Skip to main content
Help us understand how you use our websites. Take part in our 30 minute study now.

Transcriptomic analysis of the testicular fusion in Spodoptera litura

Abstract

Background

Lepidoptera is one group of the largest plant-feeding insects and Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is one of the most serious agricultural pests in Asia countries. An interesting and unique phenomenon for gonad development of Lepidoptera is the testicular fusion. Two separated testes fused into a single one during the larva-to-pupa metamorphosis, which is believed to contribute to sperm production and the prevalence in field. To study the molecular mechanism of the testicular fusion, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) experiments of the testes from 4-day-old sixth instar larvae (L6D4) (before fusion), 6-day-old sixth instar larvae (L6D6, prepupae) (on fusing) and 4-day-old pupae (P4D) (after fusion) of S. litura were performed.

Results

RNA-seq data of the testes showed that totally 12,339 transcripts were expressed at L6D4, L6D6 and P4D stages. A large number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were up-regulated from L6D4 to L6D6, and then more genes were down-regulated from L6D6 to P4D. The DEGs mainly belongs to the genes related to the 20E signal transduction pathway, transcription factors, chitin metabolism related enzymes, the families of cytoskeleton proteins, extracellular matrix (ECM) components, ECM-related protein, its receptor integrins and ECM-remodeling enzymes. The expression levels of these genes that were up-regulated significantly during the testicular fusion were verified by qRT-PCR. The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) were found to be the main enzymes related to the ECM degradation and contribute to the testicular fusion. The testis was not able to fuse if MMPs inhibitor GM6001 was injected into the 5th abdomen region at L6D6 early stage.

Conclusions

The transcriptome and DEGs analysis of the testes at L6D4, L6D6 and P4D stages provided genes expression information related to the testicular fusion in S. litura. These results indicated that cytoskeleton proteins, ECM-integrin interaction genes and ECM-related proteins were involved in cell migration, adhesion and fusion during the testicular fusion. The ECM degradation enzymes MMPs probably play a critical role in the fusion of testis.

Background

Lepidoptera is one group of the largest plant-feeding insects. They are important in pollinating and preying and have substantial impacts on humans and many other species. Lepidopteran insects are also important for the studies of genetics, evolutionary biology, ecology, physiology and development [1]. S. litura is one of the most serious agricultural pests in the tropical and subtropical areas of Asia including India, China and Japan [1, 2]. The genome of S. litura has been sequenced and the genomic information provide a platform for further functional analysis [2].

Efficient reproduction depends on the production of health sperms and eggs during insect life cycle [3]. The male reproductive system of insects consists of the testes, vas deferens, seminal vesicles, accessory glands, single or double ejaculatory ducts, and aedeagus [4, 5]. An interesting and special phenomenon during the metamorphosis process is the testicular fusion, which occurs in most of the lepidopteran insects. In the larval period, a pair of kidneys-like testes are separated in the abdomen. During the prepupal or pupal period, the two separated testes fuse together to form a single one [6,7,8]. The testicular fusion has been reported in many lepidopteran insects, such as the Crambidae insects Diatraea saccharalis [7], the Lymantriidae insect Agraulis vanillae [8], the Nymphalidae insect Dione juno [8], the Noctuidae insects Heliothis zea [9], Heliothis virescens [10], and S. litura [11] and Ostrinia nubilalis [12], the Sphingidae insect Manduca sexta [13]. Most of these insects are important agricultural pests, causing extensive damage to cotton, soybean, tobacco, cruciferous vegetables [14, 15]. Comparatively, the Bombycidae insect Bomby mori, which is a domesticized lepidopteran insect, the testis does not fuse during the development [4]. Although there are many reports describing the process of testicular fusion, no study has reported on the molecular mechanism of testicular fusion in lepidopteran insects.

Fusion of cell or tissues is an indispensable process in diverse physiological events. Fusion events of tissue or organ are reported in the different developmental process in different organisms such as sperm-egg adhesion and fusion in mammals [16], myoblast fusion in flies and mice [17], epithelial fusion during neural tube morphogenesis [18] and medial cardiac cell fusion during the heart morphogenesis in Drosophila [19]. Fusion is essential for the fertilization, muscle development, neural tube formation and heart formation. Some reports have investigated the molecular mechanism of these fusion events. For example, the proteins ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain) including fertilin α, fertilin β and cyritestin, have been found to be important for sperm-egg binding and fusion by interacting with integrins on oocyte [20]. The major proteins involved in cell recognition and adhesion in mice are integrins, cadherins and focal adhesion proteins and the ECM are remodeled by MMPs during the myoblast fusion in the process of muscle regeneration [21,22,23]. During Drosophila heart development, cardioblasts (CBs) in the lateral mesoderm undergo specific medial adhesions with their contralateral partners, forming an apical lumen. MMPs promote the collective CB cell migration, ECM remodeling and lumen formation. Integrin and cadherin are also involved in cell adhesion and fusion [19]. These studies indicate that ECM remodeling is very important in the sperm-egg fusion, myoblast fusion and heart development of Drosophila, and the MMPs are the main enzymes in ECM remodeling [19, 23]. Although, the mechanisms of the fusion of different cells or tissues are reported in different species, the mechanism for the testis fusion in insects is still unknown.

In our previous study, a barrier sheet was embedded between the two separated testes so that the testicular fusion process was blocked. We found that the number of sperm bundless was decreased for those individuals that testes did not fuse at pupal stage. And the hatch rate of eggs was decreased if female mated with male whose testis did not fuse. It was speculated that testicular fusion benefit the development of sperms in lepidopteran insect [11]. It is interesting and compelling to figure out the mechanism of the testicular fusion, find key genes related to testicular fusion. The research will help us to understand the miracle of fusion process and develop the strategy for male sterility technology to control the pest in the future.

In this study, transcriptomic analysis of the testicular fusion in S. litura was conducted by RNA-seq technology [24] to examine the molecular process and potential genes that are involved in the fusion. The molecular mechanism of testicular fusion is discussed.

Results

RNA-sequencing and statistics of transcript expression

To explore the molecular mechanism of testicular fusion during the larva-to-pupa metamorphosis in S. litura, the samples of the testes were collected at L6D4, L6D6 and P4D (Fig. 1). The mRNA was extracted and sequenced by SE using Illumina Hiseq™ 2000 platform. In total, 4,780,380, 4,891,555 and 4,854,931 clean reads were obtained respectively for three groups of samples (Additional file 1). These clean reads were well mapped to reference sequences from S. litura genome database [2] using TOPHat software [25]. At L6D4, L6D6 and P4D stages 4,524,698, 4,602,274 and 4,594,593 unique reads were mapped and the mapping ratios were higher than 94% (Additional file 2). All the mapped clean reads were assembled by Cufflinks software [24] and the known genes from S. litura genome were obtained. Novel transcripts were detected using Cuffcompare. There were 12,339 transcripts expressing in all the three samples, while 9856 transcripts were co-expressed at the three stages, and 10,995, 11,389 and 10,879 transcripts were expressed at L6D4, L6D6 and P4D stages, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

The testes of S. litura at different development stages. a Two separated testes at L6D4; b The fusing testes at L6D6 stage; c One testis after fusion at P3D. The red bars represent 100 μm

Fig. 2
figure2

The read numbers of the expressed transcripts and distribution at L6D4, L6D6 and P4D testes

The expression levels of transcripts were calculated by using the Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKMs) [24, 26]. According to FRKM, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained comparing the samples between L6D4 and L6D6 (L6D4 vs L6D6), and between L6D6 and P4D (L6D6 vs P4D) by using the edgeR platform (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/edgeR.html) [27]. In total, 1676 transcripts were identified as DEGs for L6D4 vs L6D6, of which 1387 were up-regulated and 289 were down-regulated. For L6D6 vs P4D, 3365 transcripts showed differential expression levels, of which 884 were up-regulated and 2481 were down-regulated (Fig. 3). The results indicated a large number of the transcripts were up-regulated during the testis fusion, but after the fusion, the major of DEGs were down-regulated. It is speculated that those transcripts that were expressed in such a trend may be involved in the testicular fusion.

Fig. 3
figure3

Comparison of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between L6D4 and L6D6, and between L6D6 and P4D. The red shows the up-regulated DEGs and the green show the down-regulated DEGs

Expression of the 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) and juvenile hormone (JH) signaling pathway related genes during the testicular fusion

The testicular fusion occurs during the larva-pupae metamorphosis, which is regulated by 20E and JH. In this study, the 20E signaling pathway related genes Ultraspiracle (USP), Ecdysone receptor (EcR), the nuclear hormone receptor 38 (HR38), the transcription factors betaFTZ-F1(βFTZ-F1) and Broad Complex isform Z2/Z3/Z4 (BRC-Z2/Z3/Z4) were highly expressed at L6D6 (Fig. 4a) and the genes Krüppel homolog (Kr-h1) and Steroid receptor coactivator (SRC) in JH signaling pathway were up-regulated at L6D6 (Fig. 4b). The results implied that the 20E signaling pathway may mainly regulate or initiate the testicular fusion, while JH signaling may also play roles in the process.

Fig. 4
figure4

Expression of the 20E and JH signals-related genes. a Transcriptomic analysis of the expression of the 20E and JH signals-related genes; b qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of the 20E and JH signals-related genes in the testes at indicated six developmental stages in X-axis. L6D0, L6D2, L6D4 and L6D6 represent day 0, 2, 4 and 6 of the 6th instar larval stage; P1D and P3D represent day 1 and 3 after pupation. 20E signals genes includes Ultraspiracle (USP), Ecdysone receptor (EcR), the nuclear hormone receptor 38 (HR38), the transcription factors betaFTZ-F1(βFTZ-F1), Broad Complex isform Z2/Z4 (BRC-Z2/Z4). JH signals genes includes Methoprene-tolerant (Met1) and Krüppel homolog (Kr-h1). The relative expression levels are normalized to the expression level of Slgapdh. One-way ANOVA analysis of variances was performed, followed by Turkey’s Multiple Comparison Test for significance analysis of the differences by GraphPad Prism 5 software. The values are mean ± SEM (n = 3). The significance is represented with different letters

Expression of transcription factors (TFs) during the testicular fusion

Transcription factors regulate the growth, development and differentiation of organisms. By using Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/), a total of 187 transcripts with potential transcription factor activity were predicted in DEGs, 12 of which were specifically highly expressed at L6D6 (when the testicular fusion occurred) including the transcription factors class A basic helix-loop-helix protein 15-like (bHLH15), Ken1, chorion specific C/EBP (C/EBP), βFTZ-F1, homeotic protein spalt-major-like isform X2 (Salm-X2), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein gamma-like (C/EBP-γ), zinc finger protein Elbow (Elbow), avian erythroblastosis virus E26 transformation-specific (Ets), trachealess (Trh), kayak isform X3 (Kayak-X3), GF22772 and zinc finger homeobox protein 3 (Fig. 5a). Their expression pattern was verified by qRT-PCR (Fig. 5b). It is hypothesized that highly expressed transcription factors at L6D6 may be involved in testicular fusion.

Fig. 5
figure5

Expression of the selected 12 transcription factors. a Transcriptomic analysis of the expression of the 12 transcription factors; b qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of the 12 transcription factors at indicated six developmental stages of testes. The transcription factors includes class A basic helix-loop-helix protein 15-like (bHLH15), Ken1, chorion specific C/EBP (C/EBP), transcription factor beta FTZ-F1 (βFTZ-F1), homeotic protein spalt-major-like isform X2 (Salm-X2), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein gamma-like (C/EBP-γ), zinc finger protein Elbow (Elbow), avian erythroblastosis virus E26 transformation-specific (Ets), trachealess (Trh), transcription factor kayak isform X3 (Kayak-X3), GF22772 and zinc finger homeobox protein 3 . The method and other information are the same as the Fig. 4. The significance is represented with different letters

Expression of the cytoskeleton and chitin metabolism related genes during the testicular fusion

The testicular fusion occurs during the larva-to-pupa metamorphosis, during which many of the tissues and organs are remodeled. The cytoskeletal proteins and insect chitin are involved in the remodeling of the tissue and organ [28, 29]. To study whether cytoskeleton and chitin are involved in testicular fusion, the expression of these genes was analyzed. The analysis found that the cytoskeletal proteins, including actin, tubulin, actin binding protein and microtubule-associated proteins were up-regulated from L6D4 to L6D6, and down-regulated from L6D6 to P4D (Fig. 6a). The expression pattern of chitinases, chitin deacetylases and chitin synthase A was similar to that of the cytoskeletal proteins (Fig. 6b). The results indicated that the testis fusion during the larva-to-pupa metamorphosis involved in testis remodeling through the roles of cytoskeletal proteins and chitin metabolism-related proteins.

Fig. 6
figure6

Expression patterns of transcripts related to cytoskeleton (a) and chitin metabolism b. The red represents the significantly up-regulated genes; the gray represents the genes not differentially expressed; the green represents the significantly down-regulated genes

Expression of ECM component proteins

ECM proteins usually consist of collagens, proteoglycans and glycoproteins and these proteins function in physical support for tissue integrity and elasticity, as well as the microenvironment of a cell, which influences cell behaviors, such as cell proliferation, adhesion and migration [30]. GO and KEGG analysis of DEG genes indicated those genes related to cell, cell part, membrance and membrance part and ECM-receptor interaction pathway were up-regulated when the testes were fusing and down-regulated after the testicular fusion. so, we are interested in these DEGs (Additional file 3). To study the roles of the ECM components in the testicular fusion, the expression of collagens, proteoglycans and glycoproteins were analyzed. Most of these genes were up-regulated at L6D6, when the testicular fusion occurred (Fig. 7). Two collagen genes (SWUSl10005600, XM_022978189.1, collagen alpha-1(IV) chain; SWUSl10005599, XM_022978190.1, collagen alpha-2(IV) chain) and the three glycoprotein laminin genes (SWUSl10014957, XM_022976705.1, laminin subunit gamma-1; SWUSl10015737, XM_022973420.1, laminin subunit beta-1; and SWUSl10010299, XM_022964712.1, laminin subunit alpha-2) were selected for qRT-PCR verification (Fig. 8), the results revealed that ECM component proteins may be involved in the testicular fusion in S. litura.

Fig. 7
figure7

Expression patterns of the ECM component proteins. a collagens; b proteoglycans; c glycoproteins. The red represents the significantly up-regulated genes; the gray represents the genes not differentially expressed; the green represents the significantly down-regulated genes

Fig. 8
figure8

qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of the selected ECM component protein genes in the testes at the six different developmental stages in X-axis. The two collagen genes were collagen alpha-1(IV) and collagen alpha-2(IV) in Fig. 7a. The three glycoprotein laminin genes were laminin subunit alpha-2; laminin subunit beta-1; laminin subunit gamma-1 in Fig. 7b. The method and other information are the same as the Fig. 4. The significance is represented with different letters

Expression of ECM-associated proteins: mucins and lectins

In this study, ECM-associated proteins: mucins and lectins were analyzed, these genes were up-regulated significantly during the testicular fusion (from L6D4 to L6D6), and down-regulated after the testicular fusion (from L6D6 to P4D) (Fig. 9). The expression patterns of these genes were consistent with that of the ECM component proteins, implying that the ECM-associated proteins and ECM component proteins may work together in the testicular fusion in S. litura.

Fig. 9
figure9

Expression patterns of the ECM-associated proteins: mucins and lecins. The red represents the significantly up-regulated genes; the gray represents the genes not differentially expressed; the green represents the significantly down-regulated genes

Expression of ECM receptor integrins

The ECM-receptor interaction plays important roles in controlling cytoskeletal dynamics and regulating diverse functions including cell survival, differentiation, migration, attachment and focal adhesion assembly [28]. In this study, the ECM receptors integrins were significantly up-regulated at L6D6 as detected by both transcriptome and qRT-PCR analyses (Fig. 10). These results implied that all of the ECM component proteins, their receptor integrins and ECM-related proteins may jointly participate in the testicular fusion in S. litura.

Fig. 10
figure10

Expression of the integrin genes. a Transcriptomic analysis of the integrin expression; b qRT-PCR analysis of the integrin expression. The method and other information are the same as the Fig. 4. The significance is represented with different letters

Expression and function analysis of ECM-remodeling enzymes: matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)

In this study, the genes related to the ECM remodeling were found and analyzed, MMPs and ADAMs were up-regulated significantly at L6D6 (Fig. 11a). To study the function of ECM-remodeling enzymes, MMPs were selected because three MMP transcripts were found in the testes (SWUSl10007900, XM_022966048.1, matrix metalloproteinase-14 isoform X3; SWUSl10005499, XM_022958284.1, matrix metalloproteinase-2-like and SWUSl10009480, XM_022964227.1, matrix metalloproteinase-2-like). Two SlMmps were significantly up-regulated during the testicular fusion process (Fig. 11b). Phylogenetic tree analysis was performed for the three MMP proteins. These three MMP proteins of S. litura were highly homologous to the Bombyx mori MMP proteins, BmMMP1, BmMMP2 and BmMMP3, respectively (Additional file 4). Thus, MMP SWUSl10007900, SWUSl10005499 and SWUSl10009480 were respectively named SlMMP1, SlMMP2 and SlMMP3 in this study.

Fig. 11
figure11

Developmental and spatial expression of SlMmps in the S. litura testes. a Transcriptomic analysis of the ECM-remodeling enzymes. The red represents the significantly up-regulated genes; the gray represents the genes not differentially expressed; the green represents the significantly down-regulated. b qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of the SlMmp genes in the testes at the six different developmental stages. SlMmp1: SWUSl10007900; SlMmp2:SWUSl10005499; SlMmp3:SWUSl10009480. c Expression levels of the SlMmp genes at whole testes, sheath and sperm cells. The method and other information are the same as the Fig. 4. The significance is represented with different letters

To study the relationships between SlMMP proteins and the testicular fusion, the expression patterns of SlMmps were tested by qRT-PCR, the results indicated that SlMmp1 was not differentially expressed, while SlMmp2 and SlMmp3 were up-regulated significantly during the testicular fusion (Fig. 11b), which was consistent with the transcriptomic analysis. To study the location of SlMmps RNA in the testis, the peritoneal sheath and sperm cells were isolated from the testis, the results indicated that SlMmp2 and SlMmp3 had a higher expression level in the peritoneal sheath than in sperm cells (Fig. 11c), while SlMmp1 was not significantly differentially expressed in the peritoneal sheath and sperm cells (Fig. 11c). These results implied that SlMMP1 may not be related to the testicular fusion, whereas SlMMP2 and SlMMP3 may play roles in the peritoneal sheath helpful for testicular fusion.

To study the function of the SlMMPs during the testicular fusion, a broad-spectrum inhibitor, GM6001, which is found to inhibit MMP function in some studies [31, 32], was applied to inhibit the SlMMPs action. GM6001 was injected into the 5th abdominal segment near the testis at the early L6D6 stage and then the testicular fusion process was statistically analyzed at the middle L6D6, late L6D6 stage, white pupae stage (P0) and 1-day-old pupae stage (P1D) (Fig. 12 and Table 1). The results indicated that almost half of larvae were not able to develop into normal pupae in the GM6001 treatment group, as compared to the control DMSO, in which most larvae developed into normal pupae. In all of the normal control pupae, the testis was able to get to close, adhere and fuse, however the fusion did not happen in the normal treatment pupae. For melanism pupae, the testis was fused for most control one while fusion did not happen for most treatment individuals (Table 1). Thus, these results implied that SlMMPs play a vital role in the testicular fusion.

Fig. 12
figure12

Phenotypic observation after the treatment with the MMP protein inhibitor GM6001. Phenotypic of male larvae, pupae and their testes of S. litura from L6D6 middle stage to P1D in the control group and the treatment group. The male larvae were injected with DMSO (a) or MMP protein inhibitor GM6001 (b) at L6D6 early stage. Twenty four hours later, in DMSO control group, most larvae developed into normal pupae and the testes were fused, a few larvae did not develop into normal pupae and was not able to shed during the larva-to-pupa metamorphosis. Most testes were fused for these melanism pupae (a). In the GM6001 treatment group, most larvae were not able to develop into normal pupae, and their testes did not fuse for both melanism and normal pupae (b). The 60–70 male larvae were injected for each treatment. Experiment was repeated three times. One representative result was shown

Table 1 Statistics of the four kinds of testes (pre-fusion, slight fusion, fusion, torsion) after GM6001 treatment

Discussion

The insect metamorphosis process is regulated coordinately by 20E and JH signals. The 20E signal related genes BR-C, E75, E74, FTZ-F1 and HR38 are up-regulated during the larva-to-pupa metamorphosis [33], contributing to the organ development such as the silk gland and wing disc in B. mori [34, 35]. 20E signal related genes were up-regulated duing the testicular fusion, which is speculated to be involved in the testis remodeling. In addition, it was also reported that the 20E stimulated the sperm development in Manduca sexta and European corn, Ostrinia nubialis during the metamorphosis [36, 37] and regulated the stem cell maintenance in Drosophila testis [38] In this study, 20E signal appeared to be more active than JH signal during the testicular fusion, implying that 20E signal may be involved in regulating the testicular fusion in S. litura.

By analyzing transcription factors in the transcriptome data during testicular fusion, 12 transcription factors were found to be highly expressed at L6D6 (Fig. 5). The gene Ken regulates the terminalia development of Drosophila [39] and is autonomously required for the self-renewal of somatic cyst stem cells in the Drosophila testis [40]. It is speculated that ken play similar roles during the testis fusion in S. litura. Chorion specific C/EBP factor is firstly isolated from B. mori follicular cells and characterized in lepidopteran insects and able to recognize homologous binding sites in the chorion gene promoters in flies and other moths [41]. The transcription factor βFTZ-F1 is very important in regulating the development of tissues and organs at the prepupal-pupal transition, such as wing [42], leg [43] and muscle [44] and is involved in the regulation of the cuticle protein genes [45]. In this study, a large number of cuticle protein genes were found from L6D4 to P4D stages (Additional file 5). Whether βFTZ-F1 is involved in the regulation of cuticle protein in the testes of S. litura should be further investigated. Dfos/kayak gene has been identified as a key regulator of epithelial cell morphogenesis during dorsal closure of the embryo and fusion of the adult thorax in Drosophila [46]. It may be also possible that kayak plays a role in cell morphogenesis and migration during the testicular fusion. The Ets gene is reported to regulate the tracheal cell migration and germ cell development [47, 48]. In insects, the testes are surrounded by branches of the trachea extended from the fifth or sixth abdominal segment (Fig. 1) [7]. Some studies report that the transcription factors trachealess, spalt and Elbow regulate the trachea development in Drosophila [49,50,51]. Thus, it is speculated that the above transcription factors, which were significantly up-regulated during the testis fusion at L6D6, probably are involved in regulating the testicular fusion events in S. litura.

The mechanisms of the cell or tissue fusion have been investigated in the past years which are complicated in different organisms [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. There are similarities and differences in different fusion events. The genes that are related to cell recognition, migration and adhesion, such as the integrin, cadherin and ECM remodeling genes, are involved in different cells or myoblast fusions in flies and mice [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. In this study, the cytoskeletal proteins are highly expressed when the testes began to fuse, which is similar to the myoblast fusion events and cellular fusion in the wing development of flies [22, 28], where the cytoskeletal protein actin plays important roles in cell shape and migration.

The ECM proteins including collagens, proteoglycans and glycoproteins bind with each other or with cell adhesion receptors forming a complex network around the cells residing in all tissues and organs [30]. It has been reported that collagen IV and the laminin glycoprotein are critical in providing the cell adhesion and stabilizing the overall structure [52]. For example, Collagen IV play a vital role in mediating inter-adipocyte adhesion in Drosophila [53], the loss of laminin function caused the failture of adhesion of wing-specific cells and formation of the wing blistering in Bombyx mori [54]. In this study, the ECM proteins were up-regulated when the testes fused (Fig. 7), implying that ECM components may be involved in cell adhesion during the testicular fusion in S. litura.

The integrin family is a kind of transmembrane receptors, of which the extracellular domains can bind ECM ligands [28]. Cell adhesion to the ECM is mediated via integrin receptors that regulates the bi-directional signaling, which is important for cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, migration and adhesion [21, 28, 55]. Integrins are involved in cell adhesion and fusion during the sperm-egg fusion [16,17,18,19,20], myoblast fusion [17, 21], cell-cell fusion in the heart development [19], stable adhesion between epithelia in wing development of insects [54] and cell migration in the nervous system development in mammals [56], In this study, the ECM components and its receptors integrins were also up-regulated at L6D6 (Fig. 7, Fig. 10), suggesting that the ECM-integrin interaction pathway may be involved in the fusion of testes by signaling cell migration and adhesion in S. litura.

The ECM is a highly dynamic structure that is constantly undergoing a remodeling involving in quantitative and qualitative changes in the ECM components. The ECM degradation is mediated by specific enzymes, such as MMPs and ADAMs. However, MMPs are the main enzymes involved in all ECM degradation and play crucial roles in the morphogenesis of tissues and organs [57, 58]. The ECM was degraded by MMPs for the neural crest cell migration during epithelial fusion in neural tube morphogenesis [59, 60]. During Drosophila heart development, MMPs regulated ECM differentiation and remodeling which promoted leading edge membrane dynamics of cardioblasts during cell migration [19]. In this study, MMPs and ADAMs were significantly up-regulated when two testes began to fuse (Fig. 11a, b) and SlMmp2 and SlMmp3 were highly expressed in peritoneal sheath (Fig. 11c). The broad spectrum MMP inhibitor GM6001 inhibited the testicular fusion process (Fig. 12, Table 1). It is reasonable to speculate that SlMMPs may play an important role for testicular fusion of S. litura by remodeling ECM of peritoneal sheath, It is similar to the cell fusion in the Drosophila heart development. Functional studies by CRISRP/Cas9 are currently performed to verify the function of those potential proteins.

Conclusions

In this study, 12,339 transcripts were totally expressed from the testes at L6D4, L6D6 and P4D stages. From L6D4 to L6D6, 1676 transcripts were differentially expressed, while 3365 transcripts were differentially expressed from L6D6 to P4D. More transcripts were significantly up-regulated at L6D6 during the testicular fusion. 20E signal and some transcription factors which were specific highly expressed at L6D6 may be involved in the testicular fusion process. The cytoskeleton proteins, the proteins in the ECM-integrin interaction pathway, the ECM related proteins and the ECM-modifying enzymes MMPs may be involved in the cell shaping, migrating and adhering during the fusion of the testis.

Methods

Experimental animals and RNA extraction

litura larvae were provided by the Entomology Institute of SUN YAT-SEN University, Guangzhou, China and maintained in the Institute of Insect Science and Technology, South China Normal University. The larvae were reared at 25 °C on artificial diet under the condition of 12 h light and 12 h dark after egg hatching. The total number of S. litura larvae used in present study was around 2000. For RNA extraction, the testes were dissected from more than 10 male individuals at L6D4, L6D6 and P4D stages and usually there were three repeats for each stage for one experiment. Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, California, USA).

RNA-sequence, sequence mapping and annotation

About 5 μg RNA from L6D4, L6D6 and P4D testes was prepared. RNA-seq libraries were sequenced using the Illumina Hiseq™ 2000 platform by BGI company (Shenzhen, China). The clean reads of each sample were aligned to reference S. litura genome by TopHat2 software [25]. The assemble results were obtained from the TopHat2 alignment results by Cufflinks software [24]. The transcripts were annotated using the available protein databases including Nr (non-redundant protein databases), SwissProt, COG (Cluster of Orthologous Groups), and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes Genomes) (e-value< 10− 5).

Quality assessment of RNA-seq sequences

Raw reads (raw data) were saved in FASTQ format [61], and have been published on the website NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/study/?acc=PRJNA447976). The reads containing adaptor sequences, unknown bases ‘NNN...’, and low quality reads were removed. The Q20, Q30, GC content are listed in the Additional file 1.

The analysis of DEGs

The expression levels of genes were calculated by FPKM values, which were adjusted the number of fragments by the total number of the mapped fragments and the length of the gene [24, 26]. DEGs were obtained by using FPKM value of the log2ǀfold changes > 1 and the standard of false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.001.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Two μg RNA from each sample were used to synthesize cDNA as the templates for qRT-PCR. The specific primers were designed based on the sequences aligned to S. litura genome (Additional file 6). The qRT-PCR experiments were performed using the QuantStudio™ 6 Flex Real-Time system (ABI, Life Technologies, Carlsbad USA) with SYBR® Select Master Mix (ABI). The total volume of qRT-PCR reactions was 20 μl, including 10 μl of 2 x SYBR® Select Master Mix (ABI), 0.8 μl of specific forward and reverse primers (10 μM). The cycling parameters were 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 2 min, and followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min. The reference gene GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, LOC111366510) was used as a control gene. The relative expression levels were analyzed according to the method of 2-ΔΔCt [62]. All experiment was repeated at least three times and one representing result was shown.

Separation of peritoneal sheath and sperm cells

The testes were carefully isolated from L6D6 and put into the centrifuge tube and a little of PBS buffer was added. The testes were squeezed slightly with the tips, allowing the sperm cells released. A little amount of PBS buffer was used to wash the peritoneal sheath for five times, and the PBS buffer containing the sperm cells was collected in a new centrifuge tube. Then, the peritoneal sheaths were washed more twice with PBS to remove the sperm cells. The samples from 15 to 20 male individuals were used for RNA extraction. All experiment was repeated at least three times and one representing result was shown.

Treatment of MMP inhibitor

The MMP inhibitor Ilomastat (Galardin; GM6001) (HY-15768, MedChemExpress) was selected. The GM6001 was dissolved in DMSO. The larvae at early L6D6 were injected with 3 μL inhibitor (20 μM/μL) around the testis in the 5th abdominal segment, and 60–70 male larvae per replicate were injected for each treatment. All experiment was repeated at least three times and one representing result was shown.

Statistical analysis of data

For the genes expression analyses, One-way ANOVA analysis of variances was performed, followed by Turkey’s Multiple Comparison Test for significance analysis of the differences. Data were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism 5 software (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). The values are mean ± SEM (Standard Error of Mean) (n = 3).

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting the results in this article are included in the present and the Additional files. The RNA-seq raw read data have been submitted in the Sequence Read Archive of the NCBI (accession number: PRJNA447976).

Abbreviations

20E:

20-hydroxyecdysone

BR-C:

Broad complex

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

EcR:

Ecdysone receptor

FDR:

False Discovery Rate

FPKM:

Fragment Per kb per Million reads

JH:

Juvenile hormone

Kr-h1:

Krüppel homolog 1

L6D4:

4-day-old sixth instar larvae

L6D6:

6-day-old sixth instar larvae

Late-L6D6:

Late stage of L6D6

Met:

Methoprene-tolerant

Mid-L6D6:

Middle stage of L6D6

MMP:

Matrix metalloproteinase

P0:

Pupae

P1D:

1-day-old pupae

P4D:

4-day-old pupae

SRC:

Steroid receptor coactivator

USP:

Ultraspiracle

References

  1. 1.

    Mitter C, Davis DR, Cummings MP. Phylogeny and evolution of Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 2017;62:265–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cheng T, Wu J, Wu Y, Chilukuri RV, Huang L, Yamamoto K, Feng L, Li W, Chen Z, Guo H, et al. Genomic adaptation to polyphagy and insecticides in a major east Asian noctuid pest. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1(11):1747–56.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Klowden MJ. Physiological systems in insects. 2nd ed. America: Academic; 2013. p. 149–96.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ômura S. Studies on the reproductive system of the male of Bombyx mori. J Fac Agric. 1936;38(2):151–81.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Alves L, Mancini K, Lino-Neto J, Dolder H. Morphology of the male reproductive system and sperm ultrastructure of Leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lynotiidae). Acta Zoologica (Stocholm). 2006;87(2):131–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chases JA, Gilliland FR. Testicular development in the tobacco bud worm. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1972;65(4):901–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bilha JK, Brancalhão RMC, Conte H. Testicles fusion of Diatraea saccharalis F (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) during post-embryonic development. J Entomol Res Soc. 2012;14(3):01–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mari IP, Gigliolli AAS, Nanya S, Portela-Castro ALB. Histological and electron microscopy observations on the testis and spermatogenesis of the butterfly Dione juno (Cramer, 1779) and Agraulis vanillae (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Micron. 2018;109:11–21.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Callahan PS. Serial morphology as a technique for deterurination of reproductive patterns in the corn earworm, Heliothis zea. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1958;51(5):413–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    LaChance LE, Olstad G. Spermiogenesis of eupyrene sperm in prepupae, pupae, and adults of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): an ultrastructural study. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1988;81(2):292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu L, Feng QL. The study on fusion of testis in Lepidoptera insects. J South China Norm Univ. 2014;46(5):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chaudhury MFB, Raun ES. Spermatogenesis and testicular development of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyraustidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1996;59(6):1157–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Reineck JP, Adams TS. Morphology of the male reproductive tract of mature larval, pupal, and adult tobacco hornworms (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae), Manduca Sexta. Ann Entmol Soc Am. 1983;76(3):365–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tuan SJ, Lee CC, Chi H. Population and damage projection of Spodoptera litura (F.) on peanuts Arachis hypogaea (L.) under different conditions using the age-stage, two-sex life table. Pest Manag Sci. 2014;70(5):805–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dhaliwal GS, Jindal V, Dhawan AK. Insect pest problems and crop losses: changing trends. Indian J Ecol. 2010;37(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sutovsky P. Sperm-egg adhesion and fusion in mammals. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2009;11:e11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Abmayr SM, Pavlath GK. Myoblast fusion: lessons from flies and mice. Development. 2012;139(4):641–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pai YJ, Abdullah NL, Mohd-Zin SW, Mohammed RS, Rolo A, Greene ND, Abdul-Aziz NM, Copp AJ. Epithelial fusion during neural tube morphogenesis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(10):817–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Raza QS, Vanderploeg JL, Jacobs JR. Matrix Metalloproteinases are required for membrane motility and lumenogenesis during Drosophila heart development. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171905.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rubinstein E, Ziyyat A, Wolf JP, Le Naour F, Boucheix C. The molecular players of sperm-egg fusion in mammals. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2006;17(2):254–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Quach NL, Biressi S, Reichardt LF, Keller C, Rando TA. Focal adhesion kinase signaling regulates the expression of caveolin 3 and beta1 integrin, genes essential for normal myoblast fusion. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(14):3422–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Charrasse S, Comunale F, Fortier M, Portales-Casamar E, Debant A, Gauthier-Rouviere C. M-cadherin activates Rac1 GTPase through the rho-GEF trio during myoblast fusion. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18(5):1734–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jung P, Zimowska M. Matrix metalloproteinase in development, physiology and degenerative processes of skeletal muscles. Postepy Biochem. 2016;62(1):25–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14(4):R36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhang W, Chen JH, Keyhan NO, Zhang ZY, Li S, Xia YX. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of immune responses of the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria, to challenge by the fungal insect pathogen, Metarhizium acridum. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:867.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Brown NH. Cell-cell adhesion via the ECM: integrin genetics in fly and worm. Matrix Biol. 2000;19(3):191–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhu KY, Merzendorfer H, Zhang W, Zhang J, Muthukrishnan S. Biosynthesis, Turnover, and Functions of Chitin in Insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2016;61:177–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Theocharis AD, Skandalis SS, Gialeli C, Karamanos NK. Extracellular matrix structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;97:4–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jia Q, Chen X, Wu L, Ruan Z, Li K, Li S. Matrix metalloproteinases promote fat body cell dissociation and ovary development in Bombyx mori. J Insect Physiol. 2018;111:8–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Li C, Cantor WJ, Nili N, Robinson R, Fenkell L, Tran YL, Whittingham HA, Tsui W, Cheema AN, Sparkes JD, et al. Arterial repair after stenting and the effects of GM6001, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(11):1852–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Riddiford LM, Hiruma K, Zhou X, Nelson CA. Insights into the molecular basis of the hormonal control of molting and metamorphosis from Manduca sexta and Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;33(12):1327–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sekimoto T, Iwami M, Sakurai S. 20-Hydroxyecdysone regulation of two isoforms of the Ets transcription factor E74 gene in programmed cell death in the silkworm anterior silk gland. Insect Mol Biol. 2007;16(5):581–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ou J, Deng HM, Zheng SC, Huang LH, Feng QL, Liu L. Transcriptomic analysis of developmental features of Bombyx mori wing disc during metamorphosis. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:820.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Freilander M, Reynolds SE. Meiotic metaphases are induced by 20-hydroxyecdysone during spermatogenesis of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. J Insect Physiol. 1988;34:1013–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gelman DB, Woods CW, Borkovec AB. Effects of ecdysone and 20-hydroxyecdysone on apyrene spermiogenesis in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubialis. J Insect Physisol. 1988;34:733–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Li Y, Ma Q, Cherry CM, Matunis EL. Steroid signaling promotes stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila testis. Dev Biol. 2014;394(1):129–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lukacsovich T, Yuge K, Awano W, Asztalos Z, Kondo S, Juni N, Yamamoto D. The ken and barbie gene encoding a putative transcription factor with a BTB domain and three zinc finger motifs functions in terminalia development of Drosophila. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2003;54(2):77–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Issigonis M, Matunis E. The Drosophila BCL6 homolog ken and Barbie promotes somatic stem cell self-renewal in the testis niche. Dev Biol. 2012;68(2):181–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sourmeli S, Papantonis A, Lecanidou R. A novel role for the Bombyx Slbo homologue, BmC/EBP, in insect choriogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;337(2):713–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kawasaki H, Hirose S, Ueda H. BetaFTZ-F1 dependent and independent activation of Edg78E, a pupal cuticle gene, during the early metamorphic period in Drosophila melanogaster. Develop Growth Differ. 2002;44(5):419–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Broadus J, McCabe JR, Endrizzi B, Thummel CS, Woodard CT. The Drosophila βFTZ-F1 orphan nuclear receptor provides competence for stage-specific responses to the steroid hormone ecdysone. Mol Cell. 1999;3(2):143–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Fortier TM, Vasa PP, Woodard CT. Orphan nuclear receptor betaFTZ-F1 is required for muscle-driven morphogenetic events at the prepupal-pupal transition in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 2003;257(1):153–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Deng H, Zheng S, Yang X, Liu L, Feng Q. Transcription factors BmPOUM2 and BmβFTZ-F1 are involved in regulation of the expression of the wing cuticle protein gene BmWCP4 in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Mol Biol. 2011;20(1):45–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Riesgo-Escovar JR, Hafen E. Common and distinct roles of DFos and DJun during Drosophila development. Science. 1997;278(5338):669–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hsu T, Schulz RA. Sequence and functional properties of Ets genes in the model organism Drosophila. Oncogene. 2000;19(55):6409–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Chen T, Bunting M, Karim FD, Thummel CS. Isolation and characterization of five Drosophila genes that encode an ets-related DNA binding domain. Dev Biol. 1992;151(1):176–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wilk R, Weizman I, Shilo BZ. Trachealess encodes a bHLH-PAS protein that is an inducer of tracheal cell fates in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1996;10(1):93–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Franch-Marro X, Casanova J. Spalt-induced specification of distinct dorsal and ventral domains is required for Drosophila tracheal patterning. Dev Biol. 2002;250(2):374–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Dorfman R, Glazer L, Weihe U, Wernet MF, Shilo BZ. Elbow and Noc define a family of zinc finger proteins controlling morphogenesis of specific tracheal branches. Development. 2002;129(15):3585–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Xiong JP, Stehle T, Zhang R, Joachimiak A, Frech M, Goodman SL, Arnaout MA. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin alphaV beta3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-asp ligand. Science. 2002;296(5565):151–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Dai J, Ma M, Feng Z, Pastor-Pareja JC. Inter-adipocyte Adhesion and Signaling by Collagen IV Intercellular Concentrations in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2017;27(18):2729–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Tong X, He S, Chen J, Hu H, Xiang Z, Lu C, Dai F. A novel laminin β gene BmLanB1-w regulates wing-specific cell adhesion in silkworm, Bombyx mori. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12562.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ginsberg MH, Partridge A, Shattil SJ. Integrin regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17(5):509–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Fassler R, Meyer M. Consequences of lack of beta1 integrin gene expression in mice. Genes Dev. 1995;9(15):1896–908.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lu P, Takai K, Weaver VM, Werb Z. Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(12):a005058.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bonnans C, Chou J, Werb Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(12):786–801.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Shi J, Son MY, Yamada S, Szaboval L, Kahan S, Chrysovergis K, Wolf L, Surmak A, Holmbeck K. Membrane-type MMPs enable extracellular matrix permissiveness and mesenchymal cell proliferation during embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 2008;313(1):196–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Roth L, Kalev-Altman R, Monsonego-Ornan E, Sela-Donenfeld D. A new role of the membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase 16 (MMP16/MT3-MMP) in neural crest cell migration. Int J Dev Biol. 2017;61(3–4-5):245–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Cock P, Fields CJ, Goto N, Heuer ML, Rice PM. The sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(6):1767–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):e45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Xiaoyun Wang helped to improve the English and provided useful suggestion for us.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.: 31772519; No.:31720103916), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No.: 2017A030313210), Graduate Student Innovation Program of South China Normal University (NO.: 2016kxm09). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

QLF and LL designed the experiment and revised the manuscript. YQC and JO carried out the bioinformatics analysis, YQC performed most experiment and wrote the manuscript. YCL, QW and LW collected and prepared RNA samples for RNA-seq and performed some RT-PCR and MMP inhibitor injection. SCZ and SL provided suggestion to genes that should be investigated. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qili Feng or Lin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not application.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Ou, J., Liu, Y. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of the testicular fusion in Spodoptera litura. BMC Genomics 21, 171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6494-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Transcriptomic analysis
  • Testicular fusion
  • Spodoptera litura
  • Extracellular matrix (ECM)
  • Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)