Assessing the feasibility of GS FLX Pyrosequencing for sequencing the Atlantic salmon genome
© Quinn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 30 April 2008
Accepted: 28 August 2008
Published: 28 August 2008
With a whole genome duplication event and wealth of biological data, salmonids are excellent model organisms for studying evolutionary processes, fates of duplicated genes and genetic and physiological processes associated with complex behavioral phenotypes. It is surprising therefore, that no salmonid genome has been sequenced. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) is a good representative salmonid for sequencing given its importance in aquaculture and the genomic resources available. However, the size and complexity of the genome combined with the lack of a sequenced reference genome from a closely related fish makes assembly challenging. Given the cost and time limitations of Sanger sequencing as well as recent improvements to next generation sequencing technologies, we examined the feasibility of using the Genome Sequencer (GS) FLX pyrosequencing system to obtain the sequence of a salmonid genome. Eight pooled BACs belonging to a minimum tiling path covering ~1 Mb of the Atlantic salmon genome were sequenced by GS FLX shotgun and Long Paired End sequencing and compared with a ninth BAC sequenced by Sanger sequencing of a shotgun library.
An initial assembly using only GS FLX shotgun sequences (average read length 248.5 bp) with ~30× coverage allowed gene identification, but was incomplete even when 126 Sanger-generated BAC-end sequences (~0.09× coverage) were incorporated. The addition of paired end sequencing reads (additional ~26× coverage) produced a final assembly comprising 175 contigs assembled into four scaffolds with 171 gaps. Sanger sequencing of the ninth BAC (~10.5× coverage) produced nine contigs and two scaffolds. The number of scaffolds produced by the GS FLX assembly was comparable to Sanger-generated sequencing; however, the number of gaps was much higher in the GS FLX assembly.
These results represent the first use of GS FLX paired end reads for de novo sequence assembly. Our data demonstrated that this improved the GS FLX assemblies; however, with respect to de novo sequencing of complex genomes, the GS FLX technology is limited to gene mining and establishing a set of ordered sequence contigs. Currently, for a salmonid reference sequence, it appears that a substantial portion of sequencing should be done using Sanger technology.
The salmonids (salmon, trout and charr) are of considerable environmental, economic and social importance. They contribute to ecosystem health by providing food sources for predators such as bears, eagles, sea lions and whales. As an increasingly popular food choice for humans, salmonid species contribute to local and global economies through fisheries, aquaculture and sport fishing. In addition, they have distinct social importance as they are a traditional food source for indigenous peoples, and play a significant role in their culture and spirituality. Salmonids are also of great scientific interest. The common ancestor of salmonids underwent a whole genome duplication event between 20 and 120 million years ago [1, 2]. Thus, the extant salmonid species are considered pseudo-tetraploids whose genomes are in the process of reverting to a stable diploid state. More is known about the biology of salmonids than any other fish group, and in the past 20 years, more than 20,000 reports have been published on their ecology, physiology and genetics. Salmonids, with their genome duplication and wealth of biological data, are excellent model organisms for studying evolutionary processes, fates of duplicated genes and the genetic and physiological processes associated with complex behavioral phenotypes . It is surprising therefore, that no salmonid genome has been sequenced to date.
The Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) is an ideal representative salmonid for genome sequencing given the popularity of this species for aquaculture as well as the extensive genomic resources that are available. The current genomic resources include: a BAC library , restriction enzyme fingerprint physical map comprising 223,781 BACs in ~4,300 contigs , 207,869 BAC-end sequences that cover ~3.5% of the genome sequence, a linkage map with ~1,600 markers, ~600 of which are integrated with the physical map , and > 432,000 ESTs [7, 8]. The haploid C-value for Atlantic salmon is estimated to be 3.27 pg , or a genome size of approximately 3 × 109 bp, which is very comparable to the sizes of mammalian genomes. The Atlantic salmon genome is highly repetitive, and at least 14 different DNA transposon families whose members are ~1.5 kb have been described . Although five fish genomes have been sequenced (medaka, Oryzias latipes; tiger pufferfish, Takifugu rubripes; green spotted pufferfish, Tetraodon nigriviridis; zebrafish, Danio rerio and stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus), they represent euteleostei lineages, and often very derived species that have been separated from salmonids for at least 200 million years . The complexity of the Atlantic salmon genome combined with the lack of a closely related guide sequence means that sequencing and assembly will be extremely challenging.
Conventional Sanger sequencing of paired end templates (2–4 kb plasmids, 40 kb fosmids, or ~150 kb BACs) using fluorescent di-deoxy chain terminators and capillary electrophoresis revolutionized the field of genomics (reviewed in ). Although this approach remains the gold standard for sequence and assembly quality, limitations with respect to cost, labor-intensiveness and speed, which are largely due to the necessity of generating and arraying cloned shotgun libraries and isolating template DNA for sequencing, have fueled the demand for new approaches to DNA sequencing. In recent years, several novel high-throughput sequencing platforms have entered the market including the SOLiD system by Applied Biosystems , the Solexa technology , now owned by Illumina, the recently released true Single Molecule Sequencing (tSMS) platform by Helicos  and the 454 platform , now owned by Roche. Most of these are targeted to the goal of re-sequencing an entire human genome for < $1,000 . This next generation of genome sequencing stands to have major scientific, economic and cultural implications with respect to applications such as personalized medicine, metagenomics and large-scale polymorphism studies on organisms of commercial value whose genomes have already been sequenced. However, the ability of these technologies to sequence the genomes of complex organisms de novo remains unknown.
A common feature among the new generation of sequencing procedures is the elimination of the need to clone DNA fragments and the subsequent amplification and purification of DNA templates prior to capillary sequencing. Rather, sequence templates are handled in bulk, and massively parallel sequencing by synthesis or ligation allows the generation of hundreds of thousands to millions of sequences simultaneously.
With respect to de novo whole genome sequencing, perhaps the most promising new technology uses a pyrosequencing protocol  optimized for solid support and picolitre scale volumes (i.e., pyrosequencing using the 454 system ). The 454 pyrosequencing technology [both the Genome Sequencer (GS) 20 and FLX generation systems] has proven very successful for a number of applications such as complete microbial genome sequencing  metagenomic and microbial diversity analyses [20, 21] ChIP sequencing and epigenetic studies [22, 23], genome surveys , gene expression profiling  and even for sample sequencing fragments of Neanderthal DNA that were extracted from ancient remains [26, 27]. Recent accomplishments include its contribution to a high quality draft sequence of the grape genome  as well as complete re-sequencing of an individual human genome, for which the assembly was accomplished by mapping 454 reads back to a reference genome .
Although several studies comparing 454 pyrosequencing with Sanger sequencing have shown that the per base error rates of the two technologies are similar [27, 30], 454 pyrosequencing has limitations. The major concerns have been relatively short read lengths (i.e., as of 2007 an average of 100–200 nt compared to 800–1,000 nt for Sanger sequencing), a lack of a paired end protocol and the accuracy of individual reads for repetitive DNA, particularly in the case of monopolymer repeats . Combined, these factors often make it impossible to span repetitive regions, which therefore collapse into single consensus contigs during sequence assemblies and leave unresolved sequence gaps. These issues have recently been addressed with the release of the GS FLX system as well as the Long Paired End sequencing platform. The GS FLX system provides longer read lengths and lower per-base error rates than the previous systems. In addition, the 454 technology offers the longest read length of any of the next generation sequencing systems currently available. Thus, we chose to evaluate the ability of the 454 technology, as it stands, to sequence a complex genome without the aid of high-coverage Sanger-generated reads.
With respect to de novo assembly of a complex genome, the most relevant test to date of the capability of the 454 pyrosequencing technology (GS 20 system) involved sequencing four BACs containing inserts of the barley genome, two of which had previously been sequenced using the traditional Sanger approach . The barley genome is relatively large (5.5 × 109 bp) and is comprised of more than 80% repetitive DNA, posing a significant challenge for sequencing. Whereas each BAC contained approximately 100 Kb of genomic DNA, the cumulative size of all consensus sequence contigs per BAC did not reach the actual size of the BAC clones for any of the 454-based assemblies. This was largely due to the pooling of repetitive sequences into single contigs. Thus, while the 454 technology proved useful for identifying genes, it was of limited value for producing long contiguous sequence assemblies .
Given the significant and ongoing improvements in the 454 technology since the barley BAC analysis, which include longer read lengths and higher sequence accuracy attributable to the release of the GS FLX system, as well as the availability of a paired end protocol, we set out to assess the feasibility of using this technology to sequence the Atlantic salmon genome. Here we report the results of using the GS FLX pyrosequencing system to sequence de novo a 1 Mb region of Atlantic salmon DNA covered by a minimum tiling path comprising eight BACs. We discuss the integration of Atlantic salmon genomic resources such as BAC-end sequences as well as assembly techniques and annotation tools given the lack of a closely related guide sequence. We also address the ability of the GS FLX Long Paired End technology to establish the order of sequence contigs and assemble them into large scaffolds. Finally, we compare the GS FLX assemblies with and without the addition of paired end reads to a Sanger-generated assembly of a ninth BAC from the same region of the genome. This is the first application of the GS FLX Long Paired End system for de novo assembly of a large region from a complex genome. This study represents the most difficult challenge for 454 pyrosequencing thus far, and the results we present can be used to assess the feasibility of this technology for sequencing the Atlantic salmon genome de novo.
Establishment of minimum tiling path and DNA preparation
We initially chose contig 570 of the Atlantic salmon physical map for analysis due to the presence of the microsatellite marker SsaF43NUIG, which is linked to upper temperature tolerance in rainbow trout [31, 32] and Arctic charr . Contigs 2469 and 483 were joined to contig 570 using 'chromosome walking'. Specifically, 40-mer oligonucleotide probes were designed from the BAC-end sequences of the outer-most BACs in the contigs, as determined by the contig order predicted by the physical map, beginning with contig 570. The probes were labeled with γ32P-ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Invitrogen, Burlington, Ont. Canada) and hybridized to filters containing the Atlantic salmon BAC library  (CHORI-214; CHORI, BAC-PAC Resources, Oakland, CA, USA.). Filters were exposed to phosphor screens that were scanned and visualized using ImageQuant™ software, giving an image of the 32P-labeled hybridization-positive BACs containing the probe sequence. All hybridization-positive BACs were verified using PCR with the SsaF43NUIG primers . The minimum tiling path across Atlantic salmon contig 483 was established by designing primer sets for sequence tag sites (STSs) in both the SP6 and T7 ends of selected BACs. Using these primers, we screened the BACs that were predicted to overlap with the STS source BAC given the predicted assembly from the Atlantic salmon physical map using PCR, thereby establishing relative BAC orientation and overlap. The minimum tiling path was then established by selecting the minimum number of overlapping BACs required to span the entire contig. We isolated approximately 5 μg of cloned Atlantic salmon BAC DNA from the minimum tiling path BACs using Qiagen's Large Construct kit as per the manufacturer's directions (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ont. Canada). The kit includes an exonuclease digestion step to eliminate E. coli genomic DNA.
454 shotgun pyrosequencing
The shotgun sequencing protocol using the 454 sequencing system has been described previously . The salmon BAC results presented here were generated on the GS FLX (454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT) whereas the results presented previously  were generated on the GS 20 sequencer, the previous generation instrument. The GS FLX instrument is capable of generating 100 million bp of sequence in approximately 250 bp reads in a 7.5 hour run. Additionally, the GS FLX system has a significantly lower error profile than the GS 20 system.
Briefly, to generate the GS FLX shotgun library, the isolated Atlantic salmon BAC DNA was mechanically sheared into fragments, to which process specific A and B adaptors were blunt end ligated. The adaptors contain the amplification and sequencing primers necessary to the GS FLX sequencing process. After adaptor ligation, the fragments were denatured and clonally amplified via emulsion PCR, thereby generating millions of copies of template per bead. The DNA beads were then distributed into picolitre-sized wells on a fibre-optic slide (PicoTiterPlate™), along with a mixture of smaller beads coated with the enzymes required for the pyrosequencing reaction, including the firefly enzyme luciferase. The four DNA nucleotides were then flushed sequentially over the plate. Light signals released upon base incorporation were captured by a CCD camera, and the sequence of bases incorporated per well was stored as a read. DNA extractions were performed at Simon Fraser University (Burnaby, BC, Canada), and library generation and sequencing were performed at 454 Life Sciences (Branford, CT, USA).
GS FLX Long Paired End DNA library generation and sequencing
GS FLX Long Paired End library generation for 454 sequencing has been described previously . Briefly, DNA was sheared into ~3 kb fragments, EcoRI restriction sites were protected via methylation, and biotinlylated hairpin adaptors (containing an EcoRI site) were ligated to the fragment ends. The fragments were subjected to EcoRI digestion and circularized by ligation of the compatible ends, and subsequently randomly sheared. Biotinlyated linker containing fragments were isolated by streptavidin-affinity purification. These fragments were then subjected to the standard 454 sequencing on the GS FLX system. The paired end reads are recognizable as the known linker (originating from the two hairpin adaptors) surrounded by BAC sequence. When sequenced on the GS FLX, this protocol generates two, ~100 bp tags known to be ~3 kb apart. These paired end reads were used to build the original contigs and to assemble the contigs into scaffolds.
GS FLX assemblies
A previous version of the Newbler assembler used in performing the assemblies has been described previously , and the overall structure and phases of the assembler used here follows the structure described in that paper; however, the algorithms used for the specific phases of assembly have been upgraded. The upgraded Newbler assembler identifies pairwise overlaps between reads, and then uses them to construct multiple alignments of contiguous regions of the dataset. Boundaries where the read-by-read alignments diverge or converge (such as at the boundaries of repeat regions) define breaks in the contig multiple alignments (also called branch points). The resulting data structure consists of a graph, where each node is a contiguous multiple alignment, undirected edges exist between the 5' and 3' ends of the contig nodes, and reads form alignments along paths of the graph. The assembler builds this multiple alignment graph using an adjustable greedy algorithm of taking a 'query' read, finding the pairwise overlaps to it, constructing a multiple alignment of those overlaps, then choosing a subsequent 'query' read from the overlapped reads that are only partially aligned so far (thereby extending the multiple alignment). If any pairwise overlap alignments conflict with the current multiple alignment graph, corrective algorithms use the conflicting alignments to either ignore the new pairwise overlap (if the graph is more consistent) or to correct the constructed multiple alignment (if the new pairwise overlap identifies a misalignment in the graph). These overlaps and multiple alignment algorithms use a combination of nucleotide-space (i.e., the bases of the reads) and flow-space (i.e., the 454 flowgram signal intensities of the reads), where available, to perform the multiple alignment construction.
Following the construction of the multiple alignment graph, a series of 'detangling' algorithms are used to simplify the complex regions of the graph, such as overly collapsed regions shorter than the length of the reads (i.e., parts of reads that happened to be near-identical to each other by chance, and so produced overlaps that collapsed into a single multiple alignment region). The nodes in the resulting graph after detangling are considered to be the 'contigs' by the assembler, and those longer than 500 bp are output as the 'large contigs' of the assembly (those longer than 100 bp are output in the set of 'all contigs').
If paired end reads are included in the data set (either 454 or Sanger paired ends), then an additional scaffolding step is performed after detangling, to create chains of contig nodes using the paired end information. The pairs from each library where both halves of the pair occur in the same contig are used to calculate expected pair distances for the library. The scaffolding algorithm then performs a greedy algorithm of identifying pairs of nodes where at least two paired end reads have their halves aligned at the ends of the pair of nodes, with the correct alignment direction and expected distance from each other. In addition, the set of paired end reads aligned at those two contig ends must support the unambiguous chaining of the two nodes as immediate neighbors in a scaffold, with fewer than 10% of the paired end reads aligning to other contig nodes in the assembly. The chains of contig nodes found by this greedy algorithm are output as the scaffolds of the assembly.
Gene mining of 454 GS FLX assemblies using syntenic regions
Sequence contigs > 1,000 bp were analyzed using a variety of sequence similarity searches and gene prediction algorithms that have been incorporated into an in-house computational pipeline and database . Sequences entering this pipeline were screened (masked) for repetitive elements using RepeatMasker 3.1.8  and were searched against the NCBI nr (non-redundant) and Atlantic salmon EST  databases using BLAST . A GENSCAN gene model prediction algorithm  was used to predict introns and exons, and the resulting predictions were searched against the Uniref50 (clustered sets of sequences from UniProt Knowledgebase) database . Finally, a rps-BLAST against the NCBI CDD (Conserved Domain Database; ) was conducted to provide additional information with respect to the predicted genes [see additional File 1].
Use of BAC-end sequences to confirm GS FLX scaffold builds and order
The final scaffold assembly incorporating all data (GS FLX shotgun, paired end and BAC-end reads) was verified by conducting BLAST searches of the 126 BAC-end sequences against the four scaffolds > 10,000 bp and comparing the alignment positions with those predicted by the Atlantic salmon physical map. This method was also used to establish relative scaffold order and to confirm the gene order predicted by the BLAST searches of the 454 shotgun and BAC-end sequence contigs against four published fish genomes.
Sanger shotgun sequencing, assembly and annotation
The ninth BAC (S0022P24) of the minimum tiling path was sequenced using standard Sanger sequencing of a shotgun library. Briefly, the purified BAC DNA was sheared by sonication and blunt-end repaired. The sonicated DNA was size fractioned by agarose gel electrophoresis and 2–5 kb fragments were purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ont. Canada). DNA fragments were ligated into pUC19 plasmid that had been digested with SmaI and treated with shrimp-alkaline phosphatase to produce de-phosphorylated blunt ends. The ligation mixture was used to transform supercompetent E. coli cells (XL1-Blue; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA. USA). Transformed cells were cultured overnight at 37°C on LB/agar plates supplemented with ampicillin (200 mg/L) and 1,920 (5 × 384 well plates) clones were sent to the Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre for sequencing. The sequences were analyzed for quality using PHRED , assembled using PHRAP , and viewed using Consed version 15.0 . The S0022P24 assembly was annotated using the same protocol as the GS FLX assemblies (see above).
Results and discussion
Selection of BACs for GS FLX pyrosequencing
GS FLX shotgun assemblies with and without BAC-end sequences
Summary of GS FLX shotgun assemblies
Large contigsa (> 500 bp)
Total number of contigs
Bases in large contigs
Total bases covering region
Average contig size (bp)
N50 contig sizeb (bp)
Largest contig (bp)
> Q40 bases (bp)
Annotation of GS FLX shotgun contigs > 1,000 bp
Assemblies incorporating GS FLX Long Paired End data
Summary of GS FLX Long Paired End assemblies
Large contigsa (> 500 bp)
Average contig size (bp)
N50 contig sizeb (bp)
Contigs assembed into scaffoldsc
Large scaffoldsd (> 10 Kb)
Average large scaffold size (bp)
Largest scaffold size (bp)
N50 scaffold sizee (bp)
Maximum gap size (bp)
Minimum gap size (bp)
Pair distance averageg (bp)
Pair distance deviation (bp)
Total bases covering region
Depth of coverage
The combination of GS FLX shotgun and Long Paired End reads provided approximately 56× coverage of the 1 Mb region of the salmon genome. We speculate that this represents extensive over-coverage and that similar results could be obtained using fewer reads and less coverage of the region. However, further studies that examine various combinations of coverage from shotgun and paired end libraries are necessary to test this hypothesis and to determine the optimal combination of the two GS FLX read types for genome assembly.
Use of BAC-end sequences and minimum tiling path to confirm assembly and order of scaffolds
Assembly and annotation of the ninth BAC
Sanger sequencing of the shotgun library of the ninth BAC (S0022P24) in the minimum tiling path produced 3,524 confirmed reads and an average confirmed read length of 693.3 bp. PHRAP defines a confirmed read as verification of a read by another read with different chemistry or by an opposite-strand read . This produced a ~10.5× depth of coverage given the estimated BAC size of 231,979 bp. The confirmed reads were assembled into 20 contigs with an average contig size of 8,885 bp and an N50 contig size of 32,866 bp; 14 contigs were defined as large contigs (i.e., > 500 bp). Nine large contigs consisting of three or more reads were assembled into two large scaffolds based on corresponding paired end reads from cloned inserts [GenBank: EU873552]. The average and N50 scaffold sizes were 112,155 and 137,857 bp, respectively. The two scaffolds were oriented relative to one another based on the locations of the T7 and SP6 BAC-end sequences.
The Sanger assembly produced a much larger average contig size and N50 contig size than any of the GS FLX assemblies (i.e., with and without paired end and BAC-end sequence reads), which corresponds to fewer contigs produced. This is likely because of the larger average read length of the Sanger sequences. The Sanger assembly produced two scaffolds with eight gaps for a ~230,000 bp region, whereas the final GS FLX assembly produced four scaffolds with 171 gaps for a ~1 MB region. Thus, with respect to the ability to establish the order and orientation of sequence contigs relative to one another, the GS FLX assembly was comparable to a Sanger-based assembly. This, however, was offset by the numerous gaps between contigs within the GS FLX assembly.
Sequence annotation using our in-house pipeline (described above) revealed hits to two genes: gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor type I and a novel protein similar to vertebrate perilipin (Fig. 4a), with the latter located next to the final gene in the BACs sequenced by GS FLX. When the region was compared with regions that were previously identified as being syntenic with other sequenced fish genomes, only that of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) contained both genes. The remaining genomes (medaka, Oryzias latipes; tiger pufferfish, Takifugu rubripes; and stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus) only contained the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor type I gene with no evidence of the novel protein similar to perilipin or any other genes (Fig. 4b).
Nature of gaps in GS FLX assembly
With 30–40% repetitive content and its pseudo-tetraploid nature due to a whole genome duplication event , the Atlantic salmon genome poses a significant challenge for sequencing. To date, the strategies to sequence complex vertebrate genomes have been Sanger sequencing of whole genome shotgun libraries (e.g., dog genome ), the generation of a library of cloned inserts such as BACs, followed by a 'map-first, sequence second' approach (e.g., pig genome ), or a combination of whole genome shotgun sequencing and pooled BAC sequencing . These strategies are dependent on the minimal ability to sequence and assemble a full BAC insert. However, to date, this has proved unsuccessful with respect to complex genomes with any technique other than Sanger sequencing of a subcloned shotgun library .
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of GS FLX pyrosequencing for de novo assembly of the Atlantic salmon genome given recent advances in read length and the availability of GS FLX Long Paired End technology. We demonstrated that without the inclusion of GS FLX Paired End reads, the GS FLX shotgun technology alone was substantially inferior to Sanger sequencing given the size and number of contigs produced and the inability to establish the relative order and orientation of the contigs. However, the addition of GS FLX Paired End reads vastly improved the capability of 454 pyrosequencing by enabling the assembly of contigs into large scaffolds. Indeed, in terms of the number of scaffolds produced, the GS FLX assembly that included the combined shotgun and paired end reads was comparable to the Sanger assembly. Moreover, the order of the GS FLX scaffolds could be established from information from BAC-end sequences and the Atlantic salmon physical map. However, numerous gaps remained within the scaffolds, which is undesirable when a complete or reference genome sequence is one of the goals. Currently, if the Atlantic salmon genome is to provide a reference sequence for all salmonids, then a substantial proportion of the sequencing will have to be carried out using Sanger technology.
We gratefully acknowledge Kathy Bantle for her assistance with coordination of the project as well as Ken Dewar for comments on the manuscript. Roche/454 provided the GS FLX shotgun and Paired End sequencing and the authors affiliated with Roche/454 assisted with the study design, data collection, data analysis (bioinformatics) and the preparation of pertinent parts of the Methods section of the manuscript. All interpretation of the data and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication were done by researchers at Simon Fraser University independent of Roche/454. Funding for cGRASP (Consortium for Genomic Research on All Salmonids Project) was provided by Genome Canada and Genome BC.
- Ohno S: Evolution by Gene Duplication. 1970, New York: Springer-VerlagView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allendorf FW, Thorgaard GH: Tetraploidy and the evolution of salmonid fishes. Evolutionary Genetics of Fishes. Edited by: Turner BJ. 1984, New York: Plenum Press, 55-93.Google Scholar
- Thorgaard GH, Bailey GS, Williams D, Buhler DR, Kaattari SL, Ristow SS, Hansen JD, Winton JR, Bartholomew JL, Nagler JJ, Walsh PJ, Vijayan MM, Devlin RH, Hardy RW, Overturf KE, Young WP, Robison BD, Rexroad C, Palti Y: Status and opportunities for genomics research with rainbow trout. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2002, 133: 609-646. 10.1016/S1096-4959(02)00167-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thorsen J, Zhu B, Frengen E, Osoegawa K, de Jong PJ, Koop BF, Davidson WS, Høyheim B: A highly redundant BAC library of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): an important tool for salmon projects. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6 (1): 50-10.1186/1471-2164-6-50.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ng SH, Artieri CG, Bosdet IE, Chiu R, Danzmann RG, Davidson WS, Ferguson MM, Fjell CD, Hoyheim B, Jones SJ, de Jong PJ, Koop BF, Krzywinski MI, Lubieniecki K, Marra MA, Mitchell LA, Mathewson C, Osoegawa K, Parisotto SE, Phillips RB, Rise ML, von Schalburg KR, Schein JE, Shin H, Siddiqui A, Thorsen J, Wye N, Yang G, Zhu B: A physical map of the genome of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Genomics. 2005, 86: 396-404. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.06.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Atlantic salmon genome database. [http://www.ASalBase.org]
- Rise ML, von Schalburg KR, Brown GD, Mawer MA, Devlin RH, Kuipers N, Busby M, Beetz-Sargent M, Alberto R, Gibbs AR, Hunt P, Shukin R, Zeznik JA, Nelson C, Jones SR, Smailus DE, Jones SJ, Schein JE, Marra MA, Butterfield YS, Stott JM, Ng SH, Davidson WS, Koop BF: Development and application of a salmonid EST database and cDNA microarray: Data mining and interspecific hybridization characteristic. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 478-490. 10.1101/gr.1687304.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Atlantic Salmon EST Database. [http://web.uvic.ca/grasp/]
- Hardie DC, Hebert PD: The nucleotype effects of cellular DNA content in cartilaginous and ray finned fishes. Genome. 2003, 46: 683-706. 10.1139/g03-040.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Boer JG, Yazawa R, Davidson WS, Koop BF: Bursts and horizontal evolution of DNA transposons in the speciation of pseudotetraploid salmonids. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 422-10.1186/1471-2164-8-422.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Steinke D, Salzburger W, Meyer A: Novel relationships among ten fish model species revealed based on phylogenomic analysis using ESTs. J Mol Evol. 2006, 62: 772-784. 10.1007/s00239-005-0170-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hutchison CA: DNA sequencing: bench to bedside and beyon. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: 6227-6237. 10.1093/nar/gkm688.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Valouev A, Ichikawa J, Tonthat T, Stuart J, Ranade S, Peckham H, Zeng K, Malek JA, Costa G, McKernan K, Sidow A, Fire A, Johnson SM: A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. Genome Res. 2008, 18 (7): 1051-63. 10.1101/gr.076463.108.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bennet S: Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics. 2004, 5: 433-8. 10.1517/146224220.127.116.113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blow N: DNA sequencing: generation next-next. Nat Methods. 2008, 5: 267-274. 10.1038/nmeth0308-267.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim J, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM: Genome sequencing in open microfabricated high density picoliter reactors. Nature. 2005, 437: 376-380.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Service RF: Gene sequencing: The race for the $1000 genome. Science. 2006, 311: 1544-1546. 10.1126/science.311.5767.1544.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ronaghi M, Uhlén M, Nyrén P: A sequencing method based on real-time pyrophosphate. Science. 1998, 281: 363-365. 10.1126/science.281.5375.363.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hiller NL, Janto B, Hogg JS, Boissy R, Yu S, Powell E, Keefe R, Ehrlich NE, Shen K, Hayes J, Barbadora K, Klimke W, Dernovoy D, Tatusova T, Parkhill J, Bentley SD, Post JC, Ehrlich GD, Hu FZ: Comparative genomic analyses of seventeen Streptococcus pneumoniae strains: insights into the pneumococcal supragenome. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189 (22): 8186-95. 10.1128/JB.00690-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cox-Foster DL, Conlan S, Holmes EC, Palacios G, Evans JD, Moran NA, Quan PL, Briese T, Hornig M, Geiser DM, Martinson V, vanEngelsdorp D, Kalkstein AL, Drysdale A, Hui J, Zhai J, Cui L, Hutchison SK, Simons JF, Egholm M, Pettis JS, Lipkin WI: A metagenomic survey of microbes in honey bee colony collapse disorder. Science. 2007, 318: 283-287. 10.1126/science.1146498.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huber JA, Welch DBM, Morrison HG, Huse SM, Neal PR, Butterfield DA, Sogin ML: Microbial population structures in the deep marine biosphere. Science. 2007, 318: 97-100. 10.1126/science.1146689.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Albert I, Mavrich TN, Tomsho LP, Qi J, Zanton SJ, Schuster SC, Pugh BF: Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature. 2007, 446: 572-576. 10.1038/nature05632.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Korbel JO, Urban AE, Affourtit JP, Godwin B, Grubert F, Simons JF, Kim PM, Palejev D, Carriero NJ, Du L, Taillon BE, Chen Z, Tanzer A, Saunders AC, Chi J, Yang F, Carter NP, Hurles ME, Weissman SM, Harkins TT, Gerstein MB, Egholm M, Snyder M: Pair-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome. Science. 2007, 318: 420-426. 10.1126/science.1149504.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swaminathan K, Varala K, Hudson ME: Global repeat discovery and estimation of genomic copy number in a large, complex genome using a high-throughput 454 sequence survey. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 132-145. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-132.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Torres TT, Metta M, Ottenwalder B, Schlotterer C: Gene expression profiling by massively parallel sequencing. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 172-177. 10.1101/gr.6984908.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Green RE, Krause J, Ptak SE, Briggs AW, Ronan MT, Simons JF, Du L, Egholm M, Rothberg JM, Paunovic M, Pääbo S: Analysis of one million base pairs of Neanderthal DNA. Nature. 2006, 444: 330-336. 10.1038/nature05336.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noonan JP, Coop G, Kudaravalli S, Smith D, Krause J, Alessi J, Chen F, Platt D, Pääbo S, Pritchard JK, Rubin EM: Sequencing and analysis of neanderthal genomic DNA. Science. 2006, 314: 1113-10.1126/science.1131412.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Troggio M, Cartwright DA, Cestaro A, Pruss D, Pindo M, Fitzgerald LM, Vezzulli S, Reid J, Malacarne G, Iliev D, Coppola G, Wardell B, Micheletti D, Macalma T, Facci M, Mitchell JT, Perazzolli M, Eldredge G, Gatto P, Oyzerski R, Moretto M, Gutin N, Stefanini M, Chen Y, Segala C, Davenport C, Demattè L, Mraz A, Battilana J, Stormo K, Costa F, Tao Q, Si-Ammour A, Harkins T, Lackey A, Perbost C, Taillon B, Stella A, Solovyev V, Fawcett JA, Sterck L, Vandepoele K, Grando SM, Toppo S, Moser C, Lanchbury J, Bogden R, Skolnick M, Sgaramella V, Bhatnagar SK, Fontana P, Gutin A, Peer Van de Y, Salamini F, Viola R: A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PloS One. 2007, 12: e1326-10.1371/journal.pone.0001326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler DA, Srinivasan M, Egholm M, Shen Y, Chen L, McGuire A, He W, Chen YJ, Makhijani V, Roth GT, Gomes X, Tartaro K, Niazi F, Turcotte CL, Irzyk GP, Lupski JR, Chinault C, Song XZ, Liu Y, Yuan Y, Nazareth L, Qin X, Muzny DM, Margulies M, Weinstock GM, Gibbs RA, Rothberg JM: The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nature. 2008, 452: 872-10.1038/nature06884.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wicker T, Schlagenhauf E, Graner A, Close TJ, Keller B, Stein N: 454 sequencing put to the test using the complex genome of barley. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 275-10.1186/1471-2164-7-275.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jackson TR, Ferguson MM, Danzmann RG, Fishback AG, Ihssen PE, O'Connell M, Crease TJ: Identification of two QTL influencing upper temperature tolerance in three rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) half-sib families. Heredity. 1998, 80: 143-151. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00289.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perry GML, Danzmann RG, Ferguson MM, Gibson JP: Quantitative trait loci for upper thermal tolerance in outbred strains of rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss). Heredity. 2001, 86: 333-341. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00838.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Somorjai ML, Danzmann RG, Ferguson MM: Distribution of temperature tolerance quantitative trait loci in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and inferred homologies in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Genetics. 2003, 165: 1433-1456.Google Scholar
- Sanchez JA, Clabby C, Ramos D, Blanco G, Flavin F, Vazquez E, Powell R: Protein and microsatellite single locus variability in Salmo salar L. (Atlantic salmon). Heredity. 1996, 77: 423-432. 10.1038/hdy.1996.162.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Genomic Research on Atlantic Salmon Project (GRASP) website. [http://grasp.mbb.sfu.ca/]
- Repeatmasker. [http://www.repeatmasker.org]
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burge C, Karlin S: Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol. 1997, 268: 78-94. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uniprot. [http://www.pir.uniprot.org/database/nref]
- NCBI Conserved Domains Database. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd]
- Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998, 8 (3): 175-85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ewing B, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Research. 1998, 8: 186-194.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P: Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998, 8 (3): 195-202.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- PHRED/PHRAP instruction manual. [http://www.phrap.org/phredphrap/phrap.html]
- Salmonid-specific repeat masker. [http://grasp.mbb.sfu.ca/GRASPRepetitive.html]
- Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, Kamal M, Clamp M, Chang JL, Kulbokas EJ, Zody MC, Mauceli E, Xie X, Breen M, Wayne RK, Ostrander EA, Ponting CP, Galibert F, Smith DR, DeJong PJ, Kirkness E, Alvarez P, Biagi T, Brockman W, Butler J, Chin CW, Cook A, Cuff J, Daly MJ, DeCaprio D, Gnerre S, Grabherr M, Kellis M, Kleber M, Bardeleben C, Goodstadt L, Heger A, Hitte C, Kim L, Koepfli KP, Parker HG, Pollinger JP, Searle SM, Sutter NB, Thomas R, Webber C, Baldwin J, Abebe A, Abouelleil A, Aftuck L, Ait-Zahra M, Aldredge T, Allen N, An P, Anderson S, Antoine C, Arachchi H, Aslam A, Ayotte L, Bachantsang P, Barry A, Bayul T, Benamara M, Berlin A, Bessette D, Blitshteyn B, Bloom T, Blye J, Boguslavskiy L, Bonnet C, Boukhgalter B, Brown A, Cahill P, Calixte N, Camarata J, Cheshatsang Y, Chu J, Citroen M, Collymore A, Cooke P, Dawoe T, Daza R, Decktor K, DeGray S, Dhargay N, Dooley K, Dooley K, Dorje P, Dorjee K, Dorris L, Duffey N, Dupes A, Egbiremolen O, Elong R, Falk J, Farina A, Faro S, Ferguson D, Ferreira P, Fisher S, FitzGerald M, Foley K, Foley C, Franke A, Friedrich D, Gage D, Garber M, Gearin G, Giannoukos G, Goode T, Goyette A, Graham J, Grandbois E, Gyaltsen K, Hafez N, Hagopian D, Hagos B, Hall J, Healy C, Hegarty R, Honan T, Horn A, Houde N, Hughes L, Hunnicutt L, Husby M, Jester B, Jones C, Kamat A, Kanga B, Kells C, Khazanovich D, Kieu AC, Kisner P, Kumar M, Lance K, Landers T, Lara M, Lee W, Leger JP, Lennon N, Leuper L, LeVine S, Liu J, Liu X, Lokyitsang Y, Lokyitsang T, Lui A, Macdonald J, Major J, Marabella R, Maru K, Matthews C, McDonough S, Mehta T, Meldrim J, Melnikov A, Meneus L, Mihalev A, Mihova T, Miller K, Mittelman R, Mlenga V, Mulrain L, Munson G, Navidi A, Naylor J, Nguyen T, Nguyen N, Nguyen C, Nguyen T, Nicol R, Norbu N, Norbu C, Novod N, Nyima T, Olandt P, O'Neill B, O'Neill K, Osman S, Oyono L, Patti C, Perrin D, Phunkhang P, Pierre F, Priest M, Rachupka A, Raghuraman S, Rameau R, Ray V, Raymond C, Rege F, Rise C, Rogers J, Rogov P, Sahalie J, Settipalli S, Sharpe T, Shea T, Sheehan M, Sherpa N, Shi J, Shih D, Sloan J, Smith C, Sparrow T, Stalker J, Stange-Thomann N, Stavropoulos S, Stone C, Stone S, Sykes S, Tchuinga P, Tenzing P, Tesfaye S, Thoulutsang D, Thoulutsang Y, Topham K, Topping I, Tsamla T, Vassiliev H, Venkataraman V, Vo A, Wangchuk T, Wangdi T, Weiand M, Wilkinson J, Wilson A, Yadav S, Yang S, Yang X, Young G, Yu Q, Zainoun J, Zembek L, Zimmer A, Lander ES: Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 2005, 8: 803-819. 10.1038/nature04338.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Porcine Genome Sequencing Project. [http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/S_scrofa/]
- Rat Genome Sequencing Project Consortium: Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature. 2004, 428: 493-521. 10.1038/nature02426.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.