Skip to main content

Transcriptome analysis of the endangered dung beetle Copris tripartitus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and characterization of genes associated to immunity, growth, and reproduction

Abstract

Background

Dung beetles recycle organic matter through the decomposition of feces and support ecological balance. However, these insects are threatened by the indiscriminate use of agrochemicals and habitat destruction. Copris tripartitus Waterhouse (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), a dung beetle, is listed as a class-II Korean endangered species. Although the genetic diversity of C. tripartitus populations has been investigated through analysis of mitochondrial genes, genomic resources for this species remain limited. In this study, we analyzed the transcriptome of C. tripartitus to elucidate functions related to growth, immunity and reproduction for the purpose of informed conservation planning.

Results

The transcriptome of C. tripartitus was generated using next-generation Illumina sequencing and assembled de novo using a Trinity-based platform. In total, 98.59% of the raw sequence reads were processed as clean reads. These reads were assembled into 151,177 contigs, 101,352 transcripts, and 25,106 unigenes. A total of 23,450 unigenes (93.40%) were annotated to at least one database. The largest proportion of unigenes (92.76%) were annotated to the locally curated PANM-DB. A maximum of 5,512 unigenes had homologous sequences in Tribolium castaneum. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed a maximum of 5,174 unigenes in the Molecular function category. Further, in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis, a total of 462 enzymes were associated with established biological pathways. Based on sequence homology to known proteins in PANM-DB, representative immunity, growth, and reproduction-related genes were screened. Potential immunity-related genes were categorized into pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, the MyD88- dependent pathway, endogenous ligands, immune effectors, antimicrobial peptides, apoptosis, and adaptation-related transcripts. Among PRRs, we conducted detailed in silico characterization of TLR-2, CTL, and PGRP_SC2-like. Repetitive elements such as long terminal repeats, short interspersed nuclear elements, long interspersed nuclear elements and DNA elements were enriched in the unigene sequences. A total of 1,493 SSRs were identified among all unigenes of C. tripartitus.

Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive resource for analysis of the genomic topography of the beetle C. tripartitus. The data presented here clarify the fitness phenotypes of this species in the wild and provide insight to support informed conservation planning.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Insects are a highly successful taxonomic group, and this success is credited to their physiological plasticity, specifically their fitness genes. In the absence of adaptive immunity, the innate immune system of insects is specialized to provide protection against biotic and abiotic stressors. Insects have habituated to diverse ecosystem types and successfully exploited the complex but dynamic functions of innate immunity to achieve sustained survival. Wild endangered insect species are protected by law and should be prioritized for conservation through elucidation of their fitness phenotypes or adaptation-related transcripts, which could be employed a priori for informed conservation planning [1, 2].

Dung beetles feed on excrement and play a vital role in the breakdown and recycling of dung into the soil, enabling the nutrients in dung to cycle through the ecosystem. Their utility within tropical forests and agricultural ecosystems is unparalleled [3]. Moreover, these beetles have been introduced into the environment to alleviate ecological damage and maintain ecosystem sustainability [4]. Dung beetle populations have gradually been declining, with several species disappearing and possibly becoming extinct [5,6,7]. This has alerted conservation biologists to put sustained efforts for genetic rescue of such species in the wild. Copris tripartitus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) is a paracoprid dung beetle that feeds on the decaying organic matter and other organic materials in the dung balls. The species has been designated as a class-II endangered species in South Korea [8], but the recent detection of population increases has put an uncertainty to its endangered species status [9]. Widespread efforts are underway to ascertain the population genetic diversity of this insect species to support the development of conservation policies for sustainable protection in wild habitats. With the availability of a mitochondrial genome, genetic analysis of C. tripartitus populations initially employed mitochondrial markers such as the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and cytochrome b (Cytb) genes, and microsatellite markers for this species have been developed recently [10,11,12,13]. However, due to the lack of information on the nuclear genome and transcriptome of this species, screening of the fitness phenotypes that influence adaptation to wild habitat perturbations have been difficult. Improving genomics and transcriptomic resources would support the implementation of genetic rescue strategies aiming to re-establish the species in the wild [14]. The development of genomics and transcriptomic resources will provide an atlas of molecular resources that could empower conservation action, while downstream applications based on the functional genomics of immunity, growth, and reproduction-related genes, and the development of microsatellite markers, could inform explicit conservation efforts [14, 15].

In this work, we applied an Illumina-based next-generation sequencing approach (NGS) to develop transcriptome-level molecular resources (i.e., genes associated with growth, immunity, and reproduction) for C. tripartitus. In general, transcriptome sequencing is most suitable for the identification of fitness phenotypes associated with immunity, growth, and reproduction in non-model insects, and for the analysis of differential gene expression [16, 17]. Previously, we used an Illumina-based transcriptome approach to assess the physiological attributes of the Asian giant hornet, Vespa mandarinia and endangered Lycaenidae butterflies, Protantigius superans and Spindasis takanosis, thereby supporting conservation actions using genomic resources [1, 18]. The de novo assembled unigenes obtained from the C. tripartitus transcriptome were annotated to homologous protein sequences in a locally curated protostome database (PANM-DB) [19]. We screened simple sequence repeats (SSRs) from the coding unigenes, which could be effectively used for studies of polymorphism and population genetics. Molecular resources related to immunity, growth, and reproduction were catalogued and can be accessed as reference data for investigating the plasticity of this species under various habitat-based constraints. Initially, we characterized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) as immunity genes such as C-type lectin (CTL), peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP)-SC2-like, and Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2) using a bioinformatics approach. In the context of innate immunity in insects, PRRs such as CTLs, PGRPs and TLRs are indispensable for binding to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and modulating signal-transduction pathways [20, 21]. The functional data regarding C. tripartitus presented in this work could aid decision-making by conservation managers aimed at enhancing its survivability in the wild.

Methods

Ethics statement and sample collection

The paracoprid beetle C. tripartitus were collected in June 2017 from Seogwipo-si, Jeju-do, Republic of Korea. After transport to the laboratory, the specimens were immediately placed into liquid nitrogen until RNA preparation. This study was undertaken following ethical guidelines for the use of experimental animals in biomedical research [22].

Total RNA extraction, library construction and Illumina sequencing

The whole body (adult stage) of C. tripartitus (n = 3) was ground to fine powder in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, treated with RNase-free DNaseI, and stored at -80 °C until further use. The concentration and purity of the processed RNA sample was determined using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) and through electrophoresing samples on an agarose gel. The RNA samples were assessed for RNA integrity number (RIN) with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The concentration of RNA was 10.101 ng/µl in a volume of 30 µl, totaling 303.03 ng, and the same RNA was used as the input for library construction and downstream processing. An mRNA-seq library construction kit (Illumina, Inc. San Diego, CA, USA) was used to generate the cDNA library following the manufacturer’s instructions and sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq 4000 (Illumina) NGS platform at GnC Bio-Company (Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, South Korea). Briefly, mRNA was purified from total RNA using oligo(dT) magnetic beads. The refined mRNA was broken into short fragments (200 nt) using an RNA fragmentation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The first-strand cDNA was synthesized from mRNA short/cleaved fragments using random-hexamer primers and reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). The second-strand cDNA was synthesized with RNase H (Invitrogen) and DNA polymerase I (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). After ligating the cDNA to sequencing adapters with paired-end (PE) Adapter Oligo Mix using T4 DNA ligase, purification was accomplished with the QIAquick PCR extraction kit. On the Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing platform, DNA fragments (cDNA libraries) of the necessary size (200 ± 25 bp) were sequenced to create 125-bp PE reads. The sequencing reads were then transformed into raw reads through base calling and stored in fastq format. All raw data obtained from sequencing were stored in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers SRR9951154, BioProject-PRJNA559824, and BioSample-SAMN12560641 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=txid438892[Organism:noexp]).

Pre-processing of sequencing data and de novo transcriptome assembly

Raw sequencing data were cleaned to remove low-quality reads (> 50% of bases with a Q-value ≤ 20), adapter sequences and ambiguous bases using Cutadpat 1.18 software with the default parameters [23]. FastQC software (version 0.11.5; http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk) was used to analyze the quality of the raw reads in fastq format. The clean reads so obtained, were subsequently processed using the Trinity short- read assembly tool [24]with the default setting of 200 bp as the minimum permitted length. The Illumina short-reads were grouped to generate contigs ('Inchworm' assembly phase), which were then clustered and processed to produce a de Bruijin graph ('Chrysalis' phase). All likely sequences were extracted from individual components of the parallelized de Bruijin graphs ('Butterfly' phase). The tool cd-hit-est version 4.6.6 [25] was used to eliminate redundancy from the clustered datasets, and TransDecoder software (version v5.5.0; (https://github.com/TransDecoder/TransDecoder/releases/tag/TransDecoder-v5.5.0) was used to screen for candidate transcript sequences with coding regions.

Homology search and functional annotation of unigenes

Using BLASTx, the non-redundant unigene sequences were annotated to the locally curated comprehensive protein database PANM-DB (version 3.0) [19]. The Swiss-Prot protein sequence and UniGene nucleotide sequence databases were also searched using BLASTx, with an E-value threshold of 1.0E-5, to obtain homologous sequences. The EuKaryotic Orthologous Groups (KOG) database was searched to enable the classification of unigenes, based on specific functional descriptors, within major categories such as ‘Cellular Processes and Signaling’, ‘Information Storage and Processing’, ‘Metabolism’, and ‘Poorly characterized’ (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/). The conserved domains in the unigenes were annotated using the InterProScan (IPS) feature of the BLAST2GO suite (version 5.1) (https://www.blast2go.com). The Gene Ontology (GO) classifications (at level 2) of C. tripartitus unigenes (E-value threshold of 1.0E-5) were plotted on a clustered bar chart in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) with the categories such as ‘biological process’, ‘cellular component’, and ‘molecular function’. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database was used for pathway analysis of unigene sequences. (http://www.genome.jp/tools/kaas/).

Gene discovery related to immunity, reproduction, and growth

Candidate genes associated with immunity, reproduction, and growth were screened using a keyword search of the BLASTx-annotated PANM-DB. The names of representative genes involved in various stages of insect immunity, cell signaling, sex-determination, reproduction and growth processes were included as keywords. Further, the GO terms and KEGG classifications were also referred to identify putative functional transcripts. A comprehensive network of immunity-related transcripts were screened and was categorized into ‘Pathogen Recognition Receptor (Immune signaling pathway)’, ‘TLR Signaling Pathway (Adapter proteins, MyD88-dependent pathway)’, ‘Endogenous Ligands’, ‘Immune Effectors’, ‘Antimicrobial Peptides’, ‘Cytokines and Cytokine Receptors’, ‘Apoptosis’ and ‘Autophagy’.

Bioinformatics analysis

We conducted an open reading frame (ORF) prediction analysis for selected assembled unigene sequences putatively identified as TLR-2, CTL, and PGRP-SC2-like using the hidden Markov model (HMM)-based FGENESH program (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=fgenesh&group=programs&subgroup=gfind). The predicted ORF sequences were used as the query against the NCBInr database to obtain homologous sequences. After validation, the translated amino acid sequences were used as queries for predictive analyses of protein sequence and structure. The predicted ORF sequences were formatted using the text editor UltraEdit64-bit. SignalP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) was used to determine the presence of signal peptides. Transmembrane regions were predicted using TMHMM Server v.2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/). The domain architecture of the protein sequences was retrieved using the SMART domain analysis program at http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/. Secondary structure prediction was conducted using the program PSIPRED (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/). Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the program ClustalX2 (version 2.0) [26]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method with the 1,000 bootstraps. The phylogenetic tree was visualized using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) suite (ver. 11.0) (https://www.megasoftware.net/) [27].

Identification of repeats and microsatellite marker discovery

The Perl script program MicroSAtellite (MISA) (http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/) was used to detect SSRs from C. tripartitus unigenes, that were classified into di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeats. In the homology-based repeat search process, mononucleotide repeats were excluded from the analysis because Illumina sequencing induces homopolymer formation. RepeatMasker (ver. 4.0.6) was used to screen for representative repeats such as ‘Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements (SINEs)’, ‘Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (LINEs)’, ‘Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) elements’, and ‘DNA elements’ (http://ftp.genome.washington.edu/RM/RepeatMasker.html). In this process, small RNAs, satellites, simple repeats, and low-complexity repeating elements were screened from the assembled unigene sequences.

Results

Illumina sequencing and de novo assembly

The Illumina short read sequencing platform was utilized to obtain PE reads (25,603,641 × 2 = 51,207,282 raw read sequences; 7,157,952,349 bases). The raw read sequences were pre-processed and 99.84% of sequence bases were retained, with an average length of 139.6 bp (Table S1). In total, 98.58% of the raw read sequences (96.63% of bases) were processed as clean reads. The mean length, N50 length, and GC content of clean read sequences was 137 bp, 151 bp, and 40.42%, respectively. De novo assembly of clean reads generated a total of 151,177 contigs (127,555,512 bases) with an average size of 843.7 bp (largest contig size, 42,685 bp). Overall, 40.81% and 23.07% of the contig sequences had sizes of ≥ 500 and ≥ 1,000 bp, respectively. The TransDecoder program identified 67.04% of all contig sequences as likely to contain coding regions. The mean length, N50 length, and GC content of TransDecoder-derived sequences was 1,392.9 bp, 2,469 bp, and 38.72%, respectively. Approximately, 62.62% and 43.31% of the sequences had lengths of ≥ 500 and ≥ 1,000 bp, respectively. Clustering of sequences with potential coding regions using the TGICL tool identified 25,106 unigenes (45,071,628 bases). The mean length, N50 length, and GC% of the unigenes were 1,795.3 bp, 2,667 bp, and 38.54%, respectively. The unigenes ranged from 224 to 43,765 bp in length. Approximately, 81.95% and 60.26% of unigenes showed lengths of ≥ 500 and ≥ 1,000 bp, respectively. A statistical summary of the de novo assembled transcriptome of C. tripartitus is provided in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the distributions of contigs, sequences and unigenes based on their sizes. Only 10.27% and 30.41% of contig sequences had lengths of ≥ 2,001 and ≤ 300 bp, respectively (Fig. 1A). Further, 22.44% and 17.35% of TransDecoder-derived sequences were ≥ 2,001 and ≤ 300 bp, respectively. (Fig. 1B). In total, 31.84% of the total unigenes had lengths of ≥ 2,001 bp, which increased the feasibility of obtaining full-length transcripts (Fig. 1C). In summary, a greater number of unigenes with length of ≥ 2,001 bp were obtained.

Table 1 Statistical summary of C. tripartitus transcriptome
Fig. 1
figure 1

Size distribution of de novo assembled sequences obtained from the C. tripartitus transcriptome using the Illumina HiSeq4000 NGS platform. Clean reads were clustered using the Trinity short-read assembly tool to generate contigs. TransDecoder was used to identify the coding transcript sequences, followed by clustering of the datasets into unigenes. A Contig length distribution, (B) non-redundant sequences length distribution, and (C) unigene length distribution

Sequence annotation and functional gene enrichment analysis

The sequence annotation statistics (Table 2) indicated that out of the 25,106 de novo assembled unigenes, 93.40% matched homologous sequences across all databases. In total, 92.7% of all unigenes showed homologous matches to sequences in PANM–DB, followed by 79.81%, 78.30%, 56.71%, 53.95%, 33.29%, and 2.70% in the KOG, Swiss-Prot, GO, IPS, UniGene, and KEGG databases, respectively. Out of the PANM–DB annotated sequences, 64.11% showed lengths of ≥ 1,001 bp. Furthermore, 69.11%, 69.68% and 79.29% of unigenes annotated against the KOG, Swiss-Prot and UniGene databases had lengths of ≥ 1000 bp, respectively. The Venn diagram (Fig. 2) illustrates that a total of 2,599 unigenes annotated to homologous proteins present in PANM–DB. Further, a total of 11,080 unigenes showed matches to homologous proteins in PANM, Swiss-Prot and KOG databases. Furthermore, 8,016 unigenes found homologous matches in all the four databases. This suggests that a greater number of unique matches were represented under PANM-DB.

Table 2 Distribution of C. tripartitus transcripts under the publicly available databases
Fig. 2
figure 2

Annotation of C. tripartitus unigenes against public protein and nucleotide databases (PANM-DB, Swiss-Prot, UniGene, and KOG). Venn diagram showing homologous matches of unigenes to the selected databases (specific or overlapping)

The homology matrices for statistical evaluation of the unigenes annotated against PANM–DB using BLASTx analysis have been shown in Fig. 3. The score value distribution revealed that 52% and 22% of unigenes have homology scores of 100–500 and 500–1,000, respectively (Fig. 3A). The E-value distribution revealed a maximum of 32% followed by 30% unigenes showing homology at 0 and 1E-50 to 1E-5, respectively (Fig. 3B). The identity distribution (Fig. 3C) of unigenes shows a total of 34%, followed by 31%, and 19% having identities of 40–60%, 60–80%, and 10–40%, respectively. Only 16% sequences showed 80–100% identity to the homologous sequences in the PANM-DB database. The similarity distribution indicated that 41%, 37%, and 21% of unigenes had similarities of 60–80%, 80–100%, and 40–60%, respectively (Fig. 3D). The number of annotation hits compared to non-hits increased in direct proportion to the length of unigenes (Fig. 3E). A maximum of 7,955 hits (39 non-hits) to homologous sequences in the PANM database had lengths of ≥ 2,001 bp (Fig. 3E). Further, in the top-hit species distribution, a maximum of 23.66% of unigenes were annotated with homologous proteins in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, followed by 22.44% and 18.68% for the scarab beetle Oryctes borbonicus and burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides, respectively. Excepting the mollusc Octopus bimaculatus all other representative top-hit species belonged to insects (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Statistical features of C. tripartitus unigenes against PANM-DB. BLASTx annotation of the unigenes to PANM-DB at an E-value threshold of 1.0E-5 was used to obtain the homology statistics. A Score distribution, (B) E-value distribution, (C) identity distribution, (D) similarity distribution, and (E) sequence hits/non-hits correlated with the length of unigenes

Fig. 4
figure 4

Species distribution of the top matches to C. tripartitus unigenes from homologous sequences in PANM-DB (BLASTx; E-value cutoff of 1.0E-5). The strongest matches to unigenes were observed for homologous proteins of T. castaneum

To investigate functional directions, we annotated C. tripartitus unigenes against the KOG, GO, KEGG, and IPS databases. The unigenes were annotated under 25 KOG functional categories (excluding the ‘multi’ category). The highest percentage (22.9%) of unigenes was classified as R- ‘general function prediction only’, followed by 20.3% of sequences in ‘multiple’ KOG categories. Approximately, 8.2% and 6.7% of unigenes were classified into the T- ‘signal transduction mechanisms’, and S- ‘function unknown’ categories, respectively (Fig. 5). The least populated KOG functional terms included H- ‘co-enzyme transport and metabolism’, N- ‘cell motility, and Y- ‘nuclear structure’. Further, in the IPS annotation, a maximum of 1,407 unigenes contained the zinc finger C2H2-type domain, followed by 433 and 275 sequences with protein kinase and ankyrin repeat domains, respectively (Table 3). The other prominent domains included the ABC transporter-like domain, immunoglobulin-like domain, EGF-like domain, and small GTP-binding protein domain, that might be prominent in proteins belonging to the innate immune signaling pathways of C. tripartitus.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Functional classification of C. tripartitus unigenes against the KOG database. Of 25,106 non-redundant unigene sequences, 20,038 were classified into 25 functional KOG categories, excluding the multifunctional category. Most unigenes were classified into the ‘General function prediction only’, ‘Multi’, and ‘Signal transduction mechanisms’ categories

Table 3 List of top-30 protein domains found in C. tripartitus unigene sequences

A total of 14,238 unigenes were annotated to GO functional categories such as ‘Molecular function’, ‘Biological process’, and ‘Cellular component’ (Fig. 6). A three-way Venn diagram was constructed to illustrate the categorization of unigenes to GO functional categories and their overlap, if any. The largest number of unigenes (n = 12,732) were functionally annotated to the ‘Molecular function’ category. A total of 2,655 unigenes were ascribed to all three GO functional categories. In contrast, 5,174, 461, and 455 unigenes were exclusively assigned to the ‘Molecular function’, ‘Biological process’ and ‘Cellular component’ categories, respectively (Fig. 6A). In total, 5,194 unigenes had only one GO term, while 2,897, 2,397, and 2,005 had two, three, and four GO terms, respectively. (Fig. 6B). Figure 7 shows the annotations of unigenes to individual functional GO terms (at level 2) within the three GO functional categories. Within the ‘Biological process’ category, most unigenes were annotated to the cellular process term (GO: 0009987), followed by metabolic process (GO: 0008152), and single-organism process (GO: 0044699). Binding (GO: 0005488) and catalytic activity (GO: 0003824) were the major GO terms within the ‘Molecular function’ category and cell (GO: 0005623), cell part (GO: 0044464), membrane (GO: 0016020), membrane part (GO: 0044425), and organelle (GO: 0043226) were important terms in the ‘Cellular component’ category. The annotation of unigenes based on KEGG pathways revealed enzymes in four functional categories namely ‘Environmental information processing’, ‘Genetic information processing’, ‘Metabolism’, and ‘Organismal system’. In total, 462 putative enzymes were annotated, represented by 1,792 unigenes. Most unigenes predicted to be putative enzymes were assigned to ‘Metabolism’, followed by the ‘Organismal system (immune system)’ category (Fig. 8).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Gene Ontology (GO) assignments of C. tripartitus unigenes. A Venn diagram showing the distribution of unigenes among the GO functional categories ‘Biological Process’, ‘Cellular Component’, and ‘Molecular Function’. B Number of unigenes assigned to various GO terms

Fig. 7
figure 7

Assignment of C. tripartitus unigenes to the GO terms ‘Biological Process’, ‘Cellular Component’, and ‘Molecular Function’. The Y-axis shows the number of unigenes assigned to each GO term at level 2

Fig. 8
figure 8

KEGG pathway distribution. The “doughnut graph” shows the number of unigenes encoding enzymes in the pathway (outer circle) and the number of enzymes in the pathway (inner circle). The unigenes and enzymes in the pathway were classified as ‘Metabolism’, ‘Genetic information processing’, Environmental information processing’, and ‘Organismal systems’

Characterization of repeating elements and SSRs in C. tripartitus transcriptome

DNA elements were the most promiscuous repeating elements, with the hATCharlie and TcMar-Tigger elements being prominent in the C. tripartitus unigenes. LINEs such as LINE1, LINE2, and L3/CR1repeats occupied lengths of 372, 340, and 2,346 bp, respectively (Table 4). Among SINEs, only mammalian-wide interspersed repeats (MIR; 2 elements) were found among the unigenes, occupying 88 bp of length. The unigenes also contained simple repeats, low-complexity regions, and small RNAs. Among all repeating elements, simple repeats (8,082 elements) accounted for the greatest length (348,595 bp; 0.77% of all sequences). Next, we screened all unigenes for the presence of SSRs. A total of 1,493 SSR sequences were obtained from 1,212 unigenes, with 224 sequences containing more than 1 SSR. These SSRs were categorized based on the number of repeats as di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, or hexanucleotide repeats (Table 5). Dinucleotide repeats were predominant (788 SSRs), followed by trinucleotide (565 SSRs) and tetranucleotide repeats (123 SSRs). Dinucleotide, trinucleotide, tetranucleotide and pentanucleotide repeats were present with a maximum of six, five, and four iterations, respectively. Further, under the SSR type classification (Fig. 9), we found that the dinucleotide repeat AT/AT (639 SSR) was predominant. Among trinucleotide repeats, AAT/ATT (266 SSRs) was the dominant SSR repeat type.

Table 4 RepeatMasker based analysis of repeating elements in C. tripartitus unigenes
Table 5 Distribution and frequency of SSRs identified from all unigene sequences of C. tripartitus transcriptome
Fig. 9
figure 9

Numbers of SSR repeats of various types in C. tripartitus unigenes. The most common repeat types included the dinucleotide AT/AT and trinucleotide AAT/ATT

Candidate genes associated with the C. tripartitus immune defense system

Unigenes putatively involved in the physiological adaptation of C. tripartitus are listed in Table 6. Here, we emphasize that candidate genes such as aquaporin and heat shock protein 70 could be further characterized using functional genomics to elucidate the physiological adaptation of the species. An extensive summary of candidate genes assigned to immune defense categories such as ‘Pattern recognition receptor (PRR)’, ‘TLR signaling pathway’, ‘Adaptor proteins’, ‘MyD88-dependent pathway’, ‘Endogenous ligands’, ‘Immune effectors’, ‘Antimicrobial peptides’, ‘Cytokines and cytokine receptors’, ‘Apoptosis-related’, ‘Autophagy-related’ and ‘others’ are provided in Table S2.

Table 6 List of adaptation-related genes identified in C. tripartitus transcriptome

We targeted the C-type lectin (Ct_CTL; unigene_11037), Peptidoglycan recognition Protein SC2-like (Ct_PGRP-SC2-like; unigene_12574), and Toll-like receptor-2 (Ct_TLR-2; unigene_22346) sequences screened from the PANM-DB-annotated unigene profile of C. tripartitus for detailed in silico analysis. This is because of their established role as PRRs related to innate immunity in insects. Ct_TLR2 is a 1,224-bp (with a predominance of A + T bases) ORF encoding a polypeptide of 407 amino acid residues (Figure S1). Aside from leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains at the N-terminus, a conspicuous Toll-interleukin receptor (TIR) domain and type-I transmembrane region of 22 amino acids were identified in Ct_TLR2 protein sequence. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that Ct_TLR2 is related to other invertebrate TLR2 orthologs (Fig. 10). Ct_TLR2 shared maximum homology with TLR2 of the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus (Ot_TLR2). Vertebrate TLR2 protein sequences clustered separately from invertebrate TLR2 orthologs. The secondary structure prediction results indicate the presence of both β-strands and α-helices, with α-helices dominating the transmembrane region (Figure S2).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Phylogenetic analysis of Ct_TLR-2 with TLR-2 orthologs from representative invertebrate and vertebrate species. A bootstrap consensus tree (1,000 replicates) was constructed in MEGA 11.0 using the maximum-likelihood method. This analysis involved 25 amino acid sequences. All ambiguous positions were removed from each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown along each branch. The vertebrate and invertebrate taxa are shaded blue and yellow, respectively, and the molluscan cluster is circled.. GenBank accession numbers of the analyzed TLR-2 sequences are shown in parentheses. OtTLR-2, Onthophagus taurus TLR-2 (XP_022910857.1); TcTLR-2, Tribolium castaneum TLR-2 (XP_015837871.1); TmTLR-2, Tribolium madens TLR-2 (XP_044272570.1); SoTLR-2, Sitophilus oryzae TLR-2 (XP_030759691.1); ZcTLR-2, Zeugodacus cucurbitae TLR-2 (XP_011177598.1); OfTLR-2, Ostrinia furnacalis TLR-2 (XP_028171769.1); VtTLR-2, Venessa tameamea TLR-2 (XP_026487980.1); BaTLR-2, Bicyclus anynana TLR-2 (XP_023948157.1); PxTLR-2, Papilio xuthus TLR-2 (XP_013180232.1); PfTLR-2, Polistes fuscatus TLR-2 (XP_043489782.1); AaTLR-2, Aricia agestis TLR-2 (XP_041974768.1); TpTLR-2, Thrips palmi TLR-2 (XP_034250851.1); CsTLR-2, Cryptotermes secundus TLR-2 (XP_033607111.1); SpTLR-2, Sepia pharaonis TLR-2 (CAE1279087.1); CvTLR-2, Crassostrea virginica TLR-2 (XP_022314615.1); MyTLR-2, Mizuhopecten yessoensis TLR-2 (XP_021339985.1); MmTLR-2, Mus musculus TLR-2 (EDL15415.1); BtTLR-2, Bos taurus TLR-2 (ALL55248.1); ApTLR-2, Anas platyrhynchos TLR-2 (ATD82882.1); GgTLR-2, Gallus gallus TLR-2 (ATD82881.1); IpTLR-2, Ictalurus punctatus TLR-2 (AEI59663.1); LrTLR-2, Labeo rohita TLR-2 (ADQ74644.1); BbTLR-2, Bubalus bubalis TLR-2 (ANV28170.1); HsTLR-2, Homo sapiens TLR-2 (AAH33756.1)

The ORF of Ct_CTL was 1,071 bp and encoded a protein of 356 amino acid residues. Domain analysis showed a typical signal peptide sequence of 18 amino acid residues at the N-terminus with tandem CLECT [C-type lectin/carbohydrate-recognition domain (CRD)] domains (Figure S3). Ct_CTL clustered with CTL homologs from representative beetle species, and most closely with that of the scarab beetle, O. borbonicus CTL (Ob_CTL). Other clusters were associated with mammalian and insect CTLs (Fig. 11). The secondary structure of Ct_CTL contained three predicted α-helical regions at the N-terminus and three α-helical regions at the CLECT (C-type lectin) domain interspersed with short β-sheet elements (Figure S4). Although two unigenes represented CTLs in the annotation results (Table S2), both had 100% identity in the BLASTp analysis results.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Phylogenetic analysis of Ct_CTL with the maximum-likelihood method using MEGA (version 11.0). The tree passed the bootstrap test of 1,000 replications and the resulting values are shown along the branches. This analysis involved 23 amino acid sequences. All ambiguous positions were removed from each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). The vertebrate and invertebrate taxa are shaded in blue and yellow, respectively. GenBank accession numbers of the analyzed CTL sequences are shown in parentheses. FoCTL, Frankliniella occidentalis CTL (KAE8749903.1); BmCTL, Bombyx mori CTL (ABI79325.1); PxCTL, Plutella xylostella CTL (AFM52345.1); AaCTL, Aedes aegypti CTL (ABF18196.1); ApCTL, Acyrthosiphon pisum CTL (NP_001155798); HvCTL, Homalodisca vitripennis CTL (KAG8257308.1); TcCTL, Tribolium castaneum (XP_008193285); AdCTL, Anopheles dirus CTL (AFK83719.1); MsCTL, Mythimna separata CTL (BBC20960.1); HaCTL, Helicoverpa armigera CTL (ABF83203.1); PrCTL, Pieris rapae CTL (AEO52696.1); ArpCTL, Antheraea pernyi (AGN70857.1); OpbCTL, Operophtera brumata CTL (KOB78577.1); ObCTL, Oryctes borbonicus CTL (KRT82901.1); HsCTL, Homo sapiens CTL (AAG00514.1); GgCTL, Gallus gallus CTL (CAD61336.1); DrCTL, Danio rerio CTL (XP_005172687.1); SsCTL, Salmo salar CTL (ACI68944.1); MmCTL, Mus musculus CTL (AAD05125.1); RnCTL, Rattus norvegicus CTL (NP_001003707.1); BtCTL, Bos taurus CTL (NP_001180046.1); ClfCTL, Canis lupus familiaris CTL (XP_005637254.1)

Further, the predicted PGRP-SC homolog (Ct_PGRP_SC-2-like) showed a full-length ORF of 567 nucleotides that translates to a protein of 188 amino acid residues (Figure S5). Domain analysis identified a typical signal peptide sequence of 19 amino acid residues at the N-terminus, and overlapping PGRP amidase activity (N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase) domains from Pro-22 to Gly-163 (PGRP domain) and Gly-32 to Gly-169 (amidase_2 domain). On the evolutionary tree, Ct_PGRP_SC-2-like is not closely clustered with any orthologs but groups with the invertebrate PGRP_SC-2 cluster, while vertebrate PGRP_SC-2 orthologs form a separate cluster (Fig. 12). The predicted secondary structure of Ct_PGRP_SC2-like contained six α-helices and six β-strands (Figure S6).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Phylogenetic analysis of Ct_PGRP_SC-2-like along with other representative PGRP amino acid sequences from vertebrates and invertebrates. Molecular phylogeny was inferred using the maximum-likelihood method in MEGA software (version 11.0). This analysis involved 15 amino acid sequences. The tree was bootstrapped (1,000 replications) and the values are shown along the branches. All ambiguous positions were removed from each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). The vertebrate and invertebrate taxa are shaded in blue and yellow, respectively. GenBank accession numbers of the analyzed sequences are shown in parentheses. Acc PGRP SC-2, Apis cerana cerana PGRP SC-2 (PBC31638.1); Af PGRP SC-2, Apis florea PGRP SC-2 (XP_003694493.1); Bt PGRP SC-2, Bombus terrestris PGRP SC-2 (XP_012170795.1); Ob PGRP SC-2, Ooceraea biroi PGRP SC-2 (EZA50446.1); At PGRP-2-like, Aethina tumida PGRP-2-like (XP_019877658.1); Tc PGRP SC-2, Tribolium castaneum PGRP SC-2 (XP_008193407.1); Tm PGRP SC-2, Tenebrio molitor PGRP SC-2 (BAJ23047.1); Dm PGRP SC-2, Drosophila melanogaster PGRP SC-2 (CAD89178.1); Lc PGRP SC-2, Lucilia cuprina PGRP SC-2 (KNC21676.1); Tt PGRP SC-2, Triplophysa tibetana PGRP SC-2 (KAA0714663.1); Tf PGRP SC-2, Takifugu flavidus PGRP SC-2 (TWW77559.1); On PGRP SC-2, Oreochromis niloticus PGRP SC-2 (ALM04192.1); Lcc PGRP SC-2, Larimichthys crocea PGRP SC-2 (KAE8295497.1); Lm PGRP SC-2, Lateolabrax maculatus PGRP SC-2 (QQR13803.1)

Candidate genes related to growth and muscle development

Whole-body transcriptome characterization of C. tripartitus allowed for the identification of unigenes putatively related to the somatotropic axis and muscle growth. Candidate unigenes related to the somatotropic axis included insulin-related peptide, epidermal growth factor receptor, adenosine deaminase and other transcription factors. We further identified unigenes, including actin and tropomyosin, related to the muscle growth, as well as unigenes related to overall growth and development such as chitinase, collagen, apolipophorins, and calcitonin (Table S3).

Candidate genes related to sex determination and reproduction

Genetic factors putatively related to sex determination and differentiation were also identified among unigenes of C. tripartitus, including the transcription factor Sox-2, protein MAB-21, and GATA zinc finger domain. Putative unigenes for the sex-determining protein fem-1 (feminization-1) were abundant in the transcriptome. Among reproduction-related unigenes, we identified genes associated with spermatogenesis-associated protein, sperm surface protein, spermidine synthase, spermine oxidase, testis expressed sequences, vitellogenin, and kinases (Table S4).

Discussion

Mapping of regulatory transcripts using the transcriptome characterization approach has been successfully applied to elucidate the fitness traits necessary for ecological sustenance of non-model invertebrate species including insects [1, 2, 28]. Most such studies have employed Illumina sequencing platform and Trinity-based de novo assembly as it provides high-quality sequences for functional annotation and microsatellite discovery. This was the first study to characterize the transcriptome of the endangered paracoprid beetle C. tripartitus, which was screened for putative regulatory transcripts involved in immunity, growth, and reproduction, while also sufficiently addressing the need for microsatellite markers for use in population genetic studies. Notably, the highly polymorphic and codominant SSR markers obtained from transcriptome sequencing are highly transferable and can be used for diversity studies of related species, including other genera of the same family [29, 30]. The development of reference transcriptome provides an insight into fitness traits of the beetle and will contribute towards understanding the sustainability of paracoprid beetles in the wild and their maintanence of ecosystem health.

The de novo assembled unigenes obtained in this study showed higher N50 and mean length compared to transcriptome assemblies of the social caterpillar Drepana arcuata [31], coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei [32], and Lycaenidae butterflies S. takanosis and P. superans [1]. While annotating the unigenes, the PANM-DB was found to be more reliable in terms of annotation hits and time of annotation [19]. The species distribution of the top matches to C. tripartitus unigenes showed a bias towards completely sequenced beetle genomes, such as T. castaneum and O. borbonicus, and other non-model insects.

The IPS-based conserved domain search identified C2H2-like zinc-finger, protein kinase, immunoglobulin-like fold, carboxylesterase type B, zinc finger (RING-type), and reverse transcriptase as being among the most abundant domains in the unigenes. Such domains were also widely distributed in transcriptome-derived unigenes of H. hampei [32], Asian giant hornet V. mandarinia [18], Nymphalid butterfly Fabriciana nerippe [2], and Mexican bean weevil Zabrotes subfasciatus [33]. C2H2-like zinc-finger domains are among the most abundant protein domains belonging to the family of transcription factors that regulate gene expression in complex eukaryotes. C2H2 proteins with three C2H2 domains have been less thoroughly studied [34, 35]. The catalytic domain features of protein kinases function intracellularly in phosphorylation and promote numerous signaling cascades related to metabolic, cellular and immune processes. Immunoglobulin-like fold domains provide interacting surfaces for the binding of other proteins via their β-sheets [36]. Carboxylesterases containing the carboxylesterase domain are responsible for various physiological functions related to insect development and behavior, and are broadly distributed among insects such as Lucilia cuprina, Musca domestica, and Anopheles gambiae [37]. Further, our GO-based functional annotations showed an over-representation of sub-functional categories such as cellular process, metabolic process, and single-organism process (within the Biological process category); binding and catalytic activity (within the Molecular function category); and cell, cell part, and membrane (within the Cellular component category) as reported in transcriptome annotations of other beetles [38,39,40]. As known, GO annotations are based on GO evidence code distributions. Most of the GO evidence codes refer to ‘electronic’ annotations that are not experimentally defined and hence the functional directions of unigenes can only be predictive. Insights into the biochemical pathways were provided by the KEGG analysis, wherein a significant number of unigenes encoding enzymes categorized under metabolic pathways [41]. The distribution of KEGG- annotated unigenes in well-represented metabolic pathways has been suggested previously for the Sakhalin pine sawyer Monochamus saltuarius [42] and other lepidopteran insects [43, 44]. Furthermore, the distribution of C. tripartitus unigenes to the KOG functional category ‘Signal transduction’ is significant, as most immune processes in insects have conserved components under various signaling cascades determining host resistance or susceptibility to pathogenic infections. Similar KOG classification results have been obtained for the seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, Japanese pine sawyer beetle Monochamus alternatus, and pine shoot beetle Tomicus yunnanensis [38, 39, 45].

We further analyzed the repeating elements and SSRs in de novo assembled unigenes of C. tripartitus. Repeating elements such as retroelements play significant roles in adaptive processes and contribute to phenotypic plasticity [46, 47]. Transposed elements such as SINEs, LINEs, and LTR elements inserted into exons can elongate the untranslated region (UTR) and contribute to genomic expansion, genomic rearrangement, and genetic diversity [48]. Further, the discovery of polymorphic microsatellite markers has gained importance because they are ideal molecular marker system for investigating genetic diversity [49], and can reveal genes directly related to physiology and adaptation [50]. The SSR and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers screened from transcriptomic resources of non-model species, including insects, have been widely applied in conservation genomics. For example, in populations of insect pest Rhopalosiphum padi, 60 randomly selected microsatellites (out of 7,936 potential microsatellites) were amplified using specific primer pairs to identify 14 polymorphic loci demonstrating successful utilization of microsatellites to elucidate genetic heterogeneity among R. padi populations and other closely related aphid species [30]. Further, consistent with our results, trinucleotide repeats were abundantly distributed among R. padi SSRs, as were mononucleotide repeats [30]. Mononucleotide repeats were not considered in the present study due to the propensity for homopolymer formation during Illumina sequencing. Dinucleotide and trinucleotide repeats were also reported as the most abundant SSRs in the transcriptome of sawfly Dolerus aeneus, stick insect Timema cristinae, and oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis [51,52,53]. Further, dinucleotides were most abundant among unigenes of the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus with AT and TA accounting for more than half of all dinucleotide motifs [54].

Innate immunity is essential for the adaptability of insect species to varying environments. It drives physiological plasticity in invertebrates, including insects [55]. Innate immunity has been studied at the molecular level in beetles, especially T. castaneum and Tenebrio molitor unraveling the mysteries of host–pathogen interactions. T. molitor transcriptome data have revealed the critical components of Toll, IMD, JAK-STAT, and autophagy-related signaling in the context of pathogenic infections [56,57,58,59]. Reflecting the physiological plasticity to various immune elicitors, studies on the antimicrobial innate immune response of T. molitor via the transcriptional regulation of AMPs have been richly insightful [60, 61]. Innate immune signaling components, including PRRs, membrane proteins, intracellular proteins such as kinases, and NF-kappaB molecules have been functionally characterized after initial screening of the transcriptome [60, 62, 63]. In this study, we screened the conserved components of innate immunity from C. tripartitus transcriptome that could provide clues about the successful habitation of this species to microbially-sensitive environments, and the mechanism of pathogen evasion. In the context of innate immunity, PRRs such as lectins, TLRs, and glucan- and lipopolysaccharide- binding molecules in the extracellular, membrane, and intracellular environments can establish direct interactions with PAMPs and modulate signaling cascades related to innate immunity [64]. The repertoire of such PRRs is diverse in simple animals, likely due to gene duplication, and this large repertoire supports multiple binding affinities to PAMPs and complex signaling cascades. We preliminarily characterized the PRRs obtained from the C. tripartitus transcriptome, including TLR-2, PGRP-SC2-like, and CTL, in an explicitly phylogenetic context.

TLRs are by far the most comprehensively studied class of proteins in relation to the innate immune system. TLRs are single, membrane-spanning, non-catalytic receptors that recognize structurally conserved molecules derived from microbes. These proteins regulate molecular traffic between the plasma membrane and endosome [65]. TLRs contain the consensus ‘Leu-x-x-Leu-x-Leu-x-x-Arg’ protein-protein interaction module or the LRR domain [66], which are conserved across species and specifically enriched in plants [67], invertebrates [68], and cephalochordates [69]. The large repertoire of TLRs in animals is attributed to their role in the recognition of pathogens, leading to the development of diverse innate immune signaling cascades. The number and amino acid framework of the LRR motifs in TLRs lend credence to the binding stability of TLRs to PAMPs [66]. TLR proteins from the C. tripartitus transcriptome (TLR-2, TLR-6, and TLR-7) may act as membrane receptors to drive the MyD88-dependent pathway of the Toll cascade with assistance from intracellular components. Consistent with our results, core genes of the TLR pathway (TLRs, MyD88, and kinases) have also been identified in the transcriptome of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar [70].

CTLs are an important type of PRR playing diverse physiological roles in animals, including humans and insects [71, 72]. CTLs are characterized by their capacity to possess one or more CRDs (also known as CTL domains) [73, 74]. Insect CTLs facilitate pattern recognition, agglutination, encapsulation, melanization, prophenoloxidase activation, and maintanence of gut microbiome homeostasis [75]. We screened CTL homologs in the C. tripartitus transcriptome. Ct_CTL encodes a protein of 356 amino acid residues with tandem CTL domains, while Bombyx mori CTL-S2 encodes a protein of 221 amino acids [76] and Plutella xylostella CTL encodes a protein of 322 amino acids with a dual CTL domain [77]. Further, while the CTLs of most insects show species-specific gene expansion, B. mori CTLs are widely distributed among the clades of CTLs of lepidopteran insects [78]. Moreover, we found that Ct_CTL clusters with the CTL of another beetle, O. borbonicus, implying close sequence identity of CTL homologs among coleopteran insects. PGRPs specifically bind to peptidoglycan present in the cell surface of bacteria and are classified into PGRP-L (long-form) and PGRP-S (short-form) types, which are widespread across invertebrate and vertebrate phyla. PGRPs participate in lytic attack of the bacterial cell wall [79] and promote cellular phagocytosis [80]. PGRPs (both L- and S-forms) have been identified in insects such as Drosophila melanogaster [81], A. gambiae [82], B. mori [83], Nilaparvata lugens [84], and Sogatella furcifera [85]. Both L- and S-type PGRPs were identified in the transcriptome of C. tripartitus. The S-form of PGRP (PGRP_SC2) screened from the C. tripartitus transcriptome contains the characteristic overlapping PGRP and amidase domains, and a 19-amino acid signal peptide sequence. Insect S-form PGRPs all contain signal peptide sequences, with Drosophila PGRP_SC2 also showing amidase activity [86]. These PGRPs also contribute to downregulation of the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway in the fat body of insects following systemic bacterial infection. PGRP_SC2, PGRP_SC1a and PGRP_LB are catalytic PGRPs; and in contrast to non-catalytic PGRPs (PGRP_LC, -LE, -SA, and –SD), they have a cysteine residue in the active site for peptidoglycan cleavage [87]. Similarly, a secreted PGRP_SC2 homolog from the genome of the mosquito Aedes aegypti has been predicted to function as a negative regulator of immune responses [88].

Genes associated with growth and development are critical to the success of insects in the wild, and for translocation to new habitats. As C. tripartitus is designated an endangered species in Korea, permission was granted to collect only three individuals. This prevented developmental stage-specific transcriptome analysis, which could elucidate the growth and development attributes of C. tripartitus. Moreover, genome-wide analysis of developmental stage-specific transcriptome data is crucial to the development of novel control approaches for insect pests, although this goal is far removed from the objectives of this study. Developmental transcriptome analysis has been conducted for an endangered Korean butterfly, Parnassius bremeri, to clarify its population genetics and inform conservation measures [89]. The cataloging of transcripts (such as actin, myosin, and tropomyosin) with key functions in growth and muscle development has been achieved in studies of the ecological dynamics of non-model species, and has provided molecular resources for future breeding programs [90].

Genes involved in the differentiation of gonadal structures, such as the ovary and testis, are sex-determination genes. The development of gonadal structures might be indirectly influenced by environmental factors such as light, temperature, nutritional conditions, and the reproductive physiology of the species via genetic regulation. In this context, discussion of successful reproduction strategies and genetic factors governing sex determination is pertinent. Gonadal transcriptome analysis of insect species led to the identification of candidate genes involved in sex-determination/differentiation and reproduction, thereby providing a scientific basis for exploring sex-related economic traits associated with disease resistance and the overall health of the organism [91]. In the transcriptome of R. ferrugineus, 25 genes were annotated as relevant to reproduction, including five vitellogenin transcripts; however, only a single vitellogenin gene was expressed [54], consistent with reports of a single vitellogenin gene in other coleopteran species such as T. molitor [92], Anthonomus grandis [93], Octodonta nipae [94], and Colaphellus bowringi [95]. Those transcripts (designated vitellogenin-1, -2, and -6-like) were also found in the transcriptome of C. tripartitus, implying a substantial contribution to the reproductive success of insects. Vitellogenin significantly contributes to ovarian development in insects through lipid accumulation in the ovaries [96].

Conclusions

This study provides a reference transcriptome for the dung beetle species C. tripartitus, which is classified as an endangered species in South Korea. The novel characterization of molecular resources (immunity, growth, and reproduction-related transcripts) from this species will be useful for benchmarking fitness traits in C. tripartitus, which may increase its adaptation potential in the wild. The 25,106 non-redundant unigenes identified here enable gene discovery and functional genomics in Copris species, and improve understanding of beetle and insect immunity. We assessed the ORF and putative protein characteristics of PRRs, such as TLR-2, CTL, and PGRP_SC-2-like, using in silico methods. Further insights into the innate immune signaling cascades of beetles and other insects were obtained through exploration of the components of the MyD88-dependent pathway, antimicrobial peptides, autophagy, and apoptosis pathways. A significant number of putative sex-determination/reproduction and growth-related transcripts were identified in the paracoprid dung beetle transcriptome, which sheds light on the habit and habitat requirements of this species.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under accession number PRJNA559824.

Abbreviations

AMPs:

Antimicrobial peptides

ORF:

Open reading frame

PANM-DB:

Protostome database

SSR:

Simple sequence repeats

PRRs:

Pathogen recognition receptors

CTL:

C-type lectins

PGRP:

Peptidoglycan recognition proteins

TLR:

Toll-like receptors

PAMP:

Pathogen- associated molecular patterns

IMD:

Immune deficiency

RIN:

RNA integrity number

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

NCBI:

National center for biotechnology information

KOG:

Clusters of orthologous groups

GO:

Gene ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

MEGA:

Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis

MISA:

MicroSatellite

LRR:

Leucine-rich repeats

JAK-STAT:

Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription

SINE:

Short interspersed nuclear elements

LINE:

Long interspersed nuclear elements

LTR:

Long-terminal repeats

IPS:

InterProScan

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

TIR:

Toll-interleukin receptor

CRD:

Carbohydrate-recognition domain

UTR:

Untranslated region

References

  1. Patnaik BB, Hwang HJ, Kang SW, Park SY, Wang TH, Park EB, et al. Transcriptome characterization for non-model endangered lycaenids, Protantigius superans and Spindasis takanosis, using Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:29948–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hwang HJ, Patnaik BB, Kang SW, Park SY, Wang TH, Park EB, et al. RNA sequencing, de novo assembly, and functional annotation of an endangered Nymphalid butterfly, Fabriciana nerippe Felder, 1862. Entomol Res. 2016;46:148–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anduaga S, Huerta C. Importance of dung incorporation activity by three species of coprophagous beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) macrofauna in Pastureland on “La Michilía” biosphere reserve in Durango. Mexico Environ Entomol. 2007;36:555–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huerta C, Martinez MI, Montes de Oca E, Cruz-Rosales M, Favila ME. The role of dung beetles in the sustainability of pasture and grasslands. WIT Transactions on State of the Art in Science and Engineering. 2013;64:441–63.

  5. Lobo JM. Decline of roller dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) populations in the Iberian Peninsula during the 20th century. Biol Conserv. 2001;97:43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carpaneto GM, Mazziotta A, Valerio L. Inferring species decline from collection records: roller dung beetles in Italy (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Divers Distrib. 2007;13:903–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bistrom O, Silverberg H, Rutanen I. Abundance and distribution of Coprophilus histerini (Histeridae) and Onthophagus and Aphodius (Scarabaeidae) in Finland (Coleoptera). Entomologia Fennica. 1991;2:53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JI. Seasonal periodicities and faunal change by the times on Scarabaeidae from South Korea based in recent 20 years. Nat Conserv. 1994;87:35–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JI, Min WG, Park JY, Park DH, Lee SG, Lee BH, et al. Red Data Book of Endangered Insects in Korea II. Incheon, Korea: Nature & Ecology Publishing Co.; 2013. p. 116–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kang AR, Kim KG, Park JW, Kim I. Genetic diversity of the dung beetle, Copris tripartitus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), that is endangered in Korea. Entomol Res. 2012;42:247–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang EJ, Jeong SY, Wang AR, Kim MJ, Kim I. Additional mitochondrial DNA sequences from the dung beetle, Copris tripartitus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), an endangered species in South Korea. Int J Indust Entomol. 2018;36:31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong JS, Kim MJ, Kim I. The mitochondrial genome of the dung beetle, Copris tripartitus, with mitogenomic comparisons within Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera). Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;144:874–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim MJ, Jeong SY, Kim SS, Jeong JS, Kim JS, Jeong HC, et al. Population genetic characterization of the endangered dung beetle Copris tripartitus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) using novel microsatellite markers. J Asia-Pacific Entomol. 2022;25:101899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hogg CJ, Ottewell K, Latch P, Belov K. Threatened Species Initiative: Empowering conservation action using genomic resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2022;119:e2115643118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Supple MA, Shapiro B. Conservation of biodiversity in the genomics era. Genome Biol. 2018;19:131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Y, Shen D, Zhou F, Wang G, An C. Identification of immunity-related genes in Ostrinia furnacalis against entomopathogenic fungi by RNA-Seq analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Vogel H, Badapanda C, Knorr E, Vilcinskas A. RNA-Sequencing analysis reveals abundant developmental stage-specific and immunity-related genes in the pollen beetle Meligethes aeneus. Insect Mol Biol. 2014;23:98–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patnaik BB, ParkKang SYSW, Hwang HJ, Wang TH, Park EB, et al. Transcriptome profile of the Asian Giant Hornet (Vespa mandarinia) using Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing: De novo assembly, functional annotation and discovery of SSR markers. Int J Genom. 2016;2016:4169587.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kang SW, Park SY, Hwang HJ, Chung JM, Sang MK, Min HR, et al. PANM DB ver 3.0: An update of the bioinformatics database for annotation of large datasets from sequencing of species under Protostomia clade. Kor J Malacol. 2019;35:73–75.

  20. Leulier F, Parquet C, Pili-Floury S, Ryu JH, Caroff M, Lee WJ, et al. The Drosophila immune system detects bacteria through specific peptidoglycan recognition. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:478–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gottar M, Gobert V, Matskevich AA, Reichhart JM, Wang C, Butt TM, et al. Dual detection of fungal infections in Drosophila via recognition of glucans and sensing of virulence factors. Cell. 2006;127:1425–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cho A, Seok SH. Ethical guidelines for use of experimental animals in biomedical research. J Bacteriol Virol. 2013;43:18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, et al. A. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protocols. 2013;8(8):1494–512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1658–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–48.

  27. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:3022–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Patnaik BB, Chung JM, Hwang HJ, Sang MK, Park JE, et al. Transcriptome analysis of air-breathing land slug, Incilaria fruhstorferi reveals functional insights into growth, immunity, and reproduction. BMC Genom. 2019;20:154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Park SY, Patnaik BB, Kang SW, Hwang HJ, Chung JM, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of the endangered neritid species Clithon retropictus: De novo assembly, functional annotation and marker discovery. Genes. 2016;7:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Duan X, Wang K, Su S, Tian R, Li Y, Chen M. De novo transcriptome analysis and microsatellite marker development for population genetic study of a serious insect pest, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0172513.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yadav C, Smith ML, Yack JE. Transcriptome analysis of a social caterpillar, Drepana arcuata: De novo assembly, functional annotation and developmental analysis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0234903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Noriega DD, Arias PL, Barbosa HR, Arraes FB, Ossa GA, Villegas B, et al. Transcriptome and gene expression analysis of three developmental stages of the coffee berry borer. Hypothenemus hampei Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lagarda-Diaz I, Hernandez-Ornate MA, Huerta-Ocampo JA, Guzman-Partida AM, Winzerling J, Geiser D, et al. Gene sequences of potential targets of insecticidal PF2 lectin identified from the larval de novo transcriptome of the Mexican Bean Weevil (Zabrotes subfasciatus; Boheman 1833). Insects. 2020;11:736.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Swamynathan SK. Kruppel-like factors: Three fingers in control. Hum Genom. 2010;4(4):263–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fedotova AA, Bonchuk AN, Mogila VA, Georgiev PG. C2H2 zinc finger proteins: The largest but poorly explored family of higher eukaryotic transcription factors. Acta Naturae. 2017;9(2):47–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Potapov V, Sobolev V, Edelman M, Kister A, Gelfand I. Protein-Protein recognition: Juxtaposition of domain and interface cores in Immunoglobulins and other sandwich-like proteins. J Mol Biol. 2004;242(2):665–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yan S, Cui F, Qiao C. Structure, function and applications of carboxylesterases from Insects for Insecticide resistance. Protein Peptide Lett. 2009;16:1181–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sayadi A, Immonen E, Bayram H, Arnqvist G. The de novo transcriptome and its functional annotation in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0158565.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin T, Cai Z, Wu H. Transcriptome analysis of the Japanese sawyer beetle, Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) by high-throughput Illumina sequencing. J Asia-Pacific Entomol. 2015;18(3):439–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lu X, Li J, Yang J, Liu X, Ma J. De novo transcriptome of the desert beetle Microdera punctipennis (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) using Illumina RNA-seq technology. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(11):7293–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucl Acids Res. 2004;32:D277–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hou Z, Shi F, Ge S, Tao J, Ren L, Wu H, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of the newly discovered insect vector of the pine wood nematode in China, revealing putative genes related to host plant adaptation. BMC Genom. 2021;22:189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cui M, Hu P, Wang T, Tao J, Zong S. Differential transcriptome analysis reveals genes related to cold tolerance in seabuckthorn carpenter moth. Eogystia hippophaecolus PloS ONE. 2017;12:e0187105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Peterson B, Sanko TJ, Bezuidenhout CC, van den Berg J. Transcriptome and differentially expressed genes of Busseola fusca (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae challenged with Cry1Ab toxin. Gene. 2019;710:387–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu JY, Zhao N, Yang B. Global transcriptome profiling of the Pine Shoot Beetle, Tomicus yunnanensis (Coleoptera: Scolytinae). PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e32291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Casacuberta E, Gonzalez J. The impact of transposable elements in environmental adaptation. Mol Ecol. 2013;22(6):1503–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stapley J, Santure AW, Dennis SR. Transposable elements as agents of rapid adaptation may explain the genetic paradox of invasive species. Mol Ecol. 2015;24(9):2241–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Levy A, Sela N, Ast G. TranspoGene and microTranspoGene: transposed elements influence on the transcriptome of seven vertebrates and invertebrates. Nucl Acids Res. 2007;36:D47–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Dudaniec RY, Storfer A, Spear SF, Richardson JS. New microsatellite markers for examining genetic variation in peripheral and core populations of the coastal giant salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus). PLoS ONE. 2010;5(12):e14333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E. Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol. 2002;11(12):2453–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wei DD, Shi JX, Zhang XX, Chen SC, Wei D, Wang JJ. Analysis of microsatellite loci from Bactrocera dorsalis based on transcriptome dataset. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2014;25:1799–805.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Comeault AA, Sommers M, Schwander T, Buerkle CA, Farkas TE, Nosil P, et al. De novo characterization of the Timema cristinae transcriptome facilitates marker discovery and inference of genetic divergence. Mol Ecol Res. 2012;12(3):549–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cook N, Aziz N, Hedley PE, Morris J, Milne L, Karley AJ, et al. Transcriptome sequencing of an ecologically important graminivorous sawfly: a resource for marker development. Conserv Genet Res. 2011;3:789–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rasool KG, Mehmood K, Husain M, Tufail M, Alwaneen WS, Aldawood AS. De novo transcriptome analysis and identification of reproduction control genes from the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0251278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Patnaik BB, Lee YS, Han YS, Jo YH. Editorial: Innate immune system guiding physiological plasticity in invertebrates. Front Physiol. 2022;13:947707.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Jo YH, Lee JH, Patnaik BB, Keshavarz M, Lee YS, Han YS. Autophagy in Tenebrio molitor Immunity: Conserved Antimicrobial Functions in Insect Defenses. Front Immunol. 2021;12:2055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jang HA, Patnaik BB, Ali Mohammadie Kojour M, Kim BB, Bae YM, Park KB, et al. TmSpz-like Plays a Fundamental Role in Response to E. coli but not S. aureus or C. albicans Infection in Tenebrio molitor via Regulation of Antimicrobial Peptide Production. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10888.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Jo YH, Patnaik BB, Hwang J, Park KB, Ko HJ, Kim CE, et al. Regulation of the expression of nine antimicrobial peptide genes by TmIMD confers resistance against Gram-negative bacteria. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Patnaik BB, Kim BB, Jo YH, Bang IS. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of three suppressors of cytokine signaling genes (SOCS5, SOCS6, SOCS7) in the mealworm beetle Tenebrio molitor. Insects. 2019;10(3):76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Bae YM, Jo YH, Patnaik BB, Kim BB, Park KB, Edosa TT, et al. Tenebrio molitor Spätzle 1b is required to confer antibacterial defense against Gram-negative bacteria by regulation of antimicrobial peptides. Front Physiol. 2021;12:758859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Ko HJ, Patnaik BB, Park KB, Kim CE, Baliarsingh S, Jang HA, et al. TmIKKε is required to confer protection against Gram-negative bacteria E. coli by the regulation of antimicrobial peptide production in the Tenebrio molitor fat body. Front Physiol. 2022;12:758862.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Keshavarz M, Jo YH, Edosa TT, Bae YM, Han YS. TmPGRP-SA regulates antimicrobial response to bacteria and fungi in the fat body and gut of Tenebrio molitor. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):2113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Keshavarz M, Jo YH, Edosa TT, Han YS. Tenebrio molitor PGRP-LE plays a critical role in gut antimicrobial peptide production in response to Escherichia coli. Front Physiol. 2020;11:320.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Janeway CA, Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Ann Rev Immunol. 2002;20:197–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Thompson MR, Kaminski JJ, Kurt-Jones EA, Fitzgerald KA. Pattern Recognition Receptors and the Innate Immune Response to Viral Infection. Viruses. 2011;3(6):920–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Dhar D, Dey D, Basu S. Insights into the evolution of extracellular leucine-rich repeats in metazoans with special reference to Toll-like receptor 4. J Biosci. 2019;44(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Padmanabhan M, Cournoyer P, Dinesh-Kumar SP. The leucine-rich repeat domain in plant innate immunity: a wealth of possibilities. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11(2):191–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang W, Song X, Wang L, Song L. Pathogen-derived carbohydrate recognition in molluscs’ immune defense. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(3):721.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Huang S, Yuan S, Guo L, Yu Y, Li J, Wu T, et al. Genomic analysis of the immune gene repertoire of amphioxus reveals extraordinary innate complexity and diversity. Gen Res. 2008;18(7):1112–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Liu L, Wei YS, Wang D. Identification of core genes of Toll-like receptor pathway from Lymantria dispar and induced expression upon immune stimulant. Insects. 2021;12:827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Brown G. C-type lectins in innate antifungal immunity: a key to the therapeutic future? KN-01. Mycoses. 2015;583:1.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Dambuza IM, Brown GD. C-type lectins in immunity: recent developments. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;32:21–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Cambi A, Koopman M, Figdor CG. How C-type lectins detect pathogens. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:481–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Geijtenbeek TBH, Gringhuis SI. Signalling through C-type lectin receptors: shaping immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(7):465–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhu Y, Yu X, Cheng G, Zhu Y. Insect C-Type Lectins in Microbial Infections. Adv Expt Med Biol. 2020;1204:129–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Shahzad T, Zhan MY, Yang PJ, Yu XQ, Rao XJ. Molecular cloning and analysis of a C-type lectin from silkworm Bombyx mori. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2017;95(3):e21391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Li JY, Lin JH, Fernandez-Grandon GM, Zhang JY, You MS, Xia XF. Functional identification of C-type lectin in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) innate immunity. J Integr Agricult. 2021;20(12):3240–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Xia X, You M, Rao XJ, Yu XQ. Insect C-type lectins in innate immunity. Dev Comp Immunol. 2018;83:70–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Yang J, Wang W, Wei X, Qiu L, Wang L, Zhang H, et al. Peptidoglycan recognition protein of Chlamys farreri (CfPGRP-S1) mediates immune defenses against bacterial infection. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;34(12):1300–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Dziarski R, Gupta D. The peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs). Gen Biol. 2006;7(8):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Werner T, Liu G, Kang D, Ekengren S, Steiner H, Hultmark D. A family of peptidoglycan recognition proteins in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:13772–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Meister S, Agianian B, Turlure F, Relogio A, Morlais I, Kafatos FC, et al. Anopheles gambiae PGRPLC-mediated defense against bacteria modulates infections with malaria parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(8):e1000542.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Tanaka H, Ishibashi J, Fujita K, Nakajima Y, Sagisaka A, Tomimoto K, et al. A genome-wide analysis of genes and gene families involved in innate immunity of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;38(12):1087–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Bao YY, Qu LY, Zhao D, Chen LB, Jin HY, Xu LM, et al. The genome-and transcriptome-wide analysis of innate immunity in the brown planthopper. Nilaparvata lugens BMC Genom. 2013;14(1):1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Wang L, Tang N, Gao X, Chang Z, Zhang L, Zhou G, et al. Genome sequence of a rice pest, the white-backed planthopper (Sogatella furcifera). GigaSci. 2017;6(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kurata S. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins in Drosophila immunity. Dev Comp Immunol. 2014;42:36–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Mellroth P, Karlsson J. Steiner HA scavenger function for a Drosophila peptidoglycan recognition protein. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:7059–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Wang S, Beernsten BT. Functional implications of the peptidoglycan recognition proteins in the immunity of the yellow fever mosquito. Aedes aegypti Insect Mol Biol. 2015;24(3):293–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Lee KW, Denison MI, Veerappan K, Srinivasan S, Park B, Natarajan S, et al. Developmental transcriptome analysis of red-spotted apollo butterfly, Parnassius bremeri. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19):11533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Lv J, Liu P, Gao B, Wang Y, Wang Z, Chen P, et al. Transcriptome analysis of the Portunus trituberculatus: De novo assembly, growth-related gene identification and marker discovery. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e94055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Nguantad S, Chumnanpuen P, Thancharoen A, Vongsangnak W, Sriboonlert A. Identification of potential candidate genes involved in the sex determination cascade in an aquatic firefly, Sclerotia aquatilis (Coleoptera, Lampyridae). Genomics. 2020;112(3):2590–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Warr E, Meredith JM, Nimmo DD, Basu S, Hurd H, Eggleston P. A tapeworm molecule manipulates vitellogenin expression in the beetle Tenebrio molitor. Insect Mol Biol. 2006;15(4):497–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Trewitt PM, Heilmann LJ, Degrugillier SS, Kumaran AK. The boll weevil vitellogenin gene: nucleotide sequence, structure, and evolutionary relationship to nematode and vertebrate vitellogenin genes. J Mol Evol. 1992;34(6):478–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Li JL, Tang BZ, Hou YM, Xie YX. Molecular cloning and expression of the vitellogenin gene and its correlation with ovarian development in an invasive pest Octodonta nipae on two host plants. Bull Entomol Res. 2016;106(5):642–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Liu W, Li Y, Zhu L, Zhu F, Lei CL, Wang XP. Juvenile hormone facilitates the antagonism between adult reproduction and diapause through the methoprene-tolerant gene in the female Colaphellus bowringi. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;74:50–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Ghosh SK, Hunter WB, Park AL, Gundersen-Rindal DE. Double-stranded RNA oral delivery methods to induce RNA interference in phloem and plant-sap-feeding hemipteran insects. J Vis Exp. 2018;4(135):e57390.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by a Korea Basic Science Institute (National research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (2022R1A6C101B794), National Research Foundation (NRF-2021R1A6A1A03039503 / NRF-2017R1D1A3B06034971), and Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HJH, BBP, MKS, JEP, HCJ and SB conducted the experiments. JEP, JYJ, CEH, YTK, HJS and HCC collected specimens and conducted data management. BBP, JEP, DKS, ND, LZ, SYP, and SWK contributed to the data analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript preparation. YHJ, WJK, YSH, BBP, HHP, HCC and YSL contributed to the intellectual content and data review. YSH, HSP, JSL, and YSL contributed to the sequencing study and data management. YSH and YSL conceived the study. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Seok Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission for the Copris tripartitus required for this study was obtained from the Yeongsan River Basin Environment Agency under the authority of the Ministry of Environment of Korea (Permit number: 2017–29). This study was also approved by Soonchunhyang University, South Korea, and was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines for the use of experimental animals in biomedical research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Figure S1. The full-length nucleotide sequence for C. tripartitus Toll-like receptor-2 (Ct_TLR-2). Figure S2. Secondary structure prediction of Ct_TLR2 using PSI-PRED (version 4.0). Figure S3. The full-length nucleotide sequence for C. tripartitus CTL (C-type Lectin; Ct_CTL). Figure S4. Secondary structure prediction of Ct_CTL using PSI-PRED (version 4.0). Figure S5. The full-length nucleotide sequence for C. tripartitus Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein SC-2-like (Ct_PGRP_SC-2-like). Figure S6. Secondary structure prediction of Ct_PGRP_SC-2-like using PSI-PRED (version 4.0).

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Preprocessing of raw reads obtained from C. tripartitus using Illumina next-generation sequencer. Table S2. Classification of C. tripartitus Candidate genes to the innate immune signaling process. Table S3. Genes of interest related to growth in the dung beetle, C. tripartitus. Table S4. Candidate Sex-Determination and Reproduction related genes from C. tripartitus unigenes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, H.J., Patnaik, B.B., Baliarsingh, S. et al. Transcriptome analysis of the endangered dung beetle Copris tripartitus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and characterization of genes associated to immunity, growth, and reproduction. BMC Genomics 24, 94 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09122-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09122-w

Keywords