.

Linkage and physical maps are indispensable tools needed to identify genomic regions responsible for traits of interest. The genome of L. calcarifer is very compact (only 700 Mb) consisting of 24 chromosome pairs [5]. The first linkage map for L. calcarifer containing 240 microsatellite markers and genes on 24 linkage groups [6] was applied to mapping QTL for growth traits [7]. Libraries with large genomic DNA inserts are essential for physical mapping and positional cloning, particularly for higher eukaryotes [8]. The BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) cloning system has become an invaluable tool in genomics studies because of its ability to stably maintain large DNA fragments and its ease of manipulation [9]. Genomic inserts in BAC clones have been shown to be very stable in E. coli and thus serve as ideal templates in generating whole-genome physical maps by DNA fingerprinting, developing sequence-tagged connectors and shotgun sequencing [10–12]. These features make the BAC cloning system a popular choice for high-throughput genomics studies [13]. BAC libraries have been developed for many economically important animal species such as cattle [14], pig [15], and sheep [16] and the highly endangered giant panda [17]. Only currently, BAC libraries were produced for some commercially important fish species such as salmon [18], catfish [12], rainbow trout, carp and tilapia [19].

Here, we describe the construction and characterization of a BAC library covering 6.9 times L. calcarifer haploid genome and mapping of 86 BAC clones to the linkage map. The BAC library and the improved linkage map of L. calcarifer will facilitate the integration of physical and linkage maps, fine mapping of QTL and identification of genes located in QTL of interest, maker-assisted selection and genome research.

Results

Library construction

A BAC library of L. calcarifer was constructed using the HindIII cloning site in commercially prepared pCC1BAC vector (Epicentre, MD, USA). The BAC library consisted of a total of 49,152 clones, which were manually arrayed into 128 384-well plates.

Insert size distribution

To examine the quality of the BAC library, the sizes of 212 BAC clones randomly picked from the library were determined. All the 212 clones contained inserts. The insert size distribution of these 212 clones is shown in Figure 1 and 2. The average insert size was 98 kb, ranging from 45 to 200 kb. The insert size of over 80% of the BAC clones in this library was larger than 80 kb, and the insert size of 50% clones was smaller than 100 kb. This BAC library provides 6.9 time haploid genome equivalent based on a genome size of 700 Mb [6].

Figure 1
figure1

DNA analysis of 31 random BAC clones from the L. calcarifer Hin dIII BAC library by pulse-field gel electrophoresis. DNA samples digested with NotI were separated on 1% agarose gel in 0.5 × TBE buffer for 16 h under the following conditions: ramp pulse time of 5–15 s at 6 V/cm, temperature at 14°C. Markers used are Lambda Ladder PFG Marker (outside lanes) and MidRange II PFG Marker (NEB, SG, Singapore). The 8 kb common band is the pCC1BAC Vector (Epicentre, WI, USA).

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

Insert size distribution of 212 L. calcarifer BAC clones. DNA samples of the 212 clones randomly picked from the L. calcarifer HindIII BAC library were analyzed and grouped. Results indicate that the average insert size is 98 kb with over 80% of the clones > 80 kb.

Full size image

BAC library screening

To further assess the quality of this BAC library, 24 microsatellite markers randomly selected from each of the 24 linkage groups were used for hierarchical screening. PCR-screenings with the 24 microsatellite markers resulted in the number of positive clones varying from 3 to 15 with an average of 6.6 (Table 1) (see example of the PCR screening in Figure 3). PCR screening with these 15 ESTs/genes (PVALB-1, 5-HT, PROL-A, 14KDA-AP, AMY-A, MX, AP, LECT2, LYSO-G, IGF-1, TUB1A, TUB2B, GT7, CYP19A2 and AFPII) revealed that the number of positive BAC clones varied from 3 to 14 with an average of 7.3 (Table 2). The actual average number of positive BAC clones detected by screening with microsatellites and ESTs/genes was near to theoretically calculated number of genome coverage (i.e. 6.9 time coverage of the haploid genome). At least 3 positive BAC clones for each of the ESTs/genes were identified from the library.

Table 1 Screening of the BAC library with 24 microsatellites located on each of the 24 linkage groups of L. calcarifer
Full size table
Table 2 Screening of the BAC library with 15 genes/ESTs of L. calcarifer
Full size table
Figure 3
figure3

Hierarchical PCR screening of the superpools and pools of the BAC library of L. calcarifer. A First round PCR screening in 11 superpools representing the entire library or 128 384-well microtiter plates. Lanes 1–11: superpools 1–11 and lane 12: genomic DNA as positive control. Each superpool contains DNA of 12 plates or 4,608 individual BAC clones. In five superpools (3, 4, 8, 9 and 10), PCR product was amplified by the marker Lca064. B Second round PCR screening in 48 pools from the superpool number 3. Three pools (6, 35 and 41) showed a signal amplified by the marker Lca064. C Third round PCR screening in a 96-well plate from the pool number 6. Three positive clones (26, 29 and 86) were detected in the plate by the marker Lca064.

Full size image

Microsatellite isolation from BAC clones and linkage mapping

In order to map BAC clones to the linkage map for future integrating linkage and physical maps, we isolated microsatellites from 300 BAC clones through enrichment of microsatellites. 864 clones collected from the microsatellite-enriched library were sequenced in both directions. 451 clones contained microsatellites (CA > 7 or GA > 7), yielding 229 unique sequences containing microsatellites. Among the 229 sequences, 218 had enough flanking regions for primer design. Primers were designed for 218 microsatellites, among which 63 within 63 BAC clones were informative in the mapping panel used for linkage mapping. 62 were mapped to 24 LG (Figure 4, 5, 6 and 7) while one marker LcaB044 remained unlinked, making the total number of mapped markers on the L. calcarifer linkage map to be 302. At least one BAC based marker was mapped on each LG. Thus, together with 24 microsatellites located in different BAC clones and used for screening the BAC library, a total of 86 BAC based markers have been anchored on the linkage map with at least one on each LG. The male maps of LG14 and LG18, which were split to two LG on the first generation map respectively [6] due to the limited number of markers, were merged to one LG respectively by integrating new microsatellites located in single BAC clones (Figure 6). Details about primer sequences, GenBank accession number, annealing temperature for PCR, PCR product size and locations of the 63 markers located in different BAC clones are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 Microsatellites isolated from BAC clones and mapped on the linkage map of L. calcarifer
Full size table
Figure 4
figure4

A microsatellite linkage map of L. calcarifer anchored by 86 BAC clones-LG 1–6. F: linkage map for female. M: linkage map for male. Markers underlined represent microsatellites selected from each LG for screening the BAC library. Markers in italic (initiated with LcaB) represent microsatellites isolated from BAC clones and newly mapped to the map.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure5

A microsatellite linkage map of L. calcarifer anchored by 86 BAC clones-LG 7–12. See detailed explanation in Figure 4

Full size image
Figure 6
figure6

A microsatellite linkage map of L. calcarifer anchored by 86 BAC clones-LG 13–18. See detailed explanation in Figure 4

Full size image
Figure 7
figure7

A microsatellite linkage map of L. calcarifer anchored by 86 BAC clones-LG 19–24. See detailed explanation in Figure 4

Full size image

Discussion

A critical tool for genomic studies in fish species is the availability of deep-coverage large-insert genomic libraries, such as BAC libraries that can be used for physical mapping, integration of linkage and physical maps, positional cloning, comparative genomic studies and genome sequencing [13]. We constructed the first BAC library for L. calcarifer containing 49,152 clones with an average insert size of 98 kb ranging from 45 to 200 kb, indicating that this BAC library provided 6.9 × coverage of the L. calcarifer haploid genome. We have noticed that 50% of the inserts in our BAC library were under 100 kb. It is common that insert size of 50% of BAC clones was smaller than the size of DNA fragments recovered from gels. This phenomenon has been seen in several BAC libraries, such as the BAC library of tomato [13]. The reason for this is that smaller fragments could be included in larger fragments during electrophoresis, and during ligation, the relatively smaller fragments were preferentially ligated to the vectors. PCR screening of the library with 24 markers each from one of 24 LG and 15 randomly selected ESTs/genes demonstrated that the BAC library provided good coverage of the L. calcarifer genome. Whether the BAC clones with large inserts were of hybrid origin remains to be examined.

A second generation linkage map of L. calcarifer is under construction by integrating new markers including microsatellites, ESTs and candidate genes onto the first generation map. Low polymorphism of ESTs and candidate genes was a bottleneck to map them to the linkage map [6]. Using highly polymorphic microsatellites located in BAC clones harboring interesting genes and ESTs, these interesting genes and ESTs could be mapped onto the linkage map as shown in this experiment. By employing highly polymorphic microsatellites in BAC clones, we have mapped 86 BAC clones to the linkage map of L. calcarifer. At least one BAC clone has been anchored on each LG, which can be used to integrate linkage and physical maps in the future. The number of markers on the linkage map of L. calcarifer increased to 302 by mapping 62 novel microsatellites located in 62 BAC clones onto the map. The two male linkage groups (i.e. LG14 and LG18) which were split to two LG on the first generation map respectively [6] due to the limited number of markers on these LG, were merged to one LG respectively by integrating new microsatellites located in single BAC clones, which improved the quality of the linkage map of L. calcarifer.

The BAC library of L. calcarifer could be also used in constructing a physical map by BAC fingerprinting [12, 20], sequencing BAC ends and positional cloning of QTL of commercial interests [4] so as to facilitate selective breeding of L. calcarifer. Eventually, the BAC library can be used in whole genome shotgun sequencing when it becomes necessary.

Conclusion

A first L. calcarifer BAC library with 6.9 × coverage of the haploid genome has been constructed and characterized. Screening the library with 24 markers and 15 ESTs/genes demonstrated good genome coverage of this library. Eighty-six BAC clones were mapped to the first generation linkage map, improving the marker density of the linkage map of L. calcarifer. This BAC library together with the improved linkage map not only supplies an indispensable tool to physical mapping, integration of physical and linkage maps, and positional cloning for genes of importance, but also contributes to comparative genomic studies and eventually genome sequencing.

Methods

Preparation of high-molecular-weight DNA

Five hundred microliters of blood was collected from a male individual of L. calcarifer with a heparinized syringe. The concentration of leucocytes was quantified to be approximately 109 cells/ml. Quantities corresponding to 2.14 × 107 cells were embedded in 40 μl of 2% InCert agarose (in PBS) for DNA extraction. The mixture was then transferred into ice-cold plug moulds (Bio-Rad, SG, Singapore). Individual plugs were released into cell lysis solution [1% lithiumdodecyl sulfate, 10 mM Tris (pH 8), 100 mM EDTA (pH 8)] that was incubated at 37°C for 1 hr with occasional swirling. The cell lysis solution was replaced with 50 ml of new cell lysis solution and incubated overnight at 37°C. The cell lysis solution was supplanted with 50 ml of 20% NDS. Two ml of proteinase K (20 mg/ml) was added to each 50 ml of 20% NDS consisting of 0.2% N-laurylsarcosine, 2 mM Tris-HCL (pH9.0), 0.14 M EDTA. The solution was incubated at 37°C overnight. Plugs were washed three times with TE50 and 0.05 M EDTA for one hour at room temperature. The plugs were put into a fresh Falcon tube, and washed twice with 50 ml TE50 and 50 μl PMSF (100 mM) at 37°C for 20 min to inactivate proteinase K. The plugs were then washed twice with 50 ml of TE50 in the Falcon tube at room temperature for 30 min to get rid of the PMSF.

Partial digestion of high molecular weight DNA and size selection

Digestion with restriction enzyme HindIII, pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), isolation and purification of high molecular weight (HMW) DNA were performed using the method described previously [21]. Briefly, after displacement of the plugs by 1 × TE buffer, the agarose plugs were soaked in 800 μl of HindIII digestion buffer [0.015% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 75 mM NaCl, 12 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.50)] and 3 U of HindIII for 16 hours at 4°C, after which, 100 μl of MgCl2 (100 mM) was added and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for one hour to partially digest the genomic DNA. The reaction was stopped by adding 150 μl of 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8.0), 15 μl 20 mg/ml proteinase K and 37.5 μl 20% NDS, and incubating at 37°C for one hour. Plugs were rinsed in TE50 in a Petri dish then transferred to a 15 ml Falcon tube. 15 ml of TE50 and 15 μl of 100 mM PMSF were added to the tube. The tube was incubated at room temperature for 20 min on rotating shaker. The tube with plug was washed twice with 15 ml TE50 at room temperature on a shaker for 30 min each.

Size selection was carried out as described [22], with minor modifications. In brief, partially digested DNA was separated by PFGE in 0.5 × TBE on a CHEF-DRII apparatus (Bio-Rad, SG, Singapore) under the following conditions: 14°C, 6.0 v/cm, angle = 120°, initial switch time = 5 sec, final switch time = 15 sec, run time = 16 hours and ramping = linear. At the end of this electrophoresis step, the gel portion containing DNA of 50 kb or less in size together with the portion of the gel containing the original plugs was removed. 1% fresh agarose was added to the remaining gel followed by a second electrophoresis step using the same conditions for 18 hours. Gel slices containing size fractionated DNA were obtained by cutting horizontally at 0.5 cm intervals in the size range of 100–250 kb. Each excised gel slice was subsequently inverted and buried in 1% low-melting-point agarose gel. A third electrophoresis step using the same conditions for 18 hours was carried out to concentrate the widely spread DNA fragments in each gel slice into a sharp single band. The band of size selected genomic DNA was then excised and dialyzed in 1 × TAE at 4°C overnight.

Ligation and electroporation

Size fractionated DNA was recovered from each gel band by electroelution in Spectra/Por 7 dialysis bags (Spectrum Laboratories, CA, USA) as described [23]. Partially digested HMW DNA was then ligated to 25 ng of dephosphorylated, HindIII digested pCC1BAC (Epicentre, MD, USA) at a 1:10 molar ratio of insert to vector with 400 units of T4 ligase (NEB, MA, USA) in 50 μl reaction at 16°C overnight. Dialyzed ligation was used to transform ElectroMAX DH10B competent cells (Invitrogen, MD, USA). Electroporation was carried out using a BioRad Gene Pulser (BioRad, CA, USA) at 4 kΩ and 350 V. Cells were incubated in 1 ml SOC medium at 37°C for one hour with shaking and later spread on LB plates containing 12.5 μg/ml Chloramphenicol, 40 μg/ml X-gal and 100 μg/ml IPTG and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours to allow the blue color to develop sufficiently.

Isolation of BAC DNA and estimation of insert size

We isolated BAC DNA from 212 BAC clones randomly chosen using a QIAwell 8 Plasmid Kit (Qiagen, HRB, Germany) following the protocol of the manufacturer. Isolated BAC DNA were digested with the restriction enzyme NotI and then subjected to PFGE for 16 hours using the same PFGE conditions as those for high molecular weight DNA isolation.

Library pooling and PCR screening

White recombinant colonies were manually picked and arrayed to plates (Genetix, Hampshire, UK) of 384-well each containing of 60 μl of LB media and 25% glycerol. Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C and stored at -80°C. The frozen stocks of the primary clones in 384 well plates were recovered and transferred to 4 96-well PCR plates containing 100 μl LB medium supplemented with 15% glycerol and 12.5 μg/ml chloramphenicol, then incubated overnight at 37°C to make a copy of the BAC library.

To establish a hierarchical PCR screening system, the library was divided into 11 superpools each consisting of 12 plates of 384-wells. Each superpool was divided into 48 pools each consisting of one 96-well plate of BAC clones. Cultures from 48 pools were combined to make superpool DNA for the first step PCR screening. Cultures from 48 plates of 96-well BAC clones were combined to make pool DNA for the second step PCR screening. In each pool, cultures from each well of 96 clones from a 96-well plate were used for the third step screening.

For examining the genome coverage of the BAC library, twenty-four microsatellites (Lca318, Lca064, Lca137, Lca171, Lca098, Lca062, Lca130, Lca086, Lca301, Lca002, Lca058, Lca074, Lca253, Lca147, Lca069, Lca367, Lca021, Lca193, Lca220, Lca181, Lca255, Lca040, Lca411 and Lca231) located on each of the 24 linkage groups (Table 1) [6], and 15 ESTs/genes isolated from cDNA libraries or selected from GenBank were used to screen the library. These 15 ESTs/genes are: PVALB-1, 5-HT, PROL-A, 14KDA-AP, AMY-A, MX, AP, LECT2, LYSO-G, IGF-1, TUB1A, TUB2B, GT7, CYP19A2 and AFPII. Primers (Table 2) were designed in unique regions for each EST/gene using software PrimerSelect (Dnastar, WI, USA). The PCR reaction (25 μl) consisted of 2 μl cultured cells, 1 × PCR buffer (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 nM of each primer, 50 μM of each dNTP and one unit DNA polymerase (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland). PCR was conducted on a PTC-100 PCR machine (MJ Research, CA, USA) using the following PCR program: an initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min followed by 35 cycles 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 1–2 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products are checked for the presence of PCR products on 2% agarose gels. Positive pools were used to determine a set of addresses corresponding to potential clones, which were subsequently validated by a third PCR analysis of individual clones. PCR products of respective microsatellites and genes/ESTs were confirmed by direct sequencing.

Microsatellite isolation from BAC clones and linkage mapping

DNA was isolated from pool of 300 BAC clones using a QIAwell 8 Plasmid Kit (Qiagen, HRB, Germany). CA- and GA-microsatellites located in the 300 BAC clones were enriched according to a previous protocol [24] with some modifications [25]. Repeat-enriched DNA fragments of 400–1200 bp in size were cloned into pGEM-T vector (Promega, CA, USA), and transformed into XL-10 blue supercompetent cells (Stratagene, CA, USA). White clones were picked and arrayed into 96-well plates for bidirectional sequencing on an ABI3730 × l DNA sequencer (ABI, CA, USA) using the BigDye V3.0 kit, M13 forward and M13 reverse primers. Redundant and overlapping sequences were grouped using Sequencher (GeneCodes, MI, USA). Unique sequences were compared to known microsatellite sequences of L. calcarifer prior to primer design in order to reduce redundancy. Genotyping and linkage mapping of these microsatellites were performed with the mapping panel described previously [6]. The graphic maps were generated using Mapchart software [26]. To identify the origin of each microsatellite from the 300 BAC clones, these clones were PCR-screened with microsatellite primers. PCR products were checked for the presence of objective bands on 2% agarose gels.

Abbreviations

BAC:

bacterial artificial chromosome

QTL:

quantitative trait loci

LG:

linkage group

PVALB-1:

pavalbumin beta gene 1

5-HT:

5-hydroxytryptamine type 1 receptor

PROL-A:

prolactin gene alpha type

14KDA-AP:

14kDa apolipoprotein gene

AMY-A:

amylayse gene alpha type

AP:

aminopeptidase gene

LYSO-G:

lysozyme goose type

TUB1A:

tublin 1 alpha type

TUB2B:

tublin 2 beta type

GT7-EST containing a (GT)7 microsatellite:

CYP19A2-cytochrome P450 aromatase alpha type 2 and AFPII-type II antifreeze protein.

References

  1. 1.

    Nelson J: Fishes of the world. Edited by: Sons JW. 1994 , New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Berra TM: Freshwater Fish Distribution. . 2001, San Diego , Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhu ZY, Lin G, Lo LC, Xu YX, Feng F, Chou R, Yue GH: Genetic analyses of Asian seabass stocks using novel polymorphic microsatellites. Aquaculture. 2006, 256 (1-4): 167-173. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.02.033.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Andersson L: Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals. Nat Rev Genet. 2001, 2 (2): 130–130-10.1038/35052563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Carrey G, Mather P: Karyotypes of four species Melanotaenia duboulayi; Bidyanus bidyanus, Macquaria novemaculeata and Lates calcarfer. Cytobios. 1999, 100 (395): 137-146.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang CM, Zhu ZY, Lo LC, Feng F, Lin G, Yang WT, Li J, Yue GH: A microsatellite linkage map of Barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Genetics. 2007, 175 (2): 907-915. 10.1534/genetics.106.059972.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang CM, Lo LC, Zhu ZY, Yue GH: A genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting growth-related traits in an F1 family of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer). BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 274-10.1186/1471-2164-7-274.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Martin GB: Chromosome landing: a paradigm for map-based gene cloning in plants with large genomes. Trends Genet. 1995, 11 (2): 63-68. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)88999-4.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang GL, Holsten TE, Song WY, Wang HP, Ronald PC: Construction of a rice bacterial artificial chromosome library and identification of clones linked to the Xa-21 disease resistance locus. Plant J. 1995, 7 (3): 525-533. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.7030525.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Demars J, Riquet J, Feve K, Gautier M, Morisson M, Demeure O, Renard C, Chardon P, Milan D: High resolution physical map of porcine chromosome 7 QTL region and comparative mapping of this region among vertebrate genomes. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 13-10.1186/1471-2164-7-13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Luo MZ, Kim HR, Kudrna D, Sisneros NB, Lee SJ, Mueller C, Collura K, Zuccolo A, Buckingham EB, Grim SM, Yanagiya K, Inoko H, Shiina T, Flajnik MF, Wing RA, Ohta Y: Construction of a nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library and a preliminary genome survey. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 294-10.1186/1471-2164-7-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Quiniou SM, Waldbieser GC, Duke MV: A first generation BAC-based physical map of the channel catfish genome. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 40-10.1186/1471-2164-8-40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Budiman MA, Mao L, Wood TC, Wing RA: A deep-coverage tomato BAC library and prospects toward development of an STC framework for genome sequencing. Genome research. 2000, 10 (1): 129-136.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Buitkamp J, Kollers S, Durstewitz G, Fries R, Welzel K, Schäfer K, Kellermann A, Lehrach H: Construction and characterization of a gridded cattle BAC library. Anim Genet. 2000, 31: 347-351. 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00675.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fahrenkrug SC, Rohrer GA, Freking BA, Smith TP, Osoegawa K, Shu CL, Catanese JJ, de Jong PJ: A porcine BAC library with tenfold genome coverage: a resource for physical and genetic map integration. Mamm Genome. 2001, 12: 472-474. 10.1007/s003350020015.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Vaiman D, Billault A, Tabel-Aoul K, Schibler L, Vilette D, Oustry-Vaiman A, Soravito C: Construction and characterization of a sheep BAC library of three genome equivalents. Mammalian Genome. 1999, 10: 585-587. 10.1007/s003359901049.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu W, Zhao YH, Liu ZL, Zhang Y, Lian ZX, Li N: Construction of a 7-fold BAC library and cytogenetic mapping of 10 genes in the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 294-10.1186/1471-2164-7-294.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Thorsen J, Zhu BL, Frengen E, Osoegawa K, de Jong PJ, Koop BF, Davidson WS, Hoyheim B: A highly redundant BAC library of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): an important tool for salmon projects. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 50-10.1186/1471-2164-6-50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Katagiri T, Asakawa S, Minagawa S, Shimizu N, Hirono I, Aoki T: Construction and characterization of BAC libraries for three fish species; rainbow trout, carp and tilapia. Anim Genet. 2001, 32: 200-204. 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2001.00764.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Katagiri T, Kidd C, Tomasino E, Davis JT, Wishon C, Stern JE, Carleton KL, Howe AE, Kocher TD: A BAC-based physical map of the Nile tilapia genome. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6 (1): 89-10.1186/1471-2164-6-89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Katagiri T, Asakawa S, Hirono I, Aoki T, Shimizu N: Genomic bacterial artificial chromosome library of the Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Mar Biotechnol. 2000, 2 (6): 571-576. 10.1007/s101260000041.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Peterson DG, Tomkins JP, Frisch DA, Wing RA, Paterson AH: Construction of plant bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries: An illustrated guide. J Agr Genomics. 2000, 5: [http://www.ncgr.org/research/jag]

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Strong SJ, Ohta Y, Litman GW, Amemiya CT: Marked improvement of PAC and BAC cloning is achieved using electroelution of pulsed-field gel-separated partial digests of genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (19): 3959-3961. 10.1093/nar/25.19.3959.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fischer D, Bachmann K: Microsatellite enrichment in organisms with large genomes (Allium cepa L.). Biotechniques. 1998, 24 (5): 796-800, 802.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yue GH, Chen F, Orban L: Rapid isolation and characterization of microsatellites from the genome of Asian arowana (Scleropages formosus, Osteoglossidae, Pisces). Mol Ecol. 2000, 9 (7): 1007-1009. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00939-10.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Voorrips RE: MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered. 2002, 93 (1): 77-78. 10.1093/jhered/93.1.77.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the project "Selective Breeding of Marine Foodfish" funded by AVA, Singapore and the internal research fund from the Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Singapore. We would like to thank Dr. Xia J.H. for his comments on the manuscript before submission.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Molecular Population Genetics Group, Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, National University of Singapore, 1 Research Link, 117604, Singapore

    Chun Ming Wang, Loong Chueng Lo, Felicia Feng, Ping Gong, Jian Li, Ze Yuan Zhu, Grace Lin & Gen Hua Yue

Authors
  1. Chun Ming Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Loong Chueng Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felicia Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ping Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ze Yuan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Grace Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gen Hua Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gen Hua Yue.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

GHY planned and started the project, and determined the final version of the manuscript. CMW designed and conducted the experiment, as well as drafted the manuscript. LLC, FF, GP, LJ, ZZY and LG are involved in screening the library with randomly selected microsatellites and genes, mapping of markers to the linkage map. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, C.M., Lo, L.C., Feng, F. et al. Construction of a BAC library and mapping BAC clones to the linkage map of Barramundi, Lates calcarifer. BMC Genomics 9, 139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-139

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bacterial Artificial Chromosome
  • Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Clone
  • Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Library
  • Haploid Genome
  • Average Insert Size

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us