Skip to main content
Download PDF

A genome survey of Moniliophthora perniciosa gives new insights into Witches' Broom Disease of cacao

BMC Genomics volume 9, Article number: 548 (2008) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The basidiomycete fungus Moniliophthora perniciosa is the causal agent of Witches' Broom Disease (WBD) in cacao (Theobroma cacao). It is a hemibiotrophic pathogen that colonizes the apoplast of cacao's meristematic tissues as a biotrophic pathogen, switching to a saprotrophic lifestyle during later stages of infection. M. perniciosa, together with the related species M. roreri, are pathogens of aerial parts of the plant, an uncommon characteristic in the order Agaricales. A genome survey (1.9× coverage) of M. perniciosa was analyzed to evaluate the overall gene content of this phytopathogen.

Results

Genes encoding proteins involved in retrotransposition, reactive oxygen species (ROS) resistance, drug efflux transport and cell wall degradation were identified. The great number of genes encoding cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (1.15% of gene models) indicates that M. perniciosa has a great potential for detoxification, production of toxins and hormones; which may confer a high adaptive ability to the fungus. We have also discovered new genes encoding putative secreted polypeptides rich in cysteine, as well as genes related to methylotrophy and plant hormone biosynthesis (gibberellin and auxin). Analysis of gene families indicated that M. perniciosa have similar amounts of carboxylesterases and repertoires of plant cell wall degrading enzymes as other hemibiotrophic fungi. In addition, an approach for normalization of gene family data using incomplete genome data was developed and applied in M. perniciosa genome survey.

Conclusion

This genome survey gives an overview of the M. perniciosa genome, and reveals that a significant portion is involved in stress adaptation and plant necrosis, two necessary characteristics for a hemibiotrophic fungus to fulfill its infection cycle. Our analysis provides new evidence revealing potential adaptive traits that may play major roles in the mechanisms of pathogenicity in the M. perniciosa/cacao pathosystem.

Background

Moniliophthora perniciosa, previously known as Crinipellis perniciosa (Singer) Stahel, is a hemibiotrophic basidiomycete (Tricholomataceae, Agaricales, Marasmiaceae) fungus that causes Witches' broom disease (WBD) in cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) [1–3]. WBD and frosty pod rot (FPR), caused by Moniliophthora roreri, are the most devastating diseases of cacao in the Americas [4]. Cacao production in southeastern Bahia, the main production area in Brazil, was severely affected by the introduction of WBD at the end of 1980's [5]. This disease damaged Bahian agribusiness, caused major social problems and has contributed to the degradation of the Atlantic Rainforest ("Mata Atlântica"). This is because cacao producing areas, typically, maintained old-growth native tree species as shade for the cacao plantations, which were converted to pasture [6].

The symptoms displayed by cacao plants during WBD parallel the hemibiotrophic development of M. perniciosa [7]. Briefly, the disease begins when fungal spores germinate and infect meristematic tissues, developing into monokaryotic biotrophic hyphae without clamp connections that slowly occupy the intercellular space. This stage of WBD is characterized by the emergence of hypertrophic and hyperplasic anomalous branches, and the formation of parthenocarpic fruits. Infected branches, known as "green brooms", grow without apical dominance, with a phototropic orientation and displaying epinastic leaves [7]. After two to three months the infected tissue turns necrotic (dry brooms) and the hyphae become saprotrophic with two nuclei per cell and clamp connections, invading the inter and intracellular spaces of the infected tissue [6, 8]. This fungal species exhibits primary homothalism as its reproductive strategy [9]; thus, the change from the monokaryotic to the dikaryotic mycelium occurs without the prerequisite of mating between compatible individuals. After alternate wet and dry periods, basidiomes produced by the saprotrophic hyphae release basidiospores that are spread by wind or rain, thus completing the M. perniciosa life cycle [7].

The Witches' broom Genome Project http://www.lge.ibi.unicamp.br/vassoura involving several Brazilian laboratories was initiated to increase the knowledge of this disease. The genome size, chromosomal polymorphism, genetic variability and the M. perniciosa mitochondrial genome have already been described [10–12]. Additionally, a biochemical study revealed the metabolic modifications that occur in cacao plantlets during WBD development [13]. Technical improvements have been achieved in the manipulation of cacao [14, 15] and M. perniciosa [16, 17]. One of the main bottlenecks in M. perniciosa research was solved with the development of the in vitro production of biotrophic-like cultures [18]. Necrotic inducing proteins expressed by M. perniciosa have been characterized [19], and the analysis of EST libraries and DNA microarrays have identified differentially expressed genes during its development [[20]; A.B.L. Pires et al., unpublished data] and for the interaction of the fungus with cacao [21, 22]. Despite the substantial progression in understanding WBD, many questions remain unsolved, mainly those concerning the mechanisms controlling processes such as: (i) the fungal switch from biotrophism to saprotrophism; (ii) the drastic phenotypic alteration of cacao during disease development and (iii) the death of infected tissues. In vitro cultures in our laboratory demonstrate that this fungus has a great capacity to adapt to media containing different sources of carbon and nitrogen and it is able to grow in extremely nutrient-poor media. These results together with the fact that hemibiotrophic fungi, such as M. perniciosa, display complex lifestyles [23] suggest that this fungus has a significant genomic and transcriptomic plasticity that contributes to the successful pathogenic mechanisms expressed during its life cycle. In a recent review, Meinhardt et al., give a historical account and summarize the current state of knowledge about WBD [24].

Around two thirds of the known Basidiomycota species are included in the order Agaricales [25]. In addition to being an interesting group for carrying out developmental genetic studies concerning fungal development and reproduction, the Agaricales contain many important industrial species (i.e., edible mushrooms, fiber bleaching fungus), and species with unique lifestyles: saprophytes (i.e, wood-decaying fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium), symbionts (i.e., ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor), leaf-litters decomposers (i.e., Agaricus bisporus) and root pathogens (i.e., Armilaria mellea). Interestingly, M. perniciosa and M. roreri are members of a group of Agaricales species that are able to infect aerial parts of plants, an uncommon characteristic among this Basidiomycota order.

Genome sequencing and analysis is an important strategy to obtain comprehensive information concerning the metabolism and development of organisms. The initial objective of the M. perniciosa Genome Project was to obtain a genome survey sequence using a whole shotgun strategy to provide genomic information for the WBD research community. Recently, the bioinformatics and genomic communities have been debating about the benefits and costs of finishing a complete genome as compared to applying a genome survey strategy [26–32]. It has been proposed that a two-fold genome sequence coverage is sufficient to support a high percentage of EST alignments and exon similarity matches [26, 31]. Additionally, gene models resulting from a genome survey can be predicted accurately by the comparison with complete genomes of phylogenetically related organisms [26, 31]. This strategy has been used for genomic surveys of dog (1.5× coverage) [31] and of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera bruxellensis (0.4× coverage) [33]. Recently, the genomes of the basidiomycete species Laccaria bicolor, Cryptococcus neoformans, Ustilago maydis, Coprinopsis cinerea (Coprinus cinereus) and Phanerochaete chrysosporium have been determined and many additional Basidiomycota genome projects are ongoing or about to be released http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/fgi; http://www.jgi.doe.gov, which could provide a rich database for additional Basidiomycota genomic survey evaluations.

With the existence of several complete Basidiomycota genomes, and both M. perniciosa ESTs libraries, and a 1.9 × genome coverage, we decided to conduct a genome survey of M. perniciosa to obtain further information about this important phytopathogen. This report describes a survey of the genome sequences of M. perniciosa, with specific emphasis on the genes potentially involved in disease development such as a cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, transposable elements, putative plant defense elicitors, pathogenicity effectors, cell wall degrading enzymes, proteins related to methylotrophy and the biosynthesis of plant hormones by the fungus. The identification of such genes in the M. perniciosa genomic data lead us to hypothesize a connection between molecular processes involved in the growth phases of the fungus and the progression of WBD.

Results and discussion

Genome assembly and estimation of genome size

A diagram flow describing the bioinformatic procedures applied in the M. perniciosa genome survey are depicted in Figure 1. After sequencing, a total of 124,565 reads were obtained and assembled using the whole genome shotgun strategy. During the initial assembly process, a large contig including 6,920 reads was found. This contig was identified as the mitochondrial genome of the fungus (RefSeq NC_005927), which comprised approximately 6% of M. perniciosa sequences [12]. The remaining genome sequences were assembled resulting in 17,991 contigs and 7,065 singlets with average lengths of 1,300 bp and 455 bp, respectively. The largest contig consisted of 25,364 bp, and was formed by 513 reads. The sum of all reads was close to 75 Mbp and the total assembly consisted of 26.7 Mbp (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Flow diagram of bioinformatics procedures applied in M. perniciosa genome survey.

Full size image

Previous Feulgen-image analysis experiments estimated M. perniciosa genome size to be 32.98 ± 7.95 Mbp [10]. Due to the large error in this estimation we decided to assess the genome size using the genome estimation protocol established in the dog genome survey [31] (more details in Additional File 1). This analysis resulted in a genome size ranging from 38.7 to 39.0 Mbp, a value similar to the genome length of another fungus belonging the order Agaricales, C. cinerea (37.5 Mbp), and that agrees with the previous size estimated by Feulgen-image analysis [10].

The Lander Waterman theory (LW) [34] and its applications [35, 36] were used to confirm the estimate of the M. perniciosa genome size. The theoretical values for the expected number of clusters (contigs + singlets), contigs, gaps, average cluster length and average gap length can be calculated using the LW theory from the effective average read length, the number of reads and the genome size as parameters. If the calculated values derived from the genome assembly were close to the theoretical values derived from LW calculations, then it is possible to confirm the estimated genome size. A summary of the results obtained from the assembly data and from the estimation using the LW theory is shown in Table 1. The experimental values agreed with the theoretical calculations, thus supporting our genome size estimation. According to LW analysis the average gap size was 413 pb. To have more information about the distribution of the gap size, we performed a comparison between a set of eukaryotic core proteins (generated by CEGMA pipeline [37]) and M. perniciosa contigs (See Additional file 1). Using this methodology, we detected that the average gap size was around 500 ± 300 bp, corroborating with LW average gap size estimative (413 bp). Considering that most of the gaps are around 500 bp and that C. cinerea average gene size is 1,678 bp, the majority of M. perniciosa genes or partial gene regions are likely to be included in the contigs. Corroborating this notion, we have found all genes encoding proteins of essential metabolic pathways such as Glycolysis, Gluconeogenesis, Pentose Phosphate pathway, and several others, which are available in the website http://www.lge.ibi.unicamp.br/biocyc/MP (see below).

Table 1 Comparison between assembly values and values calculated using Lander Waterman theory
Full size table

In order to estimate the number of sequences misassembled due to repeat regions, we applied the integrated pipeline for assembly validation, called amosvalidate [38] (Further information in Additional file 1). This analysis resulted in 664 contigs with overrepresented regions totaling 1.1 Mbp. Multiplying the number of bases in overrepresented regions by over-coverage estimate resulted in 7.4 Mbp of repeat regions in the genome. Since reads from repetitive regions were eliminated from the estimation of the genome length using dog genome survey protocol (Additional file 1), this misassembling does not invalidates the genome size estimate.

Gene content

The initial step to uncover the gene content of M. perniciosa was performed using the genomic sequences together with a library of 3,145 ESTs, previously annotated and partially published [20]. Genes were identified by comparing these two libraries using the program Exalin [39]. This analysis allowed us to identify expressed genes and intron structure. The result was 2,002 ESTs aligned to the genome contigs. Based on this EST-genome sequence alignment, the average intron length was estimated as 52 bp. This information was then used in the next steps of the process.

A more detailed investigation of the gene content was carried out using a combination of ab initio (gene predictor programs) and comparative gene prediction (BLAST-EST sequence alignment). For ab initio gene prediction, we first applied the methodology described for the AUGUSTUS gene predictor [40]http://augustus.gobics.de/binaries/retraining.html. This methodology essentially trains the AUGUSTUS program using a combination of sequences from the species of interest together with sequences of a phylogenetically related species, specifically with similarities in intron and exon length distributions. Using this approach, the coding content sensors (codon usage, GC content) are trained with sequences of the species of interest, and signal sensors (splice sites, TATA-box, polyadenilation sites, etc) are trained with the sequences of the related species. Sequences from C. cinerea were used in the training process; together with selected M. perniciosa ESTs with E-value in BLASTX-NR ≤ 1E-10. The sequences of the ESTs that aligned with proteins in the databank were concatenated, giving rise to a 240 Kbp sequence. Ten copies of this M. perniciosa EST concatamers (total of 2.4 Mbp) together with a dataset of genes from C. cinerea http://augustus.gobics.de/datasets, comprised of 1.2 Mbp, were used to "pre-train" AUGUSTUS. The M. perniciosa predictions that came out of this pre-training were compared with the protein databank NR using BLASTp. The resulting predictions with similarities in the NR databank, and with a coverage ≥ 90%, were selected. After eliminating redundancies, 134 complete (containing the start codon and stop codon) and 1,136 partial (without the start codon and/or stop codon) M. perniciosa gene models were used to train AUGUSTUS [40] and two other gene predictors (SNAP [41] and Genezilla [42]). Predictions with less than 30 amino acids were eliminated. The remaining predictions were grouped into 19,932 overlapping clusters; that is, genomic regions covered by at least one prediction. The predictions in each overlapping cluster were ranked according to the criteria used by the Fungal Genome Initiative at the Broad Institute http://www.broad.mit.edu, with some adaptations. The ab initio gene finding pipeline generated 13,640 gene models, 9,560 of which contained significant similarity to GenBank sequences (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Number of M. perniciosa gene models predicted by ab initio and/or extrinsic prediction methods. Left ellipse: gene models predicted by ab initio methods. Right ellipse: gene models predicted by extrinsic methods. The intersection contains gene models detected by both methods. Underlined: number of gene models with BLASTX-NR E-value similarity ≤ 1e-10. In italics: number of gene models with BLASTX-NR E-value similarity > 1e-10.

Full size image

The extrinsic prediction methodology consisted of a combination of genomic similarity searches (BLASTX) using contigs and singlets, with the alignment of M. perniciosa ESTs in the genomic clusters. 17,991 contigs and 7,065 singlets were submitted to similarity analysis in a databank containing BLASTX-NR plus P. chrysosporium proteins. The genomic regions containing homologues in this databank were selected and exon-intron boundaries were determined. We also selected the alignments between ESTs and genomic clusters. Then, we evaluated if there was a superposition of BLAST alignments and EST alignments. After this analysis, the extrinsic prediction methodology revealed 12,249 gene models. Most of these gene models (9,560) were also predicted by the ab initio gene predictor programs. Of the 2,689 remaining gene models not predicted by the gene predictor programs, 1,789 presented significant similarity to sequences deposited in the GenBank (E-value ≤ 1E-10) and 900 did not have any significant similarity in the GenBank (E-value > 1 E-10) (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). One of the reasons why these genes were not detected by the gene prediction programs could be the presence of low quality sequences that may have lead to frameshifts, thus making them impossible to detect by these programs. The total number of gene models obtained using both approaches, ab initio and extrinsic predictions, is 16,329. Assuming that the average contig length is 1.3 Kbp and the average gap length is 413 bp, it is possible that this total number of gene models (16,329) represents an overestimation. For instance, in our assembly a gene with > 2 Kbp (protein ~700 aa) could be represented by two gene models, with each one in different contigs, which suggests a possible redundancy in this gene model prediction. Thus, it is very likely that the real number of gene models will be less and closer to the ab initio or extrinsic predictions separately. However, to obtain the maximum amount of information, we decided to evaluate the results of similarity searches in GenBank (BLASTX-NR) for all 16,329 gene models. As a result, 69.5% (11,349) of the gene models showed significant sequence similarity (E-value ≤ 1e-10) to GenBank proteins. The remaining 30.5% (4,980), designated as "no-hits", were sequences with lower E-value scores (E-value > 1e-10). Of these gene models 4,080 were predicted with the ab initio gene predictors and 900 with the extrinsic predictions (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).

As expected, BLASTX analysis against available complete fungal genomes showed that M. perniciosa gene models present higher similarity to genes from Basidiomycota (L. bicolor, C. cinerea and P. chrysosporium) than those from Ascomycota (Table 2).

Table 2 Moniliophthora perniciosa predicted gene comparisons
Full size table

In order to find groups of similar proteins in our dataset, we applied a Markov Clustering (MCL) algorithm [43] to the M. perniciosa gene models. Although the output by this method is not highly reliable, they correlate well with "real" gene families and can be applied efficiently to cluster large quantities of genes in a high throughput fashion [44, 45]. MCL also helped to the assemble genes without similarity in the GenBank into gene families, which are described in the following sections.

Those gene models that were not grouped into gene families by the MCL algorithm have been compared with the genome of C. cinerea in order to discard those genes with parts of their sequences present in more than one contig. In order to perform this comparison (TBLASTN) we assume that the length distribution of M. perniciosa proteins is similar to those from C. cinerea. In this comparison we evaluated similar genes according to the length of the protein (Fig. 3). This comparison showed that there is a clear correlation between complete genes in C. cinerea and M. perniciosa gene models coding for proteins smaller than 300 aa. However, for larger proteins more than one M. perniciosa gene model showed similarity to a single C. cinerea protein, thus confirming the overestimation of the number of gene models. Given the fact that the genome sequence is incomplete, there is high probability that we are predicting more than one gene model per gene.

Figure 3
figure3

Correlation between the average number of M perniciosa gene models and the length of C. cinereus proteins.

Full size image

In order to have a measurement of the overestimation and use it to correct our database, the corresponding relationship between the protein size and the number of gene models was calibrated with the genome of C. cinerea using the gene models unlinked to gene families identified by the MCL algorithm (Fig. 3). A linear regression formula was used to correct for the overestimation according to the protein size. For example, proteins smaller than 300 amino acids will have only one model representing the gene, while larger proteins will have one model and a fraction of a second model representing its gene. This fraction represents the overestimation of the number of gene models.

In order to estimate the gene density in M. perniciosa, and deal with the overestimation evident by the previous analysis, we averaged the total number of gene models obtained by the different predictions: ab initio predictions (13,640), extrinsic predictions (12,249) and total number of gene predictions (16,329). This resulted in 14,072 gene predictions that were divided by the 39 Mbp estimated genome size, which gave a gene density of approximately 2.77 ± 0.37 Kbp/gene or 0.36 ± 0.05 gene/Kbp for the genome of M. perniciosa. Figure 4 depicts the gene density comparison between M. perniciosa, two eubacteria (Xyllela fastidiosa and Escherichia coli), one archea (Haloquadratum walsbyi), an apicomplexan (Theileria parva), a primitive chordate (Ciona intestinalis) and a series of fungal genomes, and this showed that our gene density evaluation is in agreement with gene density data of other filamentous fungi [46].

Figure 4
figure4

Correlation of various organisms' genome size and number of genes (Gene Density). Error bar in M. perniciosa data point depicts the Standard Deviation (SD ± 0.05) of Gene/Kbp ratio using ab initio predicitions, extrinsic predictions and the sum of both predictions (see text).

Full size image

The overall M. perniciosa genomic features are summarized in Table 3. The genomic clusters of M. perniciosa were submitted to NCBI (GenomeProject ID 28951, Locus-tag prefix MPER) and the Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the project accession ABRE00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, ABRE01000000.

Table 3 Moniliophthora perniciosa genome survey features
Full size table

Overall Functional Annotation and Metabolic maps

The number of gene models used for the functional annotation and building of the metabolic maps was 16,329, which represents the total number of gene models obtained using ab initio and extrinsic predictions. Although this number represents an overestimation of the real number of genes (see above), it was used to maximize the information acquired from these sequences. All data obtained in the gene families and protein domain analyses were corrected according to the normalization procedure developed from the gene models not included in any of the MCL families based on comparisons with the C. cinerea genome (see above).

The program AutoFACT [47], an automated annotation tool, was used to evaluate the putative functions of M. perniciosa gene models. This program determines the most informative functional description by combining multiple BLAST reports from a number of user selected databases, and provides a consensus result [47]. AutoFACT classifies proteins as "classified proteins", which can be "assigned" (containing similarity to proteins with annotated function) or "unassigned" (containing similarity to proteins with unknown function), and "unclassified proteins" (without similarity to any other protein in databanks). Using this software, 73% of gene models (11,950) were annotated as previously classified proteins. From these 7,416 (45%) were assigned proteins, and 4,534 (28%) were classified as unassigned proteins, which can be interpreted as a class of conserved hypothetical proteins (Table 3). The remaining 4,379 gene models (27%) were considered as unclassified proteins. The number of gene models with E-value scores > 1e-10 obtained by BLASTX-NR (no-hits, see previous section) was 4,980 and represented 30.5% of the total number of models. The result obtained with AutoFACT increased the number of classified proteins by 3.5% (Fig. 1; Table 3). This indicates that the use of domain classification databases is helpful in the identification and annotation of gene models.

Additionally, we correlated the AutoFACT annotation with the gene families assembled by the MCL algorithm. As depicted in Table 4 and additional file 2, MCL data indicated that the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase family had the largest number of M. perniciosa members, followed by a gypsy-like retrotransposon gene family, and a gene family that has similarity to a C. cinerea hypothetical protein (EAU86912.1) and to a shitake mushroom Lentinula edodes EST (EB016963). This new gene family appears to be related to specific developmental traits of the Agaricales. Also found were new gene families with unknown functions based on their lack of homology with GenBank sequences (Additional file 2; Additional File 3 – Worksheet Unknown Gene Families). These families could possibly be linked to M. perniciosa physiological characteristics.

Table 4 MCL analysis of M. perniciosa gene models
Full size table

A comparison of the gene models with the CDD-PFAM databank [48] was performed to obtain information about protein domains present in M. perniciosa proteins. The data obtained were normalized using the procedure described above. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase was the most prevalent protein domain assigned in M. perniciosa (gnl|CDD|40168), followed by protein kinases (gnl|CDD|40170), sugar transporters (gnl|CDD|40184), short chain dehydrogenases (gnl|CDD|40206) and carboxylesterases/lipases (gnl|CDD|40235) (Table 5; Additional File 4). The prevalence of Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase domains in the genome agrees with the results of MCL analysis. CDD-PFAM analysis was also used to evaluate the protein domains in other genome fungi (Additional File 4). The comparisons between M. perniciosa and the other fungi analyzed are described below.

Table 5 Top 20 CDD-PFAM domains in M. perniciosa proteins
Full size table

A hypothetical metabolic map of M. perniciosa was built using BioCyc [49]. This analysis allowed us to annotate 235 metabolic pathways. These include 1358 enzymatic reactions incorporating a total of 2139 enzymes http://www.lge.ibi.unicamp.br/biocyc/MP. A comparison of this metabolic map with the fungal model Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C (documented with 132 pathways, 925 enzymatic reactions, and 675 enzymes – http://www.lge.ibi.unicamp.br/biocyc/comparatives/MP-SCER) showed that M. perniciosa has more metabolic pathways than S. cerevisiae; a result that corresponds to the smaller genome size of S. cerevisiae and possibly the more complex lifestyle of M. perniciosa. Interestingly, M. perniciosa has a higher number of reactions involving O2, CO2, H2O2, and NAD(P)+/NAD(P)H than S. cerevisiae, suggesting a greater capacity to use and deal with oxidation-reduction reactions (Additional File 5 – worksheet compounds). We also detected reactions with farnesyl pyrophosphate and dimethylallyl-diphosphate, which are involved in the biosynthesis of the secondary metabolites such as isoprenoids and indoles. Moreover, according to BioCyc analysis, M. perniciosa has more amino acid catabolic pathways, alternative carbon sources degradation and biosynthesis routes and C1 compounds (i.e., methanol) utilization and assimilation reactions than S. cerevisiae (Additional File 5 – worksheet pathways). These pathways are under manual annotation and will be published on BioCyc web page. The existence of these pathways in M. perniciosa suggest ecological and physiological adaptations to environmental stresses; to competition present in its native habitat in the Amazon Basin, and to traits that enable it to colonize cacao and trigger WBD.

Detoxification and general resistance mechanisms: cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, efflux transporters and anti-oxidative apparatus

Based on CDD-PFAM and MCL analyses gene members of the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase superfamily are prevalent in the genome of M. perniciosa (Tables 4 and 5; Additional File 3 – Worksheet P450; Additional File 4). Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases play a role in hydroxylation and oxidation processes involved in biosynthesis and degradation of different compounds [50]. Therefore, a large number of gene models similar to cytochrome P450 monooxygenases suggest a significant capacity for synthesis of secondary metabolites, such as hormones or toxins, and for detoxification. Among the fungi analyzed, M. perniciosa has the highest number of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase genes (188 gene models) representing 1.15% of the gene models (Fig. 5A). Saproprotrophic basidiomycetes P. chrysosporium and C. cinerea and the hemibiotrophic ascomycetes Magnaporthe grisea and Fusarium graminearum also have more than one hundred cytochrome P450 monooxygenase genes representing between 1.25% and 0.9% of their gene models (Figure 5A; Additional File 4). The basidiomycete L. bicolor (an ectomycorrhizal fungus) and the ascomycete Neurospora crassa (a fire-scoured landscape colonizer) follow with fewer genes. U. maydis (a biotrophic pathogen), C. neoformans (an animal pathogen) and S. cerevisiae (a fermentative fungus) have the fewest cytochrome P450 monoooxygenase genes of the fungi compared in this study (Fig. 5A; Additional File 4). This analysis clearly demonstrates the prevalence of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in saprotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungi, which have to hydrolize complex wood polymers and deal with a highly oxidative environment. As discussed by Gonzalez and Nebert [50], cytochrome P450 monooxygenase polymorphisms may be the product of the "molecular warfare" that occurs during the co-evolution of preys and predators, which produce toxins and detoxifying genes, respectively. This logic can be extrapolated to the plant-fungus interaction, and in that sense, we believe that the plethora of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in M. perniciosa may be critical to detoxification and environmental adaptation as well as for disease development.

Figure 5
figure5

Comparison of M. perniciosa protein families with other fungi. (A) comparison between cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, carboxylesterases, deuterolysins, thaumatins and aegerolysins; (B) comparison of plant cell wall degrading enzymes from fungi that interact with plants. Mp = Moniliophthora perniciosa, Lb = Laccaria bicolor, Cc = Coprinopsis cinerea, Pc = Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Um = Ustilago maydis, Mg = Magnaporthe grisea, Cn = Cryptococcus neoformans, Fg = Fusarium graminearum, Nc = Neurospora crassa, Sc = Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The legend at the right refers to the nomenclature of plant cell wall degrading enzymes according to CAZy http://www.cazy.org.

Full size image

Another set of proteins related to detoxification processes are the efflux transporters. Similarity searches in the Transport Classification Database (TCDB – http://www.tcdb.org) [51] which compare the genome of M. perniciosa with other fungal genomes (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional annotation and Worksheet Transporters) verified an extended set of efflux transporters from classes 3.A.1 (ABC superfamily) and 3.A.3 (P-type ATPase Superfamily). The majority of ABC transporters identified in M. perniciosa belong to the Pleiotropic Drug Resistance (PDR) family and the ABC Conjugate (ABCC) Transporter family. These proteins have been associated with fungal pathogenesis [52] and heavy metal resistance [53]. The members of P-type ATPase superfamily in M. perniciosa include phospholipid translocating ATPases family and fungal ENA-ATPases transporters, which are involved with the efflux of excessive Na+, and especially K+, encountered by fungi during colonization of plants [54].

During the plant defense, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced to limit the pathogen invasion [55]. However, pathogenic fungi produce antioxidant enzymes that enable them to neutralize host ROS. M. perniciosa contains a myriad of O2- and H2O2 decomposing enzymes such as superoxide dismutases, catalases, peroxiredoxins, glutathione-system, thioredoxin-system enzymes and manganese dependent peroxidases (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). Therefore, this fungal genome harbors a complete ROS detoxification system. Reports indicate that H2O2 favors necrotrophic pathogens infection [56, 57]. Furthermore, M. perniciosa produces calcium oxalate crystals (COC) [58], and a cacao susceptible genotype accumulates COC during M. perniciosa infection, followed by a programmed cell death (PCD) [59]. The degradation of COC produces carbon dioxide and H2O2, suggesting that COCs can be important to necrotrophic mycelia development. In addition, oxalate chelates Ca2+, an important secondary plant defense messenger and a key cross-linker of pectin in the middle lamella pectin [60], and was found to be a trigger of PCD in plants [61]. These findings suggest that oxalate favors M. perniciosa infection by disorganizing plant defense and plant cell wall structure, by facilitating the action of fungal pectinases and possibly triggering PCD in the later stages of WBD [59].

Genome variability: Mating-type genes and transposable elements

Seven M. perniciosa gene models were found to be similar to pheromone receptors (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). As a primary homothallic fungus, M. perniciosa does not use its mating type system to outcross, but probably to promote the formation of clamp connections, hyphae dikaryotization and for the expression of pathogenicity genes as in U. maydis [62]. Previous reports have indicated that M. perniciosa exhibits high genetic variability at the molecular level [11, 63, 64]. This level of variability may be the reason M. perniciosa overcomes resistant genotypes of cacao, such as Scavina 6 [65]. Furthermore, it has been postulated that the genome variability found in homothallic M. perniciosa may be due to transposable elements (TEs) and ectopic recombination guided by the numerous copies of these elements found in the genome [10]. The fact that retrotransposons were identified in EST libraries and differentially expressed during M. perniciosa development [20], indicates that they are active elements, which could contribute to genetic variability. Among the M. perniciosa TE families, Gypsy-like retrotransposons were the most abundant, followed by Copia-like retrotransposons (Tables 4 and 5; Additional File 2; Additional File 3 – Worksheet Transposons). TEs similar to P. chrysosporium Copia-like elements were found in M. perniciosa genome inserted within putative cytochrome P450 monooxygenase genes [66]. Curiously, they were also inserted in a P. chrysosporium cytochrome P450 monooxygenase subfamily (Additional file 2 – family 255; Additional File 3 – Worksheet P450), suggesting that these TEs may have a common ancestral origin in Basidiomycota. Retroelements of the tyrosine recombinase (YR) order [67] and DNA transposons (class II transposons) from CACTA [68], hATC [69, 70] and Tc/Mariner [71] superfamilies were also found. Finally, a previously described Boto DNA transposon [M.V. Queiroz et al., unpublished data] from the PIF/IS5 superfamily [72] was also identified in a MCL family (Additional File 2 – family 251; Additional File 3 – Worksheet Transposons).

Plant Hormonal Disarrangement: Fungal genes related to plant hormones biosynthesis

There is growing evidence of phytohormones being produced by pathogens during some infective processes [73]. For instance, the production of gibberellins (GA); hormones involved in the regulation of stem elongation, seed germination, flowering and fruit maturation; have been identified in phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi that cause overgrowth symptoms, such as Giberella fujikuroi and Sphaceloma manhiticola [74, 75]. A search for homologues of the fungal specific bi-functional ent-kaurene synthase (CPS/KS) responsible for the two-step cyclation of GGDP in fungi [76] identified gene models similar to the N-terminal domain of G. fujikuroi CPS/KS but did not detect any sequence similar to the C-terminal domain of this protein in M. perniciosa. Another gene model similar to CPS/KS that lacks the C-terminal domain was found in the Aspergillus niger genome (AM270241.1). Genes similar to GA-4 desaturase and GA oxidases (cytochrome P450), part of a GA biosynthesis gene cluster present in G. fujikuroi and Phaeosphaeria sp. were detected (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). Reinforcing our data mining discover, is the fact that a gibberellin-like compound was detected in basidiospores of M. perniciosa [77]. We can theorize that the production of GA by M. perniciosa may confer the hyperplasic phenotype of the green broom that resembles stem hyper-elongation caused by GA-producing phytopathogens.

Another interesting discovery in the M. perniciosa genome is the presence of genes encoding enzymes of two biosynthetic pathways of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), the most abundant natural plant auxin. We found a gene similar to plant nitrilases (E.C 3.5.5.1) which catalyzes the direct conversion of indole-3-acetonitrile into ammonia and IAA. Additionally, potential genes for the IAA-producing tryptamine pathway (one tryptophan decarboxylase, copper amine oxidases and a hypothetical indole-acetaldehyde oxidase) were found (Fig. 6; Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). Furthermore, a manual annotation of EST libraries reveal the presence of an aromatic amino acid aminotransferase, which could make part of Indole-3-pyruvate IAA biosynthetic pathway (Fig. 6). IAA regulates many plant biological processes including cell elongation and fruit ripening. Recently, the presence of IAA in M. perniciosa basidiocarps was reported [78]. IAA is produced by other fungal phytopathogens such as biotrophics U. maydis and Taphrina deformans and hemibiotrophic Colletotrichum gloeosporioides sp. [79–81], and induces filamentation and invasive growth in S. cerevisiae [82]. Curiously, both Gibberellin and IAA induce fruit parthenocarpy and act synergistically in plant organ expansion [83], both of which are traits of WBD.

Figure 6
figure6

Indole-3-acetate (IAA) biosynthesis pathways. M. perniciosa gene models are annotated in red.

Full size image

Cacao plantlets inoculated with M. perniciosa spores emit higher levels of ethylene during the late stages of infection than non-inoculated plants [13]. The plant hormone ethylene stimulates elongation at low concentrations, and senescence, fruit ripening, and epinasty at high doses [84]. Auxins stimulate the synthesis of ethylene [85], which together with gibberellins have integrated actions in plant cell death [86] and stem elongation during phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance, a phenomenon that occurs in response to the low red to far-red light ratios (R:FR) under dense canopies [87]. We hypothesize that in a dense and shaded environment, such as a cacao plantation, the low R:FR ratio effects can be increased by the action of the aforementioned phytohormones, explaining the shade avoidance, hypertrophy, and elongation of green brooms. The presence of genes related to plant hormones production in M. perniciosa supports previous data [77, 78] and suggests that this fungus can influence the plant metabolism and defense, by altering hormonal balance during infection [73, 88].

Pathogenicity: Fungal effectors and pathogenicity associated proteins

As a pathogen that colonizes the plant apoplast during its biotrophic stage, M. perniciosa may release elicitor or effector proteins into the extracellular medium, which in turn could evade or suppress the plant defense response. Throughout WBD, M. perniciosa produces proteins with the potential to kill plant cells, thereby releasing their contents, which are absorbed by the fungus during its saprotrophic stage. Thus, M. perniciosa uses a varied arsenal of effector proteins in order to complete its infection cycle. Although some phytopathogenic fungi deliver effector proteins into the cytoplasm by means of haustoria [89, 90] this type of structure is absent in M. perniciosa. Therefore it is possible that this fungus secretes these proteins into the apoplast, as has been described for other fungi [91]. Effector proteins that are recognized by plant resistance (R) proteins are known as avr proteins. No orthologues to the known Ascomycota avr genes, not even the U. maydis genes contained in "biotrophic clusters" [92], were found in the genome of M. perniciosa. However, ab initio gene prediction with peptide signal analysis revealed 70 "no hits" small proteins containing secretion signals and at least two cysteines (see methods, Additional File 6), which is a common trait of many proteins that are delivered into the host apoplast by phytopathogens [93]. In order to validate 22 selected ab initio predictions, we conducted RT-PCR using RNA from M. perniciosa saprotrophic mycelia. We validated the expression of 13 gene models out of 22 tested, all of which contained secretion signals (Additional File 7 – Primers No Hits Cys protein). Possibly, the gene models that were not confirmed by RT-PCR are expressed in other developmental stages of the fungus (basidiome, spore, etc.). Additional File 8 depicts the amplification of three of these genes. Whether these proteins play a role in the pathogenicity of M. perniciosa or in elicitation of cacao defense remains to be elucidated.

M. perniciosa contains Necrosis and Ethylene inducing proteins (NEPs) and cerato platanins [19, 94], which can act in conjunction with a series of proteinases, hemolysin-like proteins and carboxylesterases/lipases found in the genome (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). These proteins appear to be part of the destructive arsenal of M. perniciosa. The most abundant proteinases in the genome of M. perniciosa are deuterolysins, a type of fungal metalloproteinases that are similar to bacterial thermolysin [95]. Compared to other fungi indicates that M. perniciosa has a deuterolysin expansion (13 gene models; Fig. 5A; Additional File 4), suggesting an important role for these proteinases during this fungus development.

We also identified a gene family similar to agaricales Pleurotus ostreatus and Agrocybe aegerita hemolysin-like aegerolysins. These proteins have cytolitic properties [96] and seems to play an important role at the initial phase of fungal fruiting by making the fungal membranes permeable during cell signaling [96]. M. perniciosa genome contain a family of aegerolysins (6 aegerolysins; Fig. 5A; Additional File 4). None of the other agaricales fungi analyzed (L. bicolor, C. cinerea and P. chrysosporium) contain these proteins. Even though we could not assess the genomic data of the basidiomycete containing aegerolysins, we suggest that the diversification of these proteins in WBD causative agent indicates their importance in M. perniciosa development or even in fungi defense and infective process.

Carboxyesterases and lipases are overrepresented in M. perniciosa (Tables 4 and 5; Additional Files 2 and 4). According to CDD-PFAM, M. perniciosa have 38 gene models annotated as carboxylesterases, approximately twice the number of such proteins in other basidiomycete (ectomycorrhizal L. bicolor (15); saprobes C. cinerea (19) and P. crhysosporium (14); and biotrophic U. maydis (12); Figure 5A; Additional File 3); while the hemibiotrophic ascomycete F. graminearum and M. grisea have 40 and 29 carboxylesterases, respectively. We postulate that the great number of carboxylesterases and lipases in M. perniciosa, F. graminearum and M. grisea is related to their hemibiotrophic lifestyle. In fact, these enzymes are induced during carbon and nitrogen starvation [97], and cell wall degradation [98], two events that occur during hemibiotrophism.

Other genes associated with the plant-pathogen interaction found in our analysis were similar to the SCP-like superfamily proteins, which comprise pathogenesis related (PR) proteins of family 1 (PR-1). Additionally, gene models similar to PR-5/thaumatin superfamily were also detected in the M. perniciosa genome (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). PR proteins are well described as associated with defense reactions in plants against various pathogens [99]. For instance, transgenic plants overexpressing PR-1 proteins were more resistant to oomycete infection [100] and some Thaumatin-like proteins (TLPs) have β-glucanase activity, inhibit xylanase and have antifungal properties [101–103]. Recently, proteins similar to PR-1 and thaumatin have been characterized in animals and fungi [104, 105], indicating a conserved and important role in diverse organisms. Based on CDD-PFAM analysis, M. perniciosa contains the largest number of thaumatins of any fungus sequenced, so far (7 thaumatins, Fig. 5A; Additional File 4).

Both PR-1 and PR-5 are induced by salicylic acid (SA) in plants [99]. Curiously, the M. perniciosa necrotrophic (saprotrophic) mycelia were found to produce and have tolerance to SA in axenic cultures [70]. Plants with WBD have a higher content of SA when compared with healthy plants [106]. M. perniciosa tolerance to SA could be explained by the expression of genes encoding salicylate hydroxylases, which were also detected in the genome (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). In this scenario, high levels of SA could block the synthesis of jasmonic acid (JA), a defense compound against necrotrophic pathogens that acts as a necrosis inducer, thus rendering the plant susceptible to the spread of M. perniciosa [78, 106]. In addition, it is possible that SA and SA-induced proteins (i.e., PR-1, PR-5) may act to limit competition from other microbial competitors during WBD progression, which would be an important component of the M. perniciosa pathogenicity strategy.

Colonization: Plant cell wall degrading enzymes (PCWDE)

Degradation of hemicellulose, cellulose, pectin and depolymerization of lignin are some of the mechanisms that necrotrophic fungi use to colonize plant tissues [107]. We identified genes encoding enzymes involved in degradation of hemicellulose and cellulose, including β-1,4 cellulases, exocellobiohydrolases, endo-beta-1,4-xylanases and endoglucanases; genes encoding lignolytic enzymes including manganese dependent peroxidase and multicopper polyphenoloxidases (laccases); and genes encoding enzymes involved in pectin degradation, such as pectate lyases, polygalacturonases (pectinases) and pectin methylesterases (pectinesterase) (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). M. perniciosa have an arsenal of plant cell wall degrading enzymes that is similar to that found in the hemibiotrophic pathogens F. graminearum and M. grisea (Fig. 5B; Additional File 9). Biotrophic U. maydis and symbiont L. bicolor have a minimal set of PCWDEs what is in accordance with their lifestyle (Fig. 5B; Additional File 9).

Pectate lyases (PL1 and PL3 according to CAZy nomenclature – http://www.cazy.org) cleave pectin, an essential component of plant cell walls. Among the fungi analyzed, F. graminearum and M. perniciosa contain the largest number of PLs (Fig. 5B; Additional File 9). Unlike M. grisea, the other hemibiotrophic analyzed, F. graminearum and M. perniciosa does not have specialized structures (appressoria) for non-enzymatic penetration of plants, and colonizing the apoplast by breaching the middle lamella barrier (Fig. 7). In addition, both are able to infect dicotyledons that contain cell walls with larger amounts of pectin than monocots [108]. This analysis suggests that PLs have an important role for pathogens that colonize the apoplast of dicotyledons.

Figure 7
figure7

An illustrated hypothetical model for WBD. Model correlating classical symptoms of green and dry broom in the field (A, C and E), M. perniciosa development inside cacao (B: biotrophic stage, D: transition from biotrophic to saprotrophic stage, F: saprotrophic stage) and molecular and cellular events displayed by the fungus in each developmental stages, based on genes annotated in genome survey (right side of the panel). Notice in B (right side) the presence of biotrophic mycelia in the apoplast surrounded by intact living cells. Also notice in C the presence of biotrophic mycelia (arrowhead) and saprotrophic mycelia (double arrowhead) inside a necrotic region. Micrographs scales: B left side: 15 μM; B right side: 25 μM; D: 50 μM; F: 50 μM.

Full size image

Insights into M. perniciosa intermediary metabolism and WBD development

Pathogen energy status and the acquisition of host metabolic compounds by the pathogen are factors that determine the outcome of disease onset. Therefore, enzymes of M. perniciosa involved in intermediary metabolism (i.e., reactions concerned with storing and generating metabolic energy) may have an important role during WBD (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). During the first stages of WBD, M. perniciosa may encounter a nutrient-poor and extreme oxidative environment containing host defense molecules, such as nitric oxide (NO), an inhibitor of the cytochrome respiratory pathway [109]. Under these conditions, the activity of a NO tolerant alternative oxidase (AOX) may constitute a critical bypass mechanism for the cytochrome pathway [110–112]. A single copy of AOX was detected in M. perniciosa, and preliminary experiments indicate that this gene has a higher expression in fungi grown in nutrient-poor media (data not shown).

Following this scenario, in the low-energy status represented by the biotrophic phase, AOX may provide NAD+ for the turnover of the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) and the peroxisomal glyoxylate cycle (GLOX). Many reports have documented the importance of GLOX for phytopathogens during host infection [113–115]. All genes coding for proteins of this enzymatic pathway are present in the genomeof M. perniciosa, including the key enzymes isocitrate lyase and malate synthase (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation).

Curiously, M. perniciosa is able to use methanol as the only carbon source (data not shown), indicating that this fungus may have a methylotrophic metabolism. Methylotrophism have been extensively studied in methylotrophic yeasts such as Pichia angusta and recently methanol oxidases (MOX) have been described in filamentous fungi such as C. fulvum [116] and wood-degrading basidiomycete Gloephyllum trabeum [117]. A gene encoding a MOX was identified in M. perniciosa genome (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). Interestingly, this gene was previously detected as being overexpressed in biotrophic-mycelia [20]. The methanol catabolism enzymes formaldehyde dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation) were also found in the genome, which provides evidence that M. perniciosa indeed hydrolyzes methanol. Methanol is, possibly, derived from the first step of pectin hydrolyzation performed by the cell wall degrading enzyme pectin methylesterase [118], or from demethylation of lignin that occurs after manganese peroxidase and/or laccase action [117]. We can not discount the possibility that the biotrophic fungi can use the methanol produced by pectin metabolism during normal cell wall synthesis in early stages of plant expansion [119]. The possibility that M. perniciosa is methylotrophic resembles the methylobacteria nutritional strategy, which provides an ecological advantage over non-methylotrophic microorganisms present in the phyllosphere [120].

Previous data indicated that the utilization of glycerol, instead of fermentable sugars (i.e., glucose), is an important environmental clue for the maintenance of the biotrophic stage [18, 121]. Accordingly, our group detected higher amounts of glycerol during the biotrophic fungal phase of the green brooms development than in dry brooms [13]. Additionally, in vitro assays showed that the shift from glucose to glycerol media increased anti-oxidative defenses of M. perniciosa mycelia [122]. This result correlates well with green broom environment (high content of glycerol and ROS) raising the possibility that glycerol is a critical metabolite during the initial stages of the disease cycle. Genes involved in glycerol metabolism and uptake are present in M. perniciosa, including a biotrophic induced aquaglyceroporin transporter [20] (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation), suggesting that this fungus is able to acquire extracellular glycerol.

After 35 days of WBD, glucose levels increase again, concomitant with a reduction in starch levels [13]. We found a gene model similar to a secreted glucoamylase in the M. perniciosa genome (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). Gibberellin is an inducer of α-amylase production [123]. We can envisage a disease scenario in which the fungus produces an extracellular amylase and hormones (i.e., gibberellin) that triggers plant amylolytic activity, which then decrease starch content. The resulting glucose can be utilized by the plant since at this stage the green brooms/infected tissues are rapidly growing or even be acquired by the pathogen at the transition phase between biotrophic and necrotrophic stages.

Nitrogen starvation also appears to be a factor that influences the biotrophic lifestyle [124] and is associated with the expression of pathogenicity genes and PCWDE, mainly in hemibiotrophic and biotrophic fungi that deal with nutrient deprivation during early infection [125]. Our data from microarray and EST analysis suggests that nitrogen catabolite repression (NCR) occurs in M. perniciosa by the induction of GABA permease, tRNA synthetates and AROM protein [20]. As reported previously [20]M. perniciosa contains a gene homologous to CLNR1 from the hemibiotrophic fungus C. lindemuthianum (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation), a global nitrogen regulator that belongs to the AREA/NIT2 family. CLNR1 activates enzymes and transporters that enable uptake and catabolism of secondary nitrogen sources [126]. The depletion of CLNR1 impaired the fungal switch to necrotrophy [124], emphasizing the importance of nitrogen catabolism in hemibiotrophic development. Our genomic data mining identified a gene similar to NPR2, which encodes a regulatory protein that may act upstream of the AREA/NIT2 protein (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). NPR2 is required for the expression of the M. grisea pathogenicity gene MPG1 [127]. In addition, genes that encode enzymes involved in alternative nitrogen sources uptake (i.e., GABA transporter, urea permease and nitrate transporter) and metabolism (i.e., urease, nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, arginase and uricase) were identified (Additional File 3 – Worksheet Functional Annotation). The presence of such genes in M. perniciosa genome indicates that this fungus could allocate and utilize alternative nitrogen sources in the absence of preferential nitrogen sources (glutamine and ammonia) reinforcing our hypothesis that M. perniciosa suffers NCR during early stages of WBD.

Conclusion

Our analysis of the M. perniciosa genome survey yielded interesting insights and clues into the molecular mechanisms underlying WBD. As far as we know, this is the first phytopathogen included in the order Agaricales sequenced. Therefore, our results support the investigation of pathogenicity mechanisms among Agaricales and Basidiomycete. In addition, we provide an approach for normalization of gene family data in a genome survey that can aid the genomics community interested in functional analysis in incomplete genome data.

Based on annotated fungal genes from this report and from previous other studies, we designed a hypothetical model for WBD that correlates plant phenotype changes that happen during the disease with the developmental progression of M. perniciosa (Fig. 7).

After penetration and adhesion to the plant, the biotrophic fungus slowly grows inside the apoplast causing a series of phenotype changes in cacao, such as hypertrophy and hyperplasia, phototropism and epinasty, by secreting phytohormones that unbalance cacao metabolism (Fig 7A and 7B). In addition, M. perniciosa has to deal with nitrogen deprivation in the apoplast, which signals the production of proteins related to the acquisition of alternative nutrient sources, proteolysis and amino acid synthesis. Furthermore, the fungus takes advantage of the increasing content of glycerol in the green broom, an important cue for biotrophic stage maintenance, by expressing aquaglyceroporins. As previously discussed [13], the starch accumulated in early stages of green brooms seems to be metabolized to glucose, which suggests an amylolytic activity exerted by fungi and/or by plant amylases. This increase of glucose is not accompanied by an increase of fructose, but by a sucrose augmentation. Since photosynthesis is not increased during WBD, we suggest that sucrose is translocated from other tissues to the green brooms. Therefore, we hypothesize that these mechanisms cause a source-to-sink transition in stem, turning green brooms into a drain of nutrients.

After numerous physiological and biochemical changes in the plant, which may be caused by the fungal infection, there occurs a transition from the biotrophic to the saprotrophic lifestyle (Fig. 7C and 7D). This change could result from the increase of nutrients in the fungal environment and may be controlled by an AREA/NIT2-like regulator. During this transition phase, the plant displays the beginning of necrosis at the distal portion of the leaves that could be due to the action of NEPs and cerato-platanins that are expressed in the biotrophic hyphae. In addition, M. perniciosa produces PCWDEs, such as pectinases, whose action aids the fungus in breaching the middle lamella barrier. Pectin degradation releases methanol, which in turn could be used by M. perniciosa as a carbon source, through the action of a MOX and other methanol metabolizing enzymes. Moreover, the calcium released from pectin disruption could be scavenged by the oxalate synthesized by the fungus, a compound that triggers cell death. The release of cell content during necrosis, and the probable aforementioned source-to-sink transition, may influence, or even be indispensable to the M. perniciosa switch from biotrophism to saprotrophism. Thus, the postulated carbon and nitrogen catabolite repression displayed by the biotrophic mycelia would be switched off, thus causing the mycelial change to its invasive dikaryotic/saprotrophic stage.

During disease progression, and mainly during colonization of saprotrophic hyphae, M. perniciosa must deal with an intense oxidative environment. Based on our analysis this stress can be overcome by the action of several anti-oxidative and detoxifying enzymes. Furthermore, we believe that M. perniciosa exerts a negative control on plant defense against necrotrophic/saprotrophic fungi by producing salicylic acid, which would limit competition by other fungi by the action of antifungal proteins. Finally, after alternating wet and dry periods, the formation of the basidiomes produced by saprotrophic hyphae occurs.

Latin American cacao crops suffer tremendous damages caused by WBD, which mainly affects small acreage farmers. Such impact in the relatively primitive cacao cultivation system not only affects the socio-economic status of farmers but also the preservation of the rainforest. The demand for strategies that limit cacao diseases requires an intense effort in understanding the pathogenicity and plant resistance mechanisms. Further sequencing projects of cacao and its pathogens will serve as a background for the integration of transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics of these species in a systems biology approach. Such initiatives will provide tools for biological control, crop management and cacao biotechnology to combat cacao diseases. We believe that our report is the first step towards such an integrative initiative and provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of WBD which can aid the cacao's WBD-concerned community to develop control strategies for this plant-fungus interaction.

Methods

Biological material, libraries construction and sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from saprotrophic hyphae of M. perniciosa strain FA553 (CP02) maintained in Malt Yeast Extract Agar (Difco) at 27°C. DNA was extracted from grounded mycelia by incubation in CTAB buffer (CTAB 3%, NaCl 1.4 M, EDTA 20 mM pH 8.0, Tris-HCl 10 mM pH 8.0, PVP 1.0%, β-mercaptoethanol 0.2%) at 65°C during 30 min; followed by one phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25/24/1) wash, precipitation with sodium acetate pH 5.2 (0.1 Vol) and cold 100% ethanol (2 Vol). DNA was eluted in deionized water and sheared by nebulization and sonication into fragments of approximately 2 Kbp, which were size selected on agarose gels and purified with S.N.A.P. Gel Purification Kit (Invitrogen – Life technologies, USA). DNA fragments were blunt-end ligated into the pCR4Blunt plasmid (Invitrogen – Life technologies, USA). Approximately 50 genomic libraries were constructed, each one corresponding to individually growing cultures. Sequencing was done in an ABI Prism 3700 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA).

Clustering

The resulting chromatograms were submitted to the M. perniciosa database and subjected to automatic base calling using the software PHRED [128]. The contaminating vector sequences and low quality shotgun reads, without at least 100 bp with phred note ≥ 16 were trimmed by using the program LUCY [129]. Shotgun reads showing significant sequence similarity (BLASTn, E-value ≥ 1E-30) with M. perniciosa mitochondrial sequences (see above) were removed from subsequent assemblies. The clustering and assembly were performed using the software PHRAP http://www.phrap.org. Afterwards, low quality regions of singlets previously evaluated by LUCY (the last window of 10 bp that has an average probability of error given by phred ≤ 10) were trimmed. The remaining clusters were subjected to similarity searches against the NCBI non-redundant protein and nucleotide database using the BLASTx and tBLASTx, respectively, with an E-value cutoff of 1E-5.

Genome Length Statistical Validations

Statistical analyses of the genome length were performed using two approaches. The first one was based on the Dog genome survey using counting of start positions offsets for overlapping reads [31] (for further details see Additional File 1). The second was based on Lander Waterman Theory, [34] and their applications [35, 36], which estimate the theoretical values of expected number of clusters (contigs + singlets), contigs, gaps, average cluster size and average gap size, using the effective average read length (L), the total number of reads in the assembly (N) and the estimated genome size (G). L is the average number of base pairs of a read that contributes to the contig through parsing of ace file http://www.phrap.org. In our analysis L was equal to 550 bp. In order to estimate the gap size distribution in the M. perniciosa genome survey, we performed a comparison between a set of eukaryotic core protein (generated by CEGMA pipeline [37]) and M. perniciosa contigs using TBLASTN with threshold of 1e-10 for the E-value (Further details in Additional File 1). The estimation of misassembled sequences due to repetitive regions in the genome was performed using the integrated pipeline amosvalidate [38] (Further details in Additional File 1).

Gene Finding

EST against genome alignments

The alignment of ESTs with genomic sequences was performed using the package GeneSeqer [130] with the pre-built Aspergillus intron model. 300 highly confident introns were selected and used as an input for Exalin program [39] that is able to build a splice site model for an organism. The positions of the splice sites as assigned by Exalin were used to rank overlapping gene predictions (see below).

Ab initio gene models prediction

The ab initio gene models prediction was performed with the trainable, open source gene predictors AUGUSTUS [40], SNAP [41] and GENEZILLA [42]. Ten copies of an artificial sequence of 240 Kbp (total of 2.4 Mbp) formed by the concatenation of the M. perniciosa ESTs coding regions, together with a C. cinerea gene dataset containing 1.2 Mbp were submitted to "pre-training" in AUGUSTUS gene predictor. M. perniciosa resulting predictions were compared with the protein databank NR using BLASTp. The predictions with similarities in NR, and with coverage ≥ 90%, were selected. After redundancy elimination, M. perniciosa gene models were used to train the three gene finders aforementioned. Predictions with less than 30 amino acids were eliminated, and the remaining predictions were grouped in overlapping clusters.

Ab initio gene models ranking

The predictions in each overlapping cluster were ranked according to the criteria used by the Fungal Genome Initiative at Broad institute http://www.broad.mit.edu. In each cluster, the "best" ab initio gene model according to the stipulated criteria was selected for functional annotation. The criteria for the ranking of the gene models were the following:

1. Manual annotation had priority over all other evidences;

2. Predictions with EST evidences had priority over the predictions without EST evidences;

3. If two predictions had EST evidences, the one with more splice sites in exact agreement with ESTs had priority;

4. Prediction with similarities with known proteins had priority. A prediction was considered to be similar to some known protein if it had an E-value of at most 1e-10 (BLASTP against NR+Phanerochaete chrysosporium protein set);

5. If two predictions had similarity with known proteins, the one with better coverage score had priority. The coverage score was defined as 2 × CP × CH/(CP+CH), where CP is the coverage of the prediction and CH is the coverage of the similar protein;

6. In clusters without similarity with known proteins and without EST evidence, the priority was for AUGUSTUS, SNAP and GENEZILLA, in this order. This criterion was chosen according to the performance of the three programs in a dataset of 60 genes structures visually inspected.

A final filter discarded gene predictions reported by only one program, without similarity to known proteins and without EST evidence.

Extrinsic gene models prediction

The extrinsic gene model predictions were performed by two methodologies. First, 17,991 contigs and 7,065 singlets were submitted to similarity analysis in a databank containing BLASTX-NR plus Phanerochaete chrysosporium proteins. The genomic regions containing homologues in this databank were selected and assigned as putative gene models. GenomeThreader [131] program was used to make protein-DNA spliced alignments between the BLAST first hit against and the genomic sequence, serving as a guide to delimit the start and stop codons and exon-intron boundaries of the regions of the contigs containing similarity with GenBank.

Concurrently, M. perniciosa ESTs aligned with genomic clusters (see above) were inspected to verify if the region in which they aligned contained a BLAST extrinsic prediction gene model. These extrinsic gene models (EST and BLAST) were compared with each other to evaluate the amount of gene models predicted by these methods. After these comparisons, the extrinsic gene models were divided into 4 datasets:

(i) ESTMODELS: retrieved from the spliced alignments of the ESTs against the genomic clusters not covered to a BLAST extrinsic gene models prediction. Low score spliced alignments and ESTs that seen clearly to be UTR of a neighboring prediction were not included.

(ii) BLASTMODELS: derived from BLAST extrinsic gene models predictions analysis covering genomic regions without EST evidence.

(iii) COMBINEDMODELS: gene models derived from genomic sequence regions with BLAST hit and EST evidence.

(iv) CURATEDMODELS: extrinsic predictions manually annotated for manual correction of merged or split predictions. The genomic survey and gene models nomenclature are depicted in additional file 10.

tRNA prediction

For tRNA prediction, the tRNAscan-SE program [132] was taken into account with the default parameters, which searched for conserved sequences and the characteristic secondary structure of tRNAs.

MCL-families clustering

MCL graph clustering algorithm was applied to generate M. perniciosa gene families using WU-TBLASTx "all against all" as the tool used for aligning the gene models [43].

Normalization of gene family data

The normalization of gene family data was performed by comparison between C. cinerea proteins and M. perniciosa gene models, using TBLASTN with 1E-10 of E-value threshold. The number of gene models similar to a C. cinerea protein was plotted according to protein length. The equation that estimates the number of gene models representing the same protein was generated using linear regression fitting. This equation was used to estimate a normalization factor to each MCL family and CDD-PFAM domain according to the average of protein length of their members.

Automatic Annotation and Metabolic Maps

The automatic annotation program AutoFACT [47] was used for functional annotation of gene models. The set of coding sequences from gene models were submitted to similarity searches against the UNIREF100, UNIREF90, NR, and KEGG databases using BLASTx (E-value ≤ 1E-5) and against CDD-PFAM using RPS-BLAST (E-value ≤ 1E-5) [48]. These results were submitted to AutoFACT, which searches for a consensus in the results and output descriptions and statistics about protein domains and families.

For an inference of M. perniciosa metabolic maps, we used Pathway Tools (version 11.0), a software of BioCyc databases [49], which generates a metabolic map from a previously annotated genome. The pathways that are probably present in the genome are imported from a reference database, following the Pathway Tools parameters [133]. The annotated genome input was obtained from EST manual annotation and from M. perniciosa gene models AutoFACT annotation, using as main information the product name and, if available, E.C. numbers. Metabolic pathways of interest were manually annotated for the elimination of false positives.

The analysis of transporters was made based on a BLASTX search of M. perniciosa gene models and other fungal genes against TCDB (Transport Classification Database – http://www.tcdb.org), using a threshold of E-value 1E-05. All classes from third level that contained at least one species with 2% or more of representations were separately represented in the results.

Selection and expression confirmation of no hits ab initio gene models

The selection of ab initio gene models was performed using a SQL query wizard. As input, we ask for gene models without similarity in GenBank NR, which encoded proteins that contained at least 2 cysteines and a signal peptide, previously identified by Signal-P 3.0 program [134]. 74 gene models were then selected and their nucleotide sequences were used as template for the design of primers nested in: (i) the sequence encoding the putative signal peptide (SPE); (ii) the sequence encoding the putative first amino acid of mature protein (MAT) and; (iii) the sequence containing the putative stop codon (END). The latter was designed in reverse complement ("reverse") to allow gene amplification using the other two primers ("forward"). RT-PCR analysis was performed to validate the expression of ab initio predicted gene models. RNA from saprotrophic mycelia was extracted using hot-phenol method with modifications [135]. Equal amounts of total RNA from CP02 saprotrophic mycelia cultures (24 h, 48 h, 4 days and 7 days) were mixed. After DNase (Invitrogen, USA) treatment, 2 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript RTII (Invitrogen, USA) in a total volume of 20 μL, following the manufacturer's instructions. PCR reactions were conducted according to primers (MWG, Imprint Genetics Corp) temperature of melting (TMs).

Abbreviations

ABC:

ATP Binding Cassette

AOX:

Alternative oxidase

bp:

base pairs

COC:

calcium oxalate crystals

CTAB:

Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

EST:

xpressed Sequence Tag

FPR:

Frosty Pod Rot

GA:

Gibberellin

GABA:

Gamma-aminobutyric acid

GGPP:

Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate

IAA:

indole-3-acetic acid

JA:

Jasmonic acid

Kbp:

One thousand base pairs

LW:

Lander Waterman

Mbp:

One million base pairs

MOX:

Methanol oxidase

NAD(P):

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

NCR:

nitrogen catabolite repression

NEP:

Necrosis and ethylene-inducing proteins

NO:

Nitric oxide

PCD:

Programmed cell death

PCWDE:

Plant cell wall degrading enzymes

PVP:

Poly(vinylpyrrolidone)

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

RT-PCR:

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction

SA:

Salicylic acid

PCR:

Polymerase Chain Reaction

PR:

Pathogenesis related protein

TCA:

Tricarboxylic acid cycle

TE:

Transposable Elements

TM:

temperature of melting

tRNA:

transfer RNA

UTR:

untranslated region

WBD:

Witches' Broom Disease

References

  1. 1.

    Purdy LH, Schmidt RA: Status of cacao witches' broom: Biology, epidemiology, and management. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1996, 34: 573-594. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.573.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Aime MC, Phillips-Mora W: The causal agents of witches' broom and frosty pod rot of cacao (chocolate, Theobroma cacao) form a new lineage of Marasmiaceae. Mycologia. 2005, 97 (5): 1012-1022. 10.3852/mycologia.97.5.1012.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Griffith GW, Nicholson J, Nenninger A, Birch RN, Hedger JN: Witches' brooms and frosty pods: two major pathogens of cacao. New Zeal J Bot. 2003, 41 (3): 423-435.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Evans HC: Cacao diseases – The trilogy revisited. Phytopathology. 2007, 97 (12): 1640-1643. 10.1094/PHYTO-97-12-1640.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pereira JL, Ram A, Figuereido JM, de Almeida LC: La primera aparición de la "escoba de bruja" en la principal área productora de cacao del Brasil. Turrialba. 1989, 39 (7): 459-461.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pereira JL, deAlmeida LCC, Santos SM: Witches' broom disease of cocoa in Bahia: Attempts at eradication and containment. Crop Protection. 1996, 15 (8): 743-752. 10.1016/S0261-2194(96)00049-X.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Evans HC: Pleomorphism in Crinipellis perniciosa, Causal Agent of Witches Broom Disease of Cocoa. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1980, 74 (Jun): 515-523.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Griffith GW, Hedger JN: Dual culture of Crinipellis perniciosa and potato callus. Eur J Plant Pathol. 1994, 100 (6): 371-379. 10.1007/BF01874805.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Delgado JC, Cook AA: Nuclear condition of basidia, basidiospores, and mycelium of Marasmius perniciosus. Can J Bot. 1976, 54 (1–2): 66-72. 10.1139/b76-009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rincones J, Meinhardt LW, Vidal BC, Pereira GA: Electrophoretic karyotype analysis of Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal agent of witches' broom disease of Theobroma cacao. Mycol Res. 2003, 107 (Pt 4): 452-458. 10.1017/S0953756203007597.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rincones J, Mazotti GD, Griffith GW, Pomela A, Figueira A, Leal GA, Queiroz MV, Pereira JF, Azevedo RA, Pereira GA, Meinhardt LW: Genetic variability and chromosome-length polymorphisms of the witches' broom pathogen Crinipellis perniciosa from various plant hosts in South America. Mycol Res. 2006, 110 (Pt 7): 821-832. 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.05.002.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Formighieri EF, Tiburcio RA, Armas ED, Medrano FJ, Shimo H, Carels N, Góes-Neto A, Cotomacci C, Carazzolle MF, Sardinha-Pinto N, Rincones J, Digiampietri L, Carraro DM, Azeredo-Espin AM, Reis SF, Deckmann AC, Gramacho K, Gonçalves MS, Moura Neto JP, Barbosa LV, Meinhardt LW, Cascardo JCM, Pereira GAG: The mitochondrial genome of the phytopathogenic basidiomycete Moniliophthora perniciosa is 109 kb in size and contains a stable integrated plasmid. Mycol Res. 2008, 112: 1136-1152. 10.1016/j.mycres.2008.04.014.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Scarpari LM, Meinhardt LW, Mazzafera P, Pomella AW, Schiavinato MA, Cascardo JC, Pereira GA: Biochemical changes during the development of witches' broom: the most important disease of cocoa in Brazil caused by Crinipellis perniciosa. J Exp Bot. 2005, 56 (413): 865-877. 10.1093/jxb/eri079.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gesteira Ada S, Micheli F, Ferreira CF, Cascardo JC: Isolation and purification of functional total RNA from different organs of cacao tree during its interaction with the pathogen Crinipellis perniciosa. Biotechniques. 2003, 35 (3): 494-496. 498–500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Pirovani CP, Carvalho HA, Machado RC, Gomes DS, Alvim FC, Pomella AW, Gramacho KP, Cascardo JC, Pereira GA, Micheli F: Protein extraction for proteome analysis from cacao leaves and meristems, organs infected by Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of the witches' broom disease. Electrophoresis. 2008, 29 (11): 2391-2401. 10.1002/elps.200700743.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lima JO, dos Santos JK, Pereira JF, de Resende ML, de Araujo EF, de Queiroz MV: Development of a transformation system for Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal agent of witches' broom in cocoa plants. Curr Genet. 2003, 42 (4): 236-240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Filho DF, Pungartnik C, Cascardo JC, Brendel M: Broken hyphae of the basidiomycete Crinipellis perniciosa allow quantitative assay of toxicity. Curr Microbiol. 2006, 52 (5): 407-412. 10.1007/s00284-005-0405-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Meinhardt LW, Bellato CM, Rincones J, Azevedo RA, Cascardo JC, Pereira GA: In vitro production of biotrophic-like cultures of Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal agent of witches' broom disease of Theobroma cacao. Curr Microbiol. 2006, 52 (3): 191-196. 10.1007/s00284-005-0182-z.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Garcia O, Macedo JA, Tiburcio R, Zaparoli G, Rincones J, Bittencourt LM, Ceita GO, Micheli F, Gesteira A, Mariano AC, Schiavinato MA, Medrano FJ, Meinhardt LW, Pereira GA, Cascardo JC: Characterization of necrosis and ethylene-inducing proteins (NEP) in the basidiomycete Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of witches' broom in Theobroma cacao. Mycol Res. 2007, 111 (Pt 4): 443-455. 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.01.017.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rincones J, Scarpari LM, Carazzolle MF, Mondego JMC, Formighieri EF, Barau JG, Costa GGL, Carraro DM, Brentani HP, Vilas-Boas LA, Oliveira BV, Sabha M, Dias R, Cascardo JM, Azevedo RA, Meinhardt LW, Pereira GAG: Differential gene expression between the biotrophic-like and saprotrophic mycelia of the Witches' broom pathogen Moniliophthora perniciosa. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21 (7): 891-908. 10.1094/MPMI-21-7-0891.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gesteira AS, Micheli F, Carels N, Da Silva AC, Gramacho KP, Schuster I, Macedo JN, Pereira GA, Cascardo JC: Comparative Analysis of Expressed Genes from Cacao Meristems Infected by Moniliophthora perniciosa. Ann Bot (Lond). 2007, 100 (1): 129-140. 10.1093/aob/mcm092.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Leal GA, Albuquerque PSB, Figueira A: Genes differentially expressed in Theobroma cacao associated with resistance to witches' broom disease caused by Crinipellis perniciosa. Mol Plant Pathol. 2007, 8 (3): 279-292. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00393.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Munch S, Lingner U, Floss DS, Ludwig N, Sauer N, Deising HB: The hemibiotrophic lifestyle of Colletotrichum species. J Plant Physiol. 2008, 165 (1): 41-51. 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.06.008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Meinhardt LW, Rincones J, Bailey BA, Aime MC, Griffith GW, Zhang D, Pereira GA: Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of witches' broom disease of cacao: what's new from this old foe?. Mol Plant Pathol. 2008, 9 (5): 577-588. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00496.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, Matheny PB, Hofstetter V, Cox CJ, Celio G, Gueidan C, Fraker E, Miadlikowska J, Lumbsch HT, Rauhut A, Reeb V, Arnold AE, Amtoft A, Stajich JE, Hosaka K, Sung GH, Johnson D, O'Rourke B, Crockett M, Binder M, Curtis JM, Slot JC, Wang Z, Wilson AW, Schussler A, Longcore JE, O'Donnell K, Mozley-Standridge S, Porter D, Letcher PM, Powell MJ, Taylor JW, White MM, Griffith GW, Davies DR, Humber RA, Morton JB, Sugiyama J, Rossman AY, Rogers JD, Pfister DH, Hewitt D, Hansen K, Hambleton S, Shoemaker RA, Kohlmeyer J, Volkmann-Kohlmeyer B, Spotts RA, Serdani M, Crous PW, Hughes KW, Matsuura K, Langer E, Langer G, Untereiner WA, Lucking R, Budel B, Geiser DM, Aptroot A, Diederich P, Schmitt I, Schultz M, Yahr R, Hibbett DS, Lutzoni F, McLaughlin DJ, Spatafora JW, Vilgalys R: Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature. 2006, 443 (7113): 818-822. 10.1038/nature05110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bouck J, Miller W, Gorrell JH, Muzny D, Gibbs RA: Analysis of the quality and utility of random shotgun sequencing at low redundancies. Genome Res. 1998, 8 (10): 1074-1084.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Branscomb E, Predki P: On the high value of low standards. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184 (23): 6406-6409. 10.1128/JB.184.23.6406-6409.2002. discussion 6409

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fraser CM, Eisen JA, Nelson KE, Paulsen IT, Salzberg SL: The value of complete microbial genome sequencing (you get what you pay for). J Bacteriol. 2002, 184 (23): 6403-6405. 10.1128/JB.184.23.6403-6405.2002. discusion 6405

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gardner SN, Lam MW, Smith JR, Torres CL, Slezak TR: Draft versus finished sequence data for DNA and protein diagnostic signature development. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (18): 5838-5850. 10.1093/nar/gki896.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Taudien S, Ebersberger I, Glockner G, Platzer M: Should the draft chimpanzee sequence be finished?. Trends Genet. 2006, 22 (3): 122-125. 10.1016/j.tig.2005.12.007.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kirkness EF, Bafna V, Halpern AL, Levy S, Remington K, Rusch DB, Delcher AL, Pop M, Wang W, Fraser CM, Venter JC: The dog genome: survey sequencing and comparative analysis. Science. 2003, 301 (5641): 1898-1903. 10.1126/science.1086432.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Green P: 2× genomes-does depth matter?. Genome Res. 2007, 17 (11): 1547-1549. 10.1101/gr.7050807.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Woolfit M, Rozpedowska E, Piskur J, Wolfe KH: Genome survey sequencing of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera (Brettanomyces) bruxellensis. Eukaryot Cell. 2007, 6 (4): 721-733. 10.1128/EC.00338-06.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lander ES, Waterman MS: Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: a mathematical analysis. Genomics. 1988, 2 (3): 231-239. 10.1016/0888-7543(88)90007-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wendl MC, Waterston RH: Generalized gap model for bacterial artificial chromosome clone fingerprint mapping and shotgun sequencing. Genome Res. 2002, 12 (12): 1943-1949. 10.1101/gr.655102.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wendl MC, Yang SP: Gap statistics for whole genome shotgun DNA sequencing projects. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20 (10): 1527-1534. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth120.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Parra G, Bradnam K, Korf I: CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (9): 1061-1067. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm071.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Phillippy AM, Schatz MC, Pop M: Genome assembly forensics: finding the elusive mis-assembly. Genome Biol. 2008, 9 (3): R55-10.1186/gb-2008-9-3-r55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhang M, Gish W: Improved spliced alignment from an information theoretic approach. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22 (1): 13-20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti748.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Stanke M, Steinkamp R, Waack S, Morgenstern B: AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, W309-312. 10.1093/nar/gkh379. 32 Web Server

  41. 41.

    Korf I: Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 59-10.1186/1471-2105-5-59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Allen JE, Majoros WH, Pertea M, Salzberg SL: JIGSAW, GeneZilla, and GlimmerHMM: puzzling out the features of human genes in the ENCODE regions. Genome Biol. 2006, 7 (Suppl 1): S9 1-13. 10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Enright AJ, van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA: An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (7): 1575-1584. 10.1093/nar/30.7.1575.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Enright AJ, Kunin V, Ouzounis CA: Protein families and TRIBES in genome sequence space. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (15): 4632-4638. 10.1093/nar/gkg495.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tekaia F, Latge JP: Aspergillus fumigatus: saprophyte or pathogen?. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005, 8 (4): 385-392. 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.017.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kupfer DM, Reece CA, Clifton SW, Roe BA, Prade RA: Multicellular ascomycetous fungal genomes contain more than 8000 genes. Fungal Genet Biol. 1997, 21 (3): 364-372. 10.1006/fgbi.1997.0982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Koski LB, Gray MW, Lang BF, Burger G: AutoFACT: an automatic functional annotation and classification tool. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005, 6: 151-10.1186/1471-2105-6-151.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hao LN, He SQ, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke ZX, Krylov D, Lanczycki CJ, Liebert CA, Liu CL, Lu F, Lu SN, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Yin JJ, Zhang DC, Bryant SH: CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: D237-D240. 10.1093/nar/gkl951.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Karp PD, Ouzounis CA, Moore-Kochlacs C, Goldovsky L, Kaipa P, Ahren D, Tsoka S, Darzentas N, Kunin V, Lopez-Bigas N: Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (19): 6083-6089. 10.1093/nar/gki892.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gonzalez FJ, Nebert DW: Evolution of the P450 gene superfamily: animal-plant 'warfare', molecular drive and human genetic differences in drug oxidation. Trends Genet. 1990, 6 (6): 182-186. 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90174-5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Saier MH, Tran CV, Barabote RD: TCDB: the Transporter Classification Database for membrane transport protein analyses and information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, D181-186. 10.1093/nar/gkj001. 34 Database

  52. 52.

    Stergiopoulos I, Zwiers LH, De Waard MA: The ABC transporter MgAtr4 is a virulence factor of Mycosphaerella graminicola that affects colonization of substomatal cavities in wheat leaves. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003, 16 (8): 689-698. 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.8.689.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Rogers B, Decottignies A, Kolaczkowski M, Carvajal E, Balzi E, Goffeau A: The pleitropic drug ABC transporters from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001, 3 (2): 207-214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Benito B, Garciadeblas B, Rodriguez-Navarro A: Potassium- or sodium-efflux ATPase, a key enzyme in the evolution of fungi. Microbiology. 2002, 148 (Pt 4): 933-941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Apel K, Hirt H: Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004, 55: 373-399. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Able AJ: Role of reactive oxygen species in the response of barley to necrotrophic pathogens. Protoplasma. 2003, 221 (1–2): 137-143. 10.1007/s00709-002-0064-1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Govrin EM, Levine A: The hypersensitive response facilitates plant infection by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Curr Biol. 2000, 10 (13): 751-757. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00560-1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Rio MCS, Oliveira BV, Thomazella DP, Fracassi da Silva JA, Pereira GAG: Production of calcium oxalate crystals by the basidiomycete Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of the Witches' Broom Disease of cacao. Curr Microbiol. 2008, 56 (4): 363-370. 10.1007/s00284-007-9091-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ceita GO, Macêdo JNA, Santos TB, Alemanno L, Gesteira AS, Micheli F, Mariano AC, Gramacho KP, Silva DC, Meinhardt LW, Mazzafera P, Pereira GAG, Cascardo JM: Involvement of calcium oxalate degradation during programmed cell death in Theobroma cacao tissues triggered by the hemibiotrophic fungus Moniliophthora perniciosa. Plant Sci. 2007, 173 (2): 106-117. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.04.006.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Garcia-Brugger A, Lamotte O, Vandelle E, Bourque S, Lecourieux D, Poinssot B, Wendehenne D, Pugin A: Early signaling events induced by elicitors of plant defenses. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19 (7): 711-724. 10.1094/MPMI-19-0711.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kim KS, Min JY, Dickman MB: Oxalic Acid Is an Elicitor of Plant Programmed Cell Death during Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Disease Development. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21 (5): 605-612. 10.1094/MPMI-21-5-0605.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bolker M: Ustilago maydis-a valuable model system for the study of fungal dimorphism and virulence. Microbiology. 2001, 147 (Pt 6): 1395-1401.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    de Arruda MCCMR, Ferreira MASV, Felipe MSS: Comparison of Crinipellis perniciosa isolates from Brazil by ERIC repetitive element sequence-based PCR genomic fingerprinting. Plant Pathology. 2003, 52 (2): 236-244. 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00819.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Andebrhan T, Figueira A, Yamada MM, Cascardo J, Furtek DB: Molecular fingerprinting suggests two primary outbreaks of witches' broom disease (Crinipellis perniciosa) of Theobroma cacao in Bahia, Brazil. Eur J Plant Pathol. 1999, 105 (2): 167-175. 10.1023/A:1008716000479.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Bartley BGD: Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.). Breeding for Durable Resistance in Perennial Crops. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper. 1986, 70: 25-42.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Larrondo LF, Canessa P, Vicuna R, Stewart P, Wymelenberg Vanden A, Cullen D: Structure and transcriptional impact of divergent repetitive elements inserted within Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain RP-78 genes. Mol Genet Genomics. 2007, 277 (1): 43-55. 10.1007/s00438-006-0167-z.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Poulter RT, Goodwin TJ: DIRS-1 and the other tyrosine recombinase retrotransposons. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005, 110 (1–4): 575-588. 10.1159/000084991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    DeMarco R, Venancio TM, Verjovski-Almeida S: SmTRC1, a novel Schistosoma mansoni DNA transposon, discloses new families of animal and fungi transposons belonging to the CACTA superfamily. BMC Evol Biol. 2006, 6: 89-10.1186/1471-2148-6-89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Rep M, Does van der HC, Cornelissen BJ: Drifter, a novel, low copy hATlike transposon in Fusarium oxysporum is activated during starvation. Fungal Genet Biol. 2005, 42 (6): 546-553. 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.03.007.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Kempken F, Kuck U: restless, an active Ac-like transposon from the fungus Tolypocladium inflatum: structure, expression, and alternative RNA splicing. Mol Cell Biol. 1996, 16 (11): 6563-6572.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Monroy F, Sheppard DC: Taf1: a class II transposon of Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet Biol. 2005, 42 (7): 638-645. 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.04.003.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Zhang X, Feschotte C, Zhang Q, Jiang N, Eggleston WB, Wessler SR: P instability factor: an active maize transposon system associated with the amplification of Tourist-like MITEs and a new superfamily of transposases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (22): 12572-12577. 10.1073/pnas.211442198.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Robert-Seilaniantz A, Navarro L, Bari R, Jones JD: Pathological hormone imbalances. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007, 10 (4): 372-379. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.06.003.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sun S-K, Snyder WC: The bakanae disease of the rice plant. Fusarium: diseases, biology and taxonomy. Edited by: Nelson TAT PE, Cook RJ. 1981, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 104-113.

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Rademacher W, Graebe JE: Gibberellin A4 produced by Sphaceloma manihoticola, the cause of the superelongation disease of cassava (Manihot esculenta). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1979, 91 (1): 35-40. 10.1016/0006-291X(79)90579-5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Tudzynski B, Kawaide H, Kamiya Y: Gibberellin biosynthesis in Gibberella fujikuroi: cloning and characterization of the copalyl diphosphate synthase gene. Curr Genet. 1998, 34 (3): 234-240. 10.1007/s002940050392.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Bastos CN, Andebrhan T: Presença de giberelina em basidiosporos de Crinipelis perniciosa (Stahel) Singer. Fitopatologia Brasileira. 1981, 6: 417-423.

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Kilaru A, Bailey BA, Hasenstein KH: Moniliophthora perniciosa produces hormones and alters endogenous auxin and salicylic acid in infected cocoa leaves. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007, 274 (2): 238-244. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00837.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Wolf FT: The Production of Indole Acetic Acid by Ustilago-Zeae, and Its Possible Significance in Tumor Formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1952, 38 (2): 106-111. 10.1073/pnas.38.2.106.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Maor R, Haskin S, Levi-Kedmi H, Sharon A: In planta production of indole-3-acetic acid by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70 (3): 1852-1854. 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1852-1854.2004.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Perley JE, Stowe BB: On the ability of Taphrina deformans to produce indoleacetic acid from tryptophan by way of tryptamine. Plant Physiol. 1966, 41 (2): 234-237. 10.1104/pp.41.2.234.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Prusty R, Grisafi P, Fink GR: The plant hormone indoleacetic acid induces invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (12): 4153-4157. 10.1073/pnas.0400659101.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Ross JJ, O'Neill DP, Smith JJ, Kerckhoffs LH, Elliott RC: Evidence that auxin promotes gibberellin A1 biosynthesis in pea. Plant J. 2000, 21 (6): 547-552. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00702.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Pierik R, Tholen D, Poorter H, Visser EJ, Voesenek LA: The Janus face of ethylene: growth inhibition and stimulation. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11 (4): 176-183. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.006.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Swarup R, Parry G, Graham N, Allen T, Bennett M: Auxin cross-talk: integration of signalling pathways to control plant development. Plant Mol Biol. 2002, 49 (3–4): 411-426.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Steffens B, Sauter M: Epidermal cell death in rice is regulated by ethylene, gibberellin, and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139 (2): 713-721. 10.1104/pp.105.064469.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Pierik R, Cuppens ML, Voesenek LA, Visser EJ: Interactions between ethylene and gibberellins in phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136 (2): 2928-2936. 10.1104/pp.104.045120.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Maor R, Shirasu K: The arms race continues: battle strategies between plants and fungal pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005, 8 (4): 399-404. 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.008.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Dodds PN, Lawrence GJ, Catanzariti AM, Ayliffe MA, Ellis JG: The Melampsora lini AvrL567 avirulence genes are expressed in haustoria and their products are recognized inside plant cells. Plant Cell. 2004, 16 (3): 755-768. 10.1105/tpc.020040.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Kemen E, Kemen AC, Rafiqi M, Hempel U, Mendgen K, Hahn M, Voegele RT: Identification of a protein from rust fungi transferred from haustoria into infected plant cells. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2005, 18 (11): 1130-1139. 10.1094/MPMI-18-1130.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Rooney HC, Van't Klooster JW, Hoorn van der RA, Joosten MH, Jones JD, de Wit PJ: Cladosporium Avr2 inhibits tomato Rcr3 protease required for Cf-2-dependent disease resistance. Science. 2005, 308 (5729): 1783-1786. 10.1126/science.1111404.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Kamper J, Kahmann R, Bolker M, Ma LJ, Brefort T, Saville BJ, Banuett F, Kronstad JW, Gold SE, Muller O, Perlin MH, Wosten HA, de Vries R, Ruiz-Herrera J, Reynaga-Pena CG, Snetselaar K, McCann M, Perez-Martin J, Feldbrugge M, Basse CW, Steinberg G, Ibeas JI, Holloman W, Guzman P, Farman M, Stajich JE, Sentandreu R, Gonzalez-Prieto JM, Kennell JC, Molina L, Schirawski J, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Greilinger D, Munch K, Rossel N, Scherer M, Vranes M, Ladendorf O, Vincon V, Fuchs U, Sandrock B, Meng S, Ho EC, Cahill MJ, Boyce KJ, Klose J, Klosterman SJ, Deelstra HJ, Ortiz-Castellanos L, Li W, Sanchez-Alonso P, Schreier PH, Hauser-Hahn I, Vaupel M, Koopmann E, Friedrich G, Voss H, Schluter T, Margolis J, Platt D, Swimmer C, Gnirke A, Chen F, Vysotskaia V, Mannhaupt G, Guldener U, Munsterkotter M, Haase D, Oesterheld M, Mewes HW, Mauceli EW, DeCaprio D, Wade CM, Butler J, Young S, Jaffe DB, Calvo S, Nusbaum C, Galagan J, Birren BW: Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Nature. 2006, 444 (7115): 97-101. 10.1038/nature05248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Rep M: Small proteins of plant-pathogenic fungi secreted during host colonization. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005, 253 (1): 19-27. 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.014.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Zaparoli G, Garcia O, Medrano FJ, Tiburcio R, Costa GL, Pereira GAG: Identification of a second family of genes in Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of Witches' Broom disease in cacao, encoding necrosis inducing proteins similar to cerato platanins. Mycol Res. 2008

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Nonaka T, Dohmae N, Hashimoto Y, Takio K: Amino acid sequences of metalloendopeptidases specific for acyl-lysine bonds from Grifola frondosa and Pleurotus ostreatus fruiting bodies. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (48): 30032-30039. 10.1074/jbc.272.48.30032.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Sepcic K, Berne S, Potrich C, Turk T, Macek P, Menestrina G: Interaction of ostreolysin, a cytolytic protein from the edible mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus, with lipid membranes and modulation by lysophospholipids. Eur J Biochem. 2003, 270 (6): 1199-1210. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03480.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Wymelenberg Vanden A, Minges P, Sabat G, Martinez D, Rajangam AS, Teeri TT, Gaskell J, Kersten PJ, Cullen D: The Phanerochaete chrysosporium secretome: database predictions and initial mass spectrometry peptide identifications in cellulose-grown medium. J Biotechnol. 2005, 118 (1): 17-34. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.03.010.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Garcia-Conesa MT, Kroon PA, Ralph J, Mellon FA, Colquhoun IJ, Saulnier L, Thibault JF, Williamson G: A cinnamoyl esterase from Aspergillus niger can break plant cell wall cross-links without release of free diferulic acids. Eur J Biochem. 1999, 266 (2): 644-652. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00910.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CM: Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006, 44: 135-162. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Broekaert WF, Terras FRG, BPA C: Induced and preformed antimicrobial proteins. Mechanisms of Resistance to Plant Diseases. Edited by: Slusarenko AJFR, Van Loon LC. 2000, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 371-477.

    Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Hu X, Reddy AS: Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA clone encoding a thaumatin-like protein from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1995, 107 (1): 305-306. 10.1104/pp.107.1.305.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Punja Z: Transgenic carrots expressing a thaumatin-like protein display enhanced resistance to several fungal pathogens. Can J Plant Pathol. 2005, 27: 291-296.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Fierens E, Rombouts S, Gebruers K, Goesaert H, Brijs K, Beaugrand J, Volckaert G, van Campenhout S, Proost P, Courtin CM, Delcour JA: TLXI, a novel type of xylanase inhibitor from wheat (Triticum aestivum) belonging to the thaumatin family. Biochem J. 2007, 403 (3): 583-591. 10.1042/BJ20061291.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Miosga T, Schaaff-Gerstenschlager I, Chalwatzis N, Baur A, Boles E, Fournier C, Schmitt S, Velten C, Wilhelm N, Zimmermann FK: Sequence analysis of a 33.1 kb fragment from the left arm of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome X, including putative proteins with leucine zippers, a fungal Zn(II)2-Cys6 binuclear cluster domain and a putative alpha 2-SCB-alpha 2 binding site. Yeast. 1995, 11 (7): 681-689. 10.1002/yea.320110709.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Sakamoto Y, Watanabe H, Nagai M, Nakade K, Takahashi M, Sato T: Lentinula edodes tlg1 encodes a thaumatin-like protein that is involved in lentinan degradation and fruiting body senescence. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141 (2): 793-801. 10.1104/pp.106.076679.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Chaves FC, Gianfagna TJ: Necrotrophic phase of Monihophthora perniciosa causes salicylic acid accumulation in infected stems of cacao. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2006, 69 (1–3): 104-108. 10.1016/j.pmpp.2007.02.003.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Aro N, Pakula T, Penttila M: Transcriptional regulation of plant cell wall degradation by filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005, 29 (4): 719-739. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.006.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Cuomo CA, Guldener U, Xu JR, Trail F, Turgeon BG, Di Pietro A, Walton JD, Ma LJ, Baker SE, Rep M, Adam G, Antoniw J, Baldwin T, Calvo S, Chang YL, Decaprio D, Gale LR, Gnerre S, Goswami RS, Hammond-Kosack K, Harris LJ, Hilburn K, Kennell JC, Kroken S, Magnuson JK, Mannhaupt G, Mauceli E, Mewes HW, Mitterbauer R, Muehlbauer G, Munsterkotter M, Nelson D, O'Donnell K, Ouellet T, Qi W, Quesneville H, Roncero MI, Seong KY, Tetko IV, Urban M, Waalwijk C, Ward TJ, Yao J, Birren BW, Kistler HC: The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localized polymorphism and pathogen specialization. Science. 2007, 317 (5843): 1400-1402. 10.1126/science.1143708.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Millar AH, Day DA: Nitric oxide inhibits the cytochrome oxidase but not the alternative oxidase of plant mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 1996, 398 (2–3): 155-158. 10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01230-6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Juarez O, Guerra G, Martinez F, Pardo JP: The mitochondrial respiratory chain of Ustilago maydis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004, 1658 (3): 244-251. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.06.005.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Juarez O, Guerra G, Velazquez I, Flores-Herrera O, Rivera-Perez RE, Pardo JP: The physiologic role of alternative oxidase in Ustilago maydis. Febs J. 2006, 273 (20): 4603-4615. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05463.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Joseph-Horne T, Hollomon DW, Wood PM: Fungal respiration: a fusion of standard and alternative components. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001, 1504 (2–3): 179-195.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Idnurm A, Howlett BJ: Isocitrate lyase is essential for pathogenicity of the fungus Leptosphaeria maculans to canola (Brassica napus). Eukaryot Cell. 2002, 1 (5): 719-724. 10.1128/EC.1.5.719-724.2002.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Sakai S, Nishide T, Munir E, Baba K, Inui H, Nakano Y, Hattori T, Shimada M: Subcellular localization of glyoxylate cycle key enzymes involved in oxalate biosynthesis of wood-destroying basidiomycete Fomitopsis palustris grown on glucose. Microbiology. 2006, 152 (Pt 6): 1857-1866. 10.1099/mic.0.28702-0.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Wang ZY, Thornton CR, Kershaw MJ, Debao L, Talbot NJ: The glyoxylate cycle is required for temporal regulation of virulence by the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 47 (6): 1601-1612. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03412.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Segers G, Bradshaw N, Archer D, Blissett K, Oliver RP: Alcohol oxidase is a novel pathogenicity factor for Cladosporium fulvum, but aldehyde dehydrogenase is dispensable. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001, 14 (3): 367-377. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.3.367.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Daniel G, Volc J, Filonova L, Plihal O, Kubatova E, Halada P: Characteristics of Gloeophyllum trabeum Alcohol Oxidase, an Extracellular Source of H2O2 in Brown Rot Decay of Wood. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73 (19): 6241-6253. 10.1128/AEM.00977-07.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Nakagawa T, Miyaji T, Yurimoto H, Sakai Y, Kato N, Tomizuka N: A methylotrophic pathway participates in pectin utilization by Candida boidinii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000, 66 (10): 4253-4257. 10.1128/AEM.66.10.4253-4257.2000.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Fall R, Benson AA: Leaf methanol – The simplest natural product from plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1 (9): 296-301.

    Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Abanda-Nkpwatt D, Musch M, Tschiersch J, Boettner M, Schwab W: Molecular interaction between Methylobacterium extorquens and seedlings: growth promotion, methanol consumption, and localization of the methanol emission site. J Exp Bot. 2006, 57 (15): 4025-4032. 10.1093/jxb/erl173.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Wei Y, Shen W, Dauk M, Wang F, Selvaraj G, Zou J: Targeted gene disruption of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides reveals evidence that glycerol is a significant transferred nutrient from host plant to fungal pathogen. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (1): 429-435. 10.1074/jbc.M308363200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Santos RX, Melo SC, Cascardo JC, Brendel M, Pungartnik C: Carbon source-dependent variation of acquired mutagen resistance of Moniliophthora perniciosa: Similarities in natural and artificial systems. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008

    Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Nakayama A, Park S, Zheng-Jun X, Nakajima M, Yamaguchi I: Immunohistochemistry of active gibberellins and gibberellin-inducible alpha-amylase in developing seeds of morning glory. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129 (3): 1045-1053. 10.1104/pp.010921.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Pellier AL, Lauge R, Veneault-Fourrey C, Langin T: CLNR1, the AREA/NIT2-like global nitrogen regulator of the plant fungal pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum is required for the infection cycle. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 48 (3): 639-655. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03451.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Divon HH, Fluhr R: Nutrition acquisition strategies during fungal infection of plants. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007, 266 (1): 65-74. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00504.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Marzluf GA: Genetic regulation of nitrogen metabolism in the fungi. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997, 61 (1): 17-32.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Lau G, Hamer JE: Regulatory genes controlling MPG1 expression and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell. 1996, 8 (5): 771-781. 10.1105/tpc.8.5.771.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998, 8 (3): 175-185.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Chou HH, Holmes MH: DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17 (12): 1093-1104. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1093.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Usuka J, Zhu W, Brendel V: Optimal spliced alignment of homologous cDNA to a genomic DNA template. Bioinformatics. 2000, 16 (3): 203-211. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.3.203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Gremme G, Brendel V, Sparks ME, Kurtz S: Engineering a software tool for gene structure prediction in higher organisms. Inform Software Technol. 2005, 47 (15): 965-978. 10.1016/j.infsof.2005.09.005.

    Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Lowe TM, Eddy SR: tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (5): 955-964. 10.1093/nar/25.5.955.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Karp PD, Paley S, Romero P: The Pathway Tools software. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18 (Suppl 1): S225-232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Nielsen H, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S, von Heijne G: Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 1997, 10 (1): 1-6. 10.1093/protein/10.1.1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Collart MA, Oliviero S: Preparation of yeast RNA by extraction with hot acidic phenol. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Edited by: Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Hoboken KS. 2006, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank CENAPAD-SP (Centro Nacional de Processamento de Alto Desempenho de São Paulo) for data processing support, all sequencing technician for excellent technical assistance, especially Robson Dias (UESC – Brazil), Sulamita Freitas Franco (UNICAMP – Brazil) and Vitor Hugo de Almeida e Silva (UNICAMP – Brazil), and Dr. Francisco Javier Medrano for review and commentaries about the article. We are indebted to CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Projects 68.0032/2001-0 and 42.2279/2006-8), SEAGRI (Secretaria de Agricultura, Irrigação e Reforma Agrária do Estado da Bahia), CARGILL/FUNCAMP/UNICAMP convenium (number C. 3007), FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) and CAPES (Coordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for financial support.

Author information

Author notes

    Affiliations

    1. Laboratório de Genômica e Expressão, Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, CP 6109, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil

      Jorge MC Mondego, Marcelo F Carazzolle, Gustavo GL Costa, Eduardo F Formighieri, Lucas P Parizzi, Johana Rincones, Carolina Cotomacci, Ramon O Vidal, Raíssa C Estrela, Odalys García, Daniela PT Thomazella, Bruno V de Oliveira, Maria Carolina S Rio, Marcos Renato R Araújo, Marcos H de Moraes & Gonçalo AG Pereira

    2. Laboratório de Genômica e Biologia Molecular, Hospital A.C. Camargo, 01509-010, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

      Dirce M Carraro

    3. HEMOCENTRO, Laboratório de Genoma e Hemoglobina, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13084-878, Campinas, SP, Brazil

      Anderson F Cunha

    4. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, ESALQ, USP, 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

      Helaine Carrer

    5. Laboratório de Genômica e Expressão Gênica, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, 45650-000, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil

      Acássia BL Pires & Julio CM Cascardo

    6. Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica – PqEB – Av. W5 Norte, 70770-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil

      Luis AB Castro

    7. CEPLAC/CEPEC/SEFIT, 45600-970, Itabuna, BA, Brazil

      Karina P Gramacho

    8. Laboratório de Biologia Molecular – Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 40170-290, Salvador, BA, Brazil

      Marilda S Gonçalves & José P Moura Neto

    9. Laboratório de Pesquisa em Microbiologia (LAPEM), Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS), 44031-460, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil

      Aristóteles Góes Neto

    10. Laboratório de Biologia Molecular – Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 40170-290, Salvador, BA, Brazil

      Luciana V Barbosa

    11. Department of Horticulture, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Chester, PA, 16802, USA

      Mark J Guiltinan

    12. Sustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 10300 Baltimore Av, Bldg. 001, 18, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350, USA

      Bryan A Bailey & Lyndel W Meinhardt

    Authors
    1. Jorge MC Mondego
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Marcelo F Carazzolle
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Gustavo GL Costa
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Eduardo F Formighieri
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Lucas P Parizzi
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Johana Rincones
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Carolina Cotomacci
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Dirce M Carraro
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Anderson F Cunha
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Helaine Carrer
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Ramon O Vidal
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Raíssa C Estrela
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    13. Odalys García
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    14. Daniela PT Thomazella
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    15. Bruno V de Oliveira
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    16. Acássia BL Pires
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    17. Maria Carolina S Rio
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    18. Marcos Renato R Araújo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    19. Marcos H de Moraes
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    20. Luis AB Castro
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    21. Karina P Gramacho
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    22. Marilda S Gonçalves
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    23. José P Moura Neto
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    24. Aristóteles Góes Neto
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    25. Luciana V Barbosa
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    26. Mark J Guiltinan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    27. Bryan A Bailey
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    28. Lyndel W Meinhardt
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    29. Julio CM Cascardo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    30. Gonçalo AG Pereira
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Gonçalo AG Pereira.

    Additional information

    Authors' contributions

    JMCM conceived and wrote the article, was responsible for gene models annotation, gene density analysis, primer design and data interpretation. MFC conceived bioinformatics analysis and was responsible for genome assembly, BLASTs, statistical analysis and data interpretation. GGLC was responsible for gene models predictions, Genome Threader analysis, MCL clustering analysis and gene browser design and implementation. EFF participated in genome assembly, was responsible for transporters analysis and annotation, and made figures edition. LPP was responsible for AutoFACT and BioCyc implementation and analysis. JR was responsible for EST library construction and sequencing and participated in genome annotation. CC, DMC, AFC and HC were responsible for M. perniciosa DNA extraction, genome shotgun, cloning and maintenance of genomic libraries. ROV was responsible for gene browser design and implementation, tRNA analysis and M. perniciosa sketches. RCE performed RT-PCR and aided in primer design. OG, DPTT BVO and MHM participated in genome annotation and were responsible for the characterization of genes encoding NEPs, AOX, MOX and auxin biosynthetic proteins, respectively. ABLP was responsible for EST library construction. MCSR was responsible for microscopic analysis. MRAR participated in genome assembly and in the development of bioinformatics tools. LABC, KPG, MSG, AGN and LBB were coordinators of sequencing groups. JPMN was responsible for sequencing and libraries maintenance. MJG and BAB participated in final manuscript elaboration and provided additional sequencing in order to close gene gaps. LWM participated in pathogenicity gene data interpretation and final manuscript elaboration. JCC was the co-coordinator of M. perniciosa genome project and coordinated UESC sequencing group. GAGP conceived and was the coordinator of M. perniciosa genome project, participated in data interpretation and in final manuscript elaboration.

    Jorge MC Mondego, Marcelo F Carazzolle, Lyndel W Meinhardt, Julio CM Cascardo contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    Genome statistical validations.

    Additional file 1: A) Estimation of genome length using dog genome survey protocol, B) Estimate of distribution of gap sizes in M. perniciosa genome assembly, C) Estimate of misassembly sequences due to repetitive regions. (PDF 25 KB)

    Additional file 2: MCL analysis of M. perniciosa gene models. All predicted proteins were compared all-against-all using WU-TBLASTX. A score (-log (E-value)) for each pair of proteins (u, v) with significant BLAST hits (Evalue ≤ 1e-5) was assigned. The MCL algorithm (inflation parameter 2.0) was applied to find clusters in this graph. This method is fully automatic and protein clusters reported were not subjected to manual curation. ID: number of the MCL family; #members: number of gene models present in each family; Norm factor: factor used to normalize the number of gene models present in each family (see methods); Norm#members: normalized number of gene models present in each family. Annotation: words associated to each family after correlation of gene models with AutoFACT annotation. In parenthesis are the occurrence numbers of each word. Each worksheet shows the ranking of families using normalization factor (Rank_Norm) or not using this factor (Rank_Non_Norm). (XLS 370 KB)

    Functional annotation of

    Additional file 3: M. perniciosa gene models discussed in this paper. ID: gene model; First Hit (BLASTX-NR): Most similar sequence in GenBank; E-value: E-value of most similar sequence; AutoFACT annotation: automatic annotation by AutoFACT; AutoFACT E-value: E-value of AutoFACT annotation; EST: presence (Y) or absence of an EST aligned in this gene model; MCL family: family annotated by MCL analysis. Worksheet P450: annotation of gene models similar to cytochrome P450 monooxygenases; Worksheet transposons: classification and annotation of gene models similar to transposable elements; Worksheet unknown gene families; annotation of top 20 MCL unknown gene families; Worksheet functional annotation: classification and annotation of gene models similar to efflux transporters, anti-oxidative enzymes, phytohormones biosynthesis related proteins, pheromone receptors, salicylate hydroxylases, effectors/elicitors/pathoghenicity associated proteins, cell wall degrading enzymes and intermediary metabolism enzymes (cytochrome pathway bypass, Glyoxylate pathway and oxalate formation, glycerol uptake and metabolism, extracellular sugar degrading enzymes and nitrogen regulation, uptake and metabolism enzymes), EC = enzyme classification http://expasy.org/enzyme/; Worksheet transporters; Relative percentage of transporters distribution in fungi genomes (see methods). (XLS 474 KB)

    Ranking of CDD-PFAM families annotated in

    Additional file 4: M. perniciosa . Gene models were annotated based on CDD-PFAM-ID and ranked. This analysis was performed with other fungi genomes, which CDD-PFAM entries were classified according to M. perniciosa ranking. CDD-ID: CDD entry; PFAM Domain: PFAM entry; #Hits Domains: number of gene models containing each CDD-PFAM domain; %Hits Domains: percentage of gene models containing each CDD-PFAM domain in relation to total number of gene models containing a CDD-PFAM domain; %Hits PTN: Percentage of gene models containing each CDD-PFAM domain in relation to total number of M. perniciosa gene models; Rank: non-normalized M. perniciosa CDD-PFAM ranking; PTNS: proteins in each organism; Norm Factor: factor used to normalize the number of gene models containing each CDD-PFAM domain; # Hits Domains Norm: normalized number of gene models containing a CDD-PFAM domain; %Hits Domains Norm: percentage of gene models containing each CDD-PFAM domain in relation to total number of gene models containing each CDD-PFAM domain; %Hits PTN Norm: Normalized percentage of gene models containing each CDD-PFAM domain in relation to total number of M. perniciosa gene models; Rank Norm: normalized M. perniciosa CDD-PFAM ranking. Worksheets show the ranking of CDD-PFAM domains using normalization (Rank_Norm) or not using normalization (Rank_Non_Norm). (XLS 4 MB)

    Additional file 5: BioCyc comparison between S. cerevisiae and M. perniciosa metabolic pathways. Worksheet Compounds: Comparison of number of reactions in each organism containing the compounds described in the table; Worksheet pathways: Comparison of number of pathways in each organism present in each pathway class. The two largest top-level classes, Biosynthesis and Degradation/Utilization/Assimilation, are broken down further to show the distribution of pathways among their next-level subclasses. (XLS 18 KB)

    Additional file 6: Annotation of gene models with no similarity in BLASTX-NR encoding hypothetical small secreted proteins containing at least 2 cysteines. ID: gene model; # residues: number of amino acids of predicted protein encoded by the gene model; # cysteines: number of cysteines in predicted protein; Binomial RT; statistical analysis of cysteines presence in gene models (see methodological details in the file). (XLS 27 KB)

    Additional file 7: Primers used in the amplification of no hits gene models encoding hypothetical small secreted proteins containing at least 2 cysteines. ID: gene model; Set of primers: Group of primers used for the amplication of a gene model. Primer sequence: sequence of primers (SPE – nested in sequence encoding the putative signal peptide; MAT – nested in sequence encoding the putative first amino acid of mature protein; END – nested in sequence containing the putative stop codon). Amplification: positive (Y) or negative (N); EST: presence (Y) or absence (N) of an EST aligned in this gene model; Length: length of amplicon in genomic and cDNA using two combinations of primers (SPE-END; MAT-END). (XLS 24 KB)

    Additional file 8: Examples of amplifications of no hits gene models. PCR amplicons were run on 1% agarose gels. SPE: amplicons resulted from amplification with SPE and END primers; MAT: amplicons resulted from amplification with MAT and END primers; Ctl: water as template (control); Gen: genomic DNA as template; Glu: cDNA from saprotrophic mycelia grown in glucose as template; Cac: cDNA from saprotrophic mycelia grown in cacao extract as template; M: DNA molecular marker. (PDF 26 KB)

    Comparison of plant cell wall degrading enzymes in fungi that interact with plants.

    Additional file 9: PFAM entries were correlated with the CAZy nomenclature http://www.cazy.org of plant cell wall degrading enzymes. (PDF 14 KB)

    Additional file 10:Genomic survey sequences and gene models nomenclature.(PDF 14 KB)

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Mondego, J.M., Carazzolle, M.F., Costa, G.G. et al. A genome survey of Moniliophthora perniciosa gives new insights into Witches' Broom Disease of cacao. BMC Genomics 9, 548 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-548

    Download citation

    Keywords

    • Pectin
    • Functional Annotation
    • Graminearum
    • Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase
    • Nitrogen Catabolite Repression

    BMC Genomics

    ISSN: 1471-2164

    Contact us