Skip to main content

Genome-wide mapping of GlnR-binding sites reveals the global regulatory role of GlnR in controlling the metabolism of nitrogen and carbon in Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78

Abstract

Background

Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78 is a Gram-positive, endospore-forming and N2-fixing bacterium. Our previous study has demonstrated that GlnR acts as both an activator and a repressor to regulate the transcription of the nif (nitrogen fixation) operon (nifBHDKENXhesAnifV) according to nitrogen availability, which is achieved by binding to the two GlnR-binding sites located in the nif promoter region. However, further study on the GlnR-mediated global regulation in this bacterium is still needed.

Results

In this study, global identification of the genes directly under GlnR control is determined by using chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). Our results reveal that GlnR directly regulates the transcription of 17 genes/operons, including a nif operon, 14 nitrogen metabolism genes/operons (glnRA, amtBglnK, glnA1, glnK1, glnQHMP, nasA, nasD1, nasD2EF, gcvH, ansZ, pucR, oppABC, appABCDF and dppABC) and 2 carbon metabolism genes (ldh3 and maeA1). Except for the glnRA and nif operon, the other 15 genes/operons are newly identified targets of GlnR. Furthermore, genome-wide transcription analyses reveal that GlnR not only directly regulates the expression of these 17 genes/operons, but also indirectly controls the expression of some other genes/operons involved in nitrogen fixation and the metabolisms of nitrogen and carbon.

Conclusion

This study provides a GlnR-mediated regulation network of nitrogen fixation and the metabolisms of nitrogen and carbon.

Peer Review reports

Background

Nitrogen is one of the essential elements of life and an important constituent of various cellular metabolites and macromolecules. To all bacterial species, assimilation and utilization of nitrogen are challenges. Nitrogen metabolisms in most bacteria are regulated at transcription levels by a global transcriptional regulator that shows a great difference in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [1,2,3]. GlnR in the MerR family is one such important transcriptional regulator that regulates the global nitrogen metabolism in several low-GC Gram-positive bacteria, including Bacillus subtilis [4], Lactococcus lactis [5], and Streptococcus pneumonia [6].

The regulatory function of GlnR is well characterized in B. subtilis, where GlnR regulates the global nitrogen metabolism according to nitrogen availability together with TnrA [7]. GlnR and TnrA identify and bind to a common consensus DNA sequence (TGTNAN7TNACA) (GlnR/TnrA-sites), and regulate the nitrogen metabolism in B. subtilis by activating or regressing the relevant genes’ transcription through binding to these sites in their promoters [8]. GlnR represses gene transcription under excess nitrogen conditions, while TnrA regulates that when nitrogen is limited [9, 10]. The glnR gene (encoding GlnR) and glnA gene (encoding glutamine synthase, GS) constitute the operon glnRA [10]. In B. subtilis, GlnR negatively regulates the transcriptions of a series of genes/operons, including the glnRA operon (negative auto-regulation), tnrA [11], and the urease gene cluster (ureABC) [12] under excess nitrogen conditions. Meanwhile, TnrA regulates more genes/operons than GlnR under limited nitrogen conditions [13]. For example, TnrA activates amtB-glnK (encoding ammonium transporter AmtB and regulatory protein GlnK) [14], nasA and nasBC/DEF (encoding proteins related to nitrite reduction) [15], pucR (encoding purine catabolism regulator) [16] and its own gene tnrA [4], while it represses the glnRA operon [9], alsT (encoding an H+/Na+ amino acid symporter) [13] and gltAB (encoding glutamate synthase) [17, 18]. Under excess nitrogen conditions, the increasing glutamine content in the cells inhibits the activity of GS by turning it into feedback-inhibited GS (FBI-GS) [19]. The FBI-GS can act as a chaperone to stabilize GlnR-DNA complexes [7], but interact with TnrA physically to inhibit its DNA-binding activity [20].

Paenibacillus is a genus of facultative anaerobic and endospore-forming bacteria, which is Gram-positive, and shares a lot in common with the genus Bacillus [21]. P. polymyxa is an important species in the genus Paenibacillus, which has many plant-growth-promoting strains that could be used as bacterial fertilizer in agriculture. Our previous studies have demonstrated that Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78 possesses several plant-growth-promoting traits [22] and a nif operon [23, 24]. Unlike B. subtilis, P. polymyxa WLY78 lacks tnrA and possesses only a glnR gene in its genome. Our recent study has revealed that GlnR positively and negatively regulates the nif genes’ expression by binding to the two GlnR-binding sites in the single nif promoter region according to nitrogen availability in this bacterium [25]. However, further identification of the genes directly regulated by GlnR is still required to demonstrate its global regulatory role in this bacterium.

Here, the potential GlnR DNA-binding sites were predicted at the genome scale, and verified by chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) in vivo and in vitro, respectively. Furthermore, genome-wide transcription analyses of wild-type (WT) and ΔglnR mutant grown anaerobically under nitrogen-limited and nitrogen-excess conditions were performed to investigate the differentially expressed genes. This study reveals that GlnR directly controls the expression of 17 genes/operons (a nif operon (nifBHDKENXhesAnifV), glnRA, amtBglnK, glnA1, glnK1, glnQHMP, nasA, nasD1, nasD2EF, gcvH, ansZ, pucR, oppABC, appABCDF, dppABC, ldh3 and maeA1). These genes/operons fulfill three criteria: (1) the presence of a potential GlnR-binding site; (2) promoter region bound by GlnR in vivo; (3) GlnR-dependent expression regulation. Also, GlnR indirectly regulates the transcription of genes/operons involved in the Fe-S cluster synthesis, ferric transport and molybdenum transport that are specifically required for nitrogen fixation and the genes/operons involved in nitrogen and carbon metabolisms. This study demonstrates that GlnR has a multiple regulatory role in P. polymyxa WLY78.

Results

Prediction of GlnR target genes in the genome of P. polymyxa WLY78

For the prediction of GlnR-binding site, the promoters of each gene in the P. polymyxa WLY78 genome (bioproject accession number: PRJNA171204), which was defined as the regions from − 350 to + 50 bp relative to the translational start codon, were extracted (Additional file 1). These promoter sequences were scanned with the known GlnR-binding sequence in Bacillus (5′-TGTNA-N7-TNACA-3′) [8] using the MEME-MAST tool (version 4.11, http://meme-suite.org) [26] with default options.

A total of 488 putative GlnR-binding sites with p value ≤10− 4 were identified (Additional file 2). Twenty-four genes/operons with combined p value ≤0.05 and did not co-translate after other genes were identified as putative GlnR targets (Table 1). These genes/operons include a nif operon (nifBHDKENXhesAnifV) that is involved in nitrogen fixation, 15 genes/operons that are involved in nitrogen metabolism, 6 genes that are involved in carbon metabolism, and 2 other genes. Among the 24 putative target genes/operons, 14 of them (e.g., glnRA, nasD2EF) have one GlnR-binding site, and 10 (e.g., nif operon, glnA1, amtBglnK, glnQHMP, nasD1, and ldh3) have two GlnR-binding sites in their promoter regions. The genes nasA and nasD1 share the same GlnR-binding sites as they are next to each other with a 353-bp spacing and have opposite transcription directions. The data suggest that GlnR may regulate these genes’ expression by binding to the GlnR-binding sites.

Table 1 The predicted GlnR-binding site(s) in the promoter regions of putative GlnR target genes in P. polymyxa WLY78

Identification of GlnR-regulated genes by ChIP-qPCR and EMSA

As shown in Fig. 1A, ChIP-qPCR was used to investigate the accuracy of the predicted GlnR-binding sites in the 24 putative genes/operons described above. ChIP-qPCR revealed that GlnR significantly (p < 0.05) bound to the promoter regions of the nif operon, glnRA, glnK1, glnQHMP, pucR, dppABC, oppABC, ldh3, and maeA1 under both conditions, the promoters of glnA1, amtBglnK, and appABCDF under the nitrogen-excess condition, and the promoters of nasA, nasD1, nasD2EF, ansZ, and gcvH under the nitrogen-limited condition. However, although putative binding sites were found in the promoter regions of metN, dxs, bglA1, bglA2, gpsA, yvqEC and sigF, their binding with GlnR was not detected. Among the 17 genes/operons that showed significant affinity with GlnR in their promoter regions, 15 belong to nitrogen fixation (the nif operon) and nitrogen metabolism (glnRA, glnA1, amtBglnK, glnK1, glnQHMP, nasA, nasD1, nasD2EF, ansZ, gcvH, pucR, dppABC, oppABC, appABCDF), and 2 belong to carbon metabolism (ldh3 and maeA1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Validation of putative genes predicted to be directly regulated by GlnR. A The relative binding levels of GlnR on the upstream regions of putative genes determined by ChIP-qPCR. The binding levels in ΔglnR were arbitrarily set to 1.0. N+ and N- indicate nitrogen excess and limited condition, respectively. Error bars indicate SD from three independent experiments. **p < 0.01; * < 0.05. B EMSA of upstream regions of selected genes. Each lane contained 0.3 nM labeled probe. Lanes 2 to 5 contained 0.5, 1, 1, and 1 μM His6-GlnR respectively. Lanes -: EMSAs without His6-GlnR. A 200-fold excess of unlabelled specific probe (lanes S) or nonspecific competitor DNA (Probe 1) (lanes N) was used in competition assays. The original blots are shown in Fig. S1

The results of ChIP-qPCR were further examined using EMSA, where 6 promoters were selected to investigate their interaction with the purified His-tagged GlnR (Fig. 1B). It showed that GlnR bound to the promoter regions of glnRA, amtBglnK, glnK1, and oppA, but it did not bind to that of bglA1 and sigF. These results were consistent with and confirmed the findings in ChIP-qPCR.

Transcriptome analyses of wild-type and ΔglnR mutant strains

In order to elucidate the effects of GlnR protein on gene transcription in P. polymyxa WLY78, transcriptome analysis of WT and ΔglnR mutant strains grown under nitrogen excess and limited conditions were carried out respectively. The optimal cultivation period for global transcriptional analysis was 4 hours after the strains were transferred into the nitrogen excess or limited mediums as determined by the transcription levels of amtB and nifH in the wild-type (WT) strain cultured anaerobically under nitrogen-limited condition (Fig. 2A). Genes showing significant differences (adjusted p ≤ 0.05) with a |log2 fold change (FC)| ≥ 1 were identified as differential expression genes. A total of 190 genes were differentially expressed in WT under both conditions compared to the ΔglnR mutant. Thereinto, 57 genes were upregulated and 133 genes were downregulated in WT compared to ΔglnR mutant under both conditions (Fig. 2B). Compared to ΔglnR, the transcription of 578 genes were upregulated, and 656 genes were downregulated under excess nitrogen condition, while 130 were upregulated and 255 were down-regulated under nitrogen-limitation condition in WT. These results demonstrated that GlnR played a global regulatory role under not only nitrogen-excess, but also nitrogen-limited conditions. Moreover, GlnR could serve as both a repressor and an activator.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Transcriptome analyses of WT and ΔglnR grown under nitrogen-excess and -limited conditions. A Relative transcription levels of amtB and nifH in P. polymyxa WLY78 during anaerobic nitrogen-limited growth. Error bars indicate SD from three independent experiments. B Venn diagrams representing the differentially expressed genes under nitrogen-excess and nitrogen-limited conditions. C Statistics of KEGG pathway enrichment. The most enriched 20 pathways are shown

The pathways that the differentially expressed genes belong to were determined using KEGG enrichment analysis. As shown in Fig. 2C, the genes under the control of GlnR are mainly involved in nitrogen fixation, nitrogen metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, amino acids metabolism, citrate cycle (TCA cycle), carbon metabolism, sulfur metabolism and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. These results imply that GlnR plays an important role in regulating not only nitrogen assimilation, but also other important pathways, especially carbon metabolism. Thus, the transcription level of these differentially expressed genes involved in nitrogen fixation, nitrogen metabolism and carbon metabolism are individually analyzed as follows.

GlnR regulates the transcription of nif and the non-nif genes required in nitrogen fixation

KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that not only the nif operon, but also the genes required for nitrogen fixation were differentially expressed under nitrogen-limited conditions. The 9 genes (nifB, nifH, nifD, nifK, nifE, nifN, nifX, hesA, nifV) within the nif operon showed increases ranging from 1.4- to 2.8- log2(FC) in WT compared with ΔglnR mutant under nitrogen-limited (nitrogen-fixing) condition (Fig. 3A; Table S2), supporting that GlnR directly and positively regulates nif gene transcription [25]. Moreover, the non-nif genes required in nitrogen fixation were coordinately regulated by GlnR. For example, the genes (e.g., sufBCD, sufS) involved in the synthesis of Fe-S cluster were up-regulated (Fig. 3B). The genes (e.g., feoAB, feuABC, fhuB, fhuC, fhuD, fhuG, yclNOPQ and yfmCDE) involved in ferric transport were up-regulated (Fig. 3C). Four genes (yvgL1, yvgL2, moaB and moaD) involved in molybdenum transport and metabolism were up-regulated in WT compared with ΔglnR under nitrogen-limited condition (Fig. 3D). Since no GlnR-binding site was found in the promoters of these genes, we deduce that GlnR indirectly regulates the expression of these non-nif genes that required for nitrogen fixation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

GlnR affects the transcription of nif genes and the non-nif genes required for nitrogen fixation under nitrogen-limited condition. A Differential expression of nif genes under nitrogen-limited condition. B Differential expression of genes involved in metabolism of sulfate under nitrogen-limited condition. C Differential expression of genes involved in transporting of iron under nitrogen-limited condition. D Differential expression of genes involved in the metabolism of molybdenum under nitrogen-limited condition

GlnR regulates the transcription of the genes involved in nitrogen assimilation

KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that the genes involved in nitrogen metabolism were differentially expressed (Fig. 2C, Fig. 4A). When compared with ΔglnR mutant, both glnA within glnRA operon and glnA1 encoding glutamine synthase (GS), amtB, nasA, nasDC, narGHJI, narK1K2, nirABD, glnQHMP, and gltP were down-regulated in WT under both nitrogen-limited and -excess conditions. The gltB encoding glutamate synthase (GOGAT) was up-regulated in WT compared with ΔglnR mutant under both conditions. Also, gdh encoding glutamate dehydrogenase was down-regulated in WT compared with ΔglnR mutant under nitrogen-limited condition. The nirGHIJ were down-regulated in WT compared with ΔglnR mutant in nitrogen-excess condition. As described above, there are GlnR-binding site(s) in the promoter regions of glnRA, glnA1, amtBglnK, nasA, nasDC, glnQHMP, indicating that GlnR directly and negatively controls the expression of these genes involved in nitrogen metabolism. However, no GlnR-binding site was found in the promoter regions of gdh, gltP, narK1K2, nirABD, and gltB, suggesting that GlnR indirectly controls the expression of these genes involved in nitrogen metabolism.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Different nitrogen-metabolism-involved gene expression and nitrogen source utilization of WT and ΔglnR. A Differential expression of genes involved in nitrogen metabolism determined by KEGG enrichment. B Growth curve of WT and ΔglnR. Solid line represents the growth under nitrogen-excess condition; dash line represents the growth under nitrogen-limited condition. Error bars indicate SD from three independent experiments. C Growth status of WT and ΔglnR in minimal medium with 30 mM NH4Cl, glutamate, glutamine, urea, NaNO2, or NaNO3 as sole nitrogen source. Error bars indicate SD from three independent experiments. **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05

To test the role of GlnR in nitrogen utilization in P. polymyxa WLY78, growth tests with different nitrogen sources were carried out. When grown under nitrogen-excess condition, WT got into the logarithmic phase earlier than ΔglnR strain, but both of their growth came to a stop at a similar OD600 value. Both strains grew poorly under nitrogen-limited condition, but ΔglnR mutant was less affected (Fig. 4B). When grown 2 days in a minimal medium with 30 mM of different unique nitrogen sources, WT and ΔglnR strains showed similar growth levels on NH4Cl and glutamate, growth levels of WT were higher than those of ΔglnR mutant on NaNO2 and NaNO3, but lower on glutamine and urea (Fig. 4C), consistent with the reports that GlnR represses expression of glnA and ureABC in B. subtilis [11, 12].

GlnR regulates the transcription of genes involved in carbon metabolism directly and indirectly

KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that there were 16 and 47 genes involved in carbon metabolism were affected by GlnR under nitrogen-excess and -limited conditions, respectively (Fig. 2C, Table S3). Among these genes, ldh3 (lactate dehydrogenase) and maeA1 (malic enzyme) have GlnR-binding site(s) in their promoter regions. But there is no GlnR-binding site in the promoter regions of other genes, including the genes involved in TCA cycle (odhAB, pdhABCD), pentose phosphate pathway (kdgK, deoBC), pyruvate metabolism (pyk), xylose isomerase (xylA), mannose metabolism (manC, manXYZ) and succinate dehydrogenase (sdhABC) (Fig. 5A). Growth tests showed that ΔglnR mutant was deficient in utilizing starch, glycerol, mannose, mannitol, sorbitol, lactose, xylose, trehalose, arabinose, ribose, and cellobiose (Fig. 5B). These results indicated that GlnR controls carbon metabolism directly and indirectly.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Different carbon-metabolism-involved gene expression and carbon source utilization of WT and ΔglnR. A Differential expression of genes involved in carbon metabolism. B Growth status of WT and ΔglnR in minimal medium with 0.4% maltose, starch, glycerol, mannose, mannitol, sorbitol, lactose, xylose, trehalose, arabinose, ribose, cellobiose, and glucose as sole carbon source. Error bars indicate SD from three independent experiments. **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05

Discussion

GlnR is characterized as an important regulator in nitrogen metabolism, which regulates genes through binding to the consensus GlnR-binding sites in promoters [7, 8]. In the facultative anaerobic and nitrogen-fixing strain P. popymyxa WLY78, GlnR has been found to activate the transcription of nif genes under nitrogen-limited condition, while repress that under nitrogen-excess condition in our previous work [25]. In this study, a global identification of the genes directly and indirectly regulated by GlnR is determined by using ChIP-qPCR, EMSA and genome-wide transcriptional analysis in P. polymyxa WLY78. Our results demonstrate that GlnR is not only involved in the regulation of nitrogen fixation and nitrogen metabolism, but also in carbon assimilation. Seventeen genes/operons are identified as directly regulated by GlnR, fifteen of which are the newly identified targets of GlnR.

The 17 genes/operons that are directly regulated by GlnR include a nif operon (nifBHDKENXhesAnifV) for nitrogen fixation, 14 nitrogen metabolism genes (glnRA, glnA1, amtBglnK, glnK1, glnQHMP, nasA, nasD1, nasD2EF, ansZ, gcvH, pucR, oppABC, appABCDF, dppABC) and 2 carbon metabolism genes (ldh3 and maeA1). They fulfill three criteria: (1) the presence of a GlnR-binding site; (2) GlnR binding in ChIP-qPCR experiments; (3) GlnR-dependent expression regulation, indicating that these genes/operons are directly regulated by GlnR. Our results that GlnR binds to the promoter regions of nif operon and glnRA are consistent with the reports that GlnR binds to the promoter regions of nifB and glnRA in Paenibacillus riograndensis SBR5T [27]. It is known that GlnR represses the transcription of the glnRA, ureABC, tnrA, and alsT in B. subtilis depending on the nutritional conditions [13, 28]. However, alsT, tnrA and ureABC were not found in the genome of P. polymyxa WLY78.

Our results reveal that GlnR regulates the expressions of the 8 genes/operons (amtBglnK, glnQHMP, pucR, nasA, nasD2EF, oppABC, appABCDF and ansZ) in P. polymyxa WLY78, which are controlled by TnrA in B. subtilis [13, 29]. The data suggest that GlnR has undertaken the roles of both GlnR and TnrA [28, 29]. GlnR with functions of GlnR and TnrA in P. polymyxa WLY78 agrees with the facts that GlnR and TnrA in B. subtilis are similar in the protein sequences in their N terminal domains, and bind to a common consensus sequence (5′-TGTNAN7TNACA-3′) [8, 11, 30]. In addition, this study has revealed that glnK1, glnA1, gcvH and dppABC involved in nitrogen metabolism and ldh3 and maeA1 involved in carbon metabolism are new targets regulated by GlnR in P. polymyxa WLY78. Especially, we have identified dppABC, gcvH, maeA1 and ldh3 as the new members of the GlnR regulon in P. polymyxa WLY78, since expressions of these genes/operons under control of GlnR or TnrA in B. subtilis have never been reported.

The transcriptome profile has shown that GlnR not only directly regulates the transcription of the nif genes, but also indirectly regulates the expression of genes (encoding transporters of Fe, S and Mo atoms) specifically required in nitrogen fixation. The results indicate that GlnR controls the process of nitrogen fixation not only by regulating nif operon at the transcription level, but also by affecting the transportation of the essential genes for nitrogenase synthesis.

GlnR is the global nitrogen regulator in the class Bacilli, which plays an important role in regulating nitrogen utilization and assimilation. In this study, transcriptional analyses reveal that P. polymyxa GlnR negatively regulates the expression of glnA within glnRA operon, glnA1, amtB, nasA, nasD, and glnQHMP, whose promoter regions have GlnR-binding site(s). Also, GlnR negatively regulates the expression of narGHJI, narK1K2, nirABD, nirGHIJ, gltP and gdh, whose promoter regions have no GlnR-binding site(s). GlnR activates the expression of gltB which does not have a GlnR-binding site in its promoter region. However, in B. subtilis TnrA negatively controls the expression of gltAB that has a TnrA-binding site in its promoter [18]. Although ureABC operon is not identified in P. polymyxa WLY78, the growth level of ΔglnR mutant was higher than that of WT on urea, suggesting that GlnR is involved in urea utilization. These results indicate that GlnR regulates the expression of genes involved in nitrogen metabolism directly and indirectly.

Here, we have shown that GlnR directly regulates the expression of ldh3 (lactate dehydrogenase) and maeA1 (malic enzyme) that have GlnR-binding site(s) in their promoter regions. Both ldh3 and maeA1 involved in carbon metabolism are newly identified targets of GlnR. Moreover, it is found that GlnR indirectly regulates the expression of the genes involved in carbon metabolism, since these genes (e.g., xylA, odhAB, pdhABCD, kdgK, deoBC, sdhABC) involved in carbon metabolism have no GlnR-binding site in their promoter regions. Also, ΔglnR strain showed growth defects when starch, glycerol, mannose, lactose, xylose, trehalose, arabinose, ribose, and cellobiose were used as sole carbon sources, supporting that GlnR is involved in carbon metabolism. It is reported that GlnR is involved in carbon utilization in actinomycetes [31].

Taken together, this study has revealed that GlnR of P. polymyxa WLY78 is a global transcriptional regulator which controls the expression of genes involved in nitrogen fixation, nitrogen metabolism and carbon metabolism (Fig. 6). Among these genes, some are directly regulated by GlnR and some are indirectly regulated by GlnR.

Fig. 6
figure 6

GlnR mediates a regulatory network of nitrogen and carbon metabolism in P. polymyxa WLY78. + and – in blue and red indicate the genes encoding the enzymes are upregulated and downregulated under nitrogen excess and limited condition, respectively. GPI (glucose phosphate isomerase) and PDH (pyruvate dehydrogenase), ICD (isocitrate dehydrogenase), OGDH (ketoglutarate dehydrogenase), SDH (succinate dehydrogenase), MDH (malate dehydrogenase), GS (glutamine synthetase), GOGAT (glutamate synthetase), GDH (glutamate dehydrogenase), NIR (nitrite reductase) and NAR (nitrate reductase). Metabolism pathways presented are modified from KEGG pathway database [32, 33]

Conclusions

This study reveals that GlnR directly regulates the expression of 17 genes/operons whose promoter regions have GlnR-binding sites. These genes/operons include a nif operon (nifBHDKENXhesAnifV) for nitrogen fixation, 14 nitrogen metabolism genes/operons (glnRA, amtBglnK, glnA1, glnK1, glnQHMP, nasA, nasD1, nasD2EF, gcvH, ansZ, pucR, oppABC, appABCDF and dppABC) and 2 carbon metabolism genes (ldh3 and maeA1). Except for glnRA and nif operon, the other 15 genes/operons are newly identified targets regulated by GlnR. This is the first time to find that GlnR directly regulates the expression of maeA1 and ldh3 involved in carbon catabolism. Furthermore, our study has shown that GlnR indirectly controls transcription of the non-nif genes specifically required for nitrogen fixation and the genes involved in nitrogen and carbon metabolism. This study demonstrates that GlnR is a global regulator controlling the expression of the genes involved in nitrogen fixation and nitrogen and carbon metabolisms in low-GC Gram-positive bacterium P. polymyxa WLY78.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78 was the wild-type strain used throughout this study. Mutant ΔglnR was constructed by an in-frame deletion of glnR gene in P. polymyxa WLY78 [25]. P. polymyxa strains were cultured at 30 °C, in LD medium for routine culture, in nitrogen-deficient media for nitrogen-limited condition, and nitrogen-deficient media with 100 mM NH4Cl for nitrogen-excess condition. The LD and nitrogen-deficient media were prepared in the same way as our previous study [24]. Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) was used to express His6-GlnR and grown in LB medium.

Purification of recombinant GlnR

The His6-GlnR was overexpressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) containing plasmid pETGlnR and purified as described by Wang, et al. [25]. The plasmid pETGlnR was constructed by cloning glnR gene into pET28b (Novagen). The recombinant E. coli strain was cultivated in LB broth at 37 °C till mid-log phase and then incubated with 0.5 mM IPTG at 20 °C to induce the expression of His6-GlnR. By sonication on ice, the collected recombinant E. coli strain cells were disrupted in a lysis buffer containing 10 mM Imidazole, 50 mM NaH2PO4, and 300 mM NaCl. After centrifuged, the supernatant was loaded into Ni2+-NTA resin (Qiagen, Germany), purified using lysis buffer containing 20 mM imidazole, and then the recombinant GlnR protein was eluted using lysis buffer containing 250 mM imidazole (Fig. S2). For the binding reactions in EMSA, the eluted His6-GlnR protein solution was dialyzed in a binding buffer, which contains 20 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 1 mM DTT, 0.2% Tween 20, and 30 mM KCl. For the preparation of GlnR polyclonal rabbit antibody, the eluted His6-GlnR protein solution was dialyzed in a storage buffer, which contains 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, and 80 mM NaCl, 20%(v/v) glycerol. The titer of the antibody is 51,200 as identified by ELISA assay (Fig. S3).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR)

The ChIP-qPCR was performed as described by Wang, et al. [25]. One hundred ml of culture were harvested after 4-hour growth under both nitrogen-limited and -excess conditions, respectively. The harvested cells were fixed with formaldehyde solution for 20 min at 28 °C, and the cross-linking was stopped by adding glycine to a final concentration of 125 mM. After washing with PBS buffer, 1 mg collected cells were sonicated on ice in 4 ml lysis buffer to break chromosomal DNA into 200–500 bp fragments. Precleared supernatant containing 2 mg protein in total was incubated with 5 μl GlnR polyclonal antibody overnight at 4 °C. After incubated with 50 μl Protein G Sepharose (GE, Sweden) for 4 hours at 4 °C, the immune complexes were purified and eluted from the beads. After reverse cross-linking and purification, immunoprecipitated DNA was used for qPCR template, and primers used for ChIP-qPCR are listed in Table S1. Relative binding levels of GlnR and the putative binding sites were determined by comparison with the control strain ΔglnR. The relative binding level was calculated as follows with the promoter region of 16S rRNA gene as control region:

$$\Delta \textrm{Ct}=\textrm{Ct}\ \left(\textrm{target}\ \textrm{region}\right)-\textrm{Ct}\ \left(\textrm{control}\ \textrm{region}\right)$$
$$\Delta \Delta \textrm{Ct}=\Delta \textrm{Ct}\ \left(\textrm{Wild}\ \textrm{type}\right)-\Delta\ \left(\Delta glnR\right)$$

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs)

A DIG Gel Shift Kit (2nd Generation; Roche, USA) was used to perform EMSA following the manufacturer’s protocol. For promoters of oppA, glnR, amtB, and glnK1, the first strands of the fragments containing putative GlnR-binding sites and its complementary DNA strands were synthesized separately and annealed to form DNA probes (Table S1). For promoters of glnQ and glnA1, probes were amplified by PCR using certain primers listed in Table S1 and P. polymyxa WLY78 genome as template. The DNA fragments were labeled at the 3′ end with digoxigenin using terminal transferase, and then used as probes. The reaction systems were incubated at 25 °C for 30 min, analyzed by native 5% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5 × TBE buffer at 4 °C, and then transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane (GE Healthcare, UK). Labeled DNA on the membrane was detected by chemiluminescence, and recorded on X-ray film as described by Wang, et al. [24]. Each 20 μl reaction system contained 1 μg poly [d(A-T)], 0.3 nM labeled probe, and 0, 0.5, or 1 μM His6-GlnR. Reactions with no His6-GlnR were set as blanks. A 200-fold excess of unlabelled specific probe or nonspecific competitor DNA (Probe 1 in DIG Gel Shift Kit) was used in competition assays.

RNA preparation and RNA-seq analysis

Total RNAs of the strains were extracted using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Japan) as described in the previous study [25]. The extracted RNA was used to synthesize cDNA after removing the residual genome DNA using PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Japan). qRT-PCR was conducted on Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time System (Life Technologies) to analyze the transcription levels of nifH and amtB, according to which the proper time for harvesting the P. polymyxa strains’ cells for transcriptome sequencing was determined. 16S rRNA gene was used as reference gene in qRT-PCR.

cDNA library was constructed and sequenced at Novogene Bioinformatics Institute (Beijing, China), and two biological replicates of each sample were carried out (available in the NCBI repository, bioproject accession number: PRJNA871995). The sequencing reads were mapped against the genome sequence of P. polymyxa WLY78 (PRJNA171204). Differential expression analysis was performed using the DESeq package (1.18.0) in R software. The p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg’s approach [34], and differentially expressed genes were assigned at adjusted p-value < 0.05 with |log 2(FC)| > 1. The entire expression data of all genes in each treatment is listed in Additional file 3. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment was analyzed by KOBAS (3.0) [35].

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the NCBI repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA871995.

References

  1. Burkovski A. Nitrogen control in Corynebacterium glutamicum: proteins, mechanisms, signals. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;17(2):187–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reitzer L. Nitrogen assimilation and global regulation in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003;57:155–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sonenshein AL. Control of key metabolic intersections in Bacillus subtilis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5(12):917–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher SH. Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: vive la différence! Mol Microbiol. 1999;32(2):223–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Larsen R, Kloosterman TG, Kok J, Kuipers OP. GlnR-mediated regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(13):4978–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kloosterman TG, Hendriksen WT, Bijlsma JJ, Bootsma HJ, van Hijum SA, Kok J, et al. Regulation of glutamine and glutamate metabolism by GlnR and GlnA in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(35):25097–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher SH, Wray LV Jr. Bacillus subtilis glutamine synthetase regulates its own synthesis by acting as a chaperone to stabilize GlnR-DNA complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(3):1014–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Groot Kormelink T, Koenders E, Hagemeijer Y, Overmars L, Siezen RJ, de Vos WM, et al. Comparative genome analysis of central nitrogen metabolism and its control by GlnR in the class bacilli. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wray LV Jr, Ferson AE, Rohrer K, Fisher SH. TnrA, a transcription factor required for global nitrogen regulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(17):8841–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schreier HJ, Brown SW, Hirschi KD, Nomellini JF, Sonenshein AL. Regulation of Bacillus subtilis glutamine synthetase gene expression by the product of the glnR gene. J Mol Biol. 1989;210(1):51–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zalieckas JM, Wray LV Jr, Fisher SH. Cross-regulation of the Bacillus subtilis glnRA and tnrA genes provides evidence for DNA binding site discrimination by GlnR and TnrA. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(7):2578–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Brandenburg JL, Wray LV Jr, Beier L, Jarmer H, Saxild HH, Fisher SH. Roles of PucR, GlnR, and TnrA in regulating expression of the Bacillus subtilis ure P3 promoter. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(21):6060–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshida K, Yamaguchi H, Kinehara M, Ohki YH, Nakaura Y, Fujita Y. Identification of additional TnrA-regulated genes of Bacillus subtilis associated with a TnrA box. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49(1):157–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wray LV Jr, Zalieckas JM, Ferson AE, Fisher SH. Mutational analysis of the TnrA-binding sites in the Bacillus subtilis nrgAB and gabP promoter regions. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(11):2943–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakano MM, Hoffmann T, Zhu Y, Jahn D. Nitrogen and oxygen regulation of Bacillus subtilis nasDEF encoding NADH-dependent nitrite reductase by TnrA and ResDE. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(20):5344–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schultz AC, Nygaard P, Saxild HH. Functional analysis of 14 genes that constitute the purine catabolic pathway in Bacillus subtilis and evidence for a novel regulon controlled by the PucR transcription activator. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(11):3293–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Picossi S, Belitsky BR, Sonenshein AL. Molecular mechanism of the regulation of Bacillus subtilis gltAB expression by GltC. J Mol Biol. 2007;365(5):1298–313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Belitsky BR, Wray LV Jr, Fisher SH, Bohannon DE, Sonenshein AL. Role of TnrA in nitrogen source-dependent repression of Bacillus subtilis glutamate synthase gene expression. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(21):5939–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Deuel TF, Prusiner S. Regulation of glutamine synthetase from Bacillus subtilis by divalent cations, feedback inhibitors, and L-glutamine. J Biol Chem. 1974;249(1):257–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wray LV Jr, Zalieckas JM, Fisher SH. Bacillus subtilis glutamine synthetase controls gene expression through a protein-protein interaction with transcription factor TnrA. Cell. 2001;107(4):427–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ash C, Priest FG, Collins MD. Molecular identification of rRNA group 3 bacilli (Ash, farrow, Wallbanks and Collins) using a PCR probe test. Proposal for the creation of a new genus Paenibacillus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1993;64(3–4):253–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Xie J, Shi H, Du Z, Wang T, Liu X, Chen S. Comparative genomic and functional analysis reveal conservation of plant growth promoting traits in Paenibacillus polymyxa and its closely related species. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Xie JB, Du Z, Bai L, Tian C, Zhang Y, Xie JY, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of N2-fixing and non-N2-fixing Paenibacillus spp.: organization, evolution and expression of the nitrogen fixation genes. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(3):e1004231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang L, Zhang L, Liu Z, Zhao D, Liu X, Zhang B, et al. A minimal nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Paenibacillus sp. WLY78 enables expression of active nitrogenase in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(10):e1003865.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang T, Zhao X, Shi H, Sun L, Li Y, Li Q, et al. Positive and negative regulation of transferred nif genes mediated by indigenous GlnR in gram-positive Paenibacillus polymyxa. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(9):e1007629.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bailey TL, Gribskov M. Combining evidence using p-values: application to sequence homology searches. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 1998;14(1):48–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fernandes GC, Hauf K, Sant'Anna FH, Forchhammer K, Passaglia LM. Glutamine synthetase stabilizes the binding of GlnR to nitrogen fixation gene operators. FEBS J. 2017;284(6):903–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Randazzo P, Aucouturier A, Delumeau O, Auger S. Revisiting the in vivo GlnR-binding sites at the genome scale in Bacillus subtilis. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):422.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mirouze N, Bidnenko E, Noirot P, Auger S. Genome-wide mapping of TnrA-binding sites provides new insights into the TnrA regulon in Bacillus subtilis. MicrobiologyOpen. 2015;4(3):423–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Amon J, Titgemeyer F, Burkovski A. Common patterns - unique features: nitrogen metabolism and regulation in gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010;34(4):588–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liao CH, Yao L, Xu Y, Liu WB, Zhou Y, Ye BC. Nitrogen regulator GlnR controls uptake and utilization of non-phosphotransferase-system carbon sources in actinomycetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(51):15630–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Ishiguro-Watanabe M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D587–d92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Song WQ, Gu WQ, Qian YB, Ma X, Mao YJ, Liu WJ. Identification of long non-coding RNA involved in osteogenic differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells using RNA-Seq data. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(4):18268–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2019YFA0904700).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TW conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. XZ participated in conducting the experiments and validated the data. XW validated the data and revised the manuscript. SC designed the experiment and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanfeng Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. 

The promoter sequence set of Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78.

Additional file 2. 

The GlnR putative binding sets in Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78 identified by the MEME-MAST tool.

Additional file 3. 

The expression of genes in Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78 in WT and delta glnR mutant under nitrogen excess and limited conditions. Table S1. Primers used in this study. Table S2. Transcription of genes involved in nitrogen fixation and metabolism. Table S3. Transcription of genes involved in carbon metabolism. Fig. S1. The original blots of EMSA results in Fig. 1B. Each lane contained 0.3 nM labeled probe. For the 5 lanes of the EMSA of each gene promoter, lanes 1 to 5 contained 0, 0.5, 1, 1, and 1 μM His6-GlnR respectively. A 200-fold excess of unlabelled specific probe (lanes 4) or nonspecific competitor DNA (Probe 1) (lanes 5) was used in competition assays. Fig. S2. The SDS-PAGE result of the purified His6-GlnR protein. The lanes from left to right are marker, solution eluted by lysis buffer containing 20 mM imidazole, solution eluted by 1 mL lysis buffer containing 250 mM imidazole from the first to the fourth time. Fig. S3. The titer of GlnR polyclonal antibody determined by ELISA.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., Zhao, X., Wu, X. et al. Genome-wide mapping of GlnR-binding sites reveals the global regulatory role of GlnR in controlling the metabolism of nitrogen and carbon in Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78. BMC Genomics 24, 85 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09147-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09147-1

Keywords