Skip to main content
Download PDF

Volume 23 Supplement 1

The 20th International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB 2021): genomics

FindIT2: an R/Bioconductor package to identify influential transcription factor and targets based on multi-omics data

BMC Genomics volume 23, Article number: 272 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Transcription factors (TFs) play central roles in regulating gene expression. With the rapid growth in the use of high-throughput sequencing methods, there is a need to develop a comprehensive data processing and analyzing framework for inferring influential TFs based on ChIP-seq/ATAC-seq datasets.

Results

Here, we introduce FindIT2 (Find Influential TFs and Targets), an R/Bioconductor package for annotating and processing high-throughput multi-omics data. FindIT2 supports a complete framework for annotating ChIP-seq/ATAC-seq peaks, identifying TF targets by the combination of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq datasets, and inferring influential TFs based on different types of data input. Moreover, benefited from the annotation framework based on Bioconductor, FindIT2 can be applied to any species with genomic annotations, which is particularly useful for the non-model species that are less well-studied.

Conclusion

FindIT2 provides a user-friendly and flexible framework to generate results at different levels according to the richness of the annotation information of user’s species. FindIT2 is compatible with all the operating systems and is released under Artistic-2.0 License. The source code and documents are freely available through Bioconductor (https://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/FindIT2.html).

Background

Gene expression is regulated at different levels. In addition to transcription factors (TFs), the regulatory sequences play an important role in definition of transcriptional competence by integrating multiple cellular or environmental signals. The global regulatory landscape can be inferred by different methods. For example, Chromatin Immuno-Precipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) measures TF binding and histone modifications at genome-wide level [1]. Assay of Transposase Accessible Chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq), DNase I hypersensitive sites followed by sequencing (DNase-seq) and MNase digestion followed by sequencing (MNase-seq) can be used to interrogate chromatin accessibility dynamics [2]. Notably, the combination of these methods with transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) has become a prevalent strategy for identification of the molecular mechanism and key TFs underlying cell fate determination and developmental trajectory in both animals and plants [3, 4].

The assignment of TF binding sites and the regions with open chromatin or histone modifications (i.e., sequencing peaks) is the prerequisite for data analysis. A set of peak annotation tools such as Homer [5], ChIPpeakAnno [6] and ChIPseeker [7] have been developed. The basic principle for peak assignment is the “nearest gene” strategy, where the algorithm identifies the gene whose transcription start site (TSS) has the closet distance to a given peak. While this principle is acceptable under most conditions [4], it cannot be feasibly applied to the organism with compact genome where peaks reside among multiple protein coding genes. In addition, growing evidence has shown that distal enhancers, i.e., the regulatory cis-elements kilobases or megabases away from the TSS, can also influence gene expression in animals [8, 9]. In particular, an enhancer may have a broad effect on gene expression by regulating more than one gene in its vicinity [10, 11]. As such, there is an urgent need for the optimization of current peak assignment methods.

The quality of TF ChIP-seq dataset is affected by several experimental parameters including the amount of input DNA, the specificity of TF antibody and the enrichment of IP DNAs. One of the solutions to precisely infer the target gene(s) of a given TF is the integration of ChIP-seq peaks with differential gene expression (DGE) data (i.e., perturbed RNA-seq datasets). The traditional integrative analysis approach infers TF targets by taking the intersection of the ChIP-seq target genes revealed by the “nearest gene” principle and differentially expressed genes over an arbitrary threshold. However, as mentioned above, the assignment of ChIP-seq peaks by the “nearest gene” is frequently biased. In addition, an arbitrary threshold will miss some important gene which not show much changes. To address these issues, the software package BETA has been developed [12]. In principle, BETA models regulatory potentials (RPs) for each gene by TF ChIP-seq peaks, and uses rank product to combine the RP result with relevant DGE data [12]. To facilitate its application, a website version of BETA named Cistrome-GO has been recently launched [13]. Unfortunately, BETA and Cistrome-GO only support the analysis of human and mouse genomes. Therefore, the generation of a suitable and universal data processing and analyzing platform for the non-model species is still needed.

Chromatin accessibility inferred by DNase-seq or ATAC-seq aids the identification of regulatory regions in the genome [2]. Given a specific biological process, clustering of all the accessible peaks over time course or across different tissues can yield an overview of regulatory landscape dynamics and delineate stage- or tissue-specific DNA regions associated with cell fate transition and determination. However, how to infer the TFs that regulate a subset of genes or peaks derived from this differential cluster analysis and how to uncover the sequential action and combinatorial activity of TFs are still technically challenging. To address these problems, several bioinformatic tools such as i-cisTarget [14], BRAT [15] and lisa [16] have been developed. However, in order to further increase accuracy, these methods require comprehensive training and integration of a large-scale multi-omics data, thereby hindering its application in less well-studied species.

To address all above issues, we have developed FindIT2, an integrated R package to generate peak-gene pair, infer TF targets and identify influential TFs of query set based on Bioconductor classes and methods [17]. The FindIT2 package can be applied to any species with genomic annotations, and provides flexible and user-friendly functions based on type of data input and analysis purpose.

Implementation

FindIT2 is implemented as an open-source software package using the R programming language, and is compatible with all available operating systems. Most functions in FindIT2 are based on the Bioconductor core methods and classes, which render FindIT2 feasible for non-model species. Instructions on how to install and run FindIT2 are presented on Bioconductor repository (https://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/FindIT2.html). A detailed manual including workflows and operating parameters is given on the Bioconductor page. FindIT2 currently consists of five separate modules. Each module consists of several sub-functions for different input type and analysis purpose (Fig. 1; Table 1). Users can perform specific functions by running these modules separately or build a workflow by the combination of different modules. The overview of FindIT2 and its modules are described below.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The components of FindIT2. A sketch of FindIT2 components is shown. FindIT2 supports a complete framework for annotating ChIP-seq/ATAC-seq peaks, identifying TF targets by the combination of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq datasets, and inferring influential TFs based on different types of data input. The mmAnno module accepts the bed or bed-like format file like narrowPeak, broadPeak which contains coordinates of interesting region. mmAnno can build peak-gene links to annotate peak according to the genomic coordinates of features. The peakGeneCor module can use the genomic coordinates and count matrix to calculate correlation between features, which can build more robust peak-gene link. The caclRP module can accept the peak count matrix and Granges object produced by mm_geneScan function in mmAnno module to calculate regulatory potential (RP). Or it can also accept bigwig file or TF ChIP-seq peak to calculate RP. The data frame containing RP calculated by calcRP_TFHit in calcRP module can be integrated with differential gene expression to calculate TF target rank using integrate_ChIP_RNA function in find_influential_Target module. The find_influential_TF provides many methods to infer influential TF based on different analysis purpose and annotation. For example, findIT_regionRP can accepts the Granges object from calcRP_region to infer influential TF of interesting gene set. findIT_enrichFisher can accept public TF ChIP-seq database to find influential TF of interesting peak set

Full size image
Table 1 Major FindIT2 functions
Full size table

Multi-peak and multi-gene annotation

The analytic pipeline begins with annotating a region of interest, which is commonly referred to peak annotation. Two annotation strategies, namely “nearest” and “gene scan”, are introduced into the mmAnno module in FindIT2 (i.e., the mm_neaerestGene and mm_geneScan function, respectively). Briefly, the “nearest” strategy identifies the gene whose transcription start site (TSS) has the closest distance to a given peak. The information of corresponding gene is then used to represent peak attribute. Based on this principle, the relationship between peak and gene is one-to-one. As a result, a peak is only annotated once and only linked to one gene. For the “gene scan” strategy, it builds a scan region for each gene and all peaks residing in this region are assigned. The peak not linked to any scan regions is then assigned to the nearest gene. In this scenario, a peak is likely to be assigned to more than one gene.

FindIT2 provides another useful function, mm_geneBound, which can be used to identify associated peaks for a gene of interest. This function facilitates the visualization of peak differences on heat maps and volcano plots. The analytic pipeline for mm_geneBound starts with using the “nearest gene” strategy to annotate the peaks of interest. For the genes not yet assigned, the “nearest peak” strategy is subsequently applied.

Calculation of the correlation between peak accessibility and gene expression

Compared with the peak-gene pairing method, the analysis of the correlation of peak accessibility and gene expression can provide more robust association of peaks with the genes that they are predicted to regulate [4, 9]. Based on this assumption, FindIT2 provides the peakGeneCor module to calculate correlation scores. The peakGeneCor module consists of two functions, namely peakGeneCor and enhancerPromoterCor. The peakGeneCor accepts the peak-gene link results generated by mm_neaerestGene or mm_geneScan, and uses RNA-seq and ATAC/ChIP-seq peak accessibility values to calculate correlation score and p-value. Given the fact that correlation calculation is not robust in a small number of paired samples and most experiment design cannot afford a large number of paired samples, we introduced the enhancerPromoterCor function as an alternative strategy. In principle, it considers the nearest peak of each gene as promoter, and calculates the correlation between the distal regulatory elements and promoter. Compared with the peakGeneCor, enhancerPromoterCor can infer robust association solely based on ATAC/ChIP-seq value. In addition to the above two functions, FindIT2 embeds several other functions including getAssocPairNumber, plot_peakGeneAlias_summary, plot_peakGeneCor, and shinyParse_peakGeneCor (a shiny function), which enable users to explore the association of peaks with the genes which they are predicted to regulate.

Calculation of RP

The RP model [18] is implemented in the calcRP module to reconstruct an RP profile for measuring cis-regulatory environment surrounding the TSS of a given gene. The RP score can be applied in the following four scenes. First, it provides a statistic summary of regulatory sequence defined by ATAC-seq/H3K27ac data and serves as a signature for gene expression [19]. Second, the RP score can be used as a maker for identifying cell- or tissue-specific genes based on the ATAC-seq/H3K27ac datasets [19]. Third, it can also represent the confidence level of TF target genes [12] when the RP model is embedded in the TF ChIP-seq data. Finally, after integrating ATAC-seq/H3K27ac data with public TF ChIP-seq or imputed TF binding from motif scan, the RP score can be used to infer influential TFs [16].

To calculate the RP score according to different type of data input and analysis purpose, FindIT2 provides three functions, namely calcRP_coverage, calcRP_region and calcRP_TFHit. The first two functions are designed to process the ATAC-seq/H3K27ac data, while the third function is used for the TF ChIP-seq dataset. The calcRP_coverage function calculates the RP score for each gene directly using the ATAC-seq/H3K27ac bigwigfile, whereas the calcRP_region uses peak accessibility count matrix file and annotation results from mm_geneScan to calculate the RP score. calcRP_TFHit accepts TF ChIP-seq peak files generated by call peak tools including MACS2 [20]. The resulting dataset can help users predict direct target genes of a given TF.

Prediction of TF targets

As mentioned above, the combination of RPs defined by ChIP-seq peaks and DGE analysis improves the inference of direct TF target genes in the model species [13]. However, a general and user-friendly tool for the less well-studied species is currently not available. As such, FindIT2 introduces the integrate_ChIP_RNA function to integrate the RP rank results derived from calcRP_TFHit and the DGE results generated from diverse RNA differential analysis tools such as DESeq2 [21], edgeR [22], and limma [23]. The integrate_ChIP_RNA function is based on rank product [24] which combines RP rank results with DGE. The genes with more adjacent TF binding sites (i.e., ChIP-seq peaks) and higher differential expression ratio are likely to be identified as the targets of high confidence. Users can use this function to infer TF target genes for any species with the TF ChIP-seq and perturbed RNA-seq datasets.

Inference of regulatory TFs based on different types of data input

Inferring influential TFs involved in a given biological process is a complicated task in comparison to predicting TF targets. Users may want to infer TFs based on genes or peaks of interest, and increase confidence by using different types of public databases. To address these challenges and provide a comprehensive framework for this purpose, FindIT2 introduces the find_influential_TF module with six calculation methods. Among them, three methods are designed for input peak set while the other three for input gene set. Meanwhile, peak set and gene set can be converted to each other using the aforementioned mmAnno or peakGeneCor module, thereby improving flexibility of analysis. In general, these methods meet different analysis purpose and provide different degrees of results according to the richness of annotation of targeted species. Moreover, FindIT2 provides an integrate function, integrate_replicates, for users to integrate the results obtained from different source or replicates, thereby increasing the precision of the results.

Identification of enriched TF in a given cluster is the most common analysis purpose. The peak set can be retrieved from different methods such as k-means, hierarchical clustering or differential peak expression analysis. To this end, FindIT2 introduces two functions, findIT_enrichWilcox and findIT_enrichFisher, to reveal enriched TFs by wilcox test or fisher test respectively. A TF with higher number of binding sites in the peak set of interest is likely to be identified as an influential TF. The dataset for the TF ChIP-seq binding sites can be downloaded from public databases such as Cistrome DB [25] and Remap [26]. For the species which do not have public TF ChIP-seq database, the TF binding consensus can be inferred by motif scanning of the ATAC-seq/H3K27ac peak set with the analytic tools including HOMER [5], FIMO [27], and GimmeMotifs [28]. Alternatively, users can predict the TF binding sites using PlantRegMap [29].

Users may be also interested in inferring TFs that regulate a gene set derived from differential, correlated or clustering gene expression analysis. FindIT2 provides two functions for this purpose. The findIT_TTPair function fits with the scene where direct TF-target gene database such as RegNetwork [30] and iGRN [31] are available. Similar to the principle of the Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis [32], a TF with multiple direct target genes within a given gene set will be likely to be identified as an influential TF. In contrast, the findIT_TFHit function is suitable for the species with public TF ChIP-seq database. A TF with a higher number of binding site surrounding the TSS of a set of genes is likely to be identified. For the species which lacks the TF ChIP-seq databases, users can apply similar strategy as mentioned above.

In addition to the whole get set, users can infer the effect of TF on specific gene or specific peak of a given gene. In this scenario, FindIT2 implements Lisa model [16] into the findIT_regionRP function. As a result, the revised function accepts the RP profile results derived from calcRP_region, and TF binding site consensus derived from public TF ChIP-seq database or motif scanning. FindIT2 also provides a shiny function, shinyParse_findIT_regionRP, to help user explore the impact of inferred TFs on targets interactively.

The Motif Activity Response Analysis (MARA) model [33] is implemented into findIT_MARA to reconstruct motif activity trend across several samples. This function is useful when users want to explore timing of TF activities of a given biological process, and can be applied to any species with the TF binding motif dataset.

Results

To demonstrate the practical utility of the functionalities of FindIT2, we applied it to our recently published datasets related to the chromatin accessibility dynamics during somatic embryogenesis (SE) [34]. We focused on LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2), a B3-type TF which plays a critical role in SE [34]. We (i) assigned all the ATAC-seq peaks by different annotation modes, (ii) identified direct targets of LEC2 by the combination of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq datasets, (iii) recovered LEC2 as the top influential TF using different methods embedded in FindIT2, (iv) interactively explored the chromatin accessibility of the LEC2 direct targets, and (v) calculated TF activity trend along with SE.

Assignment of ATAC-seq peaks by different annotation modes

We first illustrated how to use the mmAnno module to assign the peaks to the genes which they may regulate. We used the merge peak set derived from the ATAC-seq dataset of the explants at 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48, 72 h after induction on E5 media (thereafter named as E5 0h–72h) [34]. We used the mm_nearestGene function to annotate peaks and found that, in most cases, each gene is only associated with one peak (Fig. 2A; Additional file 1). One of the genes with 7 peaks is AT3G14440 (Fig. 3A). AT3G14440 encodes a 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme for the biosynthesis of abscisic acid (ABA) in plants. The multiple accessible regions at this gene locus may reflect a complex transcriptional regulatory mechanism and are consistent with the notion that ABA plays a critical role in abiotic stress responses.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The functional test of the mmAnno module. A Distribution of the number of peaks linked to a gene inferred by mm_nearestGene. The result was plotted by plot_peakGeneAlias_summay. B Distribution of the number of peaks linked to a gene inferred by enhancerPromoterCor. The result was plotted by plot_peakGeneAlias_summay. The origin result is shown on the left. The filtered result is given on the right. Threshold, p-value < 0.01 and cor > 0.8. C Dot plot of the distal enhancer and promoter accessibility of peak-to-gene link located within 20 kb of AT1G80840. This plot is generated by plot_peakGeneCor. D The ATAC-seq track of AT1G80840. The genomic region is shown and the selected gene is highlighted in black. The locations of the ATAC-seq peaks are indicated by purple rectangles. The related distal enhancer or promoter are shadowed and promoter is marked by an asterisk

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Analysis result of the AT3G14440 gene locus and enhancerPromoter function. A The ATAC track of AT3G14440. B Distribution of the number of genes linked per peak. This result is produced by enhancerPromoterCor. The left panel in plot is the origin result, while the right panel is the filtered result according to the threshold: p-value < 0.01 and cor > 0.8. This plot is generated by plot_peakGeneAlias_summay

Full size image

We hypothesized that correlation between the accessibility of a distal peak and the promoter of a given gene across different time points denotes a functional connection. The correlation score of each unique link between distal peaks and promoter was calculated by enhancerPromoter. Considering the small size of the Arabidopsis genome, we restricted the length of scan region to 20 kb. Using a conservative correlation threshold over 0.8 and p-value below 0.01, we identified 4598 unique links between distal peaks and gene promoters (Additional file 2). Most genes have only one related peak and vice versa (Figs. 2B and 3B). However, some genes do have multiple distal peaks. For example, AT1G80840 (WRKY40), which encodes a pathogen-induced TF, harbors five associated distal peaks with its promoter (Fig. 2C and D). Taken together, the above results demonstrate that the “nearest” strategy is feasible under most conditions in Arabidopsis. The correlation information can help users find more useful information.

Prediction of the direct targets of LEC2

As mentioned earlier, the combination of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data improves the accuracy for TF targets prediction. We applied the integrate_ChIP_RNA function to the LEC2-GR ChIP-seq and RNA-seq datasets [34]. Compared to traditional method that takes the intersection of the ChIP-seq target genes obtained by the “nearest gene” strategy and the differentially expressed genes obtained by the arbitrary threshold, the output of integrate_ChIP_RNA provides more detailed information. For instance, users can simultaneously explore TF ChIP-seq and RNA-seq ranking results, thereby facilitating the identification of high-confidence targeted genes (Table 2; Additional file 3).

Table 2 The top 10 target genes of LEC2
Full size table

Recovering LEC2 as the top influential TF during SE

To give an example how the find_influential_TF module can be used to identify the influential TFs that regulate a query gene set, we applied this module to the top 1000 LEC2 target genes identified above (Table 2; Additional file 3). To demonstrate that the module can use different annotation types, we used the datasets from two different resources. The first database is the TF binding regions compiled in the Remap2020 [26], and the second is the motif scan results in merge ATAC-seq peak set described above. Importantly, the latter database can be applied to any species with the ATAC-seq datasets. Because the LEC2 ChIP-seq is not available in the Remap database, we imported the LEC2 binding site. As shown in Fig. 4, both findIT_TTPair and findIT_TFHit successfully ranked LEC2 as one of the most significant TFs among the input genes (Fig. 4; Additional file 4). We also identified FUS3, ABI3, BBM, LEC1, REV, and KAN1 TFs on the top of the list, suggesting that these TFs may cooperatively regulate LEC2 targeted genes. Consistent with this hypothesis, LEC1, BBM, and FUS3 have already been implicated in SE [35].

Fig. 4
figure 4

The findIT_influential_TF module recovers LEC2 as a top influential TF. A The z-score rank distribution of all TFs. The z-score is calculated by converting the rank of each TF into z-scores using inverse normal transformation. LEC2 is marked with red dot. B The resultant rank score of LEC2 using each function (X-axis) of the findIT_influential_TF module. The ranking results for each function are given

Full size image

To test the functions of findIT_enrichFisher and findIT_enrichWilcox, we used the results derived from enhancerPromoterCor analysis. We retrieved the related ATAC-seq peaks and treated these peaks as the input set. By comparing this dataset with total peak dataset, we were able to uncover LEC2 among the top enriched TFs (Fig. 4; Additional file 4).

The combination of the RP profile with the TF ChIP-seq data can improve the performance of TF inference [16]. We calculated the RPs for each gene during SE with calcRP_region. We then used findIT_regionRP to identify TFs associated with the top 1000 LEC2 targeted genes and successfully identified LEC2 as one of the top TFs (Fig. 5A). Taken together, these observations indicate that the functions provided by find_influential_TF module can be used to infer influential TFs for a given biological process.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The findIT_regionRP function provides detailed information in multi-dimension. A The TF ranking result produced from findIT_regionRP. The ATAC-seq dataset at E5 0 h was used. The Y-axis represents the -log10(p-value), while the x-axis represents the rank order of all TFs. B The ATAC-seq track of AT2G8610. The genomic region is shown and selected gene is highlighted in black. The locations of the ATAC-seq peaks are indicated by purple rectangles. The peaks hit by LEC2 are shadowed. C The interface of shinyParse_findIT_regionRP

Full size image

Exploring chromatin accessibilities of the LEC2 direct targets interactively

In addition to identify the influential TFs, findIT_regionRP can provide other dimensional information including samples, genes, and features. Users can freely combine multi-dimensional information to extract meaningful results according to their own needs. Meanwhile, FindIT2 provides the shinyParse_findIT_regionRP function for users to explore results interactively. For instance, it has been shown that WOX3 is a direct target of LEC2 [34]. The visualization of datasets by the Integrative Genomics Viewer [36] enables us to reveal that WOX3 harbors several LEC2 binding sites in the regions which are constantly accessible during SE (Fig. 5B).

Users can further explore the impact of a given TF on specific peak of specific gene with the shinyParse_findIT_regionRP function. As shown in Fig. 5C, shiny provides the RPs of WOX3, dynamic impact of LEC2 on WOX3, detailed information about peak hits by LEC2, and all the ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peaks surrounding the WOX3 locus (Fig. 5C). By selecting genes and TFs, users can explore results more quickly and extract more useful information.

Inference of the timing of TF activities during SE

Calculation of TF variability and dynamic can help users infer potentially important TFs at specific stage during cell fate transitions [3, 4]. We used the findIT_MARA function to calculate TF activity trend during SE (Fig. 6; Additional file 5). We found that the WRKY and CAMTA TF binding motifs, which are well-known for their roles in plant immunity, are highly dominant at the early stage of SE. The TFs such as KUA1 and HSFC1 mainly function at middle stage, while the effect of other TFs including ANT, LEC2, FUS3, and ATHB-9 are gradually increased across SE. Overall, all these results are consistent with our published results [34, 37].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Inference of the timing TF activities during SE by the findIT_MARA function. The top 40 highly variable TFs are given. Seven time points along with SE are shown

Full size image

Conclusions

In summary, the above analyses provide a proof-of-concept showing FindIT2 as flexible and powerful tool in dealing with multi-omics datasets. With the popularity of high-throughput ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq, we believe that FindIT2 will have a broad application ranging from annotating and processing data to inferring influential TFs and their targets, especially for those non-model species that are less well-studied and lack of high-quality databases.

Availability and requirements

Project name: FindIT2.

Project home page: https://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/FindIT2.html

Operating system: Platform independent.

Programming language: R.

License: Artistic-2.0 License.

Any restrictions to use by non-academics: none.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the GitHub repository https://github.com/shangguandong1996/FindIT2_paper_relatedCode.

Abbreviations

TF:

Transcription factor

ATAC-seq:

Assay of Transposase Accessible Chromatin sequencing

DNase-seq:

DNase I hypersensitive sites followed by sequencing

MNase-seq:

MNase digestion followed by sequencing

TSS:

Transcription start site

DGE:

Differential gene expression

RPs:

Regulatory potentials

GO:

Gene Ontology

MARA:

Motif Activity Response Analysis

SE:

Somatic embryogenesis

LEC2:

LEAFY COTYLEDON2

References

  1. Johnson DS, Mortazavi A, Myers RM, Wold B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science. 2007;316:1497–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Minnoye L, Marinov GK, Krausgruber T, Pan L, Marand AP, Secchia S, et al. Chromatin accessibility profiling methods. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2021;1:10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Corces MR, Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Greenside PG, Chan SM, Koenig JL, et al. Lineage-specific and single-cell chromatin accessibility charts human hematopoiesis and leukemia evolution. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1193–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshida H, Lareau CA, Ramirez RN, Rose SA, Maier B, Wroblewska A, et al. The cis-regulatory atlas of the mouse immune system. Cell. 2019;176:897–912.e20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, et al. Homer: simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu LJ, Gazin C, Lawson ND, Pagès H, Lin SM, Lapointe DS, et al. ChIPpeakAnno: a bioconductor package to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu G, Wang L-G, He Q-Y. ChIPseeker: an R/bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2382–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahr C, von Paleske L, Uslu VV, Remeseiro S, Takayama N, Ng SW, et al. A Myc enhancer cluster regulates normal and leukaemic haematopoietic stem cell hierarchies. Nature. 2018;553:515–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Corces MR, Granja JM, Shams S, Louie BH, Seoane JA, Zhou W, et al. The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers. Science. 2018;362:eaav1898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pennacchio LA, Bickmore W, Dean A, Nobrega MA, Bejerano G. Enhancers: five essential questions. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:288–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Panigrahi A, O’Malley BW. Mechanisms of enhancer action: the known and the unknown. Genome Biol. 2021;22:108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang S, Sun H, Ma J, Zang C, Wang C, Wang J, et al. Target analysis by integration of transcriptome and ChIP-seq data with BETA. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:2502–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li S, Wan C, Zheng R, Fan J, Dong X, Meyer CA, et al. Cistrome-GO: a web server for functional enrichment analysis of transcription factor ChIP-seq peaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W206–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Imrichová H, Hulselmans G, Kalender Atak Z, Potier D, Aerts S. I-cisTarget 2015 update: generalized cis-regulatory enrichment analysis in human, mouse and fly. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Z, Civelek M, Miller CL, Sheffield NC, Guertin MJ, Zang C. BART: a transcription factor prediction tool with query gene sets or epigenomic profiles. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2867–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Qin Q, Fan J, Zheng R, Wan C, Mei S, Wu Q, et al. Lisa: inferring transcriptional regulators through integrative modeling of public chromatin accessibility and ChIP-seq data. Genome Biol. 2020;21:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, Anders S, Carlson M, Carvalho BS, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with bioconductor. Nat Methods. 2015;12:115–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang Q, Chen Y, Meyer C, Geistlinger T, Lupien M, Wang Q, et al. A comprehensive view of nuclear receptor Cancer Cistromes. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6940–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang S, Zang C, Xiao T, Fan J, Mei S, Qin Q, et al. Modeling cis-regulation with a compendium of genome-wide histone H3K27ac profiles. Genome Res. 2016;26:1417–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, et al. MACS: model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. DESeq2: moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Breitling R, Armengaud P, Amtmann A, Herzyk P. Rank products: a simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments. FEBS Lett. 2004;573:83–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mei S, Qin Q, Wu Q, Sun H, Zheng R, Zang C, et al. Cistrome data browser: a data portal for ChIP-Seq and chromatin accessibility data in human and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D658–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chèneby J, Ménétrier Z, Mestdagh M, Rosnet T, Douida A, Rhalloussi W, et al. ReMap 2020: a database of regulatory regions from an integrative analysis of Human and Arabidopsis DNA-binding sequencing experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D180–8.

  27. Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1017–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bruse N, van Heeringen SJ. GrimmeMotifs: an analysis framework for transcription factor motif analysis. bioRxiv. 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/474403.

  29. Tian F, Yang D-C, Meng Y-Q, Jin J, Gao G. PlantRegMap: charting functional regulatory maps in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D1104–13.

  30. Liu Z-P, Wu C, Miao H, Wu H. RegNetwork: an integrated database of transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory networks in human and mouse. Database. 2015;2015:bav095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. De Clercq I, Van de Velde J, Luo X, Liu L, Storme V, Van Bel M, et al. Integrative inference of transcriptional networks in Arabidopsis yields novel ROS signalling regulators. Nat Plants. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-00894-1.

  32. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. The FANTOM Consortium. Riken Omics science center. The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line. Nat Genet. 2009;41:553–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang F-X, Shang G-D, Wu L-Y, Xu Z-G, Zhao X-Y, Wang J-W. Chromatin accessibility dynamics and a hierarchical transcriptional regulatory network structure for plant somatic embryogenesis. Dev Cell. 2020;54:742–757.e8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ikeuchi M, Favero DS, Sakamoto Y, Iwase A, Coleman D, Rymen B, et al. Molecular mechanisms of plant regeneration. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019;70:377–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, et al. IGV: integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fehér A. Somatic embryogenesis — stress-induced remodeling of plant cell fate. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2015;1849:385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members in JWW lab for discussion and comments on the manuscript.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of BMC Genomics Volume 23 Supplement 1, 2022: The 20th International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB 2021): genomics. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-23-supplement-1.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31788103; 31721001) and Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB27030101). Publication cost is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31788103). The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics (NKLPMG), CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology (SIPPE), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shanghai, 200032, China

    Guan-Dong Shang, Zhou-Geng Xu, Mu-Chun Wan, Fu-Xiang Wang & Jia-Wei Wang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China

    Guan-Dong Shang, Zhou-Geng Xu, Fu-Xiang Wang & Jia-Wei Wang

  3. School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China

    Mu-Chun Wan & Jia-Wei Wang

Authors
  1. Guan-Dong Shang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhou-Geng Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mu-Chun Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fu-Xiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jia-Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GDS and JWW designed the research. GDS generated package. ZGX and MCW implemented webserver. FXW contributes to experimental materials and share with datasets. GDS prepared the figures and tables. GDS and JWW wrote the article. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia-Wei Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

These requirements are not applicable to the current manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

The number of related peaks for each gene.

Additional file 2.

The detailed information of unique links between distal peaks and gene promoters.

Additional file 3.

The integrated LEC2 target ranking results.

Additional file 4.

The TF rankings of interesting gene set or peak set.

Additional file 5.

The TF activity during SE.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shang, GD., Xu, ZG., Wan, MC. et al. FindIT2: an R/Bioconductor package to identify influential transcription factor and targets based on multi-omics data. BMC Genomics 23 (Suppl 1), 272 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08506-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08506-8

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us