Skip to main content
Download PDF

Chromosome-length genome assembly of Teladorsagia circumcincta – a globally important helminth parasite in livestock

BMC Genomics volume 24, Article number: 74 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Gastrointestinal (GIT) helminthiasis is a global problem that affects livestock health, especially in small ruminants. One of the major helminth parasites of sheep and goats, Teladorsagia circumcincta, infects the abomasum and causes production losses, reductions in weight gain, diarrhoea and, in some cases, death in young animals. Control strategies have relied heavily on the use of anthelmintic medication but, unfortunately, T. circumcincta has developed resistance, as have many helminths. Vaccination offers a sustainable and practical solution, but there is no commercially available vaccine to prevent Teladorsagiosis. The discovery of new strategies for controlling T. circumcincta, such as novel vaccine targets and drug candidates, would be greatly accelerated by the availability of better quality, chromosome-length, genome assembly because it would allow the identification of key genetic determinants of the pathophysiology of infection and host-parasite interaction. The available draft genome assembly of T. circumcincta (GCA_002352805.1) is highly fragmented and thus impedes large-scale investigations of population and functional genomics.

Results

We have constructed a high-quality reference genome, with chromosome-length scaffolds, by purging alternative haplotypes from the existing draft genome assembly and scaffolding the result using chromosome conformation, capture-based, in situ Hi-C technique. The improved (Hi-C) assembly resulted in six chromosome-length scaffolds with length ranging from 66.6 Mbp to 49.6 Mbp, 35% fewer sequences and reduction in size. Substantial improvements were also achieved in both the values for N50 (57.1 Mbp) and L50 (5 Mbp). A higher and comparable level of genome and proteome completeness was achieved for Hi-C assembly on BUSCO parameters. The Hi-C assembly had a greater synteny and number of orthologs with a closely related nematode, Haemonchus contortus.

Conclusion

This improved genomic resource is suitable as a foundation for the identification of potential targets for vaccine and drug development.

Peer Review reports

Background

Roundworms (phylum Platyhelminthes; class Nematoda) include some economically important species that infect livestock globally and incur huge annual losses in production [1, 2]. For example, Teladorsagia circumcincta, also known as the brown stomach worm, infects small ruminants including sheep [3] and is one of the major problematic helminth species in the southwestern part of Australia. This region has a Mediterranean-type climate with winter rainfall that favours the propagation of the larval stages of T. circumcincta on pasture [4].

The life cycle of T. circumcincta continues when third-stage (L3) larvae on pasture are ingested by grazing sheep, exsheath and invade the mucosa of the abomasum where they develop into the fourth stage (L4). Immature worms emerge from the mucosa into the gastric lumen where they develop into adult males and females and become sexually mature. The infection leads to functional disruption of the gastric mucosa, oedema of abomasal folds and sloughing of the mucosal lining, resulting in increased production of mucus, decreased production of acid, increased serum levels of pepsinogen and, possibly, protein deficiency (hypoalbuminemia). The host can suffer anorexia, dehydration, weight loss and diarrhoea, collectively leading to significant economic losses [2]. The helminth eggs leave the host in faecal material to re-contaminate the pasture and complete the life cycle, thus leading to recurrent infections [1].

For decades, control of the infection has relied on the extensive use of anthelmintic medications that were originally able to control the helminths, including T. circumcincta. Unfortunately, this practice has led to widespread development of resistance to some of the most effective anthelmintics on the market, including monepantel [5, 6]. Among the alternative, sustainable options are vaccination, but for T. circumcincta, a vaccine is not commercially available [7]. All issues considered; therefore, we need to be able to identify new targets for vaccine and drug development and elucidate the mechanisms that lead to anthelmintic resistance. Clearly, a good starting point in this quest would be a high-quality reference genome assembly.

Advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies over the past two decades have triggered a massive output of genomic data. The improvements in the technology provide an opportunity to revisit the original sequencing and genome assembling attempts. The original sequencing attempt that resulted in a highly fragmented genome thus offers a real opportunity to develop a high-quality genomic resource for T. circumcincta, potentially allowing major gains in our basic understanding of the physiology, evolutionary biology, pathogenesis of infection, host immune response, and the mechanisms that underpin the anthelmintic resistance [8, 9].

In the present study, we aimed to improve the current T. circumcincta draft genome to a chromosome-length assembly, using chromosome conformation capture technique, or in situ Hi-C [10], and thus increase the value of the genome resource by annotating and analysing it for genome-wide synteny and orthologs.

Results

Genome contiguity and completeness

The original draft genome assembly (GCA_002352805.1) was highly fragmented with 81,730 scaffolds, with N50 of 47,089 bp and L50 of 3152, and a total size of 700 Mbp (Table 1). Following the purging of alternative haplotypes and the integration of Hi-C sequencing data, the new Hi-C assembly contained 52,860 scaffolds approximately 35% fewer sequences than the original draft. Notably, of these, six were chromosome-length as shown in Fig. 1, with lengths ranging from 66.6 Mbp to 49.6 Mbp. Substantial improvements were achieved in both the values for N50 (57.1 Mbp) and L50 (5 Mbp). The longest scaffold had increased markedly in length, from approximately 1.4 Mbp in the original assembly to nearly 66.6 Mbp in the Hi-C assembly, while the estimated genome size was reduced from 700 Mbp to 614 Mbp, probably due to improved identification and separation of haplotypes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of the Hi-C and draft genome assemblies for genome contiguity and completeness. Top: Hi-C matrix of the spatial clustering of Hi-C reads to six chromosome-length scaffolds in Hi-C assembly. The interactive contact map is available at https://www.dnazoo.org/assemblies/Teladorsagia_circumcincta. Bottom: comparison of the scaffold lengths of Hi-C and draft genome assemblies (values for N50 and L50 are indicated for both assemblies)

Full size image
Table 1 Quality assessments of the original and Hi-C integrated genome assemblies of T. circumcincta
Full size table

Next, BUSCO (with nematode odb10 data) was used to assess and compare the genome completeness levels of both assemblies. After adding scaffolds (n = 353) to the Hi-C assembly from the draft assembly that contained missing BUSCOs, we detected a higher level of genome completeness in the Hi-C assembly, with 67.5% (2112/3131) of BUSCO genes identified compared to 67% (2099/3131) in the original assembly (Table 1). More importantly, the Hi-C assembly contained 143 more single-copy and 130 fewer duplicated BUSCO genes, than the original assembly, indicating a significant reduction in the number of duplicated sequences. We then examined the genome completeness of only the six chromosome-length scaffolds, achieving an overall completeness score of 58.8% compared to 67.5% in the entire Hi-C-assembly. The sequences for the missing BUSCOs were retrieved manually from https://www.orthodb.org/ and 1269 scaffolds containing missing BUSCOs were added to the six chromosome-length scaffolds and the completeness score rose to 67.1%, very similar to the Hi-C assembly containing 52,860 scaffolds.

Genome and functional annotations

The genome annotation results generated from the Braker2 pipeline are outlined in Table 2. The annotated Hi-C assembly had fewer genes (28,082) and mRNA transcripts (30,055), compared to the original draft (37,276 genes; 39,896 mRNA transcripts), but the BUSCO assessment scores of both protein sequence sets were highly comparable. In the Hi-C assembly, the overall genome completeness level was 76.7%, slightly less than that of the original assembly (76.9%). However, it is important to note that, in comparison to the original assembly, the Hi-C assembly contained more single-copy (58% vs. 58.6%), fewer duplicates (18.9% vs. 18.1%) and fewer fragmented (8% vs. 7.6%) orthologs, demonstrating the improvement in genome accuracy and fragmentation.

Table 2 Comparison of genome annotations in the purged, Hi-C integrated and original genome assemblies of T. circumcincta
Full size table

The complete functional annotation outcomes are available in Additional File 1. Overall, based on the protein sequences extracted from the annotated Hi-C assembly, nearly half of the predicted Gene Ontology (GO) terms (49.18%; 12,265 terms), were classified under the molecular function category, followed by the cellular component (31.68%; 8,133 terms) and biological processes (19.14%; 4,915 terms). As depicted in Fig. 2 some of the most frequent GO biological process terms were ‘translation’, ‘intracellular signal transduction’, ‘carbohydrate metabolic process’, ‘regulation of transcription’ and ‘intracellular protein transport’. The most frequent GO terms in the cellular component category included ‘integral component of membrane’, “nucleus’, ‘cytoplasm’, ‘extracellular region’ and ‘plasma membrane’. In the molecular function group, bindings to nucleic acids and both ATP and GTP, as well as metal ions, including zinc and calcium, were the most common GO terms predicted.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Bar plots depicting the 10 most abundant Gene Ontology (GO) terms in the Hi-C assembly, for biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions

Full size image

Genome synteny analysis

Both versions of the T. circumcincta assembly were compared with H. contortus using pairwise synteny analysis because H. contortus has a near-complete genome assembly [11] and, more importantly, phylogenetic analysis shows that it is closely related to T. circumcincta [12]. The synteny between the H. contortus genome and the original assembly for T. circumcincta was relatively poor (Fig. 3A) and greatly improved with the Hi-C assembly (Fig. 3B). It is important to note the strikingly high level of synteny between all six chromosome-length scaffolds in the Hi-C assembly and the six chromosomal sequences of H. contortus. Further, synteny analysis allowed identification, for the first time, of the X-chromosome in T. circumcincta, with Hi-C scaffold 6 evident as the counterpart of the X-chromosome of H. contortus. Interestingly, no syntenic links could be drawn between any unplaced scaffolds in the Hi-C assembly and H. contortus genome sequences, perhaps because the parameters were too stringent during the alignment process and when bundling the syntenic links in Circos.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Syntenic relationships between Haemonchus contortus genome (orange) and (a) the original genome assembly (green) for T. circumcincta; and (b) the Hi-C genome assembly for T. circumcincta (chromosome-length scaffolds in grey; unplaced scaffolds in green). Syntenic links were bundled using the following parameters: --max_gap = 1,000,000 --min_bundle_size = 10,000 min_bundle_membership = 5

Full size image

Orthology analysis

Using OrthoVenn2, the protein sequences from annotated T. circumcincta Hi-C assembly were also compared with those from H. contortus, as well as with two other more distant parasitic nematode species, Burgia malayi and Trichinella spiralis. Of 12,504 ortholog clusters, 3,214 were shared by all four species (Fig. 4a and b). As expected, the closely related helminths, T. circumcincta and H. contortus, shared the most orthologs (7,332 clusters), whereas T. circumcincta shared only 3,318 orthologs with B. malayi and 3,291 orthologs with T. spiralis. Using Orthofinder, we also compared the number of orthologs shared between H. contortus and the original and Hi-C assemblies of T. circumcincta. As shown in Fig. 4c, the Hi-C assembly shared significantly more orthologs (6948) with H. contortus than the original draft (5313).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Orthologs shared among helminth species. (a) Venn diagram showing comparisons and distribution of orthologous clusters shared among Burgia malayi (Bmal, clade-III nematode), Trichinella spiralis (Tspi, clade-I nematode), H. contortus (Hcon, clade-Va nematode), T. circumcincta Hi-C assembly (Tcir_Hi-C, clade-Va nematode) . The species formed 14,185 clusters of which 12,504 were orthologous (contained in at least two species) and 1,681 were single-copy gene clusters. (b) Table showing the pattern of occurrence of shared orthologues among Bmal, Tspi, Hcon and Tcir_Hi-C. (c) Venn-diagram indicating one-to-one OrthologuesStats inferred from Orthofinder by comparing proteomes of H. contortus with T. circumcincta Hi-C and T. circumcincta draft

Full size image

Discussion and conclusion

The present project aims to improve the current genome reference for T. circumcincta, a helminth nematode that is important for small ruminant livestock [8]. By purging alternative haplotypes and using in situ Hi-C to order, orient, correct and anchor draft sequences to chromosomes [10, 13], we have been able to improve the draft genome and create the first chromosome-length assembly for T. circumcincta.

The Hi-C assembly is more contiguous and complete than the previously available draft, and, at 614 Mbp, 13% smaller than the original assembly. This reduction in size makes the revised genome of T. circumcincta more consistent with that of H. contortus, another helminth nematode of the same clade, where the genome size has recently been reduced from 465 Mbp to 283 Mbp [11]. The karyotype (2n = 12) of the T. circumcincta genome, identified for the first time in the present analysis, is also consistent with that of H. contortus [11], as well as that of C. elegans, a model organism that is a free-living nematode [14]. Furthermore, the synteny analysis between the chromosome-length assemblies of T. circumcincta and H. contortus suggest that chromosomes are syntenic [12] but, while genes are conserved between the two species, the gene order is not, and different regions are linked to different chromosomes [11]. For example, Hi-C Scaffold 6 is syntenic to Chromosome-X on H. contortus, whereas Hi-C Scaffold 1 is syntenic to Chromosome 5, Hi-C Scaffold 2 is syntenic to Chromosome 4, and Hi-C Scaffold 3 is syntenic to Chromosome 3.

After genome annotation, there were fewer genes in the Hi-C T. circumcincta assembly because haplotypes had been removed and contiguity increased, compared to the original T. circumcincta assembly [15]. Although the number of predicted proteins was reduced in the Hi-C assembly, completeness and accuracy were identical for both assemblies, suggesting that, during Hi-C assembly, the rearrangements and reductions in fragmentation increased the number of curated gene models [15]. The single-copy orthologs (SCOs) were also compared across four helminth species from different clades – T. circumcincta, H. contortus, B. malayi and T. spiralis. As T. circumcincta and H. contortus belong to the same clade-Va, they share more SCOs (7332) with each other than they share with the other species showing that clade variation can affect the number of shared SCOs within helminths as T. circumcincta shares 3318 SCOs with B. malayi (clade-III) and 3291 SCOs with T. spiralis (clade-I). This variation in shared SCOs is an outcome of speciation and differences among life cycle stages of each helminth – for example, T. spiralis with a broad host range, lives in muscle and small intestine [16], whereas infective larvae of T. circumcincta and H. contortus are found on pastures and infect the abomasum [17], and B. malayi requires the mosquito as an intermediate host and infects lymph nodes [18].

Our improved Hi-C assembly still contains several unplaced scaffolds. The analysis of completeness and accuracy of the six Hi-C scaffolds (~ 59% BUSCO; Table 1) suggests that most of the genetic information is retained in the chromosome-length scaffolds. A total of 1275 scaffolds (six chromosome-length scaffolds plus 1269 unplaced scaffolds), has the completeness level like that for the total scaffolds in the Hi-C assembly (52,860), indicating redundancy in the unplaced scaffolds.

In conclusion, our chromosome-length scaffold assembly and annotation have advanced the genomics of the economically important small ruminant nematode parasite, T. circumcincta (isolated from Western Australia). The availability of a better reference genome, with greater comprehension of the genetic architecture of Teladorsagiosis, will help phylogenomic analysis of helminths of various clades [19], and help understand the parasite biology and host-parasite interactions. Ultimately, this information should lead to new options for vaccine and drug targets and, most importantly, pave the way to sustainable solutions for gastrointestinal parasitism [20]. Finally, the inclusion of long-read sequencing (from PacBio or Oxford Nanopore) should help resolve the unplaced scaffolds in the current version of the genome assembly [21, 22].

Materials and methods

Helminth collection and identification

Helminths were collected from the abomasum (predilection site for T. circumcincta) of sheep obtained from the Western Australian Meat Marketing Company (WAMMCO). The sheep had been naturally infected with T. circumcincta, an important helminth in the southwest of Western Australia. The abomasal contents were carefully scraped onto a sieve (mesh size 150 μm) and washed thoroughly and placed in a petri-dish from which individual helminths were removed with the aid of a dissecting microscope. Helminth species were identified based on morphological characteristics (Fig. 5) using differential contrast and compound microscopy. Males were identified by the shape and length of spicules which are up to 450 μm in length; females were identified by the presence of a vulvar flap, annular rings and their body length (10–12 mm; about twice that of males) [3]. Eggs can also be seen in females near the vulvar flap from where they are laid. The worms were then thoroughly washed with physiological saline and stored at − 80 °C until processing. Extracted DNA (see below) was subjected to PCR using helminth specific ITS2 primers, as previously described [23]. Helminth’s identity was confirmed by Sanger sequencing of the PCR product followed by a blastn search against the NCBI database.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Morphological identification of T. circumcincta. (a) Eggs towards the posterior end of the female; (b) Vulvar flap towards the posterior end of the female; (c) Annular rings towards the posterior end of the female; (d) and (e) Spicules towards the posterior, a specific characteristic of the male of this species

Full size image

DNA extraction

Briefly, the helminths (100 mature male and female Teladorsagia circumcincta in equal ratios) were mechanically homogenized using a sterile micro-pestle in a microcentrifuge tube containing 200 µL of Tris-EDTA buffer, 1% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol, 200 mg proteinase K, 10 mg/ml RNAase, 0.5 M EDTA and 10% (v/v) sodium dodecyl sulphate. The cell lysate was then incubated at 65 °C for 2 h. After incubation, an equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added and the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 5 min. The supernatant was collected into a sterile microcentrifuge tube and resuspended with an equal volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1). After centrifugation, the supernatant was again collected into a sterile microcentrifuge tube, this time with ice-cold ethanol (95% v/v) to precipitate the DNA. The DNA pellet was washed with ethanol (70% v/v) before being resuspended in 50 µL DEPC water. The integrity of the extracted DNA was assessed by electrophoresis on 1% (w/v) agarose gel. The quality and quantity of the DNA were assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermofisher, USA) and a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermofisher, USA).

PCR amplification of the helminth specific ITS2 region

The ITS2 primer sequences were 5’-CTTAATGATCTCGCCTAGACG-3’ (forward) and 5’-TTTCATCGATACGCGAATCG-3’ (reverse). A 50 µL reaction mixture (reaction buffer 10 µL; forward and reverse primer 2 µL each; DNA polymerase 1 µL; DNA sample 3 µL; water 32 µL) was run through 35 cycles of PCR with MyTaq HS DNA (Bioline, Canada), using following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min followed by 35 amplification cycles, each comprising denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 54 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 10 s.

Hi-C sequencing, chromosome-length scaffolding and quality assessment

In situ Hi-C sequencing was performed as described previously [10] using 100 adult T. circumcincta, including both males and females. We constructed one in situ library which was then sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. The generated Hi-C reads were used to anchor, order, orient, and correct misjoins in the existing draft genome assembly (GCA_002352805.1) using the 3D de novo assembly (3D-DNA) pipeline [24]. Before scaffolding with Hi-C reads, the draft assembly was run through purge haplotigs software [25]. The resulting assembly was then polished using the Juicebox Assembly Tools [13]. The resulting contact map was visualized using Juicebox visualization software [13]. QUAST (v5.0.2) was used to assess the assembly metrics [26]. Benchmark for Universal Single Copy Orthologues (BUSCO, v5.1.2) was used in genome mode to determine the genome completeness [27]. In this analysis, the sequences for missing BUSCOs in the Hi-C assembly were retrieved manually from https://www.orthodb.org/ (orthoDB v10) and blasted against the draft genome to obtain the relevant scaffolds which were then addedto the Hi-C assembly. The list of added scaffolds can be found in Additional File 2.

Genome and functional annotations

The original (GCA_002352805.1) and Hi-C integrated draft genome assemblies were annotated using Braker2 v2.1.6 [28]. First, each genome was softmasked using RepeatMasker v4.1.1 [29] with custom repeat library built upon itself by RepeatModeler v2.0.1 [29]. The Braker2 was run with the --etpmode parameter enabled to train GeneMark-ETP [30] with RNA-Seq data and protein hints. The GeneMark-ETP predictions were then used for training AUGUSTUS, following which genes with hints were predicted by AUGUSTUS [30,31,32,33,34]. Five sets of T. circumcincta RNA-Seq data (sequence read accession numbers SRX1507697, SRX1507698, SRX2485888, SRX2485887, SRX2485886) derived from two previous studies [8, 35], were downloaded from the NCBI Database and aligned to both the original draft and our improved Hi-C version of genome assemblies, using STAR (v2.7.6a) with default parameters [36, 37]. The Caenorhabditis elegans proteome from the UniProt Database served as protein hints when running Braker2. BUSCO was run in protein mode to assess the annotation results. After genome annotation, functional analysis was performed using the web-based Gene Ontology Functional Enrichment Annotation Tool (GO FEAT) [38].

Genome synteny and orthology analyses

Genome-wide synteny was analysed using Cactus v1.3.0 and halSynteny [39] to compare the Hi-C integrated T. circumcincta genome assembly with the original GCA_002352805.1 genome assembly, and the genome of a closely related helminth species, Haemonchus contortus (GCA_000469685.2). A hierarchical alignment (hal) output file was generated using the Cactus package, and a PSL output file with syntenic links was generated using the halSynteny function within Cactus, using the following parameters: --minBlockSize 10,000 --maxAnchorDistance 1,000,000. The syntenic links were bundled using Circos tools v0.69-8 in Galaxy platform v7 [40, 41] and then visualized using shinyCircos [42]. The single copy orthologs in both the original and Hi-C integrated T. circumcincta genome assemblies, as well as the draft assembly of Haemonchus contortus, were inferred using Orthofinder [43]. OrthoVenn2 [44] was also used to compare the orthologs between four nematode species: Burgia malayi; Trichinella spiralis; H. contortus; T. circumcincta [12].

Data Availability

The interactive Hi-C contact map for the genome assembly is available at www.dnazoo.org. The genome assembly and intermediate files can be accessed here; https://www.dropbox.com/sh/czjlxso80stoqts/AAA0wnAO0qttk8i3--rHOPFba?dl=0.

References

  1. Stear M, Bishop S, Henderson N, Scott I. A key mechanism of pathogenesis in sheep infected with the nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta, Animal Health Research Reviews. 4 (2003) 45–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1079/ahrr200351. PMID: 12885208.

  2. Craig TM, CHAPTER 22 - Helminth Parasites of the Ruminant Gastrointestinal Tract, in: D.E. Anderson, D.M. Rings, editors, Food Animal Practice (Fifth Edition), Saunders WB. Saint Louis, 2009: pp. 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-141603591-6.10022-3.

  3. Roeber F, Jex AR, Gasser RB. Chapter Four - Next-Generation Molecular-Diagnostic Tools for gastrointestinal nematodes of Livestock, with an emphasis on small ruminants: a turning point? In: Rollinson D, editor. Advances in parasitology. Academic Press; 2013. pp. 267–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407705-8.00004-5.

  4. O’Connor LJ, Walkden-Brown SW, Kahn LP. Ecology of the free-living stages of major trichostrongylid parasites of sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2006;142:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Turnbull F, Devaney E, Morrison AA, Laing R, Bartley DJ. Genotypic characterisation of monepantel resistance in historical and newly derived field strains of Teladorsagia circumcincta. Int J Parasitology: Drugs Drug Resist. 2019;11:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN. An inconvenient truth: Global worming and anthelmintic resistance, Veterinary Parasitology. 186 (2012)70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.048.

  7. Nisbet AJ, McNeilly TN, Wildblood LA, Morrison AA, Bartley DJ, Bartley Y, Longhi C, McKendrick IJ, Palarea-Albaladejo J, Matthews JB. Successful immunization against a parasitic nematode by vaccination with recombinant proteins. Vaccine. 2013;31:4017–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi Y-J, Bisset SA, Doyle SR, Hallsworth-Pepin K, Martin J, Grant WN, Mitreva M. Genomic introgression mapping of field-derived multiple-anthelmintic resistance in Teladorsagia circumcincta. PLOS Genet. 2017;13:e1006857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwood JM, Ezquerra AL, Behrens S, Branca A, Mallet L. Current analysis of host–parasite interactions with a focus on next generation sequencing data,Zoology.119 (2016)298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2016.06.010.

  10. Rao SSP, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, Sanborn AL, Machol I, Omer AD, Lander ES, Aiden EL. A 3D map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159:1665–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Doyle SR, Tracey A, Laing R, Holroyd N, Bartley D, Bazant W, Beasley H, Beech R, Britton C, Brooks K, Chaudhry U, Maitland K, Martinelli A, Noonan JD, Paulini M, Quail MA, Redman E, Rodgers FH, Sallé G, Shabbir MZ, Sankaranarayanan G, Wit J, Howe KL, Sargison N, Devaney E, Berriman M, Gilleard JS, Cotton JA. Genomic and transcriptomic variation defines the chromosome-scale assembly of Haemonchus contortus, a model gastrointestinal worm. Commun Biology. 2020;3:656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01377-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coghlan A, Tyagi R, Cotton JA, Holroyd N, Rosa BA, Tsai IJ, Laetsch DR, Beech RN, Day TA, Hallsworth-Pepin K, Ke H-M, Kuo T-H, Lee TJ, Martin J, Maizels RM, Mutowo P, Ozersky P, Parkinson J, Reid AJ, Rawlings ND, Ribeiro DM, Swapna LS, Stanley E, Taylor DW, Wheeler NJ, Zamanian M, Zhang X, Allan F, Allen JE, Asano K, Babayan SA, Bah G, Beasley H, Bennett HM, Bisset SA, Castillo E, Cook J, Cooper PJ, Cruz-Bustos T, Cuéllar C, Devaney E, Doyle SR, Eberhard ML, Emery A, Eom KS, Gilleard JS, Gordon D, Harcus Y, Harsha B, Hawdon JM, Hill DE, Hodgkinson J, Horák P, Howe KL, Huckvale T, Kalbe M, Kaur G, Kikuchi T, Koutsovoulos G, Kumar S, Leach AR, Lomax J, Makepeace B, Matthews JB, Muro A, O’Boyle NM, Olson PD, Osuna A, Partono F, Pfarr K, Rinaldi G, Foronda P, Rollinson D, Samblas MG, Sato H, Schnyder M, Scholz T, Shafie M, Tanya VN, Toledo R, Tracey A, Urban JF, Wang L-C, Zarlenga D, Blaxter ML, Mitreva M, Berriman M. International Helminth Genomes Consortium, Comparative genomics of the major parasitic worms, Nature Genetics. 51 (2019) 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0262-1.

  13. Dudchenko O, Batra SS, Omer AD, Nyquist SK, Hoeger M, Durand NC, Shamim MS, Machol I, Lander ES, Aiden AP, Aiden EL. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science. 2017;356:92–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Roelens B, Schvarzstein M, Villeneuve AM. Manipulation of Karyotype in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals multiple inputs driving pairwise chromosome Synapsis during Meiosis. Genetics. 2015;201:1363–79. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.182279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Thrash A, Hoffmann F, Perkins A. Toward a more holistic method of genome assembly assessment. BMC Bioinf. 2020;21:249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-3382-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gottstein B, Pozio E, Nöckler K. Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clin Microbiolgy Reviews. 2009;22:127–45. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00026-08.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zajac AM. Gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants: life cycle, anthelmintics, and diagnosis, Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice. 22 (2006) 529–541. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2006.07.006. PMID: 17071351.

  18. Paily KP, Hoti SL, Das PK. A review of the complexity of biology of lymphatic filarial parasites. J Parasitic Dis. 2009;33:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-009-0005-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Viney M. The genomic basis of nematode parasitism. Brief Funct Genomics. 2017;17:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elx010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Viney M. How can we understand the genomic basis of Nematode Parasitism? Trends in Parasitology. 2017;33:444–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2017.01.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Young ND, Stroehlein AJ, Kinkar L, Wang T, Sohn W-M, Chang BCH, Kaur P, Weisz D, Dudchenko O, Aiden EL, Korhonen PK, Gasser RB. High-quality reference genome for Clonorchis sinensis. Genomics. 2021;113:1605–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.03.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nath S, Shaw DE, White MA. Improved contiguity of the threespine stickleback genome using long-read sequencing, G3 (Bethesda). 11 (2021)jkab007. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab007.

  23. Learmount J, Conyers C, Hird H, Morgan C, Craig BH, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Taylor M. Development and validation of real-time PCR methods for diagnosis of Teladorsagia circumcincta and haemonchus contortus in sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2009;166:268–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Durand NC, Shamim MS, Machol I, Rao SSP, Huntley MH, Lander ES, Aiden EL. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 2016;3:95–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Roach MJ, Schmidt SA, Borneman AR. Purge Haplotigs: allelic contig reassignment for third-gen diploid genome assemblies. BMC Bioinf. 2018;19:460. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2485-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brůna T, Hoff KJ, Lomsadze A, Stanke M, Borodovsky M. BRAKER2: Automatic Eukaryotic Genome Annotation with GeneMark-EP + and AUGUSTUS Supported by a Protein Database, BioRxiv. (2020) 2020.08.10.245134. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.10.245134.

  29. Smit AFA, Hubley R. & P. Green RepeatMasker at http://repeatmasker.org

  30. Brůna T, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. GeneMark-EP+: eukaryotic gene prediction with self-training in the space of genes and proteins. NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. 2020;2. https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaa026.

  31. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lomsadze A, Ter-Hovhannisyan V, Chernoff YO, Borodovsky M. Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6494–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Iwata H, Gotoh O. Benchmarking spliced alignment programs including Spaln2, an extended version of Spaln that incorporates additional species-specific features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e161. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gotoh O, Morita M, Nelson DR. Assessment and refinement of eukaryotic gene structure prediction with gene-structure-aware multiple protein sequence alignment. BMC Bioinf. 2014;15:189. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. McNeilly TN, Frew D, Burgess STG, Wright H, Bartley DJ, Bartley Y, Nisbet AJ. Niche-specific gene expression in a parasitic nematode; increased expression of immunomodulators in Teladorsagia circumcincta larvae derived from host mucosa. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07092-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. The sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Araujo FA, Barh D, Silva A, Guimarães L, Ramos RTJ. GO FEAT: a rapid web-based functional annotation tool for genomic and transcriptomic data, Scientific Reports. 8 (2018)1794. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20211-9.

  39. Paten B, Earl D, Nguyen N, Diekhans M, Zerbino D, Haussler D. Cactus: algorithms for genome multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res. 2011;21:1512–28. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.123356.111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Rasche H, Hiltemann S, Circos G. User-friendly Circos plots within the Galaxy platform, GigaScience.9(2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa065.

  41. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol İ, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–45. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.092759.109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yu Y, Ouyang Y, Yao W. shinyCircos: an R/Shiny application for interactive creation of Circos plot. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:1229–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biology. 2019;20:238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu L, Dong Z, Fang L, Luo Y, Wei Z, Guo H, Zhang G, Gu YQ, Coleman-Derr D, Xia Q, Wang Y. OrthoVenn2: a web server for whole-genome comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W52–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.U.H. was supported by a joint PhD scholarship from the University of Agriculture Faisalabad (Pakistan) and the University of Western Australia (reference number PS-2(11) FDP/17/8071). Hi-C data were created in collaboration with the DNA Zoo Consortium (www.dnazoo.org). DNA Zoo sequencing effort is supported by Illumina, Inc., IBM, and the Pawsey Supercomputing Center. P.K. is supported by the University of Western Australia. Special thanks to Ashling Charles from the team at DNA Zoo Australia for routine data processing support. We also acknowledge the resources provided by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) and Western Australian Meat Marketing Company (WAMMCO).

Funding

S.U.H. received a joint scholarship from the University of Agriculture Faisalabad (Pakistan) and the University of Western Australia for PhD studies (reference number PS-2(11) FDP/17/8071). E.L.A. was supported by the Welch Foundation (Q-1866), a McNair Medical Institute Scholar Award, an NIH Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Mapping Center Award (UM1HG009375), a US-Israel Binational Science Foundation Award (2019276), the Behavioral Plasticity Research Institute (NSF DBI-2021795), NSF Physics Frontiers Center Award (NSF PHY-2019745), and an NIH CEGS (RM1HG011016-01A1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, 6009, Crawley, WA, Australia

    Shamshad Ul Hassan, Erwin A. Paz, Graeme B. Martin & Parwinder Kaur

  2. Helicobacter Research Laboratory, The Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

    Shamshad Ul Hassan, Eng Guan Chua, Erwin A. Paz & Chin Yen Tay

  3. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia 3 Baron Hay Court, South Perth, 6151, WA, Australia

    Johan C. Greeff & Dieter G. Palmer

  4. The Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, 77030, Houston, TX, USA

    Olga Dudchenko & Erez Lieberman Aiden

  5. Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, 77005, Houston, TX, USA

    Olga Dudchenko & Erez Lieberman Aiden

  6. Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech, Pudong, China

    Erez Lieberman Aiden

  7. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Erez Lieberman Aiden

Authors
  1. Shamshad Ul Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eng Guan Chua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erwin A. Paz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chin Yen Tay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Johan C. Greeff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dieter G. Palmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Olga Dudchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Erez Lieberman Aiden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Graeme B. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Parwinder Kaur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: S.U.H., P.K. and C.Y.T. Computational analysis and data interpretation: S.U.H., P.K. and E.G.C. Investigation; S.U.H., P.K., O.D., E.L.A., J.C.G., E.A.P., C.Y.T., and D.G.P. Writing (original draft); S.U.H. Writing (review and editing); G.B.M. and E.G.C. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parwinder Kaur.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. No live animals were used.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Additional File 1

Additional File 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, S.U., Chua, E.G., Paz, E.A. et al. Chromosome-length genome assembly of Teladorsagia circumcincta – a globally important helminth parasite in livestock. BMC Genomics 24, 74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09172-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09172-0

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us