Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals that PCK1 is a potential gene affecting IMF deposition in buffalo

BMC Genomics volume 21, Article number: 710 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In China, although buffaloes are abundant, beef is mainly obtained from cattle, and this preference is mainly attributed to the low intramuscular fat (IMF) content of buffalo. Genetic factors are an important driver that affects IMF deposition.

Results

To reveal the intrinsic factors responsible for the low IMF content of buffalo, mRNA expression patterns in muscle and adipose tissue between buffalo and cattle were characterized by RNA sequencing analysis. The IMF content in Nanyang cattle was higher than that in Xinyang buffalo. A total of 1566 mRNAs expressed in adipose tissue showed differential expression between the longissimus dorsi muscles of buffalo and cattle. Functional annotation suggested a difference in the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway between the two species. The results of RT-qPCR analysis and gain-of-function experiments confirmed the positive association between the IMF content and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (PCK1) expression in buffalo. In both mouse C2C12 cells and cultured bovine myocytes, the activity of the PCK1 promoter in buffalo is lower than that in cattle. However, in mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes and cultured bovine adipocytes, the activity of PCK1 in buffalo promoter is higher than that in cattle.

Conclusions

These results indicate the important role of PCK1 in buffalo IMF deposition and illustrate the differences between buffalo and cattle promoter activity that drive PCK1 expression. This research helps to establish a foundation for further studies investigating IMF deposition in buffalo.

Background

The world population is rapidly growing and will consume two-thirds more animal protein by 2050 relative to today [1]. Thus, the livestock meat industry requires diversified production to ensure stable and sustainable development. Pork, poultry, and beef are the three most heavily consumed meats in the world [2]. In recent years, avian influenza and African swine fever have had significantly negative effects on the meat industry [3, 4]. In contrast, bovines are a reliable and stable source of meat. Cattle meat accounts for the greatest proportion of beef, and other bovine meat, such as buffalo meat, also accounts for a considerable portion of the bovine meat market, especially in several Asian countries [1]. In fact, the nutritional value of buffalo meat is similar to that of cattle meat [5]. Importantly, buffaloes show high disease resistance and adaptability to a wide range of feeding and management conditions [6]. In terms of the population, buffalo is the second largest bovid species next to cattle. Thus, buffalo hold promise for meat production. However, due to the low intramuscular fat (IMF) content, the quality of buffalo meat in terms of flavour and juiciness is poorer than that of cattle meat.

IMF is highly valued because it improves meat quality by enhancing taste, juiciness, and tenderness [7]. IMF deposition has attracted widespread attention for many years. Genetic, managerial, and nutritional factors can affect IMF deposition [8], and genetic factors present moderate or more pronounced effects [9, 10]. For example, in Japanese Black cattle, notably high amounts of IMF (approximately 23%) are deposited in the longissimus dorsi muscle (LM), while in European breeds, the IMF content is less than 5% [11]. Comparisons of the gene expression pattern in LM between cattle breeds with high or low IMF content has revealed that many lipid metabolism-related genes are associated with IMF deposition, including adiponectin, C1Q and collagen domain containing (ADIPOQ) [12], peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ or PPARG) [13], thyroid hormone responsive [7], and fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) [7]. Based on the high-density genotypes, a genome-wide association study suggested that PPARG coactivator 1 alpha, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 gamma, and forkhead box P3 participated in IMF deposition in cattle [14]. Noncoding RNAs have also been reported to be involved in IMF deposition [15, 16]. Although many studies have been performed on this subject, the molecular mechanism governing IMF deposition has not been elucidated.

In buffaloes, the low IMF content is mainly due to the long-term selection for draught power. Uncovering the genetic differences in the IMF content between buffalo and cattle may provide guiding significance for the improvement of buffalo meat quality. In this study, RNA sequencing was performed to compare mRNA expression patterns in muscle and adipose tissues between buffalo and cattle. A series of analyses revealed that the expression pattern of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (PCK1), a gene with a significant association with IMF, differs between buffalo and cattle in adipose and muscle cells. Overexpression of PCK1 promotes lipid accumulation in buffalo intramuscular adipocytes. The results of this study suggest a positive role of PCK1 in buffalo IMF deposition, which can be used as a molecular marker for the improvement of buffalo meat quality through breeding.

Results

IMF content of Xinyang buffalo and Nanyang cattle

To evaluate the effects of fattening in Xinyang buffalo and Nanyang cattle, the back fat thickness, LM area (LMA), and IMF content were measured at slaughter. As shown in Table 1, the LMA of cattle was 70.71 ± 11.19 cm2, which was larger than that of buffalo (59.61 ± 8.34 cm2); the back fat thickness of cattle (4.03 ± 0.81 cm) was higher than that of buffalo (1.03 ± 0.24 cm). Correspondingly, the IMF content in cattle (2.43%) was higher than that in buffalo (0.51%), which could also be observed after slaughter (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

Table 1 Comparison of carcass traits between Xinyang buffalo and Nanyang cattle
Full size table

Overview of mRNA expression profiles

To compare the gene expression pattern of IMF between buffalo and cattle, RNA sequencing was performed. The IMF in cattle and buffalo was too limited to be sampled for RNA sequencing analysis. Thus, both muscle and adipose tissues were used for analysis in this study. A total of 12 cDNA libraries were constructed, and 12 RNA sequencing datasets were obtained. After a highly stringent filtering pipeline and analyses, 18,713 and 18,535 mRNAs were identified in buffaloes and cattle, respectively (Additional file 2: Table S1 and Additional file 3: Table S2). In buffaloes, 369 mRNAs were specifically expressed in muscle, and 17,906 coexpressed mRNAs were identified in both muscle and adipose tissues (Fig. 1a). In cattle, 97 mRNAs were specifically identified in muscle, and 18,220 coexpressed mRNAs were identified in both tissues (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparative analysis of mRNA expression between muscle and adipose tissues in buffaloes and cattle based on RNA sequencing. a Venn chart for mRNAs expressed in buffalo muscle and adipose tissue. b Venn chart for mRNAs expressed in cattle muscle and adipose tissue. Comparison of the expression levels of five adipogenesis markers between buffalo and cattle adipose tissues (c) and muscle tissues (d). The expressional data are presented as the mean ± S.E. (n = 3); ** indicates p < 0.01

Full size image

Differential expression analysis

The analysis strategy used to identify intrinsic factors related to the low IMF content in buffaloes is presented in Fig. 2. mRNAs expressed in IMF should be involved in the coexpressed mRNAs of muscle and adipose tissues. In addition, IMF deposition can be affected by the muscle [18, 19]. Therefore, a differential expression analysis was performed with the coexpressed mRNAs and muscle-specific mRNAs between buffalo and cattle (Fig. 2). In total, 1566 differentially expressed (DE) coexpressed mRNAs were ultimately identified, with 1143 upregulated mRNAs and 423 downregulated mRNAs in the muscle of cattle (Fig. 3a and Additional file 4: Table S3). Among these, adipose markers such as PCK1, fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3), FABP4, ADIPOQ, and perilipin 1 (PLIN1) were significantly upregulated in the muscle of cattle (Fig. 1d). In adipose tissue, however, significant differences were not found between buffalo and cattle (Fig. 1c). These results also indicated that the IMF level in cattle was higher than that in buffaloes, which was consistent with the slaughter traits presented in Table 1. In addition, 70 DE muscle-specific mRNAs were identified between buffalo and cattle (Fig. 3b and Additional file 5: Table S4). Interestingly, 35 mRNAs were upregulated and 35 mRNAs were downregulated in cattle. Both hierarchical clustering of the 1566 DE coexpressed mRNAs and 70 DE muscle-specific mRNAs could distinguish buffalo muscle from cattle muscle (Fig. 3), which indicated the high quality of RNA sequencing.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic illustration of RNA sequencing analysis in this study. The results of HE staining are from a previous study [17]

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed mRNAs. a Hierarchical clustering of 1566 differentially expressed mRNAs (coexpressed in muscle and adipose tissue) in muscle between buffalo and cattle. Hierarchical clustering of 70 differentially expressed mRNAs (specifically expressed in muscle) in muscle between buffalo and cattle

Full size image

RT-qPCR validation of differentially expressed mRNAs

To evaluate the quality of the results in the differential expression analysis, 6 DE coexpressed mRNAs and 2 DE muscle-specific mRNAs were randomly selected for validation via RT-qPCR. As shown in Fig. 4, the expression patterns of DE mRNAs in RT-qPCR were approximately similar to those of RNA sequences, although no significant difference was found for MYH6 and SLC16A6. These results indicate the relatively high quality of the differential expression analysis; thus, the DE mRNAs can be used for the following analysis.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Validation of the differentially expressed mRNAs by RT-qPCR. Expressional patterns of differentially expressed mRNAs analysed by RNA sequencing (a) and RT-qPCR (B). UXT was used to normalize the expression level of genes, and their prime sequences were conserved between buffalo and cattle. Expression level data are presented as the mean ± S.E. (n = 6); * indicates p < 0.05; ** indicates p < 0.01

Full size image

Functional enrichment

To characterize the putative functions of DE mRNAs, functional enrichment was performed for the 1566 DE coexpressed mRNAs and the 70 DE muscle-specific mRNAs. The results showed that the muscle-specific DE mRNAs were enriched in five Gene Ontology (GO) terms, namely, muscle filament sliding, muscle contraction, skeletal muscle contraction, regulation of striated muscle contraction, and sarcomere (Additional file 6: Table S5). Clearly, the terms were all associated with the development of muscle tissue. The aim of our functional enrichment was to find items associated with fat deposition. Thus, we did not investigate these results further.

The coexpressed DE mRNAs were enriched in 41 GO terms and seven Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (Additional file 7: Table S6). However, only glycolysis/gluconeogenesis (hsa00010), a pathway with a significant effect on fat deposition, was identified (Additional file 7: Table S6). Seventeen DE genes were included in the pathway. Among these genes, PCK1 has been demonstrated to be associated with fat deposition [20]. Overexpression of PCK1 in skeletal muscle can improve IMF levels in mice [17]. These results indicate that PCK1 may be a candidate gene that regulates IMF deposition in buffaloes.

Expression pattern of PCK1

According to the RNA sequencing analysis, PCK1 was upregulated in adipose tissue compared to muscle tissue in both buffalo and cattle (Fig. 5a). In addition, the expression of PCK1 in cattle muscle was higher than that in buffalo muscle (Fig. 5a). The mRNA expression level of PCK1 was then validated by RT-qPCR. The sequences of PCK1 primers were totally conserved between buffalo and cattle. Consistent with the results of RNA sequencing, PCK1 in adipose tissue was richer than that in muscle tissue in both buffalo and cattle (Fig. 5b, p < 0.01). In muscle, the expression of PCK1 was higher in cattle than that in buffalo (Fig. 5b, p < 0.01). In addition, compared to unfattened buffalo, the expression of PCK1 in muscle was upregulated in fattened buffalo (Fig. 5c, p < 0.05). These findings indicated a positive correlation between PCK1 and IMF content in buffalo.

Fig. 5
figure 5

mRNA expression pattern of PCK1 in muscle and adipose tissue of buffalo and cattle. Comparative analysis of mRNA expression levels in adipose and muscle tissue was performed in buffaloes and cattle by RNA sequencing (a) and RT-qPCR (b). Expression pattern of PCK1 in adipose and muscle of fattened and unfattened animals in buffaloes (c) and in cattle (d). UXT was used to normalize the expression level of PCK1, and their prime sequences were conserved between buffalo and cattle. Expression level data are presented as the mean ± S.E. (RNA sequencing, n = 3; RT-qPCR, n = 6); lower case indicates p < 0.05; upper case indicates p < 0.01

Full size image

Effects of PCK1 on the adipogenic differentiation of buffalo intramuscular preadipocytes

To detect the effect of PCK1 on the adipogenic differentiation of buffalo intramuscular adipocytes, the CDS region of buffalo PCK1 was inserted into the pHBAd vector and packaged into adenovirus for overexpression (Ad_PCK1), with EGFP as an internal indicator. Ad_EGFP was used as a control. EGFP was highly expressed on day 0 (24 h after overexpression) and day 6 of adipogenesis induction (Fig. 6a), which indicated a high level of overexpression. Indeed, the expression level of PCK1 in Ad_PCK1 cells was significantly higher than that in Ad_EGFP cells (Fig. 6b, p < 0.01). The adipogenic marker PPARG was upregulated with the overexpression of PCK1 on day 0 of adipogenesis induction (Fig. 6c, p < 0.05). On day 6, the fatty acid uptake gene (FABP4) was upregulated in Ad_PCK1 group (Fig. 6d, p < 0.01). No significant difference was detected for CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) (Fig. 6c), fatty acid translocase (FAT/CD36) (Fig. 6d), lipogenesis genes (glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4 (GPAT4) and diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1)) (Fig. 6g), and lipolysis genes (hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL), lipoprotein lipase (LPL), and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARα)) (Fig. 6h) between Ad_EGFP and Ad_PCK1 groups. Compared to the Ad_EGFP group, lipid accumulation was significantly enhanced in the Ad_PCK1 group on day 6 of adipogenesis induction (Fig. 6e and f, p < 0.01).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Overexpression of PCK1 promotes lipoid accumulation in buffalo intramuscular adipocytes. a Micrographs of EGFP-positive cells under white and fluorescent light in the Ad_EGFP (control) and Ad_PCK1 groups on day o and day 6 of adipogenesis induction. The preadipocytes were induced to differentiation 24 h after adenovirus transduction. Scale bar, 200 μm. b-d, g, h The RNA expression levels of PCK1, PPARG, C/EBPα, FABP4, FAT/CD36, GPAT4, DGAT1, HSL, LPL, and PPARα on day 0 and day6 of adipogenesis induction in buffalo intramuscular adipocytes transfected with Ad_EGFP and Ad_PCK1. Expression level data are presented as the mean ± S.E. (n = 6); * indicates p < 0.05; ** indicates p < 0.01. e Images of Oil Red O staining in buffalo intramuscular adipocytes transfected with Ad_EGFP and Ad_PCK1 on day 6 of adipogenesis induction. Scale bar, 50 μm. f Histogram showing the quantitation of Oil Red O staining by spectrophotometry. N.C., negative control by using isopropanol. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E. (n = 6); * indicates p < 0.05; ** indicates p < 0.01

Full size image

Transcriptional activity of bovine PCK1 promoter

Although the expression pattern of PCK1 between muscle and adipose tissue in buffaloes was similar to that in cattle, PCK1 in muscle was more abundant in cattle than in buffaloes, and the opposite finding was observed in adipose tissue (Fig. 5a and 3b). These results suggested that PCK1 in muscle was more active in cattle; in contrast, PCK1 in adipose tissue was richer in buffaloes. Then, the transcriptional activity of the PCK1 promoter of buffalo and cattle was further analysed. The upstream putative promoter of PCK1 (Fig. 7a) was contained in the luciferase reporter construct and transfected into 3T3-L1 cells, C2C12 cells, primary bovine adipocytes, and primary bovine myoblasts. In 3T3-L1 cells and primary bovine adipocytes, the PCK1 promoter of buffalo demonstrated higher transcriptional activity than that of cattle (Fig. 7b and d, p < 0.05). In C2C12 cells and primary bovine myoblasts, the PCK1 promoter of cattle presented higher activity than that of buffalo (Fig. 7c and e, p < 0.05).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Promoter activity of buffalo and cattle PCK1 in adipocytes and myoblasts. a Putative promoter regions of buffalo and cattle PCK1 were cloned for activity analysis. Comparison of promoter activity of buffalo and cattle PCK1 in 3T3-L1 cells (b), C2C12 cells (c), bovine adipocytes (d), and bovine myoblasts (e). Data are presented as the mean ± S.E. (n = 6); lower case indicates p < 0.05; upper case indicates p < 0.01

Full size image

Discussion

IMF deposition is a highly complex process that can be affected by genetic, managerial, and nutritional factors [8]. Among these factors, genetics is a significant driver. Japanese Black is the best beef breed and exhibits more than 20% IMF content at 24 months of age [11]. By comparison, other European breeds, such as Belgian Blue and German Angus, have only 0.6 and 4.4% IMF content, respectively [11]. IMF levels in Chinese breeds are similar to those of European breeds. In Qinchuan cattle, the IMF content ranges from ~ 3% to ~ 4% at 18 months of age [21]. Nanyang cattle at 24 months of age have an IMF content of (1.88 ± 0.64)% [22]. In the present study, the IMF content of Nanyang cattle at 30 months of age was 2.43% (Table 1). In contrast, Xinyang buffalo had only a 0.51% IMF content (Table 1). Accordingly, the back fat thickness and LMA in Nanyang cattle were higher than those in Xinyang buffalo. Xinyang buffalo and Nanyang cattle were raised with similar forage and feeding management conditions. Thus, the difference in IMF content in animals between the two groups may be attributed to genetic factors.

To identify candidate genes for IMF deposition, a large number of studies have been carried out in cattle [10]. Comparisons of gene expression between breeds with variable IMF contents have indicated that some adipogenic transcription factors are associated with IMF deposition in cattle [7, 12, 13]. Because the IMF content in the tissue was too limited to be sampled for transcriptome analysis or RT-qPCR assay, both muscle (containing very limited amounts of IMF) and adipose tissues were used to identify genes that explain the difference in the IMF content between buffalo and cattle according to the strategy shown in Fig. 2. Simply stated, the coexpressed mRNAs in muscle and adipose tissues were considered to be part of the mRNAs expressed in IMF tissue. Moreover, muscle-specific mRNAs also affect IMF deposition [18, 19]. Both the coexpressed mRNAs and muscle-specific mRNAs that showed differential expression between buffalo and cattle muscle tissues were used for functional enrichment.

The number of mRNAs identified in buffalo muscle and adipose tissue is similar to that of cattle (Fig. 1a and b), which indicates a similar level of complexity between buffalo and cattle meat. However, there were 1566 coexpressed mRNAs (Additional file 4: Table S3) and 70 muscle-specific mRNAs (Additional file 5: Table S4) that showed differential expression between the two bovid species, suggesting a significant difference between buffalo and cattle IMF deposition. Of the 1566 DE mRNAs, 112 and 38 were also identified between Wagyu and Piedmontese [7] and between Japanese Black and Holstein Friesian breeds [23], respectively. However, only four of these DE genes were shared by the three studies, and they showed variable expression patterns among the three studies. These results indicate that the DE genes can be variable from different breed pairs and suggest a highly complex genetic regulation mechanism in IMF deposition.

Based on its specific location, IMF deposition can be affected by both the activity of adipocytes and muscle-specific factors. Coculturing C2C12 and 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cells downregulates adipogenic marker gene expression [18]. Myostatin, which is secreted by myoblasts, decreases IMF deposition by inhibiting the differentiation of intramuscular preadipocytes [19]. However, a similar factor that is responsible for the difference in IMF deposition between buffalo and cattle was not identified in this study; all 5 identified GO items with Benjamini values (p) < 0.05 were associated with muscle development (Additional file 6: Table S5).

Lipid metabolism is notably different between buffalo and cattle, which is also reflected by the difference in milk fat content [24, 25]. The percentage of milk fat in buffaloes is higher than that in cattle [24, 26, 27]. A previous study suggested that four genes (KCTD8, FOXO4, SSTR3, and LOC782855) related to carbohydrate metabolism and a gene (ESRRG) related to lipid metabolism may contribute to the differences between buffalo and cattle milk fat content [25]. In the present study, however, these five genes did not show differential expression between buffalo and cattle muscle tissues, and no item marked with “carbohydrate metabolism” was identified in our functional enrichment analysis. Instead, an energy metabolism pathway, the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway (p < 0.01), was identified by the functional enrichment of the DE coexpressed mRNAs (Fig. 2; Additional file 7: Table S6). Glycolysis is a catabolic pathway that reverses the carbon flow of anabolic pathways, gluconeogenesis and glyceroneogenesis [28]. Essentially, glyceroneogenesis is an abbreviated version of gluconeogenesis responsible for the de novo synthesis of glycerol-3-phosphate from the precursors of gluconeogenesis [29]. Glycerol-3-phosphate can esterify fatty acyl-CoAs into triglycerides (TGs). Thus, the carbon for TG comes from glycolysis. The hyperactivity of glyceroneogenesis enhances the storage of TG and results in fat deposition in muscle [30].

A total of 17 DE genes were involved in the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway. Among them, PCK1 drives a significant and irreversible reaction that is shared by glyceroneogenesis and gluconeogenesis [28]. In fact, PCK1 is considered an adipogenic marker, an obesity gene, and even an IMF deposition-related gene [17, 31]. In mice, white adipose tissue-specific overexpression of PCK1 increases the rate of glyceroneogenesis in adipose tissue and results in obesity [32]. In contrast, knockdown of PCK1 expression in adipose tissue results in lipodystrophy in mice [20]. In skeletal muscle tissue, specific overexpression of PCK1 enhances IMF deposition in mice [17]. In pigs, the expression level of PCK1 demonstrates a positive association with the IMF content and fatty acid composition [31]. Functional mutation of the PCK1 gene results in a lower IMF content in pigs [33]. Interestingly, pigs with PCK1 specifically expressed in skeletal muscle show an enhanced IMF content [34]. In cattle, PCK1 is upregulated in Wagyu breed (high IMF) compared to Piedmontese breed (low IMF) [7]. In the present study, PCK1 was downregulated in buffalo muscle tissue (Fig. 5a and b), which may be responsible for the lower IMF content in buffaloes (Table 1). Interestingly, overexpression of PCK1 promoted the expression of the adipogenic marker PPARG (Fig. 6c, p < 0.05) and the lipid accumulation in buffalo intramuscular adipocytes (Fig. 6e and f, p < 0.01), suggesting a positive role of PCK1 in IMF deposition in buffalo. The expression level of fatty acid uptake gene FABP4 was upregulated by PCK1 on day 6 (Fig. 6d, p < 0.01). FABP4 is a fatty acid binding protein and promotes fatty acid transport [35]. As mentioned above, PCK1 drives glyceroneogenesis to produce glycerol-3-phosphate [28]. Both fatty acid and glycerol-3-phosphate can be utilized for TGs synthesis [28, 29]. Therefore, overexpression of PCK1 enhances lipid accumulation by upregulating the expression of PPARG and FABP4 in buffalo intramuscular adipocytes, which is consistent with the effects of PCK1 in other species (20,35).

We hypothesized that there should be some intrinsic reasons for the lower expression of PCK1 in buffalo muscle than in cattle muscle. In terms of the PCK1 putative promoter sequence, differences can be found between buffalo and cattle, with 44 single-base, 2 double-base, and 1 tribasic base mutations (Additional file 8: Fig. S2). Accordingly, the activity of the PCK1 promoter demonstrated variable levels between buffalo and cattle (Fig. 5). Interestingly, the activity of the buffalo PCK1 promoter is higher than that of cattle in adipocytes, while the opposite occurs in myoblasts (Fig. 5). PCK1 is widely expressed in multiple tissues and has high levels in the liver and adipose tissue [36], which also suggests its important role in lipid metabolism. The molecular mechanism driving PCK1 expression is highly complex, and its expression in different tissues can be regulated in a variable manner according to its specific role in the tissue. The promoter of PCK1 has been widely studied, and some significant transcription factors have been identified, such as PPARG, sterol regulatory element binding protein 1, and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta [36]. Recently, a large number of noncoding RNAs have been demonstrated to participate in the regulation of coding genes via interaction with promoters [37, 38]. In addition, methylation in the promoter sequence can influence the expression of a gene [39]. Therefore, the underlying molecular mechanism driving the expression of PCK1 in the promoter regions of buffalo and cattle, such as DNA methylation, protein-DNA interactions, and RNA-DNA interactions, needs further study.

Conclusions

This study evaluated the IMF content of fattened buffalo and cattle and compared the mRNA expression patterns in muscle and adipose tissue between the two bovid species. This study demonstrates that (1) the IMF content of fattened cattle at 30 months of age is higher than that of fattened buffalo, as well as other relative traits, including back fat thickness and LMA; (2) a large number of mRNAs have differential expression between buffalo and cattle muscles; (3) the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway may regulate IMF deposition in buffalo; (4) PCK1 shows a positive association with the IMF content in buffalo; and (5) PCK1 promoter activity of buffalo is higher than that of cattle in adipocytes, which is in contrast to that of myoblasts.

Methods

The IMF content in buffalo is lower than that in cattle, and a genetic factor should be responsible for such a difference. The aim of this research is to identify the genetic factors responsible for the low IMF content in buffalo. Because the IMF content in tissue is too limited to be sampled for detection, both muscle and adipose tissues were used for high-throughput RNA sequencing and further validation.

Animals, sample collection, and fattening traits

Xinyang buffaloes (n = 12) and Nanyang cattle (n = 12) were raised in the breeding farm of Xinyang Buffalo (Guangshan, Henan Province, P.R. China) and the breeding centre of Nanyang cattle (Nanyang, Henan Province, P.R. China), respectively, with equivalent forage and feeding management conditions. They were weaned at 3 months of age, castrated at 6 months of age, started to fatten at 18 months of age, and slaughtered at 30 months of age. Details of the feeding conditions were described in a previous study [40]. In this study, only six buffaloes and six cattle were fattened, and the others were not fattened. For the unfattened animals, concentrate was replaced by roughage from 18 to 30 months of age.

The LM (muscle) and back subcutaneous fat (adipose) tissues were sampled immediately after slaughter. For determination of IMF, fresh muscle was kept in an icebox and taken back to the laboratory immediately. For RNA extraction, tissue was frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C.

The back fat thickness, LMA, and IMF content of fattened animals were measured. The 12th–13th rib back fat thickness and LMA were measured by an Ultrasonic Backfat Tester (HS-1600 V; Honda Electronics, Toyohashi, Japan) at slaughter. The IMF content was measured by a near-infrared meat quality analyser (Series 3000 Food Analyser, NIR, Australia).

RNA isolation and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of total RNA were determined by a NanoDrop 2000 (Nanodrop, Wilmington, DE) and 1% agarose gel. Total RNA from muscle and adipose tissues (three buffaloes and three cattle) of high quality was sent to Genergy Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for library construction and RNA sequencing. Briefly, approximately 2 μg of total RNA per sample was used for library construction according to the protocol of the TruSeq® RNA LT Sample Prep Kit v2 (Illumina, USA). The cDNA library was sequenced using the double terminal sequencing mode of the Illumina HiSeq 3000 platform. A total of four groups that included the LM and the back fat tissues of buffalo and cattle were used for RNA sequencing. Three samples were obtained for each group.

Bioinformatics analysis of sequencing data

Low-quality reads and those containing adapters were removed to obtain clean reads using Trim Galore (Version 0.4.2, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK) [41]. High-quality data were used for the subsequent analysis. Since annotation information of the buffalo genome was not available, the cattle genome (UMD3.1) was used in the present study. Cattle genome and gene model annotation files were downloaded from the Ensemble database (http://www.ensembl.org/index.html). Reads were aligned to the reference genome using STAR [42]. Mapped reads were assembled using Cufflinks v2.2.1 [43]. These assemblies were merged to the reference gene model annotation by Cuffmerge [44]. Fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) was used as an index to calculate the expression level of each transcript in every library using the Cuffdiff program. The expression level was presented as log2(FPKM+ 1). The DE mRNAs were identified by DESeq2, with an absolute value of log2(fold change) ≥ 1 and an FDR ≤ 0.05 [44]. DE mRNAs were presented in heatmaps by the R package [45]. Functional enrichment for DE mRNAs was performed using DAVID bioinformatics resources (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) [46]. The human database was used. GO terms (including molecular function (MF), biological process (BP), and cellular components (CC)) and KEGG pathways with a Benjamini value (p) < 0.05 were considered to be significantly enriched.

RT-qPCR

Primers were designed by Primer-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) (Table 2). The ubiquitously expressed prefoldin-like chaperone (UXT) gene was used to normalize the expression level of the candidate gene [47, 48]. Total RNA was transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). qPCR was performed using SYBR Green I (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) with two-step reactions according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The efficiency of amplification was detected for each primer pair to ensure a reliable result. The cycle threshold (2–ΔΔCt) method was used to calculate the relative expression level of candidate genes. The RT-qPCR analysis was performed with six biological repeats, and each sample had three technological repeats.

Table 2 Details of primers used in this study
Full size table

Adenovirus packaging

The overexpression adenovirus packaging was performed by the Hanbio Biotechnology Co.; Ltd. (Shanghai, China) as previously described [40]. Briefly, the CDS of buffalo PCK1 was synthesized and ligated to the AdMax system. EGFP was included to indicate the transduction efficiency. Ad_EGFP was used as a negative control.

Isolation of buffalo intramuscular preadipocytes and cell culture

Buffalo intramuscular preadipocytes were isolated as described in a previous study [49]. Briefly, fresh LM tissue was sampled and the visible connective tissue was removed. Muscle tissue was finely minced and digested with 0.2% collagenase type II (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) in a shaking water bath at 37 °C until complete digestion. The digested sample was filtered by 80 μm nylon mesh filters and washed three times with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY). Cells were then cultured with complete culture medium (DMEM with 10% foetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY)) under conditions of 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 1 h. The complete culture medium was changed to remove the non-adherent cells. The adherent cells (intramuscular preadipocytes) were continuously cultured with complete culture medium. When reaching 90% confluence, the cells were digested and collected for further culture.

Adenoviral transduction, adipogenic differentiation, oil red O staining, and quantification

The intramuscular preadipocytes were planted in twelve-well plates. Adenoviral transduction was conducted when the cells reached 80% confluence. Two days after transduction, the cells were induced to adipogenic differentiation. Six days later, Oil Red O staining was performed. The Oil Red O was eluted by isopropanol to quantify the lipid accumulation in cells. In addition, cells induced to differentiation for 6 days were collected for RT-qPCR analysis. Details of adenoviral transduction, adipogenic differentiation, Oil Red O staining, and quantification can be found in a previous study [40]. All these experiments were performed with six biological repeats.

Vector construction

The pGL3-Basic system (Promega, Madison, USA) was used for the promoter activity analysis of PCK1 as previously described [50]. The putative upstream promoter regions were cloned from the genomic DNA of cattle and buffalo (Fig. 7a and Additional file 8: Fig. S2). Fragments were inserted into the KpnI and XhoI restriction sites of the pGL3-Basic vector to obtain recombinant plasmids (pGL3-cattle-PCK1 and pGL3-buffalo-PCK1). The pLR-TK vector was used as an internal control.

Cell culture, transfection, and luciferase reporter assays

3T3-L1 cells (ATCC, Shanghai, China), C2C12 cells (ATCC, Shanghai, China), primary bovine adipocytes, and primary bovine myoblasts were used to detect the activity of putative promoters. Isolation and culture of primary bovine adipocytes and primary bovine myoblasts were performed as previously described [40, 51]. Cells were cultured with complete culture medium in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells were plated in a 48-well plate at a density of 1 × 106 cells/well 24 h prior to transfection. Cells were cotransfected with 400 ng recombinant plasmid DNA and 16 ng pLR-TK plasmid using Lipofectamine® 3000 Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After transfection for 48 h, cells were harvested to analyse the activity of each fragment using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay System (Promega, Madison, USA) on a GloMax™ 96 Microplate Luminometer (Promega, Madison, USA). The ratio of the firefly luciferase value to Renilla luciferase value was used to evaluate the activity of the PCK1 promoter fragment. Each promoter fragment plasmid was analysed with six repeats, and the assay was repeated three times.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed by SPSS 19 software. Significant difference analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate significant differences. The results are presented as the means ± standard error (S.E.) using the OriginPro 8.5 program.

Availability of data and materials

RNA sequencing data were deposited in the Genome Expression Omnibus of NCBI. Accession number of three buffalo adipose tissues is GSE112744 and that of others is GSE139102.

Abbreviations

IMF:

Intramuscular fat

PCK1:

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1

LM:

Longissimus dorsi muscle

LMA:

LM area

ADIPOQ:

Adiponectin, C1Q and collagen domain containing

PPARγ or PPARG:

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma

FABP3:

Fatty acid binding protein 3

FABP4:

Fatty acid binding protein 4

PLIN1:

Perilipin 1

MYH6:

Myosin heavy chain 6

SLC16A6:

Solute carrier family 16 member 6

GO:

Gene Ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

C/EBPα:

CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha

FAT/CD36:

Fatty acid translocase

GPAT4:

Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 4

DGAT1:

Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1

HSL:

Hormone-sensitive lipase

LPL:

Lipoprotein lipase

PPARα:

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha

TG:

Triglyceride

FPKM:

Fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads

DE:

Differentially expressed

UXT:

Ubiquitously expressed prefoldin like chaperone

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

S.E.:

Standard error

References

  1. 1.

    Naveena BM, Kiran M. Buffalo meat quality, composition, and processing characteristics: contribution to the global economy and nutritional security. Anim Front. 2014;4:18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    FAO, 2013. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.

  3. 3.

    Su S, Bi Y, Wong G, Gray GC, Gao GF, Li S. The epidemiology, evolution and recent outbreaks of avian influenza viruses in China: a review. J Virol. 2015;89:8671–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sánchez-Cordón PJ, Montoya M, Reis AL, Dixon LK. African swine fever: a re-emerging viral disease threatening the global pig industry. Vet J. 2018;233:41–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kandeepan G, Mendiratta SK, Shukla V, Vishnuraj MR. Processing characteristics of buffalo meat-a review. J Meat Sci Technol. 2013;1:1–11..

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wanapat M, Kang SC. World buffalo production: challenges in meat and milk production, and mitigation of methane emission. Buffalo Bull. 2013;32:1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hudson NJ, Reverter A, Greenwood PL, Guo B, Café LM, Dalrymple BP. Longitudinal muscle gene expression patterns associated with differential intramuscular fat in cattle. Animal. 2015;9:650–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Park SJ, Beak SH, Jung DJS, Kim SY, Jeong IH, Piao MY, et al. Genetic, management, and nutritional factors affecting intramuscular fat deposition in beef cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018;31:1043–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bouchard C. Genetic factors in the regulation of adipose tissue distribution. Acta Medica Scand Suppl. 2010;222:135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Campos CF, Duarte MS, Guimarães SE, Verardo LL, Wei S, Du M, et al. Review: animal model and the current understanding of molecule dynamics of adipogenesis. Animal. 2016;10:927–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gotoh T, Albrecht E, Teuscher F, Kawabata K, Sakashita K, Iwamoto H, et al. Differences in muscle and fat accretion in Japanese black and European cattle. Meat Sci. 2009;82:300–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang YH, Bower NI, Reverter A, Tan SH, De Jager N, Wang R, et al. Gene expression patterns during intramuscular fat development in cattle. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:119–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    De Jager N, Hudson NJ, Reverter A, Barnard R, Café LM, Greenwood PL, et al. Gene expression phenotypes for lipid metabolism and intramuscular fat in skeletal muscle of cattle. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:1112–28.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ramayo-Caldas Y, Fortes MR, Hudson NJ, Porto-Neto LR, Bolormaa S, Barendse W, et al. A marker derived gene network reveals the regulatory role of PPARGC1A, HNF4G and FOXP3 in intramuscular fat deposition of beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:2832–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen FF, Xiong Y, Peng Y, Gao Y, Qin J, Chu GY, et al. mir-425-5p inhibits differentiation and proliferation in porcine intramuscular preadipocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2101.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Huang J, Wang S, Feng X, Liu X, Zhao J, Zheng Q, et al. miRNA transcriptome comparison between muscle and adipose tissues indicates potential miRNAs associated with intramuscular fat in Chinese swamp buffalo. Genome. 2019;62:729–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hakimi P, Yang J, Casadesus G, Massillon D, Tolentino-Silva F, Nye CK, et al. Overexpression of the cytosolic form of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP) in skeletal muscle repatterns energy metabolism in the mouse. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:32844–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Muthuraman P. Effect of coculturing on the myogenic and adipogenic marker gene expression. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;173:571–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Komolka K, Albrecht E, Wimmers K, Michal JJ, Maak S. Molecular heterogeneities of adipose depots-potential effects on adipose-muscle cross-talk in humans, mice and farm animals. J Genomics. 2014;2:31–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Olswang Y, Cohen H, Papo O, Cassuto H, Croniger CM, Hakimi P, et al. A mutation in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-binding site in the gene for the cytosolic form of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase reduces adipose tissue size and fat content in mice. PNAS. 2002;99:625–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang Y, Wang H, Wang Y, Wang HC, Zhang S, Hong JY, et al. Transcriptome analysis of mRNA and microRNAs in intramuscular fat tissues of castrated and intact male Chinese Qinchuan cattle. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0185961.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Qi Y, Zhang X, Wang Y, Wang D, Guo Z, Liu P. The expression of ADAMTS2 and collagen genes in muscle tissue and its relationship with meat quality characters in cattle. J Yunnan Agric Univ (Natural Science). 2014;29:173–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Albrecht E, Schering L, Liu Y, Komolka K, Kühn C, Wimmers K, et al. TRIENNIAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT SYMPOSIUM: factors influencing bovine intramuscular adipose tissue development and cellularity. J Anim Sci. 2017;95:2244–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Aspilcueta-Borquis RR, Di Palo R, Araujo Neto FR, Baldi F, de Camargo GMF, de Albuquerque LG, et al. Genetic parameter estimates for buffalo milk yield, milk quality and mozzarella production and Bayesian inference analysis of their relationships. Genet Mol Res. 2010;9:1636–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    de Camargo GM, Aspilcueta-Borquis RR, Fortes MR, Porto-Neto R, Cardoso DF, Santos DJ, et al. Prospecting major genes in dairy buffaloes. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:872.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cui X, Hou Y, Yang S, Xie Y, Zhang S, Zhang Y, et al. Transcriptional profiling of mammary gland in Holstein cows with extremely different milk protein and fat percentage using RNA sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:226.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bernabucci U, Biffani S, Buggiotti L, Vitali A, Lacetera N, Nardone A. The effects of heat stress in Italian Holstein dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:471–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Beale EG, Hammer RE, Antoine B, Forest C. Disregulated glyceroneogenesis: PCK1 as a candidate diabetes and obesity gene. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2004;15:129–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Reshef L, Olswang Y, Cassuto H, Blum B, Croniger CM, Kalhan SC, et al. Glyceroneogenesis and the triglyceride/fatty acid cycle. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:30413–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Forest C, Tordjman J, Glorian M, Duplus E, Chauvet G, Quette J, et al. Fatty acid recycling in adipocytes: a role for glyceroneogenesis and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase. Biochem Soc Trans. 2003;31:1125–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang W, Xue W, Jin B, Zhang X, Ma F, Xu X. Candidate gene expression affects intramuscular fat content and fatty acid composition in pigs. J Appl Genet. 2013;54:113–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Franckhauser S, Munoz S, Pujol A, Casellas A, Riu E, Otaegui P, et al. Increased fatty acid re-esterification by PEPCK overexpression in adipose tissue leads to obesity without insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2002;51:624–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Latorre P, Burgos C, Hidalgo J, Varona L, Carrodeguas JA, López-Buesa P. c.A2456C-substitution in Pck1 changes the enzyme kinetic and functional properties modifying fat distribution in pigs. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19617.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ren Z, Wang Y, Ren Y, Zhang Z, Gu W, Wu Z, et al. Enhancement of porcine intramuscular fat content by overexpression of the cytosolic form of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase in skeletal muscle. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43746.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Maeda K, Cao H, Kono K, Gorgun CZ, Furuhashi M, Uysal KT, et al. Adipocyte/macrophage fatty acid binding proteins control integrated metabolic responses in obesity and diabetes. Cell Metab. 2005;1:107–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chakravarty K, Cassuto H, Reshef L, Hanson RW. Factors that control the tissue-specific transcription of the gene for phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase-C. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;40:129–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pian L, Xue W, Kang L, Li Z, Nie Y, Du Z, et al. Targeting the IGF1R pathway in breast cancer using antisense lncRNA-mediated promoter cis competition. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;12:105–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chen L, Zhi Z, Wang L, Zhao YY, Deng M, Liu YH, et al. NSD2 circular RNA promotes metastasis of colorectal cancer by targeting miR-199b-5p-mediated DDR1 and JAG1 signalling. J Pathol. 2019;248:103–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Métivier R, Gallais R, Tiffoche C, Le Péron C, Jurkowska RZ, Carmouche RP, et al. Cyclical DNA methylation of a transcriptionally active promoter. Nature. 2008;452:45–50.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Huang J, Zheng Q, Wang S, Wei X, Fen L, Yun M. High-throughput RNA sequencing reveals NDUFC2-AS lncRNA promotes adipogenic differentiation in Chinese buffalo (Bubalus bubalis L). Genes. 2019;10:689.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Krueger F. Trim Galore. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/.

  42. 42.

    Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;291:15–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Heatplus: Heatmaps with row and/or column covariates and colored clusters. R package version 2.1.0. http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.10/bioc/html/Heatplus.html.

  46. 46.

    Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2018;4:44–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kaur R, Sodhi M, Sharma A, Sharma VL, Verma P, Swamiet SK, et al. Selection of suitable reference genes for normalization of quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) expression data across twelve tissues of riverine buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191558.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bonnet M, Bernard L, Bes S, Leroux C. Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalisation in adipose tissue, muscle, liver and mammary gland from ruminants. Animal. 2013;7:1344–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jiang Q, Sun B, Liu Q, Cai M, Wu R, Wang F, et al. MTCH2 promotes adipogenesis in intramuscular preadipocytes via an m6A-YTHDF1-dependent mechanism. FASEB J. 2019;33:2971–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Huang J, Dang R, Torigoe D, Li A, Lei C, Sasaki N, et al. Genetic variation in the GDNF promoter affects its expression and modifies the severity of Hirschsprung’s disease (HSCR) in rats carrying Ednrbsl mutations. Gene. 2016;575:144–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wei X, Li H, Yang J, Hao D, Dong D, Huang Y, et al. Circular RNA profiling reveals an abundant circLMO7 that regulates myoblasts differentiation and survival by sponging miR-378a-3p. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e3153.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Nanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars of XYNU.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 31702094 (J.H.) and grant 31672403 (Y.M.), and the Central Plains Technological Innovation Leading Talents Project of Henan Province grant 194200510022 (Y.M.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jieping Huang and Xue Feng contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530005, Guangxi, China

    Jieping Huang, Ruirui Zhu, Duo Guo & Deshun Shi

  2. College of Life Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, 464000, Henan, China

    Jieping Huang, Xue Feng, Yutong Wei, Xiaodan Cao & Yun Ma

  3. School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, 750021, Ningxia, China

    Yun Ma

Authors
  1. Jieping Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xue Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruirui Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Duo Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yutong Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaodan Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yun Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Deshun Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

conceptualization, J.H.; methodology, J.H.; software, J.H.; validation, X.F., R.Z., G.D., and Y.W.; formal analysis, Y.W. and X.C.; investigation, J.H.; resources, D.S. and Y.M.; data curation, J.H.; writing-original draft preparation, X.F. and J.H.; writing—review and editing, X.F. and J.H.; visualization, J.H.; supervision, Y.M. and D.S.; project administration, J.H.; funding acquisition, J.H. and Y.M. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jieping Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal protocols were approved by the Review Committee for the Use of Animal Subjects of Xinyang Normal University (No.XYEC-2017-002). All animals were raised for commercial used rather than for experimental reasons according to the feeding and management stander of buffalo or cattle production. Animals were slaughtered under unconscious (electric shock method) according to the food industry-approved halal food quality certified by a Muslim cleric according to the law of Islam. All efforts were made to minimize suffering. The farm owners declare that they consent to participate this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Images of the cross-section of the longissimus dorsi muscle in the 12th–13th rib of buffalo (A) and cattle (B). Intramuscular fat (IMF) of the longissimus dorsi muscle is very limited in both buffalo and cattle. IMF in cattle is slightly richer than that in buffaloes. Tissue in the yellow box was sampled for the experiment.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Total mRNAs expressed in the longissimus dorsi muscle and adipose tissue of buffalo.

Additional file 3: Table S2.

Total mRNAs expressed in the longissimus dorsi muscle and adipose tissue of cattle.

Additional file 4: Table S3.

Differentially expressed genes between buffalo and cattle in coexpressed mRNAs.

Additional file 5: Table S4.

Differentially expressed genes between buffalo and cattle in the longissimus dorsi muscle specific mRNAs.

Additional file 6: Table S5.

Functional enrichment of differentially expressed genes in the longissimus dorsi muscle-specific mRNAs.

Additional file 7: Table S6.

Functional enrichment of differentially expressed genes in coexpressed mRNAs.

Additional file 8: Fig. S2.

Sequences of the upstream region of the buffalo and cattle PCK1 genes. * under sequences indicates base difference between buffalo and cattle. Horizontal lines under sequence indicate the forward primer (F), the reverse primer (R), and the start codon (ATG), respectively.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, J., Feng, X., Zhu, R. et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals that PCK1 is a potential gene affecting IMF deposition in buffalo. BMC Genomics 21, 710 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07120-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07120-w

Keywords

  • Bubalus bubalis
  • RNA sequencing
  • Intramuscular fat
  • Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1
  • Promoter activity

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us