Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Genomics

Open Access

Tissue and time specific expression pattern of interferon regulated genes in the chicken

BMC Genomics201718:264

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3641-6

Received: 27 October 2016

Accepted: 18 March 2017

Published: 28 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Type I interferons are major players against viral infections and mediate their function by the induction of Interferon regulated genes (IRGs). Recently, it became obvious that these cytokines have a multitude of additional functions. Due to the unique features of the chickens’ immune system, available data from mouse models are not easily transferable; hence we performed an extensive analysis of chicken IRGs.

Results

A broad database search for homologues to described mammalian IRGs (common IRGs, cIRGs) was combined with a transcriptome analysis of spleen and lung at different time points after application of IFNα. To apply physiological amounts of IFN, half-life of IFN in the chicken was determined. Interestingly, the calculated 36 min are considerably shorter than the ones obtained for human and mouse. Microarray analysis revealed many additional IRGs (newly identified IRGs; nIRGs) and network analysis for selected IRGs showed a broad interaction of nIRGs among each other and with cIRGs. We found that IRGs exhibit a highly tissue and time specific expression pattern as expression quality and quantity differed strongly between spleen and lung and over time. While in the spleen for many affected genes changes in RNA abundance peaked already after 3 h, an increasing or plateau-like regulation after 3, 6 and 9 h was observed in the lung.

Conclusions

The induction or suppression of IRGs in chickens is both tissue and time specific and beside known antiviral mechanisms type I IFN induces many additional cellular functions. We confirmed many known IRGs and established a multitude of so far undescribed ones, thus providing a large database for future research on antiviral mechanisms and additional IFN functions in non-mammalian species.

Keywords

ChickenIFNαIRGHalf-lifeExpression profile

Background

Interferons (IFNs) are cytokines critically involved in the control of viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections. They mediate their activity either directly or indirectly through the induction of regulators of innate and adaptive immune cells [1]. Three families of IFNs have been described in mammals. In humans type I IFNs form a multigene family with 13 members of closely related IFNα genes, a single distinct IFNβ gene. These cytokines are best known for their antiviral activity and were the first IFNs identified [2, 3]. In addition, there are genes for IFNε, IFNκ, and IFNω, whose function is less well characterized [1]. Type II IFN is represented by a single gene encoding IFNγ. IFNγ has pleiotropic effects on cells of the immune system and is known as a potent activator of macrophages [4]. More recently, a third IFN family was uncovered named type III IFN which in humans comprises four IFNλ genes. IFNλs exert similar responses as type I IFNs but their activity is largely restricted to epithelial tissues as a consequence of the restricted expression of IFNλ receptors [5]. Type I IFNs are induced in response to viral infections in most cell types. Viral infections are sensed by the cells through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) located in the cytoplasm or the endosomal compartment. RIG-I and MDA-5 are the primary but not only cytosolic sensors recognizing RNA. The endosomal PRRs (TLR3, TLR7/8) are double and single stranded RNA sensors of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family. In contrast, TLR9 binds unmethylated CpG DNA. Upon ligand binding these PRRs activate downstream signals such as IRF3 and IRF7 which induce IFN gene transcription and secretion [6, 7].

Type I IFNs bind to a common receptor (interferon-α/β receptor (IFNAR)) expressed on most cell types. Ligation of the heterodimeric receptor activates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway which leads to phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT2 and together with IRF9 to the formation of the ISGF3 complex which induces transcription of IFN regulated genes (IRGs) through binding to IRG response elements [8]. Several IRGs have been studied in great detail including myxovirus resistance 1 (MX1), IFN-inducible double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR), 2’-‘5-oligoadenylate synthetase (OAS) and IFN induced transmembrane proteins (IFITMs) [9]. Besides this canonical pathway, type I IFNs induce the formation of STAT1 homodimers and the induction of γ-activated sequences (GAS) in promoter regions typically activated by IFNγ. Furthermore, signaling through STATs 3, 4 and 5 has been described. While signaling through the STAT1/STAT2 pathway induces classical antiviral responses, alternative signaling leads to the production of a broad range of cytokines, chemokines, antimicrobial products and regulators of apoptotic pathways [10]. Transcriptomic studies have shown the induction of hundreds of genes upon type I IFN receptor ligation in vitro and in vivo [1113]. Recently, based on these studies large scale screening systems were established to identify IRGs that are induced by different viruses to elucidate their functional relevance [10, 14].

While in-depth knowledge on the mammalian IFN system has been accumulated over decades as outlined, comparatively little is known in avian species. This is surprising taken the fact that poultry flocks are worldwide under intensive pressure by viral infections, which lead to huge economic losses. Most recent examples are highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks 2014/2015 in North America with estimated 50 million birds dead or culled [15] or the constant threat by velogenic Newcastle Disease outbreaks around the globe [16].

Members of all three IFN families have been identified in different avian species such as chickens, turkeys and ducks. In chickens the type I family is smaller than in humans with approximately ten IFNα genes and a single IFNβ gene [17, 18]. Cloning and expression of recombinant proteins enabled functional studies and confirmed the antiviral properties of avian type I IFNs in vitro and in vivo as well as the induction of known IRGs including Mx, OAS and PKR.

Though in general the mammalian and avian IFN systems appear quite similar, when studied in more detail subtle differences became apparent between birds and mammals and between individual bird species. In an effort to get insights into the differences in HPAV infection outcomes between chicken and ducks, it was recognized that galliformes lack the PRR RIG-I which strongly induces type I IFN production in mice. As this molecule is present in the duck genome and fully functional, this lead to the conclusion that observed differences in HPAIV susceptibility might result from insufficient activation of the type I IFN pathway in chickens [19]. However, work in chickens infected with the HPAIV H5N1 demonstrated rapid induction of IFNα transcripts and protein indicating that alternative pathways such as the MDA-5 and/or the TLR pathways may account for the response [20]. Interestingly, such a loss in the family of RIG-I like receptors was not only found in birds but also in mammals as recently reported for RIG-I in the Chinese tree shrew [21].

To a limited extent IRGs have been investigated in more detail in birds [2224]. In analogy to the mammalian system the avian Mx orthologue was considered to have potent antiviral properties [25, 26]. Surprisingly, in vitro and in vivo studies clearly demonstrated that chicken Mx does not limit influenza virus replication despite strong induction of the protein by IFN [27, 28]. Thus, it remains to be elucidated which IRGs confer antiviral resistance in different viral disease. Such knowledge is crucial to form breeding programs for increased innate resistance and to understand the unique antiviral properties amongst avian species.

To lay the foundation for future research we treated chickens with recombinant IFNα at physiological plasma levels and performed intensive gene expression analysis in lung and spleen. Here we provide a comprehensive list of chicken IRGs and show that in addition to common IRGs shared between mammals and chickens unique chicken IRGs could be identified. This information together with recently published in vitro studies will allow large scale functional screens of IRGs as recently reported in mammals [29].

Methods

Animals

Fertilized eggs of conventional White Leghorn chickens (LSL) were obtained from Lohmann Tierzucht GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany and hatched at the Institute of Animal Physiology, Munich. Birds were vaccinated against Marek’s Disease Virus after hatch, housed under conventional conditions in aviaries with groups up to ten birds and received food and water ad libitum.

Interferon treatment of chickens

Recombinant chicken interferon alpha (rec chIFNα) was expressed and purified from Escherichia coli as described previously [30]. The concentration of chIFNα was determined using an internal standard initially qualified with the international standard 67/18 (80 IU/ml) [31] and reported in Units per ml (U/ml). For injection, appropriate amounts of rec chIFNα for pharmacokinetics and the microarray study were dissolved in PBS (pH 7,2).

Pharmacokinetics

Six weeks old LSL chickens received a single i.v. injection of 1×107 Units for the biggest bird and a direct proportional weight adjusted dose for all others. Plasma samples were collected 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360 and 480 min after dosing and chIFNα levels were determined. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by Non Compartmental Analysis using Microsoft Excel® as follows: The highest plasma concentration observed (Cmax) as well as the corresponding time point (Tmax) were directly derived from the time/concentration plot for each individual animal. ChIFNα plasma Clearance (Cl) was calculated as a direct function of dose and Area Under the time/concentration Curve (AUC) (i.e. Cl = Dose/AUC). AUC was determined using the linear-trapezoidal rule (i.e. sum of the areas below the time/concentration curve with a linear connection between consecutive data points). The volume of distribution (Vz) as well as the terminal elimination half-life (T1/2) were extrapolated based on an exponential regression of the last three time/concentration points.

Experimental design of the microarray experiment

Twenty-four six-week-old LSL chickens were divided into four groups, a control group and three groups which received 1x107U rec chIFNα into the V. jugularis or V. cutenea ulnaris superficialis every 3 h. Birds were sacrificed at three hours (one IFN application), six hours (two IFN applications) and nine hours (three IFN applications) after the first treatment. The control group received a single injection of buffer and was killed after 6 h. Blood samples of each animal were taken before injection and before killing and obtained plasma was stored at -80 °C. Spleen and lung samples were isolated and stored in RNA later (Ambion, Warrington, UK) at -80 °C until RNA isolation. Lung samples were taken by selecting the second to last segment of the left lung containing the primary and secondary bronchi of the torus intercostalis.

IFN assay

Type I IFN activity in plasma samples was determined using a bioassay based on the strong induction of the Mx gene in the presence of type I IFN as described recently [30]. Briefly, CEC-32 reporter cells containing a luciferase gene under the chicken Mx promoter were incubated with serial dilutions of plasma samples or the chIFNα standard. After 6 h of incubation cells were lysed with 100 μl of 1× cell culture lysis reagent (Promega, Madison, USA) and luciferase activity was measured using Luciferase substrate (Promega, Madison,USA) and a Glomax 96 microplate luminometer (Promega, Madison, USA).

IL6 assay

The amount of IL6 protein in plasma samples of rec chIFNα treated chicken was measured by the ability of added plasma to stimulate proliferation of the IL6-dependent murine hybridoma cell line 7TD1 (kindly provided by J. Van Snick, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Brussels, Belgium) essentially as described previously [32]. Briefly, 7TD1 cells were thoroughly washed in PBS and cultured with 5×103 cells per well of a 96-well flat-bottomed microtiter plate in medium (RPMI 1640 medium with Glutamax, 10% fetal bovine serum) and serial twofold dilutions of the samples or of 1 ng/ml E.coli derived recombinant chIL-6. Cells were cultured for 4 days and proliferation was measured using the XTT [2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-((phenylamino)carbonyl)-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide] colorimetric assay [33]. XTT (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) was diluted in RPMI 1640 medium to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml and phenazine methosulfate was added to a final concentration of 0.025 mmol. Fifty microliters of the XTT/phenazine methosulfate solution were added to each well, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 4 h before absorbance was measured in a photometer at 450 nm.

RNA isolation

Lung and spleen tissue was homogenized in peqGold TriFast (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany). Lung tissue was homogenized with a rod homogenizer (Ultra-Turrax, IKA, Staufen, Germany). Spleen tissue was homogenized with a tissue homogenizer (Precellys 24, Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany). Total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s Trizol protocol. Quantity and purity of extracted RNA was determined with a NanoDrop 1000 (PEQLAB Biotechnologie GMBH, Erlangen, Germany), while the RNA quality was analysed using a 2100 Bioanalyzer® (Agilent Technologies, Böblingen, Germany). Only RNA samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) exceeding 8.4 were used for qRT-PCR and microarray analysis.

Oligonucleotide microarray analysis

Microarray analysis was performed using Agilent 4×44K chicken-genome microarrays, supplemented by the addition of 1699 selected genes out of the chicken genome, supposed to play a crucial role in the chicken immune system (AMADID 23824). The best four out of six lung and spleen samples of each group in the IFN experiment were hybridised. After hybridising, washing and scanning of the microarrays image following manufacturer’s instructions (Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, US), arrays were further processed with Feature Extraction Software 10.5.1.1 (Agilent Technologies). Processed signals were filtered based on “Well above background” flags (detection in three of four samples in either one of the experimental groups) and normalized using the BioConductor package vsn [34]. The quality of the normalized data was checked with a distance matrix and a heatmap following on pair-wise distances (BioConductor package geneplotter). Significance analysis was performed with the Microsoft Excel add-in “Significance analysis of microarrays” (SAM; multiclass) [35]. With a False discovery rate (FDR) <5% a fold change (FC) higher than 2 and smaller than -2 was accepted as significant.

The original Agilent gene annotation was refined by BLAST search in NCBI and Ensembl and by AvI-Blast, a software especially designed to align oligonucleotide sequences to the chicken genome database of NCBI. Official gene symbols were obtained by online ID-converter DAVID, Babelomics and g:Profiler. Multi experiment viewer (MeV) was used for the generation of expression profiles, PANTHER gene list analysis to map genes to different gene ontology clusters. The INTERFEROME and ISG databases [11, 12, 3639] were used as sources for known mammalian IRGs.

Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR

The same RNA samples as for the microarrays were used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Genomic DNA was eliminated by DNase I (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) and 400 ng cDNA were generated using the GOScript Reverse Transcription System (Promega Corporation, Madison, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 10 ng cDNA of spleen and lung were analysed for the relative abundance of 18S, Mx, IL6 and PKR RNA with a GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega Corporation, Madison, USA). Primers for qRT-PCR were designed using PerlPrimer software and obtained from Eurofins MWG Operon [40]. The following forward and reverse primers were used for qRT-PCR reactions: 18S rRNA: forward primer 5′-CATGTCTAAGTACACACGGGCGGTA-3′ and reverse primer 5-′GGCGCTCGTCGGCATGTATTA-3′ IL6 forward primer 5′-GCTTCGACGAGGAGAAATGC-3′and reverse primer 5′-GCCAGGTGCTTTGTGCTGTA-3′ Mx forward primer 5′-GCGGACAAGCCATAGAACAAG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GGCACCCCAAAAACTCCTACA-3′ PKR f+orward primer 5′-GGAAGTAGACATTTATGCGCTGG -3′and reverse primer 5′-CATCCTGCCATACCTTGTTTTTCT-3′. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using a 7300 Real-Time PCR System® (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) with SYBR-green. Obtained CT values were normalized to 18S rRNA (= dCT) and fold changes were calculated in comparison to the control group (2-ΔΔCT method).

Promotor-analysis

Sequences of differentially expressed and unaffected genes were analysed for the existence of Interferon stimulated response elements (ISRE) and/or Gamma activated sequence (GAS) elements in a first step by using ISRE and GAS sequences earlier described by Tsukahara et al. [41], who characterized functional ISRE and GAS elements according to a particular algorithm (Additional file 1: Table S1). As REFINEMENT, the search framework specifically designed for an automated large scale search for ISRE and/or GAS motifs isn’t available anymore, we screened chicken genes with motifs, which were described by Tsukahara et al. as “functional motifs”. Based on the work of Schuhmacher et. al. [22] the sequence 6 kb upstream of the first exon was considered as promotor region. In addition, the complete gene sequence was analysed from 6 kb upstream, including all exons and introns. Screening of Ensembl based sequences was performed with a self-designed Shell script. For a more detailed analysis the 30 genes with the highest changes in mRNA abundance after IFN injection were individually searched for the existence of the common ISRE consensus 5′A/GGTTTCN(1-2)TTTCC/T3′ or its reverse complement and the common GAS consensus 5′TTNCNNNAA3′ [4245].

Results

Identification of IRGs by database analysis

In order to identify IRGs in the chicken we started with an extensive comparative database analysis to relate known mammalian IRGs to annotated chicken genes. Therefore entries in INTERFEROME, the ISG-database, KEGG [46], Reactome and several publications were combined and compared to all annotated 13,353 genes on a customized laboratory internal Agilent 4x44K chicken Genome microarray. Thereby we were able to identify 1420 genes, which are known as mammalian IRGs and are also present in the chicken genome. These genes were termed “common IRGs” (cIRGs) (see Additional file 2: Table S2 for Gene description, Accession numbers and sequences). Using the INTERFEROME database the identified cISGs were also assigned to type I, type II and type III interferons as inducers. From the identified 1420 ISGs, with 1192 the majority of genes are known to be induced by type I interferon, 898 by type II and only 86 by type III, though many IRGs are induced by several types of IFN leading to an extensive overlap.

Pharmacokinetics of rec chIFNα

Next, we wanted to confirm the in silico identified cIRGs in vivo by treating chickens with recombinant chIFNα. In order to obtain biological relevant plasma levels of type I IFN for a longer time we first determined the pharmacokinetic properties of rec chIFNα in the chicken. Therefore, three adult chickens received a single i.v. injection of rec chIFNα. Plasma samples were collected at frequent intervals post dose and levels of chIFNα were determined using a reporter-assay for chicken type I IFN. Based on these results Cmax at 16,624 ± 1,985 U/ml was achieved as early as five minutes post application (i.e. the first sampling time point post administration). The pharmacokinetic profile was characterized by a 2-compartment profile consisting of an initial distribution phase up to 60 min post injection and followed by 2nd phase characterized by a first order elimination. At 240 min post application the lower detection limit of the bioanalytical assay was reached. (Fig. 1). From these data a mean terminal half-live of chIFNα was calculated at 36 min (SD 2.53 min, CV 7%). A detailed overview on all pharmacokinetic parameters calculated is provided in Additional file 3: Table S3.
Fig. 1

Pharmacokinetic profile of recombinant ChIFNα after i.v. injection. Three chickens were treated i.v. with a single dose of recChIFNα (1x107Units for the biggest bird and a direct proportional weight adjusted dose for the others). Plasma was taken at the indicated time points, and the amount of biological active type I IFN was determined using an IFN reportergene assay

Microarray based identification of chicken ISGs

Experimental setup

In order to evaluate chicken ISGs on the transcriptome level rec chIFNα was applied to three groups of six week old chickens according to the experimental scheme shown in Fig. 2a. It is known from infection studies with a Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vaccine or Highly pathogenic Avian influenza viruses (HPAIV) that endogenous plasma levels of type I IFN range between 100 U/ml (NDV, own unpublished observations) and 1,000 U/ml (HPAIV, [20]). Therefore, based on the calculated half-life birds received an i.v. injection of 1×107 U chIFNα every 3h to obtain a constant biologically relevant chIFN plasma level. After three (IFN(3 h)), six (IFN(6 h)) and nine hours (IFN(9 h)), respectively, a group of birds was killed and tissues were taken for RNA isolation and microarray analysis. Lung parenchyme (without BALT) was chosen as mucosal tissue serving as portal of entry for many pathogens, while the spleen represents the most prominent lymphatic tissue in the chicken. The control group received only buffer and was killed after 6 h.
Fig. 2

IFN treatment for the microarray experiment. a Four groups of chickens (n = 6 per group) received recChIFNα as indicated in the experimental scheme. b At the indicated time points animals were sacrificed and the plasma concentration of biologically active type I IFN was measured using an IFN reporter gene assay. Shown are group mean and individual IFN concentrations

To verify the treatment schedule plasma samples were obtained before the first IFN injection and before tissue sampling and analysed for the amount of chIFNα. While no type I IFN was detectable in any of the samples before treatment (data not shown) and in the control group, IFN treated groups had mean IFN plasma concentrations of 150 U/ml after three, 175 U/ml after six and 200 U/ml after 9 h (see. Fig. 2b). This demonstrates that the applied treatment schedule indeed led to a relatively constant IFN exposure of the animals.

Identification of differentially abundant genes

RNA from spleen and lung samples was hybridized to the customized Agilent 4x44K chicken array. Heatmap analysis using “R” demonstrated that IFN treatment resulted in significant transcriptome alterations and a distinct clustering of the different experimental groups (Fig. 3a). In both tissues all control and IFN(3 h) samples were clearly assigned to single groups, while for IFN(6 h) and IFN(9 h) in spleen and lung one sample did not group with the others. Interestingly, in the spleen, IFN-induced transcriptome changes in the three hours group were so pronounced, that the transcriptome after 6 and 9 h was closer related to controls than to this group. In the lung, control samples show a distinct separation from all IFN treated groups. Among the later IFN(3 h) is clearly discriminable from the other time points, while the transcriptome differences between 6 and 9 h were less pronounced and some overlap could be observed.
Fig. 3

Microarray analysis after IFN injection. a “R” based heat map of spleen and lung tissue: Probes are labeled by group membership and animal number (1-4). Data sets with an unusual assignment which deviates from the rest of the group are boxed. b Venn diagram for the comparison of microarray and in silico analysis: Shown are the intersections of significantly regulated genes 3 h after IFN injection between spleen (red), lung (blue) tissue and the “common IRGs” (green), identified by database analysis. c Intersections of IRGs in spleen and lung at different time points after IFN injection: Numbers indicate array-based significantly regulated genes; numbers in brackets represent “common IRGs”

This observation is also reflected by the number of significantly regulated genes, that is genes with an FC ≤ -2 or ≥ 2 and an FDR ≤ 0.05. With 1870 (spleen) and 945 (lung), by far most regulated genes were identified in the three hours group (Table 1). It is noticeable that in the spleen at each time point down-regulated genes outnumber up-regulated ones, while in the lung three to fivefold more up-regulated genes were identified.
Table 1

Number of differentially expressed genes after IFN injection with a FC ≤ -2 or ≥ 2

  

# of genes

Spleen

IFN (3 h)

1869

+

871

-

998

IFN (6 h)

852

+

316

-

536

IFN (9 h)

665

+

257

-

408

Lung

IFN (3 h)

945

+

685

-

260

IFN (6 h)

435

+

372

-

63

IFN (9 h)

611

+

489

-

122

A clear overlap exists between the genes regulated after 3 h in lung and spleen, but many genes are also tissue specific (Fig. 3b). Five hundred thirteen genes were identified in both tissues representing about a quarter of all genes regulated in the spleen and more than half of the genes, which were regulated in the lung. When the genes were compared with the identified cIRGs, some intersections were found, but in total only a quarter (381 genes, representing 17% of splenic genes and 23% of lung genes) of the in silico identified cIRGs were also found in the in vivo experiment. Forty-six additonal cIRGs were found among the genes exclusively regulated after IFN(6 h) and IFN(9 h).

A comparison between the different time points revealed, that more than 60 and 50% of genes in the spleen and lung, respectively, were solely regulated in the three hours group. Seventy percent of splenic and 77% of lung genes regulated after 6 h showed also an altered abundance after 3 h. From the genes with altered abundance after 9 h almost 90% of genes in the spleen and 75% of genes in the lung were also found at earlier time points (Fig. 3c). The percentage of cIRGs among these gene subgroups was largely the same, ranging between 9 and 15% in the spleen and 13 and 23% in the lung.

Collectively, the observed variations in RNA abundances were much stronger in the spleen than in the lung. Fold changes for significantly regulated genes ranged from a 685fold up-regulation of PTX3 (pentraxin related gene, rapidly induced by IL1beta) to a 436fold down-regulation of SFTPA1 (surfactant pulmonary-associated protein A1) in the spleen (Table 2) and a 118fold up-regulation of TULP1 (tubby like protein 1) to a 18fold down-regulation of IRG1 (immunoresponsive 1 homolog) in the lung (Table 2). Most of the highest fold changes in both organs were found after 3 h, though for some of the 30 genes with highest changes in RNA abundance, e.g. SFTPA1 the highest value was achieved after 9 h of IFN exposition (Table 2). Also among these 30 genes were the classical IRGs Mx1 and Oligoadenylate-Synthase (OAS). With 36% (spleen) and 43% (lung) the percentage of cIRGs among these genes is twofold higher than among the entity of differentially expressed genes. The fact that only 30% of the splenic genes with the strongest regulation show also regulated expression in the lung and 23% of the lung genes are regulated in the spleen, demonstrate an distinct response to IFN stimulation in both organs.
Table 2

Top 30 of genes with the highest or least changes in mRNA abundance in spleen (A) and lung (B). The scanned region for promotor elements ranged from 6 kb upstream to 1 kb downstream of the first exon

Gene symbol

Gene description

Maximal FC

Timepoint of maximal FC

cIRG

Expression in lung

# of Promotor elements (ISRE/GAS)

A)

PTX3

Pentraxin related gene, rapidly induced by IL1 beta

685

3 h

x

x

0/7

SFTPA1

Surfactant, pulmonary-associated protein A1

−436

9 h

x

-

0/12

LOC396260

Mature avidin

384

9 h

-

x

1/7

IL6

Interleukin-6

186

3 h

x

x

0/8

LAO

L-amino-acid oxidase precursor (Interleukin-4 induced 1)

169

3 h

-

x

0/7

K203

Chicken chemokine (C-C motif) L i 3

145

3 h

-

x

0/6

LL

Lung lectin

−140

9 h

-

-

0/12

PSCA

Prostate stem cell antigen

−124

9 h

-

-

0/12

KCNA1

Potassium voltage-gated channel, shaker-related subfamily, member 1

−69

3 h

-

-

0/5

LYG2

Lysozyme G-like 2

62

3 h

-

x

0/6

CSF3

Colony stimulating factor 3

58

3 h

x

x

0/3

NEFH

Neurofilament, heavy polypeptide

−56

3 h

-

-

0/5

CMBL

Carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog

44

3 h

-

x

0/12

GCH1

GTP cyclohydrolase 1

43

3 h

x

x

0/9

FSHR

Follicle stimulating hormone receptor

−39

3 h

-

-

0/5

ZPD

Zona pellucida protein D

38

3 h

-

-

0/13

IRG1

Immunoresponsive 1 homolog

35

3 h

-

x

0/9

BATF3

Basic leucine zipper transcription factor, ATF-like 3

35

3 h

-

x

0/11

IL22

Interleukin-22

34

3 h

x

x

0/4

MAOA

Monoamine oxidase A

33

9 h

-

x

0/11

HPS5

Hermansky Pudlak syndrome 5

30

6 h

x

x

0/10

ETV1

ETS variant gene 1

−30

3 h

-

-

0/13

TULP1

Tubby like protein 1

28

3 h

-

x

0/11

MMP1

Matrix metallopeptidase 1 (interstitial collagenase)

27

3 h

-

x

1/7

LIPI

Lipase, member I

26

3 h

-

x

1/9

RPL37

Ribosomal protein L37

26

3 h

x

x

0/9

GBP

Guanylate binding protein

25

3 h

x

x

0/5

OAS

2‘5’oligoadenylate synthetase like

25

3 h

x

x

0/0

SPINK5

Serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type 5

−25

6 h

-

-

0/7

Mx1

Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance-1

24

3 h

x

x

1/16

B)

TULP1

Tubby like protein 1

118

3 h

-

x

0/11

IL6

Interleukin-6

67

9 h

x

x

0/8

CMBL

Carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog

53

3 h

-

x

0/12

LOC396260

Mature avidin

44

9 h

-

x

1/7

LAO

L-amino-acid oxidase precursor

40

3 h

-

x

0/7

MSC

Musculin (activated B-cell factor-1)

33

3 h

-

x

0/5

FKBP5

FK506 binding protein 5

30

3 h

x

x

0/6

TGM4

Transglutaminase 4 (prostate)

24

3 h

-

-

0/10

LYG2

Lysozyme G-like 2

24

3 h

-

x

0/6

BATF3

Basic leucine zipper transcription factor, ATF-like 3

22

3 h

-

x

0/11

GBP

Guanylate binding protein

22

3 h

x

x

0/5

RPL37

Ribosomal protein L37

20

3 + 9 h

x

x

0/9

IFIT-5

Interferon induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 5

18

3 + 9 h

x

x

1/9

IRG1

Immunoresponsive 1 homolog

19

9 h

-

x

0/9

TLR5

Toll-like receptor-5

−18

3 h

x

-

0/11

SEMA6D

 

−17

3 h

-

x

0/11

GCH1

GTP cyclohydrolase 1

17

3 h

x

x

0/9

GAL9

Gallicin 9

16

3 h

-

-

0/8

Rd

Riboflavin-binding protein

16

3 h

-

-

0/15

MAOA

Monoamine oxidase A

16

9 h

-

x

0/11

SAMD9L

Sterile alpha motif domain containing 9 like

15

3 + 9 h

x

x

0/13

K203

Chicken chemokine (C-C motif) L i 3

14

9 h

-

x

0/6

IL1RL1

Interleukin-1 receptor like 1

14

3 h

x

x

0/15

MX1

Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance-1

13

3 + 6 + 9 h

x

x

1/16

SOCS3

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3

12

9 h

x

x

1/9

RASD1

RAS, dexamethasone induced 1

12

3 h

-

x

0/3

OAS

2‘5’oligoadenylate synthetase like protein

11

3 h

x

x

0/0

ALB

Albumin

10

3 h

-

-

0/12

PDK4

Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 4

10

3 h

x

x

0/12

SNAP25

Synaptosomal-associated protein, 25 kDa

−10

3 h

x

-

0/19

Interestingly, with a 384fold and 44fold (spleen) and a 186fold and 67fold up-regulation (lung), mature avidin (LOC396260) and IL6 (interleukin 6) were in both organs among the five strongest regulated genes. It is also noticeable that in the spleen several of the top 30 genes were cytokines and chemokines (IL6, K203, CSF3, IL22).

The vast majority of transcriptome changes occurred 3 h after IFN aplication and for genes, which were solely regulated at later time points, the regulation due to secondary effects becomes more likely. Hence, we decided to use only those genes which were regulated after 3 h for further analysis. Regulated genes which were not identified as cIRGs were termed as “newly identified IRGs” (nIRGs).

Promotor analysis

Interferons function by receptor binding, activation of the JAK-STAT-pathway and finally binding of transcription factors to DNA regulatory elements in upstream regions of target genes: these are the so called interferon-stimulated response elements (ISREs) and gamma-activated sequences (GASs). In order to test whether the identified nIRGs could be activated by either of these response elements, we searched for ISREs and GASs in the respective genes.

Using an automated search we first analysed cIRGs, nIRGs and control genes, whose RNA abundance was neither in the spleen nor in the lung affected by IFN treatment for the presence of known ISRE and GAS (Table 3). When a region 6 kb upstream of the first exon to the last exon was taken as a basis for the search, ISRE and GAS were identified in about a quarter of the genes with a somewhat higher frequency (25 and 26%) in cIRGs and nIRGs than in control genes (22%) and the majority of regulatory elements being GAS. Interestingly, when only the region 6 kb upstream of the transcription start site, presumably the promotor region, was taken into account the percentage of genes containing ISRE and/or GAS motifs was in general very low and only slightly higher in cIRGs (6%) and nIRGs (5%) than in control genes (4%).
Table 3

Number and portion of chicken genes containing ISRE and/or GAS motifs

 

Input

Localisation

ISRE/GAS

Percent

Not sign. after IFN

9677

whole gene

87/2117

22

6 kb upstream

10/406

4

cIRG

383

whole gene

3/94

25

  

6 kb upstream

3/20

6

nIRG

2254

whole gene

13/575

26

 

6 kb upstream

3/102

5

Regions analysed were either 6 kb upstream of the first exon of the respective gene referred to as “6 kb upstream” or from 6 kb upstream of the first exon down to the last exon of the gene sequence, referred to as “whole gene”

Tsukahara et al. had also found that in a standard search, genes with higher mRNA abundance after IFN treatment, genes with lower mRNA abundance and randomly expressed genes contained almost the same portion of ISRE and GAS elements [41]. To overcome this problem, we performed a detailed manual search for the 30 most strongly affected genes (Additional file 4: Table S4). With the exception of OAS, where neither an ISRE nor a GAS was found, all top 30 genes contained several GAS elements. ISRE were only found in four genes in the spleen (avidin, MMP1, LIPI, Mx) and three genes in the lung (IFIT5, Mx, SOCS3) with avidin, MMP1 and LIPI being nIRGs the others cIRGs. As Tsukahara et al. also proposed an accumulation of ISRE close to the transcription start site, we confined our search to 500 bp upstream of the transcription start site. However, in this region we found only one ISRE for IFIT5 and a strongly reduced number of GASs.

In summary, ISREs and GASs could be identified only in a minority of regulated genes but with identical results for cIRGS and nIRGs.

IRGs exhibit different expression profiles

The chosen experimental design with three different time periods of IFN exposition allows for the generation of expression courses for single genes over time. Therefore, all genes differentially expressed in the group exposed for 3 h were subjected to analysis by Multi experiment Viewer (MeV). In total 1844 (99%, spleen) and 921 (97%, lung) of all regulated genes were assigned to an expression profile. When the identified profiles were compared and highly similar profiles were grouped, a total of nine groups of expression profiles were found (Fig. 4a and Table 4). One third of the genes belong to profile 1 (solely up-regulated after 3 h) and one third to profile 2 (solely down-regulated after 3 h), showing again, that more than 60% of the regulated genes are exclusively regulated after 3 h. Profiles 3 and 4, which represent continuous up- and down-regulation over all time points, contain another quarter of regulated genes. Far less genes were assigned to profiles 5 to 9, which contain genes with a diverse additional regulation at 6 and 9 h. Remarkably, the classical IRGs Mx (Mx1), OAS (OAS) and PKR (EIF2AK2) have identical expression profiles, they all show a continuously elevated abundance and were assigned to profile 5 in the spleen and profile 3 in the lung (Fig. 4b).
Fig. 4

IRGs exhibit different expression profiles. a MEV analysis of genes with differential expression after 3 h identified nine different groups of expression profiles over the three sampling time points. Shown are characteristic examples for each group with gene name and tissue (S for spleen, L for lung) for which the profile was found. b Comparison of profiles for Mx, OAS and PKR in spleen (black symbols) and lung (grey symbols)

Table 4

Expression profiles identified by MeV. Shown are the numbers of genes assigned to the different clusters (see Fig. 4a), subdivided into cIRGs and nIRGs and the respective tissues

Expression

profile

# of genes

cIRGs

nIRGs

Spleen

Lung

Spleen

Lung

1

900

139

59

462

240

2

798

52

23

543

180

3

317

35

63

108

111

4

399

28

5

319

47

5

156

29

4

57

66

6

38

3

2

31

2

7

39

0

7

8

24

8

20

1

0

19

0

9

98

2

28

8

60

Profile 8, representing a continuous down regulation, was not observed for IRGs in the lung. Interestingly, profile 7 which shows a stair-like up-regulation after 3 and 9 h, contains only few genes, but these have a stronger representation in the lung than in the spleen (31 genes vs. eight genes corresponding to 3.3 vs. 0.4% of all genes). The same applies to the undulating profile 9, which represents genes upregulated after 3 and again after 9 h as only 0.5% of splenic but almost 10% of the regulated lung genes belong to this profile. Overall, expression profiles for the majority of differentially expressed genes in spleen and lung were quite similarly distributed. Of note, for minor subgroups of genes tissue specific profiles were identified in the lung.

IL6 protein level reflects RNA abundance

The cIRG IL6 is well-known in mammals and in our array experiment it was both in the spleen and in the lung found among the genes with highest changes in abundance. To verify the microarray data the very same samples were additionally analysed by q-RT-PCR. As Fig. 5a shows, changes in RNA abundance detected by q-RT-PCR were slightly higher than those obtained from the microarray. But all lay in the same range and resulted in identical IL6 expression profiles for spleen and lung.
Fig. 5

Validation of array results. a Comparison of detected fold changes for IL6 mRNA from the microarray experiment and qRT-PCR on identical samples. b Amount of IL6 protein in plasma samples of IFN treated and untreated animals

RNA abundance is informative, but functional activity is only exhibited by proteins. To test whether RNA levels correspond to protein expression we used a bioassay to measure IL6 protein in plasma samples. As Fig. 5b clearly shows, significant amounts of IL6 were only detected in plasma samples taken 3 h after IFN treatment. This peak expression reflects exactly RNA expression levels in the spleen. Hence either cytokines in the spleen are rapidly released into the blood or the liver as main producer for IL6 reacts like the spleen. The lung’s IL6 expression profile differs substantially and possible lung derived IL6 acts more locally.

Gene ontology and pathway analyses

In order to analyse which biological processes were influenced by type I IFN treatment, Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed looking at different aspects. Firstly, all genes with an at least 3fold change in abundance were subjected to Panther GO analysis (Fig. 6). Hereby, no significant differences between up- and downregulated genes and over time could be identified. In each data set “cell communication”, “cellular process” and “metabolic process” represented the functional classes with the highest percentage of affiliated genes. This was followed by “developmetal process” and “immunological process”. In addition, there were only minor differences between lung and spleen though in the lung proportionally more genes belong to “apoptosis”.
Fig. 6

Gene ontology of differentially expressed genes. Differentially expressed genes with an FC of at least ± 3 were subjected to Panther gene ontology. Shown are identified biological processes and their percental distribution between genes with higher (+) and lower (-) mRNA abundance after IFN injection in spleen and lung

Next, GO analysis was performed with separated data sets for cIRGs and nIRGs, which were differentially expressed either in spleen and lung or only the spleen or only the lung. (Additional file 5: Figure S1A). Thereby neither examination of “molecular process” nor “biological process” nor “cellular component” revealed significant differences between cIRGs and nIRGs or between lung and spleen. In all data sets analysed for biological processes the subgroups “cell communication”, “cellular process” and “metabolic process” were most strongly represented. Among cIRGs the proportion of genes assigned to “Immune system process” was slightly higher than among the identified nIRGs. A more detailed analysis of the selected data sets for “cellular process” showed that in all groups “cell communication” is the most prominent subclass, mostly comprising genes which were assigned to “cell cell signalling” (Additional file 5: Figure S1B).

Differentially expressed genes were also subjected to Pathway Express. Table 5 shows the 30 most significantly regulated pathways in spleen and lung after 3 h. In the lung “Phosphatidyl-Inositol-Signalling system” was the pathway with the highest level of significance being assigned a corrected gamma p-value of 6,7×10−11. Phosphatidyl-Inositol-Signalling is of major importance for intracellular signalling and is involved in a multitude of cellular processes like cell cycle progression, growth, motility, adhesion and survival [47]. Among the regulated genes is PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) with a 13.5-fold upregulation. PTEN acts as a phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase and is known as a tumor suppressor gene. It negatively regulates PI3K induced Akt-Signalling and prevents uncontrolled, too fast cell divisions.
Table 5

KEGG Pathway Express analysis

 

Spleen

Lung

Pathway name

Rank

Impact factor

input genes/genes in pathway

corrected gamma p-value

Rank

Impact factor

input genes/genes in pathway

corrected gamma p-value

Leukocyte transendothelial migration

1

138.9

16/119

6.56E-59

52

3.1

7/119

0.190507

Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)

2

123.4

15/134

3.30E-52

54

2.9

7/134

0.209069

Phosphatidylinositol signaling system

21

5.7

6/76

0.02196

1

27.5

7/76

3.22E-11

Jak-STAT signaling pathway

3

16.0

32/155

2.00E-06

2

18.7

24/155

1.55E-07

Toll-like receptor signaling pathway

4

14.9

24/102

5.22E-06

3

17.2

19/102

6.12E-07

Circadian rhythm

11

8.5

3/13

0.00192

4

17.1

1/13

7.32E-07

Graft-versus-host disease

5

14.4

6/42

8.59E-06

7

11.7

6/42

1.02E-04

Pathways in cancer

6

13.6

63/330

1.89E-05

5

13.4

39/330

2.19E-05

Complement and coagulation cascades

31

4.0

11/69

0.08904

6

12.7

13/69

4.11E-05

Axon guidance

7

12.4

30/129

5.31E-05

49

3.2

9/129

0.174755

Bladder cancer

8

11.7

14/42

1.05E-04

35

3.9

5/42

0.098477

Hematopoietic cell lineage

9

11.6

17/87

1.19E-04

9

8.5

11/87

0.001957

MAPK signaling pathway

10

10.9

44/272

2.21E-04

24

4.7

19/272

0.052229

TGF-beta signaling pathway

35

3.8

13/87

0.10746

8

8.9

13/87

0.001400

ECM-receptor interaction

12

7.9

20/84

0.00334

10

8.1

13/84

0.002819

Type II diabetes mellitus

22

5.6

7/45

0.02363

11

8.0

7/45

0.003114

Long-term depression

13

7.8

17/75

0.00361

44

3.2

2/75

0.170290

Calcium signaling pathway

38

3.7

23/182

0.11330

13

7.6

17/182

0.004315

Type I diabetes mellitus

14

7.5

8/44

0.00464

12

7.6

6/44

0.004176

Adherens junction

15

7.0

11/78

0.00718

33

4.0

3/78

0.091871

Allograft rejection

16

7.0

7/38

0.00741

15

6.7

5/38

0.009661

Epithelial cell signaling in Helicobacter pylori infection

17

6.9

15/68

0.008295

16

6.4

9/68

0.011897

Apoptosis

25

5.5

15/89

0.02658

14

6.8

11/89

0.008871

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

18

6.4

10/56

0.01234

39

3.6

5/56

0.123832

Focal adhesion

19

6.2

35/203

0.01415

34

4.0

17/203

0.095007

Small cell lung cancer

20

6.0

18/86

0.017727

30

4.1

9/86

0.083372

Systemic lupus erythematosus

26

5.4

10/144

0.02984

17

5.7

7/144

0.021797

GnRH signaling pathway

23

5.6

18/103

0.02426

32

4.1

8/103

0.085545

PPAR signaling pathway

24

5.6

14/70

0.02482

-

-

-

-

Long-term potentiation

41

3.3

11/73

0.15896

19

5.4

5/73

0.028017

Shown are the 30 most significantly affected pathways in spleen and lung ranked according to their corrected gamma p-value (the value which was used for the ranking is shown in bold letters); “Rank” is the rank of a pathway among all significantly affected pathways according to its impact factor; the “Impact factor” of a pathway is calculated from a probabilistic term considering the proportion of differentially regulated genes on the pathway and gene perturbation factors of all genes in the pathway [46]

In the spleen “leukocyte transendothelial migration” and “cell adhesion molecules” are ranked number one and two, reflecting the migratory activation of leukocytes in this central organ of the adaptive immune system. They are followed by “JAK-STAT-“and “TLR-signalling”, two pathways which play an essential role for the activation of the innate immune system and are also among the top four pathways in the lung. Three hours after IFN application TLR3 and TLR15 were upregulated in both lung and spleen. TLR3, the intraendosomal receptor for double stranded RNA, showed the strongest increase in abundance of all TLRs with an FC of +10 in the lung and +6 in the spleen and stayed upregulated at 6 and 9 h (lung: FC + 6 and +7; spleen FC +4 and +4). TLR15 is unique to reptiles and birds and binds a yeast component [48]. In contrast to the short and relatively weak upregulation in the spleen, we observed a continuous upregulation in the lung (FC +4, +2 and +5 after 3, 6 and 9 h). Interestingly, TLR5, the receptor for flagellin, was clearly downregulated in both tissues (FC –18 in the lung), while no regulation was observed for TLR21, the CpG motive binding chicken homologue of TLR9. In addition to the TLR genes themselves, the important signalling molecules TRAF3 and IRF7 were upregulated, which after TLR stimulation lead to the observed transcription of inflammatory cytokines (IL1ß, IL6, IL12) and chemokines (IL8, MIP family members and RANTES/CCLi4).

Another possibility to gain information about the connection of differentially expressed genes is a network analysis. Therefore, array data were subjected to the Interactive Pathway analysis of complex ‘omics data (IPA) from Ingenuity®. Several genes with interesting features were manually chosen as so called “upstream regulators” for a causal network analysis in order to identify genes which are directly or indirectly connected to the regulator. Exemplary, the networks for the highly upregulated cIRGs PTX3 and IL22, the strongly downregulated cIRG SFTPA1 and the nIRG ALB (albumin) are shown (Fig. 7 and Additional file 6: Figure S2).
Fig. 7

Multilayer interaction of differentially expressed genes. IPA network analysis demonstrating gene interactions with the upstream regulators PTX3 (a) and Albumin (b). Genes with higher mRNA abundance in the IFN treated animals are shown in red, genes with lower mRNA abundance in the treated animals in green. The small diagrams next to each differentially expressed gene display expression (FC) at the different time points. The magnification shows the expression course for IL6

With a 685fold upregulation (spleen, 3 h), PTX3 is the gene with the highest FC of all tissues and timepoints. As Fig. 7a shows, all of the known mammalian interactors of PTX3 were likewise regulated after IFN treatment in chickens, including several cytokines (IL1 and IL6), TLRs (TLR2 and TLR4) and transcription factors (NFκB1 and JUN). Besides, the identified interactors represented both cIRGs and nIRGs.

A nIRG for which an IPA network was found is Albumin (ALB) (Fig. 7 b). Albumin showed a 10fold upregulation in the lung after 3 h but was not affected in the spleen. IPA identified 14 significantly regulated genes to interact with albumin, among them IL1, IL6, IL12 and VEGF. And as for PTX3 interacting genes represent both cIRGs and nIRGs.

IL22 was 34-fold upregulated in the spleen (3 h) and 3-fold upregulated in the lung (9 h). From the 28 (out of 34) annotated interactors of IL22, 22 were significantly regulated by treatment with IFNα, thereby containing 14 cIRGs and 8 nIRGs (Additional file 6: Figure S2A). Among the connected genes were both, inflammatory cytokines (IL6, IL1, IL18) and regulators of an immune response (SOCS3, CD274/PD-L1).

Surfactant protein A1 (SFTPA1) is highly interesting, as it shows the strongest decrease in abundance with a 436fold downregulation in the spleen and exhibits its function through reduced expression. IPA identified 49 interacting genes, from which 31 were annotated on the microarray. Additional file 6: Figure S2B shows that about half of the known mammalian interactors were significantly affected in the chicken, nine of them being cIRGs and 13 belonging to the identified nIRGs.

Overall, IPA network analysis, a tool based on human, mouse and rat data, demonstrates that networks which were initially described in mammals are to a large part also activated in chickens and connected genes are quite equally distributed between cIRGs and nIRGs.

Cytokines and chemokines

A main effect of type I interferon on cells is to induce an antiviral state e.g. by the induction of Mx, PKR and OAS. Yet, GO analysis and Pathway express show that cell communication and cytokine signalling are as well strongly activated. As we added a multitude of probe sets for cytokine and chemokine genes and their receptors to the applied array-system, a closer examination of these cellular communicators was possible. About 20% of the Top30 genes in the spleen belong to cytokines and chemokines and IL6 and CCLi3/K203, a chicken CC-chemokine and putative homologue to human CCL16, were among the genes with strongest upregulation in spleen (IL6 + 186; K203 + 170) and lung (IL6 + 67; K203 + 16).

As Table 6 shows, IFN treatment leads to expression changes of both inflammatory and homeostatic chemokines. Among the regulated inflammatory chemokines were members of the MIP family (CCLi3, CCLi4), the MCP family (CCLi9) and both IL8 orthologs (CXCLi1 and CXCLi2). Among the homeostatic chemokines, expression of all four CCL family representatives (CCL17, 19, 20, 21), CXCL12 and the L1 and L2 isoforms of CXCL13 were regulated. Interestingly, the majority of chemokines in the spleen shows an early increase in abundance after 3 h (ten out of 15) with close to control levels after 9 h, while the opposite is seen in the lung, where expression levels for the majority of chemokines rise up to 9 h (Fig. 8a and b). For CCLi3 (K203), CXCLi1 (K60) and CXCLi2 (IL8) this results in inverted profiles in spleen and lung, demonstrating again a highly tissue specific response.
Table 6

Fold expression of differentially expressed chemokines and chemokine receptors after IFN treatment

 

Spleen

Lung

Gene symbol

IFN (3 h)

IFN (6 h)

IFN (9 h)

IFN (3 h)

IFN (6 h)

IFN (9 h)

CCLi3

145

10

5

3

3

14

CCLi6

17

2

-

-

-

-

CCLi9

3

5

6

6

11

17

CXCL13L2

9

11

13

3

4

7

CCL19

6

5

4

13

8

11

CXCLi2

3

-

-

2

2

8

CX3CL1

6

3

-

2

-

2

CXCLi1

5

2

2

2

2

5

CXCL13L1

-

-

2

3

3

5

CCL20

4

-

-

2

-

2

CCL21

-

3

3

4

2

2

CCLi4

3

−2

−2

4

3

-

CCL17

3

−2

−4

3

-

-

XCL1

−2

-

-

-

-

-

CXCL12

−4

-

-

-

-

-

CXCR4

5

-

-

-

-

-

CCRa

2

3

2

4

3

3

CCR7

-

-

-

2

-

2

CCR8

2

-

-

-

-

-

XCR1

−2

-

−2

-

-

-

CXCR7

-

-

-

−2

-

−2

CCR6

−3

-

−2

-

-

-

CX3CR1

−5

-

-

-

-

-

Fig. 8

Tissue and time specific expression profiles for chemokines and cytokines. Fold expression of differentially expressed chemokines (a + b) and cytokines (c + d) after IFN injection in the spleen (a + c) and the lung (b + d) in relation to control birds

Even more clear-cut is the picture for the regulated cytokines (Table 7 and Fig. 8c and d). Altogether IFN treatment altered the abundance of 15 cytokines and almost all highly induced cytokine genes (IL6, CSF3, IL22, IL1 and IFNγ) show the above described inverted expression profiles in spleen and lung with highest abundances after 3 h in the spleen and 9 h in the lung.
Table 7

Fold expression of differentially expressed cytokines and cytokine receptors after IFN treatment

 

Spleen

Lung

Gene Symbol

IFN (3 h)

IFN (6 h)

IFN (9 h)

IFN (3 h)

IFN (6 h)

IFN (9 h)

IL6

186

10

11

7

12

67

CSF3

58

-

-

-

-

7

IL22

34

-

3

-

-

3

IL1B

14

-

-

4

4

14

IL18

12

4

3

4

3

4

IFNG

10

2

2

2

3

9

CD40

8

3

-

-

-

-

TNFSF8

7

-

-

-

-

-

IL12B

−2

-

-

3

6

4

IL2

5

-

-

3

-

3

IL17F

5

-

2

-

-

-

TNFSF15

5

-

-

-

-

-

FAS

3

-

-

3

-

2

IL12A

3

-

-

-

-

-

TNFSF10

3

3

-

-

-

-

TNFSF13B

-

-

-

2

-

-

TNFSF11

-

-

−2

-

-

-

IL7

−3

-

-

-

-

-

TRAIL

−3

-

-

-

-

-

IL1RL1

15

5

3

14

3

3

IL13RA2

13

7

6

14

12

18

TNFRSF8

9

3

4

-

-

-

IL1R2

7

3

-

3

-

-

TNFRSF11B

3

-

-

5

-

-

CSF3R

-

4

4

-

2

2

IL20RA

4

3

-

3

-

-

CSF2RB

4

-

-

3

-

2

IL2RA

4

-

-

-

-

2

IL23R

4

2

-

-

-

-

CSF2RA

3

2

-

3

3

3

IL10RB

3

-

-

2

-

-

TNFRSF1B

3

-

-

2

-

-

IL21R

2

-

-

3

-

-

TNFRSF1A

-

-

-

2

-

3

IFNGR1

3

-

-

-

-

-

IL4R

3

-

-

-

-

-

IL1R1

3

-

-

-

-

-

IFNAR1

2

-

-

2

-

-

TNFRSF13C

2

-

-

-

-

-

IL7R

2

-

-

-

-

-

IL10RA

2

-

-

-

-

-

IL12RB2

−2

-

-

-

-

-

IL28RA

−2

-

-

-

-

-

IL1RL2

-

−2

−2

-

-

-

IL11RA

−3

-

-

-

-

-

Discussion

Methodical aspects

Though type I IFNs were first described in the chicken, the vast majority of available information about these cytokines is derived from human and mouse studies. Recently it became clear that the pleiotropic functions of type I IFNs are mediated by the regulation of a huge number of genes. As the chicken’s immune system differs significantly to that of human and mouse we aimed for a better understanding of the chicken’s response to IFNα. The performed database analysis identified more than 1400 human/murine IRGs which are also present in the chicken genome. As the existence of such a gene does not necessarily argue for its regulation by IFN, birds were intravenously treated with IFNα and changes in gene expression were analysed in lung (the target tissue of many important pathogens like AIV, IBV, NDV, APEC) and spleen (the most prominent secondary lymphatic tissue in birds). The setting evidently differs from a naturally occurring lung infection, where a local immune response with production of type I IFN would be induced first, which then could become systemic. However, it avoids the mixture of effects seen in a natural immune response, where several cytokines and effector molecules are induced in parallel.

In order to apply biologically relevant amounts of IFN, we first determined the pharmacokinetic profile of recombinant chIFN in chickens. With a terminal half-life of approximately 36 min it is clearly shorter than the half-life reported for human IFNα (4-6 h) or human IFNβ in humans (1-2 h) [49], an observation which can possibly be attributed to the higher metabolic activity in birds. Using an application setting based on these data we were able to obtain a constant IFN level during the experiment comparable to levels observed during natural occurring viral infections [20].

Heatmap analysis of the performed arrays already showed two things: firstly, strong effects of IFN on gene expression in both tissues studied with a clear separation of treated and control birds and secondly, explicit differences between spleen and lung. As expected a closer look at the differentially expressed genes showed a strong induction of IRGs Mx, OAS and PKR, thus proving the reliability of the experiment. Regarding the time point of expression the vast majority of differentially expressed genes (86% in the spleen and 80% in the lung) was found 3 h after IFNα application.

Surprisingly, we observed relatively little concordance between our in silico and in vivo analyses, with many IRGs identified in the database search being not differentially expressed in the array and many differentially expressed genes having not been found in the database. In agreement with our observation Giotis and colleagues analyzed IRGs in IFNα treated chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) and they also identified many potential chicken IRGs with no equivalent in the Interferome database [29]. Partly, annotation problems could be a reason as entries in the database and the chicken genome use a different nomenclature, hence mammalian IRGs were not found on the array. Nevertheless, it is very unlikely that this applies but for all 70% of the genes without mammalian equivalent. The finding of so many additional differentially expressed genes might have been facilitated by the usage of a strong stimulation and the high sensitivity of the array. Furthermore, we analyzed both increased and reduced expression of target genes, while many other approaches were only focused on positively affected, so called “Interferon Stimulated Genes” (ISGs) [13, 29]. Among the 30 most affected genes in the spleen were eight with reduced expression and only one of them (SFTPA1) was also identified in the database search.

Other reasons for the discrepancy between in silico and array results might be time-, tissue- and species specificity. Database entries comprise a multitude of tissues and cells with different times of IFN exposition [12]. Our analysis demonstrates large differences between the two examined tissues and three examined time points. Hence, testing of additional tissues and time points might reveal further differentially expressed genes and a larger overlap with the database search. And despite the general conservation of the IFN pathway some IRGs might be species specific.

cIRGs and nIRGs

The fact that so many differentially expressed genes had not been found in the database search suggested to discriminate between common (database) IRGs (cIRGs) and newly (only in the microarray) identified IRGs (nIRGs). To increase the probability that identified nIRGs are truly regulated by interferon, only genes differentially expressed after 3 h of IFN exposition were considered as IRGs and used for downstream analyses as at later time points secondary effects could not be excluded. For instance IL6 expression was strongly induced and high amounts of protein were found after 3 h (Fig. 5). As IL6 itself induces an inflammatory reaction, at later time points genes could be regulated by IL6 instead of IFN.

Another approach to compare cIRGs and nIRGs was the search for ISRE and GAS elements. Unfortunately, an automated search did identify only a very low number of both of them in the promotor region of the analysed genes and did not reveal clear differences between both groups of IRGs and control genes. The low overall coverage is possibly caused by weak sequence conservation between chicken on the one hand and mouse and man on the other. Additionally, due to technical limitations we were only able to screen a portion of functional ISRE and GAS elements and may have missed chicken specific ISRE and GAS elements or so far unidentified ISRE and GAS elements which are conserved across species.

More successful was the individual screening of the 30 most strongly affected genes, were with one exception in every gene an ISRE or GAS element was identified. Surprisingly, in contrast to mammalian data [41] far more GAS than ISRE elements were found, but it has already been shown that type I IFN induced transcription factors are able to activate GAS elements [44]. So, despite its limitations, the promotor analysis revealed identical motive distribution in cIRGs and nIRGs.

IPA interaction shows that upstream regulators interact equally with cIRGs and nIRGs and the GO and pathway distribution of both groups is largely identical. The fact that “Immune system process” was slightly stronger represented among cIRGs than in nIRGs, might be caused by a stronger focus on immune genes of the used databases. Overall, we think it is very likely that expression of the identified nIRGs is regulated by IFN.

Tissue and time specificity

The heatmap analysis had already pointed to a tissue specific reaction to IFN exposure. The clear separation of the 3 h expression pattern in the spleen points to a fast peaking response while the larger similarities between 3, 6 and 9 h in the lung suggest a slower and more sustained reaction of this organ. Changes in RNA abundance support this observation, as these were in general stronger in the spleen, where also twice as many differentially expressed genes were identified. For instance absolute changes of Mx, OAS and PKR abundance were clearly higher in the spleen and the expression profiles of these IRGs show a strong 3 h peak in the spleen versus a continuous up regulation (plateau) in the lung.

Though the receptor for type I IFN is ubiquitously expressed [50] and theoretically every cell can react to IFN stimulation, the more homogenous tissue composition of the spleen might lead to more intense variations than in the heterogeneous lung, where the cartilaginous parts might react differently from epithelium and lung associated immune cells. In addition, immune cells may show a more pronounced reactivity per se and this difference might have been increased as we, on purpose, did exclude large lymphoid structures in lung samples by avoiding major BALT regions during sampling.

Tissue specificity is also underlined by pathway analysis, as the most strongly affected pathways differ in spleen and lung. Interestingly, the two main pathways in the spleen “Leukocyte transendothelial migration” and “Cell adhesion molecules” were also the most affected after infection with IBDV [51]. As one would expect, IBDV infection led to the expression of type I IFN, but in parallel also IFNγ as well as many other cytokines were induced. Even though the stimuli were heterogeneous in the IBDV experiment the reaction pattern of the spleen was similar to a sole stimulation with IFNα, supporting the idea of a tissue specific reaction.

Tissue specificity is not only presented by the diversity of affected genes but also by time specific expression patterns. Generation of expression courses for all differentially expressed genes revealed that two thirds of the genes affected in both tissues are solely up- or downregulated after 3 h of IFN exposition. However, profiles with up regulation after 9 h are proportionately much stronger represented in the lung than the spleen. This is for instance shown by expression profiles of regulated chemokine and cytokine genes. In many of these profiles the spleen reacts early and the lung reacts late, leading to opposite profiles e.g. for inflammatory chemokines (CCLi3 (K203), CXCLi1 (K60), CXCLi2 (IL8)) and inflammatory cytokines (IL1, IL6). Interestingly, this time specific reaction of IRGs was also observed in a transcriptome analysis of cultured CEF [29] and hence seems to be more of a general phenomenon than restricted to lung or spleen.

Conserved interaction of selected upstream regulators

Network analysis with selected “upstream regulators” suggests a widely conserved interaction pattern for chicken IRGs as many of the known mammalian interactors are also affected in the chicken.

PTX3, the gene with the highest fold change (FC), is a member of the pentraxin superfamily like the acute phase proteins CRP (C reactive protein) and Serum Amyloid P Component (SAP) and acts as Pattern Recognition receptor (PRR). During inflammatory processes PTX3 is rapidly produced by macrophages, dendritic cells, fibroblasts and epithelial cells [52]. It is known to activate the classical pathway of the complement system and facilitates pathogen recognition by DCs and MQs [5254]. By binding to hemagglutinin it is also able to inhibit infectivity of influenza viruses [55]. In mammals PTX3 is known to directly and indirectly influence cytokines and their receptors, growth factors, G-protein coupled receptors, peptidases and transcription factors [56]. As we found regulation of IL1, IL6, IGF1 and also NFkB and Jun, chicken PTX3 seems to have a similar mode of action.

Serum albumin is a “negative acute-phase protein”, which means its abundance decreases during an acute-phase-response, probably to save amino acids for positive acute phase proteins [57, 58]. The IFNα induced upregulation of albumin in the lung strongly argues for an active function of this protein as indicated by the connection with several cytokines and chemokines. It is known that human albumin protects tissue against oxidative stress by blocking reactive oxygen species (ROS) from neutrophils [59, 60]. Hence, albumin could protect the lung against deleterious side effects of IFN.

For Surfactant protein A1 (SFTPA1) we found the strongest decrease of RNA abundance. Reduced expression of SFTPA1 was also observed in infection studies with chickens using ILTV (Infectious Lanryngotracheitis Virus) and Avian Influenza Virus H9N2 [61, 62], possibly mediated by virus induced IFN. It was shown that suppression of the P38 MAPK and the PI-3 kinase pathway can downregulate SFTPA1 [63, 64] and especially for the PI-3 kinase pathway we observed a very strong activation in spleens and lung. Two thirds of the IPA annotated interactors were also found in the chicken and among them are several proinflammatory cytokines (IL1, IL6), whose production can be suppressed by SFTPA1 [65]. Hence reduced SFTPA1 abundance allows for a higher induction of proinflammatory cytokines and a stronger IFN induced immune response.

IL22, a strongly upregulated cIRG is a member of the IL10 superfamily. Being pro-regenerative, pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic its main function is to modulate the tissue response during an inflammatory reaction [66]. The interactors for IL22 which we identified in our data set follow the idea of a modulating cytokine as both inflammatory factors and regulators of an immune response were found. While IL22 is exclusively produced by leukocytes of the innate and adaptive immune system, the IL22R is mostly expressed on epithelial cells [67]. In mice a close interaction of IL22 and IFNα and IFNλ, respectively was demonstrated for lung and gut and this interplay between IL22 and interferon seems also be true for the chicken.

Sensitization and desensitization

For several species it was shown that pathogen recognition induces the production of type I IFN and induces a multitude of effector mechanisms. In addition, exposure of cells to IFN does sensitize the cells for further detection of pathogens [6]. In our studies this was also demonstrated for chicken cells as IFN treatment upregulated TLRs for RNA and yeast detection, the RNA detecting OAS and the cytosolic NOD-like receptor NLRC5. NLRC5 shows a close evolutionary relationship to NLRC1 and NLRC2 and hence is probably involved in detection of bacterial infections [68].

In mice it was shown that in most cells pathogen sensing leads first to the expression of IFNβ, which then induces an amplification step IFNα [7]. We did not find upregulation of mRNA for type I IFNs, which might be caused by the artificial setting or a different induction mechanism in the chicken. In contrast to type I IFNs, IFNγ was upregulated in spleen and lung and showed the described inverted expression profiles. This shows that type I IFN is not only a strong effector of the innate immune response but by inducing IRGs like IFNγ, IL18, IL2 and CXCL13 does also activate adaptive immunity.

IFN signalling can induce a powerful inflammatory immune response and therefore needs to be tightly controlled. Once an IFN response is initiated desensitization of cells is induced in parallel by several mechanisms. One proposed mechanism is downregulation of the IFN receptor, but we found a slight upregulation of IFNAR1 RNA after 3 h. In mammals, the action of SOCS (suppressor of cytokine signalling) proteins, which inhibit JAK-STAT signalling, is well described as early desensitizing mechanism. The same seems to be applicable to chickens as a significant upregulation of SOCS1 and SOCS3 in spleen and lung, with a strong 3 h peak in the spleen and a plateau in the spleen was obseved. USP18 does maintain long-term desensitization by either removing ISG15 conjugated proteins or intracellular binding to IFNAR2 [69, 70]. Strong upregulation of USP18 in spleen and lung after 3 h demonstrates the conservation of negative control mechanisms of the type I IFN response in chickens.

Conclusion

The application of a constant, physiological amount of IFNα over 9 h affected a multitude of IRGs in spleen and lung. We identified many different expression profiles and found that induction/suppression of IRGs is both tissue and time specific. It became apparent that type I IFN does not only induce antiviral mechanisms but also mediates a multitude of different functions. As we found little overlap of our data with existing databases, we here provide a large new dataset for further research, both to expand the data set by further tissues and time points and to examine single IRGs for their individual function. Our study provides the basis for the potential identification of new antiviral mechanisms with broader screening approaches using RNA interference or gene editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas9.

Abbreviations

APEC: 

Avian pathogenic E.coli

BALT: 

Bronchus associated lymphoid tissue

cIRG: 

common IRG

CRP: 

C reactive protein

DC: 

Dendritic cell

FC: 

Fold change

FDR: 

False discovery rate

GAS: 

γ-activated sequences

GO: 

Gene ontology

HPAI: 

highly pathogenic avian influenza

IFIT: 

IFN induced transmembrane protein

IFN: 

Interferon

IL: 

Interleukin

IRG: 

Interferon regulated gene

IRNAR: 

Interferon-α/β receptor

ISRE: 

interferon-stimulated response element

MeV: 

Multi experiment Viewer

MQ: 

Macrophage

Mx1: 

Myxovirus resistance 1

NDV: 

Newcastle disease virus

nIRG: 

newly identified IRG

OAS: 

2’-‘5-oligoadenylate synthetase

PKR: 

IFN-inducible double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase

PRR: 

Pattern Recognition receptor

SAP: 

Serum Amyloid P Component

TLR: 

Toll like receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Peter Staeheli (University of Freiburg) for many supportive critical discussions and helpful advice.

Funding

This work was supported by the German Ministry for Education and Research (FluResearchNet), grant 01KI1006G to SH.

Availability of data and materials

Array data have been submitted to Array Express (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) under the accession number E-MTAB-5567.

Authors’ contributions

SR designed, performed and analyzed the experiments. StH determined the half-life of IFN. TL wrote the program for the promotor analysis. BK designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. SH designed the experiments, interpreted the data and was major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Animal experiments were approved by the local authorities of Upper Bavaria – Regierung von Oberbayern (Az.: 55.2-1-54-2532.6-12-09) – in response to the evaluation of the experiments by the Animal Rights Commission in accordance with the federal Animal Rights Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department for Veterinary Science, University of Munich
(2)
formerly Department for Veterinary Science, University of Munich
(3)
Institute of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, JLU Giessen

References

  1. Pestka S, Krause CD, Walter MR. Interferons, interferon-like cytokines, and their receptors. Immunol Rev. 2004;202:8–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Levy DE, Marie IJ, Durbin JE. Induction and function of type I and III interferon in response to viral infection. Curr Opin Virol. 2011;1(6):476–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Schoggins JW, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes and their antiviral effector functions. Curr Opin Virol. 2011;1(6):519–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Billiau A, Matthys P. Interferon-gamma: a historical perspective. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009;20(2):97–113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Galani IE, Koltsida O, Andreakos E. Type III interferons (IFNs): Emerging Master Regulators of Immunity. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;850:1–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Iwasaki A. A virological view of innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:177–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Haller O, Kochs G, Weber F. The interferon response circuit: induction and suppression by pathogenic viruses. Virology. 2006;344(1):119–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Takaoka A, Yanai H. Interferon signalling network in innate defence. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8(6):907–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Haller O, Kochs G. Interferon-induced mx proteins: dynamin-like GTPases with antiviral activity. Traffic. 2002;3(10):710–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schneider WM, Chevillotte MD, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes: a complex web of host defenses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:513–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. de Veer MJ, et al. Functional classification of interferon-stimulated genes identified using microarrays. J Leukoc Biol. 2001;69(6):912–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Samarajiwa SA, et al. INTERFEROME: the database of interferon regulated genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D852–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Der SD, et al. Identification of genes differentially regulated by interferon alpha, beta, or gamma using oligonucleotide arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(26):15623–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Schoggins JW, et al. A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. Nature. 2011;472(7344):481–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. USDA. Available from: www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal-disease-information/avian-influenza-disease/ct_avian_influenza_disease.
  16. Dimitrov KM, et al. Newcastle Disease Viruses Causing Recent Outbreaks Worldwide Show Unexpectedly High Genetic Similarity to Historical Virulent Isolates from the 1940s. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(5):1228–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Schultz U, Kaspers B, Staeheli P. The interferon system of non-mammalian vertebrates. Dev Comp Immunol. 2004;28(5):499–508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sick C, Schultz U, Staeheli P. A family of genes coding for two serologically distinct chicken interferons. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(13):7635–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Barber MR, et al. Association of RIG-I with innate immunity of ducks to influenza. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(13):5913–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Penski N, et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses do not inhibit interferon synthesis in infected chickens but can override the interferon-induced antiviral state. J Virol. 2011;85(15):7730–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Xu L, et al. Loss of RIG-I leads to a functional replacement with MDA5 in the Chinese tree shrew. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(39):10950–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Schumacher B, et al. The chicken Mx promoter contains an ISRE motif and confers interferon inducibility to a reporter gene in chick and monkey cells. Virology. 1994;203(1):144–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Goossens KE, et al. Characterisation of chicken viperin. Mol Immunol. 2015;63(2):373–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Goossens KE, et al. Characterisation of chicken ZAP. Dev Comp Immunol. 2014;46(2):373–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ewald SJ, et al. Association of Mx1 Asn631 variant alleles with reductions in morbidity, early mortality, viral shedding, and cytokine responses in chickens infected with a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. Immunogenetics. 2011;63(6):363–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ko JH, et al. Polymorphisms and the differential antiviral activity of the chicken Mx gene. Genome Res. 2002;12(4):595–601.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Bernasconi D, Schultz U, Staeheli P. The interferon-induced Mx protein of chickens lacks antiviral activity. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1995;15(1):47–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schusser B, et al. Mx is dispensable for interferon-mediated resistance of chicken cells against influenza A virus. J Virol. 2011;85(16):8307–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Giotis ES, et al. Chicken interferome: avian interferon-stimulated genes identified by microarray and RNA-seq of primary chick embryo fibroblasts treated with a chicken type I interferon (IFN-alpha). Vet Res. 2016;47(1):75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Schultz U, et al. Recombinant chicken interferon from Escherichia coli and transfected COS cells is biologically active. Eur J Biochem. 1995;229(1):73–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Interferon standards: a memorandum. J Biol Stand. 1979;7(4):383-95.Google Scholar
  32. Pechumer H, et al. Recovery of monocytes after bone marrow transplantation--rapid reappearance of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6 production. Transplantation. 1991;52(4):698–704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Scudiero DA, et al. Evaluation of a soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth and drug sensitivity in culture using human and other tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 1988;48(17):4827–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Huber W, et al. Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics. 2002;18 Suppl 1:S96–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(9):5116–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas PD, et al. PANTHER: a browsable database of gene products organized by biological function, using curated protein family and subfamily classification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(1):334–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Mi H, et al. PANTHER version 7: improved phylogenetic trees, orthologs and collaboration with the Gene Ontology Consortium. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Database issue):D204–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Saeed AI, et al. TM4 microarray software suite. Methods Enzymol. 2006;411:134–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Saeed AI, et al. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques. 2003;34(2):374–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall OJ. PerlPrimer: cross-platform, graphical primer design for standard, bisulphite and real-time PCR. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(15):2471–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsukahara T, Kim S, Taylor MW. REFINEMENT: a search framework for the identification of interferon-responsive elements in DNA sequences--a case study with ISRE and GAS. Comput Biol Chem. 2006;30(2):134–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Reid LE, et al. A single DNA response element can confer inducibility by both alpha- and gamma-interferons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(3):840–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Li X, et al. Cooperative binding of Stat1-2 heterodimers and ISGF3 to tandem DNA elements. Biochimie. 1998;80(8-9):703–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Stark GR, et al. How cells respond to interferons. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:227–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hug H, et al. Organization of the murine Mx gene and characterization of its interferon- and virus-inducible promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1988;8(8):3065–79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Cantrell DA. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase signalling pathways. J Cell Sci. 2001;114(Pt 8):1439–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Boyd AC, et al. TLR15 is unique to avian and reptilian lineages and recognizes a yeast-derived agonist. J Immunol. 2012;189(10):4930–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Radwanski E, et al. Pharmacokinetics of interferon alpha-2b in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;27(5):432–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. de Weerd NA, Samarajiwa SA, Hertzog PJ. Type I interferon receptors: biochemistry and biological functions. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(28):20053–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith J, et al. Analysis of the early immune response to infection by infectious bursal disease virus in chickens differing in their resistance to the disease. J Virol. 2015;89(5):2469–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Garlanda C, et al. Pentraxins at the crossroads between innate immunity, inflammation, matrix deposition, and female fertility. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:337–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Garlanda C, et al. Non-redundant role of the long pentraxin PTX3 in anti-fungal innate immune response. Nature. 2002;420(6912):182–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Diniz SN, et al. PTX3 function as an opsonin for the dectin-1-dependent internalization of zymosan by macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;75(4):649–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Reading PC, et al. Antiviral activity of the long chain pentraxin PTX3 against influenza viruses. J Immunol. 2008;180(5):3391–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Cotena A, et al. Complement dependent amplification of the innate response to a cognate microbial ligand by the long pentraxin PTX3. J Immunol. 2007;179(9):6311–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sitar ME, Aydin S, Cakatay U. Human serum albumin and its relation with oxidative stress. Clin Lab. 2013;59(9-10):945–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Jamieson JC, et al. Glycoprotein biosynthesis during the acute-phase response to inflammation. Can J Biochem Cell Biol. 1983;61(9):1041–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kouoh F, et al. Antioxidant properties of albumin: effect on oxidative metabolism of human neutrophil granulocytes. Farmaco. 1999;54(10):695–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Oettl K, et al. Oxidative damage of albumin in advanced liver disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782(7-8):469–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Lee JY, et al. Transcriptional profiling of host gene expression in chicken embryo lung cells infected with laryngotracheitis virus. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:445.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Reemers SS, et al. Transcriptional expression levels of chicken collectins are affected by avian influenza A virus inoculation. Vet Microbiol. 2010;141(3-4):379–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Miakotina OL, Goss KL, Snyder JM. Insulin utilizes the PI 3-kinase pathway to inhibit SP-A gene expression in lung epithelial cells. Respir Res. 2002;3:27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Miakotina OL, Snyder JM. TNF-alpha inhibits SP-A gene expression in lung epithelial cells via p38 MAPK. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002;283(2):L418–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Alcorn JF, Wright JR. Surfactant protein A inhibits alveolar macrophage cytokine production by CD14-independent pathway. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004;286(1):L129–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Bachmann M, et al. IFNalpha converts IL-22 into a cytokine efficiently activating STAT1 and its downstream targets. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85(3):396–403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Dudakov JA, Hanash AM, van den Brink MR. Interleukin-22: immunobiology and pathology. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:747–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Lamkanfi M, Kanneganti TD. Regulation of immune pathways by the NOD-like receptor NLRC5. Immunobiology. 2012;217(1):13–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Yang Z, et al. USP18 negatively regulates NF-kappaB signaling by targeting TAK1 and NEMO for deubiquitination through distinct mechanisms. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12738.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang X, et al. Human intracellular ISG15 prevents interferon-alpha/beta over-amplification and auto-inflammation. Nature. 2015;517(7532):89–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement