Skip to main content

Phylogenomic incongruence in Ceratocystis: a clue to speciation?

Abstract

Background

The taxonomic history of Ceratocystis, a genus in the Ceratocystidaceae, has been beset with questions and debate. This is due to many of the commonly used species recognition concepts (e.g., morphological and biological species concepts) providing different bases for interpretation of taxonomic boundaries. Species delineation in Ceratocystis primarily relied on genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR) using multiple standard molecular markers.

Results

Questions have arisen regarding the utility of these markers e.g., ITS, BT and TEF1-α due to evidence of intragenomic variation in the ITS, as well as genealogical incongruence, especially for isolates residing in a group referred to as the Latin-American clade (LAC) of the species. This study applied a phylogenomics approach to investigate the extent of phylogenetic incongruence in Ceratocystis. Phylogenomic analyses of a total of 1121 shared BUSCO genes revealed widespread incongruence within Ceratocystis, particularly within the LAC, which was typified by three equally represented topologies. Comparative analyses of the individual gene trees revealed evolutionary patterns indicative of hybridization. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree generated from the concatenated dataset comprised of 1069 shared BUSCO genes provided improved phylogenetic resolution suggesting the need for multiple gene markers in the phylogeny of Ceratocystis.

Conclusion

The incongruence observed among single gene phylogenies in this study call into question the utility of single or a few molecular markers for species delineation. Although this study provides evidence of interspecific hybridization, the role of hybridization as the source of discordance will require further research because the results could also be explained by high levels of shared ancestral polymorphism in this recently diverged lineage. This study also highlights the utility of BUSCO genes as a set of multiple orthologous genes for phylogenomic studies.

Background

Delineation of species boundaries is a complex and highly contentious topic among evolutionary biologists. Ideally, a species should be defined as representing a single lineage that maintains its identity from others, with its own evolutionary tendencies and historical fate [1]. In fungi, species recognition is generally based on three commonly applied concepts i.e., the Biological Species Concept (BSC), the Morphological Species Concept (MSC) and the Phylogenetic Species Concept (PSC) [2, 3]. Typically, species are recognised based on the application of systematic characters to reliably distinguish all individuals belonging to a defined group or lineage. MSC and BSC are trait-based and species are grouped using visibly measurable traits such as morphology or reproductive compatibility [4]. PSC differs from MSC and BSC in that it makes use of conservation in DNA sequences to represent shared ancestry [4].

Species delineation is the taxonomic practice that is used to describe an organism in relation to others [5]. Species boundaries defined using BSC, PSC and MSC in fungal systematics are challenged by recurrent inconsistencies [4, 5]. For example, in the case of the BSC and MSC, species numbers could be underestimated due to the extended time periods for changes in morphology or mating compatibility to become evident [2]. PSC determines species boundaries objectively by measuring DNA changes over time [6]. As such, it could be argued that the PSC offers the best possible approach because changes in gene sequences can be easily related to evolutionary time. Trait-based concepts typically lead to ambiguous outcomes due to convergent evolution of morphological traits and where cryptic species are commonly overlooked [2]. In this regard, cryptic speciation is common in, but not limited to, groups that comprise large numbers of species such as the prokaryotes and fungi [5].

Ceratocystis is one of numerous genera that reside in the family Ceratocystidaceae, order Microascales, and class Sordariomycetes [7]. Species in this family include important plant pathogens that cause serious disease, both in agricultural crops and in natural ecosystems [8,9,10]. Application of the PSC for Ceratocystis reveals four geographically defined groups. These include the North American clade (NAC) [11], the Latin American clade (LAC) [12, 13], the African clade (AFC) [14, 15] and the Asian-Australian clade (AAC) [11, 16, 17]. Yet problems regarding the taxonomy of Ceratocystis remain prominent. For example, Fourie et al. [18] were not able to distinguish between C. manginecans and C. acaciivora using commonly used molecular markers and reduced these species to synonymy. Similarly, Oliveira et al. [19] could not distinguish among phylogenetic lineages of C. manginecans, C. eucalypticola and C. fimbriata using BSC and consequently regarded these three species as a single taxon represented by multiple distinct genotypes. Other researchers (Harrington et al. and Li et al. [20, 21]) suggest that isolates of C. fimbriata, C. manginecans and C. eucalypticola represent a single South American species that has been introduced on different hosts to other continents by humans.

The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal RNA genes is generally treated as the barcode region used for fungal species identification [22]. It is often used in combination with additional gene regions such as β-tubulin and translation elongation factor 1-α to delineate species utilising Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) [2]. But the ITS region, especially when it is used alone, is not considered reliable for species delineation in Ceratocystis [18, 19]. This is due to intragenomic variation of multiple ITS gene within individual isolates of Ceratocystis [23, 24]. This variation was initially observed in a single C. manginecans isolate (LAC), which included ITS types similar to the ITS of two distinct species [23, 25, 26] but many other examples have arisen more recently [27, 28].

Intragenomic variation in the ITS region has been associated with hybridization [29, 30]. Ribosomal genes occur as tandem repeats and the intragenomic copies, or paralogs, are usually conserved due to concerted evolution [31]. The mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon include gene conversion and unequal crossing over [32]. In plants, hybridization leads to the retention of both parental ITS types, homogenization to a single ITS sequence and/or homogenization of elements of each parental ITS type into a single composite sequence [29]. Hybridization was first suggested to occur in Ceratocystis by Engelbrecht and Harrington [12]. A study on Ceratocystis manginecans to elucidate the causes of intragenomic variation in the ITS region demonstrated the effects of unequal crossing over, and potentially gene conversion, to explain the random homogenization toward a specific ITS type in culture [23]. The results suggested that the observed polymorphisms in the ITS region could have originated from a hybridization event.

Phylogenetic incongruence in Ceratocystis, and the presence of multiple ITS types within individual isolates has raised many questions regarding species boundaries in this genus. Phylogenomic analyses have been used to resolve incongruent phylogenetic relationships [33], analyse incongruence of genes and their histories, understand population dynamics and to explore evolutionary patterns acting across the genome [34]. The aim of this study was to use a phylogenomic approach to (i) identify a set of orthologous genes shared across the Ceratocystidaceae (ii) use these genes to identify the extent of discordance among gene trees, (iii) and analyse the alternative topologies within Ceratocystis, specifically within the LAC. The overall objective was to explore the possible role of hybridization and/or introgression that might explain phylogenetic discordance in the group. This approach allowed for a comprehensive species tree estimation using GCPSR with the largest dataset used thus far for this genus. This phylogenomic study made use of the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs tool [BUSCO] method [35] as the basis for ortholog selection.

Results

Genome information

The genomes and genome assembly statistics are summarised in Table 1. Genome sizes in Ceratocystis varied between 27 to 30 Mb. These genomes were of high quality, as shown by their N50 values (Table 1) and genome completeness based on BUSCO analyses (Table 2). The representative isolates have a broad geographical distribution, including North America, Africa, Europe and South East Asia.

Table 1 General information and assembly statistics of the 17 Ceratocystidaceae isolates used in this study
Table 2 The genome completeness score assessed by BUSCO on all Ceratocystidaceae genomes

Ortholog selection using BUSCO analysis

BUSCO analysis of the 17 Ceratocystidaceae genomes showed high levels of completeness (Table 2) with scores between 97 and 98%. An average of 1409 complete, single-copy BUSCO genes were successfully identified across all genomes. The average number of duplicated BUSCOs was approximately 7.5%, with all genomes showing little fragmentation and low levels of missing genes (± 1%). Orthologs for phylogenomic analysis were selected based on BUSCO genes that were complete, and present in single copy in each genome. A total of 1123 BUSCOs were found to be shared within Ceratocystis. Of these, 1121 BUSCO sequences were retained after curation and considered for phylogenomic analysis. When the outgroup taxa Davidsoniella and Endoconidiophora were used, the total was 1082 BUSCOs with 1069 nucleotide alignments being retained after curation.

Phylogenetic analyses

Functional annotation of the 1082 complete BUSCOs revealed that these genes were predominantly associated with primary cellular functions, including cellular regulation, organization and related key processes (Additional file 1: Figure S1). To determine the phylogenetic relatedness of Ceratocystis spp., initial analyses only included C. smalleyi, C. manginecans, C. albifundus, C. platani, C. fimbriata, and C. eucalypticola. Two maximum likelihood (ML) species trees were generated using curated concatenated amino acid sequence alignments (633,499 aa) and nucleotide alignments (approximately 2.2 Mbp long). These data were obtained from a total of 1121 shared BUSCO genes. The species tree nodes were well supported with bootstrap values of 100% observed in all nodes (Fig. 1). Incongruence between the amino acid and nucleotide ML species tree topologies was observed between C. manginecans, C. fimbriata and C. eucalypticola. The amino acid ML species tree placed C. fimbriata and C. eucalypticola as a sister clade to C. manginecans (Fig. 1a). In contrast, the nucleotide ML species tree placed C. eucalypticola and C. manginecans as a clade separate from C. fimbriata (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure1

Maximum likelihood (ML) species tree estimates of Ceratocystis species using concatenated datasets of both amino acid (a) and nucleotide (b) sequences. All nodes are supported by 100% bootstrap values (not shown). Thickened branches represent difference in topology between the 2 ML species trees using the Pairwise comparison software Compare2trees (Nye et al. [36])

Further analysis of incongruence among the 1121 amino acid ML tree set using DensiTree revealed 448 consensus tree topologies present in the tree set (Fig. 2a). Tree topologies showed incongruent branches throughout the dataset, including inconsistencies in the deeper nodes of the tree. MetaTree analysis showed a star-like pattern, with support for four consensus nodes (Additional file 2: Figure S2 A). Although not a complete representation of the number of gene trees supporting each topology, the star-tree like pattern illustrated the major incongruence of this dataset. Topologies represented by the four consensus nodes lacked phylogenetic resolution and did not resolve the species relationships. None of the consensus trees resolved C. platani as a distinct lineage, while the two smaller consensus trees either lacked resolution for C. albifundus or showed no resolution across the analysed Ceratocystis spp.

Fig. 2
figure2

DensiTree analysis of 1121 amino acid and nucleotide ML gene trees of Ceratocystis species. DensiTree analysis revealed 448 and 99 different topologies in the amino acid (a) and nucleotide (b) maximum likelihood (ML) trees respectively drawn using default tree drawing parameters. Consensus trees coloured red, bright green and blue represent the three most supported topologies

DensiTree analysis of the nucleotide 1121 gene ML tree set showed a reduction in the number of alternative topologies (99) compared to the amino acid dataset (448). Discordance patterns were mostly observed within the C. manginecans, C. fimbriata and C. eucalypticola clade (Fig. 2b). Approximately 73% of the gene trees show incongruence occurring within C. fimbriata, C. manginecans and C. eucalypticola. Despite some incongruence involving C. platani and to a lesser extent C. albifundus (CMW17620), the dataset supported the distinction of these species from C. manginecans and C. fimbriata. Three main topological patterns were evident within the C. manginecans and C. fimbriata lineage (Fig. 2b and Additional file 3: Figure S3). These topologies were supported by approximately 17% of the ML gene trees. DensiTree analysis further showed that clade probability levels within this group range between 21 and 32%, with the larger percentage supporting the grouping of C. eucalypticola with C. manginecans. MetaTree analysis again revealed a star-like topology, but the improved resolution using nucleotide data revealed a greater number of tree clusters (Additional file 2: Figure S2 B). Although most the consensus trees included C. platani as a part of the incongruent clade, the proportions of support for these consensus trees was masked by other topologies.

To better understand the levels of incongruence seen in the C. manginecans, C. eucalypticola and C. fimbriata clade, an expanded dataset including 5 C. albifundus isolates was analysed. These were specifically used to compare the patterns of incongruence within a well-defined species [37, 38]. In addition, outgroups (D. virescens, E. polonica and E. laricicola) were included to root the phylogenetic trees. The final dataset included 17 Ceratocystidaceae isolates used in this study (Table 1). After concatenation and curation of the 1082 BUSCO genes shared among the expanded dataset, we inspected the alignment and removed genes that were not present in all 17 isolates leaving 1069 BUSCO genes. For this analysis only nucleotide data were considered due to the low signal caused by widespread conservation in the amino acid sequences in the initial analysis including only Ceratocystis species. The ML and Bayesian species tree estimation was performed using a concatenated dataset (again approximately 2 Mbp long) including all 1069 shared BUSCO sequences. Both ML and Bayesian species trees showed separation between C. manginecans and C. eucalypticola supporting previous findings [7] (Fig. 3 and Additional file 4). The branch lengths in the C. manginecans lineage were short however, there was evidence to suggest a deeper branching pattern compared to the C. albifundus lineage (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Maximum likelihood species phylogeny of the 17 Ceratocystidaceae isolates used in this study. The parameters used in the ML include the GTRGAMMA model of evolution and 1000 bootstrap replicates for branch support estimation. All nodes supporting each species are supported by 100% bootstrap values. Bootstrap for nodes supporting isolates of the same species were below 100% as expected (not shown). Insets A and B are zoomed in images of the C. manginecans and C. albifundus clades respectively

Incongruence analysis of the nucleotide ML gene tree set of 1069 concatenated BUSCOs shared among the 17 Ceratocystidaceae genomes analysed using DensiTree revealed 977 consensus tree topologies (Fig. 4a and b). There were several incongruent branches deep within the tree space, showing uncertainty in the divergence patterns of Ceratocystis. The deep branching pattern of the LAC was distinct, but a less uniform pattern was observed towards the terminal nodes. This was especially true for C. eucalypticola where a less uniform pattern with no clear branching point was observed. In contrast, the divergence of the C. fimbriata and C. manginecans was clear.

Fig. 4
figure4

DensiTree analysis of phylogenetic trees of 1069 concatenated gene sequences including all 17 isolates analysed in this study. This image illustrates the difference in branching patterns between the well-defined lineage of CALB (C. albifundus) and the more divergent groupings of CEUC-CMAN (C. eucalypticola and C. manginecans) and CFIM (C. fimbriata). a – DensiTree image of all trees drawn with default drawing settings using the ‘Closest First’ Shuffle. b – DensiTree image of the consensus tree topologies drawn using the star-tree drawing option to illustrate branching patterns of the ML phylogenies. LAC denotes Latin American Clade

Discussion

Several species concepts have recently been applied to determine species boundaries in Ceratocystis [18, 19]. Species concepts in the phylogenetics era are however, constantly being challenged. This is particularly true when the regions/markers applied have conflicting signals due to lack of resolution, as seen for highly conserved genes or where there are high levels of ancestral polymorphism. The results of this study call to question the utility of employing small numbers of molecular markers when defining species boundaries.

The ML phylogenetic tree generated using the concatenated nucleotide dataset covering 17 genomes and seven species in this genus and over 1000 loci support the phylogenetic relationships established by the recent taxonomic study for alternative markers in Ceratocystis [18]. Previous studies have failed to differentiate between C. manginecans, C. eucalypticola and C. fimbriata isolates using BSC [19] but the ML phylogenetic tree placed C. fimbriata as a separate lineage from C. manginecans and C. eucalypticola. Results of the present study also suggest that BUSCOs [35], can be helpful in resolving taxonomic questions such as those for Ceratocystis, where commonly used nuclear markers fail to delineate species. Indeed, these BUSCO genes could complement previous efforts to identify molecular markers for delineating Ceratocystis species [18].

ML phylogenies obtained from nucleotide and amino acid datasets revealed incongruence in Ceratocystis. For example, discordance between the species tree topologies was observed among C. manginecans, C. eucalypticola and C. fimbriata. While the amino acid ML phylogenetic tree placed C. fimbriata and C. eucalypticola as a sister clade to C. manginecans, the nucleotide ML species tree placed C. eucalypticola and C. manginecans as a clade separated from C. fimbriata. Similar incongruence was observed between individual nucleotide and amino acid ML gene trees. The results of this study emphasise the importance of analysing a dataset comprised of multiple genes for species delineation [39]. This is particularly relevant for species of Ceratocystis residing in the LAC where the branching pattern is difficult to determine.

The hypothesis that Ceratocystis is a recently diverged lineage was raised in a recent study of Van der Nest et al. [40] where the age of speciation events in the Ceratocystidaceae was estimated. Short branch lengths separating these lineages as shown by the ML species phylogeny for Ceratocystis especially within the LAC, and the patterns of incongruence observed in this study are characteristics of recently diverged lineages [41]. Notwithstanding our findings, the possibility that the incongruence patterns in Ceratocystis are due to the use of highly conserved genes cannot be excluded. The resolution offered by the BUSCOs, which provide a large sample size of conserved orthologs present in all fungi [35], may not be sufficient, thus complicating the process of species delineation. As a case in point, in our study we were not able to resolve C. platani as a distinct lineage despite using more than 1000 gene loci.

Introgressive hybridisation or shared ancestral polymorphism are the most common biological causes of phylogenetic tree incongruence [42]. Both factors manifest in the same way when assessing tree topologies. There is no reliable way to distinguish between these possibilities, although several have been proposed [43, 44]. The results of the present study show incongruence patterns in the LAC group of Ceratocystis, which may be expected in lineages that have undergone introgression. Introgression, or gene flow, is also most common in populations that constantly undergo admixture, or in populations that are in the process of divergence [6]. In a study by Lee et al. [45], an intermediate level of gene flow was reported in populations of C. albifundus. Overall, the results of the present study appear to reflect a situation in Ceratocystis where speciation is occurring and where gene flow will continue until barriers are established through absolute divergence [6].

Closely related species of Ceratocystis such as those related to C. fimbriata display a high level of host specificity. For example, the sweet potato pathogen that defines the genus infects only this host and isolates represent a single globally distributed clone that has recently been designated as a forma specialis of C. fimbriata [46]. Other species such as C. manginecans that also display relatively limited genetic variability have a much wider host range that could have been caused by undetected positive selection. How these should be treated taxonomically has yet to be resolved but this clearly requires an analysis of large populations of isolates, from different hosts and geographic locations. In this regard, species of Ceratocystis provide a useful example to explore species concepts in a fungal lineage that is currently undergoing divergence.

A phylogenomics analysis to resolve a taxonomic question utilises considerably more data than those based on multigene phylogenies. However, despite the larger body of data, this approach failed to resolve the issue as to whether the isolates of Ceratocystis residing in the LAC group are taxonomically robust species. All researchers in the field agree that C. platani is a species distinct from C. fimbriata but these two species have also been reported to be interfertile [12]. In addition, Fourie et al. [47] reported significant transmission ratio distortion in a cross between C. manginecans and C. fimbriata, providing evidence that these two species or populations have been reproductively isolated for some time. Results of the present study show there is greater separation between C. platani than between C. manginecans, C. fimbriata and C. eucalypticola. It is also clear that within a well-defined species such as C. albifundus there is more obvious recombination than is evident than in the LAC.

Conclusions

Phylogenomic analyses of representative species in Ceratocystidaceae revealed widespread incongruence among single gene trees. Our analyses showed evolutionary patterns consistent with those of introgressive hybridization although the similar effects of incomplete lineage sorting could not be completely ruled out and is subject to further studies. The concatenated dataset was able to resolve some of the incongruence suggesting a phylogenomic approach could be necessary for the phylogeny of these species. As such, we recommend that future taxonomic analyses of species in the Ceratocystidaceae should apply a phylogenomic approach incorporating larger populations sampled from different hosts and geographical regions to maximise genetic variability.

Methods

Isolates and genome information

Seventeen isolates representing 10 species across three genera of the Ceratocystidaceae [7], were chosen for this study (Table 1). The collection included 14 isolates representing seven species of Ceratocystis, two representative isolates of Endoconidiophora and a single Davidsoniella isolate. These isolates were selected based on the fact that whole genome sequence data were available for them [40, 48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. The sequences were downloaded from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information database (NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

Ortholog selection using BUSCO analysis

Single copy orthologs for phylogenomic analysis were identified using the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCOs) tool (BUSCO v1.1b1). The BUSCO genomics tool performs an assessment of genome assembly completeness by quantifying the percentage of core genes present from a specific lineage (Simão et al. [35]). BUSCO was run in genome mode with the fungal lineage dataset. The remaining parameters focused on optimal training during the AUGUSTUS annotation step (−-long), with the gene models of Fusarium graminearum being specified. Fusarium is the phylogenetically closest fungal genus for which these models were available. The shared, complete, single copy BUSCOs were extracted into fasta files using BEDtools v2.26.0 [55, 56].

Phylogenetic analyses

Characterization of the shared BUSCO genes across the Ceratocystidaceae was performed using Blast2GO’s default pipeline [57,58,59] to identify functions possibly linked to patterns observed in the phylogenomic analysis. Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) of the BUSCO nucleotide sequences were generated using MAFFT v7 [60, 61] and curated using Gblocks v0.91b [62] to remove gaps and to rectify misaligned regions. The curated MSAs were concatenated using FASconCAT-G [63, 64], and a Maximum Likelihood (ML) species phylogenetic tree constructed using RAxML [65, 66] with 1000 bootstrap replicates performed. Additionally, to confirm the ML species tree topology, a Bayesian species tree was generated with MRBAYES with one million generations [67]. Individual ML gene trees were generated for each BUSCO alignment using RAxML with 100 bootstrap replicates. Substitution models for the nucleotide ML gene trees (individual gene trees and species tree) used the GTR model as a default parameter. DensiTree [68] was used to visualise the incongruent phylogenies by drawing all topologies in a tree set on the same image using transparency to show conflict. MetaTree was used to compare and visualize multiple alternative tree topologies [69]. The gene trees were first transformed in Figtree v1.4.2 (tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) to make all branch lengths proportional, ensuring overlap for tree topology comparison in DensiTree. Compare2trees was used for comparisons between two alternative topologies [36].

Availability of data and materials

The Whole Genome Shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession numbers listed in Table 1 and are available in the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). Additional results supporting findings presented in this study are provided in the additional information section.

Abbreviations

aa:

amino acid

AAC:

Asian-Australian Clade

AFC:

African Clade

BSC:

Biological Species Concept

BUSCO:

Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs

GCPSR:

Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition

ITS:

Internal Transcribed Spacer of ribosomal RNA genes

LAC:

Latin American Clade

Mbp:

Mega base pair

ML:

Maximum Likelihood

MSC:

Morphological Species Concept

NAC:

North American Clade

PSC:

Phylogenetic Species Concept

References

  1. 1.

    Wiley EO. The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst Biol. 1978;27:17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM, Hibbett DS, Fisher MC. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2000;31:21–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Steenkamp ET, Wingfield MJ, McTaggart AR, Wingfield BD. Fungal species and their boundaries matter – definitions, mechanisms and practical implications. Fungal Biol Rev. 2018;32:104–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Baum DA, Smith SD. Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. Greenwood Village, CO80111 USA: Roberts and Company Publishers, Inc.; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hubert N, Hanner R. DNA barcoding, species delineation and taxonomy: a historical perspective. DNA Barcodes. 2015;3:44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Harrison RG, Larson EL. Hybridization, introgression, and the nature of species boundaries. J Hered. 2014;105(Suppl 1):795–809.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    De Beer ZW, Duong TA, Barnes I, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. Redefining Ceratocystis and allied genera. Stud Mycol. 2014;79:187–219.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Roux J, Heath RN, Labuschagne L, Nkuekam GK, Wingfield MJ. Occurrence of the wattle wilt pathogen, Ceratocystis albifundus on native south African trees. For Pathol. 2007;37:292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Roux J, Wingfield MJ. Ceratocystis species: emerging pathogens of non-native plantation Eucalyptus and Acacia species. South For. 2009;71:115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lee DH, Roux J, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. Variation in growth rates and aggressiveness of naturally occuring self-fertile and self-sterile isolates of the wilt pathogen Ceratocystis albifundus. Plant Pathol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12349.

  11. 11.

    Johnson JA, Harrington TC, Engelbrecht C. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the north American clade of the Ceratocystis fimbriata complex. Mycologia. 2005;97:1067–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Engelbrecht CJ, Harrington TC. Intersterility, morphology and taxonomy of Ceratocystis fimbriata on sweet potato, cacao and sycamore. Mycologia. 2005;97:57–69.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Harrington T. Host specialization and speciation in the American wilt pathogen. Fitopatol Bras. 2000;25:262–3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mbenoun M, De Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD, Roux J. Reconsidering species boundaries in the Ceratocystis paradoxa complex, including a new species from oil palm and cacao in Cameroon. Mycologia. 2014;106:757–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Heath RN, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD, Meke G, Mbaga A, Roux J. Ceratocystis species on Acacia mearnsii and Eucalyptus spp. in eastern and southern Africa including six new species. Fungal Divers. 2009;34:41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Thorpe DJ, Harrington TC, Uchida JY. Pathogenicity, internal transcribed spacer-rDNA variation, and human dispersal of Ceratocystis fimbriata on the family Araceae. Phytopathology. 2005;95:316–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Li Q, Harrington TC, McNew D, Li J. Ceratocystis uchidae, a new species on Araceae in Hawaii and Fiji. Mycoscience. 2017;58:398–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Fourie A, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD, Barnes I. Molecular markers delimit cryptic species in Ceratocystis sensu stricto. Mycol Prog. 2015;14:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Oliveira L, Harrington TC, Ferreira MA, Damacena M, Al-Sadi AM, Al Mahmooli I, Alfenas A. Species or genotypes? Reassessment of four recently described species of the Ceratocystis wilt pathogen, Ceratocystis fimbriata, on Mangifera indica. Phytopathology. 2015;105:1229–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Harrington TC, Huang Q, Ferreira MA, Alfenas AC. Genetic analyses trace the Yunnan, China population of Ceratocystis fimbriata on pomegranate and taro to populations on Eucalyptus in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2015;99:106–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li Q, Harrington TC, McNew D, Li J, Huang Q, Somasekhara YM, Alfenas AC. Genetic bottlenecks for two populations of Ceratocystis fimbriata on sweet potato and pomegranate in China. Plant Dis. 2016;100:2266–74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Levesque CA, Chen W. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:6241–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Naidoo K, Steenkamp ET, Coetzee MP, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD. Concerted evolution in the ribosomal RNA cistron. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59355.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Harrington TC, Kazmi MR, Al-Sadi AM, Ismail SI. Intraspecific and intragenomic variability of ITS rDNA sequences reveals taxonomic problems in Ceratocystis fimbriata sensu stricto. Mycologia. 2014;106:224–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tarigan M, Roux J, Van Wyk M, Tjahjono B, Wingfield MJ. A new wilt and die-back disease of Acacia mangium associated with Ceratocystis manginecans and C. acaciivora sp. nov. in Indonesia. S Afr J Bot. 2011;77:292–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Al Adawi A, Barnes I, Khan I, Al Subhi A, Al Jahwari A, Deadman M, Wingfield B, Wingfield M. Ceratocystis manginecans associated with a serious wilt disease of two native legume trees in Oman and Pakistan. Australas Plant Path. 2013;42:179–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Liu F, Mbenoun M, Barnes I, Roux J, Wingfield MJ, Li G, Li J, Chen S. New Ceratocystis species from Eucalyptus and Cunninghamia in South China. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 2015;107:1451–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Barnes I, Fourie A, Wingfield MJ, Harrington TC, McNew DL, Sugiyama LS, Luiz BC, Heller WP, Keith LM. New Ceratocystis species associated with rapid death of Metrosideros polymorpha in Hawai'i. Persoonia. 2018;40:154–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hughes KW, Petersen RH. Apparent recombination or gene conversion in the ribosomal ITS region of a Flammulina (Fungi, Agaricales) hybrid. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18:94–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    De Sousa QC, De Carvalho Batista FR, De Oliveira LO. Evolution of the 5.8 S nrDNA gene and internal transcribed spacers in Carapichea ipecacuanha (Rubiaceae) within a phylogeographic context. Mol Phylogen Evol. 2011;59:293–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wu Z-W, Wang Q-M, Liu X-Z, Bai F-Y. Intragenomic polymorphism and intergenomic recombination in the ribosomal RNA genes of strains belonging to a yeast species Pichia membranifaciens. Mycology. 2016;7:102–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nei M, Rooney AP. Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families. Annu Rev Genet. 2005;39:121–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature. 2003;425:798–804.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Martin SH, Dasmahapatra KK, Nadeau NJ, Salazar C, Walters JR, Simpson F, Blaxter M, Manica A, Mallet J, Jiggins CD. Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res. 2013;23:1817–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nye TM, Lio P, Gilks WR. A novel algorithm and web-based tool for comparing two alternative phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:117–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Roux J, Wingfield M. Ceratocystis species on the African continent, with particular reference to C. albifundus, an African species in the C. fimbriata sensu lato species complex. Ophiostomatoid Fungi. 2013;12:131–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wingfield BD, Van Wyk M, Roos H, Wingfield MJ. Ceratocystis: emerging evidence for discrete generic boundaries. In: Seifert KA, De Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ, editors. The Ophiostomatoid Fungi: Expanding Frontiers, vol. CBS Biodiversity Series no. 12. Utrecht: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre; 2013. p. 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Van der Nest MA, Steenkamp ET, Roodt D, Soal NC, Palmer M, Chan W-Y, Wilken PM, Duong TA, Naidoo K, Santana QC, et al. Genomic analysis of the aggressive tree pathogen Ceratocystis albifundus. Fungal Biol. 2019;123:351–63.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24:332–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Som A. Causes, consequences and solutions of phylogenetic incongruence. Brief Bioinform. 2014;16:536–48.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Martin SH, Davey JW, Jiggins CD. Evaluating the use of ABBA-BABA statistics to locate introgressed loci. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:244–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Payseur BA, Rieseberg LH. A genomic perspective on hybridization and speciation. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:2337–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lee D-H, Roux J, Wingfield BD, Barnes I, Mostert L, Wingfield MJ. The genetic landscape of Ceratocystis albifundus populations in South Africa reveals a recent fungal introduction event. Fungal Biol. 2016;120:690–700.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Valdetaro DCOF, Harrington TC, Oliveira LSS, Guimarães LMS, McNew DL, Pimenta LVA, Gonçalves RC, Schurt DA, Alfenas AC. A host specialized form of Ceratocystis fimbriata causes seed and seedling blight on native Carapa guianensis (andiroba) in Amazonian rainforests. Fungal Biol. 2019;123:170–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fourie A, Van der Nest MA, De Vos L, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD, Barnes I. QTL mapping of mycelial growth and aggressiveness to distinct hosts in Ceratocystis pathogens. Fungal Genet Biol. 2019;131:103242.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Van der Nest MA, Beirn LA, Crouch JA, Demers JE, De Beer ZW, De Vos L, Gordon TR, Moncalvo JM, Naidoo K, Sanchez-Ramirez S, et al. IMA genome-F 3: draft genomes of Amanita jacksonii, Ceratocystis albifundus, Fusarium circinatum, Huntiella omanensis, Leptographium procerum, Rutstroemia sydowiana, and Sclerotinia echinophila. IMA Fungus. 2014;5:473–86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Van der Nest MA, Bihon W, De Vos L, Naidoo K, Roodt D, Rubagotti E, Slippers B, Steenkamp ET, Wilken PM, Wilson A, et al. IMA genome-F 2: Ceratocystis manginecans, Ceratocystis moniliformis, Diplodia sapinea: draft genome sequences of Diplodia sapinea, Ceratocystis manginecans, and Ceratocystis moniliformis. IMA Fungus. 2014;5:135–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wingfield BD, Ambler JM, Coetzee MPA, De Beer ZW, Duong TA, Joubert F, Hammerbacher A, McTaggart AR, Naidoo K, Nguyen HDT, et al. Draft genome sequences of Armillaria fuscipes, Ceratocystiopsis minuta, Ceratocystis adiposa, Endoconidiophora laricicola, E. polonica and Penicillium freii DAOMC 242723. IMA Fungus. 2016;7:217–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wingfield BD, Duong TA, Hammerbacher A, Van der Nest MA, Wilson A, Chang R, De Beer ZW, Steenkamp ET, Markus Wilken P, Naidoo K. IMA genome-F 7 draft genome sequences for Ceratocystis fagacearum, C. harringtonii, Grosmannia penicillata, and Huntiella bhutanensis. IMA Fungus. 2016;7:317–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wingfield BD, Barnes I, De Beer ZW, De Vos L, Duong TA, Kanzi AM, Naidoo K, Nguyen HD, Santana QC, Sayari M, et al. IMA genome-F 5: draft genome sequences of Ceratocystis eucalypticola, Chrysoporthe cubensis, C. deuterocubensis, Davidsoniella virescens, Fusarium temperatum, Graphilbum fragrans, Penicillium nordicum, and Thielaviopsis musarum. IMA Fungus. 2015;6:493–506.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Wilken PM, Steenkamp ET, Wingfield MJ, De Beer ZW, Wingfield BD. IMA genome-F 1: Ceratocystis fimbriata: draft nuclear genome sequence for the plant pathogen, Ceratocystis fimbriata. IMA Fungus. 2013;4:357–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wingfield BD, Bills GF, Dong Y, Huang W, Nel WJ, Swalarsk-Parry BS, Vaghefi N, Wilken PM, An Z, De Beer ZW, et al. IMA genome-F 9: draft genome sequence of Annulohypoxylon stygium, Aspergillus mulundensis, Berkeleyomyces basicola (syn. Thielaviopsis basicola), Ceratocystis smalleyi, two Cercospora beticola strains, Coleophoma cylindrospora, Fusarium fracticaudum, Phialophora cf. hyalina, and Morchella septimelata. IMA Fungus. 2018;9:199–223.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Quinlan AR. BEDTools: The Swiss-Army tool for genome feature analysis. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2014;47:11.12.11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Conesa A, Gotz S. Blast2GO: a comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics. Int J Plant Genom. 2008;2008:619832.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, Robles M, Talón M, Dopazo J, Conesa A. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:3420–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:540–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kuck P, Meusemann K. FASconCAT: convenient handling of data matrices. Mol Phylogen Evol. 2010;56:1115–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kuck P, Longo GC. FASconCAT-G: extensive functions for multiple sequence alignment preparations concerning phylogenetic studies. Front Zool. 2014;11:81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2688–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:754–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Bouckaert RR. DensiTree: making sense of sets of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1372–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Nye TMW. Trees of trees: An approach to comparing multiple alternative phylogenies. Syst Biol. 2008;57:785–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria and the University of Pretoria for providing computational and laboratory infrastructure that made this study possible.

Funding

The South African National Research Foundation (NRF) funded the Masters research for CT. Grant funding for the research was provided through institutional and national granting agencies, specifically; the University of Pretoria Research Development Programme and the South African Department of Science and Technology (DST)/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology (CTHB) at the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI) funded data collection. The University of Pretoria, Genomics Research Institute (GRI) and the South African DST-NRF SARChI Chair in Fungal Genomics co-funded the genomics software and computational resources that were used for data analysis and manuscript preparation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MW, BW, IB and MN were supervisors for the Masters research of CT all contributed to the idea behind the study and revisions of the final manuscript. CT did the initial data analyses and first draft of the manuscript for his Masters research. AK did the final analyses that appear in the manuscript as well as the final revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aquillah M. Kanzi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Pie chart summarizing the biological processes of the shared BUSCO genes in the analysed Ceratocystidaceae. The numbers in brackets represent the number of GO (Gene Ontology) annotations.

Additional file 2:

Figure S2. (A) MetaTree analysis of 1121 amino acid ML gene trees. The amino acid ML gene trees clustered showing major star-like radiation indicating a lack of phylogenetic resolution. (B) MetaTree analysis of 1121 nucleotide ML gene trees. The highlighted cluster shows the consensus trees of the C. fimbriata, C. manginecans and C. eucalypticola clade representing approximately 72% of all ML gene trees. The remaining clusters are supported by small numbers of the remaining ML gene trees.

Additional file 3:

Figure S3. The three main consensus topologies of the DensiTree analysis of the 1069 nucleotide ML gene trees including all 17 Ceratocystidaceae genomes analysed. Topology 1 representing 17% of all gene trees is coloured in blue, topology 2 representing 16.5% of all ML gene trees is coloured in red, and topology 3 representing 16% of all ML gene trees is coloured in green. See Table 1 in main article for full species names.

Additional file 4:

Figure S4. A Bayesian species tree for the Ceratocystidaceae species analysed. The GTR model with gamma distribution and one million generations in two runs were used. A burnin of 25% was applied when summarising the trees. All other parameters were set to default. The average standard deviation of tree splits was zero and the species tree nodes were absolutely supported with posterior probabilities of 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanzi, A.M., Trollip, C., Wingfield, M.J. et al. Phylogenomic incongruence in Ceratocystis: a clue to speciation?. BMC Genomics 21, 362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6772-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ceratocystis
  • Incongruence
  • Hybridisation
  • Phylogenomics