Open Access

Response of turkey muscle satellite cells to thermal challenge. I. transcriptome effects in proliferating cells

  • Kent M. Reed1Email author,
  • Kristelle M. Mendoza1,
  • Juan E. Abrahante2,
  • Natalie E. Barnes1,
  • Sandra G. Velleman3, 4 and
  • Gale M. Strasburg5
BMC Genomics201718:352

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3740-4

Received: 23 January 2017

Accepted: 27 April 2017

Published: 6 May 2017

Abstract

Background

Climate change poses a multi-dimensional threat to food and agricultural systems as a result of increased risk to animal growth, development, health, and food product quality. This study was designed to characterize transcriptional changes induced in turkey muscle satellite cells cultured under cold or hot thermal challenge to better define molecular mechanisms by which thermal stress alters breast muscle ultrastructure.

Results

Satellite cells isolated from the pectoralis major muscle of 7-weeks-old male turkeys from two breeding lines (16 weeks body weight-selected and it’s randombred control) were proliferated in culture at 33 °C, 38 °C or 43 °C for 72 h. Total RNA was isolated and 12 libraries subjected to RNAseq analysis. Statistically significant differences in gene expression were observed among treatments and between turkey lines with a greater number of genes altered by cold treatment than by hot and fewer differences observed between lines than between temperatures. Pathway analysis found that cold treatment resulted in an overrepresentation of genes involved in cell signaling/signal transduction and cell communication/cell signaling as compared to control (38 °C). Heat-treated muscle satellite cells showed greater tendency towards expression of genes related to muscle system development and differentiation.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates significant transcriptome effects on turkey skeletal muscle satellite cells exposed to thermal challenge. Additional effects on gene expression could be attributed to genetic selection for 16 weeks body weight (muscle mass). New targets are identified for further research on the differential control of satellite cell proliferation in poultry.

Keywords

Satellite cell Skeletal muscle Growth selected Turkey Proliferation

Background

Climate change poses a multi-dimensional threat to food and agricultural systems by affecting plant and animal production systems, stability of food supplies, food quality and access to food [1]. In addition to the increase in mean temperature, there is a predicted increase in the frequency of extreme temperature days [2, 3]. Such volatile temperatures put animals at increased risk of thermal stress, thereby potentially affecting animal growth, development, health, and food product quality.

Thermal stress can manifest as extremes of both hot and cold temperatures. In addition to the obvious welfare issues, the effects of hot temperatures have been of particular interest to poultry producers due to effects on muscle that reduce meat quality. Specifically, in chickens, chronic heat exposure results in lower weight gain, lower ratio of breast muscle to body weight, and increased intramuscular fat deposition [4]. Turkey meat in particular is valued for its low fat content, thus increased fat deposition can decrease meat quality. In contrast, relatively severe cold stress slightly before slaughter in chickens resulted in decreased meat quality via changes in pH, color, and drip loss [5]. Moderate cold stress in young chickens has also been shown to cause damage to the heart and duodenum – with the severity of injury increasing with the length of exposure [6, 7]. The nature and extent of the physiological response to thermal stress is a function of genetic background as well as the timing of the stress [8, 9]. Fast growing lines of poultry tend to be more sensitive to thermal stress than slower growing lines [9].

In this study, we utilized cultured turkey satellite cells as a model system to study the effects of thermal stress on muscle growth and development. Satellite cells are muscle stem cells located between the basement membrane and sarcolemma of skeletal muscle fibers [10]. In the early post-hatch period, avian satellite cells respond to mild heat stress with accelerated proliferation and differentiation [11]. Evidence from cell culture studies suggest that satellite cells are multi-potential stem cells which can be induced to follow myogenic, osteogenic, or adipogenic cellular pathways [12, 13]. Satellite cells are highly active during the period of rapid growth after hatch [11] and then become quiescent until they are needed for hypertrophy or repair [14]. The increased fat deposition noted above may be the result of transdifferentiation of muscle satellite cells into adipocytes.

This study seeks to characterize the transcriptional changes induced in satellite cells cultured under hot or cold thermal challenge to better define molecular mechanisms by which thermal stress alters turkey breast muscle ultrastructure and consequently food quality. Here we compare gene expression between cultured satellite cells derived from both fast and slow-growing lines in the context of thermal challenge. We hypothesize that satellite cell activity, its ultimate fate as a muscle cell or adipocyte, and thus overall muscle development will be altered by temperature. Determining the satellite cell-mediated mechanisms associated with the development of superior meat quality will allow development of effective breeding, nutritional, and management strategies to promote the production of consistent, high quality muscle food products.

Methods

Turkey myogenic satellite cells

Satellite cells were isolated from the pectoralis major muscle of 7-weeks-old males from the Randombred Control 2 (RBC2) and body weight-selected (F) turkey lines as previously described [15]. The RBC2 line is maintained at the Poultry Research Center of the Ohio Agricultural Research Development Center/The Ohio State University Wooster, OH without conscious selection for any trait [16]. The F line was derived from the RBC2 line and selected only for 16weeks body weight [16, 17]. These larger and faster- growing turkeys have greater p. major muscle and body weights than the RBC2 line [18, 19].

Turkey p. major satellite cells were plated at a density of 15,000 cells per well in 0.1% gelatin coated 24-well plates (Greiner BioOne, Monroe, NC). After plating, cells were incubated in a 38 °C 95% air/5% CO2 incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 24 h in plating medium consisting of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 10% chicken serum (Gemini BioProducts, West Sacramento, CA), 5% horse serum (Gemini BioProducts), 1% antibiotics-antimycotics, and 0.1% gentamicin. After 24 h the plating medium was removed and the cells were fed growth medium consisting of McCoy’s 5A (Sigma Aldrich), 10% chicken serum, 5% horse serum, 1% antibiotics-antimycotics, and 0.1% gentamicin. Cells were cultured in a 38 °C 95% air/5% CO2 incubator (control) or in a 95% air/5% CO2 incubator held at an experimental temperature (33° or 43 °C) for 72 h. Growth medium was changed every 24 h for the 72 h treatment. Cell medium was removed and the plates were held at −80 °C until RNA isolation. The control temperature of 38 °C is lower than the body temperature of mature turkeys (41.5 °C) but is approximately that measured in newly hatched poults (38.0–38.5 °C, Strasburg, unpubl). Growth characteristics of these cells are further detailed in Clark et al. [20].

RNA isolation and sequencing

Total RNA was isolated from each sample by TRIzol extraction (Ambion, Inc.), DNase-treated (Turbo DNA-free TM Kit, Ambion, Inc.), and stored at −80 °C. Initial RNA concentration and quality was assessed by spectrophotometry (Nanodrop 1000). RNA samples were submitted for library preparation and sequencing at the University of Minnesota Genomics Center. Each sample was quantified by RiboGreen Assay (Invitrogen Corp.) and RNA integrity was confirmed on the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Aligent Technologies). Replicate samples were sequenced from each treatment group (n = 12). Each sample had clear 18S and 28S peak separation on the electropherograms and RNA Integrity Number (RIN) between 6.4 and 8.5. Indexed libraries were constructed with 1 μg of total RNA/sample with the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit version 2 (Illumina, Inc.) and size selected for approximately 200 bp inserts. Libraries were multiplexed, pooled and sequenced over 2 lanes on the HiSeq 2000 using v3 chemistry (Illumina, Inc.) to produce 101-bp paired-end reads.

RNAseq data analyses

Sequence adapters were removed and low quality bases were trimmed using Trimmomatic [20] enabled with the optional “-q” option; 3 bp sliding-window trimming from 3’ end requiring minimum Q30. Quality control checks on raw sequence data for each sample were performed with FastQC [21]. Read mapping was performed via Bowtie (v2.2.4.0) using the turkey genome (UMD 5.0, NCBI Annotation 101). Read counts were normalized in CLC Genomics Workbench (CLCGWB v. 8.0.2, CLC Bio) by dividing the total read counts by the group sample sum and the results expressed as reads per 16M. Hierarchical clustering of samples (based on Euclidean sample distances with single linkage) was performed in CLCGWB using normalized reads counts. Empirical analysis of differential gene expression and ANOVA was performed in CLCGWB on original expression values (Bonferroni and FDR corrected). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in CLCGWB to identify and quantify variability in the data. Volcano plots and Venn diagrams were used to visualize the expression data and the results of significance testing. Pair-wise comparisons between treatment groups were made in the Bioconductor (3.2) R package DESeq2 [22] following the standard workflow. In each pair-wise comparison, significant DE genes were used to investigate affected gene pathways using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA). Gene enrichment tests were performed using the PANTHER Overrepresentation Test (GO Consortium release 20150430, [23]; http://geneontology.org/). GO analysis utilized the reference gene set of the chicken (Gallus gallus) of which ~63% of the turkey loci (Annotation 101) had ID homologs.

Results

Total RNA isolated from satellite cell cultures (n = 12) was used for construction of individual barcoded libraries. Sequencing of all libraries produced over 195M reads (accessioned as part of SRA BioProject 341399). The number of reads per library ranged from 12.4M to 18.5M (average 16.3M) (Table 1). After read trimming and filtering, median Q score was consistently high and ranged from 36.8 to 37.3. Box-plots demonstrate that quality scores across base position in each corrected dataset were sufficiently high for reliable base calling (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The number of reads per treatment group ranged from 14.5 to 17.2M with an average of 16.28M ± 1.06 M reads. Replicate libraries produced comparable results with an average difference between replicates of 1.6M reads.
Table 1

Summary of RNAseq data for proliferation experiment

Line

Temp °C

Replicate

PE reads

Median read quality R1

Median read quality R2

Trimmed PE reads

% mapped

% concordant

Estimated insert mean (bp)

Total observed genes

Mean expressed genes

% expressed genes

RBC2

33

A

18492232

37.3

37.2

17160507

90.0

84.3

199

16527

15065

71.7

  

B

15688650

37.3

37.2

14526144

89.8

84.0

199

16305

 

38

A

17462871

37.1

36.9

15938819

88.3

81.6

227

16408

14524

69.1

  

B

16861464

37.1

36.9

15388173

88.4

81.8

226

16186

 

43

A

12482369

37.1

36.8

11301872

88.4

82.2

194

15864

14241

67.8

  

B

16552504

36.9

36.8

15135313

87.3

80.5

199

15864

F-Line

33

A

15640211

37.2

37.1

14477399

89.7

84.0

199

15734

15091

71.8

  

B

15574971

37.2

37.1

14421868

89.6

83.5

199

15814

 

38

A

15615066

37.2

37

14320803

88.5

81.9

218

15343

14586

69.4

  

B

16932717

37.1

36.9

15464075

89.1

82.5

226

15365

 

43

A

16624565

37.1

36.8

15156088

89.1

81.9

225

15886

14771

70.3

  

B

17476215

37.1

37

16091169

89.2

82.8

198

15874

Mean

  

16283652.9

37.14

36.98

14948529.2

88.95

82.58

209.1

15930.8

14713

70.03

For each library the total number of concatenated reads, median read qualities (R1 and R2), estimated mean insert length (bp), number of and percentage of aligned reads, percentage of concordant reads, and the number and percentage of observed genes (mapped reads >1) and expressed genes (mean group normalized read count >3.0) are given

Gene expression

Approximately 89% of the quality trimmed reads mapped uniquely to the annotated turkey gene set (Table 1) with an estimated mean library insert of 209.1 bp. This percentage was consistent across treatment groups. For all libraries, the percentage of aligned read pairs exceeded 87% (avg 88.95%) and the majority of reads (avg 82.6%) mapped concordantly to the gene set (Table 1). A total of 16,515 genes was detected (minimum one mapped read in at least one treatment group) with an average of 15,930 per treatment group (74.3% of the turkey gene set). Mean read depth was 491.3 reads/gene (Additional file 2: Table S1). When limited by the average number of mapped reads (≥3.0), the mean number of expressed genes (tRNAs excluded) was reduced (average 14,712) and ranged from 12,192 to 13,094 within treatment groups (Table 1).

Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to visualize the variation among treatment groups based on normalized read counts (Fig. 1). Treatment groups generally clustered distinctly (Temp/Time) within the first two principal components (explaining 98% of the observed variation) irrespective of line. Hierarchical clustering of groups by Euclidean distance reiterated the relationships shown by PCA (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Groups clustered by line and incubation temperature. All replicate treatment pairs occurred as nearest neighbors, supporting the pooling of replicates for expression analyses. Differences in gene expression among groups are illustrated in the heat map which includes the co-expressed genes with the greatest experiment-wise differences in average expression.
Fig. 1

Principal component analysis (PCA) of RNAseq data based on normalized read counts. Sample to sample distances (within- and between-treatments) are illustrated for each dataset on the first two principal components comprising approximately 98% of the variation. Samples are plotted according to treatment

Distribution of unique and shared expressed genes among treatment groups are illustrated in Table 2. On average 14,245 genes were co-expressed between treatment groups, within temperature and 13,794 genes were co-expressed between lines. This reflects an overall similarity in response of cultured satellite cells between the turkey lines. Numbers of uniquely expressed genes were higher for the F-line at all incubation temperatures (453, 449, and 809 at 33 °C, 38 °C and 43 °C, respectively). In comparing treatment groups, the highest numbers of shared genes occurred between the 33 °C and 38 °C treatments for both lines (Table 2).
Table 2

Summary of gene expression and significant differential expression (DE) in pair-wise comparisons of proliferating cells

Comparison

Groups

Total expressed genes

Shared genes

Unique Genes in each group

FDR < 0.05

|Log2FC|

> 1.0

|Log2FC|

> 2.0

Cold

33R v 38R

15341

14248

817/276

8826

2746 (0.650)

676 (0.782)

 

33F v 38F

15457

14220

871/366

8727

3151 (0.693)

1048 (0.768)

Hot

43R v 38R

14896

13869

372/655

1916

1028 (0.459)

264 (0.417)

 

43F v 38F

15238

14119

652/467

4596

1386 (0.674)

495 (0.770)

Line

       
 

33F v 33R

15518

14638

453/427

2092

412 (0.464)

114 (0.403)

 

38F v 38R

14973

14137

449/387

2122

263 (0.319)

72 (0.250)

 

43F v 43R

15050

13962

809/279

1172

784 (0.764)

320 (0.859)

For each comparison of the treatment groups (Temperature, 33°, 38° or 43 °C/Line, RBC2 or F), the total number of expressed and uniquely expressed genes, number of genes with significant FDR p-value, and the numbers of significant genes also with |Log2 fold change| >1.0 and >2.0 are given. Only those genes with treatment group mean normalized read counts >3.0 are included as expressed. Numbers in parentheses equal the proportion of up-regulated genes

Characterization of the expressed genes in satellite cells under the control incubation temperature (38 °C) provided a description of the common cellular processes of these cultured cells (Fig. 2, Additional file 1: Figure S2, Additional file 3: Table S2). At 72 h of proliferation, the majority of gene products (69%) are characterized as nuclear or cytoplasmic proteins. Plasma membrane and extracellular proteins comprise the other major groups (12% and 6%, respectively). Enzyme, transcription regulator, and transporter are the largest represented functional classes of proteins. However, the largest class of gene products (category “other”, 48%) includes primarily structural proteins (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

GO classification of genes expressed in cultured turkey p. major satellite cells after 72 h proliferation at 38 °C

Of the turkey annotated gene set, 11,615 IDs mapped in the IPA database. Normalized read counts for the 8,000 genes with the highest average read count were used to conduct a Comparison Analysis between the RBC2 and F-line groups at 38 °C. The 20 most significant Metabolic and Signaling pathways identified in the expressed genes are summarized in Additional file 4: Table S3. Most significant in the Metabolic category are tRNA Charging (33 of 39 pathway genes associated) and the Inositol Phosphate Compound superpathway (110 of 193 genes). Significant Signaling pathways include Protein Ubiquitination (179 of 255 genes associated) and EIF2 Signaling (136 of 184 genes).

Differential expression

Gaussian-based ANOVA found 9,011 genes with significant (FDR p-val <0.05) experiment-wise differential expression (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Seven two-way contrasts were generated based on temperature (cold and hot) and line (RBC2 and F). Large numbers of significant differentially expressed (DE) genes were identified in each contrast (Table 2, Additional file 5: Table S4). A greater number of genes were significantly affected by cold (33 °C) treatment than by hot (43 °C) with more DE genes identified in the F-line at both 33 °C and 43 °C compared to control (Fig. 3). In the temperature comparisons, a greater proportion of DE genes were up-regulated, except in the RBC2 43 °C versus 38 °C comparison where the proportion of down-regulated genes was greater (Table 2, Fig. 3). The 50 significant DE genes with the greatest expression change for each treatment comparison are listed in Additional file 6: Table S5.
Fig. 3

Distribution of differentially expressed genes during proliferation of cultured turkey p. major satellite cells. For each temperature comparison, the number of genes with FDR pval <0.05 and |Log2FC| > 2.0 that were shared or unique to each line (RBC2 and F) are indicated in the Venn diagram [71]. Circle size is proportional to the number of genes

Statistical overrepresentation tests (PANTHER, [23]) of genes differentially expressed between the 33 °C and 38 °C found greatest enrichment for the GO Biological Processes of muscle system, synaptic transmission, and cell-signaling (Additional file 7: Table S6). Greatest enrichment of GO Cellular Components included sarcomere, ion channel complex and transmembrane transporter complex whereas calcium ion binding and signal transducer activity represented significantly enriched GO Molecular Functions. In contrast, overrepresentation tests of genes differentially expressed between the 43 °C and 38 °C found significant enrichment for several GO Biological Processes defining muscle development (Additional file 8: Table S7). Seven of these GO categories (synaptic transmission (GO:0007271), regulation of myotube differentiation (GO:0010830), regulation of striated muscle cell differentiation (GO:0051153), muscle contraction (GO:0006936), regulation of muscle contraction (GO:0006937), regulation of muscle system process (GO:0090257), and muscle system process (GO:0003012)) showed greater than 5-fold enrichment. Enrichment of GO Cellular Components reflected the shift towards muscle structure as did Molecular Function.

Although the Ingenuity Knowledge Base of (IPA) is human-centric, it provides useful insight into non-mammalian biological systems. IPA analysis of the turkey DE genes demonstrated several temperature-induced shifts in the satellite cell transcriptomes. Consistent with ongoing cellular development, many of the statistically enriched pathways involved in cell signaling (Additional file 9: Table S8) and the top gene networks involved skeletal and muscle system development. Cell signaling is an import aspect of satellite cells in regulating cell-to-cell interactions during development and homeostasis and in controlling self-renewal. The calcium and calmodulin activated gene NFATC2 (nuclear factor of activated T cell isoforms C2) was common to several of these pathways. This gene has been shown in mammals to be critical for the fusion of myoblasts with nascent myotubes [24]. Also important were ligands such as the Wnt family of proteins, receptor and modulating molecules such as FZD (Fizzled class receptor) and DKK (Dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor), and growth factors such as IGF (insulin like growth factor).

The skeletal and muscle system development network depicted in Fig. 4 demonstrates the differential myogenic response in the turkey satellite cells at 33 °C versus 38 °C with several interacting muscle-associated genes being down regulated (Fig. 4a and b). Included within this network are genes such as TRIM63 (RNF28) and FAM65B (C6orf32). In humans, the TRIM63 protein is involved in cell cycle regulatory processes of striated muscle cells [25]. FAM65B is expressed both in myogenic and non-myogenic primary human cells and is upregulated during muscle cell differentiation [26]. In contrast, many of these same genes were up regulated in cells proliferated at the higher temperature (43 °C versus 38 °C) (Fig. 4c and d). The magnitude of expression change was greater in the F-line (Fig. 4b and d) that in RBC2 (Fig. 4a and c). This is especially evident for members of the Troponin complex (TNNT1, TNNT2, and TNNT3), but also includes genes such as UNC45B (Unc-45 Myosin Chaperone B) which plays a role in sarcomere formation during muscle cell development.
Fig. 4

Example gene network identified from differentially expressed genes by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) showing differential response of p. major satellite cell transcriptome to temperature. Depicted is the top scoring skeletal and muscle system development network identified by Comparison Analysis. a) RBC2 line, 33 °C versus 38 °C. b) F line, 33 °C versus 38 °C. c). RBC2 line, 43 °C versus 38 °C. d) F line, 43 °C versus 38 °C. In each panel the direction (red = up regulated, green = down regulated) and magnitude (color intensity) of expression changes are indicate for each of the group comparisons. Gray indicates molecule that were included in the dataset but did not meet the significance cutoff value. Shapes within the networks correspond to genes, gene products, or small molecules and “Double circle” symbols indicate gene complexes or groups

The majority of DE genes were also unique to treatment groups (temperature/line) (Additional file 1: Figure S4). However, 14 significant DE genes were shared among all treatment comparisons, identifying a suite of genes that are jointly affected by deviation from the control incubation temperature. These included CASQ2 (calsequestrin 2) a calcium binding protein that stores calcium for muscle function, EFEMP1 (EGF containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1) which may play a role in cell adhesion and migration, and genes such as FAT4 (FAT atypical cadherin 4), and NKD1 (naked cuticle homolog 1) which help control and maintain planar cell polarity. Others include IGSF9B (immunoglobulin superfamily, member 9B), NTSR1 (neurotensin receptor 1), PTGS2 (prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2), RBM46 (RNA binding motif protein 46), TPPP3 (tubulin polymerization-promoting protein family member 3) and four model loci (LOC104910222 [myelin basic protein-like], LOC104909321 [E-selectin-like], LOC104911264 [uncharacterized, ncRNA], LOC104917414 [uncharacterized, ncRNA], and LOC100541961 [pantetheinase-like]). These 14 genes fall into four categories: up-regulated in both cold and hot treatments relative to control (EFEMP1, IGSF9B, LOC104910222, NKD1), down-regulated in both treatments (NTSR1, RBM46), up-regulated by cold but down-regulated by heat (FAT4, LOC100541961, LOC104909321 [selectin L, SELL], LOC104911264, LOC104917414, PTGS2) and up-regulated by heat but down-regulated by cold (CASQ2, TPPP3).

Effects of selection (Line differences)

At the control temperature 38 °C, 72 genes showed significant DE with |Log2FC| > 2.0 in comparisons between the F-line and RBC2 (Additional file 4: Table S3, Additional file 5: Table S4). Of these, 42 were unique to the temperature comparison (Fig. 5). The majority of the unique genes (75%) were down regulated in the F-line. Significantly enriched GO Biological processes involving these 42 genes were synaptic transmission (cell signaling and communication) and system development. Loci unique to 38 °C showing the greatest up regulation in the F-line were LOC104910496 (amphiphysin-like), DRD1 (dopamine receptor D1), CAMKK1 (calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 1, alpha), and those showing the greatest down regulation were MEOX2 (mesenchyme homeobox 2), LOC104916656 (uncharacterized, ncRNA), and SYT1 (synaptotagmin I). Broadly defined these genes function in regulating transcription, neuronal growth and development, exocytosis, and apoptosis.
Fig. 5

Distribution of differentially expressed genes between lines (F-line versus RBC2) during p. major satellite cell proliferation. For each temperature comparison, the number of genes with FDR pval <0.05 and |Log2FC| > 2.0 that were shared or unique to each incubation temperature are indicated. The number and direction of expression change (↑or ↓) for the genes included in each temperature group are listed outside the Venn diagram. Circle size is proportional to the number of genes

Greater differences were observed between the genetic lines in the 33 °C and 43 °C thermal challenges. At 33 °C, 114 genes showed significant DE and |Log2FC| > 2.0. Of these, 86 were unique to the temperature comparison (Fig. 5). At 43 °C, differential expression of 320 loci was significant (Table 3, Additional file 6: Table S5) with 297 being unique. At 33 °C, 60% of the 86 DE genes were down regulated in the F-line compared to RBC2. Significantly enriched GO Biological processes included nervous system development and cell communication. Loci unique to 33 °C showing the greatest up regulation in the F line were GAS6 (growth arrest-specific 6) and LOC100550971 (P2Y purinoceptor 1-like), and those showing the greatest down regulation were KCNIP1 (Kv channel interacting protein 1), LOC104913529 (uncharacterized, ncRNA), and LOC104912369 (collagen alpha-1(XI) chain-like) a fibrillar collagen. GAS6 is a gamma-carboxyglutamic acid (Gla) domain-containing protein thought to be involved in the stimulation of cell proliferation [27]. P2Y purinoceptor 1 belongs to the family of G-protein coupled receptors. Binding of ADP to the P2YR1 receptor is involved in calcium signaling [28]. KCNIP1 encodes a member of the family of cytosolic voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channel-interacting proteins that regulate neuronal membrane excitability in response to intracellular calcium [29].
Table 3

Summary of Wnt family gene expression observed in thermally challenged turkey muscle satellite cells

  

33R vs 38R

33F vs 38F

43R vs 38R

43F vs 38F

Locus

Description

 

Log2FC

FDR pval

 

Log2FC

FDR pval

 

Log2FC

FDR pval

 

Log2FC

FDR pval

LOC104916364

protein Wnt-1

−2.393

NS

−2.339

NS

−2.172

NS

−2.333

NS

LOC104916471

protein Wnt-1-like

-

0.000

NS

−2.339

NS

-

0.000

NS

−2.333

NS

LOC104917060

protein Wnt-1-like

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

WNT2

wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 2

2.259

NS

-

0.000

NS

2.493

NS

-

0.000

NS

WNT2b

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 2B

1.310

0.0316

−1.087

NS

1.163

NS

−0.971

NS

WNT3

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 3

-

0.000

NS

2.305

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

WNT3a

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 3A

5.942

0.0003

4.237

1.04E-05

-

0.000

NS

−2.336

NS

WNT4

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 4

−0.940

0.0000

−1.598

7.64E-53

−2.552

6.89E-28

−1.880

1.3E-57

WNT5a

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 5A

0.007

NS

0.499

NS

0.398

NS

−0.350

NS

WNT5b

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 5B

−0.997

1.3E-17

−1.388

2.4E-28

−1.583

7.94E-09

−1.996

1.11E-43

WNT6

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 6

−0.990

NS

3.150

NS

0.885

NS

5.477

0.0109

WNT7a

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 7A

−0.159

NS

−1.806

NS

1.596

NS

4.528

3.93E-19

WNT7b

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 7B

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

WNT8a

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 8A

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

WNT8b

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 8B

0.462

NS

0.472

NS

−1.092

NS

−0.035

NS

WNT9a

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 9A

2.382

NS

5.707

0.0013

−2.172

NS

-

0.000

NS

WNT9b

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 9B

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

WNT10a

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 10A

−0.631

0.0033

−0.218

NS

0.166

NS

0.065

NS

WNT11

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 11

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

LOC100538380

protein Wnt-11b-like

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

3.155

NS

WNT16

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 16

2.251

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

-

0.000

NS

Numbers in italics indicate comparisons with significant expression change

In contrast to the trend observed at 33 °C and 38 °C, at 43 °C the greatest proportion (85.9%) of the 320 DE genes (|Log2FC| > 2.0) were up regulated in the F-line vs RBC2. Of these, 297 loci were uniquely significant to this temperature comparison. Significantly enriched GO Biological processes included muscle contraction, mesoderm and system development, proliferation, differentiation and cell signaling. Loci unique to 43 °C showing the greatest up regulation in the F line included ACE (angiotensin I converting enzyme), LOC104914068 (uncharacterized, ncRNA), LRRC17 (leucine rich repeat containing 17), HCK (HCK proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase), FGF13 (fibroblast growth factor 13), DNASE2B (deoxyribonuclease II beta), CCDC153 (coiled-coil domain containing 153), and TXLNB (taxilin beta). Greatest down regulation was observed for LOC100550020 (DACH1, dachshund homolog 1). Interestingly, in humans DACH1 encodes a chromatin-associated transcription factor that acts to regulate cell fate determination during development [30].

Expression differences between the RBC2 and F line are further exemplified by the genes that are shared among the temperature treatments (Fig. 5, Additional file 10: Table S9). For example, 9 genes showed significant (p-value < 0.05, and |Log2FC| > 2.0) differential expression between the lines at all three temperatures. Interestingly, all nine were down regulated in the F line. Genes showing the greatest expression differences included TECRL (trans-2,3-enoyl-CoA reductase-like) and LOC104915513 (histone deacetylase 7-like) (Additional file 10: Table S9). Although little is known about the function of TECRL, this protein with oxidoreductase activity is thought to be involved in the fatty acid biosynthesis and through the pathway Regulation of lipid metabolism by Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) (www.genecards.org). Histone deacetylase 7 is a member of the histone deacetylase family which acts in repression of gene transcription by affecting transcription factor access to DNA [31]. CTNND2 (catenin (cadherin-associated protein), delta 2) and GABRA2 (gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor, alpha 2) showed decreased expression with temperature elevation. Both of these genes are described in humans as being active in the mammalian brain. CTNND2 plays a role in cell adhesion and movement [32] and GABRA2 is associated with neurotransmitter inhibition but GO annotations include chloride channel activity.

Comparison of the DE genes shared among the temperature pairs (Fig. 5) found more genes shared between the 33 °C and 38 °C treatments (13 vs 8 and 6) and a similar trend for reduced expression (down regulation) in the F-line (Additional file 10: Table S9). Greatest change was observed for LOC104916312 (forkhead box protein C2-like) a FOX-family transcription factor with average Log2FC = -6.23 (lower) in F versus RBC2 cells. Genes shared between 38 °C and 43 °C showed a mixture of up and down regulation between the lines and genes shared by the two temperature extremes (33 °C and 43 °C) were either mixed in response or upregulated in the F-line. An example of the former is LOC100541022 (keratin, type I cytoskeletal 19-like) where the gene was down regulated in F-line cells at 33 °C (Log2FC = -5.4) but up regulated (2.12) at 43 °C.

Discussion

Extreme temperature changes are of particular concern to the poultry industry because of the detrimental effects on muscle that ultimately impact meat quality. Satellite cells are multipotential-stem cells located between the basement membrane and sarcolemma of myofibers [10]. As the only source of posthatch myonuclei, these cells are a self-renewing stem cell population responsible for all posthatch skeletal muscle growth [33]. During postnatal development, satellite cells provide myonuclei to promote skeletal muscle growth [34]. In adults, myonuclei promote homeostasis through repair, regeneration or hypertrophy. In poultry, satellite cells are most active the first week after hatch [11, 35].

The function and fate of satellite cells are influenced by the local microenvironment and expression of myogenic regulatory factors [36, 37]. Satellite cells are characterized by their expression of transcription factors (Pax3 and Pax7) and through signaling, activate myogenic determination genes such as Myf5 and MyoD [38]. Quiescent cells are Pax7+ but do not express MyoD or myogenin and most are Myf5 positive [39]. Both Myf5 and MyoD are basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors required for muscle differentiation. Alternate expression of these proteins following proliferation influences cell fate [36]. Proliferating and differentiating myoblasts express MyoD whereas myogenin expression occurs during differentiation.

As demonstrated in the thermal challenge of cultured turkey satellite cells, cold treatment resulted in an overrepresentation of genes involved in cell signaling/signal transduction and cell communication (Additional file 7: Table S6). In contrast, heat-treated cells showed greater tendency towards muscle system development and differentiation (Additional file 8: Table S7). Satellite cell proliferation and differentiation is directly influenced by the cell niche including signaling molecules, hormones and innervation [37]. The activation and proliferation of satellite cells is modulated by signaling molecules (Wnt, Notch, Myf5) and growth factors (IGF, FGF). Satellite cells derived from single muscle fibers quickly reenter the cell cycle, express MyoD, and given the necessary substrates, establish proliferative colonies and differentiate into myotubes [39, 40]. In the chicken, proliferating satellite cells express Pax7 and MyoD but not myogenin [41]. In vivo, signaling between vascular and satellite cells is required for satellite cell activation and extrinsic signaling molecules orchestrate myogenisis [42]. In the present study, MYOD1 (MyoD) and several interacting genes were significantly upregulated in the heat exposed F-line cells (Fig. 4, Additional file 5: Table S4).

Myogenesis is controlled by signaling pathways that direct expression of the chief myogenic regulators. Among these pathways are those activated by Wnt ligands [43]. Wnt ligands are critical signaling molecules controlling various aspects of both muscle development and regeneration. In humans, 19 Wnt genes have been described [44]. Chicken genome contains 18 Wnt genes that are homologous to the corresponding human and mouse genes [45]. The turkey gene set includes 21 Wnt loci of which three correspond to Wnt1 (Table 3). The only mammalian homolog missing in these galliformes is Wnt10b. In the chicken, Wnt3a and Wnt7b encode alternative first exon isoforms. Although the interplay among Wnt pathways is still an area of investigation, it is clear that signaling through both the canonical Wnt/β-catenin and non-canonical Wnt pathways (PCP and mTOR) are important in myogenesis and neuromuscular synaptogenesis. The Wnt/Ca + signaling pathway was among the top canonical pathways altered in the proliferating turkey satellite cells (Additional file 9: Table S8).

Differentiation of mammalian adult satellite cells is controlled via Wnt signaling which influences the expression of myogenic regulatory factors. Wnt1, 3a and 5a induce proliferation whereas 4 and 6 are inhibitory [46]. Canonical Wnt signaling and activation of B-catenin/TCF transcriptional complexes regulate stem cell differentiation. Non-canonical Wnt-signaling mediates satellite cell renewal and myofiber growth through activation of pathways such as the AKT/mTOR pathway [42]. Activation of Wnt B-catenin signaling may also be important in modulating early regenerative processes following injury [43]. Several members of the Wnt family are up-regulated in myoblasts and myofibers of regenerating muscle [47]. During regeneration, Wnt5a, 5b and 7a are upregulated early while Wnt4 expression is down regulated. Wnt7b and 3a are expressed later. Wnt7a is important in the induction of satellite cells through PCP signaling and overexpression of Wnt7a results in higher satellite cell numbers. Overexpression of Wnt4 in chicken embryos enhanced differentiation and increased muscle mass [42].

Significant DE was observed for several of the turkey Wnt genes in the challenged satellite cells. Wnt4 and 5b were significantly down regulated at both challenge temperatures compared to control and in both lines and were down regulated in all comparisons. Wnt2b, 3a, 9a and 10a were significantly up-regulated in cold-treated cells whereas Wnt6 and 7a were significantly up-regulated in heat treated satellite cells (Table 3). Some of these genes had only minor expression changes; however, Wnt3a, 6, 7b and 9a had Log2FC > 4. Only one Wnt gene (Wnt7a which is linked to the AKT/mTOR pathway is important in the induction of satellite cells) showed significant DE between the RBC2 ad F-lines. At 43 °C, expression of Wnt7a was significantly higher in the F-line (Log2FC = 3.925, Additional file 5: Table S4). These findings support the importance of cell signaling during proliferation of these satellite cells and suggest targets for further research on the differential control of satellite cell proliferation.

Studies of the self-renewal processes in muscle suggest that the satellite cell pool is heterogeneous; comprised of self-renewing stem cells and predestined myogenic precursors [48]. Myogenic and adipogenic cells may represent separate satellite cell populations. Several studies have reported the non-myogenic differentiation of satellite cells [48]. The capacity for non-myogenic differentiation may ultimately lie in the heterogeneous nature of the satellite cell population [36]. Most satellite cells from myofibers cannot spontaneously differentiate into adipocytes [49]. However, they can be activated in culture to induce osteogenic and apidogenic pathways in addition to myogenesis. Osteogenic differentiation is reportedly induced via bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) and adipogenic fate can be altered by Wnt signaling. Powell et al. [13] found p. major satellite cells to express apidogenic genes when subjected to nutrient restriction. Gene expression of cultured quiescent and regenerating myoblasts may differ significantly from in vivo satellite cells [50] as satellite cell progeny in culture are distinct from cells newly isolated from muscle [51, 52].

There is debate regarding the ability of satellite cells to adopt a true osteogenic or apidogenic fate. For example, Starkey et al. [49] suggest that satellite cells accumulate lipid in culture but do not undergo apidogenic differentiation to adopt a new fate even under apidogenic-inducing conditions. In vivo results demonstrated both adipocyte formation in the connective tissue surrounding the muscle fiber bundles and within muscle fiber bundles [53, 54]. As interpreted by Smith and Johnson [55], adipocytes formed in the connective tissue between muscle bundles in poultry is similar to true marbling. Deposition of adipocytes within muscle bundles in the avian p. major muscle is consistent with the conversion of muscle satellite cells to adipocytes.

Signaling is important in determining cell fate as myocytes, apidocytes and osteocytes originate from the same embryonic precursor cells. Wnt and Notch signaling controls satellite cell fate. Myoblasts from cultured myofibers only respond to Wnt signaling late in differentiation, whereas Notch signaling regulates proliferation, differentiation and determination of cell fate. Low activity of Wnt signaling early in proliferation may allow for sufficient myoblast expansion via Notch signaling [56]. Commitment to the myocyte lineage may require Wnt signaling as disruption in vitro causes transdifferentiation of myoblasts into adipocytes.

Temperature can alter satellite cell proliferation, differentiation and ultimately cell fate [5760], which can impact skeletal muscle growth and meat quality [58, 61]. Immature poults have an inefficient thermoregulatory system and are sensitive to extreme temperatures. Increased temperatures can affect lipid accumulation and adipogenic gene expression of satellite cells [59]. The increase in intramuscular fat accumulation may be mediated, at least in part, by satellite cells that transdifferentiate to an adipogenic lineage [12, 37, 62, 63]. In mammals, key adipogenic genes are essential for the transcriptional regulation of adipogenesis and is controlled by a cascade of transcription factors led by the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (CEBP) β [64].

Very early in adipocyte differentiation, induction of CEBPβ (CEBPB) results in the downstream expression of PPARG (PPARγ) and CEBPA (CEBPα) as CEBPB directly binds to their promoters [65]. Delayed transactivation of PPARG and CEBPA by CEBPB appears necessary for mitotic clonal expansion and progression of terminal differentiation, a process required for adipogenesis [66]. Preadipocytes are maintained in an undifferentiated state through inhibition of CEBPB and PPARG by signaling though Wnt1. However, decrease in Wnt10b may be required for adipogenesis and this ligand may be an endogenous regulator [67]. Interestingly, CEBPB also suppresses canonical Wnt-β catenin signaling through transcriptional inhibition of the Wnt ligand (Wnt10b) that inhibits apidogenesis [68]. As the Wnt10b homolog is absent from the turkey genome, it is not known which of the Wnt family members, or if any directly inhibit apidogenesis.

Expression studies of adipogenic genes in poultry have resulted in mixed outcomes. Harding et al. [59] found satellite cells isolated from the p. major muscle of chickens to have a greater tendency to express adipogenic genes than those isolated from the biceps femoris muscle. Within the p. major satellite cells, CEBPB expression, as measured by qRT-PCR, increased with increasing temperature, while PPARG expression decreased [59]. In the same satellite cell culture system used in the present study, we [69] found expression of CEBPB, PPARG and stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD, an enzyme responsible for complex lipid production), to decrease as temperature increased from 33 °C to 43 °C at 72 h of proliferation despite an observed increase in adiposity.

In the present study significant differences in CEBPB, PPARG and SCD were observed among the temperature/group comparisons, but the degree of expression change in general was small (Log2FC < 1.0). For example, CEBPB expression significantly decreased in satellite cells from both the RBC2 and F-lines as temperature increased. Expression of CEBPB was significantly higher at 33 °C compared to 38 °C in cells from both lines but with low overall fold change (average Log2FC = 0.451). Overall expression was slightly lower in F-line cells, but this difference was not significant at any temperature. Expression of PPARG was significantly higher at 33 °C compared to 38 °C in cells from both lines but with low overall fold change (average Log2FC = 0.897). Expression of PPARG at 43 °C was significantly higher in RBC2 cells but significantly lower in F-line cells compared to cells incubated at 38 °C. Again in both comparisons the degree of change was small (Log2FC = 1.16 and −0.62, respectively). As nuclear factors, small changes in genes like CEBPB and PPARG may have amplified downstream effects. Expression of SCD was higher in F-line cells at all temperatures and this difference was significant at 33 °C and 38 °C. The greatest difference occurred at 33 °C where expression in F-line cells was 1.875 x higher. Expression of SCD was lowest in both lines at 38 °C but increased in both lines at 43 °C (Log2FC = 1.32 and 0.772, respectively). These RNAseq results are consistent with our experiments [69] that measured expression of these genes by qRT-PCR in the same satellite cell culture system.

As demonstrated in the present study, temperature significantly alters gene expression in turkey skeletal muscle satellite cells. Numerous significant gene expression differences were observed between cells when incubated at higher (43 °C) or lower (33 °C) temperatures. It is also apparent that genetic selection for 16weeks body weight (muscle mass) has altered satellite cells gene expression. One hypothesis is that selection has altered the satellite cell niche through reduced innervation or limited vascularization. Satellite cells isolated from F line turkeys have increased proliferation and differentiation [15]. Clark et al. [60] found satellite cells of the F line to be more sensitive to temperature changes during proliferation and differentiation. When incubated at temperatures above 38 °C, F line satellite cells also had less intracellular lipid accumulation compared to RBC2 cells. This suggested that growth selection has changed the proportion of resident satellite cells able to convert to an adipogenic lineage in response to thermal cues. Although the ability of the cultured cells to adopt a true non-myogenic fate is unknown, a decrease in adipocyte-like properties could limit in vivo transdifferentiation of satellite cells to an adipogenic lineage [70].

Exposure of poultry to extreme temperatures, especially in the critical post-hatch time-frame, can seriously compromise the quality of meat. With climate change, the frequency and intensity of temperature extremes are expected to grow, thereby exacerbating problems with meat production. Worldwide demand for lean, high-quality animal protein continues to expand, and the industry must develop birds that can withstand thermal variation while yielding high-quality meat. Understanding the impact of thermal stress on satellite cells is critical to this effort. The results of this study provide important insights into the proliferation of turkey stem cells in response to thermal challenge.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that temperature significantly alters gene expression in satellite cells of turkey skeletal muscle. Numerous gene expression differences were observed between cells incubated at both lower (33 °C) and higher (43 °C) temperatures as compared to control (38 °C). Enrichment analysis indicated a shift at 33 °C towards cell signaling whereas at 43 °C cells had gene expression profiles with a shift towards muscle development. For example, markers of cell proliferation such as MYOD1 and several interacting genes were significantly upregulated in the heat exposed cells. Cell signaling is critical during satellite cell proliferation and differential expression of chief myogenic regulators and pathways activated by Wnt ligands were observed. The Wnt/Ca + signaling pathway was among the canonical pathways significantly altered in the proliferating turkey satellite cells. Transcriptome analysis found greater differences in gene expression for satellite cells from the growth selected F-line as compared to its random bred control. Genes significantly altered by cold treatment tended to be down regulated in the F-line cells whereas genes significantly altered by heat treatment tended to be up regulated. This study provides important insights into the proliferation of turkey skeletal muscle stem cells in response to thermal challenge and identifies new targets for further research on the differential control of satellite cell proliferation in poultry.

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

bp: 

Base pair

CLCGWB: 

CLC Genomics workbench

DE: 

Differentially expressed

F: 

F-line

FC: 

Fold change

FDR: 

False discovery rate

GO: 

Gene ontology

IPA: 

Ingenuity pathway analysis

ncRNA: 

Non-coding RNA

PANTHER: 

Protein analysis through evolutionary relationships

PCA: 

Principal component analysis

qRT-PCR: 

Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction

RBC2: 

Randombred control 2

RIN: 

RNA integrity number

RNASeq: 

RNA sequencing

SRA: 

Short read archive

tRNA: 

Transfer RNA

WNT: 

Wingless/Integrated

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Cindy Coy for technical assistance in culturing the satellite cells used in this study and Daniel Clark for comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food Agriculture, AFRI competitive grant no. 2014-67003-21812.

Availability of data and material

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository, series accessioned as part of SRA BioProject 341399.

Authors’ contributions

KMR, SGV and GMS conceived and designed the experiments. SGV and KMM performed the experiments. KMR, JEA, and KMM analyzed the data. KMR and NEB drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Satellite cells used in this study were isolated in 1989 by Dr. Douglas McFarland (ret) at South Dakota State University according to institution-approved standard management practices that at the time did not require IACUC approval.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota
(2)
University of Minnesota Informatics Institute, University of Minnesota
(3)
Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University
(4)
Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center
(5)
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University

References

  1. Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN. Global food security under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:19703–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Karl TR, Knight RW, Gallo KP, Peterson TC, Jones PD, Kukla G, Plummer N, Razuvayev V, Lindseay J, Charlson RJ. A new perspective on recent global warming: Asymmetric trends of daily maximum and minimum temperature. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 1993;74:1007–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Karl TR, Nicholls N, Gregory J. The coming climate. Scientific American. 1997. p. 78–83.Google Scholar
  4. Ain Baziz H, Geraert PA, Padilha JC, Guillaumin S. Chronic heat exposure enhances fat deposition and modifies muscle and fat partition in broiler carcasses. Poult Sci. 1996;75:505–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dadgar S, Lee ES, Leer TLV, Crowe TG, Classen HL, Shand PJ. Effect of acute cold exposure, age, sex, and lairage on broiler breast meat quality. Poult Sci. 2011;90:444–57. doi:10.3382/ps.2010-00840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhao FQ, Zhang ZW, Wang C, Zhang B, Yao HD, Li S, Xu SW. The role of heat shock proteins in inflammatory injury induced by cold stress in chicken hearts. Cell Stress Chap. 2013;18:733–83. doi:10.1007/s12192-013-0429-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang ZW, Lv ZH, Li JL, Li S, Xu SW, Wang XL. Effects of cold stress on nitric oxide in duodenum of chicks. Poult Sci. 2011;90:1555–61. doi:10.3382/ps.2010-01333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yahav S. Domestic fowl – strategies to confront environmental conditions. Poult Avian Biol Rev. 2000;11:81–95.Google Scholar
  9. Lu Q, Wen J, Zhang H. Effect of chronic heat exposure on fat deposition and meat quality in two genetic types of chicken. Poult Sci. 2007;86:1059–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mauro A. Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J Phiophys Biochem Cytol. 1961;9:463–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Halevy O, Krispin A, Leshem Y, McMurtry JP, Yahav S. Early-age heat exposure affects skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and differentiation in chicks. Am J Physiol-Reg I. 2001;281:R302–309.Google Scholar
  12. Asakura A, Komaki M, Rudnicki M. Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation. 2001;68:245–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Powell DJ, Velleman SG, Cowieson AJ, Singh M, Muir WI. Influence of hatch time and access to feed on intramuscular adipose tissue deposition in broilers. Poult Sci. 2016;95:1449–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bi P, Kuang S. Meat Science and Muscle Biology Symposium: Stem cell niche and postnatal muscle growth. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:924–35. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Velleman SG, Liu X, Nestor KE, McFarland DC. Heterogeneity in growth and differentiation characteristics in male and female satellite cells isolated from turkey lines with different growth rates. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2000;125:503–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nestor KE. Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 5. Selection for increased body weight alone and in combination with increased egg production. Poult Sci. 1977;56:337–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nestor KE. Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 9. Long-term selection for increased 16-week body weight. Poult Sci. 1984;63:2114–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nestor KE, Bacon WL, Moorhead PD, Saif YM, Havenstein GB, Renner PA. Comparison of bone and muscle growth in turkey lines selected for increased body weight and increased shank width. Poult Sci. 1987;66:1421–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lilburn MS, Nestor KE. Body weight and carcass development in different lines of turkeys. Poult Sci. 1991;70:2223–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark DL, Strasburg GM, Reed KM, Velleman SG. Influence of temperature and growth selection on turkey pectoralis major muscle satellite cell adipogenic gene expression and lipid accumulation. Poult Sci. 2016. doi:10.3382/ps/pew374.Google Scholar
  21. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Andrews S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. Available online: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.Google Scholar
  23. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Mi H, Poudel S, Muruganujan A, Casagrande JT, Thomas PD. PANTHER version 10: expanded protein families and functions, and analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D336–342. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Horsley V, Friday BB, Matteson S, Kegley KM, Gephart J, Pavlath GK. Regulation of the growth of multinucleated muscle cells by an NFATC2-dependent pathway. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:329–38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Dai K-S, Liew C-C. A novel human striated muscle RING zinc finger protein, SMRZ, interacts with SMT3b via its RING domain. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:23992–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoon S, Molloy MJ, Wu MP, Cowan DB, Gussoni E. C6ORF32 is upregulated during muscle cell differentiation and induces the formation of cellular filopodia. Dev Biol. 2007;301:70–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zuo PY, Chen XL, Lei YH, Liu CY, Liu YW. Growth arrest-specific gene 6 protein promotes the proliferation and migration of endothelial progenitor cells through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Int J Mol Med. 2014;34:299–306. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2014.1754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sabala P, Czajkowski R, Przybyłek K, Kalita K, Kaczmarek L, Barańska J. Two subtypes of G protein-coupled nucleotide receptors, P2Y(1) and P2Y(2) are involved in calcium signaling in glioma C6 cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;132:393–402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Ames JB, Lim S. Molecular structure and target recognition of neuronal calcium sensor proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1820:1205–13. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.10.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu K, Yang Y, Wang C, Davoli MA, D'Amico M, Li A, Cveklova K, Kozmik Z, Lisanti MP, Russell RG, Cvekl A, Pestell RG. DACH1 inhibits transforming growth factor-beta signaling through binding Smad4. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:51673–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kao HY, Downes M, Ordentlich P, Evans RM. Isolation of a novel histone deacetylase reveals that class I and class II deacetylases promote SMRT-mediated repression. Genes Dev. 2000;14:55–66.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Kosik KS, Donahue CP, Israely I, Liu X, Ochiishi T. Delta-catenin at the synaptic-adherens junction. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:172–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moss F, Leblond C. Satellite cells as the source of nuclei in muscles of growing rats. Anat Rec. 1971;170:421–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zammit PS, Partridge TA, Yablonka-Reuveni Z. The skeletal muscle satellite cell: the stem cell that came in from the cold. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006;54:1177–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mozdziak PE, Walsh TJ, McCoy DW. The effect of early posthatch nutrition on satellite cell mitotic activity. Poult Sci. 2002;81:1703–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zammit PS. All muscle satellite cells are equal, but are some more equal than others? J Cell Sci. 2008;121:2975–82. doi:10.1242/jcs.019661.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yin H, Price F, Rudnicki MA. Satellite cells and the muscle stem cell niche. Physiol Rev. 2000;93:23–67. doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Pownall ME, Gustafsson MK, Emerson Jr CP. Myogenic regulatory factors and the specification of muscle progenitors in vertebrate embryos. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2002;18:747–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Cornelison DD, Wold BJ. Single-cell analysis of regulatory gene expression in quiescent and activated mouse skeletal muscle satellite cells. Dev Biol. 1997;191:270–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zammit PS, Heslop L, Hudon V, Rosenblatt JD, Tajbakhsh S, Buckingham ME, Beauchamp JR, Partridge TA. Kinetics of myoblast proliferation show that resident satellite cells are competent to fully regenerate skeletal muscle fibers. Exp Cell Res. 2002;281:39–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Halevy O, Piestun Y, Allouh MZ, Rosser BW, Rinkevich Y, Reshef R, Rozenboim I, Wleklinski-Lee M, Yablonka-Reuveni Z. Pattern of Pax7 expression during myogenesis in the posthatch chicken establishes a model for satellite cell differentiation and renewal. Dev Dyn. 2004;231:489–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. von Maltzahn J, Chang NC, Bentzinger CF, Rudnicki MA. Wnt signaling in myogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22:602–9. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2012.07.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Cisternas P, Henriquez JP, Brandan E, Inestrosa NC. Wnt signaling in skeletal muscle dynamics: myogenesis, neuromuscular synapse and fibrosis. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;49:574–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nusse R, Varmus H. Three decades of Wnts: a personal perspective on how a scientific field developed. EMBO J. 2012;31:2670–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Fokina VM, Frolova EI. Expression patterns of Wnt genes during development of an anterior part of the chicken eye. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:496–505.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Otto A, Schmidt C, Luke G, Allen S, Valasek P, Muntoni F, Lawrence-Watt D, Patel K. Canonical Wnt signalling induces satellite-cell proliferation during adult skeletal muscle regeneration. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:2939–50. doi:10.1242/jcs.026534.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Seale P, Polesskaya A, Rudnicki MA. Adult stem cell specification by Wnt signaling in muscle regeneration. Cell Cycle. 2003;2:418–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Chen JCJ, Goldhamer DJ. Skeletal muscle stem cells. Repro Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:101. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-1-101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Starkey JD, Yamamoto M, Yamamoto S, Goldhamer DJ. Skeletal muscle satellite cells are committed to myogenesis and do not spontaneously adopt nonmyogenic fates. J Histochem Cytochem. 2011;59:33–46. doi:10.1369/jhc.2010.956995.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Pallafacchina G, Francois S, Regnault B, Czarny B, Dive V, Cumano A, Montarras D, Buckingham M. An adult tissue-specific stem cell in its niche: a gene profiling analysis of in vivo quiescent and activated muscle satellite cells. Stem Cell Res. 2010;4:77–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Fukada S, Uezumi A, Ikemoto M, Masuda S, Segawa M, Tanimura N, Yamamoto H, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Takeda S. Molecular signature of quiescent satellite cells in adult skeletal muscle. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2448–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Montarras D, Morgan J, Collins C, Relaix F, Zaffran S, Cumano A, Partridge T, Buckingham M. Direct isolation of satellite cells for skeletal muscle regeneration. Science. 2005;309:2064–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Velleman SG, Nestor KE, Coy CS, Harford I, Anthony NB. Effect of posthatch feed restriction on broiler breast muscle development and muscle transcriptional regulatory factor gene and heparan sulfate proteoglycan expression. Intl J Poult Sci. 2010;9:417–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Velleman SG, Coy CS, Emmerson DA. Effect of the timing of posthatch feed restrictions on the deposition of fat during broiler breast muscle development. Poult Sci. 2014;93:2622–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith SB, Johnson BJ. Marbling: Management of cattle to maximize the deposition of intramuscular adipose tissue (White Paper). Beef Research. 2014. http://www.beefresearch.org/CMDocs/BeefResearch/PE_White_Papers/Marbling. Management of cattle to maximize the deposition of intramuscular adipose tissue.pdf
  57. Brack AS, Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Shen J, Rando TA. A temporal switch from notch to Wnt signaling in muscle stem cells is necessary for normal adult myogenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:50–9. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Piestun Y, Druyan S, Brake J, Yahav S. Thermal manipulations during broiler incubation alter performance of broilers to 70 days of age. Poult Sci. 2013;92:1155–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Loyau T, Berri C, Bedrani L, Métayer-Coustard S, Praud C, Duclos MJ, Tesseraud S, Rideau N, Everaert N, Yahav S, Mignon-Grasteau S, Collin A. Thermal manipulation of the embryo modifies the physiology and body composition of broiler chickens reared in floor pens without affecting breast meat processing quality. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:3674–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Harding RL, Clark DL, Halevy O, Coy CS, Yahav S, Velleman SG. The effect of temperature on apoptosis and adipogenesis on skeletal muscle satellite cells derived from different muscle types. Physiol Rep. 2015;3:e12539.Google Scholar
  61. Clark DL, Coy CS, Strasburg GM, Reed KM, Velleman SG. Temperature effect on proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells from turkeys with different growth rates. Poult Sci. 2016;95:934–47. doi:10.3382/ps/pev437.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Piestun Y, Halevy O, Yahav S. Thermal manipulations of broiler embryos--the effect on thermoregulation and development during embryogenesis. Poult Sci. 2009;88:2677–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Shefer G, Wleklinski-Lee M, Yablonka-Reuveni Z. Skeletal muscle satellite cells can spontaneously enter an alternative mesenchymal pathway. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:5393–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Rossi CA, Pozzobon M, Ditadi A, Archacka K, Gastaldello A, Sanna M, Franzin C, Malerba A, Milan G, Cananzi M, Schiaffino S, Campanella M, Vettor R, De Coppi P. Clonal characterization of rat muscle satellite cells: proliferation, metabolism and differentiation define an intrinsic heterogeneity. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8523.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Guo L, Li X, Tang Q. Transcriptional regulation of adipocyte differentiation: A central role for CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) beta. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:755–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Yeh WC, Bierer BE, McKnight SL. Rapamycin inhibits clonal expansion and adipogenic differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:11086–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Tang Q, Otto TC, Lane MD. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein is required for mitotic clonal expansion during adipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:850–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Ross SE, Hemati N, Longo KA, Bennett CN, Lucas PC, Erickson RL, MacDougald OA. Inhibition of adipogenesis by Wnt signaling. Science. 2000;289:950–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Chung SS, Lee JS, Kim M, Ahn BY, Jung HS, Lee HM, Kim JW, Park KS. Regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β during adipogenesis. Obesity (SilverSpring). 2012;20:482–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Velleman SG. Effect of growth selection on apidogenic gene expression during development of the turkey breast muscle. Int J Poult Sci. 2014;13:680–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Hulsen T, de Vlieg J, Alkema W. BioVenn - a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:488.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017